Kadi México https://kadimexico.com/ Imagen de Diagnóstico Maxilofacial Digital, S.A. de C.V. Wed, 12 Oct 2022 17:57:38 +0000 es hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.2 180269980 Principios De Radiacion Con Tomografia De Haz Conico CBCT https://kadimexico.com/principios-de-radiacion-con-tomografia-de-haz-conico-cbct/ Wed, 12 Oct 2022 17:57:38 +0000 https://kadimexico.com/?p=5632 Principios de Radiación con Tomografía computarizada de Haz cónico (Cone beam computed tomography-CBCT) Gradualmente la especialidad de ortodoncia está empleando cada vez más la tomografía de haz cónico, comúnmente conocida como tomografía cone beam. Esto se debe a que las posibilidades que ofrece la tomografía para visualizar al detalle estructuras dentales y esqueléticas de manera […]

La entrada Principios De Radiacion Con Tomografia De Haz Conico CBCT se publicó primero en Kadi México.

]]>
Principios de Radiación con Tomografía computarizada de Haz cónico
(Cone beam computed tomography-CBCT)
Gradualmente la especialidad de ortodoncia está empleando cada vez más
la tomografía de haz cónico, comúnmente conocida como tomografía cone beam.
Esto se debe a que las posibilidades que ofrece la tomografía para visualizar al
detalle estructuras dentales y esqueléticas de manera tridimensional y milimétrica,
información que ayudará al clínico al realizar el diagnóstico y el plan de tratamiento
en conjunto con los demás exámenes auxiliares. Y es por su progresiva inclusión
que se hace necesario que el ortodoncista conozca aspectos relacionado a la
radiación que se genera con un equipo tomográfico. El presente artículo busca
brindar de manera sencilla los principios radiológicos relacionados a dosis de
radiación y la exposición del paciente a la misma al emplear la tomografía de haz
cónico.
Esta tomografía funciona empleando un haz de Rayos X, estrecho y en forma
de cono (de allí su nombre).Para obtener la imagen tridimensional el paciente se
posiciona dentro del rango del haz mientras el emisor de de rayos x y los detectores
a la vez giran alrededor del paciente .Entonces, un escaneo de 360 grados donde la
fuente de rayos x y un detector se mueven alrededor del macizo cráneo facial del
paciente (estabilizada por un cabezal) genera una serie de proyecciones a la cual se
aplican programas de computadora que con algoritmos complejos generan datos
volumétricos tridimensionales, datos que son utilizados para la construcciones de
imágenes en 3 planos (axial, sagital y coronal)
Planos de reconstrucción del volumen
Por lo anterior descrito, el área explorada se convierte en un volumen constituido
por una matriz de volúmenes más pequeños denominados vóxeles.
Un concepto importante por entender es el campo de visión “FOV” (por sus siglas en
inglés) que puede ser definido como el área de interés a ser cubierta al momento de
realizar la tomografía. El radiólogo, dispone de acuerdo con las características del
equipo tomográfico la posibilidad de elegir diversos campos de visión para las
diferentes necesidades diagnósticas con lo cual la radiación que recibe el paciente
podría variar.
Al ser los rayos X un tipo de radiación ionizante, tiene una longitud de onda
corta, alta energía y gran poder de penetración que es absorbido por el cuerpo
humano. Una exposición intensa o prolongada puede causar efectos deterministas
(donde la severidad de la respuesta es proporcional a la dosis)o también causar
efectos estocásticos ( que ocasionan cambios en ADN ). Sin embargo, las dosis
recibidas mientras se realizan exámenes radiográficos son bajas, pero hay factores
importantes a considerar como edad del paciente, así como los órganos irradiados
en ciertas técnicas radiológicas, es por ello es muy importante la correcta indicación
de exámenes por parte del profesional, con el fin de disminuir la dosis de radiación
ionizante que recibirá el paciente y evitando la exposición a los órganos críticos.
Esto tiene especial interés en la ortodoncia donde un grupo de pacientes son niños.
Para evaluar la dosis de radiación que recibe un paciente existen los
conceptos de dosis absorbida, dosis equivalente y dosis efectiva. por ello, para
permitir una comparación útil de dosis de radiación y su riesgo, la exposición a
radiación son convertidas frecuentemente a dosis efectivas donde la unidad de
medida es el Sievert y se emplea el micro sievert.
Valores de dosis efectiva (en micro sievert) en diferentes tipos de imágenes
Una de las mayores ventajas de tomografía de haz cónico frente a la tomografía
convencional es la dosis efectiva menor. Aunque las dosis efectivas de los
escáneres CBCT varían en función de factores como el FOV, pueden ser
considerablemente menores a las de una tomografía espiral multicorte empleada en
medicina. Debido a que el haz está más enfocado y la radiación es menos dispersa.
La radiación total entonces equivaldría a un 20% de tomografía médica
computarizada convencional y a una exposición radiográfica de una serie periapical
completa.
En el 2007 la International Comission for Radiological Protection (ICRP por sus
siglas en inglés) describió 3 principios fundamentales para los sistemas de
protección en radiología. El primer principio es el de Justificación, que implica
generar más beneficio que daño al paciente. el segundo principio llamado
Optimización y tambien conocido como el principio ALARA ( As Low As Reasonably
Achievable- Tan bajo como sea posible) que explica la exposición a radiación debe
ser lo más baja posible para minimizar el riesgo en los tejidos.
Valores de dosis de radiación efectiva en equipo Planmeca Promax 3d mid. Valores en verde, corresponden a
Ultra low dose™ protocolo que permite obtener imágenes tomográficas de buena calidad con dosis menores de
radiación.
Un documento útil para profundizar en aspectos relacionados a tomografía de haz
cónico es el documento “Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial
radiology.Evidence-Based Guidelines” publicado en el 2012 por el SedentexCT en el
que se listan las aplicaciones identificadas y revisadas para la especialidad de
Ortodoncia y también se indican los 20 principios básicos para el uso de tomografía
en odontología. Entre estos principios podemos mencionar los siguientes:
-La tomografía de haz cónico no debe realizada hasta que la historia y el examen
clínico haya sido realizada.
-La tomografía de haz cónico debe ser justificada para cada paciente para
demostrar que los beneficios superan los riesgos.
-la tomografía de haz cónico potencialmente debe añadir información nueva que
ayude al manejo del caso del paciente.
-la tomografía de haz cónico no debe ser repetida rutinariamente en un paciente sin
no se haya hecho antes una nueva evaluación de riesgo/beneficio
Finalmente, es importante que el profesional sepa elegir adecuadamente cuándo
indicar una tomografía con la información anteriormente mencionada y que
información quiere obtener. Esto quiere decir que la tomografía de haz cónico no
debe pedirse de forma aleatoria. Para no exponer al paciente a dosis y riesgos
innecesarios, debe evaluar primero al paciente y saber claramente qué beneficios va
a obtener de una tomografía.
Autores:
C.D. Esp. Andrés Agurto Huerta
C.D. Esp. Andrés Córdova Berrocal
Referencias
1.-Mah. et al. Advanced Applications of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in
Orthodontics.Semin Orthod 2011;17:57-71.
2.- Brooks. Sharon. CBCT Dosimetry: Orthodontic Considerations
3.- Zamora,N.Evaluación de las dosis de radiación con los sistemas de tomografía
computarizada de haz cónico en ortodoncia.Rev Esp Ortod. 2010;40:17-22
4.- Nejaim,Y.et al. Racionalización de la dosis de radiación.Rev Estomatol
Herediana. 2015 Jul-Set;25(3):238-45.
5.- Arana-Fernández de Moya Estanislao, Buitrago-Vera Pedro, Benet-Iranzo
Francisco, Tobarra-Pérez Eva. Tomografía computerizada: introducción a las
aplicaciones dentales. RCOE [Internet]. 2006 Jun [citado 2018 Ago 27] ; 11( 3 ):
311-322. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?
script=sci_arttext&pid=S1138-123X2006000300003&lng=es.
6.-SEDENTEXCT Guideline Development Panel. Radiation protection No 172. Cone
beam ct for dental and maxillofacial radiology. Evidence based guidelines.
Luxembourg: European Commission Directorate-General for Energy; 2012. [citado el
04 agosto 2018];
Disponible en: http://www.sedentexct.eu/files/radiation_protection_172.pdf

La entrada Principios De Radiacion Con Tomografia De Haz Conico CBCT se publicó primero en Kadi México.

]]>
5632
Implementacion Sistemas CT https://kadimexico.com/implementacion-sistemas-ct/ Wed, 12 Oct 2022 17:49:57 +0000 https://kadimexico.com/?p=5629 Implementación de sistemas CT ESPRODEN Índice índice 1 Introducción 5 2 Utilizacion De Los Sistemas Ct 15 2.1 Implantología. Estudio Previo 2.2 Implantología. Control Final 2.3 Periodoncia 2.4 Tecnología Aplicada 3 Ventajas De Los Sistemas Ct 19 3.1 Seguridad En El Diagnóstico 3.2 Control Del Resultado 3.3 Confianza Del Paciente 3.4 Imagen “High-Tech” 3.5 Exención […]

La entrada Implementacion Sistemas CT se publicó primero en Kadi México.

]]>
Implementación de sistemas CT

ESPRODEN Índice
índice
1 Introducción 5
2 Utilizacion De Los Sistemas Ct 15
2.1 Implantología. Estudio Previo
2.2 Implantología. Control Final
2.3 Periodoncia
2.4 Tecnología Aplicada
3 Ventajas De Los Sistemas Ct 19
3.1 Seguridad En El Diagnóstico
3.2 Control Del Resultado
3.3 Confianza Del Paciente
3.4 Imagen “High-Tech”
3.5 Exención De Riesgos
3.6 Servicio
3.7 Rentabilidad
3.8 Lugar De Instalación
3.9 Transmisión De Datos
4 Propuesta De Modelos 30
5
25
ESPRODEN
EXPERIENCIA CLÍNICA:
TOMOGRAFÍA COMPUTERIZADA (CBCT 3D)
En la práctica dental, ninguna modalidad ha conocido un impacto tan
rápido e importante en los tratamientos, como la CBCT.
Sin duda, esta tecnología va a cambiar la actitud de los dentistas frente
a muchos tratamientos. Los resultados tridimensionales aparecen superiores respecto a la visualización de la anatomía, para muchos aspectos del
implante preoperatorio y de la cirugía dental, así como de la previsión de
la intervención.
Esta excelente tecnología, que todavía no para de evolucionar, mejorará el
tratamiento del paciente: se reducirá el riesgo operatorio y los tratamientos
complejos, así como los implantes dentales resultarán mucho menos complicados. El desarrollo de esta tecnología va a mejorar de manera decisiva el
tratamiento del paciente, es decir, el objetivo principal de nuestra profesión.
La reciente introducción de la Tomografía Computerizada Volumétrica
(CBCT) en la profesión dental ha resuelto muchos problemas relacionados
con los escáneres CT tradicionales.
La tecnología CBCT crea imágenes tridimensionales de las estructuras
dentales a través de un Haz de Rx cónico (cone beam) que se desplaza en
torno a la cabeza del paciente en un tiempo seleccionado, 24 segundos.
Se utiliza un detector Flat-Panel para capturar cada ½ grado de proyección y obtener así una traducción computerizada tridimensional de la
región anatómica deseada.
La tecnología CBCT utiliza 10 veces menos radiación que los sistemas CT
(TAC) tradicionales, y genera imágenes 10 veces más precisas.
Introducción
1INTRODUCCIÓN
6 Implementación de Sistemas “CT”
25
ESPRODEN
Las imágenes en 3D con Haz Cónico proporcionan una clara información
anatómica, en estructura oral y maxilo facial.
CT CON HAZ CÓNICO (CONE BEAM)
Aplicación con
Tecnología de Haz
Cónico en nueva
generación
Beneficios: Menor Coste + Menor Radiación
TAC
Varios minutos Sólo de 15 a 24 segundos
CBCT
7
25
ESPRODEN
Radiografía
Imagen obtenida sin movimiento de ningún elemento; Emisor-ObjetoDetector.
Tomografía
Imagen obtenida mediante el movimiento del conjunto Emisor-Detector,
estando inmóvil el Objeto.
Emisor y Detector móviles, objeto inmóvil.
Introducción
Técnica de radiografía
de mano Imagen obtenida
Emisor y Detector se mueven en direcciones opuestas Solo la zona de enfoque
aparece
8 Implementación de Sistemas “CT”
25
ESPRODEN
Existen diversos tipos de tomógrafos, dependiendo de su movimiento.
Emisor y Detector se mueven en direcciones opuestas.
TOMÓGRAFO
Tomógrafo Lineal para su uso en cráneo, permite hacer cortes:
• Sagital
• Transversal (coronal)
• Horizontal (axial)
• Especiales
Emisor y Detector se mueven en direcciones opuestas.
Lineal Circular Elipsoidal Hipocicloidal Espiral
Implementación de Sistemas “CT” 9
25
ESPRODEN
TOMOGRAFÍA: LINEAL
Situación de los Ejes o planos
Emisor y Detector se mueven en direcciones opuestas.
En sus inicios, el TAC sólo se utilizaba para el cráneo, posteriormente se
ampliaron para el resto del cuerpo.
Sagital
Parte anterior
o posterior
del paciente
Axial
(horizontal) Coronal
(transversal)
Primer TAC de Siemens
Siretom en1974.
Tiempo de adquisición
de información por corte
de 7 minutos.
Resolución de imagen
80×80 pixels.
10 Implementación de Sistemas “CT”
25
ESPRODEN
En la Radiología Digital, los diversos sensores, utilizados como Detectores, son diferentes según su uso y sus componentes son distintos:
PRIMER TAC TAC ACTUAL
Pixel Voxel
Para radiología plana;
sólo tienen dos dimensiones
Para poder generar una
imagen volumétrica, los
sensores tienen una diversa construcción; su
unidad más pequeña se
llama VOXEL
Implementación de Sistemas “CT” 11
25
ESPRODEN
Aparece Una nueva tecnología: el sistema CBCT (Tomografía Computerizada de Haz Cónico).
Sensor plano
• Escaneo en 3D en una sola rotación
• Los algoritmos de reconstrucción son complejos y necesitan tiempo
• Para objetos de diversos tamaños
• Adaptado por E-Woo tech
Diferencias entre TAC convencional y sistemas CBCT de E-WOO:
• Funcionamiento: Dósis
De 1.500 μSv a 3.000 μSv De 20 μSv a 65 μSv
TAC
1 TAC= 75 CBCT
CBCT
12 Implementación de Sistemas “CT”
25
ESPRODEN
Ejemplos:
• Panorámica convencional 15/25 μSv
• Panorámica digital 5/15 μSv
• Serie de boca 150 μSv
• Ambiente 8 μSv
• TAC 1.200/3.000 μSv
Densidad obtenida por los sistemas TAC convencional y sistemas CBCT
de E-WOO:
• Unidad de medida: Números CT o números Hounsfield
ELEMENTO UNIDADES HU
Hueso Cortical 800-1000
Hueso esponjoso 100-300
Musculo 40-50
Riñones 40-50
Agua 0
Grasa -80 a -100
Aire -1000
13
25
ESPRODEN Introducción
FLAT PANEL (PANEL PLANO) VS II CCD
Numero de “bits” (escalas de grises) en la Calidad de la Imagen.
12 bits (212 = 4,096 niveles de grises) es 16 veces mayor (mejor calidad de
imagen), comparada con datos a 8 bits (28
= 256 niveles).
14 Implementación de Sistemas “CT”
25
ESPRODEN
CT DENTAL DE VATECH
¿FOV (ÁREA DE VISIÓN)?
15
25
ESPRODEN Utilización de los Sistemas CT
2.1 IMPLANTOLOGÍA. ESTUDIO PREVIO
La preparación de la cirugía implantológica es básica para el éxito de la
misma.
Se debe determinar:
1º El modelo de implante.
2º El posicionamiento adecuado del mismo.
Para ello, es imprescindible:
1º Medir las distancias precisas.
2º Comprobar la densidad ósea.
3º Determinar la situación de senos y/o canal mandibular.
El resultado será:
1. Poder comunicar al paciente el resultado del estudio.
2. Asegurar el tratamiento a seguir.
2.2 Implantología. Control final
Al finalizar la intervención, es absolutamente recomendable realizar un
control.
Se comprueba:
1º La posición definitiva del implante.
2º Las distancias al canal mandibular y/o senos, comprobando que dichas distancias sean seguras.
Se obtiene:
1º En caso de alguna anomalía, efectuar una acción correctiva precoz.
2º Una mayor satisfacción del paciente, al poder realizar una comprobación de la calidad del tratamiento.
2 UTILIZACION DE LOS SISTEMAS CT
16 Implementación de Sistemas “CT”
25
ESPRODEN
2.3 Periodoncia
Una sola exploración, mediante CT, permite una visión completa de la
arcada permitiendo la visión de:
1. Bolsas periodontales.
2. Sarro
3. Retracción de masa ósea
Además, se evitan las series de radiografías, obteniendo:
1. Menor radiación para el paciente.
2. Más seguridad en la visualización en 3D.
2.4 Tecnología aplicada
Case Western Reserve University
La tomografía computerizada CBCT es hoy en día la tecnología más innovadora que los dentistas utilizan para diagnosticar complicados problemas de salud dental.
“La incorporación, tan deseada, de la tecnología tridimensional en la
elaboración radiográfica es, por fin, una realidad. Todavía se puede mejorar, sin embargo, la tecnología CBCT es algo que va a durar mucho tiempo”. (J. Martin Palomo y Mark Hans del Departamento de Ortodoncia de la
Escuela de Medicina Dental de la Case Western Reserve University y C. H.
Kau e S. Richmond del Departamento de Salud dental y Ciencias biológicas
del College of Medicine de la Universidad de Gales).
El prototipo de visualizador CT realizado en 1967 ya ha llegado a su sexta
generación, con imágenes mejores y más enfocadas y menor exposición a
las radiaciones para los pacientes. Los escáneres de primera generación
sólo sacaban imágenes parciales. La última generación de escáneres CBCT
ofrece una variedad de imágenes para ofrecer una visión completa en tres
dimensiones de la estructura de la boca.
Ventajas de la tecnología aplicada:
1º La nueva tecnología permite elaborar una vasta gama de imágenes en
menos de un minuto (24 segundos), reduciendo al 20 % la exposición a las
radiaciones respeto a los sistemas tradicionales.
17
25
ESPRODEN Utilización de los Sistemas CT
2º La definición de las imágenes es tan elevada que es posible captar un
corazón que late.
3º La tecnología respeta las reglas elaboradas por la Asociación Dental
Americana y la Sociedad de Ortodoncia Británica para reducir la exposición
a las radiaciones.
4º La nueva tecnología permite captar imágenes tridimensionales mucho
más precisas, así que se pueden detectar con mayor facilidad anomalías
orales (quistes, dientes sepultados, etc).
5º Las imágenes mejoradas permiten análisis más eficaces de los conductos de aire y de tratamiento de las condiciones relacionadas con la apnea y con el adenoide ensanchado.
6º Las imágenes creadas por la tecnología CBCT se pueden utilizar también en la realización de nuevos implantes, cuyo empleo resulta cada vez
más importante.

19
25
ESPRODEN Ventajas de los Sistemas CT
La imagen panorámica, al ser una proyección en 2 dimensiones, no permite:
1º Efectuar mediciones precisas. Magnificación variable, posicionamiento, etc.
2º Ver la situación de las piezas en su profundidad.
3º Ver la situación del seno, relativo a la zona de implante.
4º Apreciar la densidad ósea.
5º Determinar el espesor y anatomía de la mandíbula.
3 VENTAJAS DE LOS SISTEMAS CT
La utilización del sistema
CT nos permite mayor
definición para ver:
Nervio
alveolar
Senos
maxilares
PANORÁMICO
PERIAPICAL
TOMOGRAFIA
COMPUTERIZADA
++ ++
+ +
++++ ++++
La utilización del sistema
CT nos permite mayor
definición por:
La utilización del sistema
CT nos permite mayor
definición para ver:
Distorsión
media
Máxima
distorsión
Espesor
óseo
Densidad
ósea
PANORÁMICO
PERIAPICAL
TOMOGRAFIA
COMPUTERIZADA
3.0 mm 7.5 mm – –
1.0 mm 5.5 mm – –
0.2 mm 0.5 mm ++++ ++++
20 Implementación de Sistemas “CT”
25
ESPRODEN
CT para la determinación preoperatoria
del lugar apto para implantes
Dr. David C. Hatcher
La planificación de implantes necesita datos muy específicos y precisos.
Siempre se han utilizado imágenes a ese fin, pero hasta la reciente introducción de escáneres CBCT la calidad de las imágenes era baja en relación al
potencial diagnóstico, al coste del estudio y al riesgo para el paciente. El
uso de escáneres CBCT para obtener imágenes maxilofaciales se ha convertido en uno de los instrumentos más importantes en el proceso de planificación de implantes dentales.
Los escáneres CBCT son sencillos de utilizar y producen una imagen
tridimensional que puede ser elaborada con un software apto para la visualización personalizada de la anatomía. También existen protocolos para
optimizar la resolución de las imágenes.
Las imágenes anteriores se refieren a un
varón de 25 años con ausencia congénita
de bicúspide mandibular. Se están investigando las áreas más aptas para el implante. Las radiografías clínicas sugieren que
hay suficiente volumen de hueso alveolar
como para poner implantes. Sin embargo,
las imágenes tridimensionales elaboradas
por la tecnología CBCT indican que la ancha concavidad lingual podría constituir
un obstáculo importante.
21
25
ESPRODEN Ventajas de los Sistemas CT
Estas imágenes se refieren a una mujer de 17 años con ausencia congénita de incisivos laterales. La radiología intenta determinar el sitio más apto
para un implante. Se han puesto marcadores de metal para verificar lo que
pasaría en el caso de una intervención. La tecnología CBCT puede ser utilizada para determinar si la intervención planeada es la mejor en relación a
la conformación de la mandíbula.
Este es el caso de un varón de 56 años a quien le faltan los dientes números 8 y 9. Se han puesto dientes opacos para simular la posición y el tamaño
deseados. Un hueco a lo largo del eje del diente identifica la trayectoria
que va a seguir el implante.
Ese sistema se puede emplear para la radiología de planificación y para
transferir el producto planeado a la boca del paciente.
Las siguientes imágenes pertenecen a una mujer de 19 años que perdió de forma traumática los dientes del 7 al 10. Con una planificación de
tipo tradicional, las informaciones estarían limitadas al sitio del implante, sin
embargo, con la tecnología CBCT hay más información disponible, incluso
sobre la oclusión opuesta y las articulaciones temporo-mandibulares.
22 Implementación de Sistemas “CT”
25
ESPRODEN
La evaluación de estas últimas indica un problema degenerativo de la
articulación en la parte izquierda, y una dislocación debida a una fractura
en el lado derecho.
Las imágenes tridimensionales producidas por la tecnología CBCT ofrecen relevante información adicional en la planificación de implantes, lo que
resulta ideal para este fin.
El sistema CBCT es una modalidad de visualización maxilofacial que permite obtener información rentable para mejorar el conjunto de la intervención en la sustitución de dientes por implantes.
Gracias a CBCT el dentista ya puede verificar adecuadamente el sitio
para el implante.
Cuando el campo de las imágenes se extiende a la oclusión, las relaciones espaciales máxilo-mandibulares y la articulación temporo-mandibular,
la tecnología CBCT es la mejor solución. Asimismo permite detectar otros
factores que puedan constituir un riesgo para la eficacia del implante y la
seguridad del paciente.
Con el actual desarrollo de los programas informáticos relacionados con
la tecnología CBCT, hoy, ya podemos disponer de un módulo 3D.
Este modelo tridimensional permite el diagnóstico de implantes, la planificación del tratamiento, su simulación y las operaciones de cirugía sustitutiva.
23
25
ESPRODEN Ventajas de los Sistemas CT
3.1 Seguridad en el diagnóstico
Una sola exploración, mediante CT, nos ofrece una visión completa de la
arcada permitiendo las siguientes apreciaciones:
1º Realizar mediciones precisas, sin distorsión, en cualquier dirección.
2º Ver perfectamente el espacio disponible para el implante.
24 Implementación de Sistemas “CT”
25
ESPRODEN
3º Realizar cortes tomográficos precisos y sucesivos, prácticamente sin
limitación.
4º Alcanzar el control de toda la zona de interés.
5º Observar una zona de interés, desde cualquier ángulo.
25
25
ESPRODEN Ventajas de los Sistemas CT
3.2 Control del resultado
Control final del perfecto posicionamiento del implante.
Caso en el que se tuvo que añadir hueso en el seno lateral.
3.3 Confianza del paciente
1. Recibe el máximo de información.
2. Entiende el tratamiento a efectuar.
3. Coopera en la decisión.
4. Difícilmente, tras ver las imágenes en 2D y 3D, tendrá dudas sobre
el tratamiento propuesto.
5. Tras el tratamiento, comprueba el resultado final.
6. Máxima tecnología para “su” caso específico.
26 Implementación de Sistemas “CT”
25
ESPRODEN
3.4 Imagen “high-tech”
La utilización de sistemas informáticos de alto nivel, la imagen en 3D y
el diseño de la máquina, genera confianza por el uso de la más “Alta Tecnología”.
27
25
ESPRODEN Ventajas de los Sistemas CT
3.5 Exención de riesgos
1. La garantía de utilizar los mejores sistemas de Diagnóstico por la Imagen, dan como resultado la ausencia total de errores para los diagnósticos.
2. Los errores y fracasos, se minimizan.
3. Manteniendo un archivo de los estudios de CT, tanto el inicial como
el de control final, se tiene la tranquilidad de demostrar la calidad del
tratamiento.
4. Debido a la tranquilidad y confianza del paciente, es difícil llegar a una
situación de reclamación ya que ha sido co-participe en la toma de
decisiones.
3.6 Servicio
1. Tomografía Computerizada.
2. Imágenes Tridimensionales.
3. Manipulación de las imágenes por el profesional, en la propia Clínica.
4. Colaboración del paciente para seleccionar el mejor tratamiento
5. Garantía de calidad de los tratamientos
Todos estos elementos son necesarios para ofrecer el máximo de:
“CALIDAD Y SERVICIO PARA EL PACIENTE”
3.7 Rentabilidad
El uso de aparatología avanzada en las Clínicas Dentales privadas para
el Diagnóstico por la Imagen, ha ido siempre precedida de su instalación
en Centros Radiológicos, tal vez por el temor a la rentabilidad de estos
aparatos.
Siempre fue un temor infundado, ya que la rentabilidad diagnóstica de
servicio y económica es un hecho.
Los sistemas CT o TAC se utilizan desde hace muchos años en Radiología. Las Clínicas Dentales se sirven de ellos para los estudios de implantes,
aumentando sus solicitudes día a día.
28 Implementación de Sistemas “CT”
25
ESPRODEN
La complejidad de los tratamientos nos obligan a dar respuesta, con
garantía de seguridad, a las exigencias y necesidades del paciente.
La incorporación de los Sistemas CT en las Clínicas Dentales, es ya un
hecho.
3.8 Lugar de instalación
El sistema puede instalarse en:
1º Centro independiente que requiere:
• Local adecuado
• Personal cualificado
• Sistema ECT 12 con FOV 12×7 cm
2º La clínica que disponga de:
• Espacio suficiente
• Sistema ECT 12 con FOV 12×7 cm
3.9 Transmisión de datos
Junto con los sistemas se sirve el Software EzImplant, permitiendo la
visualización y el tratamiento de los estudios.
Las exploraciones efectuadas se pueden enviar a las Clínicas, en diversos
formatos:
 Estudio completo con visor incorporado.
• El visor de Ezlmplant le permite tratar de forma personalizada
todo el estudio.
 Solo imágenes seleccionadas: Actualmente es el sistema más
difundido.
• En formato informático o placas radiográficas.
• En el caso de placas radiográficas, es necesario disponer de
una impresora de alta calidad.
• En formato informático, la Clínica puede ver las imágenes con
visor de Windows o programas de tratamiento de imágenes.
• No requiere personal “especializado”.
29
25
ESPRODEN Ventajas de los Sistemas CT
Una vez determinado el formato a utilizar con cada Clínica, se envía el
estudio por los siguientes medios:
 Placas:
• Entregándolo al paciente, en mano.
• Posteriormente, por mensajero.
 Imágenes seleccionadas, en formato informático:
• En CD-ROM, entregado en mano al paciente.
• En CD-ROM, posteriormente, por mensajero.
• Via e-mail, directamente a la Clínica.
• Cargándolo en un servidor ftp, la Clínica los recupera directamente.
 Estudio completo con visor Ezlmplant:
• En CD-ROM, entregado en mano al paciente.
• En CD-ROM, posteriormente, por mensajero.
30 Implementación de Sistemas “CT”
25
ESPRODEN
4 PROPUESTA DE MODELOS
MODELO PICASSO PRO
• EXPLORACIONES C.T.
• FLAT PANEL
• FOV de 12 x 7 cm
• VOXEL min. 0,1 mm.
• POSICIONAMIENTO: SENTADO
• Movimiento vertical motorizado del sillón
31
25
ESPRODEN Propuestas de Modelos
MODELO PICASSO TRIO
• EXPLORACIONES: CT + PANO + TELE
• FLAT PLANEL, PARA CT
• VOXEL: min. 0,1 mm.
• FOV DE 12 X 7 cm
• POSICIONAMIENTO: ERGUIDO
• MOVIMIENTO VERTICAL MOTORIZADO
32 Implementación de Sistemas “CT”
25
ESPRODEN
NECESIDADES PARA SU INSTALACION
Principio de operación:
• Sistema controlado por Consola PC
• Comandos de control enviados por puerto serie
• Imágenes desde sensor Flat Panel, por cable LVDS 80 pin, a Frame
Grabber
Comunicación Serie
Normalmente COM3
Comunicación Ethernet
Sólo Sensor Pano/Ceph
Puestos de Trabajo (Esay Dent / EzImplant)
80 pin LVDS
Picasso Trio, Picasso Pro
(Picasso Máster: comunicación por fibra óptica)
Consola
Software:
• Easy Dent
• EzPax
• EzImplant
• Hasp Key
Base de imágenes
Base de pacientes
Comunicación
33
25
ESPRODEN Propuestas de Modelos
Consola
Imágenes Datos del paciente
Imágen original
1º Programa de captura
2º Reconstrucción
Caracteristicas Vatech & Woo
PICASSO
TRIO
PICASSO
PRO
PICASSO
MASTER
PROYECCIONES
FOV
SENSOR
VOXEL SIZE
ROTACIÓN
IMÁGENES
POSICIONAMIENTO
VISOR PARA DRS.
PAN+CEPH+CT CT CT
12 x 7 cm 12 x 7 cm 20×15 / 20×19 cm
FLAT PANEL + CCD FLAT PANEL FLAT PANEL
Desde 0,1 mm
(Normal 0,2 mm)
360º
720 (420)
Erguido
SI SI SI
Sentado Sentado
720 (420) 720 (420)
360º 360º
Desde 0,1 mm
(Normal 0,2 mm)
Desde 0,1 mm
(Normal 0,3 mm)

Monturiol, 7
• 28906 Getafe (Madrid)
Polígono Industrial san Marcos
Telf.: 91 547 93 97 / 91 547 97 41
Fax: 91 548 73 74
e-mail: esproden@esproden.com
1983-2008
www.esproden.com
25

La entrada Implementacion Sistemas CT se publicó primero en Kadi México.

]]>
5629
Essentials of Dental Radiography https://kadimexico.com/essentials-of-dental-radiography/ Wed, 12 Oct 2022 17:42:15 +0000 https://kadimexico.com/?p=5626 Essentials of Dental Radiography for Dental Assistants and Hygienists Pearson Boston Columbus Indianapolis New York San Francisco Upper Saddle River Amsterdam Cape Town Dubai London Madrid Milan Munich Paris Montreal Toronto Delhi Mexico City Sao Paulo Sydney Hong Kong Seoul Singapore Taipei Tokyo Essentials of Dental Radiography for Dental Assistants and Hygienists NINTH EDITION Evelyn […]

La entrada Essentials of Dental Radiography se publicó primero en Kadi México.

]]>
Essentials of Dental Radiography
for Dental Assistants and Hygienists

Pearson
Boston Columbus Indianapolis New York San Francisco Upper Saddle River
Amsterdam Cape Town Dubai London Madrid Milan Munich Paris Montreal Toronto
Delhi Mexico City Sao Paulo Sydney Hong Kong Seoul Singapore Taipei Tokyo
Essentials of Dental Radiography
for Dental Assistants and Hygienists
NINTH EDITION
Evelyn M. Thomson, BSDH, MS
Adjunct Assistant Professor
Gene W. Hirschfeld School of Dental Hygiene
Old Dominion University
Norfolk, Virginia
Orlen N. Johnson, BS, DDS, MS
College of Dentistry
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Lincoln, Nebraska
Notice: The authors and the publisher of this volume have taken care that the information and technical recommendations contained herein are
based on research and expert consultation and are accurate and compatible with the standards generally accepted at the time of publication. Nevertheless, as new information becomes available, changes in clinical and technical practices become necessary. The reader is advised to carefully
consult manufacturers’ instructions and information material for all supplies and equipment before use and to consult with a health care professional as necessary. This advice is especially important when using new supplies or equipment for clinical purposes. The authors and publisher
disclaim all responsibility for any liability, loss, injury, or damage incurred as a consequence, directly or indirectly, of the use and application of
any of the contents of this volume.
Publisher: Julie Levin Alexander
Assistant to Publisher: Regina Bruno
Editor-in-Chief: Mark Cohen
Executive Editor: John Goucher
Development Editor: Melissa Kerian
Assistant Editor: Nicole Ragonese
Editorial Assistant: Rosalie Hawley
Media Editor: Amy Peltier
Media Product Manager: Lorena Cerisano
Managing Production Editor: Patrick Walsh
Production Liaison: Christina Zingone
Production Editor: Sunitha Arun Bhaskar, Laserwords
Manufacturing Manager: Alan Fischer
Design Director: Jayne Conte
Cover Designer: Suzanne Behnke
Director of Marketing: David Gesell
Executive Marketing Manager: Katrin Beacom
Marketing Specialist: Michael Sirinides
Composition: Laserwords
Printer/Binder: Edwards Brothers
Cover Printer: Lehigh-Phoenix Color/Hagerstown
Cover Image: Dental X-Rays, Ocean Photography/Veer.
Copyright © 2012, 2007, 2003 Pearson Education, Inc., 1 Lake Street, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458. Publishing as Pearson. All rights
reserved. Manufactured in the United States of America. This publication is protected by Copyright, and permission should be obtained from the
publisher prior to any prohibited reproduction, storage in a retrieval system, or transmission in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or likewise. To obtain permission(s) to use material from this work, please submit a written request to Pearson
Education, Inc., Permissions Department, 1 Lake Street, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458.
www.pearsonhighered.com
10 9 8 7 6 4 3
ISBN-13: 978-0-13-801939-6
ISBN-10: 0-13-801939-8
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Cataloging-in-Publication data on file with the Library
of Congress.
To my husband, Hu Odom, once again your loving patience,
support, and encouragement gets me through.
—Evie
This page intentionally left blank
Contents
Preface ix
Acknowledgments xi
Reviewers xii
PART I: Historical Perspective and Radiation Basics 1
Chapter 1 History of Dental Radiography 1
Chapter 2 Characteristics and Measurement
of Radiation 8
Chapter 3 The Dental X-ray Machine: Components
and Functions 20
Chapter 4 Producing Quality Radiographs 32
PART II: Biological Effects of Radiation and Radiation Protection 47
Chapter 5 Effects of Radiation Exposure 47
Chapter 6 Radiation Protection 57
PART III: Dental X-ray Image Receptors and Film Processing
Techniques 74
Chapter 7 Dental X-ray Film 74
Chapter 8 Dental X-ray Film Processing 83
Chapter 9 Digital Radiography 97
PART IV: Dental Radiographer Fundamentals 114
Chapter 10 Infection Control 114
Chapter 11 Legal and Ethical Responsibilities 131
Chapter 12 Patient Relations and Education 138
PART V: Intraoral Techniques 147
Chapter 13 Intraoral Radiographic Procedures 147
Chapter 14 The Periapical Examination—Paralleling Technique 161
Chapter 15 The Periapical Examination—Bisecting Technique 179
Chapter 16 The Bitewing Examination 196
Chapter 17 The Occlusal Examination 215
vii
PART VI: Radiographic Errors and Quality Assurance 227
Chapter 18 Identifying and Correcting Undiagnostic Radiographs 227
Chapter 19 Quality Assurance in Dental Radiography 241
Chapter 20 Safety and Environmental Responsibilities
in Dental Radiography 251
PART VII: Mounting and Viewing Dental Radiographs 264
Chapter 21 Mounting and Introduction to Interpretation 264
Chapter 22 Recognizing Normal Radiographic Anatomy 273
Chapter 23 Recognizing Deviations from Normal Radiographic
Anatomy 289
Chapter 24 The Use of Radiographs in the Detection of Dental
Caries 303
Chapter 25 The Use of Radiographs in the Evaluation of Periodontal
Diseases 314
PART VIII: Patient Management and Supplemental Techniques 325
Chapter 26 Radiographic Techniques for Children 325
Chapter 27 Managing Patients with Special Needs 340
Chapter 28 Supplemental Radiographic Techniques 350
PART IX: Extraoral Techniques 364
Chapter 29 Extraoral Radiography and Alternate Imaging
Modalities 364
Chapter 30 Panoramic Radiography 377
Answers to Study Questions 403
Glossary 407
Index 423
viii CONTENTS
Preface
The study of oral radiological principles and the practice of oral radiography techniques require an understanding of theoretical concepts and a mastery of the skills needed to apply these concepts. Essentials of
Dental Radiography for Dental Assistants and Hygienists provides the student with a clear link between
theory and practice. Straightforward and well balanced, Essentials of Dental Radiography for Dental
Assistants and Hygienists provides in-depth, comprehensive information that is appropriate for an introductory course in dental radiography, without overwhelming the student with nonessential information. It
is comprehensive to prepare students for board and licensing examinations and, at the same time, practical, with practice points, procedure boxes, and suggested lab activities that prepare students to apply theory to clinical practice and patient management.
True to its title, Essentials of Dental Radiography for Dental Assistants and Hygienists clearly
demonstrates its ability to explain concepts that both dental assistants and dental hygienists must know.
The examples and case studies used throughout the book include situations that pertain to the roles of both
dental assistants and dental hygienists as members of the oral health care team.
Essentials of Dental Radiography for Dental Assistants and Hygienists is student-friendly, beginning
each chapter with learning objectives from both the knowledge and the application levels. Each objective
is tested by study questions presented at the end of the chapter, allowing the student to assess learning outcomes. The objectives and study questions are written in the same order that the material appears in the
chapter, guiding the student through assimilation of the chapter content. Key words are listed at the beginning of each chapter and bolded within the text with their definitions, and realistic rationales for learning
the material are presented in each chapter introduction. The chapter outline provides a ready reference to
locate the topics covered. Meaningful case studies relate directly to radiological applications presented in
the chapter and challenge students to apply the knowledge learned in the reading to real-life situations
through decision-making activities.
The thirty chapters of the ninth edition are organized into nine topic sections.
• Historical Perspective and Radiation Basics
• Biological Effects of Radiation and Radiation Protection
• Dental X-ray Image Receptors and Processing Techniques
• Dental Radiographer Fundamentals
• Intraoral Techniques
• Radiographic Errors and Quality Assurance
• Mounting and Viewing Dental Radiographs
• Patient Management and Supplemental Techniques
• Extraoral Techniques
Educators can easily utilize the chapters and topic sections in any order and have the option to tailor
what material is covered in their courses. The sequencing of material for presentation in this text begins
with the basics of radiation physics, biological effects, and protection to give the student the necessary
background to operate safely, followed by a description of the radiographic equipment, film and film processing, and digital image receptors to help the student understand how radiation is utilized for diagnostic
purposes. Prior to learning radiographic techniques, the student will study the fundamentals of infection
control, legal and ethical responsibilities, and patient relations. The student will then be prepared to begin
to practice the intraoral technique skills necessary to produce diagnostic-quality periapical, bitewing, and
occlusal radiographs and learn to mount, evaluate, and interpret the images. Following the interpretation
chapters, the student will now possess the basic skills of intraoral radiography and is ready to grasp supplemental techniques and alterations of these basic skills by studying management of special patients and
extraoral and panoramic techniques.
ix
Changes made to this ninth edition represent educators’ requests for an up-to-date book that speaks
to both dental assisting and dental hygiene students, provides comprehensive information without overwhelming the student with nonessential details, and is student centered. Outstanding features of this edition include the following:
• Integration of digital imaging where appropriate throughout the text. Film-based imaging is an
established standard of care, and licensing board examinations continue to require oral health
care professionals to demonstrate a working knowledge of the use of film-based radiography.
However, digital imaging has become an integral part of oral health care practice. For this reason,
the all-encompassing term image receptor is used to allow educators the option to teach the use of
film, solid-state digital sensors, or photostimuable phosphor plate technology. Additionally the
chapter on digital imaging has been moved from the section on supplemental techniques to a
position earlier in the book to assist with integration of this technology as the student learns the
basics of radiography.
• The paralleling and bisecting techniques have been separated into their own chapters to provide distinct lessons for the student. Teaching strategies suggest that introducing two similar, but difficult,
concepts together may impede learning either technique well. Placing these two important radiographic techniques into their own chapters will allow the educator to assign one or the other in any
order and at distinctly different times in the curriculum.
• The addition of the chapter on safety and environmental responsibilities in radiography is in
response to the awareness of the ecological impact of oral health practice today. Students should be
trained in the safe handling and environmentally sound disposal of potentially hazardous materials
and chemicals used in radiography.
• Update on extraoral radiography and alternate imaging modalities. It is beyond the scope of this
book to teach extraoral maxillofacial imaging to competency, and many oral health care professionals who may be called on to utilize these techniques will most likely require additional training.
Therefore, the information on the seven common techniques was condensed to key points and
placed into a table that enhances learning without overwhelming the student. This chapter now
builds on the students’ knowledge of digital imaging with an introduction to cone beam computed
tomography (CBCT), purported to become the standard of care for periodontal implant assessment
in the future.
• Each chapter was critically evaluated to update material, add new study questions, redraw complex
illustrations, and include new images, all to enhance student comprehension.
• Each of the 30 chapters in the ninth edition continues to provide Procedure Boxes, which highlight
and simplify critical steps of radiographic procedures and serve as a handy reference when providing radiographic services in a clinical setting; Practice Points, which call student attention to possible use of theory in real-life situations, providing a “mental break” from studying theory by
illustrating how that theory is applied; and Case Studies and activities for possible lab exercises,
research outside class time, essay writing, and investigation using the Internet.
The focus of the ninth edition of Essentials of Dental Radiography for Dental Assistants and
Hygienists is on the individual responsibility of the oral radiographer and conveys to the reader the
importance of understanding what ionizing radiation is and what it is not; protecting oneself, the patient,
and the oral health care team from unnecessary radiation exposure; practicing within the scope of the
law and ethically treating all patients; producing diagnostic-quality radiographs and appropriately correcting errors that diminish radiographic quality; knowing when and how to apply supplemental techniques; and assisting in the interpretation of radiographs for the benefit of the patient.
Whereas Essentials of Dental Radiography for Dental Assistants and Hygienists is written primarily for dental assisting and dental hygiene students, practicing dental assistants, dental hygienists, and
dentists may also find this book to be a helpful reference, particularly when preparing for a relicensing
examination in another jurisdiction. Additionally, Essentials of Dental Radiography for Dental Assistants and Hygienists may be a valuable study guide for on-the-job-trained oral health care professionals
who may be seeking radiation safety certification credentials.
x PREFACE
Acknowledgments
Thank you to Dr. Orlen Johnson for his continued confidence in allowing me to coauthor this ninth edition
of Essentials of Dental Radiography for Dental Assistants and Hygienists. It is a privilege to be associated
with a textbook with this long-standing history. Thank you to everyone at Pearson for their guidance and
patience. I particularly want to express appreciation to Mark Cohen, editor-in-chief, who 14 years ago
guided my first efforts at textbook writing; Melissa Kerian, associate editor, who has worked patiently
with me on several book editions now; and John Goucher, executive editor, who has kindly encouraged
me and listened to my ideas. The quality of this edition is the direct result of the assistance and support of
the students, faculty, and staff at the Gene W. Hirschfeld School of Dental Hygiene at Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia. I would like to express my special appreciation to the class of 2011 for helping
me to remember why I so enjoy teaching oral radiology.
Evie Thomson
xi
xii
Reviewers
Roberta Albano, CDA, RDH
Springfield Technical College
Springfield, Massachusetts
Dr. Robert Bennett
Texas State Technical College
Harlingen, Texas
Joanna Campbell, RDH, MA
Bergen Community College
Paramus, New Jersey
Armine Leila Derdiarian, DDS
Oxnard College
Oxnard, California
Barbara R. Ellis, RDH, MA
Monroe Community College
Rochester, New York
Mary Emmons, RDH, MSEd
Parkland College
Champaign, Illinois
Joy L. Evans, RDA, EFDA, BS
IntelliTec College
Grand Junction, Colorado
Ann Gallerie, AAS, RDA
Hudson Valley Community College
Troy, New York
Carol Anne Giaquinto, CDA, RDH, MEd
Springfield Technical College
Springfield, Massachusetts
Martha L McCaslin, MA
Dona Ana Community College
Las Cruces, New Mexico
Frances McConaughy RDH, MS
Weber State University
Ogden, Utah
Jean Magee, RDH, Med
NHTI Community College
Concord, New Hampshire
Jennifer Meyer, RDH, BSDH
Southern Illinois University
Carbondale, Illinois
Ann Prey RDH, MS
Milwaukee Area Technical College
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Judith E. Romano, RDH, MA
Hudson Valley Community College
Troy, New York
Jennifer S. Sherry, RDH
Southern Illinois University
Carbondale, Illinois
Jane H. Slach BA
Kirkwood Community College
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Gail Renee St. Pierre-Piper, RDH, MA
Iowa Central Community College
Fort Dodge, Iowa
Desiree Sutphen, BA
Volunteer State Community College
Gallatin, Tennessee
Victoria Viera CDA, RDA
Missouri College
Saint Louis, Missouri
Darlene Walsh, RDH, EdM
State University of New York—Orange
Middletown, New York
Janice M. Williams, BSDH, MS
Tennessee State University
Nashville, Tennessee
Essentials of Dental Radiography
for Dental Assistants and Hygienists
This page intentionally left blank
OBJECTIVES
Following successful completion of this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Define the key words.
2. State when x-rays were discovered and by whom.
3. Trace the history of radiography, noting the prominent contributors.
4. List two historical developments that made dental x-ray machines safer.
5. Explain how rectangular PIDs reduce patient radiation exposure.
6. Identify the two techniques used to expose dental radiographs.
7. List five uses of dental radiographs.
8. Become aware of other imaging modalities available for use in the detection and evaluation
of oral conditions.
KEY WORDS
Bisecting technique
Computed tomography (CT)
Cone
Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)
Cone beam volumetric imaging (CBVI)
Digital imaging
Dosage
Oral radiography
Panoramic radiography
Paralleling technique
Position indicating device (PID)
Radiograph
Radiography
Radiology
Roentgen ray
Roentgenograph
Sensor
Tomography
X-ray
X-ray film
History of Dental
Radiography
CHAPTER
1
PART I • HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
AND RADIATION BASICS
CHAPTER
OUTLINE
 Objectives 1
 Key Words 1
 Introduction 2
 Discovery of the
X-ray 2
 Important Scientists
and Researchers 2
 Dental X-ray
Machines 3
 Dental X-ray Film 4
 Digital Image
Receptors 4
 Dental X-ray
Techniques 5
 Advances in Dental
Radiographic
Imaging 5
 Review, Recall,
Reflect, Relate 5
 References 7
2 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE AND RADIATION BASICS
Introduction
Technological advancements continue to affect the way we
deliver oral health care. Although new methods for diagnosing
disease and treatment planning comprehensive care have been
introduced, dental radiographs, the images produced by x-rays,
remain the basis for many diagnostic procedures and play an
essential role in oral health care. Radiography is the making of
radiographs by exposing an image receptor, either film or digital sensor. The purpose of dental radiography is to provide the
oral health care team with radiographic images of the best possible diagnostic quality. The goal of dental radiography is to
obtain the highest quality radiographs while maintaining the
lowest possible radiation exposure risk for the patient.
Dental assistants and dental hygienists meet an important
need through their ability to produce diagnostic quality radiographs. The basis for development of the skills needed to
expose, process, mount, and evaluate radiographic images is a
thorough understanding of radiology concepts. All individuals
working with radiographic equipment should be educated and
trained in the theory of x-ray production. The concepts and theories regarding x-ray production that emerged during the early
days of x-radiation discovery are responsible for the quality
health care available today. The purpose of this chapter is to
present a historical perspective that recognizes the contributions of the early scientists and researchers who supplied us
with the fundamentals on which we practice today and advance
toward the future.
Discovery of the X-ray
Oral radiology is the study of x-rays and the techniques used to
produce radiographic images. We begin that study with the history of dental radiography and the discovery of the x-ray. The
x-ray revolutionized the methods of practicing medicine and
dentistry by making it possible to visualize internal body structures noninvasively. Professor Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen’s
(pronounced “rent’gun”; Figure 1-1) experiment in Bavaria
(Germany) on November 8, 1895, produced a tremendous
advance in science. Professor Roentgen’s curiosity was aroused
during an experiment with a vacuum tube called a Crookes tube
(named after William Crookes, an English chemist). Roentgen
observed that a fluorescent screen near the tube began to glow
when the tube was activated by passing an electric current
through it. Examining this strange phenomenon further, he
noticed that shadows could be cast on the screen by interposing
objects between it and the tube. Further experimentation
showed that such shadow images could be permanently
recorded on photographic film (Figure 1-2). For his work, Dr.
Roentgen was awarded the first Nobel Prize for physics in 1901.
In the beginning, Roentgen was uncertain of the nature of
this invisible ray that he had discovered. When he later reported
his finding at a scientific meeting, he spoke of it as an x-ray
because the symbol x represented the unknown. After his findings were reported and published, fellow scientists honored him
by calling the invisible ray the roentgen ray and the image produced on photosensitive film a roentgenograph. Because a photographic negative and an x-ray film have basic similarity and
FIGURE 1-2 This famous radiograph, purported to be
Mrs. Bertha Roentgen’s hand, was taken on December 22, 1895.
(Reprinted with permission from Radiology Centennial, Inc.,
Copyright 1993)
FIGURE 1-1 Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen (1845–1923).
(Reprinted with permission from Radiology Centennial, Inc.,
Copyright 1993)
the x-ray closely resembles the radio wave, the prefix radio- and
the suffix -graph have been combined into radiograph. The latter term is used by oral health care professionals because it is
more descriptive than x-ray and easier to pronounce than
roentgenograph.
Important Scientists and Researchers
A few weeks after Professor Roentgen announced his discovery, Dr. Otto Walkhoff, a German physicist, was the first to
expose a prototype of a dental radiograph. This was accomplished by covering a small, glass photographic plate with
CHAPTER 1 • HISTORY OF DENTAL RADIOGRAPHY 3
black paper to protect it from light and then wrapping it in a
sheath of thin rubber to prevent moisture damage during the 25
minutes that he held the film in his mouth. A similar exposure
can now be made in 1/10th of a second. The resulting radiograph was experimental and had little diagnostic value
because it was impossible to prevent film movement, but it did
prove that the x-ray would have a role in dentistry. The length
of the exposure made the experiment a dangerous one for Dr.
Walkhoff. The dangers of overexposure to radiation were not
known at that time.
We will probably never know who made the first dental
radiograph in the United States. It was either Dr. William
Herbert Rollins, a Boston dentist and physician, Dr. William
James Morton, a New York physician, or Dr. C. Edmund
Kells, a New Orleans dentist. Dr. Rollins was one of the first
to alert the profession to the need for radiation hygiene and
protection and is considered by many to be the first advocate
for the science of radiation protection. Unfortunately, his
advice was not taken seriously by many of his fellow practitioners for a long time.
Dr. Morton is known to have taken radiographs on skulls
very early. He gave a lecture on April 24, 1896, before the
New York Odontological Society calling attention to the possible usefulness of roentgen rays in dental practice. One of
Dr. Morton’s radiographs revealed an impacted tooth, which
was otherwise undetectable clinically.
Most people claim Dr. Kells took the first dental radiograph on a living subject in the United States. He was the first
to put the radiograph to practical use in dentistry.
Dr. Kells made numerous presentations to organized dental
groups and was instrumental in convincing many dentists that
they should use oral radiography as a diagnostic tool. At that
time, it was customary to send the patient to a hospital or physician’s office on those rare occasions when dental radiographs
were prescribed.
Two other dental x-ray pioneers who should be mentioned
are William David Coolidge and Howard Riley Raper. The
most significant advancement in radiology came in 1913 when
Dr. Coolidge, working for the General Electric Company, introduced the hot cathode tube. The x-ray output of the Coolidge
tube could be predetermined and accurately controlled. Professor Raper, at Indiana Dental College, wrote the first dental radiology textbook, Elementary and Dental Radiology, and
introduced bitewing radiographs in 1925.
Because x-rays are invisible, scientists and researchers working in the field of radiography were not aware that continued
exposure produced accumulations of radiation effects in the
body and, therefore, could be dangerous to both patient and
radiographer. When radiography was in its infancy, it was common practice for the dentist or dental assistant to help the patient
hold the film in place while making the exposure. These oral
health care professionals were exposed to unnecessary radiation. Frequent repetition of this practice endangered their health
and occasionally led to permanent injury or death. Fortunately,
although the hazards of prolonged exposure to radiation are not
completely understood, scientists have learned how to reduce
them drastically by proper use of fast film and digital sensors,
safer x-ray machines, and strict adherence to safety protocol.
Never hold the film packet or digital sensor in the patient’s
oral cavity during the exposure. If the patient cannot tolerate
placement of the image receptor or hold still throughout the
exposure, the patient’s parent or guardian may have to
assist or an extraoral radiograph may have to be substituted. The parent or guardian should be protected with lead
or lead equivalent barriers such as an apron or gloves when
they will be in the path of the beam.
PRACTICE POINT
Today, it can be assumed that every dental office in the
United States that offers comprehensive oral health care to
patients will have x-ray equipment. It is worth noting that initially few hospitals and only the most progressive physicians
and dentists possessed x-ray equipment. This limited use of
dental radiography can be attributed to the fact that the early
equipment was primitive and sometimes dangerous. Also,
x-rays were used for entertainment purposes by charlatans at
fairgrounds, so people often associated them with quackery.
Resistance to change, ignorance, apathy, and fear delayed the
widespread acceptance of radiography in dentistry for years.
Table 1-1 lists noteworthy scientists and researchers and
their contributions to dental radiology.
Dental X-ray Machines
Dental x-ray machines manufactured before 1920 were an
electrical hazard to oral health care professionals because of
the open, uninsulated high-voltage supply wires. In 1919,
William David Coolidge and General Electric introduced the
Victor CDX shockproof dental x-ray machine. The x-ray tube
and high-voltage transformer were placed in an oil-filled compartment that acted as a radiation shield and electrical insulator. Modern x-ray machines use this same basic construction.
Variable, high-kilovoltage machines were introduced in the
middle 1950s, allowing increased target–image receptor distances to be used, which in turn increased the use of the paralleling technique.
Within the last 30 years, major progress has been made in
restricting the size of the x-ray beam. One such development is
the replacement of the pointed cone through which x-rays pass
from the tube head toward the patient by open cylinders. When
the pointed cones were first used, it was not realized that the
x-rays were scattered through contact with the material of the
cones. Because cones were used for so many years, many still
refer to the open cylinders or rectangular tubes as cones. The
term position indicating device (PID) is more descriptive of
its function of directing the x-rays, rather than of its shape. A
further improvement has been the introduction of rectangular
4 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE AND RADIATION BASICS
lead-lined PIDs. This shape limits the size of the x-ray beam
that strikes the patient to the actual size of the image receptor
(Figure 1-3).
Panoramic radiography became popular in the 1960s
with the introduction of the panoramic x-ray machine.
Panoramic units are capable of exposing the entire dentition
and surrounding structures on a single image. Today, many oral
health care practices have a panoramic x-ray machine.
As digital imaging continues to develop, exciting
advances in the development of imaging systems that allow for
enhanced two- and three-dimensional images are being used in
the diagnosis and treatment of dental conditions, particularly
implant evaluation and orthodontic interventions. Medical
imaging modalities such as tomography and computed
TABLE 1-1 Noteworthy Scientists and Researchers in Dental Radiography
NAME EVENT YEAR
W. C. Roentgen Discovered x-rays 1895
C. E. Kells May have taken first dental radiograph in U.S. 1896
W. J. Morton May have taken first dental radiograph in U.S. 1896
W. H. Rollins May have taken first dental radiograph in U.S. 1896
Published “X Light Kills,” warning of x-ray dangers 1901
O. Walkhoff First to make a dental radiograph 1896
W. A. Price Suggested basics for both bisecting and paralleling techniques 1904
A. Cieszynski Applied “rule of isometry” to bisecting technique 1907
W. D. Coolidge Introduced the hot cathode tube 1913
H. R. Raper Wrote first dental x-ray textbook 1913
Introduced bitewing radiographs 1924
F. W. McCormack Developed paralleling technique 1920
G. M. Fitzgerald Designed a “long-cone” to use with the paralleling technique 1947
Francis Mouyen Developed the first digital imaging system called RadioVisioGraphy 1987
FIGURE 1-3 Comparison of circular and rectangular PIDs.
(Image courtesy of Gendex Dental Corporation)
tomography (CT scans), a method of imaging a single
selected plane of tissues has been used to assist dentists with
complex diagnosis and treatment planning since the early
1970s. Because these medical imaging modalities deliver high
radiation doses, sometimes up to 600 times more than a
panoramic radiograph, the development of cone beam volumetric imaging (CBVI) or cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) with lower radiation doses (4 to 15 times that
required for a panoramic radiograph) for dental application is
purported to become the gold standard of diagnosis for certain
dental applications in the very near future.
Dental X-ray Film
Although today it is increasingly common to see paperless dental practices equipped with computers and image receptors that
allow for the digital capture of radiographic images, film has
been the standard for producing dental radiographs since 1896.
Early dental x-ray film packets consisted of glass photographic
plates wrapped in black paper and rubber. In 1913, the Eastman
Kodak Company marketed the first hand-wrapped, moistureproof dental x-ray film packet. It was not until 1919 that the
first machine-wrapped dental x-ray film packet became commercially available (also from Kodak).
Early film had emulsion on only one side and required
long exposure times. Today, both sides of the dental x-ray film
are coated with emulsion and require only about 1/16th the
amount of exposure required 50 years ago.
Digital Image Receptors
Digital imaging systems (see Chapter 9) replace film as the
image receptor with a sensor. In 1987, Francis Mouyen, a
French dentist, introduced the use of a digital radiography
CHAPTER 1 • HISTORY OF DENTAL RADIOGRAPHY 5
system marketed for dental imaging, called RadioVisioGraphy.
The first digital sensor was bulky and had limitations. Since
that time image sensors have been improved and are now
comparable to film in dimensions of the exposed field of view
and approach film in overall radiographic quality. Their
advantages include a reduction in radiation dosage, the elimination of film and processing chemistry, and the subsequent
disposal of film packaging materials such as lead foils and
spent processing chemicals, both potentially hazardous to the
environment.
Dental X-ray Techniques
Two basic techniques are used in intraoral radiography. The
first and earliest technique is called the bisecting technique.
The second and newer technique is referred to as the
paralleling technique. The paralleling method is the technique
of choice and is taught in all dental assisting, dental hygiene,
and dental schools.
In 1904, Dr. Weston A. Price suggested the basics of both
the bisecting and paralleling techniques. As others were working on the same problems and were unaware of Price’s contributions, the credit for developing the techniques went to others.
In 1907, A. Cieszynski, a Polish engineer, applied the rule
of isometry to dental radiology and is credited for suggesting
the bisecting technique. The bisecting technique was the only
method used for many years.
The search for a less-complicated technique that would
produce better radiographs more consistently resulted in the
development of the paralleling technique by Dr. Franklin
McCormack in 1920. Dr. G. M. Fitzgerald, Dr. McCormack’s
son-in-law, designed a long “cone” PID and made the paralleling
technique more practical in 1947.
Advances in Dental Radiographic Imaging
Radiography, aided by the introduction first of transistors and
then computers, has allowed for significant radiation reduction
in modern x-ray machines. Advances in two-dimensional and
three-dimension imaging systems are predicted to move radiography away from static interpretation of pictures of images
and toward representations of real-life conditions. This introduction of a computed approach with its almost instantaneous
images is sure to benefit the quality of oral health care.
Today, an oral health care practice would find it impossible to provide patients with comprehensive dental care without dental radiographs (Figure 1-4). Many practices have
multiple intraoral dental x-ray machines (one in each operatory) and supplement these with a panoramic x-ray machine.
Although no diagnosis can be based solely on radiographic
evidence without a visual and physical examination, many
conditions might go undetected if not for radiographic examinations (Box 1-1).
The discovery of x-radiation revolutionized the practice of
preventive oral health care. Future technological advances
undoubtedly will improve both the diagnostic use and the
safety of radiography in the years ahead.
REVIEW—Chapter summary
Professor Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen’s discovery of the x-ray
on November 8, 1895, revolutionized the methods of practicing
medicine and dentistry by making it possible to visualize internal body structures noninvasively. The usefulness of the x-ray
as a diagnostic tool was recognized almost immediately as scientists and researchers contributed to its advancement. The use
of radiographs in medical and dental diagnostic procedures is
now essential.
In the early 1900s, scientists and researchers working in
the field of radiography were not aware that radiation could be
dangerous, resulting in exposure to unnecessary radiation.
Early x-ray equipment was primitive and sometimes dangerous. Today improved equipment, advanced techniques, and
educated personnel make it possible to obtain radiographs with
high diagnostic value and minimal risk of unnecessary radiation to patient or operator.
Although film has been the standard image receptor since
the discovery of the x-ray, dental practices continue to adopt
the computer and digital sensor as the method of acquiring a
dental radiographic image. Digital imaging reduces patient
FIGURE 1-4 Radiography in a modern oral health care
practice. (Image courtesy of Gendex Dental Corporation)
• To detect, confirm, and classify oral diseases and lesions
• To detect and evaluate trauma
• To evaluate growth and development
• To detect missing and supernumerary (extra) teeth
• To document the oral condition of a patient
• To educate patients about their oral health
BOX 1-1 Uses of Dental Radiographs
6 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE AND RADIATION BASICS
radiation dose, eliminates the need to maintain an inventory of
film and processing chemistry, and avoids disposal of the
potentially environmental hazards of lead foils and spent processing chemicals.
The two basic techniques for acquiring a dental radiographic image are the bisecting technique and the paralleling
technique.
Cone beam volumetric or computed tomography (CBVT
or CBCT) produces two- and three-dimension images for dental diagnosis. This technology may become the gold standard
for diagnosing certain dental conditions.
RECALL—Study questions
For questions 1–5, match each term with its definition.
a. Radiograph
b. Radiography
c. Radiology
d. Roentgen ray
e. X-ray
_____ 1. The study of x-radiation
_____ 2. Image or picture produced by x-rays
_____ 3. An older term given to x-radiation in honor of
its discoverer
_____ 4. The original term Roentgen applied to the
invisible ray he discovered
_____ 5. The making of radiographs by exposing and
processing x-ray film
6. Who discovered the x-ray?
a. C. Edmund Kells
b. William Rollins
c. Franklin McCormack
d. Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen
7. When were x-rays discovered?
a. 1695
b. 1795
c. 1895
d. 1995
8. Who is believed to have exposed the prototype of the
first dental x-ray film?
a. A. Cieszynski
b. Otto Walkhoff
c. Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen
d. C. Edmund Kells
9. Who is considered by many to be the first advocate
for the science of radiation protection?
a. Weston Price
b. William Morton
c. William Herbert Rollins
d. Franklin McCormack
10. Replacing the pointed “cone” position indicating device
(PID) with an open-cylinder PID reduced the radiation
dose to the patient because open-cylinder PIDs eliminate scattered x-rays through contact with the cone
material.
a. Both the statement and reason are correct and
related.
b. Both the statement and reason are correct but NOT
related.
c. The statement is correct, but the reason is NOT.
d. The statement is NOT correct, but the reason is correct.
e. NEITHER the statement NOR the reason is
correct.
11. Which imaging modality will most likely become the
gold standard for imaging certain dental conditions in
the near future?
a. Cone beam volumetric tomography
b. Computed tomography
c. Digital imaging
d. Tomography
12. Who is given credit for applying the rule of isometry to
the bisecting technique?
a. William Rollins
b. A. Cieszynski
c. G. M. Fitzgerald
d. Otto Walkhoff
13. Who is given credit for developing the paralleling
technique?
a. W. D. Coolidge
b. H. R. Raper
c. William Morton
d. Franklin McCormack
14. List five uses of dental radiographs.
a. ______________
b. ______________
c. ______________
d. ______________
e. ______________
REFLECT—Case study
Your patient today tells you that she recently watched a television documentary on the dangers of excess radiation exposure.
Based on your reading in this chapter, develop a brief conversation between you and this patient explaining how historical
developments have increased dental radiation safety to put the
patient at ease.
CHAPTER 1 • HISTORY OF DENTAL RADIOGRAPHY 7
RELATE—Laboratory application
Perform an inventory of the x-ray machine used in your facility.
Using the historical lessons learned in this chapter, identify the
parts of the x-ray machine, type of film or digital sensor used,
and the safety protocol and posted exposure factors in place.
Specifically list the following:
a. Unit manufacturer
Using the Internet, research the manufacturer’s Web
site to determine the company origin. How old is the
company? Are they a descendant of an original manufacturer? Who developed the design for the x-ray unit
produced today? Do they offer different unit designs?
What is the reason your facility chose this model?
b. Shape and length of the PID
Does the machine you are observing reduce radiation exposure? Why or why not? Why was the PID you
are observing chosen over other shapes and lengths?
c. Names of the dials on the control panel.
How does this differ from the dental x-ray machines
used in dental practices in the early 1900s? What exposure factors are inherent to the unit, and what factors
may be varied by the radiographer? What are the advantages and disadvantages to using an x-ray machine
where the exposure settings are fixed? Variable?
d. What are the recommended exposure settings for various types of radiographs? How do these differ from the
settings used by the first dentists to use x-rays in practice in the early 1900s?
e. Describe the film or digital sensor used to produce a
radiographic image.
What is the film size and speed, and how is it packaged? Does the film or sensor used in your facility
allow you to produce a quality radiograph using the
least amount of radiation possible? What is the rationale for using this film type in your facility?
f. Are the safety protocols regarding x-ray machine operation known to all operators? How is this made evident?
List the safety protocols in place in your facility.
REFERENCES
Carestream Health, Inc. (2007). Kodak dental systems: Radiation safety in dental radiography. Pub. N-414, Rochester,
NY: Author.
Horner, K., Drage, N., & Brettle, D. (2008). 21st century imaging. London: Quintessence Publishing.
Langland, O. E., Langlais, R. P., & Preece, J. W. (2002).
Principles of Dental Imaging (2nd ed.). Philadelphia:
Williams & Wilkins.
Miles, D. A. (2008). Color atlas of cone beam volumetric
imaging for dental applications. Chicago: Quintessence
Publishing.
Scarfe, W. C., Farnam, A. G., & Sukovic, P. (2006). Clinical
applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental
practice. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association, 72,1.
White, S. C., & Pharoah, M. J. (2008). Oral radiology. Principles and interpretation (6th ed.). St. Louis: Elsevier.
OBJECTIVES
Following successful completion of this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Define the key words.
2. Draw and label a typical atom.
3. Describe the process of ionization.
4. Differentiate between radiation and radioactivity.
5. List the properties shared by all energies of the electromagnetic spectrum.
6. Explain the relationship between wavelength and frequency.
7. Explain the inverse relationship between wavelength and penetrating power of x-rays.
8. List the properties of x-rays.
9. Identify and describe the two processes by which kinetic energy is converted to electromagnetic energy within the dental x-ray tube.
10. List and describe the four possible interactions of dental x-rays with matter.
11. Define the terms used to measure x-radiation.
12. Match the Système Internationale (SI) units of x-radiation measurement to the corresponding
traditional terms.
13. Identify three sources of naturally occurring background radiation.
Characteristics
and Measurement
of Radiation
CHAPTER
2
CHAPTER
OUTLINE
 Objectives 8
 Key Words 8
 Introduction 9
 Atomic Structure 9
 Ionization 10
 Ionizing Radiation 10
 Radioactivity 10
 Electromagnetic
Radiation 11
 Properties of
X-rays 12
 Production of
X-rays 13
 Interaction of
X-rays with
Matter 13
 Units of Radiation 15
 Background
Radiation 16
 Review, Recall,
Reflect, Relate 17
 References 18 KEY WORDS
Absorbed dose
Absorption
Alpha particle
Angstrom (Å)
Atom
Atomic number
Atomic weight
Background radiation
Beta particle
Binding energy
Characteristic radiation
Coherent scattering
Compton effect (scattering)
Coulombs per kilogram
(C/kg)
Decay
CHAPTER 2 • CHARACTERISTICS AND MEASUREMENT OF RADIATION 9
Introduction
The word radiation is attention grabbing. When news headlines incorporate words such as radiation, radioactivity, and exposure, the reader pays attention to what follows. Patients often link dental x-rays with other types of
radiation exposure they read about or see on TV. Patients
assume that oral health care professionals who are responsible for taking dental x-rays are knowledgeable regarding all
types of ionizing radiation exposures and can adequately
answer their questions. Although the study of quantum
physics is beyond the scope of this book, it is important that
dental assistants and dental hygienists understand what dental radiation is, what it can do, and what it cannot do. In this
chapter we will explore the characteristics of x-radiation and
look at where dental x-rays fit in relation to other types and
sources of radiations.
Prior to studying the production of x-rays, the radiographer should have a base knowledge of atomic structure. The
scientist understands that the world consists of matter and
energy. Matter is defined as anything that occupies space and
has mass. Things that we see and recognize are forms of matter. Energy is defined as the ability to do work and overcome
resistance. Heat, light, electricity, and x-radiation are forms
of energy. Matter and energy are closely related. Energy is
produced whenever the state of matter is altered by natural or
artificial means. The difference between water, steam, and
ice is the amount of energy associated with the molecules.
Such an energy exchange is produced within the x-ray
machine and will be discussed later.
Atomic Structure
To understand radiation, we must understand atomic structure.
Currently we know of 118 basic elements that occur either singly
or in combination in natural forms. Each element is made up of
atoms. An atom is the smallest particle of an element that still
retains the properties of the element. If any given atom is split, the
resulting components no longer retain the properties of the element. Atoms are generally combined with other atoms to form
molecules. A molecule is the smallest particle of a substance that
retains the properties of that substance. A simple molecule such
as sodium chloride (table salt) contains only two atoms, whereas a
complex molecule like DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) may contain hundreds of atoms.
Atoms are extremely minute and are composed of three
basic building blocks: electrons, protons, and neutrons.
• Electrons have a negative charge and are constantly in
motion orbiting the nucleus.
• Protons have a postitive charge. The number of protons in
the nucleus of an element determines its atomic number.
• Neutrons have no charge.
The atom’s arrangement in some ways resembles the solar
system (Figure 2-1). The atom has a nucleus as its center or
sun, and the electrons revolve around it like planets. The protons and neutrons form the central core or nucleus of the atom.
The electrons orbit around the nucleus in paths called shells or
energy levels. Normally, the atom is electrically neutral, having
equal numbers of protons in its nucleus and electrons in orbit.
The nucleus of all atoms except hydrogen contains at
least one proton and one neutron (hydrogen in its simplest
form has only a proton). Some atoms contain a very high
number of each. The electrons and the nucleus normally
remain in the same position relative to one another. To accommodate the electrons revolving about the nucleus, the larger
atoms have several concentric orbits at various distances from
the nucleus. These are referred to as electron shells, which
some chemists call energy levels. The innermost level is
referred to as the K shell, the next as the L shell, and so on, up
to 7 shells (Figure 2-1).
KEY WORDS
Dose
Dose equivalent
Effective dose equivalent
Electromagnetic radiation
Electromagnetic spectrum
Electron
Element
Energy
Energy levels
Exposure
Frequency
Gamma rays
General/bremsstrahlung radiation
Gray (Gy)
Rad
Radiation
Radioactivity
Radiolucent
Radiopaque
Rem
Roentgen (R)
Secondary radiation
Sievert (Sv)
Soft radiation
Système Internationale (SI)
Velocity
Wavelength
Weighting factor
Hard radiation
Ion
Ion pair
Ionization
Ionizing radiation
Isotope
Kinetic energy
Microsievert (μSv)
Molecule
Neutron
Particulate radiation
Photoelectric effect
Photon
Proton
e–
Displaced electron
(negative ion)
X-ray
Remaining atom
(positive ion)
e–
+
+
e–
+ Protons Neutrons e– Electrons
FIGURE 2-2 Ionization is the formation of ion pairs. When an
atom is struck by an x-ray, an electron may be dislodged, and an ion
pair results.
10 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE AND RADIATION BASICS
Electrons are maintained in their orbits by the positive
attraction of the protons, known as binding energy. The binding
energy of an electron is strongest in the intermost K shell and
becomes weaker in the outer shells.
Ionization
Atoms that have gained or lost electrons are electrically unstable and are called ions. An ion is defined as a charged particle.
The formation of ions is easier to understand if we review the
normal structural arrangement of the atom. The atom normally
has the same number of protons (positive charges) in the
nucleus as it has electrons (negative charges) in the orbital levels. When one of these electrons is removed from its orbital
level in a neutral atom, the remainder of the atom loses its electrical neutrality.
An atom from which an electron has been removed has
more protons than electrons, is positively charged, and is called a
positive ion. The negatively charged electron that has been separated from the atom is a negative ion. The positively charged
atom ion and the negatively charged electron ion are called an
ion pair. Ionization is the formation of ion pairs. When an atom
is struck by an x-ray photon, an electron may be dislodged and
an ion pair created (Figure 2-2). As high-energy electrons travel
on, they push out (like charges repel) electrons from the orbits of
other atoms, creating additional ion pairs. These unstable ions
attempt to regain electrical stability by combining with another
oppositely charged ion.
Ionizing Radiation
Radiation is defined as the emission and movement of
energy through space in the form of electromagnetic radiation
(x- and gamma rays) or particulate radiation (alpha and
beta particles). Any radiation that produces ions is called
ionizing radiation. Only a portion of the radiation portrayed
on the electromagnetic spectrum, the x-rays and the gamma
and cosmic rays, are of the ionizing type. In dental radiography, our concern is limited to the changes that may occur in
the cellular structures of the tissues as the ions are produced
by the passage of x-rays through the cells. The mechanics of
biologic tissue damage are explained in Chapter 5.
Radioactivity
Radioactivity is defined as the process whereby certain unstable elements undergo spontaneous disintegration (decay) in an
effort to attain a stable nuclear state. Unstable isotopes are
radioactive and attempt to regain stability through the release of
energy, by a process known as decay. Dental x-rays do not
involve the use of radioactivity.
Scientists have learned to produce several types of radiations that are identical to natural radiations. Ultraviolet
Orbiting electrons
(negatively charged)
“K” orbit
“L” orbit
Nucleus:
Protons
(positively charged)
Neutrons
(no charge)
e– e–
e–
e– e–
e–
+
+ +
+ +
+
+ Protons Neutrons e– Electrons
FIGURE 2-1 Diagram of carbon atom. In the
neutral atom, the number of positively charged protons
in the nucleus is equal to the number of negatively
charged orbiting electrons. The innermost orbit or
energy level is the K shell, the next is the L shell, and
so on.
waves are produced artificially for sunlamps or fluorescent
lights and for numerous other uses. Another man-made radiation is the laser beam, whose potential impact on oral health
is still being explored.
Electromagnetic Radiation
Electromagnetic radiation is the movement of wavelike
energy through space as a combination of electric and magnetic
fields. Electromagnetic radiations are arranged in an orderly
CHAPTER 2 • CHARACTERISTICS AND MEASUREMENT OF RADIATION 11
fashion according to their energies in what is called the
electromagnetic spectrum (Figure 2-3). The electromagnetic
spectrum consists of an orderly arrangement of all known radiant energies. X-radiation is a part of the electromagnetic spectrum, which also includes cosmic rays, gamma rays, ultraviolet
rays, visible light, infrared, television, radar, microwave, and
radio waves. All energies of the electromagnetic spectrum share
the following properties:
• Travel at the speed of light
• Have no electrical charge
1
10,000
1
1,000
1
1,000
1
100
1
100
1
10
1
10
1
10
100
1,000
10,000
100,000
1,000,000
1
10
100
1,000
10,000
100,000
1,000,000
10,000,000
100,000,000
Forms Uses
Cosmic rays
X-rays and
gamma rays
Very soft x-rays
Ultraviolet rays
Light
Infrared rays
Dental and
medical radiography
Sunlamp
Photography
Toaster
Radar
Television
Radio
Radio waves
Radiation
associated with
electric waves
Measured
in angstrom units
Measured
in meters
FIGURE 2-3 The electromagnetic
spectrum. Electromagnetic radiations are
arranged in an orderly fashion according to
their energies.
FIGURE 2-4 Differences in wavelengths
and frequencies. Only the shortest
wavelengths with extremely high frequency and
energy are used to expose dental radiographs
Wavelength is determined by the distances
between the crests. Observe that this distance is
much shorter in (B) than in (A). The photons
that comprise the dental x-ray beam are
estimated to have over 250 million such crests
per inch. Frequency is the number of crests of a
wavelength passing a given point per second.
Crest Crest
Crest Crest
Wavelength
A
B
Long wavelength
Low frequency
Low energy
Less penetrating x-ray
Short wavelength
High frequency
High energy
More penetrating x-ray
12 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE AND RADIATION BASICS
• Velocity refers to the speed of the wave. In a vacuum, all
electromagnetic radiations travel at the speed of light
(186,000 miles/sec or 3 × 108 m/sec).
No clear-cut separation exists between the various radiations represented on the electromagnetic spectrum; consequently, overlapping of the wavelengths is common. Each form
PRACTICE POINT
Wavelength and frequency are inversely related. When the
wavelength is long, the frequency is low, resulting in lowenergy, less penetrating x-rays (Figure 2-4). When the wavelength is short, the frequency is high, resulting in
high-energy, more penetrating x-rays.
• Have no mass or weight
• Pass through space as particles and in a wavelike motion
• Give off an electrical field at right angles to their path of
travel and a magnetic field at right angles to the electric
field
• Have energies that are measurable and different
Electromagnetic radiations display two seemingly contradictory properties. They are believed to move through space as
both a particle and a wave. Particle or quantum theory assumes
the electromagnetic radiations are particles, or quanta. These
particles are called photons. Photons are bundles of energy that
travel through space at the speed of light. Wave theory assumes
that electromagnetic radiation is propagated in the form of
waves similar to waves resulting from a disturbance in water.
Electromagnetic waves exhibit the properties of wavelength,
frequency, and velocity.
• Wavelength is the distance between two similar points on
two successive waves, as illustrated in Figure 2-4. The
symbol for wavelength is the Greek letter lambda ( ).
Wavelength may be measured in the metric system or in
angstrom (Å) units (1 Å is about 1/250,000,000 in. or
1/100,000,000 cm). The shorter the wavelength, the more
penetrating the radiation.
• Frequency is a measure of the number of waves that pass
a given point per unit of time. The symbol for frequency is
the Greek letter nu (ν). The special unit of frequency is the
hertz (Hz). One hertz equals 1 cycle per second. The
higher the frequency, the more penetrating the radiation.
l
of radiation has a range of wavelengths. This accounts for some
of the longer infrared waves being measured in meters, whereas
the shorter infrared waves are measured in angstrom units. It
therefore follows that all x-radiations are not the same wavelength. The longest of these are the Grenz rays, also called soft
radiation, that have only limited penetrating power and are
unsuitable for exposing dental radiographs. The wavelengths
used in diagnostic dental radiography range from about 0.1 to
0.5 Å and are classified as hard radiation, a term meaning
radiation with great penetrating power. Still shorter wavelengths are produced by super-voltage machines when greater
penetration is required, as in some forms of medical therapy
and industrial radiography.
Properties of X-rays
X-rays are believed to consist of minute bundles (or quanta)
of pure electromagnetic energy called photons. These have
no mass or weight, are invisible, and cannot be sensed.
Because they travel at the speed of light (186,000 miles/sec
or 3 × 108 meters/sec), these x-ray photons are often referred
to as “bullets of energy.” X-rays have the following properties. They
• Are invisible
• Travel in straight lines
• Travel at speed of light
• Have no mass or weight
• Have no charge
• Interact with matter causing ionization
• Can penetrate opaque tissues and structures
• Can affect photographic film emulsion (causing a latent
image)
• Can affect biological tissue
X-ray photons have the ability to pass through gases, liquids, and solids. The ability to penetrate materials or tissues
depends on the wavelength of the x-ray and the thickness and
density of the object. The composition of the object or the tissues determines whether the x-rays will penetrate and pass
through it or whether they will be absorbed in it. Materials that
are extremely dense and have a high atomic weight will absorb
more x-rays than thin materials with low atomic numbers. This
partially explains why dense structures such as bone and enamel
appear radiopaque (white or light gray) on the radiograph,
whereas the less dense pulp chamber, muscles, and skin appear
radiolucent (dark gray or black).
Production of X-rays
X-rays are generated inside an x-ray tube located in the tube
head of a dental x-ray machine (Chapter 3). X-rays are produced whenever high-speed electrons are abruptly stopped or
slowed down. Bodies in motion are believed to have kinetic
energy (from the Greek word kineticos, “pertaining to
motion”). In a dental x-ray tube, the kinetic energy of electrons
is converted to electromagnetic energy by the formation of general or bremsstrahlung radiation (German for “braking”) and
characteristic radiation.
• General/bremsstrahlung radiation is produced when
high-speed electrons are stopped or slowed down by the
tungsten atoms of the dental x-ray tube. Referring to
Figure 2-5, observe that the impact from both (A) and (B)
electrons produce general/bremsstrahlung. When a highspeed electron collides with the nucleus of an atom in the
target metal, as in (A), all its kinetic energy is transferred
into a single x-ray photon. In (B), a high-speed electron is
slowed down and bent off its course by the positive pull of
the nucleus. The kinetic energy lost is converted into an
x-ray. The majority of x-rays produced by dental x-ray
machines are formed by general/bremsstrahlung radiation.
• Characteristic radiation is produced when a bombarding
electron from the tube filament collides with an orbiting K
electron of the tungsten target as shown in Figure 2-5 (C).
The K-shell electron is dislodged from the atom. Another
electron in an outer shell quickly fills the void, and an
x-ray is emitted. The x-rays produced in this manner are
called characteristic x-rays. Characteristic radiation can
only be produced when the x-ray machine is operated at or
above 70 kilovolts (kVp) because a minimum force of 69
kVp is required to dislodge a K electron from a tungsten
atom. Characteristic radiation is of minor importance
because it accounts for only a very small part of the x-rays
produced in a dental x-ray machine.
Interaction of X-rays with Matter
A beam of x-rays passing through matter is weakened and
gradually disappears. Such a disappearance is referred to as
absorption of x-rays. When so defined, absorption does not
imply an occurrence such as a sponge soaking up water, but
instead refers to the process of transferring the energy of the
x-rays to the atoms of the material through which the x-ray
beam passes. The basic method of absorption is ionization.
When a beam of x-rays pass through matter, four possibilities exist:
1. No interaction. The x-ray can pass through an atom
unchanged and no interaction occurs (Figure 2-6).
• In dental radiography about 9 percent of the x-rays pass
through the patient’s tissues without interaction.
CHAPTER 2 • CHARACTERISTICS AND MEASUREMENT OF RADIATION 13
Nucleus
C
B
A
e–
e–
e–
e–
e–
e–
e–
e– e–
e–
e–
e–
e– e–
e–
e–
e– e–
FIGURE 2-5 General/bremsstrahlung and characteristic
radiation. High-speed electron (A) collides with the nucleus, and all
its kinetic energy is converted into a single x-ray. High-speed
electron (B) is slowed down and bent off its course by the positive
pull of the nucleus. The kinetic energy lost is converted into an x-ray.
The impact from both A and B electrons produce general radiation.
Characteristic radiation is produced when a high-speed electron
(C) hits and dislodges a K shell (orbiting) electron. Another electron
in an outer shell quickly fills the void, and x-ray energy is emitted.
Characteristic radiation only occurs above 70 kVp with a tungsten
target.
Scattered
x-ray
Incoming
x-ray
Nucleus
e Compton electron –
e– e–
e–
e– e–
e–
FIGURE 2-8 Compton scattering. Compton scattering is similar
to the photoelectric effect in that the incoming x-ray interacts with an
orbital electron and ejects it. But in the case of Compton interaction,
only a part of the x-ray energy is transferred to the electron, and a
new, weaker x-ray is formed and scattered in a new direction. The
new x-ray may undergo another Compton scattering or it may be
absorbed by a photoelectric effect interaction.
X-ray
Nucleus
Photoelectron
e– e–
e–
e– e–
e–
FIGURE 2-7 Photoelectric effect. The incoming x-ray gives
up all its energy to an orbital electron of the atom. The x-ray is
absorbed and simply vanishes. The electromagnetic energy of
the x-ray is imparted to the electron in the form of kinetic
energy of motion and causes the electron to fly from its orbit,
creating an ion pair. The high-speed electron (called a
photoelectron) knocks other electrons from the orbits of other
atoms forming secondary ion pairs.
14 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE AND RADIATION BASICS
2. Coherent scattering (unmodified scattering, also known
as Thompson scattering). When a low-energy x-ray passes
near an atom’s outer electron, it may be scattered without
loss of energy (Figure 2-6). The incoming x-ray interacts
with the electron by causing the electron to vibrate at the
same frequency as the incoming x-ray. The incoming x-ray
ceases to exist. The vibrating electron radiates another
x-ray of the same frequency and energy as the original
incoming x-ray. The new x-ray is scattered in a different
direction than the original x-ray. Essentially, the x-ray is
scattered unchanged.
• Coherent scattering accounts for about 8 percent of the
interactions of matter with the dental x-ray beam.
3. Photoelectric effect. The photoelectric effect is an all-ornothing energy loss. The x-ray imparts all its energy to an
orbital electron of some atom. This dental x-ray, because it
consisted only of energy in the first place, simply vanishes.
The electromagnetic energy of the x-ray is imparted to the
electron in the form of kinetic energy of motion and causes
the electron to fly from its orbit with considerable speed.
Thus, an ion pair is created (Figure 2-7). Remember, the
basic method of the interaction of x-rays with matter is the
formation of ion pairs. The high-speed electron (called a
photoelectron) knocks other electrons from the orbits of
other atoms (forming secondary ion pairs) until all its
energy is used up. The positive ion atom combines with a
free electron, and the absorbing material is restored to its
original condition.
• Photoelectric effect accounts for about 30 percent of the
interactions of matter with the dental x-ray beam.
4. Compton effect. The Compton effect (often called Compton scattering) is similar to the photoelectric effect in that
the dental x-ray interacts with an orbital electron and ejects
it. But in the case of Compton interaction, only a part of the
dental x-ray energy is transferred to the electron, and a new,
weaker x-ray is formed and scattered in some new direction
(Figure 2-8). This secondary radiation may travel in a
direction opposite that of the original x-ray. The new x-ray
may undergo another Compton scattering or it may be
A. X-ray
B. Original X-ray
C. New
unmodified X-ray
Nucleus
e–
e– e– e–
e– e–
FIGURE 2-6 X-rays interacting with atom. X-ray (A) passes
through an atom unchanged and no interaction occurs. Incoming
x-ray (B) interacts with the electron by causing the electron to vibrate
at the same frequency as the incoming x-ray. The incoming x-ray
ceases to exist. The vibrating electron radiates new x-ray (C) energy
with the same frequency and energy as the original incoming x-ray.
The new x-ray is scattered in a different direction than the original
x-ray.
CHAPTER 2 • CHARACTERISTICS AND MEASUREMENT OF RADIATION 15
PRACTICE POINT
“How long should you wait after exposure before entering
the room where the radiation was?”
X-rays travel at the speed of light and cease to exist
within a fraction of a second. This question is similar to asking, “How long will it take for the room to get dark after
turning off the light switch?”
Units of Radiation
The terms used to measure x-radiation are based on the ability
of the x-ray to deposit its energy in air, soft tissues, bone, or
other substances. The International Commission on Radiation
Units and Measurements (ICRU) has established standards
that clearly define radiation units and radiation quantities
(Table 2-1). The most widely accepted terms used for radiation
units of measurement come from the Système Internationale
(SI), a modern version of the metric system. The Système
Internationale (SI) units are
1. Coulombs per kilogram (C/kg)
2. Gray (Gy)
3. Sievert (Sv)
Older traditional units of radiation measurement are now
considered obsolete, although they may be observed in some
absorbed by a photoelectric effect interaction. The positive
ion atom combines with a free electron, and the absorbing
material is restored to its original condition. It is important
to remember that the Compton effect causes x-rays to be
scattered in all directions.
• Compton effect accounts for about 60 percent of the
interactions of matter with the dental x-ray beam.
A question often asked is, “Do x-rays make the material
they pass through radioactive?” The answer is no. Dental
x-rays have no effect on the nucleus of the atoms they interact
with. Therefore, equipment, walls, and patients do not become
radioactive after exposure to x-rays.
older documents, especially those dealing with health and
safety. The traditional units are
1. Roentgen (R)
2. Rad (radiation absorbed dose)
3. Rem (roentgen equivalent [in] man)
The American Dental Association requires the use of SI terminology on national board examinations, and following the
guidelines established by the National Institute of Standards
and Technology, this book will use SI units first, followed by
the traditional units in parentheses. It is important to note that
numerical amounts of radiation expressed using SI terminology
do not equal the numerical amounts of radiation expressed
using the traditional terms. For example, consider the metric
system of measurement adopted by most of the world with the
traditional units of measurement used in the United States.
Whereas the global community uses the term kilometers to
measure distance, in the United States distance is more commonly measured in miles. One kilometer does not equal 1 mile.
Instead, 1 kilometer equals approximately 0.62 miles. When
comparing measurements of radiation, it is important to
remember that SI units and traditional units, although measuring the same thing, are not equal numerically.
A “quantity” may be thought of as a description of a physical concept such as time, distance, or weight. The measure of
the quantity is a “unit” such as minutes, miles (kilometers), or
pounds (kilograms).
For practical x-ray protection measurement the following
are used:
1. Exposure
2. Absorbed dose
3. Dose equivalent
4. Effective dose equivalent
Exposure
Exposure can be defined as the measurement of ionization in
air produced by x- or gamma rays. The unit for measuring
exposure is coulombs per kilogram (C/kg) (roentgen (R)). A
coulomb is a unit of electrical charge. Therefore, the unit C/kg
measures electrical charges (ion pairs) in a kilogram of air.
Coulombs per kilogram (roentgen) only applies to x- or gamma
radiation and only measures ion pairs in air. It does not measure
the radiation absorbed by tissues or other materials. Therefore,
it is not a measurement of dose. An exposure does not become
a dose until the radiation is absorbed in the tissues.
TABLE 2-1 Radiation Measurement Terminology
QUANTITY SYSTÈME INTERNATIONAL (SI) UNIT TRADITIONAL UNIT
Exposure coulombs per kilogram (C/kg) roentgen (R)
Absorbed dose gray (Gy) rad
Dose equivalent sievert (Sv) rem
Radon & thoron
(background) (37%)
Space
(background) (5%)
Internal
(background) (5%)
Terrestrial
(background) (3%)
Computed tomography
(medical) (24%)
Nuclear medicine
(medical) (12%)
Interventional fluoroscopy
(medical) (7%)
Conventional radiography/
fluoroscopy (medical) (5%)
Consumer (2%)
Occupational (<0.1%)
Industrial (<0.1%)
FIGURE 2-9 Annual effective dose equivalent of ionizing radiations. This chart illustrates
the approximate percentage of exposure of the U.S. population to background and artificial
radiations.(Reprinted with permission of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements,
http://NCRPonline.org)
Effective Dose Equivalent
To aid in making more accurate comparisons between different radiographic exposures, the effective dose equivalent is
used to compare the risk of the radiation exposure producing
a biological response. The effective dose equivalent is
expressed using the term microsievert (μSv), meaning
1/1,000,000 of a sievert. The effective dose equivalent compensates for the differences in area exposed and the tissues,
critical or less critical, that may be in the path of the x-ray
beam. For example, comparing the skin dose of a chest x-ray
(approximately 0.2 mSv) and a single periapical radiograph
(approximately 2.5 mSv) does not take into consideration
that the chest x-ray delivers its dose to a larger area and to
more tissues than the single periapical radiograph. Using the
measurement for effective dose equivalent, the chest x-ray is
approximately 80 μSv, and the effective dose equivalent for the
single periapical using F-speed film and a round PID is
approximately 1.3 μSv.
Background Radiation
Dental x-rays are artificially produced, and when grouped with
medical x-rays they account for approximately 5 percent of the
total radiation exposure to the population. In fact, the total radiation exposure to the U.S. population from all medical applications of ionizing radiation including x-rays, computed
tomography (CT scans), and nuclear medication is approximately 48 percent. Consumer products and activities such as
smoking, building materials, and combustion of fossil fuels
make up another approximately 2 percent of exposure to the
population. However, it is important to note 50 percent of total
exposure to the population comes from naturally occurring,
background sources of radiation (Figure 2-9). Background
16 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE AND RADIATION BASICS
Absorbed Dose
Absorbed dose is defined as the amount of energy deposited in
any form of matter (such as teeth, soft tissues, treatment chair,
and so on), by any type of radiation (alpha or beta particles,
gamma or x-rays). The unit for measuring the absorbed dose is
the gray (Gy) (rad).
One gray equals 1 joule (J; a unit of energy) per kilogram
of tissue. One gray equals 100 rads.
Dose Equivalent
Dose equivalent is a term used for radiation protection purposes to compare the biological effects of the various types of
radiation. Dose equivalent is defined as the product of the
absorbed dose times a biological-effect qualifying or
weighting factor. Because the weighting factor for x-rays is 1,
the absorbed dose and the dose equivalent are numerically
equal. The unit for measuring the dose equivalent is the sievert
(Sv) (rem). One sievert is the product of 1 Gy times a biological-effect weighting factor. Because the weighting factor for
x- and gamma radiation equals 1, the number of sieverts is
identical to the absorbed dose in grays for these radiations. One
sievert equals 100 rem.
In dental radiology, gray (rad) and sievert (rem) are equal,
and it should be pointed out that only x-rays and gamma rays
are measured in coulombs per kilogram (roentgens). Gray
(rad) and sievert (rem) are used to measure all radiations:
gamma and x-rays, alpha and beta particles, neutrons, and
high-energy protons.
When pertaining to exposures from dental radiation, smaller
multiples of these units are commonly used. For example, milligray (mGy), where the prefix milli means “one-thousandth of,”
would more likely be used to express the smaller dose of radiation used in most dental applications.
radiation is defined as ionizing radiation that is always present
in our environment. The human race has always been subjected
to exposure from natural background radiations originating
from the following sources:
• Cosmic radiations from outer space
• Terrestrial radiations from the earth and its environments
including radon gas
• Background radiations from naturally occurring
radionuclides (unstable atoms that emit radiations) that
are deposited in our bodies by inhalation and ingestion
The average natural background radiation levels for the U.S.
population is estimated to be about 3.1 mSv (millisievert) or
310 mrem (millirem) per year or about 0.9 mrem per day.
The exact amount varies according to locality, the amount of
radioactive material present, and the intensity of the cosmic
rays—this intensity varies according to altitude and latitude.
For example, persons living on the Colorado plateau receive
an increased dose of background radiation because of the
increased cosmic radiation at the higher altitude and more
terrestrial radiation from soils enriched in naturally occurring
uranium that raise the levels of terrestrial radionuclides
located there.
REVIEW—Chapter summary
The three basic building blocks of an atom are protons, neutrons, and electrons. Protons and neutrons make up the central
nucleus, which is orbited by the electrons revolving in the
energy levels. Binding energy between the positive protons and
negative electrons maintains the electrons in their orbits.
Ionization is the formation of charged particles called ions.
A positive ion and a negative ion are called an ion pair. Ionizing
radiation is defined as any radiation that produces ions.
Electromagnetic radiation is the movement of wavelike
energy through space. Electromagnetic radiation exhibits the
properties of wavelength, frequency, and velocity. Shortwavelength x-rays, called hard radiation, are very penetrating.
Long-wavelength x-rays, called soft radiation, have limited
penetrating power. The electromagnetic spectrum consists of
an orderly arrangement of all known radiant energies.
X-rays are invisible, travel in straight lines at the speed of
light, interact with matter causing ionization, affect photographic film, and affect living tissue. X-rays are produced
whenever high-speed electrons are abruptly stopped or slowed
down. They may pass through a patient with no interaction, or
they may be absorbed by the photoelectric effect or scattered by
either Compton scattering or coherent scattering.
Four x-ray measurement quantities are exposure (C/kg;
roentgen), absorbed dose (gray/Gy; rad), dose equivalent (sievert/Sv; rem), and effective dose equivalent (microsievert/μSv).
Dental and medical x-rays make up approximately 5 percent
of the total radiation exposure to the U.S. population. All medical
uses of ionizing radiations including CT scans and nuclear medicine account for 48 percent of the total ionizing radiation exposure. Background radiation consisting of cosmic radiation,
CHAPTER 2 • CHARACTERISTICS AND MEASUREMENT OF RADIATION 17
terrestrial radiations and radon gas, and naturally occurring
radionuclides that are deposited in our bodies by inhalation and
ingestion accounts for 50 percent of the total radiation exposure.
The average natural background radiation levels for the U.S.
population is estimated to be about 3.1 mSv (millisievert) or
310 mrem (millirem) per year or 0.9 mrem per day.
RECALL—Study questions
1. What term describes the smallest particle of an element
that retains the properties of that element?
a. Atom
b. Molecule
c. Photon
d. Isotope
2. Draw and label a typical atom.
3. Which of these subatomic particles carries a negative
electric charge?
a. Proton
b. Neutron
c. Nucleus
d. Electron
4. Radiant energy sufficient to remove an electron from its
orbital level of an atom is called
a. atomic.
b. electronic.
c. ionizing.
d. ultrasonic.
5. What term describes the process by which unstable
atoms undergo decay in an effort to obtain nuclear
stability?
a. Absorption
b. Radioactivity
c. Radiolucent
d. Ionization
6. Which of the following is NOT a property shared by all
energies of the electromagnetic spectrum?
a. Have energy that is measurable and different
b. Travel in a pulsating motion at the speed of sound
c. Have no electrical charge, mass, or weight
d. Emit an electrical field at right angles to the path of
travel
7. What is the distance between two similar points on two
successive waves called?
a. Wavelength
b. Frequency
c. Velocity
d. Energy level
18 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE AND RADIATION BASICS
8. Which of these electromagnetic radiations has the
shortest wavelength?
a. Radar
b. Ultraviolet rays
c. Infrared rays
d. X-rays
9. Which of these forms of radiation has the greatest penetrating power?
a. Visible light
b. X-rays
c. Sunlamp
d. Radio waves
10. Which of these forms of radiation is least capable of
causing ionization of body tissue cells?
a. Cosmic rays
b. Gamma rays
c. X-rays
d. Infrared light
11. List five properties of x-rays.
a. ______________
b. ______________
c. ______________
d. ______________
e. ______________
12. Radiation produced when high-speed electrons are
stopped or slowed down by the tungsten atoms of the
dental x-ray tube is called
a. general/bremsstrahlung.
b. characteristic.
c. coherent.
d. Compton.
13. What term best describes the process of transferring
x-ray energy to the atoms of the material through which
the x-ray beam passes?
a. Compton scattering
b. Photoelectric effect
c. Absorption
d. Bremsstrahlung
14. Which of these terms is the unit used to measure radiation exposure?
a. Angstrom (Å)
b. Gray (rad)
c. Sievert (rem)
d. Coulombs per kilogram (roentgen)
15. The Système Internationale (SI) unit that has replaced
the traditional unit rem is
a. gray.
b. sievert.
c. rad.
d. coulomb/kilogram.
16. Dental and medical x-rays account for what percentage
of the overall total exposure to ionizing radiation to an
individual in the United States?
a. 5
b. 10
c. 25
d. 50
17. List three sources of background radiation.
a. ______________
b. ______________
c. ______________
18. What is the average amount of background radiation
to an individual in the United States?
a. 2.2 mSv (220 millirem) per year
b. 4.2 mSv (420 millirem) per year
c. 3.1 mSv (310 millirem) per year
d. 8.2 mSv (820 millirem) per year
REFLECT—Case study
While taking a full mouth series of dental radiographs on your
patient, he begins to consider the number of radiographs that
are exposed in this operatory on a daily basis. He decides to ask
you questions such as, “How long do you have to wait after
each exposure before you can re-enter the room?” and “Are the
walls and equipment in this room becoming radioactive from
all the exposures taken in here?” Prepare a conversation with
this patient addressing these two questions based on what you
learned in this chapter on radiation physics.
RELATE—Laboratory application
Research recent media (magazine or journal articles, newspaper
reports, or the Web) for stories on radiation exposure. Select an
article for review, and critique the article for clarity and readibility. Summarize how many different types of radiation are mentioned in the article. What units of radiation measurement does
the author use? Does the article use these terms in a manner that
is appropriate for what is being measured? Consider the type of
radiation described in this article. Is it naturally occuring/background radiation or a radiation generated by an artificial or manmade source? How many key words from this chapter can you
find in the article? Anticipate what questions your patient may
have for you after reading this article.
REFERENCES
Bushberg, J. T., Seibert, J. A., Leidholdt, E. M., Jr., & Boone, J.
M. (2001). The essential physics of medical imaging (2nd
ed.). Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements.
(2009). Report No 160: Ionizing radiation exposure of the
population of the United States. Bethesda, MD: Author.
Taylor, B. N., & Thompson, A. (Eds.). (2008). The international system of units. Washington, DC: National Institute
of Standards and Technology, U. S. Dept. of Commerce,
Special Publication 330.
Thompson, A., & Taylor, B. N. (2008). Guide to the SI, with
a focus on usage and unit conversions. Guide for the use
of the international system of units (SI). National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication
811.Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards
and Technology.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Public Affairs. (2003). Fact sheet. Washington, DC: Author.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (2007, December 4). Standards for protection against radiation, Title 10,
Part 20, of the Code of Federal Regulations. Retrieved
April 11, 2010, from http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/cfr/part020/part020-1201.html
White, S. C., & Pharoah, M. J. (2008). Oral radiology. Principles and interpretation (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby
Elsevier.
CHAPTER 2 • CHARACTERISTICS AND MEASUREMENT OF RADIATION 19
OBJECTIVES
Following successful completion of this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Define the key words.
2. Identify the three major components of a dental x-ray machine.
3. Identify and explain the function of the five controls on the control panel.
4. State the three conditions necessary for the production of x-rays.
5. Draw and label a dental x-ray tube.
6. Identify the parts of the cathode and explain its function in the production of x-rays.
7. Identify the parts of the anode and explain its function in the production of x-rays.
8. Trace the production of x-rays from the time the exposure button is activated until x-rays are
released from the tube.
9. Demonstrate, in sequence, steps in operating the dental x-ray machine.
KEY WORDS
Alternating current (AC)
Amperage
Ampere (A)
Anode
Autotransformer
Cathode
Central ray
Collimator
Control panel
“Dead-man” exposure switch
Direct current (DC)
Electrical circuit
Electric current
Electrode
Electron cloud
Exposure button
Extension arm
Filament
Filter
Focal spot
Focusing cup
Impulse
Incandescence
Intensity
Kilovolt (kV)
Kilovolt peak (kVp)
The Dental X-ray
Machine: Components
and Functions
CHAPTER
OUTLINE
 Objectives 20
 Key Words 20
 Introduction 21
 Evolution of the
Dental X-ray
Machine 21
 Dental X-ray
Machine
Components 21
 Electricity 24
 The X-ray Tube 26
 A Summary of the
Principles of X-ray
Tube Operation 27
 The X-ray Beam 28
 Operation of the
Dental X-ray
Machine 28
 Review, Recall,
Reflect, Relate 29
 References 31
CHAPTER
3
KEY WORDS
CHAPTER 3 • THE DENTAL X-RAY MACHINE: COMPONENTS AND FUNCTIONS 21
Introduction
At the time of exposure, the radiographer who activates the exposure button is responsible for the radiation dose the patient
incurs. The role of exposing dental radiographs is an important
one for the dental assistant and dental hygienist, making it essential that these professionals understand how the x-ray machine
works to produce ionizing radiation. To operate dental x-ray
equipment safely and competently, the radiographer needs to
develop a base knowledge of the components of the dental x-ray
machine and possess an understanding of how these components
work together to produce ionizing radiation. The purpose of this
chapter is to discuss the conventional dental x-ray machine, its
components, and its functions.
Evolution of the Dental X-ray Machine
Improvements in early x-ray generating machines began to
occur after the dangers of radiation exposure became evident.
The Coolidge hot cathode vacuum tube, invented by Dr. W. D.
Coolidge in 1913, improved the previous erratic radiation output
of earlier machines. Then during the mid-1950s, variable kilovoltage machines were introduced that allow for different penetrating abilities of the x-beam. In 1966, the recessed PID was
introduced (Figure 3-1). On x-ray machines of conventional
design, the x-ray tube is located in the front section of the tube
head; on those using a recessed design, the x-ray tube is located
in the back of the tube head. This configuration allows for a
sharper image. (The role a longer x-ray tube-to-object distance
plays in producing sharp images will be discussed in Chapter 4.)
In 1974, the federal government began regulating the manufacture and installation of all dental x-ray machines. State and
local governing agencies also set guidelines on the safe installation and use of dental x-ray equipment. New technology
employing miniaturized solid-state transformers and rare-earth
materials for filtration of the x-ray beam have also contributed
to the development of a modern dental x-ray machine that is
safe, compact, easy to position, and simple to operate.
Dental X-ray Machine Components
Although dental x-ray machines vary in size and appearance, they
have similar structural components (Figure 3-2). The dental x-ray
machine typically consists of three parts:
1. The control panel, which contains the regulating devices
2. The extension arm or bracket, which enables the tube
head to be positioned
3. The tube head, which contains the x-ray tube from which
x-rays are generated
A B
FIGURE 3-1 Comparison of conventional and recessed tube position within the tube head.
(A) Conventional position with tube in front of tube head. Note how quickly the x-ray beam pattern
flares out. (B) With a recessed tube a relatively more parallel x-ray beam is produced. This will produce a
sharper radiographic image.
Kinetic energy
Line switch
Milliampere (mA)
Polychromatic
Port
Primary beam
Quality
Quantity
Tungsten
Useful beam
Volt (V)
Voltage
Voltmeter
X-ray tube
Yoke
Radiator
Step-down transformer
Step-up transformer
Target
Thermionic emission
Timer
Transformer
Tube head
22 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE AND RADIATION BASICS
Folding extension arm
Handle for ease of
directing the horizontal
angulation
Control panel key pad
Digital sensor in holder
Dial for reading the
vertical angulation
of tube head
Yoke rotates 360°
horizontally at this point
Open-ended position
indicating device (PID)
FIGURE 3-2 Typical wall-mounted dental x-ray machine. (Image courtesy of Progeny,
A Midmark Company)
Control Panel
The electric current enters the control panel either through a
cord plugged into a grounded outlet in the wall or through a
direct connection to a power line in the wall. The control panel
may be integrated with the extension arm and tube head for ease
of access during exposures (Figure 3-3), or it may be remote
FIGURE 3-3 Control panel integrated with tube head
support. (Image courtesy of Gendex Dental Corporation)
from the unit, mounted on a shelf or wall (Figure 3-4). One
control panel may serve two or more tube heads. In the past
dental x-ray machines were readily available with variable milliamperage and kilovoltage controls of the incoming electricity
that the operator would manually adjust (Figure 3-5). Increasingly more common are dental x-ray machines with these controls preset by the manufacturer (Figure 3-6). If the milliamperage
and the kilovoltage are preset by the manufacturer, the control
panel will indicate at what variables these units are preset. Five
major controls may be operated or will be preset on dental x-ray
machines: (1) the line switch to the electrical outlet, (2) the
milliampere selector, (3) the kilovoltage selector, (4) the timer,
and (5) the exposure button. The function of each of these is
discussed next.
LINE SWITCH The line switch on the control panel of the
dental x-ray machine may be a toggle switch that can be
flicked on or off with light finger pressure, or it may be an
ON/OFF push button or a keypad (Figure 3-5). It is generally
located on the side or face of the cabinet or control panel. In
the ON position, this switch energizes the circuits in the control panel, but not the low- or high-voltage circuits to the transformers. An indicator light turns on, indicating the machine is
operational.
MILLIAMPERE (mA) SELECTOR The milliampere measures
the amount of current passing through the wires of the circuit. The
amperage is set by turning a selector knob, depressing the marked
push button, or touching a keypad. (Figure 3-5). On a dental x-ray
machine with the amperage preset, its activation is connected
CHAPTER 3 • THE DENTAL X-RAY MACHINE: COMPONENTS AND FUNCTIONS 23
directly to the ON/OFF switch. The amperage determines the
available number of free electrons at the cathode filament and,
therefore, the amount of x-rays that will be produced.
KILOVOLT PEAK (kVp) SELECTOR The voltmeter measures the
difference in potential or voltage across the x-ray tube. A kilovolt
peak (kVp) selector in the form of a dial, push button, knob, or
keypad enables the operator to change the peak kilovoltage
(Figure 3-5). On a dental x-ray machine with the kVp preset, its
activation is connected directly to the ON/OFF switch. The kVp
determines the speed of electrons traveling toward the target on the
anode and, therefore, the penetrating ability of the x-rays produced.
FIGURE 3-4 Control panel mounted in protected area.
1 23 4 5 6 7 8 9
FIGURE 3-5 Control panel of a dental x-ray machine that
allows for manual adjustment of exposure variables. (1) Exposure
button holder, (2) main ON/OFF switch, (3) mA control, (4) x-ray
tube selector (this master control accommodates three remote tube
heads), (5) power ON light, (6) x-ray emission indicator light,
(7) timer control, (8) kVp meter, (9) kVp control. This control panel
allows the operator to choose settings of 50 kVp to 90 kVp at 15 mA,
and 50 kVp to 100 kVp at 10 mA.
TIMER The timer is set by turning the selector knob, depressing the marked push button, or touching a keypad (Figure 3-6).
The timer serves to regulate the duration of the interval that the
current will pass through the x-ray tube. Dental x-ray machines
are equipped with accurate electronic timers. Timer settings
may be in fractions of a second or impulses. There are 60 impulses
in a second. For example, a 1/10th of a second exposure lasts 6
impulses, 1/5th of a second lasts 12 impulses, and so forth.
X-ray machines with electronic digital timers are accurate to
1/100th of a second intervals and work well with digital radiography systems. The time selected determines the duration of the
exposure.
FIGURE 3-6 Operator setting the exposure time. The display
indicates 16 impulses. Note the preset milliamperage and kilovoltage
values.
24 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE AND RADIATION BASICS
FIGURE 3-7 Exposure button on the handle of the timer
cord. Operator is exposing a panoramic radiograph from behind
a lead-lined glass window.
EXPOSURE BUTTON Depressing the exposure button or keypad activates the x-ray production process. The exposure button
may be located on the handle of the timer cord (Figure 3-7) or at
a remote location in a protected area (Figure 3-4). If the exposure
button is located on the end of the timer cord, the cord must be
sufficiently long to enable the operator to step into an area of protection from radiation, usually at least 6 ft (1.83 m) from the
source of the x-ray beam. Because the possibility exists that the
operator may not utilize the full length of the timer cord to be
safely protected from the x-rays generated, an exposure switch
permanently mounted to the control panel or wall in a protected
area is preferred. In fact, many state regulations now require that
the exposure button be permanently mounted in a protected area.
Older x-ray machines equipped with exposure buttons on timer
cords must be modified to attach the exposure button to an
unmovable, permanent mount to meet this requirement.
All dental x-ray machines are required to be equipped with a
“dead-man” exposure switch that automatically terminates the
exposure when the operator’s finger ceases to press on the timer button. This makesit necessary to maintain firm pressure on the button
during the entire exposure. Failure to do so results in the formation
of an insufficient number of x-rays to properly expose the image
receptor (film or digital sensor). When the exposure button is activated, the operator will hear an audible beep (required by law) that
indicates x-rays are being generated. Additionally, exposure buttons installed directly on the control panel allow the operator to
observe a light indicating that x-rays are being generated.
The manufacturing trend is toward simpler and automated
controls. In addition to preset milliamperage and kilovoltage,
many dental x-ray machines now have a default timer that automatically resets itself and does not have to be altered unless a
change in the exposure time is desired. Also available are programmable preset exposure settings that the operator can select
directly from the tube head for quickly changing the settings
chairside (Figure 3-3).
Extension Arm
The folding extension arm is a support from which the tube
housing is suspended (Figure 3-2). The extension arm allows
for moving and positioning the tube head. The extension arm is
hollow to permit the passage of electrical wires from the control panel to the tube head from one or both sides at a point
where the tube head attaches to the yoke. The tube head is
attached to the extension arm by means of a yoke that can
revolve 360 degrees horizontally where it is connected. In addition, the tube head can be rotated vertically within the yoke. All
sections of the extension arm and yoke are heavily insulated to
protect the patient and the operator from electrical shock.
Tube Head (Tube Housing)
The tube head (sometimes called tube housing; Figure 3-8) is a
tightly sealed heavy metal (usually cast aluminum), lead-lined
housing that contains the dental x-ray tube, insulating oil, and
step-up and step-down transformers. The metal housing performs
several important functions:
1. Protects the x-ray tube from accidental damage
2. Increases the safety of the x-ray machine by grounding its
high-voltage components (the x-ray tube and the transformers) to prevent electrical shock
3. Prevents overheating of the x-ray tube by providing a
space filled with oil, gas, or air to absorb the heat created
during the production of x-rays
4. Lined with lead to absorb any x-rays produced that do not
contribute to the primary beam that exits through the port
in the direction of the position indicating device (PID)
Older dental x-ray machine tube heads are heavy and bulky.
The trend is toward using lighter weight materials and miniaturized solid-state components. Reducing the size and the weight
of the tube head helps make it easier for the operator to position.
Electricity
Because electricity is needed to produce dental x-rays, an
understanding of basic electrical concepts is necessary. Electricity can be defined as electrons in motion. An electric current is a movement of electrons through a conducting medium
(such as copper wire). Electric current can flow in either
direction along a wire or conductor. It can flow steadily in one
direction (direct current) or flow in pulses and change directions
(alternating current).
PRACTICE POINT
After use, the extension arm bracket should be folded into a
neutral, closed position. The tube head is finely counterbalanced in its suspension from the extension arm. This balance
can be disturbed if the tube head is left suspended for prolonged time periods with the extension arm stretched out.
This may lead to instability and tube head drifting.
CHAPTER 3 • THE DENTAL X-RAY MACHINE: COMPONENTS AND FUNCTIONS 25
Direct Current
Direct current (DC) flows continuously in one direction. The
unidirectional current is similar to that used in flashlight batteries. Direct current dental x-ray machines are well suited for use
with digital imaging (see Chapter 9).
Alternating Current
The household current used in the United States is a 110-V or
220-V, 60-cycle alternating current (AC), which changes its
direction of flow 60 times per second (Figure 3-9). The alternating current has two phases—one positive and the other negative—
and alternates between these phases.
Electrical Circuit
The path the electricity flows is called an electrical circuit. Two
electrical circuits are used in producing dental x-rays.
1. A filament circuit provides low voltage (3–8 V) to the filament of the x-ray tube to generate a source of electrons
needed for the production of x-rays.
2. A high-voltage circuit provides the high voltage (60–100
kV) necessary to accelerate the electrons from the cathode
filament to the anode target.
Transformers
A transformer is an electromagnetic device for changing the
current coming into the dental x-ray machine. Transformers are
required to decrease (step down) or increase (step up) the ordinary 110-V or 220-V current that enters the x-ray machine. The
step-down and step-up transformers are located in the tube head.
Step-down Transformer
A step-down (low-voltage) transformer decreases the voltage
from the wall outlet to approximately 5 V, just enough to heat
the filament and form an electron cloud.
Step-up Transformer
A step-up (high-voltage) transformer increases the voltage
from the wall outlet to approximately 60–100 kVp to propel the
electrons toward the target. The high-voltage current begins to
flow through the cathode–anode circuit when the exposure button on the line switch is depressed.
Autotransformer
An autotransformer, located in the control panel, is a voltage
compensator that corrects minor fluctuations in the current
flowing through the wires.
High-voltage
transformer
X-ray
Oil
Port Low-voltage
transformer
X-rays
Filter
PID
Collimator
Primary beam
Tube
head
Central ray
Focusing
cup
Electron
cloud
Tungsten
target Anode
Copper
stem
Cathode
X-ray
Filament
Window
Vacuum
Radiator
FIGURE 3-8 Dental x-ray tube head, containing x-ray tube, transformers, and oil. When an electric current is
applied to the high-voltage circuit (between the cathode and the anode), the boiled off electrons are propelled from
the cathode to the target on the anode, producing heat and x-rays. Although x-rays are emitted in all directions,
because of the 20-degree angle of the anode target most of the x-rays travel through the window toward the port
opening. These x-rays make up the primary x-ray beam. The central ray is the x-ray in the center of the primary beam.
26 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE AND RADIATION BASICS
A kilovolt equals 1,000 V and is abbreviated kV. The voltage
varies during an exposure, producing a polychromatic beam
(x-rays of many different energies) containing high-energy
rays and also containing soft rays that have barely enough
energy to escape from the tube. The highest voltage to which
the current in the tube rises during an exposure is called the
kilovolt peak (kVp). So if the x-ray machine controls are set at
75 kVp (75,000 V), the maximum x-ray energy that can be
produced during this exposure is 75 kVp. Dental x-ray
machines typically operate within a range of 60 kVp to 100
kVp. The setting will vary by manufacturer and is usually preset, although some x-ray machines allow the operator to choose
the setting best suited for the exposure.
The X-ray Tube
X-rays are produced when a stream of high-speed electrons are
suddenly stopped or slowed down and diverted off course.
Three conditions must exist for x-rays to be produced:
1. An available source of free electrons
2. High voltage to impart speed to the electrons
3. A target that is capable of stopping/slowing the electrons
The x-ray tube and the circuits within the machine are designed
to create these conditions. The x-ray tube, located inside the
tube head, is a glass bulb from which the air has been pumped
to create a vacuum. A cathode (the negative electrode) and an
anode (the positive electrode) are sealed within the vacuum
tube, and the two protruding arms of the electrodes permit the
passage of the current through the tube with minimum resistance.
The electrical terms amperage, the measurement of the
number of electrons moving through a wire conductor, and
voltage, the measurement of electrical force that causes electrons to flow through a conductor, will be used to describe the
x-rays generated.
Amperage
Amperage measures the number of electrons that move
through a conductor. The ampere (A) is the unit of quantity of
electric current. An increase in amperage results in an increase
in the number of electrons that is available to travel from the
cathode to anode when the tube is activated. This results in a
production of more x-rays. Only a small current is required to
generate a number of electrons necessary to produce dental
x-rays; therefore, the term milliampere (mA), denoting 1/1,000th
of an ampere, is used. Dental x-ray machines typically operate
in ranges from 4 to 15 mA. The setting will vary by manufacturer and is usually preset, although some x-ray machines
allow the operator to choose the setting best suited for the
exposure.
Voltage
Voltage or volt (V) is the electrical pressure (sometimes called
potential difference) between two electrical charges. In the
production of x-rays the voltage determines the speed of the
electrons when traveling from cathode to anode. This speed of
the electrons, in turn, determines the energy (penetrating
power) of the x-rays produced. When the voltage is increased,
the electrons travel faster and produce a harder type of radiation. Because dental x-ray machines operate at very high voltages, it is customary to express voltage in terms of kilovolts.
90
70
50
90
70
50
kVp 0
1 impulse
sec
sec
Time
1
120 1
60
x-rays x-rays
no
x-rays
no
x-rays
FIGURE 3-9 Sine wave of 60-cycle alternating current
operating at 90,000 V (90 kVp). Ordinary household electric
current is called 60-cycle alternating current because the current
changes its direction of flow 60 times a second. During the time
that the x-ray tube is producing x-rays, the cathode and the anode
each change from negative to positive 60 times per second.
The crest of the wave represents the maximum voltage when the
current is moving in one direction, while the trough of the wave
represents the maximum voltage when the current is moving in
the other direction. The total cycle takes place in 1/60 sec.
This alternation in current direction occurs every 1/120 sec (twice
during each full cycle) on x-ray machines using alternating
current, producing x-rays in a series of bursts, or impulses, rather
than in a continuous flow.
CHAPTER 3 • THE DENTAL X-RAY MACHINE: COMPONENTS AND FUNCTIONS 27
In most dental x-ray tubes, the space between the electrodes is
less than 1 in. (25.4 mm; Figure 3-10).
Cathode
The purpose of the cathode is to supply the electrons necessary
to produce x-rays. The cathode, or negative electrode, consists
of a thin, spiral filament of tungsten wire. This filament wire,
when heated to incandescence (red hot and glowing), produces
the electrons (Figure 3-11). This process is known as thermionic
emission. A familiar example of this phenomenon is the tungsten electric lightbulb. Tungsten’s high atomic number makes it
possible to liberate electrons, through thermionic emission,
from their orbital shells when the metal is heated. The released
electrons form an electron cloud around the wire. The wire filament is recessed into a molybdenum focusing cup, which
directs the electrons toward the target on the anode (Figure 3-12).
The milliamperage setting accurately controls the thermionic
emission and therefore controls the quantity of free electrons
available.
Anode
The kilovoltage imparts speed to the electrons sending them
flying across the tube from cathode to anode. The purpose of
the anode is to provide the target to stop or significantly slow the
high-velocity electrons, converting their kinetic energy into x-rays
(electromagnetic energy). The anode, or positive electrode, consists of a copper bar with a tungsten plate imbedded in the end
that faces the focusing cup of the cathode. This tungsten plate,
called the target, is set into the copper at an angle of 20 degrees
to the cathode. This angle directs most of the x-rays produced
in one direction to become the primary beam. The focal spot
is a small rectangular area on the target of the anode to which
the focusing cup directs the electron beam. In Chapter 4 we will
see that the smaller the focal spot, the sharper the radiographic
image.
In summary, when the tube is in operation, a cloud of electrons first forms around the filament wire of the cathode as the
tube warms. Then, when the high-voltage current is applied, these
electrons are attracted and electrically charged to propel toward
the focal spot on the target.
A Summary of the Principles of X-ray
Tube Operation
Before x-ray production can begin, the machine must be turned
on. If not preset by the manufacturer, the radiographer must set
the correct mA and kVp by adjusting the dials on the control
panel. The radiographer will then set the correct exposure time.
The process of x-ray production is initiated by firmly pressing
the exposure button. This permits the current to enter the filament circuit of the x-ray machine. A step-down transformer
reduces the voltage before it enters the filament circuit and heats
the filament of the cathode to incandescence, separating electrons from their atoms. The degree to which the filament is
heated depends on the milliamperage setting: The higher the
mA, the more electrons in the electron cloud. These electrons
are now in a state of excitation as they hover around the tungsten
filament recessed in the molybdenum focusing cup. After just a
FIGURE 3-10 Dental x-ray tube.
Hot
object
Electron
cloud
Electron emission from hot object
FIGURE 3-11 Cross section of a filament wire. The filament
wire in the cathode is heated to incandescence. The attached electrons
are literally boiled out of the wire and become available as a source
of free electrons necessary for x-ray production. The milliamperage
setting determines the number of electrons available to be accelerated
across to the target of the anode.
Focusing cup
(reflector)
Hot filament
− emitting
electrons
− Electron beam
FIGURE 3-12 Formation of electron beam by focusing cup.
A focusing cup, within the cathode structure into which the filament
is placed, focuses the electron beam in a similar manner as light is
focused by a flashlight reflector. When the high-voltage circuit is
activated, the free electrons are accelerated toward the focal spot on
the anode target.
28 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE AND RADIATION BASICS
fraction of a second time delay, the line current enters the cathode–anode high-voltage circuit. A step-up transformer then
increases the voltage to impart sufficient force to propel the free
electrons toward the focal spot on the target at the anode. These
high-velocity electrons are stopped or slowed when they collide
with the tungsten atoms in the target resulting in the production of
general radiation (bremsstrahlung) and/or characteristic radiation. (This process is explained fully in Chapter 2.) The kinetic
energy (the high-velocity electrons) is converted into approximately 1 percent x-ray energy. The other 99 percent of the
kinetic energy generated is lost as heat energy.
The metal tungsten (symbol W and atomic number 74;
also known as wolfram) is ideally suited for use in the filament
and target because it can withstand extremely high temperatures (melting point 3370°C). Because it is subjected to such
extreme heat and has low thermal conductivity, the tungsten
plate is imbedded in a core of copper. Copper is highly conductive and carries the heat generated off to the radiator, which is
just outside the tube (refer to the tube diagram in Figure 3-8).
The large mass of copper conducts the heat out of the tube into
a radiator that transfers the heat to the oil, gas, or air that surrounds the tube.
Although the target is set into the copper at an angle to
direct most of the x-rays toward the window (a thin area in the
glass tube) located at a point where the emission of x-rays is
most intense, some x-rays are emitted out in all directions within
the tube housing. These x-rays are absorbed by the glass tube,
oil, air, wires, transformers, and the tube head lining. If the tube
head is properly sealed, the port (an opening in the tube housing) is the only place through which the x-rays can escape the
tube head (Figure 3-8). The port is covered by a permanent seal
of glass, beryllium, or aluminum. The PID (position indicating
device) fits over the port and can be moved to aim the primary
beam of x-rays in the desired direction. After completion of the
predetermined exposure, the high-voltage current is automatically shut off, and x-ray production stops.
The X-ray Beam
X-rays are produced in 360-degree direction at the focal spot of
the target. However, because of the angle of the anode, a high
concentration of x-rays travels toward the port opening of the
tube head. Only a beam of radiation the size of the port seal is
allowed to exit the tube head. The other x-rays are stopped
(absorbed) by the contents and walls of the tube head. After the
beam exits through the port, the lead collimator (explained in
Chapter 6) further restricts the x-ray beam to the desired size.
The x-ray beam is cone shaped because x-rays travel in
diverging straight lines as they radiate from the focal spot. This beam
of x-rays is called the primary beam or the useful beam. The primary beam is the original useful beam of x-rays that originates
at the focal spot and emerges through the port of the tube head.
The central ray is the x-ray in the center of the primary beam.
The x-ray beam formed at the focal spot is polychromatic,
consisting of x-rays of various wavelengths. Only x-rays with
sufficient energy to penetrate oral structures are useful for
diagnostic dental radiographs. X-rays of low penetrating power
(long wavelength) add to the patient dose but not to the information recorded on the image receptor. To remove the soft xrays, a thin sheet of aluminum called a filter is placed in the
path of the x-ray beam (explained in Chapter 6).
The intensity of the x-ray beam refers to the quantity and
quality of the x-rays. Quantity refers to the number of x-rays in
the beam. Quality refers to the energy strength or penetrating
ability of the x-ray beam (see Chapter 4). Intensity is defined as
the product of the number of x-rays (quantity) and the energy
strength of the x-rays (quality) per unit of area per unit of time.
Intensity of the x-ray beam is affected by milliamperage (mA),
kilovoltage (kVp), exposure time, and distance.
Operation of the Dental X-ray Machine
The specific steps to safe and effective use of a dental x-ray
machine are outlined in the operating manual provided by
the manufacturer. All persons operating an x-ray machine
should study the manual until they are thoroughly familiar
with the operational capability and maintenance requirements of the machine. To achieve consistent results, the radiographer should follow a systematic and orderly procedure
(Procedure Box 3-1). Additionally, whenever x-ray exposures
are made on patients, it is assumed here and in all subsequent
instructions that:
• The radiographer is competent and can follow radiation
safety protocol. (Some states require anyone placing and
exposing dental radiographs to successfully complete a
training course in radiation safety and protection protocols.)
• The radiographer performs all radiographic procedures in
accordance with federal, state, and local regulations and
recommendations.
• Infection control is maintained throughout the procedure
(see Chapter 10).
• The procedure has been explained, and the patient has
given consent.
• The patient has received verbal instructions and is able to
cooperate with the procedure.
• Image receptor holding devices are utilized for all intraoral
radiographs.
PRACTICE POINT
For maximum effectiveness in exposing dental radiographs,
prepare the patient and the x-ray equipment and set the
controls on the x-ray unit prior to positioning the image
receptor in the oral cavity. Following an orderly sequence
reduces the likelihood of errors and retakes.
CHAPTER 3 • THE DENTAL X-RAY MACHINE: COMPONENTS AND FUNCTIONS 29
1. Turn power on. A light on the control panel will indicate that the machine is ready to
operate.
2. Unless preset by the manufacturer, select mA and kVp best suited for the exposure to be
made.
3. Set timer for the desired exposure time.
4. Place the image receptor into the holding device and position in the patient’s oral cavity.
5. Utilizing the extension arm and yoke, adjust the tube head by aligning the PID so that the
central beam of radiation is directed toward the center of the image receptor at the appropriate horizontal and vertical angulations.
6. Establish appropriate protected location from the tube head.
7. Depress exposure button and hold it down firmly until the exposure is completed. The audible signal and x-ray exposure indicator light will activate for the duration of the exposure.
8. Remove the image receptor and holder from the patient’s oral cavity after the exposure.
9. When the procedure is complete, fold the tube head support extension arm into the closed,
neutral position.
10. Turn off the power to the x-ray machine.
PROCEDURE 3-1
Operation of the dental x-ray machine
REVIEW—Chapter summary
All x-ray machines, regardless of size and voltage range, operate similarly and have the same components (control panel,
extension arm, and tube head) and electrical parts (x-ray tube,
low- and high-voltage circuits, and a timing device).
The control panel may be integrated with the x-ray
machine tube head support, or it may be remote from the unit,
mounted on a shelf or wall. There are five major controls, some
of which will be preset by the manufacturer or may be selected
by the operator: (1) the line switch to the electrical outlet, (2) the
milliampere selector, (3) the kilovoltage selector, (4) the timer,
and (5) the exposure button.
A folding extension arm is a support from which the tube
housing is suspended. The tube head is a tightly sealed heavy
metal housing that contains the dental x-ray tube, insulating oil,
and step-up and step-down transformers.
Three conditions must exist to produce x-rays: (1) a source
of free electrons, (2) high voltage to accelerate them, and (3) a
target to stop them. The dental x-ray tube creates these conditions. X-rays are produced only when the unit is turned on and
a firm pressure is maintained on the exposure button.
Electric current flows into the x-ray machine and proceeds
either through the step-down transformer or the step-up transformer. The step-down transformer reduces the electric current
from the wall outlet to heat up the filament inside the focusing
cup of the cathode (negative) side of the tube. Thermionic emission results in freed electrons available to make x-rays. The step-up
transformer increases the electric current to impart kinetic energy
to the freed electrons to cause them to propel across the tube to
strike the target (at the focal spot) on the anode (positive) side of
the tube.
The degree to which the filament is heated and, therefore, the
quantity of electrons made available depends on the millamperage
setting. Quantity refers to the number of x-rays in the beam. The
higher the mA, the more electrons available. The penetrating ability or quality of the resultant x-rays is determined by the kilovoltage setting. The higher the kVp, the more penetrating the x-rays.
The beam of radiation that exits the port seal of the tube
head is the primary or useful beam. The polychromatic beam
must be filtered to allow only x-rays with sufficient energy to
reach the oral structures.
The radiographer must be familiar with the operation of
the machine, and the patient must understand the procedure and
provide consent. To achieve consistent results, the radiographer
should follow a systematic and orderly procedure.
RECALL—Study questions
1. Each of the following may be located on the control
panel EXCEPT one. Which one is the EXCEPTION?
a. mA selector
b. kVp selector
c. Focusing cup
d. Line switch
30 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE AND RADIATION BASICS
2. Which of the following activates the x-ray production
process?
a. Exposure button
b. Milliamperage
c. Voltmeter
d. Timer selector
3. The x-ray machine component that allows the operator
to position the tube head is called the
a. timer cord.
b. control panel.
c. dead-man switch.
d. extension arm.
4. Fill in the blanks.
a. 30 impulses = _____ second.
b. 45 impulses = _____ second.
c. 1/3 second = _____ impulses.
d. 1/10 second = _____ impulses.
5. To produce a larger quantity of electrons available to
produce x-rays, increase the
a. mA (milliamperage).
b. kVp (kilovoltage).
c. PID (position indicating device).
d. DC (direct current).
6. What term describes the electrical pressure (difference
in potential) between two electrical charges?
a. Amperage
b. Voltage
c. Ionization
d. Incandescence
7. Which term best describes an x-ray beam that is composed of a variety of energy wavelengths?
a. Collimated
b. Short-scale
c. Filtered
d. Polychromatic
8. List the three conditions that must exist for x-rays to be
produced.
a. ______________________
b. ______________________
c. ______________________
9. Draw and label the parts of the dental x-ray tube.
10. The process of heating the cathode wire filament until
red hot and electrons boil off is called
a. autotransformation.
b. self-rectification.
c. thermionic emission.
d. kilovoltage peak.
11. What metal is used for the target in the x-ray tube?
a. Copper
b. Tungsten
c. Aluminum
d. Molybdenum
12. Which of these must be charged negatively during the
time that the x-ray tube is operating to produce x-rays?
a. Radiator
b. Target
c. Anode
d. Cathode
13. Which of these changes the current coming into the
x-ray machine?
a. Transformer
b. Collimator
c. Radiator
d. Rectifier
14. What percent of the kinetic energy inside the x-ray
tube is converted into x-rays?
a. 1%
b. 50%
c. 75%
d. 99%
15. What term describes the opening in the tube housing that
allows the primary beam to exit?
a. Yoke
b. Filament
c. Port
d. Focusing cup
16. Which of the following removes the low-energy, longwavelength energy from the beam?
a. Transformer
b. Collimator
c. Filter
d. Radiator
17. After depressing the exposure button the radiographer
will hear an audible beep sound indicating that the
a. x-rays are being generated.
b. kilovoltage has reached the peak.
c. cathode and anode are reversing polarity.
d. alternating current has been transformed into direct
current.
REFLECT—Case study
To help you understand the practical use of altering exposure variables on a dental x-ray machine, consider the following patients
with these characteristics:
• A 9-year-old female, height 4′ 8” and weight 85 pounds,
who has been assessed for bitewing radiographs to determine the evidence of caries.
CHAPTER 3 • THE DENTAL X-RAY MACHINE: COMPONENTS AND FUNCTIONS 31
• A 21-year-old male college football player, height 6′ 1”,
280 pounds, who has been assessed for periapical radiographs of suspected impacted third molars.
• A 58-year-old female, diagnosed with Bell’s palsy with
slight head and neck tremors, who has been assessed for a
full mouth series for the evaluation of periodontal disease.
1. Would you select an increased or decreased amount of
radiation to produce diagnostic quality radiographic
images for each of these patients?
2. Which of these three exposure variables—milliamperage,
kilovoltage, or time—control(s) the amount of radiation
produced?
3. Which exposure variable would be the best choice to
alter to increase or decrease the amount of radiation
produced for each of these patients?
4. Would you select an increased or decreased penetrating ability of the x-ray beam to produce diagnostic
quality radiographic images for each of these patients?
5. Which of the three exposure variables—milliamperage,
kilovoltage, or time—control(s) the penetrating ability of
the x-ray beam?
6. Which exposure variable would be the best choice to
alter to increase or decrease the penetrating ability of the
x-ray beam?
7. Suppose that you wanted to decrease the amount of time of
the exposure, as may be needed when patient movement is
anticipated (as in the case of patient 3), but still wanted to
produce enough radiation to achieve a diagnostic quality
radiographic image. Which variable—milliamperage or
kilovoltage—would you adjust? Would you increase or
decrease this variable?
Think of other characteristics patients may present with that
would require you to adjust these x-ray machine variables. Keep
in mind that increasing one factor may necessitate decreasing
an opposing factor. Discuss the rationale for your choices.
RELATE—Laboratory application
For a comprehensive laboratory practice exercise on this topic,
see Thomson, E. M. (2012). Exercises in oral radiography
techniques: A laboratory manual 3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River,
NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. Chapter 1, “Introduction to Radiation Safety and Dental Radiographic Equipment”
REFERENCES
Bushberg, J. T., Seibert, J. A., Leidholdt, E. M., Jr., & Boone,
J. M. (2001). The essential physics of medical imaging
(2nd ed.). Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Carestream Health Inc. (2007). Exposure and processing for
dental film radiography. Rochester, NY: Author.
White, S. C., & Pharoah, M. J. (2008). Oral radiology. Principles and interpretation (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby
Elsevier
OBJECTIVES
Following successful completion of this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Define the key words.
2. Evaluate a radiographic image identifying the basic requirements of acceptability.
3. Differentiate between radiolucent and radiopaque areas on a dental radiograph.
4. Define radiographic density and contrast.
5. List the rules for casting a shadow image.
6. Differentiate between subject contrast and film contrast.
7. List the factors that influence magnification and distortion.
8. List the geometric factors that affect image sharpness.
9. Summarize the factors affecting the radiographic image.
10. Describe how mA, kVp, and exposure time affect image density.
11. Discuss how kVp affects the image contrast.
12. Explain target–surface, object–image receptor, and target–image receptor distances.
13. Demonstrate the practical use of the inverse square law.
KEY WORDS
Contrast
Crystal
Definition
Density
Distortion
Exposure chart
Exposure factors
Exposure time
Extraoral radiography
Film contrast
Focal spot
Geometric factors
Grid
Intensifying screen
Intraoral radiography
Inverse square law
Kilovoltage peak (kVp)
Long-scale contrast
Magnification
Milliampere (mA)
Milliampere/second (mAs)
Motion
Object–image receptor distance
Penumbra
Position indicating device (PID)
Radiographic contrast
Radiolucent
Radiopaque
Producing Quality
Radiographs
CHAPTER
OUTLINE
 Objectives 32
 Key Words 32
 Introduction 33
 Terminology 33
 Shadow Casting 34
 Factors Affecting
the Radiographic
Image 35
 Effects of Varying
the Exposure
Factors 39
 Effects of
Variations in
Distances 41
 Inverse Square
Law 42
 Exposure Charts 44
 Review, Recall,
Reflect, Relate 44
 References 46
CHAPTER
4
CHAPTER 4 • PRODUCING QUALITY RADIOGRAPHS 33
Introduction
Each patient presents with a unique set of characteristics for
which a customized approach to exposure settings is needed. The
dental radiographer has an ethical responsibility to produce the
highest diagnostic quality radiographs for patients who agreed to
be exposed to ionizing radiation. To consistently produce diagnostic quality radiographs at the lowest possible radiation dose,
the dental radiographer needs to understand the interrelationships of the components of the dental x-ray machine.
There are three basic requirements for an acceptable diagnostic radiograph (Figure 4-1).
1. All parts of the structures recorded must be imaged as close
to their natural shapes and sizes as the patient’s oral
anatomy will permit. Distortion and superimposition of
structures should be kept to a minimum.
2. The area examined must be imaged completely, with enough
surrounding tissue to distinguish between the structures.
3. The radiograph should be free of errors and show proper
density, contrast, and definition.
The quality of a radiograph depends on both the physical
factors and the subjective opinion of the individual who reads it.
The purpose of this chapter is to describe the physical attributes
of a quality radiographic image and to study the factors that
affect these attributes.
Terminology
The following terms should be used when describing radiographic images: radiolucent, radiopaque, density, contrast, and
sharpness.
When a film-based dental radiograph is viewed on a light
source and digital images are viewed on a computer monitor, the
image appears black and white, with various shades of gray in
between. The terms used to describe the black and white areas
are radiolucent and radiopaque, respectively.
Radiolucent
Radiolucent refers to that portion of the image that is dark or
black (Figure 4-1). Structures that appear radiolucent permit
the passage of x-rays with little or no resistance. Soft tissues
and air spaces are examples of structures that appear
radiolucent on a radiograph.
Radiopaque
Radiopaque refers to that portion of the image that is light or
white (Figure 4-1). Structures that appear radiopaque are dense
and absorb or resist the passage of x-rays. Enamel, dentin, and
bone are examples of structures that appear radiopaque on the
radiograph.
Radiolucent and radiopaque are relative terms. For instance,
even though both enamel and dentin are radiopaque, enamel is
more radiopaque (appears lighter) than dentin.
Three visual image characteristics that directly influence
the quality of the radiographic image are density, contrast, and
sharpness.
Density
Density is the degree of darkness or image blackening
(Figure 4-2). A radiographic image that appears light is said to
have little density. A radiographic image that appears dark is said
to be more dense. The blackness results when x-rays strike sensitive crystals in the film emulsion, and subsequent processing
causes the crystals to darken. When using a digital sensor, sensitive pixels capture the radiation, and “processing” by computer
software produces darker pixels. The degree of darkening of the
radiograph is increased when the milliamperage or the exposure
time is increased and more x-rays are produced to reach the
film emulsion or digital sensor.
Radiographs need just the right amount of density to be
viewed properly. If the density is too light or too dark, the images
FIGURE 4-1 An acceptable diagnostic radiograph.
Sharpness
Short-scale contrast
Subject contrast
Target–image receptor distance
Target–object distance
Target–surface distance
A B
FIGURE 4-2 Radiographic density. Radiograph (A) is
underexposed and appears too light (less dense). Radiograph (B) is
overexposed and appears too dark (more dense).
KEY WORDS
34 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE AND RADIATION BASICS
of the teeth and supporting tissues cannot be visually separated
from each other. The ideal radiograph has the proper amount of
density for the interpreter to view black areas (radiolucent),
white areas (radiopaque), and gray areas.
Contrast
Contrast refers to the many shades of gray that separate the
dark and light areas (Figure 4-3). An image with good contrast
will contain black, white, and enough shades of gray to differentiate between structures and their conditions. A radiograph
that shows just a few shades is said to have short-scale or high
contrast, whereas one that shows many variations in shade is said
to possess long-scale or low contrast.
The term short-scale contrast (also called high contrast;
Figure 4-4) describes a radiograph in which the density differences between adjacent areas are large. The contrast is high
because there are fewer shades of gray and more black against
white. The gray tones indicate the differences in absorption of
the x-ray photons by the various tissues of the oral cavity or the
head and neck region. The radiograph is radiolucent (dark)
where the tissues are soft or thin and radiopaque (white) where
the tissues are hard or thick. Such radiographs result when low
(60–70) kVp is applied.
The term long-scale contrast (also called low contrast;
Figure 4-4) describes a radiograph in which the density differences between adjacent areas are small. The contrast is low and
very gradual because there are many shades of gray. Such radiographs result when high (80–100) kVp is applied.
Sharpness
Sharpness/definition is a geometric factor that refers to the
detail and clarity of the outline of the structures shown on the
radiograph. Unsharpness is generally caused by movement of
the patient, image receptor, or tube head during exposure.
Digital imaging sharpness can be affected by pixel size and
distribution and will be discussed in Chapter 9.
Shadow Casting
A radiograph is a two-dimensional image of three-dimensional
objects. Therefore, it is necessary to apply the rules for creating a
shadow image to produce a quality radiographic image. The following rules for casting a shadow image will help to reproduce
the size and shape of the objects of the oral cavity accurately.
Rules for Casting a Shadow Image
1. Small focal spot: to reduce the size of the penumbra
(partial shadow around the objects of interest) resulting in
a sharper image and slightly less magnification
2. Long target-object distance: to reduce the penumbra and
magnification
3. Short object-image receptor distance: to reduce penumbra
and magnification
4. Parallel relationship between object and image receptor: to
prevent distortion of the image
5. Perpendicular relationship between the central ray of the
x-ray beam and both the object and the image receptor: to
prevent distortion of the image
Because x-rays belong to the same electromagnetic spectrum as
light (see Chapter 2), these two energies share many of the
same characteristics. Therefore, when considering the application of shadow cast rules, it is helpful to compare the shadows
cast by light with the shadows that x-rays will cast of the structures of the oral cavity. For example, if you were outside during
the morning hours when the sun was low on the horizon, the
60 kvp
Short scale contrast
100 kvp
Long scale contrast
FIGURE 4-3 Penetrometer tests demonstrate radiographically that
a longer contrast scale results from the use of 100-kilovolt exposures.
Dental radiographs exposed at 100 kVp have long-scale contrast.
Radiographs exposed at 60 kVp have short-scale contrast. (Courtesy of
General Electric Company, Medical Systems Division)
A B
FIGURE 4-4 Radiographic contrast. Radiograph
(A), exposed at 60 kVp, has high contrast. Radiograph
(B), exposed at 90 kVp, has low contrast.
CHAPTER 4 • PRODUCING QUALITY RADIOGRAPHS 35
sun’s rays would be directed at your body at a low angle, casting a shadow that was elongated, or longer than your actual
height. If you were outside at midday, when the sun was directly
overhead, the sun’s rays would be directed at your body at a
steep angle, casting a shadow that was foreshortened, or
shorter than your actual height. At some time during the day,
the sun’s light would be cast at the precise angle to your body
that your shadow on the ground would be at the same length as
your actual height. Directing a flashlight at an object, such as
the child’s game of producing hand puppet shadows, is another
example of shadow casting. Depending on the direction of the
flashlight beam alignment and the distance the light must travel
to reach the object, accurate or distorted shadow images result.
Shadow cast rules are often referred to as the geometric
factors that contribute to the quality of the radiographic image.
Geometric factors are those factors that relate to the relationships of angles, lines, points, or surfaces. Each of the shadow
cast rules will be discussed in detail as to its role in producing
quality radiographic images.
Radiographic Contrast
Radiographic contrast defined as the visible difference
between densities depends on the following variables.
1. Subject (types of tissues being imaged). The subject contrast is the result of differences in absorption of the x-rays
by the tissues under examination. The subject to be imaged
must have contrast. A radiograph of a 1-inch-thick sheet of
plastic would show no contrast because the plastic is of
uniform thickness and composition. Patients have contrast
because human tissues vary in size, thickness, and density.
2. Kilovoltage peak (kVp). There is an inverse relationship
between kVp and contrast (Figure 4-4). In relative terms,
higher kilovoltages produce lower contrast. The blacks are
grayer, the whites are grayer, and there are many shades (or
steps) of gray in between. Lower kilovoltages produce higher
contrast. The blacks are blacker, the whites are whiter, and
there are fewer shades (or steps) of gray in between.
3. Scatter radiation. In Chapter 2 we learned that Compton
scattering occurs whenever dental x-rays interact with matter such as the tissues of the patient’s head. These scattered
x-rays add a uniform exposure to the radiograph, thereby
decreasing the contrast. For intraoral radiography (inside
the mouth), a collimator (lead diaphragm) is used to keep
the beam size as small as possible to help reduce scatter
radiation. For extraoral radiography (outside the mouth),
grids are sometimes used to absorb scattered x-rays. A grid
is a mechanical device composed of thin strips of lead
alternating with a radiolucent material (plastic). The grid is
placed between the patient and the image receptor to
absorb scattered x-rays (see Figure 29-10).
4. Film/digital sensor type. Each film has its own inherent
(built-in) contrast that may vary by manufacturer. Digital
sensor pixel size and the effects on the image contrast and
density will be discussed in detail in Chapter 9.
5. Exposure. An underexposed or an overexposed radiograph
will result in diminished or poor contrast. Accidental exposure of the film to stray radiation or other conditions such as
heat and humidity will create film fog (Chapter 18). Fog is
the formation of a thin, cloudy layer that reduces the image
contrast. A radiograph that is too light, too dark, or fogged
will not have significantly different shades of gray to provide optimal contrast.
6. Processing. Maximum film contrast can only be obtained
through meticulous film processing procedures (Chapter
8). If improper development time or temperature is used,
the radiograph will not have the ideal contrast the manufacturer built into it.
Sharpness/Definition
Sharpness, also known as definition, refers to the clarity of the
outline of the structures on the radiograph. Radiographic image
sharpness depends on the following variables (see Table 4-2).
1. Focal spot size. As explained in Chapter 3, the focal spot is
the small area on the target where bombarding electrons are
Factors Affecting the
Radiographic Image
The dental radiographer must have a working knowledge of the
factors that affect the radiographic image. Although density is
important for producing the detail and visibility of a radiograph, it is the radiographic contrast and sharpness/definition
that interpretation and diagnosis of oral conditions depend on
(Table 4-1).
PRACTICE POINT
Some clinicians prefer the short-scale contrast radiographs
that result from a low kVp setting to diagnose caries and
long-scale contrast radiographs that result from a high kVp
setting to diagnose periodontal disease. In theory, shortscale contrast images should be better at showing a radiolucency (depicting evidence of decalcification indicating
caries) against radiopaque tooth enamel, whereas longscale contrast radiographs are purported to be better at
showing subtle changes (gray areas) indicating alveolar
bone changes. However, research indicates that both shortand long-scale contrast images perform equally well in
providing the clinician with the necessary information for
interpretation and diagnosis. The ideal level of contrast is
often a matter of individual preference.
36 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE AND RADIATION BASICS
TABLE 4-1 Summary of Factors Influencing Radiographic Image Contrast
FACTORS VARIABLES IMAGE CONTRAST
Subject thickness (different
tissues of the body)
Region with tissues of different densities
(enamel, dentin, pulp of the tooth)
Higher contrast between these
different tissues
Region with tissues of similar densities
(supporting alveolar bone)
Lower contrast between the
different areas of bone
kVp (kilovoltage peak) High kVp Lower contrast
Low kVp Higher contrast
Scatter radiation Increased scatter radiation (large beam diameter
used for intraoral radiographs/no grid used for
extraoral radiographs)
Lower contrast
.
Decreased scatter radiation (beam diameter
narrowed with collimation for intraoral
radiographs/grid used for extraoral radiographs)
Higher contrast
Image receptor type Different manufacturers Higher or lower contrast is inherent
and depends on the manufacturer
Exposure Under- or overexposure and film fog Each will lower contrast
Processing Accurate time-temperature processing followed
Inaccurate time-temperature processing followed
Adequate contrast
Lower or poor contrast
perfectly still during the exposure. Even slight vibration of
the tube head increases the size of the focal spot (Figure 4-7).
2. Target–image receptor distance. The target–image receptor distance is the distance between the source of x-ray production (which is at the target on the anode inside the tube
head) and the image receptor. PIDs are used to establish the
target–image receptor distance. PIDs are classified as being
short or long and come in standard lengths of 8 inches
(20.5 cm), 12 inches (30 cm), and 16 inches (41 cm) for
converted into x-rays. The smaller the focal spot area, the
sharper the image appears (Figure 4-5). A large focal spot
creates more penumbra (partial shadows) and therefore loss
of image sharpness (Figure 4-6). Ideally, the focal spot
should be a point source, then no penumbra would be present.
However, a single point source would create extreme heat
and burn out the x-ray tube. Focal spot size is determined by the manufacturer of the x-ray machine. To ensure
that the focal spot remains small, the tube head must remain
TABLE 4-2 Summary of Factors Influencing Radiographic Image Sharpness
FACTORS VARIABLES IMAGE SHARPNESS
Focal spot size Small focal spot Increase sharpness
Large focal spot Decrease sharpness
Target–image receptor distance Long target–image receptor distance Increase sharpness
Short target–image receptor distance Decrease sharpness
Object–image receptor distance Short object–image receptor distance Increase sharpness
Long object–image receptor distance Decrease sharpness
Motion No movement Sharp image
Movement Fuzzy image
Screen thickness Thin screen Increase sharpness
Thick screen Decrease sharpness
Screen–film contact Close contact Increase sharpness
Poor contact Decrease sharpness
Film crystal/pixel size Small crystals/pixels Increase sharpness
Large crystals/pixels Decrease sharpness
CHAPTER 4 • PRODUCING QUALITY RADIOGRAPHS 37
intraoral projections. The shorter the target–image receptor
distance, the more divergent the x-ray beam (Figure 4-8). A
long target–image receptor distance has x-rays in the center
of the beam that are nearly parallel. Therefore, the image on
the radiograph will be sharper. Also a longer target–image
receptor distance will result in less image magnification
(explained later in this chapter).
3. Object–image receptor distance. The object–image receptor distance is the distance between the object being radiographed (the teeth) and the dental x-ray image receptor
(film or digital sensor.) The image receptor should always be
placed as close to the teeth as possible. The closer the proximity of the image receptor to the teeth, the sharper the image
and the less magnification (image enlargement). The image
will become fuzzy (more penumbra) and magnified as the
object–image receptor distance is increased (Figure 4-6).
4. Motion. Movement of the patient and/or the image receptor in addition to the tube head results in a loss of image
sharpness (Figure 4-9).
5. Screen thickness. Intensifying screens (often referred to as
screens), used in extraoral radiography, are made of crystals
that emit light when struck by x-rays. The light, in turn,
exposes the film and helps to produce the image. Intensifying screens require less radiation to produce a radiographic
image than direct exposure film, resulting in less radiation
exposure to the patient. However, the use of intensifying
screens decreases the sharpness of the radiographic image
(Figure 4-10). The thicker the screen, the less radiation
required to expose the film. However, these thicker screens
produce a less sharp radiographic image. Generally, the
radiographer should use the highest speed screen and film
combination, determined by the thickness of the phosphor
FIGURE 4-5 Using a small focal spot on the target,
a long target–image receptor distance, and a short object–image
receptor distance will result in a sharp image.
Target
Object
Image receptor
Anode
Target
Object
Image receptor
Anode
FIGURE 4-6 Large focal spot on the target and long object–image
receptor distance results in more penumbra and loss of image
sharpness.
Anode Target
FIGURE 4-7 Movement of the tube head. Motion, even slight,
of the tube head will effectively create a larger surface area of the
focal spot, resulting in penumbra.
Target
Object
Image receptor
Anode
FIGURE 4-8 Large focal spot on the target and short target–image
receptor distance results in more penumbra and loss of image sharpness.
38 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE AND RADIATION BASICS
to avoid loss of image sharpness and yet maintain the maximum reduction in radiation exposure. Dental x-ray film is
explained in detail in Chapter 7.
Digital sensors (Chapter 9) use pixels (short for picture
element) that capture discrete units of information that the
computer then combines into a radiographic image. The
smaller the pixel size, the sharper the resultant image.
Magnification/Enlargement
Magnification or enlargement is the increase in size of the
image on the radiograph compared to the actual size of the
object. In Chapter 3, we learned that x-rays travel in diverging
straight lines as they radiate from the focal spot of the target.
Because of these diverging x-rays, there is some magnification present in every radiograph.
Magnification is mostly influenced by the target–object
distance and the object–image receptor distance. The target–object distance is determined by the length of the PID.
When a long PID is used, the x-rays in the center of the
beam are more parallel, resulting in less image magnification (Figure 4-11). The object–image receptor distance
should be kept to a minimum. Always place the film/sensor
as close to the teeth as possible, while maintaining a parallel
relationship between the long axes of the teeth and the plane
of the image receptor, to decrease magnification.
Increasing the target–object distance and decreasing
the object–image receptor distance will minimize image
FIGURE 4-9 Blurry, unsharp image caused by movement of the
patient, the image receptor, or the tube head.
Film Film
Protective coat
Active phosphor layer
Reflecting layer
Base
Screen
X-ray
A
X-ray
B
FIGURE 4-10 Screen thickness. X-ray A strikes a
crystal far from the film and the divergent light exposes a
wide area of the film, resulting in unsharpness. X-ray B
strikes a crystal close to the film, resulting in less
divergence of the light that exposes the film and therefore
a sharper image. The thicker the screen, the less sharp the
image.
PRACTICE POINT
The tube head must remain perfectly still during exposure.
Even slight vibration of the tube head increases the size of
the focal spot, which in turn produces an unsharp image.
layer, that is consistent with good diagnostic results. Intensifying screens are explained in detail in Chapter 29.
6. Screen–film contact. The film should be in close physical
contact with the intensifying screen. Poor screen–film contact results in the wider spread of light and fuzziness
(penumbra) of the image. Intensifying screens should be
examined periodically for proper functioning. Additionally, only one film should be placed in contact with the
screen. Attempting to make a duplicate image by placing
two films into one cassette is not acceptable practice unless
using a film type made especially for this purpose.
7. Crystal/pixel size of intraoral image receptors. X-ray
film emulsion contains crystals that are struck by x-rays
when exposed and in turn will produce the radiographic
image. Image sharpness is influenced by the size of these
crystals. Similar to the crystal size of intensifying screens,
the smaller the size of the crystals within the film emulsion, the sharper the radiographic image. However, small
crystal size contributes to a slow speed film, requiring the
patient to receive a larger dose of radiation. Film manufacturers strive to produce film with the smallest sized crystals
CHAPTER 4 • PRODUCING QUALITY RADIOGRAPHS 39
magnification. Note that these two shadow cast rules for
reducing magnification also increase image sharpness.
Distortion
Distortion is the result of unequal magnification of different
parts of the same object. Distortion results when the image
receptor is not parallel to the object (Figure 4-13) and/or
when the central ray of the x-ray beam is not perpendicular to
the object and the plane of the image receptor (Figure 4-14).
To minimize image distortion, the two shadow cast rules for
placement of the image receptor and x-ray beam positioning
Object
Image receptor
Image
Target Target
8″ (20.5 cm)
16″ (41 cm)
FIGURE 4-11 Magnification. Comparison of
8-in. (20.5-cm) and 16-in. (41-cm) target-object and
target–image receptor distances. The image is
magnified (enlarged) when these distances are
shortened.
PRACTICE POINT
When positioning the PID for intraoral exposures, it is important to place the open end of the PID as close as possible to (without
touching) the skin surface of the patient’s face. Image quality is improved when the target–surface distance is increased. However,
it is important to note that increasing the distance between the target and the skin surface of the patient is determined by the
length of the PID and not by positioning the PID a greater distance away from the patient (Figure 4-12). Positioning the open end
of the PID away from the skin surface of the patient’s face will result in a larger diameter of radiation exposure and an underexposed image.
must be followed. Rules 4 and 5 state that the plane of the
image receptor must be positioned parallel to the long axes of
the teeth, and the central ray of the x-ray beam must be
aligned perpendicular to both the image receptor and the
teeth.
Effects of Varying the Exposure Factors
Density and contrast have a tremendous influence on the diagnostic quality of the radiograph. The x-ray machine exposure
settings can affect both density and contrast (Table 4-3).
FIGURE 4-12 Correct and incorrect PID positioning. Left image illustrates the correct position of
the open end of the PID as close to the patient’s skin as possible. Right image illustrates an incorrect position
of the PID. This PID position will result in a greater beam diameter of exposure to the patient and will
produce an underexposed image.
40 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE AND RADIATION BASICS
Variations in Exposure Time
Exposure time is the interval that the x-ray machine is fully
activated and x-rays are produced. The principal effect of
changes in exposure time is on the density of the radiograph.
Increasing the exposure time darkens the radiograph, whereas
decreasing exposure time lightens it. Opinions differ on optimum density and contrast because visual perception varies from
person to person; some practitioners may prefer lighter radiographs, wherease others may prefer darker radiographs. Of the
three controls, exposure time is easiest to change. In fact, many
x-ray machines today have preset fixed milliamperage and
kilovoltage, so that time is the only exposure factor that can be
changed by the operator.
The milliamperage, exposure time, and kilovoltage are
known as the exposure, control, or radiation factors. Whenever
one of the exposure factors is altered, one or a combination of
the other factors must be altered proportionally to maintain
radiographic density. For example, exposure time will need to be
decreased when milliamperage or kilovoltage is increased to
maintain optimal image density.
Variations in Milliamperage (mA)
The amount of electric current used in the x-ray machine is
expressed in milliamperes (mA). The mA selected by the operator, or preset by the unit manufacturer, determines the quantity
or number of x-rays that are generated within the tube. The density of the radiograph is affected whenever the milliamperage is
changed. Increasing the mA increases (darkens) the density of
the radiograph, whereas decreasing the mA decreases (lightens) the density of the radiograph.
Target
Object
Image receptor
Anode
FIGURE 4-13 Object and image receptor are not parallel,
resulting in distortion.
Target
Object B
Image receptor
Object A
Anode
FIGURE 4-14 Central ray of x-ray beam is not perpendicular
to the objects and image receptor, resulting in distortion and overlapping of object A and object B. Note that object A is magnified
larger than object B because object A is a greater distance from the
image receptor than object B.
TABLE 4-3 Effect of Varying Exposure Factors on Image Density
EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENTa IMAGE DENSITY
Increase mA Darker
Decrease mA Lighter
Increase time Darker
Decrease time Lighter
Increase kVp Darkerb
Decrease kVp Lighterb
When any exposure factor is increased, or decreased, one or more of the other exposure factors must be
adjusted to maintain optimum image density.
Varying kVp primarily affects the image contrast, but it will also (secondarily) affect the image density.
Increase kVp for less contrast and decrease kVp for more contrast.
b
a
CHAPTER 4 • PRODUCING QUALITY RADIOGRAPHS 41
Milliampere/seconds (mAs)
Because both milliamperage and exposure time are used to regulate the number of x-rays generated and have the same effect on
radiographic density, they are often combined into a common factor called milliampere/seconds (mAs). Combining the milliamperage with the exposure time is an effective way to
determine the total radiation generated.
A simple formula for determining this total is: mA multiplied by the exposure time (in seconds or impulses) equals
mAs.
PROBLEM. Consider a practical problem using this formula.
Assume the following exposure factors are in use: 10 mA, 0.6
sec, 90 kVp, and 12-in. (30-cm) target–image receptor distance.
If the mA is increased to 15, but the kVp and target–image
receptor distance remain constant, what should the new exposure time be to maintain image density?
SOLUTION. The only exposure factor that was changed is the
mA, which was increased from 10 mA to 15 mA. We need to
compensate for the increase in mA by decreasing the exposure
time.
ANSWER. The new exposure time is 0.4 sec.
When the mA is increased, the exposure time must be
decreased to produce identical radiographic image density
between the first and second radiographs. A practical use for
applying this formula would be when patient movement is
anticipated—in this case, increasing the amount of radiation
produced, so that the duration of exposure could be shortened.
Variations in Kilovoltage (kVp)
The quality of the radiation (wavelength or energy of the x-ray
photons) generated by the x-ray machine is determined by the
kilovoltage peak (kVp). The more the kVp is increased, the
shorter the wavelength and the higher the energy and penetrating
power of the x-rays produced. Kilovoltage is the only exposure
factor that directly influences the contrast of a dental radiograph.
However, increasing the kVp will also increase the number
(quantity) of x-rays produced and therefore, increase the density
of the radiograph. As the kVp of the x-ray beam is increased for
the purpose of producing a lower contrast image, the density of
the radiograph is held constant by reducing the milliampere-seconds (mAs) or exposure time. Because the exposure time is usually the easiest exposure factor to change, the following rule
applies: When increasing the kVp by 15, for example from 70
kVp to 85 kVp, decrease the exposure time by dividing by 2;
when decreasing the kVp by 15, increase the exposure time by
multiplying by 2. One exposure factor balances the other to produce a radiographic image of acceptable density.
? sec. = 0.4 sec
? sec. = 6 mAs
15 mAs
15 mA * ? sec. = 6 mAs
10 mA * 0.6 sec. = 6 mAs
mA * s = mAs
mA * s = mAs
Effects of Variations in Distances
The operator must take into account several distances to produce the ideal diagnostic quality image:
• The distance between the x-ray source (at the focal spot on
the target) and the surface of the patient’s skin
• The distance between the object to be x-rayed (usually
the teeth) and the image receptor
• The distance between the x-ray source and the recording
plane of the image receptor
Various terms are used to describe these distances. The
terms target–surface (skin), anode–surface, tube–surface, and
source–surface are synonymous, as are target–image receptor,
anode–image receptor, and source–image receptor. In this text,
the terms target–surface distance, object–image receptor distance,
target–object distance, and target–image receptor distance are
used (Figure 4-15).
Target–Surface Distance
Generally, whenever the image receptor is positioned intraorally, the length of the target–surface distance depends on the
length of the position indicating device (PID) used. All intraoral techniques require the open end of the PID be positioned to
almost touch the patient’s skin to standardize the distance used
and the image density.
Object–Image Receptor Distance
The object–image receptor distance depends largely on the
method that is employed to hold the receptor in position next to
the teeth. When the bisecting technique is used (see Chapter 15),
the image receptor is pressed against the palatal or lingual tissues
as close as the oral anatomy will permit. This results in the
object–image receptor distance being shorter in the area of the
crown where the tooth and image receptor touch than in the area
of the root, where the thickness of the bone and gingiva may
cause a divergence between the long axis of the tooth and the
image receptor (Figure 4-16). The least divergence occurs in the
mandibular molar areas. The greatest divergence is in the maxillary anterior areas, where the palatal structures may curve sharply.
With the paralleling technique, most image receptor holders
are designed so that the receptor is held parallel to the long axis
of the tooth of interest. This necessitates positioning the receptor
sufficiently into the middle of the oral cavity, away from the
teeth, to avoid impinging on the supporting bone and gingival
structures. This technique results in object–image receptor distances that are often more than 1 in. (25 mm). The paralleling
technique compensates for this increased object–image receptor
distance by recommending an increase in the target–image
receptor distance (use a longer PID) to help offset the distortion,
explained next.
Target–Image Receptor Distance
The target–image receptor distance is the sum of the
target–object and the object–image receptor distance (Figure
4-15). The quality of the radiographic image improves whenever
the target–image receptor distance is increased. Magnification
42 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE AND RADIATION BASICS
Inverse Square Law
The x-ray photons, traveling in straight lines, spread out (diverge)
as they radiate away from the source (target). It follows that the
intensity of the beam is reduced as this occurs (Figure 4-17). How
much the beam intensity decreases is based on the inverse square
law, which states that the intensity of radiation varies inversely as
the square of the distance from its source.
is reduced, and sharpness of detail (definition) is increased.
Increasing the target-image receptor distance reduces the fuzzy
outline (penumbra) that is seen around the radiographic
images. Therefore, positioning the image receptor far enough
from the teeth to enable it to be held parallel and using a long
12-in. (30-cm) or 16-in. (41-cm) PID will increase the quality
of the image definition. These techniques are described in
detail in Chapter 13.
The location of the x-ray tube within the tube housing can
affect the target–image receptor distance. In the conventional
dental x-ray machine, the target (located on the anode within
the tube) is situated in the tube head in front of the transformers. The attached PID length can be visibly determined. When
the tube is recessed within the tube head, located behind the
transformers, enough space is gained within the tube head so
that a long target–image receptor distance is achieved even
though a short PID is in place (see Figure 3-1).
Target Radiation
beam
Target-surface distance
Target-object distance
Target-image receptor distance
ObjectImage
receptor distance
Skin surface
covering
cheek
Object
tooth Image receptor
Central ray
FIGURE 4-15 Distances. Relationship among target, skin surface, object (tooth), and image receptor
distance.
FIGURE 4-16 Object–image receptor distance. This placement of
the image receptor places the crown of the tooth closer to the receptor
than the root.
Image
receptor
Object tooth
Skin surface
covering cheek
Anode
D
2D
D
2D
FIGURE 4-17 Inverse square law. Relationship of distance (D)
to the area covered by x-rays emitted from the x-ray tube. X-rays
emerging from the tube travel in straight lines and diverge from each
other. The areas covered by the x-rays at any two points are
proportional to each other as the square of the distances measured
from the source of radiation.
CHAPTER 4 • PRODUCING QUALITY RADIOGRAPHS 43
The inverse square law may be written as:
where:
is the original intensity
is the new intensity
is the original distance
is the new distance
The inverse square law is applied when considering the distance between the source of radiation and the image receptor,
as in the length of the PID, and when considering the distance
between the source of radiation and the operator, as in where
the operator stands to maintain radiation protection during
exposure. The distance between the source of radiation and the
image receptor will have an affect on the image quality. When
changing the PID length, a corresponding change must occur in
the exposure time to maintain image density. It is important to
understand that the intensity of the radiation decreases by the
square of the distance increased.
Consider the following problem where distance is considered as a means of operator protection.
PROBLEM. A dental radiographer stands 3 feet (0.9 m) from
the source of radiation where the measured intensity is 100 milliroentgens (mR) per minute. The radiographer then moves to a
new location 6 ft (1.8 m) from the source of radiation. What is
the radiation intensity at the new location?
SOLUTION.
Find
ANSWER. The intensity at the new location is
25 mR/min.
In this case, the radiographer’s new location is a safer place
to stand during exposure because this new location at 6 ft away
from the source of radiation receives only one-fourth the exposure of the old location at 3 ft away for the source of radiation.
Consider the following problem where distance is considered when changing the length of the PID.
I2 = 25 mR per minute
¢ 1
4
≤ 100
I2
= 4
1 ¢ 1
4

100
I2
= 4
1
100
I2
= 22
12
100
I1
= 62
32
I2.
D2 = 6 ft
D1 = 3 ft
I1 = 100 mR/min
D2
D1
I2
I1
I1
I2
= 1D222
1D122
PROBLEM. A quality dental radiograph is obtained using an
8-in. (20.5-cm) PID and an exposure time of 3 impulses. The 8-
in. (20.5-cm) PID is removed from the tube head and replaced
with a 16-in. (41 cm) PID. What should the new exposure time
be to maintain image density of radiographs exposed at this
new target–image receptor distance?
We know that the radiation intensity at a distance of 16
inches (41 cm) will be less than the intensity at the old distance
of 8 inches (20.5-cm). Applying the inverse square law formula
we would see that the intensity of the radiation will have
decreased by the square of the distance, producing a radiographic image that would be less dense (lighter) than the original radiograph produced using an 8-in. (20.5-cm) PID. To
produce a radiograph of equal density using a 16-in. (41-cm)
PID, use the following modification of the inverse square law
formula to determine the new exposure setting:
where:
is the original exposure time (in impulses)
is the new exposure time (in impulses)
is the original distance
is the new distance
SOLUTION.
Find
ANSWER. The impulse setting required to maintain image
density at the new 16-in. (41-cm) source-to-image receptor
distance is 12 impulses.
Because the x-rays emerging from the tube travel in
straight lines and diverge from one another, it follows that the
intensity of the beam is reduced unless a corresponding
increase is made in one or a combination of the target–image
receptor distance exposure factors. Such changes in exposure
factors are essential to maintaining optimum image density.
Usually time is the easiest exposure factor to change. This formula is useful for obtaining the appropriate exposure time
when only the target–image receptor distance is altered.
I2 = 12 impulses
1423
I2
= 1142
4
3
I2
= 1
4
3
I2
= 12
22
3
I2
= 82
162
I2.
D2 = 16 inches
D1 = 8 inches
I1 = 3 impulses
D2
D1
I2
I1
I1
I2
= 1D122
1D222
44 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE AND RADIATION BASICS
exposure time and milliamperage is where
the mA is multiplied by the exposure time to determine the
millimaperage seconds. The formula for altering kilovoltage
is if increasing the kVp by 15, decrease the exposure time by
dividing by 2; if decreasing the kVp by 15, increase the exposure time by multiplying by 2.
When changing the PID length, the inverse square law is
used to adjust the exposure time to produce identical radiographic image density. This inverse square law states that the
intensity of radiation varies inversely as the square of the distance from its source. The inverse square law formula is
RECALL—Study questions
1. List the three criteria for acceptable radiographs.
a. ______________
b. ______________
c. ______________
2. Dense objects appear radiolucent because dense objects
absorb the passage of x-rays.
a. Both the statement and reason are correct and
related.
b. Both the statement and reason are correct but NOT
related.
c. The statement is correct, but the reason is NOT.
d. The statement is NOT correct, but the reason is
correct.
e. NEITHER the statement NOR the reason is correct.
3. The degree of darkening of the radiographic image is
referred to as
a. contrast.
b. definition.
c. density.
d. penumbra.
4. Which of the following describes the radiographic
image produced with a kVp exposure setting of 100?
a. Short scale
b. Long scale
c. High contrast
d. Low density
5. Image contrast is NOT affected by
a. processing procedures.
b. type of film.
c. scatter radiation.
d. milliamperage.
6. What factor has the greatest effect on image sharpness?
a. Movement
b. Filtration
c. Kilovoltage
d. Amperage
I1
I2
= 1D122
1D222
Exposure Charts mA * s = mAs,
Operators may memorize exposure factors needed for a particular technique; however, safety protocol dictates that exposure
charts, available commercially or custom made by the practice,
be posted at the x-ray unit control panel for easy reference. In
fact, in some locations regulations require that exposure charts
be posted. These charts show at a glance how much exposure
time is required for a film of any given speed or a digital sensor
when used with all possible combinations of exposure time,
milliamperage, and peak kilovoltage.
Some dental x-ray machine manufacturers have incorporated
the commonly used exposure factors into the dial of the control
panel. With these units, the operator only has to set the pointer to
the desired region to be examined, and the unit automatically sets
the required exposure factors.
REVIEW—Chapter summary
An acceptable diagnostic radiograph must show the areas of
interest—the designated teeth and surrounding bone structures—completely and with minimum distortion and maximum sharpness. When evaluating a radiographic image, the
oral health care professional should utilize appropriate scientific terminology such as density, contrast, sharpness, magnification, and distortion. The term radiolucent refers to the
dark or black portion of the image, whereas the term
radiopaque refers to the light or white portion of the image.
High-contrast images, those with black and white and few
shades of gray, are called short-scale, whereas low-contrast
images, those with grayer whites and grayer blacks with
many shades of gray, are called long-scale.
The detail and visibility of a radiograph depends on two
factors—radiographic contrast and sharpness/definition.
Radiographic contrast depends on: the subject (types of tissues
being imaged), kilovoltage peak (kVp) setting, scatter radiation, film/digital sensor type, exposure, and processing. Sharpness is determined by the geometric factors: focal spot size,
target–image receptor distance, object–image receptor distance, motion, screen thickness, and screen–film contact, and by
the crystal/pixel size of the image receptor.
To create a sharp image, the radiographer must follow the
rules for casting a shadow image: small focal spot, long
target–image receptor distance, short object–image receptor
distance, parallel relationship between object and image receptor, and perpendicular relationship between central ray of the xray beam and the object and image receptor. Image
magnification and loss of sharpness is further reduced by limiting movement of the tube head and PID, the patient, and the
image receptor during exposure.
Although not all dental x-ray units allow the operator to
manually alter all exposure factors, when available, the radiographer should take advantage of the ability to vary the
exposure factors to produce radiographs that have the desired
image qualities. When altering one exposure factor, a corresponding change must be made to another factor to produce
identical radiographic image density. The formula for altering
CHAPTER 4 • PRODUCING QUALITY RADIOGRAPHS 45
7. As crystals in the film emulsion increase in size, the
radiographic image sharpness increases because the
amount of radiation needed to expose the film at an
acceptable density decreases.
a. Both the statement and reason are correct and
related.
b. Both the statement and reason are correct but NOT
related.
c. The statement is correct, but the reason is NOT.
d. The statement is NOT correct, but the reason is correct.
e. NEITHER the statement NOR the reason is correct.
8. What term best describes a fuzzy shadow around the
outline of the radiographic image?
a. Magnification
b. Distortion
c. Detail
d. Penumbra
9. Distortion results when
a. object and image receptor are not parallel.
b. x-ray beam is perpendicular to the object and image
receptor.
c. using a short object–image receptor distance.
d. using a small focal spot.
10. The dental radiograph will appear less dense (lighter) if
one increases the
a. mA.
b. kVp.
c. exposure time.
d. target–image receptor distance.
11. The exposure factors used at an oral health care facility
are: 10 mA, 0.9 sec, 70 kVp, and 16-in. (41-cm)
target–image receptor distance. The radiographer
increases the mA to 15, but leaves the kVp and
target–image receptor distance constant. To maintain
identical image density, what should the new exposure
time be?
a. 0.3
b. 0.6
c. 1.2
d. 1.8
12. Which of the following is appropriate to increase radiographic contrast while maintaining image density?
a. Increase the kVp and increase the exposure time.
b. Increase the kVp and decrease the exposure time.
c. Decrease the kVp and increase the exposure time.
d. Decrease the kVp and decrease the exposure time.
13. Based on the inverse square law, what happens to the
intensity of the x-ray beam when the target–image
receptor distance is doubled?
a. Intensity is doubled.
b. Intensity is not affected.
c. Intensity is one-half as great.
d. Intensity is one-fourth as great.
14. A radiographer stands 4 ft (1.22 m) from the head of the
patient while exposing a dental radiograph. Her personnel
monitoring device measures the radiation dose at that
position to be 0.04 millisievert (mSv). The radiographer
decides to move to a new location 8 ft (2.44 m) from the
head of the patient. What is the dose at the new location?
a. 0.01 mSv
b. 0.02 mSv
c. 0.08 mSv
d. 0.16 mSv
15. A patient presents whose radiographs must be taken utilizing the bisecting technique. The radiographer decides
to replace the 16-in. (41-cm) PID with an 8-in. (20.5-cm)
PID to better accommodate the bisecting technique. Currently the impulse setting, with the 16-in. (41-cm) PID, is
12. To maintain image density, what will the new impulse
setting be with the 8-in. (20.5-cm) PID?
a. 3
b. 6
c. 24
d. 48
REFLECT—Case study
You have just been hired to work in a new oral health care facility. Prior to providing patient services, you are asked to help
develop exposure settings and equipment recommendations for
the practice. The equipment and image receptor manufacturers’
suggestions are as follows:
F Speed Film 8-in. (20.5-cm) PID 85 kVp
Bitewings
Impulses
Adult Child
Posterior 10 8
Anterior 6 4
Periapicals
Maxillary anterior 8 6
Maxillary premolar 12 8
Maxillary molar 14 10
Mandibular anterior 6 4
Mandibular premolar 8 6
Mandibular molar 10 8
1. You recommend that the facility replace the 8-in. (20.5-
cm) PID with a 16-in. (41-cm) PID. Develop a new exposure chart for using the new 16-in. (41-cm) PID.
2. You recommend using a kVp setting of 70 when exposing radiographs for the purpose of detecting caries.
Develop a new exposure chart for 70 kVp.
3. You recommend using a kVp setting of 100 when exposing radiographs for the purpose of evaluating supporting
bone and periodontal disease. Develop a new exposure
chart for 100 kVp.
46 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE AND RADIATION BASICS
REFERENCES
Carestream Health Inc. (2007). Exposure and processing for
dental film radiography. Rochester, NY: Author.
Thomson, E. M., & Tolle, S. L. (1994). A practical guide for
using radiographs in the assessment of periodontal disease,
Part I. Practical Hygiene, 3(1):11–16.
White, S. C., & Pharoah, M. J. (2008). Oral radiology: Principles and interpretation (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby
Elsevier.
RELATE—Laboratory application
Obtain an inanimate object of varying densities that can be
exposed at different exposure variables and compare the
results. For example expose a seashell placed on a size #2 intraoral film at the following exposure settings: 7 mA, 70 kVp, 10
impulses. Expose subsequent films varying one or more of the
exposure settings and process normally. Using a view box, analyze the resultant radiographic images. Identify which settings
produced darker or lighter images, and which settings produced
low or high contrast images.
CHAPTER
5
CHAPTER
OUTLINE
 Objectives 47
 Key Words 47
 Introduction 48
 Theories of
Biological Effect
Mechanisms 48
 Cell Sensitivity to
Radiation
Exposure 49
 The Dose–
Response Curve 49
 Factors That
Determine
Radiation Injury 50
 Sequence of
Events Following
Radiation
Exposure 51
 Radiation Effects
on Tissues of the
Body 51
 Short- and LongTerm Effects
of Radiation 51
 Risk Estimates 53
 Radiation Exposure
Comparisons 53
 Review, Recall,
Reflect, Relate 54
 References 56
Effects of Radiation
Exposure
PART II • BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS
OF RADIATION AND RADIATION
PROTECTION
OBJECTIVES
Following successful completion of this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Define the key words.
2. Explain the difference between the direct and indirect theories of biological damage.
3. Determine the relative radiosensitivity or radioresistance of various kinds of cells in the body.
4. Explain the difference between somatic and genetic effects.
5. Explain the difference between a threshold dose–response curve and a nonthreshold
dose–response curve.
6. Identify the factors that determine radiation injuries.
7. List the sequence of events that may follow exposure to radiation.
8. Explain the difference between deterministic and stochastic effects.
9. List the possible short- and long-term effects of irradiation.
10. Identify critical tissues for dental radiography in the head and neck region.
11. Discuss the risks versus benefits of dental radiographs.
12. Utilize effective dose equivalent to make radiation exposure comparisons.
13. Adopt an ethical responsibility to follow ALARA.
KEY WORDS
Acute radiation syndrome (ARS)
ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable)
Cumulative effect
Deterministic effect
Direct theory
Dose–response curve
Genetic cells
Genetic effect
Genetic mutation
Indirect theory
Ionization
Irradiation
Irreparable injury
Latent period
Law of B and T
Lethal dose (LD)
Nonthreshold dose–response curve
Period of injury
Radiolysis of water
Radioresistant
48 BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION AND RADIATION PROTECTION
Introduction
Patients are often concerned with the safety of dental x-ray
procedures. Such concerns are shared by oral health care professionals. The fact that ionizing radiation produces biological
damage has been known for many years. The first x-ray burn
was reported just a few months following Roentgen’s discovery
of x-rays in 1895. As early as 1902, the first case of x-rayinduced skin cancer was reported in the literature. Events such
as the 1945 bombing of Hiroshima and the 1986 Chernobyl
nuclear power plant accident continued to generate unfavorable
attitudes toward ionizing radiation and concern over the use of
x-rays in dentistry and medicine as well. Although public concern is warranted, there are also some sensational and unsubstantiated articles appearing in newspapers and magazines, on
television, and on the Internet. Much of what we know about the
effects of radiation exposure comes from data that is extrapolated from high doses and high dose rates. Studies of occupational workers exposed to chronic low levels of radiation have
shown no adverse biological effect (U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, http://www.nrc.gov). However, even the radiation
experts have not been able to determine whether or not a threshold level exists below which radiation effects would not be a risk.
Because even the experts cannot always predict a specific outcome from an amount of radiation exposure, the radiation protection community conservatively assumes that any amount of
radiation may pose a risk. The purpose of this chapter is to
explain the theories of radiation injury and to identify factors
that increase the risk of producing a biological response.
Theories of Biological Effect Mechanisms
As pointed out in Chapter 2, x-rays belong to the ionizing portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. X-rays have the ability to
detach and remove electric charges from the complex atoms that
make up the molecules of body tissues. This process, known as
ionization, creates an electrical imbalance within the normally
stable cells. Because disturbed cellular atoms or molecules
generally attempt to regain electrical stability, they often accept
the first available opposite electrical charge. In such cases, the
undesirable chemical changes become incompatible with the
surrounding body tissues. During ionization, the delicate balance of the cell structure is altered, and the cell may be damaged or destroyed.
There are two generally accepted theories on how radiation
damages biological tissues: (1) the direct theory and (2) the indirect (radiolysis of water) theory (Figure 5-1).
• Direct theory: According to the direct theory, x-ray photons collide with important cell chemicals and break them
apart by ionization, causing critical damage to large molecules. One-third of biological alterations from x-radiation
exposure result from a direct effect. However, most dental
x-ray photons probably pass through the cell with little or
no damage. A healthy cell can repair any minor damage
that might occur. Moreover, the body contains so many
cells that the destruction of a single cell or a small group of
cells will have no observable effect.
• Indirect theory (Radiolysis of water): This theory is
based on the assumption that radiation can cause chemical
damage to the cell by ionizing the water within it (Figure 5-2).
Because about 80 percent of body weight is water and
ionization can dissociate water into hydrogen and hydroxyl
radicals, the theory proposes that new chemicals such as
hydrogen peroxide could be formed under certain conditions. These chemicals act as toxins (poisons) to the body,
causing cellular dysfunction. Two-thirds of biological alterations from x-radiation exposure result from indirect effects.
Fortunately, when the water is broken down during irradiation, the ions have a strong tendency to recombine immediately to form water again instead of seeking out new
combinations, keeping cellular damage to a minimum. Under
ordinary circumstances, even when a new chemical such as
X-ray
X-ray
Direct theory Indirect theory
FIGURE 5-1 Direct theory and indirect theory. In the
direct theory, x-ray photons collide with large molecules and
break them apart by ionization. The indirect theory is based on
the assumption that radiation can cause chemical damage to the
cell by ionizing the water within it.
KEY WORDS (Continued)
Radiosensitive
Recovery period
Risk
Somatic cells
Somatic effect
Stochastic effect
Threshold dose–response curve
CHAPTER 5 • EFFECTS OF RADIATION EXPOSURE 49
hydrogen peroxide is formed, other cells that are not affected
can take over the functions of the damaged cells until recovery takes place. Only in extreme instances, where massive
irradiation has taken place, will entire body tissues be
destroyed or death result. However, it should be remembered that cellular destruction is not the only biological
effect; the potential exists for the cell to become malignant.
Cell Sensitivity to Radiation Exposure
The terms radiosensitive and radioresistant are used to
describe the degree of susceptibility of various cells and
body tissues to radiation. All cells are not equally sensitive to
radiation. The relative sensitivity of cells to radiation was
first described in 1906 by two French scientists, Bergonie
and Tribondeau, and is known as the law of B and T. The
first half of the law of B and T states that actively dividing
cells, such as red blood cells, are more sensitive than slowly
dividing cells. The cell is most susceptible to radiation injury
during mitosis (cell division). Embryonic and immature cells
are more sensitive than mature cells of the same tissue. The
second half of the law of B and T states that the more specialized a cell is, the more radioresistant it is. The exceptions to
this law are white blood cells (lymphocytes) and reproductive cells (oocytes), which do not divide and are very specialized and yet are radiosensitive.
Based on these factors, it is possible to rank various kinds
of cells in descending order of radiosensitivity:
• White blood cells (lymphocytes) High sensitivity
• Red blood cells (erythrocytes)
• Immature reproductive cells
• Epithelial cells
• Endothelial cells
• Connective tissue cells
• Bone cells
• Nerve cells
• Brain cells
• Muscle cells Low sensitivity
Additionally, a distinction should be made between irradiation of somatic cells and reproductive cells. Somatic cells are
all the cells of the body, except the reproductive cells. A
somatic effect occurs when the biological change or damage
occurs in the irradiated individual, but is not passed along to
offspring. A genetic effect describes the changes in hereditary material that do not manifest in the irradiated individual,
but in future generations.
The experts do not fully understand all these effects or
their future consequences. Scientists believe that some of
these effects are cumulative, especially if exposure is too
great and the intervals between exposures too frequent for the
body cells to repair themselves. Unless the damage is too
severe or the subject is in extremely poor health, many body
cells (somatic cells) have a recovery rate of almost 75 percent
during the first 24 hours; after that, repair continues at the
same rate.
In determining whether or not an exposure is potentially
harmful, the radiographer should consider the quantity and the
duration of the exposure and which body area is to be
irradiated. Continued exposure over prolonged periods alters
the ability of the genetic cells (eggs and sperm) to reproduce
normally. Current evidence indicates that chromosome damage is cumulative, increasing in effect by each successive additional radiation exposure, and genetic cells cannot repair
themselves. Radiation may alter the genetic material in the
reproductive cells so that mutations (abnormalities) may be
produced in future generations.
The Dose–Response Curve
Radiation doses, like doses of drugs or other biologically harmful agents, can be plotted with response or damage produced, in
an attempt to establish acceptable levels of exposure. In plotting
these two variables, a dose–response curve is produced. A
threshold dose–response curve indicates that there is a “threshold” amount of radiation, below which no biological response
would be expected; a nonthreshold dose–response curve indicates that any amount of radiation, no matter how small, has the
potential to cause a biological response. These two possibilities
are illustrated in Figure 5-3.
X-Rays
H2O
Ionization
Water Free Radicals Toxins
Recombination
H2O
H2O
H+
H+
H+
HOOOHO- Hydrogen
peroxide
H2O2
FIGURE 5-2 Indirect theory. X-rays ionize water, resulting in the formation of free radicals, which recombine to form toxins.
50 BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION AND RADIATION PROTECTION
Unfortunately, radiobiologists have been unable to determine radiation effects at very low levels of exposure (for example, doses below 100 mSv) and cannot be certain whether or
not a threshold dose exists. (To help put 100 mSv into perpective, a full mouth series of 18 F-speed films, at 90 kVp with 16-
in. [41-cm] length PID is approximately 30 mSv skin exposure.)
Therefore, the radiation protection community takes the conservative approach and considers any amount of ionizing radiation
exposure as being nonthreshold. This assumption has been
made in the establishment of radiation protection guidelines and
in radiation control activities. The concept that every dose of
radiation produces damage and should be kept to the minimum
necessary to meet diagnostic requirements is known as the
ALARA concept, where ALARA stands for as low as reasonably achievable. ALARA is explained in detail in Chapter 6.
Factors That Determine Radiation Injury
Biological responses to low doses of radiation exposure are
often too small to be detected. The body’s defense mechanisms
and ability to repair molecular damage often result in no residual effects. In fact, the following five outcomes are possible: (1)
nothing—the cell is unaffected by the exposure; (2) the cell is
injured or damaged but repairs itself and functions at preexposure levels; (3) the cell dies, but is replaced through normal biological processes; (4) the cell is injured or damaged, repairs
itself, but now functions at a reduced level; or (5) the cell is
injured or damaged and repairs itself incorrectly or abnormally,
resulting in a biophysical change (tumor or malignacy). Determining which of these five outcomes might occur depends on
all the following.
• Total dose: The total dose of radiation depends on the
type, energy, and duration of the radiation. The greater the
dose, the more severe the probable biological effect.
• Dose rate: The rate at which the radiation is administered
or absorbed is very important in the determination of what
effects will occur. Because a considerable degree of recovery occurs from the radiation damage, a given dose will
produce less effect if it is divided (thus allowing time for
recovery between dose increments) than if it is given in a
single exposure. For instance, an exposure of 1 R/week for
100 weeks would result in less injury than a single exposure of 100 R.
• Area exposed: The amount of injury to the individual
depends on the area or volume of tissue irradiated. The larger
the area exposed, other factors being equal, the greater the
injury to the organism. Intraoral dental radiographic exposures use a very small (2.75 in. or 7 cm) beam diameter (or
less if using rectangular collimation, see Figure 6-4) to
limit the area of radiation exposure to the area of diagnostic concern.
• Variation in species: Various species have a wide range of
radiosensitivity. Lethal doses for plants and microorganisms are usually hundreds of times higher than those for
mammals.
• Individual sensitivity: Individuals vary in sensitivity
within the same species. The genetic makeup of some individuals may pre-dispose them to ionizing radiation damage.
For this reason the lethal dose (LD) for each species is
expressed in statistical terms, usually as the LD 50/30 for
that species, or the dose required to kill 50% of the individuals in a large population in a 30-day period. For humans,
the LD 50/30 is estimated to be 4.5 gray (Gy) or 450 rad
(gray and rad are units of absorbed dose; see Chapter 2).
• Variation in cell sensitivity: Within the same individual,
a wide variation in susceptibility to radiation damage
exists among different types of cells and tissues. As the
law of B and T points out, cells with a potential for rapid
division are more sensitive to radiation than those that do
not divide. Furthermore, primitive or nonspecialized cells
are more sensitive than those that are highly specialized.
Within the same cell families, then, the immature forms,
which are generally primitive and rapidly dividing, are
more radiosensitive than the older, mature cells, which
have specialized function and have ceased to divide.
• Variation in tissue sensitivity: Some tissues (organs) of
the body are more radiosensitive than others. For instance,
blood-forming organs such as the spleen and red bone marrow are more sensitive than the highly specialized heart
muscle.
Response Response
Dose Dose
A B Threshold
FIGURE 5-3 Diagram of dose–response curve. (A) A typical “threshold” curve. The
point at which the curve intersects the base line (horizontal line) is the threshold dose that is
the dose below which there is no response. If an easily observable radiation effect, such as
erythema (reddening of the skin) is taken as “response,” then this type of curve is applicable.
(B) A linear “nonthreshold” curve, in which the curve intersects the base line at its origin.
Here it is assumed that any dose, no matter how small, causes some response.
CHAPTER 5 • EFFECTS OF RADIATION EXPOSURE 51
Radiation
injury
Time (age)
Irreparable injury
FIGURE 5-4 Concept of accumulated irreparable injury.
After exposure to radiation cell recovery can take place. However,
there may be a certain amount of damage from which no recovery
occurs, and it is this irreparable injury that can give rise to later longterm effects.
• Age: Younger, more rapidly dividing cells are more radiosensitive than older, mature cells, so it follows that children may
be more susceptible to injury than adults from an equal
dose of radiation. Also, in children the distance from the
oral cavity to the reproductive and other sensitive organs is
less than for adults. Therefore the dental doses to the critical organs may be higher than they would be for an adult.
Additionally, an increase in radiation sensitivity is observed
again in old age. As the body ages, the cells may begin to
lose the ability to repair damage.
Sequence of Events Following
Radiation Exposure
The sequence of events following radiation exposure are latent
period, period of injury, and recovery period, assuming, of course,
that the dose received was nonlethal.
• Latent period: Following the initial radiation exposure,
and before the first detectable effect occurs, a time lag
called the latent period occurs. The latent period may be
very short or extremely long, depending on the initial dose
and other factors described earlier. Effects that appear
within a matter of minutes, days, or weeks are called shortterm effects, and those that appear years, decades, and even
generations later are called long-term effects. Again, this
relates to the types of cells involved and their corresponding rates of mitosis (cell division).
• Period of injury: Following the latent period, certain
effects can be observed. One of the effects seen most frequently in growing tissues exposed to radiation is the stoppage of mitosis, or cell divisions. This may be temporary
or permanent, depending on the radiation dosage. Other
effects include breaking or clumping of chromosomes,
abnormal mitosis, and formation of giant cells (multinucleated cells) associated with cancer.
• Recovery period: Following exposure to radiation, some
recovery can take place. This is particularly apparent in the
case of short-term effects. Nevertheless, there may be a
certain amount of damage from which no recovery occurs,
and it is this irreparable injury that can give rise to later
long-term effects (Figure 5-4).
Radiation Effects on Tissues of the Body
Low levels of radiation exposure do not usually produce an
observable adverse biological effect. As the dose of radiation
increases and enough cells are destroyed, the affected tissue
will begin to exhibit clinical signs of damage. The severity of
these clinical manifestations is dependent on the dose and dose
rate. For example, erythema (redness of the skin) would not be
expected from exposing the skin to sunlight for a few seconds.
However, as the time of exposure to sunlight increased, the erythema would be expected to increase proportionally. When the
severity of the change is dependent on the dose, the effect is
called a deterministic effect.
When a biological response is based on the probability of
occurrence rather than the severity of the change, it is called a
stochastic effect. The occurrence of cancer is a stochastic effect
of radiation exposure; it is an “all-or-nothing” occurrence. When
the dose of radiation is increased, the “probability” of the stochastic effect (cancer) occurring increases, but not its severity.
Short- and Long-term Effects of Radiation
The effects of radiation are classified as either short term or long
term. Short-term effects of radiation are those seen minutes,
days, or months after exposure. When a very large dose of radiation is delivered in a very short period of time, the latent period
is short. If the dose of radiation is large enough (generally over
1.0 Gy or 100 rads, whole-body), the resultant signs and symptoms that comprise these short-term effects are collectively
known as acute radiation syndrome (ARS). ARS symptoms
include erythema (redness of the skin), nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, hemorrhage, and hair loss. ARS is not a concern in dentistry because dental x-ray machines cannot produce the very
large exposures necessary to cause it.
Long-term effects of radiation are those that are seen years
after the original exposure. The latent period is much longer
(years) than that associated with the acute radiation syndrome
(hours or days). Delayed radiation effects may result from a previous acute, high exposure that the individual has survived or
from chronic low-level exposures delivered over many years.
No unique disease associated with the long-term effects of
radiation has been established. Instead, there can be a statistical
increase in the incidence of certain conditions that can have
causes other than radiation exposure such as cancer, embryological defects, low birth weights, cataracts, (somatic effects), and
genetic mutations (genetic effect). Because of the low normal
incidence of these conditions, one must observe large numbers
of exposed persons to evaluate the increases as an effect of
long-term radiation exposure.
The long-term effects observed have been somatic damage,
which may result in an increased incidence of the following.
52 BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION AND RADIATION PROTECTION
• Cancer: Anything that is capable of causing cancer is
called a carcinogen. X-rays, like certain drugs, chemicals,
and viruses, have been shown to have carcinogenic effects.
Carcinogenic mechanisms are not clearly understood.
Moreover, cancer is probably “caused” by the simultaneous interaction of several factors, and the presence of some
of these factors without the others may not be sufficient to
cause the disease.
Some explanations for the carcinogenic action of
x-rays include the following: x-rays activate viruses
already present in cells; x-rays damage chromosomes, and
certain diseases (such as leukemia) are associated with
chromosomal injury; x-rays cause mutations in somatic
cells, which may result in uncontrolled growth of cells;
and x-rays ionize water, which results in chemical “free
radicals” that may cause cancer.
Any one or a combination of these theories may explain
how cancer is caused. X-radiation is only one of a number
of possible carcinogens involved, and the precise mechanism
is not yet understood. Much of the evidence that x-radiation
is carcinogenic comes from studies of early radiation
workers, including dentists, who were exposed to large
amounts of radiation (Figures 5-5 and 5-6).
• Embryological defects: The immature, undifferentiated,
rapidly growing cells of the embryo are highly sensitive to
radiation. The first trimester of a pregnancy when the
fetus undergoes the period of major organogenesis (formation of organs) is especially critical. High doses of radiation may cause birth abnormalities, stunting of growth,
and mental retardation. It is important to note that the dose
from a dental x-ray examination is less than 0.0003 to
0.003 milligray (0.03 to 0.3 millirad), and the use of a lead
or lead-equivalent barrier apron reduces this potential dose
to zero.
• Low birth weight: Medical (not dental) x-radiation exposure
of pregnant females has been associated with an increase
in the incidence of full-term pregnancies resulting in
below-normal-birth-weight infants. Because the reproductive
organs are not located in a critical area, exposure of necessary
dental radiographs has not been contraindicated during
pregnancy. In 2004 the American Medical Association
published research that investigated the effect on pregnancy
outcomes of radiation exposure of the pregnant female’s
hypothalamus and the pituitary and thyroid glands. This
research suggests that dental radiation exposure may be
associated with full-term low-birth-weight infants. More
research in this area may lead to altered guidelines on the
assessment of pregnant females for dental radiographs.
(Discussed further in Chapter 27.)
• Cataracts: When the lens of the eye becomes opaque, it is
called a cataract. Various agents, including x-rays, have
been known to cause cataracts. It takes at least 2 Gy (200
rads) of x-radiation to cause cataract formation. The dose to
the eye from dental radiographic procedures is in the order
of milligray (millirad). Dental x-rays have never been
reported to cause cataracts.
• Genetic mutations: The genetic material is the means by
which hereditary traits are passed from one generation to
another. In addition to x-radiation, drugs, chemicals, and
even elevated body temperatures are also capable of causing mutations. Genetic effects are especially important
because it is unknown what size dose of radiation, whether
naturally occurring or from man-made sources, may be
capable of producing a change in the genetic material of
cells.
Because the scatter radiation reaching the gonads from
dental radiography is less than 0.0001 that of the exposure
to the surface of the face (ranging from 0.0 to about 0.002
milligrays [0.2 millirad] per radiograph), the risk of genetic
mutations is extremely small. Furthermore, by using a lead
or lead-equivalent barrier apron and thyroid collar, the dose
is essentially reduced to zero.
FIGURE 5-5 Ulcerated lesion. Early carcinoma on the finger of a
dentist who admitted holding films in the patient’s oral cavity during
exposure.
FIGURE 5-6 Radiation injury on the finger of a dentist
caused by holding films in the patient’s oral cavity during
exposure. A lesion of this type would be likely to result in squamous
cell carcinoma (cancer).
CHAPTER 5 • EFFECTS OF RADIATION EXPOSURE 53
TABLE 5-1 Critical Organs and Doses for Dental Radiography
CRITICAL
ORGAN EFFECT
MINIMUM DOSE REQUIRED
TO PRODUCE EFFECT
DENTAL DOSE
FROM AN FMS
Eye cataract 2,000 mSv 0.4 mSv
Hematopoietic leukemia 50 mSv 8.0 mSv
Skin cancer 250 mSv 12.6 mSv
Thyroid gland cancer 65 mSv 0.4 mSv
Gonads sterility 4,000 to 6,000 mSv 0.005 mSv (no lead apron)
to 0.0003 mSv (lead apron)
Risk Estimates
A risk may be defined as the likelihood of injury or death from
some hazard. The primary risk from dental radiography is radiation-induced cancer and, possibly, the potential to affect pregnancy
outcomes. Otherwise, the facial and oral structures, composed
largely of bone, nerve, and muscle tissue, are fairly radioresistant
(Table 5-1).
Risk estimates vary, depending on several factors, such as
speed of film, collimation, and the technique used. In dental radiography, the most critical tissues of the head and neck are the
mandible (red bone marrow), the lens of the eye, the thyroid gland,
and possibly the hypothalamus-pituitary-thyroid combination.
The mandible contains an estimated 15 g of red bone
marrow. However, it should be noted that this is only about 1
percent of the total amount of red bone marrow in the adult
body. Although x-radiation can cause cataracts, the dental
radiation exposure to the lens of the eye during some maxillary exposures is well below the dose needed to produce
cataracts. The thyroid gland is relatively radiosensitive.
Until recently the focus has been on radiation exposure
causing cancer of the thyroid gland. A study published in the
Journal of the American Medical Association (2004) has
demonstrated a possible link between radiation exposure to the
thyroid gland and/or to the hypothalamus-pituitary-thyroid
combination of a pregnant female and low-birth-weight
infants delivered after the full 9-month term. Until more is
documented regarding this phenomenon, the focus is on
radiation-induced cancer as the primary risk from dental
radiography.
The potential risk of a full mouth dental x-ray examination
inducing cancer in a patient has been estimated to be 2.5 per
1,000,000 examinations. It should be noted that every day we
assume hundreds of risks such as climbing stairs, crossing the
street, riding a bicycle, and driving a car. Activities with a fatality risk of 1 in 1,000,000 include riding 300 miles in an automobile, traveling 1,000 miles in an airplane, or smoking 1.4
cigarettes a day (Table 5-2). People accept these risks every day
because we perceive a benefit from them.
• Risk versus benefit: Dental radiographs should be taken
only when the benefit outweighs the risk of biologic injury
to the patient. When dental radiographs are properly prescribed (see Chapter 6), exposed, and processed, the health
benefits to the patient far outweigh any risk of injury.
There have been no reports of radiation injuries caused by
normal dental procedures since safety protocols have been
adopted.
Radiation Exposure Comparisons
Patients often have questions regarding the amount of radiation
dental radiographs are adding to their accumlated lifetime exposure. The exact amount of radiation exposure produced when
taking dental radiographs varies, depending on many factors,
such as the film speed, technique used, and collimation type (circular or rectangular). Additionally, dental exposures are often
quoted as skin surface amounts rather than amounts to the more
important bone marrow and other deeper structures
The effective dose equivalent (Chapter 2) can be used to compare dental radiation exposures with days of natural background
exposure. The average effective dose equivalent from naturally
TABLE 5-2 One in One Million Fatality Risk
sRISK NATURE
Smoking 1.4 cigarettes/day Cancer
Riding 10 miles on a bicycle Accident
Travel 300 miles by auto Accident
Travel 1,000 miles by airplane Accident
PRACTICE POINT
Dental radiographs should be prescribed only when necessary. Consider the following case: If a female patient is
assessed for bitewing radiographs, and then she reveals that
she may be pregnant, would the need for the bitewing radiographs change? Would she still need the radiographs? Or
would these once-needed radiographs now be radiographs
that can wait? If radiographs can wait, they are not necessary
radiographs.
54 BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION AND RADIATION PROTECTION
occuring background radiation to the population of the United
States is approximately (microseiverts) per day. A full
mouth series of radiographs using F-speed film and a round PID
has an effective dose equivalent of approximately
Therefore, the full mouth series is equal to approximately 2.9 days
of naturally occurring background radiation exposure (Table 5-3).
23.4 mSv.
8 mSv REVIEW—Chapter summary
Ionizing radiation has the potential to produce biological damage because x-rays can detach subatomic particles from larger
molecules and create an imbalance within a normally stable cell.
The two generally accepted theories on how radiation may cause
damage to cellular tissues are: (1) the direct theory, and (2) the
indirect theory or the radiolysis of water. Whether cell damage
from radiation is physical or chemical, it has been established
that minor damage is soon repaired by a healthy body.
The terms radiosensitive and radioresistant are used to
describe the degree of susceptibility of various cells and body
tissues to radiation. According to the law of B and T, cells that
are highly specialized and have a lesser reproductive capacity
are considered to be radioresistant, and cells that are undifferenciated and have a greater capacity for reproduction are considered to be radiosensitive.
Biological changes or damage that occur in somatic cells
will affect the irradiated individual but will not be passed along
to offspring. Biological changes or damage that do not affect
the irradiated individual but are passed to future generations are
called genetic effects.
The cumulative effect of irradiation is defined as an
amount of radiation damage from which no recovery occurs,
giving rise to later long-term effects.
The dose–response curve is a method used to plot the
dosage of radiation administered with the response produced to
establish responsible levels of radiation exposure. The conservative view that every dose of radiation potentially produces
damage and should be kept to a minimum is expressed by the
ALARA concept—as low as reasonably achievable.
TABLE 5-3 Effective Dose Equivalenta
EXAMINATION EFFECTIVE DOSE DAYS OF NATURAL EXPOSUREb
Single intraoral exposurec 1.3 MSv 0.2
Bitewing radiographs (4 films) c 5.2 MSv 0.7
Full mouth series (18 films) c 23.4 MSv 2.9
Panoramic radiograph 7 MSv 0.9
CT scan of the maxilla 240–1200 MSv 40–200
CT scan of the mandible 480–3324 MSv 80–547.5
Cone beam CT mandible 75 MSv 12.5
Cone beam CT maxilla 42 MSv 7
Chest x-ray 80 MSv 10
Upper GI 2440 MSv 305
Lower GI 4060 MSv 507.5
References: White, S. C., & Pharoah, M. (2008). Oral radiology: Principles and interpretation (6th ed.).
St. Louis, MO: Elsevier, and Horner, K., Drage, N., & Brettle, D. (2008). 21st century imaging. London:
Quintessence Publishing Co Ltd.
Fractions rounded up.
F-speed, round PID. c
b
a
PRACTICE POINT
Be careful not to tell the patient that a full mouth series is
equal to 2.9 days “in the sun.” Naturally occurring background radiation includes not only the sun, or cosmic
energy, but also terrestrial and internal sources of background radiation (see Chapter 2). Additionally, most
patients are aware that exposure to the sun’s rays is harmful
and many take precautions against putting themselves at
risk for skin damage. To compare dental x-rays to sun exposure may provoke a response from the patient to avoid dental x-rays as well.
Much about radiation effects remains to be discovered.
Future research may demonstrate that human beings are not as
sensitive to radiation damage as we now believe. But until we
have such evidence, common sense dictates improving radiographic safety techniques in every way possible.
CHAPTER 5 • EFFECTS OF RADIATION EXPOSURE 55
5. Which of these cells are most radiosensitive?
a. Brain cells
b. Nerve cells
c. White blood cells
d. Mature bone cells
6. Which of these cells are most radioresistant?
a. Endothelial cells
b. Muscle cells
c. Epithelial cells
d. Red blood cells
7. When the effect of a radiation exposure is observed in the
offspring of an irradiated person, but not in the irradiated
person, this is called the
a. somatic effect.
b. genetic effect.
c. direct effect.
d. indirect effect.
8. A dose–response curve indicating that any amount of radiation, no matter how small, has the potential to cause a biological response is called
a. stochastic
b. deterministic
c. threshold
d. nonthreshold
9. ALARA stands for ____________________.
10. List the five possible biological responses of an irradiated
cell.
a. ______________
b. ______________
c. ______________
d. ______________
e. ______________
11. Each of the following is a factor that determines radiation
injury EXCEPT one. Which one is the EXCEPTION?
a. Size of the irradiated area
b. Amount of radiation
c. Patient gender
d. Dose rate
12. According to the factors that determine radiation injury,
based on age, who is the most radiosensitive?
a. a 6-year-old
b. a 16-year-old
c. a 26-year-old
d. a 46-year-old
13. Which of the following is the correct sequence of events
following radiation exposure?
a. Period of injury, latent period, recovery period
b. Latent period, period of injury, recovery period
c. Latent period, recovery period, period of injury
d. Recovery period, latent period, period of injury
Factors that influence a biological response to irradiation
include dose amount, dose rate, area exposed, species exposed,
individual sensitivity, cell sensitivity, tissue sensitivity, and age.
Assuming that the dose received is not lethal, the sequence of
events following radiation exposure are (1) a latent period, (2) a
period of injury, and (3) a recovery period.
The term deterministic is used when referring to a tissue
response, such as erythema, whose severity is directly related to
the radiation dose. The term stochastic effect is used when
referring to a tissue response, such as cancer, that is based on
the probability of occurrence rather then the severity of the
response.
The effects of radiation exposure may be short or longterm.
Short-term effects include erythema and general discomfort.
Long-term effects may result in an increased incidence of cancer, embryological defects, poor pregnancy outcomes, cataracts,
and genetic mutations.
The potential benefits of dental radiographs outweigh the
risk. With proper radiation safety protocol, there is minimal
risk of injury caused by necessary dental radiographic procedures. The critical tissues in the head and neck are (1) the red bone
marrow in the mandible, (2) lens of the eye, and (3) thyroid gland,
but most facial tissues are fairly radioresistant.
The effective dose equivalent can be used to compare
the risks of different radiation exposures and to compare
dental radiation exposures with days of natural background
exposure.
RECALL—Study questions
1. The primary cause of biological damage from radiation is
a. ionization.
b. direct effect.
c. indirect effect.
d. genetic effect.
2. Direct injury from radiation occurs when the x-ray
photons
a. ionize water and form toxins.
b. pass through the cell.
c. strike critical cell molecules.
d. All of the above.
3. Indirect injury from radiation occurs when the x-ray
photons
a. ionize water and form toxins.
b. pass through the cell.
c. strike critical cell molecules.
d. All of the above.
4. According to the law of B and T, cells with a high
reproductive rate are described as
a. radiopaque.
b. radiolucent.
c. radioresistant.
d. radiosensitive.
56 BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION AND RADIATION PROTECTION
14. When a biological response is based on the probability
of occurrence rather than the severity of the change, it is
called a
a. short-term effect.
b. long-term effect.
c. deterministic effect.
d. stochastic effect.
15. Which of these is considered a short-term outcome following radiation exposure?
a. Embryological defects
b. Cataracts
c. Acute radiation syndrome
d. Cancer
16. Full-term, low birth weight is possibly associated with
radiation exposure to which of the following?
a. Thyroid gland
b. Hypothalamus
c. Pituitary gland
d. All of the above
17. During exposure of an intraoral dental radiograph,
approximately how much smaller is the dose of radiation in the gonadal area than at the surface of the
face?
a. 0.10
b. 0.01
c. 0.001
d. 0.0001
18. Each of the following is in the path of the x-ray beam during exposure of an intraoral dental radiograph on an adult
patient. Which one, because of its relative radioresistancy
is NOT considered critical for dental radiography?
a. Mandible
b. Lens of the eye
c. Spinal cord
d. Thyroid gland
19. The potential risk of a full mouth dental x-ray examination inducing cancer in a patient has been estimated to be
a. 2.5 per 1,000 examinations.
b. 2.5 per 10,000 examinations.
c. 2.5 per 100,000 examinations.
d. 2.5 per 1,000,000 examinations.
20. What term best expresses comparisons between dental
radiation exposures and natural background exposure?
a. Absorbed dose
b. Effective dose equivalent
c. Accumulated dose
d. Lethal dose
REFLECT—Case study
Retaking a radiograph because of a technique or processing
error causes an increase in radiation exposure for the patient.
Discuss ways a retake radiograph affects the factors that determine radiation injury.
RELATE—Laboratory application
Calculate your radiation dose. Visit the United States Environmental
Protection Agency at http://www.epa.gov/radiation/understand/
calculate.html, where you can estimate your average annual
radiation dose. Based on the questions posed by this calculator,
what conclusions can you draw about (1) the source of radiation
exposure, (2) the region in which people live, (3) sources of
internal radiation exposure, and (4) situations and/or products
with the ability to increase your dose of radiation exposure?
REFERENCES
American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs.
(2006). The use of dental radiographs: Update and recommendations. Journal of the American Dental Association,
137(9), 1304–1312.
Carestream Health Inc. (2007). Kodak Dental Systems. Radiation safety in dental radiography., Rochester NY: Author.
Hujoel, P. P., Bollen, A., Noonan, C. J., & del Aguila, M. A.
(2004). Antepartum dental radiography and infant low birth
weight. JAMA, 291(16), 1987–1993.
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements.
(2009). Report No 160: Ionizing radiation exposure of the
population of the United States. Bethesda, MD: Author.
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements.
(1991). Implementation of the principle of as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) for medical and dental personnel. NCRP report no. 107. Washington, DC: Author.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (2007,
December 4). Standards for protection against radiation,
Title 10, Part 20, of the Code of Federal Regulations.
Retrieved April 11, 2010, from http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part020/part020-1201.html
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (2010). Radiation protection. Retrieved April 16, 2010, from http://www.nrc.
gov/about-nrc/radiation.html
White, S. C., & Pharoah, M. J. (2008) Oral radiology: Principles
and interpretation (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier.
CHAPTER
Radiation Protection 6
OBJECTIVES
Following successful completion of this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Define the key words.
2. Adopt the ALARA concept.
3. Use the selection criteria guidelines to explain the need for prescribed radiographs.
4. Explain the roles communication, working knowledge of quality radiographs, and education
play in preventing unnecessary radiation exposure.
5. Explain the roles technique and exposure choices play in preventing unnecessary radiation
exposure.
6. Explain the function of the filter.
7. State the filtration requirements for an intraoral dental x-ray unit that operates above and
below 70 kVp.
8. Compare inherent, added, and total filtration.
9. State the federally mandated diameter of the intraoral dental x-ray beam at the patient’s
skin.
10. Explain the difference between round and rectangular collimation.
11. List the two functions of a collimator.
12. Explain how PID shape and length contribute to reducing patient radiation exposure.
13. Identify film speeds currently available for dental radiography use.
14. Explain the role image receptor holders play in reducing patient radiation exposure.
15. Advocate the use of the lead/lead equivalent thyroid collar and apron.
16. Explain the role darkroom protocol and film handling play in reducing patient radiation
exposure.
17. Summarize the radiation protection methods for the patient.
18. Explain the roles time, shielding, and distance play in protecting the radiographer from
unnecessary radiation exposure.
19. Utilize distance and location to take a position the appropriate distance and angle from the
x-ray source at the patient’s head during an exposure.
20. Describe monitoring devices used to detect radiation.
21. Summarize the radiation protection methods for the radiographer.
22. List the organizations responsible for recommending and setting exposure limits.
23. State the maximum permissible dose (MPD) for radiation workers and for the general public.
CHAPTER
OUTLINE
 Objectives 57
 Key Words 58
 Introduction 58
 ALARA 58
 Protection
Measures for the
Patient 58
 Protection
Measures for the
Radiographer 66
 Radiation
Monitoring 67
 Organizations
Responsible for
Recommending/
Setting Exposure
Limits 70
 Guidelines for
Maintaining Safe
Radiation Levels 71
 Review, Recall,
Reflect, Relate 71
 References 73
58 BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION AND RADIATION PROTECTION
Introduction
In Chapter 5 we learned that radiation exposure in sufficient
doses may produce harmful biological changes in humans.
Although it is the consensus of radiobiologists that the dose
received from a dental x-ray exposure is not likely to be harmful, even the experts do not know what risk a small dose carries.
Therefore, it must be assumed that any dose may be capable of
potential risk. The patient has agreed to be subjected to the
risks of radiation exposure because he/she believes that the oral
health care practitioner will follow safety protocols that protect
the patient from excess exposure.
In this chapter we discuss radiation safety protocols,
including selection criteria used in prescribing dental radiographs
and methods to minimize x-ray exposure to both the dental
patient and the radiographer.
ALARA
The oral health care team has an ethical responsibility to
embrace the ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) concept, recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection to minimize radiation risks. The ALARA
concept implies that “any radiation dose that can be reduced
without major difficulty, great expense, or inconvenience should
be reduced or eliminated.” ALARA is not simply a phrase, but a
culture of professional excellence. ALARA should guide practice principles. In an ideal world, the oral health care team
would like to get the diagnostic benefits of dental radiographs
with a zero dose radiation exposure to the patient. In reality, this
is not possible; all dental radiographs will result in a small but
acceptable level of risk. The best way to prevent this risk from
increasing is to keep the exposure ALARA.
Protection Measures for the Patient
Professional Judgment
The benefits of radiographs in dentistry outweigh the risks
when proper safety procedures are followed. The most
KEY WORDS
Added filtration
ALARA (as low as
reasonably achievable)
Aluminum equivalent
Area monitoring
Collimation
DIS (direct ion storage)
monitor
Dosimeter
Exposure factors
Film badge
Film/image receptor holder
Filter
Filtration
Half-value layer
Inherent filtration
Lead apron
Lead equivalent
Monitoring
MPD (maximum permissible dose)
OSL (optically stimulated
luminescence) monitor
Personnel monitoring
Personnel monitoring device
PID (position indicating device)/BID
(beam indicating device)
Primary beam
Protective barrier
Radiation leakage
Radiation worker
Retake radiograph
Scatter (secondary)
radiation
Selection criteria
Structural shielding
TLD (thermoluminescent
dosimeter)
Thyroid collar
Total filtration
important way to ensure that the patient receives a reasonably low dose of radiation is to use evidence-based
selection criteria when determining which patients need
radiographs. Guidelines developed by an expert panel of
health care professionals convened by the Public Health
Service and adopted by the American Dental Association
have been published to assist in deciding when, what type,
and how many radiographs should be taken (Table 6-1).
These guidelines allow the dentist to base the decision
regarding x-rays for the patient on expert recommendations. Although the dentist prescribes the radiographic
exam for the patient based on these guidelines, these recommendations are subject to clinical judgment and may not
apply to every patient.
Evidence-based selection criteria guidelines are applied
only after reviewing the patient’s health history and completing a clinical examination. The time frames suggested in
the guidelines are used in the absence of positive historical
findings and signs and symptoms presented by the patient.
For example, a patient who presents with a toothache would
most likely be assessed for a radiographic exam of this
symptom even if the patient had radiographs within the
suggested time frame for this patient’s category. Additionally, a radiographic examination should not wait until a
patient presents with pain or other symptom of pathology.
The time frames suggested by the selection criteria guidelines are preventive measures that are evidence-based effective. The dentist uses these guidelines to prescribe the
radiographic exam for the patient, but the dental hygienist
may use the guidelines during initial examination of the
patient to make a preliminary assessment for the recommendation of radiographic need; the dental hygienist and the
dental assistant rely on the selection criteria guidelines to
assist with explaining radiographic need to the patient. Once
the decision to expose radiographs is made, every reasonable effort must be made to minimize exposure to the patient
and to the operator and to those who may be in the area of
the x-ray machine.
CHAPTER 6 • RADIATION PROTECTION 59
• Education. Continuing education is the cornerstone of
all health care professions. Rapidly advancing technology is constantly changing the scope of oral health care
Technical Ability of the Operator
• Communication. Reduction of radiation exposure begins
with communication skills. The patient’s cooperation must
be secured to perform radiographic examinations accurately
and safely. Patient protection during a radiographic procedure should begin with clear, concise instructions. When
responsibilities are adequately defined through effective
communication, the patient understands what must be done
and can more fully cooperate with the radiographer and
avoid retake mistakes.
• Working knowledge of quality radiographs. The radiographer should understand what a quality dental radiograph
should image. Based on this knowledge, the radiographer
needs to take every precaution against retaking radiographs.
Retake radiographs are necessary when the first exposure
results in errors that compromise image quality. When a radiograph is retaken, the second exposure doubles the dose and
dose rate of radiation for the patient. The best way to avoid
retake radiographs is to develop an understanding of common technique and processing errors (see Chapter 18).
Armed with this knowledge, the radiographer can better
avoid mistakes that lead to an increase in patient radiation
exposure.
PRACTICE POINT
Not every undiagnostic radiograph must be retaken. If multiple radiographs are taken at the same time, for example,
when exposing a full mouth series or set of bitewings the
radiographer should check to see if the area of interest is
imaged on an adjacent radiograph. Sometimes a retake radiograph may be avoided if the area of interest is imaged diagnostically on an adjacent radiograph.
practice. Some of the methods and procedures learned
for the practice of oral health care just a few years ago
may be obsolete in today’s world. For example, we are
currently witnessing the possible elimination of filmbased dental radiography. With the increasing use of
computers and the advancement of digital imaging, new
technology will surely contribute to the reduction of
dental radiation exposure. The radiographer who continues to learn about and adopt these new practices will
further help decrease radiation exposure for the patient
and the radiographer.
Technique Standards
• Intraoral technique choice. The paralleling technique
should be the operator’s first choice when exposing
periapical radiographs. The paralleling technique yields
more accurate and precisely sized radiographic images
(see Chapter 14). However, consideration should also
be given to which technique, paralleling or bisecting,
will produce the best results for the patient. The more
efficient and convenient the technique, the less likely
there will be retake radiographs. The radiographer should
be skilled at both techniques and should possess the
knowledge on which to base the decision regarding
which one to use.
• Exposure factors. Operating the dental x-ray machine
includes selecting the appropriate exposure factors—
kilovoltage (kVp), milliamperage (mA), and time—for the
patient and the area to be imaged. The radiographer should
possess a working knowledge of appropriate exposure
factors to avoid overexposing the patient unnecessarily.
Underexposures can also lead to additional exposures for
the patient if a retake is necessary. A working knowledge
of the exposure factors includes the ability to adjust each
of the variables—kilovoltage (kVp), milliamperage (mA),
and time—in relation to each other. In Chapter 4, we
learned that an adjustment in one variable usually leads
to a necessary counteradjustment in another variable to
maintain exposure control. To assist in radiation safety,
exposure charts should be posted near the control panel for
easy reference.
Equipment Standards
Using proper equipment is the next step in reducing radiation
exposure to the patient. All dental x-ray machines in the
United States are safe from a radiological health point of view.
The Federal Performance Standard for Diagnostic X-Ray
Equipment became effective on August 1, 1974. The provisions
of the standard require that all x-ray equipment manufactured
after that date meet certain radiation safety requirements
including filtration, collimation, and PID (position indicating
device).
• Filtration is the absorption of the long wavelength, less
penetrating, x-rays of the polychromatic x-ray beam by
PRACTICE POINT
Completing an accurate dental history may reveal that a new
patient has recently had radiographs taken at another oral
health care practice. Every effort should be made to have a
copy of these radiographs forwarded to your practice to
avoid additional radiation exposure for the patient.
60 TABLE 6-1 Guidelines for Prescribing Dental Radiographs
TYPE OF
ENCOUNTER
CHILDREN ADOLESCENT ADULT
Primary Dentition
(prior to eruption
of first permanent
tooth)
Transitional
Dentition (after
eruption of first
permanent tooth)
Permanent
Dentition (prior
to eruption of
third molars)
Dentate
or Partially
Edentulous Edentulous
New Patient
Being evaluated
for dental disease
and dental
development
Individualized radiographic exam
consisting of selected periapical/ occlusal views and/or posterior bitewings if proximal
surfaces cannot be visualized
or probed. Patients without
evidence of disease and with
open proximal contacts may
not require a radiographic
exam at this time.
Individualized radiographic
exam consisting of posterior bitewings with
panoramic exam or posterior bitewings and
selected
periapical images.
Individualized radiographic exam consisting of posterior bitewings
with panoramic exam or posterior bitewings
and selected periapical images. A full mouth intraoral
radiographic exam is preferred when the patient has
clinical evidence of generalized dental disease or a history of extensive dental treatment.
Individualized
radiographic
exam, based on
clinical signs
and symptoms.
Recall Patient*
With clinical caries or
at increased risk for
caries**
Posterior bitewing exam at 6- to 12-month intervals if proximal
surfaces cannot be examined visually or with a probe.
Posterior bitewing exam
at 6- to 18-month intervals.
Not applicable.
Recall Patient*
With no clinical caries
and not at risk for
caries**
Posterior bitewing exam at 12- to 24-month intervals if proximal surfaces cannot be examined visually or with a probe. Posterior bitewing exam at 18- to 36-month
intervals.
Posterior bitewing exam at
24- to –
36-month intervals.
Not applicable.
Recall Patient
With periodontal
disease
Clinical judgment as to the need for and type of radiographic images for the evaluation of periodontal disease. Imaging may consist of,
but is not limited to, selected bitewing and/or periapical images of areas where periodontal disease
(other than nonspecific gingivitis) can be identified clinically.
Not applicable.
Patient
For monitoring of
growth and
development
Clinical judgment as to the need for and type of radiographic
images for the evaluation and/or monitoring of dentofacial
growth and development.
Clinical judgment as to the need for and
type of radiographic images for evaluation and/or monitoring of dentofacial
growth and development. Panoramic
or periapical exam to assess developing third molars.
Not usually indicated.
61
Patient
With other circumstances including,
but not limited to,
proposed or existing
implants, pathology,
restorative/endodontic needs, treated
periodontal disease
and caries
remineralization.
Clinical judgment as to the need for and type of radiographic images for the evaluation and/or monitoring in these circumstances.
Clinical situations for which radiographs may be indicated include but are not limited to:
A. Positive historical findings
1. Previous periodontal or endodontic treatment
2. History of pain or trauma
3. Familial history of dental anomalies
4. Postoperative evaluation of healing
5. Remineralization monitoring
6. Presence of implants or evaluation for impact placement
B. Positive clinical signs/symptoms
1. Clinical evidence of periodontal disease
2. Large or deep restorations
3. Deep carious lesions
4. Malposed or clinically impacted teeth
5. Swelling
6. Evidence of dental/facial trauma
7. Mobility of teeth
8. Sinus tract (“fistula”)
9. Clinically suspected sinus pathology
10. Growth abnormalities
11. Oral involvement in known or suspected systemic disease
12. Positive neurologic findings in the head and neck
13. Evidence of foreign objects
14. Pain and/or dysfunction of the temporomandibular joint
15. Facial asymmetry
16. Abutment teeth for fixed or removable partial prosthesis
17. Unexplained bleeding
* 18. Unexplained sensitivity of teeth
19. Unusual eruption, spacing, or migration of teeth
20. Unusual tooth morphology, calcification, or color
21. Unexplained absence of teeth
22. Clinical erosion
Factors increasing risk for caries may include but are not limited to:
1. High level of caries experience or demineralization
2. History of recurrent caries
3. High titers of cariogenic bacteria
4. Existing restoration(s) of poor quality
5. Poor oral hygiene
6. Inadequate fluoride exposure
7. Prolonged nursing (bottle or breast)
8. High-sucrose frequency diet
9. Poor family oral health
10. Developmental or acquired enamel defects
11. Developmental or acquired disability
12. Xerostomia
13. Genetic abnormality of teeth
14. Many multisurface restorations
15. Chemo/radiation therapy
16. Eating disorders
17. Drug/alcohol abuse
18. Irregular dental care
Data from U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services: The Selection of Patients for Dental
Radiographic Examinations. Revised 2004 by the American Dental Association: Council
on Dental Benefit Program, Council on Dental Practice, Council on Scientific Affairs.
**
62 BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION AND RADIATION PROTECTION
x-rays, but will absorb a high percentage of the lowenergy x-rays. The latter do not contribute to the radiographic image. Low-energy x-rays are harmful to the
patient because they are absorbed by the skin, increasing
the patient’s dose (Figure 6-2).
Any material the x-ray beam passes through filters the
beam. Filtration may be built into the tube head (inherent),
or it may be added.
Inherent filtration is the filtration built into the machine by
the manufacturer. This includes the glass of the x-ray tube,
the insulating oil, and the material that seals the port. All x-ray
units have some built-in filtration. Usually the inherent filtration is not sufficient to meet state and federal standards,
requiring that filtration be added.
Added filtration is the placement of aluminum discs in
the path of the x-ray beam between the port seal of the
tube head and the PID. When the inherent filtration is not
sufficient to meet safety standards, a disk of aluminum of
the appropriate thickness (usually 0.5 mm) can be
inserted between the port of the tube head and the PID.
Several manufacturers have introduced x-ray units in
which the traditional aluminum filter is replaced with
samarium, a rare-earth metal.
Total filtration is the sum of the inherent and added filtration expressed in millimeters of aluminum equivalent.
Beam filtration must comply with state and federal laws.
Present safety standards require an equivalent of 1.5 mm
aluminum for x-ray machines operating in ranges below
70 kVp and a minimum of 2.5 mm aluminum for
machines operating at or above 70 kVp.
• Collimation controls the size and shape of the useful
beam.
Collimation of the beam is accomplished by using a lead
diaphragm or washer. The lead diaphragm collimator is
placed in the path of the primary beam as it exits the tube
housing at the port (Figure 6-3). Rectangular collimation
may also be achieved through the use of external collimators
that attach to the PID (Figure 6-4.) The function of the
passage of the beam through a sheet of material called a
filter (Figure 6-1). A filter is an absorbing material (usually aluminum) placed in the path of the x-ray beam to
remove a high percentage of the soft x-rays (the longer
wavelengths) and reduce patient radiation dose.
In the dental x-ray machine, these aluminum filter
disks vary in thickness. The half-value layer (HVL) of
an x-ray beam is the thickness (measured in millimeters)
of aluminum that will reduce the intensity of the beam
by one-half. Measuring the HVL determines the penetrating quality of the x-ray beam. The HVL is more accurate than kilovoltage to describe the x-ray beam quality
and penetration. Two similar x-ray machines operating at
the same kilovoltage may not produce x-rays of the same
quality and penetration. The half-value layer is used by
radiological health personnel when determining filtration
requirements.
Filters may be sealed into the tube head or inserted
into the port where the PID attaches. Pure aluminum or
its equivalent will not hinder the passage of high-energy
Tube Collimator Filter
FIGURE 6-1 Collimator and filter. The collimator is a lead washer that restricts the size of the
x-ray beam. The filter is an aluminum disc that filters (removes) the long wavelength x-rays.
Film No filter
Aluminum filter
FIGURE 6-2 Effect of filtration on skin exposure. Aluminum
filters selectively absorb the long wavelength
x-rays.
CHAPTER 6 • RADIATION PROTECTION 63
Collimator
(lead washer)
restricts size of
primary beam
Size of
primary beam
using collimation
Image receptor
FIGURE 6-3 Effect of collimation on
primary beam. Lead collimators control
the shape and size of the primary beam.
The beam is limited to the approximate
size of the image receptor.
FIGURE 6-7 Rectangular PIDs restrict the x-ray beam to the
approximate size of a #2 intraoral image receptor. Rectangular PIDs
are available in 8, 12, and 16 inches (20.5, 30, and 41 cm). (Courtesy of
Margraf Dental Manufacturing Inc.)
2.75″
2″
15
8

11
4

#2 film
FIGURE 6-6 Although circular collimation provides a large
enough area of exposure to adequately cover a size #2 image receptor,
the patient also receives excess radiation not needed for the exposure
of this receptor.
FIGURE 6-4 External collimator attaches to the PID to reduce
the area of radiation exposure.
Collimator PID
2.75″
FIGURE 6-5 The collimator restricts the size of the primary beam
to 2.75 in. (7 cm) at the end of the PID.
collimator is to reduce the size of the x-ray beam and the
amount of scattered radiation. Collimators may have either a
round or a rectangular opening and are matched with a
round or rectangular PID. Federal regulations require that
round opening collimators restrict the x-ray beam to 2.75 in.
(7 cm) at the patient end of the PID (Figure 6-5). Rectangular collimators restrict the beam to the approximate size of
the image receptor. Figure 6-6 shows the excess radiation
the patient receives with a round collimator when exposing a
#2-sized image receptor. Rectangular collimation reduces
patient radiation exposure by up to 70 percent (Figure 6-7).
Collimation also reduces scatter radiation (sometimes
called secondary radiation). Scatter radiation is radiation
that has been deflected from its path by impact during its
passage through matter. In addition to increasing patient
radiation dose, scattered radiation decreases the quality of
the radiographic image through fogging. In summary, the
two important functions of collimation are
PRACTICE POINT
All intraoral techniques require that the end of the PID be
placed as close to the patient’s skin as possible, without
touching, during the exposure. This is necessary to establish the desired target–surface distance. Increasing the distance between the open end of the PID and the patient’s
skin will not establish the desired target–surface distance.
For example, positioning the open end of an 8-in. (20.5-
cm) PID an additional 4 inches (10.2 cm) away from the
patient’s face is not the same as using a 12-in. (30-cm) PID.
See Figure 4-12.
PRACTICE POINT
Pointed, closed-end cones, originally designed to aid in
aiming the x-ray beam at the center of the film packet,
are no longer used (Figure 6-8). Pointed cones cause the
deflection or scattering of x-rays through contact with the
material of the cones. Because these pointed cones were
used for so many years, many still refer to the PID as a
“cone.” The term position indicating device (PID) is more
descriptive of its function of directing the x-rays, rather
than of its shape.
64 BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION AND RADIATION PROTECTION
FIGURE 6-8 Plastic closed-ended, pointed “cones” are no
longer used.
FIGURE 6-9 Round PIDs are available in 16, 12, and 8 inches
(41, 30, and 20.5 cm).
• Fast film and digital image sensors require less radiation
for exposure and are essential for exposure reduction.
In fact, after rectangular collimation, high-speed film is
the most effective equipment for reducing radiation to the
• Reduces the radiation dose to the patient by reducing the
volume of tissue exposed
• Reduces scatter radiation that causes poor contrast of the
radiograph (see Chapter 4)
• The position indicating device (PID) (or beam indicating device [BID] ) is an extension of the tube housing
and is used to direct the primary x-ray beam. The shape
of the PID indicates the shape of the collimator.
Although rectangular collimation reduces patient radiation
exposure by up to 70 percent over a round-collimated
beam, most dental x-ray machines are sold with round
PIDs attached. Rectangular PIDs can be purchased to
replace the round PIDs and reduce patient radiation
exposure (Figure 6-7).
The length of the PID also has an effect on the radiation
dose the patient receives. The length of the PID helps to
establish the desired target-surface distance. Both round
and rectangular PIDs are available in three lengths: 8 in.
(20.5 cm), 12 in. (30 cm), and 16 in. (41 cm).(See Figures 6-7
and 6-9.) The longer the PID (12-in. or 16-in. length), the
less radiation dose to the patient and the better quality radiographic image (see Figure 4-11). With a longer PID, there
is less divergence of the beam, creating a smaller diameter
of exposure (Figure 6-10).
It is important to note that the dental x-ray machine
may appear to have a short PID when it actually may be
long. Some dental x-ray machines feature a recessed PID,
where the tube is recessed back in the tubehead behind the
transformers, therefore creating a longer target–surface
distance (see Figure 3-1).
CHAPTER 6 • RADIATION PROTECTION 65
Source Source
16″
8″
2.75″
FIGURE 6-10 Target-surface distance. The longer the target-surface
distance, the more parallel the x-rays and the less tissue exposed. Note that the
beam size at the patient’s skin entrance is 2.75 in. (7 cm) for both targetsurface distances. It is the exit beam size that increases to expose a larger area
when using the shorter target-surface distance.
FIGURE 6-11 Many image receptor holding devices are available
to fit most situations. The use of a holder prevents asking patients to
put their fingers in the path of the primary beam.
the number of retakes that may result from alignment
errors. These devices also stabilize the image receptor in
the mouth and reduce the possibility of movement and of
film bending that often result when the patient uses a finger to hold the receptor in position.
• The lead apron made of at least 0.25-mm lead or leadequivalent materials is placed over the patient’s abdomen
to protect the reproductive organs and other radiosensitive tissues from potential scatter radiation during radiographic procedures (Figure 6-12). The use of a lead
apron was recommended for protecting patients during
exposure of dental radiographs many years ago when dental
x-ray machine output was less reliable and film speeds
were slower than today’s standards. Using a fast-speed film
or digital image sensor and a dental x-ray machine that is
appropriately collimated and filtered essentially eliminates
the requirement for covering the patient’s abdomen with a
lead apron. The National Council on Radiation Protection
and Measurements has determined that lead aprons do not
significantly reduce doses from intraoral dental exposures.
Nevertheless some states still have laws requiring the use of
a lead apron over the abdominal area, and patients have
come to expect it. Even if it is not legally required, the use
of a lead or lead-equivalent apron is in keeping with the
ALARA concept and remains a prudent if not essential
practice.
Lead and lead-equivalent aprons should be stored flat or
hung unbent. Folding the apron may cause the material
inside to crack. This is most likely to occur when aprons
are repeatedly folded in the same place day after day.
Cracks in the material allow radiation to penetrate and
render the apron less effective.
• Thyroid collar. Lead and lead-equivalent aprons are available with or without an attached thyroid collar (Figure 6-13).
The thyroid collar, when in place around the patient’s
neck, protects the thyroid gland and other radiosensitive
tissues in the neck region during exposure of intraoral
radiographs. Because of the direction of the dental x-ray
patient. Currently, intraoral dental x-ray film is available in
three speed groups, D, E and F. E-speed film, when compared to D-speed film, is twice as fast and therefore
requires only one-half the exposure time. F-speed film can
reduce radiation exposure 20 percent compared to E-speed
film. The American Dental Association and the American
Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology recommend the use of the fastest speed film currently available.
Digital image sensors can further reduce the amount radiation required to produce a diagnostic image and will be
discussed in Chapter 9.
• Image receptor holding devices that position the film
packet or digital sensor intraorally are recommended. The
use of a film or image receptor holder eliminates having
the patient hold the receptor in the oral cavity with the fingers (Figure 6-11). Unnecessarily exposing the patient’s
fingers is not ethical practice in keeping with ALARA. The
use of image receptor holders with external aiming devices
will assist the operator in aligning the x-ray beam, which
may afford the patient additional protection by reducing
66 BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION AND RADIATION PROTECTION
Adult patient apron
Available with or without thyroid collar
Child patient apron
Available with or without thyroid collar Thyroid collar
Collar available separate from
apron
Radiographer apron
Used to protect
individual assisting
patient during
exposure
Panoramic cape
Full-size, covers front and back
Panoramic cape
Drapes over shoulders
FIGURE 6-12 Lead aprons and
thyroid collars are available in a wide
range of sizes. Aprons are available
with an attached thyroid collar, or the
thyroid collar may be a separate part.
FIGURE 6-13 Patient protected with lead apron with
thyroid collar in place.
PRACTICE POINT
The use of a thyroid collar is contraindicated when exposing
panoramic radiographs using rotational panoramic equipment because the collar or upper part of the apron to which
it is attached may obscure diagnostic information or interfere
with the rotation of the panoramic unit. This is one of the
reasons lead aprons are available without thyroid collars.
Optimum Film Processing
An often-overlooked step in producing diagnostic radiographs
is film processing. Processing errors increase patient radiation
exposure by resulting in retake radiographs. The patient
deserves the attention that must be paid to meticulous processing procedures and careful film handling to produce ideal diagnostic quality radiographs. Darkroom procedures should be
outlined and followed carefully (see Chapter 8).
Careful attention to chemical replenishment and following
the time–temperature method of processing produces radiographs of ideal quality and avoids retakes. There are ethical considerations to proper processing protocols as well.
In the past, it was sometimes observed that an unethical
practitioner would call for overexposing (increasing the
radiation dose to the patient) and underdeveloping the film
in an attempt to save time during certain procedures.
Another unethical practice noted in history has been to let
processing chemicals go too long between replenishment or
solution change. As the processing chemistry weakens, the
resultant images appear less dense (lighter). Unethical practitioners would increase the dose of radiation to compensate
for the weakening processing solutions. It was the patient
who bore the brunt of this practice by enduring the additional radiation burden. Patient protection techniques
should be used at all times to keep radiation exposures as
low as possible (Box 6-1).
Protection Measures for the Radiographer
All measures taken to protect the patient from radiation
also benefit the radiographer (Box 6-2). Specific radiation
protection methods for the radiographer include time,
shielding, and distance. The radiographer should spend a
minimal amount of time, protected by shielding, at the
greatest distance from the source of radiation to avoid
unnecessary exposure.
beam in this region, lead or lead-equivalent thyroid collars
are recommended for all patients, and especially for children and pregnant females and women of child-bearing
age. (This topic is discussed further in Chapter 27.)
CHAPTER 6 • RADIATION PROTECTION 67
BOX 6-1 Summary of Protection Methods for
the Patient
• Evidence-based prescribing
• Communication
• Working knowledge of quality radiographs
• Education
• Selection of technique
• Posted exposure factors
• Filtration
• Collimation
• Open-ended, 16-in. (41-cm) rectangular PID
• F-speed film/digital image receptors
• Image receptor holders
• Lead/lead-equivalent thyroid collar/apron
• Darkroom protocol
BOX 6-2 Summary of Methods to Protect the
Radiographer
• Follow all patient protection measures.
• Do not contact the tubehead during exposure.
• Avoid retakes.
• Do not hold the image receptor for the patient.
• Use a protective barrier/shield.
• Use leaded protective clothing when necessary.
• Remain 6 ft (1.82 m) away and at a 45° angle from the exiting
primary beam.
• Use radiation monitoring.
Time
When careful attention is focused on producing the highest quality radiographs, the need for retake radiographs is decreased,
which in turn decreases the time the radiographer spends near the
x-ray machine. Additionally, the dental radiographer should
avoid the pitfalls that may lure movement into the path of the primary beam. For example, a drifting tube head should never be
held during the exposure. Radiation leakage from the tube head
can expose the operator to a significant amount of radiation. If
the tube head drifts, it should be serviced to stabilize it.
If a patient must be stabilized during the procedure, as is
sometimes the case with a small child, a parent or guardian
may have to be asked to assist with the procedure. The parent
or guardian should be protected with lead, or lead-equivalent
barriers such as an apron or gloves, when they will be in the
path of the x-ray beam. The radiographer must never place
him/herself in the primary beam.
Image receptor holding devices should be used to stabilize
the receptor in the patient’s oral cavity. If placement with an
image receptor holding device is difficult to achieve, as is the
case with a patient with a small mouth, low and/or sensitive
palatal vault, or an exaggerated gag reflex, the radiographer
should experiment with other holders, smaller-sized films, or
the bisecting technique. The radiographer must not hold the
image receptor in the patient’s mouth. Additionally, another
member of the oral health care team must not be allowed to
place themselves in the path of the primary beam while the
radiographer presses the exposure button.
Shielding
Structural shielding provides the radiographer with protection
from potential scattered radiation. Safe installation of dental
x-ray machines will provide an exposure button permanently
mounted behind a protective barrier, providing protection for
the operator (see Figure 3-4). Most oral health care practices
are located in buildings that have incorporated adequate
shielding in walls such as these regularly used construction
materials: plaster, cinderblock, to 3 inches of drywall,
3/16 inch steel, or 1 millimeter of lead. Additionally, leadlined walls or windows, thick or specially constructed partitions between the rooms, or specially constructed lead screens
offer excellent protection for the operator during exposure
(see Figure 3-7.)
Distance
If a protective barrier is not present, as may be the case in an
open-bay designed practice setting, distance plays an important
role in safeguarding the radiographer during patient exposures.
The operator should always stand as far away as practical—at
least 6 ft (1.8 m)—from the head of the patient (the source of
scatter radiation) while making the exposure. The intensity of
the x-radiation diminishes the farther the x-rays travel
(Figure 6-14). In addition to distance, it is important to remain
in a position 45 degrees to the primary x-ray beam as it exits the
patient, as this is the area of minimum scatter when the patient
is seated upright. Maximum scatter is most likely to occur back
in the direction of the tube head. (Figure 6-15). If exposing
radiographs while the patient is in a supine position (lying
prone in the dental chair), the radiographer should take a position
at an angle of 135 to 180 degrees behind the patient’s head
where the least scatter radiation occurs.
All persons, whether other oral health care team members
or other patients not directly involved with the x-ray exposure,
must be protected by shielding and/or distance.
Radiation Monitoring
The only way to be sure that x-ray equipment is not emitting
too much radiation and that operators are not receiving more
than the maximum permissible dose is to use radiation measuring
devices to monitor equipment and personnel. In radiography,
monitoring is defined as periodic or continuing measurement
to determine the exposure rate in a given area or the dose
received by an operator.
Area Monitoring
Area monitoring involves making an on-site survey to measure
the output of the dental x-ray unit, to check for possible high-level
radiation areas in the operatory, and to determine if any radiation
is passing through walls. Special equipment is needed to detect
the exact amount of ionizing radiation at any given area. Numerous companies specialize in area monitoring. In some regions,
this service may be performed by qualified state inspectors.
21
/2
68 BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION AND RADIATION PROTECTION
45° 45°
90° 90°
Radiographer Radiographer
6 feet
(1.83 meters)
6 feet
(1.83 meters)
Minimum scatter
Maximum scatter Maximum scatter
Minimum scatter
Exiting
beam
FIGURE 6-15 When structural shielding is not available, the radiographer should stand in a position
at least 6 ft (1.83 m) from the head of the patient at an angle of 45º to the exiting primary beam.
A radiographer standing here
would receive 4 times more
scatter radiation than if the…
…radiographer stood here.
3 feet
(0.9m)
6 feet
(1.83m)
FIGURE 6-14 Distance is an effective means of reducing exposure from scatter
radiation.
CHAPTER 6 • RADIATION PROTECTION 69
FIGURE 6-17 DIS radiation monitor. Sized and shaped similar
to a thumb drive, this device has a clip to allow the radiographer to
wear the monitor while working with ionizing radiation. The device
uses a USB connector to plug into a computer with Internet access.
When logged on to the manufacturer’s Web site, real-time radiation
exposure readings may be downloaded from the device. (Courtesy of
Quantum Products.)
FIGURE 6-16 OSL
radiation monitor worn by
the radiographer to monitor
radiation exposure.
(http:/www.landauerinc.com)
Personnel Monitoring
Personnel monitoring requires oral health care professionals to
wear a radiation monitoring device or dosimeter (Figures 6-16
and 6-17) such as a film badge, TLD, OSL monitor, or DIS
monitor (Table 6-2). For a fee, radiation monitoring companies
provide the measuring devices and services to the oral health care
team. After use, the devices are returned to the company or the
information recorded by the device is transmitted to the company
via the Internet. The company evaluates the information captured
by the device and provides the dental practice with a report
regarding exposure. This report compares the operator’s exposure
reading with the maximum allowable level, and the monitoring
company updates the subscriber’s records to keep the wearer
in full compliance with all federal and state safety regulations.
The reports from a radiation monitoring service provide a reliable
permanent record of accumulated doses of occupational radiation
exposure. The types of personnel monitoring devices currently on
the market are listed in Table 6-2.
The likelihood of dental radiation exposing an oral health care
professional who is following ALARA is so small that only a few
states consider dental radiation monitoring mandatory. Even so,
TABLE 6-2 Types of Personnel Monitoring Devices
TYPE HOW IT WORKS ADVANTAGES LIMITATIONS
Film badge Radiosensitive film in a plastic/metal holder lined
with filters of different materials varying in
thickness. Exposure is determined by “reading”
the processed film electronically.
Film itself provides a
permanent record of
exposures
Reliable technology
Film must be changed
and returned to the
monitoring company
monthly
TLD (thermoluminescent
dosimeter )
Contains crystals, usually lithium fluoride, that
absorb radiation. Crystals are heated after being
exposed, and the energy emitted, in the form of
visible light, is proportional to the amount of
radiation absorbed.
Extremely accurate
One-piece
construction
Badge must be returned
to the monitoring
company every
3 months
OSL monitor
(optically
stimulated
luminescence)
Absorbs radiation similar to TLD, but crystals
release energy during optical stimulation instead
of heat.
Allows multiple readouts for reanalysis
New technology
Badge can only be used
once
DIS monitor
(direct ion
storage)
Uses a miniature ion chamber to absorb radiation.
Exposure is determined through digital
processing.
Instant real-time unlimited readouts
New technology
Requires on-site reader
or computer connection to the Internet
more and more oral health care professionals are deciding to
secure monitoring devices and services for themselves and their
employees, even when not mandated by law. As a risk management tool, monitoring radiation exposure—or more likely, documenting the lack of exposure—helps to determine whether the
operator is maintaining radiation safety protocols; aids in providing the radiographer with peace of mind; and assists with risk management by providing a health record of exposure, or more likely,
the lack of exposure, for personnel.
Although personnel monitoring devices play a valuable
role, it should be noted that they are limited in their ability to be
precise at estimating very low levels of exposure. Advancing
technology in this area continue to improve the ability of
70 BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION AND RADIATION PROTECTION
dosimeters to estimate low-dose exposures. Monitors that have
been approved by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) can be expected to be accurate.
It should be noted that personnel monitoring devices do not
“protect” the wearer from radiation.
Organizations Responsible for
Recommending/Setting Exposure Limits
As early as 1902, studies were undertaken to determine the effect
of radiation exposure on the body and to consider setting limits on
radiation exposure. The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) was formed in 1928, and in 1929 the
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements
(NCRP) was created in the United States. The ICRP and the
NCRP do not actually set the laws governing the use of ionizing
radiation, but their suggestions and recommendations are so
highly regarded that most all regulatory bodies use recommendations from these organizations to formulate legislation controlling
the use of radiation. The American Dental Association (ADA) and
its various committees and affiliated organizations, such as the
American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
(AAOMR), work closely with all organizations to ensure that oral
health care patients receive state-of-the-art treatment in radiation
safety (Table 6-3).
Maximum Permissible Dose (MPD)
The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission has developed radiation protection guidelines referred to as the
maximum permissible dose (MPD) for the protection of radiation workers and the general public (Table 6-4). Maximum permissible dose is defined as the dose equivalent of ionizing
radiation that, in the light of present knowledge, is not expected to
cause detectable body damage to average persons at any time during their lifetime. These limits do not apply to medical or dental
radiation used for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes. Over the
years, the acceptable limits have been constantly revised downward; they are now about 700 times smaller than those originally
proposed in 1902, mainly because many aspects of tissue damage
from radiation are still not clearly understood.
Maximum limits are set higher for workers than for the
public, but the suggested limits of the maximum permissible
accumulated dose for both groups are purposely set far lower
than it is believed the human body can safely accept.
• Radiation workers. The maximum permissible dose
(MPD) for oral health care professionals is the same as for
other radiation workers. According to these guidelines,
the whole-body dose may not exceed 50 mSv (5 rem) per
year. There is no established weekly limit, but state public
health personnel usually use a weekly dose of 1.0 mSv
(0.1 rem) when inspecting dental offices.
The 50 mSv (5 rem) yearly limit for radiation workers
has two very important exceptions. It does not apply to persons under 18 years or to any female members of the oral
health care team who are known to be pregnant. Persons
under 18 years are classified as part of the general public
and can accumulate only 5 mSv (0.5 rem) per year. In the
case of pregnant women, it is recommended that exposure
to the fetus be limited to 5 mSv (0.5 rem), not to be received
at a rate greater than 0.5 mSv (0.05 rem) per month.
• General public. The general public is permitted 5 mSv
(0.5 rem) per year, or one-tenth the dose permitted radiation workers. It should be noted that the MPD has been
established for incidental or accidental exposures and
does not include doses from medical and dental diagnostic or therapeutic radiation. Necessary medical and dental
diagnostic or therapeutic radiation is not counted in the
permissible dose limits. If a patient needs radiographic
services, then that patient needs the radiographic services. An oral health care team member who requires
medical, dental diagnostic, or therapeutic radiation would
become the “patient,” and then the general public MPD
would apply.
TABLE 6-3 Radiation Protection Organizations
ORGANIZATION WEB SITE
International Commission on Radiological Units and Measurements (ICRU) www.icru.org
International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) www.icrp.org
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) www.ncrp.com
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) www.nrc.gov
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) www.epa.gov
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) www.fda.gov
U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) www.osha.gov
American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology (AAOMR) www.aaomr.org
American Dental Association (ADA) www.ada.org
CHAPTER 6 • RADIATION PROTECTION 71
The most important step in keeping the patient’s exposure
to a minimum is the use of evidence-based selection criteria to
assess patients for radiographic need.
The technical ability of the radiographer will aid in preventing
unnecessary radiation exposure to the patient. Technical ability
includes communication, working knowledge of quality radiographs, and education. Technique standards, including the choice
of paralleling or bisecting technique, and the selection of exposure
factors also aid in preventing unnecessary radiation exposure.
Equipment standards that play important roles in reducing patient
radiation dose include filtration, collimation, and PID length.
Filtration is the absorption of long wavelength, less penetrating x-rays from the x-ray beam by passage through a sheet of
material called a filter. The half-value layer (HVL) of an x-ray
beam is the thickness (measured in millimeters) of aluminum that
will reduce the intensity of the beam by one-half. Present safety
standards require an equivalent of 1.5 mm aluminum filtration for
dental x-ray machines operating in ranges below 70 kVp and a
minimum of 2.5 mm aluminum for machines operating at or above
70 kVp. Total filtration is the sum of inherent and added filtration.
Collimation is the control of the size and shape of the useful
beam. Federal regulations require that round opening collimators
restrict the x-ray beam to 2.75 in. (7 cm) at the patient end of the
PID. Rectangular collimation reduces patient radiation dose by
70 percent over round collimation. Collimation reduces scattered
radiation that contributes to poor contrast of radiographic images.
The position indicating device (PID) is an extension of
the tube housing and is used to direct the primary x-ray
beam. The length of the PID helps to establish the desired
target–surface distance; the longer the PID, the less radiation
dose to the patient. PIDs have either a round or rectangular
shape and are available in lengths of 8 in. (20.5 cm), 12 in.
(30 cm), and 16 in. (41 cm).
Fast film requires less radiation for exposure. Film speed
groups D, E, or F are currently available for use in dental radiography. Film speed F reduces patient radiation exposure by 20 percent
over film speed E. Film speed E reduces patient radiation exposure
by 50 percent over film speed D. The use of digital image receptors
can further reduce the radiation dose to the patient.
The use of image receptor holders eliminates using the
patient’s fingers to stabilize the receptor intraorally, avoiding
unnecessary radiation exposure to the patient’s fingers.
A lead or lead-equivalent thyroid collar with apron should
be placed on all patients during intraoral x-ray exposures. The
thyroid collar is most important in protecting children and
pregnant women and women of child-bearing age.
Optimum film processing using time-temperature techniques in an adequately equipped darkroom will help avoid
retakes that lead to an increase in patient radiation exposure.
To reduce the chance of operator exposure, time spent near
the source of radiation should be reduced; structural shielding
employed; or the operator should be in a position at least 6 feet
away from the source of radiation at a 45 degree angle to the exiting primary beam.
Area and personnel radiation monitoring can be used to
measure radiation exposures. The International Commission on
Radiological Protection (ICRP) and the National Council on
Guidelines for Maintaining Safe Radiation
Levels
Radiation Safety Legislation
The Tenth Amendment gives the states the constitutional
authority to regulate health. Because many federal agencies are
involved in the development and use of atomic energy, the
federal government has preempted the control of radiation.
Certain provisions of the Constitution and Public Law 86-373
have enabled the states to assume this preempted power and
pass laws that spell out radiation safety measures to protect the
patient, the operator, or anyone (the general public) near the
source of radiation. In fact, even counties and cities have passed
ordinances to protect their citizens from radiation hazards.
Most states and a few localities require periodic inspection or
monitoring of the equipment and its surroundings.
The entry of the federal government into the regulation of
x-ray machines began in 1968 with the enactment of the Radiation Control for Health and Safety Act, which standardized the
performance of x-ray equipment. Subsequently, the ConsumerPatient Radiation Health and Safety Act of 1981 was passed,
requiring the various states to develop minimum standards for
operators of dental x-ray equipment. Several states responded to
this by enacting educational requirements for the certification of
individuals who place and expose dental radiographs.
Because the laws concerning radiation control vary from
state to state, individuals working with x-rays must be familiar
with the regulations governing the use of ionizing radiation in
their locale. Regardless of laws, failure to observe safety protocol cannot be justified ethically.
REVIEW—Chapter summary
Oral health care professionals have an ethical responsibility to
adopt the ALARA concept—as low as reasonably achievable—
which implies that any dose that can be reduced without major
difficulty, great expense, or inconvenience should be reduced or
eliminated.
TABLE 6-4 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission Occupational Dose Limits
TISSUE ANNUAL DOSE LIMIT
Whole body 50 mSv (5 rem)
Any organ 500 mSv (50 rem)
Skin 500 mSv (50 rem)
Extremity 500 mSv (50 rem)
Lens of eye 150 mSv (15 rem)
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (2007, December
4). Standards for protection against radiation, Title 10,
Part 20, of the Code of Federal Regulations. Retrieved
April 11, 2010, from http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
doc-collections/cfr/part020/part020-1201.html
72 BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION AND RADIATION PROTECTION
7. Which of the following exposes the patient to less
radiation?
a. 8 in. (20.5 cm) round PID
b. 12 in. (30 cm) round PID
c. 16 in. (41 cm) round PID
d. 16 in. (41 cm) rectangular PID
8. Which of the following contributes the most to reducing
patient radiation exposure?
a. D speed film
b. E speed film
c. F speed film
9. During dental x-ray exposure, the lead/lead-equivalent
thyroid collar with apron should be placed on
a. children.
b. females.
c. males.
d. all patients.
10. Each of the following aids in reducing patient radiation exposure EXCEPT one. Which one is the
EXCEPTION?
a. Slow-speed film
b. Careful film handling
c. Darkroom protocol
d. Image receptor holders
11. If a protective barrier is not present, what is the recommended minimum distance that the operator should
stand from the source of the radiation?
a. 3 ft (0.91 m)
b. 6 ft (1.83 m)
c. 9 ft (2.74m)
d. 12 ft (3.66m)
12. Film badges, TLDs, and OSL and DIS monitors are
used to
a. protect the operator from unnecessary radiation exposure.
b. reduce the radiation exposure received by the
patient.
c. monitor radiation exposure the dental radiographer
may incur.
d. record an on-site survey of the radiation output of the
x-ray unit.
13. The annual maximum permissible whole-body dose for
oral health care personnel is
a. 0.5 mSv.
b. 5.0 mSv.
c. 50 mSv.
d. 500 mSv.
14. The annual maximum permissible whole-body dose for
the general public is
a. 0.5 mSv.
b. 5.0 mSv.
c. 50 mSv.
d. 500 mSv.
Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) recommend
dose limits. Federal, state, and local agencies set regulations
governing exposure. The American Dental Association and the
American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology work
closely with all agencies responsible for radiation safety.
The maximum permissible dose (MPD) is 50 mSv (5 rem)
per year for radiation workers and 5 mSv (0.5 rem) for the general public, radiation workers who are pregnant, and children
under 18 years of age.
RECALL—Study questions
1. Who has an ethical responsibility to adopt ALARA?
a. The dental assistant
b. The dental hygienist
c. The dentist
d. All of the above
2. Based on the selection criteria guidelines, what is the
radiographic recommendation for bitewing radiographs on an adult recall patient with no clinical
caries and no high-risk factors for caries?
a. Every 6–12 months
b. Every 12–18 months
c. Every 18–24 months
d. Every 24–36 months
3. Communication, working knowledge of a quality radiographic image, and education all aid in protecting the
patient against unnecessary radiation exposure by
a. using lower exposure factors.
b. reducing the risk of retake radiographs.
c. collimating and filtering the primary beam.
d. creating a longer target–surface distance.
4. What is the minimum total filtration that is required by
an x-ray machine that can operate in ranges above 70
kVp?
a. 1.5 mm of aluminum equivalent
b. 1.5 mm of lead equivalent
c. 2.5 mm of aluminum equivalent
d. 2.5 mm of lead equivalent
5. What is the federally mandated size of the diameter of
the primary beam at the end of the PID (at the skin of
the patient’s face)?
a. 1.75 in. (4.5 cm)
b. 2.75 in. (7 cm)
c. 3.75 in. (10 cm)
d. 4.75 in. (12 cm)
6. Radiation protection from secondary radiation may be
increased by the use of an aluminum filter and a lead
collimator because the filter regulates the size of the
tissue area that is exposed and the collimator prevents
low-energy radiation from reaching the tissue.
a. Both statement and reason are correct.
b. Both statement and reason are NOT correct.
c. The statement is correct, but the reason is NOT correct.
d. The statement is NOT correct, but the reason is correct.
CHAPTER 6 • RADIATION PROTECTION 73
15. List three radiation protection organizations.
a. ______________
b. ______________
c. ______________
REFLECT—Case Study
Use the selection criteria guidelines to make a preliminary recommendation and/or to explain to the patient why the dentist
has prescribed or has not prescribed radiographs. Consider the
following three cases:
1. A 17-year-old patient presents with a healthy oral
assessment. No active caries were clinically detected.
No periodontal pockets were noted. His record indicates that his last radiographs were bitewings taken
6 months ago. Based on the evidence-based selection
criteria guidelines, what would be the most likely recommendation for radiographs for this patient?
2. A 25-year-old female recall patient presents for her
6-month check-up. Although her homecare is good, Class
II (multisurface) restorations are present on several
molars and premolars. Her last radiographs were bitewings taken 3 years ago. Based on the evidence-based
selection criteria guidelines, what would be the most
likely recommendation for radiographs for this patient?
3. A 45-year-old male patient, new to your practice, presents with a moderate periodontal condition and evidence of generalized dental disease. He reveals that he
has not had professional oral care in several years, but is
here today to begin to “take care of his teeth.” Based on
the evidence-based selection criteria guidelines, what
would be the most likely recommendation for radiographs for this patient?
RELATE—Laboratory application
Using Box 6-1, Summary of Protection Methods for the Patient,
and Box 6-2, Summary of Methods to Protect the Radiogragher, as
a guide, perform an inventory of your facility. Make a list of all the
radiation protection methods used at your facility. Compare and
contrast these with the safety protocols you learned in this chapter.
Begin with the first patient radiation protection method
listed in Box 6-1, evidence-based prescribing. Investigate how
the dentist at your facility determines who will need radiographs. What guidelines do the dental hygienist and the dental
assistant use to help them in explaining the need for necessary
radiographs to the patient? Does your facility use guidelines
similar to the evidence-based guidelines you learned about in
this chapter? Describe them. Compare and contrast the methods
your facility uses to determine radiographic need to the guidelines you learned about in this chapter. Is your facility meeting
or exceeeding this safety method for reducing patient radiation
dose? If not, what is the rationale for not meeting this standard?
Proceed to the next item on the list in Box 6-1, Communication. Observe the communication between the oral health
care professionals at your facility prior to, during, and following
patient x-ray exposure. What are some examples of dialogue
that contributed to aiding in the protection of patients from
unnecessary radiation exposure? Was there any communication
that you think could have been added? Again, compare and
contrast the communication standards the professionals at your
facility use to decrease the likelihood of unnecessary radiation
exposure using the guidelines you learned about in this chapter.
Is your facility meeting or exceeeding this safety method for
reducing patient radiation dose? If not, what is the rationale for
not meeting this standard?
Proceed through the list of items in Box 6-1 and Box 6-2.
Use observation and interviewing techniques to thoroughly
investigate how each of these items is applied at your facility.
Based on what you learned in this chapter, determine whether
your facility is adequately applying all possible methods of
reducing radiation exposure to patients and radiographers.
REFERENCES
American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs.
(2001). An update on radiographic practices: Information
and recommendations. Journal of the American Dental
Association, 132, 234–238.
American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs.
(2006). The use of dental radiographs: Update and recommendations. Journal of the American Dental Association,
137, 1304–1312.
Carestream Health, Inc. (2007). Kodak Dental Systems: Radiation safety in dental radiography. Pub. N-414. Rochester,
NY: Author.
Health Canada. (2008). Environmental and work place health.
Technology comparison. HC Pub.: 4429. :Author.
International Commission on Radiological Protection. (1991).
1990 recommendations of ICRP. Publication 60. Stockholm: Annuals of the ICRP, 21, 1–3.
Kuroyanagi, K., Yoshihiko, H., Hisao, F., & Tadashi, S. (1998).
Distribution of scattered radiation during intraoral radiography with the patient in supine position. Oral Surgery,
Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 85(6), 736-741.
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements.
(1991). Implementation of the principle of as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) for medical and dental personnel. NCRP Report No. 107.Washington, DC: NCRP.
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements.
(2003). Radiation protection in dentistry. NCRP Report
No. 145.Washington, DC: NCRP.
Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, American Dental Association Council on Dental Benefit Program, Council on Dental Practice, Council on Scientific
Affairs. (2004). The selection of patients for dental radiographic examinations. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of
Health and Human Services.
Thomson, E. M. (2006). Radiation safety update. Contemporary
Oral Hygiene, 6(3), 10–18.
OBJECTIVES
Following successful completion of this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Define the key words.
2. List and describe the four parts of an intraoral film.
3. Describe latent image formation.
4. List and describe the four parts of an intraoral film packet.
5. Differentiate between the tube side and the back side of an intraoral film packet.
6. Identify the intraoral film speeds currently available for dental radiographs.
7. Match the intraoral film size with customary usage.
8. Match the type of intraoral projection with radiographic need.
9. Explain the difference between intraoral and extraoral film.
10. List typical extraoral film sizes.
11. Compare and contrast duplicating film with radiographic film.
12. List the seven conditions that fog stored film.
KEY WORDS
Antihalation coating
Bitewing radiograph
Duplicating film
Emulsion
Extraoral film
Film packet
Film speed
Gelatin
Halide
Identification dot
lntensifying screen
Intraoral film
Latent image
Occlusal radiograph
Pedodontic film
Periapical radiograph
Screen film
Silver halide crystals
Solarized emulsion
Tube side
Dental X-ray Film
PART III • DENTAL X-RAY IMAGE
RECEPTORS AND FILM PROCESSING
TECHNIQUES
CHAPTER
7
CHAPTER
OUTLINE
 Objectives 74
 Key Words 74
 Introduction 75
 Composition
of Dental
X-ray Film 75
 Latent Image
Formation 75
 Types of Dental
X-ray Film 76
 Film Storage
and Protection 80
 Review, Recall,
Reflect, Relate 81
 References 82
CHAPTER 7 • DENTAL X-RAY FILM 75
Introduction
Technological advances in digital imaging may one day render
film-based radiography obsolete. Until that day, film remains
a reliable method for acquiring diagnostic images to assess
oral health and plan treatment for oral disease. Because radiation’s interaction with film is what allows for the use of
x-rays in preventive oral health care, the dental assistant and
dental hygienist should possess a working knowledge of how
radiographic film records an image. Additionally, determining
how film can best be used to provide the greatest amount of
diagnostic information while exposing the patient to the least
amount of radiation possible is key to radiation safety. The
purpose of this chapter is to explain film composition,
introduce film category types, and discuss film protection
and storage to aid the dental assistant and dental hygienist
in making appropriate decisions regarding film use and
handling.
Composition of Dental X-ray Film
The film used in dental radiography is photographic film that
has been especially adapted in size, emulsion, speed, and packaging for dental uses. Figure 7-1 illustrates the composition of
dental x-ray film.
Film Base
The purpose of the film base is to provide support for the fragile
emulsion and to provide strength for handling. Films used in
dental radiography have a thin, flexible, clear, or blue-tinted
polyester base. The blue tint enhances contrast and image quality.
The base is covered with a photographic emulsion on both
sides.
Adhesive
Each emulsion layer is attached to the base by a thin layer of
adhesive.
Emulsion
The emulsion is composed of gelatin in which crystals of silver
halide salts are suspended. The function of the gelatin is to
keep the silver halide crystals evenly suspended over the base.
The gelatin will not dissolve in cold water, but swells, exposing
the silver halide crystals to the chemicals in the developing
solution. The gelatin shrinks as it dries, leaving a smooth surface
that becomes the radiograph.
The silver halide crystals are compounds of a halogen
(either bromine or iodine) with another element. In radiography,
as well as in photography, that element is silver. Dental film emulsion is about 90 to 99 percent silver bromide and 1 to 10 percent
silver iodide. Silver halide crystals are sensitive to radiation. It is
the silver halide crystals that, when exposed to x-rays, retain the
latent image.
Protective Layer
The supercoating of gelatin to protect the emulsion from
scratching and rough handling that covers the emulsion layers
is called the protective layer.
Latent Image Formation
During radiation exposure x-rays strike and ionize some, but
not all, of the silver halide crystals, resulting in the formation
of a latent (invisible) image. Not all the radiation penetrating
the patient’s tissue will reach the film emulsion. For example,
metal restorations such as amalgam or crowns will absorb
the x-ray energy and stop the radiation from reaching the
film. It should be noted that varying amounts of radiation
will reach the film. The varying thicknesses of the objects in
the path of the beam will allow more or less radiation to pass
through and reach the film emulsion. For example, enamel
and bone will absorb, or stop, more x-rays from reaching the
film than the less dense structures such as the dentin or pulp
chambers of the teeth. When radiation does reach the emulsion, the silver halide crystals are ionized, or separated into
silver and bromide and iodide ions that store this energy as a
latent image. These energy centers store the invisible image
pattern until the processing procedure produces a visual
image (see Chapter 8).
During the developing stage of the processing procedure,
the exposed silver halide crystals—which have stored a latent
image—are changed into black specks of silver, resulting in the
black or radiolucent areas observed on a dental radiograph.
The amount of black silver specks varies depending on the
structures radiographed and whether or not those structures
allowed the x-rays to pass through and reach the film
emulsion. The less dense or thin structures permit the passage
of x-rays; thick, dense structures will not. These dense
structures will appear clear/white or radiopaque on the
radiograph as a result of the fixer step during film processing
(see Chapter 8).
Film base
Protective coating
Adhesive
Adhesive
Protective coating
Silver halide
crystals
Emulsion
Gelatin
FIGURE 7-1 Schematic cross-section drawing of
dental x-ray film. The rigid but flexible film base is coated
on both sides with an emulsion consisting of silver halide
(bromide and iodide) crystals embedded in gelatin. Each
emulsion layer is attached to the base by a thin layer of
adhesive. The emulsion layers are covered by a supercoating of
gelatin to protect the emulsion from scratching and handling.
76 DENTAL X-RAY IMAGE RECEPTORS AND FILM PROCESSING TECHNIQUES
Identification dot
on tube side of
film packet
Intraoral film
Outer package
wrapping
Lead foil
Black paper
film wrapper
FIGURE 7-4 Cross-section of a film packet.
Types of Dental X-ray Film
Depending on where the film is to be used—inside or outside
the mouth—the film is classified as intraoral or extraoral.
Intraoral Films
Intraoral films are designed for use inside the oral cavity.
The use of an intraoral film outside the oral cavity is contraindicated because of the increased dose of radiation needed
to produce an acceptable radiographic density.
FILM PACKET The film manufacturer cuts the films to the
sizes required in dentistry. Small films suitable for intraoral
(inside the mouth) radiography are made into what is called a
film packet. The terms film packet and film are often used
interchangeably. Figure 7-2 shows the front or tube side and
the back side of an intraoral film packet.
All intraoral film packets are assembled similarly. The film
is first surrounded by black, light-protective paper. Next, a thin
sheet of lead foil to shield the film from backscatter radiation is
placed on the side of the film that will be away from the radiation source. An outer wrapping of moisture-resistant paper or
plastic completes the assembly (Figures 7-3 and 7-4).
The film packet consists of:
1. Film
2. Black paper wrapping
3. Lead foil
4. Moisture-resistant outer wrapping
FIGURE 7-2 Intraoral film packets showing the front or
tube side (white, unprinted side of the film packet) (top) and the
back side (color-coded side) of the film packet (bottom).
1
2
3
2
4
1
FIGURE 7-3 Back of an open film packet. (1)
Moisture-resistant outer wrap. (2) Black paper. (3) Film.
(4) Lead foil backing.
CHAPTER 7 • DENTAL X-RAY FILM 77
PRACTICE POINT
The patient has a right to access their dental records, including radiographs. The use of double film packets produces
two original radiographs, allowing the practice to keep one
as part of the patient’s permanent record and provides a
ready copy to give to the patient when requested.
A small raised identification dot is located in one corner
of the film. The raised dot is used to determine film orientation
and is used to distinguish between radiographs of the patient’s
right and left sides (see Chapter 21).
• Black paper wrapping surrounds the film inside the
packet to protect it from light.
• Lead foil. A sheet of lead foil is located in the back of the
film packet, behind the film. The purpose of the lead foil
backing is to absorb scattered radiation. Scattered x-rays
strike the film emulsion from the back side of the film (the
side away from the tube), fogging or reducing the clarity of
the image. The lead foil is embossed with a pattern that
becomes visible on the developed radiograph in the event
that the packet is accidentally positioned backward during
the exposure.
• Moisture-resistant outer wrapping consisting of paper or
soft vinyl plastic holds the packet contents and protects the
film from light and moisture. This wrapping is either
smooth or slightly pebbly to prevent slippage. Each film
packet has two sides, a front side or tube side that faces the
tube (radiation source) and a back side that faces away
from the source of radiation (Figure 7-2).
• Tube side. The tube side is usually solid white. A small
embossed dot is evident near one of the film packet corners. The embossed dot will be used later to aid in identifying the image as either the patient’s right or left side;
however, it is important to know which corner it is
located on during the film placement step.
In intraoral radiography, the tube side of the film faces the
source of radiation. When placing the film intraorally, the tube
side will face the lingual surfaces of the teeth of interest.
• Film. Film packets contain one or two films. When a packet
containing two radiographic films is exposed, a duplicate
radiograph results at no additional radiation exposure to the
patient. One radiograph must be kept as part of the patient
record. The copy can serve as a duplicate radiograph.
Duplicate radiographs may be sent to a specialist for consultation regarding treatment, to another professional as a
referral, to a third-party payer or insurance company as
evidence for needed treatment, to document legal evidence,
or given to the patient who is moving to another location
and will seek treatment at another oral health care facility.
• Back side. The back side containing the tab for opening
the film packet is white or may be color coded (Table 7-1).
To aid in determining which is the front and the back
side of the film packet, the following information is
usually printed on the back side:
• Manufacturer’s name
• Film speed
• Number of films in the packet (one or two)
• Circle or mark indicating the location of the identifying dot
• The statement “Opposite side toward tube”
TABLE 7-1 Kodak Film Packet Color Codes
ONE-FILM
PACKET
TWO-FILM
PACKET
Ultra-speed (D) Green Gray
Insight (F) Lavender Tan
PRACTICE POINT
During intraoral film packet placement, the embossed dot
should be positioned away from the area of interest. Usually,
when taking periapical radiographs, the area of interest is
the apices of the teeth; therefore, the embossed dot should
be positioned toward the occlusal. To assist with positioning
the embossed dot out of the way, intraoral film manufacturers have packaged film so that the embossed dot can be
observed on the outer moisture-resistant wrapping.
FILM PACKAGING Intraoral film packets are packaged in
cardboard boxes or plastic trays. Depending on the size, intraoral films are packaged 25, 50, 130, or 150 to a box, the most
popular being the 130- or 150-film packages. A layer of protective foil surrounds the films inside the container to protect
against damage while being stored.
FILM EMULSION SPEEDS (SENSITIVITY) Speed refers to the
amount of radiation required to produce a radiograph of acceptable density. The faster the film speed, the less radiation
required to produce a radiograph of acceptable density. Factors
that determine film speed are
• Size of silver halide crystals. The larger the crystals, the
faster the film speed.
• Thickness of emulsion. Emulsion is coated on both
sides of the film base to increase film speed. The thicker
the emulsion, the faster the film speed.
• Special radiosensitive dyes. Manufacturers add special
dyes that help to increase the film speed.
78 DENTAL X-RAY IMAGE RECEPTORS AND FILM PROCESSING TECHNIQUES
• Size No. 3. The extra-long #3 film is called a long bitewing
film. These films usually come with a preattached bite tab.
• Size No. 4. The #4 film is the largest of the intraoral films.
Size #4 films are generally referred to as occlusal films.
TYPES OF PROJECTIONS These five film sizes are used to
expose three types of intraoral film projections: bitewing,
periapical, and occlusal.
• Bitewing radiographs(Figure 7-6) image the coronal portions
of both the maxillary (upper) and mandibular (lower) teeth
and crestal bone on the same film. Bitewing radiographs are
used to examine the surfaces of the crowns of the teeth that
touch each other and are particularly valuable in determining
the extent of proximal caries. Bitewing radiographs image a
portion of the alveolar bone crests, and vertical bitewing radiographs (see Chapter 16) provide added information regarding
the supporting periodontia. Both vertical and horizontal bitewing
radiographs may be exposed using film sizes #0, #1, or #2. Film
size #3 is especially designed to expose horizontal bitewing radiographs. Bitewing film sizes, especially the size #3 film packet,
may be purchased with an attached flap or tab on which the
patient must bite to hold the film packet in place between the
occlusal surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular teeth.
• Periapical radiographs (Figure 7-7) (from the Greek word
peri, for around and the Latin word apex for the root tip) are
used to record a detailed examination of the entire tooth,
from crown to root tip or apex. Periapical radiographs image
the supporting structures of the teeth such as the periodontal
ligament space and the surrounding bone. Periapical radiographs may be exposed using film sizes #0, #1, or #2.
• Occlusal radiographs (see Figure 17-1) image a larger area
than periapical radiographs. These projections are ideal for
recording a large area of the maxilla, mandible, and floor of
the mouth. They can reveal gross pathological lesions, root
fragments, bone and tooth fractures, and impacted or supernumerary teeth and many other conditions. Occlusal radiographs can be used to survey an edentulous (without teeth)
mouth. The size #4 film packet is especially designed as an
occlusal film. Film size #2 may also be used with the
occlusal radiographic technique, especially for young children who may not be able to tolerate the film packet placement necessary for periapical radiographs.
Extraoral Films
Extraoral films are designed for use outside the mouth. These
large films are classified as screen film. Screen film (indirectexposure film) is exposed primarily by a fluorescent type of
light given off by special emulsion-coated intensifying screens
that are positioned between the film and the x-ray source. The
intensity of the fluorescent light emitted by the intensifying
screens permits a significant reduction in the amount of radiation required to produce an image. The image produced on an
extraoral film results from exposure to this fluorescent light,
instead of directly from the x-rays.
Although the thickness of the emulsion and the addition of
radiosensitive dyes aid in increasing film speed (film sensitivity), the most important factor in increasing film speed is the
size of the silver halide crystals in the emulsion. The larger the
crystals, the faster the film speed, resulting in less radiation
exposure to produce an acceptable image. However, image
sharpness is more distinct when the crystals are small. The
larger crystals used in high-speed (fast) film result in a certain
amount of graininess that reduces the sharpness of the radiographic image. It has been determined that this slight loss of
image sharpness does not interfere with diagnosis and is tolerated because of the reduction in patient radiation exposure.
SPEED GROUPS Trademark names like Ultra-speed or
Insight are names assigned by the manufacturer and do not
indicate the actual film speed. The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) groups film speed using letters of the
alphabet: speed group A for the slowest through F for the
fastest. At the present time, F-speed is the fastest film available, and film speeds slower than D are no longer used. In
addition to labeling the film packages, film speed is printed on
the back side of each individual film packet.
Currently only D-speed, E-speed, and F-speed films are
available. Some manufacturers have stopped producing E-speed
film. Both the American Dental Association and the American
Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology recommend
using the fastest speed film currently available to aid in reducing
unnecessary radiation to patients. Although F-speed film requires
less radiation to produce an acceptable image, some practitioners
have not stopped using the slower D-speed film. Faster-speed
films contain a larger crystal size that may contribute to a slight
decrease in image resolution. Some practitioners who are accustomed to viewing D-speed images resist the change. However, it
should be noted that changes in the visual acuity of today’s films
have improved the image of the faster-speed films. Additionally, it
should be noted that studies of film speed comparisons have failed
to indicate that faster-speed films are less diagnostic. The use of
high-speed film has made it possible to reduce patient exposure to
radiation to a fraction of the time formerly deemed necessary.
FILM SIZE There are five sizes of intraoral film: #0, #1, #2,
#3, and #4. The larger the number, the larger the size of the film
(Figure 7-5).
• Size No. 0. The #0 film is especially designed for small
children and is often called pedo (from the Greek word
paidos, child) or pedodontic film.
• Size No. 1. The #1 film may also be used for children.
In adults, the use of the narrow #1 film is normally limited
to exposing radiographs of the anterior teeth. Although
it images only two or three teeth, this film is ideal for
areas where the oral cavity is narrow.
• Size No. 2. The wider #2 film is generally referred to as
the standard film, or PA for periapical film. This film size
is used in probably 75 percent of all intraoral radiography.
The #2 film is commonly used on both larger children,
especially those with a mixed dentition, and adults.
CHAPTER 7 • DENTAL X-RAY FILM 79
No. 0
Size 7/8” x 1 3/8”
(22 mm x 35 mm)
No. 1
Size 15/16” x 1 9/16”
(24 mm x 40 mm)
No. 2
Size 1 1/4” x 1 5/8”
(32 mm x 41 mm)
No. 3
Size 1 1/16” x 2 1/8”
(27 mm x 54 mm)
No. 4
Size 2 1/4” x 3”
(57 mm x 76 mm)
No. 3
Available pretabbed
FIGURE 7-5 Intraoral film sizes. (Courtesy of Dentsply Rinn)
FIGURE 7-6 Bitewing radiograph. FIGURE 7-7 Periapical radiograph.
PACKAGING Larger extraoral films are generally packaged
25, 50, or 100 to a box (Figure 7-8). The films are sometimes
sandwiched between two pieces of protective paper, and the
entire group is wrapped in protective foil. Because these films are
designed for extraoral use with a cassette, discussed in detail in
Chapter 29, they require neither individual lead backing nor
moisture-resistant wrappings.
FILM SIZE Extraoral films vary in size. Different sizes can
accommodate imaging the oral cavity and various regions of
the head and neck. The most common sizes are
• used mainly for lateral views of
the jaw or the temporomandibular joint (TMJ)
• used for cephalometric profiles
and posteroanterior views of the skull
• 5 or (13 or ), used for
panoramic radiographs of the entire dentition
Duplicating Film
When a duplicate radiograph, a copy identical to an original, is
needed, oral health care practices often use two- or double-film
6 in. * 12 in. 15 cm * 30 cm
8 * 10 in. (20 * 26 cm),
5 * 7 in. (13 * 18 cm),
80 DENTAL X-RAY IMAGE RECEPTORS AND FILM PROCESSING TECHNIQUES
from radiation. Individual film packets should also be kept in a
shielded area. This is especially important while in the process
of exposing several radiographs at one time, as is the case when
exposing a set of bitewings or full mouth series on a patient.
Once a film has been exposed to radiation, the crystals within
the emulsion increase in their sensitivity. The exposed film
should be placed in a shielded area while the next film is
exposed. All exposed films should be kept safe from radiation
until processing.
Light
Care should be taken when handling intraoral film packets so as
not to tear the outer light-tight wrap. Extraoral cassettes must be
closed tightly to prevent light leaks. Safe lighting in the darkroom must be periodically examined to ensure safe light
conditions (see Chapter 19).
Heat and Humidity
To prevent fogging, film should be stored in a cool, dry place.
Ideally, all unexposed film should be stored at 50°F to 70°F
(10°C–21°C) and 30 to 50 percent relative humidity.
Chemical Fumes
Film should be stored away from the possibility of contamination
by chemical fumes. Film should not be stored in the darkroom
near processing chemicals.
Physical Pressure
Physical pressure and bending can fog film. When storing,
boxes of film must not be stacked so high as to increase the
pressure on the packets. Heavy objects should not be placed
or stored on top of film.
Shelf Life
Dental x-ray film has a limited shelf life. The expiration date
is printed on the film packaging (Figure 7-9). All intraoral
film should be stored so that the expiration date can be readily
seen and the appropriate films used first. Expired film compromises the diagnostic quality of the image and should not
be used.
FIGURE 7-8 Extraoral film packages.
and
size extraoral film packages. (Used with
permission of Eastman Kodak Company.)
8 * 10 in. (20 * 26 cm)
5 * 12-in. (13 * 30 cm), 6 * 12-in (15 * 30 cm),
intraoral packets. However, if an additional copy is needed or a
two-film packet was not used when the original radiograph was
exposed, a duplicating machine with special duplicating film
can be used.
Duplicating film is different than x-ray film and is
exposed by the action of infrared and ultraviolet light rather
than by x-rays. Only one side of the duplicating film is coated
with emulsion. The emulsion side appears dull and lighter
under safe light conditions in the darkroom where it is used.
The nonemulsion side is shiny and appears darker under safe
light conditions. To make a copy of a radiograph, the emulsion
side of the film is placed against the original radiograph with
the nonemulsion side up (see Chapter 28). When the duplicating
film is exposed to ultraviolet light from the duplicating
machine, the solarized emulsion records the copy. Solarized
emulsion is different than x-ray film emulsion in that the
image produced in response to light exposure gets darker with
less light exposure and lighter with more light exposure. The
nonemulsion side contains an antihalation coating. The dye
in the antihalation coating absorbs the ultraviolet light coming
through the film to prevent back-scattered light from reexposing
the film and creating an unsharp image.
Duplicating film, boxed in quantities of 50, 100, or 150
sheets, is available in periapical sizes and in 5 or (13 or
) and sheets.
Film Storage and Protection
All radiographic film is extremely sensitive to radiation, light,
heat, humidity, chemical fumes, and physical pressure. Additionally, film is sensitive to aging, having a shelf life determined by the manufacturer. Precautions for safely storing and
protecting films from these conditions must be followed. Film
fogging is the darkening of the finished radiograph caused by
one or more of these factors.
Radiation
Stray radiation, not intended for primary exposure, can fog film.
Film should be stored in its original packaging in an area shielded
15 * 30 cm 8 * 10 in. (20 * 26 cm)
6 * 12 in.
FIGURE 7-9 Film package showing expiration date.
CHAPTER 7 • DENTAL X-RAY FILM 81
REVIEW—Chapter summary
X-ray film serves as a radiographic image receptor. The film
used in dental radiography is photographic film that has
been especially adapted in size, emulsion, film speed, and
packaging for dental uses. All x-ray film has a polyester
base that is coated with a gelatin emulsion containing silver
halide (bromide and iodide) crystals.
During radiation exposure, the x-rays strike and ionize
some of the silver halide crystals, forming a latent image. The
image does not become visible until the film is processed.
An intraoral film packet consists of film, white-light tight
black paper wrapping, lead foil, and a moisture-resistant outer
wrapping. Intraoral film packets have a white, unprinted front
or tube side. The lead foil and the tab for opening the film
packet are on the back side.
Film speed (sensitivity) refers to the amount of radiation
required to produce a radiograph of acceptable density. Film
speed groups range from A (for the slowest) through F (for the
fastest). Currently only D-, E-, and F-speed films are available
for dental radiographs.
The five intraoral film sizes are #0, #1, #2, #3, and #4. The
three types of intraoral radiographic projections are bitewing,
for imaging proximal tooth surfaces and alveolar bone crests;
periapical, for examining the entire tooth and supporting structures; and occlusal, for surveying larger areas of the maxilla
and the mandible.
Larger extraoral films designed for use outside the mouth
are classified as screen films because fluorescent light from
intensifying screens is used to help the x-rays produce the image.
Extraoral films are used for lateral jaw exposures and cephalometric and panoramic radiographs.
Duplicating film is used in conjunction with a duplicating
machine that emits light to make copies of radiographs. Duplicating film differs from radiographic film in that the solarized
emulsion gets darker with less light exposure and lighter with
more light exposure.
X-ray film is sensitive to radiation, light, heat, humidity,
chemical fumes, physical pressure, and aging. Care must be
exercised in storing and in handling the film before, during, and
after exposure.
RECALL—Study questions
1. Which of these provides support for the fragile film
emulsion?
a. Base
b. Adhesive
c. Silver halide crystals
d. Protective coating
2. Which of these is light and x-ray sensitive?
a. Lead foil
b. Adhesive
c. Gelatin
d. Silver halide crystals
3. During x-ray exposure, crystals within the film emulsion become energized with a(n)
a. visible image.
b. slow image.
c. latent image.
d. intensified image.
4. What is the function of the lead foil in the film packet?
a. Moisture protection
b. Absorb backscatter radiation
c. Give rigidity to the packet
d. Protect against fluorescence
5. Each of the following can be found on the back side of
an intraoral film packet EXCEPT one. Which one is the
EXCEPTION?
a. Film speed
b. Film size
c. Embossed dot location
d. Number of films in packet
6. Which of these films has the greatest sensitivity to
radiation?
a. D-speed
b. E-speed
c. F-speed
7. A size #4 intraoral film packet would most likely be
used to expose a(n)
a. bitewing radiograph.
b. periapical radigraph.
c. occlusal radiograph.
d. pedodontic radiograph.
8. Which of these projections will the dentist most likely
prescribe for evaluation of a specific tooth and its surrounding structures?
a. Bitewing radiograph
b. Periapical radigraph
c. Occlusal radiograph
d. Panoramic radiograph
9. Intensifying screens will
a. reduce exposure time.
b. decrease processing time.
c. increase x-ray intensity.
d. increase image detail.
10. Which of the following is considered to be a screen
film?
a. Occlusal
b. Periapical
c. Bitewing
d. Panoramic
11. Which type of film is used to copy a radiograph?
a. Duplicating film
b. Screen film
c. Nonscreen film
d. X-ray film
82 DENTAL X-RAY IMAGE RECEPTORS AND FILM PROCESSING TECHNIQUES
RELATE—Laboratory applicaton
Obtain one each of a size #0, size #1, size #2, size #3, and size
#4 intraoral film packet. Beginning with the size #0 film
packet, consider the following. Repeat with each of the film
sizes. Write out your observations.
1. What is the film speed? How did you get the answer to
this question?
2. What information is written on the outside of the film
packet? Where is this information written: on the front
or back of the film packet?
3. How many films do you expect to find inside this
packet? How did you get the answer to this question?
4. Where is the embossed dot located? How did you find
it? What is this used for?
5. What type of projection (bitewing, periapical, or occlusal)
could be taken with this film size? Explain your answer.
6. What about this film packet’s size makes it ideal; less than
ideal; or not suited for the adult patient? A child patient?
7. For what area(s) of the oral cavity will this film packet
be best suited? Not suited?
8. Now open the film packet. List the four parts of the
packet and explain the purpose of each.
9. Next, hold the film up horizontally (parallel to the floor)
at eye level and observe it from the edge. Can you see
the film base with the emulsion coating on the top and
the bottom?
10. Next, observe the metal foil. What is the reason for the
embossed imprint?
11. When you opened the film packet, did you utilize the
black paper’s tab? The tab plays an important role in
opening a contaminated film packet aseptically. This is
discussed in detail in Chapter 10.
REFERENCE
Carestream Health, Inc. (2007). Kodak Dental Systems:
Exposure and processing for dental film radiography.
Pub. N-414. Rochester, NY.
12. X-ray films should be stored
a. away from heat and humidity.
b. near the source of radiation.
c. in the darkroom.
d. stacked in columns.
REFLECT—Case study
Utilize what you learned in this chapter about the sizes and
types of projections to make a preliminary recommendation
and/or to explain to the patient why the dentist has prescribed: (1) the type of projection; (2) the size of the film;
and/or (3) the number of films to use for each of the following three cases.
1. An adult patient with suspected carious lesions on the
proximal surfaces of posterior teeth. Additionally, this
patient is considered to have a periodontal condition for
which he is under maintenance treatment.
a. The recommended type of projection will most
likely be:
b. The size of the film(s) will most likely be:
c. The number of films to be exposed will most likely be:
2. An adult patient with a toothache in the area of the
maxillary right molar.
a. The recommended type of projection will most
likely be:
b. The size of film(s) will most likely be:
c. The number of films to be exposed will most
likely be:
3. An 8-year-old patient who, while skateboarding,
seems to have suffered a traumatic injury to the anterior teeth.
a. The recommended type of projection will most
likely be:
b. The size of film(s) will most likely be:
c. The number of films to be exposed will most
likely be:
OBJECTIVES
Following successful completion of this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Define the key words.
2. Explain how a latent image becomes a visible image.
3. List in sequence the steps in processing dental films.
4. List the four chemicals in the developer solution, and explain the function of each
ingredient.
5. List the four chemicals in the fixer solution, and explain the function of each
ingredient.
6. Discuss location, size, and lighting as considerations for setting up a darkroom.
7. Discuss the factors that affect safelighting.
8. Identify equipment needed for manual film processing
9. Demonstrate the steps of manual film processing.
10. Describe the role of rapid (chairside) processing.
11. Identify equipment needed for automatic film processing.
12. Demonstrate the steps of automatic film processing.
13. Compare manual and automatic processing methods stating advantages
and disadvantages of each.
14. Explain the role chemical replenishment and solution changes play in maintaining optimal
processing chemistry.
KEY WORDS
Acetic acid
Acidifier
Activator
Automatic processor
Darkroom
Daylight loader
Developer
Developing agent
Elon
Film feed slot
Film hanger
Film recovery slot
Fixer
Fixing agent
Hardening agent
Hydroquinone
Latent image
LED (light-emitting diode)
CHAPTER
8
CHAPTER
OUTLINE
 Objectives 83
 Key Words 83
 Introduction 84
 Overview of Film
Processing 84
 Film Processing
Solutions 84
 Darkroom 86
 Manual Film
Processing 88
 Rapid (Chairside)
Film Processing 91
 Automatic Film
Processing 91
 Processing
Chemical
Maintenance 93
 Review, Recall,
Reflect, Relate 94
 References 96
Dental X-ray Film
Processing
KEY WORDS (Continued)
84 DENTAL X-RAY IMAGE RECEPTORS AND FILM PROCESSING TECHNIQUES
Introduction
Film processing is a series of steps that converts the invisible
latent image on the dental x-ray film into a visible permanent
image called a radiograph. The diagnostic quality of the visible
image depends on strictly adhering to these processing steps.
Film processing may be accomplished either manually or automatically. The purpose of this chapter is to explain the fundamentals of film processing and identify the roles processing
solutions play in producing a visible image. Because most processing is accomplished in a darkroom equipped with special
lights, darkroom design and equipment will be described.
Overview of Film Processing
Processing transforms the latent (hidden) image, which is produced when the x-ray photons are absorbed by the silver halide
crystals in the emulsion, into a visible, stable image by means of
chemicals. The basic steps of processing dental x-ray film are:
1. Developing
2. Rinsing (automatic processors often omit this step)
3. Fixing
4. Washing
5. Drying
Developing
The initial step in the processing sequence is the development of
the film. The role of the developer solution is to reduce the
exposed silver halide crystals within the film emulsion to black
metallic silver. The unexposed silver halide crystals (in those
areas of the film opposite metallic or dense structures that absorb
and prevent the passage of x-rays) are unaffected at this time.
Rinsing
The purpose of the rinsing step is to remove as much of the alkaline developer as possible before placing the film in the fixer
solution. Rinsing preserves the acidity of the fixer and prolongs
its useful life.
Fixing
After brief rinsing, the film is immersed in the fixer solution. The
role of the fixer is to remove the unexposed and/or undeveloped
silver halide crystals from the film emulsion.
Washing
After the film is completely fixed, it is washed in running water
to remove any remaining traces of the chemicals.
Drying
The final step is drying the film for storage as a part of the
patient’s permanent record. Films may be air-dried at room temperature or they may be dried in a heated cabinet especially made
for this purpose.
The processed films are now called radiographs. The
images on the radiograph are made up of microscopic grains of
black metallic silver. The amount of silver deposited will vary
with the thickness of the tissues penetrated. As discussed in
Chapter 4, tissues that are not very dense, such as the pulp
chamber of the tooth, allow more radiation to reach the film
emulsion, resulting in black (radiolucent) areas on the film,
whereas dense structures such as metal restorations will block
the passage of x-rays, resulting in white (radiopaque) areas on
the film. Basically, the developer is responsible for creating
the film’s radiolucent appearance, and the fixer is responsible
for creating the film’s radiopaque appearance.
Film Processing Solutions
Dental x-ray film processing requires the use of developer
and fixer. These chemicals may be obtained in three forms
(Figure 8-1):
FIGURE 8-1 Processing chemicals. Liquid concentrate of
developer and fixer. When mixed with distilled water, each bottle
yields 1 gal (3.8 L) of solution. (Courtesy of Siemens Medical
Systems, Dental Division, Iselin, NJ)
Light-tight
Oxidation
Potassium alum
Potassium bromide
Preservative
Processing
Processing tank
Radiolucent
Radiopaque
Rapid (chairside) processing
Replenisher
Restrainer
Roller transport system
Safelight
Safelight filter
Selective reduction
Silver halide crystals
Sodium carbonate
Sodium sulfite
Sodium thiosulfate
Time–temperature
Viewbox
Wet reading
Working radiograph
CHAPTER 8 • DENTAL X-RAY FILM PROCESSING 85
• Powder
• Liquid concentrate
• Ready-to-use solutions
The powdered and liquid concentrate forms must be
mixed with water prior to using. Chemical manufacturers
usually recommend the use of distilled water when mixing
chemistry to avoid potential problems with other chemicals
that are sometimes present in tap water.
Developer
The main purpose of the developer is to convert the exposed
silver halide crystals into metallic silver grains.
There are four chemicals in the developer (Table 8-1):
1. Developing agents (also called reducing agents)
2. Preservative
3. Activator (also called alkalizer)
4. Restrainer
The developing agent reduces the exposed silver halide crystals
to metallic silver but has no effect on the unexposed crystals at
recommended time–temperatures. This is called selective reduction, meaning that only the nonmetallic elements, the halides, are
removed, and the exposed silver remains (Figure 8-2).
Developer contains two chemicals, hydroquinone and
elon. The hydroquinone works slowly but steadily to build up
density and contrast in the image. The elon works fast to bring
out the gray shades (contrast) of the image. Both chemicals are
affected by extreme temperatures. The higher the temperature,
the less time required to develop the film; therefore, regulating
the temperature of the developer is critical.
The preservative, sodium sulfite, protects the developing
agents by slowing down the rapid oxidation rate of the developer.
The activator, usually sodium carbonate, provides the
necessary alkaline medium required by the developing agents.
It also softens and swells the gelatin, allowing more of the
exposed silver halide crystals to come into contact with the
developing agents.
The restrainer, potassium bromide, restrains the developing agents from developing the unexposed silver halide
crystals and therefore inhibits the tendency of the solution to
fog the film.
Fixer
The fixer plays three roles: (1) stops further film development—
thereby establishing the image permanently on the film; (2)
removes (dissolves) the unexposed/undeveloped silver halide
crystals (those that were not exposed to x-rays); and (3) hardens (fixes) the emulsion.
There are four chemicals in the fixer (Table 8-2):
1. Fixing agent (also called a clearing agent)
2. Preservative
3. Hardening agent
4. Acidifier
The fixing (clearing) agent, ammonium thiosulfate or
sodium thiosulfate, also known as “hypo” or hyposulfate of
sodium, removes all unexposed and any remaining undeveloped
silver halide crystals from the emulsion.
The preservative, sodium sulfite (the same chemical as
used in the developer), slows the rate of oxidation and prevents
the deterioration of the hypo and the precipitation of sulfur.
A
B
C
FIGURE 8-2 Cross section of dental x-ray film emulsion.
(A) X-rays strike silver halide crystals, forming latent image sites
(shown in gray). (B) After development, crystals struck by x-rays
(latent image sites) reduced to black metallic silver. (C) Fixer
removes unexposed, undeveloped crystals, leaving the black
metallic silver.
TABLE 8-1 Composition of Developer
INGREDIENT CHEMICAL ACTION
Developing agents
(reducing agents)
Hydroquinone Reduces (converts) exposed silver halide crystals to black metallic silver.
Slowly builds up black tones and contrast.
Elon Reduces (converts) exposed silver halide crystals to black metallic silver.
Quickly builds up gray tones.
Preservative Sodium sulfite Prevents rapid oxidation of the developing agents.
Activator Sodium carbonate Activates developing agents by providing required alkalinity.
Restrainer Potassium bromide Restrains the developing agents from developing the unexposed silver halide
crystals, which produce film fog.
86 DENTAL X-RAY IMAGE RECEPTORS AND FILM PROCESSING TECHNIQUES
The hardening agent, potassium alum, shrinks and hardens the gelatin emulsion. This hardening continues until the film
is dry, thus protecting it from abrasion.
The acidifier, acetic acid, provides the acid medium to stop
further development by neutralizing the alkali of the developer.
Hardening Agents
Special hardening agents are sometimes added to the developer
used in automatic processors to facilitate the transportation of
the films through the roller systems.
Replenisher
Replenisher is a superconcentrated solution of developer or
fixer. Replenisher is added to the developer or fixer in the processing tanks to compensate for the loss of volume and strength
of the solutions due to oxidation and other causes. Processing
solutions lose their potency over time and with use. Adding
replenisher helps to maintain solution strength.
Darkroom
The purpose of the darkroom is to provide an area where x-ray
films can be safely handled and processed. A well-equipped room
with adequate safelighting aids in producing high-quality radiographic images. Films can be processed outside the darkroom
with chairside manual processing mini-darkrooms (Figure 8-3) or
with a daylight loader–equipped automatic processor
(Figure 8-4). A darkroom remains the standard in most film-based
practices, especially because safelight conditions are required to
handle larger tasks such as extraoral film cassette loading and processing. The darkroom should be located near the area where
radiographs will be exposed for convenient access and should be
large enough to meet the requirements of the practice. The darkroom should be equipped with correct lighting, be well ventilated,
and have adequate storage space for radiographic supplies.
The ability to store radiographic supplies such as extraoral
film cassettes, duplicating film, and processing chemicals and
cleaning supplies in the darkroom will add to the convenience of
maintaining the ideal darkroom. Although storing unused film
in the darkroom may seem convenient, it is not recommended.
In addition to being sensitive to radiation and white light exposure, unexposed film is sensitive to heat, humidity and chemical
fumes, all of which may be increased in the darkroom.
Lighting
X-ray film is sensitive to white light. Any white light in the
darkroom can blacken the film or cause film fog. Therefore, the
darkroom must be light-tight. A light-tight room is one that is
completely dark and excludes all light. Felt strips may have to
be installed around the door(s) to the darkroom or any other
area such as around water pipes where a light leak is discovered.
Although darkroom walls are sometimes painted black, this is
not necessary if the room is completely sealed to white light.
The following forms of illumination are desirable in the wellequipped darkroom.
TABLE 8-2 Composition of Fixer
INGREDIENT CHEMICAL ACTION
Fixing agent
(clearing agent)
Ammonium thiosulfate
or sodium thiosulfate
Removes the unexposed and any remaining undeveloped silver halide
crystals.
Preservative Sodium sulfite Slows the rate of oxidation and prevents deterioration of the fixing
agent.
Hardening agent Potassium alum Shrinks and hardens the gelatin emulsion.
Acidifier Acetic acid Stops further development by neutralizing the alkali of the developer.
FIGURE 8-3 Chair-side minidarkroom box with view-through
plastic filtered top. First cup is filled
with developer, second cup with rinse
water, third cup with fixer, and fourth
cup with wash water. A heater with a
thermostat keeps the solutions at
optimum temperature for rapid
processing. (Courtesy of Dentsply Rinn.)
CHAPTER 8 • DENTAL X-RAY FILM PROCESSING 87
FIGURE 8-4 Automatic processor with daylight loader
attachment for use outside the darkroom. (Courtesy of Air
Techniques, Inc.)
1. White ceiling light. An overhead white ceiling light that provides adequate illumination for the size of the room will
allow the clinician to perform equipment maintenance and
other tasks requiring visibility.
2. Safelight. Safelighting is achieved through the use of a filtered white lightbulb or a special LED (light-emitting
diode) bulb (Figure 8-5) that provide enough light in the
darkroom to allow the clinician to perform activities without exposing or fogging the film. Traditional safelights
consist of a 7 1/2 or 15 watt white incandescent light bulb
with a safelight filter placed over it (Figure 8-6). The safelight filter removes the short wavelengths in the blue-green
region of the visible light spectrum. The longer wavelength
red-orange light is allowed to pass through the filter to illuminate the darkroom. A variety of filters are available.
Orange or yellow filters allow for safe handling of D-speed
film, but E- and F-speed film and most extraoral films
require a red filter. The type of safelight required for film
processing can usually be found written on the film package. LED (light-emitting diode) safelights emit pure red
light and are safe for all film speeds and types.
The term “safe” light is relative. Film emulsion can be
damaged by prolonged exposure even to filtered safelight.
Film handling should be limited to 2 1/2 minutes under
safelight conditions or fogging (film darkening) may occur.
The distance between the lamp and the film is critical. The
rule is 2 1/4 watts per ft (0.3 m) and a 4-ft (1.2 m) minimum
distance from the source of light and the counter space
where the film will be handled. A summary of the factors to
be considered for safelighting are listed in Box 8-1.
3. Viewbox. A viewbox or illuminator is a light source (generally a lamp behind an opaque glass) used for viewing
radiographs. A darkroom equipped with a wall-mounted or
countertop viewbox or illuminator will allow the clinician
the opportunity for a quick reading, viewing the radiograph without leaving the darkroom. A viewbox emits
considerable white light, and care must be taken not to turn
it on when film packets are unwrapped. Additionally, if
films are undergoing the developing process in a manual
processor, the manual processor tank cover must remain on
during the use of a view box.
4. In-use Light. The darkroom door should be locked when
processing films to prevent someone from entering and inadvertently allowing white light into the darkroom. Some darkrooms are equipped with a warning light outside the
darkroom, which indicates that it is not safe to open the door.
Maintenance
Cleanliness and orderliness are essential for the production of
quality radiographs and the safety and health of the clinician
using the area. Infection control protocol for opening film packets
(see Chapter 10) must be strictly adhered to, and chemicals and
other radiographic wastes must be properly handled and disposed
(see Chapter 20). Because safelight conditions reduce visibility,
FIGURE 8-5 Safelight. LED (light-emitting diode) bulb.
BOX 8-1 Safelight Considerations
• LED safelight that emits pure red light.
• 7 1/2 or 15 watt white incandescent bulb with filter.
• Darker red filters provide safer conditions for both intra and
extraoral film handling than amber or yellow colored filters.
• Scratched or cracked filters allow white light to escape.
• 4-ft (1.2-m) minimum distance between lamp and counter
surface where film is to be handled.
• Films should not be subjected to safelight exposure over 2 1/2
minutes.
FIGURE 8-6 Safelight. A commercially available bracket-type lamp
with safelight filter shielding the short wavelength, blue-green region
of the visible light spectrum given off by the bulb. The light given off
by this filter would appear dark red.
88 DENTAL X-RAY IMAGE RECEPTORS AND FILM PROCESSING TECHNIQUES
the clinician must be skilled in the procedures to be performed.
Needed materials should be within easy reach, and the person
doing the processing should be familiar with where each item is
located. The workspace counter must be free of substances that
can contaminate films such as water, chemicals, and dust.
A utility sink large enough to accommodate cleaning the
processing equipment should be available in the darkroom. A
wastebasket should be placed in the darkroom for the disposal
of general waste items. Lead foil is separated from other film
wrappings and placed in an appropriate container for safe disposal, and the remainder of the film packet placed in a biohazard container for disposal (see Chapter 20).
Manual Film Processing
Manual processing is a method used to process films by hand in
a series of steps. Although no longer in widespread use, advantages of manual film processing are that it is reliable and not
subject to equipment malfunction. The clinician has more control over the processing procedure, including the ability to adjust
the time–temperature and the ability to read the radiographs
prior to the end of the processing procedure (wet reading). Clinicians often make use of the manual processing procedure to
“rapid” or “hot” process working films discussed at the end of
this section. The biggest disadvantage of manual processing is
the time required to produce a finished radiograph.
Equipment
Manual processing requires the use of:
• Processing tank
• Thermometer
• Timer
• Stirring paddles
• Film hangers, drying racks, and drip pans
1. Processing tank. The processing tank has two insert
tanks placed inside the master tank (Figure 8-7). The
insert tanks hold the developer and fixer solutions. Usually, the left insert tank holds the developer solution,
and the right insert tank contains the fixer solution.
However, these tanks should be labeled to prevent confusion as to which tank contains which chemical. The
master tank holds water between the insert tanks for
rinsing and washing the films.
Most tanks are made of stainless steel, which does not
react with processing chemicals. Insert tanks are large enough
to accept an extraoral film. The
capacity of an insert tank is 1 gallon (3.8 L).
The insert tanks are removable to facilitate cleaning. The
master tank is connected to the water intake and to the drain.
When in use, fresh water circulates constantly. An overflow
pipe keeps the level of the water constant when the tank is full.
Some tanks are equipped with a temperature control device, a
water-mixing valve that mixes the hot and cold water in the
pipes to any desired temperature. A close-fitting lightproof
cover completes the tank assembly.
8 * 10 in. (20 * 26 cm)
2. Thermometer. A thermometer is necessary to determine the
temperature of the developing solution for time–temperature
manual processing (Figure 8-8).
3. Timer. An accurate interval timer is necessary for time–temperature manual processing. The timer is used to indicate how
long the film is placed in the developing and fixing solutions
and in the rinse and wash water baths. The timer should have
an audible alarm to alert the radiographer to remove the films
from each of the solutions. Timers with a digital readout
should emit red light only so as not to fog the film.
4. Stirring paddles. Two stirring paddles must be available for
mixing the chemicals used for manual processing. To avoid
contamination, the developer and the fixer each need their
own stirring paddle. The paddles should be made of stainless
steel or other material that will not corrode in the processing
chemicals.
Cover Outlet and
overflow pipe
Insert
tank Processing
unit
Insert
tank
FIGURE 8-7 Processing tank with removable inserts. The central
compartment holds the rinse/wash water. Usually, the insert on the
left is filled with the developer solution, and the insert on the right is
filled with the fixer solution.
FIGURE 8-8 Floating thermometer used to record the
temperature of the developer when manual processing.
CHAPTER 8 • DENTAL X-RAY FILM PROCESSING 89
5. Film hangers, drying racks, and drip pans. A film
hanger is a stainless steel frame to which the films can be
attached. A film hanger allows the radiographer to transport the films to and from each of the processing solutions
(Figure 8-9). Various film hanger sizes are available that
accommodate from 1 to 20 films. Film hangers have an
identification tag near the curved handle on which the
patient’s name can be written. When manual processing
was the norm, films would be dried with a commercial
film dryer. Film dryers are not as readily available today.
Instead, drying racks (towel racks) can be mounted for
hanging film hangers to air dry. Drip pans are placed
underneath the drying racks to catch water from wet films.
Preparation
The key to manually processing dental radiographs is adequate
preparation.
1. Solution levels must be checked to be sure the developer
and fixer will cover the top clips of the film hanger. The
tanks are full when the solution levels are about one inch
from the top. Add fresh solution if necessary.
2. Developer and fixer must be stirred thoroughly to prevent
the heavier chemicals from settling to the bottom and to
equalize the temperature of the solution throughout the tanks.
3. The temperature of the developing solution must be
determined using a thermometer after stirring (Figure 8-8).
The ideal manual processing temperature is 68°F (20°C)
with a development time of five minutes. Lower temperatures make the chemical reaction sluggish, and higher temperatures increase film fog. Temperature variations from
the ideal may be acceptable as long as the developing time
is correspondingly adjusted. The radiographer should consult a time–temperature development chart similar to the
one in Table 8-3 to adjust developing time appropriately.
4. The film hanger should be selected and examined. The
clips need to be in proper working order. Loose clips may
cause films to fall off in the tank during the process. Extraoral film hangers have channels into which the film fits and
is secured by a hinged retaining channel over the open end
of the hanger. Film hangers should be labeled with the
patient’s name or otherwise identified.
Procedure (Procedure Box 8-1)
The manual film processing sequence consists of these five steps:
1. Develop. The film hanger with the attached films should
be immersed into the developer tank first. Gently agitating
the hanger up and down a few times—taking care not to
splash—will keep air bubbles from clinging to the film. Air
bubbles prevent the developer from contacting all areas of
the film. Safelight conditions must be maintained throughout the development step unless the light-tight cover is in
place on the processing tank.
2. Rinse. The purpose of the rinsing step is to remove as
much of the alkaline developer as possible before placing
the film into the fixer. When the timed developing step is
complete, under safelight conditions, the film hanger
should be lifted above the developing insert tank and
allowed to drain a few seconds to minimize the amount of
developer that will be removed from the tank. After gently
agitating the film hanger in the rinse water, it should be
held above the rinse water to drain for a few seconds to
prevent diluting the fixer solution with excess water.
3. Fix. The film hanger with the attached films should be
immersed into the fixer insert tank next, gently agitating
the hanger to keep air bubbles from clinging to the film.
Safelight conditions must be maintained for the first two
or three minutes of the recommended fixing time. If the
radiograph is needed immediately for a quick reading of
the image, the film may be read under white light conditions after two or three minutes of fixing. This is called a
A
B
C
FIGURE 8-9 Intraoral film hanger with 12 clips. (A) Curved
portion at the top allows the radiographer to rest the hanger on the
rim of the tank insert for the duration of the time required. (B) White
plastic identification tag on which the patient’s name can be written
in pencil and later erased. (C) Clamps with three-point positive grip
hold the film securely in place. (Courtesy of Dentsply Rinn.)
TABLE 8-3 Time–Temperature Chart
TEMPERATURE
DEVELOPMENT TIME
(MIN)
60°F (15.5°C) 9
65°F (18.3°C) 7
68°F (20°C) optimum 5
70°F (21.1°C) 4.5
75°F (23.9°C) 4
80°F (26.7°C) 3
90 DENTAL X-RAY IMAGE RECEPTORS AND FILM PROCESSING TECHNIQUES
4. Wash. Washing the film removes all remaining chemicals.
When the fixing step is complete, the film hanger should
be lifted above the fixer insert tank and allowed to drain a
few seconds to minimize the amount of fixer that will be
removed from the tank. The films should be placed in the
circulating water for 20 minutes. Leaving the films in the
water slightly longer than 20 minutes is permissible, but
leaving a film in water more than a few hours will begin to
dissolve the emulsion, and the emulsion may peel away
from the film base. The processing tank cover should
remain in place during the washing step; however, it is not
necessary to maintain safelight conditions during this step.
5. Drying. Following the wash step, the film hanger should be
lifted above the water tank and allowed to drain. Excess
PROCEDURE 8-1
Manual film processing
1. Maintain infection control (see Chapter 10).
2. Select a film hanger and label with patient information.
3. Open the light-tight cover of the manual processing tank.
4. Stir the developer and fixer solutions to ensure even concentration throughout the tank. Use a different
stirring paddle for each, developer and fixer, to prevent contamination of solutions.
5. Check the developer temperature.
6. Refer to the time–temperature recommendations of the solution manufacturer and set timer. (Optimal
time–temperature for manually processed radiographs is 68°F for five minutes.)
7. Lock the darkroom door, turn off the white light, and turn on the safelight.
8. Open the film packets (see Procedure Box 10–5) and place films on hanger.
9. Immerse the films into the developer solution and agitate film hanger for five seconds to release trapped
air bubbles.
10. Set the timer. (Time is dependent on temperature of the developer solution.)
11. Close the light-tight cover while the film is developing.
12. When the developing time is complete, under safelight conditions, open the light-tight cover and remove
film hanger with films attached from developer solution.
13. Pause a few seconds over the developer tank to allow the excess solution to drain from the films.
14. Immerse the film hanger into the water rinse and agitate for 30 seconds.
15. Pause a few seconds over the water tank to allow the excess water to drain from the films.
16. Immerse the film hanger into the fixer solution and agitate for five seconds to release trapped air bubbles.
17. Activate the timer for double the time in the developer or 10 minutes.
18. Close the light-tight cover for the first two to three minutes of fixation. (It is safe to view the films under
white light after two or three minutes of fixation for a wet reading, following which the films must be
returned to the fixer solution for completion of the fixation time for archival quality.)
19. Remove the film hanger from the fixer solution when the time is up.
20. Pause a few seconds over the fixer tank to allow the excess solution to drain from the films.
21. Immerse the films into the water wash for 20 minutes.
22. Remove the film hanger from the water wash when the time is up.
23. Place the film hanger in a commercially made film dryer or hang to air dry when the wash is complete.
24. Mount and label the dried films.
wet reading. The film can be rinsed in water for a short
interval and viewed at a viewbox. The film must be returned
to the fixer as soon as possible to complete fixation and permit further shrinking of the emulsion. If this is not done,
some of the unexposed silver halide grains may be left on
the film, giving it a fogged and discolored appearance after
it dries. Also, the emulsion may not completely harden.
The recommended fixing time is double the development time, or 10 minutes. The fixing time is not as critical
as the developing time, so films may remain in the fixer
slightly longer. When the fixing time is too short, the result
can be slow drying, poor hardening of the emulsion, a possible partial loss of detail, and darkening over time. When
the fixing time is excessively long, the image will lighten.
CHAPTER 8 • DENTAL X-RAY FILM PROCESSING 91
water may be removed by gently shaking the film hanger
over the water tank. Films may be dried in a commercial
heated drying cabinet if available or suspended from a rack
until dry.
Following the Procedure
The steps taken to secure the darkroom are equally important to
the preparation steps.
1. Once the white lights are turned on and visibility
improves, the radiographer should check to see that none
of the films have loosened from the clips and dropped on
the floor or the bottom of the tank.
2. The work area should be cleaned as needed. Any moisture
caused by dripping or accidental splashing of the water or
chemical solutions must be wiped up.
3. After dry, films should be removed from the hangers and
placed in properly identified protective envelopes or on
film mounts with identifying data (see Chapter 21).
4. Identification markings should be removed or erased from
the hangers. The hangers should be cleaned and dried as
needed.
5. At the end of the workday, turn off the water to the tank, drain
the water compartment, and turn off all lights in the darkroom. Leave the cover in place over the developer and fixer
tanks to prevent oxidation and to contain chemical fumes.
Rapid (Chairside) Film Processing
Manual processing can be used to produce a working radiograph
without a darkroom in about 30 seconds. Rapid or chair-side
processing with the use of special, faster-acting chemicals and a
compact light-tight box that acts as a miniature darkroom
(Figure 8-3) can be valuable in endodontic, oral surgery practices
and at remote sites, such as community outreach oral health projects where a darkroom is not available. A significant amount of
time can be saved, for example, when it is necessary to expose a
series of single films to check the progress in opening and cleaning out a root canal during endodontic treatment. However, rapid
processing has definite limitations and is not intended to replace
conventional processing.
Films processed in this manner are seldom suitable for filing with the patient’s permanent record. Short developing and
fixing times, combined with minimal washing, result in a substandard radiograph. Rapid processing chemistry does not produce archival (permanent) results, and the films will eventually
discolor. In the event that the film is to be retained with the permanent record, it should be refixed for 4 minutes and washed
for 20 minutes at normal conventional darkroom temperatures
and conditions. Although rapid processing fulfills the dentist’s
need to receive information quickly, it is at the expense of
image quality and longevity.
Equipment
Rapid processing requires the use of a light-tight countertop
box that has two light-tight openings, or baffles, through which
the radiographer’s hands can be passed into the working compartment when the lid is closed. A transparent plastic top
functions to filter out unsafe light while permitting the operator to see into the box to unwrap the film packet and manually
proceed through the processing steps. Four cups are set up
inside the box containing developer, rinse water, fixer, and
wash water. Developing and fixing solutions made especially
for rapid processing can be heated to 85°F (29.4°C) by a calibrated heater in the unit. Chemicals used for chairside processing are used for processing a limited number of films and then
discarded appropriately (see Chapter 20). A small film hanger
with a single clip is used to manually transfer the film from
solution to solution.
Procedure
The steps for processing films using the rapid processing
method are identical to the steps used for manual processing
(Procedure Box 8-1). The film is placed in the developer first,
then rinsed and placed in the fixer, then washed and dried. The
development time ranges from 5 to 15 seconds; the fix time is
approximately 30 seconds.
Following the Procedure
1. Turn off the heater.
2. Empty, rinse, and dry each of the cups. Dispose of the used
fixer appropriately (see Chapter 20).
3. Clean and disinfect the inside of the chairside darkroom.
Wipe off the transparent plastic top as needed.
4. Continue fixing and complete the washing and drying steps to
convert a working film to a permanent image.
Automatic Film Processing
Automatic processing is more commonly employed to process
dental x-ray film. Because of its ability to produce a large volume
of radiographs in less time (usually five minutes from developer
to dried finished radiograph), it is often preferred over manual
processing. Another advantage of an automatic processor is the
machine’s ability to regulate automatically the temperature of the
processing solutions and the time of the development process.
Automatic processing has several disadvantages, however,
including initial unit expense, possible equipment malfunction,
increased maintenance required for optimal output, and more
rapid chemical depletion than with manual processing chemistry.
Equipment
Automatic processing equipment varies in size and complexity
(Figures 8-4 and 8-10). Some processors have a limited capacity
and process only intraoral or certain sizes of extraoral films; others can handle any dental film regardless of size. Most are
intended for use in the darkroom under safelight conditions.
Automatic processors equipped with daylight loaders have a
light-tight baffle for inserting the hands while unwrapping the
film and can be used under normal white light conditions with a
filter that acts as a safelight over the film entry slots (Figure 8-4).
Most automatic processors consist of three tanks or compartments, one each for the developer, fixer, and water, and a drying
chamber (Figure 8-11). All automatic processors require water.
Some machines are connected to existing plumbing, whereas others have a self-contained water supply. A heating unit warms the
92 DENTAL X-RAY IMAGE RECEPTORS AND FILM PROCESSING TECHNIQUES
processing chemicals to the required temperature so there may be
a warming-up period before the unit is operational.
The automatic film processing sequence usually consists
of only four steps: developing, fixing, washing, and drying.
The use of a roller transport system helps “squeeze” excess
solution from the film surface, allowing the automatic processor to omit the rinsing step between developing and fixing.
Unwrapped film is fed into the film feed slot on the outside of the processor. The roller transport system moves the
film through the developer, fixer, water, and drying compartments. Motor-driven gears or belts propel the roller transport
system. The film emerges from the processor through an
opening on the outside of the processor called the film recovery slot. Most machines process a film in approximately five
minutes. Some automatic processors have a two-minute setting for producing working radiographs for a quick reading.
Preparation
To prepare the automatic processor:
1. The water supply to the automatic processor should be
turned on. If the processor uses a self-contained water
supply, the water bottles should be checked and filled as
needed.
2. The chemicals should be replenished or changed as necessary. Ensure that the tanks are filled to the levels indicated by the manufacturer.
3. The automatic processor should be turned on and
allowed to warm up according to the manufacturer’s recommendations.
4. A special cleaning film designed to remove debris from the
unit rollers should be run at the beginning of the day or if the
machine has been idle several hours.
FIGURE 8-10 Automatic processors. (Left image: Courtesy of Air Techniques, Inc.)
Film
path
Developer Fixer Wash
Drying elements
Film exit
FIGURE 8-11 Schematic illustration of automatic film processor.
Film is transported by roller assemblies through each of the processing steps.
CHAPTER 8 • DENTAL X-RAY FILM PROCESSING 93
PRACTICE POINT
In addition to being less effective, a breakdown in the
integrity of the processing chemicals will occur if chemicals
are not replenished or changed at the recommended intervals. This breakdown causes the solutions to become slick.
Slick solutions cause the films to slide or slip through the
roller transport system of the automatic processor, making it
difficult for the rollers to advance the film and resulting in
films that get stuck inside the machine.
Procedure (Procedure Box 8-2)
Unless the automatic processor is equipped with daylight loader
baffles, the processing procedure should begin under safelight
conditions. An unwrapped film is placed into the designated
feed slot on the processor. Once the film is completely inside the
automatic processing unit, safelighting is no longer necessary.
When processing multiple films, each should be placed
into alternating feed slots, one at a time, to prevent the films
from overlapping and getting stuck in the machine. Five to ten
seconds should elapse between the insertion of each film.
Inserting the films too rapidly after each other will also result
in overlapping films.
When more than one operator uses the processor, or when
processing more than one patient’s films, a method of labeling
the feed slots for film identification is necessary. Depending on
the processor model, the films will exit the processor in about
five minutes, dried and ready for mounting.
PROCEDURE 8-2
Automatic film processing
1. Maintain infection control (see Chapter 10).
2. Turn on water supply.
3. Check for replenishment of chemicals.
4. Turn on the automatic processor.
5. Set the appropriate time/temperature as indicated by the manufacturer.
6. If it is the beginning of the day, or after several hours of inactivity, run a specially manufactured cleaning
film through the processor and discard.
7. Lock the darkroom door, turn off the white light, and turn on the safelight.
8. Open the film packets (see Procedure Box 10-5) and place films into the automatic processor feed slot.
9. Allow the rollers to take the film before releasing.
10. Wait 10 seconds before placing an additional film into the same slot to avoid overlapping films.
11. Retrieve the processed films when the cycle is complete, usually about five minutes.
12. Mount and label the dried radiographs.
Following the Procedure
1. Once the white lights are turned on and visibility
improves, the radiographer should check to see that all the
films have exited the processor.
2. Unless equipped with an automatic shutoff, the unit should
be turned off or placed in stand-by mode to conserve water
that would continue to run after the films have finished
processing.
3. The work area should be cleaned as needed. Any moisture
caused by dripping or accidental splashing of chemical
solutions during replenishment must be wiped up.
4. At the end of the workday, the main power and water
supply to the unit should be turned off. Leave the cover
in place over the developer and fixer tanks to prevent
oxidation and to contain chemical fumes. Turn off all
lights in the darkroom.
Processing Chemical Maintenance
Both manual and automatic processing methods require chemical maintenance and solution replenishing and changing. Protective eyewear, mask, utility gloves, and a plastic or rubber
apron should be worn when cleaning the processing tanks or
changing the solutions.
Processing chemistry becomes weakened or lost in several ways. A small amount of developer and fixer is lost
when chemicals adhere to the film surfaces during transfer
from solution to solution. During manual processing stirring
paddles, the thermometer, and film hangers all contribute
to the loss of solution. Additionally, transfer of films
between solutions will slowly contaminate the chemicals and
weaken them.
94 DENTAL X-RAY IMAGE RECEPTORS AND FILM PROCESSING TECHNIQUES
Weakened chemistry also occurs through oxidation, the
union of a substance—in this case, the developer and fixer—
with the oxygen in the air. The developer is especially subject to
oxidation in the presence of air and loses its effectiveness very
quickly. Whenever possible, the processing tank covers should
remain in place to slow oxidation and evaporation. The cover
should be removed only when adding solutions to the proper
level; when checking the temperature of the developer, and
when inserting, removing, or changing the film hangers from
one compartment or insert to another (manual processing). Care
must be taken not to rotate the processor cover when it is
removed. Causing only a few drops of condensed developer to
fall into the fixer or vice versa will contaminate and weaken the
solutions. All chemistry must be changed periodically to avoid
diminishing quality. The useful life of the solutions depends on:
• The original quality or concentration of the solution
• The original freshness of the solution used
• The number of films that are processed
• Contamination, oxidation, and evaporation of the chemicals
Many chemical manufacturers recommend that processing
solutions be changed at least every four weeks under “normal” use.
Because normal use may be defined differently among different
practices, refer to the manufacturer recommendations to determine
reasonable intervals to change solutions. One way to maintain
solution strength in between changes is through replenishment.
Replenishment consists of removing a small amount of
developer and fixer and replacing with fresh chemistry or
chemical replenisher specifically made for this purpose. For
every 30 intraoral films processed, it is recommended that 6 to
8 ounces of developer and fixer be removed and discarded. (See
Chapter 20 for safe and environmentally sound protocols for
discarding radiographic wastes.) Fresh chemicals should be
added to raise the solution levels in the tanks to the full level.
REVIEW—Chapter summary
Film processing is a series of steps that converts the invisible
latent image on the dental x-ray film into a visible permanent
image called a radiograph. The sequence of processing steps is
developing, rinsing, fixing, washing, and drying. Developing
reduces the exposed silver halide crystals within the film emulsion to black metallic silver. Rinsing removes the alkaline
developer before the film enters the fixer solution. Fixing
removes the unexposed and/or undeveloped silver halide crystals from the film emulsion. Washing removes any remaining
traces of the chemicals. Drying preserves the film for storage as
a part of the patient’s permanent record.
Two processing chemicals are used—an alkaline developer
and a slightly acidic fixer. The four ingredients that make up the
developer are developing agents (hydroquinone and elon), a
preservative (sodium sulfite), an activator (sodium carbonate),
and a restrainer (potassium bromide). The purpose of the developing solution is to reduce the exposed silver halide crystals to
PRACTICE POINT
It is important to note that the processing chemicals used
in automatic processors differ from those used in manual
procedures. Solutions for use in automatic processors are
supersaturated, and the developer contains more hardening agents. The chemical solutions in automatic processors
are heated to temperatures much higher than those used
in manual processing—as high as 125°F (52°C) in some
units. Advanced film technology has produced film emulsions that can withstand these temperatures for the short
times required in automated processing without excessive
softening or melting.
Depending on the workload, automatic processors require
daily, weekly, or monthly cleaning. A specially made cleaning film
may be run through the processor to remove any dirt and residual
gelatin from the rollers daily or more often if the processor sits
idle for several hours (Figure 8-12). However, complete cleaning and maintenance of the roller transports and solutionholding tanks is also required. If the rollers are not kept clean,
the radiographs emerge streaked, stained, or worse, with scratched
emulsion. Most manufacturers recommend that the roller assembly
be removed and cleaned weekly, in warm, running water and special cleansers. It is important to follow the manufacturer’s instructions concerning care and maintenance.
FIGURE 8-12 Cleaning sheet or specially prepared film run
through the processor to remove any residual debris from the rollers.
Some processors automatically replenish the solutions; others
depend on the operator to keep them at the correct level.
Automatic processors require strict adherence to manufacturers’ instructions for chemical replenishment and changes and
for cleaning the unit to maintain optimal performance. Few
pieces of equipment in the oral health care practice require such
diligence and regular care.
CHAPTER 8 • DENTAL X-RAY FILM PROCESSING 95
black metallic silver. The four ingredients that make up the fixer
are a fixing agent (sodium thiosulfate), a preservative (sodium
sulfite), a hardening agent (potassium alum), and an acidifier
(acetic acid). The purpose of the fixing solution is to remove the
undeveloped silver halide crystals and harden the emulsion.
A darkroom must shut out all white light. With the exception
of automatic processors equipped with daylight loaders and
chairside rapid processing miniature darkroom boxes, all processing must be done in the darkroom under safelight conditions.
Safelighting is achieved with a red LED (light-emitting diode) or
a white incandescent lightbulb with a filter that eliminates short
wavelength, blue-green colored light. Unwrapped film should
not be exposed to safelight longer than about 21
⁄2 minutes.
Advantages of manual film processing include reliability,
no equipment to malfunction, control over the time and temperature, and the ability to produce a wet reading. The biggest
disadvantage of manual processing is the long time required
to produce a finished radiograph. Manual processing requires
a processing tank, thermometer, timer, stirring paddles, film
hangers, and drying racks. The ideal time–temperature for
manual processing is 68°F (20°C) for five minutes. Colder
developer solution requires a longer developing time; warmer
developer solution requires a shorter developing time.
A chairside miniature darkroom is utilized to produce
working radiographs by the rapid processing method. Films are
manually processed with special developer and fixer, which
produce a radiographic image in less than 1 minute. Rapid processing chemistry does not produce archival results, and the
films will eventually discolor. The advantage of rapid processing is that it fulfills the need to receive rapid information. However, image quality will be diminished.
The biggest advantage of automatic film processing is the
short time required to produce a finished radiograph. Automatic
processors equipped with daylight loader attachments can be
used to process film without a darkroom. Disadvantages
include initial unit expense, possible equipment malfunction,
increased maintenance required for optimal output, and rapid
chemical depletion. Automatic processors use a roller transport
assembly to advance the films automatically from solution to
solution, producing a finished radiograph in five minutes.
Step-by-step procedures for manual, rapid, and automatic
processing are presented in this chapter.
Oxidation over time and chemical contamination through
normal use prompt solution changes and regularly scheduled
equipment maintenance and cleaning. The useful life of the solutions is determined by the original quality or concentration of the
solution, the freshness of the solution, the number of films that are
processed, and the contamination of the chemicals. Replenishment
helps prolong the life of the processing solutions.
RECALL—Study questions
1. Which term best describes the process by which the
latent image becomes visible?
a. Reticulation
b. Reduction
c. Activation
d. Preservation
2. Which of these is the correct processing sequence?
a. Rinse, fix, wash, develop, dry
b. Fix, rinse, develop, wash, dry
c. Develop, rinse, fix, wash, dry
d. Rinse, develop, wash, fix, dry
3. The basic constituents of the developer solution are
a. reducing agent, activator, preservative, restrainer.
b. reducing agent, acidifier, preservative, restrainer.
c. clearing agent, activator, preservative, restrainer.
d. clearing agent, preservative, hardener, acidifier.
4. During which step of the processing procedure are the
exposed silver halide crystals reduced to metallic silver?
a. Developing
b. Fixing
c. Rinsing
d. Washing
5. Which ingredient removes the unexposed/undeveloped
silver halide crystals from the film emulsion?
a. Acetic acid
b. Potassium bromide
c. Sodium thiosulfate
d. Hydroquinone
6. Which ingredient causes the emulsion to soften and
swell?
a. Acidifier
b. Preservative
c. Restrainer
d. Activator
7. Which ingredient hardens the emulsion?
a. Elon
b. Potassium alum
c. Sodium carbonate
d. Sodium sulfite
8. Chemically, the developer used in an automatic processor contains more _____________ than developer used
for manual processing.
a. activator
b. acid
c. preservative
d. hardener
9. Each of the following should be considered when setting up an ideal darkroom EXCEPT one. Which one is
the EXCEPTION?
a. Black walls
b. Location
c. Lighting
d. Size
10. Which of the following colors of safelight filters is safe
for processing all film speeds?
a. Yellow
b. Green
c. Red
d. Blue
96 DENTAL X-RAY IMAGE RECEPTORS AND FILM PROCESSING TECHNIQUES
11. What is the minimum safe distance to position the safelight above the work area in the darkroom?
a. 2 ft (0.6 m)
b. 4 ft (1.2 m)
c. 6 ft (1.8 m)
d. 8 ft (2.4 m)
12. What is the appearance of the radiographic image if a
film is exposed to a safelight too long?
a. Oxidized
b. Fogged
c. Fixed
d. Attenuated
13. Which of these is considered a disadvantage of
manual processing over automatic processing?
a. Darkroom required
b. Processing time is long
c. Chemicals must be replenished
d. Temperature must be regulated
14. A thermometer is used for manual processing to determine the temperature of the
a. developer solution.
b. water.
c. fixer solution.
d. Both a and c
15. Each of the following is necessary and required for
manual processing EXCEPT one. Which one is the
EXCEPTION?
a. Thermometer
b. Timer
c. Film dryer
d. Film hanger
16. What is the ideal temperature for processing film manually?
a. 60°F (15.5°C)
b. 68°F (20°C)
c. 75°F (23.9°C)
d. 83°F (28.3°C)
17. A film may be safely exposed to white light for a wet
reading after two or three minutes of
a. developing.
b. rinsing.
c. fixing.
d. washing.
18. Each of the following is true regarding rapid film processing EXCEPT one. Which one is the EXCEPTION?
a. Uses a miniature darkroom placed on the counter in
the operatory
b. Produces archival (permanent) quality radiographs
c. May use developer that is super heated to high temperatures
d. Produces a radiographic image in about 1 or 2 minutes
19. Each of the following is an advantage of automatic processing over manual processing EXCEPT one. Which
one is the EXCEPTION?
a. Less maintenance
b. Decreased processing time
c. Increased capacity for processing
d. Self-regulation of time and temperature
20. Replenisher is added to the developing solution to compensate for
a. oxidation.
b. loss of volume.
c. loss of solution strength.
d. All of the above
21. Which processing method requires the most maintenance and the strictest adherence to regular replenishment and cleaning?
a. Manual
b. Rapid
c. Automatic
REFLECT—Case study
You work for a temporary agency that provides staffing for
oral health care practices in your area. Today your employer
has sent you to a practice organized and set up for a lefthanded practitioner. Your first patient requires a bitewing
series of radiographs. You expose the films and proceed to
the darkroom for processing. Unknown to you, this practice
has set up the manual processing tanks with the developing
solution tank on the right and the fixer tank on the left. You
are used to working with processing tanks set up with the
developing solution on the left and the fixer on the right, and
you proceed to process your films in this manner. What effect
will this have on the resultant radiographs? Why will they
look this way? Explain why the processing solutions will
produce this result. What can you do to avoid this mistake in
the future? What can this practice do to prevent this mistake
from happening again?
RELATE—Laboratory application
For a comprehensive laboratory practice exercise on this topic,
see Thomson, E. M. (2012). Exercises in oral radiography
techniques: A laboratory manual (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Pearson. Chapter 1, “Introduction to Radiation
Safety and Dental Radiographic Equipment”
REFERENCE
Carestream Health, Inc. (2007). Kodak Dental Systems:
Exposure and processing for dental film radiography. Pub.
N-414. Rochester, NY.
OBJECTIVES
Following successful completion of this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Define the key words.
2. Explain the fundamental concept of digital radiography.
3. Differentiate between direct and indirect digital imaging.
4. List the equipment used in digital imaging.
5. List and describe three types of digital image receptors.
6. Discuss digital radiography’s effect on radiation exposure.
7. List and describe five software features used to enhance digital image interpretation.
8. Identify advantages and limitations of digital radiography.
KEY WORDS
Analog
Artificial intelligence
Charge-coupled device (CCD)
Complementary metal oxide
semiconductor (CMOS)
Digital image
Digital Imaging and Communications
in Medicine (DICOM)
Digital radiograph
Digital subtraction
Digitize
Direct digital imaging
Gray scale
Gray value
Indirect digital imaging
Line pair
Noise
Photostimuable
phosphor (PSP)
Pixel
Sensor
Solid state
Spatial resolution
Storage phosphor
x-coordinate
y-coordinate
Digital Radiography
CHAPTER
9
CHAPTER
OUTLINE
 Objectives 97
 Key Words 97
 Introduction 98
 Fundamental
Concepts 98
 Uses 98
 Methods
of Acquiring
a Digital Image 99
 Equipment 101
 Characteristics
of a Digital
Image 108
 Radiation
Exposure 109
 Digital Imaging
and Communications
in Medicine
(DICOM) 109
 Review, Recall,
Reflect, Relate 111
 References 113
98 DENTAL X-RAY IMAGE RECEPTORS AND FILM PROCESSING TECHNIQUES
Introduction
Digital radiographs, or filmless imaging, is rapidly becoming
an integral part of the paperless oral health care practice
(Figure 9-1). The introduction of a computer approach to
x-rays with almost instant images has the potential to improve
the quality of oral health care while reducing radiation exposure for the patient. Although the fundamentals of film-based
radiography are necessary, it is important that the dental assistant and dental hygienist have an understanding of the basic
concepts of digital radiography and be prepared to utilize digital
technology.
The purpose of this chapter is to present the fundamental
concepts of digital radiography, to introduce the types of digital
imaging currently available, and to discuss the advantages and
limitations of digital radiography.
Fundamental Concepts
The term radiography is derived from the words radiation
and photography, meaning that a radiograph is a photographic image created using radiation. Digital imaging systems used in dentistry replace film with a solid state (no
moving parts) image receptor called a sensor (Figure 9-2) or
a polyester plate covered with phosphor crystals called a
photostimuable phosphor (PSP) plate (Figure 9-3). Images
made within a computer using these image receptors no
longer need the photographic process. The term imaging has
come to replace the term radiography when referring to these
images. In radiography, we “take a radiograph,” whereas in
digital imaging we “acquire an image.” Table 9-1 lists several
terms pertaining to digital imaging that you should be familiar with.
The difference between a digital image and a film-based
radiograph is that a digital image has no physical form. Digital
images exist only as bits of information in a computer file that
tell the computer how to construct an image on a monitor or
other viewing device (Figure 9-4). Digital radiography systems
are not limited to intraoral images. Panoramic and other extraoral radiographic digital imaging systems are also available.
Uses
Digital radiography is used for the same reasons one would use
film-based radiography, including to:
• Detect, confirm, and classify oral diseases and lesions
• Detect and evaluate trauma
FIGURE 9-1 Digital intraoral radiographic system. The
radiographic image is displayed on the computer monitor within
seconds of exposure.
FIGURE 9-2 Solid-state digital sensors in sizes comparable to
film. (Courtesy of Planmeca.)
FIGURE 9-3 PSP plate digital image receptor in sizes
comparable to film. (Courtesy of Air Techniques, Inc.)
CHAPTER 9 • DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY 99
FIGURE 9-4 An example of a digital radiographic image. (Courtesy
of Dentrix Dental Systems)
film or a digital image receptor. The significant difference
between film-based radiography and digital imaging is that the
film is replaced with a digital image receptor.
Methods of Acquiring a Digital Image
It is sometimes desirable to convert film-based radiographs to
digital images, for example, when updating to a paperless practice or to send an image electronically to another practice.
Radiographs taken with film can be digitized by scanning or by
digitally photographing the existing radiograph. A device
called a transparency adapter can be mounted in the lid of a
paper document scanner that will allow the scanner to scan
film-based radiographs (Figure 9-5). Or existing radiographs
can be placed on a viewbox and photographed with a digital
camera. Although digitizing film-based radiographs with these
methods can play a valuable role, the quality of the scanned or
photographed images will most likely be inferior to an original
digital image because the resultant image is essentially a copy.
It should be noted that some practitioners call the process of
digitizing film-based radiographs indirect digital imaging. In
this text we will refer to images obtained via a photostimuable
phosphor (PSP) plate indirect imaging. This will be explained
in the next section.
True digital images are obtained via either direct digital
imaging and indirect digital imaging.
• Evaluate growth and development
• Provide information during dental procedures such as root
canal therapy and surgery
The techniques and methods learned for exposing intra- and
extraoral radiographs are the same whether using traditional
TABLE 9-1 Terminology
TERM DEFINITION
Analog Relating to a mechanism in which data is represented by continuously variable physical quantities.
Artificial intelligence Ability of a computer to perform decision making similar to a human being.
CCD and CMOS device. metal oxide semiconductor. Solid-state detectors used
in electronic devices such as digital cameras (CCD) and memory chips of a CPU (central processing unit; CMOS).
In direct digital radiography, a CCD or CMOS (which one is used will depend on the manufacturer) sensor image
receptor converts x-rays to an electronic signal that is then reconstructed by the computer and displayed on a
monitor.
CCD = charge-coupled CMOS = complementary
Digital subtraction A process of digitally merging two images to show changes that occur over time or as the result of treatment intervention. The like images “cancel” each other out, clearly imaging the differences.
Digitize To convert analog data, such as a film-based image, into a digital form that can be processed by a computer.
Electronic noise An electrical disturbance that clutters the digital image.
Gray value The number that corresponds to the amount of radiation received by a pixel.
Gray scale Refers to the number of shades of gray visible in an image.
lp/mm Line pairs per millimeter. A term used to refer to the spatial resolution or sharpness of the image.
Pixel Short for picture element (pix, plural of picture and el, short for element). Discrete units of information that
together constitute an image.
PSP plate Indirect digital image receptor composed of a polyester plate covered with storage phosphor crystals that “store” x-ray energy as a latent image. A laser scanning device releases the stored energy
and sends it to a computer that reconstructs the image to display on a computer monitor.
PSP = photostimuable phosphor.
Spatial resolution The discernable separation of closely adjacent image details.
x- and y-coordinates Values assigned to dimensions of a pixel that tell the computer where the pixel is located.
100 DENTAL X-RAY IMAGE RECEPTORS AND FILM PROCESSING TECHNIQUES
Direct Digital Imaging
A solid state sensor, containing an electronic chip based
on either charge-coupled device (CCD) technology or
complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) technology, replaces conventional film as the image receptor.
Both CCD and CMOS technologies work equally well at
converting x-rays into an electronic signal that is sent to the
computer. The difference between the two is in the architecture of the electronic chip. The use of CCD or CMOS technology depends on the manufacturer of the digital imaging
system.
CCD and CMOS sensors are made up of a grid of x-ray
or light sensitive cells (Figure 9-6). Each cell represents one
pixel in the final image. A pixel serves as a small box or
“well” into which the electrons produced by the x-ray exposure are deposited. A pixel is the digital equivalent of a silver
halide crystal used in film-based radiography. As opposed to
film emulsion that contains a random arrangement of silver
halide crystals, pixels are arranged in a structured order in
rows and columns. Each pixel has an x-coordinate, a y-coordinate, and a gray value. The x- and y-coordinates are numbers that represent where the pixel is located (what row and
column) in the grid. When x-rays strike the sensor, the pixels
are excited in such a way that an electronic charge is produced on the surface of the sensor. The number that represents the gray value increases or decreases in proportion to
the number of x-rays striking each pixel. The sensor then
transmits the x- and y-coordinates and the gray value,
through a wire or wirelessly via radio frequency to a circuit
board inside the computer. The computer software processes
the x- and y-coordinates and a gray value number to reconstruct an image to display on the monitor.
Indirect Digital Imaging
Photostimuable phosphor (PSP) plate sensor technology,
also called a storage phosphor system, replaces conventional
film as the image receptor, but uses very different technology
than CCD and CMOS systems. PSP sensors very closely parallel film in the way they look and in the way the radiographic
image is captured as analog data and then processed (Figure 9-7).
PSP technology uses polyester plates coated with something
called a storage phosphor (europium activated barium fluorohalide). When exposed to x-rays this storage phosphor “stores”
the x-ray energy as a latent image similar to the way silver
halide crystals within film emulsion store a latent image. After
exposure the PSP plate is placed into a laser scanning device
(Figure 9-8). As the laser beam passes over the PSP plate,
energy in proportion to the amount of x-ray energy absorbed is
released. The released energy, in the form of light, is converted
to an electrical signal that is then converted into digital values.
The computer uses these digital values to reconstruct an image
on the computer monitor. The laser scanner processing step
makes PSP technology seem similar to film-based radiography
FIGURE 9-5 Digitizing film-based radiographs is accomplished
by scanning into the computer. (Courtesy of DEXIS, LLC.)
189 187 185
180 101
179 105
109
102
175 178 181 249
245
248
189 187 185 246
180 101
179 105
109
102
175 178 181 249
245
248
246
x-coordinate
y-coordinate
Gray value
FIGURE 9-6 Diagram of sensor grid. Each square represents a
pixel. Pixels store a number from 0 to 255, representing pure black at 0
to pure white at 255 that the computer will re-construct into an image.
FIGURE 9-7 PSP plate. The similar dimensions allow for the use of
a film holder to place the PSP plate. (Courtesy of Gendex Dental Systems.)
CHAPTER 9 • DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY 101
FIGURE 9-8 PSP scanner. Operator placing the exposed PSP
sensor plates in to the laser scanning device. (Courtesy of Gendex
Dental Systems.)
in that the image receptor is exposed and then “developed”
later. Because of this additional laser scanning step, this
method of acquiring a digital image is referred to as indirect
digital imaging. After processing with the laser scanner, PSP
plates must be erased by exposing them to bright light before
using again.
Equipment
Both direct and indirect digital radiography use a dental x-ray
machine, an image receptor capable of capturing digital
information, a computer, and specialized software (Procedure
Box 9-1).
PROCEDURE 9-1
Procedure for obtaining digital images
Equipment preparation*
1. Turn on the computer. Using the keyboard or mouse, activate the computer exam window and select the
type of exam from the task bar (i.e., bitewings, periapicals, full mouth series).
2. Using the keyboard, type the patient identification information (i.e., name) and date of exam.
3. Wipe the sensor with an intermediate-level disinfectant approved by the sensor manufacturer. Place an
FDA-cleared plastic sheath over the sensor (Figures 9-9 and 9-10).
4. Place the sensor into the appropriate biteblock and attach to the holding device (Figures 9-7 and 9-11).
5. Turn on the x-ray machine and adjust exposure settings. Refer to the manufacturer’s recommendations for reducing film exposure settings by up to one-half those used for F-speed film-based
exposures.
(Continued )
*Follow the manufacturer’s instructions for your digital system. Only general guidelines concerning patient preparation and
sensor placement are included here.
102 DENTAL X-RAY IMAGE RECEPTORS AND FILM PROCESSING TECHNIQUES
PROCEDURE 9-1
Procedure for obtaining digital images (continued)
Patient preparation
1. Request that the patient remove objects from the mouth that can interfere with the procedure and remove
eyeglasses.
2. Adjust chair to a comfortable working level.
3. Adjust headrest to position patient’s head so that the occlusal plane is parallel to the floor and the midsagittal plane (midline) is perpendicular to the floor.
4. Place the lead/lead equivalent apron and thyroid collar on the patient.
5. Perform a cursory inspection of the oral cavity and note possible obstructions (tori, shallow palatal vault,
malaligned teeth) that may require an alteration of technique or placement of the sensor. Note the patient’s
occlusion to assist with aligning the sensor with the maxillary or mandibular teeth.
Exposure
1. Place the sensor intraorally into position (Figure 9-12).
2. Utilize the paralleling technique to position the sensor parallel to the long axes of the teeth of interest. Align the
tube head and PID to direct the central rays of the x-ray beam perpendicular to the sensor. Direct the central
rays to the middle (center) of the sensor to avoid conecut error (Figure 9-13).
FIGURE 9-11 Wired digital sensor being
placed into the image receptor holder.
FIGURE 9-9 Wireless sensor being covered with a disposable
plastic barrier for placement intraorally. (Courtesy of Schick
Technologies, Inc.)
FIGURE 9-10 Infection control. Wired digital
sensor being covered with a disposable plastic
barrier for placement intraorally.
CHAPTER 9 • DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY 103
FIGURE 9-12 Sensor being placed intraorally.
PROCEDURE 9-1
Procedure for obtaining digital images (continued)
CCD (Charge-Coupled Device) or CMOS
(Complementary Metal Oxide
Semiconductor)
5. Wait for the image to appear on the computer
monitor and evaluate technique. If a technique
error has occurred that compromises diagnostic
quality and requires a retake, do the following:
a. Do not remove the sensor from the patient’s
oral cavity.
b. Request that the patient remain still, in position.
c. Observe the error and decide the corrective
action. For example, if a conecut error has
resulted in the posterior section of the image
being blank, the appropriate corrective action
would be to move the PID toward the posterior to align the central rays of the x-ray beam
to the center of the sensor.
d. Realign the PID to correct. To correct sensor
placement errors, request that the patient
open the mouth slightly, allowing you to perform the corrective action and then occlude
on the biteblock holding the sensor in this
new position.
e. Using the keyboard or mouse, activate the
retake window and make the exposure.
Repeat step 5 to produce a diagnostic quality
image.
PSP (Photostimuable Phosphor)
plate
5. Remove the sensor (plate) from the patient’s oral
cavity.
6. Remove the sensor from the holding device.
7. Remove the plastic barrier and clean and disinfect
sensor according to manufacturer’s instructions.
8. Place the plate in light-tight box until ready for
scanning (Figure 9-14) or place directly into the
laser scanner and activate (Figure 9-8).
9. Observe the image on the monitor and evaluate
technique. If a technique error has occurred that
compromises diagnostic quality, retake the exposure. You may choose to use another prepared
sensor or perform the following steps:
a. Erase the used sensor plate according to
manufacturer’s instructions.
b. Repeat the Equipment Preparation, Patient
Preparation, and Exposure steps.
10. If the image is satisfactory, remove the sensor
from the scanner and erase the used sensor plate
according to the manufacturer’s instructions. If
additional images are required, repeat the Equipment Preparation, Patient Preparation, and Exposure steps or use additional sensors.
11. Repeat steps 1 through 10 until all exposures are
acquired.
FIGURE 9-13 PID aligned with sensor held in place by
holder.
3. Using the keyboard or mouse, activate the sensor for exposure.
4. Depress the exposure button to expose the sensor.
(Continued )
X-ray Machine
Most digital x-ray systems can be used with existing dental
x-ray machines that have electronic timers capable of producing very short exposure times (Figure 9-15). Older x-ray
machines using impulse timers may need to be updated with
electronic timers for use with digital systems. An x-ray
machine adapted for digital radiography can still be used for
conventional film-based radiography. Dental x-ray machines
that are capable of producing low kilovoltage (60 kV), have low
millamperage (5 mA), and have a direct current (DC) curcuit
are ideally suited to digital radiography.
PROCEDURE 9-1
Procedure for obtaining digital images (continued)
FIGURE 9-14 Box to keep exposed PSP plates shielded
from bright light until scanned. (Courtesy of Air Techniques.)
6. If the image is satisfactory, remove the sensor
from the patient’s oral cavity. If additional images
are required, reposition the sensor for the next
exposure. (It may not be necessary to completely
remove the sensor from the patient’s oral cavity.
Depending on the cooperation of the patient,
the sensor may be positioned for the next image
without completely removing the sensor from
the oral cavity.)
7. Repeat steps 1 through 6 until all exposures are
acquired.
Following exposure
1. Remove the sensor from the holding device.
2. Remove the plastic barrier and clean and disinfect according to manufacturer’s instructions.
3. Save the patient’s exam in the archived files. Back up the file on the computer or supplemental storage
system. If required, print out a hard copy of the images.
104 DENTAL X-RAY IMAGE RECEPTORS AND FILM PROCESSING TECHNIQUES
Image Receptors
Both intra- and extraoral digital radiography use either a solid
state sensor (CCD or CMOS) or a photostimuable phosphor
(PSP) plate instead of film. CCD or CMOS intraoral sensors
may be wired, connected to the computer by a fiber optic cable
that records the generated signal or wireless. The cable may
vary in length, with popular lengths from 3 to 9 ft (1 to 3 m).
The shorter the cable, the more limited the range of motion.
Intraoral dental x-ray machines are available with a conveniently attached wired sensor (Figure 9-16). Wireless sensors
use a radio frequency to communicate with the computer and
CHAPTER 9 • DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY 105
FIGURE 9-16 Digital radiography system with conveniently
attached sensor. (Courtesy of Planmeca.)
FIGURE 9-17 Wireless digital sensor in sizes similar to film.
(Courtesy of Schick Technologies, Inc.)
FIGURE 9-15 Digital radiography system. An existing dental xray unit being used with a digital imaging system.
are not connected by a cable (Figure 9-17). Eliminating the
wire from the sensor has potential benefits such as increased
mobility to position the sensor intraorally and increased
patient comfort from not having to occlude carefully to avoid
the wire. However, wireless sensors are usually thicker than
wired sensors, and the technology used to communicate with
the computer without being physically attached via a wire is
sensitive to other signals or noise in the area, such as from
other electronic devices being used in the vicinity. Digital
images are usually displayed on a computer monitor within
0.5 to 120 seconds after the sensor is exposed. The sensor
design is unique to the manufacturer. Sensors are available
with contoured edges and angled wire attachments (Figure 9-
18), and others have been reduced to just over 3 mm in width
(thickness), all characteristics designed to enhance patient
comfort during sensor placement intraorally.
FIGURE 9-18 Digital wired sensor. Note the contoured edges
and the angled attachment of the wire designed to facilitate placement
intraorally. (Courtesy of DEXIS, LLC.)
PRACTICE POINT
The ability to view a digital image immediately allows for
quick assessment of diagnostic quality and accurate correction of technique errors. For example, if a technique error
results in overlapping or conecut images, the operator can
make the necessary adjustments to the sensor placement or
tube head alignment without removing the sensor from the
patient’s mouth, greatly increasing the likelihood that the
corrective action will produce a quality image.
106 DENTAL X-RAY IMAGE RECEPTORS AND FILM PROCESSING TECHNIQUES
FIGURE 9-21 Computer with CRT monitor continue to
provide high quality image viewing. (Courtesy of DEXIS, LLC.)
FIGURE 9-20 Flat panel computer monitor. (Courtesy of DEXIS,
LLC.)
Intraoral PSP plates very closely resemble intraoral film
packets, and extraoral PSP plates are placed into a cassette
(without intensifying screens) in the same manner as extraoral
film (see Chapter 30). Intraoral PSP plates are thin and slightly
flexible. (Figure 9-7) Care should be taken to not bend the
plate, or damage will occur. There is no wire connection
directly to the computer. Each plate is exposed and then kept
protected from bright light until ready for the scanning step
(Figure 9-14). Each plate is then arranged in a special mount
and inserted into the laser scanner that is attached to the computer (Figure 9-8). The scanner uses a laser beam to convert the
digital signal contained as a latent image in the plate to a visible
image on a computer monitor. The scanning time can take
between 10 seconds to produce an image for a single periapical
radiograph and 5 minutes to produce a high-resolution panoramic
image. PSP plates must be erased by exposing to bright light
before they can be reused.
Both CCD and CMOS sensors and PSP plates are available
in the sizes that approximate the different sizes of an intraoral
film packet and extraoral film sizes, but PSP plates have a
greater variety of sizes available, including a size suitable for
exposing occlusal radiograph (Figure 9-3; see Chapter 17).
Computer
Digital radiography requires a computer to capture and a
monitor to view the image (Figure 9-19). The computer digitizes, processes, and stores information received from the sensor. The type and size of computer required depends on the
digital imaging software to be used. The computer must have
a large enough memory to store the images and be equipped
to support visual image displays on a monitor. Flat panel
monitors have largely replaced large cathode ray tube (CRT)
monitors (Figure 9-20). However, older CRT monitors, with
tested technology, continue to provide high-quality image
viewing (Figure 9-21). Technology has recently made available hand-held image viewers that store images, similar to a
portable hard drive. The images can then be transferred wirelessly to a nearby computer via radio waves for permanent
storage. When choosing a monitor with newer technology
such as liquid crystal display (LCD) or plasma displays, careful
FIGURE 9-19 Digital imaging system for use with a laptop
computer. (Courtesy of DEXIS, LLC.)
attention should be given to match the digital imaging system
with the monitor recommended by the manufacturer.
The computer may be connected to the Internet to allow
for electronic transfer of the images to insurance companies or
when referring to other health care specialists. Connecting a
printer to the computer will allow the operator to print out a
photo- or plain-paper copy for the patient record if desired.
Software
Manufacturers of digital radiographic systems provide software programs that when loaded onto the computer will allow
the operator to manipulate the images. Digital systems offer a
variety of features to aid in viewing and interpreting the
images. Some of the features offered by manufacturers of digital software include the following:
• Side-by-side displays of images. Allows the operator to
view and compare multiple images on the monitor at one
time. This feature is helpful when comparing current
images with images taken previously (Figure 9-20).
CHAPTER 9 • DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY 107
• Magnification. Allows specific images to be magnified.
This feature is helpful when evaluating subtle changes
not easily detected by the unaided human eye.
• Density and contrast Changes can be made to image density and contrast without retaking the radiograph. For
example, when an image appears too light, this software
tool allows the operator to increase the image darkness.
• Measurement tools. Linear and angular measurements
can be obtained with a software “ruler” or measuring
feature. Measurement tools are useful in measuring the
length of root canals in endodontic therapy and for estimating periodontal bone levels.
• Charting. Software programs allow the operator to place
interpretive notes directly on the radiographic images
(Figures 9-22 and 9-23). An arrow or circle may be
drawn directly on an area of interest, in much the same
manner as an entry would be made on the patient’s paper
record or chart.
• Digital subtraction. This feature allows for comparison of
digitally stored images to detect changes over time or
prior to and after treatment interventions. Digital subtraction merges two radiographic images of the same area,
taken at different times. Merged together electronically,
those portions of the images that are alike (i.e., did not
change over time) will cancel each other out as they are
subtracted from each other. The portions of the images
where change occurred will stand out conspicuously. Digital subtraction eliminates distracting background information that is similar in both images and highlights the
changes (differences). Digital subtraction is an effective
method of measuring periodontal changes such as bone
loss or regeneration, assessment of implants, and healing
of periapical pathosis.
In the past, for digital subtraction to be effective, the
technique used to acquire the two images had to be closely
standardized. The positions of the sensor, the patient, and
the tube head all had to be the same for both images. This
was accomplished with fabrication of a custom biteblock
so that the patient could bite down in the same place with
each radiograph. Technological advances in software that
match gray values between subsequent images have made
digital subtraction easier to achieve.
• Artificial intelligence. Software technology continues
to find ways to improve the diagnostic yields from digital imaging. Predictions have been made that artificial
intelligence, programming a computer to make decisions regarding the diagnosis of the images acquired,
will one day be used to assist the practitioner with
reading and interpreting digital images. Possible uses for
artificial intelligence would be to develop computer
software to analyze bone around a dental implant to
determine if osseointegration (anchoring in bone)
has occurred or to analyze bone densities of the jaws
to screen for osteoporosis with a dental radiograph.
Although certainly very beneficial ideas, these uses of
artificial intelligence are still being studied.
FIGURE 9-22 Charting software allows the radiographer to
place notes directly on the image.
FIGURE 9-23 Charting software allows the radiographer to
place notes directly on the image. (Courtesy of Dentrix Dental Systems.)
PRACTICE POINT
A future possible use of artificial intelligence. Because the
computer can record more data than the human eye can
detect, in the future software features might be constructed
that alert the practitioner to subtle dental disease that may go
undetected. For example, the computer could be directed to
color all healthy enamel, with a certain level of density, yellow.
Any enamel density that falls below a certain established
healthy level could be colored purple. Therefore, when interpreting the image on the computer monitor, the practitioner
could easily identify the caries indicated by the purple areas.
108 DENTAL X-RAY IMAGE RECEPTORS AND FILM PROCESSING TECHNIQUES
FIGURE 9-26 Example of pixel size effect on the image.
FIGURE 9-25 Embossing. An example of a digital software
feature that can be used to manipulate the image to enhance
interpretation. (Courtesy of Dentrix Dental Systems.)
FIGURE 9-24 Reversing the gray scale. Digital software can change
the image’s radiopacities to radiolucencies and vice versa.
Characteristics of a Digital Image
The term digital image is used to distinguish it from an analog
image. An analog image can be compared to a painting that has
a continuous smooth blend from one color to another. A digital
image is like a mosaic, made up of many small pieces put
together to make a whole. The digital image is composed of
structurally ordered areas called pixels. Pixels, short for “picture
elements,” are tiny dots that make up a digital image. Each pixel
is a single dot in a digital image. The more pixels in an image, the
higher the resolution and the sharper the image. Studies continue
to compare different digital imaging systems and find that all
systems currently on the market produce acceptable images in
terms of spatial resolution and gray scale when compared to
intraoral film.
Spatial Resolution
The number and size of pixels determines the spatial resolution
of an image. When the number of pixels is low, the image
appears to have jagged edges and is difficult to see (Figure 9-26).
Spatial resolution is measured in terms of line pairs. A line pair
refers to the greatest number of paired lines visible in 1 millimeter (mm) of an image. For example, a resolution of 10 line
pairs/mm would mean that when 10 ruled lines are squeezed into
1 mm of an image, the individual lines can still be distinguished
from each other. The greater the spatial resolution in an image,
the sharper it looks.
Gray Scale
Gray scale refers to the number of shades of gray visible in an
image. The gray scale of a radiographic image is probably the
most important characteristic of a radiographic image. Detection and diagnosis of oral conditions depend on the gray scale
to provide the appropriate image contrast. The practitioner
most often relies on the radiograph’s contrast, its radiolucency
and radiopacity, to determine the presence or absence of disease. The ability to record subtle changes in the gray areas of
images improves diagnosis. Digital radiographic systems
claim the ability to produce up to 65,500 gray levels. However,
computer monitors can display only 256 gray levels. A number
stored for each pixel determines the number of shades of gray
• Other features. Other features of specialized software
promoted by manufacturers include reversing the gray
scale, embossing (Figures 9-24 and 9-25), and colorization, where different densities can be assigned a
different color value on the monitor. Some practitioners
find these features helpful aids to interpreting images,
whereas others view them as visual gimmicks because
these features currently do not have the power to take
the place of the dental practitioner. Interpreting digital
images with or without these features requires practice.
A practitioner must spend time developing the skills
required for interpreting digital images. Currently software cannot match the ability of a skilled practitioner
at interpreting dental disease and deviations from the
normal.
CHAPTER 9 • DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY 109
visible (Figure 9-6). Each pixel has a number from 0 to 255,
representing pure black at 0 to pure white at 255 for a total of
256 gray levels in an image.
The human eye can distinguish only about 32 shades of
gray unaided. However, this does not necessarily mean that the
large range of gray scale captured by digital imaging systems is
wasted. When aided by the computer software features, which
can be used to enhance the gray levels, it may be possible to
detect changes that might be overlooked in film-based images.
The goal of digital imaging systems is to produce highquality diagnostic images. It is the combination of pixels,
spatial resolution, and gray scale that determines the quality
of the final image. Manufacturers are continuing to improve
the capability of digital equipment and software to aid in the
early detection of oral diseases.
PRACTICE POINT
The ability to increase or decrease digital image density will
not compensate for a severely under- or overexposed
image. For example, if the exposure setting is too low, the
resultant image will be too light. Often a light image will
not reveal such subtle changes as an early or incipient carious lesion. If the original image does not detect the radiolucency of the caries because it was underexposed (too
light), then merely darkening the image with the digital
software density control tool will not “put” the caries into
the picture. If it was not detected to begin with, the software will not reveal it.
Radiation Exposure
The advantages of digital imaging over film-based radiography
are significant (Table 9-2). One of these advantages that is often
a major benefit touted by digital imaging system manufacturers
is the reduction in radiation exposure to the patient. However,
with fast-speed intraoral film and the fast-speed extraoral film
and screen combinations (see Chapter 29) used today, the
actual radiation reduction may be 0 to 50%. Claims for up to
80% radiation reduction are most often accurate when the digital exposure is compared to slower D-speed film.
Solid-state CCD and CMOS digital imaging sensors are
more efficient at capturing x-rays than conventional dental
x-ray film and would most likely produce a bigger reduction
in exposure. For example, if a 12-impulse (0.2-second) exposure time is required for a radiograph taken with F-speed
intraoral film, the exposure time for this same image
acquired utilizing CCD or CMOS technology could possibly
be reduced to 6 impulses (0.1 second). However, the operator
should evaluate the actual result in practice and adjust the
exposure time as necessary to produce a diagnostically
acceptable image. This large of a reduction in radiation dose
may not be realized in practice with PSP plate technology, as
a low radiation exposure produces an increase in noise, an
electrical disturbance that clutters the image, at very low
exposure times. The practitioner will often increase the
exposure time to eliminate the noise. Additionally, PSP technology has the unique ability to produce an acceptable image
at longer exposure times. Overexposed PSP plates will not
alert the radiographer that too much radiation is being used
to produce the image. What this means in practice is that the
radiographer may be setting the exposure time higher than
needed.
There may be no radiation reduction realized when comparing extraoral CCD, CMOS, or PSP technology to extraoral
film-screen combinations. In fact, some extraoral systems
using PSP technology actually require an increase in radiation
exposure over film-screen radiographs.
Another important consideration when discussing radiation exposure is that studies have indicated a higher retake rate
and more exposures taken with direct digital imaging when
compared with film-based radiographs. Increased exposures
lead to increased patient radiation doses. Possible explanations
for this higher incidence of exposure with direct digital imaging include:
• The ease with which retakes can be immediately taken
without removing the sensor from the patient’s mouth.
• The real and the perceived radiation dose reduction expected
by digital imaging makes retakes seem easily justifiable.
• The recording dimensions of the sensors are smaller than a
film requiring multiple exposures of the same region.
• The size and rigidity of the sensor and the wire and plastic
infection-control barrier protruding from the oral cavity
make placement difficult, which leads to increased chance
of errors.
Although a reduction in radiation dose is an advantage of
digital imaging technologies, the International Commission on
Radiological Protection has recently indicated interest in investigating how some digital imaging systems arrive at radiation
reduction claims used in advertising. The radiographer should
critically evaluate a digital system to determine the radiation
dose reduction and be aware of the pitfalls that negate the beneficial reductions in radiation exposures.
Digital Imaging and Communications in
Medicine (DICOM)
When digital imaging began to replace film-based radiography, the medical community, where digital imaging is more
widely utilized, adopted the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) standard to allow different
digital systems to interface with each other. Exporting and
importing digital images can require complex steps and considerable computer knowledge. Without standards, system
compatibility will be an issue when digital images are transferred electronically between systems. The American Dental
Association Informatics Task Group has recommended that
the DICOM standard be used for dental imaging systems as
110 DENTAL X-RAY IMAGE RECEPTORS AND FILM PROCESSING TECHNIQUES
TABLE 9-2 Advantages and Limitations of Digital Radiography
ADVANTAGES LIMITATIONS
• Less radiation exposure
• Almost instantaneous viewing of the image
• Elimination of the photographic process and darkroom
• No generation of hazardous wastes such as used fixer and lead foils and
elimination of cost of disposal
• Elimination of darkroom processing errors
• Dark/light images may be improved with software to avoid reexposing the patient
• Images can be manipulated to enhance interpretation
• Improved grayscale resolution enhances contrast discrimination
• Software features such as charting and measuring tools assist with
interpretation and diagnosis
• Remote electronic consultation and sending of images
• Effective patient viewing that enhances discussion of treatment plan
and oral hygiene education (Figure 9-28)
• Long-term costs may be less when compared to costs associated
with purchasing film and processing chemicals
• The ease of retakes may result in excess radiation exposure
• Bulky, thicker sensor size (CCD and CMOS) and attached wire
may elicit patient complaints of discomfort or excite a gag reflex
• Plastic barrier sheaths placed over the sensor to maintain infection
control add additional bulk.
• Infection control requires careful adherence to manufacturer’s recommendations to avoid damage to the sensor. Infection control
must be maintained for computer keyboard and/or mouse
(Figure 9-27)
• Smaller overall sensor dimensions limits recording area. Additional exposures may be required to image an area entirely.
• Initial investment costs to convert from film-based radiography
• Special image receptor holders may need to be purchased
• Technology concerns, when to make the change from film-based
imaging, and what type of digital system to buy can be a difficult
decision
• Concern with reliability of digital imaging. Computer crashes, system malfunction, and computer viruses are real risks.
• Concern regarding a possible temporary inability to access the
images in the computer’s memory due to a computer glitch or
power failure that can delay patient treatment
• Archival storage (to keep patient records for the time required or
recommended by law) and backup storage (to protect files from
computer malfunction) need to be considered. Media used to store
the images will have to be updated continually to be accessible
over time.
• Learning curve required to read digital images on a computer monitor
• Viewing digital images will be restricted to the area where
the computer and monitor are located. (Although technology is
now producing portable viewers.)
• Although environmentally friendly in the short term, disposal of
broken, obsolete digital equipment is a concern.
FIGURE 9-27 Infection control. A disposable plastic barrier
protects the computer mouse.
FIGURE 9-28 Digital imaging system enhances patient
consult. (Courtesy of Gendex Dental Systems.)
CHAPTER 9 • DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY 111
well. As manufacturers of digital imaging equipment adopt
the DICOM standard, the ease with which information can
be shared will improve. Currently manufacturers of dental
digital imaging systems are being encouraged to produce
systems that are compatible with each other.
Studies indicate that although the adoption of digital imaging by oral health care practices is increasing, it has not
replaced film-based radiography. Oral health care will most
likely continue to implement digital imaging into patient care
as improvements and standardizations of the technology continue. The oral health care practice of the near future will most
likely see a decreased use of film-based radiography.
REVIEW—Chapter summary
Digital radiography is a method of capturing a radiographic
image and displaying it on a computer screen. A solid-state
sensor or phosphor plate replaces film. Digital images have
no physical form, but exist as bits of information in a computer file. Film-based radiographs may be digitized by scanning or photographing to convert these analog images to
digital files.
Direct digital imaging replaces film with a solid-state
sensor, containing an electronic chip based on either chargecoupled device (CCD) technology or complementary metal
oxide semiconductor (CMOS) technology. Grids made up of
pixels arranged in columns and rows make up the sensor.
When x-rays strike the sensor an electronic signal is produced
and transmitted to a computer. The computer uses the x- and
y-coordinates and the gray value for each pixel to reconstruct the
image for viewing on a monitor. Indirect digital imaging
replaces film with a photostimuable phosphor (PSP) plate covered with a storage phosphor that captures the analog image
similar to the action of film. PSP sensor “stores” x-ray energy
until read later in a laser scanner.
Digital imaging requires the use of a conventional dental
x-ray unit, CCD or CMOS sensor or PSP plate, computer,
and special software. Ideal x-ray machines have an electronic
timer, low kVp, low mA, and direct current (DC). CCD and
CMOS sensors may be wired or wireless, with contoured
edges, and with angled wire attachments. PSP plates are not
attached to the computer with a wire. After exposure to
x-rays PSP plates must be kept away from bright light until
scanned. PSP plates are placed into a laser scanner that converts the digital signal to an image on a computer monitor.
PSP plates must be erased by exposing to bright light before
reusing.
All digital imaging systems require the use of a computer
with enough memory to run the special software and to store
the images generated. Consideration should be given to choosing a monitor that provides ease of reading and interpreting the
images. A printer attached to the computer will allow the operator to print hard copies of the radiographic images if desired.
Special software is required to run the digital radiographic
systems. Digital software packages allow the radiographer to
manipulate the image. Common features include the ability to
view multiple radiographic images on one screen, magnification, measuring, and charting tools. Digital subtraction is a
software process where two images are merged electronically,
canceling out like portions of the image and revealing changes.
Artificial intelligence may one day assist practitioners with
determining the presence of diseases.
The digital image is composed of pixels, short for picture
elements. Each pixel is a single dot in the digital image. The
number and size of pixels determines the spatial resolution and
the sharpness of the image. Spatial resolution is measured as
line pairs. A line pair refers to the number of paired lines visible
in 1 mm of an image. The greater the spatial resolution, the
sharper the image appears. Pixels also determine the gray scale
of the image. Each pixel has a number from 0 to 255, representing pure black at 0 to pure white at 255. The higher the gray
scale, the more likely the image is to record subtle changes in
the patient’s condition.
A major advantage of digital radiography is radiation
dose reduction, between 0 and 50% over film-based radiography. Other advantages include almost instant images, elimination of the darkroom and chemicals and hazardous wastes,
potential for improved interpretation through image manipulation, ability to transmit the images electronically, and
effective patient education. Limitations include too easily
making retakes that might lead to excess radiation exposure
and the need for digital system manufacturers to adhere to
DICOM (digital imaging and communications in medicine)
to allow transfer of images between different systems. Other
limitations include increased sensor width and decreased
recording area, initial costs to convert to digital imaging,
infection control protocols, issues with the technology
including memory storage, computer crashes, and interrupted
access to the data. There is a learning curve to gain proficiency with interpretation.
RECALL—Study questions
For questions 1 to 5, match each term with its definition.
a. analog
b. gray scale
c. line pair
d. pixel
e. spatial resolution
_____ 1. Discrete units of information that together
constitute an image.
_____ 2. The discernable separation of closely adjacent image details.
_____ 3. Refers to the number of paired lines visible in
1 mm of an image.
_____ 4. Relating to a mechanism in which data is represented by continuously variable physical
quantities.
_____ 5. Refers to the total number of shades of gray
visible in an image.
112 DENTAL X-RAY IMAGE RECEPTORS AND FILM PROCESSING TECHNIQUES
13. To maintain infection control, most manufacturers recommend that the sensor used in digital radiography be
a. packaged for steam sterilization and autoclaved.
b. disposed of after use, with biohazard wastes.
c. decontaminated with soap and water and disinfected
with a high-level disinfectant.
d. wiped with an intermediate-level disinfectant and
covered with a plastic barrier.
e. sanitized and immersed in a chemical sterilant.
14. List five features offered by digital software that can
be used to enhance the radiographic image.
a. ______________
b. ______________
c. ______________
d. ______________
e. ______________
15. The smaller the number of pixels in the image the
sharper the spatial resolution.
Each pixel stores a number representing a different
shade of gray.
a. The first statement is true. The second statement is
false.
b. The first statement is false. The second statement is
true.
c. Both statements are true.
d. Both statements are false.
16. Digital radiography requires less radiation exposure to produce an image than film-based radiography because the
a. chemical processing steps are eliminated.
b. radiation used for digital imaging is different than
radiation used for film-based imaging.
c. image receptor (CCD or CMOS) is more sensitive to
x-rays than film.
d. computer can control the amount of radiation output
better than the radiographer.
17. Each of the following is true regarding digital radiography in comparison to film-based radiography
EXCEPT one. Which one is the EXCEPTION?
a. Provides a more legal document.
b. Less time is required to obtain a diagnostic image.
c. Eliminates film and chemical wastes.
d. Patient radiation is reduced 0 to 50 percent.
e. Software features enhance interpretation.
18. Each of the following is a disadvantage of digital radiography when compared to film-based radiography
EXCEPT one. Which one is the EXCEPTION?
a. Initial cost of setting up the system
b. Being able to magnify the image for diagnosis
c. Risk of computer crashes and lost files
d. Learning curve required to transfer interpretation
skills
e. Management of infection control
6. A digital radiographic image exists as bits of information in a computer file.
The computer converts this information into an image
that appears on the computer monitor.
a. The first statement is true. The second statement is
false.
b. The first statement is false. The second statement is
true.
c. Both statements are true.
d. Both statements are false.
7. Digital radiography can be used for which of the following?
a. To detect caries
b. To monitor an endodontic procedure
c. To detect dental disease
d. All of the above
8. Digital radiography systems can be used for which of
the following?
a. Bitewing images
b. Periapical images
c. Panoramic images
d. All of the above
9. When a transparency scanner or digital camera is used
to convert an existing film-based radiograph to a digital
file, the process is called
a. digital radiography.
b. digital subtraction.
c. direct digital imaging.
d. digitization.
10. Each of the following is a digital image receptor
EXCEPT one. Which one is the EXCEPTION?
a. CCD
b. CMOS
c. XCP
d. PSP
11. Which of the following stores the x-ray energy until
later stimulation by a laser beam reads the electric signal and converts it into a digital image?
a. CCD
b. CMOS
c. XCP
d. PSP
12. Each of the following is necessary for digital radiography EXCEPT one. Which one is the EXCEPTION?
a. X-ray machine
b. Solid-state sensor or phosphor coated plate
c. Computer and monitor
d. Special software
e. Darkroom
RELATE—Laboratory application
For a comprehensive laboratory practice exercise on this
topic, see Thomson, E. M. (2012). Exercises in oral radiography techniques: A laboratory manual (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Pearson Education. Chapter 3, “Introduction to
digital imaging.”
REFERENCES
American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs.
(2006). The use of dental radiographs: Update and recommendations. J Am Dent Assn, 137, 1304–1312.
American Dental Association Standards Committee on Dental
Informatics. (2005). Implementation requirements for
DICOM in dentistry. Technical report no. 1023-2005.
Chicago: Author.
Farman, A. G., & Farman, T. T. (2005). A comparison of 18
different x-ray detectors currently used in dentistry. Oral
Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 99, 485–489.
Francisco, E. F., Horlak, D., & Azevedo, S. (2010). The balance between safety and efficacy: Understanding the technology available that will produce high quality
radiographs while reducing patient risk to ionizing radiation. Dimensions of Dental Hygiene, 8, 26–30.
Horner, K., Drage, N., & Brettle, D. (2008). 21st century
imaging. London: Quintessence Publishing.
Palenik, C. J. (2004). Infection control for dental radiography.
Dentistry Today, 23, 52–55.
Van der Stelt, P. F. (2005). Filmless imaging: The uses of digital radiography in dental practice. Journal of the American Dental Association, 136, 1379–1387.
Van der Stelt, P. F. (2008). Better imaging: The advantages of
digital radiography. Journal of the American Dental Association, 139, 7S–13S
White, S. C., & Pharoah, M. J. (2008). Oral radiology: Principles and interpretation (6th ed.). St. Louis: Elsevier.
Williamson, G. F. (2005). Digital radiography in dentistry.
Journal of Practical Hygiene, 13–14.
CHAPTER 9 • DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY 113
REFLECT—Case study
The oral health care practice where you are employed is considering purchasing a digital radiography system. Using the
Internet, search for companies that manufacture and sell dental
digital imaging products. From your research, choose two companies and compare their two products. Prepare an analysis to
help your practice decide what digital radiography system will
be the best choice. Contact the company for literature or additional information as needed to answer the following questions
about each of the products.
a. What are the names of the companies that manufacture
the products you chose to compare?
b. What are the names of the digital radiography systems
they manufacture/sell?
c. Do these digital systems have special computer requirements, or can they be used with the computer currently
in use at your practice?
d. What type of sensor does each offer? How are they
alike? How are they different?
e. What size sensors are available?
f. Are special sensor holding devices required for positioning the sensor intraorally? Where can these be purchased?
g. What are the infection control guidelines for the sensor?
Does the company make custom-sized plastic barriers
that fit the sensor?
h. Does software come with the purchase of the digital
radiography system? What features are included that
will allow the operator to enhance the image for interpretation?
i. Are the companies adhering to DICOM standards?
j. Does the company offer training for your oral health care
team to learn to operate the system? Is there training in
digital radiographic interpretation? Is there a fee for service and/or maintenance to the system after purchase?
k. Does the company offer articles or reviews of their
products by outside agencies that support their marketing claims?
l. Based on what you learned in this chapter, prepare a list
of advantages and limitations of each of these products.
m. Based on your research, which product would you recommend your practice purchase, and why?
OBJECTIVES
Following successful completion of this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Define the key words.
2. State the purpose of infection control.
3. Describe the possible routes of disease transmission.
4. Identify conditions for the chain of infection and methods of breaking the chain.
5. Identify agencies responsible for recommending and regulating infection control guidelines.
6. List the personal protective equipment recommended for the dental radiographer.
7. Explain disinfection and sterilization.
8. Differentiate between semicritical and noncritical objects used during radiographic procedures.
9. Demonstrate competency in following infection control protocol prior to radiographic
procedures.
10. Demonstrate competency in following infection control protocol during radiographic
procedures.
11. Demonstrate competency in following infection control protocol after radiographic procedures.
12. Demonstrate competency in following infection control protocol for handling and processing
intraoral image receptors.
13. Demonstrate competency in following the infection control protocol when using an automatic
processor with a daylight loader attachment.
KEY WORDS
Acquired immunodeficiency
syndrome (AIDS)
Antiseptic
Asepsis
Barrier envelope
Contamination
Cross-contamination
Disinfect
Hepatitis B
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
Immunization
Infection control
Intraoral dental film
Microbial aerosol
Pathogen
Personal protective equipment (PPE)
Protective barrier
Sepsis
Spatter
Standard precautions
Sterilize
Universal precautions
Infection Control
PART IV • DENTAL
RADIOGRAPHER FUNDAMENTALS
CHAPTER
10
CHAPTER
OUTLINE
 Objectives 114
 Key Words 114
 Introduction 115
 Purpose of
Infection
Control 115
 Guidelines
for Infection
Control 116
 Personal
Protective
Equipment (PPE) 117
 Handwashing 117
 Disinfection
and Sterilization
of Radiographic
Instruments
and Equipment 117
 Infection Control
Protocol for the
Radiographic
Procedure 119
 Infection Control
Protocol for
Radiographic
Processing 125
 Infection Control
for Processors
with a Daylight
Loader
Attachment 126
 Review, Recall,
Reflect, Relate 128
 References 129
CHAPTER 10 • INFECTION CONTROL 115
Introduction
The purpose of infection control procedures used in oral health
care is to prevent the transmission of disease among patients
and between patients and oral health care practitioners. Maintaining infection control throughout the radiographic procedure
can be challenging. The radiographer must possess a thorough
understanding of the recommended infection control protocols
that should be followed before, during, and after radiographic
exposures. The specific steps of these protocols require practice
to achieve competency in skilled handling of contaminated
radiographic equipment and supplies.
The purpose of this chapter is to identify infection control
terminology (Table 10-1), present the need for infection control
during radiographic procedures, and describe step-by-step
infection control procedures used in dental radiology.
Purpose of Infection Control
Infectious diseases may be transmitted from patient to oral
health care personnel, from oral health care personnel to
patient, and from patient to patient. The primary purpose
of infection control is to prevent the transmission of infectious diseases. Human beings have always lived with the
possibility of infection occurring through invasion of the
body by pathogens such as bacteria or viruses. A pathogen
is a microorganism capable of causing disease. Because of
the special risk these diseases carry, of particular concern
to the oral health care professionals are acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), the human immunodeficiency
virus (HIV), viral hepatitis, including the highly infectious
hepatitis B virus (HBV), tuberculosis (TB), and herpesvirus
diseases.
Routes of infection transmission are
• Direct contact with pathogens in open lesions, blood,
saliva, or respiratory secretions.
• Direct contact with airborne contaminants present in
aerosols of oral and respiratory fluids.
• Indirect contact with contaminated objects or instruments.
Chain of Infection
For infection to occur, four conditions must be present
(Figure 10-1).
1. A susceptible (i.e., not immune) host
2. A disease-causing microorganism (pathogen)
3. Sufficient numbers of the pathogen to initiate infection
4. An appropriate route (portal of entry) for the pathogen to
enter the host
The purpose of infection control is to alter one of these four
conditions to prevent the transmission of disease.
Breaking the Chain of Infection
The chain of infection can be broken by:
1. Immunization of the susceptible host. The Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends that
dental personnel working with blood or blood-contaminated
substances be vaccinated for hepatitis B virus (HBV).
TABLE 10-1 Terminology
TERM DEFINITION
Antiseptic Agent used on living tissues to destroy or stop the growth of bacteria
Asepsis Absence of septic matter or freedom from infection (a means without; sepsis means infection)
Contamination Soiling by contact or mixing
‘Cross-contamination To contaminate from one place or person to another place or person
Disinfect The use of a chemical or physical procedure to reduce the disease-producing microorganisms
to an acceptable level on inanimate objects
Immunization The process of making someone immune to a disease
Infection control The prevention and reduction of disease-causing (pathogenic) microorganisms
Microbial aerosol Suspension of microorganisms that may be capable of causing disease produced during normal breathing and
speaking
Pathogen A microorganism that can cause disease (pathos means disease)
Protective barrier Any material that prevents the transmission of infective microorganisms
Sepsis Infection, or the presence of septic matter
Spatter A heavier concentration of microbial aerosols, such as visible particles from a cough or sneeze
Standard precautions A practice of care to protect persons from pathogens spread via blood or any other body fluid, excretion, or
secretion (except sweat)
Sterilize The total destruction of spores and disease-producing microorganisms, accomplished by
autoclaving or dry heat processes
Universal precautions Concept of infection control where the focus was on blood-borne pathogens. The all-inclusive “standard
precautions” has replaced this concept
116 DENTAL RADIOGRAPHER FUNDAMENTALS
BOX 10-1 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Recommended
Infection-Control Practices for Oral Radiography
• Wear patient treatment gloves when exposing radiographs and handling contaminated image receptors.
• Use protective eyewear, mask, and gown as appropriate if spattering of blood or other body fluids is likely.
• Use heat-tolerant or disposable image receptor holding devices whenever possible (at a minimum, disinfect semicritical heat-sensitive
devices such as digital radiographic sensors, according to the manufacturer’s instructions).
• Clean and heat-sterilize image receptor holding devices between patients.
• Transport and handle exposed image receptors in an aseptic manner to prevent contamination of processing equipment.
• Use FDA-cleared protective barriers on digital radiographic image receptors.
Additionally, all oral health care workers should be vaccinated against influenza, measles, mumps, rubella, and tetanus.
2. Removing the pathogen. Use sterilization techniques
and/or protective barriers.
3. Reducing the sufficient numbers of pathogens. Use disinfection and sterilization techniques and/or protective barriers.
4. Blocking the portal of entry. Use personal protective
equipment (PPE) barriers such as protective clothes,
masks, eyewear, and gloves.
Guidelines for Infection Control
In the past, there may have been a tendency to use a double
standard in that certain infection control precautions were used
only if the patient was known to be infectious. It is a fact that
some patients are reluctant to admit their infectious condition.
Taking a thorough medical history and performing an oral
examination will not always identify potential infected patients.
Failure to use a single standard for all patients put everyone at
risk. Therefore, the use of standard precautions, where all
body fluids (except sweat) of all patients, whether known to
be infected or not, are assumed to be infected requires that
the necessary infection control procedures must be applied to
all patients.
The following government agencies are responsible for
developing, recommending, and/or regulating infection control
guidelines:
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Although it does not enforce regulations, the CDC is a
major influence in the development and recommendation
of guidelines for preventing disease and controlling
infection.
• Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OHSA) Enforces regulations that protect the radiographer
from infection in the oral health care workplace.
• U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Regulates
oral health care products to ensure safe use. Although we
associate the FDA with drug testing, the products tested by
this agency include protective plastic barriers for use with
digital introral image receptors.
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) The EPA
is most often associated with its efforts to promote a clean
environment, but its regulation of waste products, chemicals, and disinfectants influence radiographic infection
control practices.
Each oral health care practice should have a written infection control policy that incorporates practical procedures that
are compatible with recommendations and regulations stated
by these agencies and are in accordance with state and local
regulations. The dentist (or designated personnel) has the
authority and the responsibility to see that the infection control
policy is correctly carried out. The CDC’s infection control
guidelines that directly relate to dental radiology are listed in
Box 10-1.
Proper portal
of entry
Susceptible
host
Numbers of pathogen sufficient
to cause infection
Pathogen
FIGURE 10-1 Chain of infection.
CHAPTER 10 • INFECTION CONTROL 117
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
Personal protective equipment or PPE (clothing, masks, eyewear, and gloves) worn by dental personnel acts as a protective
barrier (Figure 10-2). PPE prevents the transmission of infective microorganisms between oral health care practitioners and
patients.
Protective Clothing
Protective clothing, such as scrubs, gowns, and uniforms, provides protection from exposure to body fluids. Protective
clothing should be changed daily, or more frequently if soiled
or wet. Protective clothing should be removed before leaving
the treatment facility. Protective clothing should be laundered
separately with bleach to prevent contamination of other items.
Ideally, protective clothing should be laundered by a commercial biohazard laundry service that can safely remove the items
from the practice for laundering.
Masks
Although radiographic procedures are much less likely than other
dental procedures to produce spatter, protection from microbial
aerosols may be achieved through the use of a mask. Masks
should be changed when soiled or wet and between patients.
Protective Eyewear
Although radiographic procedures are much less likely than
other types of dental procedures to subject the radiographer to
physical eye accidents, the use of protective eyewear will protect against microbial aerosols and spatter. Types of protective
eyewear include glasses with side shields, goggles, and fullface shields. Protective eyewear must be washed with appropriate cleaning agents following treatment and as needed.
Gloves
Gloves must be worn at all times throughout the radiographic procedure. A variety of gloves is available for specialized uses. Sterile gloves are used for surgical procedures; medical examination
(nonsterile) gloves are used for most dental procedures, including
radiographic procedures; plastic overgloves have temporary
applications such as protecting or containing patient treatment
gloves; and utility gloves are appropriate for cleaning and disinfection. Medical examination gloves are made of latex or vinyl
material. Powdered gloves should be avoided, as the powder
residue can cause radiographic artifacts (see Chapter 18.) Gloves
should never be washed with soap or disinfected for reuse. Soap
may damage gloves in a way that would allow the flow of liquid
through undetected holes. Punctured, torn, or cut gloves should be
changed immediately. Gloves should always be changed and discarded between patients.
All unprotected surfaces not directly associated with the
procedure such as doorknobs to access the darkroom, unexposed film packets or unprotected digital sensors, or patient
records should not be touched with contaminated gloves.
Handwashing
Protective clothing, mask, and eyewear should all be in place
to prepare for handwashing prior to putting on medical examination gloves. Hands should be cleaned thoroughly before
and after treating each patient (before gloving and after removing gloves; see Procedure Box 10-1). Potentially infectious
pathogens can grow rapidly inside a warm, moist glove.
When hands are visibly dirty, they must be washed with
an antimicrobial soap and water. If hands are not visibly
soiled, an alcohol-containing preparation designed for reducing the number of viable microorganisms on the hands may be
used. All jewelry, including a watch and rings, should be
removed prior to handwashing. Long fingernails, false fingernails, and nail polish should be avoided, as these may harbor
pathogens and have the potential to puncture treatment gloves.
Handwashing is most effective when nails are cut short and
well manicured. Hands must be dried thoroughly before
putting on treatment gloves.
Disinfection and Sterilization of
Radiographic Instruments and Equipment
Prior to and following radiographic procedures, the treatment
area and the equipment must be cleaned and disinfected.
Cleaning instruments and equipment to prepare for sterilization and prior to disinfecting provides for effective infection
control. Cleaning, disinfection, and sterilization break the
chain of infection to prevent the transmission of infective
microorganisms.
Disinfection
Disinfection is the use of a chemical or physical procedure to
reduce the disease-producing microorganisms (pathogens) to
an acceptable level on inanimate objects. Spores are not necessarily destroyed. Disinfecting agents are too toxic for use on
living tissue, so are only used on clinical surfaces and on some
instruments that cannot be heat sterilized.
FIGURE 10-2 Radiographer preparing x-ray equipment.
Wearing PPE (barrier gown, protective eyewear, mask, gloves) to place
barriers to cover the x-ray tube head and PID. In the background, note
that image receptor holders have been assembled and placed on a plastic
barrier on the countertop.
118 DENTAL RADIOGRAPHER FUNDAMENTALS
FIGURE 10-3 Plastic barrier wrap covering x-ray control
panel.
PROCEDURE 10-1
Procedure for handwashing for radiographic procedures
1. Put on protective gown, eyewear, and mask.
2. Remove rings, wristwatch,* and other jewelry.
3. Wet hands with cool/tepid water and apply liquid antimicrobial soap.
4. Vigorously lather for 15 seconds; interlace fingers and thumbs, and move hands back and forth; work
lather under nails.
5. Rinse well, allowing water to run from fingertips.
6. Dry each hand thoroughly with a separate paper towel.
7. Unless equipped with a foot pedal, turn off the water by placing a clean paper towel between clean, dry
hand and the faucet.
*Wristwatch may be replaced after handwashing as long as it will remain protected under the gown or covered with the
glove during the procedure.
EPA-registered disinfectants are classified as:
• High-level disinfectant. Chemical germicides inactivate
spores and can be used to disinfect heat-sensitive semicritical dental instruments.
• Intermediate-level disinfectant. Chemical germicides
labeled as both hospital-grade disinfectants and tuberculocidals. Examples are iodophors, phenolics, and chlorinecontaining compounds. These do not destroy spores.
• Low-level disinfectant. Chemical germicides labeled as
hospital-grade disinfectants. Cannot destroy spores, tubercle bacilli, or nonlipid viruses.
Because of their corrosive and toxic properties, the CDC
discourages the use of disinfectants. Additionally, disinfectants
have the potential to affect electrical connections, so directly
spraying or saturating the x-ray control panel, dials, or exposure
button may damage the x-ray machine. Therefore, protective barriers should be used whenever practical. Plastic wrap or barriers
are commonly used to cover those surfaces most likely to be contaminated during the radiographic procedure such as the PID and
tube head, control panel, exposure switch, and counter surfaces
(Figures 10-2 and 10-3). Surfaces not covered must be cleaned
and disinfected after the radiographic procedures are completed.
Sterilization
Sterilization is the total destruction of spores and diseaseproducing microorganisms. Sterilization is usually accomplished
by autoclaving or dry heat processes. Ideally, all equipment and
instruments should be sterilized. Acceptable methods of sterilization in the oral health care facility include
• Steam under pressure (steam autoclave)
• Dry heat
• Heat/chemical vapor (chemical autoclave)
• EPA-registered high-level disinfectant
Classification of Objects Used in Radiographic
Procedures
Radiographic instruments and clinical contact surfaces are classified according to their risk of transmitting infection and to the
need to sterilize between uses (Table 10-2). All surfaces that
will be used for or contacted during the procedure must be
cleaned and disinfected or sterilized according to the object’s
classification as critical, semicritical, or noncritical.
• Critical instruments are those used to penetrate soft tissue or bone. Examples are needles, forceps, and scalers.
Critical objects must be discarded or sterilized after each
use. No critical instruments or equipment are used in
radiographic procedures.
• Semicritical instruments are those that contact oral mucosa
without penetrating soft tissue or bone, such as intraoral
dental mirrors. Radiographic image receptor holding
CHAPTER 10 • INFECTION CONTROL 119
TABLE 10-2 Risk of Transmitting Disease Classification of Objects Used in
Radiographic Procedures
CATEGORY RADIOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT STERILIZE OR DISINFECT OR DISCARD
Critical None N/A
Semicritical Image receptor holders Sterilize or use disposable devices
Digital sensor/phosphor plate*
Panoramic biteblocks
‘Noncritical/clinical contact
surface
X-ray tube head, PID, support arms
Exposure controls**
Clean and disinfect with an appropriate
level EPA-registered disinfectant
Lead/lead-equivalent apron and thyroid collar
Countertop in operatory and darkroom
Extraoral radiographic machine parts such as chin/forehead rest, side head positioner guides; cephalostat
Some phosphor plates can be gas sterilized, but most digital radiographic sensor manufacturers recommend against sterilizing these fragile devices.
Instead, wipe with an appropriate level EPA-registered disinfectant before covering with an FDA-cleared barrier and wipe again following barrier removal
after the procedure. Consult manufacturer’s recommendations.
Liquid disinfectants may damage the electrical components of the dental x-ray control panel. Therefore, most dental x-ray equipment manufacturers
recommend covering the control panel exposure dials and exposure button with an FDA-cleared barrier. Consult manufacturer’s recommendations.
**
*
devices and the bite block of the panoramic x-ray machine
(see Chapter 30) fall into this category. Semicritical instruments must be sterilized after use or discarded. Although
most image receptor holders can be sterilized or are disposable, some devices on the market may be heat sensitive.
Although heat-sensitive semicritical instruments may be
sterilized under certain conditions with EPA-registered
chemicals classified as high-level disinfectant, using
instruments that can be heat-sterilized or that are disposable is recommended.
• Noncritical instruments and clinical contact surfaces are
those devices and surfaces of the treatment area that may
contact intact skin or may become contaminated by microbial aerosols or spatter, but do not come into contact with the
mucous membranes. Examples include the lead apron, the
PID (position indicating device), and the chin rest and head
positioner guides of extraoral radiographic equipment
such as the panoramic x-ray machine. (See Chapter 30.)
Other clinical contact surfaces that may become contaminated during the procedure include the x-ray machine tube
head, the exposure button, and the countertop. Noncritical
instruments and clinical contact surfaces can be disinfected using EPA-registered intermediate- or low-level
disinfectants.
Infection Control Protocol for the
Radiographic Procedure
Using standard precautions, infection control procedures for
radiography assume that all body fluids (except sweat) of all
patients have the potential to be infectious. Infection control
procedures for exposing radiographs can be divided into three
categories: prior to, during, and after exposure.
Infection Control Prior to the Radiographic Procedure
(Procedure Box 10-2)
PREPARE THE TREATMENT AREA All treatment area surfaces
likely to come in contact with the patient either directly or indirectly must be sterilized, or cleaned and disinfected, and/or covered with a protective barrier. All supplies, image receptors, and
holding devices should be obtained and placed for easy access
during the procedure.
Intraoral dental film inside its original packaging is not
sterile, but rather is considered “industrially clean,” which
means that it is not expected to be contaminated with pathogens.
To avoid contamination prior to use, intraoral film packets
should be dispensed just prior to use in disposable containers
such as a paper cup or small envelope. The film packets must be
handled carefully to prevent cross-contamination. Because they
are heat-sensitive, film packets cannot be sterilized, and the liquid saturation required for disinfecting is not recommended.
Another method used to prevent the transmission of microorganisms by the film packet is to use barrier envelopes. Barrier
envelopes are commercially available for film sizes #0, #1, and
#2. Film packets placed and sealed in these plastic envelopes
(Figure 10-4) are protected from contact with fluids in the oral
cavity during exposure. Film packets already sealed in barrier
plastic envelopes by the manufacturer are also available commercially. Following removal from the patient’s oral cavity, the barrier envelope is opened (Figure 10-5) and discarded appropriately.
The film packet that was sealed in the barrier envelope may now
be handled with clean hands (or new gloves) to complete the processing procedure.
DIGITAL IMAGE RECEPTORS Phosphor plates used to obtain
radiographic images digitally (see Chapter 9) must also be
sealed in plastic barrier envelops prior to use intraorally
120 DENTAL RADIOGRAPHER FUNDAMENTALS
PROCEDURE 10-2
Infection control prior to the radiographic procedure
1. Follow handwashing described in Procedure Box 10-1 or apply an antiseptic hand rub following the manufacturer’s directions for use.*
2. Put on utility gloves.
3. Clean and disinfect with appropriate disinfectant all surfaces that will come in contact either directly or
indirectly with the patient. See the following list:
a. PID
b. X-ray tube head
c. Tube head support arms and handles
d. Exposure button**
e. Control panel dials (impulse timer, kVp, and MA controls)**
f. Treatment chair, including headrest, back support, arm rests, body and back of the chair
g. Bracket table or countertop or other clinical contact surfaces that will be used during the procedure
h. Digital sensor or phosphor plates
i. Lead/lead equivalent apron/thyroid collar
4. Wash, dry, and remove utility gloves. Disinfect.
5. Wash hands with an antimicrobial soap or apply an antiseptic hand rub.*
6. Put on clean overgloves.
7. Obtain plastic barriers and cover all surfaces that will come in contact either directly or indirectly with the
patient. See the following list:
a. PID
b. X-ray tube head (Figure 10-2)
c. Tube head support arms and handles
d. Exposure button
e. Control panel dials (impulse timer, kVp, and MA controls; Figure 10-3)
f. Treatment chair including headrest, back support, arm rests, body and back of the chair
g. Bracket table or countertop or other clinical contact surface that will be used during the procedure
h. Computer keyboard and mouse (digital imaging)
i. Digital sensor or phosphor plates
j. Lead/lead equivalent apron/thyroid collar (optional)
k. Film packets (optional; Figure 10-4)
l. Digital sensors or phosphor plates
8. Obtain radiographic supplies. See the following list:
a. Image receptors (film packets/digital sensors/phosphor plates)
b. Sterile or disposable image receptor holding devices
c. Film mount (for film-based radiography)
d. Disposable paper/plastic cup
e. Paper towels
f. Miscellaneous supplies (i.e., cotton rolls, extra disposable image receptor holding devices)
9. Place the film mount under the plastic barrier on the counter work space.
CHAPTER 10 • INFECTION CONTROL 121
(Figure 10-6). The same careful handling recommended for
film packets should be followed to avoid cross-contamination.
Solid-state digital sensors cannot withstand sterilization procedures, so they must be wiped with disinfectant and covered
with a plastic barrier prior to placing intraorally (Figure 10-7).
There are many sizes and styles of plastic barriers for
phosphor plates and plastic sheaths for digital sensors
designed to protect these image receptors from contamination (see Figures 9-9 and 9-10). However, these barriers are
subject to tearing and are not always totally protective. The
use of an FDA-cleared disposable plastic barrier will help
decrease the risk of a breach in asepsis. Additionally, wiping
the sensor or phosphor plate with an appropriate level disinfectant prior to and after placement of the plastic barrier is
usually recommended (Figure 10-7). Although the manufacturer’s instructions for maintaining infection control should
FIGURE 10-4 Barrier envelope. (left) Film available from
manufacturer sealed in barrier packet ready for use. (right) Barrier
envelopes may be purchased separately.
FIGURE 10-5 Opening the barrier envelope. A steady pull is
used, allowing the film packet to drop into a clean cup.
be consulted to prevent damage to the sensor or phosphor
plate, options for substitutes for harsh chemical disinfection
and sterilants are not usually offered. Infection control techniques for digital radiography have not yet been perfected
and remain a problem to be solved through rigorous testing
as this technology evolves.
A laser scanning device (for use with phosphor plates) and
a computer keyboard and/or mouse (for use with solid state
sensors) must be operated to produce images and activate the
exposure sequence, so these should also be covered with a plastic barrier that is changed between patients (see Figure 9-28).
As digital technology advances, infection control protocols are
expected to advance as well. In fact, medical grade computer
monitors that have glass fronts that are easy to clean and can be
disinfected are becoming increasingly available for mounting
in a dental operatory in close proximity to patient treatment.
PROCEDURE 10-2
Infection control prior to the radiographic procedure (continued)
10. Place the film packets on the plastic barrier placed over the film mount.
11. Saturate a folded paper towel with disinfectant and place next to the film mount on top of the plastic barrier.
12. Prepare antimicrobial mouth rinse for patient use prior to procedure.***
*When hands are visibly dirty, they must be washed with an antimicrobial soap and water. If hands are not visibly soiled, an
alcohol-containing preparation designed for reducing the number of viable microorganisms on the hands may be used.
Refer to manufacturer’s recommendations for use.
**Exposure switches and control panel dials may be damaged by the use of a disinfectant solution. Manufacturer’s recommendations should be consulted. Saturating a paper towel with disinfectant and then carefully wiping the switches may be
an option. Infection control may also be achieved by protecting with a plastic barrier (Figure 10-3). (Foot pedal exposure
switches do not require disinfection.)
***Scientific evidence does not indicate that preprocedural mouth rinsing prevents the spread of infections. However,
antimicrobial mouth rinses (e.g., chlorhexidine gluconate, essential oils, or povidone-iodine) can reduce the number of
microorganisms the patient might release in the form of aerosols or spatter.
122 DENTAL RADIOGRAPHER FUNDAMENTALS
Protocol During the Radiographic Procedure
(Procedure Box 10-3)
PATIENT PREPARATION The patient is seated after the treatment area is prepared and supplies are readied. The patient may
be asked to rinse with an antimicrobial mouth rinse to reduce oral
microorganisms that contribute to infectious aerosols. The
patient is draped with the lead/lead-equivalent apron and thyroid
collar. Care must be taken when making adjustments to the treatment chair and headrest so as not to compromise the infection
control process. Covering the treatment chair controls with a
plastic barrier will aid in the infection control process.
Any object that may interfere with the procedure, such as
patient’s eyeglasses, dentures, etc., should be removed by the
patient and placed in an area so they do not become contaminated and do not contaminate other objects.
DURING EXPOSURES Once the procedure has begun, care
must be taken to touch only covered surfaces. The best way to
minimize contamination is to touch as few surfaces as possible.
If drawers or cabinets must be opened to retrieve additional supplies, or the radiographer must leave the treatment area during
the procedure, the patient treatment gloves should be removed
and the hands washed. New treatment gloves must be used when
restarting the procedure. Overgloves may also be used, if treatment must be interrupted. The patient treatment gloves may be
rinsed briefly with water only (do not use soap, as it will compromise the integrity of the protection), dried, and covered with
plastic overgloves. To restart the exposure procedure, the overgloves are removed.
FILM PACKETS AND PHOSPHOR PLATES Immediately after
removing the image receptor from the oral cavity it should be
swiped across a disinfectant-soaked paper towel that was prepared during setup to remove excess saliva (Figure 10-8). The
film should next be dropped into a paper cup without touching
the outside edges of the cup. The cup will serve as the transport
method of getting the contaminated film packets safely into the
darkroom. Phosphor plates should be dropped into the containment light-tight box for transport to the laser scanner (see
Figure 9-14).
If using a film packet covered with a plastic barrier, the
infection control protocol is the same as that used for phosphor
plates. Hold the image receptor over the cup designated for
containment (film packets) or the containment light-tight box
(phosphor plates) and tear open the plastic barrier (Figure 10-
5), allowing the sealed image receptor to drop into the containment receptacle untouched by gloved hands. Once all the image
receptors are exposed and opened in this manner, the containment cup of film packets can be transported to the darkroom for
processing, and the containment box of phosphor plates can be
transported to the location of the laser scanner.
DIGITAL IMAGE RECEPTORS The plastic barrier placed prior
to use will remain in place until the completion of all exposures. Excess saliva should be removed with a paper towel.
When the procedure is complete, the plastic barrier should be
carefully removed to avoid tearing and contaminating the sensor (Figure 10-9).
IMAGE RECEPTOR HOLDERS The image receptor holding
devices should be transferred from a barrier-protected surface
to the patient’s oral cavity and then back to the same covered
surface. Never place contaminated instruments on an uncovered surface.
FIGURE 10-6 Barrier envelopes for phosphor plates. (Courtesy
of Air Techniques, Inc.)
FIGURE 10-7 Using a disinfectant wipe to prepare a digital
sensor prior to placing plastic barrier.
[PROCEDURE 10-3
Infection control during the radiographic procedure
CHAPTER 10 • INFECTION CONTROL 123
1. Follow handwashing described in Procedure Box 10-1 or apply an antiseptic hand rub following the
manufacturer’s directions for use.
2. Put on patient treatment gloves.
3. Place overgloves over patient treatment gloves.
4. Place the lead/lead equivalent apron and thyroid collar on the patient.
5. Remove overgloves and place on the counter.
6. Assemble the image receptor into the appropriate holding device, place intraorally, and position the x-ray
tube head and PID.
7. Depress the exposure button, and remove the image receptor and holding device from the patient’s oral
cavity.
8. Remove the image receptor from the holding device.
9. Film or phosphor plate: swipe the image receptor across the disinfectant-soaked paper towel and drop
into the containment cup/box.*
Digital sensor: remove excess saliva with paper towel.
10. Proceed to place and expose all radiographs in this manner.
11. If additional supplies are needed that requires the operator to contact noncovered surfaces or the procedure must otherwise be interrupted:
a. Rinse treatment gloves with plain water (no soap) and dry.**
b. Place overgloves over treatment gloves.
c. To restart the procedure, remove overgloves.
*Phosphor plates and film packets sealed in plastic barrier envelopes should be opened immediately using aseptic technique.
**If the procedure must be interrupted, the treatment gloves may be removed and discarded and the hands washed. Prior to
restarting the procedure, the hands should be washed again and new treatment gloves put on.
FIGURE 10-8 Remove saliva. Radiographer is swiping the film
packet across a disinfectant-soaked paper towel prior to dropping the
film into the containment cup.
Protocol After the Radiographic Procedure
(Procedure Box 10-4)
Once the radiographic procedure is complete, patient gloves
should be removed and discarded, and hands washed with an
antimicrobial soap or an alcohol-based hand rub. The lead/lead
equivalent apron with thyroid collar can now be removed from the
patient and the cup containing the exposed films, carried to the
darkroom for processing or phosphor plates to the laser scanner.
Once the patient is dismissed, the radiographer should place
utility gloves on for cleaning and disinfecting the treatment area.
With utility gloves on, the image receptor holders are cleaned and
prepared for sterilization according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Usually these holders can be washed with soap and
water or ultrasonic cleaned in detergent and dried and packaged in
an autoclave bag for sterilization. All disposable holders and other
disposable supplies, such as cotton rolls, should be discarded.
Dispose of all contaminated items according to local and state
regulations. Plastic barriers, including those covering the digital
sensor, should be carefully removed, making sure not to touch the
surfaces underneath. The digital sensor should be wiped with a
1. Rinse, remove, and discard patient treatment gloves and wash hands. Follow handwashing described in
Procedure Box 10-1 or apply an antiseptic hand rub following the manufacturer’s directions for use.
2. Remove lead/lead equivalent apron with thyroid collar and dismiss patient.
3. Put on utility gloves.
4. Prepare and package image receptor holders for sterilization.*
5. Sterilize image receptor holders according to manufacturer’s recommendations.
6. Discard all disposable contaminated items (i.e., disposable image receptor holders, paper towels, cotton
rolls).
7. Remove and discard all plastic barriers.
8. Clean and disinfect any uncovered surface.
9. Wipe digital sensor/phosphor plates with disinfectant.
10. Clean and disinfect lead/lead equivalent apron and thyroid collar.
11. Wash, dry and remove utility gloves. Disinfect.
12. Wash hands with antimicrobial soap. Follow handwashing described in Procedure Box 10-1 or apply an
antiseptic hand rub following the manufacturer’s directions for use.
*Refer to manufacturer’s recommendations for cleaning with soap and water or ultrasonic detergents.
PROCEDURE 10-4
Infection control after the radiographic procedure
124 DENTAL RADIOGRAPHER FUNDAMENTALS
FIGURE 10-9 Removing the plastic barrier from a
digital sensor. Removal of sticky-backed biteblocks is easier
if the image receptor holder remains in place attached to the
barrier. (A) Grasping the holder in the palm of one hand, press
on the sensor with the thumb. (B) As the sensor begins to
B move, guide it out of the plastic sheath with the other hand.
CHAPTER 10 • INFECTION CONTROL 125
disinfectant. All areas not covered should be cleaned and disinfected, including the lead/lead equivalent apron and thyroid collar.
When cleanup is complete, utility gloves should be washed with
soap and water, removed, and disinfected. The radiographer
should wash hands again after removing utility gloves.
Infection Control Protocol
for Radiographic Processing
Film-handling procedures for processing will depend on whether
or not barrier envelopes are used to protect the film packets.
Film Handling Without the Use of Barrier Envelopes
(Procedure Box 10-5)
The use of commercial plastic film barrier envelopes protects the
film packet while in the oral cavity. Once the film packet is aseptically removed from the barrier envelope, it is safe to handle with
clean, dry hands or clean treatment gloves. Although readily available, the use of protective plastic envelopes for intraoral films is not
universal. For this reason, it is important that the dental radiographer be skilled at handling film packets without barrier envelopes.
Once the film packets have been transported to the darkroom,
the operator must put on treatment gloves and proceed to open the
PROCEDURE 10-5
Infection control for processing radiographic films without barrier envelopes
1. Transport the contaminated film packets to the darkroom in the paper/plastic cup used for containment.
2. Place one paper towel on the counter work space, and place the cup with contaminated films on this
paper towel.
3. Place a second paper towel on the counter work space adjacent to the first paper towel and designate it
as the uncontaminated area.
4. Secure darkroom door.
5. Turn off white overhead light and turn on safelight.
6. Put on clean patient treatment gloves.
7. Open each film packet (Figure 10-10).
a. Peel back the outer plastic/paper wrap using the tab on the back of the packet.
b. Grasp the black paper with film sandwiched in between, and pull straight out.
c. Hold the black paper–film assembly over the designated uncontaminated paper towel and pull out slowly.
d. Allow the film to drop out onto the paper towel. Do not touch the film with contaminated patient
treatment gloves.
8. Drop the contaminated film packet outer plastic/paper wrap, black paper, and lead foil onto the contaminated paper towel.
9. Repeat steps 7 and 8 until all film packets have been opened.
10. Remove and discard patient treatment gloves and wash and dry hands.
11. With clean, dry hands, grasp by the edges and place films into the automatic processor feeder slots or
load onto manual processing film racks for processing.
12. When the films are safely in the automatic processor, or the manual processing cover is securely closed,
turn on the overhead white light.
13. Put on utility gloves.
14. Separate lead foil from film packets and discard into lead recycling waste.
15. Gather the contaminated paper towel with all waste and discard appropriately.
16. Clean and disinfect the counter work space and any other area that may have been touched during the
procedure.
17. Wash, dry, and remove utility gloves. Disinfect.
18. Wash and dry hands.*
*If hands are not visibly soiled, an alcohol-containing preparation designed for reducing the number of viable microorganisms on the hands may be used. Refer to manufacturer’s recommendations for use.
126 DENTAL RADIOGRAPHER FUNDAMENTALS
Infection Control for Processors with a
Daylight Loader
Daylight loader attachments on automatic processors have
light-tight flaps or sleeves that allow the radiographer’s hands
to slide through to access the intake slots on the front of the
processor. A processor equipped with daylight loader attachment does not require a darkroom. Daylight loader attachments require special infection control considerations
(Procedure Box 10-6). With strict adherence to proper infection control protocol, the use of daylight loaders should not
compromise infection control. The radiographer should be discouraged from shortcutting these procedures, which would
pose a health threat not only for the operator, but also for others who use the device.
The key to infection control using the daylight loader is
to open the light-filter cover when placing and removing
items (Figure 10-11). Never attempt to push items through the
light-tight baffles. After removing the light-filter cover from
the daylight loader, the cup containing the contaminated film
packets, an additional, uncontaminated cup, and unused treatment gloves should be placed inside the unit on top of a plastic or paper towel barrier. With the light-filter cover closed,
clean, dry hands can be slid through the light-tight baffles to
packets aseptically (Figure 10-10). Skill in this procedure will
help avoid dropping and potentially losing films in the darkroom’s
dim lighting. In addition, the radiographer should be able to open
all film packets, especially when processing a full mouth series, in
two minutes or less to avoid prolonged exposure of the film to
safelight. Prolonged exposure to light, even if it is called safelight,
increases the risk of film fog (see Chapter 8.) After the last film is
placed into the automatic processor or into the manual processing
tank and the cover is closed, the darkroom must be cleaned and
disinfected. Discard all materials appropriately, including the film
packets, lead foil (see Chapter 20), and any materials used as protective barriers. Clean and disinfect darkroom counter surfaces
and/or any other areas touched by gloved hands.
Film Handling with the Use of Barrier Envelopes
and Phosphor Plates
Although protected while in the oral cavity, film packets and
phosphor plates that were secured in barrier envelopes must
still be handled carefully. Once these image receptors have
been removed from the plastic barrier envelopes, they may be
handled with clean, dry hands, or with new treatment gloves.
To avoid damage, handle these image receptors by the edges.
The use of powdered gloves should be avoided because powder
residue will leave artifacts on the radiograph (see Chapter 18).
A B
C D
FIGURE 10-10 Steps for removing film from packet without touching film with contaminated gloves. (A) Open the
film packet by lifting the plastic tab. (B) Locate the folded tab of black paper and grasp with finger and thumb. (C) Gently pull on
the black paper tab, sliding the film out of the packet. (D) Allow the film to drop out onto the plastic or paper towel barrier placed
on the counter. Separate the lead foil from the rest of the packet and dispose of all materials appropriately.
PROCEDURE 10-6
Infection control for an automatic processor with a daylight loader attachment
1. Transport the contaminated film packets to the automatic processor equipped with the daylight loader
attachment.
2. Obtain a clean pair of patient treatment gloves.
3. Open the light-filter cover and line the floor of the daylight loader compartment with a clean paper towel
or plastic barrier. Designate one side as the contaminated side and the other side as uncontaminated.
4. Place the cup with the film packets on the contaminated side and a clean pair of patient treatment gloves
on the uncontaminated side inside the daylight loader.
5. Close the light-filter cover.
6. Slide clean, dry hands through the light-tight baffles.
7. Once inside, put on the pair of clean patient treatment gloves.
8. Open each film packet (Figure 10-10).
a. Peel back the outer plastic/paper wrap using the tab on the back of the packet.
b. Grasp the black paper with film sandwiched in between and pull straight out.
c. Allow the film to drop onto the paper towel or plastic barrier on the uncontaminated side of the
floor of the compartment. Do not touch the film with contaminated client gloves.
9. Drop the contaminated film packet onto the paper towel on the contaminated side of the floor of the
compartment.
10. Repeat steps 8 and 9 until all film packets have been opened.
11. Remove patient treatment gloves and place on the contaminated side of the paper towel on the floor of
the compartment.
12. With clean, dry hands, grasp by the edges and place films into the automatic processor feeder slots for
processing.
13. When the films are safely in the automatic processor, remove ungloved hands through the light-tight baffles.
14. Wash and dry hands.*
15. Put on utility gloves.
16. Open the light-filter cover and separate the lead foil from the film packets, and dispose of appropriately.
Remove the cup, contaminated film packet outer plastic/paper wrap, and paper towels or plastic barrier
and discard appropriately.
17. Clean and disinfect the inside of the compartment.
18. Wash, dry and remove utility gloves. Disinfect.
19. Wash and dry hands.*
*If hands are not visibly soiled, an alcohol-containing preparation designed for reducing the number of viable microorganisms on the hands may be used. Refer to manufacturer’s recommendations for use.
CHAPTER 10 • INFECTION CONTROL 127
128 DENTAL RADIOGRAPHER FUNDAMENTALS
semicritical or noncritical and clinical contact surfaces, and they
should be sterilized or disinfected accordingly. Specific step-bystep infection control procedures must be performed prior to,
during, and after the radiographic procedure.
Recommended step-by-step procedures for handling
image receptors with and without barrier envelopes is presented. Darkroom infection control protocol must be mastered
to prevent lost or fogged radiographs. Strict infection control
protocol must be followed when using an automatic processor
with a daylight loader.
RECALL—Study questions
1. The purpose of infection control is to prevent the transmission of disease between
a. patients.
b. patient and operator.
c. operator and patient.
d. All of the above
2. Each of the following will break the chain of infection
EXCEPT one. Which one is the EXCEPTION?
a. Use of a digital sensor
b. Use of personal protective equipment
c. Sterilizaton of radiographic equipment
d. Immunization of oral health care practitioners
3. An approach to infection control that states that the
body fluids (except sweat) of all patients should be
treated as if infected is
a. universal precautions.
b. standard precautions.
c. protective barriers.
d. cross-contaminations.
4. Which of these agencies develops and provides recommendations for adoption of infection control guidelines, but does not act as an enforcer of these
guidelines?
a. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
b. Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OHSA)
c. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
d. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
5. List four items of PPE (personal protective equipment)
recommended for the dental radiographer:
a. ______________
b. ______________
c. ______________
d. ______________
6. The use of a chemical or physical procedure to reduce
the disease-producing microorganisms to an acceptable
level on inanimate objects is the definition of
a. asepsis.
b. antiseptic.
c. disinfection.
d. sterilizaton.
access the unit. With hands inside, the radiographer will place
the treatment gloves on, open the film packets, separate the
lead foil, and contain all contaminated items. Once all the
film packets have been opened, the gloves are removed and
placed with the contaminated items, and the films can be
loaded in the automatic processor with clean, dry hands. The
ungloved hands are removed through the light-tight baffles,
and the light-filter cover is opened to remove the discarded
items and clean and disinfect the inside of the unit wearing
utility gloves. The key to infection control using the daylight
loader is never to slide anything through the light-tight baffles
except clean, dry hands.
Although film packets with and without plastic barrier
envelopes can be processed in an automatic processor with a
daylight loader attachment, because of the complexity of the
infection protocol for its use, using film packets with barriers is
recommended.
REVIEW—Chapter summary
The purpose of infection control is to prevent the transmission
of disease between patients and operators and between patients.
Standard precautions treat every patient as if known to be infectious. The chain of infection involves a susceptible host,
pathogens in sufficient numbers to initiate infection, and an
appropriate route for the pathogen to enter the host. The oral
health care practice should have a written infection control policy. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OHSA), the
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) each play a role in developing, recommending, and/or enforcing guidelines for
infection control.
Personal protective equipment (PPE) includes protective
clothing, masks, eyewear, and gloves that act as barriers to prevent the transmission of infective microorganisms. Hands should
be washed thoroughly before and after treating each patient.
Disinfection and sterilization breaks the chain of infection to prevent the transmission of infective microorganisms.
Radiographic equipment and instruments may be classified as
FIGURE 10-11 Daylight loader with cover opened. The
operator placed clean, dry hands through the baffles. Note that gloves
will be put on once the hands are inside the unit.
CHAPTER 10 • INFECTION CONTROL 129
7. Radiographic image receptor holders are classified as
a. critical instruments.
b. semicritical instruments.
c. noncritical instruments.
d. clinical contact surfaces.
8. The lead/lead equivalent apron and thyroid collar is
classified as a
a. critical object.
b. semicritical object.
c. noncritical object.
d. cross-contaminated object.
9. Spraying disinfectant directly on which of these should
be avoided?
a. Digital sensor
b. Lead/lead equivalent apron and thyroid collar
c. X-ray machine exposure switch
d. Bracket table or countertop
10. Each of the following may be protected with a plastic
barrier to maintain infection control during the radiographic procedure EXCEPT one. Which one is the
EXCEPTION?
a. Image receptor
b. Image receptor holder
c. Exposure button
d. PID and tube head
11. Which of the following is correct infection control for
digital image receptors such as phosphor plates and
solid state sensors?
a. Protect with a plastic barrier prior to use. Sterilize
following use.
b. Protect with a plastic barrier prior to use. Disinfect
following use.
c. Disinfect prior to use. Protect with a plastic barrier
prior to use. Sterilize following use.
d. Disinfect prior to use. Protect with a plastic barrier
prior to use. Disinfect following use.
12. Which of the following can be heat-sterilized following
use?
a. Digital sensor
b. Phosphor plate
c. Film packet
d. Image receptor holder
13. What should be done with the image receptor immediately after removing it from the patient’s mouth?
a. Remove and reapply a clean plastic barrier.
b. Remove excess saliva with a dry or disinfectantsoaked paper towel.
c. Drop it into a containment cup or box without touching the sides.
d. Rinse briefly with plain water, do not use soap.
14. Following the radiographic procedure, the patient treatment area should be cleaned and disinfected using
a. clean, dry hands.
b. patient treatment gloves.
c. plastic overgloves.
d. utility gloves.
15. Which of the following is the correct order for maintaining infection control after the radiographic procedure?
a. Remove patient treatment gloves, remove lead/lead
equivalent apron, put on utility gloves, clean and disinfect
b. Remove lead/lead equivalent apron, remove patient
treatment gloves, put on utility gloves, clean and disinfect
c. Remove lead/lead equivalent apron, clean and disinfect, remove patient treatment gloves, put on utility
gloves
d. Put on utility gloves, remove lead/lead equivalent
apron, clean and disinfect, remove patient treatment
gloves
16. Which of the following is aseptically correct after using
the tab to open an exposed, contaminated film packet
without a plastic barrier?
a. Grasp the film holding by the edges between the
index finger and thumb.
b. Remove the lead foil first to get it out of the way to
allow for easier removal of the film.
c. Pull the black paper tab to allow the film to drop out
onto a paper towel.
d. Continue peeling back the outer plastic/paper wrap
until all contents of the packet are readily accessable.
17. Which of the following is recommended for use with an
automatic processor with a daylight loader attachment?
a. Digital sensors that used plastic barrier sheaths
b. Phosphor plates that used plastic barrier envelopes
c. Film packets that used plastic barrier envelopes
d. Film packets that did not use plastic barrier envelopes
REFLECT—Case study
While exposing a full mouth series of radiographs on your
patient, you accidentally drop the image receptor holding
device on the floor. Because you still have additional exposures
to complete, you need the use of this device. Explain in detail
what infection control protocol you would follow to deal with
this dilemma.
RELATE—Laboratory application
For a comprehensive laboratory practice exercise on this topic,
see Thomson, E. M. (2012). Exercises in oral radiography
techniques: A laboratory manual (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Pearson Education. Chapter 8, “Infection control and
student partner practice.”
REFERENCES
American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs.
(2006). The use of dental radiographs: Update and recommendations. Journal of the American Dental Association,
137(9), 1304–1312.
130 DENTAL RADIOGRAPHER FUNDAMENTALS
Darby, M. L., & Walsh, M. M. (2010). Dental hygiene theory
and practice (3rd ed.). St. Louis: Saunders Elsevier.
Dietz-Bourguignon E., & Badavinac R. (2002). Safety standards and infection control for dental hygienists. Albany,
NY: Delmar, Thomson Learning.
Hokett, S. D., Honey, J. R., Ruiz, F., Baisden, M. K., & Hoen,
M. M. (2000). Assessing the effectiveness of direct digital
radiography barrier sheaths and finger cots. Journal of the
American Dental Assocication, 131, 463–467.
Huber, M. A., Holton, R. H., & Terezhalmy, G. T. (2005). Cost
analysis of hand hygiene using antimicrobial soap and
water versus an alcohol-based hand rub. Oral Surgery,
Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 99, 4.
Kalathingal, S. M., Moore, S., Kwon, S., Schuster, G. S.,
Shrout, M. K., & Plummer, K. (2009). An evaluation of
microbiologic contamination on phosphor plates in a dental school. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology,
107, 279–282.
Kalathingal, S. M., Youngpeter, A., Minton, J., Shrout, M.
K., Dickinson, D., Plummer, K., & Looney, S. (2010). An
evaluation of microbiologic contamination on a phosphor
plate system: Is weekly gas sterilization enough? Oral
Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 109, 457–462.
Kohn, W. G., Harte, J. A., Malvitz, D. M., Collins, A. S., Cleveland, J. L., & Eklund, K. J. (2004). Guidelines for infection
control in dental health care settings—2003. Journal of the
American Dental Association, 135, 33–47.
Negron, W., Mauriello, S. M., Peterson, C. A., & Arnold, R.
(2005). Cross-contamination of the PSP sensor in a preclinical setting. Journal of Dental Hygiene, 79(3), 1–10.
Organization for Safety, Asepsis and Prevention. (2004, January). Infection Control in Practice, 3(1), entire issue.
Retrieved from http://www.osap.org
Organization for Safety, Asepsis Prevention. (2004). OSAP
check-up: 2003 CDC guidelines. Is your infection control
program up to date? Infection Control in Practice. Dentistry’s Newsletter for Infection Control and Safety, 3(1),
1–11.
Palenik, C. J. (2004). Infection control for dental radiography.
AADMRT Newsletter Retrieved from www.aadmrt.com/
currents/palenik_fall_04_print.htm
U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services for Disease Control
and Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2003, December 19). Guidelines for infection control
in dental health-care settings. MMWR, 52(RR17), 1–61.
U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services for Disease Control
and Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2002, October 25). Guidelines for hand hygiene in
health care settings: Recommendations of the Healthcare
Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the
HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force.
MMWR, 51(RR16), 1–44.
Wilkins, E. M. (2009). Clinical practice of the dental hygienist
(10th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
OBJECTIVES
Following successful completion of this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Define the key words.
2. Discuss the federal and state regulations concerning the use of dental x-ray equipment.
3. Describe licensure requirements for exposing dental radiographs.
4. Identify specific risk management strategies for radiography.
5. Recognize negative remarks about radiographic equipment that should be avoided.
6. List the five aspects of informed consent.
7. List the radiographic items that must be documented in the patient’s record.
8. Explain what should be said to patients who refuse radiographs.
9. Identify the role professional ethics play in guiding the radiographer’s behavior.
KEY WORDS
American Dental Assistants Association
(ADAA)
American Dental Association (ADA)
American Dental Hygienists’ Association
(ADHA)
Code of Ethics
Confidentiality
Consumer-Patient Radiation Health and
Safety Act
Direct supervision
Disclosure
Ethics
Federal Performance Act of 1974
Health Insurance Portability
and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
Informed consent
Liable
Malpractice
Negligence
Risk management
Self-determination
Statute of limitations
CHAPTER
11 Legal and Ethical
Responsibilities
CHAPTER
OUTLINE
 Objectives 131
 Key Words 131
 Introduction 132
 Regulations and
Licensure 132
 Legal Aspects 132
 Ethics 135
 Goals 135
 Review, Recall,
Reflect, Relate 136
 References 137
BOX 11-1 Web Sites for Professional Organizations
132 DENTAL RADIOGRAPHER FUNDAMENTALS
Introduction
Legal and ethical issues directly relate to radiation safety. The
dental radiographer must understand and respect the law governing
the use of ionizing radiation. Additionally, the radiographer
should be aware of the dental profession’s codes of ethics that
guide decisions regarding the use of ionizing radiation. The
purpose of this chapter is to discuss regulations that apply to
dental radiography and to present the ethical use of dental
radiographs.
Regulations and Licensure
To perform radiographic services for patients safely and legally,
the dental radiographer should be aware of the laws and regulations pertaining to dental radiology. This is especially important
because laws vary from state to state and often change to meet the
changing needs of society.
Equipment Regulations
Both federal and state regulations control the manufacture and
use of x-ray equipment. The Federal Performance Act of
1974 requires that all x-ray equipment manufactured or sold in
the United States meet federal performance standards. These
standards include safety requirements for filtration, collimation,
and other x-ray machine characteristics.
In addition to federal regulations, city, county, and state
laws affect the use of dental x-ray equipment. State laws require
registration and inspection of x-ray machines. Inspections are
conducted every 2 to 4 years, and usually fees are collected for
this service. Because laws and regulations vary for each state
and are subject to change, the dental radiographer should
contact the state’s bureau of radiological health for specific
information.
Licensure Requirements
Additionally, there are laws that establish guidelines regarding
who can place and expose radiographs. In 1981, then updated in
1991, the federal Consumer-Patient Radiation Health and
Safety Act was passed and signed into law to protect patients
from unnecessary radiation. This act established minimum
standards for state certification and licensure of personnel who
administer radiation in medical and dental radiographic
procedures. The intent of the act was to minimize unnecessary
exposure to potentially hazardous radiation.
Adoption of the act’s standards was made discretionary with
each state. As a result, not all states have voluntarily established
licensure laws for personnel who place and expose dental
radiographs. Nevertheless, most state laws require that operators
of x-ray equipment be trained and certified or licensed to take
dental radiographs. Many states consider dental hygienists and
dental assistants who have passed the National Board Dental
Hygiene Examine (NBDHE) and the Dental Assisting National
Board Examination (DANB), respectively, and hold a license to
practice in the state as a Registered Dental Hygienist or Certified
Dental Assistant, respectively, to meet this requirement. However,
some states require dental hygienists and dental assistants to take
an additional examination or to fulfill continuing education
requirements annually to be certified specifically in radiation
safety or radiographic technique competency.
State laws regulating personnel who expose dental radiographs vary considerably for on-the-job trained dental assistants.
Whereas many states have a mandatory state examination or a
continuing education requirement, some states allow these uncertified dental assistants with proper training to take radiographs
under the direct supervision of a dentist without certification.
Direct supervision means the dentist is present in the office when
the radiographs are taken. Each state’s Dental Commission
controls the scope of practice for assistants and hygienists.
Because laws and regulations vary for each state and are subject
to change, the dental radiographer should contact the state’s
Dental Commission directly to learn about legal requirements for
placing and exposing dental radiographs in that state. A complete
list of state Dental Commisions can be viewed on the American
Dental Association’s Web site (www.ada.org) (Box 11-1).
Legal Aspects
To aid in ensuring that one is practicing within the scope of the
law, the dental radiographer should be familiar with all laws and
regulations pertaining to dental radiography.
Risk Management
The most important legal aspect of dental radiology is risk
management. Risk management can be defined as the policies
and procedures to be followed by the radiographer to reduce the
chances that a patient will file legal action against the dentist
and oral health care team. Malpractice actions have increased in
number and amount of awards in recent years. All members of
the oral health care team must participate to make an effective
American Dental Assistant Association (ADAA) www.dentalassistant.org
American Dental Hygienists’ Association (ADHA) www.adha.org
American Dental Association (ADA) www.ada.org
Hispanic Dental Association (HDA) www.hdassoc.org
National Dental Association (NDA) www.ndaonline.org
National Dental Assistants Association (NDAA) Link from www.ndaonline.org
National Dental Hygienists Association (NDHA) www.ndhaonline.org
CHAPTER 11 • LEGAL AND ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITIES 133
risk management program. Following standard procedures and
performing procedures correctly will help reach the goal of
providing quality care and minimizing risk. (See Box 11-2 for
a radiography mini-audit for avoiding risk.)
Specific risk management procedures that can be a good
defense when performed correctly or a liability if performed poorly
include attempting to obtain a duplicate copy of a new patient’s
radiographs before reexposing the patient to ionizing radiation;
using the best equipment currently available, including fast-speed
film, leaded aprons and thyroid collars, film-holding devices, and
collimination; and establishing a written quality assurance system
for the darkroom to include daily, weekly, and monthly evaluation.
Providing all radiographers with a radiation monitoring badge,
whether required by law or not, is also a good risk management tool
(Figure 11-1). Monitoring radiation exposure, or more precisely
the lack of exposure, will provide the practice with documentation
of safe work habits.
Patient Relations
Patient relations refers to the relationship between the patient
and the dental radiographer. It is important to make the patient
feel comfortable by establishing a relaxing and confident chairside
manner (see Chapter 12). Always explain to the patient what
and how procedures are to be performed. Answer all questions
the patient may have concerning the procedures. Good patient
relations reduces the risk of possible legal action.
Avoid negative remarks about procedures, equipment, and
the dental staff. Statements like, “The films got stuck in the
processor again” or “This tube head always drifts” should never
be made to the patient or in front of the patient. These statements
imply that you have chosen to use known defective equipment
on a patient. This is not the same as saying, “The films got stuck
in the processor. They must be retaken. However, we will not
process the new films until a thorough investigation is made to
correct the problem with the processor.” or “This tube head is
drifting. Because this is a problem, we cannot use it to take your
x-rays until it is repaired. Let’s move to another room for your
procedure.” If equipment is not working properly, it should be
repaired or serviced.
Informed Consent
Informed consent is the consent the patient gives for treatment
after being informed of the nature and purpose of all treatment
procedures.
All patients have the legal right to make choices about the
health care they receive. This is called self-determination.
Self-determination includes the right to refuse treatment. To make
FIGURE 11-1 Radiographer wearing a radiation monitoring
badge.
BOX 11-2 Radiography Safety Audit for Risk Management
• Are all radiographers legally licensed, or certified, or properly trained to work with the x-ray equipment?
• Are radiographers’ licenses, registrations, certificates, and continuing education achievements posted for public view?
• Are equipment inspection certificates posted near or on the x-ray equipment as may be required by law?
• Are accident prevention signs in place as needed (i.e., to watch head when pulling x-ray tube head away from the wall)?
• Are signs posted regarding the use of ionizing radiation as may be required by law?
• Does the radiographer wear personal protective equipment (PPE) during the procedure?
• Are all radiographers required to wear a radiation dosimeter?
• Are radiation safety rules posted near the x-ray units?
• Are exposure settings for types of projections and patients posted near the control panel?
• Is a signed informed consent from the patient secured prior to radiography procedure?
• Are adequate records kept on patient exposures (consent, assessment of need, number and type of exposures, retakes, name of
radiographer who took the radiographs)?
• Are patient radiographs kept confidential? How?
• Will patient radiographs be interpreted thoroughly and findings documented and communicated to the patient
following the appointment?
• Is x-ray equipment up to date on all required inspections?
• Is documentation on quality control tests performed on all darkroom equipment kept?
• Does the radiographer wear impervious gloves and gowns and safety goggles when handling processing chemistry?
• Is an emergency eye wash station near where processing chemistry is handled?
• Do all radiographers or handlers of chemicals know the location of the hazardous chemicals lists and material safety
data sheets? (See chapter 20)
• Is emergency spill equipment available?
134 DENTAL RADIOGRAPHER FUNDAMENTALS
a decision regarding informed consent, the patient must be
informed of the following:
• The purpose of taking radiographs
• The benefits the radiographs will supply
• The possible risks of radiation exposure
• The possible risks of refusing the radiographs
• The person who will perform the procedure
It is the responsibility of the dentist to explain the nature
and purpose of all treatment procedures. When taking radiographs,
the risks and benefits must be explained in lay terms. The
informing process is called disclosure. The patient should be
given the opportunity to ask questions prior to radiography.
Answer all questions completely in terms the patient understands. State laws vary concerning informed consent. Be sure to
become familiar with your state laws.
Liability
Liable means to be legally obligated to make good any loss or
damage that may occur. Many states have laws that require dentists to supervise the performance of dental radiographers. Both
dentists and dental radiographers are liable for procedures
performed by the dental radiographer. Therefore, it is important
to understand that even though radiographers work under the
supervision of the dentist, they are legally liable for their own
actions. In malpractice cases, both the supervising dentist and
the dental radiographer may be sued for the actions of the
radiographer.
Patient Records
A record of all aspects of dental care must be kept for every
patient. Dental radiographs are considered a part of the patient’s
record and are therefore legal documents.
DOCUMENTATION The exposure of dental radiographs should be
documented in the patient’s record. Entries in the patient’s record
should be made by the dentist or under the dentist’s supervision.
The following items must be documented in the patient’s record.
• The patient’s informed consent
• The number and type of radiographs, including retakes
• The date the radiographs are taken and the name of the
radiographer who took them
• The reason for taking the radiographs
• The interpretive and diagnostic results
CONFIDENTIALITY State laws have always governed
confidentiality to protect the patient’s privacy. On April 14,
2003, the federal government signed into law privacy standards
to protect patients’ medical records and other health information, including radiographs. Developed by the Department of
Health and Human Services (DHHS) as part of the Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
(HIPAA), this federal law is designed to provide patients with
control over how their personal health information is used and
disclosed. Radiographs are confidential and should never be
shown or discussed with anyone outside the oral health care
practice without first obtaining a current, signed release from
the patient. A patient will usually be asked to sign a notice that
indicates how their radiographs may be used and their privacy
rights under this law.
OWNERSHIP The courts have ruled that radiographs are the
property of the dentist. The patient pays for the dentist’s ability
to interpret the radiographs and to arrive at a diagnosis. However, patients may have reasonable access to their radiographs.
They may request a copy of their radiographs if they decide to
change dentists or request a consultation with a dental specialist (Procedure Box 11-1). The original radiographs, however,
belong to the dentist. Because of statute of limitation laws, it is
recommended that all records (including radiographs) be
retained indefinitely.
RETENTION Dental radiographs must be retained for seven
years after the patient ceases to be a patient. Legal action that can
be brought against the dentist depend on the malpractice and limitation statues that vary from state to state. For adult patients, the
statute of limitations generally begins to run at the time of the
injury, or when the injury should have reasonably been discovered. For children, the statute of limitations does not begin until
the child reaches the age of majority (18 to 21 years old, depending on the state). If you work for a governmental entity, the statute
of limitations may be affected by certain notice statutes, which
PROCEDURE 11-1
Procedure for releasing a copy of the patient’s radiographs
1. Patient requests copy of radiographs in writing.
2. Keep the letter requesting radiographs in the patient’s record.
3. Duplicate the original radiographs or print out a paper copy of digital images.
4. Send the duplicate radiographs or paper copy of digital images by the U.S. Postal Service’s
Certified Mail™.
5. Keep the postal receipt in the patient’s record.
CHAPTER 11 • LEGAL AND ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITIES 135
may greatly reduce the time in which a suit may be brought.
Because the time period is so indefinite, it is recommended that
radiographs be retained forever.
INSURANCE CLAIMS Insurance companies have the right to
request pretreatment radiographs to evaluate the dental treatment
plan for services that they will be paying for. Again, only duplicate
radiographs should be sent. The oral health care practice should
keep the originals. It may be acceptable to send digital images
electronically. The number of insurance companies that except
digital images electronically is increasing.
Malpractice Issues
Malpractice results when one is negligent. Negligence occurs
when the dental diagnosis or treatment is below the standard of
care provided by dentists in a similar locality and under similar
conditions.
NEGLIGENCE Negligence is defined as the failure to use a
reasonable amount of care when failure results in injury or
damage to another. Negligence may result from the care (or lack
of care) of either the dentist or the dental radiographer.
Statute of Limitations is the time period during which
a patient may bring a malpractice action against a dentist or
radiographer. State laws govern this time period, which begins
when the patient discovers, or should have discovered, an injury
due to negligent dental treatment.
Sometimes negligence is not discovered until years later,
when a patient changes dentists and discovers an injury has
occurred. In such cases, the statute of limitations begins years
after the negligent dental treatment occurred. An example would
be where appropriate radiographs were not taken on a patient
with periodontal disease. Years later, the patient is examined by
another dentist and is informed of the irreversible periodontal
condition that might have been prevented if detected earlier.
Besides the statute of limitations, many states have separate
malpractice laws that may limit damages or, in the case of
governmental entities, may provide limited or complete immunity
from suit, under certain circumstances. Because the laws vary
greatly from state to state, it is desirable to consult a lawyer
experienced in this area to provide training and answer questions
for the entire oral health care practice team as part of the risk
management program.
PATIENTS WHO REFUSE RADIOGRAPHS Occasionally, for a
variety of reasons, patients express opposition to the dentist’s
proposal that x-rays be taken. Often these patients believe that
such radiographs are unnecessary or that they will add to the cost
of treatment, or the patient may be fearful that dental x-ray exposure
will be hazardous to their health. When this happens, the dentist
and radiographer must carefully explain in clear terms why the
radiographs are needed to supplement the diagnosis, prognosis,
or treatment plan and therefore benefit the patient.
Frequently a patient may offer to sign a paper to assume the
responsibility for not taking radiographs. The patient must be
informed in a diplomatic manner that legally, such documents
do not release the dentist from liability and are not valid because
the patient cannot legally consent to negligent care. If the patient
still refuses the radiographs, the dentist must carefully decide
whether treatment can be provided. Usually, in such cases, the
dentist cannot treat the patient.
Ethics
In addition to the law, the ethics of a profession also guide the
behavior of the health care practitioner. Ethics is defined as a
sense of moral obligation regarding right and wrong behavior.
Professional ethics define a standard by which all members of
the profession are obligated to conform. These professional rules
of conduct are called a profession’s Code of Ethics. See
Box 11-1 for a list of Web sites where you can locate the Code
of Ethics for the American Dental Association (ADA),
American Dental Hygienists’ Association (ADHA), and
American Dental Assistants Association (ADAA). A professional Code of Ethics helps to define the rules of conduct for its
members.
Goals
Managing risk, knowing the law, and applying ethics, the dental
radiographer should strive for practice that is safe, is professional, and places the patient’s well-being first. One achieves
this by setting goals. Such goals are closely related, and all are
equally important. Goals of the dental radiographer include the
following:
• Achieve perfection with each radiograph. This is accomplished by careful attention to details. Each step in the process,
whether in image receptor placement, exposure technique, or
processing and identification, is significant.
• Perform confidently and with authority. Patients are
more likely to cooperate with someone who demonstrates
self-confidence. Communicate with patients in a respectful
manner.
• Take pride in services rendered and professional advancement. Obtain certification in radiation safety, whether or not
required by law. Improve skills and update techniques by
attending continuing education lectures and workshops,
participating in professional association meetings, and reading
professional journals and books.
• Keep radiation exposure as low as possible. Take the
time to use protective devices that minimize radiation to
the patient and follow strict protocols to protect yourself
during exposures. Maintain an environment that minimizes
the risk of harm.
• Avoid retakes. Be familiar with common errors to avoid.
Do not retake any exposure when you are not sure of the
corrective action. If the patient cannot tolerate placement
of the image receptor or cannot cooperate with the procedure, stop and get assistance, or try an acceptable alternative
procedure.
• Develop integrity, dedication, and competence that
promotes ethical behavior and high standards of care.
Provide patients with information to assist them in making
informed decisions regarding their consent to radiographic
procedures. Serve all patients without discrimination.
136 DENTAL RADIOGRAPHER FUNDAMENTALS
REVIEW—Chapter summary
The dental radiographer should be aware of the laws and
regulations pertaining to dental radiography. Both federal and
state regulations control the manufacture and use of x-ray
equipment.
State laws require that operators of x-ray equipment be
trained and certified or licensed to take dental radiographs.
Some states may require the registered dental hygienist and the
certified dental assistant to take an additional examination or a
continuing education course to be certified to take radiographs.
Other states allow an on-the-job-trained dental assistant with
proper training to place and expose radiographs under the direct
supervision of the dentist.
Risk management strategies and good patient relations
reduce the risk of possible legal actions. Informed consent allows
the patient to make decisions regarding the procedure. Disclosure
informs the patient about the radiographic procedure and answers
all questions the patient may have concerning the procedures.
Both the dentist and the dental radiographer are liable for procedures
performed by the dental radiographer.
The patient’s records, including the radiographs, are confidential. The courts have ruled that radiographs are the property
of the dentist; the patient pays only for the diagnosis. However,
patients may have access to their radiographs via copies.
When an individual ceases to be a patient, the radiographs
should be retained for at least seven years. Risk management and
the statutes of limitation suggest that radiographs be retained
indefinitely.
The patient who refuses radiographs may not legally consent
to negligent care. The professional’s code of ethics guides the
behavior of the radiographer. Goals for the dental radiographer
are presented.
RECALL—Study questions
1. Registration and inspection of x-ray machines is regulated by the
a. federal government.
b. state government.
c. local government.
d. Any of the above
2. The laws allowing individuals to place and expose dental
radiographs vary from state to state.
a. True
b. False
3. Which of the following is a risk management strategy?
a. The use of fast-speed film, film-holding devices, and
collimation
b. Monitoring the dental radiographer with radiation
dosimeters
c. Obtaining a copy of a new patient’s radiographs
from a previous dentist
d. All of the above
4. Which of these comments should be avoided when talking to the patient?
a. “We have switched to a fast-speed film.”
b. “This exposure button sticks sometimes.”
c. “You must stay still during the exposure.”
d. “I’m certified to take your radiographs.”
5. List five aspects of informed consent.
a. ______________
b. ______________
c. ______________
d. ______________
e. ______________
6. Every patient has the legal right to make choices about the
oral health care they receive. This is called
a. disclosure.
b. informed consent.
c. self-determination.
d. liability.
7. List five items regarding the radiographic procedure
that should be documented in the patient’s record.
a. _______________
b. _______________
c. _______________
d. _______________
e. _______________
8. Legally dental radiographs should be retained for an
individual who ceases to be a patient for
a. three years.
b. five years.
c. seven years.
d. nine years.
9. Both the dentist and the dental radiographer are liable
for procedures performed by the dental radiographer.
a. True
b. False
10. Failure to use a reasonable amount of care that results in
injury is termed
a. risk.
b. liability.
c. confidentiality.
d. negligence.
11. The courts have ruled that radiographs are the property of the
a. patient.
b. dentist.
c. dental radiographer.
d. state.
12. When patients express opposition to having dental radiographs taken, the radiographer should
a. ask the patient to sign a document to release the dentist of liability.
b. consult the professional code of ethics about what to
do next.
c. postpone the procedure and ask the patient to return
at a later date.
d. explain why the radiographs are needed and what the
benefits will be.
CHAPTER 11 • LEGAL AND ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITIES 137
13. A professional code of ethics
a. makes the laws that govern the use of dental radiographs.
b. establishes the time frame for taking dental radiographs.
c. helps to define the rules of conduct for its members.
d. protects the dental radiographer in cases of legal
action.
14. Each of the following is a goal of the radiographer
EXCEPT one. Which one is the EXCEPTION?
a. Increasing the demand for dental x-ray services
b. Reducing the radiation dose used during an exposure
c. Professional improvement and advancement
d. Presenting confidence to gain patient acceptance
REFLECT—Case study
Consider the following scenario.
You have been working in a practice for over a year and
have developed a friendship with another dental assistant. You
often socialize together outside work, and your children play
together. One evening during dinner, your dental assistant
friend tells you that even though she has been exposing dental
radiographs on patients since she was hired by the practice
over two years ago, she does not have the state-required radiation safety certification. She tells you that the dentist never
asked to see her certificate during the job interview. She wasn’t planning to “break the law” but the first day on the job, the
dentist explained to a patient that she would be taking the full
mouth series, and “not to worry, because she was a competent
clinician.” Your friend explains to you that it would have been
embarrassing to tell the dentist at that point that she was not
certified, so she exposed the radiographs. After that, she
thought about taking a course to prepare for the state examination, but didn’t want to get “caught” taking the exam after
she had already been placing and exposing radiographs all
this time. She hopes you will keep her confidence because
you are friends.
Reflect on this scenario and answer the following
questions.
1. How has your friend broken the law?
2. How has this behavior endangered the patient? Your
friend? Your employer?
3. Describe the legal and/or ethical situation she faces.
4. Describe the legal and/or ethical dilemma you face.
5. How could your employer have prevented this situation?
6. What aspects of the Dental Assisting or Dental Hygiene
Code of Ethics apply to this situation?
7. Take the role of your friend; what would you have done
if you were she?
RELATE—Laboratory practice
Using the computer, visit the Web sites for the board of
radiological health or the board of dentistry in all 50 states
and the District of Columbia. Compile a listing of states with
certification requirements for dental radiographers and answer
the following questions.
1. How many states require all radiographers to be certified
for performing radiographic procedures?
2. What states accept a registered dental hygienist’s or
certified dental assistant’s credentials as certification
for performing radiographic procedures?
3. Do any states require additional tests or continuing
education classes for a dental assistant or dental hygienist
to maintain radiographic certification?
4. Why do you think some states do not require certification
for those individuals who place and expose dental
radiographs?
5. What are the advantages to the oral health care practice
to hire only certified radiographers?
6. How should the public be educated on these laws governing
the certification of individuals to place and expose dental
radiographs?
REFERENCES
Bundy, A. L. (1988). Radiology and the law. Rockville, MD:
Aspen.
Darby, M. L., & Walsh, M. M. (2010). Dental hygiene theory
and practice (3rd ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
Davison, J. A. (2000). Legal and ethical considerations for
dental hygienists and assistants. St. Louis, MO: Mosby
Elsevier.
U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. (n.d.). Fact sheet:
Protecting the privacy of patients’ health information.
Retrieved from www.hhs.gov/news/facts/privacy.html
Patient Relations
and Education
CHAPTER
OUTLINE
 Objectives 138
 Key Words 138
 Introduction 139
 Patient Relations 139
 Communication 140
 Patient
Education 141
 Frequently Asked
Questions 143
 Review, Recall,
Reflect, Relate 145
 References 146
OBJECTIVES
Following successful completion of this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Define key words.
2. Value the need for patient cooperation in producing quality radiographs.
3. List the aspects of patient relations that help to gain confidence and cooperation.
4. Explain how appearance and first impression affect patient relations.
5. Identify five areas where the radiographer’s positive attitude will foster patient confidence.
6. State examples of interpersonal skills that are used to communicate effectively.
7. Explain the relationship between verbal and nonverbal communication.
8. Give an example of a negative-sounding word that should be avoided when explaining
the radiographic procedure.
9. Explain the communication method show-tell-do and give three examples of when this
method would be effective.
10. State the two reasons patient education in radiography is valuable.
11. Respond to a patient’s concern regarding unnecessary exposure to x-rays.
12. Describe two methods by which the patient can be educated to appreciate the value of
dental radiographs.
Appearance
Attitude
Chairside manner
Communication
Empathy
Frequently asked questions (FAQs)
Interpersonal skills
Nonverbal communication
Patient education
Patient relations
Show-tell-do
Verbal communication
CHAPTER
12
KEY WORDS
CHAPTER 12 • PATIENT RELATIONS AND EDUCATION 139
The radiographer’s attitude toward his/her own technical
ability will also be conveyed to the patient. Because a demonstration of technical skill will build patient confidence, the radiographer should feel that his/her training and education provided
adequate preparation for this role. Having confidence in oneself
fosters confidence in others.
Additionally, the unique close working relationship of the
oral health care team requires that everyone work well together.
Attitudes toward an employer and coworkers also play a role in
determining the degree of successful patient management.
Patients can sense the professional’s attitude by the way he/she
walks, talks, and behaves. For example, the patient will easily
sense a disgruntled dental assistant who had to interrupt what
he/she was doing to take radiographs for a dental hygienist who
was running behind in the schedule. Maintaining a pleasant,
positive attitude will help generate the same from patients.
Interpersonal Skills
Interpersonal skills are used to communicate with others successfully. Respectfulness, courtesy, empathy, and patient,
honest, and tactful communication are examples of interpersonal skills. When explaining the need for radiographs, consider how the patient will feel. If the patient has concerns
regarding the need for x-ray exposure, respect their views.
Statements such as, “Don’t worry” and “Everything will be
okay,” may convey an attitude of apathy, or imply that the
patient’s apprehensions don’t matter. If placement of an intraoral imaging receptor during the radiographic procedure is
uncomfortable, show empathy. Empathy is defined as the
ability to share in another’s emotions or feelings. Be courteous and polite at all times even in difficult situations. However, if discomfort must be tolerated to produce the necessary
radiograph, empathetic, yet direct and tactful communication
can help bring about the desired result.
An important aspect of interpersonal skills is the radiographer’s chairside manner. Chairside manner refers to the conduct of the radiographer while working at the patient’s
chairside. The radiographer should strive to always make the
Introduction
Effective communication is essential to producing quality
radiographic images. The radiographic procedure requires
that the patient understand and cooperate with the process.
The radiographer must be able to communicate specific directions for success of the procedure. Precise patient positioning,
the sometimes difficult placement of an image sensor in the
oral cavity, and the potentially harmful nature of ionizing
radiation make clear communication and good interpersonal
skills especially important. The purpose of this chapter is to
discuss how interpersonal skills affect the radiographic
process, present guidelines for effective communication, and
investigate the role the dental assistant and the dental hygienist play in educating the patient regarding the need for dental
radiographs.
Patient Relations
Patient relations refers to the relationship between the patient
and the oral health care professional. Appearance, attitude,
interpersonal skills, and communication help gain patient confidence and cooperation, the outcome of which will be the production of quality radiographs.
Appearance
The patient’s first impression of the dental radiographer is
important. The first impression is often made based on the
radiographer’s appearance. The dental radiographer should
always maintain a professional appearance. The careful
attention given to personal hygiene and grooming such as
trimmed nails, clean hands, and fresh breath convey an
understanding of the importance of maintaining all aspects of
infection control. A clean, neat appearance builds confidence
in patients.
Attitude
Attitude is defined as the position assumed by the body in
connection with a feeling or mood. Attitude will play a significant role in gaining the patient’s trust in the radiographer’s
ability. The attitude of the radiographer toward the procedure
will be conveyed to the patient. If the radiographer feels that
the procedure is uncomfortable or unnecessary, these feelings
will be conveyed to the patient. The radiographer should not
impose his/her own feelings onto the patient. Although the
radiographer may have had a less than ideal experience with a
certain procedure, this does not necessarily mean that the
patient will experience the same discomfort. For example, the
radiographer may have experienced a gag reflex when posterior periapicals were taken on him/her. If this radiographer
approaches the patient with the attitude that posterior periapicals will excite a gag reflex, the outcome is likely to be just
that. A fresh, positive attitude with each new patient will more
likely produce a cooperative patient. This is especially true if
the patient perceives the radiographer as possessing a nonjudgmental attitude.
PRACTICE POINT
Always greet the patient by name. Address the patient using
their proper title (Miss, Mrs., Ms., Mr., Dr., etc.) and last
name. If you are uncertain of the correct pronunciation of
the patient’s name, ask the patient to pronounce it for you.
Always introduce yourself to the patient, using both your
name and title. For example: “Good morning, Ms. Washington. My name is Maria Melendez. I’m the dental assistant
who will be taking your radiographs today. Please follow me
to the x-ray room, and we will get started.”
140 DENTAL RADIOGRAPHER FUNDAMENTALS
Communication
Communication is defined as the process by which information is exchanged between two or more persons. This may be
accomplished verbally (with words) or nonverbally (without
words). Effective communication is communication that works
(Box 12-1).
HONESTY Verbal and nonverbal communication are essential
to building patient confidence. Patient questions must be
answered honestly. It is very important that the radiographic
procedure be explained honestly, including any possible discomfort anticipated, to gain cooperation and assistance. Honesty develops trust. When a patient trusts the dental
radiographer, the patient is more likely to cooperate with the
radiographic procedure.
patient feel comfortable. Working in a confident manner will
help put the patient at ease. Comments that indicate a lack of
control, such as “Oops!” must be avoided. An important consideration during the radiographic procedure is to praise the
patient for any assistance they provide. Positive reinforcement
and feedback that the procedure is going well will help foster
even more cooperation. For example, letting a patient know that
you appreciated their ability to hold the image receptor in place
long enough to make the exposure will help to motivate the
patient to continue working together with you to complete the
procedure. Likewise, showing frustration with a patient who is
having difficulty managing the the procedure will most likely
only increase the patient’s anxiety.
BOX 12-1 Guidelines for Effective
Communication
• Introduce yourself and show interest.
• Face the patient and make eye contact.
• Lean forward to demonstrate listening.
• Be honest to build trust.
• Show courtesy and respectfulness.
• Maintain a positive attitude.
• Demonstrate empathy when appropriate.
• Use clear commands.
• Make nonverbal communication in agreement with verbal
communication.
Verbal Communication
Effective use of words in verbal communication begins with
facing the patient directly and maintaining eye contact.
Because a face mask is recommended PPE (personal protective
equipment; see Chapter 10) during radiographic procedures, it
is very important that the verbal requests and commands used
to communicate specific directions during the radiographic
procedures be understood by the patient. Once the image receptor is in place, the operator needs to give explicit directions to
complete the procedure quickly. For example, once the receptor
holding device is placed in the mouth, the patient must be
requested to bite firmly and to hold completely still while the
operator leaves the area to make the exposure. The process will
be hindered and prolonged if the patient does not understand
the requests or the operator must repeat the commands.
The radiographer’s choice of words and sentence structure
are also important. Words used should be at a level the patient
can understand. For example, young children may better understand, “These are pictures of the teeth made with a special dental camera” (Box 12-2). An adult would appreciate hearing a
more professional sounding, “Here’s a radiograph showing
your periodontal condition.” However, too many highly technical words may confuse the patient and result in misunderstandings. Words that imply negative images such as “zap,” “shot,”
and “irradiate” are better avoided.
PRACTICE POINT
If it is necessary to place the image receptor into a particularly
sensitive area, encourage the patient to cooperate and praise
him/her for the willingness to tolerate the difficult placement.
Show empathy, but let the patient know that the placement
is correct and if he/she can tolerate the discomfort for the
short time required for exposure, the result will be a diagnostic quality radiograph. Avoid asking, “Does that feel okay?”
The patient will perceive this to mean that discomfort equals
incorrect positioning and will feel obligated to inform you of
any and all feelings associated with the procedure. The
patient will now be acutely aware of the feeling of the image
receptor in the mouth and continue to inform you regarding
the “feeling” of each subsequent placement, possibly making the procedure more difficult. Saying, “Are you doing okay
so far?” is a better way to let the patient know you are aware
of their efforts to cooperate.
PRACTICE POINT
Always give a command, and not a question, to request that
the patient hold still during the exposure. For example, asking the patient, “Can you hold still, please?” will most likely
cause the patient to attempt to move to answer you, defeating the purpose of your request. The command, “Hold still,
please” is less likely to prompt the patient to move.
CHAPTER 12 • PATIENT RELATIONS AND EDUCATION 141
FIGURE 12-1 Patient education The dental radiographer
educates the patient on the value of radiographs.
Nonverbal Communication
Nonverbal communication includes gestures, facial expressions,
body movement, and listening. A nod of the head indicates yes or
agreement, and a shake of the head indicates no or disagreement.
We usually use a combination of verbal and nonverbal communication. Nonverbal communication is very believable. When verbal and nonverbal communications are not in synch, it is often
the nonverbal communication that conveys the strongest message. For example, if you tell the patient that you don’t mind
that they have to stop and take a break in between each radiograph placement, but you roll your eyes or tap your foot while
waiting for them to feel ready to begin again, the patient will
probably not believe you because your actions speak louder
than your words. Facial expressions strongly convey the attitude of the radiographer. A smile by the radiographer will likely
relax the patient and reduce apprehension.
It is just as important that the radiographer practice good
listening skills. Careful attention to listening results in fewer
misunderstandings. Eye contact and attentive body posturing
communicates warmth and caring to the patient. Additionally,
the radiographer should observe the patient’s nonverbal communication. There is most likely something wrong with a patient
who is clutching the arms of the treatment chair with tears in
her eyes, even if she has not verbally communicated with you.
The use of show-tell-do as a method of combined verbal
and nonverbal communication is useful in dental radiography,
especially when barriers to communication exist such as in the
case of a language or cultural difference, a sensory impairment,
or a cognitive impairment (Boxes 12-3 and 12-4). Showing the
patient the image receptor and holder and demonstrating PID
placement prior to beginning to procedure can help alleviate
apprehension.
Patient Education
Educating patients about the importance of dental radiographs
in comprehensive oral health care depends on the radiographer’s ability to communicate (Figures 12-1 and 12-2). This
communication ability is based on the radiographer’s knowledge, education, and training in the area of dental radiology. It
is surprising how many patients do not comprehend the
BOX 12-3 Guidelines for Communicating with
the Elderly
• Use guidelines for effective communication.
• Address by the person’s title unless they instruct you otherwise.
• Avoid condescending salutations such as “Honey” and
“Dear.”
• Be aware of generational differences.
• Be aware of sensory or cognitive impairments such as hearing
loss, effects of stroke.
• Encourage the use of eyeglasses and hearing aids during the
procedure and especially when showing radiographs during
patient education.
BOX 12-2 Guidelines for Communicating
with Children
• Use guidelines for effective communication.
• Use age-level appropriate language.
• Do not talk down or use baby talk.
• Avoid threatening-sounding words.
• Expain the procedure simply and clearly.
• Use show-tell-do.
• Tell the truth whenever possible.
PRACTICE POINT
Sentence structure is important for the short, precise directions needed for radiographic procedures. For example,
requesting that the patient bite down on the image receptor holder by saying, “Close slowly please” may prompt the
patient to close before the operator says the word slowly.
Rearranging the words to say, “Slowly close please,” may
be more likely to produce the desired result.
BOX 12-4 Guidelines for Communicating with
People of Different Cultures
• Use guidelines for effective communication.
• Learn about the cultures in your community.
• Be accepting and nonjudgmental.
• Be aware that gestures may be interpreted differently.
• Be aware that touch and personal space are sometimes considered differently by different cultures.
• Speak slowly and avoid the use of slang or uncommon terms.
• Verify that the listener has understood what you said.
142 DENTAL RADIOGRAPHER FUNDAMENTALS
enormous value of a radiographic examination of their teeth
and the supporting oral structures.
Value of Patient Education
The value of patient education is twofold. First is the understanding that dental radiographs disclose pathology (disease)
that might otherwise go undetected and become an increasing
threat to the patient’s health if not treated in a timely manner.
Second is that the educated patient is more inclined to understand and accept dental treatment plans and embrace suggestions for oral health promotion and disease prevention. Such
patient acceptance helps develop a spirit of confidence and
mutual trust in the oral health care practice.
Necessity for Patient Education
Most people have heard negative reports regarding the effects
of overexposure to radiation. The dental patient, when faced
with a treatment plan recommending radiographs, will rightfully question the necessity of being exposed to x-radiation. It
is the responsibility of the entire dental team to provide the
patient with clear, concise, and satisfactory answers regarding
any questions or concerns he/she may have. Acceptance of the
dental treatment plan is more likely not only when a satisfactory explanation of need is presented, but also when the patient
is given an explanation of the ethical safeguards the practice
has adopted to reduce the risk of harm.
Identifying with the patient’s concerns is the first step to
open communication. The radiographer can verbally agree with
the patient that excess radiation exposure is a concern and that
the practice has adopted a strict radiation safety program. Patient
acceptance and confidence increase when he/she is made aware
of the many safety protocols the practice has put into place.
To begin the conversation, the patient should be told about
the evidence-based selection criteria guidelines developed by
an expert panel of health care professionals and updated in
2004 by the American Dental Association that aid the dentist
in deciding when, what type, and how many radiographs
should be taken (see Chapter 6). These evidence-based guidelines are the single biggest factor in eliminating unnecessary
radiographs.
Further, the patient should be informed that all standard
safety protocols as suggested by federal agencies, such as the
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, and
the state and local laws governing inspections, calibrations, and
the use of radiological equipment are being adhered to. Many
people may not realize that x-ray equipment is strictly regulated by law.
In some locations, laws also regulate who can operate the
dental x-ray machine. Where applicable, individuals who place
and expose radiographs must be educated and trained and pass
an examination prior to being certified to place and expose dental radiographs. If the state issues a license or a certificate of
compliance to show that a radiation safety examination has been
passed, that can be offered in evidence. Many radiographers
display their certificates near the x-ray machine. Patient confidence in the radiographer increases when he/she knows that the
professional has been educated or trained and has passed a certification exam in the safety protocols governing the use of xradiation.
The patient should be assured that everyone in the office
who works with the dental x-ray machine, regardless of statemandated certification, is trained in its use and the safety
aspects of radiation. Continuing education courses in radiology
taken by the radiographer also boost patient confidence and
elevate the practice as one that values competency.
Finally, the patient and radiographer may have a discussion
about equipment specially designed to reduce radiation exposure, such as collimated position indicating devices (PIDs), thyroid collars and protective lead aprons, fast-speed film, and
modern equipment that is better constructed to prevent unnecessary radiation. The patient may not be aware of the reasoning
behind the use of these devices. Many patients assume the lead
apron is only for pregnant females and may be unaware that
utilizing a holder to position the image receptor prevents them
from having to hold the film in their mouth and unnecessarily
expose their fingers.
Methods of Patient Education
The patient can be educated on the value of radiographs
through verbal discussion, printed literature, or a combination
of the two. Backing up your verbal explanation with a printed
brochure is very effective at getting the message across. Literature may be obtained from professional organizations, commercial dental product companies, or off the Web. However,
care should be taken to use reliable sources of literature. The
radiographer should be aware of misleading sources of information, especially those readily available to patients on the
Web. The radiographer should be prepared to help the patient
separate correct information from incorrect or misleading
information.
ORAL PRESENTATION An effective method of educating the
patient is to give an oral presentation using a series of radiographs showing typical dental conditions, both normal and
abnormal. Placed in convenient mounts, the radiographs are
shown to the patient on a lighted view box or a computer
FIGURE 12-2 Incorporating digital radiographic images in
patient education.
CHAPTER 12 • PATIENT RELATIONS AND EDUCATION 143
monitor (Figures 12-1 and 12-2). The handheld viewer shown
in Figure 12-3 is well suited for an up-close chairside view of
film-based radiographs. Patients are generally able to identify
the areas that are pointed out to them on the radiographs better if the images are magnified and the brightness of the light
is controlled. A sample set of radiographs will allow the radiographer to explain the value of the use of radiographs in the
patient’s oral care plan. When viewing the patient’s own radiographs, the radiographer should remember that all members
of the oral health care team can interpret radiographs, but it is
the dentist’s responsibility to make the final interpretation and
diagnosis. The difference between interpretation and diagnosis is discussed in Chapter 21.
PRINTED LITERATURE An effective education method is to
place printed literature in the reception area or to give it to
patients before their appointment. Giving pamphlets to the
patient opens the door for two-way communication on the
advisability and necessity of regular radiographic examinations. All too often the patient is simply told that the doctor
requires radiographs and will not treat the patient unless they
are taken, or else the explanation is limited to a few short and
often unsatisfactory answers.
Literature may be obtained from one’s professional association (American Dental Association, American Dental Hygienists’
Association, American Dental Assistants Association) or can be
custom produced to meet the needs of the practice (Table 12-1).
Frequently Asked Questions
Here are some examples of frequently asked questions (FAQs)
and answers reprinted from the American Dental Association
brochure Dental X-ray Examinations: Your Dentist’s Advice and
Web site (www.ada.org/public/topics/xrays_Faq.asp) and from the
Academy of General Dentistry’s Web site (http://www.knowyour
teeth.com/infobites/abc/article/?abc=w&iid=342&aid=1373).
QUESTION: What are the benefits of dental x-rays?
ANSWER: Many diseases of the teeth and surrounding tissues
cannot be seen through a visual examination alone. An x-ray
examination may reveal
• Small areas of decay between the teeth
• Infections in the bone
• Abscesses or cysts
• Developmental abnormalities
• Some types of tumors
Finding and treating oral health problems at an early stage
can save time, money, and unnecessary discomfort. Radiographs can detect damage to oral structures not visible during
a regular exam. If you have a hidden tumor, radiographs may
even help save your life.
QUESTION: How often should x-rays be taken?
ANSWER: How often radiographs (dental x-rays) should be taken
depends on the patient’s individual health needs. It is important to
recognize that just as each patient is different from the next, so
should the scheduling of x-ray exams be individualized for each
patient. The dentist will review your history, examine your mouth,
and then decide whether you need radiographs and what type. If
you are a new patient, the dentist may recommend radiographs to
determine the present status of the hidden areas of your mouth
and to help analyze changes that may occur later.
The schedule for needing radiographs at recall visits
varies according to your age, risk for disease, and signs and
symptoms. Updated radiographs may be needed to detect new
cavities, to determine the status of gum disease, or for evaluation of growth and development. Children may need x-rays
more often than adults. This is because their teeth and jaws are
still developing and because their teeth are more likely to be
affected by tooth decay than those of adults.
FIGURE 12-3 Handheld viewer-enlarger is a helpful
adjunct to patient education.
TABLE 12-1 Web Site Resources for Patient Education Materials
SOURCE URL
American Dental Association http://www.ada.org/2760.aspx?currentTab=2
Academy of General Dentistry http://www.knowyourteeth.com/infobites/abc/article/?abc=X&iid=342&aid=1373
U.S. National Library of Medicine www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/003801.htm
Colgate http://www.colgate.com/app/Colgate/US/OC/Information/OralHealthBasics/
CheckupsDentProc/XRays/XRaysandIntraoralPictures.cvsp
WebMD Health http://www.webmd.com/oral-health/guide/dental-x-rays-when-get-them
144 DENTAL RADIOGRAPHER FUNDAMENTALS
Source
Estimated Exposure
(mSv ) *
Dental radiographs
Bitewings (4 films) 0.038
Full mouth series
(about 19 films)
0.150
Medical radiographs
Lower GI series 4.060
Upper GI series 2.440
Chest 0.080
Average radiation from outer space
in Denver, CO (per year)
0.510
Average radiation in the United
States from natural sources
(per year)
5.500
The term millisievert (mSv) is a unit of radiation measurement that
allows for comparisons between different types of radiation.
Source: Frederiksen, N. L. (1995). X-rays: What is the risk? Texas Dental
Journal, 112(2), 68–72.
*
QUESTION: Can I refuse dental x-rays and still be treated?
ANSWER: No. Treatment without necessary radiographs is
considered negligent care. Even if you signed a paper stating
that you refused radiographs and released the dentist from all
liability, you would be consenting to negligent care. You cannot, legally, consent to negligent care. (Negligent care is discussed in Chapter 11.)
QUESTION: What kind of radiographs does my dentist usually
recommend?
ANSWER: Typically, most dental patients have periapical or
bitewing radiographs taken. These require a film or digital sensor
be placed into the mouth, and the patient must stabilize it by biting
down on the holder. Bitewing radiographs can be used to determine the presence of decay in between teeth, whereas periapical
radiographs show root structure, bone levels, cysts, and abscesses.
QUESTION: My dentist has prescribed a panoramic radiograph. What is that?
ANSWER: Just as a panoramic photograph allows you to see a
broad view, a panoramic radiograph allows your dentist to see
the entire structure of your mouth in a single image. All teeth of
both the maxilla and the mandible plus the surrounding tissues
and supporting bone are imaged.
QUESTION: Why do I need both types of radiographs?
ANSWER: A periapical or bitewing radiograph shows only a few
teeth on one image. The panoramic radiograph is a comprehensive view of all of the teeth plus the surrounding supporting
structures. Both may be needed because although the panoramic
radiograph images more tissues, the periapical or bitewing radiographs provide a more detailed image, making it easier to see
decay or cavities between your teeth and early or subtle changes
in the periodontal tissues. Radiographs are not prescribed indiscriminately. Your dentist has a need for the different information
that each radiograph can provide to formulate a diagnosis.
QUESTION: How is x-ray exposure measured?
ANSWER: Special units are used to measure x-rays. When
human tissue or other materials are exposed to x-rays, some of
the energy is absorbed and some passes through without effect.
The amount of energy absorbed by the tissue is the dose. The dose
is often measured in sieverts (Sv). In modern diagnostic dental xray procedures, the exposures are usually so small that they are
expressed in “milli” units—that is, units that are equal to onethousandth of a Sv, or mSv.
QUESTION: What effects can x-rays have on the body?
ANSWER: Scientists have known for some time that exposure to
very large amounts of x-radiation is harmful. Changes can occur
in the reproductive system, altering the genetic material that
determines the health of future generations. Large amounts of
radiation can cause changes in the tissues of the body, including
the possibility of cancer.
On the other hand, diagnostic procedures involve very low
doses. With modern techniques and equipment, the amount
of radiation received in a dental exam is minuscule. Also
only a small part of the body is exposed (approximately the
region corresponding to the size of the image receptor).
Therefore, the risk of harmful effects from dental x-ray
exams is extremely small.
QUESTION: How do dental x-rays compare to other sources of
radiation?
ANSWER: We are exposed to radiation every day from various
sources, including outer space, minerals in the soil, and appliances in our homes (like smoke detectors and television
screens). Here is a sample of a comparison of radiation doses
from different sources:
QUESTION: Why do you use a lead apron?
ANSWER: Lead and other materials that simulate lead used in protective aprons and thyroid collars absorb potential scatter radiation
and protect other parts of your body from unnecessary radiation.
QUESTION: Why does the radiographer leave the room when
x-ray exposures are taken?
ANSWER: If the radiographer did not leave the room or stand
behind a barrier, he/she would be exposed many times a day to
radiation. Although the amount of radiation he/she would
receive each time is quite small, over a long period of time they
would receive a needless dose that provides no benefit to them.
QUESTION: If I am pregnant or think I may be pregnant,
should dental x-ray exams be postponed?
CHAPTER 12 • PATIENT RELATIONS AND EDUCATION 145
ANSWER: A 2004 study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA, 291, 16) suggests that dental
radiography during pregnancy is associated with full-term,
low-birth-weight pregnancies. It is currently unclear whether
dental radiation affects the reproductive organs directly or
whether exposure to the head and neck area affects the thyroid
function and thereby indirectly affects pregnancy outcomes or
whether factors unrelated to radiation are responsible for the
low birth weight. Currently, the American Dental Association
recommends that pregnant women postpone elective dental xrays until after delivery and reinforces the importance of using
lead/lead equivalent thyroid collars in addition to abdominal
shielding (e.g., protective aprons). (Radiographs for the pregnant patient is discussed in Chapter 27.)
QUESTION: If I had radiation therapy for cancer of the head or
neck, should I avoid dental x-rays?
ANSWER: No. The dose of radiation required for dental x-rays
is extremely small compared to that used for radiation therapy.
The effects of very high doses involved in therapeutic radiation
may increase your susceptibility to diseases, such as tooth
decay. This can occur as a result of a decrease in secretions of the
salivary glands. It is especially important for you to have dental
x-ray exams as needed, to detect problems at an early stage.
(Radiographs for the cancer patient is discussed in Chapter 27.)
QUESTION: Can dental x-rays cause skin cancer?
ANSWER: There have been no recorded cases of patients developing cancer from modern diagnostic dental x-rays. In the early
days, prior to radiation safety standards, dentists who repeatedly
held the film in the patient’s mouth during exposures developed
cancer on their fingers.
QUESTION: What special precautions will you take to minimize the amount of radiation I receive?
ANSWER: There are several ways we minimize the amount of
radiation that you receive. First and foremost, only necessary
radiographs are taken. We use the fastest type of x-ray film currently available and use equipment that restricts the beam to the
area that needs to be examined. A lead/lead equivalent apron
and thyroid shield will be placed on you during the exposure,
and the films will be developed according to the manufacturer’s
recommendations to produce a high-quality image.
QUESTION: Who owns my dental radiographs?
ANSWER: The dentist owns all your dental records, including
the radiographs. You have the right of reasonable access to your
dental records, but they remain the property of the dentist.
QUESTION: Should I have my previous radiographs sent to my
new dentist?
ANSWER: Yes, if possible. These radiographs can reveal
your previous disease activity and may assist in determining
the need for a new x-ray exam. Although the dentist who
treated you in the past is considered the owner of your
records, including your x-rays, arrangements can usually be
made to have x-rays duplicated and sent to your new dentist.
You should contact your former dentist and request that this
be done.
REVIEW—Chapter summary
Effective communication is the key to producing quality radiographs. The radiographer must be a skilled communicator.
Patient relations affect the confidence level of the patient
and help the radiographer gain trust. The radiographer’s
appearance and attitude play a significant role in conveying
professionalism.
The attitude of the radiographer toward the patient, the radiographic procedure and his/her own technical ability, coworkers,
and employer will be conveyed to the patient. A positive, empathetic attitude will most likely generate a cooperative patient who
will accept treatment recommendations and embrace oral health
promotion and disease prevention. The radiographer should be
cognizant of the roles interpersonal skills and chairside manner
play in producing quality radiographs.
Honesty in verbal and nonverbal communication develops
trust. Nonverbal communication is often stronger than verbal
communication. Show-tell-do is an effective method of communication for all patients, especially when barriers to communication exist such as a language or cultural difference, a
sensory impairment, or a cognitive impairment.
Patient education is valuable in securing acceptance of treatment and in addressing concerns about the safety of the radiographic procedures. The entire oral health care team must be able
to provide the patient with complete explanations regarding the
need for radiographs. The methods of patient education include
oral presentations and the distribution of printed materials.
Examples of frequently asked questions and answers are
provided.
RECALL—Study questions
1. The key to producing quality radiographic images is
a. gaining patient trust and cooperation.
b. presenting a confident, caring image.
c. communicating effectively.
d. All of the above
2. List four aspects of patient relations that help to gain
confidence.
a. ______________
b. ______________
c. ______________
d. ______________
3. Dental radiographers with a positive attitude are more
likely to produce high-quality radiographs.
a. True
b. False
146 DENTAL RADIOGRAPHER FUNDAMENTALS
4. When a patient trusts the radiographer, the patient is more
likely to cooperate with the radiographic procedures.
a. True
b. False
5. The ability to share in the patient’s emotions and feelings is called
a. chairside manner.
b. atitude.
c. empathy.
d. verbal communication.
6. Each of the following will enhance verbal communication EXCEPT one. Which one is the EXCEPTION?
a. Face the patient.
b. Make eye contact.
c. Use clear commands.
d. Use slang words.
7. Which of the following words should be avoided when
discussing the radiographic procedure?
a. Picture
b. Zap
c. X-ray
d. Radiograph
8. The use of highly technical words may confuse the
patient and result in miscommunication.
a. True
b. False
9. The method of show-tell-do is a beneficial way of communicating with
a. someone who speaks a different language.
b. children.
c. hearing-impaired patients.
d. All of the above
10. What is the value of patient education regarding dental
radiographs?
a. Radiographer is more likely to spend less time
exposing radiographs.
b. Radiographer is more likely to develop a positive
attitude.
c. Patient is more likely to accept the treatment plan.
d. Patient is more likely to request radiographs at each
appointment.
11. Patient education in radiography is necessary to
a. increase the demand for oral health services.
b. increase acceptance of oral health care recommendations.
c. assure the patient that the radiographer is licensed.
d. meet legally required mandates for it.
12. List four things you could tell the patient in response to
his/her concerns regarding the necessity of dental x-rays
and the reduction of excess radiation exposure.
a. ______________
b. ______________
c. ______________
d. ______________
REFLECT—Case study
A new patient to your practice has just been examined by the
dentist, who has prescribed a set of vertical bitewings and a
panoramic radiograph. You escort the patient to the x-ray room
to prepare to expose the radiographs. At this time, the patient is
having second thoughts about consenting to the radiographic
surveys. She begins to question you about the procedure.
Respond to the questions listed. Write out your answers.
Together with a partner, role-play this scenario.
“Why do I need x-rays?”
“Why do I have to have bitewings and a panoramic x-ray?”
“How often should I have x-rays taken?
“Are you going to take the x-rays, or will the dentist take
them?”
“I’m a little nervous about having this done.”
“How long will it take?”
“What will you do to protect me from excessive exposure?”
RELATE—Laboratory application
Produce your own brochure for the purpose of educating
patients about the radiographic procedure. Give your brochure
a title, for example, “Dental X-Rays for Your Health,” or something similar. The narration should be simple and in language
that is professional, yet not overly technical. You may direct
your brochure to a target population. For example your
brochure may be for children or for a particular culture (e.g.,
for Spanish speakers). Include pictures of radiographs illustrating conditions that can be identified easily. Search the Web for
information and pictures to download (Table 12-1).
REFERENCES
American Dental Association. (2000). The benefits of dental
x-ray examinations. Chicago: ADA.
American Dental Association. (2000). Answers to common
questions about dental x-rays. Chicago: ADA.
Grubbs, P. A. (2003). Essentials for today’s nursing assistant.
Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hujoel, P. P., Bollen, A. M., Noonan, C. J., & del Aguila, M. A.
(2004). Antepartum dental radiography and infant low
birth weight. JAMA, 291(16), 1987–1993.
Pulliam, J. L. (2006). The nursing assistant: Acute, sub-acute
and long-term care (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Prentice Hall.
Thunthy, K. H. (1993). X-rays: Detailed answers to frequently
asked questions. Compendium of Continuing Education in
Dentistry, 14, 394–398.
OBJECTIVES
Following successful completion of this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Define the key words.
2. Compare the three intraoral radiographic examinations.
3. Identify the two intraoral techniques.
4. List the five rules for shadow casting.
5. Determine conditions that effect the selection of image receptor size.
6. Select the type and number of image receptor required for a full mouth survey.
7. Explain horizontal and vertical angulation.
8. Explain point of entry.
9. List at least five contraindications for using the patient’s finger to hold the image
receptor during exposure.
10. Explain the basic design of image receptor positioners/holders.
11. Describe the proper patient seating position.
12. Demonstrate a systematic and orderly sequence of the exposure procedure.
KEY WORDS
Angulation
Bisecting technique
Biteblock
Bitewing radiograph
Conecut error
Film holder
Full mouth series (full mouth survey)
Horizontal angulation
Identification dot
Image receptor holder or positioner
Interproximal radiograph
Intraoral
Mean tangent
Midsaggital plane
Negative angulation
Occlusal plane
Occlusal radiograph
Paralleling technique
Periapical radiograph
Point of entry
Positive angulation
Rule of isometry
Shadow casting
Vertical angulation
Vertical bitewing radiograph
Intraoral Radiographic
Procedures
CHAPTER
13
PART V • INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
CHAPTER
OUTLINE
\ Objectives 147
 Key Words 147
 Introduction 148
 Intraoral
Procedures 148
 Techniques 148
 Fundamentals
of Shadow
Casting 149
 The Radiographic
Examination 150
 Horizontal and
Vertical Angulation
Procedures 152
 Points of Entry 153
 Film Holders and
Image ReceptorPositioners 153
 Preparations and
Seating Positions 154
 Sequence of
Procedure 156
 Review, Recall,
Reflect, Relate 158
 References 160
148 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
Introduction
Intraoral radiography consists of methods of exposing dental
x-ray film, phosphor plates, or digital sensors within the oral
cavity. Producing diagnostic quality dental radiographs depends
on knowledge of and attention to:
• Positioning the patient in the chair
• Selecting a film, phosphor plate, or digital sensor of suitable size
• Determining how the image receptor is to be positioned
and held in place
• Setting the radiation exposure variables
• Aiming the position indicating device (PID)
Each of these steps have specific applications for each of the
three types of intraoral examinations and when utilizing the paralleling
or the bisecting technique. The purpose of this chapter is to introduce the
three types of intraoral examinations, explain the principles of
producing intraoral images (shadow casting), and describe the
fundamentals of image receptor holding devices to set the stage for
Chapters 13, 14, and 15, where an in-depth explanation of the
paralleling, bisecting, and bitewing techniques will follow.
Intraoral Procedures
Each of the three types of intraoral radiographic examinations
has a specific imaging objective.
1. Bitewing examination. Images the coronal portions of the
teeth and the alveolar crests of bone of both the maxilla and
mandible on a single radiograph (see Figure 7-6). The bitewing
examination, sometimes referred to as an interproximal
radiograph, is especially useful in detecting caries (dental
decay) of the proximal surfaces where adjacent teeth contact
each other in the arch. Bitewing radiographs are also used to
examine crestal bone of patients with periodontal disease.
The technique used to image bitewing radiographs is unique
to the bitewing exam. However, because of the almost parallel
relationship of the image receptor to the teeth, the bitewing
technique could be considered to be a modification of the
paralleling technique used for exposing periapical radiographs.
2. Periapical examination. The purpose of periapical radiographsis to image the apices of the teeth and the surrounding
bone (see Figure 7-7). The word periapical is derived from the
Greek word peri (meaning around) and the Latin word apex
(meaning highest point). Therefore, as the word suggests, the
periapical radiograph images the entire tooth, including the
root end and surrounding bone. The periapical radiograph
may be used to examine a single tooth or condition or may be
used in combination with other periapical and bitewing radiographs to image the entire dentition and supporting structures
(full mouth series; Figure 13-1). Conditions prompting the
exposure of a periapical radiograph include apical pathology
(abscesses), fractures, large carious lesions (Figure 13-2),
extensive periodontal involvement (Figure 13-3), examination of
developmental anomalies such as missing teeth and abnormal
eruption patterns, and any unexplained pain or bleeding.
Periapical radiographs may be taken utilizing either the
paralleling or the bisecting technique.
3. Occlusal examination. Images the entire maxillary or
mandibular arch, or a portion thereof, on a single radiograph (see Figure 17-1). Occlusal radiographs are most
often taken with a larger size #4 intraoral film, making this
examination useful in imaging large areas of pathology
that may not be adequately imaged on a smaller periapical
radiograph. Conditions that may prompt the exposure of
occlusal radiographs include cysts, fractures, impacted or
supernumerary (extra) teeth, and in locating the buccal or
lingual position of foreign objects (see Chapter 28). The
technique used to image occlusal radiographs is unique to
the occlusal exam. However, because of the image receptor
placement required, the occlusal technique could be considered a modification of the bisecting technique.
Techniques
Two basic techniques are used in intraoral radiography: paralleling and bisecting. Either technique can be modified to meet
special conditions and requirements. Although each technique
will produce diagnostic quality radiographic images if the fundamental principles of the technique are followed, paralleling is
the technique of choice because it is more likely to satisfy more
of the shadow casting requirements.
The concept of the bisecting technique (also called the
bisecting-angle or short-cone technique) originated in 1907
through the application of a geometric principle known as the
rule of isometry. This theorem states that two triangles having equal angles and a common side are equal triangles (see
Figure 15-1). The bisecting technique was the only method
used for many years. However, because many radiographers
FIGURE 13-1 Full mouth series. The 20-film
radiographic survey includes four bitewing
radiographs and eight anterior and eight posterior
periapical radiographs.
CHAPTER 13 • INTRAORAL RADIOGRAPHIC PROCEDURES 149
1
2
3
FIGURE 13-2 Periapical radiograph. Posterior periapical
radiograph showing (1) extensive caries, (2) apical pathology, and
(3) impacted third molar. Note the use of a size #2 film and the
horizontal positioning of the long dimension of the film packet for
imaging the posterior regions.
FIGURE 13-3 Periapical radiograph. Anterior periapical
radiograph showing extensive periodontal involvement. Note the use
of a size #1 film and the vertical positioning of the long dimension of
the film packet for imaging the anterior regions.
experienced difficulties and obtained unsatisfactory results,
the search for a less-complicated technique that would produce better radiographs more consistently resulted in the
development of the paralleling technique in 1920. The
paralleling technique (also called right-angle, extensioncone, or long-cone technique) is considered to be the technique of choice because better-quality radiographs are
produced with this technique. The specific steps of each of these
two techniques are discussed in detail in Chapters 14 and 15.
Fundamentals of Shadow Casting
X-rays produce an image on a film, phosphor plate, or digital
sensor in a similar manner as light casting a shadow of an object.
When a hand is placed between a nearby light source such as an
electric bulb and a flat object such as a tabletop, a shadow of the
hand is seen on the tabletop. In dental radiography, x-rays cast a
shadow of the teeth on to the image receptor.
The radiograph is essentially a shadow image. To produce
an image that represents the teeth and supporting structures
accurately, the x-ray beam must be directed at the structures and
the image receptor at certain angles. The function of the image
receptor is to record the shadow image. To produce the best
image, it is important to understand the fundamentals of shadow
casting. Shadow casting refers to five basic rules for casting a
shadow image (see Chapter 4).
1. Use the smallest possible focal spot on the target (source of
radiation).
2. The object (tooth) should be as far as practical from the target
(source of radiation).
3. The object (tooth) and the image receptor (film, phosphor
plate, or digital sensor) should be as close to each other as
possible.
4. The object (tooth) and the image receptor (film, phosphor
plate, or digital sensor) should be parallel to each other.
5. The radiation (central ray) must strike both the object (tooth)
and the image receptor (film, phosphor plate, or digital sensor)
at right angles (perpendicularly).
Neither the paralleling nor the bisecting technique completely meets all five requirements for accurate shadow casting
in all regions of the oral cavity on all patient types. With the
bisecting technique, it is often not possible to position the
image receptor parallel to the object, preventing the radiation
from striking the object and the image receptor at right angles.
With the paralleling technique, the distance between the object
and the image receptor is often greater than ideal in most
regions of the oral cavity. However, the paralleling technique is
more likely to meet most of these requirements, making the
technique less likely to produce image distortion. For this reason, the paralleling technique is the recommended technique
(Figures 13-4 and 13-5).
FIGURE 13-4 Principle of the paralleling technique.
Positioning the recording plane parallel to the long axis of the tooth
and directing the x-ray beam perpendicular to both the recording
plane and the long axis of the tooth produces an image with less
distortion. (Courtesy of Dentsply Rinn.)
150 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
Although the paralleling technique produces superior
diagnostic quality radiographs, not all patients present with
conditions that allow for the use of the paralleling technique. When
use of the paralleling technique is difficult, a reasonably acceptable
quality radiograph may be produced using the bisecting technique.
For this reason, the radiographer who is skilled in both paralleling
and bisecting techniques will be better prepared to produce
quality radiographs in most all situations.
The Radiographic Examination
Size, Number, and Placement of Image Receptors
The size #4 film or phosphor plate is used exclusively for
occlusal radiographs of adult patients, and the size #3 film or
phosphor plate is used exclusively for horizontal bitewing
radiographs of adult patients. Bitewing and periapical radiographs of adults, adolescents, and children can be made with
any of the three intraoral film, phosphor plates, or digital sensor
sizes (#0, #1, #2) or any combination of these sizes. The size of
the image receptor selected for use depends on:
• The age of the patient
• The size of the oral cavity
• The shape of the dental arches
• The presence or absence of unusual conditions or anatomical
limitations
• The patient’s ability to tolerate placement of the image
receptor
• The image receptor positioner or holder and technique used
The bitewing survey may consist of two to eight radiographs. A
complete set of seven or eight vertical bitewing radiographs
may be exposed for the examination of a periodontally involved
patient. This vertical bitewing set will include both posterior and
anterior bitewings. When the patient does not require anterior
bitewings, two or four posterior bitewing radiographs positioned
either vertically or horizontally are usually taken (see Figure 15-5).
When the periapical and bitewing examinations include a series
of radiographs that image all the teeth, the term full mouth
series or full mouth survey is used to describe the collection
of radiographs (Figure 13-1).
The number and size of image receptors used for a full mouth
series of bitewing and periapical radiographs varies among oral
health care practices. A minimum of 4 bitewing and 14 periapical
radiographs (Figure 13-6) make up a full mouth survey for most
adult patients. The four bitewing radiographs are used to image
the following regions:
• One radiograph each for the right and left premolar regions
• One radiograph each for the right and left molar regions
The 14 periapical radiographs are used to image the following
regions:
• One radiograph each for the maxillary and mandibular
incisor regions
• One radiograph each for the right and left maxillary and
mandibular canine regions
• One radiograph each for the right and left maxillary and
mandibular premolar regions
• One radiograph each for the right and left maxillary and
mandibular molar regions
Although most oral health care practices will use eight size
#2 image receptors for the exposure of the posterior periapicals
on an adult patient, the number and size of image receptors
used for the exposure of the anterior teeth varies. The general
rule is to use the largest image receptor that can readily be positioned to minimize the number of exposures. However, more
films or more exposures of a digital sensor may be required for
unusual conditions or for narrow arches requiring a smaller size
image receptor. A size #1 image receptor is often used instead
of the size #2 image receptor for exposures of the anterior teeth.
However, the narrow size #1 image receptor may require the use
of additional exposures to completely record the region. Three
examples of image receptor combinations for use in recording
the images for anterior periapical radiographs using the narrow
#1 size or the standard #2 size are:
• Eight anterior exposures. Five size #1 image receptors
may be used for the exposure of the maxillary anterior
teeth (Figure 13-7A). One image receptor is centered at the
midline behind the central incisors, one image receptor
each is centered behind the right and left lateral incisors,
and one image receptor each is centered behind the right
and left canines. Three size #1 image receptors are used for
the exposure of the mandibular arch, where the teeth are
smaller. One image receptor is centered behind the central
and lateral incisors, and one image receptor each is centered
behind the right and left canines.
• Eight anterior exposure. Four size #1 image receptors
may be used for the exposure of the maxillary anterior
teeth (Figure 13-7B). One image receptor each is centered
behind the right and left central and lateral incisors, and
one image receptor each is centered behind the right and
left canines. Four size #1 image receptors are used for the
exposure of the mandibular anterior teeth in much the
same way as for the maxilla. One image receptor each is
centered behind each of the right and left central and lateral incisors, and one image receptor each is centered
behind the right and left canines.
FIGURE 13-5 Principle of the bisecting technique. The x-ray
beam is directed perpendicular to the imaginary line that bisects the
angle formed by the recording plane and the long axis of the tooth.
Because the tooth is a three–dimensional object, the part of the object
farthest from the recording plane is projected in an incorrect
relationship to the parts closest to the recording plane. (Courtesy of
Dentsply Rinn.)
CHAPTER 13 • INTRAORAL RADIOGRAPHIC PROCEDURES 151
B
C
A
FIGURE 13-7 Maxillary anterior image receptor placement. (A) Five-image survey.
(B) Four-image survey. (C) Three-image survey.
• Six anterior exposures. Three size #1 or three size #2
image receptors may be used for the exposure of the maxillary anterior teeth (Figure 13-7C). One image receptor is
centered at the midline behind the central and lateral
incisors, and one image receptor each is centered behind
each of the right and left canines. The three size #1 or three
size #2 image receptors used for the exposure of the
mandibular arch are positioned in the same manner as
described earlier, where one image receptor is centered
behind the central and lateral incisors and one image
receptor each is centered behind the right and left canines.
Although the use of size #2 image receptor for anterior
periapical radiographs is acceptable, the narrower size #1
image receptor usually fits this area better. When using the
size #2 film packet or phosphor plate in the anterior region,
there is a tendency to bend the film packet or plate corners
FIGURE 13-6 Full mouth series. Drawing of 18-image full mouth survey includes 14 periapical
and 4 bitewing radiographs.
152 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
Horizontal and Vertical Angulation
Procedures
Angulation is defined as the procedure by which the tube head
and PID are aligned to obtain the optimum angle at which the
radiation is to be directed toward the image receptor. Angulation
is changed by rotating the tube head horizontally and vertically.
The x-ray machine is constructed with three swivel joints to support
to make it fit more comfortably. Bending the image receptor will result in a distorted image and/or radiolucent or
radiopaque creases. Some patients present with a narrow
anterior region that may make positioning the size #2 digital sensor difficult. Some practices utilize one size #2
image receptor for the exposure of the maxillary central
and lateral incisors, where the area is the widest, and use
size #1 image receptors to expose the remaining five areas.
See Table 13-1 for a list of the various combinations of standard placements of the film packet, phosphor plate, or digital sensor for each of the periapical radiographs of a full mouth series.
Orientation of the Image Receptor
With few exceptions, for exposure of the anterior regions of the
oral cavity the film packet, phosphor plate, or digital sensor is
placed with the longer dimension vertical (described as vertical
placement; Figure 13-3). For exposure of the posterior regions the
image receptor should be placed with the longer dimension horizontal (described as horizontal placement; Figure 13-2). The
white, unprinted side of the film packet (front side) must face the
source of radiation. Depending on the manufacturer, the plain side
of the phosphor plate, or side without the cord attachment of the
digital sensor, should be placed to face the source of radiation.
When placing a film packet for periapical radiographs, it is
important to make note of where the identification dot is located.
The identification dot, embossed into the film by the manufacturer, will be utilized during interpretation of the radiograph to
distinguish between the patient’s right and left sides (see
Chapter 21). There is a tendency for the embossed identification
TABLE 13-1 Standard Image Receptor Placements for Periapical Radiographs of a
Full Mouth Series
PERIAPICAL RADIOGRAPH IMAGE RECEPTOR PLACEMENT
Maxillary central incisors (size #1
or size #2)
Center the image receptor to line up behind the central and lateral incisors; if using
size #2, include the mesial halves of the canines.
Maxillary central and lateral
incisors (size #1)
Center the image receptor to line up behind the central and lateral incisors; include the
distal half of the central incisor on the opposite side and the mesial half of the canine.
Maxillary lateral incisor
(size #1)
Center the image receptor to line up behind the lateral incisor; include the distal half
of the central incisor and the mesial half of the canine.
Maxillary lateral incisor and canine
(size #1)
Center the image receptor to line up behind the lateral incisor and canine; include
the distal half of the central incisor and the mesial half of the premolar.
Maxillary canine (size #1 or
size #2)
Center the image receptor to line up behind the canine; include the distal half of the
lateral incisor and the mesial half of the first premolar.
Mandibular central incisors (size
#1 or size #2)
Center the image receptor to line up behind the central and lateral incisors; if using a
size #2 film, include the mesial halves of the canines.
Mandibular central and lateral
incisors (size #1)
Center the image receptor to line up behind the central and lateral incisors; include the
distal half of the central incisor on the opposite side and the mesial half of the canine.
Mandibular canine (size #1 or size
#2)
Center the image receptor to line up behind the canine; include the distal half of the
lateral incisor and the mesial half of the first premolar.
Maxillary and mandibular
premolar (size #2)
Align the anterior edge of the image receptor to line up behind the distal half of the
canine; include the entire first and second premolars and mesial half of the first molar.
Maxillary and mandibular molar
(size #2)
Align the anterior edge of the image receptor to line up behind the distal half of the
second premolar; include the entire first, second, and third molars.
dot to distort images, so during film packet placement it is important to position the identification dot away from the area of interest. In the case of periapical radiographs, the identification dot
should be positioned toward the incisal or occlusal edges, where
it is least likely to interfere with diagnostic information.
PRACTICE POINT
When using a film-holding device with a film slot, it is helpful to remember that “dot in the slot” will position the
embossed identification dot away from the apices of the
teeth where it could interfere with diagnosis. Dot in the slot
will position the identification dot toward the incisal or
occlusal edges for both maxillary and mandibular periapical
radiographs.
CHAPTER 13 • INTRAORAL RADIOGRAPHIC PROCEDURES 153
positive (plus) angulations. Those in which the PID is tipped
upward to direct the x-rays toward the ceiling are called
negative (minus) angulations. Positive angulation, the
positioning of the central ray (PID) downward toward the floor,
is used for exposure of bitewing radiographs and generally used
for the exposure of periapical radiographs of the maxillary arch.
Negative angulation, the positioning of the central ray
(PID) upward toward the ceiling, is generally used for the exposure of periapical radiographs of the mandibular arch. Although
the vertical angulation setting for the exposure of bitewing radiographs for the adult patient is for all regions of the oral cavity, the precise vertical angulation setting for periapical
radiographs is determined differently depending on the technique used (see Chapters 14 and 15).
Points of Entry
The image receptor must be centered within the beam of radiation to avoid conecut error, where a portion of the image is not
recorded on the radiograph. The point of entry for the central
ray should be in the middle for the image receptor. A film holder
or image receptor postioner with an external aiming device will
assist the radiographer with determining the point of entry. The
portion of the holder, or biteblock, that extends from the oral cavity can be used to estimate the center of the image receptor when
using a holder without an external indicator. The open end of the
PID should be placed as close to the patient’s skin as possible
without touching. Failure to bring the end of the PID in close to
the patient will result in an underexposed radiograph because as
the beam of radiation spreads out, less radiation is available to
strike the image receptor and produce a diagnostic quality image.
Film Holders and Image
Receptor Postioners
Film holders and holders designed to position a phosphor plate
or digital sensor are collectively called image receptor holders
or positioners. These devices are used to hold the image receptor in place to expose intraoral radiographs. When the bisecting
+10
1-2
1+2
the yoke and tube head. One of these, located at the top and center of the yoke where it attaches to the extension arm, permits
horizontal movement of the tube head to control the
anterior–posterior dimensions. The other two swivel joints are
located at either side of the yoke. These permit the tube head to
be rotated up or down in a vertical direction to control the longitudinal dimensions of the resulting image. Determining the correct direction of the central beam in the horizontal and vertical
planes requires practice.
The correct horizontal and vertical angulations are critical
to producing a quality radiograph.
Horizontal Angulation
Horizontal angulation is achieved by directing the central rays
perpendicularly (at a right angle) toward the surface of the
image receptor in a horizontal plane (Figure 13-8). To change
direction, swivel the tube head from side to side. The central ray
(PID) should be directed perpendicular to the curvature of the
arch, through the contact points of the teeth. The horizontal
angulation is established by directing the central rays perpendicularly through the mean tangent of the embrasures between
the teeth of interest. Incorrect alignment in the horizontal plane
caused by incorrect angulation toward the mesial or the distal
results in overlapping of adjacent tooth structures shown on the
radiograph. The steps to determining correct horizontal angulation are the same for both the bisecting and paralleling methods
and for exposing bitewing radiographs.
Vertical Angulation
Vertical Angulation is achieved by directing the central rays
perpendicularly (at a right angle) toward the surface of the
image receptor in a vertical plane (Figure 13-9). Vertical angulation is customarily described in degrees. On most dental x-ray
machines the vertical angles are scaled in intervals of 5 or 10
degrees on one or both sides of the yoke where the tube head is
connected. The vertical angulation of the tube head and the PID
begins at zero. In the zero position the PID is parallel to the
plane of the floor. All deviations from zero in which the PID is
tilted downward to direct the x-rays toward the floor are called
A Maxilla B Mandible
FIGURE 13-8 Horizontal angulation. Horizontal angulation is determined by directing the
x-ray beam directly through the interproximal spaces perpendicular to the mean tangent of the
teeth. The image receptor must be positioned parallel to the teeth of interest so that the central
ray will also strike the image receptor perpendicularly.
154 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
type of receptor (film, phosphor plate, or sensor) for which it
was designed, to achieve optimal results.
It is beneficial to have a variety of image receptor positioners
available, because one type of holder may not be suitable for all
patients, or even all areas of the same patient’s mouth. Additionally, the operator may have to alternate between the paralleling
and the bisecting technique to complete a full mouth series on a
patient.
Preparations and Seating Positions
Unit Preparation
Prior to placing the image receptor intraorally, the x-ray unit
should be turned on and the exposure settings selected. It is
helpful to place the tube head and PID in the approximate
position for the exposure to limit the time required for this
step once the image receptor has been placed into the patient’s
oral cavity.
technique was first introduced in 1907, film holders and image
receptor positioners did not yet exist. Instead, the patient was
directed to hold the film packet in the mouth using a finger or
thumb. Asking the patient to hold the film packet in this manner
has many disadvantages, and this practice is no longer acceptable (Box 13-1). Image receptor positioners and holders vary
from simple disposable biteblocks that require no sterilization to
complex devices that position the image receptor at the correct
angles for directing the x-ray beam in relation to the teeth and
image receptor (Figures 13-10 and 13-11.) Some commercially
manufactured image receptor holders are designed specifically
for use with the bisecting technique or specifically for use with
the paralleling technique. Some holders may be slightly altered
to accommodate both techniques (Figure 13-12). Other manufactures offer interchangeable biteblocks to accommodate either
technique and placement of a film packet, phosphor plate, or
digital sensor (Figure 13-13). It is important that the radiographer match the image receptor biteblock with the technique and
BOX 13-1 Contraindications for Using the Patient’s Finger to Hold the Film Packet,
Phosphor Plate, or Digital Sensor in Place
• Potential for bending the image receptor.
• Potential to move the image receptor from the
correct position.
• Increased patient instruction and cooperation required.
• Potential patient objection to placing the fingers in
the mouth.
• Radiation exposure to the patient’s fingers.
• No external aiming device to assist with aligning the x-ray beam
to the correct position.
• Potential to be viewed by the patient as unprofessional and
unsanitary.
90°
90° 80° 70° 60°
50°
40°
30°
20°
10°
10°

20°
30°
40°
50°
60° 70° 80°
PID
−45°
+45°
Zero
angulation
angulation
Negative
angulation
Positive
Plane of floor
Occlusal
plane
Midsagittal
plane
FIGURE 13-9 Vertical angulation. Diagram showing
patient sitting in the recommended position upright in
dental chair with midsagittal plane perpendicular to and
occlusal plane parallel with the floor. Zero angulation is
achieved when the long axis of the PID is directed parallel
with the floor. All angulations achieved with the PID
pointed toward the floor are called positive, or plus
angulations. All angulations achieved with the PID is
pointed toward the ceiling are called negative, or minus
angulations. Generally a positive angle is used for
bitewing exposures and periapical exposures of the
maxilla, and a negative angle is used for periapical
exposures of the mandible.
1-2
1+2
CHAPTER 13 • INTRAORAL RADIOGRAPHIC PROCEDURES 155
A
B
FIGURE 13-13 Film holders. The extension arm and aiming ring
of the Rinn XCP® (Dentsply Rinn) instrument may be combined with
a (A) biteblock suitable for the paralleling technique or a
(B) biteblock suitable for the bisecting technique.
A B
FIGURE 13-10 Rinn XCP™ paralleling technique film
holders. Color-coded rings and biteblocks assist with assembly of
multiple parts. Note the mirror-image assembly of these posterior
periapical film holders. Assembly A is used for exposures on the
maxillary right and the mandibular left, whereas assembly B is used
for exposures on the maxillary left and on the mandibular right.
FIGURE 13-11 Rinn XCP ORA™ (one ring and arm)
positioning system. Color-coded pins on the metal arm match the
colored inserts on the plastic ring. When matched with the
appropriate biteblocks, it can be configured for exposures in all
regions of the oral cavity with either film or digital sensors.
FIGURE 13-12 Stabe® (Dentsply Rinn). Bite extension
required for use with the paralleling technique may be broken off for
use with the bisecting technique.
Patient Preparation
To help gain patient cooperation and confidence, it is important to explain the procedure. Include specific instructions
regarding the need for patient cooperation and be honest about
any difficulties anticipated (see Chapter 12). Perform a cursory
oral inspection and ask the patient to remove any objects from
the mouth that would interfere with the procedure, such as
removable dentures or orthodontic appliances, chewing gum,
and so on. Ask the patient to remove eyeglasses; if any metal
or thick plastic parts of the eyeglasses remain in the path of the
x-ray beam, they will be imaged onto the radiograph. Protect
the patient with the lead or lead equivalent apron and thyroid
collar barriers.
Patient Seating Position
If the image receptor holder has an external aiming device, the
patient’s head can be in any position. Without these special
holders that indicate x-ray beam positions, patients must be
seated upright with their head straight. This position is necessary for consistent results in determining the best horizontal
PRACTICE POINT
Seating the patient with the head against the headrest not
only helps position the occlusal and midsaggital planes, but
the patient is much less likely to move during the exposures
when his/her head is firmly supported by the headrest.
Additionally, Chapter 27 states that directing the patient’s
attention to the back of the head where it touches the
headrest (the occipital protuberance) can serve as a distraction technique when needed (for example, when an exaggerated gag reflex presents).
156 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
Plane C
A
B
O
X
Y
FIGURE 13-15 Head divided by midsagittal plane and
occlusal plane. The midsagittal plane (A–B) must be
perpendicular to the floor, and the occlusal plane (C) must be
parallel with the floor unless an image receptor with an external
aiming device is used. The lines O–X and X–Y are the lines of
orientation for the maxillary teeth, also known as the ala–tragus
line. The apices of the roots of the maxillary teeth are located
close to this line.
A B
FIGURE 13-14 Patient positioning. The patient is positioned with the head supported against the headrest with
the (A) occlusal plane parallel to the floor and the (B) midsaggital plane perpendicular to the floor.
Sequence of Procedure
A definite sequence of positioning the image receptor should
be followed to prevent omitting an area or exposing an area
twice. Develop a set routine to prevent errors and save time.
Opinions differ as to which region should be exposed first
when taking a full mouth series of periapical and bitewing radiographs. Some radiographers prefer to begin in the right maxillary molar region and continue in sequence to the left maxillary
molar region, drop down to the left mandibular molar region, and
finish in the right mandibular molar region.
Others begin with the anterior exposures, on the theory that
the image receptor placement is more comfortable here and less
likely to excite a gag reflex than when it is placed in the maxillary molar region, where the tissues may be more sensitive (see
Chapter 27). If the first few placements produce no discomfort,
the patient may become used to the feel of the image receptor
and may more readily accept it as the procedure continues.
For an experienced radiographer who can place the image
receptor skillfully and rapidly, it probably makes little difference which area is exposed first. However, the same order for
placement of the image receptor should always be followed to
make sure that all regions are exposed in an orderly and efficient
manner. The following sequence of image receptor placements
is suggested to help the student adopt a systematic routine:
• Maxillary anterior periapicals
• Mandibular anterior periapicals
• Maxillary posterior periapicals
• Mandibular posterior periapicals
• Anterior bitewings
• Posterior bitewings
Anterior image receptor placements are often more comfortable and allow the patient to become accustomed to the
and vertical angulations of the x-ray beam and points of entry.
Additionally, stabilizing the patient’s head against the headrest
is important to prevent movement during the exposure. Place
the headrest against the occipital protuberance (the back, base
of the skull) for greatest stability.
The recommended position is to seat the patient upright
and adjust the headrest so that the occlusal plane for the arch
being examined is parallel to the floor (Figure 13-14). The
midsagittal plane that divides the patient’s head into a right
and left side should be positioned perpendicular to the floor
(Figure 13-15). Although an experienced radiographer can
expose radiographs with the patient either upright or supine, the
use of predetermined head positions is recommended to standardize the procedure.
CHAPTER 13 • INTRAORAL RADIOGRAPHIC PROCEDURES 157
PROCEDURE 13-1
Procedure for exposing a full mouth series of radiographs
1. Perform infection control procedures (see Procedure Box 10-2).
2. Prepare unit. Turn on and set exposure factors.
3. Seat patient and explain the procedure.
4. Request that the patient remove objects from the mouth that can interfere with the procedure and
remove eyeglasses.
5. Adjust chair to a comfortable working level.
6. Adjust the headrest to position the patient’s head so that the occlusal plane of the arch being imaged is
parallel to the floor and the midsagittal plane (midline) is perpendicular to the floor.
7. Place the lead or lead-equivalent barrier apron and thyroid collar on the patient.
8. Perform a cursory inspection of the oral cavity and note possible obstructions (tori, shallow palatal vault,
malaligned teeth) that may require an alteration of technique or number of exposures.
9. Place the image receptor into the positioner. When using film, place such that the embossed dot will be
positioned toward the occlusal/incisal edge (“dot in the slot”). Position anterior image receptors vertically and posterior image receptors horizontally.
10. Insert the image receptor and positioner into the patient’s oral cavity and center the receptor behind the
teeth to be imaged. (See Table 14-5 for the exact placements for each of the maxillary and mandibular
periapical radiographs and Table 16-3 for placements for each of the posterior and/or anterior bitewing
radiographs in the procedure.) Visually locate the contact points of the teeth to be imaged and place the
image receptor perpendicular to the embrasures.
11. Hold the image receptor holder against the occlusal/incisal surface of the maxillary/mandibular teeth
while asking the patient to bite firmly onto the biteblock of the holder. (Use a sterilized cotton roll for
stabilization if needed.)
12. Release the image receptor postioner when the patient has closed firmly, holding it in place.
13. Set the vertical angulation:
a. For periapical radiographs: (See Table 14-5 for the recommended vertical angulation setting for the
area being imaged.)
1. Intersect the image receptor plane and the long axes of the teeth perpendicularly when utilizing
the paralleling technique. If using an image receptor positioner with an external aiming device,
align the open end of the PID with the indicator ring.
2. Intersect the imaginary bisector of the receptor plane and the long axes of the teeth perpendicularly when utilizing the bisecting technique.
b. For bitewing radiographs use degrees.
14. Determine the correct horizontal angulation by directing the central ray of the x-ray beam perpendicular
to the receptor in the horizontal plane through the contact point of the teeth of interest. (See Table 14-5
for the exact embrasure space through which to direct the central ray for each of the periapical radiographs and Table 16-3 for each of the bitewing radiographs in the procedure. Horizontal angulation is
determined the same for both paralleling and bisecting techniques and for bitewing radiographs.) If
using an image receptor positioner with an external aiming device, align the open end of the PID with
the indicator ring.
+10
procedure. The bitewing examination (see Chapter 16) is last
because the patient tolerates these fairly well, and the radiographic procedure can end pleasantly. In addition, it may be
helpful for the radiographer not to have to break the sequence
of exposing periapical radiographs by switching to a bitewing
holder and changing techniques in the middle of the procedure.
Procedure Box 13-1 summarizes the steps for exposing a full
mouth series of radiographs.
(Continued)
158 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
to the plane of the image receptor and the long axes of the teeth
when utilizing the paralleling technique. When utilizing the
bisecting technique, the vertical angulation is determined by
directing the central rays of the x-ray beam perpendicular to the
imaginary bisector. The vertical angulation setting for exposing
bitewings is
The point of entry is used to center the image receptor
within the beam of radiation.
Before image positioners were developed, the patient
would hold the film packet in the oral cavity with the fingers or
a thumb. With the variety of image receptor positioners currently on the market, this practice is unacceptable today. Film
holders are designed for use with the paralleling or the bisecting technique or may be modified to use with both techniques.
Unless the image receptor holder has an external aiming
device to indicate the correct angulation, care must be taken to
seat the patient so that the occlusal plane is parallel with the
floor and that the midsaggital plane is perpendicular to the floor.
An exposure sequence is recommended to avoid error and
be efficient. Anterior image receptor placements may be more
comfortable for some patients. Beginning the exposure sequence
in the anterior may assist in gaining patient cooperation with
the procedure.
RECALL—Study questions
1. Which of these is NOT an intraoral radiograph?
a. Bitewing
b. Occlusal
c. Panoramic
d. Periapical
2. Which radiograph is used most often to detect proximal
surface dental decay?
a. Bitewing
b. Occlusal
c. Panoramic
d. Periapical
+10.
PROCEDURE 13-1
Procedure for exposing a full mouth series of radiographs (continued)
15. Center the PID over the image receptor. If using an image receptor positioner with an external aiming
device, align the open end of the PID with the indicator ring. (See Table 15-4 for point of entry recommendations when utilizing the bisecting technique.)
16. Make the exposure.
17. Remove the image receptor and positioner from the patient’s oral cavity.
18. Repeat steps 9 through 17 until all radiographs in the series have been exposed.
19. Remove the lead or lead equivalent barrier apron and thyroid collar from the patient.
20. Perform infection control procedures following the exposures (see Procedure Box 10-4).
REVIEW—Chapter summary
The three types of intraoral radiographic procedures are the bitewing, periapical, and occlusal surveys. Each of these examinations
differs in purpose, and a variety of image receptor sizes may be
used to achieve the desired result.
Both the bisecting and the paralleling techniques are used
to produce a shadow image of the tooth onto the radiograph.
Although neither technique completely satisfies all the requirements for accurate shadow casting, the paralleling technique is
more likely to produce superior results. Each technique has
advantages and disadvantages. The skilled operator, within the
limits of the equipment available, must select the technique that
fits the situation.
The size and number of image receptors used for exposure
of a full mouth radiographic survey depends on several factors.
A bitewing series may consist of two to eight radiographs. A
minimum of 14 periapical radiographs are required for a full
mouth series of an adult patient—additional images may be
needed if narrow size #1 image receptors are used in the anterior regions. Exposures include the central incisor, canine, premolar, and molar areas of the right and left maxilla and
mandible. The image receptor should be positioned with the
long dimension vertical in the anterior region and horizontal in
the posterior region. The embossed identification dot present
on radiographic film should be placed toward the
incisal/occlusal edges of the teeth when positioning the film
packet for periapical radiographs.
The horizontal angulation is determined by directing the
central rays of the x-beam perpendicular to the plane of the
image receptor through the mean tangent of the embrasures
between the teeth of interest. Both paralleling and bisecting
techniques and bitewing procedures determine horizontal angulation in the same manner.
With negative vertical angulation, the PID is pointing down
toward the floor. With positive vertical angulation, the PID is
pointing up toward the ceiling. The vertical angulation is determined by directing the central rays of the x-beam perpendicular
CHAPTER 13 • INTRAORAL RADIOGRAPHIC PROCEDURES 159
3. Which intraoral technique satisfies more shadow casting principles?
a. Bisecting
b. Paralleling
4. Which intraoral technique is based on the rule of isometry?
a. Bisecting
b. Paralleling
5. Each of the following is a shadow casting principle
EXCEPT one. Which one is the EXCEPTION?
a. Object and image receptor should be perpendicular
to each other.
b. Object and image receptor should be as close as possible to each other.
c. Object should be as far as practical from the target
(source of radiation).
d. Radiation should strike the object and image receptor perpendicularly.
6. Which of these factors does NOT need to be considered
when deciding which image receptor size to use when
exposing a full mouth series?
a. Age of the patient
b. Shape of the dental arches
c. Previous accumulated exposure
d. Patient’s ability to tolerate the image receptor
7. What is the minimum image receptor requirement for
an adult full mouth series of periapical radiographs?
a. 12
b. 14
c. 16
d. 18
8. How many size #2 image receptors are required by most
health care practices for the exposure of posterior radiographs of a full mouth series?
a. 5
b. 6
c. 7
d. 8
9. Lining the image receptor up behind the right and left
central and lateral incisors to include the mesial half
of the right and left canines describes the image
receptor placement for which of the following periapical radiographs?
a. Central incisors
b. Canines
c. Premolars
d. Molars
10. Anterior periapical image receptors are placed
______________ in the oral cavity. Posterior periapical
image receptors are placed _____________ in the oral
cavity.
a. vertically; horizontally
b. horizontally; vertically
c. vertically; vertically
d. horizontally; horizontally
11. Where should the embossed identification dot be
positioned when taking periapical radiographs?
a. Toward the midline of the oral cavity
b. Toward the incisal or occlusal edge of the tooth
c. Toward the palate or floor of the mouth
d. Toward the distal or back of the arch
12. The x-ray tube head must be swiveled from side
to side to adjust the vertical angulation of the
central ray.
To avoid overlap error the central ray must be directed
perpendicular to the curvature of the arch through the
contact points of the teeth.
a. Both statements are true.
b. Both statements are false
c. The first statement is true. The second statement is
false.
d. The first statement is false. The second statement is
true.
13. At which of the following settings would the PID be
pointing to the floor?
a.
b. 0
c.
14. An incorrect point of entry will result in
a. overlapping.
b. foreshortening.
c. cutting off the root apices.
d. conecutting.
15. List five contraindications for using the patient’s finger
to hold a film packet in position during exposure.
a. ______________
b. ______________
c. ______________
d. ______________
e. ______________
16. An image receptor positioner/holder must be used
with
a. the paralleling technique.
b. the bisecting technique.
c. the bitewing technique.
d. all of the above techniques.
17. Which of the following is the correct seating position
for the patient during radiographic examinations when
an image receptor without an external aiming device is
used?
a. Occlusal plane parallel and midsaggital plane perpendicular to the floor
b. Occlusal plane perpendicular and midsaggital plane
parallel to the floor
c. Occlusal and midsaggital planes parallel to the
floor
d. Occlusal and midsaggital planes perpendicular to the
floor
+20
-30
160 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
2. Observe and describe the orientation of the image
receptor in each position. Give a rationale for why the
image receptor is positioned with the long dimension
vertical or horizontal in different regions of the oral
cavity.
3. If using intraoral film packets, where did you position
the embossed dot? Why?
4. Explain the order you used to position each of the radiograph.
Next practice positioning the x-ray tube head in relation
to each of the standard image receptor placements. Using the
paralleling technique, determine the horizontal angulation by
swiveling the tube head from side to side to direct the central
rays of the x-ray beam perpendicular to the image receptor
through the mean tangent of the embrasures between the
teeth of interest. Determine the vertical angulation by moving the tube head up and down in the yoke to direct the central rays of the x-ray beam perpendicular to the image
receptor.
5. List what teeth you used to determine where to horizontally direct the central rays of the x-ray beam for each of
the standard image receptor placements. Why did you
choose these teeth?
6. What error is most likely to occur if the horizontal
angulation is not correctly aligned between the embrasures of the teeth of interest?
7. Observe the degrees of vertical angulation noted on
the yoke of the x-ray tube head for each of the standard image receptor placements. Determine if using
positive or negative angulation. Write down each of
the settings.
8. Compare the vertical angulation settings you used for
each of the standard image receptor placements with
those noted in Table 15-2 Summary of Steps for Acquiring Periapical Radiographs–Bisecting Technique. Explain
the difference between the vertical angulations you used
for the paralleling technique with the vertical angulations
recommended in Table 15-2 for use with the bisecting
technique. What general statement can you make about
the differences? Why?
REFERENCES
Eastman Kodak Company. (2002). Successful intraoral radiography. Rochester, NY: Author.
Rinn Corporation. (1983). Intraoral radiography with Rinn
XCP/BAI instruments. Elgin, IL: Dentsply/Rinn Corporation.
White, S. C., & Pharoah, M. J. (2008). Oral radiology: Principles
and interpretation (6th ed.). St. Louis: Elsevier.
18. Which of the following is the best sequencing for
exposing a full mouth series of periapical radiographs?
a. Mandibular anteriors, maxillary anteriors, mandibular
posteriors, maxillary posteriors
b. Maxillary anteriors, mandibular anteriors, maxillary
posteriors, mandibular posteriors
c. Mandibular posteriors, maxillary posteriors, mandibular anteriors, maxillary anteriors
d. Maxillary posteriors, mandibular posteriors, maxillary anteriors, mandibular anteriors
REFLECT—Case study
The dentist has prescribed a full mouth series of periapical and
bitewing radiographs for a patient who represents with several
areas of decay and a suspected abscess. This oral health care
practice uses an 18-image full mouth series configuration. Consider the following and write out your answers:
1. Prepare a list of the specific periapical and bitewing
radiographs you intend to expose. Include what size
image receptor you will use and why, and which specific teeth must be imaged on each of the projections.
2. Which radiographic technique for exposing periapical
radiographs will you choose for this exam? Why?
3. How will your patient be seated for the exposures? Why?
4. Will you be using the patient’s finger or a holder to
position the image receptor within the oral cavity?
Explain your choice.
5. Describe how the image receptor will be positioned in
relation to the teeth and how you will be directing the
central ray of the x-ray beam for the specific technique
you plan to use.
6. Summarize the steps you would take to locate the vertical and horizontal angulations.
7. Prepare a sequence of exposures and explain your choice.
RELATE—Laboratory application
Set up a teaching manikin or skull in the radiography operatory.
Position the occlusal plane parallel to the floor and the mid-sagittal plane perpendicular to the floor. Obtain an image receptor and
holder. Using Table 13-1 Standard Image Receptor Placements
for Periapical Radiographs of a Full Mouth Series practice the
standard image receptor placements for the periapical radiographs
listed. Write out your answers to the following questions.
1. What size image receptors did you chose for each of the
radiographs? List the considerations that prompted your
decision.
The Periapical
Examination—Paralleling
Technique
OBJECTIVES
Following successful completion of this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Define the key words.
2. Discuss the principles of the paralleling technique.
3. List the advantages and disadvantages of the paralleling technique.
4. Identify and be able to assemble and position image receptor holders for use with the
paralleling techniques.
5. Explain the importance of achieving accurate horizontal and vertical angulation in obtaining
quality diagnostic radiographs using the paralleling technique.
6. Identify vertical angulation errors made when using the paralleling technique.
7. Demonstrate the image receptor positioning for maxillary and mandibular periapical
exposures using the paralleling technique.
KEY WORDS
Biteblock
Embrasure
External aiming device
Film holder
Image receptor holder or positioner
Indicator ring
CHAPTER
OUTLINE
 Objectives 161
 Key Words 161
 Introduction 162
 Fundamentals
of Paralleling
Technique 162
 Holding the
Periapical Image
Receptor in
Position 163
 Horizontal and
Vertical Angulation Procedures 166
 Points of Entry 166
 The Periapical
Examination:
Paralleling
Technique 166
 Review, Recall,
Reflect, Relate 177
 References 178
CHAPTER
14
162 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
Introduction
Because of its ability to produce superior diagnostic quality
radiographs, the paralleling technique should be the technique of choice when exposing periapical radiographs
(Table 14-1). The purpose of this chapter is to present stepby-step procedures for exposing a full mouth series of periapical radiographs using the paralleling technique.
Fundamentals of Paralleling Technique
The basic principles of the paralleling technique meet the following two shadow casting principles:
• The image receptor (film packet, phosphor plate, or digital
sensor) is placed parallel to the long axis of the object
(tooth) being radiographed.
• The central ray of the x-ray beam is directed to intersect
both the image receptor and the object (tooth) perpendicularly (Figure 14-1).
Oral structures, particularly the curvature of the palate and
the outwardly inclined anterior teeth, make it difficult to place
the image receptor parallel to the long axes of the teeth
(Figure 14-2). The paralleling technique must achieve parallelism by placing the image receptor away from the crowns of
the teeth. Parallelism is accomplished by using an image receptor positioner or film holder specifically designed to allow the
patient to stabilize the image receptor in this position away from
the crowns of the teeth. This position, however, does not meet
the shadow cast principle that states that the image receptor
(film, phosphor plate, or digital sensor) and the object (tooth)
should be as close to each other as possible. To compensate for
the increased object–image receptor distance needed to achieve
parallelism, the target–image receptor distance should also be
increased. The PID length contributes to the target–image receptor distance and satisfies the shadow cast principle that states that
the object (tooth) should be as far as practical from the target
Direction of
central beam
of x-rays
Image receptor
FIGURE 14-1 Paralleling technique. The x-ray beam is directed
perpendicular to the recording plane of the image receptor, which has
been positioned parallel to the long axis of the tooth.
Visible Axis Actual Axis
FIGURE 14-2 Visible and actual long axis of the tooth. The
root portion of the tooth should be taken into consideration to
accurately locate the long axis of the tooth.
TABLE 14-1 Advantages and Disadvantages of the Paralleling Technique
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
• Produces images with minimal dimensional distortion.
• Minimizes superimposition of adjacent structures.
• Long axis of the tooth and recording plane of the image receptor
can be visually located making it easier to direct the x-rays
appropriately.
• Many choices of image receptor holders on the market with
external aiming devices specifically designed to make paralleling simple and easy to learn.
• With appropriate image receptor holding devices, takes less time
than trying to locate the position of an imaginary bisector.
• When using a long PID (16 in./41 cm), patient radiation dose
may be reduced.
• Parallel placement of the image receptor may be difficult to
achieve on certain patients: children, adults with small mouths, low
palatal vaults, or the presence of tori, patients with sensitive oral
mucosa or an exaggerated gag reflex, edentulous regions.
• These same conditions may increase patient discomfort when the
image receptor impinges on oral tissues.
• A short PID (8 in./20.5 cm) should not be used. The longer PID
required may be more difficult to maneuver and stabilize for exposures.
CHAPTER 14 • THE PERIAPICAL EXAMINATION—PARALLELING TECHNIQUE 163
(source of radiation). Ideally, the target–image receptor distance
used with the paralleling technique is 16 in. (41 cm) or at least
12 in. (30 cm; Figure 14-3).
Holding the Periapical Image Receptor in
Position
Image receptor holders designed for use with the paralleling
technique usually have a long biteblock area for the purpose of
achieving a parallel relationship between the recording plane of
the image receptor and the long axes of the teeth and an Lshaped backing to help support the image receptor and keep it
in position (Figure 14-4). Examples of paralleling positioners
and holders are the XCP™ (which stands for Extension Cone
Paralleling) for use with radiographic film (Figure 14-5) and
the XCP-DS™ for use with digital sensors manufactured by
Dentsply Rinn (www.rinncorp.com) and the RAPD® (which
stands for Right Angle Positioning Device) manufactured by
Flow Dental (www.flowdental.com; Figure 14-6). These instruments have an external aiming device to assist the radiographer in locating the correct angles and points of entry, making
errors less likely. The external aiming device also eliminates
the need to position the patient’s head precisely.
It should be noted, however, that the extra size and weight
of the external aiming device may make placement difficult or
uncomfortable for some patients. If placement of the image
Image receptor Using 8 inch (20.5 cm)
target-image receptor
distance
Using 16 inch (41 cm)
target-image receptor
distance
Image receptor
FIGURE 14-3 Comparison of the bisecting and paralleling methods.
With the bisecting technique, the image receptor is positioned adjacent to the
tooth, making a target–image receptor distance of 8 in. (20.5 cm) acceptable.
With the paralleling technique the image receptor is positioned near the center of
the oral cavity, where it must be retained in a position parallel to the long axes of
the teeth. This increased object–image receptor distance requires a longer
(12 in./30 cm or 16 in./41 cm) target–image receptor distance to produce a quality
radiograph.
FIGURE 14-4 Paralleling image receptor holder. Anterior
biteblock . The biting plane is at a right angle (900
) with the
backing plate. The patient bites down far enough out on the
bite extension to keep the image receptor and teeth parallel.
(Courtesy of Dentsply Rinn.)
164 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
Aiming device (ring)
Indicator rod (arm)
Posterior
instrument
Posterior
instrument
Anterior
instrument
Bitewing
(interproximal)
instrument
Biteblock
FIGURE 14-5 Rinn XCP™. Note the external aiming device to assist with
locating the correct angles and points of entry. The external aiming device eliminates
the need to position the patient’s head precisely. (Courtesy of Dentsply Rinn.)
FIGURE 14-6 Flow Dental’s RAPD®. (Courtesy of Flow Dental.)
FIGURE 14-7 Dentsply Rinn’s Uni-GripAR®. Note the
wireless digital sensor image receptor. (Courtesy of Dentsply Rinn.)
receptor is compromised and therefore not positioned correctly,
the aiming device will indicate directing the x-ray beam to the
wrong place. Manufacturers have responded to the need to help
reduce the size and weight of an external aiming device with
products such as Dentsply Rinn’s Uni-GripAR® (Figure 14-7)
and Flip Ray™ (Figure 14-8). These holders with positioning
arms and aiming rings are made of lightweight plastic for the
purpose of improving patient comfort.
There are several image receptor positioners on the market
that with slight modifications may be used with both the paralleling and the bisecting techniques. Examples include the
Stabe® (Dentsply Rinn www.rinncorp.com) and the SUPA®
(which stands for Single Use Positioning Aid), manufactured by
Flow Dental (www.flowdental.com; Figure 14-9). These holders
provide a long biteblock and L-shaped back support for use with
the paralleling technique. However, the manufacturers have
designed the holder with a scored groove that allows the radiographer to break off the bite extension and use the holder with the
bisecting technique as well (see Figure 13-12). The light, polystyrene single-part construction makes these holders comfortable
and easy to place for most patients. However, because these
positioners lack an external aiming ring, the radiographer must
be skilled in estimating the correct angles and points of entry to
utilize these devices. For this reason, it is important that the radiographer develop the skills necessary to evaluate image receptor
placement for correctness, regardless of the holder used.
For illustration purposes, the Rinn XCP™ film holder with
film packet is described and demonstrated here because its
external aiming device attachment aids in directing the central
ray at the teeth and image receptor perpendicularly. The Rinn
XCP-ORA™ (Figure 14-10 and see Figure 13-11) may be used
in the same manner while eliminating the need for multiple
extension arms and rings. This holder allows the operator to
insert the metal arm into color-coordinated openings in the aiming ring that match the biteblocks to accommodate placements for
exposure of periapical and bitewing radiographs in all regions of
PRACTICE POINT
When using a sterile cotton roll to aid in stabilizing the image
receptor, be sure that the cotton roll is placed on the opposite
side from the teeth of interest. If the purpose of the radiograph is to image a maxillary tooth, the cotton roll should
be placed under the biteblock so that the mandibular teeth
contact the cotton roll when the patient occludes. If the purpose of the radiograph is to image a mandibular tooth, the
cotton roll should be placed on top of the biteblock so that
the maxillary teeth contact the cotton roll when the patient
occludes. Placing the cotton roll on the biteblock on the same
side as the teeth being imaged will prevent the patient from
occluding all the way onto the biteblock and will result in cutting off the apices of the teeth on the image.
CHAPTER 14 • THE PERIAPICAL EXAMINATION—PARALLELING TECHNIQUE 165
FIGURE 14-8 Dentsply Rinn’s Flip Ray™. Note the film packet
image receptor. (Courtesy of Dentsply Rinn.)
FIGURE 14-9 Flow Dental’s SUPA®. Note the film packet image
receptor. (Courtesy of Flow Dental.)
FIGURE 14-10 Dentsply Rinn’s XCP-ORA®. (Courtesy of
Dentsply Rinn.)
the oral cavity. Although the radiographer should refer to the manufacturer’s instructions for use, important key points regarding
image receptor holders with external aiming devices are:
• The patient must bite down on the biteblock as far away from
the teeth as possible, utilizing the full extent of the biteblock.
The exception to this rule is for the mandibular premolar and
molar regions, where the image receptor can be close to the
teeth and still remain parallel because of the nearly vertical
position of the mandibular premolars and the slightly inward
inclination of the mandibular molars (Figure 14-11).
• The patient must bite down on the biteblock firmly enough
to hold the image recptor in place. A sterilized cotton roll
may be placed on the opposite side of the biteblock to provide stabilization and add to patient comfort.
• The external indicator ring attachment must be slid all the
way down the metal arm of the device to be as close to the
Midsagittal plane
Molars Premolars
FIGURE 14-11 Long axes of the premolar and molar teeth.
patient’s skin as possible without touching the patient prior
to the exposure.
• The open end of the PID is aligned to the indicator ring to
achieve correct horizontal and vertical angulations and
correct point of entry.
166 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
Horizontal and Vertical Angulation
Procedures
Horizontal Angulation
To rely on the image receptor holder’s external aiming ring to
accurately direct the central rays of the x-ray beam perpendicularly (at a right angle) toward the surface of the image receptor
in a horizontal plane, the image receptor itself must be positioned parallel to the teeth of interest in the horizontal dimension. The image receptor must be positioned parallel to the
interproximal space or embrasure of two predetermined teeth.
The teeth selected depend on the region being radiographed.
Table 14-2 lists the embrasure through which to align the image
receptor and to direct the central ray for each projection. The
central ray must be directed appropriately to avoid overlapping
adjacent teeth on the resultant image.
Image receptor
PID
Root
apex
not
recorded
A
B
Image receptor
PID
Incisal edge
not recorded
FIGURE 14-12 Vertical angulation error–paralleling
technique. (A) Excessive vertical angulation results in incisal/occlusal
edges being cut off the image. (B) Inadequate vertical angulation
results in the apices being cut off the image.
Vertical Angulation
When utilizing the paralleling technique, the correct vertical
angulation is achieved by directing the central rays of the x-ray
beam perpendicular to the image receptor and perpendicular to
the long axes of the teeth in the vertical plane. An image receptor
holding device designed for use with the paralleling technique is
used to position the image receptor parallel to the long axes of
teeth so that directing the central rays perpendicular to the teeth
will simultaneously direct the central rays perpendicular to the
image receptor. To rely on a holder’s external aiming ring to
accurately direct the central ray perpendicularly (at a right angle)
toward the surface of the image receptor in a vertical plane, the
image receptor itself must be positioned parallel to the teeth of
interest in the vertical dimension. Incorrect vertical angulation
when utilizing the paralleling technique results in cutting off a
portion of the area of interest from the image. When the vertical
angulation is excessive (greater than perpendicular to the recording plane of the image receptor), the incisal or occlusal edges of
the teeth will most likely be cut off, and when the vertical angulation is inadequate (less than perpendicular to the recording
plane of the image receptor), the root apices of the teeth will
most likely be cut off (Figure 14-12).
Points of Entry
Point of Entry
The point of entry for directing the central ray at the image
receptor when utilizing the paralleling technique for periapical
radiographs may be located using the external aiming device of
the image receptor positioner. Without an external indicator,
care should be taken to center the image receptor within the
beam of x-radiation. Use the portion of the holder, or biteblock,
that extends from the oral cavity to estimate the center of the
image receptor. Incorrect point of entry, or not centering the
image receptor within the x-ray beam, will result in conecut
error. (see Figure 18-7 and Figure 18-8)
The Periapical Examination: Paralleling
Technique
Figures 14-13 through 14-20 illustrate the precise positions and
the required angulations for each of the periapical radiographs
in a basic 14-image full-mouth series utilizing the paralleling
technique. See Table 14-2 for a summary of the four basic steps
of the technique—placement, vertical angulation, horizontal
angulation, and point of entry.
PRACTICE POINT
If the image receptor is correctly positioned parallel to the
teeth of interest and the central ray is accurately directed
through the appropriate embrasure and overlapping of other
adjacent teeth on the image occurs, it is usually attributed to
crowded or malaligned teeth. Crowded or malaligned teeth
will most likely require additional exposures to achieve a clear
view of all proximal surfaces (see Chapter 28).
167
TABLE 14-2 Summary of Steps for Acquiring Periapical Radiographs—Paralleling Technique
PERIAPICAL RADIOGRAPH PLACEMENT VERTICAL ANGULATION* HORIZONTAL ANGULATION POINT OF ENTRY
Maxillary incisors (image receptor size #1 or size #2)
(Figure 14-13)
Center the image receptor to line
up behind the central and lateral
incisors; if using a size #2
image receptor, include the
mesial halves of the canines.
Align the image receptor parallel
to the long axes of the incisors
and parallel to the left and right
central incisor embrasure.
Direct the central ray perpendicular to the plane of the image
receptor and long axes of the
incisors.
PID will be pointing down.
Direct the central ray perpendicular to the image receptor
through the left and right central
incisor embrasure.
Center the image receptor within
the x-ray beam by directing the
central rays at the center of the
image receptor.
Maxillary canine (image receptor
#1 or size #2) (Figure 14-14)
Center the image receptor to line
up behind the canine; include
the distal half of the lateral
incisor and the mesial half of the
first premolar.
Align the image receptor parallel
to the long axes of the canines
and parallel to the mesial and
distal line angles of the canine.
Direct the central ray perpendicular to the plane of the image
receptor and long axis of the
canine.
PID will be pointing down.
Direct the central ray perpendicular to the image receptor at the
center of the canine.
Center the image receptor within
the x-ray beam by directing the
central rays at the center of the
image receptor.
Maxillary premolar (image receptor size #2) (Figure 14-15) Align the anterior edge of the image receptor to line up behind
the distal half of the canine;
include the first and second premolars and mesial half of the
first molar.
Align the image receptor parallel
to the long axes of the premolars and parallel to the first and
second premolar embrasure.
Direct the central ray perpendicular to the plane of the image
receptor and long axes of the
premolars.
PID will be pointing down.
Direct the central ray perpendicular to the image receptor
through the first and second
premolar embrasure.
Center the image receptor within
the x-ray beam by directing the
central rays at the center of the
image receptor.
Maxillary molar (image receptor
size #2) (Figure 14-16)
Align the anterior edge of the
image receptor to line up behind
the distal half of the second premolar; include the first, second,
and third molars.
Align the image receptor parallel to
the long axes of the molars and
parallel to the first and second
molar embrasure.
Direct the central ray perpendicular
to the plane of the image receptor
and long axes of the molars.
PID will be pointing down.
Direct the central ray perpendicular
to the image receptor through the
first and second molar
embrasure.
Center the image receptor within the
x-ray beam by directing the central
rays at the center of the image
receptor.
(Continued )
168TABLE 14-2 (Continued)
PERIAPICAL RADIOGRAPH PLACEMENT VERTICAL ANGULATION* HORIZONTAL ANGULATION POINT OF ENTRY
Mandibular incisors (image
receptor size #1 or #2)
(Figure 14-17)
Center the image receptor to line
up behind the central and lateral
incisors if using a size #2 image
receptor; include the mesial
halves of the canines.
Align the image receptor parallel
to the long axes of the incisors
and parallel to the left and right
central incisor embrasure.
Direct the central ray perpendicular to the plane of the image
receptor and long axes of the
incisors.
PID will be pointing up.
Direct the central ray perpendicular to the image receptor
through the left and right central
incisor embrasure.
Center the image receptor within
the x-ray beam by directing the
central rays at the center of the
image receptor.
Mandibular canine (image receptor size #1 or #2) (Figure 14-18) Center the image receptor to line up behind the canine; include
the distal half of the lateral
incisor and the mesial half of the
first premolar.
Align the image receptor parallel
to the long axes of the canines
and parallel to the mesial and
distal line angles of the canine.
Direct the central ray perpendicular to the plane of the image
receptor and long axis of the
canine.
PID will be pointing up.
Direct the central ray perpendicular to the image receptor at the
center of the canine.
Center the image receptor within
the x-ray beam by directing the
central rays at the center of the
image receptor.
Mandibular premolar (image
receptor size #2) (Figure 14-19)
Align the anterior edge of the image
receptor to line up behind the distal half of the canine; include the
first and second premolars and
mesial half of the first molar.
Align the image receptor parallel to
the long axes of the premolars
and parallel to the first and second premolar embrasure.
Direct the central ray perpendicular
to the plane of the image receptor
and long axes of the premolars.
PID will be pointing up.
Direct the central ray perpendicular
to the image receptor through the
first and second premolar embrasure.
Center the image receptor within
the x-ray beam by directing the
central rays at the center of the
image receptor.
Mandibular molar (image receptor size #2) (Figure 14-20) Align the anterior edge of the image receptor to line up behind
the distal half of the second premolar; include the first, second,
and third molars.
Align the image receptor parallel to
the long axes of the molars and
parallel to the first and second
molar embrasure.
Direct the central ray perpendicular
to the plane of the image receptor
and long axes of the molars.
PID will be pointing up.
Direct the central ray perpendicular
to the image receptor through the
first and second molar
embrasure.
Center the image receptor within
the x-ray beam by directing the
central ray at the center of the
image receptor.
*The patient must be seated in the correct position, with the occlusal plane of the arch being imaged parallel to the floor and the midsaggital plane perpendicular to the floor.
CHAPTER 14 • THE PERIAPICAL EXAMINATION—PARALLELING TECHNIQUE 169
B C
PARALLELING TECHNIQUE
Maxillary Incisors Exposure
A
FIGURE 14-13 Maxillary incisors exposure. (A) Diagrams show the relationship of the image receptor and holder, teeth, and PID. As in
all anterior regions, the image receptor is positioned with the long dimension vertically. Image receptor is parallel to the teeth with the biteblock
inserted to its full length to position the image receptor back toward the region of the first molars to achieve parallelism with the long axes of the
incisors. A sterile cotton roll may be placed on the biteblock on the opposite side from the image receptor to help stabilize the placement.
(B) Patient showing position of image receptor holder and 12 in. (30 cm) circular PID. (C) Maxillary incisors radiograph.
170 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
FIGURE 14-14 Maxillary canine exposure. (A) Diagrams show the relationship of the image receptor and holder, teeth, and PID. As in all
anterior regions, the image receptor is positioned with the long dimension vertically. Image receptor is parallel to the teeth with the biteblock
inserted to its full length to position the image receptor up into the midline of the palate to take advantage of the highest point and achieve
parallelism with the long axis of the canine. A sterile cotton roll may be placed on the biteblock on the opposite side from the image receptor to
help stabilize the placement (B) Patient showing position of image receptor holder and 12 in. (30 cm) circular PID. (C) Maxillary canine
radiograph.
B C
A
PARALLELING TECHNIQUE
Maxillary Canine Exposure
CHAPTER 14 • THE PERIAPICAL EXAMINATION—PARALLELING TECHNIQUE 171
B
A
C
PARALLELING TECHNIQUE
Maxillary Premolar Exposure
FIGURE 14-15 Maxillary premolar exposure. (A) Diagrams show the relationship of image receptor and holder, teeth, and PID. As in all
posterior regions, the image receptor is positioned with the long dimension horizontally. Image receptor is parallel to the teeth with the biteblock
inserted to its full length to position the image receptor up into the midline of the palate to take advantage of the highest point and achieve
parallelism with the long axes of the premolars. A sterile cotton roll may be placed on the biteblock on the opposite side from the image receptor
to help stabilize the placement. (B) Patient showing position of image receptor holder and 12 in. (30 cm) circular PID. (C) Maxillary premolar
radiograph.
172 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
B
C
A
PARALLELING TECHNIQUE
Maxillary Molar Exposure
FIGURE 14-16 Maxillary molar exposure. (A) Diagrams show the relationship of the image receptor and holder, teeth, and PID. As in all
posterior regions, the image receptor is positioned with the long dimension horizontally. Image receptor is parallel to the teeth with the biteblock
inserted to its full length to position the image receptor up into the midline of the palate to take advantage of the highest point and achieve
parallelism with the long axes of the molars. A sterile cotton roll may be placed on the biteblock on the opposite side from the image receptor to
help stabilize the placement. (B) Patient showing position of image receptor holder and 12 in. (30 cm) circular PID. (C) Maxillary molar
radiograph.
CHAPTER 14 • THE PERIAPICAL EXAMINATION—PARALLELING TECHNIQUE 173
A
B C
PARALLELING TECHNIQUE
Mandibular Incisors Exposure
FIGURE 14-17 Mandibular incisors exposure. (A) Diagrams show the relationship of the image receptor and holder, teeth and PID. As in
all anterior regions, the image receptor is positioned with the long dimension vertically. Image receptor is parallel to the teeth. A sterile cotton
roll may be placed on the biteblock on the opposite side from the image receptor to help stabilize the placement. This will aid in forcing the
biteblock down into position when the opposing teeth occlude. (B) Patient showing position of image receptor holder and 12 in. (30 cm) circular
PID. (C) Mandibular incisors radiograph.
174 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
B C
A
PARALLELING TECHNIQUE
Mandibular Canine Exposure
FIGURE 14-18 Mandibular canine exposure. (A) Diagrams show the relationship of the image receptor and holder, teeth, and PID. As in
all anterior regions, the image receptor is positioned with the long dimension vertically. Image receptor is parallel to the teeth. A sterile cotton
roll may be placed on the biteblock on the opposite side from the image receptor to help stabilize the placement. This will aid in forcing the
biteblock down into position when the opposing teeth occlude. (B) Patient showing position of image receptor holder and 12 in. (30 cm) circular
PID. (C) Mandibular canine radiograph.
CHAPTER 14 • THE PERIAPICAL EXAMINATION—PARALLELING TECHNIQUE 175
B
C
A
PARALLELING TECHNIQUE
Mandibular Premolar Exposure
FIGURE 14-19 Mandibular premolar exposure. (A) Diagrams show the relationship of the image receptor and holder, teeth, and PID. As in all
posterior regions, the image receptor is positioned with the long dimension horizontally. Image receptor is parallel to the teeth. A sterile cotton roll
may be placed on the biteblock on the opposite side from the image receptor to help stabilize the placement. This will aid in forcing the biteblock
down into position when the opposing teeth occlude. (B) Patient showing position of image receptor holder and 12 in. (30 cm) circular PID.
(C) Mandibular premolar radiograph.
176 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
C
B
A
PARALLELING TECHNIQUE
Mandibular Molar Exposure
FIGURE 14-20 Mandibular molar exposure. (A) Diagrams show the relationship of the image receptor and holder, teeth, and PID. As in
all posterior regions, the image receptor is positioned with the long dimension horizontally. Image receptor is parallel to the teeth. A sterile
cotton roll may be placed on the biteblock on the opposite side from the image receptor to help stabilize the placement. This will aid in forcing
the biteblock down into position when the opposing teeth occlude. (B) Patient showing position of image receptor holder and 12 in. (30 cm)
circular PID. (C) Mandibular molar radiograph.
CHAPTER 14 • THE PERIAPICAL EXAMINATION—PARALLELING TECHNIQUE 177
2. To compensate for the increased object–image receptor
distance needed to achieve parallelism, the target–image
receptor distance should be
a. increased.
b. decreased.
3. Which of the following is NOT an advantage of the paralleling technique?
a. Produces images with minimal dimensional distortion
b. Minimizes superimposition of adjacent structures
c. Satisfies more shadow casting principles
d. Easy technique for children
4. The most important reason for using a holder when utilizing the paralleling technique is to stabilize the image
receptor in a position
a. at a right angle to the teeth.
b. perpendicular to the teeth.
c. parallel to the teeth.
d. parallel to the bisector.
5. Film holders designed for use with the paralleling technique should have a
a. short biteblock and L-shaped backing.
b. long biteblock and L-shaped backing.
c. short biteblock and no backing.
d. long biteblock and no backing.
6. Which of the following is an example of a holder that
can be used with both the paralleling and the bisecting
techniques?
a. SUPA®
b. Uni-GripAR®
c. XCP™
d. Flip Ray™
7. Each of the following is a part of the assembled XCP®
holder EXCEPT one. Which one is the EXCEPTION?
a. Metal arm
b. Indicator ring
c. Long biteblock
d. 105-degree angled backing
8. Lining the image receptor up behind the distal half of
the canine to include the first and second premolars and
mesial half of the first molar describes the placement
for which of the following periapical radiographs?
a. Central incisors
b. Canine
c. Premolar
d. Molar
9. To determine the horizontal angulation for the maxillary molar periapical radiograph, the central rays of the
x-ray beam should be directed at the image receptor
perpendicularly through the embrasures of the
a. first and second molars.
b. second premolar and first molar.
c. first and second premolars.
d. canine and first premolar.
REVIEW—Chapter summary
The paralleling technique is the technique of choice when
exposing periapical radiographs because of its ability to produce superior diagnostic-quality radiographs. The paralleling
technique satisfies two key shadow casting principles—the
image receptor is placed parallel to the long axes of the teeth,
and the central ray of the x-ray beam is directed perpendicular
to both the recording plane of the image receptor and the long
axes of the teeth. A long PID (16 in/41 cm or 12 in/30 cm)
compensates for the increased distance between the image
receptor and the teeth required to achieve parallelism. A disadvantage of the paralleling technique is that a parallel
object–image receptor relationship may be difficult to achieve
on some patients.
Because the image receptor must be positioned farther from
the teeth to achieve parallelism, a holding device with a long
biteblock and L-shaped backing is required. Image receptor
holders are designed for use with the paralleling or the bisecting
technique or may be modified to use with both techniques. A
holder with an external aiming device will assist in determining
the correct horizontal and vertical angulations and with determining the precise point of entry. To rely on the holder’s external
aiming ring, the image receptor must be positioned parallel to the
long axes of the teeth (in the vertical dimension) and parallel to
the embrasure of two predetermined teeth (in the horizontal
dimension).
If a holder without an external aiming device is used, the
horizontal angulation is determined by directing the central ray
of the x-beam perpendicular to the recording plane of the image
receptor through the mean tangent of the embrasures between
the teeth of interest, and the vertical angulation is determined
by directing the central ray of the x-beam perpendicular to the
long axes of the teeth and perpendicular to the recording plane
of the image receptor. The point of entry is determined by
using that portion of the biteblock that extends beyond the oral
cavity to direct the central ray of the x-ray beam to the center
of the image receptor.
The four basic steps to exposing a periapical radiograph
are placement, vertical angulation, horizontal angulation, and
point of entry. Step-by-step illustrated instructions for exposing
a full mouth series of periapical radiographs utilizing the paralleling techniques are presented.
RECALL—Study questions
1. What shadow casting principle is NOT likely to be met
when utilizing the paralleling technique?
a. Radiation should strike the object (tooth) and image
receptor perpendicularly.
b. Object (tooth) should be as far as practical from the
target (source of radiation).
c. Object (tooth) and image receptor should be parallel
to each other.
d. Object (tooth) and image receptor should be as close
as possible to each other.
178 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
receptor holders designed for use with the paralleling technique,
answer the following questions:
1. Which technique is the new holder designed to be used
with? How can you tell?
2. How is the new holder similar to the one you have been
using? Different?
3. Which holder would it be best to know how to use?
Why?
4. What are the advantages/disadvantages of the new
holder?
5. What are the advantages/disadvantages of the holder
you have been using?
6. What is your recommendation for the practice? Should
they continue to use this holder, or should they purchase
the holder you are familiar with? Explain your answers.
RELATE—Laboratory application
For a comprehensive laboratory practice exercise on this topic,
see Thomson, E. M. (2012). Exercises in oral radiography
techniques: A laboratory manual (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Pearson Education. Chapter 4, “Periapical radiographs—paralleling technique.”
REFERENCES
Eastman Kodak Company. (2002). Successful intraoral radiography. Rochester, NY: Author.
Rinn Corporation. (1983). Intraoral radiography with Rinn
XCP/BAI instruments. Elgin, IL: Dentsply/Rinn Corporation.
White, S. C., & Pharoah, M. J. (2008). Oral radiology: Principles
and interpretation (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
10. To determine the horizontal angulation for the
mandibular premolar periapical radiograph, the central rays of the x-ray beam should be directed at the
image receptor perpendicularly through the embrasures of the
a. first and second molars.
b. second premolar and first molar.
c. first and second premolars.
d. canine and first premolar.
11. Directing the central rays perpendicular to the plane of
the image receptor and perpendicular to the long axes
of the teeth describes which step of the paralleling
technique?
a. Placement
b. Vertical angulation
c. Horizontal angulation
d. Point of entry
12. Cutting off the root apex portion of the image on a periapical radiograph results from
a. excessive horizontal angulation.
b. inadequate horizontal angulation.
c. excessive vertical angulation.
d. inadequate vertical angulation.
REFLECT—Case study
You have recently accepted a position in a general practice dental
office. This week you discovered that the image receptor holding
device for exposing a full mouth survey is the one pictured in
Figure 14-9. You have always used the film-holding device pictured in Figures 14-13 through 14-20, and the new holder is unfamiliar to you. Based on what you have learned about image
OBJECTIVES
Following successful completion of this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Define the key words.
2. Discuss the principles of the bisecting technique.
3. List the advantages and disadvantages of the bisecting technique.
4. Identify and be able to assemble and position image receptor holders for use with the
bisecting technique and distinguish these holders from those used with the paralleling
technique.
5. Explain the importance of achieving accurate horizontal and vertical angulation in obtaining
quality diagnostic radiographs using the bisecting technique.
6. List the recommended predetermined vertical angulation settings used with the bisecting
technqiue.
7. Identify vertical angulation errors made when using the bisecting technique.
8. Locate facial landmarks used for determining the points of entry used with the bisecting
technqiue.
9. Demonstrate image receptor positioning for maxillary and mandibular periapical exposures
using the bisecting technique.
KEY WORDS
Ala
Bisector
Biteblock
Bite extension
Elongated image
Embrasure
Film holder
Foreshortened image
Horizontal angulation
Image receptor holder or positioner
Isometric triangle
Mean tangent
Symphysis
Vertical angulation
The Periapical
Examination—Bisecting
Technique
CHAPTER
OUTLINE
 Objectives 179
 Key Words 179
 Introduction 180
 Fundamentals
of Bisecting
Technique 180
 Holding the
Periapical Image
Receptor
in Position 181
 Horizontal
and Vertical
Angulation
Procedures 182
 Points of Entry 185
 The Periapical
Examination:
Bisecting
Technique 185
 Review, Recall,
Reflect, Relate 194
 References 195
CHAPTER
15
180 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
Introduction
Because it satisfies fewer shadow cast principles (see
Chapter 13), the bisecting technique is less likely to produce
superior diagnostic quality radiographs. However, some situations and conditions make the use of the paralleling technique
difficult. When irregularities or obstructions of the oral tissues
and the curvature of the palate prevent a parallel image receptor
to long axes of the teeth placement, an acceptable diagnosticquality radiograph may be obtained utilizing the bisecting technique (Table 15-1). The radiographer who possesses a working
knowledge of both the paralleling and the bisecting techniques
will be prepared to meet and overcome conditions that challenge
the ability to produce diagnostic radiographs. Although the
bisecting technique is not recommended because images produced contain inherent dimensional distortion, careful attention
to the steps of the technique can produce acceptable results
when needed. The purpose of this chapter is to present step-bystep procedures for exposing a full mouth series of periapical
radiographs using the bisecting technique.
Fundamentals of Bisecting Technique
The bisecting principle is applied when the image receptor is
not, or cannot, be placed parallel to the long axes of the teeth.
This is often the case with children, with adults who have a shallow palatal vault or a large torus present, or when edentulous
regions exist. If the image receptor is not positioned parallel to
the long axes of teeth, it will not be possible to direct the central
ray appropriately perpendicular to the long axes of the teeth
simultaneously with perpendicular to the plane of the image
receptor. To cast an accurate shadow representation of a tooth
onto the image receptor, the angle formed by the long axis of the
tooth and the plane of the image receptor must be bisected. One
must first find the long axis of the tooth and then find the long
axis of the image receptor as it is placed next to the tooth. After
visualizing these two planes, one must imagine a line, called
the bisector, which bisects the angle where the long axis of the
tooth and the long axis of the image receptor plane meet. The
central ray of the x-ray beam is directed perpendicular to this
imaginary bisector (Figure 15-1).
Theoretically, two isometric triangles (triangles having
equal measurements) are formed when the central ray is directed
perpendicular to the bisector, and the image that results should
be the same size as the tooth. In practice, this does not always
happen (Figure 15-2 and see Figure 4-13). The diagnostic quality
of the image is usually compromised, with some dimensional
distortion that is inherent in the bisecting technique.
TARGET–IMAGE RECEPTOR DISTANCE Because the long
axis of the tooth and the plane of the image receptor are not
parallel, a shorter target–image receptor distance will limit
magnification and distortion. The shorter 8-in. (20.5-cm) PID
facilitates a shorter target–image receptor distance and is
generally preferred for use with the bisecting technique.
Whereas the paralleling technique is better matched with a
longer target–image receptor distance, typically a 12-in. (30-cm)
or ideally a 16-in. (41-cm) PID to compensate for the greater
object–image receptor distance, the bisecting technique
should be matched with a shorter target—image receptor distance, typically an 8-in. (20.5-cm) PID, to compensate for
the lack of parallelism between the long axis of the tooth and
the plane of the image receptor.
90° 90°
Image receptor
Direction of
central beam
of x-rays
FIGURE 15-1 Rule of isometry applied to the bisecting
technique. Line XY passes through the long axis of the tooth while
the image receptor is positioned along line XZ. The central beam of
radiation is directed perpendicularly through the apical area of the
tooth toward the bisector XW. Because triangles WXY and WXZ are
equal, the shadow image cast on the image receptor will be
approximately equal to the length of the actual tooth, provided that
the bisector line is correctly estimated.
TABLE 15-1 Advantages and Disadvantages of the Bisecting Technique
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
• Image receptor placement may be easier with certain
patients: children, adults with small mouths, low
palatal vaults, or the presence of tori, patients with sensitive oral mucosa or an exaggerated gag reflex, edentulous regions.
• A short PID (8 in/20.5 cm) may be used.
(Some operators find a short PID easier to maneuver.)
• Produces images with dimensional distortion. (Some elongation or foreshortening will occur even when the technique is performed correctly.)
• Often superimposes adjacent structures. (The necessary vertical angle increase
often causes a shadow of the zygomatic process of the maxilla to be superimposed over the molar roots in the maxillary regions.)
• Estimating the location of the imaginary bisector may be difficult.
• When using a short PID (8 in/20.5 cm), patient radiation dose may be
increased.
CHAPTER 15 • THE PERIAPICAL EXAMINATION—BISECTING TECHNIQUE 181
PRACTICE POINT
To aid in estimating the imaginary bisector, utilize the two
visible planes: the teeth and the image receptor. Looking at
the teeth, locate the long axes. Then align the x-ray beam
to intersect the long axes of the teeth perpendicularly. Study
the PID and make a mental note of this angle. Next look at
the image receptor. Note the plane of the image receptor as
it is placed against the teeth. Then shift the PID so that the
x-ray beam is aligned to intersect the plane of the image
receptor perpendicularly. Note this angle while recalling the
angle at which the x-ray beam intersected the long axes of
the teeth. If you need to, repeat this process, shifting the
PID to allow the x-ray beam to intersect the long axes of the
teeth and then the image receptor plane perpendicularly
until you can estimate a position halfway in between these
two angles. This halfway point is the imaginary bisector.
Image
Direction of receptor
central beam
of x-rays
Three-dimentional
object
Angular image
results
FIGURE 15-2 Dimensional distortion is inherent to the
bisecting technique. When the image receptor is not positioned
parallel to the object, the part of the object farthest from the image
receptor is projected in an incorrect relationship to the parts closest
to the image receptor. This occurs when a three-dimensional object,
such as the tooth, is projected onto a two-dimensional surface,
creating an angular relationship between the object and the image
receptor.
OBJECT–IMAGE RECEPTOR DISTANCE It is important to
note that when the image receptor is placed close to the teeth
in both the anterior and the posterior regions of the maxilla and
in the anterior region of the mandible, the bisecting technique
must be utilized to compensate for the lack of parallelism
between the image receptor and the long axes of the teeth.
However, the mandibular posterior region, which includes the
molars and premolars, is the exception to this generalization.
If oral conditions present that allow for placement of the image
receptor close to the teeth in these regions a parallel relationship
may indeed result, and the paralleling technique may be used
successfully (see Figure 14-11).
Holding the Periapical Image Receptor
in Position
Image receptor holders or positioners designed for use with the
bisecting technique will most likely have a short biteblock. Typically, a shorter biteblock or a holder that lacks the L-shaped support backing is considered an image receptor positioner better
suited for use with the bisecting technique. The use of holders of
this type allows the image receptor to be placed close to the lingual surface of the teeth and therefore not parallel to the long
axes of the teeth. Examples of holders designed for use with the
bisecting technique are the Snap-A-Ray® (manufactured by
Dentsply Rinn www.rinncorp.com) and the Wing-A-Ray™
(manufactured by steri-shield www.steri-shield.com) both for
use with radiographic film, phosphor plates, or digital sensors;
Figure 15-3 and Figure 15-4).
As noted in Chapter 13, paralleling image receptor positioners are available that can be slightly modified for use with
the bisecting technique. The bite extension of the Stabe®
(Dentsply Rinn www.rinncorp.com) and the SUPA® (which
stands for Single Use Positioning Aid) manufactured by Flow
Dental (www.flowdental.com) that is needed for use with the
FIGURE 15-3 Snap-A-Ray® image receptor holder. The short
biteblock and 105º; angled backing indicate that this holder be paired
with the bisecting technique. Note the film packet image receptor.
(Courtesy of Dentsply Rinn.)
FIGURE 15-4 Wing-A-Ray™ image receptor holder. The short
biteblock and lack of L-shaped backing indicate that this holder be
paired with the bisecting technique. Note the digital sensor image receptor.
182 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
paralleling technique may be broken off for use with the bisecting technique (see Figure 13-12 ). Dentsply Rinn offers a biteblock with a raised platform and a 105-degree backing plate
(Figure 15-5), called the BAI® (which stands for Bisecting
Angle Instrument), for use with the positioning arm and aiming
ring of the XCP® (which stands for Extension Cone Paralleling; see Figure 13-13). Replacing the 90-degree biteblock of
the XCP® with the 105-degree biteblock of the BAI® converts
this paralleling image receptor-holder into one that can be used
with the bisecting technique.
Because of the variety of film, phosphor plate, and digital
sensor holders available currently and that continue to come to
market, it is important that the radiographer possess a working
knowledge of the bisecting technique to better match the holder
with the technique for optimal results.
For illustration purposes, the Rinn Stabe® film holder
with film packet is described and demonstrated here. Its lightweight construction and small size allow for ease in placing
the image receptor when the patient presents with conditions
that make parallel image receptor placement difficult.
Although the radiographer should refer to the manufacturer’s
instructions for use, important key points regarding this type
of image receptor holder are:
• The patient should bite down on the biteblock as close
to the teeth as necessary. This will most likely not position the image receptor parallel to the long axes of the
teeth. The exception to this rule is for the mandibular
premolar and molar regions, where the image receptor
can be close to the teeth and still remain parallel
because of the nearly vertical position of the mandibular
premolars and the slightly inward inclination of the
mandibular molars (see Figures 14-2 and 14-11).
• The patient must bite down on the biteblock firmly enough
to hold the image receptor in place. A sterilized cotton roll
may be placed on the opposite side of the biteblock to provide stabilization and add to patient comfort.
• Using the long axes of the teeth and the plane of the image
receptor, the radiographer must determine the correct
vertical angle and direct the central ray perpendicular to
the imaginary bisector, adjusting the PID accordingly. If
the patient is seated correctly with the midsaggital plane
perpendicular to the floor and the occlusal plane parallel
to the floor, predetermined vertical anglation settings may
be used.
• Using the teeth contact points and the plane of the image
receptor, the radiographer must determine the correct horizontal angle and direct the central ray perpendicular
through the embrasures of the teeth of interest adjusting
the PID accordingly.
• The radiographer must determine the correct point of entry
and direct the central ray at the apices of the teeth of interest. If the patient is seated correctly with the midsaggital
plane perpendicular to the floor and the occlusal plane parallel to the floor, predetermined anatomical landmarks
may be used through which to direct the central ray of the
x-ray beam.
To limit magnification and distortion that results from
lack of parallelism between the long axes of the teeth and
the plane of the image receptor when using the bisecting
technique, the target–image receptor distance is decreased to
an 8-in. (30-cm) PID.
Horizontal and Vertical Angulation
Procedures
Horizontal Angulation
The steps for determining correct horizontal angulation are
the same for both the bisecting and paralleling techniques.
First, the image receptor must be positioned parallel to the
interproximal space, or embrasure, of two predetermined
teeth. Then the horizontal angulation is achieved by directing
the central ray of the x-ray beam perpendicular to the mean
tangent, or curvature of the arch, through the contact points of
these teeth (Table 15-2).
Vertical Angulation
With the bisecting technique the central ray of the x-ray beam
can not be directed perpendicular to both the long axes of
the teeth and the plane of the image receptor simultaneously.
When utilizing the bisecting technique, the correct vertical
angulation is achieved by directing the central ray of the
x-ray beam perpendicular to the imaginary bisector between
the long axes of the teeth and the plane of the image receptor.
If the patient is seated with the head positioning correct, the
occlusal plane parallel to the floor, and the midsaggital
plane perpendicular to the floor, predetermined vertical
settings may be utilized to position the PID at the correct
vertical angulation (Table 15-2). It is important to check
that the occlusal plane of the arch being imaged is parallel
to the floor. Incorrect vertical angulation when utilizing
the bisecting technique results in an image that appears
elongated or foreshortened. When the vertical angulation is
excessive (greater than perpendicular to the imaginary
bisector) a foreshortened image will result, and when the
vertical angulation is inadequate (less than perpendicular
to the imaginary bisector), the result is an elongated
image (Figure 15-6). Vertical angulation error is explained
in Chapter 18.
Image receptor
Backing plate Biting platform
FIGURE 15-5 Bisecting technique image receptor holder.
Anterior biteblock of BAI®. The backing plate is at a 105º angle with
the short biteblock allowing for close placement of the image
receptor to the teeth. (Courtesy of Dentsply Rinn.)
183
TABLE 15-2 Summary of Steps for Acquiring Periapical Radiographs—Bisecting Technique
PERIAPICAL
RADIOGRAPH PLACEMENT VERTICAL ANGULATION* HORIZONTAL ANGULATION POINT OF ENTRY*
Maxillary incisors
(image receptor
size #1 or size #2)
(Figure 15-8)
Center the image receptor to line up
behind the central and lateral incisors;
if using a size #2 image receptor,
include the mesial halves of the canines.
Place the image receptor as close as
possible to the lingual surfaces of
the incisors, parallel to the left and right
central incisor embrasure.
Direct the central ray toward the imaginary bisector between the long axes of
the incisors and the plane of the image
receptor in the vertical dimension at
+40°.
Direct the central ray perpendicular
to the image receptor through the left
and right central incisor
embrasure.
Center the image receptor
within the x-ray beam by
directing the central ray at a
point near the tip of the nose.
(Figure 14-7 maxillary
point #1)
Maxillary canine
(image receptor
size #1 or size
#2) (Figure 15-9)
Center the image receptor to line up
behind the canine; include the distal half
of the lateral incisor and the mesial half
of the first premolar.
Place the image receptor as close as
possible to the lingual surface of
the canine, parallel to the mesial
and distal line angles of the canine.
Direct the central ray toward the imaginary bisector between the long axis of
the canine and the plane of the image
receptor in the vertical dimension at
+45°.
Direct the central ray perpendicular
to the image receptor at the center of the
canine.
Center the image receptor
within the x-ray beam by
directing the central ray at
the root of the canine, at the ala
of the nose. (Figure 14-7
maxillary point #2)
Maxillary premolar
(image receptor
size #2)
(Figure 15-10)
Align the anterior edge of the image
receptor to line up behind the distal half
of the canine; include the first and
second premolars and mesial half of the
first molar.
Place the image receptor as close as
possible to the lingual surfaces of
the premolars, parallel to the first
and second premolar embrasure.
Direct the central ray toward the
imaginary bisector between
the long axes of the premolars and the
plane of the image receptor
in the vertical dimension at +30°.
Direct the central ray perpendicular
to the image receptor through the first
and second premolar
embrasure.
Center the image receptor
within the x-ray beam by
directing the central ray at a
point on the ala–tragus line
directly below the pupil of the
eye. (Figure 14-7 maxillary
point #3)
Maxillary molar
(image receptor
size #2)
(Figure 15-11)
Align the anterior edge of the image
receptor to line up behind the distal half
of the second premolar; include the first,
second, and third molars.
Place the image receptor as close as
possible to the lingual surfaces of
the molars, parallel to the first and
second molar embrasure.
Direct the central ray toward the
imaginary bisector between
the long axes of the molars and
the plane of the image receptor
in the vertical dimension at +20°.
Direct the central ray perpendicular
to the image receptor through the first
and second molar embrasure.
Center the image receptor
within the x-ray beam by
directing the center ray at a
point on the ala–tragus line
directly below the outer canthus
of the eye. (Figure 14-7
maxillary
point #4)
(Continued )
184TABLE 15-2 (Continued)
PERIAPICAL
RADIOGRAPH PLACEMENT VERTICAL ANGULATION* HORIZONTAL ANGULATION POINT OF ENTRY*
Mandibular incisors
(image receptor
size #1 or #2)
(Figure 15-12)
Center the image receptor to line up
behind the central and lateral incisors;
if using a size #2 image receptor,
include the mesial halves of the
canines.
Place the image receptor as close as
possible to the lingual surfaces of
the incisors, parallel to the left and
right central incisor embrasure.
Direct the central ray toward the
imaginary bisector between the long
axes of the incisors and the
plane of the image receptor in the
vertical dimension at -15°.
Direct the central ray perpendicular
to the image receptor through
the left and right central incisor
embrasure.
Center the image receptor within the
x-ray beam by directing
the central ray at a point in the
middle of the chin (symphysis),
1 in. (2.5 cm) above the lower
border of the mandible.
(Figure 14-7 mandibular
point #1)
Mandibular canine
(image receptor
size #1 or #2)
(Figure 15-13)
Center the image receptor to line up
behind the canine; include the distal
half of the lateral incisor and the
mesial half of the first premolar.
Place the image receptor as close as
possible to the lingual surfaces of
the canine, parallel to the mesial
and distal line angles of the canine.
Direct the central ray toward the
imaginary bisector between
the long axis of the canine and
the plane of the image receptor
in the vertical dimension at -20°.
Direct the central ray perpendicular
to the image receptor at the center
of the canine.
Center the image receptor
within the x-ray beam by directing the central ray at
the center of the root of the
canine, 1 in. (2.5 cm) above the
inferior border of the mandible.
(Figure 14-7 mandibular point
#2)
Mandibular premolar
(image receptor size
#2) (Figure 15-14)
Align the anterior edge of the image
receptor to line up behind the distal
half of the canine; include the first
and second premolars and mesial
half of the first molar.
Place the image receptor as close as
possible to the lingual surfaces of
the premolars, parallel to the first
and second premolar embrasure.
Direct the central ray toward the
imaginary bisector between
the long axes of the premolar and the
plane of the image receptor
in the vertical dimension at -10°.
Direct the central ray perpendicular
to the image receptor through
the first and second premolar
embrasure.
Center the image receptor
within the x-ray beam by directing the central ray at a point on
the chin, 1 in. (2.5 cm) above the
border of the mandible, directly
inferior to the pupil of the eye.
(Figure 14-7 mandibular
point #3)
Mandibular molar
(image receptor size
#2) (Figure 15-15)
Align the anterior edge of the image
receptor to line up behind the
distal half of the second premolar;
include the first, second, and third
molars.
Place the image receptor as close as
possible to the lingual surfaces of
the molars, parallel to the first and
second molar embrasure.
Direct the central ray toward the
imaginary bisector between
the long axes of the molars and
the plane of the image receptor
in the vertical dimension at -5°.
Direct the central ray perpendicular
to the image receptor through
the first and second molar
embrasure.
Center the image receptor
within the x-ray beam by directing the central ray at a point on
the center of the
chin 1 in. (2.5 cm) above the
lower border of the mandible,
directly below the outer canthus
of the eye. (Figure 14-7
mandibular point #4)
* The patient must be seated in the correct position, with the occlusal plane of the arch being imaged parallel to the floor and the midsaggital plane perpendicular to the floor.
CHAPTER 15 • THE PERIAPICAL EXAMINATION—BISECTING TECHNIQUE 185
Points of Entry
The image receptor must be centered within the beam of x-radiation to avoid conecut error. The central ray of the x-ray beam
should be directed through the apices of the teeth of interest.
When utilizing the bisecting technique, if the patient is seated
with the correct head position, the point of entry may be estimated with the use of recommended landmarks (Table 15-2;
Figure 15-7).
The Periapical Examination: Bisecting
Technique
Figures 15-8 through 15-15 illustrate the precise image receptor
positions and the required angulations for each of the periapical
radiographs in a basic 14-film full mouth series utilizing the
bisecting technique. See Table 15-2 for a summary of the four
basic steps of the technique—placement, vertical angulation,
horizontal angulation, and point of entry.
Outer
canthus Inner canthus
Ala of nose
Tip of nose
Commissure of lips
Symphysis of chin
Tragus
of ear
4 3 2 1
4 3 2 1
FIGURE 15-7 Points of entry. Facial landmarks can provide the
radiographer with a reference for positioning the PID and directing
the central ray of the x-ray beam. The patient must be seated upright
with the midsagittal plane perpendicular to the floor and the occlusal
plane parallel to the floor to use these landmarks accurately. Note the
numbers that indicate the points of entry for each of the projections
listed in Table 15-2.
A
Image receptor
Image receptor
PID
Foreshortened
image
PID
B
Elongated
image
FIGURE 15-6 Vertical angulation error—
bisecting technique. (A) Excessive vertical
angulation results in a foreshortened image.
(B) Inadequate vertical angulation results in an
elongated image.
186 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
C D
Central
ray
PID
Mean tangent
A
Occlusal plane
Image receptor
Image receptor
Bisector
Long axis
of tooth Central ray PID
+40°
B
BISECTING TECHNIQUE
Maxillary Incisors Exposure
FIGURE 15-8 Maxillary incisors exposure. (A) Diagram shows horizontal angulation is directed through the central incisors embrasure
and perpendicular to the mean tangent. (B) Vertical angulation is directed perpendicular to the bisector at approximately degrees with the
PID tilted downward. (C) Patient showing position of image receptor and holder, and 8-in. (20.5-cm) circular PID. (D) Maxillary incisors
radiograph.
+40
CHAPTER 15 • THE PERIAPICAL EXAMINATION—BISECTING TECHNIQUE 187
C D
Image receptor
Central
ray
PID
Mean
tangent
A
Central ray
Occlusal plane Image receptor
Bisector
Long axis
of tooth
PID
+45°
B
BISECTING TECHNIQUE
Maxillary Canine Exposure
FIGURE 15-9 Maxillary canine exposure. (A) Diagram shows horizontal angulation is directed at the midline of the canine and
perpendicular to the mean tangent. (B) Vertical angulation is directed perpendicular to the bisector at approximately degrees with the PID
tilted downward. (C) Patient showing position of image receptor and holder, and 8-in. (20.5-cm) circular PID. (D) Maxillary canine radiograph.
+45
188 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
Central ray
B
Occlusal plane
Image receptor
Bisector
Long axis
of tooth
PID
+30°
Central ray PID
Image receptor
Mean
tangent
A
C
D
BISECTING TECHNIQUE
Maxillary Premolar Exposure
FIGURE 15-10 Maxillary premolar exposure. (A) Diagram shows horizontal angulation is directed through the premolars embrasure and
perpendicular to the mean tangent. (B) Vertical angulation is directed perpendicular to the bisector at approximately degrees with the PID
tilted downward. (C) Patient showing position of image receptor and holder, and 8-in. (20.5-cm) circular PID. (D) Maxillary premolar radiograph.
+30
CHAPTER 15 • THE PERIAPICAL EXAMINATION—BISECTING TECHNIQUE 189
C
D
A
PID
Image
receptor
Mean
tangent
Central ray
B
Central ray
Occlusal plane
Image receptor
Bisector
Long axis
of tooth
PID
+20°
BISECTING TECHNIQUE
Maxillary Molar Exposure
FIGURE 15-11 Maxillary molar exposure. (A) Diagram shows horizontal angulation is directed through the first and second molar
embrasure and perpendicular to the mean tangent. (B) Vertical angulation is directed perpendicular to the bisector at approximately degrees
with the PID tilted downward. (C) Patient showing position of image receptor and holder, and 8-in. (20.5-cm) circular PID. (D) Maxillary molar
radiograph.
+20
C D
B
Central ray
Occlusal plane
Image receptor
Bisector
Long axis
of tooth
PID
−15°
Image
receptor
Central
ray
PID
Mean
tangent
A
BISECTING TECHNIQUE
Mandibular Incisors Exposure
190 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
FIGURE 15-12 Mandibular incisors exposure. (A) Diagram shows horizontal angulation is directed through the central incisors embrasure
and perpendicular to the mean tangent. (B) Vertical angulation is directed perpendicular to the bisector at approximately degrees with the
PID tilted upward. (C) Patient showing position of image receptor and holder, and 8-in. (20.5-cm) circular PID. (D) Mandibular incisors
radiograph.
-15
CHAPTER 15 • THE PERIAPICAL EXAMINATION—BISECTING TECHNIQUE 191
C D
Image receptor
Central
ray
PID
Mean
tangent
A B
Occlusal plane
Image receptor
Bisector
Long axis
of tooth PID
−20°
Central ray
BISECTING TECHNIQUE
Mandibular Canine Exposure
FIGURE 15-13 Mandibular canine exposure. (A) Diagram shows horizontal angulation is directed at the midline of the canine and
perpendicular to the mean tangent. (B) Vertical angulation is directed perpendicular to the bisector at approximately degrees with the PID
tilted upward. (C) Patient showing position of image receptor and holder, and 8-in. (20.5-cm) circular PID. (D) Mandibular canine radiograph.
-20
192 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
C
D
B
Occlusal plane
Image receptor
Bisector
Long axis
of tooth
PID
−10° Central ray
A
PID
Image
receptor
Mean tangent Central ray
BISECTING TECHNIQUE
Mandibular Premolar Exposure
FIGURE 15-14 Mandibular premolar exposure. (A) Diagram shows horizontal angulation is directed through the premolar embrasure
and perpendicular to the mean tangent. (B) Vertical angulation is directed perpendicular to the bisector at approximately degrees with the
PID tilted upward. (C) Patient showing position of image receptor and holder, and 8-in. (20.5-cm) circular PID. (D) Mandibular premolar
radiograph.
-10
CHAPTER 15 • THE PERIAPICAL EXAMINATION—BISECTING TECHNIQUE 193
B
Occlusal plane
Image receptor
Bisector
Long axis
of tooth
PID
−5° Central ray
PID
Image
receptor
Mean
tangent
A
Central ray
C
D
BISECTING TECHNIQUE
Mandibular Molar Exposure
FIGURE 15-15 Mandibular molar exposure. (A) Diagram shows horizontal angulation is directed through the first and second molar
embrasure and perpendicular to the mean tangent. (B) Vertical angulation is directed perpendicular to the bisector at approximately degrees
with slight upward tilt of the PID. (C) Patient showing position of image receptor and holder, and 8-in. (20.5-cm) circular PID. (D) Mandibular
molar radiograph.
-5
194 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
REVIEW—Chapter summary
Meeting fewer shadow casting principles than the paralleling
technique, the bisecting technique is less likely to produce
superior diagnostic quality radiographs. The bisecting technique is based on the theory that two isometric triangles are
formed when the central ray is directed perpendicular to the
bisector. If irregularities or obstructions of the oral tissues prevent a parallel image receptor placement, the radiographer who
is skilled in the bisecting technique can produce an acceptable
diagnostic-quality radiograph when needed.
When the image receptor is positioned close to the tooth,
parallelism is not likely. The exception to this occurs in the
mandibular posterior region, where the molars and premolars
are positioned near vertical in the arch. When parallelism cannot be established, to cast an accurate shadow representation
of a tooth onto the image receptor, the angle formed by the
long axis of the tooth and the plane of the image receptor must
be bisected. The central ray of the x-ray beam is directed perpendicular to this imaginary bisector. A short target—image
receptor distance (8-in/20.5-cm PID) will limit magnification
that is inherent when parallelism is not established.
Image receptor holders designed for use with the bisecting
technique generally have a short biteblock and lack the L-shaped
back support. Holders are available that with modification can be
used with either the bisecting or the paralleling technique.
The horizontal angulation is determined by directing the
central ray of the x-beam perpendicular to the recording plane of
the image receptor through the mean tangent of the embrasures
between the teeth of interest. Both paralleling and bisecting
techniques determine horizontal angulation in the same manner.
The vertical angulation is determined by directing the central ray of the x-beam perpendicular to the imaginary bisector.
If the patient’s head position is correct, predetermined vertical
angle settings may be used.
The image receptor must be centered within the beam of
radiation. If the patient’s head position is correct, predetermined landmarks may be used to estimate the point of entry.
The four basic steps to exposing a periapical radiograph
are placement, vertical angulation, horizontal angulation, and
point of entry. Step-by-step illustrated instructions for exposing a full mouth series of periapical radiographs utilizing the
bisecting technique are presented.
RECALL—Study questions
1. The bisecting technique satisfies more shadow casting
rules than the paralleling technique.
A better image results when the shadow casting rules
are followed.
a. The first statement is true. The second statement is
false.
b. The first statement is false. The second statement is true.
c. Both statements are true.
d. Both statements are false.
2. What shadow casting principle is most likely to be met
when utilizing the bisecting technique?
a. Object (tooth) and image receptor should be parallel
to each other.
b. Object (tooth) and image receptor should be as close
as possible to each other.
c. Object (tooth) should be as far as practical from the
target (source of radiation).
d. Radiation should strike the object (tooth) and image
receptor perpendicularly.
3. What term describes the imaginary line between the long
axis of the tooth and the plane of the image receptor?
a. Tangent
b. Median
c. Midsagittal
d. Bisector
4. When utilizing the bisecting technique, the image
receptor is placed
a. parallel to the tooth.
b. as close as possible to the tooth.
c. as close as possible to the bisector.
d. parallel to the bisector.
5. When utilizing the bisecting technique, the central ray
of the x-ray beam is directed
a. perpendicular to the bisector.
b. parallel to the bisector.
c. perpendicular to the image receptor.
d. parallel to the image receptor.
6. Which of these target–image receptor distances is recommended for use with the bisecting technique?
a. 8 in. (20.5 cm)
b. 12 in. (30 cm)
c. 16 in. (41 cm)
7. Each of the following is a disadvantage of the bisecting
technique EXCEPT one. Which one is the EXCEPTION?
a. Produces images with dimensional distortion.
b. Often superimposes adjacent structures.
c. Estimating the location of the bisector may be
difficult.
d. May not be used with children or adults with small
oral cavities.
8. Image receptor holders designed for use with the bisecting technique should have a
a. short biteblock and L-shaped backing.
b. long biteblock and L-shaped backing.
c. short biteblock and 105º backing.
d. long biteblock and 105º backing.
9. Which of the following is NOT an image receptor holder
that can be used with the bisecting technique?
a. Snap-A-Ray®
b. SUPA®
c. BAI®
d. XCP®
CHAPTER 15 • THE PERIAPICAL EXAMINATION—BISECTING TECHNIQUE 195
10. Lining the image receptor up behind the distal half of
the second premolar to include the first, second, and
third molars describes the placement for which of the
following periapical radiographs?
a. Central incisors
b. Canine
c. Premolar
d. Molar
11. To determine the horizontal angulation for the mandibular premolar periapical radiograph, the central rays of
the x-ray beam should be directed at the image receptor
perpendicularly through the embrasures of the
a. canine and first premolar.
b. first and second premolars.
c. second premolar and first molar.
d. first and second molars.
12. When utilizing the bisecting technique, the recommended vertical angle setting for the maxillary premolar periapical radiograph is
a. degrees
b. degrees
c. degrees
d. degrees
13. When utilizing the bisecting technique, the recommended
vertical angle setting for the mandibular canine periapical
radiograph is
a. degrees
b. degrees
c. degrees
d. degrees
14. With the bisecting technique, what is the effect on the
radiographic image if the vertical angulation is significantly greater than necessary?
a. Overlapping
b. Conecutting
c. Elongating
d. Foreshortening
15. Elongation results from
a. excessive horizontal angulation.
b. inadequate horizontal angulation.
c. excessive vertical angulation.
d. inadequate vertical angulation.
16. Which of the following is the suggested point of entry
for directing the central ray of the x-ray beam when
exposing the maxillary incisors radiograph using the
bisecting technique?
a. The tip of the nose
b. The ala of the nose
c. A point on the ala-tragus line below the pupil of
the eye
d. A point on the ala-tragus line below the outer canthus
of the eye
-20
-15
+20
+40
-5
-10
+30
+45
17. Which of the following points 1 in. (2.5 cm) above the
lower border of the mandible is the suggested landmark
for directing the central ray of the x-ray beam when
exposing the mandibular premolar radiograph using the
bisecting technique?
a. The middle (symphysis) of the chin
b. The center of the root of the canine
c. Directly inferior to the pupil of the eye
d. Directly inferior to the outer canthus of the eye
REFLECT—Case study
Compare the paralleling (Chapter 14) and the bisecting techniques. Include answers to the following questions in your
discussion.
1. What are the major differences between the two techniques?
2. How are the two techniques similar?
3. What are the advantages/disadvantages of each of the
two techniques?
4. When would use of the bisecting/paralleling technique
be appropriate?
5. Describe the characteristics of the image receptor holder
appropriate for use bisecting/paralleling technique.
6. How does each of the four steps for exposing periapical radiographs (placement, vertical and horizontal
angulation, and point of entry) differ between the two
techniques? How are they similar?
7. Which technique do you anticipate being easier/more
difficult to master?
8. Would you recommend that radiographers learn one
technique over the other? Why/why not?
RELATE—Laboratory application
For a comprehensive laboratory practice exercise on this
topic, see Thomson, E. M. (2012). Exercises in oral radiography techniques: A laboratory manual 3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. Chapter 5, “Periapical
radiographs—bisecting technique.”
REFERENCES
Eastman Kodak Company. (2002). Successful intraoral radiography. Rochester, NY: Author.
Rinn Corporation. (1983). Intraoral radiography with Rinn
XCP/BAI instruments. Elgin, IL: Dentsply/Rinn Corporation.
White, S. C., & Pharoah, M. J. (2008). Oral radiology: Principles and interpretation (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
OBJECTIVES
Following successful completion of this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Define the key words.
2. Match the bitewing examination with two ideal uses.
3. Describe the bitewing radiographic technique.
4. List the four sizes of image receptors that can be used for bitewing surveys explaining
advantages and disadvantages of each size.
5. Differentiate between horizontal and vertical bitewing radiographs.
6. Identify the type, size, and number of image receptors best suited for a child bitewing
survey.
7. Explain the effect of horizontal angulation on the resultant bitewing image.
8. Identify positive and negative vertical angulations.
9. State the recommended vertical angulation for bitewing exposures.
10. Compare methods used for holding the bitewing image receptor in position.
11. Describe the image receptor placement, horizontal and vertical angulation, and point of
entry for horizontal and vertical posterior bitewing examinations.
12. Describe the image receptor placement, horizontal and vertical angulation, and point of
entry for a vertical anterior bitewing examination.
KEY WORDS
Bitetab
Bitewing radiograph
Contact point
Embrasure
External aiming device
Film loop
Horizontal angulation
Horizontal bitewing radiograph
Interproximal radiograph
Mean tangent
Overlap
Point of entry
Proximal surface
Vertical angulation
Vertical bitewing
radiograph
The Bitewing Examination
CHAPTER
16
CHAPTER
OUTLINE
 Objectives 196
 Key Words 196
 Introduction 197
 Fundamentals
of Bitewing
Radiography 197
 The Radiographic
Examination 198
 Holding the
Bitewing Image
Receptor
in Position 202
 Horizontal
and Vertical
Angulation
Procedures 203
 The Bitewing
Technique 207
 Review, Recall,
Reflect, Relate 212
 References 214
CHAPTER 16 • THE BITEWING EXAMINATION 197
Introduction
Bitewing radiographs are probably the most frequently performed intraoral dental radiographic technique. Bitewings are
most often exposed at the time of regularly scheduled recare or
recall appointments. Bitewing radiographs image the crowns
and alveolar bone of both the maxillary and mandibular teeth
on a single radiograph. The name bitewing is descriptive. Traditionally, the bitewing film packet had a tab, or wing, that was
either attached to the packet by the manufacturer or attached by
the radiographer as a holder (Figures 16-1 and 16-2). The
patient bites on this tab to hold the image receptor in place. The
purpose of this chapter is to present step-by-step procedures for
exposing bitewing radiographs.
Fundamentals of Bitewing Radiography
Bitewing (interproximal) radiographs may be taken as a series
or in conjunction with a full mouth series of periapical radiographs
or with a panoramic radiograph. Bitewing radiographs showing
the crowns and alveolar bone crests of both the maxillary and
mandibular teeth on the same image are ideal for examining
dental caries on the proximal surfaces of the teeth (where adjacent
teeth contact each other in the arch) and periodontal bone levels
supporting the teeth (Figure 16-3). The true value of the bitewing
radiograph is that it reveals caries in the very early stages when
remineralization treatment may be possible. This is particularly
important in the premolar and molar regions, where incipient
(small) caries are often concealed by the wide bucco-lingual
diameters of these teeth. Such caries are frequently unnoticed in
a visual inspection. Bitewing radiographs do not image the entire
tooth and therefore will not reveal apical conditions or lesions.
To expose a bitewing radiograph, the image receptor is positioned near and almost parallel to the teeth of both arches when
FIGURE 16-1 Bitewing tabs and loops. (A) Loop tabs; (B) Stickon tabs; (C) Size #3 film packet with manufacturer-attached tab.
FIGURE 16-2 Bitewing loop for digital sensor.
A B
FIGURE 16-3 (A) Horizontal and (B) vertical bitewing radiographs. Bitewing radiographs
are ideal at imaging the interproximal areas of the teeth to show caries and alveolar bone crests. Note
the increased coverage of the alveolar bone imaged on the vertical bitewing radiograph.
the patient’s teeth are occluded (closed). Bitewing image receptor
placement is often closer to the teeth, and the central ray of the
x-ray beam can be directed at a more ideal angle than for periapical
radiographs (Figure 16-4). With this ideal image receptor placement, the bitewing radiograph often images decay and the height
198 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
are also available in size #3. (see Figure 9-3) The advantage of
these image receptors is that only one image receptor needs to
be exposed on each side of the arch to image both premolars and
all molars on one image. However, when compared with the
standard #2 image receptor, the #3 has two disadvantages. One
is that most dental arches curve so that the horizontal angle
required to clearly image the proximal surfaces of the premolars
is not the same horizontal angle required to clearly image the
proximal surfaces of the molars. There are two slightly divergent
pathways of the posterior teeth. As the central rays pass through
these divergent embrasures, it is not likely that all of the interproximal spaces will be imaged clearly without overlapping.
The other disadvantage is that the long image receptor is
narrower in the vertical dimension than size #2 and may reveal
less of the periodontal crestal bone level (Figure 16-5).
As discussed in Chapter 13, the bitewing examination
may consist of two to eight images. The posterior bitewing
examination consists of either two (one on the left and one on
the right) or four (two on the left and two on the right) images
(Figure 16-6A,B). The image receptor orientation in the oral
cavity may be such that the longer dimension is placed
horizontally or vertically. Traditionally, the image receptor
has been placed horizontally in the posterior region. This
remains the placement of choice for children. However, if
there is a need to image more of the supporting bone, as is the
case in periodontally involved patients, a vertical bitewing is
recommended.
of the alveolar bone crest better than periapical radiographs. It is
because of this improved imaging for these conditions that bitewing
radiographs are taken in conjunction with periapical radiographs
of the same area when exposing a full mouth series.
The Radiographic Examination
Size, Number, and Placement of Image Receptors
The number and size of image receptors to use depends on the
type of survey required and the size and shape of the patient’s
oral cavity (Table 16-1). Additional factors to be considered
when deciding how many and what size image receptor to
select is the length and curvature of the arches, which vary in
all individuals. A single image receptor placed on each side of
the mouth often provides adequate coverage for children, prior to
the eruption of the permanent second molars. Although an
image receptor size #0 or #1 is usually used for a child with
primary teeth, the preferred size for mixed dentition is a #2.
However, tissue sensitivity or anatomical limitations must be
taken into consideration, so size is often based on the individual
patient. The advantage to using the largest size image receptor
possible is that the amount of structures imaged, including the
developing permanent teeth, will be increased. For most adults,
four #2 image receptors (two on each side) are generally preferred.
Size #3 (extra-long) radiographic film packets with preattached tabs are especially made for taking horizontal bitewing
radiographs. Phosphor plates used for indirect digital imaging
PID
Direction of central beam
+10 degrees
Bite
tab
Image receptor
Horizontal occlusal plane
Plane of floor
FIGURE 16-4 Bitewing placement. The
bitewing image receptor placement, slightly angled to
take advantage of the height of the midline of the
palate when the patient occludes, is such that the
coronal portion of both the maxillary and the
mandibular teeth will be recorded on the image. The
close relationship between the teeth and the image
receptor and the ideal angle of the x-ray beam allow
bitewings to accurately image caries and alveolar
bone crests.
TABLE 16-1 Suggested Image Receptor Size and Number to Use for Bitewing Radiographs
IMAGE
RECEPTOR SIZE RECOMMENDED FOR USE WITH THESE PATIENTS
NUMBER AND ORIENTATION
OF IMAGE RECEPTOR
#0 Child with primary dentition 2 horizontal posterior
#1 Child with primary or mixed dentition 2 horizontal posterior
Adult for caries detection or the presence of periodontal disease 3 or 4 vertical anterior
#2 Child with mixed dentition, prior to the eruption of the
permanent second molars
2 horizontal posterior
Adolescent after the eruption of the permanent second molars 4 horizontal posterior
Adult 4 horizontal posterior
Adult with periodontal disease 4 vertical posterior
#3 Adolescent after the eruption of the permanent second molars 2 horizontal posterior
Adult 2 horizontal posterior
CHAPTER 16 • THE BITEWING EXAMINATION 199
The anterior bitewing examination consists of either three
(one just left of center, one centered behind the central incisors,
and one just right of center; Figure 16-6C) or four (two just left of
center and two just right of center) images. The image receptor
orientation in the oral cavity is usually such that the longer
dimension is placed vertically. For ease of placement, especially
when using rigid digital sensors and to avoid bending the film
packet or phosphor plate, the narrow size #1 image receptor is
recommended, especially for imaging the lateral-canine region.
However, a size #2 may be used for the central incisors when the
arch permits. Using a longer bitetab than that used for the posterior
exposures may facilitate positioning the image receptor further
lingually in the mouth to avoid contact with the lingual gingiva or
curvature of the palate when the patient occludes. This may prevent
the film or phosphor plate from bending in the middle as the tab is
pulled forward when the patient is asked to bite down and may
avoid pushing down on or causing the receptor to slant in a way
that compromises the vertical angulation. Two stick-on paper
bitetabs may be attached to lengthen the bitetab for this purpose
(Figure 16-7).
The goal of image receptor placement is to image all contacts
(mesial and distal surfaces) of all of the teeth of interest. It is
important to remember that each bitewing—molar, premolar,
canine, and incisors—has a standard recommended placement.
This means that a premolar bitewing taken at one oral health care
practice will most likely image the same teeth as a premolar bitewing
exposed in every other practice. This standardization is important
to learn.
A
B
FIGURE 16-5 Comparison of size #2 and size #3
image receptors. (A) Size #2 has a shorter horizontal
dimension, taller vertical dimension. (B) Size #3 has a
longer horizontal dimension, shorter vertical dimension.
The incisors and canine radiographs instruct the radiographer to center the teeth of interest in the middle of the image
receptor. However anatomical considerations prevent centering
the premolars and molars. Instead the radiographer should focus
on placing the anterior edge of the image receptor and allow the
receptor, once in the correct position, to capture the images of
the appropriate teeth. For example, when placing the image
receptor for a premolar horizontal or vertical bitewing radiograph, the radiographer should not try to center the first and
second premolars. Because of the curvature of the arches and
the position of the canine, this is not usually possible. The radiographer should focus on placing the anterior edge of the image
receptor so that it lines up behind the distal half of the canine,
and the rest of the teeth should be imaged correctly.
It is important to visually inspect the patient’s occlusion to
determine which canine, maxillary, or mandibular, to use to align
the image receptor for exposure of premolar bitewing radiographs.
The premolar bitewing must image the distal portion of both the
maxillary and the mandibular canines to image the mesial surface
of the first premolar, one of the teeth of interest for this projection.
The radiographer should align the anterior edge of the image
receptor behind the canine that is further forward in the mouth
(the most mesial canine).
When placing the image receptor to image a molar horizontal
or vertical bitewing radiograph, the radiographer should focus
on placing the anterior edge of the image receptor so that it lines
up behind the distal half of the second premolar. Again, a visual
inspection of the patient’s occlusion will determine whether to line
200 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
up the image receptor with the maxillary or the mandibular
second premolar.
Generally, in Class I and III occlusal relationships, the radiographer will choose to align the anterior edge of the image receptor
behind the distal half of the mandibular canine for a premolar
bitewing radiograph and behind the distal half of the mandibular
second premolar for a molar bitewing radiograph. When a Class II
occlusal relationship presents, the radiographer will most likely
choose to align the anterior edge of the image receptor behind the
distal half of the maxillary canine for a premolar bitewing radiograph
and behind the distal half of the maxillary second premolar for a
molar bitewing radiograph (Figure 16-8). It should be noted that
patients often present with different occlusal relationships on the
right and left sides or individual teeth that are malaligned or
missing. It is important to perform a visual inspection prior to
each placement.
It is important to also position the image receptor well into
the oral cavity, a slight distance from the lingual surfaces of the
maxillary teeth, taking advantage of the midline where the palate
is at its highest to accommodate the image receptor and facilitate
correct stabilization and vertical alignment with the x-ray beam.
According to the shadow casting principles (see Chapter 13), the
image receptor should be positioned as close to the object (tooth)
as possible. However, if the image receptor is placed too close to
the maxillary teeth, especially in the premolar and anterior
regions, the top edge of the receptor may contact the lingual
gingiva or curvature of the palate when the patient occludes,
pushing down on or causing the receptor to slant away from the
correct position (Figure 16-9). A sloping or slanting (tilted)
occlusal plane is a frequent reason for having to retake bitewing
radiographs.
FIGURE 16-7 Two stick-on bitetabs lengthen the holder for use
in the anterior region.
A
B
C
FIGURE 16-6 Horizontal and vertical bitewing series. (A) Set of two horizontal posterior bitewing radiographs.
(B) Set of four horizontal posterior bitewing radiographs. (C) Set of seven vertical bitewing radiographs, including posterior
and anterior images.
CHAPTER 16 • THE BITEWING EXAMINATION 201
A
B
C
FIGURE 16-8 Occlusal relationships. (A) Class I occlusion
demonstrating that the mandibular canine and second premolar
(shaded) are located further forward in the oral cavity. (B) Class II
occlusion demonstrating that the maxillary canine and second
premolar (shaded) are located further forward in the oral cavity.
(C) Class III occlusion demonstrating that the mandibular canine
and second premolar (shaded) are located further forward in the oral
cavity.
FIGURE 16-9 Tilted image. The slanted occlusal plane
observed on this radiograph resulted from a failure to place the
image receptor far enough lingually to avoid being pushed down
by the palate when the patient occluded onto the bitetab.
PRACTICE POINT
Although contact with the lingual gingiva or curvature of the
palate or other obstruction such as tori is the most likely
cause of a tilted or slanting occlusal plane, other causes
include (1) failure of the patient to maintain a steady pressure
occluding on the bitetab, (2) patient swallowing while the
exposure is being made, (3) incorrect or slanted placement
of the bitetab or image receptor holder. The best corrective
action is to position the image receptor far enough away
from the lingual surfaces of the maxillary teeth to avoid
premature and excessive contact with the palate. Other
corrective actions include selecting the appropriately sized
image receptor and providing the patient with specific
instructions about securely biting on the bitetab and not
swallowing during exposure.
Sequence of Placement
It is recommended to always follow a systematic order when taking
radiographs to prevent errors and for efficiency (Table 16-2).
TABLE 16-2 Recommended Sequence for Exposing
Bitewing Radiographs
BITEWING SERIES RECOMMENDED SEQUENCE
2 posterior 1st: right premolar *
2nd: left premolar
4 posterior 1st: right premolar *
2nd: right molar
3rd: left premolar
4th: left molar
7 anterior and posterior 1st: central-lateral incisors
2nd: left canine *
3rd: right canine
4th: right premolar
5th: right molar
6th: left premolar
7th: left molar
8 anterior and posterior 1st: left canine *
2nd: left central-lateral incisors
3rd: right central-lateral incisors
4th: right canine
5th: right premolar
6th: right molar
7th: left premolar
8th: left molar
Left-handed radiographers may choose to begin the exposures on the
opposite side.
*
202 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
Chapter 13 explained at what point to take bitewing radiographs
when exposing a full mouth series. When exposing a set of four
posterior bitewings alone, it is recommended that the premolar
bitewing on one side be exposed first, followed by the molar
bitewing on the same side. Placing the image receptor for exposure
of the premolar may be more comfortable for the patient and less
likely to excite a gag reflex, gaining the patient’s confidence for
the molar placements that may sometimes be more difficult.
Then the premolar and molar bitewing on the opposite should be
exposed. Completing both the premolar and molar bitewing radiographs on one side first will avoid shifting the tube head back
and forth across the patient.
PRACTICE POINT
When using a stick-on tab holder, follow these steps for placement (Figure 16-10).
A B
C D
FIGURE 16-10 Bitewing placement using a stick-on tab. (A) Insert the image receptor completely into the
patient’s mouth. (B) Rotate until the image receptor is in a vertical position. Inserting in this manner allows the
image receptor to move the tongue out of the way. (C) Using the index finger of one hand, hold the bitetab firmly
against the occlusal surface of the mandibular teeth while the index finger of the other hand angles the top edge of
the image receptor into the midline of the palate. (D) Instruct the patient to close so that the teeth occlude normally.
Failure to hold the tab firmly may lead to a drift lingually and distally and increase the possibility that the tongue
will move the image receptor out of the correct position.
Holding the Bitewing Image Receptor
in Position
There are many commercially made holders for stabilizing a
film packet, phosphor plate, or digital sensor for bitewing exposures.
Stick-on paper or plastic bitetabs have the most versatility
because they can be fastened to the image receptor for both
horizontal and vertical bitewings. The paper or plastic film loop
into which a film packet or digital sensor can be slid is limited
to horizontal bitewings. Bitetabs and loops are easy to use,
disposable, and readily tolerated by the patient. Bitetabs must
be attached to the white unprinted side (front) of the film packet
CHAPTER 16 • THE BITEWING EXAMINATION 203
Image receptor
holder
Image receptor
Bitewing biteblock
Positioning arm
Aiming ring
FIGURE 16-11 Bitewing image receptor holder with metal
positioning arm and plastic external aiming ring.
(Courtesy of Dentsply Rinn.)
Many holders (including the Dentsply Rinn XCP® and Flow
Dental RAPD® introduced in Chapter 14) designed for positioning
the image receptor for periapical radiographs include a bitewing
biteblock that can be used with the metal positioning arm and
plastic external aiming ring to assist with locating correct angles
and points of entry, making errors less likely (Figure 16-11). The
external aiming device also eliminates the need to position the
patient’s head precisely. Biteblock image receptor holder attachments
are available for both horizontal and vertical bitewings. It should
be noted that the plastic biteblock on some holders is wider than
paper/plastic bitetabs and loops and may prevent the patient from
biting down far enough to image the greatest amount of alveolar
bone (Figure 16-12). This is especially important when periodontal disease is suspected or present. To overcome this disadvantage,
the vertical bitewing biteblock attachment can be substituted.
Regardless of the holder used, care should be taken to
ensure that the image receptor is positioned in such a manner
that it is evenly divided between the maxillary and mandibular teeth. Once the image receptor is satisfactorily positioned,
the patient must close down on the tab or biteblock in an
edge-to-edge relationship and hold it there for the duration of
the exposure.
It is important to note that if an image receptor holder with
an external aiming device is not positioned correctly, the aiming
device will indicate directing the x-ray beam to the wrong place.
For this reason, it is important that the radiographer develop the
skills necessary to evaluate placement of the image receptor for
correctness, regardless of the holder used.
or the plain side of the phosphor plate or digital sensor (over the
plastic infection control barrier; see Chapter 10) so that this
side will face the PID (x-rays) when placed intraorally.
Generally the bitetab or loop is visible extraorally after the
patient bites down to stabilize the image receptor. This extension
of the tab serves as a guide for directing the central rays toward
the center of the image receptor. Without a significantly visible
external aiming device,some operators find it difficult to determine
the correct horizontal and vertical angulations and centering of
the image receptor within the x-ray beam.
Horizontal and Vertical Angulation
Procedures
The correct horizontal and vertical angulations are critical to
producing a quality bitewing radiograph.
Horizontal Angulation is the positioning of the central ray
(PID) in a horizontal (side-to-side) plane and is of critical importance when exposing bitewing radiographs. The horizontal angulation for bitewing exposures is the same as that used for
periapical radiographs of the same region (see Chapter 14). The
central ray (PID) should be directed perpendicular to the curvature of the arch or mean tangent, through the contact points of
the teeth (see Figure 13-8). To rely on the image receptor
holder’s external aiming ring to accurately direct the central ray
perpendicularly (at a right angle) toward the surface of the image
receptor in a horizontal plane, the image receptor itself must be
positioned parallel to the teeth of interest in the horizontal
dimension. The image receptor must be positioned parallel to the
interproximal space or embrasure of two predetermined teeth.
The teeth selected depend on the region being imaged. Table 16-3
A
B
FIGURE 16-12 Holder comparison. (A) Bitewing radiograph
taken using a disposable paper stick-on bitetab. (B) Bitewing
radiograph taken using a thicker plastic, autoclavable image receptor
holding device. Notice the wider space between the occlusal surfaces
of the maxillary and mandibular teeth.
204
TABLE 16-3 Summary of Steps for Acquiring Bitewing Radiographs
BITEWING
RADIOGRAPH PLACEMENT
VERTICAL
ANGULATION*
HORIZONTAL
ANGULATION POINT OF ENTRY*
Central incisors (vertical)
(image receptor size #1 or
size #2) (Figure 16-17)
Center the image receptor to line up behind the
central and lateral incisors; if using a size #2
image receptor, include the mesial halves of
the canines.
Align the image receptor parallel to the long axes
of the incisors and parallel to the left and right
central incisor embrasure.
+10 Direct the central ray perpendicular to the image receptor
through the left and right
central incisor embrasure.
Center the image receptor within
the x-ray beam by directing the
central ray at the center of the
image receptor at a spot on the
incisal plane between the maxillary and mandibular central
incisors.
Canine (vertical) (image
receptor size #1 or size
#2) (Figure 16-18)
Center the image receptor to line up behind the
maxillary and mandibular canines; include the
lateral incisor and the first premolar
Align the image receptor parallel to the long axes
of the canines and parallel to the mesial and
distal line angles of the canines.
+10 Direct the central ray perpendicular to the image receptor at
the center of the canine.
To minimize distal overlap of
the canine with the lingual
cusp of the first premolar
shift the PID no more than
10 degrees toward the
distal.
Center the image receptor within the
x-ray beam by directing the central ray at the center of the image
receptor at a spot on the incisal
plane between the maxillary and
mandibular canines.
Premolar (horizontal or vertical) (image receptor size
#2) (Figure 16-19)
Align the anterior edge of the image receptor to line
up behind the distal half of the maxillary or
mandibular canine. Choose the most mesially
positioned canine; include the first and second
premolars and mesial half of the first molar.
Align the image receptor parallel to the long axes
of the premolars and parallel to the first and second premolar embrasure.
+10 Direct the central ray perpendicular to the image receptor
through the first and second
premolar embrasure.
Center the image receptor within
the x-ray beam by directing the
central ray at the center of the
image receptor at a spot on the
occlusal plane between the
maxillary and mandibular second premolars.
205
Molar (horizontal or vertical) (image receptor
size #2)
(Figure 16-20)
Align the anterior edge of the image receptor to line up behind the distal half of the
maxillary or mandibular second premolar. Choose the most mesially located
second premolar; include the first, second, third molars (horizontal placement); include the first, second molars
(vertical placement)
Align the image receptor parallel to the long
axes of the molars and parallel to the first
and second molar embrasure.
+10 Direct the central ray perpendicular to the image receptor through the first and
second molar embrasure.
Center the image receptor
within the x-ray beam by
directing the central ray at
the center of the image
receptor at a spot on the
occlusal plane between the
maxillary and mandibular
first molars.
Premolar-molar (image
receptor size #3)
Align the anterior edge of image receptor to
line up behind the distal half of the maxillary or the mandibular canine. Choose the
most mesially located canine; include all
premolars and molars on the image.
+10 Direct the central ray perpendicular to the image
receptor through the second premolar and first
molar embrasure.
Center the image receptor
within the x-ray beam by
directing the central ray at
the center of the image
receptor at a spot on the
occlusal plane between the
maxillary and mandibular
second premolars.
Molar (child) (horizontal) (image receptor
size #1 or size #2)
Align the anterior edge of the image receptor
to line up behind the distal half of the
maxillary or the mandibular canine.
Choose the most mesially located canine;
include the remaining erupted teeth on the
image.
+5 to +10 Direct the central ray perpendicular to the image receptor through the first and
second primary molar
embrasure; or, if erupted,
the first and second premolar embrasure.
Center the image receptor
within the x-ray beam by
directing the central ray at
the center of the image
receptor at a spot on the
occlusal plane between the
primary maxillary and
mandibular first molars; or,
if erupted, the maxillary
and mandibular second
premolars.
*The patient must be seated in the correct position, with the occlusal plane parallel to the floor and the midsaggital plane perpendicular to the floor.
206 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
VERTICAL ANGULATION The correct vertical angulation for
bitewing radiographs is degrees. (A degree vertical
angulation is sometimes recommended for children. See Chapter
26.) Positioning the PID at this slightly downward position will
more likely match the vertical slant of the image receptor when
it is correctly placed into the oral cavity (Figure 16-4). Because
bitewing radiographs are placed to image both the maxillary and
the mandibular teeth on one image, consideration is given to the
+10 +5
A
B
C
FIGURE 16-13 Horizontal angulation. (A) Mesiodistal
projection of the x-ray beam shown here deviates from a right angle by
about 15º, resulting in greater overlap of the contacts in the posterior
region of the radiograph. (B) Correct horizontal projection of the x-ray
beam produces no overlapping. (C) Distomesial projection of the x-ray
beam shown here deviates from a right angle about 15º, resulting in
greater overlap of the contacts in the anterior region of the radiograph.
A
B
FIGURE 16-14 Horizontal overlap error. (A) When the PID is
directed obliquely from the mesial (mesiodistal projection of the
x-ray beam), the overlapping will be more severe in the distal or
posterior region of the image. (B) When the horizontal angulation is
directed obliquely from the distal (distomesial projection of the x-ray
beam), the overlapping will be more severe in the mesial or anterior
region of the image.
lists the embrasure to align the image receptor behind and
through which to direct the central ray for each projection. The
central ray must be directed appropriately to avoid overlapping
adjacent teeth on the resultant image (Figure 16-13). The contact points should appear open or separate from each other on
the resultant radiograph. When the horizontal angulation is
directed obliquely from the mesial, the overlapping will be more
severe in the distal or posterior region of the image; when the
horizontal angulation is directed obliquely from the distal, the
overlapping will be more severe in the mesial or anterior region
of the image (Figure 16-14). Because bitewing radiographs are
taken to reveal information about the interproximal areas of the
teeth, radiographs with overlapping error are undiagnostic.
It is important to note that even with correct horizontal
angulation, the canine bitewing will often exhibit significant
overlap of the distal portion of the canines with the mesial
portions of the first premolars. The anatomical positions of
the canines, which are anterior teeth, and the premolars,
which are posterior teeth, is such that the lingual cusp of the
first premolar is often superimposed over the distal edge of the
canine. To minimize this occurrence the horizontal angulation
should first be aligned correctly to direct the central ray of
the x-ray beam perpendicular to the image receptor at the
center of the canine and then shift the PID no more than 10
degrees toward the distal (see Chapter 28).
anatomic positions of the teeth in both arches. In the posterior
region, the maxillary teeth have a slight buccal inclination, whereas
the mandibular teeth often have a slight lingual inclination. This
anatomical relationship allows a slight degree slant to the
image receptor. Positioning the PID to match this angle will
produce the best image. In addition, adjusting the vertical angulation
of the PID to degrees will match the slight angle the image
receptor takes on when the patient closes and the palate pushes
down against the receptor in both the posterior and the anterior
regions. If using an image receptor holder with an external aiming device, it is important that the patient occludes fully on the
biteblock so that the aiming ring will direct the operator to the
correct vertical angle.
Incorrect vertical angulation results in an unequal distribution of the arches on the radiograph. A quality bitewing radiograph should image an equal portion of the maxillary and
mandibular teeth plus a portion of the supporting bone. When
the vertical angulation is excessive (greater than ), more +10°
+10
+10
CHAPTER 16 • THE BITEWING EXAMINATION 207
PRACTICE POINT
To avoid molar overlap follow these steps for placement
(Figure 16-15).
Aiming device (ring)
Aiming device (ring)
Image
receptor
Image
receptor
Biteblock
Biteblock
PID
PID
A
B
FIGURE 16-15 Avoiding molar overlap when using
a holder with external aiming device. (Courtesy of
Dentsply Rinn.) (A) Note the recommended premolar
bitewing placement positions the image receptor
slightly diagonal with the front edge of the image
receptor farther from the lingual of the teeth than the
back part. (B) Because the proximal surfaces of the
molar teeth are in a mesiodistal relationship to the
sagittal plane, it is recommended that the image
receptor be positioned perpendicularly to the
embrasures, resulting in a diagonal placement similar to
the premolar position.
Point of Entry
The point of entry for the central ray for all bitewing exposures
is on the level of the incisal or occlusal plane (near the lip line) at
a point opposite the center of the image receptor and through the
interproximal spaces of the teeth of interest (Figure 16-4). An
image receptor holder with an external aiming device will assist
with determining the accurate point of entry. Incorrect point of
entry, or not centering the image receptor within the x-ray beam,
will result in conecut error, where the portion of the image receptor that was not in the path of the x-ray beam will be clear or
blank on the resultant radiograph (see Figures 18-7 and 18-8).
The Bitewing Technique
Figures 16-17 through 16-20 illustrate the precise image
receptor positions and required angulations for each of the
horizontal and vertical bitewing radiographs discussed in this
chapter. See Table 16-3 for a summary of the four basic steps
of the technique—placement, vertical angulation, horizontal
angulation, and point of entry.
maxillary teeth and bone are imaged, cutting off a portion of
the mandibular structures. When the vertical angulation is
inadequate (less than ), more mandibular teeth and bone
are imaged, cutting off a portion of the maxillary structures
(Figure 16-16).
+10°
FIGURE 16-16 Vertical angulation error. (A) Inadequate
vertical angulation results in imaging more of the mandible.
(B) Excessive vertical angulation results in imaging more
of the maxilla.
A
B
FIGURE 16-17 Central incisors bitewing exposure. (A) Diagrams show the relationship of the image receptor and holder, teeth, and PID.
(B) Vertical angulation is directed perpendicular to the image receptor at approximately with the PID tilted downward. Central ray is
directed at the center of the image receptor at a spot on the incisal plane between the maxillary and mandibular teeth. (C) Patient showing
position of image receptor holder and 12-in. (30-cm) circular PID. (D) Central incisor bitewing radiograph. In the anterior region, the image
receptor is positioned with the long dimension vertical.
+10°
A
Aiming device (ring)
Image
receptor
Biteblock
C D
BITEWING TECHNIQUE
Central Incisors Bitewing Exposure
PID
Image
receptor
PID
Direction of central beam
+10 degrees
Plane of floor
B
208 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
CHAPTER 16 • THE BITEWING EXAMINATION 209
FIGURE 16-18 Canine bitewing exposure. (A) Diagrams show the relationship of the image receptor and holder, teeth, and PID.
(B) Vertical angulation is directed perpendicular to the image receptor at approximately with the PID tilted downward. Central ray is
directed at the center of the image receptor at a spot on the incisal plane between the maxillary and mandibular teeth. (C) Patient showing
position of image receptor holder and 12-in. (30-cm) circular PID. (D) Canine bitewing radiograph. In the anterior region, the image receptor is
positioned with the long dimension vertical.
+10°
C D
A
Aiming device (ring)
Image
receptor
Biteblock
BITEWING TECHNIQUE
Canine Bitewing Exposure
PID
Image
receptor
PID
Direction of central beam
+10 degrees
Plane of floor
B
210 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
C
D E
A
Aiming device (ring) Image
receptor
Bite block
BITEWING TECHNIQUE
Premolar Bitewing Exposure
PID Image
receptor
Direction of central beam
+10 degrees
Plane of floor
B
FIGURE 16-19 Premolar bitewing exposure. (A) Diagrams show the relationship of the image receptor and holder, teeth, and PID.
(B) Vertical angulation is directed perpendicular to the image receptor at approximately degrees with the PID tilted downward. Central ray
is directed at the center of the image receptor at a spot on the occlusal plane between the maxillary and mandibular teeth. (C) Patient showing
position of image receptor holder and 12-in. (30-cm) circular PID. (D) Horizontal premolar bitewing radiograph. (E) Vertical premolar bitewing
radiograph. In the posterior region, the image receptor may be positioned with the long dimension horizontal or vertical.
+10
l be
FIGURE 16-20 Molar bitewing exposure. (A) Diagrams show the relationship of the image receptor and holder, teeth, and PID.
(B) Vertical angulation is directed perpendicular to the image receptor at approximately degrees with the PID tilted downward. Central ray
is directed at the center of the image receptor at a spot on the occlusal plane between the maxillary and mandibular teeth. (C) Patient showing
position of image receptor holder and 12-in. (30-cm) circular PID. (D) Horizontal molar bitewing radiograph. (E) Vertical molar bitewing
radiograph. In the posterior region, the image receptor may be positioned with the long dimension horizontal or vertical.
+10
CHAPTER 16 • THE BITEWING EXAMINATION 211
BITEWING TECHNIQUE
Molar Bitewing Exposure
C
D E
B
PID
Direction of central beam
+10 degrees
Plane of floor
A
Aiming device (ring) Image
receptor
PID
Bite
tab Image receptor
212 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
REVIEW—Chapter summary
Bitewing radiographs image the coronal portion of both maxillary
and mandibular teeth on one image receptor. Bitewing radiographs supplement and complete the full mouth survey because
of their improved ability to image incipient caries in the tooth contact areas and early resorptive changes in the alveolar bony crest.
The size and number of images to expose depend on the
type of survey required and the size and shape of the patient’s
oral cavity. The image receptor may be positioned with the long
dimension horizontally or vertically. Traditionally posterior
bitewing radiographs have been positioned horizontally. Anterior bitewing radiographs are positioned vertically. Vertical
positioning in the posterior regions image more periodontal
bone. The patient’s occlusal relationship should be used to
determine which arch the radiographer should focus on during
placement of the image receptor. Positioning the image receptor a slight distance away from the lingual surfaces of the maxillary teeth of interest will help avoid contact with the curvature
of the palate and avoid producing a sloping or slanted image
that may result in a retake. Using a systemic order of sequence
in exposing bitewing radiographs will help avoid errors.
Image receptor holders/positioners include stick-on or loop
bitetabs and instruments with external aiming devices that assist
with determining the correct horizontal and vertical angulations
and the points of entry. If a holder without an external aiming
device is used, the horizontal angulation is determined by directing the central ray of the x-beam perpendicular to the recording
plane of the image receptor through the mean tangent of the
embrasures between the teeth of interest, and the vertical angulation for all bitewing radiographs is degrees. When the
horizontal angulation is directed obliquely from the mesial,
overlapping will be more severe in the distal or posterior region
of the image; when the horizontal angulation is directed
obliquely from the distal, overlapping will be more severe in the
mesial or anterior region of the image. When the vertical angulation is excessive (greater than ), more maxillary teeth
and bone are imaged, cutting off a portion of the mandibular
structures. When the vertical angulation is inadequate (less than
) more mandibular teeth and bone are imaged, cutting off a
portion of the maxillary structures. Directing the central ray of
the x-ray beam at the level of the incisal/occlusal plane (at the
lip line) will assist with directing the central ray of the x-ray
beam to the center of the image receptor to avoid conecut error.
The four basic steps to exposing a bitewing radiograph are
placement, vertical angulation, horizontal angulation, and point
of entry. Step-by-step illustrated instructions for exposing anterior and posterior bitewing radiographs are presented.
RECALL—Study questions
1. Which of these conditions would NOT be visible on a
bitewing radiograph?
a. Proximal surface caries
b. Overhanging restoration
c. Apical abscess
d. Alveolar crest resorption
+10°
+10°
+10
2. How many standard-sized #2 image receptors are recommended for a posterior horizontal bitewing survey of
an adult patient?
a. 2
b. 4
c. 7
d. 8
3. In which of the following situations would using a size
#3 image receptor be acceptable?
a. Horizontal bitewings on a child patient who presented
a need for them
b. Horizontal bitewings on an adult patient for caries
detection
c. Horizontal bitewings on an adult patient with periodontal disease
d. Vertical bitewings on any patient who presented with
a need for them
4. In which of the following conditions would vertical
bitewing radiographs be recommended over horizontal
bitewing radiographs?
a. Child with rampant caries
b. Adolescent with suspected third molar impactions
c. Adult with malaligned teeth
d. Adult with periodontal disease
5. Which size image receptor is used, and how is it positioned for exposure of an anterior bitewing radiograph
of a small and narrow adult arch?
a. Size #3 placed vertically
b. Size #2 placed horizontally
c. Size #1 placed vertically
d. Size #0 placed horizontally
6. When taking a premolar horizontal bitewing
radiograph, the anterior edge of the image receptor
should be positioned behind the distal edge of the
maxillary canine when presented with which occlusal
relationship?
a. Class I
b. Class II
c. Class III
7. When taking a set of eight vertical bitewing radiographs, which of the following should be exposed
first?
a. Left molar bitewing
b. Left premolar bitewing
c. Right canine bitewing
d. Right premolar bitewing
8. Which of the following best fits this description: “Disposable, may be used for placing both horizontal and
vertical bitewings, and provides increased imaging of
the alveolar bone”?
a. Stick-on bitetabs
b. Manufacturer preattached bitetabs
c. Bite loops
d. Holder with external aiming device
CHAPTER 16 • THE BITEWING EXAMINATION 213
9. An error in which of these results in overlapping?
a. Placement of image receptor
b. Point of entry
c. Vertical angulation
d. Horizontal angulation
10. What is the approximate vertical angulation for adult
bitewing radiographs?
a. degrees
b. 0 degrees
c. degrees
d. degrees
11. An error in vertical angulation will result in
a. unequal distribution of the arches.
b. overlapping.
c. overexposure to the patient.
d. conecut.
12. The image receptor placement for an adult horizontal
molar bitewing is to align the receptor so that the
a. central and lateral incisors are centered.
b. canine is centered.
c. anterior portion of the receptor lines up behind the
distal half of the canine.
d. anterior portion of the receptor lines up behind the
distal half of the second premolar.
13. The image receptor placement for an adult vertical premolar bitewing is to align the receptor so that the
a. central and lateral incisors are centered.
b. canine is centered.
c. anterior portion of the receptor lines up behind the
distal half of the canine.
d. anterior portion of the receptor lines up behind the
distal half of the second premolar.
+20
+10
-10
14. Through which interproximal space should the central
ray of the x-ray beam be perpendicularly directed when
exposing a molar bitewing on a child with primary
teeth?
a. Between the central and lateral incisors
b. Between the lateral incisor and canine
c. Between the canine and first molar
d. Between the first and second molars
15. Through which interproximal space should the central
ray of the x-ray beam be perpendicularly directed when
exposing a premolar bitewing on an adolescent with
permanent teeth?
a. Between the central and lateral incisors
b. Between the lateral incisor and canine
c. Between the canine and first premolar
d. Between the first and second premolars
REFLECT—Case study
Study the dental chart and patient record that follows. Note the
dentist’s written prescription for a radiographic examination.
Decide the following:
1. What type of bitewings will most likely be exposed?
2. What size image receptor will best fit this patient?
3. How many image receptors will be required to complete the exam?
4. Write out a detailed procedure for exposing each of the
required radiographs. Include:
a. Specific image receptor placements
b. The vertical angulation required
c. How the horizontal angulation will be determined
d. What the point of entry will be
Clinically visible restoration
Clinically visible carious lesion
Clinically missing tooth
Case: New patient to your practice.
Age/Gender: 40-year-old male.
Medical History: Hypertension.
Dental History: Has had extensive dental treatment
in the past as evidenced by several
extractions and restored teeth.
Social History: Appears nervous of dental treatment.
Chief Complaint: Thinks he has “gum disease.”
Current Oral Generalized 4–6 mm pockets;
Hygiene Status: Generalized moderate gingivitis.
Initial Treatment: Take a set of bitewing radiographs.
Probe
Probe
Probe
Probe
R
R
214 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
RELATE—Laboratory application
For a comprehensive laboratory practice exercise on this
topic, see Thomson, E. M. (2012). Exercises in oral radiography techniques: A laboratory manual (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. Chapter 2, “Bitewing radiographic
technique.”
REFERENCES
Eastman Kodak Company. (2002). Successful intraoral radiography. Rochester, NY: Author.
Rinn Corporation. (1989). Intraoral radiography with Rinn
XCP/BAI instruments. Elgin, IL: Dentsply/Rinn Corporation.
White, S. C., & Pharoah, M. J. (2008). Oral radiology: Principles and interpretation (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
Wilkins, E. M. (2010). Clinical practice of the dental hygienist
(10th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
OBJECTIVES
Following successful completion of this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Define the key words.
2. State the purpose of the occlusal examination.
3. List the indications for occlusal radiographs.
4. Match the topographical and cross-sectional techniques with the condition to be imaged.
5. Compare the patient head positions for the topographical and the cross-sectional techniques.
6. Demonstrate the steps for the maxillary and mandibular topographical surveys.
7. Demonstrate the steps for the mandibular cross-sectional survey.
KEY WORDS
Cross-sectional technique
Occlusal radiograph
Topographical technique
The Occlusal Examination
CHAPTER
17
CHAPTER
OUTLINE
 Objectives 215
 Key Words 215
 Introduction 216
 Types of Occlusal
Examinations 216
 Fundamentals
of Occlusal
Radiographs 216
 Horizontal
and Vertical
Angulation
Procedures 217
 Points of Entry 218
 The Occlusal
Examination 219
 Review, Recall,
Reflect, Relate 225
 References 226
216 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
Introduction
The purpose of the occlusal examination is to view large areas
of the maxilla (upper jaw) or the mandible (lower jaw) on one
radiograph. The image receptor is placed in the mouth
between the occlusal surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular
teeth. The patient occludes (bites) lightly on the image receptor
to stabilize it.
The purpose of this chapter is to discuss the use and
explain the procedures for the occlusal examination.
Types of Occlusal Examinations
Occlusal radiographs are either topographical or cross-sectional.
Topographical Technique
The topographical technique produces an image that looks
like a large periapical radiograph (Figure 17-1). The topographical occlusal technique is similar to the bisecting technique used to produce periapical radiographs (see Chapter
15). Topographical occlusal radiographs may be exposed in
any area of the oral cavity, the anterior and posterior regions
of both the maxilla and the mandible. Topographical
occlusal radiographs are best used to image conditions of
the teeth and supporting structures when a larger area than
that imaged by a periapical radiograph is required. Topographical occlusal surveys generally yield a greater amount
of information in the alveolar crest and apical areas than
periapical radiographs.
Cross-sectional Technique
The cross-sectional technique produces an image much like
its name implies (Figure 17-1). The circular or elliptical
appearance of the teeth on the radiograph and the increased
coverage of the sublingual area (under the tongue) allow the
cross-sectional occlusal radiograph to yield more information
about the location of tori and impacted or malpositioned teeth
and calcifications of soft tissues.
Fundamentals of Occlusal Radiographs
The occlusal examination may be made alone or to supplement
periapical or bitewing radiographs. The large size #4 occlusal
image receptor is useful for recording information that cannot
be adequately recorded on the smaller periapical image receptors. Occlusal radiographs are used to:
• Locate supernumerary, unerupted, or impacted teeth (especially impacted canines and third molars)
• Locate retained roots of extracted teeth
• Detect the presence, locate, and evaluate the extent of disease and lesions (cysts, tumors, etc.)
• Locate foreign bodies in the jaws
• Reveal the presence of salivary stones (sialoliths) in the
ducts of the sublingual and submandibular glands
• Aid in evaluating fractures of the maxilla or mandible
• Show the size and shape of mandibular tori
A B
FIGURE 17-1 A comparison of topographical and cross-sectional occlusal radiographs. (A) The
topographical occlusal radiograph of the anterior mandible closely resembles a periapical radiograph.
Note how the large occlusal film images a larger portion of the region. (B) The cross-sectional occlusal
radiograph of the mandibular anterior region reveals more information about the sublingual area
(under the tongue) and conditions of the soft tissue than about the teeth and the supporting bone.
CHAPTER 17 • THE OCCLUSAL EXAMINATION 217
• Aid in examining patients with trismus who can open their
mouths only a few millimeters
• Evaluate the borders of the maxillary sinus
• Examine cleft palate patients
• Substitute for a periapical examination on young children
who may not be able to tolerate periapical image receptor
placement (see Chapter 26)
Occlusal radiographs may be taken in any region of the
oral cavity. This chapter focuses on five of the most common
standard placements:
1. Maxillary topographical (anterior)
2. Maxillary topographical (posterior)
3. Mandibular topographical (anterior)
4. Mandibular topographical (posterior)
5. Mandibular cross-sectional
Image Receptor Requirements
The large #4 film or phosphor
plate is used for occlusal radiographs on most adult patients.
Currently this larger size #4 is not available as a digital sensor. Smaller size #2 intraoral image receptors may also be
used, depending on the area to be examined. The standard #2
periapical film or sensor is frequently used with children,
either to image labiolingual or buccolingual unerupted tooth
positions or in place of periapical radiographs when needed.
Orientation of the Image Receptor
An image receptor holder is not used for occlusal radiographs.
The image receptor is held in place during the exposure by
slight pressure of the teeth of the opposite jaw.
When using a size #4 film, the packet is positioned with
the white unprinted side (front side) against the arch of interest.
When using a phosphor plate, the plain side is positioned
against the arch of interest. When imaging the mandibular arch,
the white, unprinted side of the image receptor will face the
mandible. When imaging the maxillary arch, the white,
unprinted side of the image receptor will face the maxilla. The
image receptor may be placed into the mouth with the long
dimension positioned horizontally or vertically, centered over
one small region of interest or over the entire right or left sides
of the dental arches. The position used will depend on the type
of occlusal radiograph needed and the area to be imaged.
In the correct position, the image receptor should be
placed well back into the mouth, but with at least 1/4 in.
(1/2 cm) protruding outside the mouth to avoid cutting off
part of the image. Because the embossed identification dot
(on the film packet) should be positioned away from the area
of interest, positioning it toward the anterior should leave it
outside the mouth and therefore prevent it from interfering
with the image.
Patient Positioning
Because predetermined vertical angulations and points of
entry are utilized in taking occlusal radiographs (just as
3 * 2 1/4 in. 17.7 * 5.8 cm2
they are for periapical radiographs using the bisecting technique), it is very important that the patient be seated with
the head in the correct position for the area to be imaged.
For occlusal radiographs taken on the maxilla, the patient
should be seated with the occlusal plane parallel to the
plane of the floor and the midsagittal plane perpendicular to
the plane of the floor (see Figure 13-14). The head position
for the mandibular exposures will depend on the type of
occlusal radiograph to be produced. Topographical occlusal
radiographs of the mandible may be taken with the head
positioned the same as for maxillary exposures, with the
occlusal plane parallel to the floor and the midsagittal plane
perpendicular to the floor. Mandibular cross-sectional
occlusal radiographs are taken with the patient reclined in
the chair so that the head is tipped back, positioning the
occlusal plane perpendicular to the plane of the floor
(Figure 17-2).
Exposure Factors
The exposure factors (kVp, mA, and time) used for occlusal
radiographs are usually the same as those settings used for
periapical and bitewing radiographs of the same region.
Horizontal and Vertical Angulation
Procedures
Horizontal Angulation
The correct horizontal angulation for topographical occlusal
radiographs is determined in the same manner as for periapical and bitewing radiographs; by directing the central rays at
the image receptor perpendicularly through the teeth embrasures (spaces). When exposing anterior topographical
occlusal radiographs, direct the central rays of the x-ray beam
perpendicular to the image receptor through the interproximal
embrasures of the anterior teeth. When exposing posterior
topographical occlusal radiographs, direct the central rays of
the x-ray beam perpendicular to the image receptor through
Floor
X-ray unit
Image receptor
FIGURE 17-2 Patient positioning for mandibular crosssectional occlusal radiographs. Patient reclined in the chair so
that the head is tipped back, positioning the occlusal plane
perpendicular to the plane of the floor. The central rays of the x-ray
beam are directed toward the image receptor perpendicularly.
218 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
Image receptor
Bisector
of angle
Central ray
Central ray
90°
B
A
90° Bisector
of angle
FIGURE 17-3 Angulation theory of topographical occlusal
radiographs. The image receptor placement for occlusal
radiographs is not parallel to the long axes of the teeth being
imaged. Based on the bisecting technique, vertical angulation for
(A) maxillary and (B) mandibular topographical radiographs is
determined by directing the central rays of the x-ray beam
perpendicular to the imaginary bisector between the plane of the
image receptor and the long axes of the teeth of interest.
the interproximal spaces or embrasures of the posterior teeth.
The horizontal angulation for the mandibular cross-sectional
is also such that the central rays will intersect the image
receptor perpendicularly. This alignment is best determined
by positioning the open end of the PID parallel to the image
receptor.
Vertical Angulation
The vertical angulation for topographical occlusal radiographs
follows the rules of the bisecting technique used for periapical
radiographs, where the central rays of the x-ray beam are
directed through the apices of the teeth perpendicularly toward
the bisector (Figure 17-3). To determine the correct vertical
angulation when taking a topographical occlusal radiograph,
the radiographer must observe the plane of the image receptor,
locate the long axes of the teeth of interest, and estimate the
imaginary bisector of these two planes. If the patient’s head is
in the correct position, the radiographer can use predetermined
vertical angulation settings (Table 17-1).
The vertical angulation for the mandibular cross-sectional occlusal radiograph of the mandible is such that the
central rays of the x-ray beam are directed toward the image
receptor perpendicularly (Figure 17-2). To achieve a perpendicular relationship between the plane of the image receptor
and the central rays of the x-ray beam, the patient’s head
position must be such that the occlusal plane is perpendicular
to the plane of the floor. In other words, the patient should be
reclined and the chin tipped upward. In this position, the vertical angulation will most likely be set at 0º, allowing the x-rays
to strike the image receptor perpendicularly.
Cross-sectional occlusal radiographs of the maxilla are
sometimes needed to assess the maxillary sinus, edentulous
ridges, or other specific needs. However, the significant amount
of bony structures located here make cross-sectional occlusal
radiographs of the maxilla difficult to image with clarity. Therefore maxillary cross-sectional occlusal radiographs are exposed
less frequently.
Points of Entry
If the patient’s head is in the correct position, predetermined
points of entry may be used (Table 17-2). Essentially, the
central rays of the x-ray beam should strike the middle of
the image receptor. The open end of the PID must be aligned
as close as possible to the patient’s skin at the correct point
of entry. Although occlusal radiographs can be made with
any length position indicating device (PID), the shorter 8-in.
(20.5-cm) length may be easier to position into the increased
vertical angulation positions required for this technique. In
addition, because of the angular relationship between the
object (teeth) and the central ray of the x-ray beam, a longer
PID length (16-in./41-cm) will likely add to the dimensional
distortion of the image.
PRACTICE POINT
When exposing an occlusal radiograph on the mandible, it may
be necessary to modify placement of the lead/lead equivalent
thyroid collar. Although it is very important to use ALARA (as
low as reasonably achievable) practices and use the lead/lead
equivalent thyroid collar to protect radiation-sensitive tissues
in the head and neck region, the thyroid collar may be in the
path of the primary beam during mandibular topographical
and/or cross-sectional techniques.
You should place the lead/lead equivalent apron and
thyroid collar on the patient in the usual manner. After
adjusting the patient’s head position and placing the image
receptor, align the PID and check to be sure that the thyroid
collar is not in the path of the x-ray beam. If the thyroid collar is in a position that will block the x-rays from reaching the
image receptor, adjust the collar position. Failure to remove
the thyroid collar from in front of the open end of the PID
will most likely result in a retake of the radiograph.
CHAPTER 17 • THE OCCLUSAL EXAMINATION 219
TABLE 17-1 Recommended Vertical Angulation
Settings for Occlusal Radiographs
OCCLUSAL
RADIOGRAPH VERTICAL ANGLE SETTING*
Maxillary topographical
(anterior)
+65°
Maxillary topographical
(posterior)
+45°
Mandibular topographical
(anterior)
-55°
Mandibular topographical
(posterior)
-45°
Mandibular cross-sectional 0°**
The patient must be seated in the correct position, with the occlusal
plane of the arch being imaged parallel to the floor and the midsaggital
plane perpendicular to the floor.
The patient must be seated in the correct position, with the occlusal
plane of the mandible perpendicular to the floor and the midsaggital
plane parallel to the floor.
**
*
TABLE 17-2 A Summary of Occlusal Radiographic Technique
OCCLUSAL
RADIOGRAPH PLACEMENT VERTICAL ANGULATION*
HORIZONTAL
ANGULATION POINT OF ENTRY*
Maxillary topographical
(anterior) (Figure 17-4)
Long dimension across the
mouth (buccal-to-buccal).
White unprinted film side
toward the maxillary
teeth.
Perpendicular to the imaginary
bisector between the long
axes of the teeth and image
receptor in the vertical
dimension, +65°.
Perpendicular to the
image receptor
through the maxillary central incisor
embrasure.
Through a point near the
bridge of the nose
toward the center of
the image receptor
Maxillary topographical
(posterior) (Figure 17-5)
Long dimension along the
midline (front-to-back).
White unprinted film
side toward the
maxillary teeth.
Perpendicular to the imaginary
bisector between the long
axes of the teeth and the
image receptor in the vertical
dimension, +45°.
Perpendicular to the
image receptor
through the
maxillary posterior
embrasures.
Through a point on the
ala–tragus line below
the outer cantus of the
eye (see Figure 15-7)
toward the center of
the image receptor
Mandibular topographical
(anterior) (Figure 17-6)
Long dimension across
the mouth (buccal-tobuccal). White unprinted
film side toward the
mandibular teeth.
Perpendicular to the imaginary
bisector between the long
axes of the teeth and the
image receptor in the vertical
dimension, -55°.
Perpendicular to the
image receptor
through the
mandibular central
incisor embrasure.
Through a point on the
middle of the chin
toward the center of
the image receptor
Mandibular topographical
(posterior) (Figure 17-7)
Long dimension along the
midline (front-to-back).
White unprinted film
side toward the
mandibular teeth.
Perpendicular to the imaginary
bisector between the long
axes of the teeth and the
image receptor in the vertical
dimension, -45°
Perpendicular to the
image receptor
through the
mandibular posterior
embrasures.
Through a point on the
inferior border of the
mandible directly
below the second
mandibular premolar
toward the center of
the image receptor
Mandibular cross-sectional
(Figure 17-8)
Long dimension across the
mouth (buccal-tobuccal). White unprinted
side toward the
mandibular teeth.
Perpendicular to the image
receptor; 0°.**
Align the open end of
the PID parallel to
the plane of the
image receptor
Through a point 2 in.
(5 cm) back from the
tip of the chin toward
the center of the
image receptor**
The patient must be seated in the correct position, with the occlusal plane of the arch being imaged parallel to the floor and the midsaggital plane
perpendicular to the floor.
The patient must be seated in the correct position, with the occlusal plane of the mandible perpendicular to the floor and the midsaggital plane
parallel to the floor.
**
*
The Occlusal Examination
Figures 17-4 through 17-8 illustrate the image receptor positions and required angulations for each of the topographical
and cross-sectional occlusal radiographs discussed in this
chapter. See Table 17-2 for a summary of the technique.
220 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
PID
65°
Tube head
A B
C
OCCLUSAL TECHNIQUE
Maxillary Topographical Occlusal Radiograph (Anterior)
FIGURE 17-4 Maxillary topographical occlusal radiograph (anterior). (A) Diagram showing relationship of tube head and PID to image
receptor and patient. Exposure side of the image receptor faces the maxillary arch with longer dimension buccal-to-buccal (across the arch). The
central ray is directed perpendicular in the horizontal dimension to the patient’s midsagittal plane through the maxillary central incisor embrasure.
The vertical angulation is directed approximately through a point near the bridge of the nose toward the center of the image receptor.
(B) Patient showing position of image receptor and 8-in. (20.5-cm) circular PID. (C) Anterior maxillary topographical occlusal radiograph.
+65°
CHAPTER 17 • THE OCCLUSAL EXAMINATION 221
OCCLUSAL TECHNIQUE
Maxillary Topographical Occlusal Radiograph (Posterior)
C
A B
PID
45°
Tube head
FIGURE 17-5 Maxillary topographical occlusal radiograph (posterior). (A) Diagram showing relationship of tube head and PID to
image receptor and patient. The image receptor is positioned over the left or right side, depending on the area of interest. Exposure side of the
image receptor faces the maxillary arch with longer dimension along the midline (anterior-to-posterior). The central ray is directed perpendicular
in the horizontal dimension to patient’s midsagittal plane through the maxillary posterior embrasures. The vertical angulation is directed
approximately through a point on the ala–tragus line below the outer canthus of the eye toward the center of the image receptor.
(B) Patient showing position of image receptor and 8-in. (20.5-cm) circular PID. (C) Posterior maxillary topographical occlusal radiograph.
+45°
OCCLUSAL TECHNIQUE
Mandibular Topographical Occlusal Radiograph (Anterior)
C
B
−55°
PID
Tube head
A
FIGURE 17-6 Mandibular topographical occlusal radiograph (anterior). (A) Diagram showing relationship of tube head and PID to
image receptor and patient. Exposure side of the image receptor faces the mandibular arch with longer dimension buccal-to-buccal (across the
arch). The central ray is directed perpendicular in the horizontal dimension to patient’s midsaggittal plane through the mandibular central incisor
embrasure. The vertical angulation is directed approximately through a point in the middle of the chin toward the center of the image
receptor. (B) Patient showing position of image receptor and 8-in. (20.5-cm) circular PID. (C) Anterior mandibular topographical occlusal
radiograph.
-55°
222 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
CHAPTER 17 • THE OCCLUSAL EXAMINATION 223
OCCLUSAL TECHNIQUE
Mandibular Topographical Occlusal Radiograph (Posterior)
C
A B
PID
−45°
Tube head
FIGURE 17-7 Mandibular topographical occlusal radiograph (posterior). (A) Diagram showing relationship of tube head and PID to
image receptor and patient. The image receptor is positioned over the left or right side, depending on the area of interest. Exposure side of the
image receptor faces the mandibular arch with longer dimension along the midline (anterior-to-posterior). The central ray is directed
perpendicular in the horizontal dimension to patient’s midsagittal plane through the mandibular posterior embrasures. The vertical angulation is
directed approximately through a point on the inferior border of the mandible directly below the second mandibular premolar toward the
center of the image receptor. (B) Patient showing position of image receptor and 8-in. (20.5-cm) circular PID. (C) Posterior mandibular
topographical occlusal radiograph.
-45°
224 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
OCCLUSAL TECHNIQUE
Mandibular Cross-Sectional Occlusal Radiograph
A B
PID
Tube head
C
FIGURE 17-8 Mandibular cross-sectional occlusal radiograph. (A) Diagram showing relationship of tube head and PID to image receptor
and patient. The exposure side of the image receptor faces the mandibular arch with the longer dimension buccal-to-buccal (across the arch). The
central ray is directed perpendicular in both the horizontal and vertical dimensions toward the image receptor. Positioning the open end of the PID
parallel to the image receptor achieves the required perpendicular alignment. The vertical angulation is directed approximately 0º through a point
2 in. (5 cm) back from the tip of the chin toward the center of the image receptor. (B) Patient showing position of image receptor and 8-in.
(20.5-cm) circular PID. (C) Mandibular cross-sectional occlusal radiograph.
CHAPTER 17 • THE OCCLUSAL EXAMINATION 225
REVIEW—Chapter summary
The purpose of occlusal radiographs is to image a larger area than
that produced on a periapical radiograph. The topographical
occlusal teachnique is based on a modification of the bisecting
technique used to expose periapical radiographs. The x-ray beam is
directed perpendicularly toward the image receptor in both the horizontal and vertical dimensions when exposing a cross-sectional
occlusal radiograph. Occlusal radiographs are used to view conditions of the teeth and supporting structures such as impactions,
large apical lesions, calcifications in soft tissue, and fractures.
Size #4 image receptor is used for adult examinations. If
indicated, a size #2 or smaller image receptor may be used with
the occlusal technique, especially for children. An image receptor holder is not required; the patient lightly bites down on the
image receptor to hold it in place. The image receptor may be
positioned with the long dimension horizontal or vertical with
at least 1/4 in. (1/2 cm) protruding outside the mouth.
The patient’s head should be positioned with the occlusal
plane parallel and the midsaggital plane perpendicular to the
floor when exposing maxillary and mandibular topographical
occlusal radiographs. The patient’s head should be tipped back
into a position with the occlusal plane perpendicular to the plane
of the floor and the midsaggital plane parallel to the floor when
exposing a mandibular cross-sectional occlusal radiograph.
The horizontal angulation used to produce a topographical
occlusal radiograph is determined in the same manner as for
periapical and bitewing radiographs, where the central rays of
the x-ray beam are directed perpendicularly to the image receptor through the embrasures of the teeth of interest. Aligning the
open end of the PID parallel to the image receptor will assist in
determining the correct horizontal angulation to produce a
cross-sectional occlusal radiograph. The vertical angulation used
to produce a topographical occlusal radiograph is determined in a
similar manner to the bisecting technique used to produce periapical radiographs, where the central rays of the x-ray beam are
directed perpendicularly to the bisector between the long axes of
the teeth and the plane of the image receptor. Determining the vertical angulation for exposure of a cross-sectional occlusal radiograph is assisted by positioning the open end of the PID parallel
to the plane of the image receptor. Correct points of entry position
are determined by directing the central rays of the x-ray beam at
the center of the image receptor. If the patient’s head is in correct
position, predetermined vertical angulations and points of the
entry may be used. Step-by-step illustrated instructions for exposing five of the most common occlusal radiographs are presented
RECALL—Study questions
1. Each of the following is an indication for exposing
occlusal radiographs EXCEPT one. Which one is the
EXCEPTION?
a. Evaluate periodontal disease
b. Examine sinus borders
c. Locate foreign bodies
d. Reveal sialoliths
2. Which of the following will a mandibular cross-sectional
occlusal radiograph best image?
a. Cleft palate
b. Fractured jaw
c. Large periapical cyst
d. Sublingual swelling
3. Which of these sizes is known as the occlusal image
receptor?
a. #1
b. #2
c. #3
d. #4
4. The image receptor should be placed with the long
dimension along the midline (front to back) for which
of these occlusal radiographs?
a. Maxillary topographical anterior
b. Maxillary topographical posterior
c. Mandibular topographical anterior
d. Mandibular cross-sectional
5. Where should the embossed dot be positioned when
placing an occlusal film packet intraorally?
a. Toward the apical
b. Toward the occlusal
c. Toward the anterior
d. Toward the posterior
6. The ideal patient head position when exposing a maxillary topographical occlusal radiograph is to position
the occlusal plane ______________ to the plane of
the floor and the midsaggital plane ______________
to the plane of the floor.
a. parallel; perpendicular
b. perpendicular; parallel
c. parallel; parallel
d. perpendicular; perpendicular
7. The ideal patient head position when exposing a
mandibular cross-sectional occlusal radiograph is to
position the head rest so that the chin is tipped
______________ and the occlusal plane is ________
______ to the plane of the floor.
a. down; perpendicular
b. up; perpendicular
c. down; parallel
d. up; parallel
8. Assuming that the patient’s head is in the correct position, which of the following is the correct vertical angulation setting for a maxillary anterior topographical
occlusal radiograph?
a.
b.
c. 0 degrees
d. -55 degrees
+45 degrees
+65 degrees
226 INTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
9. Assuming that the patient’s head is in the correct
position, which of the following is the correct vertical
angulation setting for a mandibular cross-sectional
occlusal radiograph?
a.
b.
c. 0 degrees
d.
10. What is the point of entry for correctly exposing a
posterior mandible topographical occlusal radiograph?
a. The middle of the chin
b. A point 2 in. (5 cm) back from the tip of the chin
c. A point on the ala–tragus line below the outer cantus
of the eye
d. A point on the inferior border of the mandible directly
below the second mandibular premolar
REFLECT—Case study
Consider the following cases. After determining the radiographic assessment for each of these three cases, write out a
detailed procedure chart that a radiographer can follow to
obtain the needed radiographs. Begin with patient positioning.
Be sure to include the steps for determining the correct placement of the image receptor, x-ray beam angles, and landmarks
for determining points of entry.
1. An adult patient presents with a sublingual swelling
indicating the possibility of a blocked salivary gland.
What type of occlusal radiograph will this patient most
likely be assessed for?
-55 degrees
+45 degrees
+65 degrees
2. An adult patient presents with severe pain in the
mandibular left posterior region, indicating the possibility
of an impacted third molar. The pain and swelling in this
region is preventing the patient from opening more than a
few millimeters. What type of occlusal radiograph will
this patient most likely be assessed for?
3. A child patient presents with trauma to the maxillary
anterior teeth after a fall off her bicycle. What type of
occlusal radiograph will this patient most likely be
assessed for?
RELATE—Laboratory application
For a comprehensive laboratory practice exercise on this
topic, see Thomson, E. M. (2012). Exercises in oral radiography techniques: A laboratory manual (3rd ed.). Upper
Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. Chapter 10 “Occlusal
Radiographic Technique.”
REFERENCES
Carroll, M. K. (1993). Advanced oral radiographic techniques: Part I, occlusal and lateral oblique projections
(videorecording). Jackson, MS: Health Sciences Consortium, Learning Resources, University of Mississippi
Medical Center.
Eastman Kodak Company. (2002). Successful intraoral radiography. Rochester, NY: Author.
White, S. C., & Pharoah, M. J. (2008). Oral radiology: Principles and interpretation (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
OBJECTIVES
Following successful completion of this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Define the key words.
2. Recognize errors caused by incorrect radiographic techniques.
3. Apply the appropriate corrective actions for technique errors.
4. Recognize errors caused by incorrect radiographic processing.
5. Apply the appropriate corrective actions for processing errors.
6. Recognize errors caused by incorrect radiographic image receptor handling.
7. Apply the appropriate corrective actions for handling errors.
8. Identify five causes of film fog.
9. Apply the appropriate actions for preventing film fog.
KEY WORDS
Artifacts
Conecut error
Dead pixel
Distomesial overlap
Double exposure
Electronic noise
Elongation
Film fog
Foreshortening
Herringbone error
Mesiodistal overlap
Overdevelopment
Overexposure
Overlapping
Static electricity
Underdevelopment
Underexposure
Identifying and Correcting
Undiagnostic Radiographs
PART VI • RADIOGRAPHIC ERRORS
AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
CHAPTER
18
CHAPTER
OUTLINE
 Objectives 227
 Key Words 227
 Introduction 228
 Recognizing
Radiographic
Errors 228
 Technique Errors 229
 Processing
Errors 235
 Handling Errors 236
 Fogged Images 237
 Review, Recall,
Reflect, Relate 238
 References 240
228 RADIOGRAPHIC ERRORS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
Introduction
Although radiographs play an important role in oral health
care, it should be remembered that exposure to radiation carries a risk. The radiographer has an ethical responsibility to
the patient to produce the highest diagnostic quality radiographs, in return for the patient’s consent to undergo the
radiographic examination. Less-than-ideal radiographic
images diminish the usefulness of the radiograph. When the
error is significant, a radiograph will have to be retaken. In
addition to increasing the patient’s radiation exposure, retake
radiographs require additional patient consent and may
reduce the patient’s confidence in the operator and in the
practice.
No radiograph should be retaken until a thorough
investigation reveals the exact cause of the error and
the appropriate corrective action is identified and can
be implemented.
It is important that the radiographer develop the skills
needed to identify radiographic errors. Identifying common
mistakes and knowing the causes will help the knowledgeable operator avoid these pitfalls. Being able to identify the
cause of an undiagnostic image will allow the radiographer
to apply the appropriate corrective action for retaking the
exposure.
The purpose of this chapter is to investigate common radiographic errors, identify probable causes of such errors, and
present the appropriate corrective actions.
Recognizing Radiographic Errors
To recognize errors that diminish the diagnostic quality of a
radiograph, the radiographer must understand what a quality
image looks like (Table 18-1). First and foremost, the radiograph must be an accurate representation of the teeth and
the supporting structures. The image should not be magnified,
elongated, foreshortened, or otherwise distorted. Image density
and contrast should be correct for ease of interpretation: not
too light, or too dark, or fogged. The radiograph should be
free of errors.
PRACTICE POINT
All errors reduce the quality of the radiograph. However, not
all errors create a need to re-expose the patient. Two examples of this are when the error does not affect the area of
interest and when the error affects only one image in a series
(bitewings or full mouth), where the area of interest can be
viewed in an adjacent radiograph. For example, a radiograph
may have a conecut error, cutting off part of the image. If
the conecut error does not affect the area of interest, a
retake would not be required. Consider this situation, where
a periapical radiograph is exposed to image a suspected apical pathology in the posterior region. If the conecut error
occurs in the anterior portion, cutting off the second premolar, but an abscess at the root apex of the first molar is adequately imaged, the radiograph would most likely not have
to be retaken.
When exposing a set of radiographs such as a vertical
bitewing or full mouth series, if an error prevents adequate
imaging of a condition, adjacent radiographs should be
observed for the possibility that the condition may be adequately revealed in another image. For example, if one radiograph in a set of bitewings is overlapped, it should be
determined if the adjacent radiograph images the area adequately. If so, a retake would most likely not be indicated.
Determining when a retake is absolutely necessary will keep
radiation exposure to a minimum.
Recognizing the cause of radiographic errors is important
in being able to take corrective action. Errors that diminish the
diagnostic quality of radiographs may be divided into three
categories:
1. Technique errors
2. Processing errors
3. Handling errors
TABLE 18-1 Characteristics of a Quality Radiograph
BITEWING RADIOGRAPH PERIAPICAL RADIOGRAPH
• Image receptor placed correctly to record area of interest • Image receptor placed correctly to record area of interest
• Equal portion of the maxilla and mandible
recorded
• Entire tooth plus at least 2 mm beyond the incisal/occlusal
edges of the crowns and beyond the root apex recorded
• Occlusal/incisal plane of the teeth is parallel to the edge of
the image receptor
• Occlusal/incisal plane of the teeth is parallel with the edge of
the image receptor
• Occlusal plane straight or slightly curved upward toward
the posterior
• Embossed dot positioned toward the incisal/occlusal
edge
• Most posterior contact point between adjacent teeth
recorded
• In a full mouth survey, each tooth should be recorded at least
once, preferably twice
CHAPTER 18 • IDENTIFYING AND CORRECTING UNDIAGNOSTIC RADIOGRAPHS 229
NOT RECORDING POSTERIOR STRUCTURES
• Probable causes: The image receptor was placed too far
forward in the patient’s oral cavity. The beginning radiographer is sometimes hesitant about placing the image
receptor far enough posterior to record diagnostic information about the third molar region. This is especially true
when the patient presents with a small oral cavity or a
hypersensitive gag reflex.
• Corrective actions: Communicate with the patient to gain
acceptance and assistance with placing the image receptor. Use tips for working with an exaggerated gag reflex.
(See Chapter 27.)
NOT RECORDING APICAL STRUCTURES (FIGURE 18-2)
• Probable causes:
1. Image receptor was not placed high enough (maxillary)
or low enough (mandibular) in the patient’s oral cavity to
image the root apices. This often occurs when the patient
does not occlude completely and securely on the image
receptor holder biteblock or tab.
2. Inadequate (not steep enough) vertical angulation will
result in less of the apical region being recorded onto
the radiograph.
• Corrective actions:
1. Ensure that the image receptor is positioned correctly
into the holding device and that the patient is biting
down all the way. Tip the image receptor in toward the
middle of the oral cavity where the midline of the
palatal vault is the highest to facilitate the patient biting
all the way down on the holder biteblock. When placing
the image receptor on the mandible, using an index finger, gently massage the sublingual area to relax and
move the tongue out of the way while positioning the
image receptor low enough to record the mandibular
teeth root apices.
2. Increase vertical angulation. If correctly directing the
central rays perpendicular to the image receptor when
using the paralleling technique (see Chapter 14) and
perpendicular to the imaginary bisector when using the
bisecting technique (see Chapter 15) does not record
enough apical structures, increase the vertical angulation slightly. An increase of no greater than 15 degrees
will still produce an acceptable radiographic image.
NOT RECORDING CORONAL STRUCTURES (FIGURE 18-3)
• Probable causes: Because this error appears to be the
opposite of not recording the apical structures, it would
seem logical to assume that the image receptor was placed
too high (maxillary) or too low (mandibular) in the
patient’s oral cavity to image the entire crowns of these
teeth. However, the use of image receptor holders will
almost always eliminate this error. When noted, the cause
is more often the result of excessive vertical angulation.
premolar
Image receptor
FIGURE 18-1 Tip for positioning the image receptor for
exposure of a premolar radiograph. Positioning the anterior edge
of the image receptor against the canine on the opposite side places
the image receptor into the correct anterior position.
It is important to note that errors in any of these categories
may produce the same or a similar result. For example, it is
possible that a dark radiographic image may have been caused
by overexposure (a technique error) or by overdevelopment (a
processing error), or by exposing the film to white light (a handling error). For the purpose of defining the more common
radiographic errors, we will discuss the errors according to
these three categories.
Technique Errors
Technique errors include mistakes made in placement of the image
receptor, positioning of the PID (vertical and horizontal angulations), and setting exposure factors. Additional technical problems
include movement of the patient, the image receptor, or the PID.
Incorrect Positioning of the Image Receptor
The most basic technique error is not imaging the correct teeth.
The radiographer must know the standard image receptor
placements for all types of projections and must possess the
skills necessary to achieve these correct placements.
NOT RECORDING ANTERIOR STRUCTURES
• Probable causes: The image receptor was placed too far
back in the patient’s oral cavity. Due to the curvature and
narrowing of the arches in the anterior region, it is sometimes difficult to place the image receptor far enough anterior without impinging on sensitive mucosa. This is
especially likely when tori are present. When using a digital sensor, the wire and/or plastic barrier may further compromise fitting the image receptor into the correct position.
• Corrective actions: To avoid placing a corner of the image
receptor uncomfortably in contact with the soft tissues lingual to the canine, position the receptor in toward the midline of the oral cavity, away from the lingual surfaces of
the teeth of interest. When positioning the image receptor
for a premolar radiograph, the anterior edge of the receptor
may be positioned to contact the canine on the opposite
side to achieve the correct position (Figure 18-1).
230 RADIOGRAPHIC ERRORS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
SLANTING OR TILTED INSTEAD OF STRAIGHT OCCLUSAL
PLANE (FIGURE 18-4)
• Probable causes: The edge of the image receptor was not
parallel with the incisal or occlusal plane of the teeth, or
the image receptor holder was not placed flush against the
occlusal surfaces. This error often results when the top
edge of the image receptor contacts the lingual gingiva or
the curvature of the palate; and when the image receptor is
placed on top of the tongue.
• Corrective actions: Straighten the image receptor by positioning away from the lingual surfaces of the teeth. Place the
image receptor in toward the midline of the palate. Utilize this
highest region of the palatal vault to stand the image receptor up parallel to the long axes of the teeth. For mandibular
1
2
FIGURE 18-3 Radiograph of mandibular molar area.
(1) Not recording the entire occlusal structures most likely
resulted from excessive (too steep) vertical angulation.
(2) Note the radiolucent artifact (horizontal line) that resulted
from bending the image receptor, in this case a film packet.
• Corrective actions: Decrease vertical angulation. If correctly
directing the central rays perpendicular to the image receptor
when using the paralleling technique (see Chapter 14) and
perpendicular to the imaginary bisector when using the
bisecting technique (see Chapter 15) does not record enough
coronal structures, decrease the vertical angulation slightly.
A decrease of no greater than 15 degrees will still produce an
acceptable radiographic image.
PRACTICE POINT
The misuse of a cotton roll to help stabilize the image receptor holder is often the cause of the root tips being cut off the
resultant radiographic image. A cotton roll is sometimes utilized to help the patient bite down on the holder’s biteblock
to secure it in place (see Chapter 14). This practice is appropriate when used correctly. Correct placement of the cotton
roll is on the opposite side of the biteblock from where the
teeth occlude. Placing the cotton roll on the same side as the
teeth will prevent the image receptor from being placed high
enough (maxillary) or low enough (mandibular) in the mouth.
1
2
3
FIGURE 18-2 Radiograph of maxillary molar area. Not recording the apical structures most likely resulted from a combination
of not placing the image receptor correctly and inadequate vertical angulation. (1) The patient did not occlude completely and securing
on the image receptor biteblock causing the image receptor to be placed too low in the mouth. (2) Inadequate (not steep enough) vertical
angulation resulted in not recording the apical structures and a stretching out of the image called elongation. (3) Overlapped contacts
results from incorrect horizontal angulation. In this example, the overlapping is more severe in the anterior (mesial) region and less severe
in the posterior (distal) region, indicating distomesial projection of the x-ray beam toward the image receptor.
CHAPTER 18 • IDENTIFYING AND CORRECTING UNDIAGNOSTIC RADIOGRAPHS 231
1
2
3 4
5
6
7
FIGURE 18-4 Radiograph of maxillary canine area. (1) Slanting
or diagonal occlusal plane caused by incorrect position of the image
receptor. (2) Foreshortened images caused by a combination of
excessive vertical angulation and incorrect image receptor position.
(3) Distortion caused by bending the image receptor. (4) Maxillary
sinus, (5) recent extraction site, (6) lamina dura, and (7) image of the
canine is distorted.
FIGURE 18-5 Reversed film packet error. These embossed patterns will be recorded on the image when the
lead foil faces the x-ray beam. Note the different patterns depending on the manufacturer and the film size.
FIGURE 18-6 Incorrect reversed film packet. An examination
through the ring of this image receptor holder assembly reveals that
the back of the film packet will be positioned incorrectly toward the
teeth and the x-ray source.
placements, slide the image receptor in between the lingual
gingiva and the lateral surface of the tongue. Ensure that the
patient is biting down securely on the biteblock of the holder.
REVERSED IMAGE ERROR (HERRINGBONE ERROR)
• Probable causes: The image receptor film packet was positioned so that the back side was facing the teeth and the radiation source. The first thing that the radiographer will notice
is that the radiograph will be significantly underexposed
(too light). However, when placed on a view box and examined closely, a pattern representing the embossed lead foil
that is in the back of a film packet can be detected. Historically film makers used a herringbone pattern, and therefore
some practitioners still call this herringbone error. Most
films currently available have a pattern resembling a tire
track or diamond pattern (Figure 18-5).
• Corrective actions: Determine the front side of the film
packet prior to placing into the image receptor holder.
When in doubt, read the printed side of the film packet
for direction. Once attached, examine the film and holder
assembly to ensure that the tube side faces toward the
teeth and the radiation source (Figure 18-6). Due to the
composition of phosphor plates and digital sensors, positioning the incorrect side of these image receptors
toward the radiation source will result in failure to produce an image.
INCORRECT POSITION OF FILM IDENTIFICATION DOT
• Probable cause: Embossed identification dot positioned in
apical area where it can interfere with diagnosis.
• Corrective actions: Pay attention when placing the film
packet into the film holding device to position the dot
toward the incisal or occlusal region, where it is less likely
to interfere with interpretation of the image. Some practitioners use the phrase “dot in the slot” to remind them to
place the edge of the film packet where the dot is located
into the slot of the film holding device. Placing the dot in
the slot of a film holder will automatically position the dot
toward the occlusal or incisal edges of the teeth and away
from the apical regions.
232 RADIOGRAPHIC ERRORS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
CONECUT ERROR (FIGURES 18-7 AND 18-8)
• Probable causes: The primary beam of radiation was not
directed toward the center of the image receptor and did
not completely expose the entire surface area of the receptor. Image receptor holders with external aiming rings help
prevent this error. However, assembling the image receptor
holding instrument incorrectly will cause the operator to
direct the central ray of the x-ray beam to the wrong place,
resulting in conecut error.
Incorrect Positioning of the Tube Head and PID
Included in this category are the errors that result from incorrect
vertical and horizontal angulations and centering of the x-ray
beam over the image receptor. We have already discussed that
incorrect vertical angulation can result in not recording the
apices or the occlusal/incisal edges of the teeth. Elongation
(images that appear stretched out) and foreshortening (images
that appear shorter than they are), with or without cutting off the
apices or the occlusal/incisal edges of the teeth, are dimensional
errors that result from incorrect vertical angulation when using
the bisecting technique. It is important to remember that it is
impossible to create images that are elongated or foreshortened
when the image receptor is positioned parallel to the teeth, as is
the case when using the paralleling technique. If elongation or
foreshortening errors result, it is important that the corrective
action be to first try to position the image receptor parallel to the
teeth of interest. Correctly positioning the image receptor parallel to the teeth will most likely prevent dimensional errors. If
parallel placement of the image receptor to the teeth is not possible, then the bisecting technique must be carefully applied to
avoid elongation and foreshortening of the image.
ELONGATION/FORESHORTENING
OF THE IMAGE (BISECTING TECHNIQUE ERROR)
• Probable causes: Insufficient vertical angulation
with the PID not positioned steep enough away from zero
degrees results in elongation (Figure 18-2). Excessive
vertical angulation with the PID positioned too steep
enough away from zero degrees results in foreshortening
(Figure 18-4).
• Corrective actions: To correct elongation, increase the
vertical angulation. To correct foreshortening, decrease the
vertical angulation. Direct the central rays perpendicular
to the imaginary bisector between the long axes of the teeth
and the plane of the image receptor (see Chapter 15).
If relying on predetermined vertical angulation settings,
check the position of the patient’s head to ensure that the
occlusal plane is parallel and that the midsaggital plane is
perpendicular to the floor.
OVERLAPPED TEETH CONTACTS (FIGURE 18-2)
• Probable causes:
1. Incorrect rotation of the tube head and PID in the horizontal plane. Superimposition of the proximal surfaces
occurs when the central ray of the x-ray beam is not
directed perpendicular through the interproximal spaces
to the image receptor. Overlapped contacts result when
the central ray of the x-ray beam is directed obliquely
toward the image receptor from the distal or from the
mesial. When the angle of the x-ray beam is directed
obliquely from mesial to distal (mesiodistal overlap), the
overlapping contacts are more severe in the posterior
part of the image. Conversely, when the angle of the x-ray
beam is directed obliquely from distal to mesial
(distomesial overlap), the overlapping contacts are more
severe in the anterior part of the image.
2. Not positioning the image receptor parallel to the interproximal spaces of the teeth of interest will prevent the
central ray of the x-ray beam from being directed perpendicular through the contacts and perpendicular to
the image receptor.
• Corrective actions:
1. Examine the image to determine where the overlap is
most severe. To correct mesiodistal overlap, rotate the
tubehead and PID to a more distomesial angle. Physically move the tubehead toward the posterior of the
patient while rotating the PID toward the anterior so
that the central ray of the x-ray beam will enter the
patient from the distal (or posterior). To correct distomesial overlap, rotate the tubehead and PID to a more
mesiodistal angle. Physically move the tubehead toward
the anterior of the patient while rotating the PID toward
the posterior so that the central ray of the x-ray beam
will enter the patient from the mesial (or anterior.). It
should be noted that there are cases when mesiodistal
and distomesial overlap cannot be distinguished from
one another. When this happens, closely examine the
teeth of interest to determine the precise contact points
through which to perpendicularly direct the central rays
of the x-ray beam.
2. Examine the teeth of interest to determine the contact
points prior to positioning the image receptor. Place
the image receptor parallel to the contact points of
interest so that the central rays of the x-ray beam will
intersect the image receptor perpendicularly through
those contacts (see Figure 28-2).
PRACTICE POINT
Use the phrase “Move toward it to fix it” when correcting
mesiodistal or distomesial overlap error. If the overlapping
appears more severe in the posterior region (mesiodistal overlap), shift the tube head toward the posterior while rotating
the PID to direct the x-ray beam from the distal. If the overlapping appears more severe in the anterior region (distomesial
overlap), shift the tube head toward the anterior while rotating the PID to direct the x-ray beam from the mesial.
CHAPTER 18 • IDENTIFYING AND CORRECTING UNDIAGNOSTIC RADIOGRAPHS 233
• Corrective actions: While maintaining correct horizontal
and vertical angulation, move the tube head up, down, posteriorly, or anteriorly, depending on which area of the
radiograph shows a clear, unexposed region. Check to see
that the image receptor holder is assembled correctly, and
direct the central ray of the x-ray beam to the center
(middle) of the receptor.
Incorrect Exposure Factors
Insufficient knowledge regarding the use of the control panel
settings and exposure button will result in less-than-ideal radiographic images.
LIGHT (THIN)/DARK IMAGES (FIGURES 18-9 AND 18-10)
• Probable causes: It has already been pointed out that underexposed images result when a film packet is positioned
reversed, or backward, in the oral cavity. The presence of an
FIGURE 18-7 Conecut error. Results when the central ray of the
x-ray beam is not directed toward the middle of the image receptor.
The white (clear) circular area was beyond the range of the x-ray
beam, and therefore received no exposure. This radiograph illustrates
conecut error that resulted from incorrect assembly of a posterior
image receptor holder.
FIGURE 18-8 Conecut error. Can also occur when using
rectangular collimation.
FIGURE 18-9 Light (thin) image. Underexposed or underdeveloped
radiograph.
FIGURE 18-10 Dark image. Overexposed or overdeveloped
radiograph.
embossed pattern or herringbone error will indicate why the
underexposure occurred. If a pattern is not noted in a light
image, an error with the selection of exposure factors should
be suspected. Insufficient exposure time in relation to milliamperage, kilovoltage, and PID length selected by the operator all result in light images, whereas excessive exposure
time in relation to these parameters results in overexposure.
Inappropriately exposing a phosphor plate to bright light
prior to the laser processing step will result in a light or faded
image. Under- or overexposure may rarely occur as a result
of equipment malfunction. Light/dark images that result
from processing errors will be discussed later in this chapter.
• Corrective actions: An exposure chart posted near the control panel for easy reference can assist with preventing
incorrect exposures. Increasing the exposure time, the milliamperage, the kilovoltage, or a combination of these factors will correct underexposures, whereas decreasing these
parameters will correct overexposures. If the PID length is
switched, then a cooresponding adjustment in the exposure
time must be made. Exposed phosphor plates should be
placed with the front side down on the counter or within a
containment box until ready for the laser processing step.
(see Chapter 9) The exposure button must be depressed for
234 RADIOGRAPHIC ERRORS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
• Corrective actions: Perform a cursory examination of the
oral cavity to check for the presence of appliances. Ask
the patient to remove any objects that may be in the path
of the primary beam. Ensure that the lead/lead equivalent
apron and thyroid collar do not block the x-rays from
reaching the image receptor.
the full cycle. The operator must watch for the red exposure
light and the audible signal to end to indicate that the exposure button may be released. If the problem persists, check
the accuracy of the timer or switch for possible malfunction.
CLEAR OR BLANK IMAGE
• Probable causes: No exposure to x-rays, that results
from failure to turn on the line switch to the x-ray
machine or to maintain firm pressure on the exposure
button during the exposure or, if using digital imaging,
exposing the back side of a phosphor plate or digital sensor. Alternate causes: electrical failure, malfunction of
the x-ray machine or processing errors (which will be
discussed later).
• Corrective actions: Turn on the x-ray machine and maintain
firm pressure on the exposure button during the entire exposure period. Watch for the red exposure light and listen for
the audible signal indicating that the exposure has occurred.
Be familiar with digital image receptors to determine the
correct exposure side.
DOUBLE IMAGE
• Probable cause: Double exposure resulting from accidentally exposing the same film or phosphor plate twice.
• Corrective actions: Maintain a systematic order to exposing
radiographs. Keep unexposed and exposed image receptors
organized.
Miscellaneous Errors in Exposure Technique
POOR DEFINITION
• Probable causes: Movement caused by the patient, slippage of the image receptor, or vibration of the tube head.
• Corrective actions: Place the patient’s head into position
against the head rest of the treatment chair and ask him/her
to hold still throughout the duration of the exposure.
Explain the procedure and gain the patient’s cooperation,
to maintain steady pressure on the image receptor holder
and not to move. Do not use the patient’s finger to stabilize
the image receptor in the oral cavity. Steady the tube head
before activating the exposure.
ARTIFACTS Artifacts are images other than anatomy or pathology that do not contribute to a diagnosis of the patient’s condition (Figures 18-11 and 18-12). Artifacts may be radiopaque or
radiolucent.
• Probable causes: The presence of foreign objects in the
oral cavity during exposure (e.g., appliances such as
removable bridges, partial or full dentures, orthodontic
retainers, patient glasses, and facial jewelry used in
piercings). There may be occasions when the lead/
lead equivalent thyroid collar could be in the path of the
x-ray beam. These metal objects will result in radiopaque
artifacts.
FIGURE 18-11 Radiopaque artifact. Partial denture left in place
during exposure.
FIGURE 18-12 Radiopaque artifact. Lead thyroid collar got
in the way of the primary beam during exposure.
CHAPTER 18 • IDENTIFYING AND CORRECTING UNDIAGNOSTIC RADIOGRAPHS 235
Processing Errors
Processing errors that result in retake radiographs also increase
patient radiation dose, add time to a busy day’s schedule, and
waste money. Processing errors occur with both manual and automatic processing. Processing errors include under- and overdevelopment, incorrectly following protocols, and failure to maintain an
ideal darkroom setting.
Development Error
LIGHT/DARK IMAGE (FIGURES 18-9 AND 18-10)
• Probable causes: Underdevelopment results when a film
is not left in the developer for the required time. Overdevelopment results when a film is left in the developer too long.
The colder the developer, the longer the time required to
produce an image of ideal density, and the warmer the
developer, the less developing time required. Images may
be too light or too dark as a result of incorrectly mixing
developer from concentrate. A weak developer mix produces
light images; a strong mix produces dark images. Light
images also result when the developer solution is old, weakened, or contaminated. A low solution level in the developer
tank of an automatic processor that does not completely
cover the rollers may also produce a light image.
• Corrective actions: When processing manually, check the
temperature of the developer and consult a time–temperature
chart before beginning processing. Ensure that the automatic
processor indicates that the solutions have warmed up and
the correct timed cycle is used. If weakened or old solutions
are suspected, change the solutions. Maintain good quality
control to replenish solutions to keep them functioning at
peak conditions and at the appropriate levels in the tanks.
Processing and Darkroom Protocol Errors
BLANK/CLEAR IMAGE
• Probable causes: It has already been discussed that no exposure to x-rays will produce a blank or clear radiograph. Film
that is accidentally placed in the fixer before being placed in
the developer will also result in a blank or clear image. If
allowed to remain in warm rinse water too long the emulsion
may dissolve also resulting in a clear image.
• Corrective actions: When processing manually, and when
filling automatic processor tanks during solution changes and
cleaning procedures, the operator must have knowledge of
which tank contains the developer and which tank contains
the fixer. Labelling the tanks prevents confusion. To prevent
the emulsion from separating from the film base, promptly
remove the film at the end of the washing period.
PARTIAL IMAGE
• Probable causes: A manual processing error—when the
level of the developer is too low to cover the entire film,
the emulsion in the section of the film that remains
above the solution level will not be developed. Once in
the fixer, the emulsion in this section will be removed
leaving a blank or clear section.
• Corrective actions: Replenish the processing solutions to
the proper level or attach the films to lower clips on the
film hanger to ensure that they will be submerged completely in the solution.
GREEN FILMS
• Probable causes: When films stick together in the developer
the solution is prevented from reaching the (green) emulsion. The most common causes include failure to separate
double film packets, placing additional films into the same
intake slot of an automatic processor too close together
resulting in overlapping of the two films, and attaching two
films to one clip used in manual processing, or allowing
films on adjacent film racks to contact each other.
• Corrective actions: The operator must be skilled at separating double film packets under safelight conditions. Use
alternating intake slots or wait 10 seconds before loading
subsequent films into the automatic processor. Carefully
handle manual film hangers and clips to avoid placing
films in contact with each other.
Chemical Contamination
BLACK/WHITE SPOTS (FIGURE 18-13)
• Probable causes: Premature contact with developing
chemicals—drops of developer or fixer that splash onto the
work area may come in contact with the undeveloped film.
Developer contamination will produce black spots. Fixer
contamination will produce white spots. Excessive wetting
of phosphor plates during the disinfecting step can damage
the plate and result in a digital image with missing information in the form of white or clear spots.
• Corrective actions: Maintain a clean and orderly darkroom and work area. Consult manufacturer recommendations to properly disinfect digital image receptors.
1
2
FIGURE 18-13 Radiograph of maxillary molar area. (1) Dark
spots caused by premature contact of film surface with developer.
(2) Uneven occlusal margin resulted because the patient did not
occlude all the way down on the image receptor biteblock.
236 RADIOGRAPHIC ERRORS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
BROWN IMAGES
• Probable cause: Insufficient or improper washing. It is
important to note that films that have not been washed
completely will appear normal immediately after drying.
Films will turn brown over a period of several weeks after
processing as the chemicals that remain on the surface of
the film erode the image.
• Corrective actions: When processing manually, rinse
films in circulating water for at least 20 minutes. Always
return a film to complete the fixing and washing steps after
a wet-reading. When processing automatically, ensure that
the main water supply to the unit is turned on and that the
water bottles of closed systems are full.
STAINS
• Probable causes: Iridescent, gray, and yellow stains can
result when processing chemicals become exhausted or contaminated.
• Corrective actions: Maintain quality control with regular
replenishment and replacing of the processing solutions.
Handling Errors
The manner in which the image receptor is handled contributes
to its ability to record a diagnostic quality image. Bending the
film produces artifacts and significantly reduces the quality of
the radiographic image. Bending a phosphor plate will damage
the surface. Exposing the image receptor to conditions such as
static electricity and the potential for scratching the emulsion
will further compromise diagnostic quality.
BLACK IMAGE
• Probable cause: Film was accidentally exposed to white
light.
• Corrective actions: Turn off all light in the darkroom except
the proper safelight before unwrapping the film packet. Lock
the door or warn others not to enter. Use an “in-use” sign to
prevent others from opening the door. When using an automatic processor, ensure that the film has completely entered
the light-protected processor before turning on the white
overhead light or removing hands from the daylight loader
baffles.
BLACK PRESSURE MARKS (BENT FILM; FIGURES 18-3
AND 18-14)
• Probable cause: Bending the film or excessive pressure to
the film emulsion can cause the emulsion to crack. Accidentally bending the film often occurs when the radiographer
is placing the film packet into the image receptor holder.
Although not recommended, a corner of the film packet is
sometimes purposely bent by the radiographer to fit comfortably into position.
• Corrective actions: Use caution when loading the film
packet into the image receptor holding device. Films should
not be bent to fit the oral cavity. Instead, use a smaller-sized
film, the occlusal technique (see Chapter 17), or an extraoral procedure (see Chapter 29).
THIN BLACK LINES, STAR-BURSTS, DOTS, LIGHTENING
PATTERN (SEE FIGURE 29-6)
• Probable causes: Static electricity may be produced when
the film is pulled out of the packet wrapping too fast. Static
electricity creates a white light spark that exposes (blackens) the film.
• Corrective actions: Follow infection control protocols for
opening film packets (see Chapter 10). Reduce the occurrence of static electricity by increasing humidity in the darkroom. Use antistatic products on protective clothing to
prevent the buildup of static electricity.
WHITE LINES OR MARKS OR BLANK IMAGE (FIGURE 18-15)
• Probable causes: The film emulsion is soft and can be
easily scratched by a sharp object such as the film clip
used for manual processing or when trying to separate
double film packets. Scratching removes the emulsion
from the base. Damaged digital sensors also result in
images with missing information in areas of dead
(damaged) pixels. Damage to the digital sensor wire
attachment can result in complete failure of the device to
record an image.
• Corrective actions: Carefully handle all types of radiographic image receptors. Avoid contacting the film with
other films or hangers. Mount dried radiographs promptly
and enclose in a protective envelope. Care should be taken
to store wired digital sensors without crimping or folding
the sensitive wire attachment.
1
2
FIGURE 18-14 Radiograph of mandibular premolar area.
(1) Purposely bending the lower left film corner to make the receptor
fit the oral cavity resulted in distortion and a pressure mark (thin
radiolucent line). (2) Long radiolucent pressure mark caused by
bending or by careless handling with excessive force.
CHAPTER 18 • IDENTIFYING AND CORRECTING UNDIAGNOSTIC RADIOGRAPHS 237
SMUDGED FILM (FIGURE 18-16)
• Probable causes: Handling the film with damp fingers or
latex treatment gloves, or with residual glove powder on
the fingers will leave black smudges.
• Corrective actions: Avoid contact with the surface of the
film. Handle all radiographs carefully and by the edges only.
Hands should be clean and free of moisture or glove powder.
BLACK PAPER STUCK TO FILM
• Probable causes: A tear or break in the outer protective
wrapping of the film packet by rough handling enables
saliva to penetrate to the emulsion. Moisture softens the
emulsion, causing the black paper to stick to the film.
• Corrective actions: Careful handling prevents a break in the
seal of the film packet. Always blot excess moisture from
the film packet after removing it from the patient’s mouth.
Fogged Images
Another cause of undiagnostic radiographs is the formation of a
thin, cloudy layer that compromises the clarity of the image. This
film fog and electronic noise (digital images) diminishes contrast
and makes it difficult and often impossible to interpret the radiograph (Figure 18-17). Fogged images are produced in many ways
and can occur before, during, or after exposure or during processing
(Box 18-1). Most fogged radiographs have a similar appearance,
making it difficult to pinpoint the cause. Careful attention to the
exposure techniques and processing method used and darkroom
and image receptor handling protocols will help reduce the occurrence of fogged images.
RADIATION FOG
• Probable cause: Not properly protecting film from stray
radiation before or after exposure.
• Preventive measures: Store film in its original package at
a safe distance from the source of x-rays. Exposing a film
increases its sensitivity; therefore, it is very important that
once a film has been exposed, it should be protected from
the causes of film fog until processed.
WHITE LIGHT FOG
• Probable causes: White light leaking into the darkroom
from around doors or plumbing pipes. White light leaking
into the film packet through a tear in the outer wrapping.
1
2
FIGURE 18-15 Radiograph of maxillary posterior area.
(1) White streak marks show where the softened emulsion has been
scratched off. (2) U-shaped radiopaque band of dense bone shows the
outline of the zygoma.
FIGURE 18-16 Radiograph of primary molar area showing
fingerprint.
FIGURE 18-17 Film fog. Film fog results in lack of image
contrast.
BOX 18-1 Causes of Film Fog
• Radiation
• Light
• Heat
• Humidity
• Chemical fumes
• Aging
238 RADIOGRAPHIC ERRORS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
• Preventive measures: Check the darkroom for white light
leaks. Handle the film packet carefully to prevent tearing the
light-tight outer wrapping.
SAFELIGHT FOG
• Probable cause: A safelight will fog film if the wattage of
the safelight bulb is stronger than recommended; the distance the safelight is located over the work space area is too
close; the filter is the incorrect type or color for the film
being used; or the filter is scratched or otherwise damaged,
allowing white light through. Even when adequate, prolonged exposure to the safelight will fog film.
• Preventive measures: Perform periodic quality control
checks on the darkroom and safelight. Follow film manufacturer’s guidelines when choosing filter color. Check the
bulb wattage, check the distance away from the work space,
and examine the filter for defects. The radiographer should
develop skills necessary to open film packets aseptically
within a two- to three-minute period to minimize the time
films are exposed to the safelight.
MISCELLANEOUS LIGHT FOG
• Probable causes: Glowing light that reaches the film such
as that from watches with fluorescent faces, indicator lights
on equipment stored in the darkroom, and cells phone carried into the darkroom in a radiographer’s pocket have the
potential to create fog. This is especially true when processing sensitive extraoral films.
• Preventive measures: Watches with fluorescent faces should
not be worn in the darkroom while processing film unless
covered with the sleeve of the operator’s protective barrier
gown or lab coat. Luminous dials of equipment located in the
darkroom that glow in unsafe light colors should be masked
with opaque tape. Cell phones should be powered off to avoid
accidental illumination by an incoming call or message.
STORAGE FOG (HEAT, HUMIDITY, AND CHEMICAL FUMES)
• Probable causes: Film fog will result when film is stored
in a warm, damp area or in the vicinity of fume-producing
chemicals.
• Preventive measures: Store film unopened, in its original
package in a cool, dry area. Many practices store film in a
refrigerator until ready to use. Film should not be stored in the
darkroom unless protected from heat, humidity, and fumeproducing processing solutions.
CHEMICAL FOG
• Probable causes: Developing films too long, at too high a
temperature, or in contaminated solutions will produce
film fog.
• Preventive measures: Develop at the recommended
time–temperature cycle. Avoid contamination of processing chemicals. Always replace the manual tank cover in the
same position, with the side over the developer remaining
over the developer and the side over the fixer remaining
over the fixer to prevent contamination of the solutions.
Thoroughly rinse films to remove developer before moving
the film hanger into the fixer.
AGED FILM FOG
• Probable causes: Film emulsion has a shelf life with an expiration date (see Figure 7-9). As film ages, it can become
fogged.
• Preventive measures: Watch the date on film boxes.
Rotate film stock so that the oldest film is used before
newer film. Do not overstock film. Thoroughly research a
supplier before purchasing film, especially when buying in
bulk or from a source found on the Internet.
DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHIC NOISE
• Probable causes: Exposure settings that are extremely low.
When switching from film-based radiography to digital
imaging, there is a tendency to set the exposure factors too
low resulting in radiographic electronic noise.
• Preventive measures: Use correct exposure settings. After
setting at manufacturer’s recommendations, evaluate the
images to determine the need for varying the settings to
eliminate radiographic noise and obtain the desired image
clarity and contrast.
REVIEW—Chapter summary
The dental radiographer should know what a quality diagnostic
radiograph should look like and be able to identify when errors
occur. No radiograph should be retaken until a thorough investigation reveals the exact cause of the error and the appropriate
corrective action is identified and can be implemented. Although
radiographic errors may be classified as technique errors, processing errors, and handling errors, undiagnostic radiographs
are traceable to many causes. Different errors can often produce similar-looking results.
Technique errors include mistakes made in placement of
the image receptor, positioning the tube head and the PID, and
choosing the correct exposure factors. Processing errors
include development mistakes, not following protocols for processing and darkroom use, and chemical contamination. Handling errors include black images, and bent, scratched, damaged,
and fogged images.
Examples of probable causes and corrective actions were
given for not recording the entire tooth and supporting structures, for creating a slanted occlusal plane, for producing herringbone error, and for incorrectly positioning the embossed
identification dot. Examples of probable causes and corrective
actions were given for elongation and foreshortening, overlapping teeth contacts, and conecut error. Examples of probable
causes and corrective actions were given for light/dark,
clear/blank, and double-exposed images and images with poor
definition, the presence of artifacts such as static electricity,
black/white spots and lines, and pressure marks. Examples of
CHAPTER 18 • IDENTIFYING AND CORRECTING UNDIAGNOSTIC RADIOGRAPHS 239
probable causes and corrective actions were given for over- and
underdevelopment; partial images; and green, brown, stained,
and fogged images. Fogged radiographs result from exposure to
stray radiation, light, heat, humidity, chemical fumes, and contamination. Film has a shelf life, and aging may produce film
fog. Electronic noise, the digital equivalent of film fog, results
when radiation exposure settings are set extremely low. Measures to prevent fogged images include controlling these causes.
RECALL—Study questions
1. What is the appropriate corrective action for a periapical
radiograph of the maxillary molar region that did not
image the third molar?
a. Position the image receptor higher in the oral cavity.
b. Position the image receptor lower in the oral cavity.
c. Move the image receptor forward in the oral cavity.
d. Move the image receptor back further in the oral
cavity.
2. Each of the following will result in not recording the
apices of the maxillary premolar teeth on a periapical radiograph EXCEPT one. Which one is the EXCEPTION?
a. Image receptor not placed high enough in relation to
the teeth.
b. Image receptor not placed in toward the midline of
the palate.
c. Patient not occluding all the way down on the image
receptor holder biteblock.
d. Vertical angulation was excessive.
3. What does herringbone error indicate?
a. Embossed dot was positioned incorrectly.
b. Lead foil was processed with the film.
c. Film packet was placed in the oral cavity backwards.
d. Temperatures of the processing chemicals were not
equal.
4. When using the bisecting technique, which of these
errors results from inadequate vertical angulation?
a. Elongation
b. Foreshortening
c. Conecut
d. Overlapping
5. What error results in overlapped contacts being more
severe between the first and second molar than between
the first and second premolar?
a. Excessive vertical angulation
b. Inadequate vertical angulation
c. Mesiodistal projection of horizontal angulation
d. Distomesial projection of horizontal angulation
6. Overlapped teeth contacts renders a bitewing radiograph undiagnostic. The overlap appears more severe
in the anterior region. What corrective action is needed?
a. Increase the vertical angulation.
b. Decrease the vertical angulation.
c. Shift the horizontal angulation toward the mesial.
d. Shift the horizontal angulation toward the distal.
7. Which of these conditions results from a failure to
direct the central ray toward the middle of the image
receptor?
a. Overlapping
b. Conecut
c. Elongation
d. Foreshortening
8. Which of these indicates an overexposed radiograph?
a. Clear image
b. Light image
c. Dark image
d. Double image
9. Each of the following will result in radiographs that are
too light EXCEPT one. Which one is the EXCEPTION?
a. Hot developer solution
b. Old, expired film
c. Underexposing
d. Underdeveloping
10. Each of the following will result in radiographs that
are blank (clear) EXCEPT one. Which one is the
EXCEPTION?
a. No exposure to x-rays
b. Placing films in the fixer first
c. Extended time in warm water rinse
d. Accidental white light exposure
11. If two films become overlapped together because they
were inserted into the automatic processor too quickly,
what is the result?
a. Green films
b. Brown films
c. Light films
d. Black films
12. Which of these indicates that a film was not properly
washed?
a. Image appears light
b. Fogging results
c. Film turns brown
d. White spots form
13. Each of the following will result in black artifacts
on the radiograph EXCEPT one. Which one is the
EXCEPTION?
a. Static electricity
b. Bent film
c. Glove powder
d. Fixer splash
14. Static electricity appears radiographically as black
a. thin lines.
b. starbursts.
c. dots.
d. Any of the above
240 RADIOGRAPHIC ERRORS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
15. Each of the following is a cause of film fog EXCEPT
one. Which one is the EXCEPTION?
a. Exposure to scatter radiation
b. Use of old, expired film
c. Double exposing the film
d. Chemical fume contamination
REFLECT—Case study
You have just finished taking a full mouth series of periapical
and bitewing radiographs. After processing and mounting the
films, you notice the following:
1. The maxillary right molar periapical radiograph did not
image the third molar.
2. The maxillary right canine periapical radiograph appears
elongated, and the image of the root tip is not recorded.
3. The teeth contacts in the right premolar bitewing radiograph are overlapped. The overlapping appears most
severe in the posterior portion of the image and less
severe in the anterior region.
4. The left molar bitewing film was bent when it was
placed into the image receptor holder.
5. The mandibular central incisors periapical radiograph
appears very light, with a hint of a diamondlike pattern
superimposed over the image of the teeth.
6. The film that should have been a left mandibular molar
periapical radiograph is blank, with no hint of an image.
7. The left maxillary premolar periapical radiograph
appears to have been double exposed.
Consider these seven radiographs with the errors noted and
answer the following questions:
a. What is the most likely cause of this error? How did you
arrive at this conclusion?
b. Could there be multiple causes for this error? What
other errors would produce this result?
c. Why do you think this error occurred?
d. What corrective action would you take when retaking
this radiograph? Be specific.
e. What are you basing your decision to reexpose the
patient on?
f. What steps or actions would you recommend to prevent
this error from occurring in the future?
RELATE—Laboratory application
For a comprehensive laboratory practice exercise on this topic,
see Thomson, E. M. (2012). Exercises in oral radiography
techniques: A laboratory manual (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Pearson Education. Chapter 7, “Identifying and correcting radiographic errors.”
REFERENCES
Carestream Health, Inc. (2007). Kodak Dental Systems:Exposure
and processing for dental film radiography. Pub. N-414,
Rochester, NY: Author.
Eastman Kodak Company. (2002). Successful intraoral radiography.
N-418 CAT No. 103. Rochester, NY: Author.
Thomson, E. M. (2012). Exercises in oral radiographic techniques:
A laboratory manual (3rd ed.,). Upper Saddle River,
NJ: Pearson Education.
White, S. C., & Pharoah, M. J. (2008). Oral radiology: Principles and interpretation (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
OBJECTIVES
Following successful completion of this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Define the key words.
2. Explain the relationship between quality assurance and quality control.
3. List the steps of a quality assurance program.
4. Explain the role a competent radiographer plays in quality assurance.
5. List the four objectives of quality control tests.
6. Make a step-wedge with cardboard and lead foil and demonstrate how to use it.
7. List two tests the radiographer can use to monitor a dental x-ray machine.
8. Explain the use of the coin test to monitor darkroom safelighting.
9. Describe how to test for light leaks in the darkroom.
10. Explain the use of a reference film to test processing chemistry.
11. Explain the use of the fresh-film test to monitor the quality of a box of film.
12. Describe quality control tests for radiographic viewing equipment.
13. Advocate the use of quality assurance to produce diagnostic-quality radiographs with minimal radiation exposure.
KEY WORDS
Coin test
Fresh-film test
Light-tight
Quality assurance
Quality control
Reference film
Step-wedge
Quality Assurance in
Dental Radiography
CHAPTER
OUTLINE
 Objectives 241
 Key Words 241
 Introduction 242
 Quality
Administration
Procedures 242
 Competency of the
Radiographer 242
 Quality Control 243
 Benefits of Quality
Assurance
Programs 248
 Review, Recall,
Reflect, Relate 248
 References 250
CHAPTER
19
242 RADIOGRAPHIC ERRORS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
Introduction
Quality assurance is defined as the planning, implementation,
and evaluation of procedures used to produce high-quality radiographs with maximum diagnostic information (yield) while
minimizing radiation exposure. Establishing a quality control
program for radiographic procedures helps to increase the quality
of radiographs produced and decrease the incidence of retake
radiographs. Quality assurance includes both quality administration procedures and quality control techniques (Table 19-1).
The purpose of this chapter is to present quality control tests
that are used to monitor operator competency, the dental x-ray
machine, the darkroom and x-ray processing systems, film and
equipment used to view the images, and documentation and
administrative maintenance.
Quality Administration Procedures
Quality administration refers to conducting a quality assurance
program in the oral health care practice. A quality assurance program
should include an assessment of current practices, where and how
the problems seem to be occurring, a written plan that identifies
who is responsible and what training the personnel need to be
able to carry out the quality control tests, record-keeping, and
periodic evaluations of the plan.
Needs Assessment
Periodically the oral health care team should review patient radiographs for quality. Problems that occur should be documented
and then periodically reviewed to look for areas where a change in
policy, maintenance schedules, or other area is noted.
Written Plan
The oral health care team should develop a written plan that
will guide quality control. The plan should include, but not be
limited to, the purpose of the quality assurance program,
assignment of authority and responsibilities, a list of equipment
that requires monitoring, a list of tests that will be performed
and at what time intervals (Table 19-2), a log of all quality
assurance test results, a log of retake radiographs, documentation of training, and evaluation interval and report.
Careful planning and thoroughly carrying out a quality assurance program increases the likelihood of producing the highest
quality radiographs while minimizing radiation exposure.
Authority and Responsibilities
Although the dentist is ultimately responsible for the overall
quality care that his/her practice provides the patient, each oral
health care team member can be given authority to carry out specific
aspects of the quality control program. Assigning authority and
clearly defining specific tasks and/or maintenance procedures
helps to ensure that the procedures are being carried out. Each
oral health care team member must be informed of how and why
the tasks are to be performed and provided with training opportunities to ensure compentency in performing in this capacity.
Monitoring and Maintenance Schedules
A monitoring schedule listing all the quality control tests, identification of the person responsible for each test, and the frequency of testing should be generated and posted. Checkoff lists
can be used to record maintenance and inspections.
Logs and Periodic Evaluation
A log should be kept of all quality control tests. Include the date,
the specific test, the results, action taken if any, and the name of
the person who conducted the test. Also, a log of all radiographs
retaken should be recorded to identify recurring problems. The
oral healthcare team should meet periodically to evaluate the logs
and the quality assurance program.
Competency of the Radiographer
Essential to a quality assurance program is the ability of the radiographer. Operator errors that result in undiagnostic radiographs
generate the need for retake radiographs. Retakes result in
unnecessary radiation exposure to the patient and lost time for
both the patient and the practice. The radiographer must be
competent not only in exposing, processing, and mounting dental
radiographs, but also in identifying when errors occur. Even
competent radiographers encounter situations where less-thanideal radiographic images result. It is important, therefore, that
TABLE 19-1 Quality Assurance Includes Both
Quality Administration and Quality Control
QUALITY ADMINISTRATION QUALITY CONTROL
Assess needs Operator competence
Develop a written plan X-ray machines
Assign authority and responsibility Darkroom
Provide training Processing equipment
Monitor maintenance schedule Processing chemistry
Document actions and keep records/log X-ray film and storage
Perform periodic evaluation Image viewing
TABLE 19-2 Suggested Time Intervals for
Performing Quality Control Tests
QUALITY CONTROL TEST SUGGESTED TIME INTERVAL
Output consistency Annually
Tube head stability Monthly
Darkroom safelighting Annually
Automatic processor Daily
Processing solutions Daily
Cassettes and screens Annually
Viewboxes Monthly
CHAPTER 19 • QUALITY ASSURANCE IN DENTAL RADIOGRAPHY 243
A B
FIGURE 19-1 Step-wedge. (A) Commercially made
step-wedge. (B) Step-wedge made from discarded sheets of lead foil
from intraoral film packets.
BOX 19-1 Quality Control Tests for Dental
X-ray Machines
1. Radiation output
2. Timer accuracy
3. Milliamperage accuracy
4. Kilovoltage accuracy
5. Focal spot size
6. Filtration (beam quality)
7. Collimation
8. Beam alignment
9. Tube head stability
the radiographer be able to recognize poor quality, identify the
cause, and apply the appropriate corrective action.
Operator errors and retakes should be recorded to identify
recurring problems. Each exposure may be recorded in a log
that can be reviewed periodically to monitor for problems and
the application of the appropriate corrective actions. This will
also help monitor the skills of the radiographer. To aid in operator competency, opportunities such as continuing education
courses or on-the-job-training can assist the radiographer in
brushing up on skills, improving in an area of deficiency,
and/or staying apprised of the newest technology and treatment
recommendations.
Quality Control
Quality control is defined as a series of tests to ensure that the
radiographic system is functioning properly and that the radiographs produced are of an acceptable level of quality. The
objectives of quality control include the following:
1. Maintain a high standard of image quality.
2. Identify problems before image quality is compromised.
3. Keep patient and occupational exposures to a minimum.
4. Reduce the occurrence of retake radiographs.
Examples of quality control measures include tests to evaluate
dental x-ray machine output; tests to evaluate safelighting of
the darkroom, processing chemistry testing and replenishing,
evaluation of safe film storage, view box inspections, calibrations
of computer monitors used to view digital images, documentation
such as records of when processing chemistry needs changing,
posted technique factors near x-ray machines, and a maintenance
log of retakes to keep track of common errors and find solutions
for avoiding them in the future.
Dental X-ray Machine Monitoring
Periodic comprehensive testing of the x-ray machine is essential
to a quality assurance program. These tests include radiation output, timer accuracy, accuracy of milliamperage and kilovoltage
settings, focal spot size, filtration (beam quality), collimation,
beam alignment, and tube head stability (Box 19-1). State and
local health departments may provide or require x-ray machine
testing as part of their registration or licensing programs. In this
case, a qualified health physicist will conduct most of these tests
prior to renewing registration or license. However, the radiographer who uses the equipment on a daily basis should also play a
role in monitoring the x-ray machine. Additionally, a working
knowledge of the quality control tests available will help the
radiographer identify when the equipment is not functioning at
peak performance.
OUTPUT CONSISTENCY TEST (PROCEDURE BOXES 19-1 AND
19-2) Radiation output may be monitored by the radiographer
using a step-wedge. A step-wedge is a device of layered metal
steps of varying thickness used to determine image density and
contrast. A step-wedge may also be used to test the strength of
the processing chemicals, which will be discussed later.
A step-wedge may be obtained commercially or be made
using several pieces of lead foil from intraoral film packets
(Figure 19-1). To perform the radiation output test, the stepwedge is placed on a size #2 intraoral image receptor on the
counter or exam chair and then exposed with set exposure factors. This film is put aside, protected from stray radiation, heat
and humidity, and other potential causes of film fog (see
Chapter 18). The process is repeated with a new film at intervals determined by the practice. For example, the first exposure
may be made in the morning, followed by a second exposure at
midday and a third exposure at the end of the day. At the end of
the desired time frame, all the exposed films are processed at
the same time and evaluated. Consistency in radiation output
will produce three radiographs with images of the step-wedge
that are identical in densities and contrast. A failed test will
produce images that are different from each other, indicating
that the radiation output varied over the course of the day
(Figure 19-2). A failed test would indicate that a qualified
health physicist should examine the x-ray machine.
TUBE HEAD STABILITY Another test the radiographer should
make regularly on the dental x-ray machine is tube head stability. A drifting tube head must not be used until the support arm
and yoke are properly adjusted to prevent movement of the tube
head during exposure. To test for drift, the radiographer should
position the tube head in various positions that will likely be
needed for radiographic exposures to evaluate stability in each
PROCEDURE 19-1
Assembling a step-wedge
1. Divide a piece of cardboard the size of a #2 x-ray film into thirds.
2. Leave the first third uncovered, and cover the remaining two-thirds with two pieces of lead backing from
a discarded film packet. Tape into place.
3. Cover the final third with four additional pieces of lead backing, taping them into place.
244 RADIOGRAPHIC ERRORS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
2 lead foils
4 lead foils Cardboard
Clear Dark gray Black
Gray Too dark Gray
Safelight,
light leaks,
age of film,
improper storage,
under development
Over exposure Under exposure,
under development
(too cold, too short,
exhausted, contaminated),
age of film
Under exposure,
under development
(too cold, too short,
exhausted, diluted,
contaminated),
age of film
Too light
Check for:
If it is:
Should appear:
FIGURE 19-2 Sketch of a step-wedge. A step-wedge is useful in making visual comparisons for
quality control.
of the positions. When not in use, the support arm should be
folded into a closed position with the PID pointing down to prevent weight stress from loosening the support arm and causing
drift (Figure 19-3).
Darkroom Monitoring
The darkroom should be evaluated for the presence of conditions
that create film fog and compromise image quality. The darkroom
should be checked to determine that it is adequately ventilated,
free from chemical fumes, within the prescribed temperature and
humidity range recommended by the film manufacturer, beyond
the reach of stray radiation, and light-tight. The key to a safe
darkroom is an appropriate safelight.
SAFELIGHT TEST As you will recall from Chapter 8, the safelight must have a bulb of the proper wattage, have a filter color
CHAPTER 19 • QUALITY ASSURANCE IN DENTAL RADIOGRAPHY 245
FIGURE 19-3 Correct position of tube head when
not in use. Extension arm folded, tube head and PID
aimed at the floor.
PROCEDURE 19-2
Procedure for x-ray machine output consistency test
1. Prepare a step-wedge or use a commercially made device (see Procedure Box 19-1).
2. Obtain three (or desired number) size #2 intraoral film packets from the same package.
3. Place two of the films in a safe place, protected from film fog–causing elements (stray
radiation, heat, humidity, chemical fumes).
4. Place one of the film packets on the counter or exam chair within reach of the x-ray tube head.
5. Place the step-wedge on top of the film packet.
6. Position the x-ray tube head over the film packet and step-wedge, and direct the central rays of the x-ray
beam perpendicularly toward the film packet. Place the open end of the PID exactly 1 in. (2.5 cm) above
the film packet. Use a ruler for accuracy.
7. Set the exposure factors to those utilized for an adult patient maxillary anterior periapcial radiograph.
8. Make the exposure.
9. Place the exposed film in a safe place, protected from film fog–causing elements (stray radiation, heat,
humidity, chemical fumes).
10. Some time after the first exposure (at the desired time interval), retrieve one of the stored size #2 intraoral film packets.
11. Repeat steps 4 through 9.
12. Some time after the first two exposures (at the desired time interval), retrieve the other stored size #2
intraoral film packet.
13. Repeat steps 4 through 9.
14. When ready, process all three of the films at the same time.
15. When processing is complete, observe all three of the films for consistency in density and constrast.
16. A failed test will show a difference in density or contrast among the three images.
17. Call a qualified health physicist to examine the x-ray machine if needed.
PROCEDURE 19-3
Coin test for safelight adequacy
1. Obtain a size #2 intraoral film packet and a coin.
2. Place the film packet on the counter or exam chair within reach of the x-ray tube head.
3. Position the x-ray tube head over the film packet. Direct the central rays of the x-ray beam perpendicularly toward the film packet. Place the open end of the PID about 12 in. (30 cm) above the film packet.
4. Set the exposure factors to the lowest possible setting.
5. Make the exposure.
6. Take the slightly exposed film and a coin to the darkroom. Turn off the overhead white light and turn on
the safelight.
7. Unwrap the film packet and place the film on the counter where you would normally process patient
films.
8. Place the coin on top of the unwrapped film.
9. Wait approximately two or three minutes.
10. Remove the coin from the film and process the film in the usual manner.
11. When processing is complete, observe the film for any outline of the coin. (The film will have an overall
gray appearance or slight fogging from the slight radiation exposure in step 5. However, you are looking
for a distinguishable outline of the coin.)
12. A failed test will show an outline of the coin.
13. Examine the safelight for correct bulb wattage, filter color, scratches or cracks, and distance away from
working area. Perform additional tests to check for possible white light leaks or the presence of other
light sources.
246 RADIOGRAPHIC ERRORS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
prompt the radiographer to check to be sure that the safelight bulb
wattage is correct and that the filter color is appropriate for the
film used. The distance away from the working area should be
checked, and the safelight filter should be visually inspected for
scratches or cracks in the filter that would allow white light to
escape.
TEST FOR LIGHT LEAKS Whether the darkroom is light-tight
can be determined by closing the door and turning off all lights,
including the safelight. Light leaks, if present, become visible
after about five minutes when the eyes become accustomed to
the dark. Possible sources of light leaks include around the
entry door or around the pipes leading into the darkroom. Drop
ceiling tiles and ventilation screens may also allow white light
to enter the darkroom. While eyes are still adjusted to the dark,
white light leaks may be marked with tape or chalk to allow the
radiographer to find them when the white overhead lights are
turned back on. Light leaks should be sealed with tape or
weather stripping.
Additional sources of inappropriate light include illuminated
dials or fluorescent objects worn or carried into the darkroom
by personnel. Illuminated dials on equipment located in the
darkroom must be red or may be masked with tape if necessary.
deemed safe for the film being processed, and be located a safe
distance from the working area where films will be unwrapped.
The coin test can be used to test the safelight for adequacy.
The coin test uses a coin and a slightly exposed film to
determine safelight adequacy (Procedure Box 19-3). Because
films that have already been exposed are more sensitive to
conditions that cause film fog, a true test of the safelight uses
a film that is preexposed to a small amount of radiation. After
the test film has been slightly exposed, it is unwrapped in the
darkroom under safelight conditions and placed on the counter
where patient films will normally be unwrapped. A coin is
placed on top of the unwrapped film for two or three minutes.
This period simulates the approximate time required to aseptically unwrap a full mouth series of films and load them into
the processor. It is assumed that while the film is on the
counter, the portion of the film that remains under the metal
coin would be protected from possible light exposure, while
the rest of the area would receive exposure if the light was
unsafe.
When the time is up, the film is processed as usual. After
processing, the film is examined. An image of the outline of the
coin would indicate a failed test, suggesting that the safelight
conditions in the darkroom are fogging the film. A failed test should
CHAPTER 19 • QUALITY ASSURANCE IN DENTAL RADIOGRAPHY 247
Fluorescent wristwatch faces should not be worn in the darkroom unless covered by the sleeve of the operator’s lab coat.
Operators who carry a cell phone in a pocket must completely
shield any light or shut off the phone to prevent accidental
illumination should there be an incoming call.
Processing System Monitoring
Processing equipment and chemistry need to be monitored, and
quality control tests should be performed on a periodic basis.
AUTOMATIC PROCESSOR The key to peak performance of an
automatic processor is maintenance. Often the unit manufacturer
will recommend daily, weekly, monthly, and quarterly maintenance and cleaning procedures to ensure quality performance. A
schedule of set maintenance procedures, and a log of when those
procedures need to be performed, should be posted with the
maintenance scheduling.
These two tests are helpful in daily monitoring of the automatic processor:
1. Begin by processing an unexposed film under safelight
conditions. The film should come out of the return chute of
the automatic processor clear (slightly blue tinted) and dry.
2. Then process a film that has been exposed to white light.
This film should come out of the return chute of the automatic processor black and dry after processing.
A failed test should prompt the operator to check the solutions,
the water supply, and film dryer. The solution levels should be
checked and must be replenished and changed on a regular basis.
The processor should maintain the correct temperature. The water
supply must be turned on and the dryer operating correctly to
produce a clear, dry film.
PROCESSING SOLUTIONS As explained in Chapter 8, chemical manufacturers recommend extending the life of processing solutions with regular replenishment and changing out
expired solutions with fresh chemicals at regular intervals.
Therefore it is important to monitor the strength of the processing solutions on a daily basis, before undiagnostic film
images result.
The developer solution is the most critical of the processing
solutions and demands careful attention. When the developer solution
deteriorates and loses strength, the underdeveloped radiographic
images lighten. Commercially available instruments are available
that can be utilized to monitor the developer. (Figure 19-4) These
devices utilize a filmstrip with several density steps for comparison
to a test film.
The radiographer may prepare a step-wedge from discarded lead foil from intraoral film packets, discussed earlier,
to monitor the developer as well (Procedure Box 19-4). Using
the step-wedge, several films are exposed at the same settings,
all at the same time. At the beginning of the day, immediately
after fresh chemistry has been prepared, one of the exposed
films is processed. This becomes the reference film, with the
ideal image density and contrast. The remaining exposed films
should be stored in a cool, dry place protected from stray radiation and other conditions that produce film fog. At the beginning
of each day, one of the previously exposed films is processed
and compared to the reference film. Each subsequent film
should match the reference film in density and contrast. A failed
test would indicate that the processing chemicals, particularly
the developer, is losing strength and needs to be changed
(Figure 19-2).
X-ray Film Monitoring
Only fresh x-ray film should be used for exposing dental radiographs. Film manufacturers use a series of quality control tests
to ensure dental x-ray film quality. Film should be properly
stored, protected, and used before the expiration date. Check
the expiration date on the x-ray film box and always use the
oldest film first.
The fresh-film test can be used to monitor the quality of
each box of film. When a new film box is opened for use, immediately process one of the films without exposing it. If the film is
fresh, it will appear clear with a slight blue tint. If the film appears
fogged, the remaining films in the box should not be used.
Equipment Used to View Radiographic
Images Monitoring
VIEWBOX If functioning properly, the viewbox should give off
a uniform, subdued light. Flickering light may indicate bulb failure.
The surface of the viewbox should be wiped clean as needed.
COMPUTER MONITOR As discussed in Chapter 9, all types
of monitors perform equally well at displaying digital radiographs for interpretation and diagnosis. Periodically performing
quality control calibrations on the monitor will keep the image
displayed at the proper resolution and gray scale. The manufacturer’s
recommendations should be followed
The location of the monitor where images are viewed should
be evaluated to ensure that bright ambient light is not producing
glare off the monitor surface that will compromise viewing the
images. With the computer turned off, take the usual operator
position in front of the monitor, either seated or standing.
Observe the monitor for reflected images indicating that the
monitor should be moved to a position that eliminates glare.
Extraoral Equipment Monitoring
CASSETTES AND INTENSIFYING SCREENS Quality control procedures include periodically examining cassettes and intensifying
FIGURE 19-4 Dental radiographic quality control device.
Available from Xray QC [formerly Dental Radiographic Devices],
www.xrayqc.com.
PROCEDURE 19-4
Reference film to monitor processing solutions
1. Prepare a step-wedge or use a commercially made device (see Procedure Box 19-1).
2. Obtain several size #2 intraoral film packets from the same package.
3. Place one of the film packets on the counter or exam chair within reach of the x-ray tube head.
4. Place the step-wedge on top of the film packet.
5. Position the x-ray tube head over the film packet and step-wedge, and direct the central rays of the x-ray
beam perpendicularly toward the film packet. Place the open end of the PID exactly 1 in. (2.5 cm) above
the film packet. Use a ruler for accuracy.
6. Set the exposure factors to those utilized for an adult patient maxillary anterior periapcial radiograph.
7. Make the exposure.
8. Place the exposed film in a safe place, protected from film fog–causing elements (stray radiation, heat,
humidity, chemical fumes).
9. Immediately repeat steps 3 through 8 with the rest of the films.
10. Following a complete solution change of the processing chemistry, process one of the exposed films. This
film is the reference film.
11. Mount the reference film on the viewbox.
12. Each day immediately after replenishing the processing chemistry, retrieve one of the stored exposed
films and process as usual.
13. Compare the film processed on this day to the reference film processed when the chemistry was
changed. Look for similar density and contrast indicating that the processing solutions are functioning at
peak levels.
14. Repeat steps 12 and 13 each day. The solutions are exhausted and need to be changed when the density and contrast of the just-processed film does not match the reference film.
248 RADIOGRAPHIC ERRORS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
screens. Extraoral cassettes should be checked for warping and
light leaks that can result in fogged radiographs. Defective cassettes should be repaired or replaced.
Intensifying screens should be examined for cleanliness
and scratches. Any specks of dirt, lint, or other material will
absorb the light given off by the screen crystals and produce
white or clear artifacts on the resultant radiographic image.
Dirty screens should be cleaned as needed with solutions recommended by the screen manufacturer. However, overuse of
chemical cleaning should be avoided. Any scratched or damaged
screen should be repaired or replaced.
Benefits of Quality Assurance Programs
Everyone benefits from a well-organized quality assurance program. The time required to assess, plan, implement, and evaluate
a quality assurance program is made up in the time saved and
the benefits gained avoiding the production of poor-quality
radiographs and retakes.
Periodic evaluation of the program will allow for flexibility
as changes in recommended protocols or new techniques come
into being. The ultimate goal of quality assurance is to produce
radiographs with the greatest amount of diagnostic yield using
the smallest amount of radiation exposure.
REVIEW—Chapter summary
Quality assurance is defined as the planning, implementation, and
evaluation of procedures used to produce high-quality radiographs
with maximum diagnostic information (yield) while minimizing
radiation exposure. Quality assurance includes both quality
administration procedures and quality control techniques.
Quality administration refers to conducting a quality assurance program in the oral health care practice. The five steps to a
quality administration program are (1) assess needs, (2) develop a
written plan, (3) assign authority and responsibilities, (4) develop
monitoring and maintenance schedules, and (5) utilize a log and
evaluations to check on the program.
The key to producing the highest quality diagnostic radiographs
with the lowest possible radiation exposure is operator competence.
Quality control is defined as a series of tests to ensure that
the radiographic system is functioning properly and that the
radiographs produced are of an acceptable level of quality.
CHAPTER 19 • QUALITY ASSURANCE IN DENTAL RADIOGRAPHY 249
These tests include the monitoring of the dental x-ray machine,
the darkroom, processing system, and x-ray film. A step-wedge
is a valuable tool that can be used in a variety of tests.
Quality control tests for monitoring dental x-ray machines
include the output consistency test and tube head stability. Quality
control tests for monitoring the darkroom include the coin test for
checking the safelight and for checking for light leaks. Quality
control tests for monitoring the processing system include monitoring the processing solutions with the use of a reference film
or a commercial device. The fresh film test is used to monitor
dental x-ray film.
Everyone, the oral health care team and the patients, benefits
from a well-organized quality assurance program.
RECALL—Study questions
1. The goal of quality assurance is to achieve maximum
diagnostic yield from each radiograph.
Quality control means using tests to ensure quality.
a. The first statement is true. The second statement is
false.
b. The first statement is false. The second statement is
true.
c. Both statements are true.
d. Both statements are false.
2. On-the-job training and continuing education courses
contribute to radiographic competence.
Competent radiographers are key to a quality assurance
program.
a. The first statement is true. The second statement is
false.
b. The first statement is false. The second statement is
true.
c. Both statements are true.
d. Both statements are false.
3. List the four objectives of quality control.
a. ______________
b. ______________
c. ______________
d. ______________
4. The step-wedge can be used to test each of the following
EXCEPT one. Which one is the EXCEPTION?
a. Dental x-ray machine output consistency
b. Processing chemistry strength
c. Density and contrast of the image
d. Adequacy of the safelight
5. Each of the following is a quality control test for monitoring the dental x-ray machine EXCEPT one. Which
one is the EXCEPTION?
a. Tube head stability test
b. Coin test
c. Output consistency test
d. Timer, milliamperage, and kilovoltage setting accuracy test
6. The use of the coin test will monitor darkroom safelight
conditions.
When an image of the coin appears on the radiograph,
the safelight is adequate.
a. The first statement is true. The second statement is
false.
b. The first statement is false. The second statement is
true.
c. Both statements are true.
d. Both statements are false.
7. A film processed under ideal conditions and used to
compare subsequent radiographic images is a
a. fresh film.
b. fogged film.
c. periapical film.
d. reference film.
8. When the automatic processor is functioning properly, an unexposed film will exit the return chute
dry and
a. black.
b. clear.
c. green.
d. with the image of a coin.
9. In addition to the dentist, who is responsible for planning, implementing, and evaluating a quality assurance
plan?
a. Dental assistant
b. Dental hygienist
c. Practice manager
d. All of the above
REFLECT—Case study
The practice where you work needs to update their radiographic
quality control plan. Currently the basic plan mentions the need to
test the x-ray machine and monitor the darkroom and processing
systems. Applying what you have learned in this chapter, develop
a quality control plan for your practice. Include the following:
1. List of equipment you think the practice should be testing
2. The name of the test needed
3. Recommended time interval for performing the test
4. Name of the person assigned to perform the test
5. A description of what a failed test and a successful test
would look like
6. The action required if a failed test results
Then prepare the following documents that your practice
would use to assist the quality assurance plan:
1. A detailed, step-by-step procedure that someone could follow to perform each of the tests you have recommended
2. Forms to keep a log of the outcomes for each of the tests
you recommended
250 RADIOGRAPHIC ERRORS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
RELATE—Laboratory application
For a comprehensive laboratory practice exercise on this topic,
see Thomson, E. M. (2012). Exercises in oral radiography
techniques: A laboratory manual (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Pearson Education. Chapter 13, “Radiographic
quality assurance.”
REFERENCES
American Academy of Dental Radiology Quality Assurance
Committee. (1983). Recommendations for quality assurance
in dental radiography. Oral Surgery, 55, 421–426.
Eastman Kodak. (1998). Quality assurance in dental radiography.
Rochester, NY: Author.
National Council of Radiation Protection and Measurements.
(1988). Quality assurance for diagnostic imaging equipment:
Recommendations of the National Council on Radiation
Protection and Measurements. NCRP Report no. 99.
Bethesda, MD: NCRP Publications.
Thomson, E. M. (2012). Exercises in oral radiographic techniques. A laboratory manual, (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Pearson Education.
OBJECTIVES
Following successful completion of this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Define the key words.
2. Identify agencies responsible for regulations regarding safe handling of hazardous radiographic products.
3. Use MSDSs to identify proper handling and disposal of chemicals and materials associated
with radiographic procedures.
4. List the requirements of the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard.
5. Identify radiographic wastes that are considered hazardous to personnel and harmful to the
environment.
6. Advocate the need for safe handling and proper disposal of radiographic chemicals and
materials.
7. Demonstrate effective use of an eyewash station.
KEY WORDS
Alkaline
Biodegradable
Caustic
Eyewash station
Hazardous waste
Material Safety and Data Sheets (MSDSs)
Neoprene gloves
Nitrile gloves
pH
PPE (personal protective equipment)
Silver thiosulphate complex
Waste stream
CHAPTER
20 Safety and Environmental
Responsibilities in Dental
Radiography
CHAPTER
OUTLINE
 Objectives 251
 Key Words 251
 Introduction 252
 Requirements for
Safety and
Environmental
Health 252
 Safe Handling of
Radiographic
Chemicals and
Materials 252
 Management of
Radiographic
Wastes 259
 Review, Recall,
Reflect, Relate 261
 References 263
252 RADIOGRAPHIC ERRORS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
Introduction
To work safely with and around ionizing radiation, dental
assistants and dental hygienists study the characteristics and
properties of x-ray energy. Competence in dental radiation
safety results from a thorough understanding of the appropriate
uses and the potential effects of x-radiation. It is equally important that oral health care professionals understand the properties
and actions of the chemicals and materials that are used in the
production of dental radiographs. Radiographic chemicals and
materials that require careful handling and special disposal
considerations include silver in radiographic film emulsions and
silver thiosulphate complexes in used fixer chemistry; the lead
used in intraoral film packets, lead aprons and thyroid collars,
and older film storage boxes; and broken or obsolete digital
imaging systems. Safe handling of these materials and other
products used in dental radiography will help prevent errors that
may lead to retake radiographs for the patient; avoid injury to the
radiographer; and reduce the potential harm to the environment.
Although the individual oral health care practice generates a
small amount of these hazardous wastes, collectively the potential
exists for a significant impact on the environment. A heightened
awareness of the impact of these wastes on our environment is
changing the way we manage their disposal.
Requirements for Safety and
Environmental Health
Two agencies responsible for recommendations and regulations
regarding safe handling of chemicals and other potentially harmful materials and for the management of hazardous wastes used
in dental radiography are:
• Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OHSA)
Introduced in Chapter 10, we learned that OHSA sets and
enforces regulations that protect the radiographer from
infection in the oral health care setting. OHSA also develops standards for workplace safety regarding the handling
of radiographic chemicals.
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) We learned
in Chapter 10 that the EPA plays a role in the regulation of
disinfectants used in radiographic infection control practices. The EPA’s primary responsibility is to establish and
enforce national standards that protect humans and the
environment.
OSHA requires that manufacturers of chemical products
such as developer and fixer supply Material Safety Data Sheets
(MSDSs) to the oral health care practices that purchase these
products (Figure 20-1). MSDS provide the oral health care
professional with information regarding the properties and the
potential health effects of the product. MSDSs include the
following information:
• Chemical ingredients and common name
• Potential hazards of working with the product
• An explanation of the product’s stability and reactivity
• Requirements for safe handling and storage
• Exposure controls and personal protection required when
using the product
• Disposal considerations
• Regulatory information
Dentists are required by OHSA to obtain and keep on file
an MSDS for every chemical product used in the practice. The
MSDS should be reviewed by all personnel who will work with
the product and kept for easy reference and periodic review to
ensure safe handling. All personnel should receive training and
practice with safe handling of the product and appropriate
emergency exposure responses.
Chemical product manufacturers must also provide warning
labels. Labeling products assists the radiographer in safe management of these products (Figure 20-2). Product labels should
be designed according to the OSHA Hazard Communication
Standard that states that oral health care employees have a right
to know the identities of, and the potential hazards of, the chemicals they will be working with (Box 20-1). Radiographers also
need to know what protective measures to take to prevent adverse
effects that might result when working with the product. This
information will assist the radiographer in establishing proper
work practices and in taking steps to reduce exposure and the
occurrence of work-related illnesses and injuries caused by the
products. All containers must be labeled. This includes the developer and fixer tanks, even those inside an automatic processor,
tubs used to clean the processor rollers, and any containers used
for disposing absorbent towels used to clean up a spill.
MSDSs and product labels must be obtained from the
manufacturer for all chemicals used in radiographic procedures. These include:
• Fixer
• Developer
• Disinfectants
• Cleaners used on processing equipment
Safe Handling of Radiographic Chemicals
and Materials
Safe handling and appropriate exposure emergency responses
when working with the chemicals used in radiographic procedures can be found on the MSDSs for the specific product being
used. The following are general safe handling instructions.
Because the chemical makeup of products will vary depending
on the manufacturer, the radiographer must be familiar with the
BOX 20-1 Requirements of OSHA Hazard
Communication Standard
• Develop a written hazard communication program.
• Maintain an inventory list of all hazardous chemicals present in
the oral health care facility.
• Obtain and have accessible MSDSs for all chemicals.
• Label containers of hazardous chemicals.
• Train all personnel in safe handling of the hazardous chemicals.
253
1. CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION
PRODUCT NAME: FORMULA 2000 PLUS COMPONENT 1
PRODUCT TYPE: Special cleaner for removal of oxidation/
reduction products from X-ray film developers
IMPORTER/
DISTRIBUTOR: Air Techniques, Inc.
1295 Walt Whitman Road
Melville, NY 11747, USA
Phone: 516-433-7676
PRIMARY EMERGENCY
CONTACT: CHEMTREC Phone: 1-800-424-9300
2.
CAS# % By Wt. Exposure Limits
COMPOSITION/INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS
Component
1-Hydroxyethane-1, 1- 2809-21-4 1 – 5 N/A
diphosphonic acid
Thiourea 62-56-6 1 – 5 OSHA 1 mg/kg
Water 7732-18-5 60 – 95 N/A
3. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION
POTENTIAL HEALTH EFFECTS:
ROUTE(S) OF ENTRY: Skin and eye contact
HUMAN EFFECTS AND SYMPTOMS OF OVEREXPOSURE:
1-Hydroxyethane-1,1-diphosphonic acid is a severe eye irritant and a skin irritant.
Thiourea is toxic by ingestion or inhalation. It is an irritant to skin, eyes and
respiratory passages. It may cause sensitization.
CARCINOGENICITY:
NTP: Yes thiourea listed as “reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen”
IARC: Yes thiourea group 2B, “possibly carcinogenic to humans”
OSHA: No
California Prop. 65 thiourea listed as “Chemicals known to the State to
cause cancer”
4. FIRST AID MEASURES
SKIN: Remove contaminated clothing and shoes. Flush affected area with large
amounts of water. Do not use solvents or thinners. Get immediate medical attention.
EYES: Hold eyes open and flush for at least 15 minutes with large amounts of
water. Get immediate medical attention.
INGESTION: Do not induce vomiting. Give two glasses of water to dilute stomach
contents. Never give anything by mouth to an unconscious person. Get immediate
medical attention.
INHALATION: Remove to fresh air immediately. If breathing is difficult administer
oxygen. Get immediate medical attention.
5. FIRE FIGHTING MEASURES
FLASH POINT:. N/A
EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: Use extinguishing media suitable for surrounding fire.
SPECIAL FIRE FIGHTING PROCEDURES: Product is not flammble. However,
overheating of containers will produce toxic fumes. Use self contained breathing
apparatus and full protective clothing.
6. ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES
SPILL AND LEAK PROCEDURES: Wear appropriate personal protective equipment;
contain spills onto inert absorbent and place in suitable containers.
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET 0
3 0
0
4-EXTREME
3-HIGH
2-MODERATE
1-SLIGHT
0-INSIGNIFICANT
NFPA FIRE
HAZARD SYMBOL
FLAMMABILITY
HEALTH REACTIVITY
SEE NFPA704 F0R DETAILED EXPLANATION
SPECIAL
HAZARDS
7. HANDLING AND STORAGE
STORAGE: Store closed containers in an area away from heat. Do not store at temperatures below 5°C.
HANDLING: Use with adequate ventilation. Avoid skin and eye contact. Do not eat,
drink or smoke in application area.
8. EXPOSURE CONTROLS/PERSONAL PROTECTION
RESPIRATORY PROTECTION: If airborne concentration exceeds recommended limits,
use a NIOSH approved respirator in accordance with OSHA Respirator Protection
requirements under 29 CFR 1910.134.
SKIN PROTECTION: Clothing suitable to avoid skin contact. Use neoprene, nitrile or
natural rubber gloves. Check suitability recommendations by protective equipment
manufacturers, especially towards chemical breakthrough resistance.
EYE PROTECTION: Safety goggles with side shields.
9.
10. STABILITY AND REACTIVITY
CHEMICAL STABILITY: Stable
HAZARDOUS DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS: Sulfur dioxide.
POLYMERIZATION: Hazardous polymerization will not occur.
INCOMPATIBILITIES: Strong acids and alkaline materials.
11. TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION
See Section 3 – Human Effects and Symptoms of Overexposure
12. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION
Avoid contamination of ground water or waterways. Do not discharge into sewers.
13. DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS
Dispose of in accordance with Federal, State or Local regulations.
14. TRANSPORT INFORMATION
DOT SHIPPING NAME: NOT REGULATED.
15. REGULATORY INFORMATION
All components of this product are on the TSCA Inventory.
SARA Title III:
Thiourea is subject to the supplier notification requirements of Section 313 of the
Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA/EPCRA) and the requirements of 40 CFR Part 372.
Note: Entries under this section cover only those regulations typically addressed in
the MSDS generating process, such as TSCA, and EPCRA/SARA Title III.
16. OTHER INFORMATION
HAZCOM LABEL: DANGER! CAUSES EYE BURNS. MAY CAUSE SKIN IRRITATION.
POSSIBLE CANCER HAZARD. CONTAINS INGREDIENT THAT CAUSED CANCER IN
ANIMALS.
To the best of our knowledge, the information contained in this MSDS is accurate.
It is intended to assist the user in his evaluation of the product’s hazards, and safety
precautions to be taken in its use. The data on this MSDS relate only to the specific
material designated herein. We do not assume any liability for the use of, or
reliance on this information, nor do we guarantee its accuracy or completeness.
Printed in Germany 2009-21-01
PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
PHYSICAL FORM: Clear Colorless Liquid
ODOR: Characteristic
PH: 1.0 – 2.0
BOILING POINT: ~212°F (100°C)
AUTOIGNITION: N/A
VAPOR PRESSURE: N/A
SOLUBILITY IN WATER:
DENSITY: 1.02 -1.04 g/cm3
Completely
FIGURE 20-1 Sample MSDS. (Courtesy of Air Techniques, Inc.) (Continued)
254
3. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION
POTENTIAL HEALTH EFFECTS:
ROUTE(S) OF ENTRY: Inhalation, skin and eye contact
HUMAN EFFECTS AND SYMPTOMS OF OVEREXPOSURE:
Sodium persulfate is a severe irritant to skin, eyes and respiratory passages. May
cause sensitization by inhalation or skin contact.
CARCINOGENICITY:
NTP: No
IARC: No
OSHA: No
4. FIRST AID MEASURES
SKIN: Remove contaminated clothing and shoes. Flush affected area with large
amounts of water. Do not use solvents or thinners. Get immediate medical attention.
EYES: Hold eyes open and flush for at least 15 minutes with large amounts of
water. Get immediate medical attention.
INGESTION: Do not induce vomiting. Give two glasses of water to dilute stomach
contents. Never give anything by mouth to an unconscious person. Get immediate
medical attention.
INHALATION: Remove to fresh air immediately. If breathing is difficult administer
oxygen. Get immediate medical attention.
5. FIRE FIGHTING MEASURES
FLASH POINT: N/A
EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: Alcohol foam, carbon dioxide, dry powder, or water
spray.
SPECIAL FIRE FIGHTING PROCEDURES: Product is not flammable. However, overheating of containers will produce toxic fumes. Use self contained breathing apparatus and full protective clothing.
6. ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES
SPILL AND LEAK PROCEDURES: Wear appropriate personal protective equipment;
collect and place in suitable containers.
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
1. CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION
PRODUCT NAME:
PRODUCT TYPE:
IMPORTER/
DISTRIBUTOR:
PRIMARY EMERGENCY
CONTACT:
FORMULA 2000 PLUS COMPONENT 2
Special cleaner for removal of oxidation/
reduction products from X-ray film developers
Air Techniques, Inc.
1295 Walt Whitman Road
Melville, NY 11747, USA
Phone: 516-433-7676
CHEMTREC Phone: 1-800-424-9300
2.
45 – 55
COMPOSITION/INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS
Component
Sodium persulfate 0.1 mg/m3 TWA ACGIH
Sodium sulfate
CAS# % By Wt. Exposure Limits
7775-27-1
45 – 55 N/A
45 – 55
7757-82-6
7. HANDLING AND STORAGE
STORAGE: Store closed containers in an area away from heat and combustible
materials.
HANDLING: Use with adequate ventilation. Avoid skin and eye contact. Do not eat,
drink or smoke in application area.
8. EXPOSURE CONTROLS/PERSONAL PROTECTION
RESPIRATORY PROTECTION: If airborne concentration exceeds recommended
limits, use a NIOSH approved respirator in accordance with OSHA Respirator
Protection requirements under 29 CFR 1910.134.
SKIN PROTECTION: Clothing suitable to avoid skin contact. Use neoprene, nitrile
or natural rubber gloves. Check suitability recommendations by protective equipment
manufacturers, especially towards chemical breakthrough resistance.
EYE PROTECTION: Safety goggles with side shields.
10. STABILITY AND REACTIVITY
CHEMICAL STABILITY: Stable.
HAZARDOUS DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS: Oxides of Sulfur.
POLYMERIZATION: Hazardous polymerization will not occur.
INCOMPATIBILITIES: Will oxidize organic substances. Keep away from alkalis,
metals, reducing agents and combustible substances.
11. TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION
See Section 3 Human Effects and Symptoms of Overexposure
12. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION
Avoid contamination of ground water or waterways. Do not discharge into sewers.
May be toxic to aquatic organisms.
13. DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS
Dispose of in accordance with Federal, State or Local regulations.
14. TRANSPORT INFORMATION
DOT SHIPPING NAME: NOT REGULATED.
15. REGULATORY INFORMATION
All components of this product are on the TSCA Inventory.
SARA Title III:
To the best of our knowledge this product contains no toxic chemicals subject to
the supplier notification requirements of Section 313 of the Superfund Amendments
and Reauthorization Act (SARA/EPCRA) and the requirements of 40 CFR Part 372.
Note: Entries under this section cover only those regulations typically addressed in
the MSDS generating process, such as, TSCA, and EPCRA/SARA Title III.
16. OTHER INFORMATION
HAZCOM LABEL: WARNING! CAUSES SKIN AND EYE IRRITATION. MAY
CAUSE SENSITIZATION BY INHALATION AND SKIN CONTACT.
To the best of our knowledge, the information contained in this MSDS is accurate.
It is intended to assist the user in his evaluation of the product’s hazards, and safety
precautions to be taken in its use. The data on this MSDS relate only to the specific
material designated herein. We do not assume any liability for the use of, or
reliance on this information, nor do we guarantee its accuracy or completeness.
Printed in Germany 2009-21-01
9. PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
PHYSICAL FORM:
ODOR:
pH: N/A
AUTOIGNITION:
VAPOR PRESSURE:
SOLUBILITY IN WATER:
BULK DENSITY:
White powder
Odorless
N/A
N/A
Completely
1100 kg/m3
0
3 0
0
4-EXTREME
3-HIGH
2-MODERATE
1-SLIGHT
0-INSIGNIFICANT
NFPA FIRE
HAZARD SYMBOL
FLAMMABILITY
HEALTH REACTIVITY
SEE NFPA 704 F0R DETAILED EXPLANATION
SPECIAL
HAZARDS
FIGURE 20-1 (Continued)
CHAPTER 20 • SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT RESPONSIBILITIES IN DENTAL RADIOGRAPHY 255
KODAK GBX Developer and
Replenisher
KODAK GBX Fixer and Replenisher
WHEN DILUTED FOR USE AS RECOMMENDED
Contains:
Water
Ammonium thiosulfate
Sodium bisulfite
CAS Reg. #
7732-18-5
7783-18-8
7631-90-5
Concentrates (not diluted solution) made by:
Eastman Kodak Company
Rochester, New York 14650
(716)722-5151
WHEN DILUTED FOR USE AS RECOMMENDED
Contains:
Water
Hydroquinone
Diethylene glycol
Potassium sulfite
CAS Reg. #
7732-18-5
123-31-9
111-46-6
10117-38-1
*Principal hazardous components.
Warning: causes skin and eye irritation. May
cause allergic skin reaction. Wash thoroughly after handling. (see MSDS)
Concentrates (not diluted solution) made by:
Eastman Kodak Company
Rochester, New York 14650
(716)722-5151
This label is for use only with
the indicated product.
TM: KODAK
This label is for use only with
the indicated product.
TM: KODAK
LOW HAZARD FOR RECOMMENDED HANDLING (see MSDS)
Attach these labels directly to the
proper chemical tanks or containers,
or on the protective cover of the
processor near the chemicals.
These labels are provided
to assist you in complying
with the U.S. Federal OSHA
Hazard Communication Standard –
29 CFR 1910. 1200
List Price $1.00 CIESSL10
FIGURE 20-2 Sample label that meets OSHA Hazard Communication Standard. (Courtesy Carestream Health.)
PRACTICE POINT
Although OSHA requires manufacturers of chemical products to provide users with an MSDS that lists the specific
chemicals found in the product, there is sometimes a reluctance to disclose a chemical when it is considered a trade
secret or special ingredient that the manufacturer considers
unique to their product. A trade secret can help the manufacturer advertise their product as better, or having an
advantage over competitors. OSHA allows leeway for ingredients considered a trade secret, provided that the secret
ingredient must be disclosed immediately on the occurrence
of an emergency. For example, if a reaction occurs following
contact with a chemical that the oral health care professional then seeks medical attention for, the product manufacturer will be contacted, and they must disclose the
identity of the chemical to the medical professional so that
appropriate treatment can occur.
specific requirements for safe handling of the specific brand of
product being used at his/her facility. The following are general
guidelines for safe handling of these chemicals and materials.
Fixer
Safe handling begins with a well-ventilated darkroom and the
use of PPE (personal protective equipment; see Chapter 10),
including protective clothing, mask, eyewear, and impervious
gloves (that do not permit liquid penetration), especially when
cleaning the processing equipment or changing or replenishing
chemistry (Box 20-2). Strong chemicals may penetrate latex
medical examination gloves that are used for patient treatment.
Nitrile or neoprene (rubber) utility gloves provide the radiographer with better protection. The radiographer should avoid
prolonged breathing of fixer chemical vapors. Under normal
conditions, fixer should not cause respiratory difficulty in most
individuals. If heated sufficiently or an accidental contact with
developer occurs, an irritating sulphur dioxide gas may be
released. Close, prolonged contact with this gas may cause some
hypersensitive or asthmatic individuals discomfort. If uncomfortable
symptoms occur, move to a well-ventilated area. If symptoms
persist, seek medical attention.
256 RADIOGRAPHIC ERRORS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
Avoid inhaling mist or vapors when pouring fixer liquid
from bottles or when mixing concentrated chemicals with
water. If fixer contacts skin, immediately wash off with soap
and water. If fixer splashes in eyes, flush immediately with
water. A sink and eyewash station should be available in the
darkroom or in close proximity to where processing equipment
and chemistry is handled (Figure 20-3). The radiographer must
know how to use the eye wash equipment so that it can be
appropriately operated in an emergency. (Procedure Box 20-1)
Regular training and practice in responding to a potential exposure can help the radiographer react quickly and appropriately
in an emergency. Minor contact with a small amount of fixer is
not likely to cause irritation, or an allergic reaction. If irritating
symptoms persist as a result of inhaling sulphur dioxide gas or
from repeated, prolonged skin or eye contact, the radiographer
should seek medical attention.
Fixer chemistry should be stored in the original container.
The container must remain unopened or tightly capped until
ready for use to prevent oxidation and the buildup of chemical
vapors in the storage area. An accidental spill should be absorbed
with a disposable towel immediately. A spill can increase the
amount of vapors released in the vicinity. The towel used to
absorb the spill should be treated as chemical waste and disposed of in the same manner as used fixer. The surface where
the spill occurred should then be cleaned thoroughly to remove
any trace of the chemical. After handling fixer containers or
after wiping up a spill, remove contaminated PPE and wash
hands before performing any other task. The impervious gloves
should be disinfected and dried before storing. Wash contaminated clothing prior to wearing again.
BOX 20-2 General Recommendations for Safe Handling of Hazardous Chemicals
• Read MSDS for the specific product being used.
• Provide training on the use of the product.
• Keep container of product tightly closed.
• Store in the original container.
• Do not store product in the same area where food or drinks are stored or consumed.
• Ensure proper labeling of product.
• Wear appropriate PPE.
• Impervious clothing or vinyl apron recommended.
• Use protective eyewear with side shields. Safety goggles recommended.
• Use nitrile or neoprene gloves.
• Avoid breathing mist or vapor.
• Avoid contact with eyes.
• Avoid prolonged or repeated contact with skin.
• Use only with adequate ventilation.
• Wash hands thoroughly after handling.
• Do not consume foods or drink or smoke where chemicals are handled.
• Dispose of container appropriately.
• Do not reuse container.
• Remove and launder clothing if contaminated.
• Periodically check PPE to ensure working condition.
FIGURE 20-3 Eyewash station. Radiographer preparing to use
the eyewash station in response to accidental contact with a
potentially hazardous chemical. Note the recognizable label on the
wall noting the location of the eyewash station.
Developer
Developer requires the same safe handling precautions as
fixer, which includes adequate ventilation and avoiding contact (Box 20-2). Developer has a high pH, meaning that it is
alkaline or caustic and very capable of burning biological tissues on contact. It is this caustic property that makes developer
an even more serious eye irritant than fixer. An accidental eye
exposure requires an immediate flushing with water at an eyewash station for a minimum of 15 minutes (Procedure Box 20-1).
If a contact lens is present, it should be removed if easy to do.
The radiographer should seek medical attention following
accidental eye contact with developer. If developer contacts
skin, immediately wash off with soap and water. Prolonged or
CHAPTER 20 • SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT RESPONSIBILITIES IN DENTAL RADIOGRAPHY 257
*If easy to do, contact lens should be removed. Rinse fingers well. Do not use the same finger to hold open the eyelids
unless thoroughly washed of possible chemical contamination.
PROCEDURE 20-1
Use of an emergency eyewash station
1. Eyewash station
a. Must be within 25 feet of where potentially hazardous chemicals are being used.
b. Personnel must be able to get to the station within 10 seconds from where they are handling potentially hazardous chemicals.
c. Must be clearly labeled with appropriate signage that is easily recognized.
2. Remove the caps covering the eye wash faucets. Caps should be easy to remove.
3. Turn on the water flow to a rate of about 0.5 gallons per minute.
4. Water temperature should be warm, between 60 to 95 degrees.
5. Hold the eye lids open with an index finger and thumb. Do not touch the eyeballs.*
6. Maintain water contact with the eyes for the recommended rinsing time, 5 to 60 minutes, even if
uncomfortable.
7. Consult the product MSDS to determine the recommended rinsing time. Acids such as fixer are easier to
rinse away than alkalines such as developer. Truly caustic chemicals that may be used in processor cleaners may require a 60-minute rinse time.
8. Seek medical attention at completion of the recommended rinse time.
repeated skin contact may cause irritation that results in drying
or cracking and can result in depigmentation.
Accidentally mixing developer with fixer, even in minute
droplets, will result in the release of an irritating sulphur dioxide gas. If contamination occurs between developer and fixer,
both tanks should be emptied and cleaned, disposing of both
solutions appropriately. When cleaning the processing equipment or changing or replenishing chemistry, the radiographer
should take care to avoid a splash that would mix developer
and fixer (Figure 20-4). If developer is spilled, the same steps
taken to contain a fixer spill should be followed. Using a disposable towel, absorb the liquid and then thoroughly clean the
surface to remove any trace of the chemical. The towel should
be treated as chemical waste and disposed of appropriately.
Remove, disinfect, and dry the impervious gloves; remove
contaminated PPE; and wash hands before performing any
other task.
Disinfectants
The radiographer should be aware of the possible hazards of
contact with or inhaling the vapors of the disinfectants that
will be used in the radiographic process. (See Chapter 10.)
The oral health care facility should have written documentation of what chemicals are used to disinfect radiographic
equipment and clinical contact surfaces, where these are stored,
and the preparation dates to avoid using expired disinfectants.
FIGURE 20-4 Barrier placed to separate the developer and
fixer tanks when adding chemicals.
Updating the inventory at regular intervals will assist with
maintaining only effective disinfectant solutions and knowing
when to discard older chemicals. The radiographer must
use PPE (personal protective equipment; see Figure 10-2),
including protective clothing, mask, eyewear, and impervious gloves when preparing and using any level of disinfectant.
Low- or intermediate-level disinfectants are commonly used
to prepare clinical contact surfaces prior to radiographic
procedures. Although not as corrosive as high-level disinfectants
258 RADIOGRAPHIC ERRORS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
FIGURE 20-5 PPE used when cleaning processing equipment.
FIGURE 20-6 Old lead-lined storage box showing signs of flaking.
or sterilants, the same level of caution should be used when
handling any chemical. The radiographer should be familiar with
the emergency first aid requirements for the product being
used. Regular review of the MSDS and training updates,
especially if a new product has been introduced, will
prepare the radiographer for the appropriate action in an
emergency.
Contact with the disinfectant should be avoided. If eye or
skin contact should occur, flush immediately with water. If
diluting or mixing of the chemical concentrate is required prior
to use, the bottle used for this purpose must be labeled appropriately. Labels should be maintained and checked periodically
to be sure that the information remains readable. Never use or
reuse a container that was made for another product to prepare
disinfectant solutions.
Although the affects of accidental skin and eye contact or
inhaling the vapors of the disinfectant will depend on the chemical used in the product, in general, accidental exposures should
be handled in the same manner as described previously for
fixer or developer contact. If discomfort does not subside after
flushing skin or eyes with water or moving to a well-ventilated
area, the radiographer should seek medical attention.
Cleaners Used on Processing Equipment
Processing equipment, especially the rollers in the tanks of
automatic processors, require cleaning to provide optimal
radiographs. Cleaning agents used to remove residue and
oxidized chemicals from the reducing agents in developer
usually contain strong acids and corrosive agents. As with
disinfectants, the radiographer should consult the MSDS on
the product to determine the appropriate PPE (personal protective equipment) and to be prepared with the correct action
should an accidental exposure occur. Most manufacturers of
processing cleaners recommend that PPE (personal protective equipment) cover the skin, especially around the wrists
and arms. Puncturing inner safety seals to open bottles of
chemicals and mixing, pouring, and/or spraying cleaner
products all increase the risk of a splash that could lead to
accidental exposure. Most processor cleaners will cause skin
irritations and eye burns on contact. An apron made from an
impervious material such as vinyl or rubber is recommended.
Nitrile or other suitable heavy-duty utility gloves must be
used when handling these cleaners. It is recommended that
the radiographer check with the manufacturer of the gloves
to determine their ability to prevent the chemical cleaner
from breaking through the glove material. Safety goggles are
the recommended eyewear protection, especially when using
a spray bottle to apply the cleaner to rollers (Figure 20-5).
Adequate ventilation will prevent irritation to respiratory
tissues. If discomfort results, the radiographer should move
to a well-ventilated area. If symptoms persist, seek medical
attention. If there is accidental contact with skin, flush with
plenty of water. Because of the caustic nature of cleaners of
this type, accidentally splashing cleaner in the eyes requires
medical attention after flushing the eyes with water for a
minimum of 15 minutes. If cleaner contacts the radiographer’s
clothes or shoes, these should be removed and washed before
reusing.
Lead
Normal handling of intact lead foil used in intraoral film packets
and lead sealed in aprons and thyroid collars will not present a
hazard to the radiographer. In years past, lead-lined containers
or film packet dispensers were available in which to store film
safely away from stray radiation until ready for use. Improvements made to fast-speed film have made these lead-lined boxes
unnecessary. In fact these lead-lined containers should not be
used either for storage of film or any other storage or dispensing
purpose. The lead lining is subject to flaking off in a powder
form with the potential for inhalation or ingestion (Figure 20-6).
All old radiographic storage containers suspected of being made
CHAPTER 20 • SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT RESPONSIBILITIES IN DENTAL RADIOGRAPHY 259
of lead should be appropriately discarded. (See next section on
management of radiographic wastes.) All intra- and extraoral
film should be stored in original packaging until ready for use.
Management of Radiographic Wastes
Disposal of hazardous wastes generated by the oral health care
practice is often mandated by federal law. It is important to
note that some state and local waste management regulations
are more stringent than federal regulations. In many areas, it is
against the law to discard used fixer into the municipal sewer
system or to discard lead foil at municipal landfills. The radiographer must know what laws apply in the practice area. Equally
important is the ethical responsibility to recycle or properly dispose of wastes that may be harmful to the environment.
The most common way to dispose of the hazardous materials used in dental radiography appropriately is to contract with
a waste disposal company. Many practices already employ a
waste management company to dispose of biohazard materials.
These same companies usually offer a hazardous waste service
that can manage radiographic wastes as well.
The MSDS for the product can sometimes be vague in
proper disposal of the product, often stating to “dispose of
according to state or local regulations.” Therefore is it important to know what the regulations are for the practice area.
Some of the options for proper management of radiographic
wastes are:
• Contract with a waste management company to provide
container and pick-up service.
• Contract with a lead or silver reclaiming company for
recycling.
• Establish an agreement with the supplier to “take back”
used fixer/unused radiographic film.
• Collect the used product and transport it to a designated
drop-off center in your community.
• Utilize silver recovery or reclaiming system (for used fixer).
Although it is most important to know what the laws are in
the location of the oral health care practice, the following are
general guidelines for proper management of radiographic
wastes.
Used Fixer Waste
Both developer and fixer are biodegradable, meaning that they
can be broken down into harmless products by a wastewater
treatment facility. In Chapter 7 we learned that the function of
fixer is to remove the unexposed and undeveloped silver halide
crystals from the emulsion of radiographic film. Compared to
photographic processing facilities, which also use fixer to
remove silver halides, oral health care practices generate a
very small amount of silver waste. The silver found in used
fixer of dental radiographic processors is in the form of a very
stable silver thiosulphate complex. Thus bonded, there are
virtually no free silver ions present in used fixer, prompting
experts to conclude that used fixer poses very little threat to the
environment if discharged into wastewater treatment facilities.
However, many state and local municipalities have regulations
regarding the amount and/or the concentration of used fixer
that can be discharged to a wastewater treatment facility. The
oral health care practice has several sound and environmentalfriendly options to responsibly dispose of used fixer. Collecting
used fixer for the purpose of extracting the silver ions will
conserve a resource and prevent adding this metal to the waste
stream. The easiest way for an oral health care facility to
achieve these goals is often to contract with a licensed company
that will provide containers for collection and periodic pickup
for proper disposal. It is important that the qualifications of the
contractor selected for disposal of hazardous wastes or recycling
be thoroughly investigated. If materials are disposed of
inappropriately, it is possible that the oral health care practice
would be partly liable for fines and costs incurred by faulty
handling of materials by the disposal service (Box 20-3).
An option that allows for silver recovery in-office at the
site of use is to purchase a silver recovery system. Silver recovery or reclaiming systems attach to the automatic processor
BOX 20-3 Questions to Ask of a Waste Management Service
• Are you licensed to handle hazardous wastes?
• What types of hazardous wastes do you accept?
• Do you have certifications in the management of certain materials?
• Do you provide a pickup service, or do you accept shipment of wastes at your facility?
• Will containers for collecting the wastes be supplied?
• Is your company the primary recycler?
• What will be the final destination of the materials?
• How do you track the transport of the materials from our practice to the final destination?
• What materials will be recycled? Where will these materials end up?
• Who is responsible for completing EPA or other state-required documentation?
• What is the cost of your service?
• Is there a reimbursement payment for returning silver, lead, or other precious metals (from recycled electronic equipment) for recycling?
260 RADIOGRAPHIC ERRORS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
FIGURE 20-8 Lead foil waste. Collecting lead foil from film
packets for proper disposal by a licensed waste management
contractor.
fixer and/or rinse water drain line (Figure 20-7). These systems
can be adapted for use with manual and chairside processing as
well. When attached to an automatic processor, as the processor
operates and when the fixer tank is drained for cleaning and
changing the chemistry, the used fixer is circulated through the
silver recovery unit. Silver recovery systems that use metallic
replacement technology remove the hazardous silver ions from
the used fixer before allowing the solution to go down the
drain. Once the cartridge inside the silver recovery unit is saturated with silver ions, it can be removed by a commercial waste
disposal company and replaced with a fresh cartridge.
Lead Waste
Lead foil from inside intraoral film packets should be separated
from the outer moisture-proof wrap and black paper to keep it
out of the waste stream (Figure 20-8). Many states or local
municipal landfills have regulations regarding disposal of this
heavy metal. Lead foil waste can be recovered and recycled for
another use. Other lead-containing products that are no longer
serviceable, such as damaged lead aprons or thyroid collars, or
no longer recommended, such as lead-lined film storage boxes
or dispensers (Figure 20-6), should also have the lead recovered
or recycled prior to disposing of these items into the waste
stream. Options for disposal of items containing lead are suggested in Table 20-1. As mentioned previously, when selecting a
contractor, it is important that the contractor be licensed to avoid
litigation or fines as a result of their faulty handling of materials.
Discarded Radiographs Waste
Oral health care practices are advised to keep dental radiographs
indefinitely. (See Chapter 11.) Legal issues such as malpractice
and the varying statutes of limitations between states make this
recommendation a good risk management strategy. However,
there are times when a practice may have a need to dispose of
unwanted or very old radiographs. Unused radiographic film may
occasionally need to be discarded, as is the case when it has been
damaged or contaminated by exposure conditions that cause fogging or it is past the expiration date (see Figure 7-9). Radiographs
contain silver that should be recovered or recycled prior to disposal into the waste stream. The amount of silver remaining in the
film will depend on whether it has been processed (old radiographs) or not and also on the density of the radiographic image.
Film that has been processed will have had some of the silver ions
removed during fixation, and radiographs that are more dense
(darker) will have more of the silver ions remaining on the radiograph base material. Options for proper disposal of radiographic
film include contacting the company that the product was purchased from to see if they will take back the product or contracting with a licensed waste management company.
Digital Imaging Equipment
The move away from film-based radiography to digital imaging
will reduce and may eventually eliminate many of the hazardous
wastes associated with dental radiography. However, electronic
equipment poses a whole new set of considerations for disposal
and recycling. As technology advances, older equipment
becomes obsolete. Computers, monitors, solid-state digital sensors, and phosphor plates (see Chapter 9) continue to improve,
phasing out older systems. Also, electronic failure of computer
equipment, broken sensor wires, and damaged phosphor plates
will all need to be disposed of properly. This electronic equipment contains both hazardous materials such as lead, mercury,
cadmium, and beryllium and valuable metals such as gold, palladium, platinum, and silver. Computers and monitors also contain
glass, plastic, and aluminum that are readily recycled. Proper
FIGURE 20-7 Silver reclaiming unit. Attached to the drain tube
of the automatic processor. Note the appropriately labeled bottles of
developer and fixer attached to the unit for automatic chemical
replenishment.
CHAPTER 20 • SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT RESPONSIBILITIES IN DENTAL RADIOGRAPHY 261
TABLE 20-1 Options for Disposal of Radiographic Waste Products
Fixer 1.Collect for recycling/return to supplier for recovery of silver.
2. Treat to remove silver before discharge to municipal wastewater treatment.
3.Contract with hazardous waste disposal company.
Developer 1. Usually acceptable to discharge to municipal wastewater treatment. Check state/local regulations.
Disinfectants 1. Usually acceptable to discharge to municipal wastewater treatment. Check state/local regulations.
2.Choose disinfectants containing less-hazardous materials.
3. Use barriers to minimize the need for disinfecting.
Radiographic processor cleaners 1.Choose cleaners containing less-hazardous materials.
2. Take steps daily, such as the use of a cleaning sheet, to minimize the need for strong chemicals
(Figure 20-9).
3. Use mechanical methods (brush/sponge) instead of chemicals.
Radiographs/unused film 1.Collect for recycling/return to supplier for recovery of silver.
2.Contract with hazardous waste disposal company.
3. Send to metal reclaimer.
4. May be acceptable to discharge to municipal landfills. Check state/local regulations. However,
recovery and recycling is recommended.
Lead foils and other lead-containing
items (aprons/boxes)
1.Collect for recycling/return to supplier for recovery of lead.
2.Contract with hazardous waste disposal company.
3. Send to metal reclaimer.
Digital imaging equipment 1.Collect for recycling/return to supplier for recovery of precious metals and plastics.
2.Remanufacture and upgrade.
3. Donate usable equipment. Remove sensitive data regarding patient records before recycling/donating.
4. Visit EPA Web site eCycle: How to recycle or donate used electronics
FIGURE 20-9 Cleaning sheet. Run daily or more often, the
cleaning sheet can pick up debris from the rollers maintaining the
processor for longer intervals between cleanings with a strong chemical.
recycling and disposal of electronic equipment can preserve precious resources and keep hazardous materials out of municipal
landfills. Options for reusing older digital imaging equipment
include refurbishing and/or upgrading to accommodate new
technology or donating still usable equipment for uses that may
not require the latest technology. If disposal is required, the same
considerations regarding the qualifications of a hazardous waste
company previously discussed should be given.
The radiographer must possess a working knowledge of safe
handling and safe disposal of the chemicals and materials used in
dental radiography. It is important to be familiar with national,
state, and local laws regulating the handling and disposal of hazardous wastes. Laws and regulations guide and direct the oral
health care practice to handle radiographic chemicals and materials safely, but an ethical responsibility to the environment should
also play a role in how the oral health care practice reduces,
reuses, and recycles materials to avoid adding to the waste stream.
REVIEW—Chapter summary
Many of the chemicals and materials used in the radiographic
process are considered hazardous and require a working knowledge of safe handling and proper disposal. Two agencies responsible
for regulations that help to protect and inform the radiographer
are the Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OHSA)
and the Environmental Protection Agnecy (EPA). OSHA requires
that oral health care practices maintain Material Safety Data
Sheets (MSDSs) and product labels for all hazardous chemicals
used in the radiographic process. The hazardous chemicals used
in the radiographic process that require an MSDS include fixer,
developer, disinfectants, and cleaners used on processing
equipment.
Safe handling instructions for hazardous chemicals can be
found on the MSDSs. The radiographer should be familiar with
safe handling and effective emergency responses when working
with hazardous chemicals. General safe handling and emergency
responses were outlined and include use of PPE, impervious
262 RADIOGRAPHIC ERRORS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
gloves, adequate ventilation, and avoiding inhalation or contact
with skin or eyes. However, because the chemical ingredients
vary among product manufacturers, the radiographer is responsible for studying the MSDS for the specific product being used.
Emergency responses to skin and eye exposures include
immediate flushing with water and seeking medical attention
for symptoms that persist. Emergency eyewash stations must be
within 25 feet or 10 seconds from where the chemical is being
handled. The radiographer should be trained in the use of the
emergency eyewash equipment.
Oral health care practices have a legal and ethical responsibility to the environment to properly dispose of hazardous radiographic chemicals and materials. Chemicals and materials that
must be given consideration for proper disposal or recycling
include used fixer (because it contains silver thiosulphate complexes), lead foils from intraoral film packets, or other sources
such as lead aprons and thyroid collars and lead-lined storage
boxes. Safe and proper disposal instructions can be found on
the product MSDS and by contacting the federal, state, and
local agencies responsible for regulation of wastes. Safe disposal options include contracting with a licensed waste disposal company, collecting the waste for recycling, and
eliminating or reducing the waste on-site. Although the shift to
digital imaging will eventually eliminate most of the hazardous
chemicals and materials associated with film-based radiography, electronic equipment will require the development of safe
disposal protocols as well.
RECALL—Study questions
1. List two agencies responsible for the development of safe
handling standards for hazardous chemicals and materials
used in the radiographic process.
a. ______________
b. ______________
2. Each of the following may be found on a Material
Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) EXCEPT one. Which one is
the EXCEPTION?
a. Chemical ingredients
b. Date of manufacture
c. Requirements for safe handling
d. Disposal considerations
3. A Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) would NOT
need to be obtained for which of the following?
a. Lead foils from intraoral film packets
b. Radiographic fixer
c. Radiographic developer
d. Low-level disinfectant
4. Each of the following is a requirement of the OSHA
Hazard Communication Standard EXCEPT one. Which
one is the EXCEPTION?
a. Maintain an inventory of all hazardous chemicals.
b. Provide training for all personnel who handle the
chemicals.
c. Label all containers that will hold hazardous chemicals.
d. Store all hazardous chemicals in the same central
location.
5. List radiographic wastes that are considered hazardous to personnel and harmful to the environment.
a. ______________
b. ______________
c. ______________
d. ______________
e. ______________
6. Which of the following lists of personal protective
equipment (PPE) is the best recommendation for the
dental radiographer when cleaning the processing
equipment?
a. Long-sleeve lab coat, eyeglasses, mask, latex gloves
b. Long-sleeve barrier gown, eyeglasses with side
shields, mask, vinyl gloves
c. Long-sleeve barrier gown with rubber apron, safety
goggles, mask, nitrile gloves
d. Scrubs with rubber apron, safety face shield, respirator mask, neoprene gloves
7. Each of the following will help prevent an accidental
exposure to hazardous chemicals EXCEPT one. Which
one is the EXCEPTION?
a. Store the product in the smallest container possible.
b. Be familiar with the MSDS information regarding
the product.
c. Use the chemical in a well-ventilated area.
d. Wash hands thoroughly after handling the chemical.
8. In general, what is the emergency recommendation if
fixer or developer splashes into the eyes?
a. If an irritation develops, then move to a wellventilated area.
b. Keep eyes securely closed and seek medical attention immediately.
c. Wait 5 minutes to determine the severity of the exposure. Then seek medical attention.
d. Immediately flush with a steady stream of warm
water for a minimum of 15 minutes.
9. Which of the following is NOT a requirement for an
emergency eyewash station?
a. Must be clearly labeled.
b. Water temperature must not exceed 60 degrees.
c. Must be located within 25 feet or 10 seconds of
where the chemical is handled.
d. The flow of water must be easy to activate.
10. Chemicals with what pH would be most likely to cause
severe eye irritation?
a. Low pH (acidic)
b. Neutral pH
c. High pH (alkaline)
11. Which of the following is LEAST likely to require
special consideration prior to discharging into the waste
stream?
a. Lead foils from intraoral film packets
b. Used fixer
c. Used developer
d. Digital imaging equipment
CHAPTER 20 • SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT RESPONSIBILITIES IN DENTAL RADIOGRAPHY 263
REFLECT—Case study
Oral health care practices have a legal and an ethical responsibility to the environment to properly dispose of hazardous radiographic chemicals and materials. However, today the focus has
shifted from proper disposal and recycling to prerecycling, or
reducing the amount of waste generated in the first place. Make a
list of all the materials and resources you can think of that are
used in the radiographic process. Include the plastic barriers used
to cover equipment, the types of image receptor holders available
for use, the wash water that circulates when the automatic processor is running, etc. Then using the technique of brainstorming, list
ways to reduce the generation of waste and to conserve resources.
For example: (1) eliminate the use of image receptors made from
polystyrene and (2) purchase film from a “green”
company who has demonstrated environmentally sound operations in manufacturing their product. Combine your ideas with
your classmates and consider sharing the list in a presentation at
the next meeting of your professional association.
RELATE—Laboratory application
Assess and update the written hazard communication program
at your facility. Begin by performing a physical inventory of all
chemicals and potentially hazardous products. Make note of
where the products are stored. Is the product stored in one location, or in multiple areas throughout the facility? Are the containers labeled appropriately? List the products by their trade
name. Next, using the Internet, visit the product manufacturer’s
Web site to get an up-to-date copy of the MSDS and product
labels. Print out and organize the MSDSs into a three-ring
binder. A suggested way to organize the MSDSs is:
1Styrofoam R2;
MSDS Number Product
1 Kodak READYMATIC Dental Developer
and Replenisher
2 Kodak READYMATIC Dental Fixer
and Replenisher
3 Birex Disinfectant Wipes
4 Air Techniques Formula 2000 Plus
health care team or class where each person will review the
steps for safe handling and disposal of the product. Provide the
opportunity for everyone to practice safe protocols and simulated emergency responses to exposures.
REFERENCES
American Dental Association. (2007). Best management practices
for amalgam waste. Retrieved March 28, 2010, from http://
www.ada.org/prof/resources/topics/topics_amalrecyclers.pdf
American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs.
(2003). Managing silver and lead waste in dental offices.
Journal of the American Dental Association, 134, 1095–1096.
Carestream Health Inc. (2007). Kodak dental systems: Exposure and processing for dental film radiography. Pub. N414. Rochester, NY: Author.
Carestream Health Inc. (2010). Environmental health and
safety support. Health, safety and environment frequently
asked questions. Retrieved March 28, 2010, from http:/
/carestreamhealth.com/ehs-faqs.html
DePaola, L. G. (2008). Surface disinfection in the dental office.
The infection control forum. Current infection control
insights from The Richmond Institute. The Richmond Institute for Continuing Education, 6(6).
Eastman Kodak Company. (1990). Management of photographic wastes in the dental office. Pub N-414 8–90.
Rochester, NY: Author.
Eastman Kodak Company. (1994). Waste management guidelines. Pub N-414 6-94-BX revision. Rochester, NY:
Author.
Molinari, J. A., & Harte, J. A. (2009). Cottone’s practical infection control in dentistry (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins.
Rockett, W. M. (2009). Revamped recycling. Simple steps
to do your part and make the dental practice a more
eco-conscious environment. Retrieved March 28, 2010,
DentalProductsReport.com.
Thomson, E. M. (2012). Exercises in oral radiographic techniques. A laboratory manual, (3rd ed.,). Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Thomson-Lakey, E. M. (1996). Developing an environmentally
sound oral health practice. Access, 10(4), 19–26.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). eCycling. Retrieved April 3, 2010, from http://www.epa.gov/
epawaste/conserve/materials/ecycling/index.htm
Wikipedia. (n.d.). United States Environmental Protection
Agency. Retrieved March 28, 2010, from http://en
.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epa
Print out and attach labels to all containers, including the
developer and fixer tanks inside the automatic processor and any
tubs used to wash and clean the rollers. Once organized, study
the MSDS for each of the products, or assign one or more of the
MSDSs to each member of the oral health care team or your
class to study. Then schedule a training session for your oral
OBJECTIVES
Following successful completion of this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Define the key words.
2. List at least five advantages of mounting radiographs.
3. Discuss the use and importance of the identification dot.
4. Compare labial and lingual methods of film mounting.
5. Demonstrate mounting radiographs according to the suggested steps presented.
6. List at least five anatomic generalizations that aid in mounting radiographs.
7. Compare interpretation and diagnosis.
8. Describe the roles of the film mount, viewbox, and magnification in viewing radiographs.
9. List considerations for reading digital radiographic images not encountered when reading
film-based radiographs.
10. Demonstrate viewing radiographs according to the suggested steps presented.
KEY WORDS
Anatomical order
Diagnosis
Film mount
Film mounting
Identification dot
Interpretation
Labial mounting method
Lingual mounting method
Viewbox
Mounting and Introduction
to Interpretation
PART VII • MOUNTING AND VIEWING
DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS
CHAPTER
21
CHAPTER
OUTLINE
 Objectives 264
 Key Words 264
 Introduction 265
 Mounting
Radiographs 265
 Viewing the
Radiographs 268
 Using Mounted
Radiographs 270
 Review, Recall,
Reflect, Relate 270
 References 272
CHAPTER 21 • MOUNTING AND INTRODUCTION TO INTERPRETATION 265
Introduction
Mounting is an important step in the interpretation of dental
radiographs. Dental radiographs must be mounted in the correct anatomic order to allow for a thorough and systematic
interpretation. A thorough knowledge of the normal anatomy of
the teeth and jaws is needed to mount radiographs correctly.
Therefore, mounting and interpreting dental radiographs go
hand in hand.
The purpose of this chapter is to describe the step-by-step
procedures for mounting and viewing dental radiographs. To aid
in this process, basic key points regarding anatomic landmarks
will be discussed. Chapter 22 provides the detailed radiographic
interpretation of normal radiographic anatomy.
Mounting Radiographs
Film mounting is the placement of radiographs in a holder
arranged in anatomical order (Figure 21-1). The advantages of
film mounting are:
• Intraoral radiographs are easier to view and interpret in the
correct anatomical position.
• Mounting decreases the chance of error caused by confusing the patient’s right and left sides.
• Viewing films side by side allows for easy comparison
between different views.
• Less handling of individual radiographs results in fewer
scratches and fingerprint marks.
• Film mounts can mask out distracting side light, making
radiographs easier to view and interpret.
• Film mounts provide a means for labeling the radiographs
with patient’s name, date of exposure, name of the practice, etc.
• Mounted films are easy to store.
• Patient education and consultations are enhanced when
films are mounted.
• When mounted labially, radiographic findings can be easily transferred to the patient’s dental chart.
Film mounting generally refers only to intraoral films.
Large extraoral radiographs must be labeled with lead letters or
tape that identify the right and left sides and are often placed in
an envelope so the patent’s name and the date of the exposure
can be written on the outside.
Occasionally, single intraoral radiographs are not mounted,
but are placed into a small envelope and attached to the patient
record. However, it is better to mount even a single or a small
group of radiographs. A full mouth series should always be
mounted for accurate viewing. In addition, the film mount provides a place to record the patient’s name, date, and other pertinent information.
Film Mounts
Film mounts are celluloid, cardboard, or plastic holders with
frames or windows for the radiographs (Figure 21-2). Attaching the radiographs to the film mounts is called film mounting.
Film mounts are available in many sizes and with numerous
combinations of windows or frames to fit films of different
sizes. Mounts may be large enough to accommodate a fullmouth series of radiographs or hold only a few or even a single
radiograph. Standard commercially made mounts are available,
or companies will make custom mounts to suit special needs.
Black plastic or gray cardboard mounts are often preferred over
clear plastic mounts because these can block out extraneous
light from the viewbox, enhancing viewing and interpretation.
Identification Dot
An embossed identification dot near the edge of the film appears
convex or concave, depending on the side from which the film is
FIGURE 21-1 Full mouth series mounted in an opaque mount.
266 MOUNTING AND VIEWING DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS
The second method, recommended by the American Dental
Association and the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, is the labial mounting method. With the labial
method of film mounting, the radiographs are mounted so that
the embossed dot is convex. In this position, the viewer is reading
the radiograph as if standing in front of, and facing, the patient
(Figure 21-4). Therefore, what the viewer observes on the right
side of the radiograph would correspond to the patient’s left side.
Essentially, the viewer’s right is the patient’s left. This also corresponds to the order in which teeth and anatomical structures are
drawn on most dental and periodontal charts.
Film Mounting Procedure
Radiographs should be mounted immediately after processing.
Handle films by the edges to avoid smudging or scratching
them, and label the radiographs to prevent loss or mixing them
up with other patient films. An orderly sequence to the mounting procedure is suggested (Procedure Box 21-1). This is especially true for the beginner. Although the sequence for mounting
is often a matter of preference, the first step in mounting all
radiographs should be to orient the embossed dot the same way
for all the films. When mounting using the labial method, orient all the films so that the embossed dot is convex.
When mounting a full mouth series of periapical and
bitewing radiographs, it is helpful to use the film sizes and orientation in the oral cavity to help with the mounting process.
Size #1 film is often used to radiograph the anterior region.
Additionally, anterior periapical radiographs are placed in the
oral cavity with the long dimension of the film packet positioned vertically, whereas posterior periapical radiographs are
viewed. If the film packet was placed in the patient’s oral cavity
correctly, the raised portion of the identification dot (the convexity) automatically faces the x-ray tube and the source of radiation.
Therefore, when the radiograph is viewed later, the identification
dot may be relied on to determine which are the patient’s left and
right sides. Because the radiograph may be viewed from either
side, it is important that the radiographer understand the role the
identification dot plays in film orientation.
Film Mounting Methods
Because the radiograph may be viewed from either side, two
methods of film mounting have been used. The first method, now
obsolete but still used by some dentists, is the lingual method.
With the lingual mounting method, the radiographs are
mounted so that the embossed dot is concave. In this position, the
viewer is reading the radiograph as if standing behind the patient
(Figure 21-3). Therefore, what the viewer observes on the right
side of the radiograph would correspond to the patient’s right as
well. Essentially, the viewer’s right is the patient’s right. Position of
identification dot
when film is
positioned inside
the mouth
Viewer’s orientation
is looking at the teeth
from outside the mouth
FIGURE 21-4 Labial method of film mounting. When the
identification dot is viewed in the convex position, the viewer’s
orientation is in front of and facing the patient. The patient’s left is
the viewer’s right.
FIGURE 21-2 Examples of various film mounts. Film mounts
are available in a variety of sizes and film combinations.
Position of
identification dot
when film is
positioned inside
the mouth
Viewer’s orientation
is looking at the teeth
from inside the mouth
FIGURE 21-3 Lingual method of film mounting. When the
identification dot is viewed in the concave position, the viewer’s
orientation is from behind the patient. The patient’s left is the
viewer’s left.
CHAPTER 21 • MOUNTING AND INTRODUCTION TO INTERPRETATION 267
placed in the oral cavity with the long dimension of the film
packet positioned horizontally. These clues may be utilized to
help the radiographer determine where to position the films in
the mount.
To mount correctly, the radiographer must have a base knowledge in radiographic anatomy. Chapter 22 covers radiographic
PROCEDURE 21-1
Suggested sequence for mounting a full mouth series of radiographs
1. Place the films on a clean white or light-colored paper towel or tray cover on the counter in front of a viewbox.
2. Wash hands to prevent smudging the films.
3. Orient the embossed dots all the same way.
4. Separate the bitewing from the periapical radiographs.
5. Separate the anterior from the posterior periapical radiographs.
6. Separate the maxillary from the mandible periapical radiographs.
7. Orient the periapical radiographs so that the roots are pointing up for the maxilla and down for the
mandible.
8. Orient the bitewing radiographs so that the occlusal plane slants upward in the posterior, producing a slight
“smile” appearance.
9. Place the anterior periapical radiographs into the appropriate frame on the left or right side of the film
mount.
10. Place the posterior periapical radiographs into the appropriate frame on the left or right side of the film
mount.
11. Place the bitewing radiographs into the appropriate frame on the left or right side of the film mount.
12. Label the film mount with the patient’s name, date of exposure, facility name, and other pertinent information.
13. Check the mounted films to be sure they are secured in the mount and are mounted appropriately.
(Embossed dots all facing the same direction, no films upside down.)
14. Place the mounted radiographs on the viewbox for use during the patient appointment and for interpretation.
anatomy observed on intraoral radiographs, (Table 21-1). However, to aid in the mounting procedure, the following generalizations are offered:
• Roots and crowns of the maxillary anterior teeth are larger
and longer than those of the mandibular teeth.
TABLE 21-1 Anatomical Landmarks Distinguishing Maxillary Radiographs from
Mandibular Radiographs
AREA MAXILLARY ANATOMICAL LANDMARKS MANDIBULAR ANATOMICAL LANDMARKS
Incisor Incisive foramen Lingual foramen
Median palatine suture Genial tubercles
Nasal fossa Nutrient canals
Nasal septum Mental ridge
Anterior nasal spine Mental fossa
Canine Inverted Y
Lateral fossa
Premolar Maxillary sinus Mental foramen
Molar Maxillary sinus Mandibular canal
Zygomatic process of maxilla Oblique ridge
Zygoma Mylohyoid ridge
Maxillary tuberosity Submandibular fossa
Hamulus
Coronoid process of mandible
268 MOUNTING AND VIEWING DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS
The dental hygienist and dental assistant play a valuable
role in the preliminary diagnosis, by interpreting deviations
from normal radiographic anatomy and calling these to the
attention of the dentist. The more pairs of eyes evaluating the
radiographs, the more benefit to the patient.
Viewing Equipment
A viewbox and a magnifying glass are required for optimal film
viewing (Figure 21-5). Holding radiographs up to the overhead
room light will not provide adequate conditions in which to
observe detailed, subtle changes often revealed by radiographs.
• Viewbox. Many types of viewboxes are available. The viewbox lighting must be of uniform intensity and be evenly diffused. The viewing surface should be large enough to
accommodate a full set of intraoral radiographs as well as
typical dental extraoral radiographs (i.e., panoramic radiographs). The film mount or a cardboard template should be
used to mask out distracting light around the mount. Blocking out excess sidelight reduces glare and facilitates viewing. The use of gray or black cardboard or frosted plastic
film mounts helps to reduce glare and enhances the detail of
the images. Always use subdued room lighting to allow the
eyes to adapt to the light level of the radiographs.
• Magnifying glass. Some viewboxes are equipped with a
magnifying device (Figure 21-6). Otherwise, a handheld
magnifying glass should be used to aid the radiographer.
• Computer monitor. Transferring the ability to read filmbased radiographs to the ability to read digital images on a
computer monitor requires practice for radiographers who are
new to digital imaging. Instead of utilizing a viewbox, digital
images are read directly off the computer monitor. Considerations not encountered when reading film-based radiographs
include the possibility of not being able to view an entire full
mouth series of images on one screen without switching
between views and the multiple mouse clicks that may be
needed to view images side by side, especially when viewing
radiographs taken on different days and stored in different
files on the computer. Additionally, viewing digital images
will be restricted to the area where the computer and monitor
• Canine teeth generally have the longest roots when compared to adjacent teeth.
• Maxillary molars generally have three roots. The presence of
the palatal root makes it difficult to visual three distinct roots.
• Mandibular molars generally have two divergent roots
that are distinctly observed. Bone is visible in between the
two roots.
• Most roots curve toward the distal.
• Large radiolucent areas denoting the nasal fossa or the maxillary sinus indicate that the radiograph is of a maxillary area.
• The body of the mandible has a distinct upward curve
toward the ramus in the molar area. The film should be oriented so that a slight “smile” appearance is detected.
After the last radiograph has been mounted, the entire film
mount should be carefully checked to see that:
• Identification dots all face the same direction.
• All radiographs are arranged in proper anatomical order.
• No radiographs were reversed or mounted upside down.
• The radiographs are firmly attached to the mount.
• The patient’s name and date have been recorded on the
mount.
Viewing the Radiographs
Proper viewing is essential for the interpretation of dental radiographs. One must be familiar with and understand optimal
viewing conditions and the proper sequence of viewing the
radiographs.
Interpretation versus Diagnosis
Dental radiographs are viewed by any trained professional (dentist, dental hygienist, or dental assistant) with knowledge of normal anatomic landmarks of the maxilla, mandible, and related
structures. Radiographs may be interpreted by all members of the
oral health care team, but the dentist is responsible for the final
interpretation and diagnosis. Interpretation is explanatory and
may be defined as reading the radiograph and explaining what is
observed in terms the patient understands. Items that a dental
hygienist or dental assistant may interpret are radiographic errors
such as overlapped contacts or elongated images; artifacts that
may have appeared on the radiograph such as the image of a film
holder; and normal radiographic anatomy such as the absence of
a developing permanent tooth under a primary tooth or the presence radiographically of unerupted third molars. Diagnosis is
defined as the determination of the nature and the identification
of an abnormal condition or disease. An example of interpretation would be showing the patient the image of the developing
third molar on the radiograph, whereas diagnosis would be the
dentist determining that the third molar is impacted. Referring a
patient to the dentist for evaluation of a radiolucent finding on the
proximal surface of a tooth that appears on a bitewing is interpretation. Dental hygienists and dental assistants are trained to identify this deviation from normal-appearing enamel and can point
out these deviations for further evaluation by the dentist. Telling
the patient that the radiolucency is caries and requires treatment
is diagnosis, a responsibility of the dentist.
FIGURE 21-5 Radiographer viewing radiographs.
Radiographs should be viewed in subdued room lighting, using a
viewbox and a magnifying glass. Note the black film mount that
blocks distracting light around the films.
CHAPTER 21 • MOUNTING AND INTRODUCTION TO INTERPRETATION 269
are located. Coping with overhead room lighting reflecting off
the monitor screen is another consideration the radiographer
will have to manage. Setting up the monitor in a position to
minimize reflections from overhead room lighting or ambient
lighting entering the room through windows will assist with
reducing glare that can interfere with interpretation.
The radiographer can utilize the computer software features to magnify images and enhance gray scale levels to
assist with interpretation. (See Chapter 9.)
FIGURE 21-6 Viewboxes come in many varieties. Note the attached magnifying
device on three of these viewboxes. (Courtesy of Dentsply Rinn.)
Depending on the radiographer’s training and responsibility, the individual may now proceed to make a preliminary
interpretation and discuss it with the dentist, who will make
the final diagnosis regarding any findings. A thorough examination is best accomplished when a specific sequence of
analysis is used (Procedure Box 21-2 and Figure 21-7). The
mounted radiographs must be viewed in a systematic order to
prevent errors in interpretation. All available radiographs
should be examined for a specific condition, and then the
PROCEDURE 21-2
Suggested sequence for viewing a full mouth series of radiographs
1. Place the mounted radiographs on the viewbox.
2. Dim the overhead lights and turn on the viewbox light.
3. Using a magnifying glass, begin the examination in the patient’s maxillary right posterior region (Figure 21-7).
4. Proceed horizontally to the anterior region and continue to the patient’s maxillary left posterior region.
5. Next, move down to the patient’s mandibular left posterior region.
6. Proceed horizontally to the anterior region and continue to the patient’s mandibular right posterior region.
7. Next, move up to the bitewing radiographs, starting with the right molar bitewing radiograph on the left
side of the film mount. Proceed horizontally, examining each bitewing radiograph until you finish with the
left molar bitewing radiograph on the right side of the film mount.
8. Repeat steps 3 through 7 for the following conditions:
a. Presence or absence of teeth
b. Tooth morphology and eruption patterns
c. Deviations from normal and/or suspected pathology
d. Presence, type, and condition of dental materials
e. Caries
f. Periodontal conditions and risk factors
9. Document all findings on a preliminary radiographic interpretative form.
10. Collaborate with the dentist regarding findings.
11. After confirmation and diagnosis of findings by the dentist, record findings on the patient’s permanent
record.
12. Assist the dentist in explaining findings and treatment plan to the patient using the radiographs.
270 MOUNTING AND VIEWING DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS
(See Chapter 11.) Although radiographs often lose value after
more than six months to one year due to changes in the patient’s
oral conditions, they are valuable for comparing present with
previous conditions. The need for an orderly filing system cannot
be overstressed. Misplaced radiographs can result in inappropriate treatment being rendered, may cause risk management problems, and may have legal implications. All radiographs should be
handled with care to prevent smudging or scratching. Radiographs should be protected from heat damage by storage in
cool, well-ventilated areas.
REVIEW—Chapter summary
A thorough knowledge of normal radiographic anatomical
landmarks is needed for mounting and interpreting radiographs. Mounting films is recommended for its many advantages. Film mounts vary in size and number of frames, but all
have space for documenting information such as the patient’s
name and date of exposure. Each film has an embossed identification dot used to determine the patient’s left and right sides.
Lingual mounting places the identification dot in a concave
position, so that the patient’s left side is the viewer’s left side.
Labial mounting places the identification dot in a convex position, so that the patient’s left side is the viewer’s right side.
Labial mounting method is the recommended method.
To aid in fast and accurate mounting of radiographs, a systematic procedure should be followed. The first step in film
mounting is to orient the embossed identification dot the same
way (convex) for all radiographs. Several generalizations
regarding the teeth and oral cavity anatomy can be used to aid
in mounting radiographs correctly.
Interpretation is explanatory, as is the reading of radiographs. Diagnosis uses radiographs to determine the nature and
identification of the disease or abnormality. Dental radiographs
may be interpreted by the dentist, dental hygienist, or dental
assistant. The dentist is responsible for the final diagnosis.
Viewing radiographs is facilitated with the use of a viewbox
and magnification. Mounted radiographs must be viewed in a
systematic order to prevent errors in interpretation. Locating the
computer monitor away from the glare of ambient lighting will
assist the radiographer in viewing digital radiographic images.
Radiographs should be interpreted thoroughly during or after
the patient’s appointment. Radiographs should be accurately
labeled, used to compare present with previous conditions, and
kept indefinitely.
RECALL—Study questions
1. List four advantages of mounting intraoral radiographs.
a. ______________
b. ______________
c. ______________
d. ______________
examination process should be repeated for the next condition. For example, the radiographs may be examined first for
the presence or absence of teeth and other development anomalies. A second examination could concentrate on detecting
caries, and the third examination would look for periodontal
conditions. Interpreting these conditions is discussed in
Chapters 23, 24, and 25.
When interpreting more than one radiograph, such as a set
of bitewings or a full mouth series, the teeth and the supporting
structures are often imaged more than once. While maintaining
a systematic order of interpretation, it is helpful to compare
each area in all of the views. For example, a suspected periodontal condition may be observed on a maxillary periapical radiograph, whereas the bitewing radiograph may possibly image
the level of bone with more detail. Comparing adjacent films
will add to a thorough interpretation.
All radiographic findings must be noted in the patient’s
record after confirmation by the dentist. Although all professionals may record findings, the final interpretation and diagnosis is the responsibility of the dentist.
Using Mounted Radiographs
Radiographs should be developed and mounted as soon as possible and placed on the viewbox during the patient’s appointment for easy reference during treatment. At each subsequent
appointment the latest radiographs should be placed on the
viewbox, where they can be easily accessed as needed.
After the appointment, all radiographs should be thoroughly
interpreted during time set aside for this purpose. Unless only
one or two radiographs were taken, there may not have been
enough time during the patient’s appointment to thoroughly
review each film for all possible conditions. Once the interpretation is complete, the radiographs should be filed appropriately
and kept indefinitely as part of the patient’s permanent record.
1
14 8
7
2
15
13 12 11 10 9
16 17 18
345 6
FIGURE 21-7 Proper sequence for viewing radiographs. The
radiographer should view the radiographs in the sequence illustrated.
Start with number 1 and proceed clockwise through number 18.
CHAPTER 21 • MOUNTING AND INTRODUCTION TO INTERPRETATION 271
2. A desirable film mount should be
a. made of cardboard.
b. made of plastic.
c. translucent, to allow light to reach the film.
d. black, to block out light transmission and prevent
glare.
3. Which of these helps to determine whether the radiograph is the patient’s left or right side?
a. Slight “smile” appearance
b. Distally curved roots
c. Large crowns
d. Identification dot
4. Labial method film mounting positions the identification dot concave.
The labial method is the recommended film mounting
method.
a. The first statement is true. The second statement is
false.
b. The first statement is false. The second statement is
true.
c. Both statements are true.
d. Both statements are false.
5. Lingual method film mounting positions the identification dot convex.
When utilizing the lingual method, the viewer’s right is
the patient’s left.
a. The first statement is true. The second statement is
false.
b. The first statement is false. The second statement is
true.
c. Both statements are true.
d. Both statements are false.
6. Mounting is the placement of radiographs in a holder
arranged in anatomical order.
All radiographs should be handled with care to prevent
smudging or scratching.
a. The first statement is true. The second statement is
false.
b. The first statement is false. The second statement is
true.
c. Both statements are true.
d. Both statements are false.
7. Which of the following should be done first when
mounting radiographs?
a. Orient the identification dot the same way.
b. Separate bitewing from periapical films.
c. Separate the anterior from the posterior films.
d. Orient the teeth roots to point in the correct
direction.
8. Each of the following will aid the radiographer in correctly mounting radiographs EXCEPT one. Which one
is the EXCEPTION?
a. Anterior films are positioned with the long dimension vertically.
b. Canine teeth generally have the longest roots.
c. Maxillary molars usually have three roots.
d. Roots and crowns of mandibular teeth are usually
larger than maxillary teeth.
9. Reading and explaining radiographic images is
a. diagnosing.
b. interpreting.
c. viewing.
d. mounting.
10. The final responsibility to diagnose the radiograph rests
with the
a. dental assistant.
b. dental hygienist.
c. dentist.
d. patient.
11. Viewing mounted radiographs in a systematic sequence
can help prevent errors in interpretation.
Mounted radiographs may be thoroughly viewed by
holding the mount up to overhead room lighting.
a. The first statement is true. The second statement is
false.
b. The first statement is false. The second statement is
true.
c. Both statements are true.
d. Both statements are false.
12. Which of these is NOT a consideration when viewing
digital radiographic images?
a. Glare off the computer monitor must be managed to
enhance interpretation.
b. Radiographic images must be utilized where a computer monitor is located.
c. Multiple mouse clicks may be required to view a full
mouth series of radiographs.
d. A magnifying glass will be required for optimal
viewing and interpretation.
13. In which region is it best to begin the interpretation
process when viewing radiographs mounted using the
labial method?
a. Maxillary left posterior
b. Maxillary right posterior
c. Mandibular left posterior
d. Mandibular right posterior
272 MOUNTING AND VIEWING DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS
14. Following diagnosis by the dentist, the radiographic
findings must be recorded on the patient’s record by the
a. dental assistant.
b. dental hygienist.
c. dentist.
d. Any of the above
REFLECT—Case study
These four radiographs have just exited the automatic processor. Based on what you learned in this chapter, correctly
“mount” each of these four radiographs by writing the corresponding number in the correct frame of the film mount.
Assuming the identification dots are all positioned convex,
label the film mount indicating the left and right sides. Then
address the following:
1. Describe how you determined which side was the left
and which side was the right.
2. List the steps you followed to mount these radiographs
correctly.
3. List three generalizations you used to mount these films.
4. List three final checks you would make to double-check
your mounting procedure.
RELATE—Laboratory application
For a comprehensive laboratory practice exercise on this topic,
see Thomson, E. M. (2012). Exercises in oral radiography
techniques: A laboratory manual (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Pearson. Chapter 6, “Film mounting and radiographic landmarks.”
REFERENCES
Horner, K., Drage, N., & Brettle, D. (2008). 21st century
imaging. London: Quintessence Publishing Co.
Langland, O. E., & Langlais, R. P. (2002). Principles of dental
imaging (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &
Wilkins.
White, S. C., & Pharoah, M. J. (2008). Oral radiology: Principles and interpretation (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
1 2
3 4
Recognizing Normal
Radiographic Anatomy
OBJECTIVES
Following successful completion of this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Define the key words.
2. Provide three rationales for why it is important to recognize and identify normal anatomical
landmarks of the face and head.
3. Describe and identify the facial and cranial bones.
4. Differentiate between the lamina dura and the periodontal ligament space.
5. Describe and identify the radiographic appearance of all structures of the teeth.
6. Name significant anatomical landmarks of the maxilla and mandible.
7. Identify significant anatomy normally seen on intraoral radiographs of the maxilla and
mandible.
KEY WORDS
Alveolar bone
Alveolar process
Alveolus
Angle of mandible
Anodontia
Anterior nasal spine
Apical foramen
Cancellous bone
Cementum
Condyle
Coronoid process of the mandible
Cortical bone
Dentin
Dentition
Enamel
Exfoliation
External auditory meatus (foramen)
Frontal bone
Genial tubercles
Hamulus
Impacted teeth
Incisive (anterior palatine) foramen
Inferior border
Inverted Y
Lamina dura
Lateral fossa
Lingual foramen
Mandible
Mandibular canal
Mandibular foramen
Mandibular notch
Mastoid process
Maxilla
Maxillary sinus
Maxillary tuberosity
Median palatine suture
CHAPTER
OUTLINE
 Objectives 273
 Key Words 273
 Introduction 274
 Significant Normal
Anatomical
Landmarks 274
 Radiographic
Appearance of
the Alveolar Bone
and Tooth Area 277
 Anatomy Basics,
Intraoral
Radiographs 278
 Review, Recall,
Reflect, Relate 286
 References 288
CHAPTER
22
274 MOUNTING AND VIEWING DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS
Introduction
Learning to read radiographic images and to recognize normal
radiographic anatomy, the radiographer begins to develop an
appreciation for precise placement of the image receptor and
accurate techniques. Before the radiographer can identify a
deviation from the normal, a solid base knowledge of what is
normal is required. The importance of learning to identify normal radiographic anatomy may be summarized as follows:
1. To evaluate the image receptor for correct positioning so that
the areas of interest and anatomical structures are clearly
visible, enhancing the diagnostic value of the radiograph
2. To assist with determining into which frame of the x-ray
mount each radiograph is to be mounted
3. To assist in interpreting radiographs and recognizing a
deviation from the normal that would require referral to the
dentist for evaluation
The purpose of this chapter is to review the anatomy of the
head and neck region and to describe these anatomical structures as they often appear on dental radiographs.
Significant Normal Anatomical Landmarks
Although most anatomical landmarks observed on intraoral
radiographs are located on the maxilla or the mandible, the
radiographer should also be able to recognize and identify the
major bones and anatomical structures of the cranium and face.
This knowledge is particularly useful when reading extraoral
radiographs such as a panoramic radiograph.
Some of the cranial and facial bones that may be imaged
on dental radiographs are illustrated in Figures 22-1 and 22-2.
These include the frontal bone; the right and left parietal
bones; the occipital bone; the right and left temporal bones;
the right and left zygomas (zygomatic bone, also called malar
bone or cheekbone); the zygomatic arch, which is made up of
Sphenoid
Zygoma (malar)
Zygomatic process
of maxilla
Maxilla
Mandible
Frontal
Parietal
Nasal
Median palatine
suture
FIGURE 22-1 Frontal view of the skull.
KEY WORDS (Continued)
Mental foramen
Mental fossa
Mental ridge
Mylohyoid ridge
Nasal bones
Nasal conchae
Nasal fossa (cavity)
Nasal septum
Nutrient canal
Nutrient foramen
Oblique ridge
Occipital bone
Periodontal ligament (PDL)
Permanent teeth
Primary teeth
Pterygoid plates
Pulp chamber
Ramus
Septum
Sphenoid bone
Styloid process
Submandibular fossa
Supernumerary teeth
Suture
Symphysis
Temporal bone
Torus mandibularis (lingual torus)
Trabeculae
Trabecular bone
Zygoma
Zygomatic arch
Zygomatic process
CHAPTER 22 • RECOGNIZING NORMAL RADIOGRAPHIC ANATOMY 275
Zygoma
Maxilla
Mandible
Frontal Parietal
Nasal
Zygomatic arch
Temporal
Styloid process
External auditory
meatus (foramen)
Mastoid process
Occipital
FIGURE 22-2 Lateral view of the skull.
the temporal process of the zygoma and the zygomatic process
of the temporal bone; the sphenoid bone; the right and left
nasal bones; the external auditory meatus (foramen); the
styloid process; the mastoid process of the temporal bone; the
right and left maxilla; and the mandible.
The teeth are located within the alveolar processes of the
maxillae and the mandible; thus most dental radiographs
include portions of these bones. The maxillae are actually two
bones, a right and left maxilla, whereas the mandible is a single
bone. Generally, but not always, the same landmarks appear on
both right and left sides.
It is helpful to consider the overall location of these features prior to learning how and where each will appear on an
intraoral radiograph. Figure 22-3 shows the nasal septum
and the anterior nasal spine. Figure 22-4 illustrates the location of the median palatine suture, the maxillary tuberosity area, and the incisive (anterior palatine) foramen. The
maxillary sinus is an empty space within the maxilla.
Figures 22-5 and 22-6 illustrate the structures of the
mandible: body; ramus; inferior border; alveolar process;
angle of the mandible; condyle; coronoid process;
mandibular notch; mandibular foramen; mental
foramen; mandibular canal, which is located within the
mandible between the mandibular foramen and the mental
foramen; mental ridge; symphysis; lingual foramen;
genial tubercles; oblique ridge; mylohyoid ridge; and the
submandibular fossa.
Some of these landmarks are visible only on larger occlusal
and extraoral radiographs. Depending on the placement of the
image receptor, patient positioning and the angle of the x-ray
beam, certain landmarks may or may not be imaged. Furthermore, the angle of the x-ray beam may distort the appearance of
the structure so that it may not always appear exactly as illustrated in this textbook. However, a working knowledge of what
structures are likely to be imaged will assist the radiographer in
achieving competence in this skill.
Nasal septum
Nasal conchae
Anterior nasal spine
FIGURE 22-3 Frontal view of the nose.
276 MOUNTING AND VIEWING DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS
Incisive foramen
(anterior palatine foramen)
Maxillary tuberosity
Median palatine suture
FIGURE 22-4 Palatal view of maxilla.
Mandibular notch
Coronoid process
Oblique ridge
Condyle
Ramus
Angle
Body Inferior border
Alveolar process
Mental foramen
Mental ridge
Symphysis
FIGURE 22-5 Lateral view of detached mandible.
Mandibular foramen
Mylohyoid ridge
Submandibular fossa Genial tubercles
Lingual foramen
FIGURE 22-6 Lingual view of detached mandible.
CHAPTER 22 • RECOGNIZING NORMAL RADIOGRAPHIC ANATOMY 277
Radiographic Appearance of the Alveolar
Bone and Tooth Area
Before considering the appearance of these specific bones and
their features on a full mouth series of radiographs, it is important to recognize and identify the normal appearance of the
alveolar bone and the structures of the teeth. Compare the
drawing in Figure 22-7 with a radiograph of the same area
shown in Figure 22-8.
Bone
Although bones appear solid, they are solid only on the outside
and are honeycombed within. Bone is classified as cortical
bone, a compact or dense form of bone, such as what lines the
outside layers of the maxillae and the mandible, and cancellous
or spongy bone, which forms the bulk of the inner bone.
Small, interconnected trabeculae (bars or plates of bone)
form a multitude of various-sized compartments that account
for the honeycomb appearance. These trabecular bone spaces
are usually filled with fat, blood, or bone cells, which accounts
for the difference in the radiographic appearance of bone.
All bone tissues appear radiopaque. The compact or cortical outside layer appears extremely radiopaque (white), whereas
the cancellous bone varies in radiopacity (shades of gray)
according to the size and number of the trabecular spaces. The
area may even appear almost radiolucent (black) if these spaces
are very large or if the bone is thin, as is the case in the area of
the submandibular fossa.
By definition, the alveolar process is that portion of the
maxilla or mandible that surrounds and supports the teeth. It is
composed of the lamina dura and the supporting bone.
LAMINA DURA The lamina dura is the hard, cortical bone
that lines the alveolus (the tooth socket). On radiographs, the
lamina dura appears as a thin radiopaque (white) border that
outlines the shape of the alveolus (the root of the tooth). The
supporting bone is cancellous and varies in density in the different parts of the alveolar process.
PERIODONTAL LIGAMENT SPACE The teeth are attached to
the lamina dura by the fibers of the periodontal ligament
(PDL). The PDL itself is made up of soft tissues and therefore
will not be imaged on a radiograph. However, the space in
which the PDL lies is often visible as a thin radiolucent (dark)
border between the lamina dura and the roots of the teeth.
NUTRIENT CANALS Nutrient canals are thin radiolucent
lines of fairly uniform width that sometimes exhibit radiopaque
borders. They contain blood vessels and nerves that supply the
teeth, bone, and gingivae. Nutrient canals are most often visualized in the anterior of the mandible and in edentulous areas.
When nutrient canals open at the surface of the bone, they often
appear radiographically as a tiny radiolucent dot called the
nutrient foramen.
Teeth
The tooth structures are enamel, dentin, cementum, and pulp.
Enamel, the hardest body structure, covers the crown and is
very radiopaque. The underlying dentin is not as dense and
appears less radiopaque. The cementum that covers the roots is
even less dense. Because only a thin layer of cementum covers
the root, it is generally indistinguishable radiographically from
the underlying dentin (Figure 22-8). Although all three highly
calcified tooth structures vary in radiopacity in direct proportion to the thickness of each structure in the path of the x-ray
beam, for descriptive purposes enamel, dentin, and cementum
are considered radiopaque.
The tooth pulp that occupies the pulp chamber and the
root canals is the only noncalcified tooth tissue. As this soft tissue offers only minimal resistance to the passage of x-rays, it
appears radiolucent. The end of the root canal is called the
apical foramen. This foramen permits the passage of nerves
and blood vessels that nourish the tooth structures.
Enamel
Dentin
Pulp chamber
Cementum
Periodontal ligament
Pulp (root) canal
Lamina dura
Cancellous
(trabecular) bone
FIGURE 22-7 Drawing of mandibular premolar–molar area.
1 2
3
4
5 6
7
FIGURE 22-8 Radiograph of mandibular premolar area
showing (1) dentin, (2) enamel, (3) pulp chamber, (4) periodontal
ligament space, (5) lamina dura, (6) pulp (root) canal, and
(7) cancellous (trabecular) bone. Note that because only a very
thin layer of cementum covers the root, it is radiographically
indistinguishable from the underlying dentin.
278 MOUNTING AND VIEWING DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS
DENTITION To correctly identify and interpret radiographs,
one needs to understand the dentition. Young children have 20
primary teeth that are gradually lost as they grow older. During the transition years a mixed dentition—that is, both primary
and permanent teeth—may be present. A radiograph may show
the primary teeth with partially resorbed roots, which are in a
process of exfoliation, as well as permanent teeth whose roots
are not yet fully formed, which are in the process of eruption.
This is a normal phenomenon and is often observed in radiographs of children between 6 and 12 years old (Figure 22-9).
There are 32 permanent teeth, including all four of the third
molars (wisdom teeth).
Occasionally, teeth form but are unable to erupt. These are
described as impacted teeth. Some people have one or more
extra teeth, called supernumerary teeth. Another deviation is
the congenital absence of certain teeth, described as anodontia.
These conditions occur so frequently that, although not normal,
they are not considered pathologic.
Anatomy Basics, Intraoral Radiographs
Learning to identify anatomical structures and their specific landmarks takes practice. Radiographs provide a two-dimensional
image of three-dimensional structures. When imaging the head
and neck region, multiple structures may be imaged superimposed on top of each other, adding to the difficulty of correctly
identifying these structures. The first step in becoming competent
at this skill is to understand what basic anatomy may be in the
path of the x-ray beam. This will assist the radiographer in distinguishing what will be recorded on the radiograph (Figure 22-10).
It is helpful to be aware of which structures appear
radiopaque and radiolucent. As you will recall from Chapter 4,
structures that are dense and absorb or resist the passage of xrays will appear light or white on the radiograph. Structures that
permit the passage of x-rays with little or no resistance will
appear dark or black. Bone and its dense features such as a ridge,
spine, or tubercle will appear radiopaque, whereas less dense features such as a foramen, canal, or suture will appear radiolucent.
To aid the radiographer in learning the radiographic appearance
of anatomy, it is helpful to remember that a landmark called the
oblique ridge will be a radiopaque structure, and a landmark
called the mental foramen will appear radiolucent (Table 22-1).
Just as it is helpful to follow a systematic order when mounting and interpreting films, the radiographer will benefit from
organizing the identification of anatomical landmarks into specific steps. Because memorizing the structures that make up the
head and neck region can be an overwhelming task, the following system is offered to assist the beginning radiographer in
learning to identify structures commonly imaged on intraoral
radiographs (Figure 22-11).
As illustrated by the flowchart in Figure 22-11, differentiating among which structures will most likely be imaged on
intraoral radiographs of the maxilla and which structures will
1
2
3
4
FIGURE 22-9 Radiograph of mixed dentition in mandibular
canine area showing (1) primary canine, (2) primary first molar with
partially resorbed roots, (3) permanent canine, and (4) permanent first
premolar with incomplete root formation.
FIGURE 22-10 Facial bones recorded on radiographs. Note
the position of the PID when exposing a maxillary posterior
periapical radiograph. The zygomatic arch will most likely be
recorded on this radiograph.
TABLE 22-1 Radiopaque and Radiolucent
Features
RADIOPAQUE RADIOLUCENT
• Bone • Canal
• Border (wall) • Foramen
• Process • Fossa
• Ridge • Meatus
• Spine • Sinus
• Tubercles • Space (PDL)
• Tuberosity • Suture
279
• Floor of the
sinus
• Septum
• Zygomatic
process
• Zygoma
• Zygomatic
arch
• Maxillary
tuberosity
• Pterygoid
plates
• Hamulus
• Coronoid
process
Radiopaque?
• Median
palatine
suture
• Incisive
foramen
• Nasal fossa
• Lateral fossa
Radiolucent?
• Nasal septum
• Anterior
nasal spine
• Inverted “Y”
• Soft tissue of
the nose
Radiopaque?
• Lingual
foramen
• Mental fossa
Radiolucent?
• Genial
tubercles
• Mental ridge
Radiopaque?
• Maxillary
sinus
Radiolucent?
• Mental
foramen
• Submandibular
fossa
• Mandibular
canal
Radiolucent?
• Oblique ridge
• Mylohyoid
ridge
• Inferior
border of the
mandible
• Torus
mandibularis
Radiopaque?
Anterior region? Posterior region?
Maxilla?
Anterior region? Posterior region?
Mandible?
Is this a radiograph of the …?
FIGURE 22-11 Sequence for interpreting normal radiographic anatomy.
280 MOUNTING AND VIEWING DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS
be imaged on intraoral radiographs of the mandible will help
the radiographer organize the anatomy terms and narrow the possible choices. When beginning the interpretation process, first
determine if the intraoral radiograph you are looking at is a maxillary view or a mandibular view. See Chapter 21 for generalizations that aid in determining whether or not a radiograph is of the
maxilla or the mandible. Once the correct arch is identified,
determine whether the view is of the anterior or the posterior
region. As you will recall, in the anterior regions, the image
receptor is usually positioned with the long dimension vertically,
whereas in the posterior regions the image receptor is placed
with the long dimension positioned horizontally. Certain anatomical structures are more likely to be visible on radiographs of the
anterior region, whereas others are more likely to be visible in
the posterior region. Prior to deciding which anatomical structure
is being observed, the radiographer should determine whether or
not the structure is radiopaque or radiolucent. A radiopaque
appearance indicates a structure that is dense, eliminating structures such as a foramen or fossa or other feature that would not
present as radiopaque. Likewise, a radiolucent appearance indicates a structure that is less dense, so the terms process or ridge
would not apply to radiolucent observations.
Organizing the interpretation of normal radiographic
anatomy in this manner (Figure 22-11) will assist the beginning
radiographer by providing a framework on which to learn the
terms associated with head and neck radiography and will continue to be a basis for building on these basic interpretative
skills. A working knowledge of the radiographic appearance of
normal anatomy must be mastered to develop the skills needed
to recognize deviations from the normal such as periodontal
disease, caries, and growth and development anomalies.
In keeping with the system laid out in Figure 22-11, anatomical landmarks in this chapter are separated into the regions where
they are most likely to be observed on intraoral radiographs:
1. Maxillary anterior region
2. Maxillary posterior region
3. Mandibular anterior region
4. Mandibular posterior region
Depending on the manner in which the image receptor was
positioned, and the angle at which the exposure was made, the
expected anatomical landmark may or may not be visible.
Sometimes the landmark is visible on only the right or only the
left side. Keeping this in mind, the following descriptions offer
guidance for learning these structures.
Maxillary Anterior Region (Figures 22-12
through 22-15)
RADIOPAQUE FEATURES
1. Nasal septum. A dense cartilage structure that separates the
right nasal fossa from the left. Usually appears as a vertical
radiopaque line separating the paired radiolucencies of the
nasal cavity.
2. Anterior nasal spine. A V-shaped projection from the
floor of the nasal fossa in the midline. Usually appears as a
triangle-shaped radiopacity.
1
2
3
45 6
7
8
FIGURE 22-12 Drawing of maxillary midline area illustrating
(1) outline of nose, (2) incisive foramen (anterior palatine foramen),
(3) lateral fossa, (4) nasal fossa, (5) nasal septum, (6) border of nasal
fossa, (7) anterior nasal spine, and (8) median palatine suture.
1
2
3
45 6
7
8
FIGURE 22-13 Radiograph of maxillary midline area
showing (1) incisive (anterior palatine) foramen, indicated by an
irregularly shaped, rounded radiolucent area, (2) outline of the nose,
(3) lateral fossa, (4) nasal fossa (radiolucent), (5) nasal septum,
(6) border of nasal fossa, (7) anterior nasal spine, and (8) median
palatine suture.
CHAPTER 22 • RECOGNIZING NORMAL RADIOGRAPHIC ANATOMY 281
1
2
3
4
5
FIGURE 22-14 Drawing of maxillary canine area illustrating
(1) lateral fossa, (2) nasal fossa, (3) inverted Y (intersection of the
borders of nasal fossa and maxillary sinus), and (4) maxillary sinus.
(5) Note the dense radiopaque area caused by overlapping of the
mesial surface of the first premolar over the distal surface of the
canine. This overlapping is common in this region of the oral cavity
because of the curvature of the arch.
3
4
5
2
1
FIGURE 22-15 Radiograph of maxillary canine area showing
(1) lateral fossa, (2) nasal fossa, (3) inverted Y (intersection of the
borders of the nasal fossa and maxillary sinus), (4) maxillary sinus,
and (5) dense radiopaque area caused by overlapping of the mesial
surface of the first premolar over the distal surface of the canine. This
overlapping is common in this region of the oral cavity because of the
curvature of the arch.
3. Inverted Y. An important landmark seen in the
canine–premolar area, made up of the lateral wall of the
nasal fossa and the anterior–medial wall of the maxillary
sinus. The intersection of these two radiopaque lines often
criss-cross each other in the form of the letter Y. This Y
shape often appears upside down or turned on its side.
4. Soft tissue of the nose. Sometimes an outline of the soft
tissue of the nose may be shadowed onto anterior intraoral
radiographs (Figures 22-16 and 22-17).
RADIOLUCENT FEATURES
1. Median palatine suture. A radiolucent thin line that delineates the midline of the palate and the junction of the right
and left maxillae. Frequently seen between the central
incisors, this structure should not be mistaken for a fracture.
2. Incisive foramen (anterior palatine foramen). A round
or pear-shaped radiolucent opening that varies greatly in
size serves for the passage of nerves and blood vessels. It is
often visible near or between the apices of the central
incisors. (This foramen should not be mistaken for an
abscess, cyst, or other pathological condition.)
3. Nasal fossa (cavity). A large air space divided into two
paired radiolucencies by the radiopaque nasal septum, often
visible above the roots of the incisors. The radiolucency of
FIGURE 22-16 Soft tissue of the nose in the path of the
x-ray beam. Note that the soft tissue of the nose will be in the path
of the x-ray beam in this exposure. The resultant radiograph will most
likely show an image of the soft tissue, outlining the tip of the nose.
282 MOUNTING AND VIEWING DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS
1
FIGURE 22-17 Soft tissue image of the nose. (1) The resultant
image of the soft tissue of the nose is often magnified to a large size.
According to the rules of shadow casting (see Chapter 4), the further
an object is from the image receptor, the more likely that object will
appear magnified. The tip of the nose is at an increased distance from
the intraoral image receptor, resulting in a magnification of the size of
the nose.
FIGURE 22-18 Drawing of maxillary premolar area
illustrating (1) border (floor) of maxillary sinus, (2) maxillary sinus,
(3) septum in maxillary sinus dividing the sinus into two
compartments, (4) zygomatic process of maxilla, (5) zygoma, and
(6) lower border of zygomatic arch.
1
2 34 5
6
FIGURE 22-19 Radiograph of maxillary premolar area
showing (1) border (floor) of maxillary sinus, (2) maxillary sinus,
(3) zygomatic process of maxilla, (4) septum in maxillary sinus
dividing the sinus into two compartments, (5) zygoma, and
(6) inferior border of the zygomatic arch.
the nasal cavities will vary in dark appearance, depending on
the angle of the x-ray beam. At times, the x-ray beam may
have to penetrate the nasal conchae, thin bony extensions
of the nasal wall, and result in a less radiolucent appearance of the nasal fossa itself. (Figure 22-3)
4. Lateral fossa. A radiolucency between the maxillary lateral incisor and the maxillary canine representing the
decreased thickness in bone in this area.
Maxillary Posterior Region (Figures 22-18
through 22-22)
RADIOPAQUE FEATURES
1. Floor or inferior border of the sinuses. A thin, dense bone
indicating the walls of the maxillary sinuses, whereas the
sinus cavities themselves are referred to as radiolucent. The
term radiopaque is used when referring to the sinus walls.
The anterior extent of the maxillary sinus is often visible on
an intraoral radiograph of the canine region as well.
2. Septum. A radiopaque wall (or partition) may be seen separating the maxillary sinus into two or more compartments.
Septa (plural) are not always visible on all patients.
3. Zygomatic process of the maxilla. Appearing as a broad
U-shaped band often seen above or superimposed over the
roots of the first and second molars.
4. Zygoma (malar or cheekbone). Extends laterally and distally from the zygomatic process of the maxilla.
5. Zygomatic arch. Is continuous with the zygoma and
extends distally. Because radiographs are a two-dimensional
picture of three-dimensional structures, it is difficult to distinguish radiographically where the zygomatic process,
zygoma, and zygomatic arch end and begin.
6. Maxillary tuberosity. The extension of the alveolar bone
behind the molars marking the posterior limits of the maxillary arch. The maxillary tuberosity is usually referred to
as radiopaque; however, depending on the size of the trabeculae located here, the radiopacity will vary.
7. Pterygoid plates of the sphenoid will usually appear only
on the most posterior intraoral radiograph. To distinguish
this structure from the maxilla, look for the posterior outline of the maxilla, distal to the maxillary tuberosity. A
radiolucent suture may be detected separating the lateral
ptyergoid plate from the maxilla, or the pterygoid plate
may appear to overlap onto the maxilla.
1
2 34 5
6
CHAPTER 22 • RECOGNIZING NORMAL RADIOGRAPHIC ANATOMY 283
FIGURE 22-20 Drawing of maxillary molar area illustrating
(1) border (floor) of maxillary sinus, (2) maxillary sinus,
(3) zygomatic process of maxilla, (4) zygoma, (5) septum in
maxillary sinus, (6) lower border of zygomatic arch, (7) hamulus
(hamular process), (8) maxillary tuberosity, and (9) coronoid process
(mandible).
1
3 4
6
7
5
8
2
FIGURE 22-21 Radiograph of maxillary molar area showing
(1) border (floor) of maxillary sinus, (2) maxillary sinus,
(3) zygomatic process of maxilla, (4) zygoma, (5) lateral pterygoid
plate, (6) lower border of zygomatic arch, (7) maxillary tuberosity,
and (8) coronoid process of the mandible.
2
3 45
1
FIGURE 22-22 Radiograph of maxillary molar area showing
(1) hamulus (hamular process), a downward projection of the medial
pterygoid plate, (2) lateral pterygoid plate, (3) coronoid process of the
mandible, (4) maxillary tuberosity, and (5) maxillary sinus.
8. Hamulus (hamular process). A downward projection of
the medial pterygoid plate. It appears as a radiopaque
pointed, sometimes hooklike, structure that serves as a
muscle attachment. The hamulus is usually observed on
only the most posterior intraoral radiographs.
9. Coronoid process of the mandible is sometimes seen as a
triangle or large pointed radiopacity superimposed over the
maxillary tuberosity. Although this structure is technically
a feature of the mandible, it is often in the path of the x-ray
beam when positioning the PID for images of the maxillary posterior region (Figure 22-23).
RADIOLUCENT FEATURES
1. Maxillary sinus. This large air chamber inside the maxilla is
visible in almost all periapical radiographs from the region
of the canines posterior to the molars. The thin, radiopaque
sinus wall can be observed outlining the radiolucent sinus.
Mandibular Anterior Region (Figures 22-24
through 22-27)
RADIOPAQUE FEATURES
1. Genial tubercles. Are made up of four small, bony crests on
the lingual surface of the mandible that serve for muscle
attachments. Generally visible as a round radiopaque “doughnut” at the midline below the apices of the central incisors.
2. Mental ridge. Located on the lateral surface of the mandible,
the mental ridge appears as a horizontal radiopaque line
extending from the premolar region to the symphysis (the
midline of the mandible where the left and right sides of bone
are fused together).
RADIOLUCENT FEATURES
1. Lingual foramen. A very small circular radiolucency in
the middle of the radiopaque genial tubercles. May not be
recorded on the radiograph because of its small size.
FIGURE 22-23 Coronoid process of the mandible may be
recorded on intraoral radiographs of the maxillary posterior
region. Note the position of the image receptor holder when
exposing a maxillary posterior periapical radiograph. The coronoid
process of the mandible will most likely be recorded on this
radiograph.
1
2 3 45
6
7
8
9
284 MOUNTING AND VIEWING DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS
1
2
3
4
5
6
FIGURE 22-25 Radiograph of the mandibular midline area
showing (1) mental ridge, (2) nutrient canal, (3) nutrient foramen,
(4) genial tubercles surrounding the (5) lingual foramen, and
(6) inferior border of the mandible (radiopaque band of dense
cortical bone).
1
2
3
4
5
6
FIGURE 22-24 Drawing of mandibular midline area
illustrating (1) mental ridge, (2) nutrient canal, (3) nutrient foramen,
(4) genial tubercles surrounding the (5) lingual foramen, and
(6) inferior border of mandible.
1
2
FIGURE 22-26 Drawing of mandibular canine area
illustrating (1) nutrient canal, and (2) torus mandibularis (lingual
torus).
1
2
FIGURE 22-27 Radiograph of mandibular canine area
showing (1) nutrient canal, (2) torus mandibularis (lingual torus).
CHAPTER 22 • RECOGNIZING NORMAL RADIOGRAPHIC ANATOMY 285
1
6
5
2
3
4
FIGURE 22-28 Drawing of mandibular premolar area
illustrating (1) torus mandibularis, (2) oblique ridge, (3) mylohyoid
ridge, (4) submandibular fossa, (5) mandibular canal, and (6) mental
foramen.
2. Mental fossa. A depression on the labial aspect of the
mandibular incisor area, representing an accentuated thinness of the mandible. On a mandibular incisor radiograph,
the mental fossa appears as a generalized radiolucent area
around the incisor apices.
Mandibular Posterior Region (Figures 22-28
through 22-32)
RADIOPAQUE FEATURES
1. Oblique ridge. A continuation of the anterior border of the
ramus that extends downward and forward on the lateral
surface of the mandible. The oblique ridge (sometimes
called the external oblique ridge) appears as a radiopaque
horizontal line of varied width superimposed across the
molar roots.
2. Mylohyoid ridge is an irregular crest of bone for muscle
attachments on the lingual surface of the mandible in the
molar region. The mylohyoid ridge appears as a horizontal
radiopaque line parallel and always inferior to (below) the
oblique ridge. The mylohyoid ridge will most likely be
imaged apical to (below) the teeth roots.
3. Inferior border of the mandible is a heavy layer of cortical bone that is imaged only if the radiograph is deeply
depressed in the floor of the mouth or the vertical angle of
the x-ray beam is excessive. The inferior border of the
mandible will appear as a distinct, thick radiopaque border.
4. Torus mandibularis (lingual torus). This bony growth
extending out from the lingual surface of the mandible is a
frequently encountered form of benign tumor. Depending
on the size of the torus, the increased thickness in the bone
will appear as a radiopaque fuzzy cotton ball imaged over
or apical to the roots of posterior teeth.
1
2
4 3
FIGURE 22-29 Radiograph of mandibular premolar area
showing (1) submandibular fossa, (2) thin radiolucent line indicating
the periodontal ligament space, (3) thin radiopaque line representing
the lamina dura, and (4) the mental foramen.
1
FIGURE 22-30 Radiograph of mandibular premolar area
showing (1) small torus mandibularis (lingual torus).
RADIOLUCENT FEATURES
1. Mental foramen. A small opening on the lateral side of
the body of the mandible, often seen near the apices of the
premolars. This foramen should not be mistaken for an
abscess, cyst, or other pathological condition.
2. Submandibular fossa. A large irregular-shaped area
below the mylohyoid ridge and the roots of the mandibular
molars, where the bone is thin, allowing more x-rays to
penentrate this area and reach the image receptor. The submandibular fossa should not be mistaken for pathology.
3. Mandibular canal. A canal for the passage of the
mandibular nerve and blood vessels, it is outlined by two
paired, thin, barely visible, parallel radiopaque lines,
which represent thin layers of cortical bone. The mandibular canal is often imaged in the premolar–molar areas
below the apices of the teeth.
286 MOUNTING AND VIEWING DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS
1
2
3
4
FIGURE 22-32 Radiograph of mandibular molar area
showing (1) oblique ridge, (2) mylohyoid ridge, (3) mandibular canal
(note the thin, parallel radiopaque lines representing the canal walls),
and (4) submandibular fossa.
REVIEW—Chapter summary
Knowledge of the anatomical landmarks of the face and skull
is needed to properly position the image receptor to clearly
image the area of interest, to assist in mounting intraoral
radiographs, and to develop the ability to interpret radiographs
and recognize deviations from normal.
The radiographer should be able to identify cranial and
facial bones as well as the specific landmarks and features of
the maxilla and mandible. The radiographic appearance of the
alveolar bone and the structures of the teeth were presented.
For the purpose of organizing anatomical structures for
learning, landmarks are divided into the following categories,
depending on where they would be most likely to appear: maxillary anterior region, maxillary posterior region, mandibular
anterior region, and mandibular posterior region. Anatomical
landmarks are further separated into radiopaque images or radiolucent images. A systematic procedure is helpful to the beginning radiographer in learning to identify normal radiographic
anatomy.
RECALL—Study questions
1. A competent dental hygienist and dental assistant must
be able to identify which of the following radiographically?
a. Caries
b. Periodontal abcess
c. Normal anatomy
d. Periapical pathology
2. Which of the following facial bones would most likely
appear on a periapical radiograph?
a. Occipital
b. Parietal
c. Frontal
d. Zygoma
3. Bone sometimes has a mixed radiopaque-radiolucent
appearance due to the nature of the
a. cortical plates.
b. trabeculae patterns.
c. alveolar process.
d. genial tubercles.
4. Which of the following will most likely appear as a
radiopacity outlining the tooth root?
a. PDL space
b. Lamina dura
c. Nutrient canal
d. Cementum
5. When nutrient canals open at the surface of the bone,
they often appear radiographically as
a. small radiolucent dots.
b. large radiopaque lines.
c. small radiolucent lines.
d. small radiopaque dots.
6. Which of these structures appears radiolucent?
a. Enamel
b. Cementum
c. Dentin
d. Pulp
7. A periapical radiograph of a 10-year-old will most likely
reveal developing permanent dentition.
Evidence of a congenitally missing permanent tooth is
called an impaction.
a. The first statement is true. The second statement is
false.
b. The first statement is false. The second statement is
true.
c. Both statements are true.
d. Both statements are false.
1
2
4 3
FIGURE 22-31 Drawing of mandibular molar area illustrating
(1) oblique ridge, (2) mylohyoid ridge, (3) submandibular fossa, and
(4) mandibular canal.
CHAPTER 22 • RECOGNIZING NORMAL RADIOGRAPHIC ANATOMY 287
8. On a periapical radiograph of the maxillary molars,
which of the following structures may be recorded superimposed over the roots of the teeth?
a. Mastoid process
b. Maxillary tuberosity
c. Zygomatic process
d. Mylohyoid ridge
9. Each of these features will appear radiolucent EXCEPT
one. Which one is the EXCEPTION?
a. Foramen
b. Suture
c. Canal
d. Spine
10. Each of these features will appear radiopaque EXCEPT
one. Which one is the EXCEPTION?
a. Ridge
b. Sinus
c. Tubercles
d. Process
11. Which of the following is the best recommended sequence
for learning to identify normal radiographic anatomy?
a. 1. Determine if radiograph is of the maxilla or
mandible.
2. Determine if radiograph is of the anterior or posterior region.
3. Determine if the structure is radiopaque or radiolucent.
b. 1. Determine if radiograph is of the anterior or posterior region.
2. Determine if the structure is radiopaque or radiolucent.
3. Determine if radiograph is of the maxilla or
mandible.
c. 1. Determine if the structure is radiopaque or radiolucent.
2. Determine if radiograph is of the maxilla or
mandible.
3. Determine if radiograph is of the anterior or posterior region.
d. 1. Determine if radiograph is of the maxilla or
mandible.
2. Determine if the structure is radiopaque or radiolucent.
3. Determine if radiograph is of the anterior or posterior region.
12. Each of the following may appear on a periapical radiograph of the maxillary anterior region EXCEPT one.
Which one is the EXCEPTION?
a. Nasal septum
b. Median palatine suture
c. Maxillary tuberosity
d. Inverted Y
13. Each of the following may appear on a periapical radiograph of the maxillary posterior region EXCEPT one.
Which one is the EXCEPTION?
a. Maxillary sinus
b. Incisive foramen
c. Zygomatic arch
d. Hamulus
14. A mandible landmark feature that may be imaged on a
periapical radiograph of the maxillary posterior region
is the
a. mandibular canal.
b. submandibular fossa.
c. inferior border of the mandible.
d. coronoid process.
15. Each of the following may appear on a periapical radiograph of the mandibular anterior region EXCEPT one.
Which one is the EXCEPTION?
a. Genial tubercles
b. Mental ridge
c. Coronoid process
d. Lingual foramen
16. Each of the following may appear on a periapical radiograph of the mandibular posterior region EXCEPT
one. Which one is the EXCEPTION?
a. Mental foramen
b. Pterygoid plate
c. Mandibular canal
d. Mylohyoid ridge
17. The inverted Y landmark is composed of the intersection of which two structures?
a. Lateral wall of the nasal cavity and anterior border of
the maxillary sinus
b. Anterior border of the maxillary sinus and inferior
border of the mandible
c. Lateral wall of the nasal cavity and soft tissue
shadow of the nose
d. Inferior border of the zygomatic process and the
anterior nasal spine
REFLECT—Case study
Your colleague is viewing a full mouth series of radiographs
that he just finished mounting. As he is describing the following features, see if you can tell him the name of the anatomic
landmark.
1. A dense, vertical radiopacity separating two paired oval
radiolucencies observed in the maxillary anterior region.
2. Large, paired oval radiolucencies separated by a dense,
vertical radiopacity observed in the maxillary anterior
region.
3. A thin radiolucent line resembling a fracture observed
between the maxillary central incisors.
288 MOUNTING AND VIEWING DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS
4. A round or pear-shaped radiolucency observed between
the maxillary central incisors.
5. A broad, U-shaped radiopacity observed superimposed
over the maxillary posterior teeth roots.
6. A radiopaque downward projection of bone that
appears pointed or hooklike observed in the far posterior region of the maxilla.
7. A large triangular-shaped radiopacity observed superimposed over the maxillary tuberosity region.
8. A large radiolucency outlined by a thin radiopaque border that is observed in almost all the periapical radiographs of the maxilla, from the canine posteriorly.
9. A very small, round radiolucency observed in the midline apical (below) the mandibular incisors.
10. A horizontal radiopaque line extending from the premolar region to the symphysis.
11. A round radiolucency that resembles an abscess observed
near the apex of the mandibular second premolar.
12. A horizontal radiopaque line observed in the mandibular
posterior region, superimposed across the molar roots.
13. Another horizontal radiopaque line observed in the
mandibular posterior region, but inferior to (below) the
line described in #12 above. This line is observed inferior to the molar roots.
14. A large, irregularly shaped radiolucency observed inferior to the line described in #13 above.
RELATE—Laboratory application
Developing the ability to recognize, identify, and describe radiographic anatomy of the head and neck region takes practice.
Using the illustrations in this chapter, compare the appearance
of the structures labeled with how they appear on a dry skull.
Looking at a skull, point out each of the landmarks in the figures. To make it easier to locate these bones or structures, turn
the skull so that it is oriented in the same direction as the illustration at which you are looking. Many structures can be seen
readily; others may only be seen from one specific direction.
REFERENCES
Farman, A. G., Nortje, C. J., & Wood, R. E. (1993). Oral and
maxillofacial diagnostic imaging. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
White, S. C., & Pharoah, M. J. (2008). Oral radiology: Principles and interpretation (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
OBJECTIVES
Following successful completion of this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Define the key words.
2. Identify the radiographic appearance of dental materials.
3. Identify the radiographic appearance of developmental anomalies.
4. Identify the radiographic appearance of periapical abscesses, cysts, and granulomas.
5. Identify the radiographic appearance of external and internal tooth resorption.
6. Identify the radiographic appearance of calcifications and ossifications.
7. Identify the radiographic appearance of odontogenic tumors.
8. Identify the radiographic appearance of nonodontogenic tumors.
9. Identify the radiographic appearance of fractures.
KEY WORDS
Abscess
Amalgam
Amalgam tattoo
Ameloblastoma
Anodontia
Anomaly
Base material
Benign
Carcinoma
Composite
Condensing osteitis
Crown
Cyst
Dens in dente
Dentigerous cyst
Dilaceration
Exostosis
External resorption
Follicular (eruptive) cyst
Foreign body
Fracture line
Fusion
Gemination
Globulomaxillary cyst
Granuloma
Gutta percha
Hypercementosis
Idiopathic resorption
Incisive canal cyst
Internal resorption
Recognizing Deviations
from Normal Radiographic
Anatomy
CHAPTER
OUTLINE
 Objectives 289
 Key Words 289
 Introduction 290
 Radiographic
Appearance of
Dental Restorative
Material 290
 Radiographic
Appearance of
Developmental
Anomalies 294
 Radiographic
Appearance of
Apical Disease 296
 Radiographic
Appearance of
Tooth Resorption 297
 Radiographic
Appearance of
Calcifications and
Ossifications 299
 Radiographic
Appearance of
Odontogenic
Tumors 299
 Radiographic
Appearance of
Nonodontogenic
Tumors 300
 Radiographic
Appearance of
Trauma 301
 Review, Recall,
Reflect, Relate 301
 References 302
CHAPTER
23
290 MOUNTING AND VIEWING DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS
Introduction
The most important skill in interpreting radiographs that a dental hygienist and dental assistant can possess is the ability to recognize deviations from normal radiographic anatomy. Although
the dentist is responsible for the final diagnosis and treatment of
dental disease, all members of the oral health care team should
be able to recognize radiographic deviations from the normal.
Patient care is enhanced when the entire team views and interprets
the radiographs.
Interpretation is a skill that requires a great deal of practice.
The beginning radiology student is often frustrated by not being
able to “see” what the expert easily identifies. To help develop
this skill, a solid working knowledge of normal radiographic
anatomy is needed. The radiographer should first identify normal radiographic anatomy, then systematically progress through a
sequence of evaluation, naming each radiopaque and radiolucent
structure observed.
The purpose of this chapter is to help build on the skills
acquired in Chapter 22 and to begin to identify common radiographic features that patients often present with (Procedure
Box 23-1). These include the radiographic appearance of restorative materials, developmental anomalies, periapical pathology
and other common pathological conditions of the teeth and the
jaws, and the effects of trauma.
Prior to the discussion of the radiographic appearance of
these materials and conditions, it should be noted that interpretation of radiographic findings is enhanced when the patient is
present, allowing the practitioner to compare the radiographic
findings with the clinical examination of the patient. Attempting to determine what a particular finding is from the radiograph alone may sometimes be difficult; for example, a
radiolucency observed in the otherwise radiopaque enamel of a
maxillary central incisor may give the appearance of caries.
However, a clinical examination of this tooth may reveal the
presence of a composite restoration, which can sometimes mimic
decay radiographically. In addition, the dentist will always use
radiographs in conjunction with the patient’s clinical examination, medical and dental histories, and physical signs and symptoms, together with other necessary diagnostic tests to make a
final diagnosis.
Radiographic Appearance of Dental
Restorative Material
It is important to observe restorative materials radiographically for the presence of recurrent decay, defective margins
that contribute to periodontal disease, and other potential
problems. Restorative materials may appear radiopaque or
radiolucent, and some can be differentiated by their relative
degree of radiopacity or radiolucency (Table 23-1). Others are
better identified by their size and contour or by their probable
location on the tooth. However, because radiographs are a
two-dimensional image of three-dimensional objects, the
image of a restoration on one surface may be superimposed
on the image of another large restoration on the same tooth,
giving the appearance of only one restoration instead of two,
or even more. Often, there is more than one type of material
superimposed. For example, the appearance of a base material
may be observed apical to a metallic restoration, or the presence of metallic retention pins may be detected apical to a
crown. In addition, it is not always possible to determine on
which tooth surface the restoration is located. A restoration
looks the same whether it is on the facial (buccal) or lingual
surface of the tooth.
KEY WORDS (Continued)
Malignant
Mesiodens
Nonodontogenic cyst
Odontogenic cyst
Odontoma
Ossification
Osteosclerosis
Overhang
Periapical cemental dysplasia (PCD)
Phleboliths
Post and core
Pulp stone
Radicular cyst
Residual cyst
Resorption
Retained root
Retention pin
Rhinoliths
Sarcoma
Sclerotic bone
Sialolith
Silver point
Supernumerary tooth
Taurodontia
Torus
Tumor
PRACTICE POINT
The rule follows that when viewing radiographs, you should
give everything you see a name. Every radiopaque and radiolucent object observed on the radiograph should be identified as an anatomical landmark. Is the observation in
question the mental foramen, the submandibular fossa, or
the periodontal ligament space? When you have exhausted
all possibilities of what a finding could be, it then becomes
a deviation from the normal, requiring the attention of the
dentist.
CHAPTER 23 • RECOGNIZING DEVIATIONS FROM NORMAL RADIOGRAPHIC ANATOMY 291
1. See Procedure Box 21-2, Suggested Sequence for Viewing a Full Mouth Series of Radiographs.
2. Examine one anatomic structure at a time. Compare each finding with its appearance in adjacent
radiographs.
3. First, examine the supporting structures (the bones of the head and neck).
a. Identify each landmark (see Chapter 22).
b. Determine whether the landmark is in the appropriate region.
c. Determine whether the landmark is of accurate size and shape.
d. Examine the trabecular spaces and cortical plate of the bones.
4. Second, examine the teeth.
a. Determine if each tooth is present or absent.
b. Examine the shape and morphology of the crowns and roots.
c. Look for developmental stages and/or abnormalities.
d. Examine the pulp chamber and root canals.
5. Third, observe any dental restorations and the presence of dental materials.
a. Check for shape and contour.
b. Check for appropriate placement.
c. Look for radiolucencies that suggest recurrent decay (see Chapter 24).
6. Fourth, examine the teeth for possible carious lesions (see Chapter 24).
7. Fifth, examine the supporting alveolar bone and the periodontal ligament space for evidence of
periodontal disease (see Chapter 25).
8. Present a preliminary interpretation for the dentist’s review.
9. Following confirmation by the dentist, document all findings on the patient’s permanent record.
PROCEDURE 23-1
Sequence for interpreting a full mouth series for deviations from normal
radiographic anatomy
TABLE 23-1 Metallic and Nonmetallic Restorations
METALLIC DENTAL MATERIALS NONMETALLIC DENTAL MATERIALS
RADIOPAQUE LESS RADIOPAQUE SOMETIMES RADIOLUCENT
Amalgam Composite Composite
Gold Porcelain Acrylic resins
Stainless steel Acrylic resins Silicate
Retention pin Silicate
Post and core Base
Silver point Cement
Orthodontic appliance Temporary filling
Implants Gutta percha
Sealants
Metallic Restorations
The images of all metallic restorations of approximately equal
density appear extremely radiopaque. Therefore, it is impossible to determine whether the material is gold, silver, or a base
metal alloy. Only by looking at the size and contour of the
restoration is it possible to make an educated guess based on
what materials are generally used in such circumstances. For
example, metal crowns will most often appear to have smooth
292 MOUNTING AND VIEWING DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS
margins, whereas amalgam restorations have irregular margins
(Figure 23-1).
Nonmetallic Restorations
Aesthetic materials, such as composites, porcelain, silicate,
and acrylic resins (plastics), may appear radiopaque or radiolucent and may be barely visible or not detected at all. Radiolucent dental materials have a tendency to mimic decay
radiographically, so some manufacturers add radiopaque particles to their product so that the viewer will not mistake it for
caries (Figure 23-2).
Other restorative materials such as base material (calcium
hydroxide pastes; Figure 23-1) and cements (Figure 23-2) exhibit
about the same degree of radiopacity as dentin. Sealants may
appear very slightly radiopaque, or not at all.
Identification of Common Restorative Materials
• Amalgam. The most common restorative material;
appears radiopaque with irregular margins and varies in
size and shape. The amalgam radiopacity observed will
most likely not cover the entire crown of the teeth; the
less radiopaque enamel cusps are often still visible. Radiographs help to image the contours of amalgam restorations and can reveal poorly contoured margins called
overhangs (Figure 23-3).
Radiographs sometime reveal particles of amalgam in the
soft tissue. Often found in edentulous areas of the mandible,
amalgam that fractures during an extraction and falls into
the root socket or under the gingival tissue may impart a
bluish-purple color to the tissue, called an amalgam tattoo
(Figure 23-4).
• Composite. Varies in appearance from radiopaque to
radiolucent. When radiolucent, composite may mimic caries
(Figure 23-2). To help distinguish composite from caries,
look for the restoration to appear to have straight margins
and a prepared look, whereas the radiolucency of caries
appears more diffuse (see Figure 24-17). A clinical examination may be needed to determine definitively whether
caries or composite is present.
• Crown (full metal). Appears radiopaque and is distinguished from amalgam by its smooth margins. Full metal
crowns usually cover the entire crown of the tooth and will
be contoured to resemble the correct shape of the cusps of
the tooth (Figure 23-1).
1
2
3
4 5
6
7
8
FIGURE 23-1 Dental materials. (1) Amalgam. (2) Porcelainfused-to-metal crown. (3) Post and core. (4) Gutta percha. (5) Base
material. (6) Full metal crown, which is the posterior abutment of a
three-unit bridge. (7) Retention pin. (8) Metal pontic (part of the
three-unit bridge).
1
2
3
4
5
FIGURE 23-2 Comparision of radiopaque and radiolucent
appearance of composite. (1) Radiopaque composite. (2)
Radiolucent composite (or acrylic resin or silicate). (3) Porcelainfused-to-metal crowns. Overexposure (darkness) of this radiograph
makes it especially difficult to view the porcelain on the left lateral
incisor. (4) However, the overexposure made it possible to image the
cement under this crown. (5) Silver point endodontic filler.
1
2
2
FIGURE 23-3 Overhang. (1) Amalgam overhang. (2) Base
material. Note the many shapes and sizes of the amalgam
restorations.
CHAPTER 23 • RECOGNIZING DEVIATIONS FROM NORMAL RADIOGRAPHIC ANATOMY 293
• Crown (porcelain-fused-to-metal). The metal core of the
crown appears radiopaque, whereas the porcelain appears
less radiopaque. The radiopaque shape of the metal core
will be more rounded than a full metal crown and is not
contoured to resemble the correct shape of the cusps of the
tooth. Instead, the porcelain will take the shape of the
cusps (Figure 23-1).
• Crown (porcelain jacket). Appears less radiopaque than a
full metal crown because no metal is present. The porcelain
material will appear to be about the same radiopacity as
dentin.
• Crown (stainless steel). As a temporary restoration, this
metal is less dense and will allow the passage of more
x-rays, giving the material a “see-through” appearance.
These crowns are prefabricated and do not appear to fit the
tooth very well (Figure 23-5).
• Retention pin. A metal pin used to support a restoration.
Retention pins appear radiopaque in a very easy-to-identify
shape (Figures 23-1 and 23-6). Because another restorative
material such as an amalgam, composite, or crown will be
placed over the retention pin, it may not be recorded on the
radiograph. It should be noted that retention pins will only
be located in the dentin and will not be observed penetrating
the pulp. A retention pin should not be confused with a post
and core restoration, which penetrates the pulp chamber and
must be observed in conjunction with an endodontic filling
material (Figures 23-1 and 23-7). These materials are
described later.
• Base material (calcium hydroxide pastes). Base materials are used to line the cavity preparation to protect the
tooth’s pulp. Because another restorative material such as
an amalgam or composite will be placed over the base, it
may not be recorded on the radiograph. When recorded,
the base material will appear very slightly radiopaque
(Figure 23-1 and Figure 23-3).
• Endodontic fillers. Radiopacities observed within the
pulp chamber may be either silver points (Figure 23-2), a
very radiopaque metal root canal filling, or gutta percha,
a less radiopaque filling (Figures 23-1 and 23-7).
• Post and core. A metal restoration that builds up a tooth so
that it can support a crown; appears radiopaque. The core
section penetrates the pulp chamber, so the presence of
endodotic filler will be observed along with a post and
core. It should be noted that in addition to location, a post
and core restoration can be distinguished from a retention
pin by its significantly larger size (Figure 23-7).
1
FIGURE 23-4 Amalgam fragment (1) embedded in the soft
tissue, probably left after an extraction. Clinically called an
amalgam tattoo because the amalgam fragment produces a bluishpurple spot on the gingiva.
1
FIGURE 23-5 Stainless steel crown (1). Note the “see-through”
appearance.
1
2
FIGURE 23-6 Retention pins. (1) Radiopaque pins help retain
the radiolucent composite restorations. (2) Small radiopaque
amalgam restorations.
294 MOUNTING AND VIEWING DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS
• Implant. Appears as a distinct radiopacity. The implant is
located in an area of a missing tooth (Figure 23-8).
• Orthodontic and surgical materials. Metal orthodontic
bands, wires, and brackets and surgical wires, pins, and
screws all appear as distinct radiopacities (Figures 23-9
and 23-10).
Radiographic Appearance
of Developmental Anomalies
An anomaly is defined as any deviation from normal. Dental
anomalies are numerous, so it is important that the dental hygienist and the dental assistant be skilled at identifying the more
common of these. Such anomalies include the following:
• Anodontia. Absence of the teeth (may be complete or partial). The third molars are the most common congenitally
missing teeth, followed by the premolars (Figure 23-11) and
the maxillary lateral incisors. It is important when viewing
1
2
3
FIGURE 23-7 Endodontic treatments. (1) Post and core within
the root canals. (2) Gutta percha. Endodontic filling material will also
be present when a post and core restoration is observed. (3) Amalgam
restorations.
FIGURE 23-8 Implants take the shape of the missing teeth roots.
1
FIGURE 23-9 Orthodontic appliance. (1) Note the root-end
external resorption caused by trauma of orthodontic treatment.
2
1
FIGURE 23-10 Surgical materials. (1) Surgical wire used to
treat a fractured mandible. (2) Mandibular fracture indicated by
the radiolucent line.
CHAPTER 23 • RECOGNIZING DEVIATIONS FROM NORMAL RADIOGRAPHIC ANATOMY 295
radiographs of children that the presence of the developing
permanent teeth be noted.
• Supernumerary teeth (extra teeth). It is equally important
that the presence of supernumerary teeth be detected.
(Figure 23-12) Often there is not a space for these extra teeth
to erupt into, or the radiopacities may be deformed and not
resemble normal tooth form. Complications caused by supernumerary teeth include the possibility of cyst formation and
the malposition, noneruption, or both of the normal teeth.
• Mesiodens. A supernumerary tooth located in the maxillary midline (Figure 23-13).
• Dens in dente (dens invaginatus). Literally, a tooth within
a tooth, an invagination of the enamel within the body of
the tooth. This anomaly occurs most frequently in the maxillary lateral incisor (Figure 23-14).
• Hypercementosis. Usually appears radiopaque and is
caused by excessive cementum formation. The excessive
cementum on the roots often causes a bulbous enlargement
along the root surface, with the area near the apex appearing most bulbous (Figure 23-15). Hypercementosis is
distinguished from radiopacities surrounding or near the
tooth roots by the outline of the periodontal ligament
(PDL) space. When observing hypercementosis, the PDL
contains the radiopacity and separates it from the bone.
3 2
1
FIGURE 23-11 Congenitally missing tooth. (1). Second
premolar did not develop under this primary molar. (2) Severe caries.
(3) Severe caries.
1
FIGURE 23-12 Supernumerary tooth. (1). Impacted
supernumerary premolar.
1
FIGURE 23-13 Mesiodens. (1) A small supernumerary tooth,
located in the midline between the central incisors.
1
FIGURE 23-14 Dens in dente. (1) An invagination of the enamel
within the body of the lateral incisor.
296 MOUNTING AND VIEWING DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS
This distinction will help to avoid mistaking hypercementosis for sclerotic bone, explained later.
• Dilaceration. When the tooth root is misshapen with a
sharp bend. (Figure 23-16).
• Taurodontia. Characterized by an elongated pulp chamber
and very short roots.
• Gemination (twinning). A single tooth bud that divides and
forms two joined teeth. The presence of adjacent teeth helps
to distinguish this condition from fusion.
• Fusion. A condition where the dentin and one other dental
tissue of adjacent teeth are united (Figure 23-17). In this case,
two adjacent teeth will be involved, distinguishing fusion
from gemination.
Radiographic Appearance of Apical
Disease
Radiolucencies surrounding the apices or root tips of the teeth
indicate pathological changes in the hard (bony) tissues. These
radiolucenies cannot usually be distinguished from each other
based on the radiographic image alone. The appearance of apical pathology on a radiograph must be carefully correlated with
other assessment information before a diagnosis can be made.
The three most common periapical lesions observed on radiographs are abscess, granuloma, and cyst (Figure 23-18).
• Periapical abscess. Periapical infections usually result
from pulpal inflammation. Bacteria from caries infect
the pulp and gain access to the periapical bone by way of
the root canals. As a rule, an acute abscess (early stage
of pulpal or periapical infection) is barely discernible
1
FIGURE 23-15 Hypercementosis. (1) Overgrowth of
cementum on the roots of the molar.
2 1
FIGURE 23-16 Dilaceration. (1) A sharp bend in the root of the
second premolar. (2) Torus palatinus, a radiopaque benign
overgrowth of bone on the midline of the palate.
1
FIGURE 23-17 Fusion. (1) Two joined adjacent incisors.
1
2
FIGURE 23-18 Periapical pathology. (1) Caries on the distal
surface of the left central incisor. (2) Round radiolucent lesion that
may be a periapical abscess, a granuloma, or a cyst.
CHAPTER 23 • RECOGNIZING DEVIATIONS FROM NORMAL RADIOGRAPHIC ANATOMY 297
radiographically, becoming more radiolucent as it
becomes chronic. In fact, in the very early acute stage there
may be no radiographic evidence at all. The earliest sign
may be a break, or loss of radiopacity, in the lamina dura.
A chronic abscess may appear as a circular radiolucency
around the root apices and eventual turn into a granuloma.
• Granuloma. A mass of granulation tissue usually surrounded by a fibrous sac continuous with the periodontal
ligament space that appears attached to the root apices.
Under certain conditions, epithelial elements may proliferate to form a cyst.
• Cyst. Epithelium-lined sac filled with fluid or semisolid
material. The periapical cyst (also known as a radicular
cyst) is a cyst around the end of the tooth root. Unless the
cyst is completely removed at the time of the extraction or
surgery, it will remain and is then called a residual cyst.
Because of osmotic imbalance within a cyst, pressure is
exerted in all directions; therefore, cysts tend to be spherical
unless unequal resistance is encountered. Although usually
unilocular (made up of one compartment), cysts may also be
multilocular (made up of several compartments). Radiographically, a cyst may appear as a fairly uniform radiolucent cavity within the bone and surrounded by a well-defined
radiopaque border that resembles the lamina dura.
A dentigerous or follicular cyst (Figure 23-19) is associated with impacted or unerupted teeth—most often third molars
and supernumerary teeth—and is always associated with the
1
2
3
FIGURE 23-19 Dentigerous cyst (1) involving (2) the impacted
third molar. (3) Note the expansion and thinning of the cortical bone
of the mandible in response to the cyst. (The image receptor was
purposely placed in a vertical position instead of the usual horizontal
position to better record this condition.)
crown only of the involved tooth. If the tooth causing the cyst
continues to develop and is able to erupt, the cyst is often
destroyed by natural means (Figure 23-20).
Periapical, residual, and dentigerous cysts are categorized
as odontogenic cysts, which means of tooth origin.
Nonodontogenic cysts arise from epithelium other than that
associated with tooth formation. Two types of nonodontogenic
cysts are the incisive canal (nasopalatine) cyst (Figure 23-21),
located within the incisive canal, and the rare globulomaxillary
cyst (Figure 23-22), which arises between the maxillary lateral
incisor and the canine.
Radiographic Appearance of Tooth
Resorption
Evidence of tooth resorption is a common finding on dental
radiographs. Natural physiologic resorption, such as when the
roots of primary teeth resorb in response to the erupting permanent teeth, is considered normal (Figure 23-20). Other resorptive processes, however, are the result of infection, trauma, or
some unusual condition. Tooth resorption may be external or
internal. External resorption is most often characterized by
root-end resorption, where the roots of the teeth appear shorter
than normal (Figure 23-23). External resorption is not limited
to the root end, but can occur anywhere along the tooth root.
Other examples of external resorption include the resorption
caused by pressure from an adjacent impacted or unerupted
tooth; resorption caused by slowly growing tumors; or trauma,
such as when teeth are moved too rapidly during orthodontic
treatment (Figure 23-9). When the resorption cause is unknown,
it is called idiopathic resorption.
2
3 4
5
1
FIGURE 23-20 Follicular cyst (1) surrounds the crown of
the unerupted second premolar. (2) Incipient caries on the first
permanent molar. (3) Advanced caries on the primary second molar.
(4) Erupting second premolar. (5) Primary first molars about to be
exfoliated. Note the physiologic external resorption of the primary
roots.
298 MOUNTING AND VIEWING DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS
Internal resorption typically appears as a radiolucent
widening of the root canal, representing the resorption process
taking place from the inside out (Figure 23-24).
Although not classified as resorption, but often undergoing a resorption process, are retained root fragments that
may be observed on radiographs of an edentulous area
(Figure 23-25). These structures may have broken off the
tooth and were left behind following extraction or remain as
the result of severe decay or trauma that broke off the crown
of the tooth, leaving behind the root. The patient did not seek
dental tratment for the condition, and the root tip remained.
Retained root tips may be clearly visible radiographically or
less so, depending on their size and degree of resorption.
FIGURE 23-21 Incisive canal cyst. Arrows outline an incisive
canal (nasopalatine) cyst in an edentulous maxilla.
FIGURE 23-22 Globulomaxillary cyst. Arrows outline a
globulomaxillary cyst between the maxillary lateral incisor and the
canine.
1
FIGURE 23-23 External resorption. (1) Idiopathic resorption of
the distal root of the first molar.
1
FIGURE 23-25 Retained root (1) fragment in an
extraction site.
1
FIGURE 23-24 Internal resorption. (1) Idiopathic resorption
noted as the widening of the pulp chamber.
CHAPTER 23 • RECOGNIZING DEVIATIONS FROM NORMAL RADIOGRAPHIC ANATOMY 299
Radiographic Appearance of Calcifications
and Ossifications
Calcifications in the dental pulp occur in the form of small nodules called pulp stones (Figure 23-26). These appear as
radiopaque ovoid structures of varied size. Pulp stones are very
common but of little significance, unless root canal therapy is
needed on the affected tooth.
Other less frequently encountered calcifications are sialoliths,
depositions of calcium salts in the salivary glands and ducts
(Figure 23-27); rhinoliths, stones within the maxillary sinuses;
and phleboliths or calcified thrombi, calcified masses that are
observed as round or oval bodies in the soft tissues of the
cheeks.
Two forms of ossification (the conversion of structures into
hardened bone) are often imaged on radiographs. Condensing
osteitis occurs when sclerotic (hardened) bone is formed as a
result of infection (Figure 23-28). The increased radiopacity
of the bone is often accompanied by an increased widening
(radiolucency) of the periodontal ligament space. Osteosclerosis
occurs when regions of abnormally dense bone form, but not as
a direct result of infection (Figure 23-29). Although the cause is
unknown, osteosclerosis commonly occurs in the interseptal
premolar area and may be associated with fragments of retained
primary roots.
1
FIGURE 23-26 Pulp stones. (1) Ovoid radiopaque calcifications
observed in the pulp chambers.
1
FIGURE 23-27 Sialolith (1) in a salivary gland. Note the
edentulous mandible.
1
FIGURE 23-28 Condensing osteitis. (1) Radiopaque, sclerotic
(hardening of) bone.
1
FIGURE 23-29 Osteosclerosis. (1) Diffuse idiopathic
osteosclerosis.
Radiographic Appearance of Odontogenic
Tumors
Odontogenic tumors result from abnormal proliferation of cells
and tissues involved in odontogenesis (the formation of the
teeth). The three types occasionally seen on radiographs are
ameloblastomas, odontomas, and periapical cemental dysplasia (PCD). Ameloblastomas have the greatest potential for
serious implications for the patient. These appear as large radiolucencies of enamel origin. Radiographically, ameloblastomas
may be monolocular (one compartment) or multilocular (many
compartments). The monolocular form closely resembles a
dentigerous cyst (Figure 23-30). The multilocular form has a
characteristic “soap bubble” appearance.
Odontomas are the most common ondontogenic tumors
(Figure 23-31). These are tumors of small misshaped teeth
whose number in each odontoma varies widely. These toothlike
structures appear radiopaque and are located within a radiolucent fibrous capsule that often resembles a cyst.
Periapical cemental dysplasia (PCD), sometimes called
cementomas, is a bone dysplasia derived from the periodontal
300 MOUNTING AND VIEWING DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS
1
2
FIGURE 23-30 Ameloblastoma. (1) Large radiolucency.
(2) Resorption of the molar roots caused by pressure of the tumor.
1
FIGURE 23-31 Odontoma. (1) Consisting of small, misshaped
teeth located within a radiolucent fibrous capsule.
1
2
FIGURE 23-32 Periapical cemental dysplasia (PCD).
(1) Early PCD (radiolucent). (2) Late stage of development
(radiopaque). The teeth are vital.
ligaments of fully developed and erupted teeth. Early PCD is
radiolucent and appears identical to radicular cysts. In the later
stages of development, PCD appears as radiopaque masses surrounded by a radiolucent line (Figure 23-32). PCD occurs more
frequently in middle-aged females than males. The teeth are
vital, and the condition needs no treatment. Radiographic Appearance
of Nonodontogenic Tumors
The majority of tumors found in the head and neck region do
not have a characteristic radiographic appearance that enables a
diagnosis from the radiograph alone. In fact, a diagnosis of a
tumor cannot be made until the dentist, the pathologist, and the
radiologist have combined their findings. However, the oral
health care professional may be the first to detect the presence
of a lesion and make the appropriate referral.
Tumors are classed as benign (doing little or no harm) and
malignant (very dangerous or life threatening). Fortunately,
most tumors detected in the oral health care practice are benign.
Careful examination of the radiograph can often help to differentiate benign from malignant lesions.
Benign tumors may be either radiolucent or radiopaque, with
well-defined margins. Malignant tumors tend to have irregular
margins and are less distinct, blending into the adjacent bone.
Exostoses and tori are the most frequently encountered
forms of benign tumors. An exostosis is a localized overgrowth
of bone. The term torus (plural tori) is often used to describe an
exostosis that occurs near the midline of the palate (torus palatinus; Figure 23-16) and on the lingual surface of the mandible
(torus mandibularis; see Figures 22-26 and 22-27). Radiographically, both appear as an area of increased radiographic
density (radiopaque).
The two main types of oral malignancies are carcinoma
and sarcoma. Both grow rapidly and spread into adjacent tissues. Carcinomas are malignant tumors of epithelial origin, and
sarcomas are malignant tumors of connective tissue origin. The
CHAPTER 23 • RECOGNIZING DEVIATIONS FROM NORMAL RADIOGRAPHIC ANATOMY 301
radiographic appearance of these tumors is radiolucent, with
irregular and poorly defined borders. Sarcomas often have a
“patchy” appearance with no demarcation from normal surrounding bone. Radiographs are vitally important in early
detection because sarcomas produce changes in bone early in
their development.
Radiographic Appearance of Trauma
The two most common injuries observed on dental radiographs
are fractures of facial bones and teeth. Fracture lines are thin
radiolucent lines that demarcate the region of bone or tooth separation (Figure 23-10). Fractures may on occasion have a similar appearance to the nutrient canals described in Chapter 22.
Radiographs will sometimes reveal the presence of foreign
bodies. Note the broken dental instrument imaged in Figure 23-33.
REVIEW—Chapter summary
The dental hygienist and dental assistant should possess the ability to recognize deviations from the normal. Developing this skill
requires practice. Although identifying deviations from the normal radiographically is important, a diagnosis cannot be made
from the radiograph alone. Common radiographic observations
that the dental hygienist and dental assistant should be able to
identify radiographically include the appearance of restorative
materials, developmental anomalies, periapical pathology and
other pathological conditions, and the effects of trauma.
Metallic restorative materials such as amlagam, metal
crowns, retention pins, post and core, and silver points appear
radiopaque and are distinguished from each other by their size
and shape. Nonmetallic restorative materials such as composite,
porcelain, base material, and gutta percha appear less radiopaque
than metal. Composite materials, may appear slightly radiopaque
or radiolucent.
Developmental anomalies that may be recorded on radiographs
include anodontia, supernumerary teeth, mesiodens, dens in dente,
hypercementosis, dilaceration, taurodontia, gemination, and fusion.
Periapical abscesses, granulomas, and cysts all appear
radiolucent and cannot be distinguished from each other radiographically.
Radiographs may record external and internal tooth
resorption. Radiographic evidence of calcifications and ossifications include pulp stones, sialoliths, rhinoliths, phleboliths,
condensing osteitis, and osteosclerosis.
Although tumors may not be diagnosed from radiographs
alone, the presence of ameloblastomas, odontomas, periapical
cemental dysplasia (PCD), and benign and malignant tumors
may be detected radiographically.
Fractures of the tooth and bone and foreign objects may be
detected radiographically.
RECALL—Study questions
1. Amalgam and a full metal crown can be distinguished
from each other radiographically by their
a. degree of radiopacity.
b. shape and margins.
c. location in the mouth.
d. use of retention pins.
2. Which of these dental restorative materials appears
most radiopaque?
a. Amalgam
b. Porcelain
c. Silicate
d. Acrylic resin
3. Which of these dental restorative materials is most
likely to mimic decay radiographically?
a. Gold
b. Stainless steel
c. Amalgam
d. Composite
4. Dens in dente appears radiographically as a
a. Tiny tooth.
b. Large tooth.
c. Twin tooth.
d. Tooth within a tooth.
5. A sharp bend in the tooth root is called
a. taurodontia.
b. hypercementosis.
c. dilaceration.
d. exostosis.
6. Radiographically, it is not possible to accurately differentiate between a periapical abscess, a granuloma, and a cyst.
Radiographically, it is not possible to accurately differentiate between carcinoma and sarcoma.
a. The first statement is true. The second statement is
false.
b. The first statement is false. The second statement is
true.
c. Both statements are true.
d. Both statements are false.
1
FIGURE 23-33 Foreign object. (1) Broken dental bur, which
probably lodged here when it was used during removal of the
third molar.
302 MOUNTING AND VIEWING DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS
7. Which of these appears radiolucent on a radiograph?
a. Sialolith
b. Abscess
c. Torus
d. Odontoma
8. A large radiolucency surrounding the crown only of an
unerupted tooth is most likely what type of cyst?
a. Dentigerous
b. Radicular
c. Residual
d. Periapical
9. The evidence of resorption that appears to shorten the
tooth root is called
a. internal resorption.
b. external resorption.
c. primary resorption.
d. secondary resorption.
10. The radiographic appearance of a small ovoid radiopacity within the pulp chamber of the tooth is called a
a. rhinolith.
b. phlebolith.
c. pulp stone.
d. pulp cap.
11. Which of the following appears radiolucent in its early
stages and as a radiopaque mass in later stages?
a. Condensing osteitis
b. Periapical granuloma
c. Osteosclerosis
d. Periapical cemental dysplasia (PCD)
12. Which of the following tumors appears radiolucent
radiographically?
a. Torus palatinus
b. Odontoma
c. Sarcoma
13. Radiographic evidence of a bone fracture appears as a
radiolucent line that may resemble a
a. nutrient canal.
b. cyst.
c. tumor.
d. retained root tip.
REFLECT—Case Study
You have just accepted a position in a large oral health care
clinic at a university-based dental school, where your primary
role will be to process, mount, and prepare a preliminary interpretation of full mouth series of radiographs taken on incoming
patients. You know how valuable it is to follow a systematic
order when mounting films, so you decide to apply an orderly
system to interpreting the radiographs as well.
Design a form that will guide you and other radiographers
through the interpretive process. Your form should include the
following:
1. A place to record basic information (the patient’s name,
date the radiographs were exposed, name of the person
interpreting the radiographs, date of interpretation,
etc.).
2. A step-by-step guide for where to begin and end the
interpretive process.
3. A list of common conditions or deviations from normal
that you will be looking for. (Organize the conditions
you will be interpreting logically.)
4. Organize the conditions according to what you will
examine the radiographs for first, second, third, etc.
5. Prepare columns, rows of boxes, or whatever your
design requires as a place to record or list the condition.
6. Label the columns, rows of boxes, or whatever your
design uses, with the appropriate headings.
7. Prepare a place to document that the condition needs a
referral to the dentist.
8. Prepare your form in such a manner that other professionals may be able to utilize the form. Prepare written
instructions for utilizing the form as needed.
RELATE—Laboratory application
For a comprehensive laboratory practice exercise on this topic,
see Thomson, E. M. (2012). Exercises in oral radiography
techniques: A laboratory manual (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Pearson. Chapter 14, “Radiographic interpretation.”
REFERENCES
Farman, A. G., Nortje, C. J., & Wood, R. E. (1993). Oral and
maxillofacial diagnostic imaging. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
Hatrick, C. D., Eakle, W. S., & Bird, W. F. (2010). Dental
materials: Clinical applications for dental assistants and
dental hygienists (2nd ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
Langlais, R. P. (2003). Exercises in oral radiology and interpretation (4th ed.). Philadelphia: Saunders.
Langlais, R. P., Langland, O. E., & Nortje, C. J. (1995).
Diagnostic imaging of the jaw. Philadelphia: Williams &
Wilkins.
White, S. C., & Pharoah, M. J. (2008). Oral radiology: Principles and interpretation (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
OBJECTIVES
Following successful completion of this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Define the key words.
2. Explain why caries appear radiolucent on radiographs.
3. Define the role radiographs play in detecting caries.
4. Identify the ideal type of projection, technique, and exposure factors that enhance a radiograph’s ability to image caries.
5. List and describe the four categories of the caries depth grading system.
6. List the four locations of dental caries and identify their radiographic appearance.
7. Define and identify the radiographic appearance of recurrent dental caries.
8. List three conditions that resemble dental caries radiographically and discuss how to distinguish
these from caries.
KEY WORDS
Advanced caries
Arrested caries
Buccal caries
Caries
Cemental (root) caries
Cementoenamel junction (CEJ)
Cervical burnout
Dentinoenamel junction (DEJ)
Incipient (enamel) caries
Interproximal
Interproximal caries
Lingual caries
Mach band effect
Moderate caries
Nonmetalic restoration
Occlusal caries
Proximal caries
Rampant caries
Recurrent (secondary) caries
Severe caries
The Use of Radiographs
in the Detection
of Dental Caries
CHAPTER
OUTLINE
 Objectives 303
 Key Words 303
 Introduction 304
 Dental Caries 304
 Interpreting
Dental Caries 306
 Caries Depth
Grading System 306
 Classification of
the Radiographic
Appearance of
Caries 306
 Conditions
Resembling
Caries 309
 Review, Recall,
Reflect, Relate 311
 References 313
CHAPTER
24
304 MOUNTING AND VIEWING DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS
FIGURE 24-1 Proximal surface caries found just apical to the
contact area between two adjacent teeth.
Introduction
The detection of caries (tooth decay) is probably the most common reason for exposing dental radiographs. The dental hygienist or dental assistant who is skilled in identifying normal
radiographic anatomy should be able to differentiate between the
appearance of normal tooth structures and dental caries on a
radiograph.
The purpose of this chapter is to describe the radiographic
appearance of dental caries, identify a caries depth grading system, and offer some tips that may influence caries interpretation
(Procedure Box 24-1).
Dental Caries
Description
Dental caries, or tooth decay, is a pathological process consisting of localized destruction of dental hard tissues by organic
acids produced by microorganisms. The caries process is one of
demineralization of tooth structure (enamel, dentin, cementum).
This demineralization of tooth density allows more x-rays to
pass through the tooth and darken the image. Therefore, caries
appear radiolucent on the radiograph (Figure 24-1).
Detection
Radiographs reveal carious lesions that may go undetected clinically, especially caries on the proximal surfaces (in between the
teeth; Table 24-1). To be a useful diagnostic aid, the radiographs
must be precisely exposed and meticulously processed. Improper
angulation can render a radiograph worthless for caries detection. Incorrect vertical angulation may prevent the radiograph
PROCEDURE 24-1
Radiographic interpretation for caries
1. See Procedure Box 21-2, Suggested Sequence for Viewing a Full Mouth Series of Radiographs.
2. View all surfaces of each tooth.
3. Examine the contact points and just apical to the estimated gingival margin (soft tissue will not be imaged on
the radiograph) for radiolucencies indicating proximal caries.
4. Examine the dentin just apical to the occlusal enamel for radiolucencies indicating occlusal caries.
5. Examine the dentin in the middle of the tooth for a round radiolucency indicating buccal/facial or lingual caries.
6. If there is bone loss and evidence that cementum is exposed in the oral cavity, examine the cervical region of the
tooth for an ill-defined, radiolucent crescent-shaped area below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) indicating
cemental (root) caries.
7. Examine existing restorations for recurent decay.
8. Confirm findings and/or clarify uncertain interpretations with a clinical examination of the patient.
9. Consult the patient’s chart for confirmation or clarification of findings as needed.
10. Present a preliminary interpretation for the dentist’s review.
11. Following confirmation by the dentist, document all findings on the patient’s permanent record.
from imaging caries (Figure 24-2). The horizontal angulation is
particularly important. Overlapping of the contact areas between
the teeth will make it impossible to detect caries in these areas
(Figure 24-3).
The bitewing radiograph, described in Chapter 16, is the
radiograph of choice for the evaluation of caries due to the precise parallelism established between the tooth and the plane of
the image receptor. However, a precisely placed periapical radiograph exposed using the paralleling technique will adequately
image dental caries (Figure 24-4).
Although the exposure factors (mA, kVp, and time) used
will depend on the patient and the area to be exposed, some
CHAPTER 24 • THE USE OF RADIOGRAPHS IN THE DETECTION OF DENTAL CARIES 305
TABLE 24-1 Radiographic Appearance of Caries
GRADE SEVERITY PROXIMAL OCCLUSAL BUCCAL/LINGUAL CEMENTAL
C-1 Incipient Radiolucent notch in the enamel
only. Radiolucency is less than
halfway through the enamel.
Not evident
radiographically.
Not evident
radiographically.
Not applicable.
C-2 Moderate Radiolucent triangle with the
apex pointing toward the DEJ.
Radiolucency is more than
halfway through the enamel,
but does not invade the DEJ.
Not evident
radiographically.
Not evident
radiographically.
Not applicable.
C-3 Advanced Radiolucency takes on a double
triangle shape, first through the
enamel with the apex pointing
toward the DEJ and a second
triangle base spreading along
the DEJ with the apex pointing
toward the pulp. Radiolucency
is less than halfway through
the dentin toward the pulp.
Flat radiolucent line, often
with no or little change
detected in the enamel.
Radiolucency is less
than halfway through the
dentin toward the pulp.
Not possible to distinguish advanced
from severe. Both
appear as a round
radiolucency in the
middle of the tooth
with well-defined
borders.
Although enamel is not
involved in this type of
caries, at this stage an
ill-defined, radiolucent,
cresent-shaped area
below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ)
may be observed. Bone
loss must be evident.
C-4 Severe Radiolucency may retain a double triangle shape, or be so
severe as to appear as a large
diffuse radiolucency.
Radiolucency is more than
halfway through the
dentin toward the pulp.
Large radiolucency detected
in the dentin below the
occlusal enamel. Depending on the extent of destruction, radiolucent breaks in
the occlusal enamel may be
imaged. Radiolucency is
more than halfway through
the dentin toward the pulp.
Not possible to distinguish advanced from
severe. Both appear
as a round radiolucency in the middle
of the tooth with
well-defined
borders.
Although enamel is not
involved in this type of
caries, at this stage an
ill-defined, radiolucent,
crescent-shaped area
below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ)
may be observed. Bone
loss must be evident.
2
1
FIGURE 24-2 Vertical angulation. (1) Excessive vertical
angulation prevents viewing this proximal surface carious lesion.
(2) Proper vertical angulation shows the proximal surface caries.
Note the difference in alveolar bone crest heights between the two
radiographs indicating a change in the vertical angulation.
1
2
3
FIGURE 24-3 Horizontal angulation. (1) Incorrect horizontal
angulation causes overlapping between adjacent teeth, which prevents
viewing for interproximal caries. (2) Improved horizontal angulation,
but caries difficult to view. (3) Correct horizontal angulation clearly
images caries.
practitioners prefer to use a lower kVp to best image caries.
A low setting, such as 60 kVp (with direct current x-ray equipment), will result in a high-contrast image: black and white with
few shades of gray in between. Because caries appear radiolucent against a radiopaque enamel (or lesser radiopaque dentin),
a high-contrast image is preferred by some practitioners for
imaging carious lesions.
306 MOUNTING AND VIEWING DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS
Interpreting Dental Caries
Dental caries is a process of decalcification and requires 40 to
50 percent loss of calcium and phosphorus before the
decreased density can be seen on a radiograph. For this reason,
the depth of penetration of a carious lesion is deeper clinically
than it appears on the radiograph. Also, because the proximal
surfaces of posterior teeth are broad, the loss of small amounts
of mineral from incipient lesions may be difficult to see on the
radiograph (Figure 24-5).
Caries Depth Grading System
Several systems are used to grade the depth of penetration of
caries. This text will use a grading system suggested by Haugejorden and Slack, 1977 (Figure 24-6). The advantage of this
system is that it allows one to accurately grade the penetration
of caries (establish a baseline) and to track the progression
FIGURE 24-4 Periapical radiograph records proximal
surface caries.
X-ray A X-ray B
FIGURE 24-5 Drawing showing ratio of caries to enamel.
X-ray A passing through a small ratio of caries to enamel, resulting
in the caries being difficult to view. X-ray B passing through a large
ratio of caries to enamel, results in the caries being easier to view.
and/or remineralization of the carious lesions at future appointments. These grades may also be called incipient, moderate,
advanced, or severe.
• C-1: Enamel caries, also called incipient caries (meaning
the first stage of existence), penetrate less than halfway
through the enamel of the tooth toward the dentinoenamel
junction (DEJ) (Figure 24-6, 1).
• C-2: Moderate caries, penetrating over halfway through
the enamel toward the dentinoenamel junction (DEJ), but
not reaching the DEJ. Moderate caries are only seen in the
enamel (Figure 24-6, 2).
• C-3: Advanced caries are of enamel and dentin at or through
the dentinoenamel junction (DEJ), but less than halfway
through the dentin toward the pulp (Figure 24-6, 3). Advanced
caries are seen in both the enamel and dentin.
• C-4: Severe caries are of enamel and dentin penetrating
over halfway through the dentin toward the pulp (Figure
24-6, 4). Severe caries are seen in both the enamel and the
dentin.
Classification of the Radiographic
Appearance of Caries
The radiographic appearance of caries may be classified according to their location on the tooth.
1 2
3
3
3
4
FIGURE 24-6 Diagram of classification of dental caries
recommended by Haugejorden and Slack. (1) C-1 caries. Less
than halfway through the enamel (incipient caries). (2) C-2 caries.
Penetrate over halfway through the enamel (moderate caries).
(3) C-3 caries. At or through the dentinoenamel junction (DEJ), but
less than halfway through the dentin toward the pulp (advanced
caries). (4) C-4 caries. Penetrate over halfway through the dentin
toward the pulp (severe caries).
CHAPTER 24 • THE USE OF RADIOGRAPHS IN THE DETECTION OF DENTAL CARIES 307
There are four locations on the tooth that caries occur:
1. Proximal (mesial and distal)
2. Occlusal
3. Buccal/lingual
4. Cemental (root surface)
Caries may be categorized as recurrent, rampant, or arrested.
Radiographs are often prescribed to detect proximal surface caries. Occlusal, buccal/lingual, and cemental caries are
more readily detected clinically than with radiographs. In fact,
early (incipient and moderate) occlusal, buccal/lingual, and
cemental caries often do not show up on radiographs, even
though these may be detected clinically. However, moderate
and severe occlusal, buccal/lingual, and cemental caries will
appear radiographically, so it is important that the radiographer
recognize these.
Proximal Caries
Interproximal means between two adjacent surfaces. On dental
radiographs, proximal surface caries, often referred to as
interproximal caries, are located on the tooth surface that
contacts the adjacent tooth. The interproximal is an area that is
almost impossible to examine clinically, making the use of
radiographs vitally important in caries detection. The tooth
surface should be examined for caries at the point of contact
and just apical to this point of contact to the gingival margin
(Figure 24-7). The location of the height of the gingival margin, which is soft tissue, is not imaged on the radiograph. So
the gingival margin location is estimated based on where the
alveolar bone crest height is imaged. Assume that the gingival
margin will be located at least 1 mm above the level of bone
imaged on the radiograph.
The shape of proximal caries begins as a radiolucent notch
on the enamel (C-1; Figure 24-6, 1). As the demineralization of
enamel progresses, caries takes on a triangular shape (like a
pyramid) with the apex pointing toward the dentinoenamel
junction (DEJ) and the base toward the outer surface of the
Free gingival
margin
bone
FIGURE 24-7 Drawing indicating the area to examine for interproximal caries. View the area where two
adjacent teeth contact, and apical down to where the gingival margin would most likely be (boxed area). Avoid
mistaking caries in the region apical to the gingival margin, where the optical illusion cervical burnout is most
likely to be appear.
tooth (C-2; Figure 24-6, 2). At the DEJ the caries spreads,
undermining normal enamel, and again takes on a triangular
shape as it penetrates toward the pulp (C-3; Figure 24-6, 3).
The base of this second triangle is along the DEJ and the apex
points toward the pulp (C-4; Figure 24-6, 4).
Occlusal Caries
Occlusal caries are located on the chewing surface of the posterior teeth. Because of the superimposition of the buccal and
lingual cusps, occlusal caries in early stages (incipient and
moderate) may not be imaged on a radiograph (Figure 24-6, 3,
and Figure 24-8), even when a clinical examination does detect
incipient or moderate occlusal caries.
After occlusal caries has reached the DEJ (advanced caries),
it may be imaged on the radiograph (Figures 24-9 and 24-10). At
the DEJ occlusal caries will appear as a flat radiolucent line.
Often no or little change is detected in the enamel radiographically at this stage. As demineralization progresses, the size of the
radiolucency increases. It is important to note that when examining radiographs for occlusal caries, the area of interest is below
FIGURE 24-8 Drawing of occlusal caries, early stage. Early
occlusal caries (C-1 and C-2) extend along the dentinoenamel
junction (DEJ) and may not be seen on the radiograph, even though
the lesion may be detected clinically.
308 MOUNTING AND VIEWING DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS
FIGURE 24-9 Drawing of advanced occlusal caries. Advanced
(up to halfway toward the pulp) or severe occlusal caries (more than
halfway toward the pulp) will most likely be imaged radiographically.
the occlusal enamel, in the area of the dentin, and not from the
top of the tooth. The irregularity of the cusps and occlusal surface pits and fissures do not usually indicate the presence of
caries. Changes (radiolucencies) in the dentin below the occlusal
enamel are indicative of occlusal caries. As advanced caries
progress to a severe stage, changes in the occlusal enamel are
more likely to be imaged as the crown of the tooth begins to
break down.
Buccal and Lingual Caries
Buccal caries involves the buccal or facial surface of a tooth,
and lingual caries involves the lingual surface (Figure 24-11).
Buccal and lingual caries are best detected clinically. Early buccal
and lingual carious lesions are almost impossible to detect radiographically. This is due to the superimposition of the normal
tooth structures over the caries. As the demineralization becomes
severe, the caries appears as a radiolucency characterized by welldefined borders, often described as looking into a hole on the radiograph (Figure 24-12). However, because the radiograph is a
two-dimensional image of three-dimensional structures, it is
1
FIGURE 24-10 Radiograph of occlusal caries. (1) Severe
occlusal caries appearing as a large radiolucent lesion in the first
molar.
FIGURE 24-11 Drawing of buccal or lingual caries.
Advanced buccal or lingual caries have well-defined borders.
FIGURE 24-12 Radiograph of buccal or lingual caries on this
mandibular second premolar appears as a round radiolucency
(superimposed over the pulp chamber).
impossible to tell the depth of buccal or lingual caries or the relationship to the pulpal tissue.
Cemental (Root) Caries
Cemental caries (also known as root caries) develop between
the enamel border and the free margin of the gingiva on the
cemental surface (Figure 24-13). Bone loss and recession of
the gingival tissue are necessary for the caries’ process to start
on the root surfaces. Cemental caries may appear on the buccal, lingual, mesial, or distal surface of the tooth.
Radiographically, cemental caries appear as an ill-defined,
radiolucent, crescent-shaped area just below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ; Figure 24-14). Cemental caries may at
times be misinterpreted as cervical burnout (discussed later in
this chapter), an optical illusion of the radiographic image.
Cemental caries are more easily detected clinically than radiographically.
Recurrent (Secondary) Caries
Recurrent or secondary caries is decay that occurs under a
restoration or around its margins. Recurrent caries often occur
CHAPTER 24 • THE USE OF RADIOGRAPHS IN THE DETECTION OF DENTAL CARIES 309
because of poor cavity preparation, defective margins of the
restoration, or incomplete removal of the caries prior to the
placement of the restoration. Recurrent caries appears on a
radiograph as a radiolucent area beneath a restoration or apical
to the interproximal margin of a restoration (Figure 24-15).
Rampant Caries
The term rampant means growing rapidly or spreading
unchecked. Rampant caries are severe, unchecked caries that
affect multiple teeth (Figure 24-16).
Arrested Caries
The term arrested means stopped or inactive. Arrested
caries are caries that are no longer active. Carious lesions
may become arrested if there is a significant shift in the oral
environment from factors that cause caries to those that slow
down the caries’ process. Incipient enamel caries (C-1) can
FIGURE 24-13 Drawing of cemental (root) caries
illustrates involvement of only the roots of teeth. Gingival
recession and bone loss precede the demineraliztion process to
expose the root surfaces.
FIGURE 24-14 Radiograph of cemental (root) caries. The
large radiolucency on the distal surface of the distal root of the first
mandibular molar is cemental caries. Note the bone loss exposing the
root surface.
FIGURE 24-16 Radiographs of rampant caries. Multiple teeth
affected by severe cemental caries.
1
FIGURE 24-15 Radiograph of recurrent caries. (1) Radiolucent caries under the metallic restoration.
remain dormant for long periods of time. Some carious
lesions may even be reversed by remineralization. It is
important that radiographic exams continue to monitor
arrested caries.
Conditions Resembling Caries
Three conditions that resemble caries are nonmetallic restorations, cervical burnout, and mach band effect.
Nonmetallic Restorations
Nonmetallic esthetic restorations may mimic decay radiographically (Figure 24-17). Nonmetallic restorations such as
composite, silicate, and acrylic resin, discussed in Chapter 23,
may mimic decay when they appear radiolucent. To aid in distinguishing a restoration from caries, look for the restoration to
have straight borders, or a prepared look, with an overall even
310 MOUNTING AND VIEWING DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS
radiolucency. A radiopaque base material may also be present
under the radiolucent nonmetallic restoration. Caries tend to
have more diffuse borders and an uneven radiolucency that
takes on a triangular shape, with the apex pointing toward the
DEJ or pulp. A clinical examination may be required to make a
final determination.
Cervical Burnout
Cervical burnout is an optical illusion created when the eye
must distinguish between a very light (white) area and a very
dark (black) area on the radiograph. The area of the tooth most
likely to produce this optical illusion is the cervical root, or
neck of the tooth. In this region, the concavity of the root surfaces allows greater penetration by the x-rays (Figure 24-18).
This region will appear especially dark next to radiopaque
structures. When the radiopaque enamel on one side and the
radiopaque lamina dura on the other side sandwich the radiolucent cervical of the tooth in between, the effect is an
increased darkness called cervical burnout. Cervical burnout
often appears as an irregularly shaped radiolucent area with a
fuzzy outline seen on the mesial and/or the distal surfaces of
the tooth along the cervical line (Figure 24-19). To assist in
distinguishing cervical burnout from caries, remember to
focus caries detection only in the area of the contact point of
adjacent teeth and apical to the gingival margin (Figure 24-7).
Cervical burnout appears more apical, apparently under the
gingival margin.
Mach Band Effect
Another optical illusion is a radiolucency caused by overlapping images of the teeth. When two proximal surfaces overlap
(caused either by natural overlap of misaligned teeth or by
improper horizontal angulation of the x-ray beam), the result is
a dense radiopaque area surrounded by radiolucent lines. These
radiolucent lines represent an optical illusion called the mach
band effect, resulting from the high contrast between the normal enamel and the dense overlapped enamel (Figure 24-20).
The ability of these overlapped structures to produce this optical illusion illustrates how important it is to produce radiographs that do not have angulation errors.
1
2
FIGURE 24-17 Radiograph of nonmetalic restorations and
carious lesions in anterior teeth. (1) Radiolucent nonmetallic
restorations on the mesial surface of the lateral incisor and distal
surface of the central incisor. Note that under both restorations is a
base of radiopaque material. (2) The radiolucencies on the mesial
surfaces of both central incisors are carious lesions.
1
FIGURE 24-18 Drawing of cervical burnout. (1) Thin cervical
root surface between dense crown and alveolar bone crest allows
more x-rays to pass and reach the image receptor. This cervical area
of the teeth will most likely be imaged at an increased radiolucency.
FIGURE 24-19 Radiograph demonstrating cervical burnout.
Note the radiolucent optical illusion of cervical burnout on the
mesials and distals between the enamel and restorations and the
alveolar crest of bone.
CHAPTER 24 • THE USE OF RADIOGRAPHS IN THE DETECTION OF DENTAL CARIES 311
REVIEW—Chapter summary
The detection of caries is often the most common reason for taking dental radiographs. Caries appear radiolucent because the
demineralization of the tooth allows more x-rays to pass through
to reach the image receptor. Only precisely exposed and meticulously processed radiographs are useful in detecting caries.
Detecting proximal surface caries is the main purpose of
bitewing radiographs. Carefully positioned periapical radiographs, exposed using the paralleling technique, are also valuable in detecting proximal surface caries. Some practitioners
prefer a high-contrast image (produced with a low kVp) for
detecting caries. Radiographs detect more proximal surface caries
than a clinical exam alone. A clinical exam is better at detecting
early occlusal, buccal/lingual, and cemental caries. The depth of
the caries penetration is deeper clinically than it appears on the
radiograph.
An example of a caries depth grading system is presented.
These grades may also be referred to as incipient, moderate,
advanced, and severe caries.
The radiographic appearance of caries may be classified
according to their location on the tooth: proximal, occlusal, buccal/lingual, and cemental (root surface). Three conditions that
resemble caries are nonmetallic restorations, cervical burnout,
and mach band effect.
1
2 3
4
FIGURE 24-20 Caries and optical illusions that mimic decay.
(1) Severe occlusal caries. (2) Radiolucent lines creating a mach band
effect caused by overlapped enamel. (3) Incipient distal surface caries.
(4) Cervical burnout.
RECALL—Study questions
1. Caries appear radiopaque, because more radiation is
passing through the demineralization than the surrounding tissues.
a. The first part of the statement is true, but the second
part of the statement is false.
b. The first part of the statement is false, but the second
part of the statement is true.
c. Both parts of the statement are true.
d. Both parts of the statement are false.
2. Each of the following will produce an ideal radiographic
image for detecting caries EXCEPT one. Which one is the
EXCEPTION?
a. Bitewing radiographs
b. Periapical radiographs
c. Horizontal angulation that avoids overlapping
d. Excessive vertical angulation
3. Caries in the earliest stage is called
a. incipient.
b. moderate.
c. advanced.
d. severe.
4. Radiographs are best at detecting incipient caries of
which of these locations on the tooth?
a. Occlusal
b. Proximal
c. Buccal/lingual
d. Cemental
5. The key to successfully interpretating radiographs for
proximal surface caries is to examine the contact point
between adjacent teeth and just apical to the
a. DEJ.
b. CEJ.
c. estimated gingival margin.
d. alveolar bone crest.
6. Proximal surface carious lesions appear
a. triangular.
b. square.
c. round.
d. crescent-shaped.
7. Which of the following appears radiographically as a
radiolucent notch that is less than half-way through the
enamel?
a. Incipient proximal caries
b. Moderate proximal caries
c. Advanced proximal caries
d. Severe proximal caries
312 MOUNTING AND VIEWING DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS
8. Which of the following appears radiographically as a radiolucent double triangle that is less than halfway through
the dentin toward the pulp?
a. Incipient proximal caries
b. Moderate proximal caries
c. Advanced proximal caries
d. Severe proximal caries
9. The key to successfully interpretating radiographs for
occlusal caries is to examine
a. the occlusal surface for changes in the pits and fissures.
b. under the occlusal surface for changes in the dentin.
c. the contact point between adjacent teeth for changes
in the enamel.
d. just apical to the contact point for changes in the DEJ.
10. Which of the following appears radiographically as a
round radiolucency in the middle of the tooth with welldefined borders?
a. Proximal caries
b. Occlusal caries
c. Cemental caries
d. Buccal/lingual caries
11. Which of the following appears radiographically as an
ill-defined crescent-shaped radiolucency below the
CEJ?
a. Proximal caries
b. Occlusal caries
c. Cemental caries
d. Buccal/lingual caries
12. Caries that occur under a restoration or around its margins are called
a. recurrent caries.
b. cemental caries.
c. root caries.
d. buccal caries.
13. Each of the following may mimic caries radiographically EXCEPT one. Which one is the EXCEPTION?
a. Composite restorations
b. Stainless stain crowns
c. Cervical burnout
d. Mach banding
14. An optical illusion created by an increased radiolucency
observed at the cervical area of the tooth is called mach
banding.
The mach banding effect increases when overlap error
occurs.
a. The first statement is true. The second statement is
false.
b. The first statement is false. The second statement is
true.
c. Both statements are true.
d. Both statements are false.
REFLECT—Case study
You are interpreting a full mouth series of radiographs on a
patient who had dental hygiene services at your facility this
morning. The completed patient’s dental examination chart is
available, but the patient has been dismissed. As you examine the
radiographs, you notice the following:
1. Incipient proximal caries on the distal of the maxillary
right first molar.
a. Describe the radiographic appearance of this lesion.
b. Indicate why you classified this lesion as incipient.
2. Moderate proximal caries on the mesial of the maxillary
left first premolar.
a. Describe the radiographic appearance of this lesion.
b. Indicate why you classified this lesion as moderate.
3. Advanced proximal caries on the mesial of the mandibular left second premolar.
a. Describe the radiographic appearance of this lesion.
b. Indicate why you classified this lesion as advanced.
4. Severe proximal caries on the distal of the mandibular
right first molar.
a. Describe the radiographic appearance of this lesion.
b. Indicate why you classified this lesion as severe.
5. Advanced occlusal caries on the maxillary right second
molar.
a. Describe the radiographic appearance of this lesion.
b. Indicate why you classified this lesion as advanced.
6. Cemental caries on the mesial of the mandibular right
first premolar.
a. Describe the radiographic appearance of this lesion.
b. Indicate why you classified this lesion as cemental.
7. The patient’s chart indicates incipient occlusal caries
detected clinically on the maxillary left first and second
molars. However, these do not seem to be evident radiographically.
a. Explain why these caries are not observed on the
radiographs.
8. The patient’s chart indicates incipient buccal caries
detected clinically on the mandibular left first molar.
However, this lesion does not seem to be evident radiographically.
a. Explain why the buccal caries is not observed on the
radiographs.
9. The radiographs reveal two radiolucencies resembling
cemental (root) caries around the cervical of the mandibular right first and second premolars. However, the
patient’s chart does not indicate that cemental caries
were detected clinically.
a. Explain the possible cause of these radiolucencies.
10. The periapical radiograph of the maxillary left molar
region is overlapped between the maxillary first and
second molars.
a. Explain why detecting caries in this area will be
compromised.
b. What optical illusion will most likely present in this
area?
c. Describe the appearance of this optical illusion.
RELATE—Laboratory application
For a comprehensive laboratory practice exercise on this topic,
see Thomson, E. M. (2012). Exercises in oral radiography
techniques: A laboratory manual (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Pearson. Chapter 14, “Radiographic interpretation.”
REFERENCES
Berry, H. (1983). Cervical burnout and mach band: Two shadows of doubt in radiologic interpretation of carious lesions.
Journal of the American Dental Assocication, 106, 622.
Langlais, R. P., & Kasle, M. J. (1992). Exercises in oral radiographic interpretation (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Saunders.
Langlais, R. P., Langland, O. E., & Nortje, C. J. (1995).
Diagnostic imaging of the jaws. Philadelphia:
Williams & Wilkins.
Langlais, R. P. (2003). Exercises in oral radiology and interpretation (4th ed.). Philadelphia: Saunders.
White, S. C., & Pharoah, M. J. (2008). Oral radiology: Principles and interpretation (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
CHAPTER 24 • THE USE OF RADIOGRAPHS IN THE DETECTION OF DENTAL CARIES 313
CHAPTER
OUTLINE
 Objectives 314
 Key Words 314
 Introduction 315
 Radiographic
Appearance of
Periodontal
Diseases 315
 Radiographic
Examination 315
 Radiographic
Techniques 318
 Radiographic
Interpretation of
Periodontal
Diseases 320
 Review, Recall,
Reflect, Relate 323
 References 324
OBJECTIVES
Following successful completion of this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Define the key words.
2. List the uses of radiographs in the assessment of periodontal diseases.
3. Differentiate between horizontal and vertical bone loss.
4. Identify three local contributing factors for periodontal disease that radiographs can help
locate.
5. Explain how imaging anatomical configurations aids in the prognosis of periodontally
involved teeth.
6. List the limitations of radiographs in the assessment of periodontal diseases.
7. Recognize the role vertical and horizontal angulations play in imaging periodontal diseases.
8. Use the appropriate radiographic techniques to best detect and evaluate periodontal diseases.
9. Describe the radiographic appearance of the normal periodontium.
10. List four American Academy of Periodontology disease classification case types, and describe
their radiographic appearance.
KEY WORDS
Alveolar (crestal) bone
Calculus
Cementoenamel junction (CEJ)
Furcation involvement
Generalized bone loss
Gingivitis
Horizontal bone loss
Interdental septa
Lamina dura
Local contributing factor
Localized bone loss
Occlusal trauma
Pathogen
Periodontal diseases
Periodontal ligament space
Periodontitis
Periodontium
Triangulation
Vertical (angular) bone loss
Vertical bitewing series
The Use of Radiographs
in the Evaluation of
Periodontal Diseases
CHAPTER
25
CHAPTER 25 • THE USE OF RADIOGRAPHS IN THE EVALUATION OF PERIODONTAL DISEASES 315
Introduction
Dental radiographs play a key role in the diagnosis, prognosis,
management and evaluation of periodontal diseases. Properly
exposed and meticulously processed radiographs are invaluable
aids in the diagnosis of periodontal diseases. To get the most diagnostic information from radiographs taken to image periodontal
status, radiographers should have an extensive knowledge of the
radiographic techniques that will produce quality images. The
purpose of this chapter is to introduce the dental radiographer to
the radiographic appearance of periodontal diseases, to outline the
radiographic examinations and techniques best suited to produce
quality radiographs for the purpose of evaluating periodontal diseases, and to describe local contributing factors for the disease
that radiographs help to identify.
Radiographic Appearance of Periodontal
Diseases
Periodontal diseases are diseases that affect both soft tissues
(gingiva) and bone around the teeth. The severity of periodontal
disease may range from a simple inflammation of the gingiva to
the destruction of supporting bone and the periodontal ligament. The most common periodontal diseases are gingivitis and
periodontitis. Gingivitis is inflammation of the gingiva and
limited to the soft tissue (gingiva). Periodontitis is also the
result of infection, but includes loss of alveolar bone.
The proper diagnosis and evaluation of periodontal diseases
must be made with a combination of radiographic and clinical
examinations.
Radiographic Examination
Uses (Box 25-1)
Radiographs, along with a thorough clinical examination, allow
the dentist and dental hygienist to evaluate and document periodontal diseases. The uses of radiographs in the assessment of
periodontal diseases include the following:
1. Imaging supporting bone. Radiographs allow the practitioner to evaluate crestal bone irregularities and interdental
septa changes (alveolar bone changes between the teeth).
Radiographs document the amount of bone remaining
rather than the amount lost. The amount of bone loss is estimated as the difference between the physiologic bone level
and the height of the remaining bone (Figure 25-1).
Radiographs also allow the practitioner to determine
the pattern of bone loss; horizontal or vertical.
Horizontal bone loss describes height loss around adjacent teeth in a region. In horizontal bone loss, both buccal
and lingual plates have been resorbed as well as the intervening interdental bone. Horizontal bone loss occurs in a
plane parallel to the cementoenamel junctions (CEJ) of
adjacent teeth (Figure 25-2). Vertical bone loss, sometimes called angular bone loss, occurs in a vertical direction where the resorption of one tooth root sharing the
interdental septum (bone between the teeth) is greater
than the other tooth (Figures 25-3, 25-4, and 25-5).
Radiographs can help the practitioner determine the distribution of bone loss: localized or generalized. Localized
bone loss occurs in local areas and involves one or only a few
teeth. Generalized bone loss occurs throughout the entire
dental arches.
A
B
FIGURE 25-1 Drawing illustrating horizontal bone loss.
(A) Normal (physiologic) level of bone (alveolar bone parallel to the
cementoenamel junction) and (B) Bone level of patient with
periodontal disease. Horizontal bone loss is the difference between
(A) and (B) (shaded area).
FIGURE 25-2 Horizontal bone loss. Arrows show bone level of
patient with periodontal disease. Note that the level of bone loss is
parallel to an imaginary line drawn between the cementoenamel
junctions of the adjacent teeth.
BOX 25-1 Periodontal Bone Changes Recorded
by Radiographs
• Crestal irregularities
• Interdental alveolar bone changes
• Pattern of bone loss (horizontal/vertical)
• Distribution of bone loss (localized/generalized)
• Severity of bone loss (slight, moderate, advanced)
• Furcation involvement
316 MOUNTING AND VIEWING DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS
Vertical bone loss
FIGURE 25-3 Drawing illustrating vertical bone loss. Vertical
bone loss appears angular where the resorption is greater on the side
of one tooth than on the side of the adjacent tooth.
FIGURE 25-4 Vertical bone loss. Arrows show bone level of
patient with periodontal disease.
Radiographs can reveal the severity of bone loss—slight,
moderate, or advanced—and furcation involvement (bone
loss between the roots) of multirooted teeth (Figure 25-6).
2. Imaging local contributing factors. Radiographs can detect
conditions such as amalgam overhangs (see Chapter 23),
poorly contoured crown margins, and calculus deposits that
act as traps that can lead to the buildup of bacterial
pathogens that cause periodontal diseases (Figures 25-7 and
25-8). Calculus, essentially hardened plaque, appears
slightly radiopaque (about the radiopacity of dentin) and
must be significantly calcified to be recorded on radiographs.
Depending on the density and the amount of the deposit, calculus may appear as pointed or irregular projections on the
proximal root surfaces, or as a ringlike radiopacity around
the cervical neck of a tooth.
Radiographs often reveal the effects of traumatic
occlusion, another contributing factor for periodontal disease. Occlusal trauma does not cause periodontal disease,
but has been shown to hinder the body’s response to the
disease. The effects of excessive occlusal forces show up
2 1
FIGURE 25-5 Comparison of horizontal and verical bone
loss. Use the CEJ of adjacent teeth as a guideline. (1) Horizontal
bone loss. (2) Vertical bone loss.
FIGURE 25-6 Furcation involvement. Note the radiolucency in
between the roots of these multirooted teeth.
FIGURE 25-7 Local contributing factors. Calculus (arrow) and
amalgam overhang (circled) are likely to collect bacterial pathogens that
can contribute to the progression of periodontal diseases.
CHAPTER 25 • THE USE OF RADIOGRAPHS IN THE EVALUATION OF PERIODONTAL DISEASES 317
1
2
FIGURE 25-8 Calculus. (1) large deposits around the necks of
the teeth. (2) Height of alveolar bone remaining as a result of
periodontal disease.
be more likely to have a better prognosis because of the
amount of bone support.
4. Evaluating the prognosis and treatment intervention needs.
By providing information on the tooth root-to-crown ratio, and
adjacent tooth proximity, radiographs help the practitioner plan
treatment and predict outcomes.
5. Serving as a baseline and as a means for evaluating the
results of treatment. Radiographs provide documentation
on the progression of disease and provide a permanent record
of the condition of the bone throughout the course of the disease and treatment.
Limitations
1. Radiographs are a two-dimensional image of threedimensional objects. Radiographs lack the third dimension
of depth, which results in bone and tooth structures being
superimposed over each other. This will often hide bone loss
on the buccal and lingual surfaces and furcation area, especially in the posterior region of the oral cavity.
2. Changes in soft tissue not imaged. Because soft tissue is
not recorded on radiographs, gingivitis cannot be detected
radiographically. Radiographs do not add any information
regarding the location and/or depth of periodontal pockets.
3. Cannot distinguish treated versus untreated disease.
Radiographs do not indicate the presence or absence of
active disease.
4. Actual destruction more advanced clinically. Radiographs
cannot detect early signs of periodontal diseases. A significant
loss of bone density must occur before radiographic changes
are detected.
FIGURE 25-9 Triangulation. Widening of the periodontal
ligament space indicative of occlusal trauma.
FIGURE 25-10 Root length and root-to-crown ratio.
Although the bone loss observed on this radiograph is significant, the
longer than normal, dilacerated root improves the
prognosis for the canine.
on radiographs as a widening of the periodontal ligament
space (Figure 25-9), called triangulation. Triangulation is
bordered by the lamina dura and the root surface of the
tooth, with its base toward the tooth crown.
3. Imaging anatomical configurations. Radiographs can
reveal information about root morphology and lengths and
the presence of dilacerations (see Chapter 23); root shape and
width, such as multirooted teeth with ample supporting bone
in between the roots; or narrow, close, or fused roots, all of
which can help determine the treatment and predict treatment
outcomes. For example, a tooth with a shortened root as a
result of external resorption (see Chapter 23) will have a poor
prognosis, whereas a tooth with a normal or long root may
have a better prognosis (Figure 25-10). Additionally, teeth
that have ample bone surrounding widely spaced roots will
318 MOUNTING AND VIEWING DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS
B
FIGURE 25-12 Correct and incorrect vertical angulation.
(A) Correct vertical angulation accurately records crestal bone
indicating no bone loss between the mandibular first and second
molars. (B) Incorrect vertical angulation produces a radiolucent,
cupping-out appearance of the lamina dura falsely indicating bone
loss between these same teeth. (Thomson, E. M., & Tolle, S. L. (1994).
A practical guide for using radiographs in the assessment of periodontal
diseases. Part 2: Interpretation and future advances. Journal of Practical
Hygiene, 3(2), 12. Permission from Montage Media.)
Radiographic Techniques
Bitewings, especially the vertical bitewing series of anterior
and posterior radiographs described in Chapter 16, are most
useful for examining the periodontium (Figure 25-11). The
A
B
C
FIGURE 25-11 Comparsion of bitewing and periapcial
radiographs imaging the periodontium. (A) Vertical bitewing.
(B) Horizontal bitewing. (C) Periapical.
precise parallelism established between the tooth and the plane
of the image receptor when taking bitewing radiographs makes
it possible to image the alveolar crestal bone accurately. To
achieve this same degree of accuracy when using periapical
radiographs to image the periodontium, the paralleling technique must be used. The image receptor must be placed parallel to the long axis of the teeth to ensure that the images of the
bone and teeth on the radiograph are not distorted.
To be a useful diagnostic aid, the radiographs must be
precisely exposed and meticulously processed. Incorrect
angulation can render a radiograph worthless for evaluating
periodontal disease. Excessive vertical angulation may not
reveal bone loss, whereas inadequate vertical angulation
may result in a radiographic image that falsely indicates
bone loss when there is none (Figures 25-12 and 25-13).
A
CHAPTER 25 • THE USE OF RADIOGRAPHS IN THE EVALUATION OF PERIODONTAL DISEASES 319
A B
FIGURE 25-13 Correct and incorrect vertical angulation. (A) Correct vertical angulation accurately records crestal bone
indicating bone loss mesial and distal to the maxillary first molar,. (B) Incorrect vertical angulation produces a false appearance
to the level of bone in these same areas. (Thomson, E. M., & Tolle, S. L. (1994). A practical guide for using radiographs in the assessment of
periodontal diseases. Part 2: Interpretation and future advances. Journal of Practical Hygiene, 3(2), 12. Permission from Montage Media.)
Accurate horizontal angulation is also important in evaluating periodontal disease. Incorrect horizontal angulation
results in overlapping of the contact areas between the teeth,
making it impossible to determine the condition of interdental bone (bone in between the teeth). Second, varying the
horizontal angulation slightly may actually increase the
chances of imaging interdental defects and furcation
A B
FIGURE 25-14 Example of varying horizontal angulation. (A) Correct horizontal
angulation, but image does not reveal the vertical (angular) defect on the mesial of the maxillary
first molar. (B). Slightly varied horizontal angulation of the same region now reveals the vertical
bony defect. (Thomson, E. M., & Tolle, S. L. (1994). A practical guide for using radiographs in the
assessment of periodontal diseases. Part 2: Interpretation and future advances. Journal of Practical Hygiene,
3(2), 13. Permission from Montage Media.)
involvement. For example, a bitewing series of seven radiographs (discussed in Chapter 16) and a full mouth series of
multiple periapical and bitewing radiographs (discussed in
Chapter 14) will contain images that were produced with
different horizontal angles. The varying angulations used
allow for multiple views of the condition of the periodontium (Figure 25-14).
320 MOUNTING AND VIEWING DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS
PROCEDURE 25-1
Radiographic interpretation for periodontal disease
1. See Procedure Box 21-2, Suggested Sequence for Viewing a Full Mouth Series of Radiographs.
2. View all surfaces of each tooth.
3. Note the alveolar bone height. Use the CEJ as a reference point. Measure with a probe as needed (see
Figure 21-5).
4. Examine the periodontal ligament space, following it around the entire tooth. Note widening, triangulation.
5. Examine the furcation area of multirooted teeth.
6. Identify local contributing factors such as restoration overhangs and calculus.
7. Confirm findings and/or clarify uncertain interpretations with a clinical examination of the patient.
8. Consult the patient’s chart for confirmation or clarification of findings as needed.
9. Present a preliminary interpretation for the dentist’s review.
10. Following confirmation by the dentist, document all findings on the patient’s permanent record.
TABLE 25-1 American Academy of Periodontal Disease Classification
CLASSIFICATION RADIOGRAPHIC APPEARANCEa
Case Type I: Gingivitis Alveolar crest: Unbroken, radiopaque at a level 1.5–2.0 mm below and parallel to the CEJ
Anterior: Pointed Posterior: Flat, smooth
Case Type II: Slight Chronic Periodontitis Alveolar crest: Loss of density with slight radiolucencies evident; triangulation observed
Anterior: Blunted Posterior: Fuzzy, cupping-out appearance
Case Type III: Moderate Chronic or
Aggressive Periodontitis
Alveolar crest: Level greater than 2.0 mm below the CEJ, indicating 30–50 percent bone loss
Anterior and posterior: Horizontal and/or vertical patterns of bone loss observed
Posterior: Furcation radiolucencies evident
Case Type VI: Advanced Chronic or
Aggressive Periodontitis
Alveolar crest: Easily identified with level of bone loss greater than 50 percent
Anterior and Posterior: Evidence of tooth position changes, drifting
Source: Perry, D. A., Beemsterboer, P., & Taggart, E. J. (2007). Periodontology for the dental hygienist (3rd ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier. a
Although the exposure factors (mA, kVp, and time) used
will depend on the patient and the area to be exposed, some
practitioners prefer to use a higher kVp to best image subtle
bone changes. A higher setting, such as 90 kVp, will result in
an image that has a low constrast: black and white with many
shades of gray in between. Because bone changes that accompany periodontal diseases appear as a radiolucency within the
radiopaque bone, a low-contrast image is preferred by some
practitioners for imaging these early signs of bone destruction.
Radiographic Interpretation of Periodontal
Diseases
The dental radiographer should be familiar with the radiographic appearance of the normal periodontium to be able to
identify deviations from normal that may indicate possible
periodontal diseases (Procedure Box 25-1). The American
Academy of Periodontology classifies periodontal disease
based on etiologic factors of the disease and tissue response to
treatment. Four classifications of periodontal disease are
described, based on changes in the periodontium as seen on
radiographs (Table 25-1).
Case Type I: Gingivitis
Radiographs do not image soft tissue, and therefore the radiographic appearance of the periodontium in all types and
severities of gingivitis appears the same as normal bone. The
lamina dura (dense cortical plate of the bony tooth socket)
appears as an unbroken, dense radiopaque line around the
roots of the teeth. The alveolar crest is located 1.5 to 2.0 mm
apical to the cementoenamel junctions (CEJ) of the teeth
(Figure 25-15). In the anterior region of the oral cavity, the
CHAPTER 25 • THE USE OF RADIOGRAPHS IN THE EVALUATION OF PERIODONTAL DISEASES 321
FIGURE 25-15 Drawing illustrating Case Type I: Gingivitis.
Alveolar crest located 1.5 to 2.0 mm apical to the cementoenamel
junctions (CEJ) of the teeth.
FIGURE 25-16 Case Type I: Gingivitis-anterior region. Note
the normal pointed radiopaque appearance of the lamina dura and
thin radiolucent line of the periodontal ligament space.
alveolar crest appears pointed and sharp (Figure 25-16). In the
posterior region of the oral cavity, the alveolar crest is more
flat, smooth, and parallel to an imaginary line drawn between
adjacent CEJ (Figure 25-17). The peridontal ligament space
appears as a thin radiolucent line between the lamina dura and
the root of the tooth.
Case Type II: Slight Chronic Periodontitis
Early bone loss up to 30 percent is evident (Figure 25-18).
Loss of crestal bone density that often appears as a fuzzy
cupping-out of the alveolar crest is the first radiographic
indication of periodontal disease (Figure 25-19). The alveolar crest appears blunted in the anterior region of the oral
FIGURE 25-17 Case Type I: Gingivitis-posterior region. Note
the normal radiopaque flat appearance of the lamina dura and thin
radiolucent line of the periodontal ligament space.
FIGURE 25-18 Drawing illustrating Case Type II: Slight Chronic
Periodontitis.
FIGURE 25-19 Case Type II: Slight Chronic Periodontitisposterior region. Note the slight radiolucent cupping-out of the
lamina dura, especially visible between the mandibular first and
second molars. Radiopaque calculus is visible on the proximal
surfaces of the teeth.
322 MOUNTING AND VIEWING DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS
FIGURE 25-23 Case Type III: Moderate Chronic or
Aggressive Periodontitis-posterior region. Note the 30–50
percent bone level resorption and radiolucency in the furca of the
mandibular molars indicating furcation involvement.
FIGURE 25-24 Drawing illustrating Case Type IV: Advanced
Chronic or Aggressive Periodontitis.
FIGURE 25-20 Case Type II: Slight Chronic Periodontitisanterior region. Note the blunting of the lamina dura and slight
radiolucent widening of the periodontal ligament space. Slightly
radiopaque calculus is visible.
cavity (Figure 25-20). In the posterior region of the oral cavity triangulation, a widening of the periodontal ligament
space becomes evident at the mesial or distal surfaces of the
teeth.
Case Type III: Moderate Chronic or Aggressive
Periodontitis
Moderate bone loss (30 to 50 percent) may appear in both the
horizontal and vertical planes (Figures 25-21 and 25-22). As
the bone levels resorb, radiolucencies may appear in the furcations of multirooted teeth. (Figure 25-23).
Case Type IV: Advanced Chronic or Aggressive
Periodontitis
The advanced stage of periodontal disease (greater than 50 percent bone loss) is characterized radiographically by severe horizontal and/or vertical bone loss, evidence of furcation
FIGURE 25-21 Drawing illustrating Case Type III: Moderate
Chronic or Aggressive Periodontitis.
FIGURE 25-22 Case Type III: Moderate Chronic or Aggressive
Periodontitis-anterior region. Note the 30–50 percent bone level
resorption.
CHAPTER 25 • THE USE OF RADIOGRAPHS IN THE EVALUATION OF PERIODONTAL DISEASES 323
involvement, widened periodontal spaces, and indications of
changes in tooth position (Figures 25-24 through 25-26).
REVIEW—Chapter summary
Periodontal diseases are diseases that affect both soft tissues (gingivitis) and bone around the teeth (periodontitis).
Properly exposed and meticulously processed radiographs
play a key role in the diagnosis and evaluation of periodontal diseases.
The uses of radiographs in the evaluation and treatment
of periodontal diseases include imaging the supporting bone,
locating local contributing factors, imaging anatomical configurations, evaluating prognosis and treatment intervention
needs, and serving as a baseline for identifying and documenting the progression of the disease and the results of
treatment. Radiographs are limited in their ability to image
periodontal diseases because they are two-dimensional pictures of three-dimensional teeth and supporting bone;
changes in soft tissue are not imaged; treated disease cannot
be distinguished from untreated disease, and the actual
destruction of bone is more clinically advanced than what is
revealed on radiographs.
The ideal radiographs for imaging periodontal diseases are
bitewings, particularly vertical bitewings, or periapical radiographs exposed by the paralleling technique. Some practitioners prefer low-contrast images produced with a high kVp for
detecting subtle changes in the bone.
Radiographs are important aids in identifying changes in
the periodontium and can assist in classifying various stages
of periodontal disease. The dental hygienist and the dental
assistant should possess a working knowledge of normal radiographic appearance of the periodontium to be able to recognize deviations from normal that indicate periodontal disease.
FIGURE 25-25 Case Type IV: Advanced Chronic or
Aggressive Periodontitis-anterior region. Note the 50 percent or
greater bone level resorption.
FIGURE 25-26 Case Type IV: Advanced Chronic or
Aggressive Periodontitis-posterior region. Note the 50 percent or
greater bone level resorption and obvious furcation involvement.
RECALL—Study questions
1. Each of the following may be determined from a dental radiograph EXCEPT one. Which one is the
EXCEPTION?
a. Bone loss
b. Pocket depth
c. Furcation involvement
d. Local contributing factors
2. List four uses of radiographs in the assessment of periodontal diseases.
a. ______________
b. ______________
c. ______________
d. ______________
3. Which of the following terms describes bone loss that
occurs in a plane parallel to the cementoenamel junction of adjacent teeth?
a. Irregular
b. Vertical
c. Horizontal
d. Periapical
4. Significant bone loss that results in a radiolucency
observed in the area between the roots of multirooted
teeth is called
a. localized bone loss.
b. interdental septa.
c. local contributing factor.
d. furcation involvement.
5. Radiographs may help to locate each of the following
local contributing factors EXCEPT one. Which one is
the EXCEPTION?
a. Calculus
b. Poorly contoured crown margin
c. Deep pocket
d. Amalgam overhang
324 MOUNTING AND VIEWING DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS
6. Excessive occlusal force may result in a widening of the
periodontal ligament space.
Widening of the periodontal ligament space is called
furcation involvement.
a. The first statement is true. The second statement is
false.
b. The first statement is false. The second statement is
true.
c. Both statements are true.
d. Both statements are false.
7. Dental radiographs are important because they document the location and depths of periodontal pockets.
Dental radiographs may serve as a baseline and as a means
for evaluating the outcomes of periodontal treatments.
a. The first statement is true. The second statement is
false.
b. The first statement is false. The second statement is
true.
c. Both statements are true.
d. Both statements are false.
8. List four limitations of dental radiographs in the assessment of periodontal diseases.
a. ______________
b. ______________
c. ______________
d. ______________
9. Which of the following would be best for imaging a
slight, but generalized periodontal status?
a. Select periapical radiographs using the bisecting technique.
b. Select periapical radiographs using the paralleling
technique.
c. Posterior horizontal bitewing radiographs.
d. Posterior and anterior vertical bitewing radiographs.
10. Correct horizontal angulation is needed to accurately
image interdental bone levels.
Altering the horizontal angulation can reveal additional
information regarding interdental bone levels.
a. The first statement is true. The second statement is
false.
b. The first statement is false. The second statement is
true.
c. Both statements are true.
d. Both statements are false.
11. Alveolar crests pointed in the anterior region and a
radiopaque flat, smooth lamina dura 1.5 to 2.0 mm below
the CEJ in the posterior region describes
a. Case Type I: Gingivitis
b. Case Type II: Slight Chronic Periodontitis
c. Case Type III: Moderate Chronic or Aggressive
Periodontitis
d. Case Type IV: Advanced Chronic or Aggressive
Periodontitis
12. Radiolucent changes observed on a radiograph such as
a fuzzy, cupping-out of the crestal bone and a blunted
appearance of the lamina dura in the anterior region
describes
a. Case Type I: Gingivitis
b. Case Type II: Slight Chronic Periodontitis
c. Case Type III: Moderate Chronic or Aggressive
Periodontitis
d. Case Type IV: Advanced Chronic or Aggressive
Periodontitis
REFLECT—Case study
Describe what radiographic changes in the periodontium you
would expect to observe on a seven-image series of vertical
bitewing radiographs on the following patients classified according to the American Academy of Periodontology Disease Classification:
1. Case Type I: Gingivitis
2. Case Type II: Slight Chronic Periodontitis
3. Case Type III: Moderate Chronic or Aggressive
Periodontitis
4. Case Type IV: Advanced Chronic or Aggressive
Periodontitis
RELATE—Laboratory application
For a comprehensive laboratory practice exercise on this topic,
see Thomson, E. M. (2012). Exercises in oral radiography techniques: A laboratory manual (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Pearson Education. Chapter 14, “Radiographic interpretation.”
REFERENCES
Langlais, R. P. (2003). Exercises in oral radiology and interpretation (4th ed.). Philadelphia: Saunders.
Perry, D. A., Beemsterboer, P., & Taggart, E. J. (2007).
Periodontology for the dental hygienist (3rd ed.). St. Louis,
MO: Elsevier.
Thomson, E. M., & Tolle, S. L. (1994). A practical guide for
using radiographs in the assessment of periodontal disease,
Part 2: Interpretation and Future Advances. Practical
Hygiene 3, 2.
White, S. C., & Pharoah, M. J. (2008). Oral radiology: Principles and interpretation (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
OBJECTIVES
Following successful completion of this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Define the key words.
2. State the basis for prescribing dental radiographs for children.
3. List the conditions that would indicate radiographs be taken on children.
4. Identify suggested exposure intervals for the child patient.
5. List the factors that determine the number and size of image receptors to be exposed on
children.
6. List image receptor size and type suggested for use with primary dentition.
7. List image receptor size and type suggested for use with transitional (mixed primary and
permanent) dentition.
8. Identify two types of extraoral radiographs that may be acceptable substitutes for children
who cannot tolerate intraoral image receptor placement.
9. Identify adaptations or modifications in standard paralleling and bisecting techniques that
aid in radiographic procedures for children.
10. Explain the role occlusal radiographs play in imaging children.
11. Appropriately adjust standard adult exposure settings to apply to children.
12. Explain the roles that the patient management techniques show-tell-do and modeling play
in assisting the radiographer with child patient management.
13. Interpret radiographs taken on children with primary and transitional (mixed primary and
permanent) dentition.
KEY WORDS
ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable)
Anodontia
Exfoliation
Lateral jaw projection (mandibular oblique
lateral projection)
Modeling
Panoramic radiograph
Pediatric dentistry
Permanent teeth
Primary teeth
Show-tell-do
Supernumerary teeth
Transitional mixed dentition
Radiographic Techniques
for Children
CHAPTER
26
PART VIII • PATIENT MANAGEMENT
AND SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNIQUES
CHAPTER
OUTLINE
 Objectives 325
 Key Words 325
 Introduction 326
 Assessment of
Radiographic
Need 326
 Suggested Exposure
Intervals 326
 Image Receptor
Sizes and Numbers
and Types of
Projections 326
 Suggested
Radiographic
Techniques 328
 ALARA Radiation
Protection 329
 Patient
Management 329
 Interpretation 334
 Review, Recall,
Reflect, Relate 337
 References 339
326 PATIENT MANAGEMENT AND SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNIQUES
Introduction
Children have the same basic needs for oral health care as do
adults. In fact, the best time to prevent dental problems is in
childhood. Children are at a higher risk for caries that progress
more rapidly than in adults. Radiographs play an important role
in both detecting disease and assessing growth and development
for the child patient.
Radiographic techniques and the types of projections used
to image the oral cavity of the child patient do not differ significantly
from those used for adult patients. However, the child patient
presents with unique characteristics such as a smaller oral cavity
and behavioral considerations that often require adaptations to
standard procedures. The purpose of this chapter is to discuss
ways the radiographer can adapt these standard techniques to
best image the child’s smaller and sometimes more sensitive
oral cavity. These adaptations, along with behavior modification
strategies can assist the radiographer in gaining the confidence
of the child patient to produce the highest quality diagnostic
images using the least amount of radiation exposure.
Assessment of Radiographic Need
The indication to expose dental radiographs on a child patient
is based on the individual needs of the patient. The evidencebased selection criteria guidelines, discussed in Chapter 6, have
categories for assessing children and adolescents as well as
adults (see Table 6-1). Indications for exposing radiographs for
the child patient include the detection of caries and periodontal
diseases; the assessment of growth and development and the
need for orthodontic intervention; the detection of congenital
dental abnormalities, such as anodontia (absence of teeth) and
supernumerary (extra) teeth; the evaluation of third molars;
the diagnosis of pathologic conditions such as an abscess or
other infection; and the assessment of the effect of trauma, such
as a fall or accident, not only for primary teeth, but for the
developing, unerupted permanent teeth as well.
Suggested Exposure Intervals
The American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (pediatric
dentistry—pedia is Greek for child—is the branch of dentistry
that specializes in providing comprehensive preventive and therapeutic oral health care for children), and other oral health and
medical organizations, recommend that a child’s first professional
oral examination be made within 12 months following the eruption
of the first primary tooth, usually between six and twelve months
of age. Early prevention is key to preventing tooth loss and
developing good oral self-care habits. At this early age the teeth
can usually be visually inspected clinically without the need for
radiographs. Unless an accident, toothache, or other unusual
circumstance causes a need for radiographs, the selection criteria
guidelines discussed in Chapter 6 (see Table 6-1) suggest that the
first radiographic survey may not be necessary until all the primary teeth have erupted, preventing a visual inspection of the
proximal (contact) surfaces via a clinical inspection. Patients
without evidence of disease and with open interproximal contacts
may not require a radiographic exam. Once the teeth have erupted
in such a manner that the proximal surfaces can no longer be
viewed clinically, and caries are suspected, or the patient presents
with high risk factors for caries, such as poor oral self-care or
inadequate fluoride protection, radiographs may be indicated.
Image Receptor Sizes and Numbers
and Types of Projections
Once it has been determined that radiographs are needed, the
child’s age, size of the oral cavity, and cooperation level must
be considered when determining the size and number of radiographs to expose (Box 26-1). Although a size #0 or #1 intraoral
image receptor is usually used for radiographs of a child with
primary teeth, the preferred size for transitional mixed
dentition, where the child presents with a mix of both primary
and permanent teeth, is a standard size #2 image receptor. The
radiographer should use the largest size image receptor that the
child can tolerate. The amount of radiation required does not
change with different sizes of intraoral image receptors. Using
a size #2 image receptor whenever possible instead of a size #0
or size #1 will provide more information due to the coverage of
a larger area. This is particularly important when imaging
permanent teeth that are developing. The choice of image receptor
size should be individualized based on anatomical limitations
and tissue sensitivity. To aid with accurate and comfortable positioning, a smaller-size film packet should be selected rather than
bending the larger-size film, and a smaller-size digital sensor or
phosphor plate would be more likely retained in position for the
duration of the exposure.
The number of image receptors required depends on the
needs of the individual (see Table 15-1). When exposing bitewing
radiographs on a child patient prior to the eruption of the permanent second molar, two horizontal posterior bitewings, one on
each side, is recommended. Following eruption of the permanent
second molar, four horizontal (or vertical if periodontal disease is
suspected) posterior bitewings must be taken to image all proximal
contacts of the posterior teeth without overlap.
If conditions exist that require additional exposures, the following radiographic full mouth surveys are offered as suggestions.
BOX 26-1 Considerations for Choosing
the Number and Size of Image Receptor
to Expose on the Child Patient
• Oral health needs
• Willingness to cooperate
• Attention span and emotional state
• Ability to understand and follow directions
• Ability to hold still throughout the exposure
• Size of the opening to the oral cavity
• Size and shape of the teeth and the dental arches
• Sensitivity of the oral mucosa
• Operator’s ability to gain patient’s trust
• Operator’s ability to position the image receptor
• Operator’s knowledge of and skill ability to adapt standard
techniques
CHAPTER 26 • RADIOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES FOR CHILDREN 327
FIGURE 26-1 Radiographic survey of primary dentition. One
anterior occlusal radiograph in each arch and one posterior bitewing
radiograph on each side. (Courtesy DP Gutz, DDS, University Nebraska
Medical Center, College of Dentistry, Lincoln, NE.)
FIGURE 26-2 Radiographic survey of transitional dentition. Six anterior periapical radiographs (three on the
maxilla and three on the mandible), one posterior periapical radiograph in each quadrant, and one posterior bitewing
radiograph on each side.
Primary Dentition
Small oral cavity size, tongue resistance, and gagging can be a
problem in small children aged three to six years old. Ideally, it
is advisable to expose four radiographs, one anterior occlusal
(see Chapter 17) of each arch (maxilla and mandible) and one
posterior bitewing on each side (Figure 26-1).
Transitional (Mixed Primary and Permanent) Dentition
At six years, the first permanent teeth have begun to erupt. Ideally,
the survey should include a minimum of twelve radiographs: ten
periapical and two bitewing exposures. Periapical radiographs are
exposed in each of the four molar and canine regions and in the
two incisor regions (Figure 26-2).
Between 12 and 14 years of age, all the permanent teeth
except the third molars have usually erupted. It is during this
adolescent period that growth is rapid and metabolic changes
occur that heighten the possibility of dental caries and increase
the need for preventive oral hygiene care. The full mouth survey
recommended for the adolescent is the same as that required for
the adult patient, usually fourteen periapical and four bitewing
radiographs. (See Chapters 14, 15, and 16.)
Extraoral Radiographs
The evidence-based selection criteria guidelines discussed in
Chapter 6 (see Table 6-1) indicate the value of an extraoral
technique called a panoramic radiograph (see Chapter 30) for
assessing growth and development for the child in mixed dentition
and for evaluating third molars in adolescents. Panoramic
radiographs are often prescribed to supplement intraoral exposures.
In addition, a panoramic radiograph may be an acceptable substitute when intraoral radiographs cannot be tolerated by the patient.
Panoramic radiographs do not image structures with the clarity
of intraoral radiographs and, therefore, do not reveal details such
as early carious lesions. However, these large radiographs are
ideal for imaging overall jaw development and the eruption pattern
of the teeth (Figure 26-3). The panoramic procedure is usually
well tolerated by the child patient. However, the child must be
able to hold still for the duration of the exposure (most panoramic
machines have a 15- to 20-second exposure cycle), and the child
must be able to understand and cooperate with the positioning
requirements necessary for a diagnostic image (see Chapter 30).
Although largely replaced by the availability of panoramic
machines in general practice, the lateral jaw projection (also
called a mandibular oblique lateral projection; see Chapter 29)
has been especially valuable to use with children (Figure 26-4).
The lateral jaw radiograph is used to examine the posterior region
328 PATIENT MANAGEMENT AND SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNIQUES
FIGURE 26-3 Panoramic radiograph of a child with
transitional dentition. Note the overall jaw development and
eruption pattern of the teeth.
of the mandible with patients who are unable to tolerate
intraoral image receptor placement. The lateral jaw technique
is described in Chapter 28.
Suggested Radiographic Techniques
Methods for exposing radiographs on children are essentially the
same as those for adults. Although either the paralleling or bisecting technique can be used, the characteristics children present
with usually require a slight variation in the vertical angulation. A
smaller oral cavity and lowered palatal vault; the tendency toward
an exaggerated gag reflex and lack of tongue and muscle control;
and sensitive oral mucosa due to growth and the exfoliation
(shedding) of primary teeth and the eruption of permanent teeth
require that the radiographer be creative in improvising on the
basic techniques in a manner that will produce diagnostic-quality
images in the presence of these challenges.
The paralleling method is preferred for use on all patients
because of its ability to produce accurate images with little distortion. The greatest challenge of using the paralleling technique with children is placing the image receptor parallel to the
long axes of the teeth of interest. Switching to a smaller-sized
image receptor may help with this placement. Often, it is the
size and weight of the image receptor holder that the child has
FIGURE 26-4 Lateral jaw extraoral radiograph being
exposed on a child. The child holds the cassette that contains the
extraoral film against the side to be imaged. The PID directs the x-ray
beam under the chin up toward the cassette/film.
FIGURE 26-5 Modifying an image receptor holder biteblock
for use with the child patient. (Thomson, E. M. (1993). Dental
radiographs for the child patient. Dental Hygiene News, 6(4), 24, with
permission from Procter & Gamble Company.)
FIGURE 26-6 Adaptation of film holders for use with the
child patient. Using a bitewing bitetab as a periapical film holder.
(Thomson, E. M. (1993). Dental radiographs for the child patient. Dental
Hygiene News, 6(4), 24, with permission from Procter & Gamble Company.)
difficultly tolerating. Switching to a smaller, lighter image receptor holder, modifying an adult image receptor holder, or designing a custom holder may help the child patient tolerate placement
(Figures 26-5 and 26-6).
Once the image receptor is positioned, the vertical angulation
may still need to be increased slightly (no more than 10 degrees)
over the setting used for adult patients. Due to a shallow palatal
vault, the image receptor will most likely lay flatter in position.
Slightly increasing the vertical angulation over perpendicular
will help to image the root apices and the unerupted developing
permanent teeth (Figure 26-7).
The bisecting technique produces images with more distortion
and magnification than the paralleling technique, but its greatest
advantage is the ability to produce reasonably acceptable images
when parallel image receptor positioning is not possible. The
bisecting technique with its image receptor placement (see
Chapter 15) is ideal for use with the child patient.
PRACTICE POINT
Children can easily understand the directive to bite on the
image receptor as if it were a graham cracker. Occluding on
the flat positioning of a size #2 image receptor placed for an
occlusal projection is readily accepted by the child patient. It
will be up to the radiographer to have the knowledge and
skills to align the x-ray beam to produce an acceptable quality
radiograph.
CHAPTER 26 • RADIOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES FOR CHILDREN 329
Position Indicating
Device
Position Indicating
Device
Image
receptor
Image
receptor
FIGURE 26-7 Slightly increasing the vertical angulation will
image more of the unerupted developing permanent teeth and
compensate for the child’s lower palatal vault.
FIGURE 26-8 Occlusal technique. Using a size #2 film to
expose a maxillary occlusal radiograph.
ALARA Radiation Protection
The child’s smaller size places radiation-sensitive tissues closer
to the path of the primary beam of radiation. It is imperative that
a lead/lead equivalent apron and thyroid collar be placed over all
patients, including children. Child-sized lead/lead-equivalent
protective barriers are available commercially; some are decorated with cartoon figures, making these especially childfriendly. Other ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable; see
Chapter 6) protocols that apply to adult patients also apply to
children. These include the use of fast film or digital image
receptors, x-ray beam filtration and collimating devices, and
appropriate exposure settings.
As the bone structure of a child is smaller and less dense than
that of an adult, less radiation is required to produce an acceptable
image. The amount of radiation required for most intraoral exposures
can be reduced by about one-third to one-half of that required for
the same exposure on an adult patient. Reducing the mA setting
(amount of radiation) or the exposure time by one-half of that
used for adult exposures is appropriate for children under 10 years
of age. Exposures on children between the ages of 10 and 15
years can be reduced by approximately one-third. Once the
adolescent reaches 15 or 16 years of age, the exposure settings
should be the same as for an adult patient.
Patient Management
Obtaining quality radiographs on children can be challenging.
The radiographer must be able to communicate and explain the
procedure so that the child understands what is expected. The
child must be able to follow directions and cooperate with the
procedure. The patient management skills of the radiographer
should bring out the child’s natural curiosity and eagerness to
participate.
First impressions are always important and lasting. The
child’s first experience should be pleasant and informative. Usually
it is best to greet and take the child from the reception room to
the x-ray room without the parents. The child should be a willing
participant in the process. Only in emergencies should a child
be forced to undergo dental treatment. If necessary, it is better to
postpone taking radiographs until the next visit than to cause an
unpleasant experience for the child. The child can be told that
they will “be bigger” next time and that the procedure will be
easier now that they have “practiced” for it. Planting a positive
thought is better than risking instilling a fear of dentistry.
When the child patient cannot tolerate image receptor
placement in either the parallel or the bisecting relationships,
the radiographer can often use the occlusal technique to achieve
reasonably acceptable images. Where an image receptor size
#4 is utilized for occlusal radiographs for adults, an intraoral
film size #2 or the equivalent sized digital sensor or phosphor
plate can be used with children (Figure 26-8). The flat image
receptor placement is usually readily accepted by the child
patient. The angulation used for the occlusal technique for children differs slightly from the angles used for adults (Table 26-1).
330TABLE 26-1 Recommended Techniques for the Child Patient if Radiographic Need Is Assessed
DENTITION
CATEGORY
TYPE AND
REGION
IMAGE
RECEPTOR
SIZE
NUMBER
OF IMAGE
RECEPTORS
IMAGE RECEPTOR
PLACEMENT
VERTICAL
ANGULATION
HORIZONTAL
ANGULATION POINT OF ENTRY EXPOSURE
Primary dentition (3 to
6 years
of age)
Bitewing
posterior
#0 or #1 1 on each side Align the anterior edge
of image receptor to
line up behind the distal half of the primary
maxillary or mandibular canine; choose the
most mesially located
canine
+5 to degrees +10 Direct the central rays
perpendicularly
through the primary
first and second
molar embrasure
A spot on the
occlusal plane
between the
primary maxillary
and mandibular
first molars
Reduce exposure to 1/2
the exposure
used for this
projection
on an adult
Primary dentition (3 to
6 years
of age)
Occlusal
anterior
#2 1 on each arch Place long dimension of
image receptor across
the mouth (buccal to
buccal; Figures 26-9
and 26-10)
Maxilla: Direct the central
rays perpendicular to
the imaginary bisector
approximately
degrees
Mandible: Direct the central rays perpendicular
to the imaginary bisector approximately
degrees
-30
+60
Direct the central rays
perpendicular to
patient’s
midsagittal plane
Maxilla: Through a
point at the tip of
the nose toward
the center of the
image receptor
Mandible: Through a
point in the middle
of the chin toward
the center of the
image receptor
Reduce exposure to 1/2
the exposure
used for this
projection
on an adult
Transitional
dentition
(7 to 12
years of
age)
Bitewing
posterior
Prior to
eruption
of the permanent
second
molar: #1
or #2
Prior to eruption
of the permanent second
molar: 1 on
each side
Prior to eruption
of the permanent second molar: Align the
anterior edge of image
receptor to line up
behind the distal half
of the primary or permanent maxillary or
mandibular canine;
choose the most
mesially located
canine (Figure 26-11)
Prior to eruption of the
permanent
second molar:
Direct the central
rays perpendicularly
through the primary
first and second
molar embrasure or,
if erupted, the first
and second
premolar
embrasure
A spot on the
occlusal plane
between the primary maxillary
and mandibular
first molars or, if
erupted, the first
and second premolars to center
the image receptor
within the x-ray
beam
Reduce exposure to 1/2
the exposure
used for this
projection
on an adult
331
After eruption of the
permanent
second
molar: #2
After eruption of
the permanent
second molar:
2 on each side
(1 premolar
bitewing
and 1 molar
bitewing)
After eruption of the
permanent second
molar: Use the same
criteria as for the
adult patient (see
Table 16-3)
+10 degrees After eruption of the
permanent second
molar: Use the same
criteria as for the
adult patient (see
Table 16-3)
After eruption of the
permanent second
molar: Use the
same criteria as
the adult patient
(see Table 16-3)
Reduce exposure by 1/3
to 1/2 the
exposure
used for this
projection
on an adult
Transitional
dentition
(7 to
12 years
of age)
Anterior
periapical
#0 or #1 3 on each arch
(1 centrallateral, 1 right
canine, and
1 left canine)
Maxillary central-lateral incisors: Center
the image receptor to
line up behind the primary or, if erupted,
permanent central and
lateral incisors
(Figure 26-12)
Maxillary central-lateral
incisors:
Paralleling technique—
Direct the central rays
toward the image receptor perpendicularly in
the vertical dimension.
Bisecting technique—
Direct the central rays
toward the imaginary
bisector approximately
+45 to degrees +50
Maxillary centrallateral incisors:
Direct the central
rays perpendicularly
through the maxillary left and right
primary or, if
erupted, permanent
central incisor
embrasure
Maxillary centrallateral incisors:
At the root tips of
the central incisors
to center the
image receptor
within the x-ray
beam
Reduce exposure by 1/3
to 1/2 the
exposure
used for this
projection
on an adult
Mandibular central-lateral incisors: Center
the image receptor to
line up behind the primary or, if erupted,
permanent central and
lateral incisors
(Figure 26-13)
Mandibular central-lateral incisors:
Paralleling technique—
Direct the central rays
toward the image receptor perpendicularly in
the vertical dimension.
Bisecting technique:
Direct the central rays
toward the imaginary
bisector approximately
-20 to degrees -25
Mandibular centrallateral incisors:
Direct the central
rays perpendicularly
through the
mandibular left and
right primary or, if
erupted, permanent
central incisor
embrasure
Mandibular centrallateral incisors:
At the root tips of
the central incisors
to center the
image receptor
within the x-ray
beam
(Continued)
332TABLE 26-1 (Continued)
DENTITION
CATEGORY
TYPE AND
REGION
IMAGE
RECEPTOR
SIZE
NUMBER
OF IMAGE
RECEPTORS
IMAGE RECEPTOR
PLACEMENT
VERTICAL
ANGULATION
HORIZONTAL
ANGULATION POINT OF ENTRY EXPOSURE
Maxillary canine: Center the image receptor
to line up behind the
primary or, if erupted,
permanent canine
(Figure 26-14)
Maxillary canine:
Paralleling technique—
Direct the central rays
toward the image receptor
perpendicularly in the vertical dimension.
Bisecting technique—
Direct the central rays
toward the imaginary
bisector approximately
+55 to degrees +60
Maxillary canine:
Direct the central
rays perpendicularly
at the center of the
canine
Maxillary canine: At
the root tip of the
canine to center
the image receptor
within the x-ray
beam
Mandibular canine:
Center the image
receptor to line up
behind the primary
canine, or, if erupted,
the permanent canine
(Figure 26-15)
Mandibular canine: Paralleling technique—
Direct the central rays
toward the image receptor perpendicularly in
the vertical dimension.
Bisecting technique:
Direct the central rays
toward the imaginary
bisector approximately
-25 to degrees -30
Mandibular canine:
Direct the central
rays perpendicularly
at the center of the
canine
Mandibular canine:
At the root tip of
the canine to center the image
receptor within the
x-ray beam
Transitional
dentition (7
to 12 years
of age)
Posterior
periapical
#1 or #2 Prior to eruption
of the permanent second
molar: 1 in
each quadrant
(4 molar periapicals)
Prior to eruption of the
permanent second
molars:
Maxillary molar—Align
the anterior edge of
image receptor to line
up behind the distal
half of the primary or,
if erupted, permanent
maxillary canine (Figure 26-16)
Prior to eruption of the
permanent second
molars:
Maxillary molar:
Paralleling technique—
Direct the central rays
toward the image receptor perpendicularly in
the vertical dimension
Bisecting technique—
Direct the central rays
toward the imaginary
bisector approximately
+30 to degrees +55
Prior to eruption of the
permanent second
molars:
Maxillary molar:
Direct the central
rays perpendicularly
through the primary
first and second
molar embrasure or,
if erupted, the first
and second premolar
embrasure
Prior to eruption of
the permanent
second molars:
Maxillary molar: At
the root tip of the
primary first
molar, or if
erupted, the root
tip of first premolar to center the
image receptor
within the x-ray
beam
Reduce exposure by 1/3
to 1/2 the
exposure
used for this
projection
on an adult
333
Mandibular molar—Align
the anterior edge of
image receptor to line
up behind the distal half
of the primary or, if
erupted, permanent
mandibular canine
(Figure 26-17)
Mandibular molar:
Paralleling technique:
Direct the central
rays toward the
image receptor perpendicularly in the
vertical dimension
Bisecting technique:
Direct the central
rays toward the
imaginary bisector
approximately
to degrees -20
-15
Mandibular molar:
Direct the central
rays perpendicularly through the
primary first and
second molar
embrasure or, if
erupted, the first
and second premolar embrasure
Mandibular
molar: At
the root tip
of the primary first
molar, or if
erupted, the
root tip of
first premolar to center
the image
receptor
within the
x-ray beam
After eruption of the second permanent molar:
2 in each quadrant (4
premolar and 4 molar
periapicals)
After eruption of the second permanent molar:
Use the same criteria as
the adult patient (see
Table 13-1)
After eruption of the
second permanent
molar: Use the same
criteria as the adult
patient (see
Table 13-1)
After eruption of the
second permanent
molar: Use the
same criteria as the
adult patient (see
Table 13-1)
334 PATIENT MANAGEMENT AND SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNIQUES
Most children react favorably to the authority of a confident, capable operator. Occasionally, a stubborn or frightened
child proves difficult to manage. If such a child does not
respond to firmness, a parent or older brother or sister may
accompany the child into the x-ray room. In fact, if the child is
too small to understand instructions or unable to hold the image
receptor in place, a parent or accompanying adult may have to
assist with holding the image receptor while it is being
exposed. The parent or guardian should be protected with
lead/lead equivalent barriers such as an apron or gloves when
they are in the path of the x-ray beam. The radiographer must
never hold the image receptor in the mouth of a patient during
exposure.
Show-Tell-Do
The use of Show-tell-do (see Chapter 12) is especially useful
with children. Children, and adults, can be naturally fearful
of the unknown. Orienting the child patient to the radiographic equipment will help to alleviate fear and pique
curiosity. The child can be given a film packet to feel and to
handle. It may be unwrapped so that the child can see the
film. Showing the child different image receptor sizes and
then choosing the size that is “just right” for the child’s
mouth may assist with cooperation during placement intraorally. If an image receptor holder is to be used, the child can
be allowed to examine and handle it. The entire procedure
should be carefully explained and rehearsed. The terms used
to describe the radiographic equipment should be on the level
the patient understands. Young children can be told that the
x-ray tube head is the “camera” used to take special x-ray
pictures of the teeth.
Modeling
Modeling, where the child is given the opportunity to observe
the procedure being performed on another patient, is another
successful tool the radiographer may apply to alleviate fear of
the unknown and gain cooperation. The child may observe an
older sibling or parent undergoing the procedure. Of course,
care should be taken to not subject the child to unnecessary
radiation exposure. The child can accompany the radiographer
to the protected location of the exposure button and assist in the
exposure by watching for, and confirming, that the red exposure
indicator lights up.
Communication
Honest communication and good interpersonal skills that are utilized
to gain procedure acceptance and cooperation from the adult can
also be applied to the child patient (see Chapter 12). Praising the
child for his/her cooperation and successful completion of each
step of the procedure will encourage more of the same behavior.
A young child’s attention span can be short, so repeated praise
and instructions given again with each exposure is often necessary.
Young children can be get fidgety and restless, so when the child
is ready, image receptor placement and exposures should be made
as rapidly as possible.
Giving the child a job to do, such as listening for the “beep”
sound to be sure that the x-ray machine worked will allow the
patient to be a willing participant in the process. Giving the child
a sense of control over the procedure will often boost cooperation.
However, the radiographer should be careful about which procedures to maintain authority over. Allowing the patient to hold and
examine the image receptor holder device is reasonable; giving
the child patient permission to place the holder intraorally where
he/she wants to may lead to less cooperation.
Many strategies that apply to managing patients with special needs, presented in Chapter 27, will apply to the child
patient as well. The easiest and most comfortable exposures,
usually radiographs of the maxillary anterior teeth, can be
exposed first to gain the child’s confidence and to get the
child accustomed to having the image receptor in the mouth.
Distraction techniques such as telling the child a story during
the procedure; asking the child to take a deep breath and hold
it while you count down from five to zero, allowing time to
make the exposure; and palpating the tissues with an index
finger to massage and desensitize sensitive mucosa and familiarize the patient with where the image receptor will be placed
are strategies that help make the radiographic experience a
comfortable one.
Interpretation
The radiographer must possess a working knowledge of eruption
patterns and tooth morphology to read radiographs that record
primary and developing permanent teeth. Figure 26-9 through
Figure 26-17 illustrates the teeth and structures most likely to
be recorded on radiographs of children with primary and transitional (mixed primary and permanent) dentition.
1
2
3 4
5
7 6
FIGURE 26-9 Maxillary anterior occlusal radiograph of
primary dentition exposed with size #2 film. (1) Primary canine.
(2) Unerupted permanent lateral incisor. (3) Unerupted permanent
central incisors—note that root formation has not started yet. (4) Thin
radiolucent line indicating the median palatine suture. (5) Partially
resorbed root of primary central incisor. (6) Primary central incisors.
(7) Primary lateral incisor.
CHAPTER 26 • RADIOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES FOR CHILDREN 335
1
2
3
4
FIGURE 26-10 Mandibular anterior occlusal radiograph
of primary dentition exposed with size #2 film. (1) Alveolar bone.
(2) Partially erupted permanent central incisors. (3) Primary teeth.
(4) Unerupted permanent lateral incisors.
1
2
4
4
3
FIGURE 26-11 Posterior bitewing radiograph of transitional
(mixed primary and permanent) dentition (1) Primary maxillary
canine, first and second molars. (2) Primary mandibular canine, first
and second molars. (3) Permanent maxillary and mandibular molars.
(4) Note that this small size film does not adequately image the area
of the developing premolars.
1
2
3
4
FIGURE 26-12 Maxillary central-lateral incisors periapical
radiograph of transitional (mixed primary and permanent)
dentition (1) Primary lateral incisor. (2) Unerupted permanent
central incisors. (3) Roots of primary central incisors showing signs
of physiological resorption. (4) Primary central incisors.
1
2
3
4
FIGURE 26-13 Mandibular central-lateral incisors
periapical radiograph of transitional (mixed primary and
permanent) dentition (1) Unerupted permanent lateral incisor. (2)
Caries on mesial surface of primary lateral incisor. (3) Permanent
central incisors. (4) Large open apex on all permanent teeth,
indicating that root formation is still in progress. Root formation is
generally not complete until about two or three years following tooth
eruption.
336 PATIENT MANAGEMENT AND SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNIQUES
1
2 3
4
5
FIGURE 26-14 Maxillary canine periapical radiograph
of transitional (mixed primary and permanent) dentition
(1) Primary canine. (2) Unerupted first premolar. (3) Unerupted
permanent canine still in a follicle as indicated by radiolucency
surrounding the crown. (4) Permanent central incisor. (5) Permanent
lateral incisor, which appears to be tipped distally and overlapping
with deciduous canine.
1
6
2
3
4
5
FIGURE 26-15 Mandibular canine periapical radiograph
of transitional (mixed primary and permanent) dentition
(1) Primary lateral incisor. (2) Radiolucent areas on mesial and distal
of primary canine. A visual examination is needed to determine if this
indicates caries or restorative materials that mimic caries
radiographically (see Chapter 21). (3) Primary first molar.
(4) Unerupted first premolar. (5) Unerupted permanent canine.
(6) Unerupted permanent lateral incisor.
1
2 3
4
6 5
FIGURE 26-16 Maxillary molar periapical radiograph
of transitional (mixed primary and permanent) dentition
(1) Permanent first molar. (2) Unerupted second premolar.
(3) Unerupted first premolar. (4) Primary canine. (5) Primary first
molar (note that the roots are almost completely resorbed).
(6) Primary second molar.
1
2
3
4
5
FIGURE 26-17 Mandibular molar periapical radiograph
of transitional (mixed primary and permanent) dentition
(1) Unerupted first premolar. (2) Primary first molar with partial
resorption of distal root. (3) Primary second molar. (4) Permanent
first molar. (5) Unerupted second premolar.
CHAPTER 26 • RADIOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES FOR CHILDREN 337
Sample illustrations are provided to assist with learning to
interpret radiographs of children with primary and transitional
(mixed primary and permenant) dentition.
RECALL—Study questions
1. List five conditions that would indicate the need for
dental radiographs on the child patient.
a. ______________
b. ______________
c. ______________
d. ______________
e. ______________
2. Under which of these conditions would dental radiographs most likely NOT need to be exposed?
a. When the child presents with poor self-care and suspected caries.
b. When the child is under 12 years of age.
c. When the proximal surfaces of the teeth are visible
clinically.
d. When the child has accidentally fallen, but there is
no apparent damage to the primary teeth.
3. According to the evidence-based selection criteria
guidelines listed in Table 6-1, which of these intervals is
recommended for posterior bitewing radiographs on a
10-year-old child recall patient who presents with good
self-care and no evidence of clinical caries?
a. 6–12 months
b. 12–24 months
c. 18–36 months
d. 24–36 months
4. Each of the following need to be considered when deciding what size image receptor to use on a child EXCEPT
one. Which one is the EXCEPTION?
a. Cooperation level
b. Size of the dental arches
c. Size of the mouth opening
d. Amount of plaque present
5. Which image receptor size would be the easiest to position for a bitewing radiograph on a 5-year-old patient?
a. #0
b. #1
c. #2
d. #4
6. Which of the following is the best reason to use the largest
size intraoral image receptor that the child will tolerate?
a. So that a lesser number of image receptors will have
to be exposed
b. To be able to use the paralleling technique
c. So that the radiation exposure can be reduced
d. To image an increased amount of the tissues
REVIEW—Chapter summary
Children have the same basic needs for oral health care as do
adults. Radiographic techniques and the types of projections
used to image the oral cavity of the child patient do not differ
significantly from those used for adult patients. The child
patient presents with unique characteristics, such as a smaller
oral cavity and special behavioral considerations that often
require adaptation to standard procedures.
Radiographs for the child patient may be indicated for the
detection of congenital dental abnormalities, to assess growth
and development, and to detect and diagnose diseases and the
effect of trauma. Selection criteria guidelines suggest that radiographs on children may not be necessary until all the primary
teeth have erupted unless an emergency or suspected pathology
exists. Once teeth have erupted in such a manner that the proximal surfaces of the teeth cannot be examined clinically for
caries, radiographs may need to be exposed.
The number and size of image receptor used for radiographs for the child patient will depend on the child’s age, size
of the oral cavity, and cooperation level. Image receptor size #0
or #1 is usually used for bitewing radiographs for patients with
primary dentition, prior to the eruption of the first permanent
molars. Image receptor size #2 is usually used for patients with
a transitional (mixed primary and permanent) dentition.
Occlusal radiographs may be substituted for periapicals on
children if necessary. After the eruption of the permanent second molars, the bitewing and full mouth surveys recommended
for the child patient are the same as those recommended for an
adult patient.
Evidence-based selection criteria recommend panoramic
radiographs for the assessment of growth and development.
Panoramic or lateral jaw (mandibular oblique lateral) extraoral
radiographs may sometimes be acceptable substitutes for intraoral radiographs for the child patient who cannot tolerate intraoral image receptor placement.
As with the adult patient, the paralleling method is the
technique of choice for use with children; however, image
receptor placement may be easier with the bisecting method.
Because the bone structure of a child is smaller and less
dense than that of an adult, less radiation is required to produce an acceptable image. Exposure settings for radiographs
on children under 10 years of age can be reduced by one-half
of that used for adult exposures. Exposure settings for radiographs on children 10 to 15 years of age can be reduced by
one-third of that used for adult exposures. Adolescents 15 or
16 years of age and older require the same exposure settings
as an adult patient.
Show-tell-do and modeling are valuable patient management tools that can aid the radiographer in taking quality radiographic images. Orienting the child patient to the radiographic
equipment will help alleviate fear of the unknown. Good communication and demonstration of authority are imperative
when interacting with children. Most children react favorably
to the authority of a confident, capable operator.
338 PATIENT MANAGEMENT AND SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNIQUES
7. Which of the following is the suggested number and
size of projections to use for a 3-year-old patient with
primary dentition?
a. Two bitewing and two occlusal radiographs
b. Two bitewing and two periapical radiographs
c. Two bitewing and four periapical radiographs
d. Four bitewing and 10 periapical radiographs
8. Which of the following is the suggested number and
size of projections to use for a 10-year-old patient
with transitional (mixed primary and permanent)
dentition?
a. Two bitewing and eight periapical radiographs
b. Two bitewing and 10 periapical radiographs
c. Four bitewing and 10 periapical radiographs
d. Four bitewing and 14 periapical radiographs
9. Which of the following is the suggested number and
size of projections to use for a 15-year-old patient with
permanent dentition?
a. Two bitewings and six periapical radiographs
b. Four bitewing and eight periapical radiographs
c. Four bitewing and 10 periapical radiographs
d. Four bitewing and 14 periapical radiographs
10. When a child patient cannot tolerate intraoral placement
of the image receptor for exposure of a periapical radiograph, which of the following may sometimes be an
acceptable substitute?
a. Bitewing
b. Panoramic
c. Lateral jaw
d. Both b and c
11. If well tolerated, which of the following techniques
will provide the best-quality images on the child
patient?
a. Panoramic
b. Occlusal
c. Paralleling
d. Bisecting
12. What slight change in angulation is usually required
when using the bisecting technique on a child
patient?
a. Increase the vertical angulation
b. Decrease the vertical angulation
c. Direct the horizontal angulation mesiodistally
d. Direct the horizontal angulation distomesially
13. Which of the following image receptors is recommended for an occlusal radiograph on an 8-year-old
patient?
a. #0
b. #2
c. #3
d. #4
14. The exposure settings for children under the age of 10
years should be
a. reduced by one-half the exposure used for adults.
b. reduced by one-third the exposure used for adults.
c. three-fourths the exposure used for adults.
d. the same exposure as used for adults.
15. The exposure settings for children between the ages of
10 and 15 years should be
a. reduced by one-half the exposure used for adults.
b. reduced by one-third the exposure used for adults.
c. three-fourths the exposure used for adults.
d. the same exposure as used for adults.
16. The exposure settings for children over the age of 16
years should be
a. reduced by one-half the exposure used for adults.
b. reduced by one-third the exposure used for adults.
c. three-fourths the exposure used for adults.
d. the same exposure as used for adults.
17. Allowing the child patient to observe a sibling or parent undergoing the radiographic procedure may help to
alleviate fear of the unknown and promote cooperation.
This patient management strategy is called modeling.
a. The first statement is true. The second statement is false.
b. The first statement is false. The second statement is true.
c. Both statements are true.
d. Both statements are false.
18. When taking a series of periapical radiographs on an
11-year-old patient, placing and exposing which of the
following first will most likely aid in gaining the
patient’s confidence and cooperation?
a. Mandibular molar
b. Mandibular canine
c. Maxillary molar
d. Maxillary central-lateral incisors
REFLECT—Case study
The public health clinic where you have volunteered to work
one day a week has just received funding to begin providing
oral health care services to children. Currently the exposure
times for radiographic projections posted near the x-ray unit
control panels list only the following impulse times for adults.
Based on what you learned in this chapter, design an exposure
setting chart that lists the impulse timer settings that would be
appropriate for children. Design your chart to include children of all ages: under age 10 and between the ages of 10 and
15. Current settings for adult patients are as follows:
Film speed: F
PID length: 12 in. (30.5 cm)
mA: 7
kVp: 70
CHAPTER 26 • RADIOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES FOR CHILDREN 339
RELATE—Laboratory application
Observe the exposure charts that are used in your clinical facility. Write down the settings that are being recommended for use
with adults and with children. How many categories of settings
did you find? Are there parameters given for the settings? That
is, are age, size of the patient, or dentition parameters listed to
base the settings on? Compare and calculate the difference
between the adult and child settings used at your facility. Do the
differences match the recommendations presented in this chapter? What is the basis for the recommended settings at your
facility? That is, why were they selected? After analyzing the
settings and comparing them to the recommendations in this
chapter, write a brief summary that would explain the use of different settings to a concerned parent.
REFERENCES
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. (2005). Guideline
on prescribing dental radiographs for infants, children,
adolescents, and persons with special health care needs.
Pediatric Dentistry, 27(reference manual), 185–186.
Eastman Kodak Company. (2002). Successful intraoral
radiography. N-418 CAT No. 103. Rochester, NY:
Author.
Pinkham, J., Casamassimo, P., Fields, H. W., McTigue, D. J.,
& Nowak, A. J. (2005). Pediatric dentistry: Infancy
through adolescence (4th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier
Saunders.
Thomson, E. M. (1993). Dental radiographs for the child
patient. Dental Hygiene News, 6, 19–20, 24.
Thomson, E. M. (2008). Panoramic radiographs and the
pediatric patient. Part 1. Dimensions of Dental Hygiene,
6(2), 26–29.
White, S. C., & Pharoah, M. J. (2004). Oral radiology:
Principles and interpretation (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO:
Elsevier.
Impulses
Bitewings Adult Child (under 10 yrs) Child (10–15 yrs)
Posterior 20 — —
Anterior 16 — —
Periapicals
Maxillary anterior 18 — —
Maxillary premolar 22 — —
Maxillary molar 24 — —
Mandibular anterior 16 — —
Mandibular premolar 18 — —
Mandibular molar 20 — —
OBJECTIVES
Following successful completion of this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Define key words.
2. Discuss five actions for managing the apprehensive patient.
3. Identify the areas of the oral cavity that are most likely to initiate the gag reflex.
4. List the two stimuli that commonly initiate the gag reflex.
5. Describe five methods to reduce psychogenic stimuli to control the gag reflex.
6. Describe four methods to reduce tactile stimuli to control the gag reflex.
7. Discuss ways to manage radiographic procedures for the older adult patient.
8. Discuss ways to manage radiographic procedures for the patient with motor disorders and
conditions of involuntary movement.
9. Discuss ways to manage radiographic procedures for the patient with disabilities.
10. Explain necessary radiographs for the cancer patient.
11. Explain necessary radiographs for the pregnant patient.
12. Value the need for cultural sensitivity.
KEY WORDS
Angular cheilitis
Apprehensive
Cultural barriers
Disability
Gag reflex
Hypersensitive gag reflex
Speech reading
Managing Patients
with Special Needs
CHAPTER
OUTLINE
 Objectives 340
 Key Words 340
 Introduction 341
 The Apprehensive
Patient 342
 A Hypersensitive
Gag Reflex 342
 Aging 344
 Motor Disorders
and Conditions
of Involuntary
Movement 344
 Disabilities 345
 Cancer 346
 Pregnancy 346
 The Culturally
Sensitive
Radiographer 346
 Review, Recall,
Reflect, Relate 347
 References 349
CHAPTER
27
CHAPTER 27 • MANAGING PATIENTS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS 341
TABLE 27-1 Conditions Prompting Alterations to Radiographic Procedures
CONDITION ANTICIPATED PROBLEM MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
Apprehensive Ability to tolerate placement of the
image receptor
Develop a rapport
Project confidence
Maintain authority
Be organized
Reassure patient
Hypersensitive
gag reflex
Ability to tolerate placement of the
image receptor
Do not suggest gagging
Empathize
Use the power of suggestion
Apply distraction techniques
Give the patient breathing instructions
Reduce tactile stimuli
• Begin exposures in the anterior regions
• Place image receptor firmly and expertly
• Confuse the senses
• Utilize special products
Substitute extraoral radiographs as needed
Aging Angular cheilitis (soft tissue cracking of lips)
Decreased muscle function
Unsteadiness, tremors
Dementia (reduced attentiveness to
instructions)
Smaller image receptor; lighter-weight image receptor holder; use
of edge cushion products
Set exposure to increase radiation and decrease exposure time
Utilize caregiver as assistant to stabilize image receptor and/or
patient
Substitute extraoral radiographs
Motor disorders and
conditions of
involuntary movement
Ability to remain still throughout the exposure Set exposure to increase radiation and decrease exposure time
Utilize caregiver as assistant to stabilize image
receptor and/or patient
Wheelchair-bound Positioning patient within the range of the
x-ray unit extension arm and tube head
Transfer the patient to the dental chair when possible
Visual impairment Ability to communicate instructions to gain
patient cooperation
Ability to prevent apprehension of the unknown
Patient personal eyewear may be in the path of
the central ray
Explain each step of the procedure
Use touch to explain equipment and procedures
Announce when exiting and entering the room and explain why
Allow the patient to wear their familiar eyewear whenever possible;
explain the need to remove glasses; allow the patient to
remove glasses
Hearing impairment Ability to understand and follow directions Be creative in finding alternate methods of communication
Cancer Patient hesitant to undergo dental radiographic
procedure
Explain the use of evidence-based selection criteria
Pregnancy Patient hesitant to undergo dental radiographic
procedure
Explain the use of evidence-based selection criteria
Discuss necessary and elective radiographic procedures
Explain the need for, and use lead/lead equivalent thyroid collar
Culturally diverse Language, beliefs, traditions and familiar
influences can be barriers to care
Exhibit an accepting, nonjudgmental attitude
Make an effort to understand the culture
Introduction
Each patient presents with unique characteristics. In addition to
oral manifestations, the dental radiographer should be familiar
with possible medical, physical, psychological, emotional, and
cultural conditions that may require additional knowledge and
skills to successfully produce diagnostic quality radiographs
while practicing ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable; see
Chapter 6).
The purpose of this chapter is to present some of these
conditions that the radiographer must manage to produce
quality radiographs. Recommendations based on current
research for exposure of special conditions will be presented
(Table 27-1).
342 PATIENT MANAGEMENT AND SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNIQUES
The Apprehensive Patient
Apprehensive means to be anxious or fearful about the future.
Apprehensive patients may consider the radiographic procedure
to be unpleasant. These patients may have had a negative experience with a past procedure, which causes them to project those
negative feelings onto the current radiographer. Therefore, it is
important that the apprehensive patient’s contact with the dental
radiographer be pleasant and reassuring.
It is equally important that the radiographer not project
his/her own negative feelings or experiences onto the patient. If
the radiographer has personal views regarding the experience
as uncomfortable or not necessary, he/she must not assume that
the patient shares in those views. Most patients are not apprehensive about radiographic procedures, and the radiographer
should not say or do anything that would prompt the patient to
become anxious.
To reduce a patient’s apprehension, the dental radiographer
should
• Develop a rapport. Take the time to explain the procedure
and allow the patient to ask questions. A conversation that
demonstrates attentive listening and empathy can help relax
the patient.
• Project confidence. A skilled radiographer who demonstrates confidence will gain the patient’s trust and cooperation. A patient’s apprehension is increased when the operator
appears unsure of him/herself.
• Maintain authority. The radiographer should maintain
control over the procedure. Be gentle, but firm. The patient
who trusts in the radiographer’s ability will be less anxious. For example, if placement of an intraoral image
receptor is uncomfortable, and the radiographer allows the
patient to tell the radiographer how it should be placed,
instead of alleviating patient apprehensiveness, the operator may actually increase it. The patient may now feel
responsible for directing the procedure and may become
increasingly anxious that the radiographs may not come
out right.
• Be organized. Progress through the procedure rapidly and
accurately. For example, expose the easier maxillary anterior projections first, and then progress to the more difficult
posterior areas.
• Reassure the patient. Compliment apprehensive patients
on their cooperation. Thank them for their cooperation, even
when the procedure may have been uncomfortable.
A Hypersensitive Gag Reflex
The gag reflex is a protective mechanism that serves to clear
the airway of obstruction. The receptors for the gag reflex are
located in the soft palate and lateral posterior third of the
tongue. Two reactions occur prior to the gag reflex. The first is
a cessation of respiration, and the second is a contraction of the
muscles of the abdomen and the throat.
All patients have gag reflexes, but some are more sensitive
than others. A hypersensitive gag reflex is probably the most
troublesome problem the dental radiographer may encounter.
Two stimuli that must be diminished or eliminated to reduce
gagging are
1. Psychogenic stimuli. Originating in the mind; may result
from the suggestion of gagging or as a result of a past experience of gagging.
2. Tactile stimuli. Originating from touch; a physical reaction
to a feeling of the airway being blocked.
Reducing Psychogenic Stimuli
To help avoid a hypersensitive gag reflex that originates in the
patient’s mind, the radiographer should apply all the suggested
behaviors just explained for alleviating patient apprehensiveness. If the patient reports a past experience with gagging during
the radiographic procedure, or you suspect that a gagging reflex
will occur, the following suggestions may help to prevent its
occurrence:
• Do not suggest gagging. The dental radiographer should
not ask the question, “Are you a gagger?” The power of suggestion is a strong psychogenic stimulus and can initiate the
gag reflex. Unless the patient brings it up, do not mention it.
• Empathize. If the patient brings up the subject of gagging,
do not dismiss their concern as “all in the mind.” Instead,
empathize with their response and explain that some tricks
and techniques have been shown to help avoid stimulating
the gag reflex and that you will individualize these to help
them control their gag reflex.
• Use the power of suggestion. When applying these tricks
and techniques, explain them to the patient. Letting the
patient know that you are altering treatment to help them
manage the gag reflex will increase the likelihood of success. The gagging patient will often be embarrassed by their
involuntary reaction and most are willing to accept any
methods you offer to help them regain control.
• Apply distraction techniques. There are many ways to
divert the patient’s attention away from the oral cavity. This
can be done by maintaining an engaging dialogue or telling
the patient to think of something pleasant, such as their
favorite vacation. However, if the gag reflex has been identified, it may be better to tell the patient that you are going
to give him/her a distraction task to perform. For example,
the patient may be instructed to bite hard on the image
receptor holder’s biteblock; raise an arm or clench a fist; or
press the head back against the head rest of the treatment
chair. Anything that helps to divert the patient’s attention
from the oral cavity may lessen the likelihood of initiating
the gag reflex (Figure 27-1).
• Give the patient breathing instructions. A gag reflex is
often stimulated by a sense of not being able to breathe.
Explain this to the patient and together, plan a breathing
exercise that the patient can concentrate on during placement of the image receptor. For example, the patient may be
coached to breathe deeply through the nose or the mouth; to
hum a familiar song; or to hold the breath while counting to
10 slowly, by which time the radiographer should have completed the exposure.
CHAPTER 27 • MANAGING PATIENTS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS 343
Reducing Tactile Stimuli
Some patients have an accentuated gag reflex because of
hypersensitive pharyngeal tissues. Chronic sinus problems
and postnasal drip can contribute to gagging as mucus and
saliva accumulate into the nasopharygeal area. The dental
radiographer can reduce tactile stimuli by use of the following
techniques.
• Begin exposures in the anterior regions first. Anterior
image receptor placements are less likely to initiate the
gag reflex. Positioning the image receptor in the maxillary
molar region is more likely to initiate the gag reflex.
When exposing a series of bitewing radiographs, expose
the premolar radiograph before the molar. It is often easier
to prevent a gag reflex than to subdue it once excited.
Placing the image receptor in the anterior regions first
allows the patient to get used to the procedure, builds
acceptance, and will usually permit the radiographer to
proceed successfully to the more difficult posterior placements. Additionally, fears from psychic stimuli are most
likely to have been forgotten by the time the maxillary
molar exposure is made.
• Place the image receptor firmly and expertly. For all
projections, carry the image receptor into the mouth parallel with the plane of occlusion. When in proper position,
rotate into place against the appropriate structures. Retain
in position without movement. Avoid sliding the image
receptor across sensitive oral mucosa (soft tissue lining of
the oral cavity).
• Use the bisecting technique. (See Chapter 15.) Because a
gag reflex is sometimes excited by placement of the image
receptor, using the bisecting technique may help prevent
gagging. Placing the image receptor close to the lingual
surface of the teeth and therefore not parallel to the long
axes of the teeth may be less likely to stimulate a gag reflex
on some patients.
• Confuse the senses. Stimulating the oral mucosa with
digital palpation (rubbing with the finger) serves two purposes. When the radiographer places a finger in the area to
simulate for the patient where the image receptor will be
placed, the patient can experience what the actual placement will feel like. Second, palpation helps to massage
and desensitize the soft tissue to make placement of the
image receptor feel less foreign. Another technique that
helps confuse the senses and lower the risk of gagging is
to instruct the patient to rinse with cold water, ice cubes,
or an antimicrobial oral rinse product just prior to image
receptor placement. Placing table salt on the middle or tip
of the patient’s tongue has been shown to be effective at
reducing the gag reflex. When introducing any of these
agents, care must be taken to first be sure that there are no
contraindications for their use. For example, the patient’s
teeth may be sensitive to cold; and the hypertensive
patient (the patient with high blood pressure) may be on a
salt-restricted diet.
• Use special products. A different image receptor holder
may be successful at avoiding or managing a patient with a
hypersensitive gag reflex. Different patients may find different image receptor holders more comfortable than others. Additionally, some products on the market, such as film
packet edge protectors and plastic barriers for digital sensors, reduce the edge sharpness that some patients report
stimulating a gag reflex (Figures 27-2 and 27-3).
Extreme Cases of the Gag Reflex
Occasionally, the radiographer will encounter a patient with a
hypersensitive gag reflex that cannot be managed. The radiographer may be able to substitute a smaller-sized image receptor,
such as a #1 or #0 for the standard #2 size. The radiographer
should take as many intraoral radiographs as possible and then
supplement these with extraoral radiographs.
In rare cases the dentist may prescribe the use of a topical
anesthetic to numb the areas causing the patient to gag. However,
some patients experience an increased anxiety as the result of
this numbing sensation, especially in the soft palate and oral pharyngeal area. Additionally, the risks and contraindications of the
topical anesthetic must be considered.
FIGURE 27-2 Edge protectors. Applying a commercial product
to reduce the edge sharpness of the film packet.
FIGURE 27-1 Distraction techniques. To help control a gag
reflex, this patient has been given an exercise to bend and straighten her
index finger. She has been instructed to keep a steady motion while
continuing to watch her finger.
344 PATIENT MANAGEMENT AND SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNIQUES
FIGURE 27-3 Edge protectors. Film is available with
commercially applied edge softeners.
Aging
Normal changes in the body due to aging do not necessarily
mean that all older adult patients will present with unique conditions that require alterations in the radiographic procedure.
However, the dental radiographer should be aware of an
increased incidence of conditions and diseases such as angular
cheilitis (fissuring and cracking of the soft tissue at the corners
of the mouth), missing teeth (see Chapter 28), hearing impairment, arthritis, stroke, and physical impairment that are seen
increasingly with aging. Soft tissue changes in the lips may
prevent accurate image receptor placement. Muscle function
that diminishes with aging, resulting in unsteadiness and
tremor, may present a barrier to holding still during exposures.
Residual effects of stroke, such as paralysis, may involve the
ability to move the tongue. Alzheimer’s disease—which often
results in inattentiveness to instructions, loss of coordination,
and other motor abnormalities, including exaggerated
reflexes—should be taken into consideration when planning to
expose radiographs.
It is important to communicate with the older adult patient
to ensure that they can follow instructions for a successful outcome to the radiographic procedure. Some of the alterations
suggested earlier for managing the gag reflex will aid image
receptor placement for the older adult patient. These include
using a smaller, lighter-weight image receptor holder, using a
smaller image receptor, and applying a commercial product that
reduces image receptor edge sharpness.
To assist with possible patient movement that occurs as the
result of slight tremors or unsteadiness, the exposure settings may
be manipulated to provide the appropriate amount of radiation in
the shortest period of time. This is discussed in detail in the next
section. If the patient cannot hold still, a caregiver or family member may need to help steady the patient. The assistant must be
offered protective barriers such as lead/lead-equivalent gloves,
aprons, or shields. The dental radiographer must never hold the
image receptor in the patient’s mouth during the x-ray exposure.
Extraoral radiographs may prove to be an acceptable substitute if the patient’s head can be stabilized throughout the duration of the exposure. Head stabilization may be possible with
certain panoramic x-ray machines that have secure head positioner guides. It is important to note that in later stages of osteoporosis, the loss of stature and spinal deformity that creates a
stooping posture will often make the use of the panoramic procedure difficult (see Chapter 30).
Motor Disorders and Conditions
of Involuntary Movement
Many conditions present with unsteadiness and tremor that
require careful consideration prior to exposing radiographs. In
addition to the considerations listed earlier, patients who present with Parkinson’s disease, Bell’s palsy, cerebral palsy, multiple sclerosis, and myasthenia gravis (a neuromuscular disease
characterized by weakened muscles, especially of the face and
oral cavity) require careful assessment as to their ability to
undergo a radiographic examination. If the possibility of movement during the exposure is identified, the exposure settings—
the milliamperage (mA) and the exposure time—may be adjusted
to decrease the time required for exposure by increasing the
amount of radiation generated. As you will recall in Chapter 3,
the mA setting controls the amount of radiation generated. By
increasing the mA, the x-ray machine will generate more radiation. With this increase in radiation, the exposure time may be
decreased (Table 27-2). The guidelines to adjust these settings
are explained in Chapter 3.
Disabilities
A disability is defined as a physical or mental impairment that
substantially limits one or more of an individual’s major life
activities. The dental radiographer must be prepared to accommodate patients with disabilities. When treating a patient with a
disability
• Talk directly to the patient. Do not ask the patient’s caregiver questions that should be directed to the patient. For
TABLE 27-2 Suggested Exposure Times When
Changing the mA Setting* for Adult Patients
REGION TO BE
RADIOGRAPHED
IMPULSE SETTING
7 mA 10 mA 15 mA
Maxillary anterior periapical 14 10 7
Maxillary posterior periapical 20 14 9
Mandibular anterior periapical 12 8 6
Mandibular posterior periapical 16 11 8
Anterior bitewing 12 8 6
Posterior bitewing 16 11 8
*F-speed film; 12 in. (20 cm) PID; 70 kVp.
CHAPTER 27 • MANAGING PATIENTS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS 345
example, do not say to the caregiver, “Can he (or she) stand
up?” Instead, speak directly to the patient and say, “Can
you stand up?”
• Offer assistance to disabled patients. Ask the patient how
you can best assist them.
• Do not ask personal questions about the patient’s disability.
The Patient Who uses a Wheelchair
The difficulty encountered with the patient who uses a wheelchair is getting the patient into position close enough to the xray unit (Figure 27-4). Care should be taken to be sure that the
extension arm can support the tube head in position without
drifting. Unless the patient is in a total-support wheelchair, it
may be best to transfer the patient to the dental chair.
Patients can be transferred from the wheelchair to the dental
chair by use of the following techniques:
• Patients who can temporarily support their weight are
transferred to the dental chair by placing the wheelchair
alongside the dental chair. Set the brakes of the wheelchair
and elevate the dental chair to the height of the wheelchair. Move the dental chair arm from between the chairs.
Have the patient move or slide sideways into the dental
chair with the caregiver and radiographer assisting.
• If the patient is unable to support their weight, the
immobile patient may be transferred to the dental chair by
radiographer and caregiver. With one taking a position
behind the patient and the other facing the patient, the radiographer and caregiver may lift the patient from the wheelchair into the dental chair.
The Patient with a Visual Impairment
The visually impaired or blind patient requires special consideration during the radiographic procedure. The radiographer must
communicate using clear verbal explanations of each step of the
procedure before performing it. When taking multiple exposures,
it is important to maintain verbal contact to reorient the patient
each time you must exit and reenter the oral cavity. Using touch,
the radiographer can demonstrate placement of the image receptor and the feel of the receptor holder prior to its placement to
help eliminate the feeling of anxiety when facing the unknown.
The personal eyewear worn by the patient with a visual
impairment may have to be temporarily removed if the glasses
will be positioned within the primary beam. Explain the need
for this to the patient. Allow the patient to remove his/her own
glasses. Immediately following the exposures, allow the patient
to resume wearing their personal eyewear.
Maintain communication with the blind patient. Explain why
you are leaving the room when you go to the darkroom to process
the films. Immediately announce your return to the operatory by
speaking directly to the patient.
FIGURE 27-4 Panoramic unit that can accommodate
wheelchair-bound patients. (Courtesy of Planmeca.)
PRACTICE POINT
Never gesture to another person in the presence of a patient
who is blind. Blind persons are sensitive to gesture communication and may feel you are “talking behind their back.”
The Patient with a Hearing Impairment
Communication is vitally important to the success of all radiographic procedures. The radiographer must give the patient
explicit detailed instructions before, during, and at the end of each
placement and exposure. The production of quality radiographs
depends on the patient’s ability to understand and follow these
instructions. Communication with the hearing-impaired patient
requires that the radiographer be aware of what method of communication works best for the patient. The radiographer should
always ask a hearing-impaired or deaf patient how he/she prefers
to communicate. Several options are
• Use written instructions.
• Ask a relative or caregiver to act as an interpreter.
• Use gestures.
If the patient can use speech reading (reading lips), face
the patient and speak slowly and clearly, allowing the patient
to read your facial expressions and gestures. Because a face
mask is recommended as PPE (personal protective equipment;
see Chapter 10) during radiographic procedures, it is important
that the patient and the radiographer agree on the meaning of
certain gestures before beginning the procedure. In fact, the
346 PATIENT MANAGEMENT AND SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNIQUES
A B
FIGURE 27-5 Example of signing. The radiographer is letting this hearing-impaired patient know that she is
doing a good job cooperating with the radiographic procedure. (A) Right hand on chin. (B) Drops to left hand open
palm. Communicating “Good patient.”
may lead to altered guidelines on dental radiographs for
pregnant females. The American Dental Association (ADA)
currently recommends that necessary dental radiographs that
help the dentist diagnose and treat oral disease still be
exposed on pregnant females; and that elective dental x-rays
be postponed for the pregnant female until after delivery. The
ADA strongly recommends the use of lead/lead-equivalent
thyroid collars in conjuction with lead apron barriers for all
patients, and especially for pregnant females and women of
child-bearing age.
hearing-impaired patient will appreciate the radiographer who
takes the time to learn a few of the gestures or sign language
he/she uses to communicate (Figure 27-5).
If the patient uses a hearing aid, it may have to be removed
prior to the panoramic radiographic procedure (see Chapter 30).
Explain the upcoming radiographic procedures before asking
the patient to remove the hearing aid because communication
will be diminished when it is removed.
Cancer
There is often a concern whenever the necessity arises to expose
dental radiographs on any patient who is currently receiving or
has recently undergone radiation therapy. The patient is often
reluctant to receive additional radiation, no matter how minimal,
and the dentist may be hesitant to prescribe dental radiographs.
Likewise, the radiographer making the exposure may feel apprehensive about the procedure.
The patient should be told that the concerns for radiation
safety are shared. Although the patient may already have received
large therapeutic doses of radiation, this is not a contraindication to exposing dental radiographs, provided that they are
determined to be necessary to make an oral diagnosis. The additional radiation that the patient would receive is minimal, and
its use is justified if the patient benefits.
Pregnancy
Prior to a research report published by the American Medical
Association (AMA) in 2004, the potential effects of dental
radiation exposure centered on the possibility of exposure to
the developing fetus. Then JAMA (Journal of the American
Medical Association) published research that investigated the
effect on pregnancy outcomes of radiation exposure of the
hypothalamus and the pituitary and thyroid glands that suggests that dental radiation exposure is associated with fullterm low-birth-weight infants. More research in this area
The Culturally Sensitive Radiographer
The diversity of culture in today’s global society means that the
radiographer is more and more likely to find him/herself performing radiographic examinations on patients of a variety of racial,
ethnic, and cultural backgrounds. Educating these patients regarding the role radiographs play in the diagnosis and treatment of
oral diseases requires that the radiographer be aware of possible
cultural barriers, such as language, beliefs, traditions, and familiar influences.
Because good communication is the foundation on which
quality radiographs are produced, the radiographer should strive
to develop a better understanding of the cultures most likely to be
encountered in the community where the oral health care practice
is located. To assist in developing cultural sensitivity the radiographer should take into consideration the patient’s
• Communication style. Is eye contact considered respectful or a sign of rudeness? Does the patient consider discussing the oral cavity personal and private? Is the patient
comfortable having a family member translate personal or
sensitive information?
• Comfortable personal space zone. Does touch convey
acceptance, or is it offensive? Is the patient uncomfortable
being treated by a professional of the opposite gender?
Does the patient wear certain articles of clothing or spiritual
CHAPTER 27 • MANAGING PATIENTS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS 347
PRACTICE POINT
Do not confuse the terms “elective” and “unnecessary.” The
evidence-based selection guidelines (see Chapter 6) used by
dentists to help with the decision to expose radiographs on all
types of patients prevent the exposure of unnecessary radiographs. Unnecessary radiographs should never be exposed
on any patient. When considering radiographs for the pregnant female, the ADA recommends that elective dental x-rays
be postponed until after delivery. Although the ADA Council
on Scientific Affairs publication, “The use of dental radiographics: update and recommendations” (Journal of the
American Dental Assocication, 137(9), 1304–1312, 2006)
does not define “elective” radiographs, this example is
offered to help differentiate elective from unnecessary.
• Pregnant patient A presents for dental hygiene services
after a one-year time frame. Bitewing radiographs were
last taken three years ago. After the assessment it is
determined that the patient has periodontal disease.
According to the evidence-based selection criteria guidelines (see Table 6-1), this patient should be treatment
planned for a set of vertical bitewing radiographs. These
radiographs have been determined to be necessary to
diagnose and treat this oral condition.
• Pregnant patient B presents for a dental consultation to
replace a removal partial denture with a fixed bridge. To
determine the health of the teeth and the periodontium
that will support the bridge, periapical radiographs are
necessary. However, the dentist would most likely assess
this dental treatment and the need for radiographs as
elective at this time and recommend postponement until
after delivery.
jewelry that they would be uncomfortable removing for the
radiographic procedure?
• Gestures and body language. Does the hand gesture you
use mean the same thing to the patient in his/her culture?
Are there hand gestures that you need to use to convey
instructions regarding the radiographic procedure considered obscene in another culture?
The dental radiographer who presents an accepting, nonjudgmental attitude when presented with diverse cultures is more
likely to gain the trust and cooperation of the patient.
with the patient, project confidence, maintain authority, be
organized, and reassure the patient throughout the procedure.
A hypersensitive gag reflex is probably the most troublesome problem the radiographer encounters. Psychogenic and
tactile stimuli must be diminished or eliminated to reduce
gagging.
The elderly sometimes present with conditions that require
management to produce quality radiographs. Motor disorders and
conditions of involuntary movement may be managed by increasing the amount of radiation (mA) and decreasing the exposure
time (impulses).
A disability is a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more of an individual’s major life activities. The dental radiographer must be prepared to accommodate
patients with disabilities.
Patients who have received radiation therapy should be reassured that necessary dental radiographs are justified if the patient
benefits. The American Dental Association currently recommends that necessary dental radiographs that help the dentist
diagnose and treat oral disease be exposed on pregnant females;
and that elective dental x-rays be postponed for the pregnant
female until after delivery.
The dental radiographer who presents an accepting, nonjudgmental attitude when presented with diverse cultures is more
likely to gain the trust and cooperation of the patient.
RECALL—Study questions
1. List five actions for managing the apprehensive
patient.
a. ______________
b. ______________
c. ______________
d. ______________
e. ______________
2. A hypersensitive gag reflex that results from a physical
reaction to a feeling of the airway being blocked is called
a psychogenic stimulus.
Eliminating psychogenic and tactile stimuli will assist
with managing a hypersensitive gag reflex.
a. The first statement is true. The second statement is
false.
b. The first statement is false. The second statement is
true.
c. Both statements are true.
d. Both statements are false.
3. Dental radiographers who demonstrate confidence can
lead to improved patient cooperation.
A patient who is told that gagging is “all in their mind”
will experience fewer gagging problems.
a. The first statement is true. The second statement is
false.
b. The first statement is false. The second statement is
true.
c. Both statements are true.
d. Both statements are false.
REVIEW—Chapter summary
The dental radiographer must be competent in altering procedures to meet the needs of individual patients. To help manage
apprehension, the dental radiographer should develop a rapport
348 PATIENT MANAGEMENT AND SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNIQUES
4. Each of the following suggestions help the radiographer
avoid exciting a hypersensitive gag reflex EXCEPT
one. Which one is the EXCEPTION?
a. Ask the patient to breathe through the nose.
b. Ask the patient to rinse the mouth with ice water
prior to placement of the image receptor.
c. Ask the patient if they have ever gagged during x-ray
exposures.
d. Ask the patient to press their head against the headrest during the procedure.
5. Placement of the image receptor in which of these following regions is most likely to initiate a gag reflex?
a. Maxillary premolar
b. Maxillary molar
c. Mandibular premolar
d. Mandibular molar
6. The patient is less likely to gag
a. the longer the image receptor stays in the mouth.
b. if they concentrate on the image receptor placement.
c. when the image receptor is slid into position over the
oral mucosa.
d. while performing a breathing exercise during image
receptor placement.
7. Older adults who present with soft tissue degeneration
that makes placement of the image receptor uncomfortable may benefit from each of the following EXCEPT
one. Which one is the EXCEPTION?
a. Increasing the exposure time
b. Using a smaller-sized image receptor
c. Using a lighter-weight image receptor holder
d. Applying an edge protector to the image receptor
8. To compensate for slight movement that results from
Parkinson’s disease tremors, the radiographer can adjust
the exposure settings to
a. decrease the mA and decrease the impulses.
b. increase the mA and increase the impulses.
c. decrease the mA and increase the impulses.
d. increase the mA and decrease the impulses.
9. When performing radiographic services for the patient
with a disability, the radiographer should
a. remove the patient’s eyewear for them prior to exposures.
b. offer to assist the patient in the manner that they want.
c. communicate with the caregiver instead of talking
directly to the patient.
d. ask personal questions about the patient’s disability.
10. Unnecessary radiographs may be taken on the cancer
patient, but only elective radiographs may be taken on
the pregnant female.
a. The first part of the statement is true, the second part
of the statement is false.
b. The first part of the statement is false, the second
part of the statement is true.
c. Both parts of the statement are true.
d. Both parts of the statement are false.
11. It is ethical practice to take unnecessary radiographs on
a. the older adult.
b. the pregnant female.
c. the cancer patient.
d. no one.
12. The dental radiographer should consider each of the following to develop sensitivity for the culturally diverse
patient EXCEPT one. Which one is the EXCEPTION?
a. Lowered mental capacities
b. Personal space zone
c. Communication style
d. Culturally different meanings to hand gestures
REFLECT—Case study
You have just greeted your patient in the reception area, introduced yourself, and asked her to follow you to the operatory,
where you will be taking a full mouth series of radiographs.
Once seated, you notice that the patient appears apprehensive.
As you get ready to begin the procedure, you engage her in a
conversation to assess why she appears so nervous. The patient
eventually tells you that her last experience taking radiographs
could not be completed because she experienced a gagging
problem. She states that she was so embarrassed by it that she
never went back to that practice.
1. Explain how you would respond to this patient. Include
how you would develop a rapport, project confidence,
and maintain authority.
2. Prepare a conversation with this patient where your
responses reassure her about your ability to perform the
procedure; how the procedure today can be different
than her past experience; and what techniques you have
to help her control the gag reflex.
3. Answer the following questions:
a. Why should you not tell this patient that gagging is
all in her mind?
b. What area of the oral cavity should you try placing
the image receptor first, and why?
c. What is the purpose of thanking and praising the
patient for her cooperation with the procedure?
d. What is the difference between psychogenic and tactile stimuli? Give an example of each.
e. What is the purpose of asking the patient to do
breathing exercises during radiographic exposures?
f. What is the purpose of rinsing with ice water or placing salt on the tongue?
g. If you use any of these tricks and techniques, why is
it best to tell the patient what trick you are planning
to use?
RELATE—Laboratory application
For a comprehensive laboratory practice exercise on this topic,
see Thomson, E. M. (2012). Exercises in oral radiography
techniques: A laboratory manual (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle
CHAPTER 27 • MANAGING PATIENTS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS 349
River, NJ: Pearson Education. Chapter 9, “Patient Management
and student partner practice.”
REFERENCES
American Dental Association. (2004, April 28). Statement on
ante partum dental radiography and infant low birth
weight. JAMA. Retrieved from www.da.org/public/media/
releases/0404_release03.asp
American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs.
(2006). The use of dental radiographs: Update and recommendations. Journal of the American Dental Association,
137, 1304–1312.
Darby, M. L., & Walsh, M. M. (2009). Dental hygiene theory
and practice (3rd ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
Hujoel, P. P., Bollen, A., Noonan, C. J., & del Aguila, M. A.
(2004). Ante partum dental radiography and infant low birth
weight. JAMA, 291, 16–1993.
Khan, F. M. (2009). The physics of radiation therapy (4th ed.).
Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Langland, O. E., Langlais, R. P., & Preece, J. (2002). Principles
of dental imaging (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins.
White, S. C., & Pharoah, M. J. (2008). Oral radiology:
Principles and interpretation (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO:
Elsevier.
Wilkins, E. M. (2010). Clinical practice of the dental
hygienist (10th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams
& Wilkins.
OBJECTIVES
Following successful completion of this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Define the key words.
2. Demonstrate the ability to adapt standard techniques when necessary.
3. Demonstrate appropriate adaptations in image receptor placement to avoid overlap.
4. Explain the need to alter vertical angulation in the presence of a shallow palatal vault.
5. Demonstrate knowledge of setting the exposure time based on patient characteristics.
6. Demonstrate the ability to place an intraoral image receptor in the presence of large
maxillary or mandibular tori.
7. Discuss the procedures for image receptor placement in patients with edentulous areas.
8. Discuss the procedures for image receptor placement during endodontic procedures.
9. List three methods of localization.
10. Utilize the buccal-object rule to identify the location of a foreign object.
11. Describe the difference between a standard molar periapical radiograph and
a disto-oblique periapical radiograph.
12. List four reasons to duplicate radiographs.
13. Demonstrate the step-by-step procedures for duplicating radiographs.
KEY WORDS
Buccal-object rule
Disto-oblique periapical radiographs
Duplicate radiograph
Duplicating film
Edentulous
Endodontic therapy
Film duplicator
Hemostat
Localization
Root canal treatment
SLOB rule
Tori
Torus mandibularis
Torus palatinus
Tube shift method
Working radiograph
Supplemental
Radiographic Techniques
CHAPTER
28
CHAPTER
OUTLINE
 Objectives 350
 Key Words 350
 Introduction 351
 Acceptable
Variations in
Technique 351
 Anatomical
Variations 353
 Endodontic
Techniques 356
 Methods of
Localization 357
 Disto-oblique
Periapical
Radiographs 357
 Film Duplicating
Procedure 360
 Review, Recall,
Reflect, Relate 361
 References 363
CHAPTER 28 • SUPPLEMENTAL RADIOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES 351
Conventional molar
image receptor placement
Modified image receptor
placement
FIGURE 28-2 Image receptor position to avoid molar overlap.
The anterior portion of the image receptor is placed a greater distance
away from the lingual surfaces of the teeth.
Introduction
It is important that the dental radiographer possess a working
knowledge of radiographic theory and techniques to produce
diagnostic quality radiographs. However, each patient presents
with unique characteristics, some of which may require that the
dental radiographer have the knowledge and skills to adapt
these ideal procedures to best suit the circumstances. What sets
the skilled radiographer apart from the average is the ability to
alter techniques and still produce diagnostic images.
The purpose of this chapter is to provide specific information on acceptable alterations of the ideal skills you have learned
in this book.
Acceptable Variations in Technique
Anatomical limitations, such as rotation of the teeth, variations in
the height of the palate, the presence of unerupted third molars,
or excessive root lengths, may require that the radiographer
apply acceptable variations in the radiographic technique. Such
changes may occur in the horizontal or vertical angulations or in
placement of the image receptor. Although image receptor holders with external aiming devices assist the radiographer in producing diagnostic radiographs some conditions may affect the
ideal placement of these holders. If the image receptor holder
cannot be placed precisely, the radiographer may be aligning the
x-ray beam to the wrong place. The radiographer who possesses
the skills necessary to evaluate image receptor placement for correctness may still produce a diagnostic quality radiograph by
aligning the angles and points of entry to the image receptor
itself, instead of relying on the external aiming device alone. The
external aiming device on an image receptor holder is an indicator, but does not have to be the absolute “dictator” on where to
line up the x-ray beam (Figure 28-1). The radiographer who can
judge the accuracy of the image receptor placement can compensate when positioning is less than ideal.
Avoiding Overlap
MOLARS Because the interproximal surfaces of the molars
are in a mesiodistal relationship to the patient’s sagittal plane,
conventional image receptor placement parallel to the buccal
surfaces may result in overlapping of the contact areas and closure of the embrasure spaces. To assist with avoiding the occurrence of overlap error, the image receptor should be positioned
perpendicularly to the embrasures. To achieve this position, the
image receptor should be placed slightly diagonal, with the
front edge of the receptor a greater distance from the lingual
surfaces of the teeth than the back edge (Figure 28-2).
CANINE-PREMOLAR The canine periapical and bitewing
radiographs will almost always exhibit overlap between the distal
of the canine and the mesial of the premolar. This overlap
occurs because the curve of the arches in this region superimposes
the lingual cusp of the premolar onto the distal edge of the
canine. To help minimize this overlap, the horizontal angulation
can be adjusted slightly to direct the central rays of the x-ray
beam to intersect the image receptor from the distal. Shifting
the PID slightly toward the posterior will help separate these
two teeth on the resultant image (Figure 28-3).
Because the mesial portion of the premolar will often overlap
the distal portion of the canine on canine periapical and bitewing
radiographs, it is important that the distal portion of the canine
be imaged clearly when exposing premolar periapical and bitewing
radiographs when taking a series of radographs.
Malaligned or Crowded Teeth
When teeth are malaligned or crowded, it may be necessary to
take additional radiographs at various horizontal angles to image
every interproximal area clearly, with no overlap (Figure 28-4).
The image receptor should be positioned perpendicularly to the
embrasures of each tooth as necessary.
Altering Vertical Angulation
Absolute parallelism between the image receptor and the long
axes of the teeth is sometimes difficult to achieve. If the deviation
from parallel does not exceed 15 degrees, the radiograph is generally acceptable (Figure 28-5). When the patient presents with a
shallow palate that prevents the image receptor from being
placed parallel to the teeth, the root apices may not be recorded
on the radiograph. Increasing the vertical angulation by up to 15
degrees over what is indicated will image more of the apical
region (see Figure 26-6 and Figure 28-7). It is important to
FIGURE 28-1 Indicator ring not a dictator. The radiographer
has chosen to increase the vertical angulation to increase the
periapical coverage on the resultant image.
352 PATIENT MANAGEMENT AND SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNIQUES
1st radiograph
2nd radiograph
FIGURE 28-4 Different horizontal angluation is required
when teeth are malaligned.
FIGURE 28-5 Shallow palate. The tissue edge of the image
receptor is shown tipped away from the teeth. When the lack of
parallelism is less than 15 degrees, the resultant radiograph will
generally be acceptable.
A
C
B
FIGURE 28-3 Minimize canine and
premolar overlap. (A) The curve of the
arches in this region superimposes the
lingual cusp of the premolar onto the distal
edge of the canine. (B) Shifting the
horizontal angulation slightly to direct the
x-ray beam to intersect the image receptor
from the distal will help avoid overlap of
these two teeth. (C) Note the elimination of
overlap error in the radiograph on the right.
PID
Plane of the
image receptor
Long axis
of tooth
CHAPTER 28 • SUPPLEMENTAL RADIOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES 353
FIGURE 28-6 Increased vertical angulation recorded more of
the apical region imaging this supernumerary (extra) impacted
premolar, while cutting off a portion of the occlusal region of the teeth.
PID
Maxillary torus
FIGURE 28-7 Maxillary torus. Image receptor placed on the far
side of the torus away from the teeth.
Mandibular torus
PID
Tongue
FIGURE 28-8 Mandibular torus. Image receptor placed between
the torus and the tongue.
remember that varying the vertical angulation must be slight, no
more than 15 degrees, or noticeable distortion will result.
Exposure Factors
Bone and tissue density vary with the age and physical structure of the patient. In most patients the bone structures are thinner in the mandibular incisor region and denser in the maxillary
molar region, making it desirable to alter the exposure time or
milliamperage to produce radiographs of ideal density. Making
changes in the exposure settings customizes the radiation dose
the patient receives. We learned in Chapter 26 that the exposure
settings for a child patient, whose bone structures are less
dense, should be less than the setting for an adult patient. In
addition, patients who present with edentulous regions would
require less radiation for those areas with missing teeth. Exposure recommendations depend on the characteristics of the
patient and the film speed and the type of x-ray equipment in
use. Because these exposure recommendations vary widely,
recommended settings for all patients and all regions of the oral
cavity should be posted next to the x-ray unit control panel for
easy reference.
Anatomical Variations
The dental radiographer should be familiar with anatomical
variations patients may present with. In addition to a shallow
palate, patients may present with bony outgrowths on the palate
and the lingual surfaces of the mandible, called tori.
Tori
Tori (torus, singular) are commonly seen in the oral cavity. A
maxillary torus, called torus palatinus, is a benign outgrowth
of bone along the midline of the hard palate. A mandibular
torus, called torus mandibularis or lingual torus, is a benign
outgrowth of bone along the lingual aspect of the mandible in
the canine-premolar area.
A large torus palatinus or torus mandibularis may interfere
with placement of the image recpetor. Care should be taken when
placing the image receptor in the presence of tori. In addition to
its intrusion into the oral cavity, the oral mucosa covering the
tori can be thin and sensitive. The edge of the image receptor
should not be placed directly on top of the tori, as this would
result in only a partial image of the roots of the teeth. Instead,
the image receptor should be placed on the far side of the torus
(Figure 28-7). When placing the image receptor in the presence
of mandibular tori, place the image receptor between the torus
and the tongue (Figure 28-8). This recommended placement
may prove difficult when bitewing tab holders are used. Positioning the image receptor away from the teeth requires that the
patient bite on the very end of the bitewing tab. To aid with
proper placement in such cases, the bite tab would need to be
lengthened (see Figure 16-7).
The Edentulous Patient
Preventive radiography is often beneficial to the fully and partially edentulous patient because the normal appearance of the
dental ridges may conceal problems underneath. Radiographs
benefit the edentulous patient for the following reasons:
• To detect the presence of retained roots, impacted teeth,
foreign bodies, cysts, and other pathological lesions.
• To establish the position of the mental foramen before constructing dentures.
• To establish the position of the mandibular canal before
implant surgery.
• To determine the condition and extent of alveolar bone
present.
Periapical radiographs may be taken of edentulous areas
using either the paralleling or the bisecting technique with minor
modifications. Normally, the teeth serve as landmarks to guide
354 PATIENT MANAGEMENT AND SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNIQUES
then directed horizontally and vertically toward the center of the
image receptor perpendicular to the mean tangent of the facial
side of the ridge and to the plane of the image receptor.
If parallel placement of the image receptor remains difficult
in an edentulous area, it is better to try using the bisecting technique than to risk taking a poor-quality radiograph that would
need to be retaken. When using the bisecting technique, the
image receptor is placed against the lingual surface of the edentulous ridge. The vertical angulation is determined by bisecting
the angle formed between the recording plane of the image
receptor and an imaginary line through the ridge that substitutes for the long axes of the teeth (Figure 28-11). This position
often results in some dimensional distortion. However, acceptable radiographs can still be produced.
Because the edentulous region is less dense, the amount of
radiation needed to produce an acceptable radiographic image
A
B
Image
receptor
Polystyrene
block
Polystyrene
block
Holder
Holder
Holder
Holder
Image
receptor
Image
receptor
Image
receptor
Cotton
roll
Cotton roll
Cotton roll
Cotton
roll
FIGURE 28-9 Partially edentulous mouth. Cotton rolls or polystyrene blocks can be used to substitute
for missing teeth to help hold the image receptor holder in place. (A) Edentulous mandibular anterior region.
(B) Edentulous maxillary posterior region.
placement of the image receptor. Because these landmarks are
not present in the edentulous patient, one must estimate the best
positions. Additionally, visualizing and establishing horizontal
and vertical planes is more difficult, particularly when the
bisecting technique is used. However, in the totally edentulous
patient a fair amount of leeway in horizontal angulation is permissible because the absence of teeth eliminates the problem of
overlapping tooth images. The focus of interest is no longer the
teeth but the bone structure of the edentulous ridge.
Because it produces the best diagnostic images, the paralleling technique should be the radiographer’s first choice. Radiographic detail is improved and dimensional distortion is
minimized when the image receptor holder can be properly supported with cotton rolls or polystyrene blocks to position the
image receptor parallel to the long axis of the edentulous ridge
(Figures 28-9 and 28-10). The central rays of the x-ray beam are
CHAPTER 28 • SUPPLEMENTAL RADIOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES 355
A
Image receptor
Holder
Polystyrene
block
Cotton roll
B
Image
receptor
Holder
Polystyrene
block
Cotton roll
FIGURE 28-10 Totally edentulous mouth. When all teeth are missing, cotton rolls,
polystyrene blocks, or a combination of both can be used as substitutes for the crowns of the
teeth. These will allow the patient to bite and stabilize the image receptor holder. The
thickness of the cotton rolls or blocks will determine the amount of edentulous ridge recorded.
(A) Maxillary anterior region. (B) Mandibular posterior region.
A
B
Bisector
Bisector
Long axis of
maxillary ridge
Long axis of
mandibular ridge
Vertical direction
of central beam
Vertical direction
of central beam
Tongue
Image receptor
Image receptor
FIGURE 28-11 Illustration of the bisecting technique for an edentulous patient. The
central ray is directed perpendicular to the bisector, an imaginary line estimated to be halfway
between the plane of the image receptor and a line drawn vertically through the ridge to substitute
for the long axes of the teeth. (A) Maxillary edentulous ridge, (B) Mandibular edentulous ridge.
356 PATIENT MANAGEMENT AND SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNIQUES
FIGURE 28-12 Endodontic film holder. (Courtesy of
Dentsply Rinn.)
FIGURE 28-13 Modifying a film holder for use in
endodontic therapy. Removing a portion of this disposable
polystyrene image receptor holder will allow the endodontic
materials placed in the tooth to remain in place during the exposure.
FIGURE 28-14 Rinn Snap-A-Ray image receptor holder.
FIGURE 28-15 Hemostat as a film holder for endodontic
procedures eliminates the need to occlude on on a biteblock.
is less. Exposure settings for edentulous regions should be reduced
by about one-fifth less than the exposure required for an area
where teeth are present.
Endodontic Techniques
Endodontic therapy involves the treatment of the tooth by
removing the nerves and tissues of the pulp cavity and replacing
them with filling material. Successful endodontic therapy or
root canal treatment depends on the use of radiographs. A
series of radiographs on the same tooth is needed to evaluate
various stages of endodontic treatment. The initial radiograph
is exposed to determine the preoperative condition and to
make a diagnosis. Additional radiographs are made as the
work progresses to determine the length of the root; the position
of a reamer, broach, or file in the canal; or the position of the
sealer and point or points (the tooth may have several canals).
And finally, a posttreatment radiograph is needed to make
sure that the canal or canals are closed satisfactorily.
Once again, the paralleling technique is the technique of
choice. Standard periapical radiographic procedures can be
applied in endodontic radiographic exposures; however, there
are some differences. The materials used in endodontic treatment—such as a rubber dam, reamers, broaches, files, or silver
or gutta-percha points—often hinder placement of the image
receptor. The presence of these materials, which must be left in
place during radiographic exposures, makes it impossible for
the patient to bite down on the biteblock of an image receptor
holder to hold it in place. Avoiding distortion and magnification
of the image is a major concern in endodontic treatment
because the length of each canal must be accurately measured.
Therefore the paralleling technique, which consistently produces the least distortion, should be used whenever possible.
Although preoperative and postoperative radiographs are made
in the usual manner, some technique modifications are required
for the working radiographs that are exposed with the rubber
dam and instruments in place.
The ideal image receptor holder is one specifically designed
for exposure of working radiographs (Figure 28-12). Other types
of holders may be modified to accommodate retention of the
image receptor during endodontic therapy (Figure 28-13). However, it may become necessary to use methods of image receptor retention that rely on visual alignment of the PID. Image
receptor holders such as the Rinn Snap-A-Ray (Figure 28-14)
or the employment of a dental instrumental called a hemostat
(Figure 28-15) or a tongue depressor as a custom-made holder
will allow the patient to help stabilize the image receptor in the
correct position (Figure 28-16).
When imaging multirooted teeth, such as the maxillary premolars and molars, the buccal and lingual root canals will often
CHAPTER 28 • SUPPLEMENTAL RADIOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES 357
Hemostat
Image receptor
Long axis of the tooth
Endodontic files
PID
FIGURE 28-16 Hemostat facilitates holding the image
receptor in a parallel position to the long axis of the tooth.
appear superimposed. The ability to separate the buccal and lingual
roots on the image increases the radiograph’s value during
endodontic procedures. The radiographer can accomplish this
through the use of tube head shifting called localization.
Methods of Localization
Radiographs are a two-dimensional picture of three-dimensional objects. To get that third dimension from a radiographic image, the dental radiographer should be skilled in
reading the images. Localization methods help the radiographer determine whether a structure such as a root canal or a
foreign object embedded within the maxilla or mandible is in
front of (facial or buccal) or behind (lingual) the teeth. There
are three methods of localization.
Definitive Evaluation Method
The definitive method of localization is based on the shadow
casting principles explained in Chapter 4. The principle that an
object positioned farther away from the image receptor will be
magnified and less clearly imaged is applied with the definitive
method. Because intraoral image receptor placement positions
the receptor close to the lingual surface of the teeth, those objects
on the lingual are more likely to appear distinctly defined on the
resultant radiograph. Those objects positioned more toward the
buccal or facial surface will be farther away from the image
receptor and therefore are more likely to appear magnified and
less clearly imaged on the resultant radiograph (Figure 28-17).
Although true in principle, the definitive method of localization
is not consistantly reliable.
Right-angle Method
Once identified on a periapical radiograph, a better way to determine whether or not a foreign object or structure, such as an
impacted tooth, is located on the buccal or the lingual is to take
an occlusal radiograph. A cross-sectional occlusal radiograph,
described in Chapter 17, places the image receptor at a right
angle to the tooth. In this position the occlusal radiograph will
image the object clearly on the buccal or lingual (Figure 28-18).
Tube Shift Method (Buccal-object Rule)
The tube shift method, also called the buccal-object rule, is the
most versatile method of localization. To apply the tube shift
method, two radiographs are needed. The two radiographs must
have been exposed using either a different horizontal or a different
vertical angulation. If a full mouth series of periapicals or a
complete set of bitewing radiographs, or a combination of both,
are available and the object in question is imaged in more than
one radiograph, it is possible to apply the tube shift method
when reading the radiographs to determine the buccal or lingual
location of the object.
The principle behind the tube shift method is that if the
structure or object in question appears to have moved in the
same direction as the horizontal (Figure 28-19) or vertical
(Figure 28-20) shift of the tube, then the structure or object is
located on the lingual. Conversely, if the move is in the opposite direction of the shift of the tube, the structure or object is
located on the buccal or facial. The tube shift method is
summarized as the SLOB Rule, which stands for same on
lingual–opposite on buccal.
Disto-oblique Periapical Radiographs
Shifting the tube (the PID and tube head) has another useful application. Disto-oblique periapical radiographs utilize a tube shift
to help image posterior objects such as impacted third molars,
especially when the patient cannot tolerate posterior image receptor placement. Standard vertical and horizontal angulation utilized when exposing periapicals may be altered slightly (no more
than 15 degrees) to project posterior objects forward or anteriorly
onto the image receptor (Procedure Box 28-1).
FIGURE 28-17 Definitive method of localization. Note the
barely visible supernumerary (extra) root on this first molar.
Applying the definitive method of localization, it is most likely a
buccal root. The buccal position would place this root a greater
distance away from the image receptor, resulting in its magnified and
less distinctly defined appearance.
358
A
B
C
PID
PID
PID
FIGURE 28-19 Horizontal tube shift. (A) In the original
radiograph, buccal and lingual objects are superimposed. (B) When
the tube head is moved distally, the buccal object appears to move
mesially, whereas the lingual object appears to move distally. (C)
When the tube head is moved mesially, the buccal object appears to
move distally, whereas the lingual object appears to move mesially.
A
B
C
PID
PID
PID
FIGURE 28-20 Vertical tube shift. (A) In the original
radiograph, buccal and lingual objects are superimposed. (B) When
the tube head is moved superiorly, the buccal object appears to move
inferiorally, whereas the lingual object appears to move superiorly.
(C) When the tube head is moved inferiorly, the buccal object appears
to move superiorly, whereas the lingual object appears to have moved
inferiorally.
A B
FIGURE 28-18 Right angle method of localization. (A) A foreign object appears in the periodontal pocket between the
second premolar and the first molar. It is impossible to tell from this periapical radiograph whether the object is located toward
the buccal or the lingual. (B) The occlusal radiograph, placed at a right angle position to the tooth, clearly images the object on
the buccal side of the pocket.
CHAPTER 28 • SUPPLEMENTAL RADIOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES 359
PROCEDURE 28-1
Disto-oblique periapical radiographs
1. Perform infection control procedures (see Procedure 10-2).
2. Prepare unit, patient, and supplies needed according to the procedure for exposing periapical radiographs (see Procedure 13-1).
3. Place the image receptor into the holding device. (If using film, place such that the embossed dot will be
positioned toward the occlusal/incisal edge–dot in the slot).
Maxillary Disto-oblique Periapical Radiographs
1. Position the image receptor and align the horizontal and vertical angulations for a standard maxillary
molar periapical radiograph.
2. From this standard alignment, shift the tubehead and PID to direct the central rays of the x-ray beam to
intersect the image receptor obliquely from the distal by 10 degrees.
3. Increase the vertical angulation by 5 degrees.
4. Check that the image receptor is centered in the middle of the x-ray beam.
5. Increase the recommended exposure setting for the standard periapical radiograph to the next higher
impulse or timer setting.
Mandibular Periapical Radiograph
1. Position the image receptor and align the horizontal and vertical angulations for a standard mandibular
molar periapical radiograph.
2. From this standard alignment shift the tube to direct the central rays of the x-ray beam to intersect the
image receptor obliquely from the distal by 10 degrees.
3. Check that the image receptor is centered in the middle of the x-ray beam.
4. No change is made to the standard vertical angulation.
5. No change is made to the standard recommended exposure setting.
FIGURE 28-21 Disto-oblique periapical technique. The
horizontal angulation is shifted 10 degrees from the distal, and the
vertical angulation is increased 5 degrees.
For example, if an impacted third molar is positioned so far
posterior in the oral cavity that the standard image receptor
placement is not likely to record it, the PID and tube head can
be moved to project the impacted tooth forward onto the image
receptor (Figure 28-21). By directing the x-ray beam mesially,
the posterior object will be projected anteriorly. Because the
central rays will intersect the plane of the image receptor at an
oblique angle, there will be slight overlap and distortion of the
image (Figure 28-22). However, the focus of disto-oblique
periapical radiographs is on recording an object or structure
that may not be in standard periapical radiographs, so this distortion is tolerated.
The maxillary disto-oblique periapical radiograph requires
three changes to the standard maxillary molar periapical
radiograph. The first and most important step is to shift the
horizontal angulation so that the posterior object will be projected forward. Second is to increase the vertical angulation.
360 PATIENT MANAGEMENT AND SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNIQUES
Most impactions, or foreign objects in the posterior region of
the maxilla, will be located farther superior than the erupted
teeth. As discussed at the beginning of this chapter, increasing
the vertical angulation will increase the periapical coverage
of the image. And finally, the exposure setting for a maxillary
disto-oblique radiograph must be increased to the next higher
timer setting. The oblique angle of the x-ray beam will
require a longer passage through the patient’s tissues. The
increased vertical angulation will most likely direct the x-ray
beam through the zygomatic arch. These two changes, in the
horizontal and the vertical angulations, necessitate more
radiation to produce adequate radiographic image density.
The mandibular disto-oblique periapical radiograph
requires only the change to the horizontal angulation, to project the impaction or object forward. Most impactions of the
posterior mandible will be located at the level of, or higher
than, the erupted teeth so no change is required in the vertical
angulation. There are no thick bony structures, like the
zygoma, to penetrate, so the exposure time does not have to be
increased.
Film Duplicating Procedure
Original radiographs should remain a part of the patient’s permanent record, so there are times when a duplicate radiograph
is needed. These include copies for third-party payment (insurance companies), when referring the patient to a specialist,
when the patient changes dentists or moves, for consultations
with other professionals, for publications in professional journals or for use in professional study clubs, to accompany biopsies of pathological conditions, and for evidence in legal cases.
A duplicate radiograph is an identical copy of the original
radiograph and may be obtained through the use of two-film
intraoral film packets. If a double film packet is not available
or the film is an extraoral film, the use of a film duplicator will
produce a copy of the original radiograph. Radiographs can be
duplicated as often as necessary without additional patient
exposure.
Equipment
Duplicating radiographs requires duplicating film and a
duplicator.
DUPLICATING FILM Duplicating film is available in sheet
form in a variety of sizes. The film is emulsion-coated on one
side only. Under a safelight, the emulsion side looks dull or
lighter, whereas the side without the emulsion coating looks
shiny or darker (see Chapter 7). It is possible to duplicate either
a single radiograph or a full mouth series at a single printing.
FILM DUPLICATOR A film duplicator is a device that provides a diffused light source (usually ultraviolet) that evenly
exposes the duplicating film. There are different size film
duplicator models available commercially (Figure 28-23).
Large duplicators accommodate all film sizes, whereas
small duplicators may be used only for #2 film and smaller
(Figure 28-24).
PROCEDURES FOR FILM DUPLICATION Flm duplicators come
with manufacturer’s instructions for use. All duplication must be
done in the darkroom under a safelight (Procedure Box 28-2).
FIGURE 28-23 Radiograph duplicating machines. Contain a
built-in ultraviolet fluorescent light source and a timer to permit
variations in density. These x-ray film duplicators accommodate
duplication of multiple films at a time, with room for a full mouth
series, or a panoramic radiograph. (Courtesy of Densply Rinn.)
FIGURE 28-24 Small radiograph duplicator accommodates
film sizes #0, #1, and #2.
FIGURE 28-22 Comparision of standard and disto-oblique
periapical radiographs. (A) Standard periapical radiograph images
a portion of the impacted third molar. (B) Disto-oblique periapical
radiograph images more of the impacted third molar. Note that
shifting the tube horizontally causes overlap error, and shifting the
tube head vertically causes the crowns to be cut off the the image.
PROCEDURE 28-2
Film duplication
CHAPTER 28 • SUPPLEMENTAL RADIOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES 361
1. Select radiographs for duplication (referrals, third-party payment, consultations).
2. Prepare duplicator. Raise cover and wipe glass surface with glass cleaner if necessary.
3. Place duplicator mode switch in the VIEW position to turn on the view box as necessary to arrange original
radiographs into position for duplicating.
4. Remove the original radiographs from the film mounts prior to duplication. (Leaving the original radiographs
in the film mount will prevent close contact between the originals and the duplicating film, resulting in the
fuzzy appearance of the duplicate radiograph.)
5. Place original radiographs on the duplicator glass surface with the embossed dots concave (dimple). Placing the “down dot” on the duplicator surface will allow for close contact between the original radiographs
and the duplicating films.
6. Place the radiographs near the L or R on the duplicator glass surface to identify the left or right sides
respectively on the duplicate images.
7. Turn the duplicator mode switch to the DUPLICATE position to turn off the view box light. Be sure to turn
off this view box light prior to opening the box of duplicating film.
8. Set the timer to the desired exposure time. See the manufacturer’s recommendations. If a darker duplicate
is desired, decrease the exposure time; if a lighter duplicate is desired, increase the exposure time. (Increasing and decreasing the exposure time from the duplicator light has the opposite effect on the resulting
image than increasing and decreasing the x-ray exposure.)
9. Obtain a box of duplicating film.
10. Under safelight conditions, remove a sheet of duplicating film from the box. When duplicating individual
films, use scissors to cut duplicating film to the approximate size needed.
11. Place the duplicating film emulsion (light) side down on top of the originals.
12. Close the duplicator cover and secure the latch tightly. (Failure to secure the latch will result in a loss of contact between the originals and the duplicating film, resulting in the fuzzy appearance of the duplicate image.)
13. Depress the exposure button to activate exposure.
14. When the indicator light goes off at the end of exposure cycle, unlatch and raise the cover, remove the
duplicating film, and process the duplicating film either automatically or manually.
15. Remount the original radiographs and return to the patient’s permanent record.
16. Clean the darkroom and replace materials.
17. When the duplicate film exits the processor, label it with the patient’s name, date, and any other information necessary. Ensure that the right and left sides of the image are identified appropriately.
REVIEW—Chapter summary
Anatomical conditions such as malaligned or crowded teeth, a
shallow palatal vault, the presence of tori, and endentulous
regions may require alterations in radiographic technique. A
skilled radiographer can apply acceptable variations in aligning
the horizontal and vertical angulations and still produce diagnostic quality radiographs. The radiographer should possess the
skills necessary to evaluate image receptor placement for correctness, align horizontal and vertical angluations, and determine points of entry when using an image receptor holder with
and without an external aiming device.
Exposure times should be adjusted based on the patient’s
characteristics and the area of the oral cavity to be imaged.
Edentulous regions require one-fifth the dose of radiation
required in regions with teeth present. The paralleling technique is preferred, however, periapical radiographs may be
exposed in edentulous regions using the paralleling or the
bisecting technique. Cotton rolls and/or polystyrene blocks
may be used to help stabilize the image receptor to a position
parallel to the edentulous ridge.
362 PATIENT MANAGEMENT AND SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNIQUES
Image receptor holders are available commercially or may
be altered by the radiographer to produce working radiographs
during endodontic therapy.
Localization methods add a third dimension to two-dimensional radiographs. Definitive method is the least reliable
method of localization. The right angle method of localization
uses a periapical radiograph and a cross-sectional occlusal
radiograph. With the tube shift method of localization, the
object in question is located on the lingual if it moves in the
same direction as the horizontal or vertical shift of the tube
and on the buccal if it moves in the opposite direction as the
horizontal or vertical shift of the tube. The tube shift method,
or buccal object rule, is summarized as the SLOB (same on
lingual–opposite on buccal) rule.
Disto-oblique periapical radiographs are useful when the
patient cannot tolerate posterior placement of the image receptor. Disto-oblique periapical radiographs allow the radiographer to shift the PID and tube head to project posterior objects
and structures anteriorly onto the image receptor.
Copies of radiographs are used to send to insurance companies or to another oral health care practice; for use in referrals, consultations with other professionals, or publication in
professional journals; or when needed in litigation. Duplicate
radiographs are made using a commercially made duplicator
and special duplicating film.
RECALL—Study questions
1. To help avoid molar overlap, the radiographer should
place the image receptor
a. parallel to the buccal surfaces of the molars.
b. perpendicular to the buccal surfaces of the molars.
c. parallel to the molar embrasures.
d. perpendicular to the molar embrasures.
2. To minimize canine-premolar overlap, the radiographer
should direct the x-ray beam toward the image receptor
slightly obliquely from the
a. mesial.
b. distal.
c. occlusal.
d. apical.
3. To compensate for a shallow palatal vault, the vertical
angulation may be adjusted to
a. increase by up to15 degrees.
b. decrease by up to 15 degrees.
c. increase by up to 25 degrees.
d. decrease by up to 25 degrees.
4. Which area of the oral cavity would require the highest
exposure setting?
a. Maxillary anterior region
b. Maxillary posterior region
c. Mandibular anterior region
d. Mandibular posterior region
5. The presence of a large mandibular torus may make
which of these difficult?
a. Aligning the correct horizontal angulation
b. Determining the accurate vertical angulation
c. Placing the image receptor precisely
d. Directing the central ray of the x-ray beam at the
center of the image receptor
6. The best image receptor placement for a patient with a
torus palatinus is
a. between the torus and the tongue.
b. on the top of the torus.
c. near the front of the torus.
d. behind the torus.
7. The paralleling technique is the best technique for
imaging edentulous areas.
The bisecting technique is the best technique when
imaging endodontic treatment.
a. The first statement is true. The second statement is
false.
b. The first statement is false. The second statement is
true.
c. Both statements are true.
d. Both statements are false.
8. Which of the following radiographs would be the least
beneficial for the totally edentulous patient?
a. Bitewing
b. Periapical
c. Panoramic
d. Occlusal
9. The exposure setting for edentulous regions should be
decreased from the exposure time for the same region
with teeth by
a. one-half.
b. one-third.
c. one-fourth.
d. one-fifth.
10. Which of the following would be the BEST image
receptor holder for exposing working radiographs during a root canal procedure?
a. Rinn XCP
b. Rinn Snap-A-Ray
c. Commercially made endodontic holder
d. Polystyrene block
11. Localization adds which of the following dimensions to
two-dimensional radiographs?
a. Anterior-posterior
b. Buccal-lingual
c. Mesial-distal
d. Inferior-superior
12. Which of the following methods of localization utilizes
a cross-sectional occlusal radiograph?
a. Definitive method
b. Right-angle method
c. Tube shift method
d. Buccal-object rule
R
R
CHAPTER 28 • SUPPLEMENTAL RADIOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES 363
13. If the tube shifts to the mesial and the object in question
shifts to the distal, the object is located on the lingual.
This is an example of the definitive method of localization.
a. The first statement is true. The second statement is
false.
b. The first statement is false. The second statement is
true.
c. Both statements are true.
d. Both statements are false.
14. When exposing a disto-oblique periapical radiograph of
the maxilla, which of the following changes should be
made to the standard periapical radiograph?
a. 5-degree shift in the vertical angulation
b. 10-degree shift in the horizontal angulation
c. An increase in the time/implulse setting
d. All of the above
15. To project an impacted mandibular third molar anteriorly onto the image receptor, a mandibular disto-oblique
periapical radiograph requires a
a. 5-degree shift in the vertical angulation.
b. 10-degree shift in the horizontal angulation.
c. An increase in the time/implulse setting.
d. All of the above.
16. List four reasons to duplicate radiographs.
a. ______________
b. ______________
c. ______________
d. ______________
REFLECT—Case study
A patient has presented at your practice today for a consult
regarding extensive dental work. This patient has several areas
of missing teeth and has expressed an interest in dentures. The
dentist has prescribed a full mouth series of radiographs, and
you are preparing to take the exposures. After performing a cursory exam of the patient’s oral cavity, you note the following:
Several missing and/or broken down teeth
Malaligned and crowded teeth
Partially erupted third molars
Large torus palatinus and bilateral torus mandibularis
A shallow palatal vault
Consider the following and write out your answers:
1. Describe the alterations in technique you will apply to
obtain radiographs in the edentulous areas.
2. Describe the alterations in technique you will apply to
avoid overlap error in the areas of malaligned and
crowded teeth.
3. Identify and describe the technique you will use to best
image the partially erupted third molars.
4. Describe the problems you anticipate facing with the
presence of large tori and a shallow palatal vault.
5. Identify alterations in techniques that will help you
overcome these obstacles.
6. If broken root tips or other foreign objects are identified
on the radiographs, describe how the interpretation of
these can reveal whether or not the objects in question
are located on the buccal or the lingual.
7. Describe other methods of localization that can aid in
making this determination.
8. Identify reasons why this patient’s radiographs may
need to be duplicated.
RELATE—Laboratory application
For a comprehensive laboratory practice exercise on this topic,
see Thomson, E. M. (2012). Exercises in oral radiography
techniques: A laboratory manual (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Pearson Education. Chapter 11, “Supplemental
Radiographic Techniques and Tips”
REFERENCES
Del Rio, C. E., Canales, M. L., & Preece, J. W. (1982).
Radiographic technique for endodontics. San Antonio:
University of Texas Health Science Center.
Rinn Corporation. (1983). Intraoral radiography with Rinn
XCP/BAS instruments. Elgin, IL: Dentsply/Rinn
Corporation.
Thomson, E. M. (2010). Exercises in oral radiography techniques: A laboratory manual (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Pearson Education.
OBJECTIVES
Following successful completion of this chapter you should be able to:
1. Define the key words.
2. Describe the purpose and use of extraoral radiographs.
3. List seven extraoral radiographs that contribute to the treatment of dental patients.
4. Explain the need for proper extraoral film handling.
5. Explain the role intensifying screens play in producing a radiographic image.
6. Match blue- and green-light sensitive film with the appropriate intensifying screen.
7. Explain the role of the extraoral film cassette.
8. Describe how extraoral radiographs are labeled.
9. Explain the need for proper care and cleaning of cassettes and intensifying screens.
10. Explain the role grids play in extraoral radiography.
11. Explain tomography and describe its role in oral health care.
12. Explain cone beam computed tomography and describe its role in oral health care.
KEY WORDS
Ankylosis
Artifacts
Calcium tungstate
Cassette
Cephalostat
Computed tomography (CT)
Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)
Cone beam volumetric imaging (CBVI)
Grid
Intensifying screens
Lateral cephalometric radiograph
(lateral skull)
Lateral jaw radiograph (mandibular
oblique lateral)
Maxillofacial
Occult disease
Panoramic radiograph
Phosphors
Pixel (picture element)
Posteroanterior (PA) cephalometric
radiograph
Rare-earth phosphors
Reverse Towne radiograph
Screen film
Extraoral Radiography
and Alternate Imaging
Modalities
PART IX • EXTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
CHAPTER
29
CHAPTER
OUTLINE
 Objectives 364
 Key Words 364
 Introduction 365
 Purpose and Use
of Extraoral
Imaging
Modalities 365
 Extraoral
Radiographs
Useful in Oral
Health Care 365
 Extraoral Image
Receptors 366
 Grids 371
 Exposure Factors 371
 Tomography,
Computed
Tomography,
Cone Beam
Computed
Tomography 372
 Review, Recall,
Reflect, Relate 374
 References 376
KEY WORDS
CHAPTER 29 • EXTRAORAL RADIOGRAPHY AND ALTERNATE IMAGING MODALITIES 365
Submentovertex radiograph
Temporomandibular disorder (TMD)
Temporomandibular joint (TMJ)
Tomograph
Tomography
Transcranial radiograph (TMJ)
Voxel (volume element)
Waters radiograph
Introduction
Extraoral radiographs and alternate imaging modalities such as
computed tomography record large areas of the dental arches,
supporting facial structures, and skull using image receptors
that are positioned outside the mouth. Most of these extraoral
imaging techniques require special equipment not readily
available in the general practice dental office (Figure 29-1).
Even though dental assistants and hygienists may not routinely
perform these services, a base knowledge in types of extraoral
radiographs and alternate imaging modalities; an understanding
of what conditions will most likely benefit from which type of
examination; and the ability to recognize the different images
are valuable skills. Patients may need to be referred to an oral
surgeon or to a medical imaging center for examination of a
condition affecting the maxillofacial region. The dental assistant
and dental hygienist may be called on to educate the patient
regarding the procedure or may need to assist with scheduling
the patient’s appointment for the referral. Oral radiographers
should be able to communicate professionally with other health
care professionals.
The purpose of this chapter is to provide an overview of the
types of extraoral radiographs that contribute to the treatment of
dental patients and identify the equipment and image receptors
required and to introduce cutting-edge alternate imaging modalities
that have developed from digital and computer technological
advances.
Figure 29-1 A combination panoramic and cephalometric
dental x-ray unit. (Courtesy of Planmeca.)
Purpose and Use of Extraoral Imaging
Modalities
The purpose of extraoral imaging modalities is to examine structures of the oral cavity and the maxillofacial region that includes
the maxilla and mandible, the facial bones and sinuses, and the
temporomandibular joint. Extraoral radiographs are used to
• Examine large areas of the dental arches and skull
• Study growth and development of bone and teeth
• Detect fractures and evaluate trauma
• Detect pathological lesions and diseases of the jaws
• Detect and evaluate impacted teeth
• Evaluate temporomandibular disorder (TMD)
• Plan treatment for dental implants and prosthetic appliances
Extraoral radiographs may also be substituted for intraoral
radiographs when patients cannot or will not open the mouth.
Handicapped patients or patients with trismus or TMD may not
be able to tolerate the placement of intraoral image receptor.
Extraoral radiographs can be used alone or in conjunction with
intraoral radiographs. For example, it is common to expose both
a panoramic radiograph (see Chapter 30) and intraoral bitewing
radiographs on the same patient.
The general practitioner is most likely to limit the use of
extraoral radiographs to panoramic imaging, discussed in detail in
Chapter 30. The practitioner who specializes in dental implants
will increasingly rely on cone beam computed tomography,
introduced later in this chapter. Othodontists, prosthodontists,
and oral surgeons are more frequent users of extraoral imaging
modalities for diagnosing and treating conditions of the oral cavity
and head and facial regions.
• Orthodontists use facial profile radiographs, produced with
cephalostat headplates (“cephalometric,” meaning measuring
the head) to record, measure, and compare changes in growth
and development of the bones and the teeth.
• Prosthodontists use facial profile radiographs to record the
contour of the lips and face and the relationship of the teeth
before removal to help in constructing prosthetic appliances
that look natural (Figure 29-2).
• Oral surgeons use extraoral radiographs extensively to evaluate trauma, to determine the location and extent of fractures;
to locate impacted teeth, abnormalities, and malignancies;
and to evaluate injuries to the temporomandibular joint.
Extraoral Radiographs Useful in Oral
Health Care
There are many techniques for exposing radiographs of the oral
cavity and the maxillofacial region. It is not within the scope of
this book to describe every available technique. The seven
366 EXTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
projections presented in Table 29-1 are the most common extraoral radiographs in which the x-ray source and the image receptor
remain still and in position during exposure. The panoramic
radiograph, which requires movement of the x-ray source and
the image receptor during exposure, is discussed in Chapter 30.
Extraoral Image Receptors
Traditional Film
To produce a diagnostic quality radiograph while maintaining a
low radiation dose for the patient, extraoral screen film (see
Chapter 7) must be used in conjunction with a pair of intensifying
screens housed within a light-tight cassette. Because they are
extremely light sensitive and not packaged in a protective sealed
wrapper like intraoral films, extraoral films must be carefully
loaded into a cassette under darkroom safelight illumination
(Figure 29-3 and Procedure Box 29-1).
Extraoral films are generally packaged 25, 50, or 100 to a
box, so care should be taken to ensure that overhead white light
is turned off when removing the box cover. Darkroom safelight
filter color and bulb wattage must be appropriate for use with
extraoral film (see Chapter 8). Because extraoral film is more
sensitive than intraoral film, filters that are safe for intraoral film
handling may not be safe for extraoral film handling. The type of
safelight required for extraoral film can usually be found written
on the film package or by checking with the manufacturer.
Extraoral films should be removed from the box with clean,
dry hands. Latex or vinyl treatment gloves should be avoided.
Treatment gloves and plastic overgloves increase the risk of generating static electricity. A static charge results in a white light spark
that will expose the film, leaving radiolucent artifacts (black lines
or smudges) on the resultant image (Figure 29-6). Glove powder
residue on films will also cause radiolucent artifacts.
Handle films by the edges only. Remove each sheet of film
from the box slowly to avoid generating static electricity that
will create artifacts on the films inside the box as well as the
FIGURE 29-3 Loading film into a flexible cassette under
safelight conditions.
FIGURE 29-2 Cephalometric
radiograph produced with a filter
placed between the tube and patient to
remove some of the x-rays to record
outlines of the soft tissue profile.
TABLE 29-1 Extraoral Radiographs of the Maxillofacial Region
TYPE OF
RADIOGRAPH AREA OF INTEREST PURPOSE POSITIONING
Lateral jaw
(mandibular oblique
lateral)
Body or ramus of
mandible; coronoid
process; condyle
To examine posterior region of the
mandible, third molars, especially
when panoramic machine not
available; when children or
patients who have fractures or
swelling are unable to tolerate
placement or hold intraoral image
receptor in place
Lateral
cephalometric (lateral skull)
Entire skull from the
side (lateral); sinus
cavities
Prior to orthodontic intervention, at
various stages of treatment, on completion of treatment; to evaluate
growth/development, trauma,
pathology, developmental abnormalities; can reveal facial soft tissue
profile when a filter is placed
between the tube and patient to
remove some of the x-rays; to establish pre-/posttreatment records
Posteroanteri
or (PA)
cephalometric
(posterior
skull)
Entire skull in the posteroanterior plane;
orbit; frontal sinus
To examine facial growth/development, disease, trauma, developmental abnormalities. Used to
supplement lateral survey because
the right and left sides of the facial
structures are not superimposed on
each other
Waters Middle third of the
face to include
zygoma, coronoid
process, sinuses
To evaluate maxillary, frontal, ethmoid
sinuses
CHAPTER 29 • EXTRAORAL RADIOGRAPHY AND ALTERNATE IMAGING MODALITIES 367
Central
ray
X-ray
beam
Image receptor
Central
ray
X-ray
beam
Image receptor
Image
receptor
Tip of nose from image receptor 3
4

Central
ray
X-ray
beam
Sagittal plane
Central ray
Image
receptor
(Continued)
368 EXTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
one being removed. Try to place the film into the cassette without sliding it across the intensifying screens, again to prevent a
static discharge. Film should be loaded into the cassette just
prior to use. Storing film inside cassettes may increase the likelihood of generating artifacts. Only one film should be loaded
into the cassette at a time unless special film made for exposing
two films at once is used.
Intensifying Screens
Intensifying screens transfer x-ray energy into visible light.
This visible light, in turn, exposes the film. The image produced
on an extraoral film results from exposure to this fluorescent
light instead of directly from the x-rays. As the name implies,
intensifying screens “intensify” the effect of x-rays on film. The
use of intensifying screens allows the amount of radiation
required to expose the film to be reduced and therefore reduces
the amount of radiation the patient is exposed to.
Intensifying screens work in pairs. An intensifying screen is
a smooth cardboard or plastic sheet coated with minute fluorescent
crystals mixed into a suitable binding medium. Intensifying
screens are based on the principle that crystals of certain salts—
calcium tungstate, barium strontium sulfate, or rare-earth
phosphors [lanthanum (La) and gadolinium (Gd)]—will
fluoresce and emit energy in the form of blue or green light when
they absorb x-rays. Each of these fluorescent crystals, also called
phosphors, gives off blue or green light that varies in intensity
TABLE 29-1 (Continued)
TYPE OF
RADIOGRAPH AREA OF INTEREST PURPOSE POSITIONING
Reverse Towne Condyles To examine fractures of the condylar
neck
Submentovertex
Base of the skull;
condyles; sphenoid
sinus; zygoma
To evaluate the position/orientation of
the condyles; fractures of the zygomatic arch
Transcranial Head of condyle; glenoid fossa; temporal
bone; temporomandibular joint in
open, closed and at
rest positions
Aids in diagnosing ankylosis (a stiffening of the temporomandibular
joint); malignancies, fractures, and
tissue changes caused by arthritis
[[C ch29unfig07]][[E ch29unfig07]] Mouth open,
head tipped down
Image
receptor
Central
ray
X-ray
beam
Floor
Frankfort line
Image
receptor
X-ray
beam
Central
ray
Image receptor
Central ray
25°
Sagittal plane
1. Obtain the cassette and box of film. Ensure that the film sensitivity matches the intensifying screens used.
2. Open the cassette and inspect to ensure that the hinge and snaps are working. Examine the intensifying screens
for debris or scratches. Clean with solution recommended by the manufacturer if necessary.
3. Turn off overhead white light and turn on safelight.
4. Open the package containing the film and slowly pull out one film.
5. Handle the film by the edges only with clean, dry hands. Place film inside cassette (rigid) (Figure 29-4). When loading film into a flexible plastic sleeve cassette, pull the screens part way out of the cassette to separate the pair. Slowly
slide the film between the folded screens (Figure 29-5). Make sure that the film is seated all the way down to the
fold in the screen.
6. Close the cassette and ensure that the hinge is secured (rigid). Close the snaps or Velcro® closures on the flexible
cassette. When the cassette is not tightly closed, the film and screen contact is not tight, and it causes the radiograph to be blurry.
7. Replace the cover on the film box to protect from white light.
8. Turn on the overhead white light and exit the darkroom.
CHAPTER 29 • EXTRAORAL RADIOGRAPHY AND ALTERNATE IMAGING MODALITIES 369
FIGURE 29-4 Loading a rigid cassette. FIGURE 29-5 Film is placed between the
intensifying screens.
FIGURE 29-6 Static electricity artifacts. Blank area on a panoramic film showing static electricity artifacts.
PROCEDURE 29-1
Loading an extraoral cassette
370 EXTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
according to the x-rays in that part of the image. Screen film is
more sensitive to this type of fluorescent light than to radiation.
When the film is sandwiched tightly between a pair of two
intensifying screens, the x-rays cause the crystals on the screens
to fluoresce and return the emitted light to the film emulsion to
produce the radiographic image (Figure 29-7).
Rare earth screens emit green light when energized by x-rays
and must be paired with green-light–sensitive film. Calcium
tungstate screens give off a blue to violet fluorescent light and
must be paired with blue-light–sensitive film. Inappropriately
interchanging green- or blue-light–sensitive films between calcium tungstate and rare earth screens produces undiagnostic
radiographic images.
The use of intensifying screens decreases the amount of radiation required to produce an image. However, the sharpness of
the radiographic image also is reduced over the images produced
on intraoral films. The sensitivity and image sharpness of different types of intensifying screens varies and depends on the:
• Size of the crystals. The larger the crystal size, the less
radiation required to produce an image. Larger crystals
produce a less sharp image.
• Thickness of the emulsion. The thicker the emulsion, the
faster the speed of the screen, requiring less radiation to produce an image. Thicker emulsion results in a less sharp image.
• Type of phosphor used. Rare earth screens produce a
latent image on the film with less radiation exposure than
calcium tungstate screens.
Although varying speeds of screens are available, the
American Dental Association and the American Association of
Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology recommend that the fastest
speed screen–film combination be used to reduce the amount of
radiation exposure to the patient. While reducing the radiation
required to produce an image, a large crystal size and a thick
emulsion will produce a less sharp radiographic image. The slight
reduction in image clarity produced by fast speed screen–film
combinations is considered acceptable to reduce the radiation
dose to the patient.
Cassettes
The purpose of the cassette is to hold the intensifying screens
in close contact with the film and to protect the film from white
light exposure. Cassettes are available in a variety of shapes
and sizes, depending on the intended use. Cassettes are available as a rigid box or case that may be flat or curved. Rigid
cassettes are usually or
A typical rigid cassette has a front and back
cover joined together with a hinge (Figure 29-8). The front
cover is constructed of plastic to permit the passage of the x-ray
120 * 25 cm2.
5 * 7 in. 113 * 18 cm2 8 * 10 in.
Cassette front (plastic)
X-ray film
Screen support
Screen support
Front screen (fluorescent coating)
Back screen (fluorescent coating)
Cassette back (metal)
Felt padding
Screen
Screen
Film
A
B
C
FIGURE 29-7 Cross-section of cassette showing the effect of x-ray and
fluorescent light on the film. X-ray A strikes a crystal in the screen behind the
film, producing light that then forms latent images in the silver halide crystal of the
film. X-ray B strikes a silver halide crystal in the film, forming a latent image.
X-ray C strikes a crystal in the screen in front of the film, producing light, which
then forms latent images in the silver halide crystals of the film.
FIGURE 29-8 The back side of three rigid cassettes
of various sizes.
CHAPTER 29 • EXTRAORAL RADIOGRAPHY AND ALTERNATE IMAGING MODALITIES 371
beam and must be positioned so that it faces the patient. The
back cover is constructed of heavy metal to absorb remnant
x-rays. A pair of intensifying screens lines the inside of the
front and back covers of the cassette.
Flexible plastic sleeve cassettes are most often used for
exposing panoramic radiographs (see Figure 30-11). Flexible
cassettes measure 5 or and are
composed of a plastic sleeve with intensifying screens inside.
The paired intensifying screens are usually joined together at one
end, so that a film may be inserted in between (Figure 29-5).
Snaps or Velcro® closures seal the cassette to prevent white
light from leaking in.
Film Identification
Extraoral films do not have the embossed identification dot that
intraoral films have to aid in identifying the left and right sides of
the image. Extraoral films are best identified by fastening an
identification letter or plate to one of the corners of the front of
the cassette. Special lettering sets, made of lead, are available for
this purpose. The letters R (for right) and L (for left) can be placed
on the front of the cassette prior to exposure. These identifications become visible on the processed radiograph. Identification
plates can be used to record the patient’s name and date of exposure directly onto the radiograph. Commercial film identification
imprinters are available that permanently image pertinent data on
the processed radiograph (Figure 29-9).
Care of Cassettes and Intensifying Screens
Extraoral cassettes and intensifying screens should be
inspected periodically. Rigid and flexible cassette hinges and
snaps should be checked to ensure light tightness to prevent
film fog. Cassettes should be checked for warping to ensure
close screen–film contact. Poor screen–film contact results in
an image of reduced sharpness (blurry image). Defective cassettes should be repaired or replaced.
Intensifying screens should be examined for cleanliness
and scratches. Debris present on the screens will block the light
given off by the crystals and result in radiopaque artifacts on the
resultant radiographic image. Screens may be carefully cleaned
6 * 12 in. 113 or 15 * 30 cm2
as needed with solutions recommended by the manufacturer.
However, overuse of chemical cleaning may cause scratches and
should be avoided. A scratched or damaged screen will not produce the light needed to expose the film and will result in
radiopaque artifacts.
Grids
Grids are sometimes used in extraoral radiography to absorb
scattered x-rays that contribute to film fog that reduces image
contrast (Figure 29-10). Radiation that strikes the patient’s tissues has the potential to be deflected back toward the film,
reexposing it. A grid is a mechanical device composed of thin
strips of lead alternating with a radiolucent material (usually
plastic). The grid is placed between the patient and the film to
absorb scattered x-rays and reduce film fog to improve image
contrast. However, the use of a grid requires an increased dose
of radiation, usually double the dose of radiation required when
not using a grid. The use of a grid with its increased radiation
dose to the patient must be carefully weighed against the diagnostic benefits. For example, when exposing radiographs to
assess growth and development, a grid may be contraindicated.
However, when evaluating the extent of a tumor, the increased
image contrast obtained by using a grid may be justified.
Exposure Factors
The exposure factors for extraoral techniques vary considerably.
The settings depend largely on the intensifying screen–film
combination, which plays a similar role to intraoral film speed
in determining appropriate exposure settings and the use of digital extraoral radiographic equipment. The patient’s size and tissue density and the target–image receptor distance also must be
considered. Refer to the x-ray equipment and film and screen
manufacturers’ recommendations to determine appropriate mA,
kVp, and impulse settings.
FIGURE 29-9 Film identification printer for imprinting
permanent identification information on the radiographic image.
Film
X-ray
beam
Grid
radiolucent material
lead strips
FIGURE 29-10 Grid used to absorb back scattered radiation
is placed between the patient and the film to absorb scattered x-rays
to reduce film fog.
372 EXTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
Tomography, Computed Tomography,
Cone Beam Computed Tomography
Radiographs are taken with a stationary x-ray source and
image receptor. Structures such as the teeth and the supporting bone that lie along the same path travelled by the x-ray
beam will be superimposed on the radiograph, limiting radiographs to distinctly separate structures. In addition, there
are oral conditions, such as the need for an orthodontic evaluation or implant dentistry when the diagnosis and treatment
planning would be enhanced by three-dimensional imaging.
Tomography is a special radiographic technique that uses
simultaneous movement of the x-ray source and the image
receptor to record images of structures located within a
selected plane of tissue, while blurring structures outside the
selected plane. Tomography produces images by utilizing a
narrow beam of x-rays to image a curved layer or slice of tissue. Tomography has been a valuable tool in imaging the
temporomandibular joint (TMJ) (Figure 29-11). Panoramic
radiography, discussed in Chapter 30, is also based on
tomography. In fact, panoramic x-ray machines are available
with multiple functions, allowing the operator to produce not
only panoramic radiographs, but TMJ tomographs as well
(Figure 29-12).
With digital technological advances, modern-day tomography now uses complex computer systems and multiple image
receptors to produce enhanced two-dimensional and threedimensional images out of the slices of tissue recorded with no
superimposed blurring of the structures that lie outside the
selected plane. A familiar medical use of this technology is a CT
scan or computed tomography. Patients undergoing a CT scan
of the maxillofacial region lie on a table with the head positioned inside the scanner (Figure 29-13). The scanner emits a
narrow, fan-shaped x-ray beam that rotates 360 degrees around
the patient’s head while up to 2,000 image receptors receive the
data. The table supporting the patient moves as the x-rays focus
on each new layer or slice of tissue. Most CT systems have
imaging software programs for dental implant treatment planning. These programs translate the data received by the image
receptors into workable cases the practitioner can use to formulate decisions regarding implant size, orientation, and placement.
FIGURE 29-11 Serial radiographs produced by tomography of the
temporomandibular joint showing the head of the condyle in the glenoid
fossa with the mouth closed, in the at-rest position, and with the mouth open.
(Courtesy of McCormack Dental X-ray Laboratory.)
FIGURE 29-12 A combination panoramic and TMJ
tomography imaging dental x-ray unit. (Courtesy of Planmeca.)
CHAPTER 29 • EXTRAORAL RADIOGRAPHY AND ALTERNATE IMAGING MODALITIES 373
Computed tomography is a highly regarded, accurate method
of choice for imaging bone height, density, and the shape and
contours of the edentulous ridges prior to dental implant
surgery. However, the radiation dose to the patient from computed tomography is high, so this method of imaging must be
balanced with the benefits it will provide. Although the actual
radiation dose to the patient depends on many factors, the
effective dose from a CT scan of the maxilla is estimated to be
between 240 and and between 480 and for
a scan of the mandible. You will recall from Chapter 5 that the
effective dose from a panoramic radiograph is approximately
(See Table 5-3.)
In the desire to use computed tomography technology
for dental applications while limiting the radiation dose to
the patient, CT scanners are now available that are dedicated
for maxillofacial use. Cone beam computed tomography
(CBCT), also called cone beam volumetric imaging (CBVI),
provides accurate, multiplanar images with no superimposed
blurring with lower radiation doses (approximately for
a scan of the maxilla and for a scan of the mandible).
The technology of these lower-dose CT scanners is specifically
targeted at imaging the maxillofacial region for oral health care
applications. In fact, some machines allow the operator to
switch from CBCT or CBVI mode to panoramic radiography,
making this technology increasingly accessible for adoption by
the oral health care practice (Figure 29-14).
The patient position for exposure is seated or standing
upright, similar to the positioning for producing a panoramic
radiograph. The cone-shaped x-ray beam is collimated to
control radiation exposure to record only a limited region
around the dental arches in one rotation around the head,
reducing the radiation dose over CT scans. Whereas digital
sensors used in intraoral radiography use pixels to produce
the image (see Chapter 9), CBCT utilize voxels. A pixel, or
picture element, is essentially a square with two sides.
A voxel, or volume element, adds a third side to this square,
making a cubed area for capturing more data. The computer
software then converts this data into an image that can be
75 mSv
42 mSv
7 mSv.
1200 mSv 3324 mSv
FIGURE 29-13 CT scanner.
FIGURE 29-14 Cone beam volumetric imaging machine.
Designed for the oral health care practice, can also produce panoramic
radiographs. (Courtesy of Gendex Dental Systems/Imaging Sciences Intl.)
read on a computer monitor. The images can be interpreted
and studied from not only the sagittal plane, as film-based
and digital radiographic images are, but also from the coronal and axial planes and as a three-dimension reconstructed
image (Figure 29-15).
At this point in time, CBCT has not been widely taught or
practiced by oral health care professionals and is considered
new technology for dental applications, although widely accepted
in the medical community. Currently most patients who would
benefit from this technology can be referred to a medical
imaging center for the procedure. An expert dental or medical
professional at these centers would be responsible for interpreting the images and providing a report or summary to the
referring dentist. When the CBCT scanning equipment is
available in an oral health care practice, it is usually a specialty
practice such as an orthodontist, periodontist, or specialist in
dental implantology. Even in these practices, unless he or she
has been trained and is comfortable making the final diagnosis, the dentist will often have the images interpreted by a medical expert, especially because these images are likely to reveal
information beyond the teeth and oral cavity. Although the
dentist may be an expert at determining conditions of the teeth
and the supporting structures, conditions beyond the oral cavity such as the oral and nasal airways, paranasal sinuses, and
other tissues outside the maxillofacial region must be examined for potential occult diseases (diseases that were not
apparent clinically).
Cone beam computed tomography will continue to play
an increasingly valuable role in oral health care treatment,
especially as technology finds ways to reduce the radiation
dose to the patient. Some experts in the field of dentistry predict that CBCT will become the standard of care in implant
dentistry in the near future.
374 EXTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
must be paired with green-light–sensitive film. Calcium tungstate
screens emit blue light and must be paired with blue-light–sensitive film. The use of fast-speed screen–film combinations is
recommended to produce acceptable images at a reduced radiation dose to the patient.
Special lettering sets or commercial film imprinters are
used to label and identify extraoral film. Cassettes hold the
intensifying screens in close contact with the film in a lighttight rigid case or a flexible plastic sleeve. Cassettes and intensifying screens should be examined periodically to ensure
optimum performance. Dirty or scratched screens will result in
radiopaque artifacts that compromise diagnosis.
Grids are devices used to absorb scatter radiation that
would fog the film and compromise image contrast. The use of
grids requires increased radiation exposure and so they are not
usually recommended unless a fine detail contrasting image is
required for accurate diagnosis.
Exposure settings for extraoral techniques depend on the
intensifying screen–film combination used, the patient’s size
and tissue density, and the target–image receptor distance.
Radiographs are produced with a stationary x-ray source and
image receptor. Tomography employs a simultaneously moving
x-ray source and image receptor to produce an image within a
selected plane while blurring objects outside the selected layer.
Computed tomography (CT) utilizes complex digital x-ray systems and multiple image receptors to produce images within a
slice of tissue without blurred superimposition of objects outside
the layer of interest. CT scans provide accurate images of bone
REVIEW—Chapter summary
Extraoral radiographs image large areas of the head and facial
regions. Extraoral radiographs are useful in examination of
large areas of the dental arches and skull; to study growth and
development of bone and teeth; in the detection of fractures,
pathological lesions, and diseases of the jaws; in assessment of
impacted teeth; in evaluation of temporomandibular disorders
(TMD); and in treatment planning for dental implants and prosthetics. Orthodontists, prosthodontists, and oral surgeons are
major users of extraoral imaging modalities.
The purpose of exposing the following extraoral radiographs was presented: lateral jaw, lateral cephalometric, posteroanterior (PA) cephalometric, Waters, Reverse Towne,
submentovertex, and transcranial.
Extraoral screen film is used in conjunction with a pair of
intensifying screens housed in a light-tight cassette. Extraoral
film is more sensitive than intraoral film. Careful handling is
needed to avoid static electricity and glove powder artifacts.
Intensifying screens transfer x-ray energy into visible light that
in turn exposes screen film to produce an image. Intensifying
screens intensify the effect of x-rays on the film, resulting in a
reduced dose of radiation required to produce an image. Faster
speed intensifying screens have larger sized fluorescent crystals
(phosphors) and thicker emulsion, but produce a slightly less
sharp image. Rare earth phosphor screens are faster than calcium tungstate screens. Rare earth screens emit green light and
FIGURE 29-15 Image produced by CBCT and reconstructed software. Note the images produced
from different planes and the reconstructed 3D image of the teeth in the arches. (Courtesy of Planmeca.)
CHAPTER 29 • EXTRAORAL RADIOGRAPHY AND ALTERNATE IMAGING MODALITIES 375
height, density, and shape and contours of edentulous ridges prior
to dental implant surgery. Radiation doses from computed tomography are significantly higher than extraoral radiography.
Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), also called
cone beam volumetric imaging (CBVI), focused on maxillofacial imaging with oral health care applications provides accurate, multiplanar images with no superimposed blurring with
lower radiation doses than CT scans. Some CBCT machines
can produce panoramic radiographs. The practitioner must be
skilled in interpreting images obtained by CBCT, which uses
voxels to reconstruct data received by the image receptor that
can be interpreted and studied from the sagittal, coronal, and
axial planes. CBCT technology will continue to increase in
value as an imaging modality in oral health care treatment.
RECALL—Study questions
1. For which of these purposes are extraoral radiographs
least suitable?
a. Detection of interproximal caries
b. Locating impacted teeth
c. Viewing the sinuses
d. Determining the extent of a fracture
2. Which of these radiographs is most frequently prescribed by the orthodontist?
a. Transcranial
b. Lateral cephalometric
c. Waters
d. Reverse Towne
3. The general practitioner is most likely to use which of
these extraoral radiographs?
a. Posteroanterior cephalometric
b. Reverse Towne
c. Panoramic
d. Submentovertex
4. Which of these radiographs would best image the maxillary sinus?
a. Transcranial
b. Waters
c. Periapical
d. Posteroanterior cephalometric
5. What size film is generally used to produce a cephalometric radiograph?
a.
b.
c.
d.
6. Black artifacts on extraoral radiographs may result from
each of the following EXCEPT one. Which one is the
EXCEPTION?
a. Static electricity
b. Glove powder residue
c. Rapidly removing films from the packaging
d. Scratched intensifying screens
6 * 12 in. 115 * 30 mm2
5 * 12 in. 113 * 30 cm2
8 * 10 in. 120 * 25 cm2
5 * 7 in. 113 * 18 cm2
7. Intensifying screens will
a. increase x-ray intensity.
b. increase image detail.
c. reduce exposure time.
d. decrease processing time.
8. What term describes the crystals used in the emulsion
of intensifying screens?
a. Phosphors
b. Halides
c. Sulfates
d. Bromides
9. Fast intensifying screens have ______________ sized
crystals and ______________ thickness of emulsion.
a. large; decreased
b. large; increased
c. small; decreased
d. small; increased
10. Rare-earth intensifying screens require less radiation to
produce a quality image.
Rare-earth intensifying screens emit blue light when
energized by x-radiation.
a. The first statement is correct. The second statement
is incorrect.
b. The first statement is incorrect. The second statement is correct.
c. Both statements are correct.
d. Both statements are incorrect.
11. Which of these is NOT a way to identify extraoral
radiographs?
a. Embossed identification dot
b. Commercial identification printer
c. Lead letters “R” and “L”
d. Lead plates affixed to the cassette
12. Unsharp (blurry) images result from which of the
following?
a. Film and screens not in close contact
b. Faulty (not tight) hinge on rigid cassette
c. Not closing the cassette tightly
d. All of the above
13. Which of the following is used to help reduce film fog
during exposure of extraoral radiographs?
a. Voxel
b. Cephalostat
c. Grid
d. Phosphors
14. Which of the following is true regarding tomography
when compared to extraoral radiography?
a. Requires less radiation to produce an image of the
maxillofacial region.
b. Utilizes a moving x-ray source and moving image
receptor.
c. Superimposes structures in the path of the x-ray
beam on the image.
d. Less likely to exhibit film fog.
376 EXTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
15. Cone beam computed tomography plays a valuable role
in which of the following?
a. Assessing growth and development of the orthodontic patient.
b. Imaging the height and contour of edentulous ridges.
c. Treatment planning for dental implants
d. All of the above.
REFLECT—Case study
Consider the following patients and conditions. Which of the
seven extraoral radiographs described in this chapter might be
the best recommendation for these cases? (Note: Radiographs
of the skull are difficult to interpret due to the numerous structures that exist in a very small area. These structures often
appear superimposed over each other, requiring multiple views
to obtain a good diagnosis. Therefore, in some of these cases,
although there is usually a best answer, there may be more than
one correct answer.)
1. A 20-year-old patient presents with pain and swelling
from an impacted third molar. The patient can open
only 10 mm. No panoramic unit is available. What is an
alternate extraoral projection type that can be used to
assist with diagnosis for this patient?
2. A 13-year-old patient presents for an orthodontic consultation. Occlusal (teeth) and facial disharmonies (soft
tissue relationships) need to be assessed prior to treatment intervention.
3. A difficult extraction case presents with a severely
decayed maxillary molar. During the extraction procedure, the root tip fractures and is possibly lost in the
sinus cavity.
4. A medically compromised patient suffered a seizure
and fell. A fractured mandibular condyle is suspected.
5. A 69-year-old patient presents with a history of degenerative joint disease that may be affecting the temporal
mandibular joint. An examination for the purpose of
diagnosing ankylosis (a stiffening of the TMJ) is
planned.
6. A patient presents for extraction of several badly
decayed teeth, following which the prosthodontist will
construct a maxillary full denture and a mandibular partial denture.
RELATE—Laboratory application
Because intensifying screens fluoresce visible light when energized by x-radiation, you can perform this experiment to confirm what types of intensifying screens are available for use at
your facility:
Open the cassette to expose the intensifying screens and
place on the counter or operatory chair, face up. No film is
needed. Place the tube head of the intraoral dental x-ray machine
directly over the opened cassette and aim the PID so that x-rays
will strike the exposed intensifying screens. Set the exposure
timer to the maximum setting, a full second, for example. Stand
at least six feet away from the tube head at a 90- to 135-degree
angle (see Figure 6-15) or remain behind a barrier that allows
visual contact with the screens during the exposure (see Figure 3-
7). Depress the exposure button and observe the intensifying
screens. Make note of the color, either blue or green, of the light
emitted during exposure. Match the color observed with what
you learned about calcium tungstate and rare-earth screens.
Next, perform an inventory on the extraoral films available for use at your facility. Does the film, either bluelight–sensitive or green-light–sensitive, match the screens? Use
the information learned in this chapter to explain why this is
important.
REFERENCES
Chau, A. C. M., & Fung K. (2009). Comparison of radiation
dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral
tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral
Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 107,
559–565.
Farman, A. G., Nortje, C. J., & Wood, R. E. (1993). Oral and
maxillofacial diagnostic imaging. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
Horner, K., Drage, N., & Brettle, D. (2008). 21st century
imaging. London: Quintessence Publishing Co.
Miles, D. A. (2008). Color atlas of cone beam volumetric
imaging for dental applications. Chicago: Quintessence
Publishing Co.
White, S. C., & Pharoah, M. J. (2004).Oral radiology: Principles and interpretation (5th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
OBJECTIVES
Following successful completion of this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Define the key words.
2. List uses of panoramic radiography.
3. Compare the advantages and limitations of panoramic versus intraoral radiographs.
4. Explain how the panoramic technique relates to the principles of tomography.
5. Identify the three dimensions of the focal trough.
6. List the components of a panoramic x-ray machine.
7. Explain how to use each of the head positioner guides found on a panoramic x-ray machine.
8. Identify the planes used to position the dental arches correctly within the focal trough.
9. Explain the use of a cape-style lead/lead equivalent barrier or the use of an apron without
an attached thyroid collar.
10. List patient preparation errors and describe how these will affect the appearance of the
panoramic radiograph.
11. Match the patient-positioning errors with the characteristic affect on the appearance of the
panoramic radiograph.
12. List exposure and image receptor handling errors and describe how these will affect the
appearance of the panoramic radiograph.
13. List and identify the anatomic landmarks of the maxilla and surrounding tissues as viewed
on a panoramic radiograph.
14. List and identify the anatomic landmarks of the mandible and surrounding tissues as viewed
on a panoramic radiograph.
15. List and identify soft tissue images as viewed on a panoramic radiograph.
16. List and identify three air space images as viewed on a panoramic radiograph.
17. List and identify machine part artifacts as viewed on a panoramic radiograph.
18. List and identify ghost image artifacts as viewed on a panoramic radiograph.
19. Identify in sequence the basic steps in the panoramic radiographic procedure.
Panoramic Radiography
CHAPTER
30
CHAPTER
OUTLINE
 Objectives 377
 Key Words 378
 Introduction 378
 Purpose and Use 378
 Advantages and
Limitations 378
 Fundamentals
of Panoramic
Radiography 379
 Concept of the
Focal Trough 381
 Components of
the Panoramic
X-Ray Machine 382
 Importance of
Correct Patient
Positioning 386
 Panoramic
Imaging Errors 386
 Normal
Panoramic
Anatomical
Landmarks 392
 Images of
Machine Parts
Viewed on the
Panoramic
Radiograph 397
 Ghost Images
Viewed on the
Panoramic
Radiograph 397
 Review, Recall,
Reflect, Relate 398
 References 401
378 EXTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
Introduction
The panoramic radiograph is probably the most common
extraoral projection used in general oral health care practice.
Panoramic radiography refers to a technique for producing a
broad view image of the entire dentition of both the maxilla and
mandible with the surrounding alveolar bone, the sinuses, and
the temporomandibular joints on a single radiograph (Figure 30-1).
The purpose of this chapter is to explain the fundamental concepts of panoramic radiography and to interpret normal anatomy
and other structures that will be recorded on these images.
Purpose and Use
The term panoramic means “wide view.” Panoramic radiography
is descriptive of the wide view of the maxilla and mandible
produced on a single radiograph. Panoramic radiographs play a
valuable role in:
• Examining large areas of the face and jaws
• Locating impacted teeth or retained root tips
• Evaluating trauma, lesions, and diseases of the jaws
• Assessing growth and development
Panoramic image quality, especially with the introduction of
digital imaging, continues to improve, suggesting that panoramic
radiographs may also aid in the evaluation of large caries and
moderate periodontal diseases. However, panoramic imagery is
not as sharp and detailed as the images produced by intraoral
radiographs. When specific conditions or diseases are suspected,
intraoral radiographs are often prescribed in conjunction with
panoramic radiographs (see Table 6-1).
Advantages and Limitations
The greatest advantage of panoramic radiographs is that they
image a greater area and provide an increased amount of diagnostic information when compared to a full mouth series of
individual radiographs with a reduced amount of radiation dose
to the patient (Box 30-1).In addition, the broad image produced
by a panoramic radiograph is easy for patients to understand,
aiding in the explanation of the diagnosis and the proposed
treatment plan in a manner that is clear and understandable.
Panoramic procedures are relatively easy to perform, requiring
less time than a full mouth series. The simple procedure
demands less patient cooperation, and because the image receptor is not placed intraorally, there is less discomfort, making the
panoramic procedure an acceptable substitute, under certain
conditions, for patients who cannot tolerate intraoral procedures. Because of the relative ease with which a panoramic radiograph may be obtained, there may be a tendency to overuse this
diagnostic tool. It is important to note that research on the use of
panoramic radiographs cautions against using panoramic
images as a screening film for occult disease (diseases that may
exist without signs or symptoms).
FIGURE 30-1 Panoramic radiograph. Provides a broad view of the dental arches.
Note, however, the inherent image distortion as the panoramic view broadens the arches.
(Courtesy of Gendex Dental Systems/Imaging Sciences Intl.)
KEY WORDS
Ala
Ala–tragus line
Cassette holder
Focal trough (layer)
Frankfort plane
Ghost image
Glossopharyngeal air space
Head positioner guides
Midsagittal plane
Nasopharyngeal air space
Negative shadows
Occult disease
Palatoglossal air space
Panoramic
Panoramic radiography
Rotational center
Tomography
Tragus
CHAPTER 30 • PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY 379
The greatest limitation of panoramic radiographs is image
quality. Magnification, distortion, and poor definition are inherent
with panoramic techniques. Ghost images, negative shadows,
and other artifacts can make interpreting panoramic images
difficult. Further compromising the ability to obtain quality
images is the difficulty associated with positioning the patient
within the focal trough (area of image sharpness). Manufacturers
design panoramic x-ray machines to be able to image the average
patient. However, it may be difficult to record all structures
with relative clarity when a patient’s dental arches do not fall
into this average range.
Fundamentals of Panoramic Radiography
Panoramic radiography is based on the principle of tomography.
As discussed in Chapter 29, tomography is a special radiographic
technique used to record images of structures located within a
selected plane of tissue, while blurring structures outside the
selected plane. During panoramic imaging as during tomography,
the x-ray source and image receptor move in relationship to each
other. Panoramic x-ray machines operate with the patient positioned between the x-ray tube head and the cassette that holds the
image receptor. The exposure is made as the tube head and
cassette rotate slowly around the patient’s head during the operational cycle (usually about 15 to 20 seconds). The cassette with
image receptor and the x-ray tube head move in directions opposite
each other while the patient stands or is seated in a stationary
position (Figure 30-2). The x-ray tube head moves around the
back of the patient while the cassette with image receptor moves
BOX 30-1 Advantages and Limitations of Panoramic Radiographs
Advantages
• Increased coverage of supporting structures of the oral cavity.
• Reduced patient radiation dose over a film-based intraoral full mouth series of radiographs.
• Can be performed in less time than the exposure of a full mouth series of radiographs.
• Simple procedure to perform.
• May be performed on patients who cannot, or will not tolerate placement of an intraoral image receptor.
• Requires minimal patient instruction and cooperation.
• Infection control protocol minimized.
• Mounting time is eliminated.
• Aids in explaining treatment plan to patients.
Limitations
• Increased image distortion. The amount of vertical and horizontal distortion is not constant—it varies from one part of the radiograph
to another
• Reduced image sharpness.
• Increased occurrence of overlapping of the proximal contact areas, especially in the premolar region.
• Focal trough size and shape limits imaging only those structures that “fit” into the image layer. Teeth with labial or lingual tilting may
not image well.
• The size and shape of the focal trough is predetermined by the manufacturer, therefore not all patients’ arches will be recorded equally well.
• Superimposition of structures (e.g., the spinal column) may make interpretation difficult.
• Soft tissue shadows present on the resulting image may mimic pathology.
• Ghost images present on the resulting image may hide pathology.
• Not useful in detecting incipient carious lesions or early periodontal changes.
• Simple procedure may be overused inappropriately.
• Length of exposure time may limit its use on young children and other patients who cannot remain still throughout the exposure cycle.
• Cost of panoramic machine is significant.
FIGURE 30-2 Panoramic x-ray machine. Radiographer
positions the patient between the image receptor and the x-ray tube
head of this digital panoramic dental x-ray machine.
380 EXTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
around the front. The x-ray beam strikes the patient’s tissues from
the back of the head.
Through the use of a series of rotational points or centers
(differing according to the unit manufacturer), the x-ray beam
is directed toward the moving image receptor to record a select
plane of dental anatomy (Figure 30-3). The rotational center,
which is defined as the axis on which the x-ray tube head and
the cassette rotate, is the functional focus of the projection.
Most panoramic machines available today utilize a continuous
moving rotational center to refocus the x-ray beam during
movement to produce an image (Figure 30-4). This type of
rotational center will keep the inherent horizontal and vertical
magnification of the image relatively constant. All panoramic
images have between 10 and 30 percent image magnification,
depending on where the structures are located in relationship to
the center of the slice of tissue being focused on. It is desirable
to keep the inherent magnification even throughout the image.
The elliptical pattern made by the rotational center in
Figure 30-4 very closely matches the arc of the teeth and jaws
and is likely to keep image magnification relatively constant.
Unlike the concentric or rectangular beam of x-radiation of
intraoral radiography, the x-rays emerge from a narrow vertical
slit opening in the tube head and are constricted to form a narrow
band. This narrow opening collimates (constricts) the x-ray
beam so that a limited amount of tissue is irradiated. The narrow
vertical beam of radiation then passes through the patient and
through a secondary collimator vertical slit in the cassette holder
to expose the image receptor that is moving or rotating in the
opposite direction (Figure 30-5).
Moving x-ray source
Rotational center
Moving image receptor
FIGURE 30-3 Panoramic radiography. The moving x-ray source
passes through the center of rotation in a horizontal plane toward the
path of the moving image receptor. As the beam scans the object (the
dental arches), a continuous image is recorded on the moving image
receptor.
Moving rotational
center
FIGURE 30-4 Moving rotational center allows the x-ray beam
to continuously focus as the tube head and the image receptor
simultaneously move.
A
B
FIGURE 30-5 Slit collimator (A) and slit opening (B) to the
image receptor.
CHAPTER 30 • PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY 381
Concept of the Focal Trough
The focal trough or focal layer is where the dental arches
should be positioned to achieve the sharpest image. The focal
trough is that area between the x-ray source and the image
receptor that will be imaged distinctly on the panoramic radiograph (Figure 30-6). Objects located at various distances from
the center of the focal trough become less sharp the farther
away they are located.
C
left right
Tube head
Image receptor
B
left right
Tube head
A
left right Tube head
Image receptor
Image receptor
FIGURE 30-6 Plane of focus within the focal trough. The x-ray beam is focused on imaging the structures that are positioned
closest to the image receptor. As the tube head and image receptor rotate, the x-ray beam is refocused to image the next section of
anatomy. (A) Illustrated here is one moment in the continuous exposure. At this precise moment, the tube head is positioned on the
right side, allowing the x-ray beam to penetrate the right side, then continue on to penetrate the left side and carry the images of the
structures penetrated to the receptor. At this moment the right side is farther from the image receptor than the left side. At this moment
in the exposure sequence, the left side will be recorded on the image, while the right side will be blurred out as a ghost image. (B) As
the tube head and image receptor rotate, the x-ray beam now penetrates the back of head (and the cervical vertebrae), then continues on
to penetrate the anterior teeth. Because the anterior teeth at this moment are closer to the image receptor, the cervical vertebrae will
most likely appear magnified and blurred out as a ghost image, while the anterior teeth will be more distinctly recorded onto the image.
(C) As the tube head and image receptor continue to rotate to the opposite side, the x-ray beam now penetrates the left side first,
blurring it out of the image. The right side is now closer to the image receptor, so it will be imaged more clearly.
382 EXTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
FIGURE 30-7 Diagram of the focal trough.
The panoramic x-ray machine’s moving center rotation system
results in a focal trough that is wider in the posterior regions
and narrower in the anterior regions, making it imperative that
the anterior teeth be positioned precisely to be imaged correctly.
It is important to note that a mistake in positioning the arches in
the anterior region of the focal trough by as little as 3 or 4 mm
will make a significant difference in the degree of magnification
on the resultant radiograph.
Components of the Panoramic
X-Ray Machine
Although considerable differences exist in the size and configuration of panoramic x-ray machines, the operational procedures are
similar and relatively simple (Procedure Box 30-1). Many machines
require that the patient stand during the exposure; others operate
with the patient seated. The machine’s design will determine
whether the patient is positioned to face the radiographer and
away from the machine or to face the machine with their back to
the radiographer. Film-based panoramic radiographs require the
use of either a rigid or flexible cassette with intensifying screens
(Figure 30-8; see Chapter 29); phosphor plates utilize a rigid or
flexible cassette without intensifying screens (Figure 30-9); and
the image receptor, usually a CCD (see Chapter 9), is built into
digital panoramic x-ray machines (Figure 30-10).
All panoramic x-ray machines have four basic components:
1. Rotational x-ray tube head
2. Cassette holder (for film or phosphor plate) or digital image
receptor
3. Head positioner guides
4. Exposure control panel
The x-ray tube used in panoramic x-ray machines generates
electrons to produce x-ray energy similar to x-ray units used for
intraoral exposures. The panoramic tube head is in a fixed vertical
position with the short PID pointing up slightly, about negative
8 degrees. Film-based panoramic machines require that the film
be loaded into a cassette that is then attached to the cassette
holder so that it will rotate in relation with the tube head. Each
machine manufacturer provides specific instructions for attaching the cassette to the unit (Figure 30-11).
FIGURE 30-8 Film-based panoramic x-ray machine.
FIGURE 30-9 Phosphor plates used for indirect digital
panoramic x-ray machine. (Courtesy of Air Techniques.)
The focal trough is three-dimensional, and its actual shape
varies depending on the equipment used (Figure 30-7). The
three-dimensions of the focal trough are (1) anterior–posterior,
(2) lateral or left–right, and (3) superior–inferior or up–down.
CHAPTER 30 • PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY 383
PROCEDURE 30-1
Panoramic radiographic procedure*
Cassette and film preparation
1. Examine cassette for proper function. Check hinge for wear. Check for light-tight seal.
2. Examine intensifying screens (if film-based) or phosphor plates for quality. Check for scratches and need
of cleaning.
3. Obtain a box of extraoral film. Ensure that the film sensitivity matches the screen type used (see Chapter 29). The
image receptor is built in to digital panoramic machines and will already be in place.
4. Turn off white overhead light and turn on safelight. (Ensure that safelight color filter recommended
by the film manufacturer is in use.)
5. Remove the cover from the box of film and carefully, with clean, dry hands, remove one film from the
box. Remove slowly to avoid generating static electricity.
6. Handling the film by the edges only, load into the cassette. (When using a flexible cassette, ensure that
the film is inserted between the screens and is seated all the way down to the fold). Close tightly, securing the hinge (rigid cassette) or snaps (flexible cassette). Replace the cover on the box of film prior to
turning on overhead white light and leaving the darkroom.
Unit preparation
1. Clean and disinfect with appropriate disinfectant all surfaces that will come in contact either directly or
indirectly with the patient, such as the:
a. Forehead rest
b. Chin rest
c. Side head positioner guides
d. Patient support handles
e. Chair (sit-down units)
2. Select sterile or disposable biteblock or cotton roll.
3. Attach the cassette onto the cassette holder of the unit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Ensure that
the cassette is placed so that the exposure will begin at the appropriate edge of the film.
4. Turn on the machine. Raise or lower the overhead assembly to the approximate height of the patient,
and move to the patient-entry position or move out of the way (if necessary) so that the way is clear for
the patient to get into position.
Patient preparation
1. Inform patient of the need for the panoramic radiograph. Explain the procedure, answer patient concerns/questions regarding the procedure, and obtain patient’s consent.
2. Request that the patient remove eyeglasses, necklaces, hair barrettes, facial jewelry (tongue, lip piercing
adornments), removable dental appliances and any other material that may interfere with the radiographic
procedure such as chewing gum or a thick hooded sweatshirt.
3. Place the lead/lead-equivalent cape or apron without a thyroid collar over the patient. Ensure that the
lead apron will not impede the rotation of the cassette or image receptor holder.
*The procedures for taking panoramic radiographs are similar on most panoramic machines. As the complexity of the
controls and head holder adjustments varies from unit to unit, the radiographer should read the manufacturer’s
instructions carefully before attempting to operate an unfamiliar machine.
(Continued)
384 EXTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
PROCEDURE 30-1
Panoramic radiographic procedure* (continued)
Patient positioning
1. To position the arches into the focal trough’s anterior/posterior dimension, instruct the patient to bite on
the bite guide with the anterior teeth occluding edge to edge, or to place the chin completely forward
into the chin rest or against the forehead rest. If available, align the laser light beam at the interproximal
space recommended by the machine manufacturer.
2. To position the arches into the focal trough’s lateral (right–left) dimension, close the head positioner
guides or instruct the patient to view reflection in the mirror (on some units) and align the midsaggital
plane perpendicular to the floor. Utilize unit light beams if available.
3. To position the arches into the focal trough’s superior–inferior dimension, adjust the patient’s chin up or
down until the Frankfort plane is parallel to the floor or until the ala–tragus line is approximately positive
5 degrees to the floor. (Some panoramic x-ray units have indicator lines scribed on the head positioner
guides or projected as a beam of light from the unit to align either the Frankfort plane or the ala–tragus line
to obtain correct superior–inferior patient positioning in the focal trough.)
Exposure
1. Select the appropriate kVp and mA for the patient. Refer to posted exposure settings or use the manufacturer’s recommendations.
2. Instruct the patient to place the tongue up against the hard palate and to close the lips around the bite
guide or cotton roll. (Asking the patient to swallow or suck in the cheeks will assist with correct placement of the tongue and lips.)
3. Instruct the patient to remain still throughout the exposure cycle.
4. Take a position behind a protective barrier or an adequate distance away from the x-ray source and
depress the exposure button for the duration of the cycle. You should be able to watch the procedure
during the exposure from a protected location (see Figure 3-7) to ensure that the patient does not move
and that the rotation of the unit continues unhindered. If patient movement occurs or the unit contacts
the patient or protective barrier cape, release the exposure button to stop the process. The cassette
should be removed from the unit and the procedure should start over, beginning with a new film.
5. When the exposure cycle is complete, move the overhead assembly to the patient-exit position or move
out of the way (if necessary) so that the way is clear for the patient to be released. Remove the protective barrier cape. Return glasses, earrings, appliances, or other personal belongings to the patient.
6. Return the head positioner and overhead assembly to the closed position and turn off the machine.
Discard the disposable bite guide or prepare autoclavable bite guide for sterilization. Clean and disinfect
with appropriate disinfectant all surfaces that came in contact either directly or indirectly with the
patient. (See Step 1.)
Processing
1. Remove the cassette from the cassette holder.
2. Proceed to the darkroom. Turn off the overhead white light and turn on the safelight. Open the cassette
and remove the film from between the intensifying screens. Handle the film with clean, dry hands by the
edges only. Use care to avoid sliding the film across the screens in such a manner that would generate
static electricity or scratch the screens or the film.
3. Manually or automatically process the film according to the manufacturer’s instructions.**
**Prior to processing, a film identification printer may be utilized to permanently label the film with the patient’s name,
the date of exposure and other information (see Figure 29-9).
CHAPTER 30 • PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY 385
FIGURE 30-10 Digital panoramic x-ray machine. (Courtesy of
Gendex Dental Systems/Imaging Sciences Intl.)
Because the focal trough is determined and set by the
machine manufacturer, head positioner guides will assist the
radiographer in positioning the patient correctly. Most
panoramic machines are equipped with a biteblock or forehead
rest that allows the radiographer to correctly determine how
far forward or back the patient should be positioned, side
positioner guides or a mirror for determining the correct
side-to-side or right–left or lateral alignment, and a chin rest
FIGURE 30-11 Radiographer preparing to attach flexible
cassette to the cassette holder carriage. Note the markings on the
outside of the cassette that indicate the correct direction for attaching
the cassette to the unit.
to correctly locate how far up or down the arches should be
positioned (Figure 30-12). Some panoramic machines have
beams of light that when turned on to shine on the patient’s face
will guide the operator to find each of these three dimensions
(Figure 30-13).
The exposure control panel will usually allow the radiographer to select the mA and kVp as recommended by the manufacturer (Figure 30-14). The size of the patient and density of
the tissues to be imaged will determine what settings are used.
FIGURE 30-12 Head positioner guides. A biteblock aids the
radiographer in locating the correct forward and back dimension of
the focal trough; side positioner guides aid with locating the correct
left and right dimension; and a chin rest aids with locating the correct
up and down dimension. Note the cape-style lead/lead equivalent
apron without a thyroid collar for use with panoramic exposures.
FIGURE 30-13 Head positioner guides. Beams of light shine
on the patient’s face to aid the radiographer in positioning the arches
in the focal trough. (Courtesy of Gendex Dental Corporation.)
386 EXTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
trough, the radiographer must be able to determine the location
of three facial landmarks. (1) The midsaggital plane (see
Figure 13-13) that divides the patient’s head into a right and left
side must be positioned perpendicular to the floor for the correct
lateral (left–right) position. (2) The ala–tragus line—an imaginary plane or line from the ala (a winglike projection at the side of
the nose) to the tragus (the cartilaginous portion in front of the
acoustic meatus of the ear)—must be positioned approximately 5
degrees down toward the floor. (3) When the ala–tragus line is
positioned correctly, the Frankfort plane—an imaginary plane or
line from the orbital ridge (under the eye) to the acoustic meatus
of the ear—will be parallel to the floor. Some panoramic machines
utilize guides that aid the radiographer in locating the ala–tragus
line, whereas others focus on the Frankfort plane. The radiographer should be able to utilize either landmark (Figure 30-16).
When the arches are correctly positioned within the focal
trough, all teeth and supporting structures are recorded and
there is less unequal magnification and unsharpness over all
parts of the radiographic image (Figure 30-17). If the patient
has been positioned incorrectly, the resultant radiographic
image will exhibit unique errors that are characteristic of the
positioning mistake made. It is important that the radiographer
be able to identify the causes of common panoramic image
errors to be able to apply the appropriate corrective actions.
Patients should be protected with a lead/lead equivalent
barrier when undergoing the panoramic exam. The thyroid collar
must be removed from the apron for use during a panoramic
exposure. Due to the position of the tube head and PID, the
thyroid collar would get in the way of the primary beam and
block the radiation from reaching the tissues. Lead/lead
equivalent aprons are available without a thyroid collar, and
there are cape-style aprons made especially for panoramic use
(see Figures 6-12 and 30-12).
Panoramic Imaging Errors
Panoramic imaging errors may result from incorrectly
preparing the patient for the procedure; incorrectly positioning the patient and dental arches in the focal trough; and
incorrectly handling, exposing, and processing the image
FIGURE 30-15 Aligning the correct anterior–posterior
position with the light beam guide illuminated over the
interproximal space of the canine and the premolar.
The kVp controls the penetrating ability of the beam, so it is
often adjusted up when exposing larger patients or denser tissues
and adjusted down when exposing children and edentulous
patients. The exposure time is preset by the manufacturer and
varies from 15 to 20 seconds to complete the cycle. To activate
the exposure, the radiographer must depress the exposure button
and hold for the duration of the cycle.
Importance of Correct Patient Positioning
Positioning the patient’s head and dental arches within the focal
trough is necessary for producing diagnostic images. Correct
positioning will vary, depending on whether the area of interest is
in the region of the temporomandibular joints, the sinuses, or the
teeth and their supporting structures. Because the focal trough is
predetermined by the panoramic machine manufacturer, the radiographer must refer to the manufacturer’s instructions when
positioning the patient. Each manufacturer provides an instruction manual that must be carefully read and followed. It is the
radiographer’s responsibility to position the patient’s dental
arches in relation to the focal trough to avoid images that are
magnified, diminished, or blurred.
As discussed previously, most panoramic x-ray machines
have guides such as a head positioner, chin rest, or beams of
light that shine on the patient’s face to aid the radiographer in
positioning the patient within the focal trough (Figures 30-12
and 30-13). Because the focal trough or area of image sharpness is three dimensional (Figure 30-7), the patient’s dental
arches must be positioned in the correct: anterior–posterior
(forward or back) position; lateral (left or right) position; and
superior–inferior (up or down) position. Directing the patient to
occlude the anterior teeth in the correct position on the biteblock of the panoramic machine will align the correct anterior–posterior position. Some panoramic x-ray machines have a
light beam guide, that when illuminated can be used to align
with a specific tooth or interproximal space as determined by
the manufacturer. For example, Figure 30-15 illustrates a vertical positioning light that has been aligned with the interproximal space of the canine and the premolar. To correctly align the
dental arches within the other two dimensions of the focal
FIGURE 30-14 The radiographer uses the control panel
to set the exposure.
CHAPTER 30 • PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY 387
Orbital ridge
Ala of nose
Tragus
of ear
B Frankfort plane
Ala–tragus line
A
FIGURE 30-16 Landmarks used to position the patient. (A) When the
ala–tragus line is positioned 5 degrees down, (B) the Frankfort plane will be in a
position parallel to the floor.
A B
FIGURE 30-17 Correct positioning. The arches are positioned
correctly within the focal trough in all three dimensions: (A) Anterior–
posterior and left–right; and (B) superior–inferior (up-down).
receptor. The radiographer should possess a working knowledge of the characteristic appearance of errors made in these
steps to avoid producing undiagnostic radiographic images and
to better implement appropriate corrective actions.
Patient Preparation Errors
It is important to remember that the x-ray beam rotates around the
patient from behind. Any objects made of metal or other dense
material located here, such as a necklace, earrings, or hair adornments will be in the path of the primary beam and result in
radiopaque artifacts. These items, along with the patient’s glasses,
dental appliances, patient napkin chain, oral piercings and other
facial jewelry, must be removed prior to exposure. As already
discussed, the thyroid collar must be removed from the lead/lead
equivalent apron for panoramic exposures. There are occasions
when the clothing the patient is wearing may interfere with the
rotation of the tube head. Thickly padded shoulders of clothing
and hooded sweatshirts need to be assessed to ensure that they
won’t impede the movement of the cassette and tube head during
the rotational cycle.
Patient understanding of the procedure and cooperation
are necessary to produce quality images. The patient must
hold still, in position, throughout the exposure. The patient
should be requested to rest the tongue against the palate and
close the lips around the bite guide. The open air space
between the tongue and the roof of the mouth (palatoglossal
PRACTICE POINT
When asked to place the tongue against the roof of the
mouth to reduce the radiolucency caused by the palatoglossal air space, the patient will sometimes incorrectly touch
only the tip of the tongue to the palate. To assist with placing the entire dorsal surface of the tongue flat against the
palate, ask the patient to swallow and note the position of
the tongue. Another method used to get the tongue into
the correct position is to ask the patient to suck in the
cheeks, which automatically raises the tongue into a position flat against the palate. This directive works especially
well when communicating with the child patient.
A B
FIGURE 30-18 Positioning of lips on the biteblock. (A) The lips incorrectly open on the
biteblock. (B) The lips correctly positioned closed around the biteblock.
magnified and widened. Depending on the angle that the
patient is tipped, the condyles can appear higher on one side
than the other.
If the patient’s chin is tipped too low (Frankfort plane
angled downward and ala–tragus line angled downward greater
than 5 degrees), the resultant image will appear as an exaggerated smile (Figure 30-21). The mandibular condyles slant
inward and the nasopharyngeal air space appears larger and
darker, reducing the quality of the image. The appearance of a
reversed smile (frown) results when the patient’s chin is raised
too high (Figure 30-21). Tipping the chin up causes the bottom
of the nasal cavity and the hard palate to widen into a
radiopaque band that obscures the apices of the maxillary teeth.
Tipping the chin up or down will also cause the anterior teeth to
be positioned outside the focal trough, often resulting in the
appearance of root resorption.
If the patient is not standing or sitting up straight, or is
slumped over, the radiation (which strikes the patient from
behind) is attenuated by the compressed vertabrae, resulting
in a wide radiopacity superimposed over the anterior teeth
(Figure 30-22).
Exposure and Film Handling Errors
Careful attention to exposure settings and film handling will
avoid errors that result in undiagnostic radiographs. Consideration should be given to the following. Exposure settings should
be posted near the control panel to avoid over- or underexposures. Extraoral film requires careful handling to avoid static
electricity artifacts (see Figure 29-6). Darkroom safelighting
must be appropriate for light-sensitive extraoral film. Cassettes
should be inspected to ensure a tight contact between film and
intensifying screens. Blurry images result when the film and
screens are not in tight contact. Intensifying screens must be
free of scratches that would result in a loss of image and
radiopaque artifacts.
Careful loading of flexible plastic sleeve cassettes must
ensure that the film is seated all the way down at the fold in
388 EXTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
air space) will create a large radiolucency on the image that
will obscure the root apices of the maxillary teeth. Raising
the flat, dorsal surface of the tongue to the palate utilizes the
soft tissue image of the tongue to “fill in” this airspace and
create a more even density to the image. Closing the lips
together around the biteblock will avoid recording an image
of the lip line across the anterior teeth. Open lips will
create an image that can mimic caries of the anterior teeth
(Figure 30-18).
Positioning Errors
Positioning the patient too far forward in the focal trough
results in all of the anterior teeth appearing blurred and narrowed in width (Figure 30-19). Consequently, when the
patient is too far back toward the tube head, the anterior teeth
will appear blurred and magnified (Figure 30-19). Most
panoramic machines have a relatively narrow focal trough in
the anterior region, requiring precision in locating the forward
and backward dimension of image sharpness. Panoramic
machines will have a forehead rest or may require the patient
to bite on a biteblock to position the arches correctly in this
dimension. When using a biteblock the radiographer should
request that the patient bring both maxillary and mandibular
central incisors into an edge-to-edge position on the biteblock. When using a machine with laser light beams, follow
the manufacturer’s recommendation for aiming the lateral or
vertical beam of light at a predetermined interproximal space.
If the midsaggital plane is not positioned perpendicular to
the floor, the patient’s head will be rotated, turned, or tipped to
the left or to the right. This rotation of the dental arches will
cause the anatomy of condyles, sinus, and teeth on the side
closer to the image receptor to appear narrowed, whereas these
anatomical landmarks on the side closer to the x-ray tube head
will appear magnified and widened (Figure 30-20). When the
patient is positioned too far to the left, the anatomy and teeth on
the right appear magnified and widened. When the patient is
positioned too far to the right, the anatomy on the left appears
CHAPTER 30 • PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY 389
A B
D
E
C
ANTERIOR-POSTERIOR POSITIONING
FIGURE 30-19 Incorrect positioning. (A) Arches too far forward, causing the anterior teeth to be positioned outside and forward from the
center of the focal trough. (B) Arches too far backward, causing the anterior teeth to be positioned outside and backward from the center of the
focal trough. (C) Patient positioned too far forward. Note the incorrect position of the laser light beam. Compare with the correct position in
Figure 30-15. (D) Radiographic image resulting from positioning the arches too far forward. Note the blurred and magnified anterior teeth and the
prominent imaging of the spinal column on both sides. (E) Radiographic image resulting from positioning the arches too far backward. Note the
widened and magnified anterior teeth.
390 EXTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
A
receptor
Image
position
Patient’s left
side
Image
receptor
position
Patient’s right
side
Image
receptor
position
Image
receptor
position
Tube
head
Patient’s right
side
B
receptor
Image
position
Image
receptor
position
Image
receptor
position
Image
receptor
position
Patient’s left
side
Tube
head
C
D
LATERAL (LEFT-RIGHT) POSITIONING
FIGURE 30-20 Incorrect positioning: patient’s head is rotated. Midsaggital plane rotated to position the (A) left side of the arches closer
to the image receptor and right side farther away from the x-ray tube head or (B) right side closer to the image receptor and left side farther
away from the x-ray tube head. Diminution is apparent on the side malpositioned closer to the image receptor and magnification is apparent on
the side malpositioned farther away from the x-ray tube head. (C) Patient positioned with the midsaggital plane rotated to the left.
(D) Radiographic image resulting from a position rotated to the left. Note the arches, condyles, sinus, and teeth on the left appear narrowed,
and these anatomical landmarks and teeth on the right appear widened and magnified. Note the higher position of the left condyle.
CHAPTER 30 • PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY 391
F
A B C D
E
SUPERIOR-INFERIOR (UP-DOWN) POSITIONING
FIGURE 30-21 Incorrect positioning. (A) Patient’s chin too low. The root apices of the mandibular anterior teeth slant out of
the focal trough. (B) Frankfort plane/ala–tragus line incorrectly aligned to position the chin too low. (C) Patient’s chin too high. The root
apices of the maxillary anterior teeth slant out of the focal trough. (D) Frankfort plane/ala–tragus line incorrectly aligned to position the chin
too high. (E) Radiograph with the characteristic exaggerated “smile” appearance. (F) Radiograph with the characteristic exaggerated “frown”
appearance.
392 EXTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
A
B
CDE
ACHIEVING CORRECT POSTURE POSITIONING
FIGURE 30-22 Incorrect patient positioning (A) Patient not standing up straight. Compare with the correct straight posture illustrated in
Figures 30-12 and 30-13. (B) Radiograph with wide radiopacity representing the compressed vertebrae superimposed over the anterior teeth. (C)
Normal hand position on machine handles. (D) Altered hand position with arms crossed, left hand holding the right handle and right hand
holding the left handle. (E) Altered hand position with arms crossed, left hand holding the right handle with palm facing up and right hand
holding the left handle with palm facing up.
CHAPTER 30 • PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY 393
PRACTICE POINT
When standing straight is compromised due to the patient’s
stature or build/size, direct the patient to hold on to the
handles of the machine with the arms crossed. Holding on
to the right handle with the left hand and to the left handle
with the right hand will bring the patient’s shoulders in and
usually out of the way of the machine rotation. For patients
with a very short neck, or short distance between the shoulders and chin, crossing the arms and holding on to the handles with the palms up will further round the shoulders in
and out of the way during the rotational cycle of the exposure (Figure 30-22).
the pair of intensifying screens. Failure to correctly load the
film into the cassette will result in a loss of part of the image.
All panoramic machines have special instructions on
how to load the film cassette onto the rotational arm of the
unit. The manufacturer’s instructions must be followed to
avoid positioning the film so that only a portion gets exposed
(see Figure 29-6).
Normal Panoramic Anatomical Landmarks
The principles of panoramic radiography result in the formation of a unique image. The superimposition of anatomical
structures and the broadening of the arches produces unusual
anatomical relationships in the panoramic image not seen in
intraoral radiographs. In the panoramic radiograph, the
mandible and maxilla as well as the spine are imaged as if they
were split vertically in half down the midsagittal plane, with
each half folded outward. The split cervical spine appears
twice, beyond the mandibular rami at the extreme right and left
edges of the radiograph. Many structures will appear broadened and wider in the same way that a map of the world flattens
and broadens the images of a globe.
To develop the skills needed to recognize normal anatomic
structures viewed on the panoramic radiograph, the radiographer should build on his/her knowledge of how normal
anatomy appears on intraoral radiographs and transfer this
knowledge to the panoramic image. For example, when viewing the maxillary posterior area on a panoramic image, the radiographer can visualize a periapical radiograph taken in this
same area. Because the radiographer would be able to identify
anatomical landmarks most likely to be imaged here (e.g., the
zygomatic arch and maxillary sinus) on an intraoral radiograph,
he/she can expect to see these landmarks here on the panoramic
image as well. Of course the panoramic radiograph will image
more structures of the maxillofacial regions than intraoral radiographs. The structures listed here are those anatomical landmarks that commonly appear on the panoramic image.
PRACTICE POINT
The panoramic radiograph records more structures of the
maxillofacial region than the dentition and the surrounding
supporting bone. Although the oral health care professional is primarily concerned with the oral cavity, panoramic
radiographs must be interpreted by the dentist for all deviations from normal anatomy. Research has indicated that it
is possible to identify carotid arterial plaques on some
panoramic radiographs. This serious medical condition
known as carotid artery stenosis can lead to a stroke, called
a cerebrovascular accident (CVA). When suspected carotid
artery calcifications are recorded on a panoramic radiograph, the dentist must immediately refer the patient to a
physician for further evaluation.
Anatomic Landmarks of the Maxilla and Surrounding
Tissues (Figures 30-23 and 30-24)
Mastoid process of the temporal bone is located posterior
and inferior to the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), appears
as a rounded radiopacity.
Styloid process appears as a long, narrow radiopaque spine
that extends downward, from the inferior surface of the temporal bone, just anterior to the mastoid process.
External auditory meatus (external acoustic meatus), a
round opening in the temporal bone located anterior and
superior to the mastoid process, appears as a round
radiolucency.
Glenoid fossa (mandibular fossa) is a concave, depressed
area of the temporal bone located anterior to the external
auditory meatus. The head of the mandibular condyle rests
in the glenoid fossa. This landmark appears as a concavity
superior to the mandibular condyle.
Articular eminence appears as a rounded projection of the
temporal bone just anterior to the glenoid fossa.
Lateral pterygoid plate appears as a radiopaque winglike
bony projection of the sphenoid bone located posterior to
the maxillary tuberosity.
Maxillary tuberosity appears as a radiopaque rounded
prominence distal to the third molar region.
Infraorbital foramen, a small round opening in the maxilla, appears as a round radiolucency inferior to the border of
the orbit.
Orbit, the bony cavity of the eye socket, appears as a large
round radiolucency with radiopaque borders superior to the
maxillary sinuses. Often, only the inferior border of the orbit
is visible as a radiopaque line.
394 EXTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 11
12
13
14
15
16
17 18
19
2
FIGURE 30-23 Drawing of panoramic radiograph showing the maxilla and surrounding
normal anatomic landmarks. (1) Mastoid process, (2) styloid process, (3) external auditory meatus,
(4) glenoid fossa, (5) articular eminence, (6) lateral pterygoid plate, (7) maxillary tuberosity, (8) infraorbital
foramen, (9) orbit of the eye, (10) incisive canal, (11) incisive foramen, (12) anterior nasal spine, (13) nasal
cavity, (14) nasal septum, (15) hard palate, (16) maxillary sinus, (17) zygomatic process of the zygoma,
(18) zygoma, and (19) hamulus.
1
2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13
FIGURE 30-24 Panoramic
radiograph showing the maxilla
and surrounding normal anatomic
landmarks. (1) Mastoid process,
(2) external auditory meatus,
(3) glenoid fossa, (4) articular eminence,
(5) maxillary tuberosity, (6) orbit of the
eye, (7) nasal cavity, (8) nasal septum,
(9) incisive canal, (10) incisive foramen,
(11) hard palate, (12) maxillary sinus,
and (13) chin rest (machine part artifact).
Incisive canal (nasopalatine canal) is a Y-shaped passageway that extends from the floor of the nose to the hard palate
lingual to the central incisors. This landmark appears as a
tunnel-like radiolucency with radiopaque borders located
between the maxillary central incisors.
Incisive foramen (nasopalatine foramen), an opening in
bone located in the anterior midline of the hard palate
directly posterior to the maxillary central incisors, appears
as a round or oval radiolucency between the roots of the
maxillary central incisors.
Anterior nasal spine, a pointed bony projection of the maxilla located at the most anterior point of the floor of the nasal
cavity, appears as a V-shaped radiopacity located at the intersection of the floor of the nasal cavity and the nasal septum.
Nasal cavity (nasal fossa), a pear-shaped compartment of
bone located superior to the maxilla, appears as a large radiolucency above the maxillary incisors.
Nasal septum, a vertical bony wall that separates the right
and left nasal fossae, appears as a vertical radiopacity that
divides the nasal cavity into two parts.
Hard palate, a bony wall that separates the oral cavity from
the nasal cavity, appears as a horizontal thick radiopaque
band superior to the maxillary teeth.
CHAPTER 30 • PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY 395
Maxillary sinus consists of two paired cavities that appear
radiolucent, located within the maxilla apical to the maxillary posterior teeth.
Zygomatic process of the maxilla is a bony process of the
maxilla that extends laterally to articulate with the zygoma
and appears as a J- or U-shaped radiopacity located apically
to the maxillary first molar.
Zygoma is the cheekbone that articulates with the zygomatic process of the maxilla. This structure appears as a
thick radiopaque band that extends posteriorly from the
zygomatic process of the maxilla.
Hamulus (hamular process) appears as a very small
radiopaque hooklike process of bone that extends downward
and slightly backward from the medial pterygoid plate of the
sphenoid bone.
Anatomic Landmarks of the Mandible and
Surrounding Tissues (Figures 30-25 and 30-26)
Mandibular condyle appears as a radiopaque rounded bony
process extending from the posterior superior border of the
ramus of the mandible that articulates with the glenoid fossa
of the temporal bone.
Mandibular notch appears as a concavity of bone located
posterior to the coronoid process on the superior border of
the ramus of the mandible.
Coronoid process appears as a large radiopaque triangular
prominence of bone located on the anterior superior ramus
of the mandible.
Mandibular foramen, an ovoid opening in the bone on the
lingual aspect of the ramus of the mandible, appears as a
round radiolucency located in the center of the ramus of the
mandible.
Lingula (meaning “little tongue”) is a small tongueshaped projection of bone located anterior and adjacent
to the mandibular foramen. This landmark appears as a
small radiopacity anterior to the mandibular foramen.
Mandibular canal, a long tunnel-like passageway
extending from the mandibular foramen on the medial
aspect of the ramus of the mandible to the mental foramen on the lateral aspect of the body of the mandible,
appears as a radiolucent tube outlined by two thin
radiopaque lines representing the walls of the canal.
Mental foramen, an opening through which the mental
nerve and related blood vessels emerge on the lateral
aspect of the body of the mandible, appears as a small
round radiolucent area near the roots of the mandibular
premolars.
Mental ridge, appears as a thick radiopaque band representing the prominence of bone located on the external
surface of the mandible and extends anteriorly from the
premolar area to the midline.
Mental fossa appears as a radiolucent depressed area
of bone in the region of the roots of the mandibular
incisor teeth.
Lingual foramen, a very small round opening located in
the center of the genial tubercles on the lingual side of
midline of the mandible, appears as a small round radiolucency located inferior to the apices of the mandibular
incisor teeth.
Genial tubercles The genial tubercles, four small projections of bone located on the lingual surface of the
midline of the mandible, appear as a radiopaque donutshaped circle surrounding the lingual foramen.
1
3
4
5
6 8 9
10
11 12
13
15
14
16
17
2
7
FIGURE 30-25 Drawing of panoramic radiograph showing the mandible and surrounding normal
anatomic landmarks. (1) Mandibular condyle, (2) mandibular notch, (3) coronoid process, (4) mandibular
foramen, (5) lingula, (6) submandibular fossa, (7) mandibular canal, (8) mental foramen, (9) mental ridge,
(10) mental fossa, (11) lingual foramen, (12) genial tubercles, (13) inferior border of the mandible,
(14) mylohyoid ridge, (15) oblique ridge, (16) angle of the mandible, (17) cervical vertabrae.
396 EXTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
1
4
5
2 3
7
8 9 10
11 12 13 14 16 17
15
6
FIGURE 30-26 Panoramic
radiograph showing the mandible
and surrounding normal anatomic
landmarks. (1) Mandibular condyle,
(2) mandibular notch, (3) coronoid
process, (4) mandibular foramen,
(5) lingula, (6) submandibular fossa,
(7) mandibular canal, (8) mental
foramen, (9) mental ridge, (10) mental
fossa, (11) lingual foramen, (12) genial
tubercles, (13) inferior border of the
mandible, (14) mylohyoid ridge,
(15) oblique ridge, (16) angle of the
mandible, (17) cervical vertabrae.
Inferior border of the mandible, composed of the thick
cortical bone that outlines the lower border of the mandible,
appears as a dense radiopaque band.
Mylohyoid ridge, a ridge of bone running diagonally downward and forward on the lingual aspect of the ramus of the
mandible to near the apices of the molar roots, appears as a
dense radiopaque band.
Submandibular fossa, a concavity in the mandible where
the salivary glands are located, appears as a diffuse radiolucenct area below the mylohyoid ridge and the roots of the
mandibular molars.
Oblique ridge, a diagonal ridge of bone on the lateral aspect
of the mandible that runs downward and forward from the
anterior border of the ramus to the level of the cervical portion of the molar and premolar roots, appears as a dense
radiopaque band.
Angle of the mandible is the area at the posterior and inferior corners of the mandible, where the body of the mandible
meets and joins the ascending ramus of the mandible.
Cervical spine radiopaque vertebrae appear beyond the
rami of the mandible at the extreme right and left edges of
the radiograph.
Soft Tissue Images Viewed on the Panoramic
Radiograph (Figures 30-27 and 30-28)
The panoramic radiograph is unique in that some soft tissue
structures (e.g., tongue, soft palate, lipline, and ear) attenuate the beam of radiation enough to become visible on the
radiograph.
1 1
3
4
4
2 2
FIGURE 30-27 Drawing of panoramic radiograph showing soft tissue images. (1) Tongue,
(2) soft palate, (3) lipline, and (4) ear.
CHAPTER 30 • PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY 397
Tongue, when positioned correctly, resting on the palate,
allows the soft tissue image of the tongue to be minimally
visible. When visible, the radiopaque dorsal side of the
tongue appears superimposed over the ramus. Remember
that the panoramic view of the tongue will be broadened and
much wider than it appears clinically.
Soft palate, located posterior to the hard palate, separating
the oral cavity from the nasal cavity, appears as a diagonal
radiopaque structure above and posterior to the maxillary
tuberosity.
Lipline image can be avoided if the patient is instructed to
close the lips together around the bite guide (Figure 30-18).
When imaged, the outline of the patient’s lips appears as a
radiopacity superimposed over the anterior teeth.
Ear appears radiopaque and superimposed over the styloid
process, anterior and inferior to the mastoid process.
Air Space Images Viewed on the Panoramic
Radiograph (Figures 30-29 and 30-30)
Air does not attenuate the beam of radiation as much as hard or
soft tissue. For this reason, air spaces appear radiolucent
(black) on a panoramic radiograph. Air spaces that may be
recorded include the palatoglossal, nasopharyngeal, and glos12 3
FIGURE 30-28 Panoramic radiograph
showing soft tissue images. (1) Tongue,
(2) soft palate, and (3) ear.
sopharyngeal air spaces. The radiolucencies produced by these
landmarks often are so dark that they may obscure other structures, compromising the diagnostic ability of the panoramic
radiograph. Careful positioning of the patient into the focal
trough will help minimize the appearance of these negative
shadows. The term negative shadow implies to these radiolucencies because they are shadows of “nothing.”
Palatoglossal air space appears as a radiolucency between
the palate and the tongue. When the patient is instructed to rest the
tongue against the hard palate, the palatoglossal air space negative
shadow is minimized. If the tongue is not correctly positioned
against the palate during exposure, the radiolucency appears
superimposed on or above the apices of the maxillary teeth.
Nasopharyngeal air space is the radiolulcency located
posterior to the nasal cavity. The negative shadow it creates on
the image often appears as a radiolucent diagonal streak
located superior to the radiopaque soft palate. This negative
shadow is emphasized when the patient’s chin is incorrectly
tipped down.
Glossopharyngeal air space is the portion of the pharynx
located posterior to the tongue and oral cavity (the oropharyngeal region). The negative shadow it creates on the image
appears as a vertical radiolucent band superimposed over the
ramus of the mandible.
1 1
3 3
2 2
FIGURE 30-29 Drawing of
panoramic radiograph showing air
space images. (1) Palatoglossal air
space, (2) nasopharyngeal air space,
and (3) glossopharyngeal air space.
398 EXTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
Images of Machine Parts Viewed on
the Panoramic Radiograph (Figures 30-31
and 30-32)
The chin rest, side head positioner guides, and biteblock are
often recorded on a panoramic radiograph. Care should be taken
to identify these artifacts so that they are not confused with normal anatomical landmarks or the presence of disease.
Ghost Images Viewed on the Panoramic
Radiograph (Figures 30-33 and 30-34)
The rotation of the panoramic tube head and the use of a focal
trough to isolate slices or layers of the image creates ghost
images on the resultant panoramic radiograph. Ghost images
are mirror or second images of structures that are penetrated
by the x-ray beam twice. Consider that when the x-ray tube
1 23
FIGURE 30-30 Panoramic radiograph
showing air space images. (1) Palatoglossal
air space, (2) nasopharyngeal air space, and
(3) glossopharyngeal air space.
1
3 3
2 2
FIGURE 30-31 Drawing of
panoramic radiograph showing
images of machine parts.
(1) Biteblock, (2) chin rest, (3) side
positioner guides.
1 2 2
FIGURE 30-32 Panoramic radiograph
showing images of machine parts.
(1) Biteblock, (2) side positioner guides.
CHAPTER 30 • PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY 399
head is on the patient’s right side, the x-ray beam penetrates
the right side first. Because this right side is closer to the
x-ray source and farther from the image receptor, the structures here are blurred almost completely out of the image. The
beam continues through the patient to the left side, which is at
that moment closer to the image receptor and inside the focal
trough (Figure 30-6). As the tube head rotates around the back
of the patient, the x-ray beam enters the back of the head and
“refocuses” on imaging the anterior teeth. Because the anterior teeth at that moment are closer to the image receptor, and
in the focal layer, they are being imaged onto the radiograph
and the back of the skull is being blurred out. As the beam
continues around the patient to the left side, the blurring out
and refocusing continues along the predetermined focal layer.
In principle those structures outside the focal trough will not
be imaged on the radiograph. However, a magnified, unsharp
image called a ghost image often appears. For example, when
viewing a panoramic image of the patient’s right mandible, a
ghost image of the left mandible can be observed superimposed over the actual right mandible, as a mirror image
(Figures 30-33 and 30-34). Ghost images appear on the opposite side of the image than the actual structure and will often
appear larger (more magnified) and higher (due to the slight
negative vertical angulation of the PID). Being aware of ghost
images will assist the radiographer in interpreting panoramic
radiographs.
REVIEW—Chapter summary
Panoramic radiography produces a broad view image of both the
maxilla and the mandible on a single radiograph. Panoramic
radiographs are valuable in examining large areas of the maxillofacial region; locating impacted teeth or retained root tips; evaluating trauma, lesions, and diseases of the jaws; and assessing
growth and development.
The greatest advantage of the panoramic radiograph
is that it can image a large region of structures and provide
an increased amount of diagnostic information when compared to a full mouth series of intraoral radiographs. The
greatest limitation of the panoramic radiograph is the image
magnification and distortion that make interpreting the image
difficult.
Panoramic imagery is based on tomography where a slice
or layer of tissue is imaged with relative clarity, while blurring out other structures not of interest. During the panoramic
2 2
1
FIGURE 30-33 Drawing of
panoramic radiograph showing
ghost images. (1) Ghost image of
the spinal column (cervical vertebrae),
(2) ghost image of the opposite side
mandible.
2
2
1
FIGURE 30-34 Panoramic radiograph
showing ghost images. (1) Ghost image of the
spinal column (cervical vertebrae), (2) ghost
image of the opposite side mandible.
400 EXTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
exposure, the image receptor and x-ray tube head move
slowly (about 15–20 seconds cycle) in opposite directions of
each other around the patient’s head. The patient remains still
during the exposure, either in a standing or seated position
(depending on the machine type). Through the use of a series
of rotational points or centers, the x-ray beam is directed
toward the moving cassette to record a select plane of dental
anatomy. The rotational center is defined as the axis on which
the tube head and the cassette rotate. Most modern panoramic
machines use a moving-center rotation.
The focal trough is the area between the x-ray source and
the image receptor where structures will be imaged clearly on
the radiograph. Structures positioned outside the focal trough
will be blurred out of the image. The focal trough is threedimensional, and the size and shape is determined by the
machine manufacturer. Each manufacturer provides instructions and head positioner guides to assit the radiographer in
positioning the patient within the focal trough.
All panoramic units have (1) a rotational x-ray tube
head; (2) a cassette holder for film or phosphor plate or a
built-in digital sensor; (3) head positioner guides; and (4) an
exposure control panel. The PID is collimated to a narrow slit
opening, allowing the x-ray beam to fan out to expose a narrow slice of tissue as the tube head rotates around the
patient’s head. The x-ray beam penetrates the patient from
the back of the head.
Positioning the patient’s head within the focal trough
is key to producing a diagnostic image. Most panoramic
units have a forehead rest, chin rest, or biteblock to aid
the radiographer in positioning the arches in the correct
anterior–posterior dimension; side head positioner guides, a
mirror, or beams of light that shine on the patient’s face to
determine the correct left–right dimension; and a chin rest or
light beams to aid in locating the ala–tragus line or Frankfort
plane to determine the correct superior–inferior dimension of
the focal trough.
Artifacts that compromise diagnostic quality result when
metal or dense material objects, such as a necklace, earrings,
oral piercings, and other facial jewelry, are not removed prior to
exposure. The patient must be instructed to rest the tongue
against the palate and to close the lips around the biteblock
during the exposure to minimize the appearance of these structures on the radiograph. Accurate exposure settings and careful
film handling will avoid errors that result in undiagnostic radiographs.
Positioning errors result in characteristic image appearances. Positioning the arches too far forward in the focal
trough produces blurred and narrowed anterior teeth; positioning the arches too far back in the focal trough produces
blurred and widened anterior teeth. Positioning the arches too
far to the lateral (tipping or turning the head to the right or
left) results in narrowed teeth on the side closer to the image
receptor and magnified teeth on the side closer to the x-ray
tube head. Positioning the patient’s chin too far down results
in an image with an exaggerated “smile.” Positioning the
patient’s chin too far up results in an image with an exaggerated “frown.”
The skilled radiographer should be able to identify normal radiographic anatomy of the maxilla and the mandible,
including soft tissue images and air spaces that appear on a
panoramic radiograph. The radiographer should be able to
distinguish normal radiographic anatomy from artifacts such
as machine parts and ghost images that appear on the radiograph.
RECALL—Review questions
1. A panoramic radiograph is valuable when diagnosing
each of the following EXCEPT one. Which one is the
EXCEPTION?
a. A cyst
b. An impacted molar
c. Recurrent caries
d. A supernumerary tooth
2. Which of these is an advantage of a panoramic radiograph when compared to an intraoral radiograph?
a. A larger region is recorded.
b. The image is magnified.
c. Distortion is eliminated.
d. Definition is improved.
3. Which of these is a limitation of a panoramic radiograph when compared to an intraoral radiograph?
a. Larger radiation dose to the patient.
b. Increased time required for exposure.
c. Superimposition of structures may make interpretation difficult.
d. Requires an increase in patient instruction and cooperation with the procedure.
4. What is the term given to the technique where a slice of
tissue is exposed distinctly, whereas structures outside
the designated area are blurred out of the image?
a. Ghost image
b. Artifact
c. Focal trough
d. Tomography
5. All panoramic radiographs have 10 to 30 percent
magnification.
It is desirable to keep the magnification less in the anterior region and greater in the posterior region.
a. The first statement is true. The second statement is
false.
b. The first statement is false. The second statement is
true.
c. Both statements are true.
d. Both statements are false.
6. The panoramic PID is collimated to what shape?
a. Round
b. Rectangular
c. Narrow slit
CHAPTER 30 • PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY 401
7. What term is given to the area where structures will be
imaged with relative clarity, whereas structures outside
this area are blurred out of the image?
a. Ghost image
b. Artifact
c. Focal trough
d. Tomography
8. Each of the following is a component of the panoramic
x-ray machine EXCEPT one. Which one is the
EXCEPTION?
a. Rotational x-ray tube head
b. Cassette holder or built-in digital sensor
c. Head positioner guides
d. Variable exposure timer
9. Which dimension of the focal trough does the biteblock
of the panoramic x-ray machine assist the operator with
positioning?
a. Anterior–posterior
b. Lateral (left–right)
c. Superior–inferior
10. Which of the following planes is used to position the
patient correctly within the superior–inferior (up–down)
dimension?
a. Ala–tragus line
b. Frankfort plane
c. Midsaggital plane
d. Both (a) and (b)
11. Which of the following positioning errors results in
anterior teeth that are blurry and narrowed in size?
a. Too far forward in the focal trough
b. Too far backward in the focal trough
c. Too far to the left in the focal trough
d. Too far to the right in the focal trough
12. When the dental arches are rotated to the left, the teeth
on the right side will be positioned closer to the image
receptor.
The teeth closer to the image receptor will appear blurry
and magnified.
a. The first statement is true. The second statement is
false.
b. The first statement is false. The second statement is
true.
c. Both statements are true.
d. Both statements are false.
13. Which of the following positioning errors results in an
exaggerated “smile” appearance of the arches?
a. Midsaggital plane tipped to the left
b. Midsaggital plane tipped to the right
c. Chin tipped too far up
d. Chin tipped too far down
14. The appearance of a large radiolucency that obscures
the maxillary teeth apices results when
a. the lips are not closed around the biteblock during
exposure.
b. the tongue is not resting on the palate during exposure.
c. the lead thyroid collar gets in the way of the primary
beam.
d. facial jewelry (e.g., oral piercing) is not removed
prior to exposure.
15. Which of the following appears radiolucent on a
panoramic radiograph?
a. Nasal cavity
b. Nasal septum
c. Nasal spine
d. Hard palate
16. Which of the following appears radiopaque on the
panoramic radiograph?
a. External auditory meatus
b. Zygomatic process of the maxilla
c. Mental fossa
d. Mandibular foramen
17. Which of the following could be called a negative
shadow?
a. Tongue
b. Ghost image
c. Glossopharyngeal air space
d. Biteblock
18. List three air spaces that may be recorded on panoramic
radiographs.
a. ______________
b. ______________
c. ______________
19. List three machine parts that may be recorded on
panoramic radiographs.
a. ______________
b. ______________
c. ______________
20. What is the term given to a structure that is recorded a second time, with less sharpness, and on the opposite side?
a. Ghost image
b. Focal trough
c. Split image
d. Tomograph
REFLECT—Case study
You have to expose a panoramic radiograph on the following
patients today. Each of these patients presents with a characteristic that will make positioning the patient for the procedure a
challenge. Carefully review each of the patient descriptions and
answer the following questions:
1. What patient positioning step do you anticipate having
a problem with?
2. What error is most likely to occur?
3. What will the image look like?
4. How can you prevent this error from occurring or minimize the result on the image?
5. Write out the specific steps you plan to take to produce
a diagnostic quality image.
Case A
A hyperactive 10-year-old child who seems to be having difficulty paying attention to your directions.
Case B
A young adult with multiple facial piercings, including a
tongue ring and several earrings.
Case C
A young woman with fashionable hair extensions gathered into
a large ponytail.
Case D
A middle-aged man who wears partial dentures that when
removed reveal missing anterior teeth.
Case E
An older woman with osteoporosis who exhibits a pronounced
stooped posture as a result of collapsed vertebrae.
RELATE—Laboratory application
For a comprehensive laboratory practice exercise on this topic,
see Thomson, E. M. (2012). Exercises in oral radiography
techniques: A laboratory manual 3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River,
NJ: Pearson. Chapter 12, “Panoramic radiographic technique.”
REFERENCES
Eastman Kodak. (2000). Successful Panoramic Radiography.
Rochester, NY: Eastman Kodak.
Farman, A. G., Nortje, C. J., & Wood, R. E. (1993). Oral and
maxillofacial diagnostic imaging. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
Ferrús-Torres, E., Gargallo-Albiol, J., Berini-Aytés, L., &
Gay-Escoda, C. (2009). Diagnostic predictability of digital versus conventional panoramic radiographs in the
presurgical evaluation of impacted mandibular third
molars. International Journal of Oral Maxillofacial
Surgery, 38, 1184–1187.
Horner, K., Drage, N., & Brettle, D. (2008). 21st century
imaging. London: Quintessence Publishing Co.
Langland, O. E., Langlais, R. P., McDavid, W. D., et al.
(1989). Panoramic radiology (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Lea
& Febiger.
Rushton, V. E., Horner, K., & Worthington, H. V. (1999). The
quality of panoramic radiographs in a sample of general
dental practices. British Dental Journal, 26, 186(12),
630-633.
Rushton, V. E., & Rout, J. (2006). Panoramic radiography.
London: Quintessence Publishing Co.
Serman, N., Horrell, B. M., & Singer, S. (2003). High-quality
panoramic radiographs. Tips and tricks. Dentistry Today,
22(1), 70–73.
Thomson, E. M. (2009). Focusing on the image. How to produce error-free radiographic images for the pediatric
patient. Dimensions of Dental Hygiene, 7(2), 24–26, 27.
White, S. C., & Pharoah, M. J. (2008). Oral radiology: Principles and interpretation (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
402 EXTRAORAL TECHNIQUES
403
Answers to Study Questions
Chapter 1
1. c
2. a
3. d
4. e
5. b
6. d
7. c
8. b
9. c
10. a
11. a
12. b
13. d
14. Use Box 1-1 to list uses
Chapter 2
1. a
2. Use chapter information and Figure 2-1
to draw diagram
3. d
4. c
5. b
6. b
7. a
8. d
9. b
10. d
11. Use chapter information to list
properties
12. a
13. c
14. d
15. b
16. a
17. Use chapter information to list sources
18. c
Chapter 3
1. c
2. a
3. d
4. 0.5, 0.75, 20, 6
5. a
6. b
7. d
8. Use chapter information to list
conditions
9. Use chapter information and Figure 3-8
to draw and label diagram
10. c
11. b
12. d
13. a
14. a
15. c
16. c
17. a
Chapter 4
1. Use chapter information to list
criteria
2. d
3. c
4. b
5. d
6. a
7. d
8. d
9. a
10. d
11. b
12. c
13. d
14. a
15. a
Chapter 5
1. a
2. c
3. a
4. d
5. c
6. b
7. b
8. d
9. As low as reasonably achievable
10. Use chapter information to
list responses
11. c
12. a
13. b
14. d
15. c
16. d
17. d
18. c
19. d
20. b
Chapter 6
1. d
2. d
3. b
4. c
5. b
6. c
7. d
8. c
9. d
10. a
11. b
12. c
13. c
14. b
15. Use Table 6-3 to list
organizations.
Chapter 7
1. a
2. d
3. c
4. b
5. b
6. c
7. c
8. b
9. a
10. d
11. a
12. a
Chapter 8
1. b
2. c
3. a
4. a
5. c
6. d
7. b
8. d
9. a
10. c
11. b
12. b
13. b
14. a
15. c
16. b
17. c
18. b
19. a
20. d
21. c
Chapter 9
1. d
2. e
3. c
4. a
5. b
6. c
7. d
8. d
9. d
10. c
11. d
12. e
13. d
14. Use chapter information to list
features
15. c
16. c
17. a
18. b
404 ANSWERS TO STUDY QUESTIONS
Chapter 10
1. d
2. a
3. b
4. a
5. Use chapter information to list items
6. c
7. b
8. c
9. c
10. b
11. d
12. d
13. b
14. d
15. a
16. c
17. c
Chapter 11
1. d
2. a
3. d
4. b
5. Use chapter information to list aspects
6. c
7. Use chapter information to list items
8. c
9. a
10. d
11. b
12. d
13. c
14. a
Chapter 12
1. d
2. Use chapter information to list aspects
3. a
4. a
5. c
6. d
7. b
8. a
9. d
10. c
11. b
12. Use chapter information to complete list.
Chapter 13
1. c
2. a
3. b
4. a
5. a
6. c
7. b
8. d
9. a
10. a
11. b
12. d
13. c
14. d
15. Use chapter information to list
contraindications
16. d
17. a
18. b
Chapter 14
1. d
2. a
3. d
4. c
5. b
6. a
7. d
8. c
9. a
10. c
11. b
12. d
Chapter 15
1. b
2. b
3. d
4. b
5. a
6. a
7. d
8. c
9. d
10. d
11. b
12. b
13. d
14. d
15. d
16. a
17. c
Chapter 16
1. c
2. b
3. b
4. d
5. c
6. b
7. c
8. a
9. d
10. c
11. a
12. d
13. c
14. d
15. d
Chapter 17
1. a
2. d
3. d
4. b
5. c
6. a
7. b
8. a
9. c
10. d
Chapter 18
1. d
2. d
3. c
4. a
5. c
6. c
7. b
8. c
9. a
10. d
11. a
12. c
13. d
14. d
15. c
Chapter 19
1. c
2. c
3. Use chapter information to list objectives
4. d
5. b
6. a
7. d
8. b
9. d
Chapter 20
1. Use chapter information to list agencies
2. b
3. a
4. d
5. Use chapter information to list wastes
6. c
7. a
8. d
9. b
10. c
11. c
Chapter 21
1. Use chapter information to list
advantages
2. d
3. d
4. b
5. d
6. c
7. a
8. d
9. b
10. c
11. a
12. d
13. b
14. d
ANSWERS TO STUDY QUESTIONS 405
Chapter 22
1. c
2. d
3. b
4. b
5. a
6. d
7. a
8. c
9. d
10. b
11. a
12. c
13. b
14. d
15. c
16. b
17. a
Chapter 23
1. b
2. a
3. d
4. d
5. c
6. c
7. b
8. a
9. b
10. c
11. d
12. c
13. a
Chapter 24
1. b
2. d
3. a
4. b
5. c
6. a
7. a
8. c
9. b
10. d
11. c
12. a
13. b
14. b
Chapter 25
1. b
2. Use Box 25-1 to list uses
3. c
4. d
5. c
6. a
7. b
8. Use chapter information to list
limitations
9. d
10. c
11. a
12. b
Chapter 26
1. Use chapter information to list
conditions
2. c
3. b
4. d
5. a
6. d
7. a
8. b
9. d
10. d
11. c
12. a
13. b
14. a
15. b
16. d
17. c
18. d
Chapter 27
1. Use chapter information to list
actions
2. b
3. a
4. c
5. b
6. d
7. a
8. d
9. b
10. d
11. d
12. a
Chapter 28
1. d
2. b
3. a
4. b
5. c
6. d
7. a
8. a
9. d
10. c
11. b
12. b
13. d
14. d
15. b
16. Use chapter information to list reasons.
Chapter 29
1. a
2. b
3. c
4. b
5. b
6. d
7. c
8. a
9. b
10. a
11. a
12. d
13. c
14. b
15. d
Chapter 30
1. c
2. a
3. c
4. d
5. a
6. c
7. c
8. d
9. a
10. d
11. a
12. d
13. d
14. b
15. a
16. b
17. c
18. Use chapter information to list air
spaces
19. Use chapter information to list machine
parts
20. a
This page intentionally left blank
407
Glossary
Abscess: A localized pus formation often accompanied by swelling
and pain. When involving an infected tooth, an abscess is usually
located near the apex of the roots. May be chronic or acute. Appears
radiolucent when large enough to be visible on a radiograph.
Absorbed dose: The amount of energy deposited in any form of
matter, such as teeth, soft tissues, treatment chair, air, and so forth,
by any type of radiation (alpha or beta particles, x- or gamma rays,
etc.). The units for measuring the absorbed dose are the gray (Gy)
and the rad (radiation absorbed dose).
Absorption: The process through which radiation imparts some or
all of its energy to any material through which it passes.
Acetic acid: A chemical in the fixer solution that provides the acid
medium to stop further development by neutralizing the alkali of
the developer.
Acidifier: A chemical (acetic acid) in the fixer solution that neutralizes the alkali in the developer solution and stops further action of
the developer.
Acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS): The end stage
of an infection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
A complex disease that interferes with the body’s immune system.
Activator: A chemical (usually sodium carbonate) in the developer
solution that causes the emulsion on the radiographic film to swell.
Initiates the reducing action of the developing agents. Sodium carbonate makes the developer alkaline.
Acute radiation syndrome: Symptoms of the short-term radiation
effects after a massive dose of ionizing radiation.
Added filtration: Added to the inherent filtration built into the
x-ray machine. Added filtration is in the form of thin disks of pure
aluminum, which can be inserted between the x-ray tube and the
lead collimator when the inherent filtration is not sufficient to meet
modern radiation safety requirements.
Advanced caries: A classification of proximal surface caries. Category where caries has progressed all the way through the enamel, to
or through the dentinoenamel junction (DEJ) but less than halfway
through the dentin toward the pulp
AIDS: See Acquired immune deficiency syndrome..
Ala: The wing of the nose. The depression at which the nostril connects
with the cheek. Used as a facial landmark in dental radiography.
ALARA: As low as reasonably achievable. Adopted as a culture and
attitude by professionals who work with ionizing radiation to minimize radiation exposure and risks.
Ala–tragus line: An imaginary plane or line from the ala of the nose
(a winglike projection at the side of the nose) to the tragus of the
ear (the cartilaginous projection in front of the acoustic meatus of
the ear). Important in determining the correct position of the
patient’s head.
Alkaline: Having a pH greater than 7. Less than 7 is acidic, 7 is neutral.
Alpha particle: A common form of particulate (corpuscular) radiation. Alpha particles contain two protons and two neutrons and are
positively charged.
Alternating current (AC): A flow of electrons in one direction, followed by a flow in the opposite direction.
Aluminum equivalent: The thickness of aluminum affording the
same degree of attenuation, under specified conditions, as the material in question.
Alveolar (crestal) bone: That portion of the maxillary or mandibular bone that immediately surrounds and supports the roots of the
dentition.
Alveolar process: The most coronal portion of the alveolar bone.
Appears radiopaque when visible on a radiograph.
Alveolus: In dentistry, that part of the alveolar bone that forms the
bony socket in which the roots of the tooth are held in position by
fibers of the periodontal ligament.
Amalgam: Metallic restorative material.
Amalgam tattoo: The bluish-purple color of the gingival tissue
caused by fragments of amalgam under the tissue.
Ameloblastoma: An odontogenic tumor of enamel origin that does
not undergo differentiation to the point of enamel formation.
American Dental Assistants Association (ADAA): Professional
organization for the purpose of promoting the dental assisting profession in ways that enhance the delivery of quality oral health care
to the public.
American Dental Association (ADA): Professional organization
of dentists committed to the public’s oral health through professional advancement, research, education, and the development of
standards of care.
American Dental Hygienists’ Association (ADHA): Professional
organization for the purpose of advancing the art and science of
dental hygiene by ensuring access to quality oral health care and
increasing awareness of the cost-effective benefits of prevention.
Amperage: The strength of an electric current measured in amperes.
Ampere (A): The unit of intensity of an electric current produced by
1 volt acting through a resistance of 1 ohm.
Analog: Relating to the mechanism in which data is represented by
continuously variable physical quantities.
Anatomical order: The order in which the teeth are arranged in the
dental arches.
Angle of mandible: The area at the posterior and inferior corners
of the mandible, where the body of the mandible meets and joins
the ascending ramus of the mandible.
Angstrom: A unit of measurement that describes the wavelengths of
certain high-frequency radiation. One angstrom unit (AU or Å)
measures 1/100,000,000 of a centimeter. Most wavelengths used in
dentistry vary from about 0.1 AU to a maximum of 1.0 AU.
Angular chelitis: Fissuring and ulcerations at the corners of the
mouth.
Angulation: The direction in which the central ray and the PID of
the x-ray machine are directed toward the teeth and the image
receptor. See Horizontal angulation, Negative angulation, Positive
angulation, and Vertical angulation.
Ankylosis: A stiffening of a joint, such as the TMJ, caused by a
fibrous or bony union. In dentistry the term can also apply to a
union of the tooth to the alveolus caused by mineralization and
hardening of the fibers of the periodontal ligament.
Anode: The positive electrode (terminal) in the x-ray tube. Tungsten
block, normally set at a 20-degree angle facing the cathode, imbedded in the copper portion of the terminal.
Anodontia: A congenital absence of teeth. Any tooth in the dental
arch may fail to develop. The teeth most frequently absent are the
third molars, the premolars, and the maxillary lateral incisors.
Anomaly: A deviation from the normal.
Anterior nasal spine: V-shaped projection from the floor of the
nasal fossa in the midline. Appears as a triangle-shaped radiopacity.
Antihalation coating: A dye added to the nonemulsion side of
duplicating film to prevent backscattered ultraviolet light from
coming through the films and creating an unsharp image.
Antiseptic: Refers to agents used on living tissues to destroy or stop
the growth of bacteria.
Apical foramen: The opening to the pulp canal at the apex (terminal
end) of the root of the tooth. A three-rooted tooth would have three
apical foramina.
Appearance: Outward impression of self that the radiographer presents to the patient.
Apprehensive: To be anxious or fearful about the future.
Area monitoring: The routine monitoring of the level of radiation
in an area such as a room, building, space around radiation-emitting equipment, or outdoor space.
Arrested caries: Caries that are no longer progressing.
Artifacts: Images other than anatomy or pathology that do not contribute to a diagnosis of the patient’s condition.
Artificial intelligence: Ability of a computer to perform decision
making similar to a human being.
Asepsis: The absence of septic matter, or freedom from infection.
Atom: The smallest particle of an element that has the properties of
that element. Atoms are extremely minute and are composed of a
number of subatomic particles. See Proton, Electron, and Neutron.
Atomic number (also called Z number): The total number of
protons in the nucleus of an atom.
Atomic weight (also called A number or mass number): The
total number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus of an atom.
Attitude: The position assumed by the body in connection with a
feeling or mood.
Automatic processor: A machine that develops, fixes, washes, and
dries radiographic film.
Autotransformer: A special single-coil transformer that corrects
fluctuations in the current flowing through the x-ray machine.
Background radiation: Ionizing radiation that is always present.
Consists of cosmic rays from outer space, naturally occurring radiation from the earth, and radiation from radioactive materials.
Barrier envelope: Plastic sheaths used to seal intraoral film packets, phosphor plates, and digital sensors to protect from contact
with fluids in the oral cavity during exposure.
Base material: A thick layer of cement used as a cavity preparation
under a restoration. Base material often appears slightly more
radiopaque than dentin.
Beam indicating device (BID): See Positioning indicating device
(PID).
408 GLOSSARY
Benign: Noncancerous. Not usually an immediate threat to overall
health.
Beta particle: A form of particulate radiation. High-speed negative
electrons.
BID: Beam indicating device. See Positioning indicating device (PID).
Binding energy: The internal energy within the atom that holds its
components together.
Biodegradable: Capable of being broken down into harmless
products by living organisms such as those found in a wastewater
treatment facility.
Bisecting technique (bisecting-angle or short-cone technique): An exposure technique in which the central beam of
radiation is directed perpendicular to an imaginary line that
bisects the angle formed by the recording plane of the image
receptor and the long axes of the teeth.
Bisector: The imaginary line that bisects the angle formed by the
image receptor and teeth. See Bisecting technique.
Biteblock: A plastic or polystyrene device that functions to hold the
image receptor in position while it is being exposed. The patient
occludes and holds the image receptor in place by biting on the
biteblock.
Bite extension: That portion of the biteblock that allows the patient
to occlude in such a way that image receptor will be positioned parallel to the long axes of the teeth.
Bitetab: An extension, made out of heavy paper or plastic, that is
attached at the center of the image receptor and on which the patient
bites to stabilize the image receptor during a bitewing exposure.
Bitewing radiograph: An intraoral radiograph that shows the
crowns of both the upper and lower teeth.
Bremsstrahlung radiation: See General radiation.
Buccal caries: Caries that involves the buccal surface of a tooth.
Buccal-object rule: Principle that structures portrayed in two or
more radiographs exposed at different angles will appear to shift
positions.
Calcium tungstate: Barium strontium sulfate salt crystals that are
used in intensifying screens. When x-rays are absorbed, the crystals fluoresce and emit energy in the form of blue light.
Calculus: Calcified microbial plaque.
Cancellous bone: See Trabecular bone.
Canthus: The angle at either end of the slit that separates the eyelids.
The inner canthus is nearest the nose. The outer canthus is farthest
from the nose.
Carcinoma: Malignant growth of epithelial cells. A form of cancer.
Caries: Disease of the calcified tissues of the teeth. The inorganic
portion is demineralized and the organic tissues are destroyed.
Cassette: A rigid or flexible extraoral film or phosphor plate (indirect
digital technology) holder. Cassettes contain a pair of intensifying
screens.
Cassette holder: That part of a panoramic x-ray machine where the
cassette is positioned for exposure.
Cathode: The negative electrode (terminal) in the x-ray tube. The
cathode consists of a tungsten filament wire that is set in a molybdenum focusing cup that directs the cathode stream toward the target
on the anode.
Caustic: Capable of burning biological tissues.
Cemental (root) caries: Caries that develops on the roots of teeth
between the enamel border and the free margin of the gingiva.
Cementoenamel junction (CEJ): The area where the enamel
covering of the tooth crown meets the cementum covering of the
tooth root.
Cementum: One of the four basic tooth structures. The thin layer of
dense tissue that covers the root of a tooth. Because the cementum
layer is thin, it is generally radiographically indistinguishable from
dentin. When the condition of hypercementosis presents, the overgrowth of cementum will appear radiopaque and bulbous.
Central ray: The central portion of the primary beam of radiation.
Cephalostat: A device used to stabilize the patient’s head in a plane
that is parallel to the image receptor and at right angles to the central rays of the x-ray beam. Ear rods that can be placed into the
openings of the acoustic meatus of the ear help to accomplish this.
Cervical burnout: A radiolucency often observed on the mesial and
distal root surfaces near the cementoenamel junction. The radiolucent appearance is caused by the concave shape of the root at the
cervical line and may be mistaken for caries.
Chairside manner: Refers to the conduct of the dental radiographer
while working at the patient’s chairside.
Chairside processing: See Rapid processing
Characteristic radiation: A form of radiation originating from an
atom following removal of an electron or excitation of the atom.
The wavelength of the emitted radiation is specific for the element
and the particular energy levels involved.
Charge-coupled device (CCD): A CCD is a solid-state detector
used in many electronic devices such as video cameras and fax
machines. A CCD is used as the image receptor found in digital
sensors. Converts x-rays to electrons that are sent to a computer via
a wire, or wirelessly via radio frequency.
Code of ethics: A professional organization’s principles to assist
members in achieving a high standard of ethical practice.
Coherent scattering: Radiation that is scattered when a low-energy
x-ray passes near an atom’s outer electron. Approximately 8 percent of interactions of matter with the dental x-ray beam are the
result of coherent scattering.
Coin test: Quality control test used to determine the adequacy of
safelighting in the darkroom.
Collimation: The restriction of the useful beam to an appropriate
size. Intraoral beam diameter is collimated to 2 3/4 in. (7 cm) at the
skin surface.
Collimator: A diaphragm, usually lead, designed to restrict the
dimensions of the useful beam.
Communication: The process by which information is exchanged
between two or more persons.
Complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS): A solidstate integrated circuit similar to the CCD. Used in digital radiography as an image receptor in the intraoral sensor. Converts x-rays to
electrons that are sent to a computer via a wire, or wirelessly via
radio frequency.
Composite (composite resin): Tooth-colored material used for
restorations.
GLOSSARY 409
Compton effect (Compton scattering): An attenuation (absorption) process for x- and gamma radiation in which a photon interacts
with an orbital electron or an atom to form a displaced electron and
a scattered photon (x-ray) of reduced energy.
Computed tomography (CT): Radiographic imaging technique
that images an isolated “slice” of tissue while blurring out other
structures.
Condensing osteitis: Term used to describe the formation of compact sclerotic bone. Such areas of hardened bone are frequently
seen on dental radiographs and appear more radiopaque than the
surrounding bone areas. Such areas are generally irregular in shape
or location.
Condyle: A rounded knob or projection on a bone, usually where
that bone articulates (joins) with another bone. The condyle of the
mandible articulates with the glenoid fossa (depression) of the temporal bone.
Cone: Older term used to describe the positioning indicating device
(PlD) or beam indicating device (BID).
Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT): Computed tomography (CT) scanning that is designed specifically for maxillofacial
use. Patient radiation dose is significantly less when compared
with conventional CT exposure of the maxillofacial region.
Cone beam volumetric imaging (CBVI): See Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Conecut error: A term used to describe a technique error in which
the central beam is not directed toward the center of the image
receptor, resulting in a blank area in that part of the radiograph that
was not reached by the radiation.
Confidentiality: Private information, such as dental records, that is
protected by law from being shared with nonprivileged individuals.
Consumer-Patient Health Act: Action that sought to establish
minimum standards for personnel who administer radiation in
medical and dental radiographic procedures. Passed and signed
into law to protect patients from unnecessary radiation.
Contact point: The area of a tooth surface that touches another
tooth. This generally refers to the mesial surface of one tooth making contact with the distal surface of the tooth adjacent to it in the
dental arch. The spot where the teeth actually touch is the contact
point, and the area between the contact point and the gingiva (gum)
is called the embrasure.
Contamination: The soiling by contact or mixing.
Contrast: The visual differences between shades ranging from
black to white in adjacent areas of the radiograph. A radiograph
that shows few shades has a short-scale or high contrast. A radiograph that shows many variations in shade has a long-scale or
low contrast. High kilovoltage produces a radiograph with longscale contrast. Low kilovoltage produces a radiograph with shortscale contrast. Digital software can be used to adjust the contrast of
digital images.
Control panel: That portion of the x-ray machine that houses the
major controls. Includes the line switch, timer, milliamperage and
kilovoltage selectors, and the exposure button.
Coronoid process of the mandible: The pointed, anterior process
on the upper border of the mandible.
Cortical bone: The solid, outer portion of the dense, compact bone.
Appears very radiopaque on radiographs.
Coulombs per kilogram (C/kg): Système Internationale unit for
measuring exposure. A coulomb is a unit of electrical charge (equal
to electrons). The unit C/kg measures electrical charges
(ion pairs) in a kilogram of air.
Cross-contamination: To contaminate from one place or person to
another place or person.
Cross-sectional technique: An occlusal radiographic technique in
which the central ray is directed perpendicular to the image receptor.
Crown: That portion of the tooth covered with enamel. “Clinical
crown” refers to the entire portion of a tooth that is visible in the
oral cavity. May also refer to a metallic or porcelain or combination
of metal and porcelain restoration.
Crystal: Term used to refer to the silver halide combinations that are
present in the film emulsion. Larger crystals require less radiation
exposure to produce an image. However, larger crystal size may
result in slightly less image resolution.
Cultural barriers: When language, beliefs, traditions, and familiar
influences become obstacles to the patient achieving optimal oral
health.
Cumulative effect: The theory that radiation-exposed tissues accrue
damage and may function at a diminished capacity with each
repeated exposure.
Cyst: An epithelium-lined sac containing fluid or other fibrous or
solid materials that appear radiolucent. Common cysts observed
on dental radiographs are dentigerous, follicular, radicular (apical
or periapical), and residual.
Darkroom: A light-tight room with special safelighting where x-ray
film is handled and processed.
Daylight loader: A light-shielded compartment attached to an automatic processor so films can be unwrapped in a room with white
light.
“Dead-man” switch: A switch so constructed that a circuit-closing
contact can only be maintained by continuous pressure by the
operator.
Dead pixel: Term given to a damaged pixel that does not respond to
x-radiation exposure. A dead pixel will not record radiographic
information.
Decay: The radioactive disintegration of the nucleus of an unstable
atom by the emission of particles, photons of energy, or both.
Definition: Sharpness and clarity of the outline of the structures in a
radiographic image. Poor definition is generally caused by movement of the patient, image receptor, or the tube head during exposure.
Dens in dente: A developmental anomaly in which the enamel
invaginates within the body of the tooth.
Density: The overall darkening or blackening of the radiographic
image. Increasing or decreasing the milliamperage and exposure
time (milliampere/second) affects density. Digital software can be
used to adjust the density of digital images.
Dentigerous cyst: A cyst derived from the enamel organ and
always associated with the crown of a tooth.
Dentin: One of the four basic tooth structures. The chief tissue of the
tooth that surrounds the pulp. Dentin is covered by enamel on the
crown of the tooth and by cementum on the root. Appears slightly
less radiopaque than enamel.
Dentinoenamel junction (DEJ): The junction between the dentin
and enamel of a tooth.
6.25 * 1018
410 GLOSSARY
Dentition: Teeth. The term dentulous refers to areas of the jaws
having teeth.
Deterministic (nonstochastic): Observable adverse biological
effects caused by radiation exposure. The severity of change in
tissues depends on the radiation dose.
Developer: The chemical solution used in film processing that
makes the latent image visible.
Developing agent: Elon and hydroquinone, substances that reduce
the halides in the film emulsion to metallic silver. Elon brings out
the details, and hydroquinone brings out the contrast in the film.
Diagnosis: The art of differentiating and determining the nature of a
problem or disease.
Digital image: Radiographic image that exists as bits of information
in a computer file. Special computer software constructs an image
on a monitor for viewing.
Digital imaging: A method of producing a filmless radiographic
image using a sensor (instead of film) and transmitting the electronic information directly into a computer, which serves to
acquire, process, store, retrieve, and display the radiographic
image. The terms digital imaging and digital radiography are often
used interchangeably.
Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM):
A joint committee formed in 1983 by the American College of
Radiology and the National Electrical Manufacturers Association
to create a standard method for electronic transmissions of digital
images, the goal of which is to achieve compatibility and ease
exchange of electronic information between digital image systems.
Digital radiograph: See Digital image.
Digital subtraction: Using a computer to superimpose two standardized radiographic images, causing the like areas of the image
to “cancel” each other out, leaving only the changes visible.
Digitize: To convert an image into a digital form that can be
processed by a computer.
Dilaceration: A sharp bend in the tooth root.
Direct current (DC): Electric current that flows continuously in one
direction. Similar to current produced in batteries. Ideal for use
with digital imaging.
Direct digital imaging: A method of directly obtaining a digital
image by exposing an intraoral sensor to x-rays to produce an
image that can be viewed on a computer monitor.
Direct supervision: Means the dentist is present in the office when
the radiographs are taken on patients.
Direct theory: States that cell damage results when ionizing radiation directly hits critical areas within the cell.
DIS (direct ion storage) monitor: A personnel radiation monitoring device that uses a miniature ion chamber to absorb radiation.
Exposure is determined through digital processing.
Disability: A physical or mental impairment that substantially limits
one or more of an individual’s major life activities.
Disclosure: The process of informing the patient about the risks and
benefits of a treatment procedure.
Disinfect: Chemical applications that reduce disease-producing
microorganisms to an acceptable level.
Distomesial overlap: When the projection angle of the x-ray beam
is directed from distal to mesial, resulting in overlapping error.
Disto-oblique periapical radiographs: Periapical radiographs
that utilize a tube shift to help image posterior objects such as
impacted third molars. Shifting the tube to the distal, causing the
x-rays to be directed from the distal aspect, will project the posterior object forward onto the image receptor.
Distortion: The variation in the true size and shape of the object
being radiographed.
Dosage: The radiation absorbed in a specified area of the body measured in grays (Gy) or rads.
Dose: The amount of absorbed radiation in grays or rads at any given
point. Dose may refer to absorbed dose, depth of the dose, entrance
dose, or surface dose.
Dose equivalent: Compares the biological effects of various types
of radiation. Dose equivalent is defined as the product of the
absorbed dose times a biological effect qualifying factor. Because
the qualifying factor for x-rays is one, the absorbed dose and the
dose equivalent are equal. The units for measuring the dose equivalent are the sievert (Sv) and the rem.
Dose-response curve: Graph produced when radiation dose and
the resultant biological response are plotted.
Dosimeter: A radiation measuring device.
Double exposure: Using the same image receptor to expose two
radiographs. Results in an overexposed, double-image error.
Duplicate radiograph: A copy made of a radiograph. Useful in
referrals, consultations, and for submitting to insurance companies
for payment of dental treatment.
Duplicating film: A photographic film similar to x-ray film. Duplicating film is exposed by the action of infrared and ultraviolet light
rather than by x-rays. Used to duplicate x-ray films in a contactprinter-type x-ray duplicating unit.
Edentulous: Without teeth. Areas of the jaws with no teeth.
Effective dose equivalent: Aids in making more accurate comparisons between different radiographic exposures. Compensates
for the differences in area exposed and the tissues that may be in
the path of the x-ray beam. Measured in microsieverts
Electric current: The flow of electrons through a conductor.
Electrical circuit: A path of electrical current.
Electrode: Either of two terminals of an electric source. In the x-ray
tube, either the anode or the cathode.
Electromagnetic radiation: Forms of energy propelled by wave
motion as photons. This is a combination of electric and magnetic
energy. Has no charge, mass, or weight and travels at the speed of
light. Differs in wavelength, frequency, and properties. For convenience, electromagnetic radiations are arranged in diagrammatic
form as the electromagnetic spectrum.
Electromagnetic spectrum: Types of electromagnetic energies
arranged in diagrammatic form on a chart. Include radio and television waves, infrared waves, visible light, ultraviolet waves, x-rays,
gamma rays, and cosmic radiations. The longer wavelengths are
measured in meters and the shorter ones in centimeters or angstroms.
Electron: A small, negatively charged particle of the atom containing
much energy and little mass.
Electron cloud: A mass of free electrons that hovers around the
filament wire of the cathode when it is heated to incandescence.
The number of free electrons increases as the milliamperage is
increased.
1mSv2.
GLOSSARY 411
Electronic noise: The digital equivalent to film fog. An electrical
disturbance that clutters the digital image reducing image clarity
and contrast.
Element: In chemistry, a simple substance that cannot be decomposed by chemical means.
Elon: Developer reducing agent that converts exposed silver halide
crystals to black metallic silver. Builds up gray tones in the image.
Elongated image : Refers to a distortion of the radiographic image
in which the tooth structures appear longer than the anatomical
size. Often caused by insufficient vertical angulation of the central
beam.
Elongation: See Elongated image.
Embrasure: The space between the sloping proximal surfaces of the
teeth. The space may diverge facially, lingually, occlusally, or apically. The interdental papillae normally fill most of the apical
embrasures.
Empathy: The ability to share in another’s emotions or feelings.
Emulsion: The gelatinous coating on radiographic film containing
silver halide crystals.
Enamel: One of the four basic tooth structures. The dense, hard substance that covers the dentin of the crown of the teeth. Appears very
radiopaque on the radiograph.
Endodontic therapy: The treatment of the tooth by removing the
nerves and tissues of the pulp cavity and replacing them with filling
material.
Energy: The ability to do work and overcome resistance.
Energy levels (electron shells or orbits): A term used in chemistry and physics to denote spherical levels containing the electrons
of the atom.
Ethics: A sense of moral obligation regarding right and wrong behavior.
Exfoliation: Shedding of primary teeth.
Exostosis: A bony growth projecting outward from the surface of a
bone or tooth. Occasionally encountered on the palate or the lingual surface of the mandible as tori.
Exposure: A measure of ionization produced in air by x- or gamma
radiation. The units of exposure are coulombs per kilogram (C/kg)
and the roentgen (R).
Exposure button: Keypad or switch that activates the x-ray production process.
Exposure chart: A chart listing the exposure factors (milliamperage,
exposure time, and kilovoltage) for each radiographic procedure.
Exposure factors: Settings for milliamperage (mA), exposure time,
and kilovoltage (kVp).
Exposure time: The time interval, expressed in seconds or impulses,
that x-rays are produced.
Extension arm: Flexible arm from which the tube head of the x-ray
machine is suspended.
External aiming device (indicator ring): An indicating component of some image receptor holders that is used to aid in aligning
the x-ray beam to the image receptor.
External auditory meatus (foramen): An opening in the temporal bone located superior and anterior to the mastoid process.
External resorption: Tooth structure lost through a resorptive
process. Characterized by tooth roots that appear shorter than
normal, but can also occur anywhere along the tooth root. Resorption
of the roots of primary teeth in response to the erupting permanent
teeth is considered normal. Pathologic external resorption may be
associated with an impacted or unerupted tooth, a tumor, or trauma.
Often the cause is idiopathic (unknown).
Extraoral film: Designed for use outside the mouth.
Extraoral radiography: Radiographic examinations made of the head
and facial region using image receptors positioned outside the mouth.
Extraoral film requires the use of a cassette and intensifying screens.
Eyewash station: Sink with faucets designed for the purpose of
flushing the eyes with copious amounts of water in an accidental
chemical contamination.
FAQs: Stands for frequently asked questions.
Federal Performance Act of 1974: Requires that all x-ray equipment manufactured or sold in the United States meet federal performance standards.
Filament: The spiral tungsten coil in the focusing cup of the cathode
of the x-ray tube.
Film badge: A monitoring device containing a special type of film
which, when properly developed and interpreted, gives a measurement of the exposure received during the time the badge was worn.
Film contrast: See Contrast.
Film duplicator: A device that provides a diffused light source (usually ultraviolet) that evenly exposes the duplicating film.
Film feed slot: Opening in an automatic film processor where the
film is inserted for processing.
Film fog: An overall darkening of the radiograph caused by old or
contaminated processing solutions, exposure to chemical fumes,
faulty safelight, or scatter radiation.
Film hanger: A stainless steel hanger equipped with clips used to
hold films during manual processing.
Film holder/Image receptor holder: Device used to hold and stabilize an intraoral film packet or digital sensor or phosphor plate in
the mouth.
Film loop (bitewing loop): Cardboard or plastic loop used as an
image receptor holder in bitewing radiography. The patient bites
on the tab portion to hold the image receptor in position during
exposure.
Film mount: Plastic or cardboard holder with frames or windows
that display films for viewing.
Film mounting: The placement of dental radiographs in a film
mount for viewing and interpretation.
Film packet: Intraoral film packaged in a moisture-proof outer plastic or paper wrap. May contain one or two films, wrapped in dark
protective paper on either side, and a thin sheet of lead foil on the
back side of the film(s).
Film recovery slot: Opening in an automatic film processing unit
where the finished radiograph exits at the completion of the processing cycle.
Film speed: The sensitivity of the film to radiation exposure. Fastfilm speed requires less radiation to produce an image. Slow film
speed requires more radiation to produce an image.
Filter: Absorbing material, usually aluminum, placed in the path of
the beam of radiation to remove a high percentage of the low
energy (longer wavelength) x-rays.
412 GLOSSARY
Filtration: The use of absorbers for selectively absorbing or screening
out low-energy x-rays from the primary beam. See Added filtration,
Inherent filtration, and Total filtration.
Fixer: A solution of chemicals that stops the action of the developer
and makes the image permanently visible.
Fixing agent: Sodium thiosulfate, also known as “hypo” or hyposulfite of sodium. It is one of several chemical ingredients in the fixer
solution and functions to remove all unexposed and any remaining
undeveloped silver bromide grains from the emulsion.
Focal spot: Small area on the target on the anode toward which the
electrons from the focusing cup of the cathode are directed. X-rays
originate at the focal spot.
Focal trough: That area between the x-ray source and the image
receptor that will be imaged distinctly on the panoramic radiograph. The size and shape of the focal trough vary with each
panoramic x-ray machine.
Focusing cup: A curved device around the cathode wire filament
that is designed to focus the free electrons toward the tungsten target of the anode.
Follicular (eruptive) cyst: A cyst associated with the enamel follicle.
Foreign body: Any object or material not normally found in the area.
Foreshortened image: Distortion of the radiographic image in
which the tooth structures appear shorter than their actual anatomical size. Most often caused by excessive vertical angulation of the
central beam.
Foreshortening: See Foreshortened image.
Fracture line: A break in a bone or a tooth. Appears radiolucent
radiographically.
Frankfort plane: An imaginary plane or line from the orbital ridge
(under the eye) to the acoustic meatus of the ear.
Frequency: The number of crests of a wavelength passing a given
point per second.
Fresh film test: Quality control test used to monitor the quality of
each new box of film.
Frontal bone: Cranial bone that forms the forehead.
Full mouth series (survey): The complete radiographic examination of the arches in which all teeth are imaged at least once, usually
consists of 14 to 22 periapical and bitewing radiographs.
Furcation involvement: Bone loss between the roots of multirooted teeth.
Fusion: A condition where the dentin and one other dental tissue of
adjacent teeth are united.
Gag reflex: A protective mechanism that serves to clear the airway
of obstruction.
Gamma rays: A form of electromagnetic radiation with properties
identical to x-rays. Usually produced spontaneously in the form of
emission from radioactive substances.
Gelatin: Component of the film emulsion in which the halide crystals are suspended.
Gemination: A single tooth bud that divides and forms two teeth.
General radiation: Also called bremsstrahlung (which means
“braking” in German) radiation. The stopping or slowing of the
electrons of the cathode stream as they collide with the nuclei of
the target atoms.
Generalized bone loss: Bone loss that occurs throughout the dental
arches.
Genetic cells: The cells contained within the testes and ovaries, containing the genes.
Genetic effect: Radiation effect that is passed on to future generations.
Genetic mutation: Change in the genetic material of a cell that
passes from one generation to another.
Genial tubercles: Anatomical landmark situated near the midline
on the lingual surface of the mandible about halfway between the
alveolar crest and the inferior border of the mandible. Appear radiographically as a small doughnut-shaped, radiopaque ring. The
lingual foramen is located in the center of this ring.
Geometric factors: Factors that relate to the relationships of angles,
lines, points, or surfaces that contribute to the quality of radiographic
image definition.
Ghost image: Mirror or second image of a structure that is penetrated twice by the x-ray beam observed on panoramic radiographs.
Gingivitis: Inflammation of the gingiva.
Globulomaxillary cyst: Type of nonodontogenic cyst arising between
the maxillary lateral incisor and the canine.
Glossopharyngeal air space: Open space posterior to the tongue
that continues into the oral-pharyngeal (throat) region. Appears as
a radiolucent negative shadow on a panoramic radiograph.
Granuloma: A tumor or neoplasm made up of granulation tissue.
Often follows an abscess. Usually round or oval and surrounded by
a fibrous capsule. Appears radiolucent on a radiograph.
Gray (Gy): Système Internationale unit for measuring absorbed dose.
One Gy equals 100 rads; 1,000 milligrays equals 1 Gy.
Gray scale: Refers to the total number of shades of gray visible in an
image.
Gray value: Number that corresponds to the amount of radiation
received by a pixel within a digital sensor. The computer uses this
value to determine the shade of gray displayed on the computer
monitor.
Grid: A device used in extraoral radiography to prevent scatter radiation from fogging the image.
Gutta percha: Endodontic filling material.
Halide: Part of a halogen compound such as bromine and iodine that
together with silver make up radiographic film emulsion.
Half-value layer (HVL): Thickness of a specified material that,
when introduced into the path of a given beam of radiation, reduces
the exposure rate by half.
Hamulus (hamular process): A very small hooklike process of bone
that extends downward and slightly backward from the sphenoid
bone. Appears radiopaque and can occasionally be seen posterior to
the maxillary tuberosity.
Hard radiation: Rays of high energy and extremely short wavelengths. Essential for dental radiography.
Hardening agent (hardener): Potassium alum, one of the chemicals of the fixing solution. Functions to shrink and harden the wet
emulsion.
Hazardous waste: Waste materials that present a threat to community health or the environment.
Head positioner guides: Device used on panoramic and cephalometric x-ray machines to stabilize the patient’s head in the correct
position.
GLOSSARY 413
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
(HIPAA): Federal law designed to provide patients with more
control over how their personal health information is used and disclosed. A patient will usually be asked to sign a notice that indicates how their radiographs may be used and their privacy rights
under this law.
Hemostat: A clamplike dental instrumental. Can be used as forceps
to grasp a film packet.
Hepatitis B (HBV): Form of viral hepatitis. May be transferred
between patient and oral health care professionals via contact with
blood. Hepatitis B vaccine in a series of three doses is recommended to achieve immunity.
Herringbone error (also called tire-track pattern): Image produced on a radiograph when the film packet is placed in the mouth
backwards. The embossed pattern in the lead foil produces this
image when the x-ray beam passes through the reversed film
packet.
HIV: See Human immunodeficiency virus.
Horizontal angulation: Direction of the central beam in a horizontal plane. Incorrect horizontal angulation results in overlapping the
proximal structures.
Horizontal bitewing radiograph: Bitewing radiograph placed in
the oral cavity with the long dimension of the image receptor positioned horizontally. Considered the traditional placement for most
patients.
Horizontal bone loss: Bone loss that occurs in a plane parallel to
the cementoenamel junctions of adjacent teeth.
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV): A type of retrovirus that
causes AIDS (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome).
Hydroquinone: Reduces (converts) exposed silver halide crystals to
black metallic silver. Slowly builds up black tones and contrast.
Hypercementosis: An excessive development of cementum that
makes the tooth root appear bulbous. Most frequently observed on
premolars. Appears radiopaque.
Hypersensitive gag reflex: Exaggerated gag response that is overly
sensitive.
Identification dot: Small circular embossed mark on the corner of
intraoral x-ray film. Used to determine the patient’s right or left
side when viewing radiographs.
Idiopathic resorption: Of unknown original. See External resorption and Internal resorption.
Image receptor holder (positioner): See film holder.
Immunization: Method, such as vaccines, of inducing resistance to
an infectious disease.
Impacted tooth (impaction): A tooth embedded in alveolar bone
in such a manner that its eruption is prevented. An impaction may
be partial or total.
Impulse: Measure of exposure time. There are 60 impulses per second.
Incandescence: Stage when the tungsten filament in the cathode
becomes red hot and glows. Free electrons are liberated and swarm
around the glowing wire to form the electron cloud.
Incipient (enamel) caries: The earliest stage of the caries process.
Incisive canal cyst: A type of nonodontogenic cyst arising in the
incisive canal.
Incisive (anterior palatine) foramen: Maxillary landmark situated at the midline of the palate immediately behind the central
incisors from which the nasopalatine nerve and vessels emerge.
Shape varies but is usually observed as a round pea-shaped radiolucency. Incorrect horizontal angulation superimposes the incisive
foramen over the apex of the root of the central incisor where it
may then be mistaken for an abscess or a cyst.
Indicator ring: See External aiming device.
Indirect digital imaging: Photostimuable phosphor (PSP) plate
sensor technology. Method of obtaining a digital image in which an
exposed phosphor plate is placed into a scanner and then converted
into a digital image.
Indirect theory: States that cell damage results indirectly when
x-rays cause the formation of toxins in the cell such as hydrogen
peroxide. Toxins in turn cause the cell damage.
Infection control: The prevention and reduction of disease-causing
(pathogenic) microorganisms.
Inferior border of the mandible: Dense layer of cortical bone
that forms the lower portion of the body of the mandible. Appears
very radiopaque on the radiograph.
Informed consent: Permission given by a patient after being
informed of the details of a treatment procedure.
Inherent filtration: Filtration built into the x-ray machine by the
manufacturer. This includes the glass x-ray tube envelope, the insulating materials of the tube head, and the materials that seal the port.
Intensifying screen: Plastic sheet coated with calcium tungstate or
rare earth fluorescent salt crystals. Positioned in a cassette. When
exposed to radiation, the fluorescent salts glow, giving off a blue
(calcium tungstate) or green (rare earth) light. Produces a latent
image faster than is possible when radiation alone is used.
Intensity: The total energy of the x-ray beam. The product of the
number of x-rays (quantity) and energy of each x-ray (quality) per
unit of area per time of exposure.
Interdental septa: Alveolar bone between adjacent teeth.
Internal resorption: Tooth structure lost through a resorptive
process. Typically appears as a radiolucent widening of the root
canal, representing the resorption process taking place from the
inside out. Often the cause is idiopathic (unknown).
Interpersonal skills: Techniques that increase successful communication with others.
Interpretation: The ability to read and explain what is revealed by
the radiograph.
Interproximal: Between two adjacent tooth surfaces.
Interproximal caries: See Proximal caries
Interproximal radiograph: See Bitewing radiograph.
Intraoral: Inside the mouth.
Intraoral dental film: Film that is placed in the oral cavity for
exposure.
Intraoral film: See Intraoral dental film.
Intraoral radiography: Radiographic examinations where the image
receptor is placed inside the mouth.
Inverse square law: States that the intensity of radiation is inversely
proportional to the square of the distance from the source of the
radiation to the point of measurement.
414 GLOSSARY
Inverted Y: Radiographic landmark made up of the lateral wall of
the nasal fossa and the anterior-medial wall of the maxillary sinus
often observed near the canine-premolar region.
Ion: An electrically charged particle, either negative or positive.
Ion pair: A pair of ions, one positive and one negative.
Ionization: The formation of ion pairs.
Ionizing radiation: Radiation that is capable of producing ions.
Irradiation: The exposure of an object or a person to radiation. Term
can be applied to radiations of various wavelengths, such as
infrared rays, ultraviolet rays, x-rays, and gamma rays.
Irreparable injury: Following exposure to radiation, injury that
results in damage that is not repaired during the recovery period.
May give rise to later long-term effects of radiation exposure.
Isosceles triangle: A triangle with two sides equal in length and
two identical angles opposite these two equal sides.
Isotope: Alternate form of an element, having the same number of
protons but a different number of neutrons inside the nucleus.
Many isotopes are radioactive.
Kilovolt (kV): A unit of electromotive force, equal to l,000 volts.
High kilovoltage is essential for the production of dental x-rays.
Kilovolt peak (kVp): The crest value in kilovolts of the potential
difference of a pulsating generator.
Kinetic energy: Energy possessed by a mass because of its motion.
Labial mounting method: Radiographs mounted so that the embossed dot is convex. The viewer is reading the radiograph as if
standing in front of, and facing, the patient. Recommended by the
American Dental Association and the American Academy of Oral
and Maxillofacial Radiology over the lingual mounting method.
Lamina dura: A thin, hard layer of cortical bone that lines the dental
alveolus. Appears as a thin, radiopaque line around the roots of the
teeth on dental radiographs.
Latent image: The invisible image produced when the film is exposed
to x-ray photons. Image remains invisible until the film is processed.
Latent period: The time between exposure to radiation and the first
clinically observable symptoms. Latent means hidden.
Lateral cephalometric radiograph: Extraoral radiograph of the
side of the skull often used by orthodontists at various stages of
treatment. Made by placing the patient’s head in a cephalostat.
Also called a lateral skull projection.
Lateral fossa: Slight decreased thickness (concavity) in bone between
the maxillary lateral incisor and the maxillary canine.
Lateral jaw (mandibular oblique lateral) radiograph: Extraoral
radiograph of the posterior mandible. Also called mandibular
oblique lateral projection.
Lateral skull projection: See Lateral cephalometric radiograph.
Law of B and T (Bergonie and Tribondeau): States that the
radiosensitivity of cells and tissues is directly proportional to their
reproductive capacity and inversely proportional to their degree of
differentiation.
Lead apron: Protective barrier made of lead or lead-equivalent materials. Shields patients’ gonadal areas from radiation during dental x-ray
exposures.
Lead equivalent: The thickness of a material that affords the same
degree of attenuation (absorption) to radiation as a specified thickness of lead.
LED (light-emitting diode): A semiconductor device that emits
light when electrical current passes through it. Used for safelighting the darkroom.
Lethal dose: The amount of radiation that is sufficient to cause the
death of an organism.
Liable: To be legally obligated to make good any loss or damage that
may occur.
Light-tight: Securing an area against all sources of white light.
Characteristic of a darkroom.
Line pair: Refers to the number of paired lines visible in 1 mm of an
image. The more line pairs visible, the better the spatial resolution
in an image.
Line switch: Toggle switch that is used to turn the x-ray machine on
or off.
Lingual caries: Caries that involves the lingual surface of a tooth.
Lingual foramen: A very small opening through which a branch of
the incisive artery emerges. Located in the center of the genial
tubercles on the lingual side of the mandible. See Genial tubercles.
Lingual mounting method: Radiographs are mounted so that the
embossed dot is concave. The viewer is reading the radiograph as if
standing behind the patient.
Local contributing factor: Amalgam overhangs, poorly contoured
crown margins, and calculus deposits that act as food traps and lead
to the buildup of bacterial deposits that cause periodontal disease.
Localization: Methods to provide a third dimension to two-dimensional
radiographs. Assists the radiographer in determining whether an
object is located on the facial (buccal) or lingual.
Localized bone loss: Bone loss that occurs in isolated areas.
Long-scale contrast: Low-contrast image. A radiographic image
with many shades of gray. Produced with high kilovoltage.
Mach band effect: An optical illusion that mimics the appearance
of decay. Often occurs along boundaries of sharp contrast, especially around areas of slight overlapping between adjacent teeth.
Magnification (enlargement): Enlargement of the structures
imaged on a radiograph over the actual size. Enlargement is greatest when the target of an x-ray machine is closer to the structures
of interest and is decreased when distance is greater.
Malignant: Tendency to progress in virulence and spread. Condition
that may result in death.
Malpractice: Improper practice. Malpractice results when one is
negligent.
Mandible: Lower arch (jaw).
Mandibular canal: Long canal extending from the mandibular
foramen on the medial aspect of the ramus of the mandible to the
mental foramen on the lateral aspect. Carries nerves and blood
vessels that supply most of the teeth in the mandible. Appears
radiolucent, with thin radiopaque lines above and below outlining
the cortical bone that lines the canal.
Mandibular foramen: Small opening on the lateral side of the body
of the mandible. Usually observed near the apices of the premolars.
Mandibular notch: Notch between the condyle and coronoid
process of the mandible. Also called the sigmoid notch.
Mandibular oblique lateral projection: See Lateral jaw projection.
Mastoid process: Large rounded protuberance of the temporal bone
located behind the ear.
GLOSSARY 415
Material Safety and Data sheets (MSDS): Documentation available from the manufacturers of chemical products that provide the
oral health care professional with information regarding the properties and the potential health effects of the product.
Maxilla: Upper arch. The maxillae are actually two bones, a right
and left maxilla.
Maxillary sinus: Large radiolucent cavity observed within the maxilla apical to the maxillary posterior teeth.
Maxillary tuberosity: A radiopaque prominence of bone on the
distal portion of the maxillary alveolar ridge.
Maxillofacial: Pertaining to the dental arches (maxilla and mandible)
and other supporting facial structures of the head and neck region.
Maximum permissible dose (MPD): The maximum accumulated
dose that persons who are occupationally exposed may have at any
given time of their life. It is the dose of ionizing radiation that, in
the light of present knowledge, is not expected to cause detectable
body damage. Currently established at 0.05 Sv per year (5 rem/year)
whole body.
Mean tangent: Average point where several curved surfaces touch
if a ruler is held against them. The labial or buccal surfaces of all
teeth have their most prominent point toward the lips or the cheeks
and curve toward the mesial or distal. A mean tangent would be
established by using a small ruler or any straight edge (such as a
tongue depressor) and attempting to align as many of the teeth as
possible. Occasionally, four or even five of the posterior teeth will
touch the ruler at some point. Used to establish correct horizontal
angulation, which requires that the central ray of the x-ray beam be
directed at right angles to the mean tangent.
Median palatine suture: An irregular line formed by the junction
of the palatine processes of the right and left maxillae. Appears as a
thin radiolucent line running vertically between the roots of the
maxillary incisors.
Mental foramen: An opening through which the mental nerve and
related blood vessels emerge on the lateral aspect of the body of the
mandible; exact location varies. When imaged on radiographs,
appears as a small round radiolucent area near the roots of the
mandibular premolars. Should not be mistaken for an abscess, cyst,
or other pathological condition.
Mental fossa: A depression on the labial aspect of the mandibular
incisor area.
Mental ridge: Raised ridge of bone located in the anterior region on
the lateral surface of the mandible.
Mesiodens: A supernumerary tooth located in the maxillary midline.
Mesiodistal overlap: When the projection angle of the x-ray beam
is directed from mesial to distal resulting in overlapping error.
Microbial aerosol: Suspension of microorganisms that may be
capable of causing disease produced during normal breathing
and speaking
Microsievert One millionth of a seivert. See Seivert.
Midsagittal plane (midsagittal line): An imaginary vertical line
or plane passing through the center of the body that divides it into a
right and left half. Important orientation line in determining the
ideal position of the patient’s head during radiographic exposures.
Milliampere (mA): One thousandth of an ampere. Milliamperage
determines the number of electrons available at the filament. See
Ampere.
1mSv2:
Milliampere second (mAs): The relationship between the milliamperage and the exposure time in seconds. When one is
increased, the other must be correspondingly decreased to maintain
film density.
Modeling: Technique used to orient patients, especially children,
to the radiographic procedure. Child is given the opportunity to
observe procedure being performed on another, such as a sibling
or parent. May help to alleviate fear of the unknown and gain
patient cooperation.
Moderate caries: A classification of proximal surface caries. Category where caries penetrate over halfway through the enamel
toward the dentinoenamel junction (DEJ), but do not reach the DEJ.
Molecule: Chemical combination of two or more atoms that forms
the smallest particle of a substance that retains the properties of
that substance.
Monitoring: Use of any of several devices to determine whether an
area is within safe radiation limits or whether a person’s exposure
is within permissible limits. See Area monitoring and Personnel
monitoring.
Motion: Movement of the image receptor, patient, or tube head during radiographic exposure that results in a less sharp image.
MPD: See Maximum permissible dose.
Mylohyoid ridge: Raised ridge of bone running diagonally downward and forward on the medial aspect of the ramus of the
mandible to near the apices of the molar roots. Parallels the (external) oblique ridge, but on the lingual surface and about 1/4 in (6
mm) lower. Appears radiopaque when observed on a radiograph.
Nasal bones: Bones that make up the upper bridge of the nose.
Nasal conchae: Thin bony extensions of the nasal wall.
Nasal fossa (cavity): Large air space divided into two paired radiolucencies by the radiopaque nasal septum. Visible above the roots
of the maxillary incisors.
Nasal septum: Dense cartilage that separates the right nasal fossa
from the left. Appears as a vertical radiopaque line separating the
paired radiolucencies of the nasal cavity
Nasopharyngeal air space: Open space superior to the soft palate.
Appears as a radiolucent negative shadow on a panoramic radiograph.
Negative angulation (negative vertical angulation): Achieved
by pointing the tip or end of the PID upward from a horizontal
plane.
Negative shadows: Term given to the radiolucencies produced on
a panoramic radiograph as a result of more radiation reaching the
image receptor in the areas of air spaces. Negative shadows are
shadows of “nothing.”
Negligence: Failure to use a reasonable amount of care that results
in injury or damage to another.
Neoprene gloves: Synthetic rubber utility gloves that provide
increased protection for handling potentially damaging or hazardous chemicals.
Neutron: One form of particulate (corpuscular) radiation or subatomic particle. A neutron has no electric charge and has about the
same mass as a proton.
Nitrile gloves: Synthetic latex utility gloves that provide increased
protection for handling potentially damaging or hazardous chemicals
Noise: See Electronic noise
416 GLOSSARY
Nonmetallic restoration: Restoration containing no metal. May
appear radiolucent, or radiopaque when radiopaque fillers have
been added to the restorative material.
Nonodontogenic cyst: Cyst that arises from epithelium other than
that associated with tooth formation.
Nonthreshold dose response curve: A graph showing the relationship between the dose of exposure and the response of the tissues, indicating that any amount of radiation, no matter how small,
has the potential to cause a biological response.
Nonverbal communication: Communication achieved without
words. Includes gestures, facial expressions, body movement, and
listening.
Nutrient canal: Small tubelike passageway through bone that contains blood vessels and nerves. Appears radiolucent in radiographs.
Nutrient foramen: Occasionally imaged on a radiograph as a tiny
radiolucent dot indicating the small opening in the tubelike passageway of a nutrient canal.
Object-image receptor distance: Distance between the object
being recorded and the image receptor.
Oblique ridge: Diagonal ridge of bone on the lateral aspect of the
mandible that runs downward and forward from the anterior border
of the ramus to the level of the cervical portion of the molar and
premolar roots. Sometimes referred to as the external oblique
ridge. The internal oblique ridge appears faintly parallel to the
external oblique ridge. The internal oblique ridge is not identified
as an anatomical structure, but as a landmark only.
Occipital bone: Forms the posterior part of the skull.
Occlusal caries: Caries found on the occlusal (chewing) surface of
posterior teeth.
Occlusal plane: Plane between the maxillary and the mandibular teeth.
Occlusal radiograph: Radiograph produced by placing the image
receptor against the incisal or occlusal plane. The patient stabilizes
the image receptor by biting down on it. In addition to the teeth,
occlusal radiographs may show surrounding maxillary or mandibular
structures. Depending on the placement of the image receptor and
angle of exposure, cross-sectional or topographic radiographs are produced. See Cross-sectional technique and Topographical technique.
Occlusal trauma: Excessive or repetitive force against the teeth that
results in a response.
Occult disease: The presence of disease that is not apparent clinically,
but can only be detected via a diagnostic test, such as a radiograph.
Odontogenic cyst: A cyst that arises from epithelial cells associated with the development of a tooth.
Odontoma: A tumor of odontogenic origin in which enamel and
dentin are formed. May contain soft tissues that appear radiolucent
and a hard calcified mass, sometimes resembling a tooth, which
appears radiopaque. Compound odontoma refers to odontogenic
tissues that resemble teeth. Complex odontoma denotes odontogenic tissues arranged in a haphazard manner with no resemblance
to tooth formation. Compound-complex odontoma is a mixture of
the two types.
Oral radiography: Procedures that pertain to producing radiographs of the teeth and/or the oral cavity.
OSL (optically stimulated luminescence) monitor: A personnel radiation monitor that absorbs radiation similar to TLD, but
crystals release energy during optical stimulation instead of heat.
Ossification: The pathological or abnormal conversion of soft tissues into bone.
Osteosclerosis: Abnormal increase in bone density. Appears as in
increased radiopacity on a radiograph.
Overdevelopment: Leaving the film in the developer solution too
long or using developer that is too warm. Overdevelopment results
in a dark image.
Overexposure: Exposing the image receptor too long or subjecting
the image receptor to an inappropriately increased kVp or mA setting. Overexposure results in a dark image.
Overhang: A restoration that is not contoured to the tooth properly.
Overlap: Term used to refer to a distortion of the tooth image in
which the structures of one tooth are superimposed over the structures of the adjacent tooth. Caused by incorrect horizontal angulation of the central beam and/or incorrect positioning of the image
receptor in relationship to the teeth of interest.
Oxidation: The process during which the chemicals of the developing
and fixing solutions combine with oxygen and lose their strength.
Palatoglossal air space: Open space between the tongue and palate.
Appears as a radiolucent negative shadow on a panoramic radiograph.
Panoramic radiograph: Generic term pertaining to the radiographic
image produced by a panoramic x-ray machine. Images all the teeth
and supporting structures of the maxilla and mandible.
Panoramic radiography: Procedure performed with a specialpurpose x-ray machine that uses a stationary patient and a simultaneously moving x-ray source and image receptor to produce an
image of the entire dentition and surrounding structures.
Paralleling technique: Intraoral technique that places the image
receptor positioned parallel to the long axes of the teeth while the
central beam of radiation is directed perpendicularly (at right
angles) toward both the teeth and the image receptor.
Particulate radiation (corpuscular radiation): Minute subatomic
particles such as protons, electrons, and neutrons; also alpha and
beta particles. These particles occupy space; have mass and weight;
and, with the exception of neutrons, have an electrical charge.
Pathogen: A disease-causing microorganism.
Patient education: Informing patients about the benefits of oral
health and preventive oral hygiene. Providing the patient with necessary information that explains the value of dental radiographs and
demonstrates radiation safety measures employed in the practice.
Patient relations: Establishment of the relationship between the
patient and the oral health care professional.
Pediatric dentistry: Branch of dentistry that specializes in providing comprehensive preventive and therapeutic oral health care for
children.
Pedodontic image receptor: Any smaller-sized film packet, phosphor plate, or digital sensor used for radiographs of children’s teeth.
Penumbra: Partial shadow or fuzzy outline around the image.
Periapical cemental dysplasia (PCD): Sometimes referred to as
cementoma. A tumor derived from the periodontal ligament of a
fully developed and erupted tooth, usually a mandibular incisor.
Early PCD is radiolucent and appears identical to radicular cysts.
In the later stages of development, calcification occurs that appears
as radiopaque masses surrounded by a radiolucent line. The teeth
are vital and need no treatment.
GLOSSARY 417
Periapical radiograph: Image that shows the entire tooth or teeth
and surrounding tissues. Peri means “around” and apical is the root
end of the tooth.
Period of injury: Radiation-induced changes that follow the latent
period.
Periodontal diseases: Diseases that affect the supporting tissues of
the teeth.
Periodontal ligament (PDL) space: The space between the root of
a tooth and the lamina dura where the thin but dense and strong
fibrous tissues of the periodontal ligament are located. Radiographically, the periodontal ligament appears as a thin radiolucent line
between the lamina dura and the root.
Periodontitis: Inflammation of the periodontium.
Periodontium: Tissues that invest and support the teeth (gingiva and
alveolar bone).
Permanent teeth: Teeth that erupt after the primary teeth have been
exfoliated (shed). Consists of 32 teeth—8 incisors, 4 canines, 8 premolars, and 12 molars.
Personal protective equipment (PPE): Clothing, masks, eyewear,
and gloves worn by dental personnel as a protective barrier that prevents the transmission of infective microorganisms between oral
health care practitioners and patients.
Personnel monitoring: The occasional or routine measuring of the
amount of radiation to which a person working around radiation
has been exposed during a given period of time.
Personnel monitoring device: Device (film badge, thermoluminescent dosimeter [TLD], direct ion storage [DIS] dosimeter and optically
stimulated luminescent [OSL] dosimeter) worn by a radiation worker
to measure the amount of radiation received in a given period of time.
pH: Chemical symbol used with a number from 0 to 14 to designate
the relative acidity or alkalinity of a solution. Under 7 is acidic,
over 7 is alkaline, 7 is neutral, neither acidic or alkaline.
Phleboliths: Calcified masses that are observed as round or oval
bodies in the soft tissues of the cheeks.
Phosphors: Fluorescent crystals, calcium tungstate or rare earth,
used in the emulsion that coats intensifying screens. Give off light
when subjected to radiation.
Photoelectric effect: An attenuation process for x- and gamma radiation in which a photon interacts with an orbital electron of an atom.
All of the energy of the photon is absorbed by the displaced electron
in the form of kinetic energy.
Photon (x-ray photon): A quantum of energy. Both x-rays and
gamma rays are photons.
Photostimuable phosphors (PSP): Digital imaging sensors that
use rare earth phosphor (barium europium fluorohalide) coated
plates. When exposed to x-rays, the PSP sensor or plate “stores”
the x-ray energy until stimulated by a laser beam to produce a digital image.
PID: See Position indicating device.
Pixel: Small, discrete units of digital information that together constitute an image. Pixel is a term shortened from the words “picture”
and “element”
Point of entry: Spot on the surface of the face toward which the
central beam of radiation is directed when aligning the PID for
intraoral exposures.
1pix = plural of picture; el = element2.
Polychromatic: A term derived from the Greek meaning “having
many colors.” Used in dental radiography to describe the x-ray
beam because it is composed of many different wavelengths.
Port: Opening in the tube head that is covered with a permanent seal
of glass, beryllium, or aluminum through which the x-rays exit.
The port is opposite the window in the x-ray tube and is the place
where the PID attaches to the tube head.
Position indicating device (PID): Also called beam indicating
device (BID). An open-ended, cylindrical or rectangular device
attached to the tube head at the aperture to direct the useful beam of
radiation. PIDs are available in different lengths.
Positive angulation (positive vertical angulation): Angulation
achieved by pointing the end of the PID downward from a horizontal plane.
Post and core: Metal restorative material used in an endodontically
treated tooth when support for a crown is needed. Appears
radiopaque.
Posteroanterior cephalometric radiograph: Extraoral radiograph
of the entire skull in the posteroanterior plane. Also called a posterioranterior projection (PA).
Posteroanterior projection (PA): See Posterioanterior cephalometric radiograph.
Potassium alum: One of the components of fixer solution. Shrinks
and hardens the gelatin emulsion.
Potassium bromide: Restrains the developing agents from developing the unexposed silver halide crystals.
PPE: See Personal protective equipment.
Preservative: One of the chemicals (sodium sulfite) used in both the
developer and fixer solutions to slow down the rate of oxidation
and prevent spoilage of the solution.
Primary beam (primary radiation or useful beam): The original undeflected useful beam of radiation that emanates at the focal
spot of the x-ray tube and emerges through the aperture of the tube
head.
Primary teeth: Teeth that fall out or are exfoliated naturally. Consists of 20 teeth—8 incisors, 4 canines, and 8 molars.
Processing: The act of bringing out the latent image and making it
permanently visible. Includes the following darkroom procedures:
developing, rinsing, fixing, washing, and drying.
Processing tank: Stainless steel receptacle divided into compartments for developer solution, water rinse, and fixer solution. Used
to process radiographs.
Protective barrier: Shield of radiation-absorbing material used to
protect against radiation exposure.
Proton: A subatomic particle of the atom. The proton is contained in
the nucleus and has a positive electrical charge. The proton has mass
and weight. The number of protons determines the chemical element.
Proximal caries: Caries found on the proximal surfaces (mesial and
distal) of teeth.
Proximal surface: Where adjacent teeth contact each other in the
arch. The mesial and distal surfaces are proximal surfaces.
Pterygoid plates: Extensions of the sphenoid bone.
Pulp chamber (cavity): Noncalcified tooth tissue containing blood
vessels and nerves. Appears radiolucent, as this soft tissue offers
only minimal resistance to the passage of x-rays.
418 GLOSSARY
Pulp stone: Calcification that appears in the pulp chamber of the
teeth, caused by an abnormal disposition of calcium salts. Often
described as nodules or denticles. Seen on radiographs as one or
more small radiopaque, irregularly shaped, rounded masses within
the pulp chamber.
Quality: Term used when describing the intensity of the x-ray beam.
Refers to the number of x-rays in the beam.
Quality assurance: The planning, implementation, and evaluation
of procedures used to produce high-quality radiographs with maximum diagnostic information while minimizing radiation exposure.
Quality control: A series of tests to ensure that the radiographic
system is functioning properly and that the radiographs produced
are of an acceptable level of quality.
Quantity: Term used when describing the intensity of the x-ray
beam. Refers to the penetrating ability of the beam.
Rad: Traditional unit for measuring absorbed dose. 100 rads equals
one gray (Gy). One rad equals 0.01 Gy. 1,000 millirads equals 1 rad.
Radiation: The emission and propagation of energy through space
or through a material medium in the form of electromagnetic
waves, corpuscular emissions such as alpha and beta particles, or
rays of mixed and unknown types such as cosmic rays. Most radiations used in dentistry are capable of producing ions directly or
indirectly by interaction with matter.
Radiation leakage: Refers to the x-rays that escape out of the tube
head at places other than the port.
Radiation worker: A radiographer or professional who works with
or around ionizing radiation or equipment that produces ionizing
radiation.
Radiator: A large mass of copper just outside the x-ray tube and
connected to the anode terminal. The radiator functions to carry
off the excess heat produced in the energy exchange that takes
place when the electrons of the cathode stream are converted into
about 1% x-rays and 99% heat. The radiator conducts the heat
away from the target and cools the tube.
Radicular cyst: A cyst around the apex of a tooth. Generally
observed as a small radiolucent circular area that extends away
from the apical portions of the root. The sac of the cyst has a distinct wall or capsule that surrounds it and can be distinguished as a
faint radiopaque thin line.
Radioactivity: The process whereby certain unstable elements
undergo spontaneous disintegration (decay). The process is accompanied by emissions of one or more types of radiation and generally results in the formation of a new isotope.
Radiograph: An image produced on photosensitive film by exposure to x-rays. Developing the film produces a negative image that
can be viewed and interpreted.
Radiographic contrast: See Contrast.
Radiography (roentgenography): The making of radiographs by
exposing and processing x-ray film.
Radiology: That branch of medical science that deals with the use of
radiant energy in the diagnosis and treatment of disease.
Radiolucent: That portion of the radiograph that is dark. Structures
that lack density permit the passage of x-rays with little or no resistance. These structures appear dark on the image.
Radiolysis of water: Ionization can dissociate water within a cell
into hydrogen and hydroxyl radicals that have the potential to
recombine into new chemicals such as hydrogen peroxide. These
new chemicals act as toxins (poisons) to the body, causing cellular
dysfunction. Considered an indirect effect of radiation exposure.
Radiopaque: That portion of the radiograph that appears light.
Dense structures resist the passage of radiation. These structures
appear light on the image.
Radioresistant: Refers to a substance or tissue that is not easily
injured by ionizing radiation.
Radiosensitive: Refers to a substance or tissue that is relatively susceptible to injury by ionizing radiation.
Rampant caries: Severe, unchecked caries that affect multiple teeth.
Ramus: The ascending portion of each end of the mandible.
Rapid (chairside) processing: The use of a chairside darkroom
(a light-tight box with a filter cover) and concentrated and/or
heated developer to quickly process working films, such as those
used during endodontic procedures.
Rare-earth phosphors: Salt crystals, usually lanthanum (La) and
gadolinium (Gd), used to coat intensifying screens. When these
absorb x-rays, they fluoresce and emit energy in the form of green
light.
Recovery period: Period following exposure to radiation, where
some healing can take place.
Recurrent (secondary) caries: Caries that occurs under a restoration or around its margins.
Reference film: A radiograph processed under ideal conditions and
then used to compare periodically subsequent films. Quality control procedure to monitor processing solution quality.
Rem (roentgen equivalent in man): Traditional unit for measuring dose equivalent. Used to compare the biological effects of the
various types of radiation. One rem equals 1 rad times a biological
effect weighting factor. Because the weighting factor for x- and
gamma radiation equals 1, the number of rems is identical to the
absorbed dose in rads for these radiations. 100 rem equals one sievert (Sv); one rem equals 0.01 Sv; 1,000 millirems equal 1 rem.
Replenisher: A superconcentrated solution of developer or fixer that
is added daily, or as indicated, to the developer or fixer in the processing tank to compensate for loss of volume and loss of strength
from oxidation. The act of adding replenisher to the processing
solutions is known as replenishment.
Residual cyst: Cyst that remains in the jaw after the tooth that
caused it to form is extracted or exfoliated. May remain within the
bone, becoming encapsulated with an epithelial lining, or may
undergo considerable growth. Appears radiolucent, and the lining
of the cyst appears as a thin radiopaque line.
Resorption: Refers to a loss of bone or tooth structure. May originate
from natural causes such as the gradual reduction of size of the roots
of primary teeth, or may be idiopathic (the result of unknown causes).
Restrainer: Potassium bromide in the developer solution that slows
down the action of the elon and hydroquinone and inhibits the tendency of the solution to chemically fog the films.
Retained root: Root remaining after the tooth has been extracted.
Retake radiograph: A radiograph that has been taken after the first
image is deemed undiagnostic.
Retention pin: Metal pin used to support a restoration.
Reverse Towne radiograph: Extraoral projection used to view the
condylar neck of the mandible. Also called open mouth projection.
GLOSSARY 419
Rhinoliths: Calcifications within the maxillary sinuses.
Risk: The chance or likelihood of adverse effects or death resulting
from exposure to a hazard.
Risk management: Policies and procedures to be followed by the
radiographer to reduce the chances that a patient will file legal
action against the dentist and oral health care team.
Roentgen (R): Traditional unit measurement of exposure to radiation. Measured in air. A simplified definition of the roentgen is the
amount of x-radiation or gamma radiation required to ionize 1 cc of
air at standard conditions of pressure and temperature (2.083 billion ion pairs).
Roentgen ray: See X-ray.
Roentgenograph: See Radiograph.
Roller transport system: Moves films through the developer, fixer,
water, and drying compartments of an automatic processor. Motordriven gears or belts propel the roller transport system.
Root canal treatment: See Endodontic therapy.
Root surface caries: See Cemental caries.
Rotational center: The axis on which the panoramic tube head and
the drum rotate. Based on tomographic radiography principles.
Rule of isometry: Geometric theorem stating that two triangles with
two equal angles and a common side are equal (isosceles) triangles.
This theorem is the basis of the bisecting technique.
Safelight: Special filtered light that can be left on in the darkroom
while films are processed.
Safelight filter: Removes short wavelengths in the blue-green region
of visible light. The longer wavelength red-orange light is allowed
to pass through the filter, illuminating the darkroom without fogging the film.
Sarcoma: Malignant tumor of connective tissue origin.
Scatter radiation: Radiation that has been deflected from its path
by impact during its passage through matter. This form of secondary radiation is scattered in all directions by the tissues of the
patient’s head.
Sclerotic bone: A hardening of the bone as a result of inflammation
or excessive growth of fibrous tissue and deposition of mineral
salts. See Condensing osteitis.
Screen film: Extraoral film for use in cassettes with intensifying
screens. Emulsion is more sensitive to green, blue, and violet light,
emitted when the radiation strikes the phosphors in the intensifying
screens than to the x-radiation.
Secondary radiation: Given off by any matter irradiated with x-rays.
Created at the instant the primary beam interacts with matter and
gives off some of its energy, forming new and less powerful wavelengths. Often referred to as scatter radiation.
Selection criteria: Guidelines developed by an expert panel of health
care professionals to assist in deciding when, what type, and how
many radiographs should be taken.
Selective reduction: Chemical change that takes place within the
film emulsion during development. During this change, the nonmetallic elements are separated from the silver halide of the
exposed crystals, leaving a coating of metallic silver on the film
emulsion while the bromide is removed. The process is called
selective because the unexposed grains are not reduced.
Self-determination: The legal right of an individual to make choices
concerning health care treatment.
Sensor: For use in digital imaging. An electronic or specially coated
plate that is sensitive to x-rays. Placed intraorally to capture a radiographic image when exposed to x-rays.
Sepsis: Infection, or the presence of septic matter.
Septum: Thin wall of bone that acts as a partition to separate the
nasal cavity or the maxillary sinuses. Appears radiopaque.
Severe caries: A classification of proximal surface caries. Category
where caries has penetrated over halfway through the dentin toward
the pulp.
Shadow casting: Principle that x-rays cast shadows of images onto
the image receptor, producing a radiographic image of the teeth
and supporting structures.
Sharpness (See Definition): The distinct outlines of structures
observed on a radiograph.
Short-scale contrast: High-contrast image. A radiograph that exhibits
black and white with few shades. Produced with low kilovoltage.
“Show-tell-do”: Technique used to orient the patient, especially
children, to the radiographic procedure. Showing the radiographic
equipment—image receptor and holder, x-ray machine—to the
patient while explaining their use may help to alleviate fear of the
unknown and gain patient cooperation.
Sialolith: A salivary calculus or hardened, stonelike mass that forms
within the passage of the salivary ducts. If sufficiently large, such
masses appear slightly radiopaque on the radiograph.
Sievert (Sv): Système Internationale unit for measuring the dose
equivalent. The sievert is used to compare the biological effects of
various types of radiation. One sievert equals one gray times a biological effect weighting (qualifying) factor. Because the weighting
factor for x- and gamma radiation equals 1, the number of sieverts
is identical to the absorbed dose in grays for these radiations. One
sievert equals 100 rem. See Microsievert.
Silver halide crystals: Compounds of a halogen (either bromine or
iodine) with silver. Dental film emulsion is approximately 90 to 99
percent silver bromide and 1 to 10 percent silver iodide. Silver
halide crystals are sensitive to radiation. It is the silver halide crystals that, when exposed to x-rays, retain the latent image.
Silver thiosulphate complex: A very stable compound found in
used fixer of dental radiographic processors following the interaction
of sodium thiosulphate with the silver ions in the emulsion of film.
Silver point: Endodontic filling material.
Sinus projection: See Waters radiograph.
SLOB rule: Stands for same on lingual, opposite on buccal. Used in
localization techniques to determine the facial (buccal) or lingual
position of objects. The tube shift method of localization states that
if the structure or object in question appears to move in the same
direction as the horizontal or vertical shift of the tube, then the
structure or object is located on the lingual. Conversely, if the move
is in the opposite direction of the shift of the tube, the object is
located on the buccal (facial).
Sodium carbonate: Provides required alkalinity of the developer
solution to activate developing agents.
Sodium sulfite: Chemical of the developing solution that prevents
rapid oxidation of the developing agents.
Sodium thiosulfate: Chemical of the fixer solution that together
with the ammonium thiosulfate removes the unexposed and any
remaining undeveloped silver halide crystals.
420 GLOSSARY
Soft radiation: Longest wavelength of the x-rays. Removed from
the polychromatic beam by filtration because soft radiation (Grenz
rays) have no value in producing dental radiographs.
Solarized emulsion: Used for duplicating film. Produces a duplicate image that gets lighter the longer the film is exposed to light.
Darker images result from shorter exposure times.
Solid state: Specifically means, no moving parts. Refers to digital
image sensors, usually CCD or CMOS technology.
Somatic cells: Any body cells except the reproductive cells.
Somatic effect: When radiation affects all body cells except the
reproductive cells.
Spatial resolution: The discernable separation of closely adjacent
image details that contributes to image sharpness. The greater the
spatial resolution, the sharper the image appears. When referring to
a digital image, sharpness is determined by the number and size of
pixels and measured in line pairs. When the number of pixels is
low, the image appears to have jagged edges and becomes difficult
to see.
Spatter: A heavier concentration of microbial aerosols such as visible particles from a cough or sneeze.
Speech reading: Method of lip reading used by the hearing impaired.
Sphenoid bone: Cranial bone bordered by the frontal and ethmoid
bones.
Standard precautions: A practice of care to protect persons from
pathogens spread via blood or any other body fluid, excretion, or
secretion (except sweat). All-inclusive term that has replaced universal precautions, where the focus was on blood-borne pathogens.
Static electricity: A white-light spark that creates a radiolucent artifact on the film.
Statute of limitations: Time period during which a person may
bring a malpractice action against another person.
Step-down transformer (low-voltage transformer): Device
consisting of two metal cores and coils so positioned within the circuitry of the tube head to decrease the line voltage to between 3
and 12 volts. Low voltage is required in the cathode to warm up the
filament wire.
Step-up transformer (high-voltage transformer): Device consisting of two metal cores and coils positioned within the circuitry
of the tube head to increase the potential of the line current to the
high kilovoltage required to produce x-radiation.
Step-wedge (penetrometer): A device consisting of increasing
increments of an absorbing material. A radiographic exposure
made with a step-wedge is used to determine the amount of radiation reaching the image receptor through each of the increments.
Measurements of radiographic image density may be used to evaluate the intensity and penetrative power of the radiation.
Sterilize: Aseptic treatment, autoclaving or dry heat processes, that
results in the total destruction of spores and disease-producing
microorganisms.
Stochastic effect: When a biological response is based on the probability of occurrence rather than the severity of the change.
Storage phosphor: Usually composed of europium activated barium fluorohalide, coating on a photostimulable phosphor plate
used in indirect digital imaging. The storage phosphor “stores” the
x-ray energy similar to the way silver halide crystals within film
emulsion store a latent image. A scanning device is used to release
the stored energy to be converted to a radiographic image on a
computer monitor.
Structural shielding: The protection afforded by building materials
found in walls, partitions, and cabinetry, present in most buildings
where dental radiographs are exposed.
Styloid process: Long, narrow spine that extends downward, from
the inferior surface of the temporal bone, just anterior to the mastoid process.
Subject contrast: The difference in densities of a radiographic
image caused by the differing thicknesses of the tissues or objects
penetrated by the x-ray beam.
Submandibular fossa: Irregular depression in the bone near the
angle on the lingual of the mandible. Usually observed radiographically below the roots of the molars and extending forward as far as
the premolar region. Thin and offering little resistance to the passage of the x-rays, it appears radiolucent.
Submentovertex projection: Extraoral projection showing the base
of the skull, the position of the mandibular condyles, and the zygomatic arches. Also called a base projection.
Supernumerary teeth: Extra teeth not normally a part of the dentition. May resemble normal teeth, only smaller with conical
crowns, or bear no resemblance to a normal tooth. Often malpositioned or unerupted.
Suture: A line of union of adjacent cranial or facial bones that
appears radiolucent on radiographs.
Symphysis: Prominent bone where the right and left sides of the
mandible fuse at the midline.
Système Internationale (SI): A metric system of units of that measures radiation quantities. The Système Internationale units are
coulombs per kilogram (C/kg), gray (Gy), and sievert (Sv).
Target: Small block of tungsten imbedded in the face of the anode,
bombarded by the electrons streaming from the cathode. The focal
spot is located on the target.
Target–image receptor distance (source–image receptor distance): Distance between the focal spot on the target and the
recording plane of the image receptor.
Target–object distance (source–object distance): Distance
between the focal spot on the target and the object being radiographed.
Target–surface distance (source–surface distance): Distance
between the focal spot on the target and the skin surface of the
patient.
Taurodontia: Teeth characterized by very large pulp chambers and
very short roots.
Temporal bone: Cranial bone the makes up the temple, or side of
the face. Contains the ear structures, including the auditory meatus.
Temporomandibular disorders (TMD): Term used to describe
the collection of symptoms and diseases that are generally found
involving the temporomandibular joint.
Temporomandibular joint (TMJ): One of two joints connecting
the mandible to the temporal bone.
Temporomandibular joint projection: See Transcranial radiograph.
Thermionic emission: The release of electrons when a material
such as tungsten is heated to incandescence. Electrons are boiled
off from the cathode filament in the x-ray tube when electric current is passed through it.
GLOSSARY 421
Thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD): Monitoring device containing certain crystalline compounds (usually lithium fluoride)
that store energy when struck by x-rays. When heated, the crystals
give off light in proportion to the amount of radiation exposure.
Threshold dose response curve: A graph showing the relationship between the dose of exposure and the response of the tissues,
indicating that there is a “threshold” amount of radiation, below
which no biological response would be expected.
Thyroid collar: An attached or detachable supplement to the lead
apron. Contains 0.25 mm lead or lead-equivalent materials to protect the radiosensitive thyroid gland in the neck region during the
exposure of intraoral radiographs.
Timer: A mechanical, electrical, or electronic device that can be set
to predetermine the duration of the interval that current flows
through the x-ray machine to produce x-rays.
Time–temperature: Principle of film processing. The length of
time the film spends in the developer is based on the temperature of
the developer solution. When the temperature is cool, processing
time is increased. When the temperature is warm, processing time
is decreased. Film manufacturer will usually recommend an ideal
temperature and time that will produce quality images.
TLD: See Thermoluminescent dosimeter.
Tomograph: A radiograph made using the tomography technique.
Tomography: A radiographic technique used to show detailed images
of structures located within a predetermined plane of tissue while
eliminating or blurring those structures in the planes not selected.
Topographical technique: Occlusal radiography technique that
follows the rules of bisecting. The central rays of the x-ray beam
are directed through the apices of the teeth perpendicularly toward
the bisector to produce an image.
Torus (tori-plural): Form of benign tumor. Outgrowth of bone
called exostosis.
Torus mandibularis (lingual torus): Hard, bony protuberance on
the lingual surface of the mandible. Usually located above the
mylohyoid line near the premolars. Often bilateral.
Torus palatinus: Hard, bony protuberance on the midline of the
maxilla.
Total filtration: The combination of inherent and added filtration in an
x-ray machine. Many states require a total filtration of 2.5 mm of aluminum equivalent for x-ray machines operating at or above 70 kVp.
Trabeculae: Tiny bars or plates of bone that form a network of
various-sized compartments that account for the honeycomb
appearance of bone.
Trabecular bone (cancellous bone): The softer spongy bone that
makes up the bulk of the inside portion of most bones. The cells of
trabecular bone vary in size and density.
Tragus: Small cartilaginous prominence of tissues located near the
center and in front of the acoustic meatus (outer ear opening).
Transcranial projection: Extraoral projection used to image the
temporomandibular joint (TMJ) in both an open and closed position. Also called a TMJ projection.
Transformer: One of several types of electrical devices capable of
increasing or decreasing the voltage of an alternating current by
mutual induction between primary and secondary coils or windings
on cores of metal. See High-voltage transformer and Low-voltage
transformer.
Transitional (mixed) dentition: Having both primary and permenent teeth present in the oral cavity. Usually exists between 6 and
12 years of age.
Triangulation: Widening of the periodontal ligament space at the
crest of the interproximal bone.
Tube head (tube housing): Protective metal covering that contains the x-ray tube, the high-voltage and low-voltage transformers,
and insulating oil. Attached to the flexible extension arm by a yoke.
The PID attaches to the tube head at the port.
Tube shift method: Method of localization. See Buccal-object rule.
Tube side: Describes the side of an intraoral film packet, phosphor
plate, digital sensor, and extraoral film or phosphor plate cassette
that must face the source of x-rays coming from the x-ray tube.
Tuberosity: Broad eminence on a bone.
Tumor: Swelling or a growth of tissue.
Tungsten (Wolfram): Element with an atomic number of 74. High
melting point makes this metal ideal for use as the cathode filament
and as the anode target.
Underdevelopment: Not leaving the film in the developer solution
long enough or using developer that is too cool or an old, weak
solution. Underdevelopment results in a light image.
Underexposure: Not exposing the image receptor long enough or
using an inappropriately decreased kVp or mA setting. Underexposure results in a light image.
Universal precautions: A method of infection control in which
blood and certain body fluids are treated as if known to be infectious
for HIV, HBV, and other blood-borne pathogens. The all-inclusive
term standard precautions has replaced universal precautions, where
the focus is on blood-borne pathogens.
Useful beam (useful radiation): That part of the primary beam
that is permitted to emerge from the tube head and limited by the
port, collimator, and lead-lined PID.
Velocity: Property exhibited by electromagnetic radiation. Refers to
the speed of the wave as it travels through space. In a vacuum, all
electromagnetic radiations travel at the speed of light (186,000
miles/sec or ).
Verbal communication: Using words to exchange information
between two or more persons.
Vertical angulation: The direction of the central beam in an up or
down direction achieved by directing the tip of the PID upward or
downward. See Negative angulation and Positive angulation.
Vertical (angular) bone loss: Occurs in a vertical direction. Alveolar crest is reduced in a manner that creates angular defects.
Vertical bitewing radiograph: Bitewing radiograph placed in the
oral cavity with the long dimension of the image receptor positioned vertically. Covers an increased area in the vertical dimension, resulting in more information regarding the periodontium
being recorded.
Vertical bitewing series: A set of 4 to 7 vertical bitewings. May
include both posterior and anterior images.
View box: Device used to view dental radiographs. Consists of a
light source illuminator behind an opaque glass.
Volt: Unit of electromotive force or potential that is sufficient to cause
a current of l ampere (A) to flow through a resistance of 1 ohm (W).
Voltage: Electrical pressure or force that drives the electric current
through the circuit of the x-ray machine. See Kilovolt and Kilovolt
peak.
3 * 108 m/sec
422 GLOSSARY
Voltmeter: Device for measuring the electromotive force (the difference in potential or voltage) across the x-ray tube.
Voxel (volume element): Similar to a pixel, but adds a third dimension
of digital data that together constitute an image. Used in computed
tomography imaging. Voxel is a term shortened from the words “volume” and “element” (similar to the shortened term for pixel where
)
Waste stream: The collective flow of waste materials beginning at
the point of discard, through waste treatments, to the final disposition of the material.
Waters radiograph: Also called the sinus projection. Similar to the
posteroanterior cephalometric radiograph except that the center of
interest is focused on the middle third of the face.
Wavelength: In radiography, the length in angstrom units or centimeters of the electromagnetic radiations produced in the x-ray
machine. The distance from the crest, or top of one wave to the
crest of the next, determines the wavelength—hence its penetration
ability.
Weighting factor (qualifying factor): Used to convert absorbed
dose to dose equivalent. Takes into consideration the difference in
biological effectiveness of various types of radiation (x-, gamma,
alpha, beta, etc). Some radiations (such as alpha particles) cause
more biological damage than others (such as x-rays). The qualifying factor for dental x-rays is 1; for alpha particles it is 10.
Wet reading: Viewing a radiograph under white light conditions
after only two or three minutes of fixation. Used when a diagnosis
from the radiograph is needed quickly. Following the wet reading,
the film must be returned to the fixer to complete processing.
Working radiograph: A film that is rapidly processed when information is needed quickly. Often used during endodontic procedures. However, short developing and fixing times, combined with
minimal washing, result in a substandard radiograph.
x-coordinate: One of two values assigned to dimensions of a pixel
that tell the computer where the pixel is located. Computer software uses the x-coordinate along with the y-coordinate to reconstruct digital data captured by a sensor or photostimuable plate into
a radiographic image displayed on a monitor.
X-ray (roentgen ray): Radiant energy of short wavelength that has
the power to penetrate substances and to record shadow images on
photographic film, phosphor plates, and digital sensors.
X-ray film: See Radiograph and Film packet.
X-ray tube: Electronic tube located in the tube head that generates
x-rays.
y-coordinate: One of two values assigned to dimensions of a pixel
that tell the computer where the pixel is located. Computer software uses the y-coordinate along with the x- coordinate to reconstruct digital data captured by a sensor or photostimuable plate into
a radiographic image displayed on a monitor..
Yoke: Curved portion of the x-ray machine that is connected to the
extension arm. The tube head is suspended within the yoke and can
be rotated vertically and horizontally within it.
Zygoma: Cheek bone. Attaches to the zygomatic process of the temporal bone to form the zygomatic arch.
Zygomatic arch: Arch formed by the temporal process of the zygomatic bone and the zygomatic process of the temporal bone. Forms
the outer margin of the cheek prominence.
Zygomatic process: Process of the temporal bone that attaches to
the zygoma to form the zygomatic arch.
pix = plural of picture and el = element
423
A
Abscess, 296–97
Absorbed dose, 16
Absorption, 13–15
Acetic acid, 86
Acidifier, 86
Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), 115
Activator, 85
Acute radiation syndrome (ARS), 51
Added filtration, 62
Advanced caries, 305, 306
Advanced chronic or aggressive periodontitis, 320, 322–23
Age, radiation injury and, 51
Aged film fog, 238
Aging patients, 341
Air spaces images viewed on panoramic radiograph, 397–98
glossopharyngeal air space, 397
nasopharyngeal air space, 397
palatoglossal air space, 397
Ala, 183, 185, 386
ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable), 50, 58
for children, 329
Ala-tragus line, 183, 386
Alkaline, 256
Alpha particle, 10
Alternating current (AC), 25
Aluminum equivalent, 62
Alveolar bone, 277
Alveolar (crestal) bone, 315
Alveolar process, 275, 277
Alveolus, 277
Amalgam, 292
Amalgam tattoo, 292
Ameloblastoma, 299
American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
(AAOMR), 70
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, 326
American Academy of Periodontology classification of periodontal
disease, 320
American Dental Assistants Association (ADAA), 135
American Dental Association (ADA), 70, 135
American Dental Hygienists’Association (ADHA), 135
Amperage, 23–24, 26
Ampere (A), 26
Analog, 99, 100, 108
Anatomical order, 265
Anatomical variations, supplemental radiographic techniques for,
353–56
edentulous patient, 353–56
tori, 353
Anatomy. See Radiographic anatomy
Andontia, 294–95
Angle of the mandible, 275, 396
Angstrom (Å), 12
Angular bone loss, 315
Angular cheilitis, 344
Angulation
horizontal, 152–53, 166
negative, 153
positive, 153
vertical, 152–53, 166
Ankylosis, 368
Anode, 27
Anodontia, 278, 294–95, 326
Anomaly, 294. See also Developmental anomalies, appearance of
Anterior nasal spine, 275, 280, 281, 394
Anterior palatine foramen, 281
Anterior structures not recorded, 229
Antihalation coating, 80
Antiseptic, 115
Apical disease, appearance of, 296–97
cyst, 297
granuloma, 297
periapical abscess, 296–97
Apical foramen, 277
Apical structures not recorded, 229
Appearance, 139
Apprehensive patient, 341, 342
Area monitoring, 67
Arrested caries, 309
Articular eminence, 393
Artifacts, 234, 366
Artificial intelligence, 99, 107
Asepsis, 115
Atom, 9
Atomic number, 9
Atomic structure, 9–10
Atomic weight, 13
Attitude, 139
Authority, 242
Automatic film processing, 91–93
equipment, 91–92
preparation, 92
procedure, 93
Automatic processor, 247
Autotransformer, 25–26
B
Background radiation, 16–17
Barrier envelope, 119
Base material, 292, 293
Benign, 300
Beta particle, 10
Binding energy, 10
Biodegradable, 259
Biological effect mechanisms, 48–49
Bisecting technique, 5, 148–49, 179–95
advantages and disadvantages of, 180
dimensional distortion, 181
fundamentals of, 180–81
horizontal angulation, 182
image receptor positioners, holding in place, 181–82
mandibular canine exposure, 191
mandibular incisors exposure, 190
mandibular molar exposure, 193
mandibular premolar exposure, 192
maxillary canine exposure, 187
maxillary incisors exposure, 186
Index
Bisecting technique (Continued)
maxillary molar exposure, 189
maxillary premolar exposure, 188
object-image receptor distance, 181
points of entry, 185
steps in, summary of, 183–84
target-image receptor distance, 180
vertical angulation, 182, 185
Bisecting technique error, 232
Bisector, 180, 182
Biteblock, 154
bisecting technique, 181
paralleling technique, 163
Bite extension, 181–82
Bitetab, 202–3
Bitewing examination, 78, 148, 196–214. See also Bitewing technique
fundamentals of, 197–98
horizontal angulation, 203, 206
image receptor positioners, holding in place, 202–3
image receptor size and number to use, 198
point of entry, 207
sequence of placement, 201–2
of transitional dentition, posterior, 335
vertical angulation, 206–7
vertical bitewing series, 318
Bitewing technique, 207–11
canine bitewing exposure, 209
central incisors bitewing exposure, 208
molar bitewing exposure, 211
premolar bitewing exposure, 210
Black lines, marks, or spots
chemical contamination, 235
handling errors, 236
Black paper stuck to film, 237
Black pressure marks, 236
Blank image
handling errors, 236
incorrect exposure, 234
processing and darkroom protocol errors, 235
Bone loss, 315–16
Brown images, 236
Buccal caries, 308
Buccal-object rule, 357, 358
C
Calcifications, appearance of, 299
Calcium hydroxide paste, 293
Calcium tungstate, 368
Calculus, 316
Cancellous bone, 277
Cancer
patients with, 341
radiation and, 52
Canine bitewing exposure, 209
Canine-premolar overlap, 351
Canthus, 183, 184, 185
Carcinogenic mechanisms, 52
Carcinoma, 300
Caries, 303–13
advanced, 306
arrested, 309
buccal, 308
cemental (root), 308
classification of, 306–9
conditions resembling, 309–11
depth grading system, 306
detection of, 304–5
description of, 304
enamel (incipient), 305, 306
interpreting, 304, 306
lingual, 308
moderate, 306
occlusal, 307–8
proximal, 307
radiographic appearance of, 305
rampant, 309
recurrent, 308–9
severe, 306
Cassette holder, 382
Cassettes
extraoral image receptors, 369–71
panoramic radiographic procedure, 383
quality control procedures, 247–48
Cataracts, 52
Cathode, 26, 27
Caustic, 256
Cell sensitivity, 49
Cemental (root) caries, 308
Cementoenamel junction (CEJ), 308, 315
Cementomas, 299–300
Cementum, 277
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), 116
Central incisors bitewing exposure, 208
Central ray, 28
Cephalometric radiograph, 366
lateral (lateral skull), 367
posteroanterior, 367
Cephalostat, 365
Cervical burnout, 309, 310
Cervical spine, 396
Chair-side film processing, 91
Chairside manner, 139–40
Characteristic radiation, 13
Charge-coupled device (CCD), 99, 100
Chemical contamination, 235–36
black/white spots, 235
stains, 236
Chemical fog, 238
Chemical fumes, film storage/protection and, 80
Chernobyl, 48
Children, radiographic interpretation, 334–36
mandibular anterior occlusal radiograph of primary dentition, 335
mandibular canine periapical radiograph of transitional dentition,
336
mandibular molar periapical radiograph of transitional dentition,
336
maxillary anterior occlusal radiograph of primary dentition, 334
maxillary canine periapical radiograph of transitional dentition, 336
maxillary central-lateral incisors periapical radiograph of transitional dentition, 335
maxillary molar periapical radiograph of transitional dentition, 336
posterior bitewing radiograph of transitional dentition, 335
Children, radiographic techniques, 325–39
ALARA radiation protection, 329
anodontia, 326
assessment of radiographic need, 326
communication, 141, 334
exposure intervals, 326
extraoral radiographs, 327–28
horizontal angulation, 330–33
image receptor sizes and numbers, 326–27, 330–33
lateral jaw projection, 327–28
panoramic radiograph, 327
patient management, 141, 329, 334
point of entry, 330–33
primary dentition, 327
424 INDEX
projection types, 327–28
suggested, 328–29, 330–33
supernumerary (extra) teeth, 326
transitional mixed dentition, 326, 327
vertical angulation, 330–33
Cieszynski, A., 4, 5
Clear image. See Blank image
Code of Ethics, 135
Coherent scattering, 14
Coin test, 246
Collimation, 62–64
Collimator, 28
Communication. See Patient communication
Complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS), 99, 100
Composite, 292
Compton effect (scattering), 14–15
Computed tomography (CT), 4, 372–73
Computer, in digital radiography, 106
Computer monitor, 247
Condensing osteitis, 299
Condyle, 275
Cone, 3
long, 5
Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), 4, 365, 373–74
Cone beam volumetric imaging (CBVI), 4, 373
Conecut error, 153, 232–33
Confidentiality, 134
Consumer-Patient Radiation Health and Safety Act of 1981, 71, 132
Contact point, 203
Contamination, 115
Contrast, 34
Control panel, 21, 22–24
electric current, 22
exposure button, 24
kilovolt peak (kVp) selector, 23
line switch, 22
milliampere (mA) selector, 22–23
timer, 23
Coolidge, William David, 3, 4
Coronal structures not recorded, 229–30
Coronoid process, 275, 283, 395
Cortical bone, 277
Coulombs per kilogram (C/kg), 15
Crookes, William, 2
Crookes tube, 2
Cross-contamination, 115
Cross-sectional technique, 216
Crowded teeth, 351
Crowns, 292–93
full metal, 292
porcelain-fused-to-metal, 293
porcelain jacket, 293
porcelain stainless steel, 293
Crystal, 38
Culturally diverse patients, 341, 346–47
Cumulative effect, 49
Cyst, 296, 297, 298
D
Dark images
development error, 235
incorrect exposure, 233–34
Darkroom, 84, 86–88
lighting, 86–87
light leaks, test for, 246–47
maintenance, 87–88
monitoring, 244, 246–47
protocol errors, 235
safelight test, 244, 246–47
Daylight loader, 86
infection control for processors with, 126–28
“Dead-man” exposure switch, 24
Dead pixel, 236
Decay, 10
Definition. See Sharpness
Definitive evaluation method, 357
Dens in dente, 295
Density, 33–34
Dental Assisting National Board Examination (DANB), 132
Dentigerous cyst, 297
Dentin, 277
Dentinoenamel junction (DEJ), 306
Dentition, 278
Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), 134
Depth grading system, 306
Deterministic effect, 51
Developer, 84, 85
safe handling of, 256, 257
Developing agent, 85
Developmental anomalies, appearance of, 294–96
andontia, 294–95
dens in dente, 295
dilaceration, 296
fusion, 296
gemination (twinning), 296
hypercementosis, 295–96
mesiodens, 295
supernumerary teeth (extra teeth), 295
taurodontia, 296
Diagnosis vs. interpretation in viewing radiographs, 268
Digital image/imaging, 4–5, 98
Digital image receptors, 4–5
Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM), 109,
111
Digital imaging equipment, radiographic wastes, 260–61
Digital radiographic noise, 237, 238
Digital radiography, 97–113
acquiring, methods of, 99–101
advantages and limitations of, 110
characteristics of, 108–9
DICOM standards, 109, 111
direct digital imaging, 99–100
exposure, 102–4
fundamental concepts, 98
indirect digital imaging, 99, 100–101
patient preparation, 102
radiation exposure, 109
terminology, 99
uses, 98–99
Digital radiography equipment, 101–2, 104–8
computer, 106
image receptors, 104–6
preparation, 101–2
software, 106–8
x-ray machine, 104
Digital sensor type, 35
Digital subtraction, 99, 107
Digitize, 99
Dilaceration, 296
Direct current (DC), 25
Direct digital imaging, 99–100
Direct supervision, 132
Direct theory, 48
Disability, 344–46. See also Special needs patients
Disclosure, 134
Disinfect, 115
Disinfectants, safe handling of, 257–58
Disinfection of instruments and equipment, 117–18
INDEX 425
DIS (direct ion storage) monitor, 69
Disposal options of radiographic waste
products, 261. See also Radiographic wastes, management of
Distance
effects of variations in, 41–42
object-image receptor distance, 41, 42
radiation protection for radiographer, 67, 68
target-image receptor distance, 41–42
target-surface distance, 41
Distomesial overlap, 232
Disto-oblique periapical radiographs, 357, 359–60
Distortion, 39
dimensional, 181
DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid), 9
Documentation, 134
Dosage, 5
Dose, 15
absorbed, 16
critical organs and, 53
effective dose equivalent, 16
lethal, 50
total, 50
Dose equivalent, 16
effective, 54
Dose rate, 50
Dose-response curve, 49–50
threshold/nonthreshold, 49
Dosimeter, 69
Dots, 236
Double exposure, 234
Double image, 234
Drying, in film processing, 84
Duplicate radiograph, 360–61
Duplicating film, 79–80, 360–61
E
Eastman Kodak Company, 4
Edentulous patient, 353–56
Education. See Patient education
Effective dose equivalent, 16
Elderly patients
communicating with, 141
Electrical circuit, 25
Electric current, 22, 25
Electricity, 24–26
alternating current, 25
amperage, 26
direct current, 25
electrical circuit, 25
transformers, 25
voltage, 26
Electrode, 26–27
Electromagnetic radiation, 11–12
Electromagnetic spectrum, 11–12
Electron, 9–10
Electron cloud, 27
Electronic noise, 99, 109, 237, 238
Electron shells, 9–10
Element, 9
Elementary and Dental Radiology (Raper), 3
Elon, 85
Elongation, 182, 232
Embrasure
bisecting technique, 182
bitewing radiography, 198, 203
paralleling technique, 166
Embryological defects, 52
Empathy, 139
Emulsion, 75
solarized, 80
thickness of, 77–78
Enamel, 277
Enamel (incipient) caries, 305, 306
Endodontic fillers, 293, 294
Endodontic therapy, 356–57
Energy, 9, 10
Energy levels, 9
Enlargement. See Magnification
Equipment
film duplicating procedure, 360
regulations, 132
for viewing radiographs, 247, 268–70
Equipment standards, 59, 62–66
collimation, 62–64
fast film and digital image sensors, 64–65
filtration, 59, 62
image receptor holding devices, 65
lead apron, 65, 66
position indicating device, 64
thyroid collar, 65–66
Ethics, 135
Evaluation, periodic, 242
Exfoliation, 278, 328
Exostosis, 300
Exposure, radiation. See Radiation exposure
Exposure button, 24
Exposure charts, 44
Exposure factors, film, 35
exposure time, 40
incorrect, 233–34
kilovoltage (kVp), 41
milliamperes (mA), 40
milliampere/seconds (mAs), 41
occlusal radiographs, 217
variations in, 39–41
Exposure time, 40
Extension arm, 21, 22, 24
External aiming device, 163, 203
External auditory meatus, 275, 393
External resorption, 297, 298
Extraoral equipment monitoring, 247–48
Extraoral film, 78–79
packaging, 79
size, 79
Extraoral image receptors, 366, 368–71
cassettes, 369–71
film identification, 371
intensifying screens, 368, 370, 371
traditional film, 366, 368
Extraoral radiography, 35, 364–76
for children, 327–28
computed tomography, 372–73
cone beam computed tomography, 365, 373–74
exposure factors, 371
extraoral image receptors, 366, 368–71
grids, 371
in oral health care, 365–66
purpose and use of, 365
tomography, 372–74
Extra teeth (supernumerary), 295, 326
Eyewash station, 256, 257
F
Facial profile radiographs, 365
Fast film and digital image sensors, 64–65
Federal Performance Act of 1974, 132
Filament, 27
Film, x-ray, 74–82
426 INDEX
composition of, 75
contrast, 35
digital sensor type, 35
duplicating, 79–80
exposure factors (See Exposure factors, film)
extraoral, 78–79
fast film and digital image sensors, 64–65
history of, 4
image receptor holder, 65
intraoral, 76–78
latent image formation, 75
monitoring, 247
optimum processing, patient protection and, 65
packet, 76–77
pedodontic, 78
screen, 78
speed, 77–78
storage and protection, 80
types of, 76–80
Film badge, 69
Film duplicating procedure, 360–61
equipment, 360
Film duplicator, 360
Film feed slot, 92
Film fog, 237
Film hanger, 89
Film holder. See Image receptor positioning
Film loop, 202–3
Film mount, 265
Film mounting. See Mounting radiographs
Film processing, 35, 83–96
automatic, 91–93
chemical maintenance, 93–94
darkroom, 86–88
developing, 84
drying, 84
fixing, 84
manual, 88–91
procedures, 35
processing chemical maintenance, 93–94
processing solutions, 247, 248
processing tank, 88
rapid, 91
rinsing, 84
solutions, 84–86
system monitoring, 247, 248
washing, 84
Film processing errors, 235–36
chemical contamination, 235–36
development error, 235
processing and darkroom protocol errors, 235
Film processing solutions, 84–86
developer, 85
fixer, 85–86
hardening agents, 86
replenisher, 86
Film recovery slot, 92
Filter, 28, 62
Filtration, 59, 62
added, 62
inherent, 62
total, 62
Fitzgerald, G. M., 4, 5
Fixer, 84, 85–86
safe handling of, 255–56
used fixer waste, disposal of, 259–60
Fixing agent, 85
Floor, sinus, 275, 282
Focal spot, 27, 35–36
Focal trough (layer), 379, 381–82
Focusing cup, 27
Fogged images, 237–38
aged film fog, 238
chemical fog, 238
digital radiographic noise, 237, 238
miscellaneous light fog, 238
radiation fog, 237
safelight fog, 238
storage fog, 238
white light fog, 237–38
Follicular (eruptive) cyst, 297
Foreign body, 301
Foreshortening, 182, 232
Fracture line, 301
Frankfort plane, 386
Frequency, 12
Frequently asked questions (FAQs), 143
Fresh-film test, 247
Frontal bone, 274
Full metal crown, 292
Full mouth series (full mouth survey), 150–52
Furcation involvement, 316
Fusion, 296 G
Gag reflex, 341, 342–44. See also Hypersensitive gag reflex
Gamma rays, 10
Gelatin, 75
Gemination (twinning), 296
General/bremsstrahlung radiation, 13
General Electric, 3
Generalized bone loss, 315
Genetic cells, 49
Genetic effect, 49
Genetic mutation, 52
Genial tubercles, 275, 283, 395
Geometric factors, 35
Ghost images, 379, 398–99
Gingivitis, 315, 320–21
Glenoid fossa, 393
Globulomaxillary cyst, 297, 298
Glossopharyngeal air space, 397
Goals, 135
Granuloma, 296, 297
Gray (Gy), 16
Gray scale, 99, 108
Gray value, 99, 100
Green films, 235
Grid, 35, 371
Gutta percha, 293 H
Half-value layer (HVL), 62
Halide, 75
Hamulus, 283, 395
Handling errors, 236–37
black image, 236
black lines, 236
black paper stuck to film, 237
black pressure marks, 236
blank image, 236
dots, 236
lightening pattern, 236
panoramic radiography, 389–93
smudged film, 237
star-bursts, 236
white lines or marks, 236, 237
Handwashing, 117
INDEX 427
Hardening agent, 86
Hard palate, 394
Hard radiation, 12
Hazardous waste, 252
Head positioner guides, 385–86
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), 134
Hearing impairment, patients with, 341
Heat and humidity, film storage/protection and, 80
Hemostat, 356
Hepatitis B, 115
Herringbone error, 231
High contrast, 34
Horizontal angulation, 152–53
bisecting technique, 182
bitewing examination, 203, 206
children, radiographic techniques for, 330–33
occlusal radiographs, 217–18
paralleling technique, 166
Horizontal bitewing radiograph, 198
Horizontal bone loss, 315–16
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), 115
Hydroquinone, 85
Hypercementosis, 295–96
Hypersensitive gag reflex, 341, 342–44
extreme cases of, 343
reducing psychogenic stimuli, 342–43
reducing tactile stimuli, 343
I
Identification dot, 77, 152
incorrect position of, 231
mounting radiographs, 265–66
Identification of, 292–94
Idiopathic resorption, 297
Image receptor positioning, 65
anterior structures not recorded, 229
apical structures not recorded, 229
bisecting technique, 181–82
bitewing examination, 202–3
coronal structures not recorded, 229–30
digital radiography, 104–6
identification dot, incorrect position of, 231
incorrect, 229–31
intraoral radiographic procedures, 153–54
occlusal radiographs, 217
paralleling technique, 162, 163–65
reversed image error, 231
slanted or tilted instead of straight occlusal plane, 230–31
Image receptor size/number
for bitewing examination, 198
for children, 326–27, 330–33
Immunization, 115
Impacted teeth, 278
Implant, 294
Impulse, 23
Incandescence, 27
Incipient (enamel) caries, 305, 306
Incisive canal, 394
Incisive canal cyst, 297
Incisive (anterior palatine) foramen, 275, 281, 394
Indicator ring, 165
Indirect digital imaging, 99, 100–101
Indirect theory, 48–49
Infection control, 114–29
after procedure, 123–25
classification of objects used, 118–19
disinfection of instruments and equipment, 117–18
guidelines for, 116
handwashing, 117
intraoral film, 119
personal protective equipment, 117
prior to procedure, 119–22
during procedure, 122–23
for processors with daylight loader, 126–28
purpose of, 115–16
for radiographic procedure, 119–25
for radiographic processing, 125–26
standard precautions, 115, 116
sterilization of instruments and equipment, 118
terminology, 115
universal precautions, 115
Inferior border, 275, 282, 285, 396
Informed consent, 133–34
Infraorbital foramen, 393
Inherent filtration, 62
Injury from radiation exposure, factors that determine, 50–51
Instruments and equipment
sterilization and disinfection of, 117–18
Insurance claims, 134
Intensifying screens, 37–38, 78, 247–48, 368, 370, 371
Intensity, 28
Interdental septa, 315
Internal resorption, 298
International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements
(ICRU), 15
International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), 70
Interpersonal skills, 139–40
Interpretation vs. diagnosis in viewing radiographs, 268
Interproximal, 307
Interproximal caries, 307
Interproximal radiograph, 148, 197–98
Intraoral film, 76–78, 119
emulsion speeds (sensitivity), 77–78
infection control, 119
packaging, 77
packet, 76–77
projection types, 78
size, 78
speed groups, 78
Intraoral image receptors, pixel size of, 38
Intraoral radiography, 35
anatomy, basics of radiographic, 278–86
bitewing examination, 148
film holders, 153–54
horizontal angulation, 152–53
image receptor positioners, holding in place, 153–54
occlusal examination, 148
periapical examination, 148
points of entry, 153
preparations, 154–55
procedures, 147–60
radiographic examination, 150–52
seating position, patient, 155–56
sequence of procedure, 156–58
shadow casting, 149–50
techniques, 148–49
vertical angulation, 152–53
Inverse square law, 42–43
Inverted Y, 281
Involuntary movement conditions, 341
Ion, 10
Ionization, 10, 48
Ionizing radiation, 10
Ion pair, 10
Irradiation, 49
Irreparable injury, 51
Isometric triangle, 180
Isotope, 10
428 INDEX
K
Kells, C. Edmund, 3, 4
Kilovolt (kV), 26
Kilovolt peak (kVp), 23, 35, 41
Kinetic energy, 13, 28
L
Labels, 255
Labial mounting method, 266
Lamina dura, 277, 320
Landmarks, 280–86. See also individual regions
air spaces images viewed on panoramic radiograph, 397–98
mandible and surrounding tissues, 395–96
mandibular anterior region, 283–85
mandibular posterior region, 285–86
maxilla and surrounding tissues, 393–95
maxillary anterior region, 280–82
maxillary posterior region, 282–83
normal anatomical, 274–76
soft tissue images viewed on panoramic radiograph, 396–97
Laser beam, 11
Latent image, 75, 84
Latent period, 51
Lateral cephalometric radiograph (lateral skull), 367
Lateral fossa, 282
Lateral jaw projection, 327–28
Lateral jaw radiograph (mandibular oblique lateral), 367
Lateral pterygoid plate, 393
Law of B and T, 49
Lead
safe handling of, 258–59
waste, 260
Lead apron, 65, 66
Lead equivalent, 65
LED (light-emitting diode), 87
Legal responsibilities, 131–37
equipment regulations, 132
ethics, 135
goals, 135
informed consent, 133–34
liability, 134
license regulations, 132
malpractice issues, 135
patient records, 134–35
patient relations, 133
risk management, 132–33
Lethal dose (LD), 50
Liability, 134
License regulations, 132
Light, film storage/protection and, 80
Lightening pattern, 236
Light (thin) images
development error, 235
incorrect exposure, 233–34
Lighting, darkroom, 86–87
daylight loader, 86, 87
in-use light, 87
light-tight, 86
safelight, 87
viewbox, 87
white ceiling light, 87
Light leaks, test for, 246–47
Light-tight, 86, 91, 244
Line pair, 108
Line pairs per millimeter (lp/mm), 99
Line switch, 22
Lingual caries, 308
Lingual foramen, 275, 283, 395
Lingual mounting method, 266
Lingula, 395
Localization, 357
Localization methods, 357
definitive evaluation method, 357
right-angle method, 357
tube-shift method (buccal-object rule), 357, 358
Localized bone loss, 315
Logs, 242
Long-scale contrast, 34
Low birth rate, 52
Low contrast, 34
M
Mach band effect, 310–11
Magnification, 38–39
Maintenance schedules, 242
Malaligned or crowded teeth, 351
Malignant, 300
Malpractice, 135
Mandible, 275
Mandible and surrounding tissue landmarks, 395–96
angle of the mandible, 396
cervical spine, 396
coronoid process, 395
genial tubercles, 395
inferior border of the mandible, 396
lingual foramen, 395
lingula, 395
mandibular canal, 395
mandibular condyle, 395
mandibular foramen, 395
mandibular notch, 395
mental foramen, 395
mental fossa, 395
mental ridge, 395
mylohyoid ridge, 396
oblique ridge, 396
submandibular fossa, 396
Mandibular anterior occlusal radiograph of primary dentition, 335
Mandibular anterior region landmarks, 283–85
genial tubercles, 283
lingual foramen, 283
mental fossa, 285
mental ridge, 283
radiolucent features, 283–84
radiopaque features, 283
Mandibular canal, 275, 285, 395
Mandibular canine exposure, 174
bisecting technique, 191
paralleling technique, 174
Mandibular canine periapical radiograph of transitional dentition, 336
Mandibular condyle, 395
Mandibular cross-sectional occlusal radiograph, 224
Mandibular foramen, 275, 395
Mandibular incisors exposure, 173
bisecting technique, 190
paralleling technique, 173
Mandibular molar exposure, 176
bisecting technique, 193
paralleling technique, 176
Mandibular molar periapical radiograph of transitional dentition, 336
Mandibular notch, 275, 395
Mandibular oblique lateral projection, 327–28
Mandibular posterior region landmarks, 285–86
inferior border of the mandible, 285
mandibular canal, 285
mental foramen, 285
mylohyoid ridge, 285
oblique ridge, 285
INDEX 429
Mandibular posterior region landmarks, (Continued)
radiolucent features, 285
radiopaque features, 285
submandibular fossa, 285
torus mandibularis (lingual torus), 285
Mandibular premolar exposure, 175
bisecting technique, 192
paralleling technique, 175
Mandibular topographical occlusal radiograph
anterior, 222
posterior, 223
Manual film processing, 88–91
equipment, 88–89
preparation, 89
procedure, 89–91
Mastoid process, 275, 393
Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDSs), 252–55
Maxilla, 275
Maxilla and surrounding tissue landmarks, 393–95
anterior nasal spine, 394
articular eminence, 393
external auditory meatus, 393
glenoid fossa, 393
hamulus, 395
hard palate, 394
incisive canal, 394
incisive foramen, 394
infraorbital foramen, 393
lateral pterygoid plate, 393
mastoid process, 393
maxillary sinus, 395
maxillary tuberosity, 393
nasal cavity, 394
nasal septum, 394
orbit, 393
styloid process, 393
zygoma, 395
zygomatic process of the maxilla, 395
Maxillary anterior occlusal radiograph of primary dentition, 334
Maxillary anterior region landmarks, 280–82
anterior nasal spine, 280
incisive foramen, 281
inverted Y, 281
lateral fossa, 282
median palatine suture, 281
nasal fossa (cavity), 281–82
nasal septum, 280
radiolucent features, 281–82
radiopaque features, 280–81
soft tissue of the nose, 281, 282
Maxillary canine exposure, 170
bisecting technique, 187
paralleling technique, 170
Maxillary canine periapical radiograph of transitional
dentition, 336
Maxillary central-lateral incisors periapical radiograph of transitional
dentition, 335
Maxillary incisors exposure, 169
bisecting technique, 186
paralleling technique, 169
Maxillary molar exposure, 172
bisecting technique, 189
paralleling technique, 172
Maxillary molar periapical radiograph of transitional
dentition, 336
Maxillary posterior region landmarks, 282–83
coronoid process, 283
floor, 282
hamulus, 283
maxillary sinus, 283
maxillary tuberosity, 282
pterygoid plates, 282
radiolucent features, 283
radiopaque features, 282–83
septum, 282
zygoma, 282
zygomatic arch, 282
zygomatic process, 282
Maxillary premolar exposure, 171
bisecting technique, 188
paralleling technique, 171
Maxillary sinus, 275, 283, 395
Maxillary topographical occlusal radiograph
anterior, 220
posterior, 221
Maxillary tuberosity, 275, 282, 393
Maxillofacial, 365
Maximum permissible dose (MPD), 70
for general public, 70
for radiation workers, 70
McCormack, Franklin, 4, 5
Mean tangent, 153, 182, 203
Median palatine suture, 275, 281
Mental foramen, 275, 285, 395
Mental fossa, 285, 395
Mental ridge, 275, 283, 395
Mesiodens, 295
Mesiodistal overlap, 232
Metallic restorations, 291–92
Microbial aerosol, 115
Microsievert (μSv), 16
Midsagittal plane, 156, 386
Milliampere (mA), 22–23, 26, 40
Milliampere/second (mAs), 41
Millisievert (mSv), 144
Miscellaneous light fog, 238
Modeling, 334
Moderate caries, 305, 306
Moderate chronic or aggressive periodontitis, 320, 322
Molar bitewing exposure, 211
Molecule, 9
Monitoring
area monitoring, 67
darkroom, 244, 246–47
equipment used to view radiographic images, 247
extraoral equipment, 247–48
personnel monitoring, 69–70
processing system, 247, 248
of radiation, 67, 69–70
schedule, 242
x-ray film, 247
x-ray machine, 243–44, 245
Morton, William James, 3, 4
Motion, 37
Motor disorders, 341
Mounting radiographs, 265–68
advantages of, 265
anatomical landmarks, 267
film mounts, 265
identification dot, 265–66
labial mounting method, 266
lingual mounting method, 266
methods of, 266
procedure, 266–68
using mounted radiographs, 270
Mouyen, Francis, 4–5
Mylohyoid ridge, 275, 285, 396
430 INDEX
N
Nasal bones, 275
Nasal cavity, 394
Nasal conchae, 282
Nasal fossa (cavity), 280, 281–82
Nasal septum, 275, 280, 394
Nasopharyngeal air space, 397
National Board Dental Hygiene Examine (NBDHE), 132
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements
(NCRP), 70
National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program
(NVLAP), 70
Needs assessment, 242
Negative angulation, 153
Negative shadows, 379
Negligence, 135
Neoprene gloves, 255
Neutron, 9
Nitrile gloves, 255
Noise, 99, 109
Nonmetallic restorations, 292, 309–10
Nonodontogenic cyst, 297
Nonodontogenic tumors, appearance of, 300–301
Nonthreshold dose-response curve, 49
Nonverbal communication, 141
Nutrient canal, 277
Nutrient foramen, 277
O
Object-image receptor distance, 37, 41, 42
bisecting technique, 181
Oblique ridge, 275, 285, 396
Occipital bone, 274
Occlusal caries, 307–8
Occlusal examination, 148, 215–26. See also Occlusal radiographs
types of, 216
Occlusal plane, 156
slanted or tilted instead of straight, 230–31
Occlusal radiographs, 78, 148, 216–19
cross-sectional technique, 216
exposure factors, 217
fundamentals of, 216–17
horizontal angulation, 217–18
image receptor orientation, 217
image receptor requirements, 217
mandibular cross-sectional occlusal radiograph, 224
mandibular topographical occlusal radiograph (anterior), 222
mandibular topographical occlusal radiograph (posterior), 223
maxillary topographical occlusal radiograph (anterior), 220
maxillary topographical occlusal radiograph (posterior), 221
patient positioning, 217
points of entry, 218
summary of, 219
topographical technique, 216
vertical angulation, 218, 219
Occlusal trauma, 316–17
Occult disease, 373, 378
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OHSA), 116, 252
Odontogenic cyst, 297
Odontogenic tumors, appearance of, 299–300
Odontoma, 299
Operator, technical ability of, 59
Oral health care, 365–66
Oral presentation, 142–43
Oral radiography, 3
Oral surgeon’s use of alternate imaging modalities, 364–76
Orbit, 393
Orthodontic materials, 294
Orthodontist’s use of facial profile radiographs, 365
OSL (optically stimulated luminescence) monitor, 69
Ossifications, appearance of, 299
Osteosclerosis, 299
Output consistency test, 243, 245
Overdevelopment, 229
Overexposure, 229
Overhang, 292
Overlapping
canine-premolar, 351, 352
radiographic errors, 206, 232–33
Ownership, 134
Oxidation, 94
P
Palatoglossal air space, 397
Panoramic, 378
Panoramic radiography, 4, 327, 328, 366, 377–401
advantages and limitations of, 378–79
anatomical landmarks, 393–97 (See also Landmarks)
cassette and film preparation, 383
exposure, 384
focal trough, 379, 381–82
fundamentals of, 379–80
ghost images, 398–99
images of machine parts, 398
imaging errors, 386–92
patient positioning, 384, 386, 389–92
patient preparation, 383, 387
procedure, 383–84
processing, 384
purpose and use, 378
unit preparation, 383
Panoramic x-ray machine, 382, 385–86
Paralleling technique, 5, 148, 149, 161–78. See also Periapical
examination
advantages and disadvantages of, 162
fundamentals of, 162–63
horizontal angulation, 166
image receptor holders, 162, 163–65
mandibular canine exposure, 174
mandibular incisors exposure, 173
mandibular molar exposure, 176
mandibular premolar exposure, 175
maxillary canine exposure, 170
maxillary incisors exposure, 169
maxillary molar exposure, 172
maxillary premolar exposure, 171
points of entry, 166
steps in, summary of, 167–68
vertical angulation, 166
vs. bisecting technique, 163
Partial image, 235
Particulate radiation, 10
Pathogens, 115, 116, 316
Patient, radiation protection for, 58–66, 67. See also Equipment
standards
operator ability, 59
optimum film processing, 65
professional judgment, 58
technique standards, 59
Patient communication, 140–41
children, 141, 334
cultural differences, 141
elderly, 141
honesty and, 140
nonverbal, 141
show-tell-do, 141
verbal, 140
INDEX 431
Patient education, 141–45
frequently asked questions, 143–45
methods of, 142–43
necessity for, 142
oral presentation, 142–43
printed literature, 143
value of, 142
Patient management
for children, 329, 334
communication, 334
modeling, 334
patients who refuse radiographs, 135
Show-tell-do, 334
special needs patients (See Special needs patients)
Patient positioning, 155–56
occlusal radiographs, 217
panoramic radiography, 384, 386, 389–92
wheelchair bound patients, 345
Patient records, 134–35
confidentiality, 134
documentation, 134
insurance claims, 134
ownership, 134
releasing, procedure for, 134
retention, 134–35
Patient relations, 133, 139–40
appearance, 139
attitude, 139
interpersonal skills, 139–40
Pediatric dentistry, 326
Pedodontic film, 78
Penetrometer test, 34
Penumbra, 34
Periapical abscess, 296–97
Periapical cemental dysplasia (PCD), 299–300
Periapical examination, 161–95. See also Bisecting
technique; Paralleling technique
Periapical image receptor. See Image receptor positioning
Periapical radiograph, 78, 148
Period of injury, 51
Periodontal diseases, 314–24
advanced chronic or aggressive periodontitis, 320, 322–23
American Academy of Periodontology
classification of, 320
anatomical configurations, 317
appearance of, 315
bone changes recorded by, 315
bone loss, 315–16
calculus, 316
examination for, 315–17
gingivitis, 320–21
interpretation of, 320–23
limitations of, 317
local contributing factors, 316–17
moderate chronic or aggressive periodontitis, 320, 322
occlusal trauma, 316–17
pathogens, 316
prognosis and treatment, 317
slight chronic periodontitis, 320, 321–22
techniques, 318–20
triangulation, 317
uses of, 315–17
Periodontal ligament (PDL), 277
Periodontal ligament (PDL) space, 321
Periodontitis, 315
Periodontium, 318
Permanent teeth, 278, 326, 334–36
Personal protective equipment (PPE)
for infection control, 116, 117
for safe handling of radiographic chemicals and materials, 255
Personnel monitoring, 69–70
Personnel monitoring device, 69–70
PH, 256
Phleboliths, 299
Phosphors, 368, 370
Photoelectric effect, 14
Photon, 12
Photostimuable phosphor (PSP), 98, 99, 100–101
Physical pressure, film storage/protection and, 80
Pixel, 99, 100, 108, 373
dead, 236
size, 38
Points of entry, 153
bisecting technique, 185
bitewing examination, 207
children, radiographic techniques for, 330–33
occlusal radiographs, 218
paralleling technique, 166
Polychromatic, 26
Poor definition, 234
Porcelain-fused-to-metal crown, 293
Porcelain jacket crown, 293
Porcelain stainless steel crown, 293
Port, 28
Position indicating device (PID), 3–4, 41
circular vs. rectangular, 4
equipment standards, 64
incorrect positioning of, 232–33
long cone, 5
positioning for, correct and incorrect, 39
target-image receptor distance established by,
36–37, 38, 41–42
target-surface distance and, 41
Positive angulation, 153
Post and core, 293
Posterior bitewing radiograph of transitional dentition, 335
Posteroanterior (PA) cephalometric radiograph, 367
Potassium alum, 86
Potassium bromide, 85
Potential difference, 26
Pregnant patients, 341
Premolar bitewing exposure, 210
Preparations for intraoral radiographic procedures, 154–55
patient, 155
unit, 154–55
Preservative, 85
Price, Weston A., 4, 5
Primary beam, 27, 28, 62–63
Primary teeth, 278, 326, 334–36
Printed literature, 143
Processing. See Film processing
Processing chemical maintenance, 93–94
Processing equipment, cleaners used on, 258
Processing solutions, 247, 248
Processing system monitoring, 247, 248
automatic processor, 247
processing solutions, 247, 248
Processing tank, 88
Professional organizations, web sites for, 132
Projection types for children, 327–28
Prosthodontist’s use of facial profile radiographs, 365
Protection of x-ray film, 80
Protective barrier, 67, 115, 117
Proton, 9
Proximal surface, 197
Proximal surface caries, 307
Pterygoid plates, 282
Public Law 86-373, 71
432 INDEX
Pulp chamber, 277
Pulp stone, 299
Q
Quality, 28
Quality administration procedures, 242
Quality assurance, 241–50. See also Quality control
authority and responsibilities, 242
competency of radiographer, 242–43
logs and periodic evaluation, 242
monitoring and maintenance schedules, 242
needs assessment, 242
quality administration procedures, 242
written plan, 242
Quality assurance programs, 248
Quality control, 243–48
darkroom monitoring, 244, 246–47
equipment used to view radiographic images monitoring, 247
extraoral equipment monitoring, 247–48
processing system monitoring, 247, 248
time intervals for performing tests, 242
x-ray film monitoring, 247
x-ray machine monitoring, 243–44, 245
Quantity, 28
R
Rad, 16
Radiation, 10. See also X-rays
atomic structure, 9–10
background, 16–17
characteristic, 8–18, 13
electromagnetic, 11–12
general/bremsstrahlung, 13
hard, 12
ionization, 10
ionizing, 10
ionizing radiation, 10
measurement of, 8–18
particulate, 10
radioactivity, 10–11
scatter (secondary), 63–64
secondary, 14–15
soft, 12
units of (See Units of radiation)
Radiation Control for Health and Safety Act, 71
Radiation exposure, 15, 47–56
alternate imaging modalities, 371
biological effect mechanisms, 48–49
cell sensitivity to, 49
in children, 326, 330–33
comparisons, 53–54
critical organs and doses, 53
in digital radiography, 102–4, 109
dose-response curve, 49–50
effective dose equivalent, 54
exposed area, 50
factors, 59
injury, 50–51
organizations responsible for exposure limits, 70–71
panoramic radiographic procedure, 384
risk estimates, 53
sensitivity to, 50
sequence of events following, 51
short- long-term effects of, 51–52
tissues of the body, 51
supplemental radiographic techniques, 353
Radiation fog, 237
Radiation leakage, 67
Radiation protection, 57–73
ALARA, 58
distance, 67, 68
monitoring, 67–70
organizations responsible for exposure limits, 70–71
for patient (See Patient, radiation protection for)
for radiographer, 66–67
safety legislation, 71
shielding, 67, 68
time, 67
Radiation worker, 70
Radiator, 28
Radicular cyst, 297
Radioactivity, 10–11
Radiographer
competency of, 242–43
culturally sensitive, 341, 346–47
radiation protection for, 66–67
Radiographic anatomy, 273–88. See also Anatomical variations,
supplemental radiographic techniques for
alveolar bone, 277
anatomical landmarks, normal, 274–76
basics, intraoral radiographs, 278–86 (See also
Landmarks)
deviations from normal (See Radiographic anatomy,
deviations from normal)
teeth, 277–78
Radiographic anatomy, deviations from normal, 289–302
apical disease, 296–97
calcifications, 299
caries (See Caries)
developmental anomalies, 294–96
nonodontogenic tumors, 300–301
odontogenic tumors, 299–300
ossifications, 299
restorative material, 290–94
tooth resporption, 297–98
trauma, 301
Radiographic chemicals and materials, safe handling of, 252–59
cleaners used on processing equipment, 258
developer, 256, 257
disinfectants, 257–58
eyewash station, 256, 257
fixer, 255–56
general recommendations for, 256
labels, 255
lead, 258–59
Material Safety Data Sheets, 252–55
personal protective equipment, 255
Radiographic contrast, 35
Radiographic errors, 227–40
fogged images, 237–38
handling errors, 236–37
panoramic radiography, 386–92
processing errors, 235–36
recognizing, 228–29
technique errors, 229–34
Radiographic examination, 150–52
Radiographic image, factors affecting, 35–39
contrast, 35, 36
distortion, 39
magnification/enlargement, 38–39
sharpness/definition, 35–38
Radiographic wastes, management of, 259–61
digital imaging equipment, 260–61
discarded radiographs waste, 260
disposal options, 261
lead waste, 260
used fixer waste, 259–60
waste management service, questions to ask of, 259
INDEX 433
Radiographs, 2. See also Supplemental radiographic
techniques
bitewing, 78, 148, 197–214
distances, effects of variations in, 41–42
errors (See Radiographic errors)
exposure charts and, 44
exposure factors, effects of variations in, 39–41
guidelines for prescribing, 60–61
inverse square law and, 42–43
maxillary vs. mandibular, anatomical landmarks distinguishing, 267
mounting (See Mounting radiographs)
occlusal, 78, 148
patients who refuse, 135
periapical, 148
quality, characteristics of, 228
quality, producing, 32–46
retake, 59
terminology used to describe, 33–35
uses of, 5
viewing (See Viewing radiographs)
waste, discarded, 260
Radiography, 2
advances in, 5
digital image receptors, 4–5
history of, 1–7
panoramic, 4
scientists and researchers, 2–3, 4
Radiology, 2
Radiolucent, 13, 33, 84
Radiolucent features
mandibular anterior region landmarks, 283–84
mandibular posterior region landmarks, 285
maxillary anterior region landmarks, 281–82
maxillary posterior region landmarks, 283
Radiolysis of water, 48–49
Radiopaque, 13, 33, 84
Radiopaque features
mandibular anterior region landmarks, 283
mandibular posterior region landmarks, 285
maxillary anterior region landmarks, 280–81
maxillary posterior region landmarks, 282–83
Radioresistant, 49
Radiosensitive, 49
RadioVisioGraphy, 4, 5
Rampant caries, 309
Ramus, 275
Raper, Howard Riley, 3, 4
Rapid (chairside) processing, 91
Rare-earth phosphors, 368
Recovery period, 51
Recurrent (secondary) caries, 308–9
Reference film, 247
Rem, 16
Replenisher, 86
Residual cyst, 297
Resorption, 297
Responsibilities, 242
Restorative material, appearance of, 290–94
amalgam, 292
base material, 293
composite, 292
crowns, 292–93
endodontic fillers, 293, 294
identification of, 292–94
implant, 294
metallic restorations, 291–92
nonmetallic restorations, 292
orthodontic materials, 294
post and core, 293
retention pin, 293
surgical materials, 294
Restrainer, 85
Retained root, 298
Retake radiograph, 59
Retention, 134–35
Retention pin, 293
Reversed image error, 231
Reverse Towne radiograph, 368
Rhinoliths, 299
Right-angle method, 357
Rinsing, in film processing, 84
Risk, 53
vs. benefit, 53
Risk management, 132–33
audit for, 133
Roentgen (R), 15
Roentgen, Bertha, 2
Roentgen, Wilhelm Conrad, 2, 4
Roentgenograph, 2
Roentgen ray, 2
Roller transport system, 92
Rollins, William Herbert, 3, 4
Root canal treatment, 356
Root (cemental) caries, 308
Rotational center, 380
Rule of isometry, 4, 5, 148–49
S
Safelight, 87
Safelight filter, 87
Safelight fog, 238
Safelight test, 244, 246–47
Safety and environmental health, 251–63
OSHA standards, 252
radiographic chemicals and materials, safe handling of, 252–59
radiographic wastes, management of, 259–61
requirements for, 252
Sarcoma, 300–301
Scatter (secondary) radiation, 35, 52, 63–64
Scientists and researchers, 2–3, 4
Sclerotic bone, 299
Screen film, 78, 366
Screen-film contact, 38
Screen thickness, 37–38
Seating position, patient. See Patient positioning
Secondary (recurrent) caries, 308–9
Secondary (scatter) radiation, 14–15, 63–64
Selection criteria, 58
Selective reduction, 85
Self-determination, 133–34
Sensitivity to radiation exposure, 50
Sensor, 4, 100
Sepsis, 115
Septum, 282
Severe caries, 305, 306
Shadow casting, 34–35
intraoral radiographic procedures, 149–50
Sharpness, 34, 35–38
crystal/pixel size and, 38
focal spot size and, 35–36
motion and, 37
object-image receptor distance and, 37
poor, 234
screen-film contact, 38
screen thickness and, 37–38
target-image receptor distance and, 36–37
Shelf life, film storage/protection and, 80
Shielding, 67, 68
434 INDEX
Short-scale contrast, 34
Show-tell-do, 141, 334
Sialolith, 299
Sievert (Sv), 16
Silver halide crystals, 75, 84
Silver point, 293
Silver thiosulphate complex, 259–60
Slight chronic periodontitis, 320, 321–22
SLOB rule, 357
Smudged film, 237
Sodium carbonate, 85
Sodium sulfite, 85
Sodium thiosulfate, 85
Soft radiation, 12
Soft tissue images viewed on panoramic radiograph, 396–97
Soft tissue of the nose, 281, 282
Software, in digital radiography, 106–8
Solarized emulsion, 80
Solid state, 98
Somatic cells, 49
Somatic effect, 49
Spatial resolution, 99, 108
Spatter, 115
Special needs patients, 340–49
aging, 341
angular cheilitis, 344
apprehensive patient, 341, 342
cancer, 341
conditions prompting alterations to radiographic procedures, 341
culturally diverse, 341, 346–47
disability, 344–46
gag reflex, 341, 342–44
hearing impairment, 341
hypersensitive gag reflex, 341, 342–44
involuntary movement conditions, 341
motor disorders, 341
pregnancy, 341
speech reading, 345–46
visual impairment, 341
wheelchair bound, 341
Species, variation in sensitivity, 50
Speech reading, 345–46
Sphenoid bone, 275
Stains, 236
Standard precautions, 115, 116
Star-bursts, 236
Static electricity, 236
Statute of limitations, 135
Step-down transformer, 25
Step-up transformer, 25
Step-wedge, 243, 244
Sterilization of instruments and equipment, 118
Sterilize, 115
Stochastic effect, 51
Storage fog, 238
Storage of x-ray film, 80
Storage phosphor, 100
Structural shielding, 67
Styloid process, 275, 393
Subject contrast, 35
Submandibular fossa, 275, 285, 396
Submentovertex radiograph, 368
Supernumerary teeth (extra teeth), 278, 295, 326
Supplemental radiographic techniques, 350–63
acceptable variations in technique, 351–52
anatomical variations, 353–56
disto-oblique periapical radiographs, 357, 359–60
edentulous patient, 353–56
endodontic techniques, 356–57
exposure factors, 353
film duplicating procedure, 360–61
localization methods, 357
malaligned or crowded teeth, 351
overlap, avoiding, 351
tori, 353
vertical angulation, altering, 351, 353
Surgical materials, 294
Suture, 278
Symphysis, 184, 275
Système Internationale (SI), 15
T
Target, 27
Target-image receptor distance, 36–37, 38, 41–42
bisecting technique, 180
Target-object distance, 38
Target-surface distance, 41
Taurodontia, 296
Technique errors, 229–34
artifacts, 234
incorrect exposure factors, 233–34
incorrect positioning of image receptor, 229–31
incorrect positioning of tube head and PID, 232–33
poor definition, 234
Technique standards, 59
Teeth, radiographic appearance of, 277–78
Temporal bone, 274
Temporomandibular disorder (TMD), 365
Temporomandibular joint (TMJ), 372
Thermionic emission, 27
Threshold dose-response curve, 49
Thyroid collar, 65–66
Time intervals for performing tests, 242
Timer, 23
Time-temperature, 89
Tissues of the body, radiation exposure and, 51
TLD (thermoluminescent dosimeter), 69
Tomograph, 372
Tomography, 4, 372–74, 379
Tooth resporption, appearance of, 297–98
external resorption, 297, 298
idiopathic resorption, 297
internal resorption, 298
Topographical technique, 216
Tori, 353
Torus, 300
Torus mandibularis, 285, 353
Torus palatinus, 353
Total dose, 50
Total filtration, 62
Trabeculae, 277
Trabecular bone, 277
Tragus, 386
Transcranial radiograph (TMJ), 368
Transformer, 25
Transitional mixed dentition, 326, 334–36
Trauma, appearance of, 301
Triangulation, 317
Tube head (tube housing), 21, 22, 24
incorrect positioning of, 232–33
stability, 243, 244
Tube-shift method (buccal-object rule), 357, 358
Tube side, 75, 77
Tumors, appearance of
nonodontogenic, 300–301
odontogenic, 299–300
Tungsten, 27
Twinning (gemination), 296
INDEX 435
U
Ultraviolet waves, 10–11
Underdevelopment, 235
Underexposure, 233
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 70, 71
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 116, 252
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 116
Units of radiation, 15–16
absorbed dose, 16
dose equivalent, 16
effective dose equivalent, 16
exposure, 15
terms used for, 15
Universal precautions, 115
Useful beam, 28
V
Velocity, 12
Verbal communication, 140
Vertical angulation, 152–53
bisecting technique, 182, 185
bitewing examination, 206–7
children, radiographic techniques for, 330–33
occlusal radiographs, 218, 219
paralleling technique, 166
Vertical bitewing radiograph, 150, 198, 318
Vertical (angular) bone loss, 315–16
Victor CDX shockproof dental x-ray machine, 3
Viewbox, 87, 247, 268–70
Viewing radiographs, 268–70
equipment for, 268–70
interpretation vs. diagnosis, 268
sequence for, 269–70
Visual impairment, patients with, 341
Volt (V), 26
Voltage, 26
Voltmeter, 23
Voxel (volume element), 373
W
Walkhoff, Otto, 2–3, 4
Washing, in film processing, 84
Waste management service, questions to ask of, 259
Waste stream, 259
Waters radiograph, 367
Wavelength, 12
Weighting factor, 16
Wet reading, 89–90
Wheelchair bound patients, 341
White light fog, 237–38
White lines, marks, or spots
chemical contamination, 235
handling errors, 236, 237
Working radiograph, 91, 356
Written plan, 242
X
X-coordinate, 99, 100
“X Light Kills” (Rollins), 4
X-ray film. See Film, x-ray
X-ray machine monitoring, 243–44, 245
output consistency test, 243, 245
step-wedge, 243, 244
tube head stability, 243, 244
X-ray machines, 20–31
components of, 21–24
control panel, 22–24
digital radiography, 104
electricity and, 24–26
evolution of, 21
extension arm, 24
history of, 3–4
monitoring (See X-ray machine monitoring)
operation of, 28–29
tube head (tube housing), 24
x-ray beam and, 28
x-ray tube and, 26–28
X-rays, 2
discovery of, 2
interaction with matter, 13–15
production of, 13
properties of, 12–13
techniques, 5
X-ray tube, 26–28
anode, 27
cathode, 27
operation, summary of, 27–28
Y
Y-coordinate, 99, 100
Yoke, 24
Z
Zygoma, 274, 282, 395
Zygomatic arch, 274–75, 282
Zygomatic process, 282, 395
436 INDEX

La entrada Essentials of Dental Radiography se publicó primero en Kadi México.

]]>
5626
Dental CT Third Eye In Dental Implants https://kadimexico.com/dental-ct-third-eye-in-dental-implants/ Wed, 12 Oct 2022 17:38:48 +0000 https://kadimexico.com/?p=5623 DENTAL CT THIRD EYE IN DENTAL IMPLANTS DENTAL CT THIRD EYE IN DENTAL IMPLANTS Editor-in-chief Prashant P Jaju BDS MDS Senior Lecturer Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology Mahatma Gandhi Vidyamandir’s KBH Dental College and Hospital Chief Radiologist 3D Facial Imaging Center (Cone-Beam CT Scan Center) Nashik, Maharashtra, India Editors Sushma P Jaju BDS MDS […]

La entrada Dental CT Third Eye In Dental Implants se publicó primero en Kadi México.

]]>
DENTAL CT THIRD EYE IN DENTAL IMPLANTS DENTAL CT THIRD EYE IN DENTAL IMPLANTS Editor-in-chief Prashant P Jaju BDS MDS Senior Lecturer Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology Mahatma Gandhi Vidyamandir’s KBH Dental College and Hospital Chief Radiologist 3D Facial Imaging Center (Cone-Beam CT Scan Center) Nashik, Maharashtra, India Editors Sushma P Jaju BDS MDS Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics Consultant Endodontist and Private Practitioner Dentocare Multispecialty Dental Clinic Nashik, Maharashtra, India Prashant V Suvarna BDS MDS Professor and Guide Oral Medicine and Radiology DY Patil Dental College and Hospital Pune, Maharashtra, India Pratik Dedhia BDS MDS Senior Lecturer Oral Medicine and Radiology Terna Dental College and Hospital Mumbai, Maharashtra, India Foreword Stuart C White JAYPEE BROTHERS Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. New Delhi • Panama City • London • Dhaka • Kathmandu ® Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. Headquarters. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. 4838/24, Ansari Road, Daryaganj New Delhi 110 002, India Phone: +91-11-43574357 Fax: +91-11-43574314 Email: jaypee@jaypeebrothers.com Overseas Offices J.P. Medical Ltd. Jaypee-Highlights medical publishers Inc. 83, Victoria Street, London City of Knowledge, Bld. 237, Clayton SW1H 0HW (UK) Panama City, Panama Phone: +44-2031708910 Phone: + 507-301-0496 Fax: +02-03-0086180 Fax: + 507- 301-0499 Email: info@jpmedpub.com Email: cservice@jphmedical.com Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. 17/1-B Babar Road, Block-B Shorakhute Shaymali Mohammadpur Kathmandu, Nepal Dhaka-1207, Bangladesh Phone: +00977-9841528578 Mobile: +08801912003485 Email: jaypee.nepal@gmail.com Email: jaypeedhaka@gmail.com Website: www.jaypeebrothers.com Website: www.jaypeedigital.com © 2013, Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means without the prior permission of the publisher. Inquiries for bulk sales may be solicited at: jaypee@jaypeebrothers.com This book has been published in good faith that the contents provided by the author(s) contained herein are original, and is intended for educational purposes only. While every effort is made to ensure accuracy of information, the publisher and the author(s) specifically disclaim any damage, liability, or loss incurred, directly or indirectly, from the use or application of any of the contents of this work. If not specifically stated, all figures and tables are courtesy of the authors(s). Where appropriate, the readers should consult with a specialist or contact the manufacturer of the drug or device. Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants First Edition: 2013 ISBN: 978-93-5025-910-8 Printed at: ® CONTRIBUTORS Allan G Farman BDS PhD MBA DSC Diplomate ABOMR Professor, Radiology and Imaging Science University Louisville School of Dentistry 501 South Preston Street Louisville, Kentucky 40292, USA Hemant Telkar MD DMRE Infinity Imaging Center Mumbai, Maharashtra, India Prashant P Jaju bds MDS Senior Lecturer Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology Mahatma Gandhi Vidyamandir’s KBH Dental College and Hospital Chief Radiologist 3D Facial Imaging Center (Cone-Beam CT Scan Center) Nashik, Maharashtra, India Prashant V Suvarna bds MDS Professor and Guide Oral Medicine and Radiology DY Patil Dental College and Hospital Pune, Maharashtra, India Pratik Dedhia bds MDS Senior Lecturer Oral Medicine and Radiology Terna Dental College and Hospital Mumbai, Maharashtra, India Rajiv Desai MDS Professor and Head Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology Nair Dental College and Hospital Mumbai, Maharashtra India Rakesh Jamkhandikar MD DMRE Department of CT and MRI Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital Pune, Maharashtra India Sanjay Jain MDS Assistant Professor Periodontics Rangoonwala Dental College Pune, Maharashtra India Stuart C White DDS PhD Professor Emeritus Ucla School of Dentistry Los Angeles USA Sushma P Jaju BDS MDS Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics Consultant Endodontists and Private Practitioner Dentocare Multispecialty Dental Clinic Nashik, Maharashtra India FOREWORD Cross-sectional imaging is an indispensible component in modern dentistry as it provides images through dental structures free of superposition of other structures and free of distortion. This book describes the various dental programs that have been optimized for dental applications of computed tomography. In particular, this book focuses on the utility of dental CT for implantology, oral and maxillofacial surgery, endodontics and periodontics. The book is well organized with a lot of attention paid to the basic principles and methods so that the readers will gain an appreciation of how to position of the patient and interpret the images to get the most from their examinations. Detailed description of the steps making for each examination is provided. There are many tables that allow the readers to quickly grasp the essential points. The qualities of the images are high and include both normal anatomic structures in the regions of interest and various common pathologic conditions. In recent years, cone-beam imaging is starting to replace dental CT, while the focus of this book is exclusively on dental CT. The principles and examples of radiographic interpretation presented in this book are fully applicable to cone-beam imaging. I commend the authors for their thoughtful work and recommend this book for everyone using dental CT. Stuart C White DDS PhD Professor Emeritus UCLA School of Dentistry Los Angeles, USA Preface As dentistry evolves within the digital age, manufacturers develop and introduce, and oral healthcare professionals continue to incorporate, technological innovations to enhance their practice, as well as improve predictability and productivity of day-to-day dental operations, especially dental implantology with prosthetic restoration of missing teeth. It is now more that a decade since the first cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) system, the NewTom (QR, Inc., Verona, Italy – now a Cefla company) received patent approval in Europe. That system required the patient to be placed supine, and in appearance, it mimicked fan-beam CT scanners used in medicine. The NewTom provided a low dose, reasonably affordable 3-D radiograph imaging system for use in the dental office. To that point, the third dimension in imaging had usually meant either blurry and magnified film-based linear tomograms or referral to a medical radiology office, where the CT system was focused at the whole body rather than the maxillofacial region, and the operators were not always cognizant of the diagnostic needs of dentists or the relatively high radiation exposure to the patient. Dental CT can be performed either by CBCT or by multi-slice CT, but the latter generally results in substantially higher doses to the patient. CBCT systems now abound, both in numbers and variety, and are already quite common in dental practices and dental imaging centers throughout the world. There are supine systems (e.g. Cefla/QR NewTom 3G; Cefla/ Myray SkyView), sit down systems (e.g. ISI/i-CAT; Gendex CB500; ISI/Soredex Scanora 3D; J Morita Accuitomo; Prexion 3D; 3M Iluma Elite) and stand-up units (e.g. Cefla/Newtom VG; J Morita Veraviewepocs 3D; Kodak 9000 and 9500; E-Woo/Vatech Picasso Trio; Suni 3D; Sirona Galileos). There are large field of view (FOV) systems that can be used in evaluating craniofacial anomalies and planning orthognathic surgery, where multi-slice CT would have been used previously, at much higher radiation dosages to the patient. Generally, such full FOV systems are employed at relatively low isotropic voxel resolution (i.e. 0.2–0.4 mm) to reduce the dose needed while reducing image noise, and also to permit reasonable reconstruction times. At the other end of the spectrum, there are small FOV systems that usually provide higher resolution (i.e. often 0.1 mm isotropic voxel resolution or better) that are ideal for such situations as endodontic assessments. These small FOV systems may be hybrid, providing 2-D digital panoramic and/or cephalograms. Hybrid systems are available at less than US $90,000, a price comparable to an upper level 2-D pan/ceph not so many years ago, and perhaps less in constant dollar value. Small FOV systems can provide limited (i.e. “focused field”) volume images of several teeth for approximately the same dose as two traditional intraoral radiographs. Given that multiple such traditional images at different angles could be needed to evaluate an endodontic problem, small FOV CBCT might actually result in a dose savings to the patient. CBCT is an adjunct to 2-D imaging in dentistry. The 3-D imaging provides a clear relationship between structures that could be obscure on 2-D images. CBCT is useful for assessing impacted teeth, particularly the relationship between mandibular third molars and mandibular canals. It is also valuable in assessing implant positioning and preimplant bone augmentation to provide the best possible prosthodontics reconstructive outcome. Small FOV CBCT is valuable in assessing failed endodontics and perhaps also in primary evaluation of certain teeth prior to endodontics. However, CBCT does not replace 2-D imaging of dental caries. Beam hardening artifact from restorations and tooth enamel would result in a very large number of false positives for dental caries should current CBCT systems be used for caries detection. While the recent graduates from dental school may have some grounding in 3-D imaging and direct experience with CBCT during their studies, this varies between institutions. Most dentists already in practice have limited or no training in using 3-D images for dental practice, and there are few existing pointers for optimizing CBCT patient x Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants image selection. For this reason, this book is particularly useful for demonstrating the value of 3-D imaging for the specific purpose of dental implant planning. While the average dentist should be able to fully understand the anatomic and disease findings from a small “focused field” image volume, there is still the need to train the dentist in Image Segmentation Methods in order to get the most out of the available information, even with these systems. With large FOV systems, careful review of the full information contained in the image volume takes more time and expertise. In such cases, it is probably most cost-effective for practitioners to refer the image volume out for a careful review by a specialist in oral and maxillofacial radiology. There can be many findings within the CBCT volume significant to the health of the patient, and such findings are particularly common in older individuals attending dentists for dental implant treatment. The individuals ordering and making the CBCT volumes are certainly responsible to make a full interpretation, just as they are with panoramic and other 2-D images. Practitioners are no less responsible for failure to diagnose with CBCT than with any other radiographic image. To indicate otherwise would be a disservice. The 3-D imaging provides accurate anatomic relationships between structures and is much easier to explain— often with simulations—to the patient. One might not always be able to preserve the integrity of the mandibular canal when extracting a third molar, even given a 3-D image, but one is more aware of potential complications and best approaches. The patient also is better informed before consenting to the procedure. There might be practitioners who have relied upon panoramic images to place dental implants for three decades or more, and these “gurus” often do not see any need to move from what they perceive to be success, until they experience 3-D images and see where they were actually placing the implants previously! After that enlightenment, 3-D imaging becomes the rule. One can teach an “old dog” new tricks, at least when it comes to dental implantology. This is a benefit for both the dentist and patient. This book is aimed both at “old dogs” and “new dogs” to dental CT in implantology. It represents a welcome addition to the library of all practitioners interested in performing dental implant placement optimally. Allan G Farman ACKNOWLEDGMENTs The book of this magnitude is possible only due to assistance and support from a considerable number of people. I am grateful to the pioneers in dental imaging in particular its utilization in implant imaging. I owe an enormous debt to the gifted implantologists and oral radiologists of this age, who seek to expand the envelope of their knowledge. They are my real contributors. The book is a culmination of many years of contemplating fundamental principles conveyed by early researchers, continually scrutinizing the literature to remain abreast of advances and refining illustrative material. First and foremost, I wish to acknowledge the work of our esteem contributors their enormous efforts is highly appreciated. I feel privileged to have had the opportunity to work closely with such talented people. Particular acknowledgment is extended to Professor Emeritus, Dr Stuart C White and President of AAOMR, Dr Allan Farman for extending their sea of knowledge towards this textbook. Both the legendary oral radiologists had no apprehension in contributing towards this book. Dental CT—Third Eye in Dental Implants would not have been possible without the guidance, support from M/s Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd, New Delhi, India. Each and every member of their team have exhibited exemplary professionalism along with a good sense of humor during this arduous task. I am also indebted to Mr Tarun Duneja (Director–Publishing) who encouraged us to write this book and saw it through from an idea to publication. I also wish to thank the production department of Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, who took the manuscript and some radiographs and created a true work of art. I am also grateful and feel indebted towards Dr Hemant Telkar, Infinity Imaging Center, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India, and Dr Rakesh Jamkhandikar by providing the excellent cases which have been a useful teaching aids and also improved the sense of understanding of dental CT. I also wish to extend our gratitude towards the management of our respective colleges without whom this book would have not become a reality. This textbook would not have been completed without the timely, valuable, knowledgeable and enthusiastic contributions of Dr Sanjay Jain, Dr Rajeev Desai, Dr Vaibhav Avinashe, Dr Jayaprakash Patil, Dr Shail Jaggi, Dr Reema Shah, Dr Arun Subramaniam, Dr Ajay Bhoosreddy, Dr Rajiv Gadgil, Dr Nipa Parikh, Dr Chetan Bhadage, Dr Seema Patil, Dr Ajay Nayak, Dr Shailesh Gondivkar and Dr Anuj Dadhich. I also wish to thank the staff, postgraduate and undergraduate students of Mahatma Gandhi Vidyamandir’s KBH Dental College and Hospital, Nashik; DY Patil Dental College, Pune; and Terna Dental College, Mumbai for their continuous encouragement and support. Finally, I wish to thank our families. Their unwavering love, encouragement and moral support not only made our lives easier but also ultimately the most important force ensuring a successful result. This is not merely a book of experiences with dental CT, but a combined effort of all of the above. Through their efforts, I hope that I have been able to describe the state of dental CT in implantology in present era. CONTRIBUTORS Contents 1. Introduction to Dental Implants …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Prashant V Suvarna 2. Conventional Imaging Techniques and Dental Implants ……………………………………………………………………………… 3 Prashant P Jaju v Implant Imaging Objectives 3 3. History of Dental CT ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 7 Sushma P Jaju 4. Working of Dental CT …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 9 Prashant P Jaju v Procedure of Scanning 9 5. Anatomical Landmarks as on Dental CT ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 19 Prashant P Jaju v Maxillary Landmarks 19 v Mandibular Landmarks 21 6. Dental CT in Implantology ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 28 Prashant P Jaju, Prashant P Suvarna v Maxilla and Mandible 29 v Radiation Dose 36 7. Dental CT in Periodontics ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 39 Pratik Dedhia v Periodontitis and Maxillary Sinus 39 v Root Evaluation 40 v Periodontal Cases 42 8. Dental CT in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery ……………………………………………………………………………………………… 43 Prashant P Jaju 9. Dental CT in Endodontics ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 52 Sushma P Jaju 10. Advances in Implant Imaging ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 58 Prashant P Jaju, Prashant V Suvarna v Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Implant Imaging 58 v Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) 59 11. Case Study …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..61 Index………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..69 The real voyage of discovery consists not in making new landscapes, but in having new eyes. Technology is fighting tooth and nails to restore health in its natural dynamics by sorting to biocompatible artificial substitutes. Implant dentistry is one of the most researched and technologically advancing modality for the treatment of partial or complete edentulousness. Experiments carried out by Branemark and co-workers at the University of Goteberg in early 1960s demonstrated that it was possible to establish a direct bone to implant contact and thereby they introduced the term “osseointegration” into the field of dentistry. Later in the 1970s Shroeder et al. and Albrektsson et al. independently confirmed the occurrence of osseointegration and gave an impetus to the progress of oral implantology. Ever since the concept of osseointegration has gained acceptance, the use of dental implants for replacing missing teeth has increased in leaps and bounds. Also with dental insurance coming into existence in the near future, the option of dental implants seems financially feasible, and subsequently an upsurge in the number of implants placed can be expected. As we all know that with the advancement in medical technologies and geriatric care facilities, the overall longevity of patient’s life is increased. This has brought out the ultimate desire in patients of living life to its fullest. This further propels this branch, of extreme research, into ultimate existence and widespread acceptance. Thus, the crux of implant dentistry is here to stay and thrive for long, as in other advanced countries. Planning, planning and planning remains the ultimate step that has to be given paramount importance prior to implant placement and is undoubtedly one of the “mantras” for success. An astute clinician will fail if he does not take the help of the “third eye”, i.e. the use of radiology for planning implant placement. Verification of radiographs, CT scan evaluation and advanced digitalization along with post pixel voxel combat results in the virtual image which is close to anatomical perfection. The quantity, quality, the bony concavities along with undercuts and neurovascular bundle and anatomic cavities like approximation to sinus can be closely assessed. Conventional radiographic techniques are being commonly used by the dental practitioners to quantify and assess the available bone at the proposed implant site. The inherent distortion in the machine and the enhanced variations due to positional technical errors further magnifies the distortion which is not anticipated and taken into account ultimately leading to inaccurate readings and unwanted stress during the operative procedures. The treatment planning and evaluation of proposed implant site most commonly is done by panoramic radiograph (OPG) by many although, trouble shooting in OPG for positional errors and incorporation of ball bearings in the radiographic techniques and thereby assessing the percentage of magnification becomes an important step which is not performed by the general dental practitioners (Figs 1.1 and 1.2). Diagnostic information, treatment planning and treatment benefits levels have increased with the use of 3-D imaging techniques. Using 3-D virtual planning techniques before treatment has resulted in optimal implant placement and improved clinical outcomes. The development of 3-D scanning such as Dental CT, Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) instead of planar films has led to improved visualization and comprehension of the anatomy Introduction to Dental Implants 1 Prashant V Suvarna C h a p t e r 2 Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants Fig. 1.2 Metal ball used in panoramic radiograph in the areas in which implants are being planned for placement. Computed tomographic (CT) scans reproduce the anatomy with a submillimetric accuracy. A surgical guide can be designed and constructed on the basis of computer analysis of the available bone, the proximity of teeth to the proposed implant site and structures to be avoided in implant placement. This information can help clinicians comprehend better the optimal location of implant placement and ultimately lead to a better potential for a successful outcome. With such technological advancement at the disposal of oral implantologists, dental implants never looked so simplified. Fig. 1.1 Panoramic radiograph suffers from inherent distortion and magnification Further chapters will add the pitfalls and nuances in implant imaging and make the journey of rehabilitation of edentulism with implant imaging as a paramount junction from where the further routes of treatment planning starts. So enjoy the journey from the start, embark on the destination but be sure that you choose the correct and the right path. Many of life’s failures are people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up—Thomas Edison. So they say keep your head and heart in right direction, you will never have to worry about your feet. There are number of basic principles of radiography that should guide the clinician in selecting an appropriate imaging techniques and judging whether the resultant images are of adequate quality for the purpose. 1. There should be an adequate number and type of images to provide the needed anatomic information. This includes the quantity of bone, quality of bone as well as the location of anatomic structures, which generally requires multiple images at right angle to each other. 2. The type of imaging technique selected should be able to provide the required information with adequate precision and dimensional accuracy. 3. There must be a way of relating the images to the patient’s anatomy. 4. Irrespective of the technique used, the patient, X-ray beam, and imaging receptor should be positioned to minimize distortion. In addition all images should have adequate density and contrast and should be free from artefacts that might interfere with interpretation. 5. The desire for preoperative imaging information should be balanced with the radiation dose and financial cost to the patient. If there is more than one technique suitable in a particular case, the ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) principle should govern the selection. IMPLANT IMAGING OBJECTIVES Imaging for dental implants can be broadly be divided into three phases of the treatment (Table 2.1): 1. Preoperative imaging 2. Surgical phase imaging 3. Postprosthetic imaging Anatomic and Architectural Considerations The objective of preoperative dental implant imaging is to gain the following information about the potential implant site (Flow Chart 2.1): 1. Presence of disease. 2. Location of anatomic features that should be avoided when placing the implant, such as the maxillary Conventional Imaging Techniques and Dental Implants 2 Prashant P Jaju C h a p t e r Table 2.1: Imaging modalities recommended according to the stage of implant treatment Phase of treatment Imaging modalities Preoperative imaging IOPA, OPG, CT Surgical phase imaging IOPA, digital imaging (RVG) Postprosthetic imaging IOPA, digital subtraction Postoperative complications CT 4 Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants sinus, nasopalatine canal, inferior alveolar canal, and the mental canal and the foramen. 3. Location of the osseous morphology, including knife edge ridges, location and depth of the submandibular fossa, developmental variations, postextraction irregularities, enlarged marrow spaces, cortical integrity and thickness, and trabecular bone density. 4. Amount of bone available for implant placement and the orientation of the alveolar bone. In the past, patients desiring dental implants were evaluated with intraoral, panoramic, or cephalometric radiographs, tomography, or a combination of these methods. The resulting images allowed the practitioner to examine the bony anatomic structures necessary for assessing potential implant sites. The American Academy of Oral Medicine Radiology (AAOMR) recommends that evaluation of any potential implant site include cross-sectional imaging orthogonal to the site of interest. This information is best acquired with tomography, either conventional or CT. Conventional film tomographic views are most useful (free of streaking artifacts) when complex motions are used, such as spiral or hypocycloidal patterns, instead of linear movement. CT is most appropriate for patients who are being considered for many implants (8–10 or more) or when grafts or reconstructive surgery have been done or are being considered. The threshold for the number of sites that may need CT imaging depends on the type of conventional tomography system available. Nevertheless, the authors emphasize that currently there is no scientific evidence for that recommendation. The below table summarizes the various imaging modalities available for implant imaging. Conventional imaging techniques which satisfactorily meets the preprosthetic imaging objectives are the periapical radiograph (IOPA) and panoramic imaging (OPG) (Tables 2.2 and 2.3). Intraoral periapical radiographs are very useful high yield modality for ruling out local bone or dental disease, but have limited value in determining quantity and in depicting the spatial relationship between the structures and the proposed implant site. In India there is a tremendous utilization of panoramic radiograph for evaluation of implant sites as it provides broad view of the maxillofacial skeleton. But it suffers from dimensional distortion both in horizontal and vertical dimension. According to Garg K, Vicari A (1995) distortion can be a major problem with panoramic radiographs, but when performed properly they can provide valuable information, and are both readily accessible and cost efficient. To help localize potential implant sites and assist in obtaining accurate measurements, it was recommended that surgical stents be used with panoramic radiographs. The panoramic image provides no information on bone width, which may be critical for implant placement in relation to the submandibular gland fossa, the sublingual gland fossa, the incisive fossa, the inferior alveolar canal, the maxillary sinus and the floor of the nose. Thus it can be concluded that panoramic radiography images provide a useful overview and may be used in conjunction with ridge mapping or other diagnostic tools, but they did not meet the strict criteria for a panoramic imaging test for implant planning. Flow Chart 2.1 Preprosthetic imaging objectives Conventional Imaging Techniques and Dental Implants 5 Table 2.2: Advantages and disadvantages of various imaging modalities Imaging modality Application Cross-sectional information Advantages Disadvantages Radiation dose Periapical Individual implant sites No High resolution Low cost Ready availability Distortion Limited size Limited reproducibility Low Occlusal Individual implant sites. Mapping for multidirectional tomography No High resolution Low cost Ready availability Large area of coverage Distortion No reproducibility Low Panoramic Multiple sites Survey view of bony anatomy No Visualization of all anatomical structures. Low cost Ready availability Lower resolution Variable magnification Potential distortion caused by positioning errors Low Tomography Cross-sectional imaging of the implant site Yes Visualization of anatomic information in the third dimension. Minimal superimposition Imaging limited to designated sites. Limited availability. Moderate cost Technique sensitive Large learning curve Moderate low, depending upon the number of sites Computed tomography Cross-sectional imaging of multiple implant sites Yes Easy visualization and interpretation. Accurate assessment of bone dimensions and density. Compatible with electronic implant placement software Imaging of entire oral cavity, not just sites of interest. Limited availability High cost High Magnetic resonance imaging Cross-sectional imaging of multiple sites Yes Nonionizing radiation Adequate assessment of bone dimensions Allows assessment of healing in sinus lift procedures Initial learning curve Appearance of tissues initially will be confusing for clinicians Cannot be used in patients with cardiac pacemaker, shrapnel wounds especially round orbits, retained ferromagnetic clips Limited availability Expensive None 6 Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants Bibliography 1. Garg AK,Vicari A. Radiographic modalities for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry. Implant soc 1995; 5(5):7-11. Table 2.3: Comparison of various dental imaging modalities Paralleling technique (IOPA) Lateral cephalogram OPG Complex motion tomography Computed tomography (MSCT) Distance Measurements Mesiodistal accuracy <1.0 mm NA Unreliable Unreliable <0.5 mm Bone height accuracy <1.0 mm Midline only Unreliable Unreliable <1.0 mm Bone width accuracy NA Midline only NA <1.0 mm <0.5 mm Bone Quality Assessment Cortical plate thickness NA NA NA <1.0 mm <0.5 mm Cortical plate density Qualitative Unreliable Unreliable Qualitative <0.5 % Trabecular density Qualitative Unreliable Unreliable Qualitative <0.5% General Overview Anatomy and pathology Local only Good Good Good Very good Identification of possible implant sites Local only Unreliable Good Good Very good 2. Louis TK, Carl EM. Diagnostic imaging and techniques, Contemporary Implant Dentistry, Carl E Misch (Ed) 2nd edition. Mosby. 1999. pp.73-87. 3. Philippe B Tardieu and Alan L Rosenfeld. The Art of Computer guided implantology. Quintessence publishing. 2009. Tomography had been one of the pillars of radiologic diagnostics until the 1970s when the availability of minicomputers and of transverse axial scanning method (due to the work of Godfrey Hounsfield and Allan McLeod Cormack) gradually supplanted it as the modality of CT. The first commercially viable CT scanner was invented by Sir Godfrey Hounsfield in Hayes, United Kingdom at EMI Central Research Laboratories using X-rays. Hounsefield conceived his idea in 1967 and it was publicly announced in 1972. Allan McLeod Cormack of Tufts University in Massachusetts independently invented a similar process, and both Hounsfield and Cormack shared the 1979 Nobel Prize. Computerized tomography scanners were initially called computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanners because they were designed to produce images in the axial plane. Direct coronal CT images were first produced in the late 1970s. The first CT scanner developed by Hounsfield in his laboratory at EMI required several hours to acquire the data for a single slice, and took several days to reconstruct the corresponding image. Data acquisition and image reconstruction became progressively faster during the 1970s and 1980s, although the speed of the scanners remained limited by the need for “stop-start” slice-by-slice acquisition. That is, in conventional CT, an axial slice is generated by rotating an X-ray tube and detector array in a 360˚ circle around the patient. After a 360˚ rotation, the rotating gantry reverses direction to prevent disruption of the tethered cables that transfer the data from the detector array to the computer. Such sequential slice acquisition limits the speed of conventional CT, prevents volumetric data acquisition, results in slice misregistration, and limits temporal resolution so that multi-phase volumetric scanning is not possible. Dental patients were first evaluated using coronal scans but it had numerous limitations. It was very difficult to obtain scans truly perpendicular to the alveolar ridge. Scanners had limited ability to tilt, and elderly patients cannot bend their necks very much. Hence the images obtained were not truly coronal. The measurements of the alveolar ridge was hence overstated. Also dental restorations produced streak artefacts. Hence, direct coronal scanning for evaluation of implants sites was never accepted by implantologist. Reformatted sagittal and coronal spinal CT became standard in the early 1980s. The development of spiral (or helical) CT in the late 1980s represented a technologic breakthrough. In spiral CT, data is carried from the rotating gantry to the computer by slip rings, which allow continuous gantry rotation and data transfer. Scanning can be performed while the patient is moved slowly but continuously through the gantry. The ability to continuously scan allows for “non-stop” volumetric data acquisition. Data is gathered on a three-dimensional volume in a spiral fashion. Images are reconstructed from the data volume. Prior to this development, the first useful technique for pre-implant imaging of jaw anatomy was conventional orthoradial tomography, using a complex (circular, spiral, or hypocycloidal) blurring device, such as the Scanora or CommCat (Soredex, Marietta, Ga.; Imaging Sciences International, Roebling, NJ). Reformation is a technique whereby the digital data that make up the axial cross-sectional images produced by the CT scanner are rearranged so that they are displayed in alternate planes. In the early 1987, Melvin Schwarz, an experienced periodontist, completed his training in Branemark implants from Sweden. He was concerned about the lack of preoperative determination of the exact position for optimal implant placement. He collaboraHistory of Dental CT 3 Sushma P Jaju C h a p t e r 8 Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants ted with Stephen Rothman, a neuro-radiologist from California for studying the role of CT in implant site assessment. Stephen Rothman was a Medical Director of Multiplanar Diagnostic Imaging Co. He combined a clinical CT scanning practice and a computer science group, led by Michael Rhodes, consisting of three PhDs in computer science and engineering and nine programmers. They had previously designed a state-ofthe-art computer software for reformatting CT images of spine into precisely sized sagittal and curved coronal images. Rhodes and his associates designed a dentist-friendly program and patented the first dental reformation package, called dentascan. This software was unique in the sense, that it is only radiologic procedure specifically designed and produced to solve a specific clinical problem for a single surgical procedure. In 1993, Sim/ Plant for Windows was developed, allowing clinicians to utilize their own computers to plan an implant case interactively. The further benefits of the Sim/Plant program are the availability to measure bone density, measure accurately the distance to vital structures, mark clearly vital structures such as the inferior alveolar nerve and sinus, and measure the volume needed for a sinus graft. The ability to see implants from a 3-D perspective, allowing verification of parallelism, is advantageous with respect to reducing offset loading of implants. Bibliography 1. Rothman S, Widenback CA. Dental applications of computerized tomography: surgical planning for implant placement. Quintessence Publishing, 1st edition, 1998. Since its clinical introduction in 1991, volumetric CT scanning using spiral or helical scanners has resulted in a revolution for diagnostic imaging. Helical CT has improved over the years with faster gantry rotation, more powerful X-ray tubes, and improved interpolation algorithms. However, in practice the spiral data sets from monoslice systems suffered from a considerable mismatch between the transverse (in plane) and the longitudinal (axial) spatial resolution. This advancement has resulted in introduction of multislice CT (MSCT) scanners. Currently capable of acquiring four channels of helical data simultaneously, MSCT scanners have achieved the greatest incremental gain in scan speed since the development of helical CT and have profound implications for clinical CT scanning. Fundamental advantages of MSCT include substantially shorter acquisition times, retrospective creation of thinner or thicker sections from the same raw data, and improved threedimensional rendering with diminished helical artefacts. Dentascan is a special post-processing software used in these multislice CT. Various companies are producing this software under different generic names (Table 4.1). Table 4.1: Different companies and dental CT software name Software Company Dentascan (1987) General electric Image master 101 (1988) General electric Sim/plant (1993) Columbia scientific Syngo dental CT Seimens PROCEDURE OF SCANNING During the procedure, the patient is placed supine in the gantry, using a head holder, chin strap, and sponges on either side of the head to prevent motion (Figs 4.1 to 4.3). The patient head is oriented in the center of the scan field with the use of lateral laser light marker for positioning. The patient position in ‘head-holder’ is such that the hard palate is nearly parallel to gantry beam as acquisition is taken without angulations. The patient is then instructed not to make chewing or swallowing maneuvers. Patient information is entered into the registration form available on the computer (Figs 4.4 and 4.5). A lateral digital scout view (Scan projection radiograph/alignment image/localizer) is then obtained to define the upper and lower limits of the study and to determine if the scan plane is parallel to the alveolar ridge (Fig. 4.6). In case of upper jaw angulation is along hard palate and in lower jaw it is along inferior border of mandible Working of Dental CT 4 Prashant P Jaju C h a p t e r Fig. 4.1 Mechanism of action of spiral CT scan 10 Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants Fig. 4.2 CT scan gantry with head rest Fig. 4.3 Patient positioning in the gantry Fig. 4.4 Patient registration template or the mandibular occlusal plane (Figs 4.7 and 4.8). Once the scan plane is corrected, 0.6×64 mm contiguous scans are obtained using a bone algorithm, 512×512 matrix, 120 kV and 90 mAs. If both the mandible and maxilla are studied, a separate run is performed because the scan angle of the mandible is different than that for maxilla. Scan direction is caudocranial beginning with the mandible base and extends to include the alveolar crest for the mandible, whereas for the maxilla the scan plane starts with the alveolar crest and extends upward to include all root tips. Axial images are acquired and then these images are processed with the dental CT reformatting program. Choosing the Scanning Plane (Table 4.2) Selection of scanning plane depends upon: 1. Oral cavity anatomy 2. Metallic restorations in oral cavity 3. Proposed site of dental implant 4. Proposed angulation of dental implant. It is the responsibility of the referring implantologist to specify the scanning plane. In MSCT scanner, the patient should be positioned so that the scanning plane is vertical while in CBCT scanner it should be horizontal. Proper selection of scanning plane reduces metal artefacts. It is always better to scan parallel to metal to minimize the artefact error. Working of Dental CT 11 Fig. 4.5 Parameters adjustment Fig. 4.6 Selection of scan area Fig. 4.7 Marking points on the center of ridge Loading the Images After loading the images into the dental task card, and defining the panoramic line, the following layout is displayed: v Segment 1: Shows a lateral MIP image of the jaw for overview purposes, with a red reference line indicating the image plane displayed in the upper right segment (Fig. 4.7). v Segment 2: Contains all axial MPR reference images in an image stack and shows the drawn panoramic reference line and the starting and end point of later reconstructions indicated with S (Start) and E (End) (Fig. 4.8). v Segment 3: Shows paraxial slice lines. Fig. 4.8 Scan plane placed parallel to inferior border of mandible 12 Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants Fig. 4.9 Perpendicular (Paraxial) and parallel (Panoramic) cuts v Segment 4: Shows up to seven panoramic lines (Fig. 4.9). An axial image that nicely shows the curve of the mandible or maxilla at the level of the roots of the teeth is selected by the radiologist and a curved line, along the midportion of the alveolus, is superimposed on the axial image by depositing the cursor on several different points along the curve of the jaw. The program then automatically connects these points to produce a smooth curve that is superimposed on the jaw. Table 4.2: Choosing the scanning plane Type of image Indication Advantages Disadvantages Axial slices parallel to occlusal plane Maxilla, mandible or both Minimal metallic artefact Cross-sectional images are appropriate for planning implants vertical to the occlusal plane NA Axial slices parallel to lower border of mandible Mandible only Minimal number of slices required to cover the mandible Cross-sectional images are appropriate for planning implants vertical to lower border Images compromised by metallic restorations Position may be uncomfortable for the patient Axial slices parallel to hard palate Maxilla Minimal number of slices required to cover the sinuses Cross-sectional images are appropriate for planning implants vertical to the maxillary ridge Images may be compromised by metal artefacts Preparing the Reconstruction of Dental Images Defining a Panoramic Line As described above, the base points are marked and double click onto the last base point. The MPR from segment 2 is duplicated in segment 3 and 4. Editing the Panoramic Line In case of unsatisfactory panoramic reference line, it can completely deleted and a new line is drawn. Working of Dental CT 13 Panoramic View Parameters The panoramic view parameters are then defined from panorama option in the task bar. v Number of views: Number of views obtained are seven (Fig. 4.10). v Distance in mm: The distance between the panoramic views is 1 mm. v Thickness in mm: Slice thickness of 1 mm. The curved line defines the plane and location of the reformatted panoramic images. Several images can then be reformatted both buccally and lingually to this curve. Paraxial Slice Parameters Then reconstruction parameters for paraxial slices in the paraxial task card is conducted. v Length in mm: Defines the length of the reconstructed paraxial slices. It is 30 mm. v Distance in mm: Defines the distance between the paraxial slices. It is 2 mm. Then the orthogonal checkbox is selected so that the paraxial slices are reconstructed orthogonal to the reference image. When the program is completed, three types of images are displayed, axial, cross-sectional, and panoramic. Filming Images are transferred on films, and this data is set to actual scale without magnification (Fig. 4.11). These data sets are also available to be viewed on any PC as these data are burned on CD with DICOM reader. Ticks marks are appended to each image to facilitate localization of visualized anatomic structures. The distance between each tick mark is equal to the amount that the scanner table moved between each slice. Generally the total distance is of 10 cm. If proper filming technique is used and the camera is carefully maintained, life sized images are obtained. To ensure the most precise determination of the magnification factor, the distance between 100 tick marks should be periodically be measured. It should measure 10.0 cm. If the marks are less than 100.00 mm, any measurement made will be underestimated. If this distance is less than 4 mm, the scan should be considered as if it were life sized because this small error can provide the safety margin for the surgeon. If the measured distance is significantly greater than the expected 100.0 mm, the magnification factor is calculated by dividing 1.0 by the amount of the actual measurement. Measurements made directly from the film are corrected by multiplying the measured distance by the magnification factor. Regarding the Software The images are transferred on CD with a DICOM viewer. This allows the dentist to study the scan and select the appropriate the implant site. Various options are available on the compact disk. These options are as follows (Flow chart 4.1): 1. Topogram 2. Axial images 3. Patient protocol 4. MIP 5. Reference plane 6. Paraxial images 7. Panoramic images. Topogram The topogram shows position of the patient in the gantry (Fig. 4.12). Axial Images This section present CT axial images taken with scanning starting from caudocranially. It includes the maxilla along with the alveolar process and followed by mandible with its alveolar process. This view gives a topographic view of the jaws and at the root level of the alveolar process the reformatting is done to provide panoramic and paraxial images (Fig. 4.13). Patient Protocol The patient protocol defines basic information about the dental scan. It includes the patient’s name along with age, sex. Also radiologist name and the date and time of scan is displayed. It also shows total milliampere seconds; kilovoltage, DLP, TI, cSL. MIP It shows the reference plane used for scanning procedure. For maxillary scan, the plane is kept parallel to the hard palate and for mandible it is kept parallel to the occlusal plane or the inferior border of mandible. Reference Plane An axial image that nicely shows the curve of the mandible or maxilla at the level of the roots of the 14 Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants Fig. 4.10 Panoramic images from buccal to lingual side Working of Dental CT 15 teeth is selected by the radiologist and a curved line, along the midportion of the alveolus, is superimposed on the axial image by depositing the cursor on several different points along the curve of the jaw. The program then automatically connects these points to produce a smooth curve that is superimposed on the jaw. Fig. 4.11 Processing unit Reference points are marked along the ridge beginning from the right side extending towards the left side. This is marked as S (start) and E (end). Then perpendicular lines are created which gives the paraxial images while lines along the arch give the panoramic images (Fig. 4.14). Flow chart 4.1 Option available on dental CT Fig. 4.12 Topogram 16 Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants Paraxial Images The paraxial images are images are present in this section. This section begins with multiple numbered lines that the program automatically creates perpendicular to the curve. It begins from the right side of the image. This image provides information about the height and width of the alveolar ridge in the buccolingual plane. The number of images varies with various parameters like the beginning of the starting point, slice thickness selected. Thicker slice gives fewer images. Along the left side of the screen information regarding the patient is present. It also presents with tools 1 and 2 and the layout (Fig. 4.15). Tool 1 1. First option is magnifying glass: Utilization of this tool provides a magnified view of the image. 2. Second option is zoom: Utilization of this tool provides to zoom the required image according to the operator satisfaction. But resolution seems to be lost with zoom tool. 3. Third option is of undo: It reverses all the changes made in the image. 4. Fourth option is of linear scale: This scale is useful in measuring the width and height of the ridge in centimeters. 5. Fifth option is angular measurement: This option provides angular measurement providing information regarding angle at which implant can be placed. This option can be used in post-implant cases to verify the angle of implant placement. 6. Sixth option is pixel lens: This option gives subjective value of the density of the cancellous and cortical bone. 7. Seventh option is reversal of images: This tool reverses the image, i.e. right image is displayed on left side and vice versa. 8. Eight option is rotation of the images: This option rotates images along the quadrant. 9. Ninth option is inversion of grayscale: This tool inverses the grayscale of the images. This option provides a soft tissue window. 10. Tenth option is movie tool: Utilization of this tool requires the operator to be in the CT scan center. It cannot be utilized by the dentist on his/her personal computer. 11. Eleventh option is making report: This also requires the operator to be in the CT scan center. It cannot be utilized by the dentist on his/her personal computer (Fig. 4.16). Tool 2 1. First option is drawing of annotation: This option provides four tools like circle, rectangle, arrow Fig. 4.13 Axial image Fig. 4.14 Reference plane for maxilla and mandible Working of Dental CT 17 and free hand. Circle can be drawn on the images of proposed implant sites. With right click circle statistic can be displayed which gives a minimum and maximal pixel value along with standard deviation. Rectangle formation zooms a selected area. Free hand helps in drawing free hand on the images. Arrow can be used to mark particular landmark present on the images. 2. Second option is text annotation: This option provides writing of text on the images such as height and width of the proposed implant site. 3. Third option is copying images: This option copies the images to the clipboard for future use. 4. Fourth option is printing of images: This tool cannot be used on the personal computer. 5. Fifth option hides the image text: This option hides the basic information about the scan and patient’s personal details present on the image. These images can be saved and utilized for future use. 6. Sixth option is edge enhancement: This option enhances the edge of the image. This is displayed in form of kernel (Fig. 4.17). Layout This option provides presentation of the images either in form of single image or 1×1, 1×2, 2×2, 3×3, 4×4 layouts according to the wish of the operator (Fig. 4.18). Panoramic Images Panoramic images present with seven panoramic sections extending from the buccal side towards the lingual side. Middle section generally number 4th slice gives the most adequate information about the jaw. Numbering is provided at the base of the image which is similar to those present on the paraxial images. This view can be used to visualize the teeth arrangement and it can also be used to locate the inferior alveolar canal which cannot be appreciated on the paraxial slices and also provide with a very good overview of the general situation, since the panoramic cuts resemble conventional panoramic radiographs, which are familiar to dentists. Fig. 4.15 Paraxial images Fig. 4.16 Tool1 layout in dental CT software 18 Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants Fig. 4.17 Tool 2 layout in dental software Fig. 4.18 Layout structure in dental CT software Bibliography 1. James J Abrahams. Dental CT imaging: a look at the jaw: Radiology 2001;219:334-45. 2. Philippe B Tardieu, Alan L Rosenfeld. The art of computer guided implantology. Quintessence Publishing 2009. 3. Rothman S, Widenback CA. Dental applications of computerized tomography: surgical planning for implant placement. Quintessence Publishing 1st edition 1998. All the maxillofacial landmarks can be clearly demonstrated in a three-dimensional view on dental CT (Table 5.1). Table 5.1: Important landmarks seen on dental CT Maxilla Mandible Nasopalatine foramen/incisive foramen Genial tubercles Nasal cavity Diagastric fossa Maxillary sinus Lingual vascular canal Greater palatine foramen Mental foramen Pterygoid plates Mandibular canal Mandibular foramen MAXILLARY LANDMARKS Nasopalatine Foramen/Incisive Foramen The incisive foramen (also called the nasopalatine foramen) in the maxilla is the oral terminus of the nasopalatine canal. It transmits the nasopalatine vessels and nerves which may participate in the innervations of the maxillary central incisors and lies in the midline of the palate behind the central incisors at approximately the junction of the median palatine and incisive sutures. On a periapical radiograph it appears as a round to oval radiolucency between the roots and in the region of the middle and apical thirds of the central incisors (Fig. 5.1). The radiographic appearance varies depending upon the anatomical variations and also technique variation. On the dental CT nasopalatine canal can be visualized accurately. Course of nasopalatine canal cannot be seen on panoramic view but it can be visualized on paraxial slices (Fig. 5.2). Hence the palatal orientation of the anterior maxillary implant can be planned. Identification of this landmark is crucial in cases of maxillary anterior implants as damage neurovascular bundle can lead to numbness and paresthesia. Nasal Cavity Nasal cavity (nasal fossa) are air filled cavities, appearing as a radiolucent shadow on the periapical radiograph of maxillary central incisors. In cases of placement of maxillary anterior implant, the identification of this anatomical structure is important to prevent postoperative Anatomical Landmarks as on Dental CT 5 Prashant P Jaju C h a p t e r Fig. 5.1 Incisive fossa seen on IOPA film 20 Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants invagination of mucous membrane from the nasal cavity. Being the largest of the paranasal sinuses, it normally occupies virtually the entire body of the maxilla. The sinus may be considered as a three-sided pyramid, with its base the medial wall adjacent to the nasal cavity and its apex extending laterally into the zygomatic process of the maxilla. The maxillary sinuses are often asymmetric. Like wise the anterior sinus borders are important in the anterior posterior implants, especially in cases of severe maxillary anterior ridge resorption. Dentascans provides images of the maxillary sinus in all dimensions. It is the modality of choice in the evaluation of diseases of nose and paranasal sinuses. Pathoses appear as mucosal thickening and diagnosed preoperatively, treatment can be provided prior to implant placement. Dentascan provides information regarding the cortical bone in the floor of the nasal cavity and maxillary sinuses prior to implant placement. Dentascans are expensive investigation but provides a three-dimensional information at an early stage with precise measurement and exclude patients not suitable for implants for technical reasons and thus save time and money both for the patient and the surgeon. Thus dentascans of the upper alveolar process justifies its place in the presurgical evaluation of the edentulous patient who is in need of implants (Fig. 5.4). Based upon the distance of the ridge from the floor of the maxillary sinus, treatment plan can be made as suggested by Carl Misch (Table 5.2). SA: Subantral (Figs 5.5 and 5.6). Greater Palatine Foramen Greater palatine foramen is present on the palatal surface Fig. 5.2 of maxilla. Its position can be varying between the first Incisive canal on dental CT seen as narrow canal Fig. 5.3 Nasal cavity seen on dental CT with inferior concha complications. Dental CT allows accurate measurement of the ridge height from the crest of the ridge to the floor of nasal cavity. Ideally implant length should be 2 mm away from the anatomical structure. Nasal cavity appears as a radiolucent shadow, seen on consecutive sections of paraxial images thus assisting in identification of any pathologies of nasal cavity (Fig. 5.3). Maxillary Sinus Maxillary sinus is a critical anatomical structure in the maxillary posterior region of the jaw. The maxillary sinus, like the other paranasal sinuses, is an air-containing cavity lined with mucous membrane. It develops by the Anatomical Landmarks as on Dental CT 21 and second maxillary molars. Identification of this landmark is critical in case of maxillary posterior implant. Damage to this foramen can lead to paresthesia (Fig. 5.7). MANDIBULAR LANDMARKS Lingual Vascular Canal Mandibular anterior region has long being considered as a safe zone for implant placement, with implant length extending up to the inferior border of mandible. But recent literature suggests serious life-threatening complications such as sublingual hematoma formation, upper airway obstruction and profuse bleeding. Thus, a proper anatomical, radiological and surgical consideraFig. 5.4 Maxillary sinus on dental CT Table 5.2: Height available at implant sites and proposed treatment plan Groups Height available at the implant site (mm) Treatment available SA 1 >12 mm Conventional implant procedure SA 2 10–12 mm Sinus lift, division A root form SA 3 5–10 mm Lateral wall approach sinus graft and delayed division A root form SA 4 <5 mm Lateral wall approach sinus graft and delayed division A root form SA 1 SA3 Fig. 5.5 Radiographic appearance of SA 1 and SA 3 on dental CT tions must be done prior to implant placement in interforaminal region of anterior mandible. A number of researchers have recommended that blood vessels and nerves could enter the lingual foramen. Ennis, Suzuki and Sakai, McDonnell et al. Darriba and Mendonca– Cardad and Givol et al. assumed a vascular content being an anastomosis of the sublingual branch of right and left lingual arteries. The artery could be of sufficient size to provoke a hemorrhage intraosseously or in the connective soft tissue, which might be difficult 22 Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants adequate visualization of the vascular canal. Multiplanar reformation (MPR) provides excellent visualization of midline mandibular structure clearly depicting the lingual canal and size of the lingual canals correlate well with the results of anatomic studies. The small difference in the size values of the canals can probably be attributed to the fact that the smallest canals were Fig. 5.6 Axial, panoramic and paraxial images showing right maxillary sinus pathology Fig. 5.7 Greater palatine foramen seen as a S-shaped canal to control. Sutton described the structures associated with the foramen as a neurovascular bundle. Goaz and White stated that the foramen and canal were the termination of the incisive branch of the mandibular canal. According to Yoshida et al. found low frequency of occurrence (45.7%) of lingual foramen on internal surface of mandible on dry cadavers. According to McDonnell et al. lingual foramen was present in 99.04 percent in midline of mandible (Fig. 5.8). Yoshida et al. believed that lingual artery visualization on radiography was difficult and CT provides a Fig. 5.8 Lingual vascular canal on dental CT Anatomical Landmarks as on Dental CT 23 too small to be visible because of the limited resolution capability of CT. Gultekin et al. in their study revealed typical lingual canal locations were the middle of the mandible and the premolar regions. Radiographic report of dental CT for pre-evaluation of implant sites should mention about the vascular channel present in mandibular anterior region before any surgical procedure is formulated. Dental CT offers the advantage of proper anatomic delineation of the jaw and depiction of the lingual vascular canals of the mandible, hence reducing the risk of implantation surgery in the preoperative phase (Table 5.3). Mandibular Canal Inferior alveolar canal is the deterministic factor for implant placement in the mandibular posterior region. During treatment planning prior to mandibular implant surgery, it is important to determine the location of the mandibular canal. In the application of an implant system to the partially edentulous distal portion of the mandible, the inferior alveolar nerve is a vital anatomic structure that must be avoided. Positioning of implants close to the canal may result in vascular trauma or damage to the inferior alveolar nerve, resulting in paresthesia of the lower lip and mentalis muscle area. Also, bone healing around the dental implant may be impaired if the implant comes in contact with the soft tissues lining the inferior alveolar nerve and vessels. Routine radiographs provide information only about the distance of the inferior alveolar canal from the alveolar crest but are unable to delineate its buccolingual dimension. Canal may not be visible on conventional radiographic methods; it is probably related to the fact that the inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle is not always surrounded by an ossified canal. The bony sheath seems to disappear anteriorly toward the mental foramen. Similarly, in edentulous patients the diameter of the artery is smaller compared to dentate patients and hence the visibility of the canal may be affected. The mandibular nerve may course diagonally from a lingual location posterior to a buccal location in the area of the mental foramen. The buccal-lingual position of the nerve can only be seen in either axial or cross-sectional views of the mandibular ridges. Paraxial slices provide consecutive sections which depict the course of the inferior alveolar nerve up to mental foramen. Klinge et al. Lind et al. Todd et al. and Sonick et al. emphasized that mandibular canal is best demonstrated on dentascans (Fig. 5.9). The position of the mandibular canal may vary buccolingually such that implant placement is possible only to the buccal or lingual aspect of the canal (Fig. 5.10). Table 5.3: Literature study of complications of lingual vascular canal Author Findings DuBrul (1980) Sublingual artery running along the floor of the mouth can be of considerable size in the region of the molars and premolars and therefore is prone to substantial bleeding when injured. Mason et al. (1990) Several reports on major hemorrhage in the floor of the mouth caused by bleeding from different surgical procedures and implant placement in the mental region. They recommend that appreciation of the sublingual artery anatomy mandatory for those performing mandible implantation. Boyes et al. (2002) Extensive hematoma in the floor of the mouth, following implant placement in mandibular anterior region which rapidly became life-threatening, requiring an emergency tracheostomy to establish a surgical airway. Kalpidis and Setayesh (2004) Reported critical hemorrhagic episodes, related to dental implantation in the anterior segments of the mandible. To reduce the probability of such a grave complication, preventive and precautionary measures to be taken before, during, and after implant placement in the anterior mandible. Issacson (2004) Reported a case of sublingual hematoma in a 56-year-old man who underwent multiple mandibular tooth extractions and alveoloplasty and received endosseous implants. DelCastillo et al. (2008) Reported a case of sublingual hematoma in a 53-year-old man following a dental implant procedure, requiring admission to the hospital. The anatomy of the lower portion of the anterior mandibular zone, with the mylohyoid ridge, makes it particularly vulnerable to this kind of injury, particularly in patients with atrophic mandibles. Pigadas et al. (2009) It is vital to appreciate the shape of the lingual cortex and to select carefully the correct implant length and angulation.Imaging techniques that assess the mandibular anatomy in a sagittal plain such as lateral cephalometric radiographs and computed tomograms (CT) as well as surgical stents may be an advantage Frenken et al. (2010) A patient experienced severe bleeding in the floor of the mouth as a consequence of the placement of 2 implants in the resorbed anterior segment of the mandible. To reduce the probability of such complications knowledge of the local anatomy, good clinical inspection and various radiographic evaluations are important. 24 Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants The detection of mandibular canal is more difficult with increased slice thickness and slice interval with reduced tube current. Visualization of the location of mandibular canal in posterior mandibular region is of paramount importance for implant placement. There are times when portions of the canal or even the entire canal may be difficult to visualize on the cross-sectional images. In this situation the following methods are helpful in locating the canal. 1. Cortical niche sign: Cortical niche sign refers to an indentation along the inner or medullary margin on the lingual cortex of the mandible. This niche is created by the mandibular nerve as it traverses the mandible. When present, it is a good way to identify the canal. Care should be taken not to confuse other cortical irregularities with the cortical niche sign. The cortical niche is a continuous defect seen on multiple cross-sectional images. When the canal is identified with the cortical niche sign, its location should be confirmed with the other methods (Fig. 5.11). 2. Triangulation: Triangulation utilizes the scale marks on the films to relate an anatomic structure well seen on one view to its location on another view. With this method, the panoramic and axial views can be utilized to identify the canal on the cross-sectional views. 3. Position distance: Finally, if a canal was identified in one of the cross-sectional images but not on others, the images on which it is identified were utilized to estimate Fig. 5.9 Mandibular canal seen as oval to round radiolucency surrounded by radiopacity Fig. 5.10 Post implant placement on dental CT. Note implant placed superior and lingually to mandibular canal Fig. 5.11 Cortical niche sign as an indentation in successive images Anatomical Landmarks as on Dental CT 25 Fig. 5.12 Position distance rule the position of the canal on the other images. This could be done because the distance from the inferior border of the mandible to the bottom of the canal tend to be relatively constant. The only region where the distance was not constant was immediately adjacent to the mandibular foramen and mental foramen (Fig. 5.12). a. Panoramic view showing implant site on right mandibular first molar (Slice 40–42). b. Lack of visibility of mandibular canal in paraxial images (Slice 40–42). c. Contralateral site measurement giving a estimation of position of mandibular canal. 26 Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants The mandibular nerve always extends more mesially than does the mental foramen. At its most anterior point, the nerve divides into the mental nerve, which curves back on itself and sweeps upward and toward its labial extent at the mental foramen. The terminal branch continues in one or more very small bony canals to provide sensory branches to the roots of anterior teeth. These bony canals can be identified on the CT scans. The anterior portion of the nerve forms a genu from inferior to superior. The length of the genu varies considerably. It is generally thought to extend approximately 3 mm forward of the mental foramen, but in some cases it extends up to 1 cm from the mental foramen. Recognition of this variation is important in the anteriorly edentulous patient. This can be appreciated on both the panoramic and paraxial images. Mental Foramen Dentascans is the radiographic method of choice to depict mental foramen (Fig. 5.13). Variations in the position of the mental foramen are also common. Typically, the foramen is located halfway between the alveolar crest and the lower mandibular border between the first and second premolars. However, it may be found as far anterior as the canine and as far posterior as the first and second molars. The neurovascular bundle may loop downward, forward and medially before exiting from the foramen in a posterosuperior direction. In older edentulous individuals with resorbed ridges, the foramen may be near, or may actually emerge from, the alveolar crest likewise, CT detects the extent of any anterior looping prior to the nerve’s exit from the mental foramen (Figs 5.14 and 5.15). Bibliography 1. Abrahams JJ. CT assessment of dental implant planning. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 1992;4:1-18. 2. Andre G, Ursula H, Gabor T, Michael P, Susanne S, Konstantin Z, et al. Lingual vascular canals of the mandible: evaluation with dental CT. Radiology 2001; 220:186-9. 3. Carl AF, Christer S. CT of the edentulous maxilla intended for osseointegrated implants. J Cranio Max Fac Surg 1987; 15:45-6. 4. Darriba MA, Mendonca-Cardad JJ. Profuse bleeding and life-threatening airway obstruction after placement of mandibular dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;55:1328-30. 5. Ennis LM. Roentengraphic variations of the maxillary sinus and the nutrient canals of the maxilla and mandible. Int J Orthod Oral Surg 1937;23:173-93. 6. Hofschneider U, Tepper G, Gahleitner A, Ulm C. Assessment of the blood supply to the mental region for reduction of bleeding complications during implant surgery in the interforaminal region. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:379-83. 7. Ismail YH, Azarbai M, Kapa SF. Conventional linear tomography: Protocol for assessing endosseous implant Fig. 5.13 Mental foramen as seen on paraxial image sites. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:153-7. Fig. 5.14 Anterior loop seen on conventional radiograph Fig. 5.15 Anterior loop seen on dental CT Anatomical Landmarks as on Dental CT 27 8. Kattan B, Snyder HS. Lingual artery hematoma resulting in upper airway obstruction. J Emerg Med 1991;9:421-44. 9. Klinge B, Petersson A, Maly P. Location of the mandibular canal: Comparison of macroscopic findings, conventional radiography, and computed tomography. Intl J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:327-32. 10. Lindh C, Petersson A, Klinge B. Visualization of the mandibular canal by different radiographic technique. Clinic Oral Implants Res 1992; 3:90-7. 11. Louis TK, Carl EM. Diagnostic imaging and tech-niques, Contemporary Implant Dentistry, Carl E Misch (Eds) 2nd edition. Mosby 1999. pp. 73-87. 12. Mc Donnell D, Reza Nouri M, Todd ME. The mandibular lingual foramen: a consistent arterial foramen in the middle of the mandible. J Anat 1994;184:363-9. 13. Pigadas N, Simoes P, Tuffin JR. Massive sublingual haematoma following osseointegrated implant placement in the anterior mandible. Br Dent J 2009;206:67-8. 14. Schiller W, Wiswell O. Lingual foramina of the mandible. Anat Rec 1954; 119:387-90. 15. Sutton RN. The practical significance of mandibular accessory foramina. Aust Dent J 1974;19:167-73. 16. Tepper G, Hofschneider UB, Gahleitner A, Ulm C. Computed tomographic diagnosis and localization of bone canals in the mandibular interforaminal region for prevention of bleeding complications during implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:68-72. 17. Todd AD, Gher ME, Quintero G, Richardson AC. Interpretation of linear and computed tomograms in the assessment of implant recipient sites. Journal of Periodontology 1993;64:1243-9. 18. Tomomi H, Tsukasa S, Kenji S, Tomohiro O. Radiologic measurements of the mandible: A comparison between CT-reformatted and conventional tomographic images. Clin Oral Impl. Res 2004; 15:226-30. 19. White SC, Pharoah MJ, (Eds). Oral radiology: principles and interpretation 5th edition. Toronto: CV Mosby – Year Book Inc 2004.pp.181-2. 20. Yoshida S, Kawai T, Okustu. K, Yosue T, Takamori H, Sunohara M, Sato I. The appearance of foramen in the internal aspect of mental region of mandible from Japanese cadavers and dry skulls under macroscopic observation and three dimensional CT images. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn 2005;82(3):83-8. “Forewarned is forearmed”, is an old adage applied to the medical field and so is to the field of implant dentistry. Dental implants are gaining immense popularity and wide acceptance because they are the conservative method of replacing lost teeth, and restore function with proprioception, esthetics and thereby revamp the self-esteem of the patients. The dental implant restorations have the highest survival rate compared with any other type of prosthesis to replace missing teeth. They do not decay or require endodontic treatment. They are also less prone to fracture and resist periodontal like disease better than teeth. Today, we see widespread clinical applications for implant procedures from the replacement of single teeth to extensive bone grafting for total reconstruction of maxillofacial skeleton needed as a result of tumor excision, trauma, etc. Implant dentistry has become an important tool for increasing the life expectancy of edentulous patients by improving the masticatory efficiency of the stomatognathic system. Patients with loss of teeth can be the victims of terrible social rejection, which includes loss of self-confidence, and self-esteem, resulting from the overshadowing aspect of endpoint atrophy of the maxillofacial skeleton. Dentascan is dedicated post-scanning image evaluation software for the teeth and the jaw, which creates panoramic and paraxial views of the upper and lower jaw. Typical applications are pre-surgical planning for implants, information about the structure of the jaw bones and proximity to the critical anatomical structures at proposed implant sites like the mandibular canal, nasal cavity, incisive foramen, maxillary sinus. This technique provides a wealth of diagnostic information that is accurate, detailed and specific. The use of CT scans in conjunction with special reformatting software, dentascan readily meets the preprosthetic imaging objectives, i.e. identify disease, determine bone quality, quantity, implant position and implant orientation, and surpasses the short comings of conventional radiographic technique with detailed accuracy and reliability (Fig. 6.1). Quantity of Available Bone at Implant Site Available bone is the amount of bone in the edentulous area considered for osseointegration of the implant. As a general guideline a distance of 1.5 mm is maintained for surgical error between the implant and any adjacent landmark. The chances of successful implantation are increased by more bone being available for anchorage and distribution of masticatory forces. Cortical bone is Dental CT in Implantology 6 Prashant P Jaju, Prashant P Suvarna C h a p t e r Fig. 6.1 Available bone volume not utilized, leading to chances of implant failure Dental CT in Implantology 29 best suited to provide support for implants. Accurate estimates of the alveolar bone height and width are mandatory for selecting the appropriate implant size and determining the degree of angulation of the edentulous alveolar ridge. The assessment of the angulation of the alveolar ridge provides information regarding the proper insertion path of the fixture. The angulation of the alveolar bone represents the root trajectory in relation to the occlusal plane. Measurement of the height and width at the proposed implant site can be done on the films itself as it “life size”, or it can determined upon the PC of the implantologist. Maxilla and mandible Maxilla For maxillary anterior region the height of the available ridge can be calculated from the crest of ridge to inferior border of nasal fossa. For maxillary posterior region, the height of the ridge can be calculated from the superior border of crest of ridge to the inferior border of maxillary sinus (Figs 6.2 and 6.3). Mandible For mandibular anterior region the height of the ridge can be calculated from the crest of ridge to inferior Fig. 6.2 Measurement for anterior maxilla Fig. 6.4 Measurement for anterior mandible Fig. 6.3 Measurement for posterior maxilla border of mandible. For mandibular posterior region, the height of the ridge can be calculated from the crest of ridge to superior border of inferior alveolar canal (Figs 6.4 and 6.5). Authors have observed that many radiologist provide the width by measuring from the outer cortical plates, which is not the actual width as it is the inner width from buccal and lingual cortical which is more reliable and accurate measurement (Fig. 6.6). Buccolingual width of the ridge hence must be calculated from the inner buccal and inner lingual cortical plates from the crest of ridge. There would be instances where a knife shape ridge may be present or where insufficient width would be present, until the implantologist perform osteotomy 30 Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants to achieve adequate width. Dentascan software thus helps us to determine the amount of bone required to be removed during the osteotomy procedure for adequate acquisition of buccolingual width (Fig. 6.7). This function can be performed by utilizing the linear scale tool present on the software. An interesting clinically relevant classification can be used for determining the available bone as suggested by Chanavaz and Donazzan. The classification is termed as Chanavaz and Donazzan French Volumetric Classification (1986) (Table 6.1) (Fig. 6.8). This classification gives a clear idea about the type of bone available at the implant sites. Presence of Type A bone will be difficult to obtain, if the patient do not report very early for implant. Generally the implantologist are encountered with Type B bone in their clinical practice. Amount of bone loss occurring the 1st year after the tooth loss is 10 times greater than the following years. There are greater chances of Type A bone in maxillary posterior region as maxillary teeth are generally not lost at an early age as compared with mandibular first molar which tend to be affected by caries very early. Also it has been reported that atrophy of the maxillary arch proceeds at a slower rate than in the mandible. The posterior mandible resorbs approximately four times faster than the anterior mandible. The original height of available bone in the mandible is twice that of maxilla. The changes in anterior maxilla ridge dimension can be very dramatic both in height and width up to 70 percent especially Fig. 6.6 Exaggerated width measurement due to outer cortical plate inclusion Fig. 6.7 Osteotomy required for knife shape ridge Table 6.1: Chanavaz and Donazzan French Volumetric Classification Category Dimension Other features A Height: 9 mm Width: 5 mm Abundant bone in all dimensions with intact basal bone. B Height: 9 mm Width: 3 mm Abundant bone except width, intact basal bone. Partially resorbed alveolar bone (After 5–9 years of extraction) C Inadequate bone Totally resorbed alveolar bone. Intact basal bone D Severe bone atrophy Totally resorbed alveolar bone. Partially resorbed basal bone except symphysis region and external oblique ridge Fig. 6.5 Measurement for posterior mandible Dental CT in Implantology 31 when multiple extractions are performed. The residual ridge shifts palatally in the maxillary and lingually in the mandible as related to tooth position at the expense of buccal cortical plate in all areas of jaw (Fig. 6.9). Literature states that the decrease in bone begins in 4th decade and is linear. Height or Width of Implant. Which is the Critical Parameter? The width of implant decreases the stress by increasing the surface area. This may also reduce the length requirement. For every 0.5 mm increase in width there is an increased surface area between 10 and 15 percent. Since the greatest stresses are concentrated at the crestal region of implant, width is more significant than the length for an implant design. In patients with triangular shaped cross-section, osteoplasty should be advised to obtain greater width of bone, although of reduced height. This rule was not applied in anterior maxilla as most edentulous ridges exhibited a labial concavity in the incisor area resulting a hour glass configuration (Fig. 6.10). Fig. 6.8 Type of bone as seen on dental CT Type A bone Type B bone Type C bone Fig. 6.9 Ridge pattern assessment seen best on paraxial image 32 Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants Does Sex Affect the Quantity of Bone? Female patients have a tendency for greater bone resorption. Following rapid initial resorption the rate decreases and then continues at about 0.1 mm per year in male and about 0.4 mm per year in female. This can be attributed to the decreased estrogen level in female patients. Females are more prone to osteoporosis and subsequently there is faster resorption of bone. The age associated bone loss is about 1 percent in women and 0.5 percent in males annually. Women represent a greater percentage of patients with residual ridge resorption than men. Ridge Morphology Buccolingual ridge pattern cannot be viewed on two dimensional radiographs, but dentascan provides with advantage of appreciating the type of alveolar ridge pattern present. Paraxial images provide the implantologist the appearance of ridge patterns like irregular ridge, narrow crestal ridge and knife shape ridge. Also loss of cortical plates can also be appreciated on paraxial images which cannot be seen on panoramic image. Buccal or lingual concavity also can be visualized on paraxial images. In panoramic view ridge pattern cannot be examined as it is appreciated in paraxial image. Ridge shape can be defined as the geometric form of the alveolar process or residual ridge. Ridge shape can be divided into rectangular, pyramidal and Fig. 6.10 Ridge morphology Rectangular shape Pyramidal shape Hourglass shape hourglass shape (Fig. 6.10). In rectangular ridge shape the buccolingual width shape is similar in its inferior and superior horizontal dimensions. Pyramidal ridge shape the crestal horizontal dimension is narrower than the apical horizontal dimension. Hourglass form has a constricture of the alveolar process or residual ridge. This occurs when the crestal and apical horizontal dimensions exceed the buccolingual width. Risks of perforation increases due to undulating concavities, and thus dentascans prevent unnecessary surgical and postoperative complications. Mcginvney et al. and Schwartz et al. concluded that dentascan images more accurately reflected the true osseous topography and considered it as a valuable diagnostic aid. In case of compromised jaw bone in terms of quality and/or quantity of bone, panoramic technique is inefficient imaging tool. This dictates additional imaging in 2-D/3-D, especially when there is risks and doubts about treatment outcome, dentascan may prove indispensable. Quality of Bone at Implant Sites Density of available bone in an edentulous site is a determining factor in treatment planning, implant design, surgical approach, healing time, and initial progressive bone loading during prosthetic reconstruction. Literature suggests that the anterior mandible has greater bone density than the anterior maxilla. The posterior mandible has poorer bone density than the anterior mandible. The poorest bone quality in Dental CT in Implantology 33 the oral environment typically exists in the posterior maxilla and it is associated with dramatic failure rates. Periapical or panoramic radiographs are unhelpful when determining bone density because the lateral cortical plates often obscure trabecular pattern. CT is currently the only diagnostically justifiable imaging technique that allows at least rough conclusion about the structure and density of the jaw bones. Bone density can be evaluated using Hounsfield units (HU), which are directly related to tissue attenuation coefficients. The Hounsfield scale is based on density values for air, water, and dense bone which are assigned arbitrarily values of –1000, 0 and +1000 respectively. Techniques such as histomorphometry of bone biopsies or densitometry, quantitative ultrasound, dual photon absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography although reliable and quantitative measures of bone density are not routinely feasible for the practice of implant dentistry (Fig. 6.11). The most critical region of bone density is the crestal 7 to 10 mm of bone. This determines the treatment protocol (Fig. 6.12). The density decrease in the jaws is related to the length of time the region has been edentulous and not loaded appropriately. Dentascans provides the clinician with Hounsfield values as an objective method of evaluating bone density for a proposed implant site. This was done only on the computer with help of the pixels tools present in the software. A circle can be formed at a height of 7 mm from the crest touching both the inner buccal and palatal/lingual cortical plates. After the formation of circle, with the help of software, a circle histogram is demonstrated which provide the minimum and maximum pixels values. Along with it a standard deviation ware also given. Haldun et al. advocated use of CT for determining bone quality and quantity. Absolute guidelines on these HU values cannot be provided, as the density observations will be scanner dependent and vary according to the particular exposure settings and window level applied. It is obvious that HU variation observed in the same jaw scan reflect local bone density variations with lower HU values for poor bone quality. Variability in values can alert the surgeon to modify the treatment plan so that primary stability in bone of less density is ensured and a longer healing period can then be planned. Role of Templates in Implant Site Assessment Slice number present on the scan cannot be duplicated into the oral cavity. Hence a technical problem arises in knowing the exact location of a particular site,which the radiologist have suggested for implant placement. This can be overcome by using the templates or radiographic markers/X-ray markers prior to scanning procedure. A template is a clear acrylic device that fits snugly over the residual teeth and alveolar process. An X-ray site marker allows the radiologist to pinpoint exactly where the ROI (region of interest) lies for the potential implant fixture. The marker material should be easily identifiable in the CT scan and not produce scatter artifact such as that seen in CT scans from metallic dental materials. Fig. 6.11 Bone density based on HU values given by Misch D1: > 1250 HU; D2: 850–1250 HU; D3: 350–850 HU; D4: 150–350 HU; D5: <150 HU Fig. 6.12 Density measurement on dental CT software at a distance of 7 mm as advised by misch 34 Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants By using radiographic markers at the time of scanning, the surgeon and restorative dentist can plant the exact placement of implants with respect to embrasures, cement-enamel junction of adjacent teeth and emergence profiles relative to the planned contour of the anticipated prosthetic restoration. Recent years much software for implant planification and navigation are developed. Meticulous protocol is needed to computered implant planning whichever software is choosen (Verstreken et al., 1996, 1998). The two principal softwares created for dental implant planification are called Simplant and Nobelguide, they are mainly designed for surgical act, and a work tool to show dental surgeon the way in implant installation called Robodent (Treil et al., 2009). These different examples should illustrate this topic. Simplant Study begins by making articulated models (Corcos, 2007). Then a wax setting simulates the final dental prosthesis and allows surgeon to visualize technical constraints. He visualizes imperatives implementation of implant prosthesis. Then the radiological guide derived from prosthetic model can be achieved. Either radiopaque commercial false teeth are inserted or barium sulfate balls are included in wax. While different barium sulfate concentrations are adjusted, we can precisely differentiate and individualize masks of different density. A cylindral cavity focused on occlusal tooth’s side and emerging from cervical side makes the main tooth axis visible. CT Scan Patients wear the radiological guide during the CT scan acquisition. Dental arches must not be in contact together, in order to make the CT scan data processing easily. Radiologist has to take care of: v Stability and well-positioning radiological guide, with control of accommodation or adjustment with mucous membrane. v Determination of axial plane that is parallel to the teeth occlusal area. v Visibility of teeth occlusal area, that has to be full visible. Nobelguide Nobelguide is the same concept as Simplant one. Robodent Softwares such as Nobelguide or Simplant give way to undeniable surgical help, particularly for surgical step. But it requires a rigourous procedure and laboratory time to transfer all the data of preimplant check-up. New tools recently appear that leads surgeon’s hand while implants installation, these tools are already used in neuro-surgery, maxilla-facial surgery and otorhinolaryngology. Softwares enable a real-time interface between preimplant plan and rotating instrumentation for implant site. In addition the surgical tool named Robodent is a navigational instrument. Surgeon can also follow the drills progress on line in comparison to contiguous anatomical structures. It pilots the surgeon’s hand while he drills the bone. Optical tracer is fixated on wax prosthesis, as well as on the drill. Then their motion is captured by a camera and worked out with three-way correlation. The more advanced systems use to optical tracers. Optical tracers, passive (ceramic balls) or active (LED) according to system secured with dental arch. Then their motion is captured by a camera and worked out with three-way correlation. It is a real-time tool to follow the drill in anatomical pieces. Prosthetic analysis happens as usual. A diagnostic wax model is made for functional and esthetic necessities. Radiological guide as a gutter, secured with facial arch contenting radiological marks is adapted to dental arch. This guide should serve as a support for location system in surgical navigation. The CT scan is acquired with this system on dental arch. A temporary removable prosthesis should be used for toothless jaw; it has to be secure and motionless meanwhile. A CD is burned with CT images in DICOM format, given to dentist. He validates the choice of anatomic sites for implants with analyze and planification software. Purpose of Template (Table 6.2) v Selection of appropriate implant site v Decrease degree of distortion v Determine precise measurements v Transfer the data to surgical site and used for accurate determination of location and angle of placement of the implant. v Avoids cortical plate perforation in thin buccolingual sites. v Determines vertical placement of implant. Dental CT in Implantology 35 Table 6.2: Literature guide for fabrication of various radiographic templates Sr No Author Name of technique Reference 1. Simon H Transitional implants The use of transitional implants requires meticulous treatment planning and additional chairtime. They provide support for an immediate fixed restoration and facilitate accurate implant placement with improved stability of the surgical template and enhanced visibility of the surgical sites. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:229-32. 2. Cehreli et al. Dual-purpose guide Dual-purpose guide with interplaced stainless steel surgical guides. The use of such guide channels assists the surgeon during site preparation. The drill guides are machined to allow consecutive surgical drills to be used without changing the implant angulation during surgery J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:640-3. 3. Takeshita et al. Stent with barium sulfate and stainless steel tubes. The barium sulfate in the stent depicts the outline of the predesigned superstructure, and the stainless steel tubes indicate the intended location and inclination of the implants on the computed tomographic scans. In addition, this stent can be used as a surgical stent to guide the pilot drill to the desired site J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:36-8 4. Cehreli et al. Bilaminar dual-purpose stent This stent is designed for use particularly in D4 type bone in which malpractice may compromise the success of implants J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:55-8 5. Pesun et al. Gutta percha markers Fabrication of a radiographic guide for a patient with severely worn dentition. Chair and laboratory time are reduced because one guide can be used for both radiographs and surgery. The guide is easily fitted to the existing dentition and allows evaluation of the contours of the final restoration in the patient’s mouth by the patient, the restoring dentist, and the surgeon. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:548-52. 6. Ku et al. Vaccum former radiographic stent A simple method of fabricating a vacuum-formed matrix filed with clear acrylic resin and a guttapercha marker. The matrix can be used not only as a radiopaque marker for evaluation but also as a surgical guide during the surgical stage for single implant therapy. J J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:252-3. 7. Miles et al. Gutta percha In office technique of radiographic stent with gutta percha 36 Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants Gutta percha is an ideal material. It is non-metal, radiopaque, readily available in almost all dental offices and inexpensive. Lead foils placed preoperatively into the oral cavity or in existing denture is another material used for implant site assessment (Figs 6.13 and 6.14). Fabrication of radiographic stents is a useful method for determining the exact location of proposed implant site. According Abraham JJ et al. markers should be 1 to 2 mm in diameter, vertically oriented, and without mesial/distal tilt. They should be attached to gingival surface of the stent and places as far into the buccal sulcus as possible. Because most dentists are unfamiliar with CT scanning the radiologist can be instrumental in helping the dentist place the markers in manner that will yield the greatest amount of information. Fabrication of various radiographic stent is beyond the scope of this textbook, but for further reading on this topic, table no. 11 will provide useful information. Streak Artifacts Streak artifacts from dental restorative materials, which interfere with visualization of bone on direct axial images, do not degrade the reformatted cross-sectional images because the artifacts are not usually projected at the level of the alveolar process (Fig. 6.15). Radiation dose Dentascan gives a radiation dose of 14.10 mGy for a total scan period of 7.98 seconds at 90 kV and 120 mAs. This radiation dose is comparatively less compared to radiation dose give by dental CT in the past where values above 200 mGy was calculated. This radiation dose can be further reduced by decreasing the kilo voltage, milliampere seconds and increasing the slice thickness. The disadvantage of changing these parameters would be that it would decrease the image resolution thereby affecting the image quality. Conventional radiographic techniques have a low radiation dosage but they do not furnish the osseous details as impeccably as dentascans do and so by providing such accurate details it increases the success rate thereby reducing the chances of failure of implants. Fig. 6.13 Lead template place prior to scanning Fig. 6.14 Lead template seen on dental CT Fig. 6.15 Streak artifact not affecting the image quality and interpretation Dental CT in Implantology 37 Advantages of Dentascans v CT always images the entire arch. v It allows for more accurate visualization of anatomic structures without superimposition. v It allows for continuous view of surface tomography. v Soft tissue detail is preserved. v Patient comfort is excellent. No hyperextension of neck required during scan. v Duration of scan is in seconds. Hence it is very comfortable to patients. v It produces lower radiographic exposure than combination techniques and allows reconstruction from original data versus re-exposure of patient. v It allows for verification of site and orientation of reconstruction. v Thin section of images can be obtained. v Film based tomography cannot show the range of contrast that is displayed on CT. v The CT examination typically produces 50 to 100, 1 to 2 mm cross-sectional images at defined locations around the dental arch in addition to panoramic, axial, and other views. v It permits preoperative evaluation for maximal use of available bone. v It allows visualization and accurate location of developmental defects, foreign bodies, undercuts and osseous pathology. v Only CT can present images in “LIFE SIZE” so that precise measurements can be made. v Only CT can sample the density of bone over the selected regions of interest and compare these estimates with bone in the cervical spine or some other site. v Streak artifacts from dental restorative materials, which interfere with visualization of bone on direct axial images, do not degrade the reformatted crosssectional images because the artifacts are not usually projected at the level of the alveolar process. Disadvantages v Patient movement must be avoided for the entire scan. v The technique and equipment are less accessible. v Cost is greater than for conventional radiographic techniques. v Radiation dose is greater compared with conventional techniques. Indications 1. Posterior mandibular therapy when conventional radiographs show insufficient bone above the mandibular canal or the canal cannot be visualized. 2. Posterior maxillary area when conventional radiographs show inadequate bone. 3. Anterior maxillary implant therapy when multiple implants are necessary. v Can determine size and location of incisive canal ; CT will reveal presence of adequate bone anterior to the canal for implant placement. v Determines location of cortical bone in floor of nasal cavity and maxillary sinuses for anchoring apical aspect of maxillary implants. v Facilitates planning of angulation and length of implants when configuration of edentulous ridges complicates implant placement. v Evaluates bone resorption patterns to determine if esthetic or phonetic compromises may be necessary. 4. Complete maxillary and mandibular implant therapy. 5. Evaluation of buccolingual ridge dimensions not available on conventional radiographs. Bibliography 1. Angelopoulous C, Aghaloo T. Imaging technology in implant diagnosis. DCNA 2011;55:141-58. 2. Atwood DA. Some clinical factors related to the rate of resorption of residual ridge. J Prosth Dent 1962;12: 441-50. 3. Breg H, Carlsson GE, Helkimo M. Changes in shape of posterior parts of upper jaws after extraction of teeth and prosthetic treatment. J Prosth Dent 1975;34(3):262-68. 4. Carl EM. Bone density: A key determinant for clinical success. In Contemporary implant dentistry. Dental Implant, 2nd edition. Mosby 1999.pp.109-18. 5. Chanavaz M, Donazzan. Maxillo-Mandibular bone reconstruction and implantology bone and biomaterials. French classification of available bone for implantology. The book of 30th Congress of Stomatology and maxillofacial Surgery. Paris 1986;189-204. 6. Clark DE, Danforth RA, Barnes RW, Burtch ML. Radiation absorbed from dental implant radiography: A comparison of linear tomography, CT scan, and panoramic and intra oral techniques. J Oral Implantology 1990;16:156-64. 7. Haldun I, Kivanc A, Murat C. The use of computerized tomography for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry. J Oral Implant 2002;28:29-36. 38 Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants 8. Kasselbaum DK, Stoller NE, McDavid WD, Goshorn B, Ahrens CR. Absorbed dose determination for tomographic implant site assessment techniques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;73:502-9. 9. Lam RV. Contour changes of alveolar process following extraction. J Prosth Dent 1960; 10(1):25-32. 10. Marie YAW, Brian LM, William WH. The role of computerized tomography in dental implantology. Int J Oral Maxill Implants 1992;7:373-80. 11. McCrohan JL, Patterson JF, Gagne RM, Goldstein HA. Average radiation doses in a standard head examination for 250 CT systems. Radiology 1987;163:263-8. 12. McGivney GP, Hauglton V, Strandt JA, Eicholz JE, Labar DM. A comparison of computer assisted tomography and data gathering modalities in prosthodontics. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:5-9. 13. Norbert B. Imaging in oral implantology. In Implants and restorative dentistry. Gerard MS, Carl EM, Klauss UB (Eds). Martin Dunitz Ltd. 2001.pp.178-96. 14. Reinhilde J. Preoperative radiologic planning of implant surgery in compromised patients. Periodontology 2000. 2003;33:12-25. 15. Schwartz MS, Rothman SLG, Chafetz N, Rhodes M. Computed tomography in dental implantation surgery. Dent Clinic North America 1989;33:555-97. 16. Stephen LG Rothman. Dental applications of computerized tomography. Surgical planning for implant placement. Quintessence publishing 1998. 17. Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers. A mixed longitudinal study covering 25 years. J Prosth Dent 1972; 27:120-32. 18. Tannaz S, Petros DD, Gary MR, Terrence JG, William MR. Quantitative evaluation of bone density using the Hounsfield index. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21:290-7. 19. Turkyilmaz TF, Tozum C, Tumer. Bone density assessments of oral implant sites using computerized tomography. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2007;34:267-72. 20. Underhill TE, Chivarquer I, Kimura K, Langlais RP, McDavid WD, Preece JW, et al. Radiobiologic risk estimation from dental radiology. Part I Absorbed doses to critical organs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1988; 66:111-20. Dental CT imaging techniques could be beneficial in assessing periodontal breakdown and its marked superiority in the diagnosis of furcation areas with greater resolution, repeatability, and accuracy compared to the clinical examinations performed. Periodontal disease begins when bacteria-laden plaques accumulate around the teeth. This plaque may harden into calculus, a tough gritty material that is difficult to remove. Bacterial overgrowth can produce gingivitis, which may progress to a periodontitis in which the periodontal ligament and other supporting structures of the tooth are affected. The periodontal ligament is responsible for holding the tooth in its bony socket and helps provide the tooth with small degrees of motion or “give” within the socket. The periodontal ligament on plain film appears as a radiolucency between the cementum of the root and the lamina dura of the bony socket (Fig. 7.1). The fibers of the periodontal ligament, which radiate from the cementum of the root into the gingiva, serve to attach the gingiva to the tooth. When gingivitis becomes severe, this attachment weakens and bacteria can attack the periodontal ligament. The ligament can be gradually destroyed, creating a space called a periodontal pocket between the lateral wall of the root and the bony socket. Bacteria accumulate in the periodontal pocket and cannot be reached with routine dental hygiene. The attack can continue until the surrounding bone becomes resorbed and the tooth is lost. Radiographically, this bone loss appears as a radiolucency adjacent to the surface of the root that can travel down as far as the root apex (Fig. 7.2). PERIODONTITIS AND MAXILLARY SINUS Periodontal disease may be a frequently unrecognized cause of maxillary sinus disease. There is a twofold increase in maxillary sinus disease in patients with periodontal disease and have shown a causal relationship. Recognition of this relationship may have an impact on the clinical management of patients, particularly Dental CT in Periodontics 7 Pratik Dedhia C h a p t e r Fig. 7.1 Bone loss seen on conventional periapical radiograph Fig. 7.2 Horizontal bone loss seen on dental CT 40 Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants those planning implant surgeries. Such findings may also provide a clue to the true cause of maxillary sinus disease, particularly when the sinus disease is focal in the inferior aspect of the sinus and in the surrounding areas of periodontal disease (Figs 7.3 and 7.4). The maxillary sinus can reach far mesially and between the roots of the molars and premolars. Due to the close relationship with these other structures, the maxillary sinus can be easily affected by Fig. 7.3 Endo perio lesion seen on dental CT Fig. 7.4 Case of periodontitis with maxillary sinus pathology as seen on panoramic and paraxial image inflammatory conditions and cystic lesions of the adjacent teeth. Much emphasis has been recently placed on the osteomeatal unit as a cause of sinus disease, but dental disease may also be a source of problems in patients. Recognizing this may have an impact on the clinical management of patients, particularly those planning implant surgeries. Because of the intimate relationship between teeth and maxillary sinus, periapical/periodontal infections might result in reactive mucosal response within the sinus. Maxillary sinus mucosal thickening is twice as common in patients with dental disease as in the general population and odontogenic sinusitis accounts for approximately 10 to 12 percent of all cases of maxillary sinusitis. Failure to recognize the tooth as a cause of sinus disease can result in incomplete or inadequate therapy and mismanagement of these conditions. Although surgical interventions involving the maxillary sinus are increasing, the presurgical planning continues using two-dimensional radiographs for maxillary sinus visualization. Considering the anatomical variability related to the surgical site, including the maxillary sinus floor and its intimate contact with the maxillary posterior teeth, observations on the threedimensional structure are most useful in relation to implant surgery and sinus grafting. ROOT EVALUATION The roots of the teeth are commonly superimposed on intraoral radiographs, particularly in the molar region. As a result, it can be difficult to determine if a root is eroded due to a lesion or if the bone in the furcation (between the roots) or surrounding the root is abnormal. It is also difficult to tell if a lesion involves all of the roots of a tooth or only one and to tell which surface of the root is involved. This is important because it allows the dental surgeon to determine his or her treatment plan and to decide if an apicoectomy (root removal) is needed to gain access to the diseased area. It also helps the dentist to preoperatively decide if there is sufficient bone surrounding the roots to render the tooth salvageable (Figs 7.5 to 7.8). Comparing the lesions of specimens with intraoral radiographs and dental CT reformatted images, the dental and periodontal pathoses and topographical structures are more clearly observed in the dental CT Dental CT in Periodontics 41 Fig. 7.7 3-D image showing loss of buccal cortical plate due to periodontal infection Fig. 7.5 Periodontal infection involving right maxillary third molar Fig. 7.6 Bone loss around mesial and distal root clearly demonstrated on paraxial image reformatted images, providing the possibility of more applications of reformatted images to clinical dentistry. In conclusion, this chapter has demonstrated, through a series of examples, the effect that dental CT programs have had on the way we image the jaw today. These programs have created not only a new way of looking at the jaw but also a new referral pattern with dentists. It is important that we work closely with our dental colleagues, 42 Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants learn their language, and assist them in understanding the imaging modalities available to them. PERIODONTAL CASES bibliography 1. James J Abrahams, MD. Dental CT Imaging: A Look at the Jaw. Radiology 2001;219(2):334-45. 2. James J Abrahams, Robert M. Glassberg. Dental Disease and Maxillary Sinus Abnormalities. AJR 1996;166:1219-23. 3. Jeffcoat M, Reddy M. A comparison of probing and radiographic methods for detection of periodontal disease progression. Current opinion in dentistry 1991;1(1):45-51. 4. Pistorius A, Patrosio C, Willershausen B, Mildenberger P, Rippen G. Periodontal probing in comparison to diagnosis by CT scan. International Dental Journal 2001; 51(5):339-47. 5. Shankarapillai Rajesh, Nair Manju A. CAT Imaging in Periodontics and Implant Dentistry. International Journal of Dental Clinics 2009;1(1):8-12. 6. Yanagisawa K, Friedman C, Vining E, Abrahams J. DentaScan imaging of the mandible and maxilla. Head and neck 1993;15(1):1-7. 7. Shahbazian M, Xue D, Hu Y, Cleynenbreuge J, Jacobs R. Spiral Computed Tomography Based Maxillary Sinus Imaging in Relation to Tooth Loss, Implant Placement and Potential Grafting Procedure J Oral Maxillofac Res Fig. 7.8 Bone loss in furcation area of mandibular left first molar 2010 (Jan-Mar);1(1):e7. Dental CT has proven its mettle even in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery. Perfect assessment of the extend of lesion, along with accurate diagnosis and efficient treatment planning is provided by dental CT. Before entering the operating room, oral surgeon becomes well acquaint with the three dimensional anatomy of the patient’s oral cavity, thereby tremendously improving the surgical efficiency, limiting postoperative complications and providing excellent healing. Indications of dental CT in oral and maxillofacial surgery includes: v Third molar position assessment and its relation with mandibular canal/maxillary sinus (Figs 8.1 to 8.3). v Supernumerary teeth assessment, ectopic tooth positioning can be accurately determined. v Displaced root pieces in the anatomical spaces can be accurately determined (Figs 8.4 and 8.6). v Buccolingual and mesiodistal extend of benign and malignant pathologies can be accurately predicted (Fig. 8.5). v Impacted canine location can be determined (Figs 8.10 to 8.12). v Pathologies involving maxillary sinus is easily identified (Figs 8.7, 8.13 and 8.14). v Maxillary and mandibular fracture extend is identified (Figs 8.8 and 8.9). Dental CT in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 8 Prashant P Jaju C h a p t e r Fig 8.1 Dentigerous cyst with horizontally impacted 48 44 Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants Fig. 8.2 Horizontally impacted 38,48. Paraxial images shows the positioning of 48 along with its relation to mandibular canal. Also paraxial image shows lingual cortical plate perforation with horizontally impacted 38 Dental CT in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 45 Fig. 8.3 Impacted maxillary third molar Fig 8.4 Positioning of lingually displaced root pieces can be accurately determined 46 Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants Fig. 8.5 Residual cyst seen on slice number 56–71 Fig. 8.6 Precise location of root pieces seen on paraxial images Dental CT in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 47 Fig. 8.7 Root piece displaced in left maxillary sinus. Accurate position determined on paraxial image Fig. 8.8 Fracture of mandible 48 Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants Fig. 8.9 Fracture of mandibular symphysis Fig. 8.10 Precise location of impacted canine seen on axial slice Dental CT in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 49 Fig. 8.11 Location of impacted mandibular tooth precisely located on paraxial slices Fig. 8.12 Impacted central incisor along with close approximation with nasopalatine canal 50 Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants Fig. 8.13 Maxillary sinus perforation accurately seen on dental CT Dental CT in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 51 Fig. 8.14 Residual cyst involving left maxillary sinus with complete haziness Bibliography 1. Rothman S, Widenback CA. Dental Applications of Computerized Tomography: Surgical Planning for Implant Placement. Quintessence Publishing 1st edition 1998. Sa accabor sequossimus am qui omnitat quatem dolendam et ulligenissum qui dolores. Radiology is the need of the hour for field of endodontics. Root canal treatment is the number one procedure performed in every dental clinic and radiological aspect is the most crucial step for successful endodontic treatment. Radiology is useful for following purpose: 1. Detection of caries (Fig. 9.2). 2. Determination of periapical lesions (Figs 9.3 and 9.4). 3. Determination of root canal length for endodontic purpose. 4. Assessment of root canal fillings (Fig. 9.1). 5. Assessment of number of canals in teeth (Fig. 9.7). Neither two dimensional imaging can depict the buccolingual extend of caries nor it is able to tell anatomical variations in root canal morphology in this plane. Dental CT in Endodontics 9 Sushma P Jaju C h a p t e r This can be easily overcome by dental CT. Proper access cavity preparation and obturation form the keystone for successful root canal therapy. Nearly 60 percent of the failures are apparently caused by incomplete obliteration of the radicular space. Root canal variations predispose to inadequate root canal preparation and should be recognized before or during treatment. There are innumerable instances of variations in root canal anatomy like, extra canals which are missed by a novice operator which ultimately leads to root canal failure. Extra canals are a common findings and missing of these canals leads to endodontic treatment failure. Hess pointed out that 54 percent of his 513 maxillary molar specimens had four canals. Mandibular molars also exhibit secondary root canals, over and above the traditional three. Although as many as five canals and as few as one and two canals rarely occur in mandibular molars, four canals are not unusual. Premolar teeth Fig. 9.1 Root canal filling seen on right maxillary first molar and mandibular canine Dental CT in Endodontics 53 Fig. 9.2 Extend of carious lesion Fig. 9.3 Periapical infection leading to maxillary sinus infection Fig. 9.4 Periapical infection leading to loss of labial cortical plate are also prone to secondary canals. Maxillary first premolars, which generally have two canals, have three canals 5 to 6 percent of the time. Twenty-four percent of maxillary second premolars have second root canals and occasionally three canals. Mandibular premolars are notorious for having extra canals 26.5 percent in first premolars and 13.5 percent in second premolars. Almost one-third of all mandibular lateral incisors have two canals with two foramina. Study conducted by Rathi et al (2010) revealed presence of mesiobuccal canal (MB2) in the age group of 51 to 60 years (29.50%), followed by 31 to 40 years and 21 to 30 years. (19.67%), 41 to 50 years (16.39%), 61 to 70 years (8.19%), 10 to 20 years (6.55%). The highest distolingual canal incidence was detected of 21 to 30 years (52.63%), followed by 41 to 50 years (15.78%), 10 to 20 years and 31 to 40 years (10.52%), 51 to 60 years (5.26%) (Figs 9.8 to 9.14). Intraoral radiographs are a two dimensional imaging modality of a three dimensional structure. Hence anatomy in the third dimension cannot be assessed on radiographs. Because root canals tend to lie one behind the other in buccolingual plane, they get superimposed onto each other on periapical panoramic radiographs 54 Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants Fig. 9.5 Periapical granuloma seen on dental CT Fig. 9.6 Perio endo lesion Fig. 9.7 Extra canals in right maxillary molars Fig. 9.8 Axial image showing two canals in mandibular left lateral incisor, and four canals in right and left first molar Dental CT in Endodontics 55 Fig. 9.9 C-Shaped root canal anatomy seen with left mandibular first molar Fig. 9.10 Extra canal seen in lower molar Fig. 9.11 Classic appearance of four canals in mandibular right first molar and easily go undetected. According to Robinson et al on dental CT a groove can be observed as a radiolucent longitudinal line within the root parallel to periodontal ligament, suggestive of an extra root canal. Nakata et al. used dental CT to study few cases and found that presence and expansion of periapical lesions in the mesial buccal root and the palatal root of the maxillary right first molar. It also revealed the resorption of the palatal cortical bone (Fig. 9.5). Another case revealed the connection of the apex of the palatal root of the maxillary left first molar and the maxillary sinus. Hyperplasia of mucosa in the maxillary sinus was observed leading to odontogenic maxillary sinusitis. Similarly, inflammatory disease is seen well on dental 56 Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants Fig. 9.12 Extra palatal canal see with maxillary right first molar Fig. 9.14 MB2 canals in both molars Fig. 9.13 MB2 canal in maxillary right second molar CT than with plain radiography (Fig. 9.6). Plain dental radiographs are still the standard for routine dental evaluation. They are readily available and relatively inexpensive and have better spatial resolution than CT scan. But in complicated cases where there is variation in root canal morphology dentascan could be a useful tool. Limitations of dental CT is the cost factor and radiation dose. With further advancement in radiology and conebeam computed tomography evolving rapidly and providing three dimensional images at a less radiation dose, this could be the next diagnostic aid in endodontics may be surpassing the conventional radiological tools. Computed tomography examination to differentiate between periapical cysts and granulomas in teeth with large periapical lesions was studied. It was stated that grey scale value measurements of periapical lesions on CT images were able to differentiate solid (granulomas) from cystic or cavity (cyst) type lesions. It was concluded that Dental CT/CBCT may be clinically more accurate and more useful than biopsy. If confirmed, these findings may influence the decision-making process when considering a non-surgical or surgical approach to endodontic retreatment. Both medical CT and CBCT have already been used for the planning of periradicular endodontic surgery (Velvart et al. 2001, Rigolone et al. 2003). Threedimensional imaging allows the anatomical relationship of the root apices to important neighboring anatomical structures such as the inferior dental canal, mental foramen and maxillary sinus to be clearly identified. Velvart et al. (2001) found that the relationship of the inferior dental canal to the root apicies could be determined in every case when using medical CT, but in less than 40 percent of cases when using conventional radiography. It is likely that similar results could be achieved with CBCT using considerably less radiation. Dental CT in Endodontics 57 Rigolone et al. (2003) concluded that CT may play an important role in periapical microsurgery of palatal roots of maxillary first molars. The distance between the cortical plate and the palatal root apex could be measured, and the presence or absence of the maxillary sinus between the roots could be assessed. In addition, the thickness of the cortical plate, the cancellous bone pattern, fenestrations, the shape of the maxilla and mandible as well as the inclination of the roots of teeth planned for periapical surgery should be able to be determined before starting surgery (Nakata et al. 2006). CBCT may also prove useful in the diagnosis of dentoalveolar trauma, because the exact nature and severity of alveolar and luxation injuries can be assessed from just onescan. It has been reported that CT has been used to detect a horizontal root fracture (Terakado et al. 2000). The same fracture may have needed multiple periapical radiographs taken at several different angles to be detected and even then may not have been visualized. bibliography 1. Abrahams JJ, Berger SB. Inflammatory disease of the jaw: appearance of reformatted CT scan. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:1085-91. 2. Beatty RG, Krell K. Mandibular molars with five canals: report of two cases. J Am Dent Assoc 1987;114:802. 3. John II, Van TH, Carl EH, Gerald NG, Thomas S, Paul AR. Endodontic cavity preparation.In Endodontics, 5th edition. BC Decker Inc 2002.pp.405-570. 4. Nakata K, Izumi M, Iwama A, Naito M, Inamoto K, Ariji E, Nakamura H. Utility of dental computed tomography (CT) in endodontic therapy. Part 2 : Diagnostic imaging of periapical lesions of each root of multirooted teeth. Japanese Journal of Conservative Dentistry 2004;47(5): 608-15. 5. Rathi S, Patil J, Jaju P. Detection of Mesiobuccal Canal in MaxillaryMolars and Distolingual Canal in Mandibular Molars by Dental CT: A Retrospective Study of 100 Cases. International Journal of Dentistry Volume 2010, Article ID 291276:1-6. 6. Rigolone M, Pasqualini D, Bianchi L, Berutti E, Bianchi SD. Vestibular Surgical Access to the Palatine Root of the Superior First Molar: ‘‘Low-dose Cone-beam’’ CT analysis of the Pathway and its Anatomic Variations. JOE 2003; 29: 773-5. 7. Sierashi SM. Identification and endodontic management of three-canaled maxillary premolars. JOE 1989;15:29. 8. Simon JHS, Enciso R, Malfaz JM, Roges R, Bailey-Perry M, Patel A. Differential diagnosis of large periapical lesions using cone-beam computed tomography measurements and biopsy. JOE 2006;32:833-7. 9. Soraya Robinson, Czerny C, Gahleitner A, Bernhart T, FM Kainberger. Dental CT evaluation of mandibular first premolar root configurations and canal variations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;93:328-32. 10. Terakado M, Hashimoto K, Arai Y, Honda M, Sekiwa T, Sato H. Diagnostic imaging with newly developed ortho cubic super-high resolution computed tomography (Ortho-CT). Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics 2000;89:509- 18. 11. Vertucci FJ, Selig A, Gillis R. Root canal morphology of the human maxillary second premolar. Oral Surg 1974;38:456. 12. Walker RT. Root form and canal anatomy of mandibular second molars in a southern Chinese population. JOE 1988;14:325. 13. Weine FS, et al. Canal configuration of the mandibular second molar using a clinically oriented in vitro method. JOE 1988;14:207. 14. Zillich R, Dowson J. Root canal morphology of mandibular first and second premolars. Oral Surg 1973;36:783. As enter this new millennium, technological advancement is at its rapid best. Then how can dental radiological imaging lack behind this advancing phase. The primary concern with dental CT was comparative high radiation dose with respect to plain radiography. This has been overcome with the introduction of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and utilization of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in implant imaging. CONE-BEAM computed tomography in implant imaging Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was introduced in dental field 10 years ago and its evolution is linked to a new paradigm in maxillofacial diagnosis called interactive diagnostic imaging. Foundations of CBCT is related to multiplanar imaging/reformation as observed in dental CT. CBCT provides the advantage of reconstruction of various images in any plane, i.e. coronal, axial, sagittal throughout the volume. If the user desires a panoramic image from the volumetric data, this can be accomplished by carefully selecting with a help of cursor, an uninterrupted sequence of voxels along a curved plane in the maxilla or mandible. The resulting image is a reflection of the voxels in the selected plane. If the operator selects the surface only voxels to be displayed, then a 3-D view is produced. CBCT allows interactive diagnosis because the operator could now control the retrieval of diagnostic information. This has promoted interactive diagnosis whereby the user can access much more information about each patient. CBCT has a conical shaped beam, with an adjustable width. The attenuated X-ray energy is acquired by a single detector with only one revolution around the patient’s head. The collected data is converted to shades Advances in Implant Imaging 10 Prashant P Jaju, Prashant V Suvarna C h a p t e r of gray as is seen in CT. The primary difference between CT and CBCT in terms of acquisition process is that the imaging data are acquired from the entire volume at once in CBCT, instead of stacks of slices as occurs in CT. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first CBCT unit for dental use in the United States on march 8, 2001-the NewTom DVT 9000 (Quantitative Radiology srl, Verona, Italy). FDA approval for three more CBCT units quickly followed in 2003 followed for the 3-D Accuitomo, (J Morita Mfg. Corp., Kyoto, Japan) on march 6, the i-CAT (Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, PA) on october 2, and the CB Mercuray (Hitachi, Medical Corp., Kashiwa-shi, Chibaken, Japan) on october 20. Since 2003, a number of other CBCT units have been FDA approved in the United States, including the Kodak 9000 3-D, (Carestream/ trophy, marne-la-vallée, France), which is currently the highest resolution unit. Once the reformatted images are available, a series of interactive applications are at operator’s disposal,including measurement tools as seen with dental CT. Scientific studies and research have established the facts that available bone measurements are accurate (life size) with most of CBCT scanners currently in the marked. Estimated error in various diagnostic tests involving accuracy of measurements with different CBCT scanners was reported to be between 5 to 12 percent. Perhaps the greatest practical advantage of CBCT in maxillofacial imaging is the ability it provides to interact with the data and generate images replicating those commonly used in clinical practice. All proprietary software is capable of various real-time advanced image display techniques, easily derived from the volumetric data set. These techniques and their specific clinical applications include: Advances in Implant Imaging 59 v Oblique planar reformation: This technique creates nonaxial 2D images by transecting a set or “stack” of axial images. This mode is particularly useful for evaluating specific structures (e.g., TMJ, impacted third molars) as certain features may not be readily apparent on perpendicular MPR images. v Curved planar reformation: This is a type of multiplanar reformation. accomplished by aligning the long axis of the imaging plane with a specific anatomic structure. This mode is useful in displaying the dental arch, providing familiar panorama like thin-slice images. Images are undistorted so that measurements and angulations made from them have minimal error. v Serial transplanar reformation: This technique produces a series of stacked sequential crosssectional images orthogonal to the oblique or curved planar reformation. Images are usually thin slices (e.g. 1 mm thick) of known separation (e.g. 1 mm apart). Resultant images are useful in the assessment of specific morphologic features such as alveolar bone height and width for implant site assessment, the inferior alveolar canal in relation to impacted mandibular molars, condylar surface and shape in the symptomatic TMJ or evaluation of pathological conditions affecting the jaws. v Multiplanar volume reformations: Any multiplanar image can be “thickened” by increasing the number of adjacent voxels included in the slice. This creates an image that represents a specific volume of the patient. The simplest technique is adding the absorption values of adjacent voxels, to produce a “ray sum” image. This mode can be used to generate simulated panoramic images by increasing the slice thickness of curved planar reformatted images along the dental arch to 25 to 30 mm, comparable to the in focus image layer of panoramic radiographs. Added feature with CBCT software is definition of path of inferior alveolar nerve in the mandibular canal, and evaluated in relation to the planned position of dental implants. With respect to measurement of bone density at implant site, CBCT does not perform exceedingly well in comparison to dental CT. This is mainly due to the high level of noise in the acquired images. Slight inconsistencies in the sensitivity of the CBCT detector in capturing the attenuated X-ray energies may also contribute to inaccuracies in bone density estimation. Data acquired from CBCT is generally dicom compliant, but in cases of lack of dicom compatibility, data is converted into a viewable format, i.e. Simplant (Materialize Dental NV, Leuven Belgium). Once the conversion is complete, a wide range of dental implant planning tools combined with realistic and undistorted views of the maxillofacial skeleton and the soft tissues is available. Diagnostic and planning software are available to assist in orthodontic assessment and analysis (e.g. Dolphin 3D, Dolphin Imaging, Chatsworth, California) and in implant planning to fabricate surgical models (e.g. Biomedical Modeling Inc., Boston, Massachusetts); to facilitate virtual implant placement; to create diagnostic and surgical implant guidance stents (e.g. Virtual Implant Placement, Implant Logic Systems, Cedarhurst, New York; Simplant, Materialise, Leuven, Belgium; EasyGuide, Keystone Dental, Burlington, Massachusetts); and even to assist in the computer-aided design and manufacture of implant prosthetics (NobelGuide/Procera software, Nobel Care AG, Goteborg, Sweden). Software is also available to provide surgical simulations for osteotomies and distraction osteogenesis (Maxilim, Medicim NV, Mechelen, Belgium). This area is a blossoming field that provides opportunities for practitioners to combine CBCT diagnosis and 3D simulations with virtual surgery and computer-assisted design and manufacture. Image guidance is an exciting advance that will undoubtedly have a substantial impact on dentistry. As with all technology, CBCT has limitations. The patient must be motionless during the scanning to achieve a good image; otherwise the image may display streaking. There also will be artifacts in the image around metal prostheses, making it difficult to evaluate teeth with metal restorations. Furthermore, the larger FOV systems can image tissues with which the dentist is not familiar, but might be held responsible for interpreting. It is often prudent to refer such image volumes for evaluation by a specialist in oral and maxillofacial radiology. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) MRI does not use ionizing radiation. MRI is based on the phenomenon of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) which was first described independently by two groups of workers in the USA. MRI was not originally thought of as a useful modality for preimplant assessment, but the use of appropriate sequences and parameters allows us largely to overcome the perceived difficulities. For 60 Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants preimplant assessment, as normal anatomy is being examined, the use of T1 -weighted sequences, as external cortical plates appears black.This MRI is due to the very low signal owing to the absence of water or lipid protons. In contrast, the more organic cancellous bone appears very bright in T1 -weighted images, as a result of the signal from protons in the fatty bone marrow,unlike the grey radiological appearance of this tissue. Neurovascular channels such as inferior dental canal and the nasopalatine foramen are identified as discrete dark structures within the bright cancellous bone. External interface between cortical bone and mucosa is clearly identified on MRI. Recent studies suggest that MRI assessment of maxilla and older patients is difficult. Also there is an initial learning curve,with many clinicians find it difficult to interpret MRI. Also appearance of bone and soft tissue is different on MRI as compared with other radiological studies. With ever increasing accessibility of MRI, reduction in operating costs and use of non ionizing radiation, can increase the use of MRI in the field of implant dentistry. Also interventional scanners may allow operators with image guided implant surgery. bibliography 1. Gray CF, Redpath TW, Bainton R and Smith FW. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of a sinus lift operation using reoxidised cellulose(Surgicel) as graft material. Clinical Oral Implant Res 2001;12:526-30. 2. Gray CF, Redpath TW, Smith FW, Staff RT. Advanced imaging: Magnetic resonance imaging in implant dentistry. A review. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2003;14:18-27. 3. Rothman S, Widenback CA. Dental Applications of Computerized Tomography: Surgical Planning for Implant Placement. Quintessence Publishing 1st edition 1998. 4. Scarfe WC, Farman AG. Clinical Applications of ConeBeam Computed Tomography in Dental PracticeJ Can Dent Assoc 2006; 72(1):75–80. 5. Scarfe WC, Farman AG. Contemporary Dental and Maxillofacial imaging. Dent Clin N Am 52 (2008) 707–30. CASE 1: EDENTULOUS RIDGE Fig. 11.1 Axial image showing paraxial slices number and implant planned in anterior region Fig. 11.2 Varied ridge pattern observed Case Study C h a p t e r 11 62 Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants CASE 2: MANDIBULAR SINGLE MOLAR IMPLANT Fig. 11.3 Implant to be placed in mandibular left first molar region Fig. 11.4 Slice 80 shows measurement of available bone along with concavity in lingual cortical plate Case Study 63 CASE 3: MANDIBULAR SINGLE TOOTH IMPLANT WITH CONCAVITY Fig. 11.5 Single tooth implant placement (Slice 45). Note the lingual cortical concavity which is not evident on panoramic image 64 Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants CASE 4: MAXILLARY ANTERIOR REGION Fig. 11.6 Implant site in maxillary anterior region (Slice 34 and 40) Note: The loss of labial cortical plate in Slice 34 Case Study 65 CASE 5: MAXILLARY ANTERIOR SINGLE REGION IMPLANT Fig 11.7 Labial concavity seen on paraxial images (Slice 30 and 31). Osteotomy advised before implant placement. Slice 29 shows nasopalatine canal 66 Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants CASE 6: MAXILLARY MOLAR REGION ΈSINUS LIFT CASEΉ Fig 11.8 Sinus lift procedure required due to lack of sufficient height in left maxillary second molar region(Slice 83–84) Case Study 67 CASE 7: MAXILLARY BILATERAL SINUS LIFT Fig. 11.9 Case of bilateral sinus lift procedure. Insufficient height at implant sites (Slice 20–24; Slice 62–66) 68 Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants Flow chart 11.1 Assessment of radiographic image on dental CT Index A Advantages of dentascans 37 American Academy of Oral Medicine Radiology 4 Axial images 13 B Bone height accuracy 6 width accuracy 6 C Chanavaz and Donazzan French volumetric classification 30t Choosing scanning plane 10, 12t Classic appearance of four canals in mandibular right first molar 55f Complications of lingual vascular canal 23t Computed tomographic scans 2 Computerized axial tomography 7 Cone-beam computed tomography 1 Cortical niche sign 24, 24f plate density 6 thickness 6 C-shaped root canal anatomy 55f CT scan 34 gantry with head rest 10f Curved planar reformation 59 D Defining panoramic line 13 Density measurement on dental CT software 33f Dental CT 19 in endodontics 52 in implantology 28 in oral and maxillofacial surgery 43 in periodontics 39 Dental implants 1, 3 Dentigerous cyst 43f Digastric fossa 19 E Edentulous ridge 61 Editing panoramic line 13 Extra canals in right maxillary molars 54f palatal canal 56f F Fracture of mandible 47f mandibular symphysis 48f G Genial tubercles 19 Greater palatine foramen 19, 20, 22f H History of dental CT 7 Horizontal bone loss 39f I Impacted maxillary third molar 45f Implant site in maxillary anterior region 64f Incisive canal on dental CT 20f foramen 19 fossa 19f Introduction of multislice CT 9 L Layout structure in dental CT software 18f Left mandibular first molar 55f maxillary sinus 47f Linear scale 16 Lingual vascular canal 19, 21 on dental CT 22f Loss of buccal cortical plate 41f cortical plate 41f M Magnetic resonance imaging 59 Magnifying glass 16 Mandibular canal 19, 23 canine 52f foramen 19 single molar implant 62 tooth implant with concavity 63 Maxilla 29 Maxillary anterior region 64 single region implant 65 bilateral sinus lift 67 first molar 52f landmarks 19 right first molar 56f sinus 19, 20, 50f infection 53f on dental CT 21f Page numbers followed by f refer to figure and t refer to table 70 Dental CT: Third Eye in Dental Implants Measurement for anterior mandible 29f maxilla 29f posterior mandible 30f maxilla 29f Mechanism of action of spiral CT scan 9f Mental foramen 19, 26, 26f Mesiobuccal canal 53 Mesiodistal accuracy 6 Metal ball used in panoramic radiograph 2f Multiplanar reformation 22 volume reformations 59 N Nasal cavity 19, 20f Nasopalatine canal 49f, 65f foramen 19 O Osteotomy 65 P Parameters adjustment 11f Paraxial slice number and implant planned in anterior region 61f parameters 13 Periapical granuloma 54f Periodontal infection 41f Periodontitis and maxillary sinus 39 Position distance rule 25f Procedure of scanning 9 Processing unit 15f Pterygoid plates 19 Q Quality of bone at implant sites 32 Quantity of available bone at implant site 28 R Reference plane for maxilla and mandible 16f Regarding software 13 Ridge morphology 32, 32f Right maxillary sinus pathology 22f third molar 41 Role of templates in implant site assessment 33 Root canal filling 52f evaluation 40 S Selection of scan area 11f Serial transplanar reformation 59 Single tooth implant placement 63f T Topogram 13, 15f Trabecular density 6 Type of bone 31f W Working of dental CT 9

La entrada Dental CT Third Eye In Dental Implants se publicó primero en Kadi México.

]]>
5623
Cone Beam Computed Tomography Oral https://kadimexico.com/cone-beam-computed-tomography-oral/ Wed, 12 Oct 2022 17:35:10 +0000 https://kadimexico.com/?p=5620 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Oral and Maxillofacial Diagnosis and Applications Cone Beam Computed Tomography Oral and Maxillofacial Diagnosis and Applications Edited by David Sarment, DDS, MS This edition first published 2014 © 2014 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc Editorial offices 1606 Golden Aspen Drive, Suites 103 and 104, Ames, Iowa 50010, USA The Atrium, […]

La entrada Cone Beam Computed Tomography Oral se publicó primero en Kadi México.

]]>
Cone Beam Computed Tomography Oral and Maxillofacial Diagnosis and Applications Cone Beam Computed Tomography Oral and Maxillofacial Diagnosis and Applications Edited by David Sarment, DDS, MS This edition first published 2014 © 2014 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc Editorial offices 1606 Golden Aspen Drive, Suites 103 and 104, Ames, Iowa 50010, USA The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, UK For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com/wiley-blackwell. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients, is granted by Blackwell Publishing, provided that the base fee is paid directly to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923. For those organizations that have been granted a photocopy license by CCC, a separate system of payments has been arranged. The fee codes for users of the Transactional Reporting Service are ISBN-13: 978-0-4709-6140-7/2014. Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book. The contents of this work are intended to further general scientific research, understanding, and discussion only and are not intended and should not be relied upon as recommending or promoting a specific method, diagnosis, or treatment by health science practitioners for any particular patient. The publisher and the author make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this work and specifically disclaim all warranties, including without limitation any implied warranties of fitness for a particular purpose. In view of ongoing research, equipment modifications, changes in governmental regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to the use of medicines, equipment, and devices, the reader is urged to review and evaluate the information provided in the package insert or instructions for each medicine, equipment, or device for, among other things, any changes in the instructions or indication of usage and for added warnings and precautions. Readers should consult with a specialist where appropriate. The fact that an organization or Website is referred to in this work as a citation and/or a potential source of further information does not mean that the author or the publisher endorses the information the organization or Website may provide or recommendations it may make. Further, readers should be aware that Internet Websites listed in this work may have changed or disappeared between when this work was written and when it is read. No warranty may be created or extended by any promotional statements for this work. Neither the publisher nor the author shall be liable for any damages arising herefrom. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Cone beam computed tomography : oral and maxillofacial diagnosis and applications / [edited by] David Sarment. p.; cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-470-96140-7 (pbk. : alk. paper) – ISBN 978-1-118-76902-7 – ISBN 978-1-118-76906-5 (epub) – ISBN 978-1-118-76908-9 (mobi) – ISBN 978-1-118-76916-4 (ePdf) I. Sarment, David P., editor of compilation. [DNLM: 1. Stomatognathic Diseases–radiography. 2. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography–methods. WU 140] RK309 617.5′22075722–dc23 2013026841 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in electronic books. Cover design by Jen Miller Designs Set in 9.5/11.5pt Palatino by SPi Publisher Services, Pondicherry, India 1 2014 To my wife Sylvie To my children Lea, Myriam, and Nathanyel vii Contents Contributors ix Preface xi Acknowledgments xiii 1 Technology and Principles of Cone Beam Computed Tomography 3 Matthew W. Jacobson 2 The Nature of Ionizing Radiation and the Risks from Maxillofacial Cone Beam Computed Tomography 25 Sanjay M. Mallya and Stuart C. White 3 Diagnosis of Jaw Pathologies Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 43 Sharon L. Brooks 4 Diagnosis of Sinus Pathologies Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 65 Aaron Miracle and Christian Güldner 5 Orthodontic and Orthognathic Planning Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 91 Lucia H. S. Cevidanes, Martin Styner, Beatriz Paniagua, and João Roberto Gonçalves 6 Three-Dimensional Planning in Maxillofacial Reconstruction of Large Defects Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 109 Rutger Schepers, Gerry M. Raghoebar, Lars U. Lahoda, Harry Reintsema, Arjan Vissink, and Max J. Witjes 7 Implant Planning Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 127 David Sarment 8 CAD/CAM Surgical Guidance Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 147 George A. Mandelaris and Alan L. Rosenfeld 9 Assessment of the Airway and Supporting Structures Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 197 David C. Hatcher 10 Endodontics Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 211 Martin D. Levin 11 Periodontal Disease Diagnosis Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 249 Bart Vandenberghe and David Sarment Index 271 ix Contributors Sharon L. Brooks, DDS, MS Professor Emerita, Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine University of Michigan School of Dentistry Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA Lucia H. S. Cevidanes, DDS, MS, PhD Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics University of Michigan School of Dentistry Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA João Roberto Gonçalves, DDS, PhD Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry Faculdade de Odontologia Universidade Estadual Paulista, Araraquara, Brazil Christian Güldner, MD Specialist in ENT, Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery University of Marburg Germany David C. Hatcher, DDS, MSc, MRCD(c) Adjunct Professor, Department of Orthodontics University of the Pacific School of Dentistry San Francisco, California, USA Clinical Professor, Orofacial Sciences University of California–San Francisco School of Dentistry San Francisco, California, USA Clinical Professor Roseman University College of Dental Medicine Henderson, Nevada, USA Private practice Diagnostic Digital Imaging Sacramento, California, USA Matthew W. Jacobson, MSc, PhD Senior Research Scientist Xoran Technologies, Inc. Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA Lars U. Lahoda, MD, PhD Plastic surgeon, Department of Plastic Surgery University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen Groningen, the Netherlands Martin D. Levin, DMD Diplomate, American Board of Endodontics Chair, Dean’s Council and Adjunct Associate Professor of Endodontics University of Pennsylvania, School of Dental Medicine Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA Private practice Chevy Chase, Maryland, USA Sanjay M. Mallya, BDS, MDS, PhD Assistant Professor and Postgraduate Program Director Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology University of California–Los Angeles School of Dentistry Los Angeles, California, USA x Contributors George A. Mandelaris, DDS, MS Diplomate, American Board of Periodontology Private practice Periodontics and Dental Implant Surgery Park Ridge and Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois, USA Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Louisiana State University School of Dentistry New Orleans, Louisiana, USA Aaron Miracle, MD Resident physician, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging University of California–San Francisco San Francisco, California, USA Beatriz Paniagua, PhD Assistant Professor Department of Psychiatry Department of Computer Science University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA Gerry M. Raghoebar, DDS, MD, PhD Professor, Oral and maxillofacial surgeon University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen Groningen, the Netherlands Harry Reintsema, DDS Maxillofacial Prosthodontist, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen Groningen, the Netherlands Alan L. Rosenfeld, DDS, FACD Diplomate, American Board of Periodontology Private practice Periodontics and Dental Implant Surgery Park Ridge and Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois, USA Clinical Professor, Department of Periodontology University of Illinois College of Dentistry Chicago, Illinois, USA Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Louisiana State University School of Dentistry New Orleans, Louisiana, USA David Sarment, DDS, MS Diplomate, American Board of Periodontology Private practice Implantology and Periodontics Alexandria, Virginia, USA Rutger Schepers, DDS, MD Maxillofacial Surgeon, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen Groningen, the Netherlands Martin Styner, PhD Associate Professor Department of Computer Science University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA Bart Vandenberghe, DDS, MSc, PhD Advimago, Center for Advanced Oral Imaging Brussels, Belgium Prosthetics Section, Department of Oral Health Sciences KU Leuven, Belgium Arjan Vissink, DDS, MD, PhD Professor, Oral and maxillofacial surgeon University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen Groningen, the Netherlands Stuart C. White, DDS, PhD Professor Emeritus, Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology University of California–Los Angeles School of Dentistry Los Angeles, California, USA Max J. Witjes, DDS, MD, PhD Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen Groningen, the Netherlands xi Preface Technology surrounds our private and professional lives, improving at ever-accelerating speeds. In turn, medical imaging benefits from general enhancements in computers, offering faster and more refined views of our patients’ anatomy and disease states. Although this Moore’s law progression appears to be exponential, it has actually been almost a century since mathematician Johann Radon first laid the groundwork for reconstruction of a three-dimensional object using a great number of two-dimensional projections. The first computed tomography (CT) scanner was invented by Sir Godfrey Hounsfield, after he led a team to build the first commercial computer at Electric and Musical Industries. The theoretical groundwork had been published a few years earlier by a particle physicist, Dr. Allan Cormack. In 1971, the first human computed tomography of a brain tumor was obtained. In 1979, the year Cormack and Hounsfield received the Nobel Prize for their contribution to medicine, more than a thousand hospitals had adopted the new technology. Several generations of computed tomography scanners were later developed, using more refined detectors, faster rotations, and more complex movement around the body. In parallel, starting in the mid1960s, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) prototypes were developed, initially for radiotherapy and angiography. The first CBCT was built in 1982 at the Mayo clinic. Yet, computers and detectors were not powerful enough to bring CBCT to practical use. It is only within the last fifteen years that CBCT machines could be built at affordable costs and reasonable sizes. Head and neck applications were an obvious choice. Although the technology allows for outstanding image quality and ease of use, we should not confuse information with education, data with knowledge. Doctors treat disease with the ultimate purpose to provide a good quality of life to patients. To do so, an in-depth knowledge of diagnosis and treatment methods is necessary. This textbook aims at providing detailed understanding of CBCT technology and its impact on oral and maxillofacial medicine. To achieve the goal of presenting a comprehensive text, world renowned engineers and clinicians from industry, academic, and private practice backgrounds came together to offer the reader a broad spectrum of information. The clinician will want to jump in and utilize images for diagnostic and treatment purposes. However, a basic understanding of CBCT properties is essential to better interpret the outcome. Trying to comprehend electronics and formulas is daunting to most of us, but Dr. Jacobson manages, in the first chapter, to present the anatomy of the machine in an attractive and elegant way. Dr. Jacobson is the magician behind the scene who has been concerned for many years with image quality, radiation, and speed. In his chapter, he opens the hood and makes us marvel at the ingeniousness and creativity necessary to build a small CBCT scanner. xii Preface The next three chapters are written by oral and maxillofacial radiologists, as well as head and neck radiologists. These two groups of specialists possess immense expertise in head and neck diseases and should be called upon whenever any pathology might be present. In the second chapter, Doctors Mallya and White address the major issue of radiobiology risks. Their chapter allows us to  make sound and confident judgment, so that  X-ray emitting CBCT is only used when the  clinical benefits largely outweigh the risk. Dr. Brooks, a pioneer and mentor to us all, reviews major relevant pathologies and reminds us that findings can often be incidental. Drs. Miracle and Christian’s unique chapter is a first: it introduces the use of CBCT for pathologies usually studied on medical CTs. The next chapters address clinical applications. Dr. Cevidanes and her team, who have pioneered the study of orthognathic surgeries’ long-term stability using three-dimensional imaging, review the state of scientific knowledge in orthodontics. Next, Dr. Shepers and his colleagues share with us the most advanced surgical techniques they have invented while taking advantage of imaging. We introduce the use of CBCT for everyday implantology to make way to Drs. Mandelaris and Rosenfeld, who present the most advanced use of CAD/CAM surgical guidance for implantology, a field they have led since its inception. Dr. Hatcher, an early adopter and leader in dental radiology, is the expert in three-dimensional airway measurement, which he shares for the first time in a comprehensive chapter. Dr. Levine was first to measure the impact of CBCT in endodontics, which he demonstrates in  his unique chapter. Finally, Dr. Vandenberghe shows us the way to use CBCT in periodontics, a new field with promising research he has in great part produced. At the turn of the century, some of us were asked by a small start-up company to estimate the number of CBCT in dental offices in years to come. Our insight was critical to the business plan, and we anticipated the company could expect to sell about fifteen units per year in the United States. Looking back, it is difficult to comprehend how we could have been so wrong! Immersed in existing options, we were unable to imagine how our practices could be quickly transformed. We should also recall that, at the time, many other electronics now woven to our personal lives were to be invented. So today, we wonder what comes next. This book is a detailed testimony of our knowledge and a window to the near future. This time, we should attempt to use our imagination. We are clearly at the beginning of an era where technological advances assist patient care. The thought leaders who wrote this book are showing us the road to our future. xiii Acknowledgments I would like to express my gratitude to the many people who have helped bring this book together, and to those who have developed the outstanding core technology around which it revolves. The topic of this text embodies interdisciplinary interaction at its best: clinical need, science, and engineering were intertwined for an outstanding outcome. Behind each of these disciplines are dedicated individuals and personal stories which I was blessed to often share. I hope to be forgiven by those who are not cited here. I am thankful to the editors at Wiley Blackwell, who had the foresight many years ago to seek and  support this project. In particular, Mr. Rick Blanchette envisioned this book and encouraged me to dive into its conception. To Melissa Wahl, Nancy Turner, and their team, I am grateful for their relentless “behind the scenes” editorial work. I am forever indebted to the co-authors of the book. They are leaders of their respective fields, busy treating patients, discovering new solutions, or lecturing throughout the word. Yet, a short meeting, a phone call, or a letter was enough to have them on board with writing a chapter. They spent countless hours refining their text, sacrificing precious moments with their families in order to share their passion. As always, the work was much greater than initially anticipated, yet it was completed to the finest detail and greatest quality. At the University of Michigan, I received the unconditional support of several experienced colleagues. In particular, Professors William Giannobile, Laurie McCauley, and Russel Taichman were immensely generous of their time, expertise, and friendship while I struggled as a young faculty member. Many engineers spend nights and weekends building, programming, and refining cone beam machines. To them all, we must be thankful. I am particularly grateful to my friend Pedja Sukovic, former CEO at Xoran Technologies in Ann Arbor, Michigan. We first met when he was a PhD student and I was a young faculty. He came to the dental school as a patient, and casually asked if a threedimensional radiograph of the head would be of  interest to us. At the time, his mentor Neal Clinthorne and he had built a bench prototype in a basement laboratory. It was only a matter of time before it became one of the most sought-after machines in the world. This work would simply have been unimaginable without the support of my family. I owe my grandmother Tosca Yulzari my graduate studies. She saw the beginning of this book but will not see its completion. My father, long gone, taught me the meaning of being a doctor. My best mentor and friend is my wife Sylvie, who has supported me unconditionally during almost two decades. Finally, I thank my children Lea, Myriam, and little Nathanyel, for giving me such joy and purpose. David Sarment, DDS, MS Cone Beam Computed Tomography Oral and Maxillofacial Diagnosis and Applications Cone Beam Computed Tomography: Oral and Maxillofacial Diagnosis and Applications, First Edition. Edited by David Sarment. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2014 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 3 Technology and Principles of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Matthew W. Jacobson 1 This chapter aims to convey a basic technical familiarity with compact Cone Beam Computed tomography (CBCT) systems, which have become prevalent since the late 1990s as enablers of in-office CT imaging of the head and neck. The technical level of the chapter is designed to be accessible to current or candidate end users of this technology and is organized as follows. In Section 1, a high-level overview of these systems is given, with a discussion of their basic hardware components and their emergence as an alternative to conventional, hospital CT. Section 2 gives a treatment of imaging basics, including various aspects of how a CT image is derived, manipulated, and evaluated for quality. Section 1: Overview of compact cone beam CT systems Computed tomography (CT) is an imaging technique in which the internal structure of a subject is deduced from the way X-rays penetrate the subject from different source positions. In the most general terms, a CT system consists of a gantry which moves an X-ray source to different positions around the subject and fires an X-ray beam of some shape through the subject, toward an array of detector cells. The detector cells measure the amount of X-ray radiation penetrating the subject along different lines of response emanating from the source. This process is called the acquisition of the X-ray measurements. Once the X-ray measurements are  acquired, they are transferred to a computer where they are processed to obtain a CT image volume. This process is called image reconstruction. Once image reconstruction has been performed, the computer components of the system make the CT image volume available for display in some sort of image viewing software. The topics of image reconstruction and display will be discussed at greater length in Section 2. Cone beam computed tomography refers to CT systems in which the beam projected by the X-ray source is in the shape of the cone wide enough to radiate either all or a significant part of the volume of interest. The shape of the beam is controlled by the use of collimators, which block X-rays from being emitted into undesired regions of the scanner field of view. Figure 1.1 depicts a CBCT system of a compact variety suitable for use in small clinics. In the particular system shown in the figure, the gantry rotates in a circular path about the subject firing a beam of X-rays that illuminates the entire desired field of view. This results in a series of 4 Cone Beam Computed Tomography two-dimensional (2D) images of the X-ray shadow of the object that is recorded by a 2D array of detector cells. Cone beam CT systems with this particular scan geometry will be the focus of this book, but it is important to realize that in the broader medical imaging industry, CT devices can vary considerably both in the shape of the X-ray beam and the trajectory of the source. Prior to the introduction of CBCT, it was common for CT systems to use so-called fan beam scan geometries in which collimators are used to focus the X-ray beam into a flat fan shape. In a fan beam geometry, the source must travel not only circularly around the subject but also axially along the subject’s length in order to cover the entire volume of interest. A helical (spiral) source trajectory is the most traditional method used to accomplish this and is common to most hospital CT scanners. The idea of fan beam geometries is that, as the source moves along the length of the subject, the X-ray fan beam is used to scan one cross-sectional slice of the subject at a time, each of which can be reconstructed individually. There are several advantages to fan beam geometries over cone beam geometries. First, since only one cross-section is being acquired at  a  time, only a 1-dimensional detector array is required, which lowers the size and cost of the detector. Second, because a fan beam only irradiates a small region of the object at a given time, the occurrence of scattered X-rays is reduced. In cone beam systems, conversely, there is a much larger component of scattered radiation, which has a corrupting effect on the scan (see “Common Image Artifacts” section). Finally, in a fan beam geometry, patient movement occurring during the scan will only degrade image quality in the small region of Cone of X-rays X-ray source Rotating gantry DentoCAT Amorphous silicon (aSi:H) detector array with rejection grid Computer running PWLS and DE PWLS reconstruction code and image display software Figure 1.1 The proposed design of DentoCAT. The patient is seated comfortably in chair (the chin-rest is not shown). DentoCAT features cone beam geometry, aSi:H detector array, PWLS and DE PWLS reconstruction methods. Technology and Principles of Cone Beam Computed Tomography 5 the subject being scanned when motion occurs. Conversely, in cone beam systems, where larger regions of anatomy are irradiated at a given time, patient movement can have a much more pervasive effect on image quality. The disadvantage of fan beam geometries, however, is their inefficient use of X-ray output. Because collimators screen away X-ray output from the source except in the narrow fan region of the beam, much of the X-rays generated by the source go unused. Accordingly, the source must generate more X-ray output than a cone beam geometry for the same region scanned, leading to problems with source heating. Regulating the temperature of the  source in such systems requires fast rotating source components, accompanied by a considerable increase in mechanical size, complexity, and expense. As the desire for greater volume coverage has grown in the CT industry, the difficulties with source heating have been found to outweigh the advantages of fan beam scanning, and the CT industry has been gradually moving to cone beam scan geometries. Cone beam geometries have other advantages as well, which have further motivated this shift. The spatial resolution produced by cone beam CT scanners, when used in conjunction with flat panel X-ray detectors, tends to be more uniform than fan beam–based systems. Although the CT industry as a whole has been trending toward cone beam scanning, the hardware simplifications brought on by CBCT have played a particularly important role in the advent of compact in-office CT systems, of the kind shown in Figure 1.1. Conventional hospital CT scanners are bulky and expensive devices, not practical for inoffice use. The reason for their large size is in part due to source cooling issues already mentioned and in part due to the fact that hospital CT systems need to be all-purpose, accommodating a comprehensive range of CT imaging tasks. To accommodate cardiac imaging, for example, hospital CT systems must be capable of very fast gantry rotation (on the order of one revolution per second) to deal with the movement of the heart. This has further exacerbated the mechanical power requirements, and hence the size and expense of the system. The evolution of compact CT came in part from recognizing how cone beam scanning and other system customizations can mitigate these issues. As discussed, the use of a cone beam scanning geometry increases the efficiency of X-ray use, leading to smaller and cheaper X-ray sources that are easier to cool. Additionally, the imaging needs of dentomaxillofacial and otolaryngological medical offices have generally been restricted to high-contrast differentiation between bone and other tissues in nonmotion prone head and neck anatomy. CT systems customized for such settings can therefore operate both at lower X-ray exposure levels and at slower scanning speeds (on the order of 20–40sec) than hospital systems. Not only does this further mitigate cooling needs of the X-ray source, it also leads to cheaper and smaller gantry control components. The emergence of compact CBCT was also facilitated in part by recent progress in fast computer processor technology and in X-ray detector technology. The mathematical operations needed to reconstruct a CT image are computationally intensive and formerly achievable at clinically acceptable speeds only through expensive, special purpose electronics.  With the advent of widely available fast computer processors, especially the massively parallel programming now possible with common video game cards, the necessary computer hardware is cheaply available to CT manufacturers and hence also to small medical facilities. Improvements in X-ray detector technology include the advent of flat panel X-ray detectors. Early work on compact CT systems (circa 2000) proposed using X-ray detectors based on image intensifier technology, then common to fluoroscopy and conventional radiography. However, flat panels have provided an alternative that is both cheaply available and also offers X-ray detection with less distortion, larger detector areas, and better dynamic range. The development of compact CBCT for the clinic has made CT imaging widely and quickly accessible. Where once patients may have had to wait weeks for a scan referred out to the hospital, they may now be scanned and treated in the same office visit. The prompt availability of CT has also been cited as a benefit to the learning process of physicians, allowing them to more quickly correlate CT information with observed symptoms. Some controversy has sprung up around this technology, with questions including how best to regulate X-ray dose to patients. The financial compensation that physicians receive when prescribing a CT scan is argued to be a counterincentive to minimizing 6 Cone Beam Computed Tomography patient X-ray dose. In spite of the controversy, CBCT has found its way into thousands of clinics over the last decade and is well on its way to becoming standard of care. Section 2: Imaging basics for compact cone beam CT systems This section describes the image processing software components of compact CBCT systems that go into action once X-ray measurements have been acquired. Tasks performed by these components include the derivation of a CT image volume from the X-ray measurements (called image reconstruction) and the subsequent display, manipulation, and analysis of this volume. In the subsections to follow, these topics will be covered in a largely qualitative manner suited to practitioners, with a minimum of mathematical detail. Overview of image processing and display The volume image data obtained from a CT system is a 3D map of the attenuation of the CT subject at  different spatial locations. Attenuation, often denoted μ, is a physical quantity measuring the tendency of the anatomy at a particular location to obstruct the flight of X-ray photons. Because attenuation is proportional to tissue density, a 3D map of attenuation can be used to observe spatial variation in the tissue type of the subject anatomy (e.g., soft tissue versus bone). The attenuation applied to an X-ray photon at a certain location also depends on the photon energy. Ideally, when the X-ray source emits photons of a single energy level only, this energy dependence is of minor consequence. In practice, however, an X-ray source will emit photons of a spectrum of different energies, a fact that introduces complications to be discussed later. Once the X-ray measurements have been acquired, the first processing step performed is to choose an imaging field of view (FOV), a region in space where the CT subject is to be imaged. For circularly orbiting cone beam CT systems, this region will typically be a cylindrical region of points in space that are all visible to the X-ray camera throughout its rotation and that cover the desired anatomy. A process of image reconstruction is then performed in which the X-ray measurements are used to evaluate the attenuation at various sample locations within the FOV. The sample locations typically are part of a 3D rectangular lattice, or reconstruction grid, enclosing the FOV cylinder (see Figure 1.2). The sample locations are thought of as lying at the Field of view (FOV) Figure 1.2 The concept of a reconstruction grid and field of view. Technology and Principles of Cone Beam Computed Tomography 7 center of small box-shaped cells, called voxels. For image analysis and display purposes, the attenuation of the subject is approximated as being uniform over the region covered by a voxel. Thus, when the reconstruction software assigns an attenuation value to a grid sample location, it is in effect assigning it to the entire box-shaped region occupied by the voxel centered at that location. The following section will delve into image reconstruction in more detail. For now, we simply note that the selection of an FOV and reconstruction grid brings a number of design trade-offs into play, and must be optimized to the medical task at hand. The selected FOV must first of all be large enough to cover the anatomy to be viewed. In addition, certain medical tasks will require the voxel sizes (equivalently, the spacing between sample points), to be chosen sufficiently small, to achieve a needed resolution. On the other hand, enlarging the FOV and/or increasing the sampling fineness will, in turn, increase the number of voxels in the FOV that need reconstructing. For example, simply halving the voxel size in all three dimensions while keeping the FOV size fixed translates into an eight-fold increase in the number of FOV voxels. This leads in turn to increased computational burden during reconstruction and slows reconstruction speed. Moreover, when sampling fineness in 3D space is increased, the sampling fineness of the X-ray measurements must typically be increased proportionately in order to reconstruct accurate values. This leads to similar increases in computational strain. Finally, as the FOV size is increased, there is a corresponding increase both in radiation dose to the patient, and also the presence of scattered radiation, which leads to a degrading effect on the CT image (see “Common Image Artifacts” section). Attenuation is measured in absolute units of inverse length (mm–1 or cm–1). However, for purposes of analysis and display, it is standard throughout the CT industry to re-express reconstructed image intensities in CT numbers, a normalized quantity which measures reconstructed attenuation relative to the reconstructed attenuation of water: µ µ µ − = × water water CT No. 1000 The value of mwater is obtained in a system calibration step by reconstructing a calibration phantom consisting of water-equivalent material. CT numbers are measured in Hounsfield units (HU). In this scale, water always has a CT number of zero, while  for air (with mair=0), the CT number is –1000.  Expressing image intensity in HU instead of  physical attenuation units provides a more sensitive scale for measuring fine attenuation differences. Additionally, it can help to cross-compare scans of the same object from different CT devices or using different X-ray source characteristics. The effect of the different system characteristics on the  contrast between tissue types is more easily observed in the normalized Hounsfield scale, in which waterlike soft tissue is always anchored at a value near zero HU. Once the reconstructed 3D volume is converted to Hounsfield units, it is made available for display in the system’s image viewing software. Typically, an image viewer will offer a number of standard capabilities, among them a multiplanar rendering (MPR) feature that allows coronal, sagittal, or axial slices of the reconstructed object to be displayed (see Figure  1.3). The slices can be displayed as reconstructed, or one can set a range of neighboring slices to be averaged together. This averaging can reduce noise and improve visibility of anatomy at some expense in resolution. Other typical display functions include the ability to rotate the volume so that MPR cross-sections at arbitrary angles can be displayed, a tool to measure physical distances between points in the image, and a tool for plotting profiles of the voxel values across one-dimensional cross-sections. CT display systems will also provide a drawing tool allowing regions of interest (ROIs) to be designated in the display. The drawing tool will typically show the mean and standard deviation of the voxel values as well as the number of voxels within the ROI to be computed. For CT systems in the U.S. market, this feature is in fact federally required under 21 CFR 1020. Figure 1.4 illustrates a circular ROI drawn in a commercial CT viewer, with the relevant ROI statistics displayed. One function of this tool is to verify certain performance specifications that the CT manufacturer is federally required to provide in the system data sheets and user manual. These metrics will be discussed in greater detail in the “Imaging Performance” section. 8 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Another important display capability is the ability to adjust the viewing contrast in the image. Because there are a limited number of different brightness levels that can be assigned to a voxel for  display purposes, the viewing software will divide the available brightness levels among the CT numbers in a user-selected range, or window. Image voxels whose CT numbers fall between the Axial Coronal Sagittal Figure 1.3 Multiplanar rendering of a CT subject. Mean 24.90 stdev 53.02 660.52 mm2 Figure 1.4 Illustration of a region of interest drawing tool in the display of a reconstructed CT phantom. Technology and Principles of Cone Beam Computed Tomography 9 minimum and maximum values set by the window are assigned a proportionate brightness level. If a voxel value falls below the minimum CT number in this range, it will be given zero brightness, whereas if it lies above the maximum CT number, it will be assigned the maximum brightness. It is common to express a window setting in terms of a level (L), meaning the CT number at the center of the range, and a window width (W), meaning the difference between the maximum and minimum CT number in the range. For example, a window ranging between 400 HU and 500 HU would be specified as L=450 HU and W=100 HU. Narrowing the display window about a particular intensity level allows for better contrast between subtly different image intensities within the window. Figure  1.5 shows an axial slice of a computer-generated head phantom as displayed in both a wide, high-contrast window (Figure 1.5A) and a narrow, low-contrast window (Figure 1.5B). Clearly, the narrower window offers better visibility of the pattern of low-contrast discs in the interior of the slice. At the time of this writing, however, low-contrast viewing windows are more commonly employed by users of compact CBCT systems. This is because certain limitations of the cone beam geometry and of current flat panel technology, to be elaborated upon later, render image quality poor when viewed in high-contrast windows. The industry has therefore been limited to head and neck imaging where often only the coarse differentiation between bone and soft tissue are needed. For these applications,  lowcontrast viewing windows, such as in Figure 1.5B, tend to be sufficient. The terms soft tissue window and bone window are commonly used to distinguish between display range settings appropriate, respectively, to soft tissue differentiation and coarse bone/soft tissue differentiation tasks. Soft tissue windows will use window levels of 30–50 HU and window widths of one to several hundred HU. The bone window will use window levels of 50–500 HU and window widths of anywhere from several hundred to over a thousand Hounsfields. Figure 1.5 Axial slice of computer-generated phantom in (A) a high-contrast viewing window (L/W = 50/1200 HU), and (B) a low-contrast window (L/W = 30/90 HU). (A) (B) 10 Cone Beam Computed Tomography The images in Figure  1.3 and Figure  1.5A are displayed at L/W=50/1200 HU, a  setting representative of the bone window. Figure  1.5B is displayed at L/W=30/90 HU, a setting at the narrower end of different possible soft tissue windows. Image reconstruction Image reconstruction is the process by which attenuation values for each voxel in the CT image are calculated from the X-ray measurements. This process tends to be the most computationally intensive software task performed by a CBCT system. There are tens of millions of voxels in a typical reconstruction grid and each computed voxel value derives information from X-ray measurements taken typically at hundreds of different gantry positions. A complete image reconstruction task may hence require, at minimum, tens of billions of  arithmetic and memory transfer operations. CT  manufacturers therefore invest considerable development effort in making reconstructions achievable within compute times acceptable in a clinical environment. Because of the computational hurdles associated with image reconstruction, commercial systems have historically resorted to filtered back projection algorithms. These are among the simplest reconstruction approaches computationally but have certain limitations in the image quality they can produce. As computer processor power has increased over time, however, and especially with the recent proliferation of cheaply available parallel computing technology, the CT industry has begun to embrace more powerful, if more computationally demanding, iterative reconstruction algorithms. The next section will overview conventional filtered back projection reconstruction, which is still the most prevalent approach. The section titled “Iterative Reconstruction” will then give a short introduction to emerging iterative reconstruction methods and some rudimentary demonstrations. Conventional filtered back projection To understand conventional image reconstruction, one must first consider a particular line of X-ray photon flight, one that emanates from the X-ray focal spot (see Figure 1.6) to a particular pixel on the detector panel for some particular gantry position. One then considers sample attenuation values of the CT subject along this line, with sample locations spaced at a separation distance, d. If the samples are weighted by this separation distance and summed, then as the separation distance is taken smaller and smaller (making the sampling more and more dense), this weighted sum approaches a Detector panel X-ray source d pi (m) Figure 1.6 The concept of a geometric projection. Technology and Principles of Cone Beam Computed Tomography 11 limiting value, pi (μ), known as the geometric projection, or X-ray transform, of the attenuation map, μ,  along the i-th measured X-ray path. The  idea behind most conventional reconstruction techniques is to extract measurements of the  geometric projections from the raw physical X-ray measurements and to then apply known mathematical formulas for inverting the X-ray transform. The calculation of geometric projections from raw X-ray measurements requires the knowledge of certain physical properties of the source-detector X-ray camera assembly. For example, it is necessary to know the sensitivity of each detector pixel to X-rays fired in air, with no object present in the field of view. It is also necessary to know the detector offset values, which are nonzero signals measured by the detector even when no X-rays are being fired from the source. The offset signals originate from stray electrical currents in the photosensitive components of the detector. These properties are measured in a calibration step performed at the time of scanner installation, by averaging together many frames of an air scan and a blank scan (a scan with no X-rays fired). The air scan and blank scan response will drift over time due to temperature sensitivity of the X-ray detector and gradual X-ray damage, and therefore they must be refreshed periodically, typically by recalibrating the device at least daily. Once the geometric projections have been calculated, an inverse X-ray transform formula is applied. Commonly, such formulas reduce to a filtering step, applied view-by-view to the geometric projections, followed by a so-called back projection step in which the filtered projection values are smeared back through the FOV. Algorithms that implement the reconstruction this way are thus called filtered back projection (FBP) algorithms and are used in a range of tomographic systems, both in CT and other modalities. The fine details of both the filtering step and the back projection step are somewhat dependent on the scanning geometry, that is, on the shape of the gantry orbit and the shape of the radiation beam. Generally speaking, however, the filtering step will be an operation that sharpens anatomical edges in the X-ray projections while dampening regions of slowly varying intensity. The smearing action of back projection, meanwhile, will typically be along the measured X-ray paths connecting the X-ray source to the panel, in a sense undoing the forward projecting action of the radiation source. For circular orbiting cone beam CT systems, our primary focus here, a well-known FBP algorithm is the Feldkamp Davis Kress (FDK) algorithm (Feldkamp and Davis, 1984). We will focus on the FDK algorithm for the remainder of this section. Figure  1.7 illustrates the stages of FDK reconstruction up through filtering, including the data Figure 1.7 Illustration of the precorrection and filtering stages of the FDK algorithm for a CT subject. (A) One frame of precorrected geometric projection measurements. (B) The same frame after filtering. (A) (B) 12 Cone Beam Computed Tomography precorrection step, for one frame of a cone beam CT scan. The edge sharpening effect of the filter is  clear in Figure  1.7B. Because the sharpening operation can also undesirably amplify sharp intensity changes due to noise, the filtering operation will also employ a user-chosen cutoff parameter. Intensity changes that are “too sharp,” as determined by the cutoff, are interpreted by the filter as noise, rather than actual anatomy, and are therefore smoothed. Generally speaking, it is impossible to distinguish anatomical boundaries from noise with perfect reliability, and so applying the cutoff always leads to some sacrifice in resolution in the final image. A judgment must be made by the system design engineers as to the best tradeoff  between noise suppression and resolution preservation. Figure  1.8 shows the result of back projecting progressively larger sets of X-ray frames. In Figure 1.8A, where only a single frame is back projected, one can see how smearing the projection intensities obtained at that particular gantry position back through the FOV results in a pattern demarcating the shape of the X-ray cone beam. In Figure 1.8B, C, D, and E, as contributions of more gantry positions are added, the true form of the CT subject gradually coalesces. As mentioned earlier, image reconstruction is computationally expensive compared to other processing steps in a CT scan. For conventional filtered back projection, most of that expense tends to be concentrated in the back projection step. For the filtering step, very efficient signal processing algorithms exist so that filtering can be accomplished in a few tens of operations per X-ray measurement. Conversely, in back projection, each X-ray measurement contributes to hundreds of voxels lying along the corresponding X-ray path and therefore results in hundreds of computations per data point. Perhaps even more troublesome is  that both the voxel array and the X-ray measurement array are too large to be held in computer cache memory. When naively implemented, a back projection operation can therefore result in very  time-consuming memory-access operations. Accordingly, a great deal of research over the years has been devoted to acceleration of back projection operations. For example, a method for approximating a typical back projection with greatly reduced operations was proposed by Basu and Bresler (2001). Later, the same group proposed a method that makes memory access patterns more efficient, resulting in strong acceleration over previous methods (De Man and Basu, 2004). Figure 1.8 The back projection step of the FDK algorithm for progressively larger numbers of frames: (A) 1 frame. (B) 12 frames. (A) (B) Technology and Principles of Cone Beam Computed Tomography 13 Much of the acceleration of image reconstruction  seen over the years has also been hardwarebased.  For high-end CT systems, specialized circuit  chips  known as application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) have been used in place  of software to  implement time-consuming reconstruction operations (Wu, 1991). Since the cost of developing such specialized chips can run into millions of dollars, this route has generally been available only to large CT manufacturers. Parallel computing technology has also often been used as an approach to acceleration. Operations like back (C) (D) (E) Figure 1.8 (Continued) (C) 40 frames. (D) 100 frames. (E) 600 frames. 14 Cone Beam Computed Tomography projection often consist of tasks that are independent and can be dispatched to several processors working in parallel. For example, the contribution of each X-ray frame to the final image can be computed independently of other frames. Similarly, different collections of slices in the reconstruction grid can be reconstructed in parallel. Although parallel computing has become increasingly available to smaller manufacturers with the  emergence of multicore CPUs, it has taken a  particular significant leap forward in recent years with the advent of general purpose graphics processing units (GPGPUs). Essentially, it has been found that the massive parallel computing done by common video game graphics cards can be adapted to a variety of scientific computing problems, including FDK back projection (Vaz, McLin, et al., 2007; Zhao, Hu, et al., 2009). This advance has first of all led to a dramatic speed-up in reconstruction time. Whereas five years ago a typical head CT reconstruction took on the order of several minutes, it can now be performed in approximately 10  seconds. Additionally, the use of GPGPU has greatly cut costs of both the relevant hardware and software engineering work. In terms of hardware, the only equipment required is a video card, costs for which may be as low as a few hundred dollars, thanks to the size of the video gaming industry. The necessary software engineering work has been simplified by the emergence of GPGPU programming languages, such as CUDA and OpenCL (Kirk and Hwu, 2010). While the FDK reconstruction algorithm is the most common choice for circular-orbit cone beam CT systems, there are limitations to a circularorbiting CT scanner that appear when the FDK algorithm is applied. Specifically, it is known that a circular-orbiting cone beam camera does not offer complete enough coverage of the object to reliably reconstruct all points in the FOV (or at least not by an algorithm relying on the projection measurements alone). Conditions for a point in 3D space to be recoverable in a given scan geometry are well studied and are given, for example, in Tuy (1983). For circular-orbiting cameras, only points in the plane of the X-ray source satisfy these conditions. Because of this, the accuracy and quality of the reconstructed image gradually deteriorate with distance from the source plane. This is illustrated in  Figure  1.9, which shows sagittal views of a computer-generated head phantom and its FDK reconstruction from simulated cone beam CT measurements. Comparing Figure 1.9B to Figure 1.9A, one can clearly see an erroneous drop-off in the image intensity values with distance from the plane of the source, as well as the appearance of streaks and shading artifacts. These so-called cone beam artifacts become more pronounced where the axial cross-sections are less symmetric, for example, in the bony region of the sinuses. It is important to emphasize that artifacts such as these can arise from a number of different causes in actual CT scans, such as scatter and beam hardening (see “Common Image Artifacts”). Here, however, the simulation has not included any such corrupting effects. The artifacts we see here are therefore assuredly and entirely due to the limitations of the circular scan geometry and the FDK algorithm. In spite of this fundamental weakness in circular cone beam scans, the circular scan geometry has nevertheless been historically favored in the compact CT device industry. This is in part because it simplifies mechanical design. It is also because a range of these artifacts are obscured when the phantom is viewed in a high-contrast bone window (as illustrated in Figure 1.9C and Figure 1.9D), and bone window imaging has been an application of predominant interest for compact CT. On the other hand, this can also be seen as one reason why circular cone beam CT has had difficulty spreading in use from bone imaging to lower contrast imaging applications. In the next section, we discuss iterative reconstruction, which among other things offers possibilities for mitigating the problem of cone beam artifacts. Iterative reconstruction Although filtered back projection methods have been commercially implemented for many years, the science has continued to look for improvements using iterative reconstruction methods, both in CT  and in other kinds of tomography (Shepp and Vardi, 1982; Lange and Carson, 1984; Erdoğan and Fessler, 1999a). With iterative reconstruction, instead of obtaining a single attenuation map from an explicit reconstruction formula, a sequence of attenuation maps is generated that converges to a final desired reconstructed map. While iterative methods are more computationally Technology and Principles of Cone Beam Computed Tomography 15 demanding than filtered back projection, they provide a flexible framework for using better models of the CT system, leading to better image quality, sometimes at reduced dose levels. At this writing, iterative methods have also begun to find their way into the  commercial CT device market. Notably, the larger medical device companies have commercialized proprietary iterative methods with claims of  reducing X-ray dose by several factors without compromising image quality (Freiherr, 2010). Iterative reconstruction software is also marketed by private software vendors such as InstaRecon, Inc., sample results of which are shown subsequently. In the design of image reconstruction algorithms, there is a trade-off between the amount/accuracy of physical modeling information included in an algorithm, which affects image quality, and the computational expense of the algorithm, which affects reconstruction speed. The previous section overviewed traditional filtered back projection algorithms, which are among the simplest and fastest reconstruction methods. An explicit formula is used to obtain the reconstructed image, and only one pass over the measured X-ray data is required. However, the amount of physical modeling information used in filtered back projection is fairly limited. As an example, filtered back projection ignores statistical variation in the X-ray measurements, leading to higher noise levels in the reconstructed image (or alternatively higher radiation dose levels) than are actually necessary. FBP also  ignores the fact that realistic X-ray beams consist of a multitude of X-ray photon energies, Figure 1.9 Comparison of sagittal views of a computer-generated phantom and its FDK reconstruction in low- and high-contrast viewing window. The dashed line marks the position of the plane of the x-ray source. (A) True phantom, low-contrast window (L/W = 50/200 HU). (B) FDK reconstruction, low-contrast window (L/W = 50/200 HU). (C) True phantom, high-contrast window (L/W = 50/1200 HU). (D) FDK reconstruction, high-contrast window (L/W = 50/1200 HU). (A) (B) (C) (D) 16 Cone Beam Computed Tomography approximating the beam instead as a monoenergetic one. This leads to beam hardening artifacts, to be discussed under “Common Image Artifacts.” Finally, FBP only incorporates information available in the X-ray measurements, whereas more complicated iterative algorithms can also incorporate a priori knowledge about the characteristics of the patient anatomy. This has important implications for circular-orbit CBCT systems, because for this scanning geometry (see “Conventional Filtered Back Projection” section), the X-ray measurements alone cannot provide enough information to accurately reconstruct the object at all points in the field of view. The FDK algorithm, a variation of FBP specific to circular-orbit systems, produces cone beam artifacts, as a result. The desire to improve image quality has led many researchers over the years to propose reconstruction algorithms based on more detailed and complicated physical models of CT systems. These more complicated models lead to reconstruction equations that have no explicit solution. Instead, the solution must be obtained by iterative computation, in which a sequence of images is generated that gradually converges to the solution. Generally speaking, every iteration of an iterative reconstruction algorithm tends to have a computational cost comparable to an FBP reconstruction. This extra computation puts a significant price tag on the image quality improvements that iterative reconstruction proposes to bring, a price tag that delayed the clinical acceptability of these methods for many years. Nevertheless, the advantages of iterative reconstruction over filtered back projection are readily demonstrated. Some relevant illustrations are provided in Figure  1.10, Figure  1.11, and Figure 1.12. Figure  1.10A and Figure  1.10B show a performance comparison of a proprietary iterative algorithm developed by InstaRecon with filtered back projection for a clinical abdominal scan. This particular scan was acquired using a conventional helical CT system, and so the filtered back projection algorithm used was not cone beam FDK. The iterative algorithm achieves reduced image noise and hence more uniform images. Furthermore, since image noise generally trades off with X-ray exposure, noise-reducing iterative algorithms such as these also allow one to scan with reduced X-ray dose, while achieving the same noise levels in the reconstructed image as conventional filtered back projection. Figure  1.11A and Figure  1.11B show a similar comparison for simulated CT measurements of a phantom commonly used to measure low-contrast imaging performance. One sees how the iterative algorithm improves the detectability of low-contrast objects as compared to filtered back projection. Figure  1.12A and Figure  1.12B show iterative reconstructions of the same computer-generated CBCT phantom scan as in Figure 1.9. This reconstruction algorithm incorporates prior information about the piece-wise smooth structure of the  patient anatomy. Reconstruction algorithms Figure 1.10 Reconstructions of a clinical helical CT scan of the abdomen using (A) filtered back projection and (B) a proprietary iterative algorithm developed by InstaRecon. (A) (B) Technology and Principles of Cone Beam Computed Tomography 17 that incorporate such information (Sukovic and Clinthorne, 2000) are abundant in the medical imaging literature. The reconstruction algorithm used here was more rudimentary than InstaRecon’s algorithm. Among other things, it has not been optimized for speed and it takes many more iterations to converge. However, it was sufficient to show how adding prior smoothness information can mitigate cone beam artifacts. Figure 1.12 shows that the intensity values in the region of the sinuses are much closer to their true  value as compared to the FDK results in Figure 1.9B. This occurs because the addition of prior information about anatomical smoothness compensates for the geometric incompleteness of the circular X-ray camera orbit. Although the image quality benefits of iterative algorithms have been known for many years, it has Figure 1.11 Reconstructions of a simulated CBCT scan of a CIRS061 contrast phantom using (A) filtered back projection and (B) a proprietary iterative algorithm developed by InstaRecon. (A) (B) Figure 1.12 Sagittal views of a computer-generated phantom reconstructed using a rudimentary iterative algorithm in a low-contrast viewing window (L/W = 50/200 HU). (A) Result after 30 iterations. (B) Result after 300 iterations. (A) (B) 18 Cone Beam Computed Tomography only recently become possible to run at sufficient speed to make them clinically acceptable for CT imaging. Computing hardware improvements over the years, such as GPGPU discussed earlier, have contributed to reducing computation time per iteration. Additionally, much medical imaging research has been devoted to finding iterative reconstruction algorithms requiring as few as possible iterations to converge (Kamphuis and Beekman, 1998; Erdoğan and Fessler, 1999b; Ahn, Fessler, et al. 2006). Imaging performance This section discusses several quantitative measures of image quality that are commonly used to assess the performance of a CT device, namely noise performance, low-contrast detectability, and spatial resolution. CT manufacturers will typically report such quality measurements in the user manuals issued with their devices. Typically also, manufacturers provide customers equipment to repeat these measurements and specify in the user manual how reproducible the measurements should be. For CT manufacturers in the United States, providing this information is legally required by the Code of Federal Regulations (21 CFR 1020.33). Image noise The term measurement noise refers to random variations in CT measurements. Image noise refers to  the ensuing effect of these variations on the reconstructed image. In a CT scan, there are several sources of measurement noise that make the measurements not precisely repeatable. When X-rays are fired through a patient along a certain straight-line path, there is randomness in the number of photons that will penetrate through the object to interact with the detector. There is also randomness in the number of photons that, after penetrating the object, will successfully interact with the X-ray detector panel to produce a signal. Finally, there are also elements of random fluctuation in the detector electronics itself, independent of the object and the X-ray source. Measurement noise leads to sharp discontinuities among the measured values of neighboring detector pixels. When the X-ray measurements are put through the image reconstruction process,  the reconstructed CT volume will exhibit correspondingly sharp discontinuities among neighboring voxel values that would otherwise be uniform or gradually varying. This is the visual manifestation of image noise. A common way to measure image noise is to compute the standard deviation of some region of voxels in a phantom of some uniform material (as in Figure  1.4, for example). As mentioned in the “Overview of Image Processing and Display,” most CT image viewing software provides this capability. In manuals for a CT device, the noise standard deviation will often be reported as a fraction of the attenuation of water. CT system engineers make design choices to control noise but must take certain trade-offs into account. Measurement noise can be reduced, for example, by increasing X-ray exposure to the patient, although health concerns place obvious limits on doing so. Certain types of detector panels have better photon detection efficiency than others, giving better resistance to noise. However, such detectors are also more expensive and lead to increased system cost. Other methods of reducing noise involve configuring the X-ray detection and image reconstruction process in a certain way, although these methods entail trade-offs in image resolution. For example, most detector panels allow one to combine neighboring detector pixels to form larger pixels. This “binning” of pixels effectively averages together the signal values that would be measured by the smaller pixels separately and reduces noise. However, projection sampling fineness, and hence resolution, are also reduced as a trade-off. Similarly, the reconstruction software can be designed to include smoothing operations. As mentioned previously, filtered back projection methods include smoothing in the filtering step, while iterative reconstruction methods can enforce image smoothness using a priori anatomical information. These smoothing methods reduce noise but can also blur anatomical tissue borders as a side effect, and so resolution is again sacrificed. Reconstruction algorithms are often compared based on how favorably noise trades off with spatial resolution. Technology and Principles of Cone Beam Computed Tomography 19 Spatial resolution Spatial resolution refers to how well small or closely spaced objects are visualized in an image. Spatial resolution in a cone beam CT system is partly limited by the size of the image voxels used for reconstruction. However, resolution is further limited by various sources of system blur. As discussed in the previous section, certain sources of  blur arise as a side effect of various engineering  measures taken to reduce image noise. Other sources of blur arise from the physics of the X-ray detection process. Detector glare is an effect whereby X-ray photons striking the detector induce a scattering event that causes a signal to be detected in several neighboring pixels. This leads to a blurring of the projection views and an ensuing blur in the reconstructed image. A similar effect is detector lag, in which the signal detected in one X-ray shot fails to dissipate before the next X-ray shot is taken. This has the effect of blurring together adjacent X-ray shots. Finally, imperfect modeling of the CT system geometry in the reconstruction process can also blur the image. For example, no cone beam CT system produces a perfectly cone-shaped X-ray beam because X-rays are emitted from different points on the surface of the source, rather than from a single apex point. However, this effect is commonly ignored by the reconstruction software, at the expense of spatial resolution. In conventional helical fan beam CT systems, the amount of blur along the axis of the scanner has historically been significantly different than the blur within an axial slice. This difference has led to common practices, and in some cases regulations, for CT manufacturers to report separate measurements of axial and in-plane spatial resolution. With the advent of cone beam systems, the difference in axial versus in-plane resolution has greatly diminished, but laws designed for helical fan beam systems are so well established that they are still applied to CBCT. To measure spatial resolution axially, an object such as a wire or bead, whose cross-section along the scanner axis is narrow and pointlike, is imaged. Due to blur effects, the cross-section in the image will have a smeared, lobelike profile, such as that shown in Figure 1.12. The amount of blur is reported on a slice sensitivity profile such as the one in Figure 1.13. The width of 1.1 1 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 –0.1 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.82.6 0.8 Figure 1.13 Example of a slice sensitivity profile (SSP) illustrated with data from the xCAT-ENT, a commercial mobile cone beam CT scanner for sinus imaging. The profile is plotted on a horizontal axis in units of millimeters. 20 Cone Beam Computed Tomography this profile at half its peak value is known as the nominal tomographic section thickness. To measure in-plane spatial resolution, it is traditional to report the modulation transfer function (MTF). An MTF is a graph showing how the imaged contrast of densely clustered objects decreases, as a result of system blur, with the clustering density. As a result of blur effects, the intensity of small or narrow objects is diluted with background material in the image, thereby lowering their apparent contrast. Since objects must be of decreasing size to be clustered more densely, an accompanying decrease in contrast with density is typically observed. This is illustrated in Figure 1.14A, which shows a series of progressively denser line pair targets, with the density expressed in line pairs per centimeter (lp/cm). One can see how not only the separation between the more densely spaced line pairs diminishes as a result of blur, but also their percent  contrast with the background medium. By measuring the percent contrast of line pair phantoms, one can plot contrast versus line pair density, which is how MTF plots are often expressed. MTFs can also be obtained more indirectly by measuring an in-plane blur profile, similar to the slice sensitivity profile (Boone, 2001). The MTF plots in Figure 1.14B were obtained in such a manner. They show the MTFs for two imaging modes of a commercial ear-nose-throat scanner. The temporal bone mode has a more slowly decreasing MTF, indicative of less blur and higher spatial resolution, than the sinus mode. This is typical, due to the higher resolution needs of temporal bone imaging tasks. Low-contrast detectability Low-contrast detectability is a performance parameter of CT systems that measures its overall ability to resolve small differences in intensity between objects. To test low-contrast detectability in a CT system, phantoms such as that in Figure 1.11, containing low-contrast targets of a range of sizes, are often used. As discussed in the previous section, system blur reduces the contrast of small objects. However, there are other contrast-limiting effects in a CBCT system that can affect the visibility of large objects as well. One contrast-limiting effect in CT systems is the energy spectrum of the X-ray source. At lower average photon energies, obtained by lowering the  X-ray source voltage, attenuation differences among different materials generally increase, leading to better contrast. The engineering trade-off in lowering source energy, however, is that the ability of X-ray photons to penetrate the CT subject is reduced, leading to higher noise and photon starvation artifacts. Contrast is also limited by certain features in the electronics of the X-ray detector. When detected X-rays are converted from analog to digital signals, information about tissue contrast is somewhat degraded. This degradation can be reduced by using A/D converters which digitize signals more finely, but the trade-off in doing so is an increase in the cost of the detector panel, and hence the overall system. Common image artifacts Image artifacts are visible patterns in an image arising from systematic errors in the reconstruction process. Common kinds of artifacts include streaks and nonuniformity trends, such as in Figure 1.15A. For circular-orbiting CT systems, ring artifacts such as in Figure 1.16A are also commonly encountered. Current use of compact CT systems is often tolerant to artifacts, since bone window viewing of CT images is still very prevalent, and many artifacts are obscured in the bone window. An understanding of artifacts and their causes can still be important, however, for several reasons. First, there are exceptions where artifacts are severe enough to appear even in the bone window viewing applications. When scanning very bony anatomy, for example in dental or skull base imaging, very strong streak artifacts can be present. Artifacts can also be a sign that a CT system is in need of maintenance. Strong ring artifacts can appear when the system is in need of recalibration, for instance. Finally, as practitioners expand their use of compact CT to low-contrast soft tissue imaging applications, the influence of artifacts becomes more noticeable in the less forgiving low-contrast viewing windows. Means of suppressing artifacts will be important to extending compact CT to these applications. Causes of artifacts can be either advertent or inadvertent. Inadvertent causes include inaccuracies in the calibration of the CT system. When a CT system Technology and Principles of Cone Beam Computed Tomography 21 is first installed, and possibly periodically thereafter, certain physical properties of the system must be measured through a calibration procedure. The physical properties to be calibrated are ones that cannot be precisely controlled by the manufacturer, or that may drift over the lifetime of the machine in some uncontrollable way. In the section “Conventional Filtered Back Projection,” for example, it was discussed how certain detector pixel parameters must be calibrated periodically using air scans and blank scans. These kinds of calibrated quantities serve as input to the image Figure 1.14 Concepts of in-plane resolution measurement illustrated with data from the MiniCAT, a commercial cone beam CT scanner for sinus and temporal bone imaging. (A) Reconstructed image of a phantom containing line pair targets of different densities. lp/cm = line pairs per centimeter. (B) Modulation transfer function for the MiniCAT’s sinus and temporal bone scan protocols. 7 Ip/cm 6 Ip/cm 5 Ip/cm (A) Modulation transfer function (MTF) 100 90 80 70 60 50 Percent contrast 40 30 20 10 0 0246 Spatial frequency (Ip/cm) Sinus Temporal bone (B) 22 Cone Beam Computed Tomography reconstruction process, which uses them to model system behavior. Inaccuracies in the calibration create disagreement between the true physical X-ray measurements and the mathematical model used by the reconstruction software, resulting in  image artifacts. In circular-scanning CBCT systems, inaccuracies in pixel sensitivities and offsets are a typical cause of tree trunk–like ring artifacts, like those shown in Figure  1.16A. Miscalibration of a given pixel will introduce errors in how that pixel’s measurement is processed in every X-ray shot. The repetition of these measurement errors throughout the circular orbit  of the X-ray camera leads to circularly symmetric artifact patterns in the image, thus showing as rings. Artifacts can also result from deliberate mathematical errors and approximations made by the reconstruction algorithm to simplify computation. As an example, in the “Conventional Filtered Back Projection” section, it was discussed how cone beam artifacts are an engineering trade-off to the mechanical simplicity of a circular-orbiting CT camera, as well as to the computational simplicity of the FDK reconstruction algorithm. Similar kinds of trade-offs have historically been made in the treatment of other corrupting physical effects such as beam hardening and scatter. Beam hardening is a physical effect whereby the average energy content of an X-ray beam gradually increases as the photons in the beam pass through an object. This occurs because lower energy X-ray photons have a lower probability than higher energy photons of passing through the object unattenuated, and are progressively sifted out of the beam. Scatter is an effect whereby some X-ray photons traveling through the CT subject are deflected from a straight-line path, due to interaction with matter, and generate signal in the wrong detector pixels. When ignored by the reconstruction process, both beam hardening and scatter can contribute to coarse nonuniformity artifacts, such those as shown in Figure 1.15A. Moreover, when scanning bony, asymmetric anatomy, beam hardening and scatter can contribute to streak artifacts, also shown in the figure. Streaks result whenever certain particular X-ray shots contain much more measurement errors than at other positions of the X-ray camera. Beam hardening and scatter effects are a common cause of such errors because their effect varies strongly with the thickness and density of tissue through which the X-ray beam passes. Figure 1.15 (A) Illustration of streaks and nonuniformity artifacts in an axial slice of a low-contrast CBCT scan. (B) The same slice after a postcorrection method is applied. (A) (B) Technology and Principles of Cone Beam Computed Tomography 23 For asymmetric patient anatomy, these in turn vary strongly with the position of the X-ray camera relative to the patient. Beam hardening and scatter have historically been computationally expensive to handle in the image reconstruction process in a mathematically precise way, which means that in practice they are either ignored or corrected using computationally cheaper compromises. One of the more mathematically rigorous ways of dealing with beam hardening, for example, is to use an image reconstruction  algorithm that models the energy variation of the  beam (Elbakri and Fessler, 2002; Elbakri and Fessler, 2003). However, reconstruction algorithms with this level of modeling generally require iterative methods, and only in recent years has computing technology become fast enough to consider using such methods clinically. Similarly, scientific literature has proposed very accurate scatter modeling and correction approaches (Zbijewski and Beekman, 2006). However, achieving clinically viable computation time remains a challenge with these methods. In situations where rigorous image reconstruction is too expensive computationally, but where the resulting artifacts cannot be tolerated, commercial systems will often remove artifacts from the reconstructed image using fast postcorrection methods. These methods are often proprietary, and therefore it is hard to comment authoritatively on how they work for different CT vendors. However, a variety of postcorrection methods have been proposed in public-domain scientific literature. It is likely that at least some methods used commercially are derived from these. The degree of mathematical or physical modeling rigor on which postcorrection methods are based can vary greatly. There is therefore much ongoing debate in scientific literature over their limitations, as compared to  their more computationally expensive, mathematically rigorous alternatives. However, postcorrection methods have certainly proven effective enough to make them popular compromises. Figure 1.15B, for example, demonstrates the reduction of streak and nonuniformity artifacts using a combination of postprocessing approach (Zbijewski and Stayman, 2009; Hsieh, Molthen, et al., 2000). Figure 1.16B demonstrates the reduction of ring artifacts using a postcorrection method (Sijbers and Postnov, 2004). Figure 1.16 (A) Illustration of ring artifacts in an axial slice of a low-contrast CBCT scan. (B) The same slice after a ring correction method is applied. (A) (B) 24 Cone Beam Computed Tomography References Ahn, S., Fessler, J.A., et al. (2006). Convergent incremental optimization transfer algorithms: Application to tomography. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 25(3): 283–96. Basu, S., and Bresler, Y. (2001). Error analysis and performance optimization of fast hierarchical backprojection algorithms. IEEE Trans Im Proc 10(7): 1103–17. Boone, J.M. (2001). Determination of the presampled MTF in computed tomography. Med Phys 28(3): 356–60. De Man, B., and Basu, S. (2004). Distance-driven projection and backprojection in three dimensions. Phys Med Biol 49(11): 2463–75. Elbakri, I.A., and Fessler, J.A. (2002). Statistical image reconstruction for polyenergetic X-ray computed tomography. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 21: 89–99. Elbakri, I.A., and Fessler, J.A. (2003). Segmentation-free statistical image reconstruction for polyenergetic X-ray computed tomography with experimental validation. Phys Med Biol 48(15): 2543–78. Erdoğan, H., and Fessler, J.A. (1999a). Monotonic algorithms for transmission tomography. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 18(9): 801–14. Erdoğan, H., and Fessler, J.A. (1999b). Ordered subsets algorithms for transmission tomography. Phys Med Biol 44(11): 2835–51. Feldkamp, L.A., and Davis, L.C. (1984). Practical conebeam algorithm. J Opt Soc Amer 1: 612–19. Freiherr, G. (2010). Iterative reconstruction cuts CT dose without harming image quality. Diagnostic Imaging 32(11). Available at www.diagnosticimaging.com. Hsieh, J., Molthen, R.C., et al. (2000). An iterative approach to the beam hardening correction in cone beam CT. Med Phys 27(1): 23–9. Kamphuis, C., and Beekman, F.J. (1998). Accelerated iterative transmission CT reconstruction using an ordered subsets convex algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 17(6): 1001–5. Kirk, D.B., and Hwu, W.W. (2010). Programming Massively  Parallel Processors: A Hands-on Approach. Morgan Kaufman. Lange, K., and Carson, R. (1984). EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. J Comp Assisted Tomo 8(2): 306–16. Shepp, L.A., and Vardi, Y. (1982). Maximum likelihood reconstruction for emission tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imag 1(2): 113–22. Sijbers, J., and Postnov, A. (2004). Reduction of ring artefacts in high resolution micro-CT reconstructions. Phys Med Biol 49(14): N247-54. Sukovic, P., and Clinthorne, N.H. (2000). Penalized weighted least-squares as a metal streak artifacts removal technique in computed tomography. Proc IEEE Nuc Sci Symp Med Im Conf. Tuy, H.K. (1983). An inversion formula for cone-beam reconstruction. SIAM J Appl Math 43(3): 546–52. Vaz, M.A., McLin, M., et al. (2007). Current and next generation GPUs for accelerating CT reconstruction: Quality, performance, and tuning. Proc Intl Mtg on Fully 3D Image Recon in Rad and Nuc Med. Wu, M. A. (1991). ASIC applications in computed tomography systems. Fourth Annual IEEE International ASIC Conference and Exhibit. Zbijewski, W., and Beekman, F.J. (2006). Efficient Monte Carlo based scatter artifact reduction in cone-beam micro-CT. IEEE Trans Med Imag 25(7): 817–27. Zbijewski, W., and Stayman, J.W. (2009). Volumetric soft tissue brain imaging on xCAT: A mobile flat-panel x-ray CT system. Proc SPIE 7258, Medical Imaging 2009: Phys Med Im. Zhao, X., Hu, J.J., et al. (2009). GPU-based 3D cone-beam CT image reconstruction for large data volume. Int J Biomed Imaging 2009: 149079. Cone Beam Computed Tomography: Oral and Maxillofacial Diagnosis and Applications, First Edition. Edited by David Sarment. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2014 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 25 The Nature of Ionizing Radiation and the Risks from Maxillofacial Cone Beam Computed Tomography Sanjay M. Mallya and Stuart C. White 2 Configuration of matter Familiarity with the atomic structure is essential to understanding production of X-rays and their interaction with matter. All matter is composed of atoms. According to the classical view of the atom, as proposed by Niels Bohr, the atom is composed of a positively charged nucleus containing protons and neutrons, with negatively charged electrons that revolve around the nucleus in well-defined orbits. The contemporary view of the atom is described by the Standard Model. As with the classical view, electrons are fundamental particles. But in contrast to the classical view, protons and neutrons are not  considered fundamental units; rather, they are composed of quarks. The contemporary model of the atom also differs in its view of the relationship of electrons to the nucleus. Unlike the classical view, which postulates that electrons revolve in a two-dimensional orbit, the modern view considers that electrons are dispersed in threedimension orbitals. Each orbital has a discrete energy state. Within all atoms, the electrons occupy the lowest energy state first. The electrons are held in orbit by an electrostatic attraction to the positively charged nucleus. If an electron absorbs sufficient energy, it can overcome this electrostatic attraction and move to a higher energy state. This energy is termed binding energy, and is specific for an orbital and depends on the atomic number (Z) of the element. The higher the atomic number, the more binding energy there is. For any given atom, the binding energy of the outer orbitals is lower than that of the inner orbitals. Some radiations such as ultraviolet light have sufficient energy to remove outer electrons. Other radiations such as X- and gamma rays have enough energy to displace inner electrons. In both these situations, the loss of an electron causes an imbalance between the net charges of electrons and protons in the nucleus, and thus results in ionization. These radiations are referred to as ionizing radiations. Nature of ionizing radiation Radiation is the propagation of energy through space and matter. There are two types of radiation: particulate and electromagnetic (White and Pharoah, 2009). Particulate radiation is energy transmitted by rapidly moving particles produced primarily by disintegration of unstable atoms. The particles 26 Cone Beam Computed Tomography may be charged, for example, α- or β-particles, or may be uncharged particles such as neutrons. Electromagnetic radiation is energy transmitted as  a combination of electric and magnetic fields. According to quantum theory, electromagnetic radiation is propagated in small bundles or packets of energy called photons. Photons have only energy and no mass are often described in  terms of their energy (eV). Some aspects of electromagnetic radiation are better explained by the wave theory, which assumes that these radiations are transmitted as electric and magnetic fields that travel in a wavelike pattern. In this case the radiation is better characterized by its wavelength. Photon energy is inversely proportional to its wavelength. The term electromagnetic radiation refers to a spectrum of radiations that differ in their energies but share some similar properties (Figure 2.1). All electromagnetic radiations travel at the speed of light. The radiations within this  spectrum have a broad range of energies ranging from the low-energy (long-wavelength) radio waves to high-energy (short-wavelength) gamma rays. High-energy electromagnetic radiations have sufficient energy to interact with and cause ionization of atoms. These radiations are  called ionizing radiations and include γ, X- and ultraviolet radiations. As described below, ionizing radiations have the potential to cause damage to biological molecules, including inducing cancer. Production of X-rays X-ray tube The X-ray tube is the heart of a radiographic imaging system and is housed within the X-ray tube head along with the essential electrical components that supply its power. The X-ray tube consists of a cathode and an anode within an evacuated glass tube. The process of X-ray production starts with the generation of electrons at the cathode. The electrons are accelerated toward the anode by providing a high potential difference between the anode and the cathode. As electrons travel from the cathode to the anode, they accumulate kinetic energy. On striking the anode, this kinetic energy is converted into heat and X-rays. In cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) units, the tube head is linked to the image detector (flat panel or image intensifier) by a C-arm. Control panels on the CBCT unit allow the operator to regulate various parameters of this process and thereby control the nature of the X-ray beam produced. Understanding the impact of these controls on X-ray beam production is important. Selection of the optimal exposure factors influences diagnostic quality of the images as well as the radiation exposure to the patient. Cathode The cathode consists of a coil of metallic filament (Figure 2.2). A low-voltage current is used to heat this coil. When the temperature of the filament is Figure 2.1 The electromagnetic spectrum, showing the relationship between photon energy and wavelength. Note that as photon energy decreases, wavelength increases. The Nature of Ionizing Radiation and the Risks from Maxillofacial Cone Beam Computed Tomography 27 high enough, electrons in the outer orbitals of the tungsten atoms absorb sufficient energy to overcome their binding energy and are released from the filament. The focusing cup is negatively charged and thus electrostatically focuses the electrons to a small area of the anode. Anode The anode is composed of a tungsten target embedded into a block of copper (Figure 2.2). As the electrons strike the anode, their kinetic energy is converted into heat and X-rays. The production of X-rays is an inefficient process, with more than 99% of the electron’s kinetic energy being converted into heat. The focal spot, the area of the target struck by the electrons and from which X-rays are emitted, should be as small as possible. The smaller the focal spot size, the sharper the final images. X-ray tubes have one of two designs. Some machines use a stationary anode (Figure 2.2A) like a conventional dental X-ray machine. Others use a rotating anode (Figure  2.2B). In this design, the anode is a disc, with an angled surface that serves as the target area. As the anode rotates, successive electrons from the cathode strike sequential regions of the target, and at any given time, the area of the target producing X-rays, the focal spot, is small. However, the heat is dissipated over the larger  area of the entire disc. This design allows production of X-rays from small focal spots even at high-energy outputs, or with prolonged exposure times. CBCT  units have either stationary or rotating anodes with focal spot sizes ranging from 0.15mm to 0.7mm. X-ray production Electrons produced at the cathode are accelerated toward the anode by providing a high potential difference between the cathode and anode. As electrons strike the anode, the kinetic energy of the electrons is converted into heat and X-ray photons. This accounts for more than 99% of the energy transfer from the striking electrons to the tungsten atoms. The remainder 1% of energy is converted in X-rays, primarily by bremsstrahlung interactions. Bremsstrahlung photons As the electrons course through the tungsten atoms in the target, they may pass close to a nucleus. Due to the electrostatic forces between the positively charged nucleus and the negatively charged electron, the electron is deviated from its course and loses some energy, which is converted into an X-ray photon (Figure  2.3). These photons are called bremsstrahlung photons. Bremsstrahlung photons have a continuous spectrum of energies (Figure 2.4). The maximum energy of the bremsstrahlung photon is determined by the potential difference between the cathode and the anode. For example, an X-ray machine set to operate at 100 kVp will produce bremsstrahlung photons with a maximum energy of 100keV. Bremsstrahlung photons constitute the majority of the diagnostically useful X-ray beam. From a diagnostic and radiation safety viewpoint, it is important to decrease the numbers of low-energy photons, which increase patient dose Figure 2.2 Schematic diagram of the components of x-ray tubes with stationary anode (A) or rotating anode (B). (A) (B) 28 Cone Beam Computed Tomography and decrease image quality. Manufacturers add filters to preferentially absorb low-energy photons. Parameters of X-ray beams in CBCT units The controls of X-ray units, including CBCT ma – chines, allow the operator to optimize various aspects of  X-ray production. Altering these parameters influences both the image quality and the radiation dose to the patient. Thus, understanding these parameters is of importance to patient care. Tube voltage (kVp) Tube voltage refers to the potential difference between the cathode and the anode and is conveyed as peak voltage (kVp). As kVp is increased, there is an increase in the number of photons generated, a higher peak energy, and a higher mean energy of the X-ray beam (Figure  2.5). Increasing the kVp increases the penetrating power of the beam. Increasing kV increases the signal-to-noise ratio but also delivers a higher dose to the patient. Depending on the CBCT unit manufacturer, the kVp is fixed or adjustable. Few studies have examined the effect on kVp on optimization of image quality and patient dose. Tube current (mA) The tube current is the flow of electrons from the cathode to the anode and is expressed as milliamperes (mA). It is a reflection of the power delivered to the tungsten filament in the cathode. When the mA setting is increased, the number of electrons liberated at the cathode is increased; this translates into a higher number of X-ray photons produced (Figure 2.6). However, the mean and peak energies of the beam remain same. Figure 2.3 Bremsstrahlung photons are produced when an electron is deviated from its path due to electrostatic interaction with the nucleus. Figure 2.4 Spectrum of photons produced by an x-ray tube operating at 100 kVp. The shaded area under the curve depicts the bremsstrahlung photons. The spike at approximately 69 keV represents characteristic radiation from the tungsten atoms in the target. Figure 2.5 Increasing kVp (with constant mA and exposure time) results in more photons, with a higher mean energy and peak energy of the beam. The Nature of Ionizing Radiation and the Risks from Maxillofacial Cone Beam Computed Tomography 29 Exposure time The exposure time is the total time during which X-ray production takes place during the CBCT scan. During the CBCT scan, multiple projections of the field of interest are obtained at varying angles. In most CBCT units, the exposure is pulsed, so that X-ray production takes place only during acquisition of the basis projections. In some units, the exposure is continuous—X-rays are produced and expose the patient even when the detector is not recording images. Using a pulsed beam reduces the radiation exposure to the patient. A second variable is the scan time or exposure time. For some units, the scan time is fixed and cannot be varied by the operator. Many contemporary units allow the operator to choose from a variety of scanning modes, such as “high speed” or “high resolution” modes. With high-speed modes, the number of basis projections is reduced, thereby decreasing scan times and thus radiation exposure to the patient. In high-resolution modes, the number of basis projections is increased, and consequently scan time as well as patient radiation dose is increased. Field of view Many CBCT units allow the operator to restrict the beam size to a predetermined area or field of view. Typically, the field of view is described as small (or limited), medium, or large depending on the extent of anatomic coverage (Figure  2.7). In general, the scan collimations are as below: a. Small field of view (also referred to as limited or focused fields of view): scan height and width less than 5cm. b. Medium field of view (also referred to as dentoalveolar field of view): scan height 5–15cm. c. Large field of view (also referred to as craniofacial field of view): scan height greater than 15 cm. Collimating the beam to as small a region as possible not only reduces patient exposure, it also enhances image quality due to decreased scatter radiation. It is of utmost importance to select the optimal field of view for a particular diagnostic task. For example, when examining teeth for fractures, periapical lesions or accessory pulp canals, a limited field of view CBCT examination acquired at a high resolution is necessary. Similarly, smaller field of view scans have a better diagnostic efficacy for detection of temporomandibular joint erosions. Figure 2.6 Increasing the mA setting (with constant kVp and exposure time) results in more photons but no change in the mean and peak energies of the beam. Figure 2.7 Fields of view. Representation of the extent of anatomical coverage for small (limited), medium (dentoalveolar) and large (craniofacial) fields of view. 30 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Rotation angle Typically during a CBCT scan, the tube and detector move around the patient acquiring multiple projections during a 360-degree rotation. However, some contemporary units provide an acquisition mode where the tube and detector assembly rotate around the patient for 180 degrees, thereby reducing the patient exposure. These modes will use fewer basis projections and thus typically yield images that are lower in resolution than a full 360-degree scan. Depending on the diagnostic task, the images may be of adequate diagnostic quality. The use of 180-degree scans has implications not only in dose reduction but also in situations where patient motion may be an issue. Research comparing the diagnostic efficacies of 360- and 180-degree scans is lacking. Interaction of X-rays with matter X-ray photons that strike an object have different potential fates. Some photons pass through the object without any loss of energy. Alternatively, photons may transfer some or all of their energy to the object’s molecules. There are three mechanisms whereby diagnostic X-ray photons interact with matter—coherent scatter, Compton scatter, and photoelectric effect. Coherent scatter This type of interaction occurs predominantly with X-ray photons with energies less than approximately 10keV. As a low-energy photon courses adjacent to an atom, it loses all of its energy and causes an outer orbital electron to become excited. As the excited electron returns to its steady state, it emits an X-ray photon, with the same energy as the initial incident photon (Figure  2.8). The scattered photon is typically at an angle to the incident photon. Importantly, coherent scatter does not cause ionization of the atom. At the photon energies used in CBCT imaging, coherent scatter accounts for only a minor proportion of the photon interactions and is of little importance in diagnostic imaging. Compton scatter When an incident photon with moderate energy collides with an outer orbital electron, it transfers some of its energy to the electron, which overcomes its binding energy and is ejected from its orbital, causing ionization of the atom. The incident photon retains some of its energy and is scattered at an  angle to its initial path (Figure  2.9). Compton scatter has important implications in diagnostic radiology. First, it causes ionization of biological molecules and thus, results in radiation-induced damage. Second, the photons are scattered in all directions. Some of the scattered photons may expose adjacent tissues outside the immediate field  of radiation, causing biological damage. Scattered photons may also exit the patient and strike the image receptor, resulting in reduced image contrast. Manufacturers incorporate filters into the X-ray beam to preferentially decrease the  number of low-energy photons, thereby decreasing Compton interactions. This added filtration reduces patient dose and also improves image quality. Importantly, during Compton interactions, photons may also be scattered at an angle of 180 degrees—backscatter radiation—and could potentially expose the operator. Figure 2.8 Coherent scatter. The incident photon transfers its energy to the atoms, causing the electrons to momentarily vibrate. As the atom returns to the ground state, it emits a photon of the same energy as the incident photon. The Nature of Ionizing Radiation and the Risks from Maxillofacial Cone Beam Computed Tomography 31 Photoelectric absorption Photoelectric absorption is an important interaction and is the basis for formation of the radiographic image. In this interaction, the X-ray photon interacts with an inner-orbital electron (Figure 2.10). As the photon collides with the electron, it loses all of its energy to the electron. A part of this energy is  used to overcome the binding energy of the electron. The remainder of the energy is converted to kinetic energy of this electron—a photoelectron—that is ejected from the atom. Thus, in a photoelectric interaction, the incident photon loses all of its energy and results in ionization of the atom. Atoms with a high atomic number absorb more photons than atoms with lower atomic numbers; this is the basis for radiographic image formation. Tissues with a higher effective atomic number such as enamel, dentin, and bone absorb more photons than soft tissue and thus are  depicted on the radiographic image as radiopaque objects. Likewise, dental materials such as amalgam, gold, and titanium have high atomic numbers and are seen as radiopaque regions on a radiograph. Biological effects of ionizing radiation As X-ray photons interact with biological tissues they can cause ionization of atoms in biological tissues. Ionization of biological molecules may manifest as radiation-induced effects. The type and nature of these effects depends on the tissue type exposed as well as the dose. There are two principal types of radiation-induced effects: deterministic and stochastic. Deterministic effects Deterministic effects of radiation are caused when the radiation exposure to an organ or tissue exceeds a particular threshold level. At doses below the threshold, the effect does not occur. All individuals exposed to doses above the threshold will develop deterministic effects. Importantly, at  doses above the threshold, the severity of the effect is proportional to the dose. Deterministic effects are typically a result of radiation-induced cell killing. Examples of deterministic radiationinduced effects include cataract formation, skin burns, fibrosis, xerostomia, and mucosal ulcerations. All dentomaxillofacial radiographic examinations are designed so that we do not induce any deterministic effects. However, dentists may often encounter such effects in patients who have received radiation therapy. Figure 2.9 Compton scatter. The incident photon transfers some of its energy to an electron, resulting in ionization of the atom. Following this interaction, the photon is deviated from its path as a scattered photon. Figure 2.10 Photoelectric interaction. The incident photon transfers all of its energy to the atom, resulting in ionization. 32 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Stochastic effects Unlike deterministic effects, stochastic effects have no minimum threshold for causation. Thus, any dose of radiation has the potential to induce a stochastic effect. While the probability of causing a stochastic effect increases as the radiation dose is  increased, the severity of the effect itself is not dependent on dose. Either you get it or you don’t. Stochastic effects are caused by radiation-induced damage to DNA. The most important stochastic effect is radiation-induced cancer. The absence of a threshold implies that any amount of radiation carries with it a risk for causing cancer. Although the potential for causing this effect cannot be entirely avoided, minimizing the radiation dose can decrease the possibility of inducing this effect; this is the basis of radiation protection. Radiation-induced cancer Cancer induction is the most important stochastic effect from diagnostic radiation. It is well established that exposure to ionizing radiation results in an increase in the incidence of malignancies. These data are largely derived from studies of human populations that were exposed to ionizing radiation, either intentionally or by accident. Examples of such populations include early radiation workers, radium dial painters, uranium miners, individuals irradiated for benign diseases, patients with tuberculosis who underwent repeated chest fluoroscopy, and survivors of the atomic bombings and the radiation disaster at Chernobyl. Studies of these human populations, as well as animal studies, have provided an insight into the mechanistic basis for radiation’s cancer-inducing effect. There is strong evidence that radiation-induced carcinogenesis is a consequence of ionizing radiation–induced DNA damage. Ionizing radiation causes several types of DNA damage, including damage to individual bases, single strand breaks, double strand breaks, and DNA–protein cross-links. Misrepair of DNA damage results in mutations of the normal DNA sequence. Such mutations may occur as single base alterations, deletions or insertions of DNA segments, or chromosomal rearrangements such as translocations and inversions. When the mutations involve growth-regulating genes—activation of oncogenes or inactivation of tumor suppressor genes—they can deregulate cell growth and/or differentiation and ultimately lead to neoplastic development. Current paradigms consider that carcinogenesis is a multistep process with accumulation of mutations in multiple oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Several aspects of ionizing radiation–induced cancer can be explained in the context of these contemporary molecular genetic models. For example, in addition to ionizing radiations, spontaneously occurring DNA damage and genotoxic chemicals also cause DNA mutations. Thus, radiationinduced neoplasms do not differ fundamentally from chemical-induced or spontaneous neoplasms. Radiation-induced tumors have no clinical or histological signatures that allow us to differentiate them from sporadically occurring tumors. Second, there is a latent period between radiation exposure and the manifestation of the neoplasm. This is expected  given the multistep nature of tumorigenesis. Depending on the tumor type, this may vary from a few years to decades. It is also important to emphasize that there is a wide variation in the risk— young children are almost two to three times more sensitive to radiation-induced cancer, compared with middle-aged and older adults. Equally important is the fact that certain tissues are more sensitive to the carcinogenic effects of radiation than others. In the maxillofacial region, these highly sensitive tissues include the bone marrow (leukemia) and the thyroid glands. These age- and tissue-dependent sensitivities are significant considerations for radiation safety and protection. Radiation-induced cancer is the principal risk of diagnostic radiography. When designing radiation protection policies, it is necessary to estimate the risk from a given dose of radiation. Currently, these risk estimates are based on the linear nonthreshold (LNT) model. The LNT model assumes that cancer risk is directly proportional to radiation dose at all dose levels. The LNT is a hypothesis and has not been scientifically proven or disproven. Nevertheless, there is strong scientific justification that supports this hypothesis. As discussed above, radiation-induced cancer is a consequence of DNA damage. Even when the dose of radiation is small, the possibility of ionizing radiation–induced DNA damage and subsequent DNA mutations exists, and this supports the nonthreshold assumption of this model. Second, cell culture studies have demonstrated that as radiation The Nature of Ionizing Radiation and the Risks from Maxillofacial Cone Beam Computed Tomography 33 dose increases, the magnitude of DNA damage also  rises, and the probability of DNA mutations increases. This finding provides justification to the assumption of a linear relationship between radiation dose and risk. Most radiation protection  agencies around the world, including the International Commission on Radiation Protection and the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement, use the LNT to estimate radiation-induced risks. Nevertheless, the LNT model is not universally accepted. The opponents of this model argue that the assumptions do not take into consideration cellular adaptive responses that may be effective at lower doses. Furthermore, the LNT model does not account for age at exposure, and assumes that sensitivity to radiation-induced cancer for a particular organ is the same at all ages. Opponents of the LNT model argue that it overestimates cancer risk from diagnostic radiation. Risk from CBCT examinations The basic premise of diagnostic radiology is that the diagnostic benefits from the radiographic examination far outweigh the risks from radiation exposure. When prescribing and performing diagnostic radiological examinations, dentists should ensure that both of these principles are satisfied. To maximize diagnostic benefits, dentists must identify those clinical situations where radiographic examinations would provide additional information that is essential for diagnosis and management of the patient’s condition. To minimize risks from radiation exposure, dentists must implement appropriate dose-reduction procedures (White and Mallya, 2012). Importantly, dentists must understand the magnitude of potential risks from radiographic examinations and convey this information in a manner that can be easily comprehended by patients. Sources of radiation Background radiation All individuals are continuously exposed to radiation from various natural and man-made sources (Figure  2.11). Natural radiation sources refer to ubiquitous background radiation. The naturally occurring radionuclides, in particular radon and thoron, contribute to a large part of this background Figure 2.11 Sources of radiation exposure in the United States. The average annual exposure to individuals in the U.S. is approximately 6.2mSv. Half of this is from background sources and half from man-made sources. The relative contributions of the various sources are shown in the pie chart. Note that diagnostic imaging contributes a large proportion of the total exposure. Data derived from NCRP, 2009. 34 Cone Beam Computed Tomography radiation. Other natural sources include space radiation (cosmic rays and solar energetic particles), terrestrial radiation from radioactive elements in rocks and soil, and internal radiation from radionuclides that are ingested through food and water or inhaled through air. The average annual effective dose from background radiation exposure in the United States is approximately 3.1mSv (see “Units of Radiation” section for definition of radiation dose units). Background radiation is often used as a basis to convey the magnitude of radiation risks from diagnostic radiological examinations. For example, an examination with an effective dose of 0.31mSv would result in an exposure equivalent to 36.5 days of background exposure. Man-made radiation The major contributor to this category of radiation exposure is from diagnostic radiology and nuclear medicine. Consumer products, occupational exposure, and industrial sources account for a minor component of this category. In the United States there has been a dramatic increase in medical radiation exposure. In 1980 medical radiation exposure was only one-sixth of natural background exposure. In 2006, medical exposures equaled background radiation, increasing the total annual effective dose from all sources to 6.2mSv. This increase is mainly due to exposures from computed tomography and reflects both an increase in the numbers of examinations as well as the dose per examination. CT now accounts for 24% of the annual total effective dose from all sources. Conventional radiography and fluoroscopy account for 5% of the total dose. Dental radiography accounts for approximately 2.5% of the dose from conventional radiography. It should be emphasized, however, that these data do not include exposure from CBCT, which is being increasingly used in dentistry. Risk-estimates for CBCT examinations The principal detriment from diagnostic X-radiation is radiation-induced neoplasia; the magnitude of  this risk increases with radiation dose. Thus, knowledge of the dose delivered by a diagnostic radiographic examination is key for its risk-benefit analysis. Several studies have estimated effective doses that result from CBCT examinations (Hirsch et  al., 2008; Librizzi et  al., 2011; Lofthag-Hansen et  al., 2008; Loubele et  al., 2009; Loubele et  al., 2005;  Ludlow, 2011; Ludlow et  al., 2003; Ludlow et  al., 2006; Ludlow and Ivanovic, 2008; Okano et al., 2009; Pauwels et al., 2012; Roberts et al., 2009; Suomalainen et  al., 2009). Typically, these doses are  determined using dosimeters placed at multiple sites in a tissue-equivalent anthropomorphic phantom to measure absorbed doses at specific organ sites. The measured absorbed doses are then used to calculate the effective dose from an examination. Such studies provide an estimate of the dose that a patient is likely to receive from a specific CBCT examination. The striking point that emerges from these studies is that the effective dose, and thus radiation risk, varies significantly between CBCT units from different manufacturers (Figure 2.12 and Table 2.1). Furthermore, different protocol settings of the same unit also result in markedly different radiation doses. This is particularly important because CBCT has often been publicized as a low-dose procedure.  However, given the significant variability depending on manufacturer and selected imaging protocol,  it is important that dentists fully understand the radiation doses delivered by the specific CBCT exams that they prescribe and make. Given the wide variation in the radiation dose between manufacturers, dentists should give due consideration to this issue when purchasing a unit, or when referring a patient to an imaging facility. Equally important is the increased radiation dose with some high-resolution imaging protocols. Dentists must be familiar with the diagnostic situations that require such high-resolution protocols and appropriately consider the balance between diagnostic benefit and radiation risk. Often patients who have been prescribed a CBCT examination may inquire about the risks from these procedures. While dentists must be aware of the estimated effective doses from such examinations, it is often useful to convey these to patients, in the context of its equivalent of background exposure. Additionally, it is also useful to provide similar data for commonly used dental and medical radiographic procedures to allow the patient to place the dose to be received in proper perspective. Table 2.1 lists the effective dose from several CBCT, multislice CT, and commonly used dentomaxillofacial radiographic examinations. Figure 2.12 shows these doses grouped by the size of the field of view. The Nature of Ionizing Radiation and the Risks from Maxillofacial Cone Beam Computed Tomography 35 Methods to minimize radiation dose from CBCT exams While CBCT radiation doses are typically lower than those from multislice maxillofacial CT examinations, it should be remembered that the overarching philosophy of radiation protection is minimizing the radiation dose to the patient while maintaining the diagnostic benefit. This philosophy is embodied in  the principle and practice of ALARA—As Low As  Reasonably Achievable. This principle aims to reduce the radiation dose of exposed individuals to as low levels as practically achievable. There are several means to satisfy this principle. Selection criteria The basic premise of diagnostic radiography is that the diagnostic benefits of radiation far outweigh the risks from radiation exposure. Thus, a fundamental requirement of all diagnostic radiological exams is  that they must have the potential to provide information that is valuable for diagnosis and patient management. It must be emphasized that any radiographic examination, including CBCT, be performed after a complete history and clinical examination. Judicious use of diagnostic radiation requires that the dentist identify those clinical situations where the radiological examination is likely to provide this benefit. The term selection criteria refers to this process where a dentist, based on the patient’s historical and clinical findings, identifies those situations where radiography is needed and prescribes the appropriate radiographic examination that would provide the needed diagnostic examination. Selection criteria are an essential and often overlooked approach to minimizing patient radiation exposure. Guidelines have been established to help dentists select the appropriate radiographic examination. For example, the American Dental Association has developed guidelines that provide dentists with a framework to prescribe commonly used conventional radiographic modalities, including intraoral, panoramic, and cephalometric imaging (ADA Council on Scientific Affairs, 2001). While these ADA guidelines do not include CBCT imaging, the principles underlying these guidelines apply to prescribing CBCT examinations. These basic principles are clearly outlined in a position paper from the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology (White et  al., 2001) and in guidelines from the European Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology (Horner et  al., 2009). Recently, the American Association of Endodontists and the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology (2011) published a joint position statement to provide guidance to the use  of CBCT imaging in endodontic treatment. These guidelines emphasize justification of radiographic examinations on an individual basis. CBCT has become increasing popular in orthodontic treatment planning. White and Pae (2009) have suggested guidelines for selection of orthodontic Intraoral BW Ceph 10 1 100 FMX PAN 1000 Radiation dose (microSv) Extraoral Limited Medium Large CBCT (FOV) Figure 2.12 Effective doses from dentomaxillofacial examinations. Note that doses are plotted on the y-axis on a logarithmic scale. Data are derived from sources listed in Table 2.1. Note also the striking overlap between limited, medium, and large field of view machines. Thus, in some situations a limited field of view machine can result in a larger effective dose than a large field of view machine from a different manufacturer. 36 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Table 2.1 Effective doses from selected CBCT and dentomaxillofacial radiographic examinations. Examination Effective Dose* (microSv) Equivalent Background Radiation (days)‡ CBCT small (limited) field of view 3D Accuitomo, 4 × 4cm 13–44 2–5 Kodak 9000, 5 × 3.7cm 19–40 2–5 Pax-Uni 3D, 5 × 5cm 44 5 CBCT medium field of view 3D Accuitomo170, 10 × 5cm 54 6 CB Mercuray, 10cm diameter 279 33 CB Mercuray, 15cm diameter 548 65 iCAT next generation, 16 × 6cm 45 5 iCAT classic, 16 × 8cm 34–77 4–9 iCAT classic, 16 × 8cm, high-resolution protocol 68–149 8–18 Kodak 9500, 15 × 8cm 76–166 9–20 NewTom3G, 10cm diameter 57 7 NewTomVGi, 15cm × 15cm, high-resolution protocol 194 23 NewTomVGi, 12cm × 8cm, high-resolution protocol 265 31 Picasso Trio, 12 × 7, low dose 81 10 Picasso Trio, 12 × 7, high dose 123 14 Prexion, 8 × 8cm, low dose 189 22 Prexion, 8 × 8cm, high dose 389 46 ProMax3D, 8 × 8cm, low-dose protocol 28 3 Promax3D, 8 × 8cm, high-dose protocol 122–652 14–77 Scanora 3D, 10 × 7.5cm 45 5 Veraviewepocs 3D, 8 × 8cm 73 9 CBCT large field of view CB Mercuray, 20cm diameter 569–1073 67–126 Galileos Comfort, 15 × 15cm 70–128 8–15 iCat Next generation, 16 × 13cm 74–83 9–10 Illuma, 21 × 14cm, low-resolution protocol 98 12 Illuma, 21 × 14cm, high-resolution protocol 368–498 43–59 Kodak 9500, 20 × 18cm 93–260 11–31 NewTom 3G, 19cm diameter 30–68 4–8 NewTom VG, 23cm × 23cm 83 10 Scanora 3D, 14.5 × 13.5cm 68 8 Skyview, 17 × 17cm 87 10 (Continued) The Nature of Ionizing Radiation and the Risks from Maxillofacial Cone Beam Computed Tomography 37 patients who would likely benefit from this imaging, emphasizing its value in assessing craniofacial asymmetry, planning for orthognathic treatment, evaluation of cleft palate patients, localizing impacted and supernumerary teeth, and guiding placement of orthodontic mini-implants. However, its routine use for all orthodontic patients is controversial and has not been substantiated by scientific evidence. Operator training Users of CBCT imaging at all levels should have appropriate training in the use of this technology. This is essential both to maximize the diagnostic yield and to minimize the patient dose. The extent of training will depend on the dentist’s role in CBCT imaging. All dentists who use CBCT imaging for their patients’ care must be familiar with the advantages, applications, and limitations of this technology to ensure that patients selected for these examinations will benefit from the diagnostic information. Furthermore, these individuals must be familiar with viewing and manipulation of multiplanar CBCT images. This includes knowledge of  dentomaxillofacial radiographic anatomy and appearances of pathological lesions on CBCT examinations. To maximize diagnostic yield and patient benefit, the entire CBCT volume must be interpreted. This includes navigation through the multiplanar images outside of the region for which the examination was ordered and creating additional reconstructions as appropriate. Where necessary, dentists must consult with an oral and maxillofacial radiologist to report on the entire CBCT image volume. Dentists who operate CBCT units in their clinics must have adequate training in the principles of CBCT production. All operators of CBCT units, Examination Effective Dose* (microSv) Equivalent Background Radiation (days)‡ Multislice CT Siemens Somatom (64-slice), 12cm scan length 860 101 Siemens Somatom (64-slice), 12cm scan length, automatic exposure control protocol 534 63 Siemens Sensation (16-slice), 22.7cm scan length 1500 177 Siemens Sensation (16-slice), 22.7cm scan length, low-dose protocol 180 21 Intraoral radiographs Bitewings (PSP/F-speed, rectangular collimation) 5 0.6 (PSP/F-speed, rectangular collimation) 35 4 (PSP/F-speed, round collimation) 171 20 Panoramic (digital, CCD-based) 14–24 2–3 Lateral cephalomteric (digital, PSP-based) 6 0.7 * Doses are rounded to the nearest whole number. Dose range is based on data derived from Hirsch et al., 2008; Librizzi et al., 2011; Lofthag-Hansen et al., 2008; Loubele et al., 2009; Loubele et al., 2005; Ludlow, 2011; Ludlow et al., 2003; Ludlow et al., 2006; Ludlow and Ivanovic, 2008; Okano et al., 2009; Pauwels et al., 2012; Roberts et al., 2009; and Suomalainen et al., 2009. ‡ Calculation of background equivalent days is based on an annual exposure of 3.1 milliSv. For doses above 10 microSv, the background equivalent days are rounded to the nearest whole number. Table 2.1 (Continued) 38 Cone Beam Computed Tomography including dentists and their technical staff, must understand the influence of exposure parameters as well as any machine-specific parameters on diagnostic quality and patient dose. These operators must also receive appropriate training in quality assurance protocols and data storage and transfer. Additionally, as with any other radiographic examination, these individuals must understand the principles of radiation protection and implement the following methods to reduce patient dose. Optimizing imaging protocols Although performing a CBCT examination appears relatively simplistic, it is essential that operators of CBCT units optimize their imaging protocols to ensure that the radiation dose to the patient is kept as low as reasonably achievable while maintaining adequate diagnostic quality. There are several settings in a CBCT unit that influence both the dose and the image quality (Figure 2.13). Field of view The smallest field of view needed for the diagnostic task should be used. Typically, as the field of view increases, the volume of tissue irradiated increases and the radiation dose to the patient is higher (Table  2.1). For example, when imaging the maxilla, collimating the beam to the maxillary region alone will reduce radiation exposure to the thyroid gland and mandibular bone marrow and thus significantly decrease effective dose. In addition to the higher dose, a larger field of view results in more scattered radiation that compromises image quality. To this end, it is important to recognize that a single CBCT unit may not be sufficient to provide field of view sizes that encompass all diagnostic tasks, and this should be a consideration when dentists refer patients for CBCT examinations. Librizzi et  al. (2011) showed that diagnostic efficacy to detect temporomandibular joint erosions was significantly impacted by the field of view, with a higher diagnostic accuracy with smaller field of view size. Thus, using a large field of view examination to examine the temporomandibular joints for osteoarthritic changes will not only deliver a higher dose to the patient, it will also result in a lower diagnostic benefit. It should also be emphasized that required diagnostic quality is dependent on the diagnostic task. To this end, clinicians who prescribe CBCT examinations must be familiar with the field of view and select the smallest that will provide an adequate view for each diagnostic task. Exposure factors The exposure settings should be optimized for the diagnostic task as well as considering individual patient size and anatomic site to be imaged. This is Figure 2.13 Imaging protocol parameters. Control panel from the Accuitomo 170 demonstrating the various parameters to be selected for an imaging examination. These include the exposure factors (kVp and mA), the field of view, the rotational arc, and the scan mode. These parameters must be adjusted to optimize diagnostic quality and minimize radiation dose. The Nature of Ionizing Radiation and the Risks from Maxillofacial Cone Beam Computed Tomography 39 necessary to get diagnostic quality images and reduce retakes. Typically, this is accomplished by reducing the mA to decrease the number of photons and thus radiation dose. Such optimization is particularly important when imaging a child, due to higher radiosensitivity of the bone marrow and thyroid gland. One manufacturer, NewTom (Imageworks Corporation), uses a patented “safebeam” technology. In this technology, the amount of radiation received by the image sensor provides feedback to  automatically adjust the exposure parameters, thereby customizing exposure for every patient. Such automated adjustments provide an excellent approach to minimizing radiation exposure to patients. Scan modes Some contemporary CBCT units allow the operator to select from a variety of scan modes. For example, some units provide the option of a “high resolution” scan mode. These high-resolution modes acquire images at a smaller voxel size. In order to increase the signal-to-noise ratio, these scan modes use an increased mA or more basis projections, both of which increase patient dose (Table  2.1). Prior to using this scan mode, the need for the high resolution for the particular diagnostic task must be evaluated. If the lower resolution mode provides adequate diagnostic information, then the added radiation dose subjects the patient to additional risk while not providing any additional benefit. For example, evaluation of dental and periapical structures and root fractures requires higher resolution, whereas evaluation of craniofacial asymmetry can be satisfactorily accomplished at lower resolutions. For some units, these higher resolution scan modes also increase exposure time, and the clinician must take into consideration the possibility of patient motion, which could degrade image quality and render the examination diagnostically inadequate. Some manufacturers offer the option of a fast scan mode, where the number of basis projections is reduced, thereby decreasing scan time and lowering radiation dose. Such modes generally yield images with a resolution lower than the standard scan mode. However, depending on the diagnostic task, this image quality may be sufficient. Operators of CBCT units must be familiar with these features of their units and must be adequately trained to select the appropriate scan mode depending on the diagnostic task and the individual patient’s circumstances. Angle of rotation Some CBCT units allow the operator to select an  exposure mode where the rotation arc is 180 degrees instead of 360 degrees. In this mode, the number of basis projections taken for image reconstruction is lower; thus, radiation dose to the patient is lower. Given the decreased number of basis projections, the resolution of the image is lower than when obtained with a full 360-degree rotation. This scan mode will reduce patient dose. However, the adequacy of the diagnostic information with this acquisition mode has not been well studied. Protective thyroid collars and protective aprons The use of thyroid shields during maxillofacial CBCT reduces the absorbed dose to the thyroid gland and thus the patient effective dose. However, it is important to ensure that the thyroid collar is not in the path of the primary beam—this would lead to significant artifacts that may compromise the diagnostic quality of the image. When all other procedures are followed, it may not be necessary to use lead aprons during the CBCT exam. However, some states in the United States require the use of lead (or lead-equivalent) aprons for all dentomaxillofacial radiographic examinations. Units of radiation Exposure This unit of radiation conveys the dose of radiation in air. The traditional unit of exposure is Roentgen. In the SI system, exposure is conveyed as coulombs/kg. From a practical viewpoint, this unit is used to measure the amount of radiation that exits from the X-ray tube head, either at or at various distances from the tube head. These measurements are used to calculate the need for protective shielding. This unit is also used to measure leakage of radiation from the tube head or denote the amount of radiation at the skin surface. 40 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Absorbed dose As described above, x-radiation interacts with and transfers energy to the patient’s tissues. The unit of absorbed dose is a measure of how much energy is transferred to (absorbed by) the exposed tissues. In radiation protection, absorbed doses to the exposed tissues are measured as a first step in estimation of the overall dose from radiographic examinations. In the SI system, absorbed dose is measured in gray. One gray represents 1 joule of energy absorbed per kilogram of tissue. The tradition unit of absorbed dose is rad. Equivalent dose The type of radiation influences the magnitude of biological damage from the same absorbed radiation dose. The unit of equivalent dose considers the type of radiation that resulted in energy transfer. It is a product of the absorbed dose and the radiationweighting factor, WR, and is mathematically summarized as: H W •D T RT = ∑ where HT is the equivalent dose, WR is the radiationweighting factor, and DT is the absorbed dose. For X-rays, the weighting factor is one; thus, absorbed dose is numerically equal to the equivalent dose. Equivalent dose is measured in Sieverts (Sv). The traditional unit of equivalent dose is the rem. Effective dose Different tissues have different sensitivities to radiation-induced stochastic effects. Thus, the total detriment per unit of equivalent dose varies depending on the tissue types exposed. The unit of effective dose accounts for this differential sensitivity. Depending on their sensitivity to radiation-induced stochastic effects, tissues have been assigned a weighting factor. This factor represents the relative contribution of injury to that organ or tissue to total risk of stochastic radiation effect. In the maxillofacial region, tissues with increased risk of stochastic effects include the thyroid gland, active bone marrow, salivary glands, brain, and bone surface. Similar to equivalent dose, the units of effective dose are Sieverts (Sv) or rems. Effective dose is mathematically denoted as: E W •H = ∑ T T where E is effective dose, WT is the tissue-weighting factor, and HT is the equivalent dose. It is important to understand the concept of effective dose. This is the unit that is used to convey the net detriment from a radiographic examination, and it is used to compare radiation risks between different modalities, specific imaging protocols, and radiographic examinations that expose different regions of the body. For example, the risk of a maxillofacial CBCT examination with an effective dose of 100 μSv is ten times higher than the risk from a panoramic radiographic examination with an effective dose of 10 μSv. References ADA Council on Scientific Affairs. (2001). An update on radiographic practices: Information and recommendations. Journal of the American Dental Association, 132(2): 234–8. American Association of Endodontists and American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. (2011). Use of cone-beam computed tomography in endodontics: Joint Position Statement of the American Association of Endodontists and the American Academy of Oral  and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics, 111(2): 234–7. Hirsch, E., Wolf, U., Heinicke, F., et al. (2008). Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 37(5): 268–73. Horner, K., Islam, M., Flygare, L., et  al. (2009). Basic principles for use of dental cone beam computed tomography: Consensus guidelines of the European Academy of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 38(4): 187–95. Librizzi, Z.T., Tadinada, A.S., Valiyaparambil, J.V., et al. (2011). Cone-beam computed tomography to detect erosions of the temporomandibular joint: Effect of field of view and voxel size on diagnostic efficacy and The Nature of Ionizing Radiation and the Risks from Maxillofacial Cone Beam Computed Tomography 41 effective dose. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 140(1): e25–30. Lofthag-Hansen, S., Thilander-Klang, A., Ekestubbe, A., et al. (2008). Calculating effective dose on a cone beam computed tomography device: 3D Accuitomo and 3D Accuitomo FPD. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 37(2): 72–9. Loubele, M., Bogaerts, R., Van Dijck, E., et  al. (2009). Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. European Journal of Radiology, 71(3): 461–8. Loubele, M., Jacobs, R., Maes, F., et  al. (2005). Radiation dose vs. image quality for low-dose CT protocols of the  head for maxillofacial surgery and oral implant planning. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 117(1–3): 211–6. Ludlow, J.B. (2011). A manufacturer’s role in reducing the dose of cone beam computed tomography examinations: Effect of beam filtration. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 40(2): 115–22. Ludlow, J.B., and Ivanovic, M. (2008). Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics, 106(1): 106–14. Ludlow, J.B., Davies-Ludlow, L.E., Brooks, S.L. (2003). Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 32(4): 229–34. Ludlow, J.B., Davies-Ludlow, L.E., Brooks, S.L., et  al. (2006). Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 35(4): 219–26. NCRP. (2009). NCRP Report Number 160, Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States. Available at http://www.ncrponline.org/PDFs/ 2012/DAS_DDM2_Athens_4-2012.pdf. Okano, T., Harata, Y., Sugihara, Y., et al. (2009). Absorbed and effective doses from cone beam volumetric imaging for implant planning. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 38(2): 79–85. Pauwels, R., Beinsberger, J., Collaert, B., et  al. (2012). Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. European Journal of Radiology, 81(2): 267–71. Roberts, J.A., Drage, N.A., Davies, J., et  al. (2009). Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in  dentistry. British Journal of Radiology, 82(973): 35–40. Suomalainen, A., Kiljunen, T., Kaser, Y., et  al. (2009). Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 38(6): 367–78. White, S.C., and Mallya, S.M. (2012). Update on the biological effects of ionizing radiation, relative dose factors and radiation hygiene. Australian Dental Journal, 57(Suppl 1): 2–8. White, S.C., and Pae, E.-K. (2009). Patient image selection criteria for cone beam computed tomography imaging. Seminars in Orthodontics, 15(1): 19–28. White, S.C., and Pharoah, M.J. (2009). Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation, 6th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby/Elsevier. White, S.C., Heslop, E.W., Hollender, L.G., et al. (2001). Parameters of radiologic care: An official report of the  American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, Endodontics, 91(5): 498–511. Cone Beam Computed Tomography: Oral and Maxillofacial Diagnosis and Applications, First Edition. Edited by David Sarment. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2014 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 43 Diagnosis of Jaw Pathologies Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Sharon L. Brooks 3 Clinicians who decide to use cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for their patients assume the responsibility for the interpretation of the entire volume encompassed in the scan, not just the area that might be the reason for the scan. This means that, in addition to using the scan data to plan implant or orthodontic or temporomandibular joint (TMJ) treatment, the clinician must review all the data to rule out pathologic changes anywhere in the region covered by the scan. Clinicians may elect to do this themselves or have an oral and maxillofacial radiologist or medical radiologist review the scan. However, the person who made the scan—the treating clinician—is ultimately responsible for the complete interpretation of the scan. This responsibility can present some challenges to the clinician: the scan volume is large and covers structures not typically visualized on standard dental images, such as intraoral and panoramic views; and significant pathologic lesions in the jaws are relatively uncommon and the dentist may not see lesions in the jaws or surrounding structures with enough frequency to feel comfortable diagnosing such conditions. The best technique for interpreting CBCT scans is to develop a systematic approach to all scans, assuring that all the data are reviewed, before concentrating on the specific area of interest on the scan. For example, if a scan is made to evaluate the edentulous ridge for implant planning, the clinician is not going to forget to make bone measurements if he waits to do so until he has reviewed the rest of the scan. However, it would be easy to forget to read the entire scan if the implant site is evaluated first, because the dentist could get caught up in the excitement of planning treatment for the patient. In addition to having a standardized way of viewing the CBCT scan, in order to evaluate the scan well the clinician must have a thorough knowledge of anatomy as revealed on the scan. Anatomy of the jaws is well known to all dentists, and the jaw structures seen on CBCT and standard dental images are similar in appearance. However, since the CBCT generally covers a larger field of view, the dentist must review (or relearn) many other structures, including the paranasal sinuses, neck, temporal bone outside the TMJ, skull base, orbits, and many other areas. Limiting the scan field of view to the area of interest reduces the amount of scan volume that must be reviewed. If an  abnormality is detected on a CBCT scan, the clinician must make some important decisions. Is the abnormality pathologic or a variation of normal anatomy that is of no clinical significance? If it is considered pathologic, what is it? Does it require further evaluation? Referral to an oral and maxillofacial 44 Cone Beam Computed Tomography radiologist or oral and maxillofacial pathologist? Referral to an oral and maxillofacial surgeon for biopsy? Does it need treatment or simply “observation”? If the latter, what is meant by that? Do nothing at all? Reimage later? If so, how often? The rest of this chapter will help the clinician develop a protocol for reviewing CBCT images and for evaluating lesions detected. An illustrated review of common pathologic lesions in and around the jaws will then be presented. Not all possible lesions can be discussed in the limited space available in this chapter. For that reason, clinicians are strongly encouraged to consult other reference books, such as comprehensive oral pathology and oral radiology texts. Suggested texts are listed at the end of the chapter. Protocol for reviewing the CBCT volume There is no single best way to review the entire CBCT volume. However, no matter what protocol the clinician uses, it should be the same for every scan and should permit a thorough evaluation of all the anatomy in all planes. Standard image viewing software allows the clinician to view the data in  multiple ways: multiplanar reconstruction (MPR)—the standard axial, coronal, and sagittal planes that can be scrolled through; reconstructed panoramic view; crosssections perpendicular to the dental arch; specific views of  some structures such as the TMJ; and three-dimensional (3D) volumetric renderings (Figure  3.1A, Figure  3.1B, Figure  3.1C, and Figure 3.1D). Some software also permits implant planning and orthodontic analysis, among other functions. The clinician needs to become very familiar with the features available in the software package being used, although all of the packages have many of the same features. The following protocol is one that the author, an oral and maxillofacial radiologist, finds useful in reviewing CBCT scans for pathology. It is not the only protocol available, but it does cover all Figure 3.1A Viewing protocol: axial plane. Figure 3.1B Viewing protocol: reconstructed panoramic view. (C) Figure 3.1C Viewing protocol: cross-sections, maxillary arch. (D) Figure 3.1D Viewing protocol: 3D volume rendering. Diagnosis of Jaw Pathologies Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 45 the  basics. It does not cover implant planning or orthodontic analysis, because these tasks are reserved for the treating clinician. When the scan volume is first opened, typically the software presents the MPR view: separate panels for the three separate planes, axial (horizontal/occlusal), coronal (frontal), and sagittal (lateral). These planes can be scrolled through (and will be later in this protocol). At this time it is helpful to rotate the scan if necessary to make the mid-sagittal plane vertical and the occlusal plane horizontal. Sometimes the patient’s head is  not completely straight in the scanner, and straightening the images makes them easier to view and to  compare anatomy from one side to the other. At this point the author likes to view the images in the 3D reconstruction mode because it gives a quick overview of the patient’s anatomy and conditions in the jaws: how many teeth are present and major abnormalities visible in the jaws or surrounding areas. The 3D rendering is not used for complete evaluation of the scan because it can be misleading, depending on the protocol used for segmenting the image before viewing, but it can be helpful to get an overall picture of the patient. A panoramic reconstruction is a useful next step in reviewing the scan because it presents the information in the jaws in a format that is familiar to most dentists and shows relationships between the teeth and adjacent areas. Because the image is a relatively narrow slice through a curved section of anatomy, structures outside that curved plane will not be visible in this view. The most important part of reviewing the scan is the evaluation of the MPR images. Again, there are different approaches available, but the author prefers to start with the axial view, scrolling from the most inferior slice to the most superior, looking at  the anatomy, identifying structures, comparing right with left, and so forth. If an abnormality is noted in the jaws or adjacent structures, the images in the other planes can be scrolled to reveal that structure in all three planes at once, in an effort to determine the nature of the structure, anatomic or pathologic (Figure  3.2). Once the axial slices are reviewed, a similar process is done with the coronal view (anterior to posterior) and sagittal view (one side to the other). Due to the oblique angle of the mandibular condyles with the mid-sagittal plane, the standard MPR images are not ideal for evaluating the TMJs, and a separate TMJ view is used for this. Finally, cross-sections to the dental arch are viewed to evaluate the teeth and alveolar bone. These views are also helpful in evaluating the relationship of impacted teeth to other teeth and the inferior alveolar canal, the relationship of jawbone pathology to teeth, and bone quantity and quality for implant planning. Evaluating pathologic lesions Once an abnormality is detected on a CBCT scan, the next step is to determine the nature of the finding. First is the decision about whether the finding is an actual pathologic lesion or a variant of  normal anatomy. Comparison of one side to the  other can  be helpful in this distinction, but knowledge of normal anatomy and common variations is essential. Not all abnormalities detected are serious and require treatment, but some may have a great impact on the patient’s health and well-being. Thus, the clinician has to determine the nature and importance of the condition detected. While a basic knowledge of pathology is necessary to make this determination, there are some imaging features than can be helpful to the clinician in deciding what to do about the lesion, including when to refer. Lesions detected on the scan should be evaluated for the following features: location, periphery and shape, internal structure, and effects of the lesion on adjacent structures. With respect to location, is the lesion in the jaws at all or in other bony structures or in soft tissues around the jaws? If it is in the jaws, is it within the tooth-bearing area, thus suggesting an odontogenic origin to the lesion, or outside this area? Is there a single lesion or multiple, similar lesions? Is the lesion localized or generalized? Is it causing jaw expansion? With respect to the periphery of the lesion, is the border well defined or ill defined (Figure 3.3A and Figure 3.3B)? If it is well defined, is it punched out (no bony reaction), corticated (thin radiopaque line of bony reaction around lesion), or sclerotic (thicker, 46 Cone Beam Computed Tomography nonuniform area of dense bone around lesion)? If  the lesion is radiopaque, is there a soft-tissue capsule (radiolucent line or “halo”) around the lesion (Figure 3.4A and Figure 3.4B)? If the border is ill defined, does the lesion blend gradually with normal bone or does it permeate (“eat away”) at the margin of normal bone? With respect to the internal structure of the lesion, is it totally radiolucent, totally radiopaque, or mixed radiolucent-radiopaque? If the latter, Figure 3.3A Low attenuation (radiolucent) mandibular lesion with well-defined margin, cross-sectional view. Figure 3.3B Mixed radiolucent-radiopaque maxillary lesion with ill-defined margin, axial view. Figure 3.2 Adjusting all planes of multiplanar reconstruction to show the area of interest at the same time can help in diagnosing the condition, such as this resorbing supernumerary tooth in the anterior maxilla. Diagnosis of Jaw Pathologies Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 47 what is the relationship between the dense and less dense parts of the lesion? With respect to the effect of the lesion on adjacent structures, is it displacing teeth? Causing any changes to the periodontal ligament space (PDL) or lamina dura? Widening or displacing the inferior alveolar nerve canal? Altering the floor of the maxillary antrum (Figure  3.5)? Affecting the cortical bone or causing periosteal reactions? Pathologic lesions of the jaws After the pertinent features of the lesion have been evaluated, the clinician next needs to make some decisions. Is the lesion developmental or acquired? If acquired, is it most likely a cyst, benign neoplasm, malignant neoplasm, inflammatory lesion, bone dysplasia, vascular abnormality, metabolic disease, or result of trauma? Classifying a lesion is helpful in Figure 3.4A and B High attenuation (radiopaque) lesion with (A) well-defined margin but with no radiolucent rim (no “halo”), sagittal view, and (B) well-defined margin, with a radiolucent rim (“halo”) separating the lesion from the adjacent normal bone, sagittal view. (A) (B) Figure 3.5 Well-defined periapical inflammatory lesion at the apex of the mesio-buccal root of tooth #3, elevating the floor of the maxillary sinus. 48 Cone Beam Computed Tomography deciding the next step: further evaluation, possibly including biopsy; treatment; or observation. The rest of this chapter will be devoted to a review of common lesions that can be found in the jaws, with some lesions in adjacent areas also covered. Most oral pathology and oral radiology texts discuss lesions by major classification, such as cyst or inflammatory condition. Because it is not always easy to determine the classification of a lesion initially, the approach taken in this section of the chapter will be that of guiding the clinician through the thought process of determining the lesion classification—and ultimately in some cases the final diagnosis—by dividing lesions into three major categories: radiopaque lesions, slow-growing radiolucent lesions, and rapidly growing radiolucent lesions. Radiopaque lesions A lesion that appears radiopaque on a radiograph is made of a material that absorbs a large proportion of the X-rays hitting it, thus allowing a relatively few to pass through and interact with the X-ray detector.  With respect to CT imaging, these lesions are also described as high attenuation or high density. In  lesions occurring in the jawbones, radiopaque masses are composed of one (or a combination) of the following materials: enamel, dentin, cementum, bone, ectopic calcification, or foreign material. In standard dental imaging, such as panoramic radiographs, soft tissue may also have a radiopaque appearance if it is replacing air, such as a mucous retention pseudocyst in the maxillary sinus. The same lesion in a CBCT has a density of soft tissue, readily distinguishable from both air and bone. There are a few general statements about radiopaque lesions that may be helpful in diagnosing something detected on a radiograph. If a lesion contains enamel or dentin, it is some type of tooth tissue: residual root tip, unerupted tooth, supernumerary tooth, or odontoma. Radiopaque objects are not always located where they seem to be in a single plane because their image can be projected. Therefore, it is necessary to localize the lesion in all planes at the same time to determine where the lesion actually is located. One of the most critical features to observe in radiopaque lesions in the bone is the border: Is there a radiolucent rim or halo around the lesion? If the answer is yes, the lesion is most likely either a tooth or toothlike lesion or a fibro-osseous lesion, both of which have either a developing follicle or a fibrous capsule. If the answer is no, then the lesion is most likely dense bone or foreign material. Radiopaque lesions in general are benign and many of them do not require treatment after identification. Although sarcomas such as osteosarcoma and chondrosarcoma do produce bone or cartilage, their overall appearance is very different from most radiopaque lesions, having many of the features of a typical malignancy. Lesions of tooth tissue If a lesion appears to contain tooth tissue (much denser than bone), the diagnostic choices include tooth fragment, unerupted tooth, supernumerary tooth, odontoma, or cementoblastoma. The shape of the mass and presence of residual PDL and lamina dura or dental follicle generally make identification of teeth or tooth remnants relatively easy. An odontoma is a benign tumor (or some consider it a hamartoma) composed of tooth tissue (enamel, dentin, cementum, and pulp) in various degrees of morphodifferentiation (Figure  3.6). Compound odontomas contain multiple denticles that can be recognized as small toothlike structures, while the tooth tissues in complex odontomas are all mixed together and do not look like teeth. All odontomas, compound or complex, have a well-defined radiolucent halo and a thin radiopaque (corticated) border, representing a dental follicle. These tumors begin developing at the time of normal tooth development and generally cease growing when tooth development finishes. They are always in the tooth-bearing areas of the jaws and may displace teeth or block them from erupting. Treatment generally is enucleation. Compound odontomas have a unique appearance that is generally readily identifiable. Complex odontomas must be differentiated from sclerotic bone masses and fibro-osseous lesions. Sclerotic bone masses, discussed more later, do not have a capsule around them and are unlikely to displace or impact teeth. Fibro-osseous lesions, also described later, do have a capsule, but it is frequently larger and less distinct than that of Diagnosis of Jaw Pathologies Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 49 odontomas and the density of the radiopaque core is generally lower than that of the odontoma. A cementoblastoma is a benign tumor that produces cementum, occurring usually attached to the root of a mandibular premolar or first molar. It frequently causes root resorption of the affected root and appears to be growing out of the root. It also has a radiolucent capsule and radiopaque border. Pain is a common feature of this tumor, whereas it is not in odontomas. Treatment is extraction of the affected tooth and enucleation of the lesion. Lesions of bone tissue Inflammation can lead to bone resorption or bone production or a combination of the two. When inflammation in the dental pulp extends into the surrounding bone, a radiolucent lesion is frequently observed: apical periodontitis, dental granuloma, or  radicular cyst. Chronic inflammation can also induce bone formation, leading to a radiopaque bony mass or a thickened radiopaque rim around a radiolucent lesion at the apex of a tooth. This is frequently called sclerosing or condensing osteitis. The border of the mass is generally ill defined and it blends gradually into the adjacent normal bone. There is no radiolucent capsule (Figure  3.7A). Usually the PDL of the affected tooth is widened and pulp vitality testing is negative. Treatment is focused on removing the source of inflammation by endodontic therapy or tooth extraction. Somewhat similar in appearance is the dense bone island, also called enostosis or idiopathic osteosclerosis. This is generally a well-defined mass of dense bone within the jaws (or other bones of the body) with no radiolucent capsule (Figure 3.7B). It can occur anywhere in the jaws, not just in the tooth-bearing Figure 3.6 Compound-complex odontoma displacing the maxillary left third molar, cross-sectional views. In some sections the lesion resembles teeth, in others the radiopaque mass is more amorphous. There is a radiolucent rim around the radiopaque material, representing the dental follicle. 50 Cone Beam Computed Tomography area, and is considered to be the internal correlate to exostoses or tori. It is benign and requires no treatment. Usually it is quite stable, although growth of the mass has been reported in some cases. Exostoses, as the name implies, are bony hyperostotic projections from the jawbones. The most common exostoses are mandibular and palatal tori, but they can also occur on the buccal or palatal alveolar ridge and under pontics of fixed prostheses. Diagnosis is not usually in doubt, but the multiplanar images in CBCT may be useful in localizing them. Fibro-osseous lesions Fibro-osseous lesion is a general term used for a condition in which normal bone is replaced first by fibrous tissue and later by bony or cementum-like tissue. The radiographic appearance of such lesions depends on the specific lesion and its stage of development. The appearance can range from totally radiolucent, in the fibrous stage, to a mixed radiolucent-radiopaque middle stage, to an almost completely radiopaque mature stage. The lesions designated by the term cemento-osseous dysplasia (or  simply cemental dysplasia or osseous dysplasia) have a fibrous capsule, producing a radiolucent rim around the lesion, surrounded by a sclerotic border. Periapical cemento-osseous dysplasia (PCOD) affects multiple teeth, usually mandibular anterior teeth, and is seen most frequently in women, average age about 40 years, more commonly in African Americans or Asians than in Whites. Single lesions may be designated as focal cemento-osseous dysplasia but are otherwise similar to PCOD. The PCOD lesions start out as radiolucent lesions at the apices of teeth. Differentiation from inflammatory lesions is done with vitality testing, because teeth affected by PCOD remain vital. Over time, calcified material is deposited within the fibrous lesion, sometimes replacing almost all of the radiolucent part of the lesion, although the radiolucent capsule is usually still visible. The PDL of the teeth is still visible, although the lamina dura may not be distinguishable. The lesions are asymptomatic and may be found on routine radiographic examination. The imaging features are distinct enough that biopsy is not necessary. In fact, surgical manipulation is discouraged because the lesions can become secondarily infected. No treatment is needed for these lesions. Similar to PCOD is florid osseous dysplasia (FOD), except the lesions affect multiple quadrants simultaneously and the lesions may grow larger than the typical PCOD lesions (Figure  3.8A and Figure  3.8B). The demographics of this condition are similar to PCOD. Sometimes the lesions are associated with simple bone cysts, giving them a large radiolucent outline. Similar to PCOD, treatment is typically periodic observation only, since these lesions also can become infected if surgery is done. The major differential diagnosis for FOD is Paget’s disease of bone, which is a metabolic condition of abnormal osteoclast activity, not considered to be a fibro-osseous lesion. This condition affects the maxilla more often than the mandible (A) Figure 3.7A Multiple periapical and periodontal inflammatory lesions, reconstructed panoramic view. Peripheral to the radiolucent lesions the bone is very dense, so-called condensing or sclerosing osteitis, with the margins of the altered bone blending into the adjacent unaffected bone. Figure 3.7B Well-defined radiopaque mass inferior to but not associated with a mandibular canine. This dense bone island (enostosis, idiopathic osteosclerosis) appears to arise from the lingual cortical plate. Diagnosis of Jaw Pathologies Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 51 and other bones more often than the jaws. Lesions are not isolated and tend to spread throughout the jaw. The bone pattern may vary, depending on the stage of the disease, from slightly radiolucent, to mixed density, to multiple radiopaque masses without radiolucent capsules. The term ground glass is frequently used to describe the irregular bone trabecular pattern of Paget’s disease. Central ossifying fibroma (or cementifying fibroma) is considered to be a true benign tumor, rather than a bone dysplasia. It may have a similar appearance to a focal cemento-osseous dysplasia, but it tends to be much more aggressive, causing significant bony enlargement. Unlike PCOD or FOD, it is a solitary lesion. Fibrous dysplasia is a fibro-osseous lesion that has an imaging appearance and natural history very different from the other fibro-osseous lesions. It generally appears at a young age and stabilizes at the time of completion of normal bone growth. It  most commonly affects one bone (monostotic) but may involve multiple bones (polyostotic), the latter frequently as part of other syndromes. The  affected bone starts out radiolucent (fibrous tissue replaces bone), then becomes more radiopaque over time as abnormal bone replaces the fibrous tissue, frequently having a ground glass appearance, although it can also have a mixed radiolucent-radiopaque appearance. Unlike PCOD or FOD, the margins of fibrous dysplasia are generally ill defined, blending in with adjacent normal bone (Figure  3.9A and Figure  3.9B). Fibrous dysplasia can cause significant bone enlargement, fill the antrum in maxillary lesions, and displace the inferior alveolar canal in mandibular lesions. Surgery has been reported to stimulate growth of active lesions. Treatment may include surgical recontouring after the lesion has stabilized and growth has ceased. Other radiopaque lesions Calcification of structures outside the jawbones can  be seen on CBCT images. The most common ones are calcified carotid atheromas, tonsilloliths, and sialoliths, although calcified lymph nodes are occasionally observed. Atherosclerosis can lead to the development of plaques within various blood vessels, leading to narrowing of the vessel and occasional embolus formation if parts of the plaque break off. Carotid artery calcifications (CAC) or carotid atheromas occur at the bifurcation of the common carotid artery, which is located in the lateral aspect of the neck at approximately the C3-C4 vertebral junction, an area that is frequently covered in CBCT scans. The CAC may be irregular in shape or show a curved outline suggestive of a vessel wall (Figure 3.10). There is some disagreement about the significance of such calcified atheromas since the  calcified plaques tend to be more stable than the noncalcified ones. However, they can be viewed as an indication of generalized cardiovascular disease and referral to a physician for further evaluation is prudent. Figure 3.8A and B Florid osseous dysplasia: reconstructed panoramic view (A) and cross-sections through left mandible (B). There are multiple irregular radiopaque lesions throughout the mandible, not associated with any teeth. The radiolucent rim (capsule) is visible around the lesion. (A) (B) 52 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Calcified normal anatomic structures in the same area of the neck can sometimes be confused with CAC, particularly triticeous cartilages (small, oval well-defined calcifications in the thyro-hyoid ligament), superior horn of the thyroid cartilage, and various parts of the hyoid bone. Small punctate calcifications located in the pharyngeal wall typically suggest the diagnosis of tonsillolith. They are located more superior and more medial than CAC and are frequently multiple. Epithelial and bacterial debris in the crypts of the palatine tonsils can become calcified, leading to  the formation of tonsilloliths. Large ones can occasionally be visualized clinically. No treatment is needed, although they have occasionally been implicated in the etiology of halitosis. Submandibular sialoliths can also occasionally be detected on CBCT scan, located medial and slightly inferior to the mandible, depending on the exact location of the stone. Frequently sialoliths produce symptoms of submandibular swelling and pain. They may be palpable clinically. A variety of foreign materials can also be observed on CBCT scan, both inside the jaws (typically amalgam fragments and fixation devices such as screws and plates) and in the soft tissues. History of trauma or surgery, particularly cosmetic surgery, may be helpful in differentiating these materials. Other uncommon radiopaque (or partially radiopaque) lesions that can be seen in the jaws include osteomyelitis (discussed further below), osteopetrosis, osteosarcoma (discussed further below), and bone-producing metastasis. Consultation of a textbook of oral pathology is recommended for more information on all of the conditions discussed above. Figure 3.10 Curvilinear radiopaque lines in right neck, at level of C3-C4 vertebral junction, axial view. The appearance and location are correct for a calcified carotid atheroma. Figure 3.9A and B Fibrous dysplasia: reconstructed panoramic view (A) and coronal view (B). There is a non-uniform radiopaque expansion of right posterior maxilla. In addition, there is periodontitis and dental caries visible, unrelated to the fibrous dysplasia. (A) (B) Diagnosis of Jaw Pathologies Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 53 Radiolucent lesions The majority of the lesions occurring in the jawbone are radiolucent in appearance, with normal bone replaced by fluid (cysts) or various soft tissues (tumors, inflammatory cells). Concavities in the surface of the bone can also produce a radiolucent appearance, although the multiplanar imaging of CBCT can distinguish a lesion that is inside the bone from one that is simply indenting it. While air-filled cavities can be distinguished from fluid- or soft tissue-filled cavities on CBCT, the latter two cannot be separated by CBCT. Conventional CT (medical) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can differentiate various types of soft tissues and may be preferable imaging techniques when soft tissue information is important in the diagnosis or treatment planning of a jaw lesion. Most of the radiolucent lesions seen in the jaws occur at the apex of teeth as a result of pulpal inflammation and are very familiar to dentists. These lesions can range from a simple widening of the apical periodontal ligament space as the earliest manifestation of the inflammatory process to a  definite periapical radiolucent lesion, with well-defined or ill-defined margins, depending on the acuteness or chronicity of the inflammation. History and clinical findings, including vitality testing, along with the imaging appearance, can usually make diagnosis relatively straightforward. Symptoms can precede radiographic changes, however, making diagnosis more difficult in those cases. Radiolucent lesions occurring away from the apices of teeth are less common and may cause confusion in diagnosis for multiple reasons. Because dentists are not likely to see some of these lesions outside of a textbook, when they do occur it is difficult to identify them. In addition, multiple types of lesions can have similar radiographic appearances, such as cysts and benign tumors. Since some of these lesions may have a significant impact on the patient’s life or quality of life, it is important to be able to distinguish which ones are serious and require immediate attention and which ones are less serious and may not even need treatment at all. To aid in making this determination, radiolucent lesions will be discussed under two broad categories, slow growing and rapidly growing, with emphasis on the radiographic features that distinguish these categories. Examples of the most frequent lesions will also be presented. Slow-growing radiolucent lesions Lesions that are relatively slow growing demonstrate some features on radiographs that help to differentiate them from more rapidly growing (and generally more serious) lesions, including borders and effects on adjacent structures. The borders of slow-growing lesions tend to be distinct and smooth, rather than indistinct and/or irregular, due to the growth pattern of the lesion. These lesions (developmental anomalies, cysts, benign tumors) tend to start with a central nidus and expand outwardly evenly in all directions, although the shape may be constrained by the anatomy of the region. Benign lesions can get very large, but they are more likely to cause expansion of the bone rather than erosion of the cortical plates and eventual perforation of the bone, as is seen in malignant lesions. This is because the bone has time to remodel around the growing lesion rather than be destroyed by it. Likewise, a slowly growing lesion can cause tooth displacement, similar to orthodontic movement, if it is located in a tooth-bearing area. Teeth can be displaced in rapidly growing malignant lesions also, but that is because the tumor has destroyed the bone holding the teeth and the teeth may seem to float. Root resorption by itself is not a good clue to the nature of the lesion in the bone because both benign and malignant lesions can cause resorption. The shape and borders of the lesion are much better predictors of the nature of the lesion than the effect on the roots of the teeth. Slow-growing lesions generally fall into three categories: developmental, cysts, and benign tumors. Developmental anomalies typically include anatomic variants that may be larger than normal or in  a slightly different location than expected. Occasionally foramina, such as the incisive or nasopalatine foramen, may be larger than usual and must be differentiated from a cyst occurring in that location, usually on the basis of size. The maxillary sinus may also present with various outpouchings or extensions into the alveolar ridge or maxillary 54 Cone Beam Computed Tomography tuberosity, simulating disease until they are viewed carefully in all planes. Two examples of a “displaced” anatomic variant is the concha bullosa (ethmoid air cells located within the middle concha of the nose) and the so-called zygomatic air cell defect, in which air cells, similar to those found in the mastoid process, are seen anterior to the TMJ in the articular eminence and the entire zygomatic process of the temporal bone. Neither of these conditions is of clinical significance unless surgery is needed in the area. The lingual salivary gland depression (Stafne bone defect, static bone cavity) is a developmental anomaly that may be seen occasionally on dental panoramic or CBCT scans (Figure  3.11A and Figure  3.11B). It occurs usually in the posterior mandible, inferior to the mandibular canal and anterior to the gonial angle, and presents as a well-defined and corticated depression or indentation on the lingual surface of the bone. It may or may not involve the base of the mandible, depending on its exact location. It is commonly filled with salivary gland tissue from the submandibular gland but may also contain fat. Other variants of the depression occur in the mandibular premolar region, associated with the sublingual glands, and the buccal surface of the ramus, associated with the parotid gland. The appearance of the condition in the multiple planes of CBCT as a cortical-lined depression on the lingual of the mandible is usually sufficient for diagnosis. No treatment is indicated. Another developmental anomaly that must be differentiated from pathology is the focal osteoporotic bone marrow. In this situation, one or more radiolucent areas, surrounded by normal trabecular bone, are located within the medullary portion of the jawbone, causing no effect on adjacent teeth or bone. These enlarged bone marrow spaces usually occur in women and are most typically found in the mandibular premolar-molar region, but they may also be seen in the maxillary tuberosity, mandibular retromolar area, edentulous sites, and in the furcation area of molars. They contain normal hematopoietic or fatty marrow and are not considered pathologic, although their exact etiology is not known. If there is doubt about the nature of the condition, follow-up radiographs can be useful to show lack of change over time. The second major type of lesion falling into the slow-growing category is the cyst. A true cyst is a  fluid-filled sac lined by epithelium. It can be developmental in nature, such as a nasopalatine duct cyst that develops within the nasopalatine duct, or inflammatory, such as a radicular cyst forming at the apex of a nonvital tooth. Odontogenic cysts arise superior to the mandibular canal, unlike the lingual salivary gland depression discussed above. Figure 3.11A and B Lingual salivary gland depression (Stafne bone defect), right mandible. A well-defined depression on the lingual aspect of the mandible is observed on the sagittal (A) and axial (B) views. (A) (B) Diagnosis of Jaw Pathologies Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 55 Cysts tend to be round or oval, depending on anatomic constraints, due to the hydrostatic pressure of the fluid within the cyst causing expansion equally in all directions. The border of the lesion is smooth and corticated, although it is possible for a cyst to become infected and lose its smooth margin at that location. Cysts may grow large and cause displacement or resorption of teeth and expansion of the jaw, sometimes thinning the buccal or lingual cortex without perforating it. Cysts are usually totally radiolucent, although dystrophic calcification can occur in older cysts. The radicular cyst is the most common cyst in the jaws. Differentiating it from a periapical granuloma may not always be possible (or necessary), although radicular cysts tend to be larger than ~ 1–2 cm. They occur more commonly in the maxilla than the mandible and are centered on the apex (or lateral canal) of a nonvital tooth. The appearance of these lesions on CBCT is similar to their appearance on standard dental radiographs, although the third dimension can frequently be helpful in establishing their exact relationship to adjacent teeth and other structures. In the posterior maxilla, a radicular cyst associated with a maxillary molar can elevate the floor of the maxillary sinus and occasionally can cause a large soft tissue invagination into the sinus that must be  distinguished from other causes of sinus disease,  such as polyps and mucous retention pseudocysts. If a cyst is incompletely removed, the remaining epithelium may result in the formation of a residual cyst. History and previous radiographs will be useful in differentiating a residual cyst from other solitary lesions in the jaw. The dentigerous (follicular) cyst, the second most common cyst in the jaw, occurs around the crown of an unerupted tooth, as a result of fluid accumulating between layers of the reduced enamel epithelium or between the epithelium and the crown of the tooth. It is a well-defined radiolucent lesion that arises from the cemento-enamel junction area of the unerupted tooth (Figure 3.12). Displacement of the affected tooth is a common finding and the cyst may cause appreciable jaw expansion. Other true cysts in the jaws include the lateral periodontal cyst and the buccal bifurcation cyst. The lateral periodontal cyst arises from epithelial rests in the periodontium and appears as a small well-defined radiolucent lesion lateral to the root of a tooth, usually in the mandible anterior to the molars. Differential diagnosis includes radicular cyst at the foramen of an accessory pulp canal, small neurofibroma, or small keratocystic odontogenic tumor (discussed ahead). The buccal bifurcation cyst usually occurs in children, buccal to an unerupted first or second molar, with the source of epithelium probably the epithelial cell rests in the bifurcation area. The cyst tends to tilt the roots of the affected tooth lingually and may prevent the eruption of the affected tooth and cause significant bony expansion buccal to the tooth. The cyst is usually treated with curettage without extraction of the tooth. Figure 3.12 Reconstructed panoramic view with multiple lesions visible, including dentigerous cyst around crown of displaced #17; impacted #1, #16, and #32; rarefying osteitis affecting #14, #19, #20, and #30; radiopaque mass at apex of distal root of #30, with a differential diagnosis of complex odontoma, foreign material, or advanced fibro-osseous lesion. 56 Cone Beam Computed Tomography A pseudocyst in the jaws may look very similar to a true cyst radiographically, but histologically it  does not contain an epithelial lining. The most common pseudocyst in the jaws is the simple bone  cyst (SBC), also frequently called traumatic bone cyst or solitary bone cyst (Figure  3.13). The SBC is a cavity within bone, most often the posterior mandible, that is lined with connective tissue and may be empty or contain fluid. The etiology of this lesion is not known, but it may represent an aberration in normal bone metabolism or healing. A history of trauma is found in some cases but not all. The lesions may also be seen in association with fibro-osseous lesions. The border of an SBC may be well defined, like a true cyst, or more diffuse, although in the toothbearing area it tends to be well defined. Scalloping of the endosteal surface of the bone is common. It frequently scallops in between the roots of the teeth but usually has no effect on the teeth themselves or on the lamina dura, which remains intact. This lesion is usually asymptomatic and thus is an incidental finding on a radiograph. Management usually consists of conservative opening into the lesion, with curettage of the lining, which both establishes the diagnosis and causes some bleeding into the lesion, which usually initiates healing. The keratocystic odontogenic tumor (KOT, previously called odontogenic keratocyst) has been reclassified by the World Health Organization from a cyst to a tumor due to its behavior, although it  does have an epithelial lining (keratinized) and  a  cystic cavity within it (Figure  3.14A and Figure  3.14B). The KOT occurs most often in the posterior mandible or ramus, superior to the mandibular canal, but it also is not uncommon in the posterior maxilla, where it may extend into the maxillary sinus and simulate a mucous retention pseudocyst. It may be associated with the crown of a tooth, like a dentigerous cyst, or be a solitary lesion. It may be unilocular or multilocular (single or multiple compartments) and tends to cause less expansion than other lesions of its size due to its propensity to grow longitudinally within the bone Figure 3.13 Simple bone cyst (traumatic bone cyst) in the left mandible, sagittal view. The lesion, which scallops up in between the teeth, was an empty bone cavity upon curettage. Figure 3.14A and B Keratocystic odontogenic tumor: sagittal (A) and axial (B) views. This is a multilocular radiolucent lesion in the right posterior mandible, with well-defined margins. There is only limited mandibular expansion despite the large size of the lesion. (A) (B) Diagnosis of Jaw Pathologies Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 57 rather than laterally. The KOT has a high recurrence rate, unlike the true cysts described above. The margin of a KOT is well defined, unless it becomes infected, and may present a scalloped appearance. If it occurs in association with a tooth, it may be connected to the tooth inferior to the cemento-enamel junction, unlike the dentigerous cyst. A small percentage of KOTs are associated with the basal cell nevus syndrome, features of which include multiple KOTs, multiple basal cell carcinomas of the skin, and skeletal, eye, and central nervous system abnormalities. This syndrome is inherited as an autosomal dominant trait with variable expressivity. If a KOT is suspected based on imaging findings, referral for further imaging evaluation is recommended in order to determine the precise boundaries of the lesion prior to treatment, given the propensity of these lesions to recur. The third major category of slow-growing lesions is the benign tumor. Tumors that occur in the jaws may be of odontogenic origin, that is, arising from cells that form teeth and surrounding structures, or non-odontogenic, including neural and vascular lesions. The odontogenic tumors may be of epithelial origin, such as the ameloblastoma; of mesenchymal origin, such as odontogenic myxoma; or of mixed epithelial and mesenchymal origin, such as odontoma and ameloblastic fibroma. The radiographic appearance and clinical behavior depend on the specific tumor involved. Various hard tissue calcified or ossified hyperplasias and tumors were discussed above under radiopaque lesions. In this section only totally radiolucent or mixed radiolucent-radiopaque lesions will be discussed. Benign tumors may be completely radiolucent and present as a single compartment (unilocular) or they may contain radiopaque septa (multilocular) that represent residual bone trapped within the  lesion. Some tumors produce bone or other calcified material, causing a mixed appearance. The ameloblastoma is a benign but locally aggressive tumor of odontogenic epithelium that may present in multiple types: unicystic, multicystic (solid), and desmoplastic (Figure 3.15A and Figure 3.15B). The unicystic type can also occur in the wall of a dentigerous cyst (mural ameloblastoma). Ameloblastomas are slow-growing tumors that may be asymptomatic and discovered on dental radiographs taken for other purposes or they may cause a slowly expanding swelling that causes the patient to seek treatment. They can occur at any age, although most patients are between 20 and 50 years, and in any part of the jaw, although the majority are in the molar-ramus region of the mandible. The lesions may be totally radiolucent or have multiple septa that remodel into rounded forms such as honeycomb or soap bubble appearance, due to the cystic components of the tumor. They tend to have well-defined, corticated margins. Unlike the keratocystic odontogenic tumor, they frequently cause gross expansion of the jaw, and tooth resorption and displacement are common. The desmoplastic form of ameloblastoma can produce bone and resemble a bone dysplasia instead of a typical radiolucent ameloblastoma. Ameloblastomas Figure 3.15A and B Ameloblastoma in the left mandible: coronal (A) and axial (B) views. The lesion is multilocular and expansile but still has well-defined margins. (Courtesy of Dr. David C. Hatcher, Sacramento, CA) (A) (B) 58 Cone Beam Computed Tomography can recur following surgery, presenting typically with a multicystic appearance. Small unicystic ameloblastomas may not be able to be differentiated from true cysts. The differential  diagnosis for multilocular ameloblastomas includes keratocystic odontogenic tumor (KOT), central giant cell granuloma (CGCG), odontogenic myxoma (OM), and ossifying fibroma (OF), all discussed elsewhere. There is usually less bone expansion with the KOT due to its longitudinal growth. The CGCG usually occurs in a younger age group and has wispy septa. The septa in OM are frequently straighter (“tennis racket”), and those in OF are usually wider, more granular, and less well defined. If an ameloblastoma is suspected, especially in the maxilla, additional soft tissue imaging (conventional CT, MRI) is recommended to determine the full extent of the lesion and the degree of extension into other structures, such as the maxillary sinuses and nasal cavity. OMs arise from odontogenic ectomesenchyme and resemble cells from the dental papilla. They are not encapsulated and thus may have a less welldefined margin than ameloblastomas, although they can have a corticated border. The septa in the OM are variable in shape, but there tends to be at  least a few straight septa, which aids in the identification of this tumor. OMs tend to affect the premolar and molar areas of the mandible but also can occur in similar locations in the maxilla. It may scallop in between teeth, like a simple bone cyst, and rarely resorbs teeth. Expansion is generally less than with ameloblastoma. As with ameloblastoma, additional conventional CT and MRI may be helpful in planning treatment, which usually includes block resection. Other benign odontogenic tumors that can occur in the jaws, albeit with less frequency than the ones discussed above, include calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor (Pindborg tumor), ameloblastic fibroma, ameloblastic fibro-odontoma, adenomatoid odontogenic tumor, and central odontogenic fibroma. Consultation of a pathology reference book for more details on these tumors is recommended. Non-odontogenic tumors can also occur in the jaws, primarily of neural or vascular origin. A lesion occurring in an expanded mandibular nerve canal should be suspected to be of neural origin, such as neurilemoma, neuroma, or neurofibroma. Vascular lesions include central hemangioma and arteriovenous fistula (A-V malformation). Some reactive lesions in the jaws can also present  as tumors or cysts radiographically. The central giant cell granuloma (giant cell reparative granuloma, giant cell lesion) is considered to be a reactive lesion to an unknown stimulus. It typically occurs in young individuals (<20 years) in the mandible anterior to the first molars, although it can occur elsewhere in the jaws. Painless swelling is the most common presenting symptom. The lesion grows slowly and thus usually has a well-defined margin. It frequently displaces teeth and may also resorb roots. It can be totally radiolucent but frequently contains wispy septa that are distinctively different from those of odontogenic tumors such as ameloblastoma. An uneven expansion of the jaws occurs in larger lesions. Histologically the lesions contain multiple giant cells, which are also a feature of the brown tumors of hyperparathyroidism. For that reason patients with giant cell lesions need  to be evaluated for hyperparathyroidism. Treatment may include enucleation, although there have been reports of successful resolution with intralesional injections of corticosteroids. Aneurysmal bone cysts are reactive lesions in the bone of unknown etiology, but they may represent an exaggerated response of vascular tissue within bone. They may occur as a solitary lesion or in association with other lesions such as fibrous dysplasia or giant cell granuloma. They are most often found in the posterior mandible in persons under age 30 and may present as a relatively rapidly growing swelling. However, the border of the lesion is usually well defined and there may be multiple wispy internal septa. Because they contain multiple blood-filled sinusoids, aspiration of the lesion has a hemorrhagic appearance. Cherubism is a rare inherited autosomal dominant disease that presents in children as bilateral facial swelling as a result of multilocular lesions in the posterior mandible or both the mandible and maxilla. When the maxilla is involved, the skin is stretched tightly over the cheeks, causing the lower eyelid to be depressed. This exposes a thin line of  sclera, which makes it appear that the child is  raising his eyes to heaven, thus displaying a cherubic appearance. The bilateral nature of the disease, occurring in the posterior of the jaws, is Diagnosis of Jaw Pathologies Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 59 generally sufficient to differentiate cherubism from central giant cell granuloma and fibrous dysplasia. Treatment is usually delayed because the disease stabilizes during adolescence, after which cosmetic surgery can be performed if needed. In making a differential diagnosis of a radiolucent lesion observed on a radiograph, it is frequently helpful to divide lesions by location. Those occurring at the apex of a tooth are most likely to be  inflammatory in origin, including periapical abscess, periapical granuloma, radicular (or periapical) cyst, or periapical scar. However, other radiolucent lesions can occur at the apex of a tooth, including the early stage of periapical cementoosseous dysplasia and simple bone cyst. Pulp vitality testing can be very helpful in distinguishing these lesions, as can the presence or absence of an intact periodontal ligament space and lamina dura. Multiple periapical inflammatory lesions can also be associated with dentin dysplasia. Lesions that occur around the crown of an unerupted tooth are relatively few in number and include normal dental follicle (normal follicular space is 2–3mm), dentigerous cyst (follicular space >5mm), and a few benign tumors, such as  adenomatoid odontogenic tumor and ameloblastic fibroma. Biopsy may be needed to differentiate these, although radiopaque flecks within the  lesion are  not uncommon with adenomatoid odontogenic tumor. Lesions that occur in other locations within the jaws present more choices and a more difficult differential diagnosis. Knowledge of typical radiographic appearances and typical locations and patient demographics can be helpful in distinguishing between lesions. Although in many cases biopsy is required to establish the final diagnosis, the ability to evaluate the appearance of the lesion and to determine whether it is most likely a slowgrowing or a fast-growing lesion can be very helpful in planning the next step for the patient. Rapidly growing lesions Rapidly growing lesions have the potential to produce serious consequences for the patient, in terms of pain or other symptoms or destruction of normal tissue and replacement with abnormal cells. There are two major categories of lesions that fall into the “rapidly growing” classification: inflammation and malignancy. It is not always possible to distinguish these lesions radiographically since they can present with similar appearances. The classical radiographic appearance of these lesions is a radiolucent (or mixed density) lesion with borders that are not well defined. The borders may blend subtly into the adjacent normal bone or may demonstrate a permeative margin, where it appears that the lesion is eating away at the bone. Other common features include a tendency to erode cortical bone rather than displace it outward as the lesion grows and a tendency to surround the roots of teeth, destroying the bone, rather than displacing the teeth the way a benign lesion might do. In addition, inflammatory and malignant lesions frequently—although not always—cause neurological symptoms, including pain and paresthesia. The majority of the rapidly growing lesions are inflammatory in nature, usually associated with a devital tooth or advanced periodontitis, making their diagnosis generally relatively straightforward. However, correlation with history and clinical findings is essential in interpreting these lesions correctly, as it is with all lesions seen on radiographs, since malignant lesions occurring in the jawbones can mimic inflammatory ones. The typical periapical inflammatory lesions are well known to dentists because they are seen frequently in dental practice. A tooth with deep caries or a deep restoration or a history of trauma may develop a pulpal inflammation, which can progress to inflammation in the surrounding bone. The initial radiographic appearance is a widening of the apical periodontal ligament space, followed by loss of a well-defined lamina dura. As the disease process advances, an ill-defined radiolucent lesion may appear at the apex of the tooth, centered on the apical foramen. Frequently the inflammatory process becomes chronic as the body attempts to wall it  off and the borders of the lesion become more defined. At this stage typically a microscopic diagnosis would be periapical granuloma or radicular cyst, depending on the specific stage of the lesion. If the inflammation starts within the periodontium, rather than in the dental pulp, the widest part of the radiolucency will be at the alveolar crest and not at the apex. However, the inflammatory process can continue down the root of the tooth and affect all the bone surrounding the tooth. 60 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Occasionally, however, the body is not successful in walling off the inflammatory process, either because of the virulence of the causative organism or the inadequacy of the immune response to the insult, and the patient may develop an osteomyelitis, an inflammation of the bone that may affect all parts of the bone: marrow, cortex, medullary bone, and periosteum. This occurs most often in the posterior mandible, probably due to the smaller blood supply than in the maxilla. The course of osteomyelitis is quite variable, and thus the radiographic appearance of the disease is also, ranging from completely radiolucent to completely radiopaque to a mixture of radiolucent and radiopaque (Figure  3.16A, Figure  3.16B, and Figure  3.16C). The bone may contain ill-defined radiolucent areas with radiopaque foci,  representing areas of necrotic bone, that will eventually slough and become sequestra. The borders of bone infections are generally diffuse, especially as the disease process continues, extending well beyond the initial nidus of infection. When osteomyelitis becomes chronic, it becomes very difficult to treat because there are many areas of necrotic bone within the diseased area and these are nonresponsive to treatment. In addition to oral and intravenous antibiotics, areas of osteomyelitis are frequently treated with surgical curettage to remove necrotic bone. It is not uncommon for bone affected by osteomyelitis to demonstrate erosion or perforation of the cortex, with inflammation extending into the Figure 3.16A, B, and C Severe osteomyelitis affecting the entire left mandible distal to the canine, including the entire ramus except for the condyle: axial (A) and coronal (B, C) views. The bone in the left mandible is sclerotic, with a ground glass appearance and loss of normal trabecular pattern. The body and ramus of the mandible are expanded and there is loss of differentiation between medullary and cortical bone. The right side of the mandible is normal. (A) (B) (C) Diagnosis of Jaw Pathologies Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 61 surrounding soft tissue. Attempts at bony repair can also be seen as new bone is laid down by the periosteum on the periphery of the diseased bone. This may have the appearance of thin layers of bone over the defect, looking like layers of onion, as the periosteum is lifted and new bone is formed underneath it, stimulated by the inflammation. This type of effect is more common in children than in adults, due to the looseness of the attachment of the periosteum and the greater potential for bone formation. Osteomyelitis, especially in the acute phase, may produce various signs and symptoms, including rapid onset, pain, swelling of soft tissues, fever, lymphadenopathy, purulent drainage, and paresthesia of the lower lip. Chronic osteomyelitis, which may occur if the acute phase is inadequately treated or arise without an acute phase, usually has a longer course, with intermittent episodes of pain, swelling, fever, and other classic signs of inflammation or infection. Differential diagnosis of osteomyelitis includes fibrous dysplasia, Paget’s disease of bone, and osteosarcoma. Typically, fibrous dysplasia does not present with the acute inflammatory symptoms and the pattern of bony enlargement is different (within the bone rather than on the surface with periosteal new bone). Paget’s disease tends to affect the entire mandible and does not present with sequestra, as does osteomyelitis. Bone destruction is usually seen in osteosarcoma, along with other bony changes. Other inflammatory changes can occur in the bone besides those associated with pulpal pathology and trauma, including osteoradionecrosis. When bone receives a high dose of radiation, such as during radiotherapy for a malignancy, the bone suffers damage, either as a result of cell death or loss of cell repair ability due to changes in the vasculature in the bone. When such irradiated bone is traumatized, such as through tooth extraction, the bone lacks an adequate healing response and part of the bone may become necrotic. Radiographically, the bone affected by osteoradionecrosis can appear very similar to acute or chronic osteomyelitis. Differentiation is via history of radiation therapy. However, it is also possible that a recurrence of the original neoplasm may invade the bone and cause a similar appearance; thus, a thorough examination is mandatory. Necrotic, exposed bone has also been reported in  the jaws of patients who have taken bisphosphonate drugs, which are used to inhibit osteoclasts and reduce bone metabolism, either as treatment for bone involvement in a number of malignancies or in the prevention of osteoporosis. Most of the cases reported in the literature have occurred in  patients taking potent bisphosphonates intravenously for malignancies. The radiographic appearance may vary widely, resembling classic osteomyelitis in some cases, but typically there is exposed bone visible clinically. The other major category of lesions that fits into the “rapidly growing” class is the malignancy, either a primary or a metastatic tumor. Radiographically they can be very similar to inflammatory lesions, although if the tumor arises in the soft tissues and only secondarily affects the bone, the clinical findings would aid in the differential diagnosis. There are many clinical features that suggest a malignancy, including a rapidly growing soft tissue mass; indurated or rolled margins; ulcer, with or without pain; alteration in surface appearance of the tissue (whiteness, redness, mixture of red and white); dysgeusia, dysphonia, dysphagia; lymphadenopathy; sensory deficits; lack of healing after oral surgery; unintended weight loss and general feeling of unwellness. Radiologic features of malignant lesions include a generally irregular radiolucent appearance (although some sarcomas and metastatic carcinomas can produce bone or other hard tissue) with an illdefined border, without cortication or any sign of encapsulation (Figure  3.17A, Figure  3.17B, and Figure  3.17C). Frequently there are fingerlike projections into the surrounding bone. The lesion may totally destroy bone and cause the teeth to appear to float due to the complete loss of bony structure around them. They may destroy bony margins, such as the floor of the maxillary sinus, the buccal and lingual cortex, the walls of the inferior alveolar canal, and the lamina dura. They may also grow in the periodontal ligament space, causing it to appear wider than normal throughout and not just at the apex like periapical inflammation caused by pulpal disease. Malignant lesions can be divided into four major types based on their origin: carcinomas (epithelial origin), metastatic tumors (from distant sites, 62 Cone Beam Computed Tomography usually carcinomas), sarcomas (mesenchymal origin), and hematopoietic malignancies. Most of the carcinomas that occur in the maxillofacial region arise in the soft tissues, such as the tongue, floor of mouth, soft palate, tonsils, and gingiva. Unless they invade bone as they grow, they will not be detected on radiologic examinations, including CBCT. Evaluation of the oral cavity by careful clinical examination should be done on all patients, including children. While most carcinomas occur in persons over the age of 50, malignancies can and do occur in young individuals. If a malignant tumor is suspected from the findings of a clinical examination, generally other types of imaging examinations besides CBCT would be used to determine the full extent of the lesion in order to plan treatment, although CBCT could be helpful to evaluate for bone invasion by the tumor. Epithelial malignancies can arise de novo in bone, without a soft tissue component, from epithelial cells remnant in the bone, but these are rare. Central carcinoma arising within bone occurs in the tooth-bearing areas, usually posterior mandible, and is similar to other carcinomas except that it has no connection with the soft tissue of the oral cavity. Central mucoepidermoid carcinomas also occur typically in the posterior mandible. They frequently are less aggressive tumors and may resemble benign tumors with a multilocular appearance. Secondary malignancies (metastatic tumors) in the jaws arise usually as a result of hematogenous spread from the primary tumor, which may arise from a number of different organs, including breast, prostate, lung, and kidney. Frequently the primary site is already known when a metastatic tumor is detected, but occasionally the metastasis may be the first sign of a malignancy. Most metastatic tumors occur in the posterior mandible, although the TMJ and the maxilla are also potential sites. Most metastatic tumors are radiolucent and have irregular margins, but tumors from the breast and prostate can also induce bone formation, giving the metastatic area a more radiopaque, frequently granular appearance. Figure 3.17A, B, and C Non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the anterior mandible: panoramic (A), sagittal (B), and 3D volumetric reconstruction (C) views. Note the ill-defined margins of the diffuse radiolucency, with loss of normal trabecular bone pattern and erosion of the buccal cortex. The 3D volumetric reconstruction (C) demonstrates the loss of buccal cortical bone. (Courtesy of Dr. David C. Hatcher, Sacramento, CA) (A) (B) (C) Diagnosis of Jaw Pathologies Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 63 Mesenchymal malignancies include osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, fibrosarcoma, and Ewing’s sarcoma. All of these are rare in the jaws, occurring more often in other bones, particularly long bones. Osteosarcomas typically occur in the posterior mandible and may be radiolucent with an illdefined margin, radiopaque, or mixed, depending on the amount of osteoid produced. If the tumor involves the periosteum, new bone may be produced at right angles to the surface, forming “sun-ray” or “hair-on-end” trabeculae. The normal bone pattern is lost, being replaced by tumoral bone of variable organization. Alteration of the width of the periodontal ligament space and distinctness of maxillary sinus floor and mandibular canal borders is not uncommon. Most chondrosarcomas are of mixed density, with a flocculent appearance of new cartilage surrounded by calcification. Chondrosarcomas tend to be slower growing than other malignancies and may have a relatively well-defined margin compared to osteosarcomas. Fibrosarcomas contain collagen and elastin, made by malignant fibroblasts, and thus are radiolucent in appearance. They tend to infiltrate through the bone and thus may be larger than their radiographic appearance would suggest. Ewing’s sarcoma tends to occur in a younger age group but is rare in the jaws. It typically appears as a radiolucent lesion with ragged borders and may cause pathologic fracture. Differential diagnosis of all of the sarcomas can be difficult because they can all look similar, depending on the amount of calcification occurring in them, and they may mimic osteomyelitis and other malignancies such as carcinomas. The last group of jaw malignancies occurs in the hematopoietic system. Multiple myeloma is a neoplasm of malignant plasma cells and typically presents with multiple radiolucent lesions that appear “punched out,” that is, well defined but with no cortical border or any type of bony reaction. While the jaws and skull can be affected, multiple myeloma is a systemic neoplasm that affects other areas more frequently. Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma is a malignancy of cells of the lymphatic system. While it occurs most often within lymph nodes, it can occur in other locations, including the maxillary sinus, palate, tonsillar area, and bone, either as a primary tumor or secondary extension from a tumor in the lymph nodes. Differential diagnosis includes the other malignancies, as well as inflammatory lesions when the lymphoma occurs near the apex of a tooth. If a primary or secondary malignancy is detected or suspected, rapid referral for further evaluation and management is needed. This may be to an oral surgeon for biopsy or to the patient’s oncologist for a suspected metastatic lesion. The dentist’s role To summarize the dentist’s role with respect to the detection, diagnosis, and management of pathology observed on CBCT scans, there are two basic scenarios. In one, the scan is made specifically to evaluate some abnormal condition of the patient, detected originally either through history (patient complains of pain or swelling), clinical examination (facial asymmetry is observed), or other radiograph (a radiolucent or radiopaque lesion is noted on a panoramic or intraoral radiograph). In the second scenario, the scan is made for some purpose  (implant, orthodontics) and an unexpected condition is observed on the scan. Even though the basic goal is the same—to determine the nature of the condition and the type of management needed—the steps the dentist takes will be slightly different. In the first case, where an abnormality is expected, before the scan is made the clinician should do a thorough history and clinical examination: when did the symptoms first begin, what has the time course of symptoms been, what has the patient done to try to relieve the symptoms; what are the clinical findings with respect to teeth, bone, soft tissue; what are the results of intraoral and/or panoramic radiographs; what are the results of pulp testing? What is the provisional diagnosis based on all the information collected? What additional information, if any, is needed to make a diagnosis? What is the best method to get the additional information? Is CBCT really the best or would conventional CT or MRI be better? In the second scenario, where an unexpected lesion is found on the CBCT, the clinician must go back to the patient and try to obtain the same information described above, but this time after the  lesion is observed. That may mean that the questions and clinical examination and tests may be more focused to try to determine the nature of the condition. 64 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Since the ultimate goal is the preservation and enhancement of the patient’s health and well-being, it is critical that all abnormalities be detected and the nature of these abnormalities be determined. In many, probably most, cases the clinician using the CBCT in the dental office will be the one to make the diagnosis and plan the management, which frequently is simple observation without treatment. However, if there is any doubt about the diagnosis, or if the management of the condition is beyond the clinician’s professional expertise, referral for further evaluation is appropriate. Additional reading Koenig, L.J., Tamimi, D., Harnsberger, H.R., Benson, B.W., Hatcher, D., Petrikowski, C.G., et al. (2012) Diagnostic Imaging, Oral and Maxillofacial. Salt Lake City, UT: Amirsys. Neville, B.W., Damm, D.D., Allen, C.M., and Bouquot, J.E. (2002) Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders. White, S.C., and Pharoah, M.J., eds. (2009) Oral radiology, principles and interpretation, 6th ed. St. Louis: MosbyElsevier. Cone Beam Computed Tomography: Oral and Maxillofacial Diagnosis and Applications, First Edition. Edited by David Sarment. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2014 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 65 Diagnosis of Sinus Pathologies Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Aaron Miracle and Christian Güldner 4 This chapter will focus predominantly on the paranasal sinuses and temporal bone, regions of the extracranial head and neck relatively well suited to cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging owing to complex bony anatomic detail and a relative paucity of soft tissue structures. Research establishing the clinical utility of CBCT in these regions is still preliminary, however, and there are many limitations to use in a diagnostic setting (Gupta et al., 2008; Miracle and Mukherji, 2009a, b). Poor low-contrast detectability is the overwhelming limitation with CBCT imaging, as many aggressive processes centered at the skull base within the extracranial head and neck involve soft tissue structures that are poorly visualized. When interpreting CBCT imaging in these regions (or any other for that matter), any aggressive lesions with bony destruction and most mass lesions warrant evaluation with MRI or contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) to better characterize the soft tissue composition and to delineate the extent of surrounding soft tissue involvement. For practitioners trained in conventional multidetector CT (MDCT) interpretation, it is tempting to equate CBCT images with MDCT images processed with bone algorithms, and while there are distinct similarities, the differences in acquisition geometry, dose, image quality, and other technical parameters should be kept in mind. One notable difference between CBCT and MDCT is related to patient positioning. With CBCT imaging, the patient is often sitting up, and therefore dependent fluid and air-fluid levels will be oriented in the axial plane, making coronal and sagittal reformatted images ideal for identification. This becomes important in the setting of trauma, atraumatic sinus fluid (as in sinusitis), and middle ear effusions, among other disease processes. Paranasal sinuses The complex high-contrast anatomy of the paranasal sinuses and anterior skull base are attractive targets for CBCT (Balbach et al., 2011), where excellent spatial resolution and isotropic voxel acquisition generate quality images that can be reconstructed in multiple viewing planes. This section will briefly review the anatomy of the anterior skull base, pertinent anatomic variants that should be identified in the setting of sinus surgery, and paranasal sinus pathology that practitioners should be familiar with when interpreting CBCT images covering this anatomic region. 66 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Diagnostic sinus imaging Despite being well suited for depicting fine detail of complex osseous structures such as those in the paranasal sinuses and anterior skull base, the role of CBCT in diagnostic sinus and skull base imaging is very limited. Paranasal sinus pathology covers a wide range of diverse disease processes, many of which are mucosal in origin and require discriminating contrast resolution for adequate evaluation (Yousem, 1993; Momeni et  al., 2007). A variety of benign and malignant neoplasms, inflammatory soft tissue masses, postoperative complications, and infectious processes can present with similar symptoms, requiring selection of an imaging modality suited to identify the underlying disease process and guide further imaging. In most cases this will still be MDCT processed with both bone and soft  tissue algorithms; however, MRI may be better suited as an initial imaging study in select situations. CBCT is not endorsed by the American College of Radiology (Mukherji et al., 2006; Rumboldt et al., 2009) for diagnostic sinus imaging, where evaluation of soft tissue windows is recommended. Despite these limitations, paranasal sinus pathology will still be encountered incidentally in CBCT imaging performed for other indications (Maillet et  al., 2011; Ritter et  al., 2011), and therefore knowledge of important bony and soft tissue pathology is vital for practitioners interpreting CBCT images. Sinusitis Sinusitis is a common clinical affliction, most often encountered in the setting of antecedent viral upper respiratory tract infection. Most cases of sinusitis do not require imaging evaluation, and in the rare case where diagnostic imaging is indicated, MDCT is the appropriate initial diagnostic modality (Branstetter and Weissman, 2005; Brook, 2006; Eggesbo, 2006). Acute Acute sinusitis manifests as air fluid levels in one or more paranasal sinuses on CT imaging, often with a bubbly or frothy appearance (Figure 4.1). Viral pathogens are typically implicated; however, bacteria in so-called pyogenic sinusitis are also common. Top differential considerations include a posttraumatic blood level (often with associated maxillofacial fractures), noninfected postobstructive secretions, and pseudo fluid levels. Pseudo fluid levels represent flaccid mucous retention cysts, and upon careful inspection should demonstrate a rounded edge at the junction with adjacent bony partitions. Chronic Chronic sinusitis is characterized by mucoperiosteal thickening, occasionally with high-attenuation dessicated secretions or concretions in opacified sinus cavities that can be seen on soft tissue windowing of MDCT images but may not be as easily recognized on CBCT (Cymerman et al., 2011). Impaired mucociliary clearance of pathogenic sinonasal bacteria is implicated in the pathogenesis of chronic sinusitis, as will be discussed in a later section. Fungal Fungal sinusitis can be allergic, chronic, or invasive, the latter of which is a highly aggressive angioinvasive process and warrants immediate surgical evaluation. Invasive fungal sinusitis occurs in immunocompromised and diabetic patients and is characterized by a rapidly progressive course with invasion through the mucosa into bone, adjacent vessels, and soft tissue, with eventual extension to  the orbits and intracranial structures. Invasive fungal sinusitis should be considered in any immunocompromised patient with findings suggestive of sinusitis with any concomitant bony erosion. Soft tissue infiltration with fat stranding is also a feature and cannot be adequately evaluated with CBCT. Intracranial and orbital extension in invasive fungal sinusitis is another feature that is incompletely evaluated with CBCT. MDCT and MRI are indicated for further evaluation if sinusitis with focal bone erosion is observed. Chronic fungal sinusitis may be suspected if dense secretions are noted on MDCT, but this is unlikely to be recognized on CBCT imaging. Allergic fungal sinusitis or mycetoma should be entertained as possible diagnoses if a soft tissue mass with a matrix of calcifications is observed, especially if mucoperiosteal thickening from chronic sinusitis is seen. Diagnosis of Sinus Pathologies Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 67 Complications Common complications of sinusitis include formation of inflammatory polyps, mucous retention cysts, and mucoceles, which will be addressed in subsequent sections. Several important complications of sinusitis cannot be sufficiently evaluated by CBCT imaging and warrant a brief discussion. Cavernous sinus thrombosis requires evaluation in soft tissue windows and is incompletely evaluated even with MDCT. Asymmetry of the cavernous sinuses in the setting of sinusitis should be further evaluated with CECT or MRI with gadolinium. Periorbital complications include preseptal cellulitis or abscess, optic neuritis and subperiosteal abscess. Subperiosteal abscesses appear as lentiform fluid collections arising from the lamina papyracea medial to the medial rectus muscle effacing extraconal fat. These should be evaluated with CECT. Intracranial complications are best assessed with gadolinium-enhanced MRI and include meningitis, epidural abscess, subdural empyema, cerebritis, and brain abscess. Superficial soft tissue complications such as subgaleal abscess and soft tissue changes from osteomyelitis are best evaluated with MRI or CECT. Inflammatory polyps, mucoceles, and mucous retention cysts Inflammatory polyps, mucoceles, and mucous retention cysts occur as complications of sinonasal inflammation, appear as uniform soft-tissue density lesions arising within sinus cavities, and Figure 4.1 Sinusitis. A normal sinus (A) as well as acute sphenoid sinusitis (B1, B2) and chronic maxillary and ethmoid sinusitis (C) are shown. The sharply bounded right maxillary sinus (arrows) without mucosal thickening or secretions in A should be contrasted with coronal (B1) and sagittal (B2) images of a left sphenoid air fluid level with mucosal thickening and a frothy/ bubbly appearance (dotted arrows), in this case of acute sphenoid sinusitis. Mucoperiosteal thickening involving the right ethmoid and maxillary sinus walls (arrows) in the coronal image in C is typical of chronic sinusitis. 68 Cone Beam Computed Tomography can often be differentiated based on morphologic characteristics (Table  4.1). Mucous retention cysts are very common and result from mucous gland obstruction in the mucosa (Figure  4.2). Sinonasal polyps are pedunculated inflammatory mucosal lesions that can grow to obstruct sinus outflow. Antrochoanal polyp refers to the specific case of an inflammatory polyp arising from the maxillary antrum and prolapsing through the maxillary ostium into the nasal cavity and on occasion into the nasopharynx. Mucoceles occur most often in the frontal and ethmoid sinuses and can become infected (mucopyocele). Mucopyoceles require CECT or MRI for diagnosis. Silent sinus syndrome Chronic obstruction of the maxillary infundibulum can result in maxillary atelectasis, with downward bowing of the maxillary roof/orbital floor and enophthalmos. The maxillary sinus is typically nearcompletely opacified with lateralization of the uncinate process toward the inferomedial orbital wall and consequent expansion of the middle meatus. Table 4.1 Common complications of sinonasal inflammation. Characteristic Findings Inflammatory polyp Polypoid soft tissue mass; ± visualized stalk; if prolapsing through sinus ostia, can appear dumbbell-shaped Mucocele Complete soft tissue opacification of sinus; ± bony remodeling/expansion Mucous retention cyst Round or dome-shaped soft tissue lesion; air still seen in the sinus Figure 4.2 Mucous retention cysts. Coronal (A1, B1), sagittal (A2, B2), and axial (A3, B3) images demonstrate right maxillary mucous retention cysts, which are frequent findings in paranasal sinus imaging. They are rarely symptomatic and most often do not require therapy. Diagnosis of Sinus Pathologies Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 69 Fibro-osseous lesions Although MDCT is the preferred modality for evaluating fibro-osseous lesions of the paranasal sinuses and skull base (Bolger et  al., 1991), this group of lesions is likely to demonstrate a similar appearance on CBCT imaging and may be encountered incidentally. The pathologic potential of these lesions is typically related to mass effect; however, chondrosarcoma occasionally needs to be excluded in aggressive-appearing lesions. Sinonasal osteomas These lesions are benign and most often encountered in the frontal sinuses. They arise from the sinus wall and protrude into the sinus lumen with well-demarcated margins (Figure 4.3). They can be either cortical (uniformly cortical density) or fibrous (irregular internal matrix with a rim of corticaldensity calcification). Ossifying fibromas These benign lesions are also well demarcated and expansile, invading the bone of origin. They can exhibit a ground-glass or mottled appearance of mixed bony and soft tissue density and can be confused with fibrous dysplasia. A characteristic finding is central calcified radiations with a dense rim, an appearance that is not typical of fibrous dysplasia. Fibrous dysplasia Fibrous dyplasia is a benign, ill-defined, heterogeneous expansile lesion of the medullary cavity. It can be classified as predominantly ground-glass, cystic (well-defined lytic lesions), pagetoid (inhomogeneous bony thickening), or a combination of these appearances. Neoplasms and noninflammatory soft tissue pathology The spectrum of noninflammatory soft tissue pathology in the paranasal sinuses is broad, and the vast majority of these lesions will be incompletely characterized by CBCT due to lack of intravenous contrast and poor low-contrast differentiation. Nevertheless, practitioners interpreting CBCT should be familiar with relevant pathology such that appropriate referral for CECT and/or MRI can be arranged. Noninflammatory soft tissue pathology will primarily appear as uniform softtissue-density space-occupying lesions on CBCT images and cannot be further evaluated. Many lesions, however, have characteristic locations, growth patterns, and patient characteristics that can guide the differential diagnosis before further evaluation with CECT and/or MRI. Nonmalignant soft tissue masses include inverting papilloma, juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma, frontoethmoid encephalocele, and benign mixed tumor. An inverting papilloma is a neoplastic Figure 4.3 Sinonasal osteoma. Coronal (A), sagittal (B), and axial (C) images demonstrate a solid, mixed-density osseous lesion (white arrow) arising in a posterior ethmoid air cell consistent with an osteoma. Direct contact with the lateral lamella of the olfactory fossa (dotted arrow) makes decisions regarding therapy difficult in this patient. 70 Cone Beam Computed Tomography growth directed into the mucosa and characteristically occurs on the lateral nasal wall centered on the hiatus semilunaris. There is an association with squamous cell carcinoma, and these lesions should be resected. Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibromas occur in male adolescents, arising from the nasal wall adjacent to the sphenopalatine foramen in the pterygopalatine fossa and can be locally aggressive but have no malignant potential. Frontoethmoid encephaloceles can occur congenitally or postraumatically but can also result from prior surgery. Soft tissue extruding from the anterior cranial fossa into  the frontal or ethmoid sinuses suggests this diagnosis, but MRI is required for definitive determination. Benign mixed tumors, or pleomorphic adenomas, arise from rests of salivary glandular tissue and occasionally occur outside the major salivary glands. They appear as solitary expansile lesions of the nasal septum with bony remodeling. Contrast-enhanced imaging is necessary for appropriate characterization. Malignant sinonasal tumors include squamous cell carcinoma—which accounts for 80% to 90% of malignant tumors in this region—as well as undifferentiated carcinoma (aggressive with extensive bony destruction), lymphoma, and minor salivary gland tumors. Primary sinonasal melanoma is rare. These lesions mainly present as soft tissue masses or opacification with bony destruction. All should be evaluated with gadolinium-enhanced MRI. The characteristic growth pattern of enthesioneuroblastoma, a highly aggressive and locally destructive tumor of the neurosensory receptor cells in the olfactory mucosa, deserves particular mention. These tumors exhibit extensive bony destruction and occur anywhere from the anterior skull base to the nasal turbinates. They classically involve the cribiform plate with extension into the anterior cranial fossa. Wegener’s granulomatosis Wegener’s granulomatosis is a noninfectious necrotizing vasculitis affecting the kidneys as well as the upper and lower respiratory tract (Benoudiba et  al., 2003). Sinonasal involvement is typically characterized by inflammatory changes in the nasal cavity with occasional extension to the maxillary and ethmoid sinuses. Involvement of the other sinuses and extrasinonasal involvement is more rare. Characteristic imaging findings include nasal septal perforation, destruction of the turbinates and/or medial maxillary sinus wall, and nodular soft tissue masses distributed in the nasal cavity. MRI with gadolinium is the preferred imaging modality when there is expected extension beyond the sinuses. Rhinolith Chronic inflammatory response to a foreign body in the nasal cavity causes calcification and inflammatory soft tissue changes. The resulting rhinolith will appear as calcified material in the nasal cavity independent of the turbinates and bony septum. Common niduses for calcification include ectopic teeth, foreign bodies, and chronic blood clot. Perioperative FESS An emerging application for CBCT in the head and neck is perioperative imaging in the setting of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). FESS is predicated on the concept that mucociliary clearance in the paranasal sinuses occurs via predictable anatomic pathways converging on either (1) the osteomeatal complex (OMC), which constitutes the final drainage pathway of the maxillary, frontal, and anterior ethmoid air cells; or (2) the sphenoethmoidal recess, which is the final drainage pathway for the posterior ethmoid air cells and sphenoid sinuses (Daly et  al., 2006; Bachar et  al., 2007; Tam et  al., 2010). The OMC comprises the maxillary sinus ostium, infundibulum, and middle meatus collectively. Posterior ethmoid air cells typically drain via the superior meatus or other ostia emptying beneath the superior turbinate, eventually reaching the sphenoethmoidal recess. Sphenoid sinuses typically drain into the sphenoethmoidal recess via the sphenoid ostia medial to the superior turbinates. These stereotypical drainage patterns are inconstant, and many important anatomic variants alter normal drainage pathways and can create points of anatomic narrowing. FESS is a minimally invasive mucosal-sparing technique aimed at restoring competent mucociliary clearance Diagnosis of Sinus Pathologies Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 71 and sinus ventilation by targeting sites of drainage obstruction (Huang et al., 2009). Preoperative evaluation before FESS should include MDCT imaging (Hoang et  al., 2010), as underlying sinonasal mass lesions can present with  symptomatology similar to chronic benign sinusitis. Important mimics and complications of  chronic sinusitis that CBCT cannot reliably exclude or evaluate include, but are not limited to,  tumor, encephalocele, subperiosteal abscess, epidural abscess, meningitis, and inflammatory involvement of the orbits. Preoperative imaging before FESS should also evaluate the optic nerves and optic contents, perimaxillary and extraconal fat, internal carotid arteries, preseptal and periorbital soft tissues, and if possible, the trigeminal nerve. Identifying variant anterior ethmoid arteries coursing below the skull base is also important. Imaging should be delayed 4–6 weeks after initiation of medical therapy and should not be performed during symptoms of acute upper respiratory infection. Once the disease process has been characterized and after mass lesions have been excluded, attention should be turned to pertinent anatomic variants that may impact the surgical approach. The location of mucosal disease should also be assessed, as certain stereotyped patterns of disease implicate pathology in particular drainage pathways. Multiplanar reformatted images are important when evaluating the paranasal sinuses, and particular viewing planes can be especially helpful when visualizing specific anatomic locations. One particularly attractive feature of CBCT imaging in the paranasal sinuses is the ability to reconstruct images in any viewing plane with high fidelity to the source data, a relatively unique feature of CBCT that is related to isotropic voxel acquisition technique. The coronal plane allows optimal visualization of the OMC and also provides a relatively familiar viewing plane for surgeons accustomed to endoscopic surgery in the sinuses. Axial images provide the most advantageous views of the basal lamella dividing the anterior and posterior ethmoid air cells, as well as the sphenoethmoidal recess and sphenoidal ostia. The sphenoethmoidal recess is well visualized in the sagittal plane as well, which allows visualization of the posterior ethmoidal drainage pathway. Additionally, the frontal sinus, frontal sinus outflow tract, and anterior ethmoid drainage pathway into the middle meatus are often viewed in the sagittal plane. Pertinent anatomic variants Concha bullosa Pneumatization of a nasal turbinate is referred to as concha bullosa (Figure 4.4) and in severe cases can cause obstruction of the OMC by mass effect, predisposing to sinus disease (Balbach et al., 2011). Figure 4.4 Middle turbinate pneumatization. Coronal (A), sagittal (B), and axial (C) images demonstrate extensive pneumatization of the middle turbinate (arrow), or concha bullosa mediana. Concha bullosa can cause obstruction of the infundibulum and is often associated with deviations of the nasal septum. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) targeting the anterior ethmoid cells or infundibulum frequently involves reduction of the concha bullosa, typically the lateral wall. 72 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Concha bullosa can be bulbous (involving the inferior bulbous portion of the turbinate), lamellar (pneumatized lamellar cells), or extensive (pneumatized bulbous turbinate and lamella). Agger nasi pneumatization Agger nasi cells are the most anterior of the anterior ethmoid cells (Figure 4.5) and with progressive pneumatization can expand to be bounded anteriorly by the frontal process of the maxilla, superiorly by the floor of the frontal sinus, inferomedially by the uncinate process, and inferolaterally by the lacrimal bone. Expanded agger nasi cells can obstruct drainage at the frontal recess and cause frontal sinusitis. Uncinate process The uncinate process forms the medial boundary of the infundibulum and as such is intimately related to the OMC and sinus outflow. Pneumatization of the uncinate bulla can cause obstruction of the OMC from mass effect. Lateral deviation of the uncinate process is also an important variant, as it can place the medial orbital wall at risk during instrumentation. Haller’s cells Pneumatized cells inferolateral to the ethmoid bulla between the roof of the maxillary sinus and the floor of the orbit are termed Haller’s cells (Figure  4.6) and can form the lateral wall of the infundibulm, causing OMC obstruction and maxillary sinusitis when enlarged. Onodi cells Expanded posterior ethmoid air cells (Figure  4.7) extending posteriorly into the sphenoid bone, occasionally as far posterior as the anterior clinoid process, are referred to as Onodi cells. Failure to recognize Onodi cells places the optic nerves at risk during FESS in the frontal recess. Figure 4.5 Frontal recess variants. Sagittal (A–C, E) and coronal (D) CBCT images demonstrate variant frontal recess cells that can lead to obstruction of frontal sinus outflow. Agger nasi cells are demonstrated in A and B (asterisks). In addition to the agger nasi cell, the anterior group of frontal recess cells includes frontal cells described by the Kuhn classification. A Kuhn 1 cell is depicted in A (arrow). A trio of Kuhn 2 cells are present in B (arrows). The Kuhn 3 cell in C (arrow) extends into the frontal sinus forming the anterior wall of the frontal sinus infundibulum. Kuhn 4 cells are single cells that pneumatize within the frontal sinus anteriorly and do not share a wall with the agger nasi cell (D, arrow). Within the posterior group of frontal recess cells, the frontal bullar cell (E) pneumatizes into the frontal sinus and projects above the ostium. Its posterior wall is the anterior skull base. An anterior ethmoidal bulla is marked by an asterisk in E. Diagnosis of Sinus Pathologies Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 73 Nasal septum Recognition of septal deflections and spurring can help determine the need for septoplasty during FESS procedures, depending on the extent and pattern of disease. Olfactory fossa The olfactory fossa is typically formed by the crista galli medially, the medial lamella inferiorly, and the lateral lamella laterally, with the fovea ethmoidalis marking the superolateral margin. Olfactory Figure 4.6 Haller cells. Coronal (A1, A2) and sagittal (B1, B2) CBCT images in two patients demonstrate inferolaterally pneumatized ethmoidal air cells, or Haller cells (arrows), which often form the lateral wall of the infundibulum and can contribute to infundibular obstruction. The patient in A has a small mucous retention cyst in the right maxillary sinus. 74 Cone Beam Computed Tomography fossa variants can place the lateral lamella, the thinnest portion of the cribiform plate, at risk during endoscopic surgeries at the anterior skull base. The depth of the olfactory fossa can be graded based on the Keros classification (Table 4.2, Figure  4.8), measuring the distance between the  fovea ethmoidalis and the medial lamella (Savvateeva et al., 2010). Keros type II anatomy is most common (Güldner, Diogo, et al., 2011; Saraiya and Aygun, 2009). Lamina papyracea Congential or posttrauamatic dehiscence of the lamina papyracea can be identified prior to FESS, alerting the surgeon to the risk of damage to orbital contents in this area (Figure 4.9). Frontal recess The frontal infundibulum, frontal ostium, and frontal recess constitute the frontal sinus outflow tract, one of the narrowest anatomic apertures and a frequent site of drainage obstruction. Most commonly, Figure 4.7 Onodi cells. Coronal (A, D), sagittal (B, E), and axial (C, F) CBCT images in two patients (A–C and D–F) demonstrate posterior ethmoidal air cells (white arrows) pneumatizing into the sphenoid bone immediately subjacent to the optic nerve in the optic canal (dotted arrows). FESS involving the ethmoid and sphenoid sinuses places the optic nerve at risk with this configuration. There is inflammatory mucosal thickening and secretions involving the ethmoid, frontal, and right sphenoid sinuses of the patient in D–F. Table 4.2 Keros classification. Keros Classification Depth of Olfactory Fossa I <3mm II 3–7mm III >7mm Diagnosis of Sinus Pathologies Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 75 the frontal recess is bordered anteriorly by the agger nasi cell, laterally by the lamina papyracea, and medially by the middle turbinate. The posterior border is formed by the ethmoid bulla, bulla  lamella, and variably, the suprabullar cell. Anatomic variations in the frontal recess are particularly important, as it is one of the most difficult regions to treat endoscopically and one of the most common sites implicated in refractory sinusitis and in the need for revision FESS. Frontal recess cells Anterior ethmoid cells that pneumatize to form margins of the frontal sinus outflow tract are referred to collectively as frontal recess cells (Figure  4.5). The most constant of these is the agger nasi cell, which pneumatizes posteriorly to form the anterior border of the frontal recess. In addition to the agger nasi cell, several other variably pneumatized frontal recess cells can be important in the pathophysiology of frontal sinusitis and are discussed below. The Kuhn classification (Table 4.3) describes four types of cells that, when present, pneumatize superiorly above the agger nasi cell to variably form the anterior wall of the frontal sinus, frontal infundibulum, or frontal recess. Along with agger nasi cells, these cells make up the anterior group of frontal recess cells. The posterior group of frontal recess cells includes supraorbital ethmoid cells, frontal bullar cells, and suprabullar cells. Supraorbital ethmoid cells are located posterior to the frontal sinus and frontal recess and pneumatize from the orbital plate superolaterally over the orbit. These cells also drain into Figure 4.8 Olfactory fossa anatomy. The depth of the olfactory fossa can be described according to the Keros classification (A—Keros I; B—Keros II; C—Keros III). The relationship between the cribiform plate (dotted arrows) and lateral lamella is well demonstrated by coronal CBCT images (A1, B1, C1). Keros type I anatomy is typically associated with a course of the anterior ethmoid artery on the anterior skull base (A2, dotted arrow), whereas in Keros type III configuration the anterior ethmoid artery can run free through the ethmoidal cells (C2, dotted arrow). 76 Cone Beam Computed Tomography the frontal recess and can obstruct sinus outflow. Their ostia can also be mistaken for the frontal ostium endoscopically. Suprabullar cells, a second variety of posterior frontal recess cells, are pneumatizations of the anterior skull base originating posterior to the frontal recess and extending anterosuperiorly only as far as the level of the frontal sinus ostium. They form the posterior border of the frontal recess when present. Frontal bullar cells are similar in position to suprabullar cells, but they project superiorly into Figure 4.9 Infraorbital nerve. The course of the infraorbital nerve in the infraorbital canal is important in surgery within the maxillary sinus. Coronal (A1) and sagittal (A2) images demonstrate a closed course along the floor of the orbit (arrow). CBCT images in a second patient (B1, B2) depict a free course (arrow) within the maxillary sinus. Diagnosis of Sinus Pathologies Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 77 the frontal sinus above the ostium. Both frontal bullar cells and suprabullar cells can be mistaken  for the anterior skull base when viewed endoscopically. A final variety of frontal recess cells is the interfrontal sinus septal cell, which refers to pneumatization of the interfrontal sinus septum. These cells can extend posteriorly into the crista galli, a variant referred to as bulla galli. Follow-up imaging after FESS Postoperative complications following FESS can be divided into those that occur immediately postoperatively and those that manifest weeks to months later. In the immediate postoperative period, hemorrhage (especially from the anterior ethmoidal artery), orbital complications, and less frequently, violation of the anterior skull base with cerebrospinal fluid leak and/or damage to intracranial structures can be encountered. Appropriate imaging in these circumstances is always CECT and/or MRI with gadolinium, as CBCT lacks the ability to resolve important soft tissue structures in the orbits and anterior cranial fossa. Recurrent symptoms after FESS Outside the immediate postoperative period, patients may present with recurrent symptoms of sinusitis (Huang et al., 2009), in which case imaging evaluation can be indicated to determine the cause of continued symptoms. The most common causes of recurrent symptoms are postoperative scarring and unaddressed outflow tract obstruction. Less commonly, remnant frontal recess cells, retained uncinate process, lateralization of the middle turbinate, and osteoneogenesis are implicated as the  source of recurrent symptoms. Inflammatory mucosal thickening and recurrent polyposis—in addition to scarring—are soft tissue findings on imaging that can be associated with sinusitis symptoms after FESS. Statistically, up to 23% of patients undergoing FESS for chronic sinusitis will require revision surgery for continued symptoms. Of this 23%, almost half require revision surgery for symptoms localized to the frontal sinuses. As such, close attention should be paid to the frontal sinus outflow tract on follow-up imaging, as revision FESS procedures are often directed to this anatomic area. There are several findings on follow-up imaging after FESS that may predispose to recurrent symptoms (Box  4.1). Insufficient resection of agger nasi and other frontal recess cells can lead  to residual obstruction or can serve as the substrate for scar formation postoperatively. Lateralization of the middle turbinate can also lead to obstruction and can result from turbinate manipulation or partial resection during initial FESS. Postoperative scarring and mucosal thickening are often implicated as causes of recurrent symptoms and cannot be differentiated based on nonenhanced CT features. Table 4.3 Kuhn classification. Type Description 1 Single cell without extension into the frontal sinus, not extending above the frontal ostium 2 Tier of 2 or more cells without extension into the frontal sinus, not extending above the frontal ostium 3 Single cell extending superiorly into the frontal sinus, forming the anterior wall of the infundibulum 4 Single cell pneumatized posteriorly into the frontal sinus, not abutting the agger nasi inferiorly Box 4.1 Findings associated with recurrent symptoms after FESS. Postoperative scarring Residual outflow tract obstruction – remnant frontal recess cells – lateralization of the middle turbinate – retained uncinate Osteoneogenesis Inflammatory mucosal thickening Recurrent polyposis Previously undetected lesions – mucoceles – mucous retention cysts – neoplasms – fibro-osseous lesions 78 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Patients who have a retained superior uncinate at its insertion can, in the setting of certain anatomic configurations, have a propensity for restenosis of the frontal recess outflow tract. In patients for whom the uncinate process inserts on the lamina papyracea or agger nasi, frontal sinus outflow proceeds directly medially into the middle meatus and the uncinate forms the lateral border of the frontal recess. For patients whose uncinate process inserts superiorly on the middle turbinate or skull base, frontal sinus outflow is directed into the ethmoid infundibulum, with the uncinate forming the medial wall of the frontal recess. In the aforementioned scenario of lateral uncinate insertion on the lamina papyracea or agger nasi, the ethmoid infundibulum ends blindly in the recessus terminalis, a recess that can remodel and expand outward with chronic sinusitis, medializing the uncinate and contributing to outflow obstruction. Retention of the superior uncinate insertion after FESS is not uncommon and should be excluded in cases of recurrent symptoms postoperatively. Osteoneogensis, also referred to as hyperostosis, can be the result of chronic inflammation, previous trauma, or surgical manipulation with mucosal defects or mucosal stripping following FESS. Expanding osteoneogenesis postoperatively can restenose outflow tracts and cause recurrent symptoms. Temporal bone CBCT is an emerging technique for select imaging tasks in temporal bone imaging, and preliminary investigations are exploring roles in middle and inner ear implant imaging (Güldner, Wiegand, et  al., 2011), surgical navigation (Kamran et  al., 2010), and in defining particularly small highcontrast structures such as the middle ear ossicles and reuniting duct (Dalchow et al., 2006; Penninger et  al., 2011). Use in general diagnostic imaging is still limited by lack of soft tissue contrast. Any practitioners interpreting CBCT images that include the lateral skull base in the field of view should be familiar with anatomy and pathology in this region, as it will be well delineated in many instances (Gupta et al., 2004). Imaging evaluation in selected imaging tasks such as postoperative middle and inner ear reconstruction are beyond the scope of this chapter. Suffice it to say that middle and inner ear prostheses are generally well visualized with CBCT with relatively minimal streak artifact compared to MDCT (Majdani et al., 2009). Inner ear The inner ear refers to the structures internal to the  oval and round windows and includes the cochlea, semicircular canals, and vestibule (collectively, the bony labyrinth) as well as the membranous labyrinth contained therein (Figure 4.10). The membranous labyrinth includes the utricle and saccule in the vestibule, the semicircular ducts, the scala media of the cochlea, and the endolymphatic duct and sac within the vestibular aqueduct. The perilymphatic space is also contained in the bony labyrinth and is composed of the space surrounding the utricle and saccule in the vestibule, the scala  tympani and vestibuli in the cochlea, and the space in the semicircular canals surrounding the semicircular ducts. The perilymphatic space communicates with the subarachnoid space via the cochlear aqueduct (Yamane et al., 2011). Congenital abnormalities A normally developed inner ear consists of 2.5 turns of the cochlea, a separate vestibule, and normal size and configuration of the semicircular canals as well as cochlear and vestibular aqueducts (Figure  4.11). Multiple congenital abnormalities with characteristic imaging findings have been described but are beyond the scope of this chapter  and are most likely to be encountered in the imaging workup of sensorineural hearing loss in a pediatric patient, a specialized area of clinical practice (Krombach et  al., 2008; Kosling et  al., 2009; Yiin et al., 2011). Acquired inner ear lesions Labyrinthitis Labyrinthitis refers to inflammation involving the membranous labyrinth and is typically infectious, although autoimmune etiologies are also possible. Figure 4.10 Normal temporal bone anatomy. Axial (A, C, D), coronal (B), and oblique (E, F) CBCT images depict the normal anatomy of the middle and inner ears. Both crura of the stapes (*) and the endplate can be seen articulating with the oval window in the oval window niche (A). The incudomalleolar joint (B and C) is seen in two different planes, demonstrating the head of the malleus (* in C) articulating with the body of the incus (#). The long limb of the incus is seen in B (*). In most patients, the bony coverage of the facial nerve in its tympanic segment can be visualized (D, *), demarcating the medial border of the mesotympanum. Oblique reformats demonstrating the posterior (E, *) and superior (F, *) semicircular canals can be constructed with high fidelity to the source data given the isotropic voxel acquisition afforded by CBCT imaging. Figure 4.11 Enlargement of the vestibular aqueduct. Axial CBCT images demonstrate a large vestibular aqueduct (A). A normal vestibular aqueduct posterior and in-plane to the horizontal semicircular canal is provided for comparison (B). This congenital anomaly can cause varying degrees of sensorineural hearing loss and/or dizziness. 79 80 Cone Beam Computed Tomography In infectious labyrinthitis, the causative agent is most commonly viral, although bacterial pathogens are also possible and represent more aggressive disease. Syphilitic labyrinthitis is more rare. The pathophysiology can be related to antecedent middle ear infection(s), meningitis, or hematogenous spread of viral infection. Posttraumatic etiologies and iatrogenic labyrinthitis after inner ear surgery are also possible. In the early phase of infection, CT imaging findings may not be present; but with progressive disease, ossification of the membranous labyrinth identified as osseous deposition within the bony labyrinth can be seen. Early manifestations of labyrinthitis before the onset of CT changes are better demonstrated with MRI (Maroldi et al., 2001). Superior semicircular canal dehiscence Frank dehiscence or extreme thinning of the roof of  the superior semicircular canal (SSC) beyond the resolution of CBCT appears as an interruption or absence of the bony partition between the SCC  and the middle cranial fossa. Identification of  SSC dehiscence is important clinically, as it is a  treatable cause of vestibular dysfunction. SSC dehiscence is typically idiopathic, possibly a developmental abnormality, but barotrauma and other posttraumatic causes have also been postulated. Otosclerosis Otoslcerosis is caused by a disruption in bone metabolism and consists of both a hypervascular spongiotic phase and a later sclerotic phase. Similar but pathophysiologically distinct from Paget’s disease, it only affects the bony labyrinth of the inner ear and is typically bilateral. It occurs sporadically and is more common in men. Progressive disease can result in fixation of the stapedial footplate and conductive hearing loss. Two forms of otosclerosis can be distinguished: fenestral and retrofenestral (Minor et  al., 1998; Mong et  al., 1999). Fenestral otosclerosis is more common and affects the fissula ante fenestram, the bony prominence demarcating the middle from inner ear just anterior to the oval window. The earliest CT evidence of fenestral otosclerosis is a lytic lesion involving the fissula ante fenestram (Figure  4.12; Lee et  al., 2009). Extension to the cochlear promontory and oval/round window niches occurs with continued disease. In later phases, lytic lesions become expansile and spongiform. The final sclerotic phase appears as dense calcification (Maillet et al., 2011). Retrofenestral, or cochlear, otosclerosis primarily affects the otic capsule and is identified in the early stages as pericochlear lucencies that can coalesce to form a lytic “halo.” Progressive phases appear as mixed lytic and sclerotic foci that may ultimately Figure 4.12 Otosclerosis. Coronal CBCT images at the level of the oval window niche and vestibule in three patients depict lucent lesions (arrows) involving the fissula ante fenestram (A) progressing retrofenestrally to involve the cochlea (B and C). Grade 1 otosclerosis is confined to the fissula ante fenestram and stapes footplate and is termed fenestral (A). Grade 2 otosclerosis subtotally involves the cochlea to varying degrees (B and C) with or without fenestral involvement. Grade 3 otosclerosis refers to diffuse and confluent involvement of the cochlea (not shown). Stapedectomy with placement of a stapes prosthesis is the therapy of choice (C). Diagnosis of Sinus Pathologies Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 81 appear predominantly sclerotic, although this can be difficult to identify in dense otic capsule bone. Retrofenestral otosclerosis often occurs with antecedent fenestral findings, so attention should be paid to the fissula ante fenestram when retrofenestral features are present. Neoplasms Evaluation of inner ear neoplasms is best performed with MRI, but CT can be useful in defining the extent of bony destruction. Incidental findings of inner ear tumors on CBCT can be inferred if soft tissue lesions arising within the inner ear spaces causing bony destruction are identified. Spaceoccupying soft tissue lesions in the inner ear include congential cholesteatomas, which can arise in the petrous apex and erode into the lanyrinth; metastases, which can be lytic, blastic, or both; lipoma; and endolymphatic sac tumors. Endolymphatic sac tumors are rare, and appear as retrolabyrinthine destructive soft tissue masses of the temporal bone, occasionally with elements of a calcified matrix. Inner ear prosthesis Cochlear implants are relatively well identified with CBCT and in some centers it is the modality of choice in their evaluation, as CBCT images typically afford lower levels of metallic streak artifact while maintaining high spatial resolution (Faccioli et al., 2009; Rafferty et al., 2006). The position of the inner ear prosthesis can sometimes be identified as within the scala tympani or scala vestibuli with CBCT and the electrode-modiolus relationship can be interrogated. A more complete discussion of inner ear implants is beyond the scope of this chapter (Marshall et al., 2005). Middle ear The middle ear can be segmented into the epitympanum, mesotympanum, and hypotympanum. The epitympanum is the superior-most space, separated from the mesotympanum by the tympanic isthmi at the level of the scutum and bounded superiorly by the tegmen tympani and aditus ad antrum into the mastoid sinus. The mesotympanum is bordered medially by the tympanic portion of the facial nerve, the cochlear promontory, and the fossae of the oval and round windows. Important structures in the posterior mesotympanum include the pyramidal eminence, sinus tympani, and facial nerve recess. The Eustachian canal arises from the anterior mesotympanum. The hypotympanum is the inferior-most recess in the tympanic cavity. The middle ear houses the ossicles, whose anatomy can be well delineated with CBCT. The handle of the malleus is applied to the tympanic membrane, and the head articulates with the body of the incus. The lenticular process of the incus articulates with the head of the stapes, forming a complete ossicular chain from the tympanic membrane and handle of the malleus to the oval window via the stapes footplate (Stone et al., 2000; Monteiro et al., 2011). Congenital abnormalities Congenital abnormalities involving the middle ear include ossicular anomalies such as deformities, fixations, and absences, as well as hypoplasia of the middle ear cavity itself and underpneumatization of the mastoid. A detailed discussion of congenital and developmental abnormalities of the middle ear and their syndromic associations is beyond the scope of this chapter. Otitis media Acute Predisposition to otitis media in the pediatric population is in part related to differences in orientation of the Eustachian tube and hypertrophy of lymphoid tissue. Acute cases are often encountered in this population, and imaging is usually not a necessary part of the diagnostic algorithm. Acute otitis media (AOM) can occur in adults as well, although it is less common, and appears as opacification of the middle ear cavity with or without an air fluid level and concomitant mastoid  opacification. In an uncomplicated case of AOM,  the ossicular chain is typically preserved. Mucoperiosteal inflammation can occur and eventually leads to osteomyelitis in severe cases, which presents as destructive erosion of cortical bone and trabeculae. 82 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Advanced AOM can lead to coalescent mastoiditis, which refers to osteomyelitis of the mastoid. The imaging appearance is one of resorption of the trabeculae within the mastoid compared to the contralateral side, with eventual erosion into surrounding cortical bone and possible subperiosteal abscess formation. A subperiosteal abscess will most likely be occult on CBCT, and contrastenhanced MDCT or MRI should be considered in the appropriate clinical setting. Inferior dehiscence of cortical bone adjacent to the insertion of the posterior digastric muscle suggests the diagnosis of Bezold’s abscess, an aggressive soft tissue infection tracking along the path of the sternocleidomastoid muscle in the suprahyoid neck, eventually spreading within fascial planes into the mediastinum. MRI or CECT is necessary to assess the extent of spread in these cases, as lack of soft tissue resolution with CBCT precludes adequate evaluation of  soft tissue involvement. Other complications of AOM include medial extension to the petrous apex, which will appear as opacification, resorption of traebeculae, and cortical erosion/destruction; epidural abscess; subdural abscess; and sigmoid sinus thrombosis.  Needless to say, evaluation of suspected complications with CBCT is incomplete and further imaging should be immediately pursued (Lemmerling et al., 2008). Chronic Chronic otitis media (COM) refers to persistent inflammatory changes in the middle ear, the earliest imaging features of which are effusion and granulation tissue in the middle ear cavity. CBCT may demonstrate partial or complete opacification of the middle ear or adherent soft tissue in the absence of effusion. When both are present, lack of soft tissue discrimination will limit reliable evaluation. Clinical manifestations of COM include recurrent OM, hearing loss, and otalgia. There is a spectrum of pathology related to chronic inflammation of the middle ear, and it can often be difficult to determine to what extent middle ear pathology is the result of recurrent or chronic inflammation/infection and to what extent pathology in the middle ear causes chronic inflammation and recurrent infections. In some instances the middle ear is predisposed to chronic otitis media and its sequellae due to obstruction of middle ear drainage, either from Eustachian tube  obstruction or narrowing/obstruction of the tympanic isthmi separating the epitympanum (attic) from the mesotympanum. Narrowing can be congenital/developmental or related to acquired pathology as will be discussed below. Related pathology in the middle ear includes tympanic membrane perforation or retraction, tympanosclerosis, and the spectrum of postinflammatory ossicular fixation, acquired cholesteatoma, and cholesterol granuloma. Underpneumatization of the ipsilateral mastoid is also associated with COM. Myringitis refers to inflammation of the tympanic membrane (Figure  4.13) and can occur with or without concomitant middle ear infection. Postinflammatory ossicular fixation Postinflammatory ossicular fixation occurs as a complication of AOM or COM and can lead to conductive hearing loss due to ossicular disruption. Three forms are typically described, chronic adhesive, tympanosclerosis, and fibro-osseous sclerosis. Chronic adhesive postinflammatory ossicular fixation refers to fixation of the ossicles with fibrous tissue and appears as soft tissue debris adjacent to the ossicles, most often around the stapes (causing stapedial fixation). Lack of middle ear effusion or erosions with a history of COM can suggest this diagnosis, but ultimately the appearance is nonspecific on CT and cannot be reliably differentiated from cholesteatoma and other soft tissue pathology. Tympanosclerosis is distinguished pathologically by hyalinized collagen deposition and manifests radiologically as multifocal or discrete calcified densities within the middle ear cavity, often on the tympanic membrane or intimate to the ossicular chain. Fibro-osseous sclerosis is rare and can be differentiated from tympanosclerosis by the presence of lamellar new bone deposition. Cholesteatoma Cholesteatomas are one of the most common middle ear lesions, with an annual incidence of 9.2 per 100,000 in the adult population. They are distinguished histopathologically as nonneoplastic cysts of squamous cells which produce keratin lamellas Diagnosis of Sinus Pathologies Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 83 that then invaginate into the cyst. The external component is composed of mixed inflammatory cells and granulation tissue, occasionally with bony fragments. The majority of cholesteatomas are acquired, but 2% may be congenital, in which case they can occur anywhere in the temporal bone and are histologically identical to epidermoid cysts encountered intracranially. Acquired cholesteatomas typically develop internal to the tympanic membrane (TM) and can be classified as either pars flaccida (arising from the pars flaccida of the TM) or pars tensa (developing through a perforation in the pars tensa  of the TM). Pars flaccida cholesteatomas (Figure 4.14) are more common and are thought to be related to some combination of chronic infection and pressure differentials between the middle and Figure 4.13 Chronic myringitis. Coronal (A) and axial (B) CBCT images demonstrating thickening of the tympanic membrane (A, *) with thickening of the dermis in the posterior external auditory canal (B, *). Normal mastoid pneumatization and a nonopacified middle ear cavity are typical in uncomplicated chronic myringitis. Figure 4.14 Pars flaccida cholesteatoma. Coronal (A, C) and axial (B) images demonstrate soft tissue centered in the epitympanum and extending into the mesotympanum and aditus ad antrum, with bony erosion causing dehiscense of the horizontal semicircular canal (* in A and B) and complete erosion of the ossicles, which are not seen within the epi- and mesotympanum (C). This lesion is centered in Prussak’s space within the lateral epitympanum. The characteristic location and presence of bony erosions is compatible with cholesteatoma. 84 Cone Beam Computed Tomography external ear. Cholesteatomas can also develop in the posttraumatic and postsurgical settings. Pars flaccida cholesteatomas are centered in Prussak’s space, the epitympanic space lateral to the ossicles. Pars tensa cholesteatomas arise medial to the ossicles in the mesotympanum and can be secondarily acquired (through perforations in the TM) or congenital. The typical CT appearance of a cholesteatoma is a uniform-density nondependent soft tissue mass that is sharply demarcated and expansile, centered in a characteristic location (Barath et  al., 2011). Associated TM retraction and extension through the aditus ad antrum can be seen. Early erosion of the scutum as well as erosions of the tegmen tympani and ossicles are characteristic but not always present. Unfortunately, these imaging features are nonspecific on CT, as granulation tissue, secretions, cholesterol granulomas, and neoplasms can all exhibit a similar appearance (Table 4.4). Diagnosis is more readily made by MRI. The most common complication of cholesteatoma is labyrinthine fistula, which can be inferred from dehiscence of the lateral semicircular canal. Facial nerve injury (erosion through the tympanic segment of the facial canal), extension into the internal auditory canal, and erosion of the mastoid trabeculations causing eventual automastoidectomy can also be seen. Dehiscence of the tegmen tympani or anterior epitympanic wall can suggest encephalocele or extension into the middle cranial fossa and warrants further evaluation with MRI. Erosion through the sigmoid sinus plate raises the possibility of sigmoid sinus thrombosis and is an indication for contrast-enhanced imaging. Cholesterol granuloma Cholesterol granulomas can be the sequela of chronic middle ear inflammation and are thought to result from chronic microhemorrhage and the formation of granulation tissue. Attempts can be made to distinguish these from cholesteatomas and hemorrhagic OM, but ultimately MRI is needed for more definitive distinction. The CT appearance is one of a smooth, expansile soft tissue mass in the middle ear, typically without ossicular erosions. Vascular lesions Important vascular lesions to recognize in the middle ear include aberrant internal carotid arteries and jugular bulb anomalies. An aberrant internal carotid artery will appear as a soft tissue mass coursing through the middle ear cavity that is continuous anteromedially with the petrous portion of the internal carotid artery. Jugular bulb anomalies include high-riding jugular bulbs and jugular bulb diverticuli. A high-riding bulb abuts the floor of the internal auditory canal and may protrude into the posteroinferior middle ear cavity if the sigmoid plate is dehiscent. Jugular bulb diverticuli, which are focal outpouchings from the jugular bulb, can also extend into the middle ear through a dehiscent sigmoid plate. Neoplasms Both primary and metastatic neoplasms of the middle ear are rare. Of the primary neoplasms, paragangliomas (glomus tumors) and schwannomas Table 4.4 Evaluating the opacified middle ear. Finding Disease Ossicular erosions Cholesteatoma, glomus jugulare Ossicular displacement Cholesterol granuloma, schwannoma, glomus tympanicum Nasopharyngeal soft tissue assymetry Obstructing nasopharyngeal carcinoma Dehiscence of facial nerve canal Cholesteatoma Tegmen tympani dehiscense Cholesteatoma, encephalocele Dehiscent lateral semicircular canal Cholesteatoma Calcified densities in the middle ear Tympanosclerosis with COM Lamellar new bone deposition Fibro-osseous sclerosis with COM Dehiscent sigmoid plate Jugular bulb anomaly, cholesteatoma Lucent fracture line Temporal bone fracture Note: COM=chronic otitis media. Diagnosis of Sinus Pathologies Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 85 are the most common. Rhabdomyosarcoma is a rare, highly aggressive tumor in children. The CT finding of a middle ear soft tissue mass with or without bony destruction is ultimately nonspecific, as cholesteatoma and other soft tissue lesions of the  middle ear can have a similar appearance. Evaluation with MRI is mandatory in any suspected middle ear neoplasm. Middle ear schwannomas can arise from the facial nerve or, less commonly, from Jacobson’s nerve, the chorda tympani, or secondarily from CN VIII-XI extending into the middle ear. A soft tissue mass associated with the facial nerve canal or arising from the round window niche (Jacobson’s nerve) is suspicious for schwannoma, but nonenhanced CT findings are nonspecific. Middle ear glomus tumors arise from paraganglia associated with either Jacobson’s nerve on the cochlear promontory (glomus tympanicum) or the internal jugular vein around the jugular foramen (glomus jugulare). Both present as soft tissue masses within the middle ear. Glomus tympanicum tumors appear to arise from the promontory, displace rather than destroy the ossicles, and are contained within the middle ear  cavity. Glomus jugulare tumors arise from the jugular foramen and are more aggressive, exhibiting bony remodeling and ossicular destruction. External auditory canal Several pathologic processes in the temporal bone are particular to the external auditory canal (EAC) and deserve specific mention. Foremost among the nonneoplastic entities is malignant otitis externa, which will be discussed below. Other pathology which should be entertained in a differential of EAC disease includes cholesteatoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Both can appear as soft tissue lesions arising in the EAC with adjacent bony erosions, findings which make these entities  difficult to distinguish from malignant otitis externa on imaging findings alone. Otoscopic findings as well as the clinical scenario should be considered. In contrast, keratosis obturans is an idiopathic inflammatory lesion of the EAC causing fibrosis in the medial canal. It can be identified as soft tissue plugging extending up to the TM with mild bony enlargement of the EAC and no appreciable erosions. Bony lesions of the outer ear include osteoma, a densely corticated osseous lesion with either a bony stalk or broad base of attachment to the EAC; and EAC exostoses, which appears as bilateral circumferential bony narrowing of the canals, classically seen in chronic exposure to cold water. Malignant otitis externa Malignant (also known as necrotic) otitis externa is an invasive infectious process (classically pseudomonas) involving the EAC with risk of extension into the skull base toward the mastoid and petrous apex. Rarely, intracranial involvement can be seen. Advanced age and diabetes mellitus are risk factors. CT findings include soft tissue in the EAC with erosions involving adjacent EAC walls and middle ear structures. Erosions extending to the petrous apex and mastoid are present in more advanced disease (Sudhoff et al., 2008). MRI is indicated for evaluation of soft tissue extension into neck spaces inferiorly. Trauma Initial imaging in the setting of head trauma will be MDCT with or without CTA, as discriminating soft tissue resolution is needed to detect intracranial hemorrhage, cerebral edema, and vascular injuries, among other things. Despite CBCT’s ability to detect bony skull base and maxillofacial fractures, the importance of identifying accompanying soft tissue and vascular pathology precludes the use of CBCT as the initial imaging modality. Dedicated temporal bone imaging with MDCT is often obtained if there is concern for laterobasal skull fracture, and multiplanar reconstructions are used to evaluate lucent fracture lines that may travel parallel to the imaging plane on axial slices (Schuknecht and Graetz, 2005; Saraiya and Aygun, 2009; Zayas et al., 2011). Although CBCT has not been well evaluated in the setting of temporal bone trauma, CBCT images obtained secondarily for pre- or intraoperative navigation in the skull base and/or maxillodental regions may identify temporal bone fractures. 86 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Maxillofacial trauma will be discussed separately. Upper cervical spine as well as condylar, clival, and transphenoidal skull base fractures are also serious injuries that are beyond the scope of this discussion. Temporal bone trauma can have serious repercussions, including hearing loss (conductive or sensorineural), vestibular dysfunction, cerebrospinal fluid leak, and facial nerve paralysis, among other things. An opacified middle ear and/or soft tissue density in the mastoid air cells is highly suspicious of temporal bone fracture in the setting of trauma. Other secondary signs include air-fluid levels in the sphenoid sinuses, adjacent pneumocephalus, and air in the glenoid fossa of the TMJ. Intracranial extra-axial fluid collections and evidence of adjacent brain parenchymal injury are unlikely to be identified by CBCT. Fractures are identified as linear lucencies that are distinguishable from normal cranial suture lines. The margins will often not be as well corticated as is seen with vascular channels and normal sutures. In the temporal bone, fractures are ideally classified as otic capsule-sparing or otic capsuleviolating, depending on whether the fracture line extends to involve the bony labyrinth of the inner ear. The distinction is important clinically, as otic capsule-violating fractures are more commonly associated with sensorineural hearing loss, cerebrospinal fluid otorrhea, and facial nerve injury. Fractures can also be classified as longitudinal or transverse based on their relationship to the long axis of the petrous temporal bone, in which case transverse fractures are more likely to involve the otic capsule compared to longitudinal and are therefore considered to represent a more serious injury. Once identified, it is important to follow the entire extent of the lucent fracture line(s), evaluating involvement of key middle and inner ear structures (Table  4.5). Extension to the external auditory canal is also relevant, as untreated EAC fractures can lead to canal stenosis. Disruption of the ossicular chain is not uncommon in temporal bone trauma and can lead to conductive hearing loss. The long process of the incus and stapedial crura are the most common sites of ossicular fracture, and incudostapedial separation is the most common dislocation injury. Skull base The skull base can be divided into anterior, central, and posterior compartments, with the temporal bone composing the lateral skull base, as discussed previously. The anterior skull base forms the floor of the anterior cranial fossa and the roof of the nasal cavity, orbits, and ethmoid sinuses. It is composed of the cribiform plate and crista galli medially, the orbital plates of the frontal bone more laterally, and the planum sphenoidale and lesser sphenoid wings posteriorly. Important bony foramina include the anterior and posterior ethmoid foramina transmitting the anterior and posterior ethmoid arteries respectively, as well as the cribiform plate foramina transmitting nerve fibers from cranial nerve (CN) I. The central skull base is composed of the sphenoid bone, its greater wings, and the petrous temporal bone anterior to the petrous ridge. It forms the floor of the middle cranial fossa and the roof of the sphenoid sinus and infratemporal fossae. Central skull base foramina include the optic canal and superior/inferior orbital fissures, the carotid canal, the vidian canal, and foraminas rotundum, ovale, spinosum, and lacerum. CN II–VI are transmitted through central skull base foramina as well as the internal carotid, ophthalmic, and middle meningeal arteries. The posterior skull base is composed of the posterior temporal bones and occipital bone and forms the floor of the posterior cranial fossa, the foramen magnum, and the superior boundary of the more posterior soft tissue compartments of the neck. Within the posterior skull base, CN VII–VIII are transmitted through the internal auditory canal, Table 4.5 Temporal bone fracture. Structure Involved Clinical Concern Ossicles Conductive hearing loss Carotid canal Carotid artery injury Facial nerve canal Facial nerve injury Cochlea Sensorineural hearing loss Vestibule Risk of developing benign paroxysmal positional vertigo Semicircular canals Vertigo Diagnosis of Sinus Pathologies Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 87 and CN IX–XII and the medulla oblongata pass through the foramen magnum. The jugular foramen is also a landmark of the posterior skull base. The foramen magnum is bounded anteriorly by the basilar quadrilateral plate of the occipital bone, laterally by the occipital condyles, and posteriorly by the squamous portion of the occipital bone. Skull base imaging is traditionally accomplished by both MDCT and contrast-enhanced MRI, as both precise bony detail and soft tissue contrast are required for adequate evaluation (Curtin et  al., 1998). Evaluation of the skull base is often performed in the setting of trauma as well as infection or malignancy to assess local extension and perineural spread of tumor, in which case CBCT is of limited value. Incidental skull base disease, however, can be encountered in CBCT scans ordered for other indications (Bremke et al., 2009). Fibro-osseous lesions Fibro-osseous pathology involving the skull base will appear similar to that encountered in other bony structures of the body. Paget’s disease can involve the skull base, in which case it manifests as  patchy or diffuse cortical thickening, blurring of  cortico-medullary differentiation, and areas of osteolysis/demineralization. Osteopetrosis is another disease of bone metabolism that can be inherited in  an autosomal dominant (adult presentation) or  autosomal recessive (childhood presentation) manner. Autosomal dominant osteopetrosis is typically less severe than childhood autosomal recessive disease and appears as relatively uniform dense sclerosis and expansion of the skull base which can encroach on neural foramina and narrow the dural sinuses. The middle and inner ears may also be involved, causing conductive or sensorineural hearing loss. Fibrous dysplasia occurs in the skull base and can exhibit variable morphology including sclerotic, pagetoid, or predominantly cystic patterns as described previously. Tumor and infection Aggressive infectious processes that originate in the soft tissues of the head and neck can extend to the skull base and cause osteomyelitis. Classically this can be seen with coalescent mastoiditis, malignant otitis externa, and aggressive sinonasal infections such as invasive fungal sinusitis, although any infection can theoretically extend to the skull base if left untreated. Bone erosions are the hallmark of osteomyelitis, and obliteration of normal fat planes is often seen on MDCT (Chong, 2003). On CBCT, bony erosions with concordant clinical history/findings should raise concern for skull base osteomyelitis. Appropriate imaging evaluation when there is suspicion for skull base osteomyelitis includes MDCT and MRI. Tumors that involve the skull base include many that have been discussed in the context of sinonasal and temporal bone pathology, as these tumors often extend to and/or arise from the anterior and lateral skull base. In brief, schwannomas, glomus tumors, and endolymphatic sac tumors are classic temporal bone tumors that involve the skull base. The vast majority of schwannomas arise from cranial nerves and are most commonly associated with CN VIII, although schwannomas of other cranial nerves are also encountered. Squamous cell carcinoma, enthesioneuroblastoma, and sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma can all involve the skull  base and have been discussed previously. Metastases and lymphoma should also be on the differential for skull base lesions with imaging features concerning for malignancy. In addition to the tumors already discussed, chondrosarcoma, plasmacytoma, chordomas, and meningiomas also deserve mention. Chondrosarcomas are aggressive chondroid malignancies that can arise from the skull base, often centered at the petro-occipital fissure. They appear as expansile calcified tumors of the skull base and should be evaluated with MDCT and MRI. Skull base plasmacytomas are monoclonal plasma cell tumors that appear either as a soft tissue mass extending to and involving the skull base (extramedullary), or as lytic lesions centered within the skull base without defined sclerotic margins. Chordomas are rare tumors that arise from remnant notochord elements. They are typically centered in the clivus with imaging features of expansile, multilobulated lytic mass lesions. Meningiomas are relatively common and can arise from any region of the skull base with intracranial exposure, presenting as circumscribed extra-axial soft tissue masses centered on the intracranial dura mater with variable degrees of calcification. All skull base soft tissue masses, 88 Cone Beam Computed Tomography especially those with bony erosion, should be further evaluated with MRI. Finally, benign tumors and tumorlike lesions of  the skull base include eosinophilic granuloma and giant cell tumors. Eosinophilic granuloma (or Langerhans cell histiocytosis) is a rare, idiopathic disease of monoclonal histiocyte proliferation with formation of granulomatous tissue. The CT appearance is that of destructive lytic bone lesions, often with soft tissue mass(es). The calvarium is more commonly involved than the skull base, and the lateral skull base is the most typical extracalvarial site of involvement. CECT or MRI are required for more complete evaluation. Skull base giant cell tumors are benign lytic bone lesions that present as expansile soft tissue masses with a thin cortical rim, often centered in the sphenoid or temporal bones. References Bachar, G., Siewerdsen, J.H., Daly, M.J., Jaffray, D.A., and Irish, J.C. (2007). Image quality and localization accuracy in C-arm tomosynthesis-guided head and neck surgery. Medical Physics, 34(12): 4664–77. Balbach, L., Trinkel, V., Güldner, C., Bien, S., Teymoortash, A., Werner, J.A., and Bremke, M. (2011). Radiological examinations of the anatomy of the inferior turbinate using digital volume tomography (DVT). Rhinology, 49(2): 248–52. Barath, K., Huber, A.M., Stampfli, P., Varga, Z., and Kollias, S. (2011). Neuroradiology of cholesteatomas. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 32(2): 221–9. Benoudiba, F., Marsot-Dupuch, K., Rabia, M.H., Cabanne, J., Bobin, S., and Lasjaunias, P. (2003). Sinonasal Wegener’s granulomatosis: CT characteristics. Neuroradiology, 45(2): 95–9. Bolger, W.E., Butzin, C.A., and Parsons, D.S. (1991). Paranasal sinus bony anatomic variations and mucosal abnormalities: CT analysis for endoscopic sinus surgery. The Laryngoscope, 101(1 Pt 1): 56–64. Branstetter, B.F., IV, and Weissman, J.L. (2005). Role of MR and CT in the paranasal sinuses. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 38(6): 1279–99. Bremke, M., Sesterhenn, A.M., Murthum, T., Al Hail, A., Bien, S., and Werner, J.A. (2009). Digital volume tomography (DVT) as a diagnostic modality of the anterior skull base. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 129(10): 1106–14. Brook, I. (2006). Sinusitis of odontogenic origin. Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, 135(3): 349–55. Chong, V. (2003). The skull base in oncologic imaging. Cancer Imaging, 4(1): 5–6. Curtin, H.D., and Chavali, R. (1998). Imaging of the skull  base. Radiologic Clinics of North America, 36(5): 801–17. Cymerman, J.J., Cymerman, D.H., and O’Dwyer, R.S. (2011). Evaluation of odontogenic maxillary sinusitis using cone-beam computed tomography: Three case reports. Journal of Endodontics, 37(10): 1465–9. Dalchow, C.V., Weber, A.L., Yanagihara, N., Bien, S., and Werner, J.A. (2006). Digital volume tomography: Radiologic examinations of the temporal bone. American Journal of Roentgenology, 186(2): 416–23. Daly, M.J., Siewerdsen, J.H., Moseley, D.J., Jaffray, D.A., and Irish, J.C. (2006). Intraoperative cone-beam CT for  guidance of head and neck surgery: Assessment of dose and image quality using a C-arm prototype. Medical Physics, 33(10): 3767–80. Eggesbo, H.B. (2006). Radiological imaging of inflammatory lesions in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. European Radiology, 16(4): 872–88. Faccioli, N., Barillari, M., Guariglia, S., Zivelonghi, E., Rizzotti, A., Cerini, R., and Mucelli, R.P. (2009). Radiation dose saving through the use of cone-beam CT in hearing-impaired patients. La Radiologia Medica, 114(8): 1308–18. Güldner, C., Diogo, I., Windfuhr, J., Bien, S., Teymoortash, A., Werner, J.A., and Bremke, M. (2011). Analysis of the fossa olfactoria using cone beam tomography (CBT). Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 131(1): 72–8. Güldner, C., Wiegand, S., Weiss, R., Bien, S., Sesterhenn, A., Teymoortash, A., and Diogo, I. (2011). Artifacts of the electrode in cochlea implantation and limits in analysis of deep insertion in cone beam tomography (CBT). European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. Published online 30 July 2011. Gupta, R., Bartling, S.H., Basu, S.K., Ross, W.R., Becker,  H., Pfoh, A., et  al. (2004). Experimental flat-panel high-spatial-resolution volume CT of the temporal bone. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 25(8): 1417–24. Gupta, R., Cheung, A.C., Bartling, S.H., Lisauskas, J., Grasruck, M., Leidecker, C., et  al. (2008). Flat-panel volume CT: Fundamental principles, technology, and  applications. Radiographics: A Review Publication of  the Radiological Society of North America, 28(7): 2009–22. Hoang, J.K., Eastwood, J.D., Tebbit, C.L., and Glastonbury, C.M. (2010). Multiplanar sinus CT: A systematic approach to imaging before functional endoscopic sinus surgery. American Journal of Roentgenology, 194(6): W527-36. Huang, B.Y., Lloyd, K.M., DelGaudio, J.M., Jablonowski, E., and Hudgins, P.A. (2009). Failed endoscopic sinus Diagnosis of Sinus Pathologies Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 89 surgery: Spectrum of CT findings in the frontal recess. Radiographics: A Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, 29(1): 177–95. Kamran, M., Nagaraja, S., and Byrne, J.V. (2010). C-arm flat detector computed tomography: The technique and its applications in interventional neuroradiology. Neuroradiology, 52(4): 319–27. Kosling, S., Omenzetter, M., and Bartel-Friedrich, S. (2009). Congenital malformations of the external and middle ear. European Journal of Radiology, 69(2): 269–79. Krombach, G.A., Honnef, D., Westhofen, M., Di Martino, E., and Gunther, R.W. (2008). Imaging of congenital anomalies and acquired lesions of the inner ear. European Radiology, 18(2): 319–30. Lee, T.C., Aviv, R.I., Chen, J.M., Nedzelski, J.M., Fox,  A.J., and Symons, S.P. (2009). CT grading of otosclerosis. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 30(7): 1435–9. Lemmerling, M.M., De Foer, B., VandeVyver, V., Vercruysse, J.P., and Verstraete, K.L. (2008). Imaging of the opacified middle ear. European Journal of Radiology, 66(3): 363–71. Maillet, M., Bowles, W.R., McClanahan, S.L., John, M.T., and Ahmad, M. (2011). Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of maxillary sinusitis. Journal of Endodontics, 37(6): 753–7. Majdani, O., Thews, K., Bartling, S., Leinung, M., Dalchow, C., Labadie, R., et al. (2009). Temporal bone imaging: Comparison of flat panel volume CT and multisection CT. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 30(7): 1419–24. Maroldi, R., Farina, D., Palvarini, L., Marconi, A., Gadola, E., Menni, K., and Battaglia, G. (2001). Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of pathologic conditions of the middle ear. European Journal of Radiology, 40(2): 78–93. Marshall, A.H., Fanning, N., Symons, S., Shipp, D., Chen,  J.M., and Nedzelski, J.M. (2005). Cochlear implantation in cochlear otosclerosis. The Laryngoscope, 115(10): 1728–33. Minor, L.B., Solomon, D., Zinreich, J.S., and Zee, D.S. (1998). Sound- and/or pressure-induced vertigo due to bone dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal. Archives of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, 124(3): 249–58. Miracle, A.C., and Mukherji, S.K. (2009a). Conebeam CT of the head and neck, part 1: Physical principles. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 30(6): 1088–95. Miracle, A.C., and Mukherji, S.K. (2009b). Conebeam CT of the head and neck, part 2: Clinical applications. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 30(7): 1285–92. Momeni, A.K., Roberts, C.C., and Chew, F.S. (2007). Imaging of chronic and exotic sinonasal disease: Review. American Journal of Roentgenology, 189(6 Suppl): S35-45. Mong, A., Loevner, L.A., Solomon, D., and Bigelow, D.C. (1999). Sound- and pressure-induced vertigo associated with dehiscence of the roof of the superior semicircular canal. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 20(10): 1973–5. Monteiro, E., Das, P., Daly, M., Chan, H., Irish, J., and James, A. (2011). Usefulness of cone-beam computed tomography in determining the position of ossicular prostheses: A cadaveric model. Otology & Neurotology, 32(8): 1358–63. Mukherji, S.K., Gujar, S., Jordan, J.E., et al. (2006). ACR practice guideline for the performance of computed tomography (CT) of the extracranial head and neck in  adults and children. ACR Practice Guideline 2006 (Res 12, 17, 35). Penninger, R.T., Tavassolie, T.S., and Carey, J.P. (2011). Cone-beam volumetric tomography for applications in the temporal bone. Otology & Neurotology, 32(3): 453–60. Rafferty, M.A., Siewerdsen, J.H., Chan, Y., Daly, M.J., Moseley, D.J., Jaffray, D.A., and Irish, J.C. (2006). Intraoperative cone-beam CT for guidance of temporal bone surgery. Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, 134(5): 801–8. Ritter, L., Lutz, J., Neugebauer, J., Scheer, M., Dreiseidler, T., Zinser, M.J., et al. (2011). Prevalence of pathologic findings in the maxillary sinus in conebeam computerized tomography. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics, 111(5): 634–40. Rumboldt, Z., Huda, W., and All, J.W. (2009). Review of portable CT with assessment of a dedicated head CT scanner. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 30(9): 1630–6. Saraiya, P.V., and Aygun, N. (2009). Temporal bone fractures. Emergency Radiology, 16(4): 255–65. Savvateeva, D.M., Güldner, C., Murthum, T., Bien, S., Teymoortash, A., Werner, J.A., et  al. (2010). Digital volume tomography (DVT) measurements of the olfactory cleft and olfactory fossa. Acta OtoLaryngologica, 130(3): 398–404. Schuknecht, B., and Graetz, K. (2005). Radiologic assessment of maxillofacial, mandibular, and skull base trauma. European Radiology, 15(3): 560–8. Stone, J.A., Mukherji, S.K., Jewett, B.S., Carrasco, V.N., and Castillo, M. (2000). CT evaluation of prosthetic ossicular reconstruction procedures: What the otologist needs to know. Radiographics, 20(3): 593–605. Sudhoff, H., Rajagopal, S., Mani, N., Moumoulidis, I., Axon, P.R., and Moffat, D. (2008). Usefulness of CT scans in malignant external otitis: Effective tool for the diagnosis, but of limited value in predicting outcome. 90 Cone Beam Computed Tomography European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 265(1): 53–6. Tam, A.L., Mohamed, A., Pfister, M., Chinndurai, P., Rohm, E., Hall, A.F., et  al. (2010). C-arm cone beam computed tomography needle path overlay for fluoroscopic guided vertebroplasty. Spine, 35(10): 1095–9. Yamane, H., Takayama, M., Sunami, K., Sakamoto, H., Imoto, T., and Anniko, M. (2011). Visualization and assessment of saccular duct and endolymphatic sinus. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 131(5): 469–73. Yiin, R.S., Tang, P.H., and Tan, T.Y. (2011). Review of congenital inner ear abnormalities on CT temporal bone. The British Journal of Radiology, 84(1005): 859–63. Yousem, D.M. (1993). Imaging of sinonasal inflammatory disease. Radiology, 188(2): 303–14. Zayas, J.O., Feliciano, Y.Z., Hadley, C.R., Gomez, A.A., and Vidal, J.A. (2011). Temporal bone trauma and the role of multidetector CT in the emergency department. Radiographics, 31(6): 1741–55. Cone Beam Computed Tomography: Oral and Maxillofacial Diagnosis and Applications, First Edition. Edited by David Sarment. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2014 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 91 Orthodontic and Orthognathic Planning Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Lucia H. S. Cevidanes, Martin Styner, Beatriz Paniagua, and João Roberto Gonçalves 5 Introduction Technology development has led to scientific advances in diagnosis and treatment planning in  orthodontics and oral maxillofacial surgery. Evidence-based dentistry seems to be a light at the end of a tunnel of benefits, costs, interests, and ethics that will potentially lead to improved quality of life for patients. Specifically, threedimensional (3D) diagnostic assessment of facial morphology at baseline and overtime has the potential to allow more effective and rational clinical decision making for orthodontic and orthognathic surgery patients. With the availability of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), the preparation of the surgical plan is shifting from using 2D radiographic images to 3D images and models. In the past ten years, a number of research centers and commercial companies have strived to provide software environments that allow preparation of the operative plan on 3D models of the skeletal structures extracted from the CBCT. As these planning systems begin to be used in clinical practice, it is important to validate the clinical application of these methods, critically assess the difficulty of transferring virtual plans into the operating room, and assess long-term treatment outcomes of surgery. Studies on the 3D bone remodeling and displacements with surgery have helped elucidate clinical questions on variability of outcomes of surgery (Cevidanes, Bailey, et  al., 2005; Carvalho et  al., 2010; Tucker et  al., 2010). Accuracy and reliability of this tool, increased costs, and radiation exposure are some of the aspects to be discussed in this transition. In this chapter we discuss applications of CBCT to diagnosis, treatment planning, and approaches to measure changes over time. The image analysis tools for 3D images, specifically color maps and 3D “closest point” quantification, have been adapted by us for use with cone beam CTs of the craniofacial complex and have brought significant contribution to clinical needs as they broaden the diagnosis and narrow the treatment targets. However, the closest point method measures displacement that occurs with orthognathic surgery as the smallest separation between the boundaries of the same structure, which may or may not be the  appropriate directional distance between equivalent boundaries or landmarks on pre- and postsurgery images. The closest point method cannot be used to quantify longitudinal changes and fails to quantify rotational and large translational movements. Other 3D morphometric 92 Cone Beam Computed Tomography approaches under development will also be discussed in this chapter. Applications of 3D CBCT imaging for diagnosis and treatment planning Although some clinicians have used CBCT routinely in the orthodontic practice, there are questions on whether the diagnostic benefits justify the  radiation dose and the routine use of CBCT. Current applications of 3D CBCT imaging in orthodontics include the following diagnosis and assessment of treatment for complex orthodontic conditions. Alveolar bone and tooth morphology and relative position CBCT allows evaluation of buccal and lingual plates of the alveolar bone, bone loss or formation, bone depth and height, presence or absence of unerupted teeth, tooth development, tooth morphology and position, amount of bone covering the tooth, proximity or resorption of adjacent teeth. For such application, the image acquisition can utilize a small or medium field of view that includes an arch quadrant or both upper and lower arches, depending on the clinical indication (Figure  5.1). Such findings in CBCT images may lead to modifications in the orthodontic treatment planning (such as avoid extraction, change plan of which tooth to  extract, or placement of bone plates and mini-screws), reduced treatment duration, and improved control of additional root resorption in the ortho-surgical planning (Molen, 2010; Leung et  al., 2010; Tai et  al., 2010; Becker et  al., 2010; Botticelli et al., 2010; Katheria et al., 2010; Leuzinger et al., 2010; Tamimi and ElSaid, 2010; Van Elslande et  al., 2010; SHemesh et  al., 2011; Sherrard et  al., 2010; Treil et al., 2009). Temporomandibular joint evaluation For detecting TMJ bony changes, panoramic radiography and MRI have only poor to marginal sensitivity (Ahmad et  al., 2009). For this reason, CBCT has recently replaced other imaging modalities as the modality of choice to study TMJ bony changes (Alexiou et al., 2009; Helenius et al., 2005; Koyama et  al., 2007). The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/ TMD; Dworkin and LeResche, 1992) was revised recently to include image analysis criteria for various imaging modalities (Ahmad et  al., 2009). The RDC/TMD validation project (Schiffman et al., 2010; Truelove et  al., 2010; Schiffman et  al., 2010) concluded that revised clinical criteria alone, without recourse to imaging, are inadequate for valid diagnosis of TMD and had previously underestimated the prevalence of bony changes in the TMJ. TMJ pathologies that result in alterations in the size, form, quality, and spatial relationships of the osseous joint components lead to skeletal and dental discrepancies in the three planes of space. In affected condyles, the perturbed growth and/or bone remodeling, resorption, and apposition can lead to progressive bite changes that are accompanied by compensations in the maxilla, “nonaffected” side of the mandible, tooth position, occlusion and articular fossa, and unpredictable orthodontic outcomes (Kapila et al., 2011; Bryndahl et al., 2006). Like any other joint, the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is prone to a myriad of pathologies that could be didactically divided as “degenerative pathologies” and “proliferative pathologies” (also see chapter 3 for details). Such pathologies can dramatically affect other craniofacial structures and be  easily recognized, or the TMJ pathology can be challenging to diagnose even to experts when its progression is subtle and limited, though still clinically relevant (Figure  5.2). In any situation, Figure 5.1 3D renderings cropping of region of interest to assess the position of the impacted canine. Orthodontic and Orthognathic Planning Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 93 longitudinal quantification of condylar changes has the potential to improve clinical decision making, by identifying the most appropriate and beneficial therapy. The TMJ is unique in relation to the other joints in our body. Adult joint bone surfaces are composed of hyaline cartilage, but the TMJ’s bone surfaces are composed of fibro cartilage, which allows a tremendous ability to adapt morphologically according to function. The threshold between functional physiologic stimulus with its positive biochemical effects on the TMJ and joint overloading that leads to degenerative changes is beyond current knowledge (Ishida et  al., 2009; Blumberg et  al., 2008; Burgin and Aspden, 2008; Roemhildt et al., 2010; Scott and Athanasiou, 2006; Verteramo and Seedhom, 2007). This threshold is influenced by a multitude of factors, including but not limited to the joint loading vectors and their magnitude (Gallo et  al., 2008), and patient inherited or acquired (genetic and mostly epigenetic) factors including hormonal and autoimmune imbalances. Current methods to detect pathological conditions in a cross-sectional diagnostic assessment (bone scintigraphy and positron emission tomography) are highly sensitive; however, they do not have enough specificity, as there are no standard normal values for baseline assessments. Longitudinal 3D  quantification using CBCTs offers a relative low-cost/low-radiation technology (compared to PET-CT and bone scintigraphy) and can make a significant difference on treatment planning as an additional biomarker or risk factor tool. The use of biomarkers to aid diagnosis in temporomandibular joint disorders is very promising, but it is not novel. Several biomarkers, including C-reactive protein, have previously been identified in blood and in synovial fluid biopsies of patients with TMJ condylar bone resorption and related to the pathological progress (Fredriksson, et al., 2006; Nordahl et  al., 2001; Alstergren and Kopp, 2000). Such techniques, still currently restricted to academic environments and research centers, are certainly very promising and will complement CBCT threedimensional techniques that are already a clinical tool protocol. Airway assessment Airway morphology (see chapter 9 for details) and changes overtime with surgery, growth, and its relationship to obstructive sleep apnea have been recently assessed in CBCTs (Abramson et al., 2011; Schendel et al., 2011; Iwasaki et al., 2011; Schendel and Hatcher, 2010; Conley, 2011; Lenza et al., 2010; El and Palomo, 2010). However, the boundaries of the nasopharynx superiorly with the maxillary and paranasal sinuses, and the boundaries of the oropharynx with the oral cavity anteriorly and inferiorly with the larynx, are not consistent among subjects. Additionally, image acquisitions and airway shape and volume will vary markedly with functional stage of the dynamic process of breathing and head posture. If head posture is not correctly reproduced in longitudinal studies, differences in head posture will lead to variability in airway dimensions. Longitudinal assessments of mandibular setback have not shown consistent reduction of airway space, nor have mandibular propulsion devices shown enlargement of the airway space Pre-surgery Pre-surgery Immediately post-surgery One year post-surgery Post-surgery Figure 5.2 Two-jaw surgery where disc displacement without capture at open bite was diagnosed in MRI. Surgical correction included disc repositioning. Please note in blue the condylar remodeling 1 year post-surgery. 94 Cone Beam Computed Tomography that might be helpful for obstructive breathing conditions (Figure  5.3). Retroglossal airway changes after extraction of four bicuspids and retraction of lower anterior teeth or after significant surgical mandibular advancement or setback are prone to great variability and are still under scrutiny in studies. Dentofacial deformities and craniofacial anomalies CBCT imaging offers the ability to analyze facial asymmetry and antero-posterior, vertical, and transverse discrepancies (Figure  5.4). The virtual treatment simulations can be used for treatment  planning in orthopedic corrections and orthognathic surgery and for printing surgical splints. Computer-aided jaw surgery is increasingly in use clinically due to the possibility of incorporating a high level of precision for accurately transferring virtual plans into the operating room. In complex cases, follow-up CBCT acquisitions, for growth observation, treatment progress, and posttreatment observations, may be helpful to assess stability of the correction overtime (Agarwal, 2011; Behnia et  al., 2011; Dalessandri et  al., 2011; Ebner et  al., 2010; Edwards, 2010; Jayaratne, Zwahlen, Lo, and Cheung, 2010; Kim et  al., 2011; Abou-Elfetouh et al., 2011; Lloyd et al., 2011; Gateno et al., 2011; Almeida et  al., 2011; Cevidanes et  al., 2010; Orentlicher et al., 2010; Jayaratne, Zwahlen, Lo, Tam, et  al., 2010; Popat and Richmond, 2010; Schendel and Lane, 2009). The methods for computer-aided systems in jaw surgery follow procedures from the image scanners to the operating room (Figure 5.5) and have Pre-surgery Splint removal 1 year post-surgery Figure 5.3 Longitudinal assessments of mandibular setback reveal reduction of airway space of the lower portion of the pharynx at splint removal. However, this airway space reduction is no longer observed at 1 year post-surgery. Figure 5.4 Skeletal antero-posterior, vertical, and transverse discrepancies shown in surface models. Orthodontic and Orthognathic Planning Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 95 included commercially a number of systems, such as Medical Modeling (Texas) and Maxilim (Medicim, Mechelen, Belgium). The advantages of those systems are that they do not require time or computer expertise for the surgeon, and for a service fee, the commercial companies construct surface models from CBCTs and impressions or digital dental casts registered to the CBCT, perform the virtual surgery, and print surgical splints. The computer-aided surgery steps include (1) data acquisition: collection of diagnostic data; (2) image segmentation: identification of anatomic structures of interest in the image data sets and visualization of 3D display of the anatomic structures; (3)  diagnosis: extraction of clinical information from the 3D representations of the anatomy, for example, by using mirroring planes; (4) planning and simulation: preparation of an operative plan by using the virtual anatomy, and preparation of a simulation of the outcome; (5) 3D printed surgical guides or individually fabricated synthetic grafts  or prosthetic repair; and (6) intraoperative guidance: assistance for intraoperative realization of the virtual plan. (1) Collection of diagnostic records Diagnosis of skeletal discrepancies is based on visual data coming from different sources: clinical examination, 3D photographic examination, CBCT, CT, MRI, and digital dental models. Computerassisted systems must integrate different records in order to characterize the orthodontic diagnosis and formulate the treatment plan. Multimodality registration is available for a number of commercial software programs, such as 3DMDvultus (3DMD, Atlanta, GA), Maxilim (Medicim, Mechelen, Belgium), Dolphin Imaging (Dolphin Imaging & Management Solutions, Chatsworth, CA), InVivoDental (Anatomage, San Jose, CA), and SimPlant OMS (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). The CMFApp software (developed under the funding of the Co-Me network; CMFApp software, 2012) and Slicer3 (3DSlicer software, 2012; National Alliance for Medical Image Computing, NIH Roadmap) provide uniform medical data handling preoperative grey level image (CBCT, CT, MRI), skeletal models, acquired dental occlusion, operative plans, diagnostic data (3D cephalometry, mirrored Collection of diagnostic records Segmentation and visualization 3D cephalometry and mirroring Planning and simulation 3D printed splints Intra-operative guidance Figure 5.5 Steps in computer-assisted surgery. 96 Cone Beam Computed Tomography structures), planning data (osteotomy lines, repositioning plans), guidance data (registration points and transformations), postoperative image, and so forth. (2) Segmentation and visualization of anatomic structures of interest The acquired DICOM files can be imported into diverse 3D image analysis software. Next, in a process known as image segmentation, we identify and delineate the anatomical structures of interest in the image. In orthodontics and orthognathic surgery, the goal of segmentation is to obtain a 3D representation of the hard and soft tissues that is usable for virtual planning. Even though image segmentation has been a field of active research for many decades, it remains one of the hardest, most frequently required steps in image processing systems. There does not and cannot exist a standard segmentation method that can be expected to work equally well for all tasks. The morphology and position of the condyles, and the internal surface of  the ramus and maxilla are critical for careful virtual surgery planning. To best capture these and  other areas, our method of choice for the segmentation procedures utilizes ITK-SNAP software (Yushkevich et al., 2006), which has received continuous NIH support for further open-source software development. ITK-SNAP was developed, based on the NIH Visualization Tool Kit and Image  Tool Kit (ITK), as part of the NIH Roadmap Initiative for National Centers of Biomedical Computing. The automatic segmentation procedures in ITK-SNAP utilize two active contour methods to compute feature images based on the CBCT image gray level intensity and boundaries (Figure  5.6). The first method causes the active contour to slow down near edges, or discontinuities, of intensity. The second causes the active contour to attract to boundaries of regions of uniform intensity. After obtaining the segmentation result, manual postprocessing is normally necessary. Artifacts resulting from metallic elements need to be removed. Lower and upper jaws are usually connected due to insufficient longitudinal image resolution and must be separated in the temporomandibular joint and on the occlusal surface Figure 5.6 Construction of surface models using ITK-SNAP. Orthodontic and Orthognathic Planning Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 97 in  particular. For this reason, it has been recommended that the CBCT be taken in centric occlusion with a stable and thin bite registration material (Swennen et al., 2009). On a laptop computer equipped with 1GB of RAM, the initial mesh generation step typically takes about 15 minutes. Manual postprocessing usually takes longer, up to a couple of hours (separation of the jaws can be particularly tedious). Two technological options are available to visualize these structures three dimensionally. The first is surface-based methods, which require the generation of an intermediate surface representation (triangular mesh) of the object to be displayed, providing very detailed shading of the facial surfaces at any zoom factor. The second is volumebased methods, which create a 3D view directly from the volume data (Pommert et al., 1996). The advantage of a surface-based method is the very detailed shading of the facial surfaces at any zoom factor. Also, any other three-dimensional structure that can be represented by a triangular mesh can be  easily included in the anatomical view (e.g., implants imported from CAD implant databases). The majority of existing cranio-maxillofacial surgery planning software uses surface-based visualization. An obvious disadvantage of surface-based methods is the need for an intermediate surface representation. The advantage of a volumetric method is that volumetric operations are immediately visible in three dimensions, as well as in  cross-sectional images. For example, virtual osteotomies can be applied on the original image dataset and seen in three dimensions (see chapter 7 for more details). The main limitation of this representation is the difficulty of establishing the boundaries between tissues and assigning the proper color/transparency values to obtain the desired display. Moreover, the image intensity for a given tissue can vary between patients and scanners (e.g., bone density varies with age and metabolic status; there are variations in scanner calibrations). Virtual cutting operations are much more difficult to simulate in voxel-wise representations. Further evolutions in software and graphics hardware that combine both surface- and volume-based visualization technologies have great potential as they offer complementary information and might expedite the process. (3) Diagnosis using 3D cephalometry and mirroring techniques Morphometrics is the branch of mathematics studying shapes and shape changes of geometric objects. Cephalometrics is a subset of morphometrics. Clinically, it is used to analyze a set of points, either of anatomical meaning or from an abstract definition (such as middle point between two other points), and understanding of facial morphology is described by angles and linear measurements (Figure  5.7). Surface and shape data available in 3D imaging provide new characterization schemes, based on higher order mathematical entities (e.g., spline curves and surfaces). For example, Cutting et al. (1996) and Subsol et al. (1998) introduced the concept of ridge curves for automatic cephalometric characterization. Ridge curves (also known as crest lines) of a surface are the loci of the maximal curvature, in the associated principal curvature directions. The ridge lines of a surface convey very rich and compact information, which tends to correspond to natural anatomic features. Lines of high curvature are typical reference features in the craniofacial skeleton. Future studies will establish new standards for 3D measurements in the craniofacial skeleton. New developments in this area might lead to comprehensive 3D morphometric systems, including surface-based and volumebased computed shape measurements (Figure 5.8). Figure 5.7 Overlay of pre-surgery (solid) and 1 year post-surgery (mesh) surface models of the mandibular condyles. The condylion landmarks in the pre-surgery and 1 year post-surgery could not be homologous points in the condyles, when marked bone changes have occurred. 98 Cone Beam Computed Tomography They could also lead to “four-dimensional” (4D) shape information, which integrates evolution over time in the analysis, an application of great relevance allowing early diagnosis of postintervention unexpected positional changes. Clinical decisions could therefore be influenced to avoid further complications. (4) Surgical planning and simulation After establishment of the diagnosis, the next step is to use the 3D representations of the anatomy to  plan and simulate the surgical intervention. In  orthognathic surgery, corrective interventions designate procedures that do not require an extrinsic graft, and reconstructive interventions are designated for situations in which a graft is used. In corrective procedures, it is important to determine the location of the surgical cuts, to plan the movements of the bony segments relative to one another, and to achieve the desired realignment intraoperatively. In reconstructive procedures, problems arise in determining the desired implant or graft shape. In the case of implants and prosthesis, the problems are to select the proper device and shape it, or to fabricate an individual device from a suitable biocompatible material. With a graft, the difficulties lie in choosing the harvesting site, shaping the graft, and placing the  implant or graft in the appropriate location (Chapuis, 2006). Virtual osteotomies allow for planning of cuts as well as position and size of fixation screws and plates, taking into account the intrinsically complex cranial anatomy. The surface model can also include regions of thin (or absent) bone, such as the maxillary sinus anterior wall, which can create sudden discontinuities in the mesh, as well as inner structures (e.g., mandibular nerve canal). After the virtual osteotomy, the virtual surgery with relocation of the bony segments can be performed with quantification of the planned surgical movements (Chapuis et al., 2007; De Momi et  al., 2006; Krol et  al., 2005; Chapuis, Langlotz, et al., 2005; Chapuis, Ryan, et al., 2005). Relocation of the anatomical segments with six degrees of freedom is tracked for each bone fragment. This allows for the correction of the skeletal discrepancy for a given patient and simultaneous tracking of measurements of X, Y, and Z translation and rotation around each of these axes. The rendering of the new position can be used as an initial suggestion to the surgeon, for discussions of the 3D orthodontic and surgical treatment goals, and/or for printing surgical splints if high-resolution scans of the dental structure are registered to the Figure 5.8 Correspondence shape analysis methods. (A) Vectors color maps of correspondent before and after surgery models using surface-based models that are parameterized into point-based models. (B) Color maps using tensor-based morphometry. (A) 0mm 15mm (B) Sagittal x z Axial Coronal Orthodontic and Orthognathic Planning Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 99 CBCT and if the software tool presents an occlusion detection functionality. Simulation of soft tissue changes Methods that attempt to predict facial soft tissue changes resulting from skeletal reshaping utilize approximation models, since direct formulation and analytical resolution of the equations of continuum mechanics is not possible with such geometrical complexity. Different types of models have been proposed: displacements of soft tissue voxels are estimated with the movements of neighboring hard tissue voxels (Schutyser et  al., 2000), bone displacement vectors are simply applied on the vertices of the soft tissue mesh (Xia et  al., 2000), and multilayer mass-spring models (Teschner et al., 2001; Keeve et al., 1996; Mollemans, et  al., 2007), finite element models (Westermark et  al., 2005; Chabanas et  al., 2003; Schendel and Montgomery, 2009), and mass tensor models (Keeve et al., 1998) assume biological properties of soft tissue response. In any case, thorough validation reports for all these methods are still lacking. Comparisons of the simulation with the postoperative facial surface have not yet been performed. Surgical planning functions generally do not fulfill the requirements enumerated above for the preparation of quantitative facial tissue simulation. Other functionalities that have been incorporated into different software systems include simulation of muscular function (Zachow et  al., 2001), distraction osteogenesis planning (Gladilin et  al., 2004), and 4D surgery planning (Gateno et al., 2003). (5) Intraoperative surgical navigation During surgical procedures, achieving the desired bone segment realignment freehand is difficult. Further, segments must often be moved with very limited visibility, for example, under the (swollen) soft tissues. Approaches used currently in surgery rely largely on the clinician’s experience and intuition. In maxillary repositioning, for example, a combination of dental splints, compass, ruler, and intuition are used to determine the final position. It has been shown that in the vertical direction (in which the splint exerts no constraint), only limited control is achieved (Vandewalle et al., 2003). While the surgical splint guides the position of the maxilla relative to the mandible, in two-jaw surgeries the spatial position of the two jaws relative to the face is influenced by the splint precision and the trans-surgical vertical assessment. As splints are made over teeth while guiding bone changes away from those teeth, small splint inaccuracies may result in significant bone position inaccuracies. The predictability of  precise osteotomies in the wide variety of patient morphologies and consequent controlled fractures such as in the pterigoyd plates, sagittal split osteotomies, or interdental cuts are still a concern. In reconstructive procedures, the problems of shaping and placing a graft or implant in the planned location also arises. Surgical navigation systems have been developed to help accurately transfer treatment plans to the operating room. Tracking technology Different tracking technologies (Langlotz, 2004; Kim et  al., 2009) for the displacement of a mobilized fragment in the course of an osteotomy can  be  used with respective advantages and disadvantages: 1. Ultrasound: An array of three ultrasound emitters is mounted on the object to be tracked, but the speed of sound value can vary with temperature changes and the calibration procedure is very delicate. 2. Electromagnetic tracking: A homogeneous magnetic field is created by a generator coil. Ferromagnetic items such as implants, instruments, or the operation table can interfere strongly with these systems, distorting the measurements in an unpredictable way. Newer systems claim reduction of these effects  and feature receivers the size of a needle head, possibly heralding a renewal of interest  for electromagnetic tracking in surgical navigation (examples are the 3D guidance trackstar, Ascension, Burlington, VT; StealthStation AXIEM, Medtronic, Louisville, CO; and Aurora, Northern Digital Inc., Ontario, Canada). 3. Infrared optical tracking devices: These rely on pairs or triplets of charged coupled devices that detect positions of infrared markers. A free line of sight is required between the cameras and markers. 100 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Longitudinal assessments using CBCT Over the last decade we have utilized longitudinal CBCT images for assessment of treatment outcomes. Even with the availability of 3D images, there are critical barriers that must be overcome before longitudinal quantitative assessment of the craniofacial complex can be routinely performed. These are outlined below. Radiation from CBCT acquisition The use of 3D images for treatment planning and follow-up raises concerns regarding radiation dose, requiring guidelines for specific applications rather than indiscriminate use. Construction of 3D surface models Longitudinal quantitative assessment of growth, surgical correction, and stability of results requires construction of 3D surface models. Segmentation, the process of constructing 3D models by examining cross-sections of a volumetric data set to outline the shape of structures, remains a challenge (Adams and Bischof, 1994; Ma and Manjunath, 2000; Lie, 1995; Moon et al., 2002). Many standard automatic segmentation methods fail when applied to the complex anatomy of patients with facial deformity. The methods described by Gerig et al. (2003) address these technical difficulties and have been adapted by Cevidanes et al. (2005, 2006, 2010) in our laboratory to construct 3D craniofacial models. Image registration Image registration is a core technology for many imaging tasks. The two obstacles to widespread clinical use of nonrigid (elastic and deformable) registration are computational cost and quantification difficulties, as the 3D models are deformed (Christensen et  al., 1996; Rueckert et  al., 1999; Hajnal et al., 2001). Nonrigid registration is required to create a composite of several different jaw shapes preoperatively to guide the construction of 3D surface models (Thompson et al., 1997). However, to evaluate surgical displacements, rigid registration has advantages for longitudinal assessments (Maes et al., 1997). We have developed (Cevidanes, Bailey, et al., 2005; Cevidanes, Phillips, et al., 2005; Cevidanes et  al., 2006) a novel sequence of fully automated voxel-wise rigid registration at the cranial base and superimposition (overlay) methods (Figure 5.9). The major strength of this method is that registration does not depend on the precision of the 3D surface models. The cranial base models are only used to mask anatomic structures that change with growth and treatment. The registration procedures actually compare voxel by voxel of gray-level CBCT images, containing only the cranial base, to calculate rotation and translation parameters between the two images. Regional superimposition in the anterior cranial base does not completely define the movement of the mandible relative to the maxilla. Future studies are needed to investigate the use of different 3D regional superimposition areas. Currently, superimposition of 3D surface models is still too time consuming and computing intensive to apply these methods in routine clinical use. Our current focus is on developing a simplified analysis so that soon these methods can be used clinically. Quantitative measurements Precise quantitative measurement is required to assess the placement of bones in the desired position, the bone remodeling, and the position of surgical cuts and fixation screws and/or plates relative to risk structures. Current quantification methods include the following: a. Volume changes (Thompson et al., 1997) reflect increase or decrease in size, but structural changes at specific locations are not sufficiently reflected in volume measurements; volume assessment does not reveal location and direction of proliferative or resorptive changes, which would be relevant for assessment clinical results. b. Landmark-based measurements (Rohr, 2001) present errors related to landmark identification. Locating 3D landmarks on complex Orthodontic and Orthognathic Planning Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 101 curving structures is not a trivial problem for representation of components of the craniofacial form (Dean et al., 2000). As Bookstein (1991) noted, there is a lack of literature about suitable operational definitions for the landmarks in the three planes of space (coronal, sagittal, and axial). Gunz et  al. (2004) and Andresen et  al. (2000) proposed the use of semi-landmarks, that is, landmarks plus vectors and tangent planes that define their location, but information from the whole curves and surfaces must also be included. The studies of Subsol et al. (1998) and Andresen et  al. (2000) provided clear advances toward studies of curves or surfaces in 3D, referring to tens of thousands of 3D points to define geometry. c. Closest point measurements between the surfaces can display changes with color maps, as  proposed by Gerig et  al. (2001). However, the  closest point method measures closest distances, not corresponding distances between anatomical points on two or more longitudinally obtained images (Figure  5.10). For this reason, the closest point measurements completely fail to quantify rotational and large translational movements, and this method cannot be used for longitudinal assessments of growth or treatment changes, nor the physiologic adaptations, such as bone remodeling that follows surgery. d. Shape correspondence: The SPHARM-PDM framework (Styner et  al., 2006; Gerig et  al., 2001) was developed as part of the National Alliance of Medical Image Computing, (NAMIC, NIH Roadmap for Medical Research), and has been adapted for use with CBCTs of  the craniofacial complex (Paniagua, Cevidanes, Walker, et  al., 2010; Paniagu, Cevidanes, Zhu, et al., 2010). SPHARM-PDM is a tool that computes point-based models using a parametric boundary description for the computing of shape analysis. The 3D virtual surface models are converted into a corresponding spherical harmonic description (SPHARM), which is then sampled into a triangulated surface (SPHARM-PDM). This work presents an improvement in outcome measurement as compared to closest point (A) (B) Pre-surgery Immediately post-surgery One year post-surgery Figure 5.9 Longitudinal follow-up of treatment outcomes of surgery. Surface models of pre-surgery (white), immediately after surgery (red), and 1 year post-surgery (blue) were superimposed on the cranial base. (A) Overlay of pre-surgery and immediately after surgery. (B) Overlay of immediately after surgery and 1 year post-surgery. 102 Cone Beam Computed Tomography correspondence–based analysis. This standard analysis is currently used by most commercial and academic softwares but does not map corresponding surfaces based in anatomical geometry, and it usually underestimates rotational and large translational movements. Closest point color maps measure surgical jaw displacement as the smallest separation between boundaries of the same structure, which may not be the right anatomical corresponding boundaries on pre- and postsurgery anatomical structures (Figure 5.11). References 3DSlicer software. http://www.slicer.org/. Accessed March 1, 2012. Abou-Elfetouh, A., Barakat, A., and Abdel-Ghany, K. (2011). Computed-guided rapid-prototyped templates for segmental mandibular osteotomies: A preliminary report. Int J Med Robot, 7(2): 187–92. Abramson, Z., Susarla, S.M., Lawler, M., Bouchard, C., Troulis, M., and Kaban, L.B. (2011). Three-dimensional computed tomographic airway analysis of patients with obstructive sleep apnea treated by maxillomandibular advancement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 69(3): 677–86. (A) (B) –7mm 0 9mm Pre-surgery to 1 year post-surgery Figure 5.10 Lateral and frontal view of closest point distance color maps between pre-surgery and 1 year post-surgery. (A) Overlay of pre-surgery (red) and 1 year post-surgery (semi-transparent mesh) surface models where the arrows point to the direction of jaw displacements 1 year post-surgery. (B) The color maps are displayed in the 1 year post-surgery model and show the amount of maxillary advancement in red and mandibular setback in blue. (A) (B) (C) –5mm Pre-surgery to 1 year post-surgery 1 year post-surgery Corresponding distance map Closest point distance map –13mm 13mm 7mm Pre-surgery Figure 5.11 What do color maps measure? Note that superimposition was perfomed relative to the cranial base. (A) Overlay of pre-surgery (white) and 1 year post-surgery (blue) surface models. (B and C) Two different types of color maps displayed in the 1 year post-surgery model. (B) Correspondent point-based color maps that reflect the pattern of bone changes shown in A. (C) Closest point surface distance color maps. Note that because the remodeling of the ramus was marked, the pattern of the color map does not reflect the actual remodeling and minimizes the measured surface changes. Orthodontic and Orthognathic Planning Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 103 Adams, R., and Bischof, L. (1994). Seeded region growing. IEEE Trans Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 16(6): 641–7. Agarwal, R. (2011). Anthropometric evaluation of complete unilateral cleft lip nose with cone beam CT in early childhood. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 64(7): e181–2. Ahmad, M., Hollender, L., Anderson, Q., Kartha, K., Ohrbach, R.K., Truelove, E.L., John, M.T., and Schiffman, E.L. (2009). Research diagnostic criteria for  temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD): Development of image analysis criteria and examiner reliability for image analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 107(6): 844–60; NIHMS121369. Alexiou, K., Stamatakis, H., and Tsiklakis, K. (2009). Evaluation of the severity of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritic changes related to age using cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 38(3): 141–7. Almeida, R.C., Cevidanes, L.H., Carvalho, F.A., Motta,  A.T., Almeida, M.A., Styner, M., et  al. (2011). Soft tissue response to mandibular advancement using 3D CBCT scanning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 40(4): 353–9. Alstergren, P., and Kopp, S. (2000). Prostaglandin E2 in  temporomandibular joint synovial fluid and its relation to pain and inflammatory disorders. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 58(2): 180–8. Andresen, R., Bookstein, F.L., Conradsen, K., Ersboll, B.K., Marsh, J.L., and Kreiborg, S. (2000). Surface-bounded growth modeling applied to human mandibles. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2000, 19: 1053–63. Becker, A., Chaushu, C., and Casap-Caspi, N. (2010). Cone-beam computed tomography and the orthosurgical management of impacted teeth. J Am Dent Assoc, 141: 14S–18S. Behnia, H., Khojasteh, A., Soleimani, M., Tehranchi, A., and Atashi, A. (2011). Repair of alveolar cleft defect with mesenchymal stem cells and platelet derived growth factors: A preliminary report. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. Epub 2011 March 21. Blumberg, T.J., Natoli, R.M., and Athanasiou, K.A. (2008). Effects of doxycycline on articular cartilage GAG release and mechanical properties following impact. Biotechnol Bioeng, 100(3): 506–515. doi:10.1002/bit.21778. Bookstein, F.L. (1991). Morphometric tools for landmark data (1st ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Botticelli, S., Verna, C., Cattaneo, P.M., Heidmann, J., and Melsen, B. (2010). Two- versus three-dimensional imaging in subjects with unerupted maxillary canines. Eur J Orthod, Epub 2010 December 3:1–6. Bryndahl, F., Eriksson, L., Legrell, P.E., and Isberg, A. (2006). Bilateral TMJ disk displacement induces mandibular retrognathia. J Dent Res, 85: 1118–23. Burgin, L.V., and Aspden, R.M. (2008). Impact testing to determine the mechanical properties of articular cartilage in isolation and on bone. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 19(2): 703–11. doi:10.1007/s10856-007-3187-2. Carvalho, Fde. A., Cevidanes, L.H., da Motta, A.T., Almeida, M.A., and Phillips, C. (2010). Threedimensional assessment of mandibular advancement 1 year after surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 137(4Suppl): S53.e1-S53.e12. Cevidanes, L.H.S., Bailey, L.T.J., Tucker Jr., G.R., Styner, M.A., Mol, A., Phillips, C.L., et  al. (2005). Superimposition of 3D cone-beam CT models of orthognathic surgery patients. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 34(6): 369–75. Cevidanes, L.H.S., Phillips, C.L., Tulloch, J.F.C., and Proffit, W.R. (2005). Superimposition of 3D cone-beam CT models of orthognathic surgery patients. In: J.A. McNamara, ed., 3D Imaging. Moyers Symposium Series. Cevidanes, L.H.S., Styner, M.A., and Proffit, W.R. (2006). Image analysis and superimposition of 3D cone-beam CT models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 129(5): 611–8. Cevidanes, L.H.S., Tucker, S., Styner, M., Kim, H., Chapuis, J., Reyes, M., et al. (2010). Three-dimensional surgical simulation. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 138(3): 361–71. Chabanas, M., Luboz, V., Payan, Y. (2003). Patient specific finite element model of the face soft tissues for computer-assisted maxillofacial surgery. Med Image Anal, 7(2): 131–51. Chapuis, J. (2006). Computer-aided cranio-maxillofacial surgery. PhD thesis, University of Bern. Chapuis, J., Langlotz, F., Blaeuer, M., Hallermann, W., Schramm, A., and Caversaccio, M. (2005). A novel approach for computer-aided corrective jaw surgery. 3rd International Conference on Computer-Aided Surgery around the Head, Berlin, Germany. 2005 August. Chapuis, J., Ryan, P., Blaeuer, M., Langlotz, F., Hallermann, W., Schramm, A., et  al. (2005). A new approach for 3D computer-assisted orthognathic surgery—first clinical case. Conference on Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, Berlin, Germany. 2005 June. Chapuis, J., Schramm, A., Pappas, I., Hallermann, W., Schwenzer-Zimmerer, K., Langlotz, F., et  al. (2007). A new system for computer-aided preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation during corrective jaw surgery. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed, 11(3): 274–87. Christensen, G.E., Rabbitt, R.D., Miller, M.I. (1996). Deformable templates using large deformation kinematics. IEEE Trans Image Processing, 5:1435–47. CMFApp software. http://co-me.ch/. Accessed March 1, 2012. 104 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Conley, R.S. (2011). Evidence for dental and dental specialty treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea. Part 1: the adult OSA patient and Part 2: the paediatric and adolescent patient. J Oral Rehabil, 38(2): 136–56. Crum, W.R., Hartkens, T., and Hill, D.L. (2004). Non-rigid image registration: Theory and practice. Br J  Radiol, 77(2): S140–53. Cutting, C.B., Bookstein, F.L., Taylor, R.H. (1996). Applications of simulation, morphometrics, and robotics in craniofacial surgery. In: R. Taylor, S. Lavallee, G. Burdea, and R. Mosges, eds., Computer Integrated Surgery (pp. 641–62). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Dalessandri, D., Laffranchi, L., Tonni, I., Zoti, F., Piancino, M.G., Paganelli, C., et al. (2011). Advantages of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the orthodontic treatment planning of cleidocranial dysplasia patients: A case report. Head Face Med, 27: 7–6. De Momi, E., Chapuis, J., Pappas, I., Ferrigno, G., Hallermann, W., Schramm, A., et al. (2006). Automatic extraction of the mid-facial plane for craniomaxillofacial surgery planning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 35(7): 636–42. Dean, D., Hans, M.G., Bookstein, F.L., and Subramanyan, K., (2000). Three-dimensional Bolton-Brush Growth Study landmark data: Ontogeny and sexual dimorphism of the Bolton Standards cohort. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 37: 145–55. Ebner, F.H., Kürschner, V., Dietz, K., Bültmann, E., Nägele, T., and Honegger, J. (2010). Craniometric changes in patients with acromegaly from a surgical perspective. Neurosurg Focus, 29(4): E3. Edwards, S.P. Computer-assisted craniomaxillofacial surgery. (2010). Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am, 22(1): 117–34. El, H., and Palomo, J.M. (2010). Measuring the airway in  3 dimensions: A reliability and accuracy study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 137(4 Suppl): S50.e1–9; discussion S50-2. Fredriksson, L., Alstergren, P., and Kopp, S. (2006). Tumor necrosis factor-alpha in temporomandibular joint synovial fluid predicts treatment effects on pain by intraarticular glucocorticoid treatment. Mediators Inflamm, 2006(6): 59425. Gallo, L.M., Gössi, D.B., Colombo, V., and Palla, S. (2008). Relationship between kinematic center and TMJ anatomy and function. J Dent Res, 87(8): 726–30. Gateno, J., Teichgraeber, J.F., and Xia, J.J. (2003). Threedimensional surgical planning for maxillary and midface distraction osteogenesis. J Craniofac Surg, 14(6): 833–9. Gateno, J., Xia, J.J., and Teichgraeber, J.F. (2011). New 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 69(3): 606–22. Gerig, G., Jomier, M., and Chakos, M. (2001). Valmet: A new validation tool for assessing and improving 3D object segmentation. In: W. Niessen and M. Viergever, eds, MICCAI 2001: Proceedings of the International Society and Conference Series on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (pp.  516–28); 2001  Oct 14–17; Utrecht, Netherlands. Berlin: Springer. Gerig, G., Prastawa, M., Lin, W., and Gilmore, J. (2003). Assessing early brain development in neonates by segmentation of high-resolution 3T MRI [Short Paper, Lecture Notes in Computer Science LNCS #2879], pp. 979–80. Gerig, G., Styner, M., Jones, D., Weinberger, D., and Lieberman, J. (2001). Shape analysis of brain ventricles using SPHARM. MMBIA Proceedings. IEEE 2001: 171–8. Gladilin, E., Zachow, S., Deuflhard, P., Hege, H.C. (2004). Anatomy- and physics-based facial animation for craniofacial surgery simulations. Med Biol Eng Comput, 42(2): 167–70. Gunz, P., Mitteroecker, P., Bookstein, F.L. (2004). Semilandmarks in three dimensions. In: D.L. Slice, editor. Modern morphometrics in physical anthropology. New York: Kluwer Academic. Hajnal, J.V., Hill, D.L.G., Hawkes, D.J., eds. (2001). Medical image registration. Boca Raton: CRC Press. Helenius, L.M., Hallikainen, D., Helenius, I., Meurman, J.H., Könönen, M., Leirisalo-Repo, M., Lindqvist, C. (2005). Clinical and radiographic findings of the temporomandibular joint in patients with various rheumatic diseases: A case control study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 99: 455–63. Ishida, T., Yabushita, T., and Soma, K. (2009). Effects of a liquid diet on temporomandibular joint mechanoreceptors. J Dent Res, 88(2): 187–91. Iwasaki, T., Saitoh, I., Takemoto, Y., Inada, E., Kanomi, R., Hayasaki, H., et al. (2011). Evaluation of upper airway obstruction in Class II children with fluid-mechanical simulation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 139(2): e135–45. Jayaratne, Y.S., Zwahlen, R.A., Lo, J., and Cheung, L.K. (2010). Three-dimensional color maps: A novel tool for assessing craniofacial changes. Surg Innov, 17: 198. Jayaratne, Y.S., Zwahlen, R.A., Lo, J., and Tam, S.C., Cheung, L.K. (2010). Computer-aided maxillofacial surgery: An update. Surg Innov, 17(3): 217–25. Kapila, S., Conley, R.S., and Harrell Jr., W.E. (2011). The current status of cone beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 40: 24–34. Katheria, B.C, Kau, C.H., Tate, R., Chen, J.-W., English, J., and Bouquot, J. (2010). Effectiveness of impacted and supernumerary tooth diagnosis from traditional Orthodontic and Orthognathic Planning Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 105 radiography versus cone beam computed tomography. Ped Dent, 32(4): 304–9. Keeve, E., Girod, B., and Girod, S. (1996). Computeraided craniofacial surgery. H.U. Lemke, editor, Computer Assisted Radiology. Paris, France. Keeve, E., Girod, S., Kikinis, R., and Girod, B. (1998). Deformable modeling of facial tissue for craniofacial surgery simulation. Comput Aided Surg, 3(5): 228–38. Kim, H., Jurgen, P., Krol, Z., Caversaccio, M., Nolte, L.P., Zeilhofer, H.F., Gonzales, M.A. (2009). Clinical applications of computer-aided planning and navigation system for cranio-maxillofacial surgery. CAS-H 2009. Leipzig, Germany, Book of Abstracts. Kim, Y.-I., Park, S.-B., Son, W.-S., and Hwang, D.-S. (2011). Midfacial soft-tissue changes after advancement of maxilla with Le Fort I osteotomy and mandibular setback surgery: Comparison of conventional and high Le Fort osteotomies by superimposition of conebeam computed tomography volumes. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2011 April 14. Koyama, J., Nishiyama, H., and Hayashi, T. (2007). Follow-up study of condylar bony changes using helical computed tomography in patients with temporomandibular disorder. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 36: 472–7. Krol, Z., Chapuis, J., Schwenzer-Zimmerer, K., Langlotz, F., and Zeilhofer, H.F. (2005). Preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation in the reconstructive craniofacial surgery. J Med Inform Tech, 9: 83–9. Langlotz, F. (2004). Localizers and trackers for computer assisted freehand navigation. In: F. Picard, L.-P. Nolte, A.M. Digiola, B. Jamaraz, eds., Hip and Knee Surgery— Navigation, Robotics, and Computer Assisted Surgical Tools (pp. 51–3). Oxford University Press. Lenza, M.G., Lenza, M.M., Dalstra, M., Melsen, B., Cattaneo, P.M. (2010). An analysis of different approaches to the assessment of upper airway morphology: a CBCT study. Orthod Craniofac Res, 13(2): 96–105. Leung, C.C., Palomo, L., Griffith, R., and Hans, M.G. (2010). Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography for measuring alveolar bone height and detecting bony dehiscences and fenestrations. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 137(4 Suppl): S109–19. Leuzinger, M., Dudic, A., Giannopoulou, C., and Killaridis, S. (2010). Root-contact evaluation by panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography of super-high resolution. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 137(3): 389–92. Lie, W.N. (1995). Automatic target segmentation by locally adaptive image thresholding, IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 4(7): 1036–41. Lloyd, T.E., Drage, N.A., and Cronin, A.J. (2011). The role  of cone beam computed tomography in the management of unfavourable fractures following sagittal split mandibular osteotomy. J Orthod, 38(1): 48–54. Ma, W.Y., and Manjunath, B.S. (2000). Edge flow: A technique for boundary detection and image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 9(8): 1375–88. Maes, F., Collignon, A., Vandermeulen, D., Marchal, G., Suetens, P. (1997). Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 16: 187–98. Molen, A.D. (2010). Considerations in the use of conebeam computed tomography for buccal bone measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 137(4 Suppl): S130-5. Mollemans, W., Schutyser, F., Nadjmi, N., Maes, F., and Suetens, P. (2007). Predicting soft tissue deformations for a maxillofacial surgery planning system: From computational strategies to a complete clinical validation. Med Image Anal, 11(3): 282–301. Moon, N., Bullitt, E., Leemput, K., and Gerig G. (2002). Model-based brain and tumor segmentation. Proc. 16th Int Conf on Pattern Recognition ICPR 2002 (pp. 528–531), editors: R. Kasturi, D. Laurendeau, C. Suen, IEEE Computer Society. Nordahl, S., Alstergren, P., Eliasson, S., and Kopp, S. (2001). Radiographic signs of bone destruction in the arthritic temporomandibular joint with special reference to markers of disease activity: A longitudinal study. Rheumatology (Oxford), 40(6): 691–4. Orentlicher, G., Goldsmith, D., and Horowitz, A. (2010). Applications of 3-dimensional virtual computerized tomography technology in oral and maxillofacial surgery: Current therapy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 68(8): 1993–59. Paniagua, B., Cevidanes, L., Walker, D., Zhu, H., Guo, R., and Styner, M. (2010). Clinical application of SPHARM-PDM to quantify temporomandibular joint arthritis. Comput Med Imaging Graph, December 23. Paniagua, B., Cevidanes, L., Zhu, H., and Styner, M. (2010). Outcome quantification using SPHARM-PDM toolbox in orthognathic surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg, December 16. Pommert, A., Riemer, M., Schiemann, T., Schubert, R., Tiede, U., Hohne, K.H. (1996). Three-dimensional imaging in medicine: Methods and applications. In: R.  Taylor, S. Lavallee, G. Burdea, and R. Mosges, eds.,  Computer Integrated Surgery (pp. 155–74). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Popat, H., and Richmond, S. (2010). New developments in three-dimensional planning for orthognathic surgery. J Orthod, 37(1): 62–71. Roemhildt, M.L., Coughlin, K.M., Peura, G.D., Badger, G.J., Churchill, D., Fleming, B.C., et al. (2010). Effects of increased chronic loading on articular cartilage 106 Cone Beam Computed Tomography material properties in the lapine tibio-femoral joint. J Biomech, 43(12): 2301–8. Rohr, K. (2001). Landmark-based image analysis: Using geometric and intensity models. Computational Imaging and Vision Series, Vol. 21. London: Kluwer Academic. Rueckert, D., Sonoda, L.I., Hayes, C., Hill, D.L.G., Leach, M.O., and Hawkes, D.J. (1999). Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: Application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 18: 712–21. Dworkin, S.F., and LeResche, L. (1992). Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: Review, criteria, examinations, and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord, 6: 301–55. Schendel, S., Powell, N., and Jacobson, R. (2011). Maxillary, mandibular, and chin advancement: Treatment planning based on airway anatomy in obstructive sleep apnea. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 69(3): 663–76. Schendel, S.A., and Hatcher, D. (2010). Automated 3-dimensional airway analysis from cone-beam computed tomography data. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 68(3): 696–701. Schendel, S.A., and Lane, C. (2009). 3D orthognathic surgery simulation using image fusion. Semin Orthod, 15: 48–56. Schendel, S.A., and Montgomery, K. (2009). A web-based, integrated simulation system for craniofacial surgical planning. Plast Reconstr Surg, 123(3): 1009–106. Schiffman, E.L., Ohrbach, R., Truelove, E.L., Tai, F., Anderson, G.C., Pan, W., et  al. (2010). The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. V: Methods used to establish and validate revised Axis I diagnostic algorithms. J Orofac Pain, 24(1): 63–78. Schiffman, E.L., Truelove, E.L., Ohrbach, R., Anderson, G.C., John, M.T., List, T., et al. (2010). The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. I: Overview and methodology for assessment of validity. J Orofac Pain, 24(1): 7–24. Schutyser, F., Van Cleynenbreugel, J., Ferrant, M., Schoenaers, J., Suetens, P. (2000). Image-based 3D planning of maxillofacial distraction procedures including soft tissue implications. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. 1935: 999–1007. Scott, C.C., and Athanasiou, K.A. (2006). Mechanical impact and articular cartilage. Crit Rev Biomed Eng, 34(5): 347–78. Shemesh, H., Cristescu, R.C., Wesslink, P.R., and Wu, M.-K. (2011). The use of cone-beam computed tomography and digital periapical radiographs to diagnose root perforations. JOE, 37(4): 513–16. Sherrard, J.F., Rossouw, P.E., Benson, B.W., Carrillo, R., and Buschang, P.H. (2010). Accuracy and reliability of  tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 137(4 Suppl): S100-8. Styner, M., Oguz, I., Xu, S., Brechbuhler, C., Pantazis, D., Levitt, J., et  al. (2006). Framework for the statistical shape analysis of brain structures using Spharm-PDM. Special edition open science workshop at MICCAI. Insight J, pp. 1–7. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/ 1926/215. Subsol, G., Thirion, J.P., and Ayache, N. (1998). A scheme for automatically building three-dimensional morphometric anatomical atlases: Application to a skull atlas. Med Image Anal, 2(1): 37–60. Swennen, G.R., Mollemans, W., De Clercq, C., Abeloos, J., Lamoral, P., Lippens, F., et  al. (2009). A cone-beam computed tomography triple scan procedure to obtain  a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model appropriate for orthognathic surgery planning. J Craniofac Surg, 20(2): 297–307. Tai, K., Hotokezak, H., Park, J.H., Tai, H., Miyajima, K., Choi, M., et  al. (2010). Preliminary cone-beam computed tomography study evaluating dental and skeletal changes after treatment with a mandibular Schwarz appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 138(3): 262.e1-262.e11. Tamimi, D., and ElSaid, K. (2009). Cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental impactions. Semin Orthod, 15: 57–62. Teschner, M., Girod, S., and Girod, B. (2001). 3-D simulation of craniofacial surgical procedures. Stud Health Technol Inform, 81: 502–8. Thompson, P.M., MacDonald, D., Mega, M.S., Holmes, C.J., Evans, A.C., Toga, A.W. (1997). Detection and mapping of abnormal brain structure with a probabilistic atlas of cortical surfaces. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 21: 567–81. Treil, J., Braga, J., Loubes, J.-M., Maza, E., Inglese, J.-M., Casteigt, J., et al. (2009). 3D tooth modeling for orthodontic assessment. Semin Orthod, 15: 42–7. Truelove, E., Pan, W., Look, J.O., Mancl, L.A., Ohrbach, R.K., Velly, A.M., et  al. (2010). The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. III: Validity of Axis I diagnoses. J Orofac Pain, 24(1): 35–47. Tucker, S., Cevidanes, L.H.S., Styner, M., Kim, H., Reyes,  M., Proffit, W., et  al. (2010). Comparison of actual surgical outcomes and 3-dimensional surgical simulations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 68(10): 2412–21. Van Elslande, D., Heo, G., Flores-Mir, C., Carey, J., and Major, P.W. (2010). Accuracy of mesiodistal root angulation projected by cone-beam computed tomographic panoramic-like images. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 137(4 Suppl): S94-S99. Vandewalle, P., Schutyser, F., Van Cleynenbreugel, J., and Suetens, P. (2003). Modeling of facial soft tissue growth Orthodontic and Orthognathic Planning Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 107 for maxillofacial surgery planning environments. IS4TH, 2003: 27–37. Verteramo, A., and Seedhom, B.B. (2007). Effect of a single impact loading on the structure and mechanical properties of articular cartilage. J Biomech, 40(16): 3580–9. Westermark, A., Zachow, S., and Eppley, B.L. (2005). Three-dimensional osteotomy planning in maxillofacial surgery including soft tissue prediction. J Craniofac Surg, 16(1): 100–4. Xia, J., Samman, N., Yeung, R.W., Shen, S.G., Wang, D., Ip, H.H., et al. (2000). Three-dimensional virtual reality surgical planning and simulation workbench for orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg, 15(4): 265–82. Yushkevich, P.A., Piven, J., Hazlett, H.C., Smith, R.G., Ho, S., Gee, J.C., et al. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage, 31(3): 1116–28. Zachow, S., Gladilin, E., Zeilhofer, H.F., and Sader, R. (2001). Improved 3D osteotomy planning in craniomaxillofacial surgery. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention: 4th International Conference, Ultrecht, The Netherlands; October 2001. Cone Beam Computed Tomography: Oral and Maxillofacial Diagnosis and Applications, First Edition. Edited by David Sarment. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2014 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 109 Three-Dimensional Planning in Maxillofacial Reconstruction of Large Defects Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Rutger Schepers, Gerry M. Raghoebar, Lars U. Lahoda, Harry Reintsema, Arjan Vissink, and Max J. Witjes 6 Introduction Large maxillofacial bone defects have been a reconstructive challenge throughout time. In case of small bony defects, bridging can be performed using free iliac crest grafts. When defects are too big or lack sufficient soft tissue to support the graft, free vascularized osseous flaps are usually necessary to close the defects. However, bony reconstruction of such defects does not always restore function. Masticatory function, especially, often remains unfavorable because of problems with retention and stabilization of the prosthesis after reconstruction with vascularized grafts. This  problem can be solved by placing dental implants in these osseous flaps to retain a denture,  thus improving mastication and speech (Schmelzeisen et al., 1996). When dental implants are considered part of the treatment plan, correct positioning of the osseous component of the free flap is eminent to allow for implant placement at the preferred anatomical locations from a prosthodontic perspective. When the bone transplant is incorrectly positioned, impants often have to be placed in a suboptimal position for prosthodontic rehabilitation. As a result, the postoperative function and  esthetics of the implant-retained mandibular prosthesis are often impaired, thereby negatively affecting the patient’s quality of life (Zlotolow et  al., 1992). Therefore, when implant placement is desired in osseous free flaps, a precise preoperative plan is essential (Albert et al., 2010; de Almeida et  al., 2010). For this type of reconstruction, imaging of the defect should provide sufficient data to reliably perform the planning. In the preoperative phase of such reconstructions, a computed tomogram (CT) has been the standard imaging modality for several decades. However, with the introduction of the cone beam CT, a versatile tool has been introduced which has replaced the standard CT in planning craniofacial defect reconstructions. In the past years cone beam CT (CBCT) has become increasingly popular because it combines good image quality with a relatively low radiation dose. Its versatility is enhanced now that software has become available that allows virtual treatment planning in implantology and maxillofacial surgery. This chapter shows the complete CBCT-based virtual workflow of fully digitally planned primary and secondary reconstructions of maxillofacial 110 Cone Beam Computed Tomography defects with osseous flaps and implant-retained prosthetic reconstructions. 3D augmented virtual model To start the digital workflow, a detailed 3D model is needed from the patient’s face, bony structures, and dentition (3D augmented model). Computer software packages, such as Simplant (Materialize Dental, Leuven, Belgium) or ProPlan CMF (Synthes, Solothurn, Switzerland and Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) can reconstruct a detailed 3D volume out of CBCT DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) data by software volume rendering. The volumes are constructed of voxel-based data, requiring the input of a threshold of a grey value of the specific voxel corresponding with the skin or bone of the patient. For skin and bone this usually results in a detailed 3D model of high quality from CBCT data. For conventional CT as well as CBCT it is still not possible to accurately display the dentition. Metal used in most fillings and crowns produce scattering artifacts in the CBCT scan; therefore, a detailed 3D model of the dentition has to be obtained in another way. This can be implied easiest by scanning an impression or a dental cast with a CBCT out of which a detailed 3D model can be derived. Now 3D optical intraoral scanners such as the Lava Chairside Oral Scanner C.O.S. (3M ESPE, St. Paul, USA) have become available. These scanners are highly accurate and can produce a 3D surface model of the dentition. This produces a more detailed 3D model compared to the impression or cast scan. A 3D augmented virtual model of the maxillofacial region is thus created by importing the 3D optically obtained dentition model into the 3D model of the bone and skin in the correct anatomical location (Figure 6.1). CBCT-based virtual planning of resection and reconstruction Planning and surgery of primary reconstruction immediately after tumor ablative surgery Reconstruction of large maxillofacial defects with free vascularized grafts directly after tumor ablation has become a standard treatment modality and is widely accepted and used (Taylor et  al., 1975). Direct reconstruction provides jaw stability and tissue support for favorable esthetic reconstruction of the face and adequate filling of the defect. The resection of a bone tumor or boneinvading tumor can be planned virtually from CBCT data. The shape of the graft can also be planned virtually. Virtual shaping of the graft at the donor site helps to adequately fill the defect created by tumor resection. In case of a large hemi maxillary defect, a deep circumflex iliac artery flap can be used to reconstruct the defect. The required shape of the iliac crest is often complex due to the complex facial bone geometry of the midface. The starting point is the virtual resection of the tumor, which is planned on a CBCT of the head and virtually simulated in ProPlan CMF (Figure 6.2A). The CBCT scan serves as a base for importing other Figure 6.1 Fusion of the 3D models of the face (CBCT), bony structures (CBCT), and dentition (Lava Chairside Oral Scan) produces a 3D augmented model of the face. Three-Dimensional Planning in Maxillofacial Reconstruction of Large Defects Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 111 data into the software. In this case, a CT scan of the iliac crest is then made and a 3D virtual bone model is created and positioned in the defect, creating a virtual reconstruction of the defect (Figure  6.2B). A  resection guide can be designed and printed by  additive manufacturing. This guide is used to exactly shape the iliac crest graft while the vascular blood supply is still intact. The planned outcome of the shape of the iliac crest graft can be printed (Materialize, Leuven, Belgium) in resin. This printed model can be used after the resection of the tumor to ensure that the graft fits well in the defect before harvesting the graft. As has been pointed out before, restoring masticatory function is highly important for a patient. To adequately restore function, implants are needed. In primary reconstructive planning, implants can be planned and guided into the bone graft. It is possible to insert implants either while the graft is still at the donor site or after the graft is fixed in the recipient jaw and blood circulation is reestablished. An important advantage of inserting implants in the graft at the donor site is that these implants can then be used to guide the placement of the graft in the jaw defect. A positioning guide can be screwed on the implants to guide intraoral fixation of the graft in the proper position. After consolidation of the graft, a superstructure can be produced to start the prosthetic phase. Preoperative virtual planning Resection margins of bone tumors or tumors that invade bone can be determined on (CB)CT scans. Normally these margins are translated to the operating room by measuring the distance of anatomical landmarks to the tumor margins on a CT scan of the target area. These are used in the operating room to determine the resection plane clinically. Planning of the resection margins and planes on CBCT scans can be adequately visualized in ProPlan CMF. Resection planes can be planned on a 3D model to virtually resect the tumor (Figure 6.3A). These planes can be visualized in 3D and in axial, sagittal, and coronal planes in the CT slices (Figure 6.3B). The anatomical information in the planes is used to precisely plan the resection cuts. Bone-supported cutting guides can be designed and printed by additive manufacturing  to guide tumor resection intraoperatively (Figure 6.4). CBCT information on the shape of the bone surface Figure 6.2A 3D bone model of a CBCT showing the tumor region on the left processus of the maxilla in the molar region. The resection area of the maxilla is shown (grey). Figure 6.2B 3D bone model of a CT of the iliac crest (left) with the planned graft segment DCIA in the maxillary defect position (right). 112 Cone Beam Computed Tomography is very accurate, yielding cutting guides that exactly fit to the actual bone surface. Often the guides only fit in one position on the bone. This leads to an optimalization of sparing the surrounding healthy bone due to the versatility of cutting planes without compromising the tumor-free margins (Figure  6.5). Primary reconstruction with a free vascularized bone graft can be performed in the same 3D plan as the tumor resection (Figure 6.6). This can include the planning of dental implants in the graft that can be used for dental rehabilitation after bone consolidation. Planning and surgery of secondary reconstruction of pre-existing maxillofacial defects Choice of free vascularized osseous flap An essential step is selecting the type of free vascularized bone graft that adequately bridges the defect. Several choices are available in order to reconstruct a large defect of the upper and lower jaw. These mainly include the free fibula as the workhorse (Lopez et al., 2010), the iliac crest, and Figure 6.3A 3D model of a mandible with an ameloblastoma located in the right corpus. The resection plane is shown in green, representing the distal resection border of the tumor. Figure 6.3B Axial slice of a mandible with an ameloblastoma located in the right corpus; the planned resection plane is shown in green, corresponding with the plane in Figure 6.3A. Figure 6.4 The insert shows the resection guides (Synthes, Solothurn, Switzerland; and Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) virtually planned to resect the tumor; this corresponds to the intraoperative situation showing the 3D printed resection guides on the mandible. Three-Dimensional Planning in Maxillofacial Reconstruction of Large Defects Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 113 theoretically others, such as, for instance, the medial femoral condyle or the scapula. For each flap an example will be given to demonstrate how these flaps can be used in the treatment plan. For large bone defects, the free fibula has many advantages and is therefore most widely used. The fibula is a long bone of the lower extremity. It has a  tubular shape with a thick, dense cortical bone layer around the entire circumference that renders it one of the strongest and longest bones available for transfer. The length of the fibula graft can easily exceed 20 cm. During harvesting, it is necessary to  leave approximately 6 cm of bone distally and proximal, in order to maintain stability of the knee and ankle joint. Furthermore, implant survival in a vascularized fibula is known to be high, which might be due to the presence of dense cortical bone contributing to adequate initial implant stability (Chiapasco et  al., 2006; Gbara et al., 2007). The deep circumflex iliac artery (DCIA) free flap is more challenging to dissect, and the length and diameter of the vascular pedicle to the iliac crest is less predictable (Cordeiro et al., 1999). In addition, a certain amount of muscle needs to be harvested as well, making this flap less pliable and more difficult to shape. However, if large combined soft tissue and bone defects need to be reconstructed, for instance the maxilla with a substantial palatal defect, the DCIA flap has been advocated as the flap of choice. The cortical layer of the bone is thinner compared to the fibula, which makes it less favorable for implant placement due to less initial stability. Due to the unique anatomic location of the scapula, with its option to be harvested as a chimerical flap, indications to be used as a replacement Figure 6.5 The tumor resected and guided out of the mandible; the insert shows the virtual plan of the resection. Figure 6.6 The defect created after virtual tumor resection is reconstructed with a fibula segment with two implants. 114 Cone Beam Computed Tomography of  maxillofacial bone are limited. The donor site, which is also a drawback of the DCIA flap compared to the fibula, is very unfavorable in the scapula when it comes to osseous free flaps. All of the above-mentioned flaps currently cannot be imaged with a CBCT. Therefore, a combination of craniofacial imaging with CBCT and flap imaging with conventional CT is still necessary. 3D virtual model of the bone and vessels For the planning of the reconstruction, the anatomy of the donor bone as well as its vascular support are essential in determining the possibilities and limits of the reconstruction. For virtual planning of some flaps it is possible to obtain information on the bone and the 3D spatial orientation of its vessels (Eckardt and Swennen, 2005). Both can be visualized in a CT angiogram with intravenous contrast in some flaps (Figure 6.7A, Figure 6.7B). Voxel-based threshold volume rendering can visualize a 3D model of the bone, including the arteriovenous blood vessels of the donor bone segment. In the planning of the graft segmentation, the vessels are relocated together with the bone graft to reconstruct the defect. Sufficient vessel length of the donor segment is needed to reach the vessels in the neck for recirculation of the blood Figure 6.7A 3D model of a CT angiogram of the lower legs, showing the bones, arterial vascular supply of the left lower leg (pink-blue), and the skin (transparent). Figure 6.7B 3D model of the skull of a patient with a large bony defect of nearly the entire maxilla. A fibula reconstructive plan is shown with three segments of the fibula combined with the arterial blood vessels. The fibular artery is shown in purple; this artery is subsequently harvested as a part of the graft to use for the recirculation of the graft on the recipient side. The insert on the upper right shows the fibula graft with an implant-supported prosthesis fixated on the graft. The arteriovenous vessel pedicle is shown with a length of 11cm, corresponding to the length of the fibular artery in the plan. Three-Dimensional Planning in Maxillofacial Reconstruction of Large Defects Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 115 supply, especially when considering reconstruction of the maxilla. 3D virtual setup of the dentition Irrespective of the type of reconstruction and free flap, the planning starts from the occlusion of the dentition. An ideal dental setup is needed to determine the optimal position of the elements in the defect. In edentulous or partial dentulous patients the prosthesis or wax-up can be virtualized. In this case a CBCT scan has to be made of the patient’s head with the full or partial denture in occlusion. Because the density of the denture (voxel value) is  too close to the density of soft tissue, the denture  has to be scanned separately (double scan procedure) in the CBCT. Matching of the denture with the patient scan is usually done by fixing several glass particles to the denture; the CBCT scan of the patient and the separate scans of the dentures can then be matched on particle geometry (Figure  6.8A). In patients with a maxillofacial defect, the defect size and anatomy are clearly visualized in the augmented model. The 3D augmented model with the defect clearly visualized is the starting point of reconstructive planning. In Simplant there is also the possibility to create a virtual setup of teeth (Figure  6.8B). It is very important for this dental setup to be accurate, because the planning of the bone graft and the implants are deducted from this. This planning should be performed from a prosthodontist point of view to ensure that the setup is functional. In the planning phase a combination of several decisions have to be made. The first decision is the type of  dental rehabilitation to aim at. In edentulous patients this can be an implantsupported bar, retained denture, or a hybrid structure. In dentulous patients an implantsupported bridge or implant-supported crowns are more desirable. Figure 6.8A Matching of the denture and the 3D bone models can be performed in a double scan procedure. The patient is scanned with a CBCT wearing the denture (with glass particles on it, shown by the red dots); after this, the denture is scanned separately. Both scans are matched on glass particle geometry into a fusion model. Figure 6.8B 3D augmented virtual model of a patient with a large bony defect of the left maxilla. A reconstruction plan is shown with a double barrel fibula graft, three implants, and a virtual teeth set-up. 116 Cone Beam Computed Tomography 3D virtual planning of the bone graft and the implants Once the setup of the missing dentition is determined, the planning continues with the selection of the type of donor graft. The choice of the graft usually has several aspects. First, the graft has to anatomically fill the defect and provide sufficient support to the implant-supported dental structure. Next, the blood supply of the graft has to be sufficient, with sufficient vessel length for recirculation attachment. The distance of the graft to the acceptor vessels of the neck can be large, especially when the reconstruction concerns a defect in the maxilla. The combination of the angiography and the CT is perfect for 3D planning because the configuration of the vessels and the bone can be visualized together. The CT-angiography has to be added to the 3D virtual augmented model in ProPlan CMF. This is done by importing the CT-angiography DICOM data into the software plan of the patient. The 3D volume of the selected bone graft and the arteries can be created by selecting the proper voxel threshold of bone and the intravenous contrast. The bone graft can be situated in the preferred anatomical location in the bone defect of the maxilla or mandible that has to be reconstructed. The shape of the bone graft usually doesn’t exactly match with the shape of the bone in the missing jaw segment. Especially in larger defects, the shape of the maxillary or mandibular segment that has to be reconstructed differs from the graft shape. The donor graft can therefore be segmented to follow the shape of the defect. One has to bear in mind that the blood supply of the segments decreases with diminishing segment size, increasing the risk of graft necrosis in small segments. Virtual bone cuts can be created in the 3D model of the bone graft, segmenting the graft to properly match the defect anatomy and meanwhile aiming at a functional position of the implant-supported structure. The definitive position of the bone graft has to reach both goals. Planning of the graft and the implants is done simultaneously to achieve the best position of both (Figure  6.9A, Figure  6.9B). The geometrical arterial vessel position to the bone graft is monitored closely in the planning process. The vessel length that can be used is anatomically identified and the position of the vessel to the bone is taken into account in planning the bone graft. For instance, if the left and right fibulas are both suitable as a transplant, the vessel geometry often determines the choice of side to reach the best location of the vessels to be connected to the recipient vessels of the neck. Once the optimal position of the implants is determined in the graft, the implant position can be locked to the graft segments. The segments can then be relocated to their original position before segmentation, giving the implant position in the original bone graft. The drilling guide is designed on the periosteum of the original bone graft, and in the case of a fibula graft, skin is supported on the lateral malleolus to prohibit axial sliding. The Figure 6.9A Plan of implants in a segmented fibula to reconstruct the bone defect of nearly the entire maxilla. The molars showed severe loss of periodontium and periradicular bone; removal of the molars was therefore inevitable. The reconstructive planning was made taking this into account. Figure 6.9B The position of the implants and the fibula segments were planned according to the desired position of the prosthesis to optimally support the prosthesis. In green the implant restorative spaces are shown, located in the centerline of the implants. Three-Dimensional Planning in Maxillofacial Reconstruction of Large Defects Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 117 guide is printed with a 3D printer and sterilized using gamma irradiation (Figure 6.10). Prefabrication of the bone graft In secondary reconstruction of maxillofacial defects, it is preferable to use prefabricated grafts since it will provide an accurate plan of the reconstruction as well as the possibility of soft tissue lining around the dental implants. Rohner et  al. (2003) described a method to prefabricate a free vascularized fibula to obtain optimal support of the superstructure and to create a stable periimplant soft tissue layer. The prefabrication includes preoperative planning of implant insertion, osteotomies of the fibula, and planning of a skin graft on the fibula for a thin lined soft tissue reconstruction. The analysis of the craniofacial defect and the reconstruction in this technique is performed on printed stereolithograpic models. Here we describe the 3D virtual planning of the technique of prefabrication. The first surgical phase includes placement of the dental implants in the bone graft, registration of the exact location of the implants in the graft, and covering the bone with a split thickness skin graft. In the first step, the dissection is only carried out to the interosseous membrane, exposing the anterior margin of the fibula to receive the dental implants. The drilling guide should be placed precisely and fixed to the bone with miniscrews (Figure 6.10). Guided implant drilling, in the case of dense bone guided tapping and guided implant insertion, are subsequently performed. After placement of the implants, the guide is removed. Even with guided implant placement, small deviations will occur in the implant position compared to the planned position. An intraoperative optical scan of the implants with scan abutments (E.S.  Healthcare, Dentsply International, Inc.; Figure 6.11) is made to register the deviation. Here the Lava Oral Scanner was used to register the exact position and angulations of the implants (Figure 6.12A). Hereafter, the fibula is covered with a split thickness skin graft taken from the ispilateral thigh of standard thickness (Figure  6.12B) and  a Gore-Tex patch (W.L. Gore and Associates, Flagstaff, USA). The wound is closed primarily with a drain left in place for 1 to 2 days, and the implants and split skin are left to heal for approximately 6 weeks. Virtual planning of the suprastructure and the cutting guide preceding the second surgical step The optical scan can be imported in the ProPlan CMF software as an STL file (STereoLithography file) format matched with the scan caps, resulting in the position of the scan caps and implant position Figure 6.10 The insert shows the virtual drilling guide (ProPlan CMF). The drilling guide is situated on the periosteum of the fibula graft and is skin supported on the lateral maleolus to prohibit axial sliding. The guide is printed through selective laser sintering and sterilized using gamma irradiation. The guide is fixated with three miniscrews (KLS Martin Group, Tuttlingen, Germany). 118 Cone Beam Computed Tomography in the graft. The optical scan is compared with the planned position of the implants and matched to this ideal position. The superimposed fusion model with the accurate position of the implants is uploaded In ProPlan. The data are then sent to a specialized CAD-CAM (computer-aided design and computer-aided milling) company for design and fabrication of the suprastructure out of titanium (E.S. Healthcare, Dentsply International, Inc.; Figure  6.13). The suprastructure design is imported in ProPlan and checked for its shape. To position the implant suprastructure–supported fibula in the correct dimension to the antagonist dentition, an intermediate occlusal guide was Figure 6.12A The fibula is covered with a rubber dam with punched holes for the scan caps. A thin dusting with titanium dioxide powder was applied and the Lava COS was used to register the position of the scan caps and thus the position of the implants. Figure 6.12B The peri implant fibula is covered with a split thickness skin graft of a standard thickness; the implants are covered with cover screws. Figure 6.11 The fibula of the right lower leg after insertion of four implants. Scan caps are fixed on the fibula for registration of the implant position in the fibula. Three-Dimensional Planning in Maxillofacial Reconstruction of Large Defects Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 119 virtually planned in ProPlan and printed with a 3D printer into a model. The occlusal guide functions as an antagonist dental cast positioner in the articulator to plan and finish the prosthesis or bridge. In case of a bar-retained prosthesis, this occlusal guide can also function as a positioner of the barsupported fibula during reconstruction. To transfer the virtual plan of the segmentation of the graft to the actual surgery, a cutting guide is designed. Fixation of the guide is planned on the implants in the graft. The guide is printed with a 3D printer and sterilized using gamma irradiation. Preparation of the recipient jaw area In most large maxillofacial defects the bone needs to be shaped to fit the graft properly without compromising the blood supply of the graft. This includes the shaping of the bony borders of the defect and the local soft tissue. There are generally two ways to prepare the defect. One possibility is to design a cutting guide, either bone or dentition supported, to perform the shaping of the defect. The planned graft will fit into the planned resection. Another possibility is to print the 3D planned suprastructure and the connected bone graft in a  3D stereolithographic model. This 3D model resembles the transplant exactly and can be used intraorally in the defect to prepare the defect (Figure  6.14). Once the model fits the defect, the transplant will fit as well (Figure 6.15). A meticulous preparation of the recipient area is mandatory: the graft and especially the attached vessels are delicate and thereby easily damaged during positioning in the defect. This positioning should therefore be minimized to avoid trauma to the graft. Also, ischemia time is known to be a significant factor in flap survival. The use of a 3D  stereolithograpic model mimicking the bony graft, the implants, and the suprastructure will Figure 6.13 The digitized position of the scan caps and implants are matched with the planned implant position (left). The suprastructure is designed digitally on the scan cap positions (middle) and milled out of titanium (E.S. Healthcare, Dentsply International, Inc.; right). On this model a prosthesis can be designed. Figure 6.14 3D model of the upper jaw reconstruction (left; see also Figure 6.11). A 3D print of the surgical outcome, including the implants and the virtual designed bar can be made (middle). This 3D print can be used together with the occlusal guide (see also Figure 6.11) intraorally to resect the defect edges until they properly match the graft dimensions (right). 120 Cone Beam Computed Tomography reduce “fondling” with the graft and significantly shorten ischemia time. Reconstructive surgery of the jaw The second surgical step, usually 6 weeks after the prefabrication to allow the implants sufficient time for osteointegration, includes harvesting of the implant-bearing transplant. While the vascular support of the graft stays intact (the fibula remains in situ), osteotomies are performed using the implant-supported cutting guide (Figure  6.15) to  shape the transplant to the correct size and form. Thereafter, the suprastructure connecting the implants is placed. The prefabricated bone graft with the suprastructure in place is cut from its blood supply and transferred to the intraoral recipient site. Here, the intermediate occlusal guide is used (Figure  6.16). In the case of a bridge or hybrid structure, a positioning wafer is made to Figure 6.15 Selective laser sintering model of the cutting guide (Synthes, Solothurn, Switzerland; and Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) fixed on the implants with Nobel guide fixation screws in the left fibula (above). The virtual cutting guide shown on the fibula (ProPlan CMF; below). Figure 6.16 After preparation of the defect edges, the occlusal guide is used to position the segmented fibula graft on the bar in the maxillary defect (left). The fibula graft is fixated on the zygomatic bone and on the infraorbital bone using 1.5-mm titanium plates (Synthes, Solothurn, Switzerland). The prosthesis in the proper occlusion intraorally (right). Three-Dimensional Planning in Maxillofacial Reconstruction of Large Defects Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 121 guide the graft and suprastructure into the desired occlusion. The skin graft, which represents the neo-mucosa at this point, is sutured to the oral mucosa (Chang et al., 1999). Evaluation of the surgery CBCT scans provide the possibility of postoperative analysis for evaluation of the outcome of the surgery. The CBCT scan shows all dimensions of the reconstruction outcome (Figure  6.17A). The DICOM files from the scan can be imported  into ProPlan; these can then be superimposed on the original reconstruction plan (Figure  6.17B). It is now easy to visualize how well reconstructive segments match the plan (Roser et  al., 2010). Postoperative CBCT scans can also be used to evaluate consolidation of the graft bone segments to the defect edges (Figure 6.17C). Figure 6.17A 3D segmented model of a postoperative CBCT scan after reconstruction of the maxilla with a three-segment fibula bone and a bar on implants. Figure 6.17B 3D model of the fibula parts and the lower jaw of the plan (orange) and the 3D model of fibula parts and the mandible extracted out of the postoperative CBCT scan (purple). The superimposition fusion model was aligned on the mandible, showing a high similarity between the planned position of the fibula parts and the surgical outcome. 122 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Case report of a secondary reconstruction At the age of 16 (1983), a male patient was diagnosed with an ameloblastoma of the right corpus of  the mandible. A partial mandibula resection was  performed, as well as immediate reconstruction with a free rib graft. Thirty years later, the rib graft was fractured and resorbed, leaving a mobile discontinuity of the mandible (Figure  6.18). The patient had a full dentition in the upper jaw and a remaining dentition in the left mandible. The left mandibular segment had migrated to the medial side over the years, showing dental compensation of the lower remaining premolars and molar. The patient was offered a reconstruction with a free fibula flap including an implant-based prosthesis, and removal of the remaining dentition in the lower jaw. Function of the temporomandibular joints was sufficient, and nearly normal condylar rotation and translation was possible. Lateral rotation of the left mandibular segment was possible to a certain extent. A 3D augmented model was obtained in ProPlan CMF with a CBCT and a scan of the dentition. The left corpus was virtually rotated to the left, preserving condylar seating to compensate for the medial migration. A more favorable position of this segment for reconstruction was thus realized (Figure 6.19). Reconstruction was planned with removal of the remaining rib graft and placement of a two-segment fibula with four implants, one of which was planned for the anterior mandibular left corpus. A bone-supported guide was planned for insertion of this implant. The remaining three implants were inserted in the fibula. All implants were placed during the first operation and their position was recorded digitally with the Lava Oral Scanner. The scan was superimposed on the plan using the remaining outer Figure 6.17C Postoperative axial CBCT slide showing the beginning phase of consolidation between the fibula segments. On conventional OPG this would not be visible in this precise manner. Figure 6.18 3D augmented model of a CBCT of a male patient 25 years after resection of the right corpus of the mandible and reconstruction with a rib graft. Resorption of the rib graft (red) can be clearly seen. Migration of the left mandible is shown with severe dental compensation. Figure 6.19 Lateral condylar rotation of the mandibular left corpus was performed (brown part, before rotation; blue part, after rotation). Three-Dimensional Planning in Maxillofacial Reconstruction of Large Defects Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 123 surface of the premolars and molar on the CBCT as a reference. A titanium bar and dental prosthesis were planned on the implants and fabricated. During the second surgical phase of the reconstructive surgery, the remaining mandibular molars were removed and the alveolar ridge was trimmed down to gain intermaxillary prosthetic height (Figure 6.20). Fixation of the fibula to the left corpus of the mandible was performed with the bar on implants and to prohibit rotation around the mandibular implant, with a 1.5-mm mini plate (Synthes, Solothurn, Switzerland). The bar and the prosthesis showed a favorable fit and occlusion (Figure 6.21). Healing was uneventful, showing a clinically and Figure 6.20 The planning of the reconstruction with two fibula segments is shown in several steps. A bar is designed on three implants in the fibula and one implant in the mandible. The teeth in the left mandibular corpus were extracted during the reconstruction surgery. Figure 6.21 The planned occlusion of the prosthesis (left) almost exactly matches the postoperative occlusion after the reconstruction. 124 Cone Beam Computed Tomography radiologically favorable consolidation. After 30 years the patient was able to eat steak. Discussion For complex reconstructions of maxillofacial defects, the CBCT scan provides an excellent basis for 3D virtual preoperative planning and postoperative evaluation. The CBCT apparatus is usually situated in the maxillofacial surgery department and is thus easily accessible. This is particularly important in reconstructive planning cases, because the patient has to be scanned in the right interrelation of the upper and lower jaw, which can then be checked by the surgeon or prosthodontist. Scanning the patient wearing a teeth setup can only be done this way. In primary resection of tumors it is possible to plan the planes of the bone resection in software based on CBCT-derived data. Cutting guides can be produced to guide the resection exactly as planned. For primary and secondary reconstruction, drilling guides for guided implant insertion and cutting guides can be produced by 3D printing. As this chapter shows, the CBCT scan is the basis of these resection and reconstruction guides. Secondary reconstruction of maxilla-mandibular defects using prefabricated bone grafts always implies that the patient must be willing to undergo at least two surgical procedures. There are three major benefits of using prefabricated bone grafts instead of bone grafts without preplanning of the graft position. First, by planning from the occlusion the prosthodontist is aiming for the optimal implant position in the bone flap, thereby trying to safeguard that implant placement and prosthetic rehabilitation are not impaired by wrong placement of implants and bone. Second, the skin graft provides an excellent thin covering around the implants of the fibula bone (Figure  6.12B; Chang et al., 1999), as in large maxillofacial defects there is usually not only a bony defect but also a lack of soft tissue. Third, ischemia time of the flap is kept to a minimum, because the shaping and cutting of the fibula as well as the fixation of the bridge onto the implants can be done with the fibula still in situ and perfused. This reduces the time needed to place the construct into the jaw defect, thus increasing the chances of successful free flap transplantation (Jokuszies et  al., 2006). Even in cases of primary reconstruction of large defects during ablative surgery, virtual planning is very useful and can prevent incorrect positioning of the bone graft (as described in the primary reconstruction section). 3D printing of anatomical parts and guides is essential to allow for precise translation of the planning to the operating room. It saves operating time and therefore cost; also, it helps to reduce ischemia time. CBCT and 3D software are the basis for virtual planning technique, as described above.  The fusion of optical 3D scan files and CT-angiography data extends the power of 3D surgical planning. 3D virtual planning provides an essential, powerful tool for complex reconstructions of maxillofacial defects. Computer-aided design can create all necessary guides, and additive manufacturing can print them (Hirsch et al., 2009). We foresee that for complex reconstructions, 3D virtual planning combined with 3D printing of surgical guides might evolve to become the standard approach and treatment. References Albert, S., Cristofari, J.P., Cox, A., Bensimon, J.L., Guedon, C., and Barry, B. (2010). Mandibular reconstruction with fibula free flap: Experience of virtual reconstruction using Osirix, a free and open source software for medical imagery. Ann Chir Plast Esthet, 56(6): 494–503. Chang, Y.M., Chan, C.P., Shen, Y.F., and Wei, F.C. (1999). Soft tissue management using palatal mucosa around endosteal implants in vascularized composite grafts in the mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 28(5): 341–3. Chiapasco, M., Biglioli, F., Autelitano, L., Romeo, E., and Brusati, R. (2006). Clinical outcome of dental implants placed in fibula-free flaps used for the reconstruction of maxillo-mandibular defects following ablation for tumors or osteoradionecrosis. Clin Oral Implants Res, 17(2): 220–8. Cordeiro, P.G., Disa, J.J., Hidalgo, D.A., and Hu, Q.Y. (1999). Reconstruction of the mandible with osseous free flaps: A 10-year experience with 150 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg, 104(5): 1314–20. de Almeida, E.O., Pellizzer, E.P., Goiatto, M.C., Margonar, R., Rocha, E.P., Freitas, A.C. Jr., et al. (2010). Computer-guided surgery in implantology: Review of basic concepts. J Craniofac Surg, 21(6): 1917–21. Three-Dimensional Planning in Maxillofacial Reconstruction of Large Defects Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 125 Eckardt, A., and Swennen, G.R. (2005). Virtual planning of composite mandibular reconstruction with free fibula bone graft. J Craniofac Surg, 16(6): 1137–40. Gbara, A., Darwich, K., Li, L., Schmelzle, R., and Blake, F. (2007). Long-term results of jaw reconstruction with microsurgical fibula grafts and dental implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 65(5): 1005–9. Hirsch, D.L., Garfein E.S., Christensen, A.M., Weimer,  K.A., Saddeh, P.B., and Levine, J.P. (2009). Use  of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing to produce orthognathically ideal surgical outcomes: A paradigm shift in head and neck  reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 67(10): 2115–22. Jokuszies, A., Niederbichler, A., Meyer-Marcotty, M., Lahoda, L.U., Reimers, K., and Vogt, P.M. (2006). Influence of transendothelial mechanisms on microcirculation: Consequences for reperfusion injury after free flap transfer. Previous, current, and future aspects. J Reconstr Microsurg, 22(7): 513–8. Lopez-Arcas, J.M., Arias, J., Castillo, J.L., Burgueno, M., Navarro, I., Moran, M.J., et al. (2010). The fibula osteomyocutaneous flap for mandible reconstruction: A  15-year experience. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 68(10): 2377–84. Rohner, D., Jaquiery, C., Kunz, C., Bucher, P., Maas, H., and Hammer, B. (2003). Maxillofacial reconstruction with prefabricated osseous free flaps: A 3-year experience with 24 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg, 112(3): 748–57. Roser, S.M., Ramachandra, S., Blair, H., Grist, W., Carlson,  G.W., Christensen, A.M., et  al. (2010). The accuracy of virtual surgical planning in free fibula mandibular reconstruction: Comparison of planned and final results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 68(11): 2824–32. Schmelzeisen, R., Neukam, F.W., Shirota, T., Specht, B., and Wichmann, M. (1996). Postoperative function after implant insertion in vascularized bone grafts in maxilla and mandible. Plast Reconstr Surg, 97(4): 719–25. Taylor, G.I., Miller, G.D., and Ham, F.J. (1975). The free vascularized bone graft. A clinical extension of microvascular techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg, 55(5): 533–44. Zlotolow, I.M., Huryn, J.M., Piro, J.D., Lenchewski, E., and Hidalgo, D.A. (1992). Osseointegrated implants and functional prosthetic rehabilitation in microvascular fibula free flap reconstructed mandibles. Am J Surg, 164(6): 677–81. Cone Beam Computed Tomography: Oral and Maxillofacial Diagnosis and Applications, First Edition. Edited by David Sarment. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2014 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 127 Implant Planning Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography David Sarment 7 Introduction Prior to surgically placing dental implants, a careful planning must be performed. Several factors are considered to ensure the successful placement of implants. The dimensions, locations, and positioning of implants should all be determined prior to surgery. Thus, it is necessary to evaluate osseous structures in detail and develop a vision of the prosthetic outcome, so that available bone volume and density, as well as anatomic limitations, are uncovered. To this effect, there are several diagnostic tools, including radiography. Two-dimensional radiographs are a projection of the anatomy onto a film or detector. The two most commonly used methods are panoramic and periapical radiographs. Because of their ease of access, they are adequate techniques for screening, detection of obvious pathology, and initial measurements. However, they are subject to significant deformation inherent to the projection angles or centers of rotations. In a 1994 comparison of radiographic methods, Sonick et al. demonstrated that measurements performed on periapical and panoramic images could deviate 2–3mm. They also reported a maximum deviation reaching 7.5mm for panoramic images (Sonick et al., 1994). Interestingly, not only these dimensions are significant, but it is not possible to know which image is most distorted. By contrast, in the same study, computed tomography (CT) distortion was 0.2mm and would reach a maximum of 0.5mm. Therefore, the examiner can consider all measurements to be accurate within 0.5mm and be in the “safe zone” at all times. Interestingly, this study and others were conducted using conventional CT, with the expectation that better results would be found using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). In 2000, the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology published a position statement, based on a thorough review of the literature available at the time, and recommended some type of cross-sectional imaging for implant planning (Tyndall and Brooks, 2000). Again, if the original studies were repeated at the present time, using CBCT in place of conventional CT, the threedimensional modality would be expected to improve. However, a similar distortion would likely occur with two-dimensional radiographs because it is mostly due to factors extrinsic to image acquisition itself. Although three-dimensional radiography has superior diagnostic value than two-dimensional images, this information alone is often insufficient 128 Cone Beam Computed Tomography to place implants in ideal or adequate locations for restorative purposes. This is because, even in the presence of bone, the prosthetic demand might require an implant position that would be outside of the osseous envelope (Figure 7.1). Consequently, it is often necessary to project the restorative expectation onto the radiographic image, using a  radiographic guide, in order to visualize bone and future restorations simultaneously. To this effect, the availability of in-office three-dimensional radiography creates the flexibility of positioning a radiographic guide in the presence of the clinician. This is in contrast to referring a patient to a  center or hospital, where the technician might not be aware of the positioning of a dental guide, and the  patient supine position together with the difficulties of scanning might compromise the outcome. There are other practical advantages of using in-office scanning. For example, when using a small field of view, it is possible to rescan an area of  interest after treatment has been rendered to document healing or evaluate a bone graft. The ability to quickly diagnose and plan for treatment is a significant advantage when care must be rendered in a timely fashion due to patient discomfort or pain. Combined with surgical guides, the use of CBCT and implant planning software allows for a predictable surgery (Nickenig and Eitner, 2007). However, there are limitations to CBCT. Image contrast is limited, and the presence of dental restorations significantly deteriorates image quality. Furthermore, radiation levels are significant and imaging can only be used reasonably. Image quality and implant planning The quality of CBCT, as discussed in chapter 1, significantly impacts diagnosis. Voxel size, contrast, and artifacts are important factors to consider when viewing and planning implants. To optimize the use of the machine, the least amount of radiation yielding accurate measurements should be utilized (Dawood et al., 2012). Three-dimensional renderings are utilized during the diagnosis treatment Figure 7.1 (A) This hopeless premolar can be removed and an implant immediately placed because bone is adequate and abundant where needed. (B) In the first mandibular edentulous location, a scannographic guide demonstrates that placement of an implant in the long axis of the future restoration would in fact bring the apex of an implant towards the lingual concavity. The decision can be made prior to surgery to angle the implant, place a shorter fixture, or avoid this site. (A) (B) Implant Planning Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 129 phase and must be accurate to provide a true representation of bone. Unfortunately, it is common to find a discrepancy between the expected anatomy and the actual topography discovered during surgery. Although several factors affect image quality (Ritter et al., 2009), viewing is most affected by image rendering method and three-dimensional calculation thresholds. Image rendering can be performed in two ways: volume rendering and surface rendering. Volume rendering is a three-dimensional display mostly available on cone beam and spiral CTs standard software. It is best understood as a cloud of pixels with some level of transparency. By contrast, surface rendering is obtained using conversion software to calculate the surface of the image and show it with small triangles. The example in Figure  7.2 illustrates the use of  surface rendering versus volume rendering. Figure 7.2A shows volume rendering of a second molar in close proximity with the mandibular nerve. Software (Uniguide, France) is then utilized to import DICOM files and prepare a surface rendering of the anatomy. In contrast to volume rendering, surface rendering uses thresholds to discern anatomic features. Since each voxel is assigned a certain Hounsfield unit that represents a gray value, it is possible to instruct the computer to eliminate voxels that are outside of a window of gray values. For examples, if an object such as a tooth, denser than adjacent bone, is believed to be  extractable using a window of units ranging from 1000 to 1500, then surrounding voxels of smaller values are assigned to a different object (in  this case, bone). Once rendered, each object can be displayed together or separately. Figure 7.3 also illustrates the use of this technique, called segmentation, for treatment planning. In this case, orthodontic implants are desired. Virtual implants are introduced to the rendering while separating anatomical features, and future osteotomies can be planned carefully. Surface rendering is therefore a superior method for viewing CBCT anatomy and planning implants. In addition, software can perform calculations such as Boolean operations that consist of detecting common areas overlaid by two objects, or subtracting unnecessary anatomy. However, because the approach is dependent upon threshold values, this arbitrary decision can also affect the outcome since true anatomy can slightly differ. In Figure  7.4, bone is represented at two different thresholds, demonstrating how changes in values can significantly affect the rendering. Once a three-dimensional image has been rendered on a computer screen, it can also be exported for three-dimensional printing. Although CAD/ CAM is most often used for fabrication of a surgical guide, it is also possible to produce CAD/CAM medical models and utilize these for implant planning (Rasmussen, 2000). In Figure 7.5, a stereolithographic medical model was ordered and planning was performed on the transparent model. Figure 7.2 (A) Volume rendering is difficult to utilize for discerning the relationship between the roots and the mandibular nerve. With surface rendering, specific anatomy can be assigned various colors with threshold methods. (B) Because objects are now separated, they can be removed from the rendering, providing a view of specific areas. In this case, the roots and their relationship to the nerve can be viewed precisely. (A) (B) 130 Cone Beam Computed Tomography A surgery on the plastic was conducted while visualizing the anatomy. A surgical guide was then fabricated in the laboratory, using acrylic and traditional methods. Again, bone surface found on the model is only as good as software segmentation and rendering. If the surface is misinterpreted because of limited contrast, the model may not be a  true representation of bone. This is particularly true if bone grafting was first performed. Anatomic evaluation Prior to placing a dental implant, it is necessary to evaluate the anatomy in order to prevent intrusion to undesirable areas, prepare for bone augmentation, and optimize implant stability and position. Furthermore, implant therapeutic options have become more sophisticated in recent years, and more delicate evaluations are often necessary. This includes prosthetic demands, surgical techniques, and intricate treatment planning with other specialties such as orthodontics. Other chapters focus on several aspects of surgical methods. This chapter focuses on practical anatomic considerations as applied to the daily practice of dental implants. Bone density Density of bone is an important factor for implant placement, and there are several critical elements with regard to density. First, thickness of cortical bone can be evaluated to anticipate the ability to stabilize the implant when minimal bone height is otherwise available. High resolution available with Figure 7.3 (A) Four orthodontic interradicular implants are planned, but volume rendering is difficult to utilize to depict the precise anatomy. (B) Using software (Uniguide, France), segmentation of anatomic features is performed and bone is eliminated from the rendering, allowing for the depiction of virtual implants and their accurate relationship to adjacent roots. (C) A CAD/CAM surgical guide (see chapter 8) is then fabricated. Implants are placed accurately. (A) (B) (C) Implant Planning Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 131 CBCT provides an adequate measurement of cortical bone thickness. Second, medullar bone density can be evaluated as well: a visual appreciation of density is possible, which allows for anticipation of the clinical scenario. Knowing that poor density will be found at surgery influences the implant protocol, perhaps leading to the decision to undersize the osteotomy. In contrast, high density might require further osseous preparation, such as pretapping of the osteotomy site. It is important to remember that CBCT is less reliable than conventional CT with regard to precise density measurements. Compared to conventional machines, which are calibrated within a few Hounsfield units, cone beam machines are not so precise, and discrepancies exist from patient to patient as well as within a single scan. Yet there is Figure 7.4 (A) A conservative threshold is used to depict bone and eliminate surrounding tissues. (B) The threshold is modified to increase the window and some bone of lesser density is no longer visible. (A) (B) Figure 7.5 A medical CAD/CAM model was ordered using the office CBCT. The model shows bone surface and hopeless teeth. A rehearsal of surgery can be performed on the model, including extractions and bone reduction. 132 Cone Beam Computed Tomography some evidence that a correlation is generally present (Norton and Gamble, 2001; Song et al., 2009; Naitoh, Aimiya, et al., 2010). As a result, implant planning software often provides calculation tools that render a representation of density in the vicinity of a virtual implant: a potential implant location is selected by overlaying the drawing of an implant onto the CT image using a dedicated software tool. Software gathers Hounsfield levels within voxels surrounding the potential implant. A  rendering is then produced, usually utilizing color schemes and figures to represent the expected density (Figure 7.6). Considerations for maxillary sinus augmentations When planning for an implant at the posterior maxilla, the anatomy of the maxillary sinus must be understood. The first consideration is bone height: if insufficient, bone grafting may be necessary. The ability to precisely measure bone height below the maxillary sinus allows for the selection of a surgical method. If available bone is sufficient to obtain primary stability, then it is conceivable to use an osteotomy technique, or a simultaneous placement and Caldwell-Luc sinus grafting technique. If this distance is insufficient to expect primary stability, a sinus augmentation alone is planned. Osteotomy techniques When using an augmentation through the osteotomy approach, a precise measurement can be performed using CBCT. In addition, the local anatomy can be precisely evaluated, at times allowing for a flapless approach (Fornell et al., 2012). Because the image can be manipulated, local measurements can  be positioned in the expected axis of the future osteotomy. As a result, the distance from the crestal bone to the floor of the sinus is known prior to surgery. In techniques where 2mm Figure 7.6 A third party software is utilized to investigate bone density in the vicinity of a future implant. The computer can analyze surrounding Hounsfield units and render graphs to approximate bone density. Implant Planning Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 133 are first subtracted prior to fracturing the cortical bone towards the sinus, an adequate estimate is available. In fact, it can be argued that a periapical radiograph taken during surgery might not be necessary since a true visualization would not be obtained. In the example of Figure  7.7, an extraction had been recently performed and the placement of a dental implant was expected. A root remnant was to be removed, but more importantly, a soft tissue communication with the maxillary sinus was evident. In evaluating the area for bone augmentation, it was found that the bucco-lingual dimension was flat. Interestingly, although the initial preference to  approach the area surgically was to utilize a window, it was determined that the extraction socket would give better access to the area of interest for several reasons. First, the window would have been at a significant buccal distance to the future implant location, and good access and visualization would have been difficult. Second, elevation of the maxillary soft tissue in the area of the extraction socket would have been difficult, with possible tear due to the fresh extraction. Furthermore, elevation to the medial wall would have been delicate, with the likelihood to graft the buccal portion of the sinus only. Finally, bone graft would have had to be placed in sufficient volume to reach the window and packing would have been difficult. As a result, it was decided to utilize the extraction socket to approach the area and graft the site. Another example where a CBCT is useful is the single premolar site. In a typical case, the sinus floor above the area of interest would be somewhat flat and regular. Yet, it is possible to find a significant slant and, at times, a bucco-lingual septum interrupting the floor, therefore forcing the surgeon to modify the surgical approach. Unique nuances of the local anatomy are best studied using CBCT and would be more difficult to depict without it. Caldwell-Luc approaches When choosing a Caldwell-Luc sinus augmentation approach, CBCT enhances the surgical preparation and execution. First, the presence of soft tissue pathology can be ruled out, or addressed appropriately. Because CBCT is present in the office and radiation doses are reduced when compared to  conventional CT, updating the anatomy with a new examination after treatment of sinus pathology is reasonable (Figure 7.8). Furthermore, specific dimensions of the sinus in the area of interest can  be studied, and might influence the surgical approach. Typically, the sinus width and shape are important dimensions to visualize prior to entering the area. Once known, a good localization and size of the window is easily identified while the depth of the graft can be predicted. In fact, a measurement can be recorded and utilized during surgery to ascertain that the sinus membrane has been elevated to the medial wall, in situations where direct visualization is difficult. Another important anatomic limitation when preparing for a maxillary sinus surgery is the presence of septi, which might interfere with the localization of the window. In the presence of a septum, the clinician can easily and accurately locate it, and then determine if the window can be displaced mesially or distally. When necessary, two windows can be created. Furthermore, elevation of the sinus membrane can purposely be performed against the septum: the clinician, knowing to look for the bony interference, will reflect the membrane using a modified angle of the surgical instrument while continuing to maintain bone contact. Figure 7.7 A single tooth implant site shows sinus pathology, lack of vertical bone, proximity of the maxillary sinus, a communication, and a root remnant. A periapical radiograph would be insufficient to anticipate these issues. 134 Cone Beam Computed Tomography In other instances, unusual sinus anatomy can be depicted, revealing mesio-distal walls or complete separations within the maxillary sinus. A twodimensional radiograph such as a panoramic or a periapical film would not reveal compartments, leaving the element of surprise at the time of surgery. For instance, in Figure  7.9, two separate sinuses are present, one a medial and one a buccal compartment. CBCT was performed for the purpose of preparing for a sinus elevation and later implant placement. In view of the anatomic structures, it would have been possible to take the unusual approach of accessing the most medial sinus with a secondary window. Yet, because the outcome was unpredictable and out of the routine practice, it was decided to avoid grafting all together. As a result, the surgical treatment plan and prosthetic plan were affected and modified to accommodate this new limitation. It is interesting to note that the initial treatment plan was established using a panoramic radiograph and, if a CBCT had not been requested, it is likely that grafting of the most buccal sinus only would have been performed as it would have been impossible, at the time of surgery, to detect the mesio-distal wall. Consequently, the area could not have been implanted. Considerations at the mandible Mandibular anatomy At the mandible, several anatomic considerations are better understood using three-dimensional radiography. For example, the localization of the mandibular nerve is more precisely measured in three dimensions, and more importantly, unusual Figure 7.9 The three-dimensional rendering (A) of a maxilla shows a right sinus divided in a buccal and palatal compartments. (B) The biomodel is easier to view. Its manipulation is convenient for treatment planning. (A) (B) Figure 7.8 A maxillary sinus is evaluated after grafting. This second scan is useful to ascertain grafting success and prepare the implant surgery. Implant Planning Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 135 anatomy such as bifid canals can and should be safely identified. The ability to scroll through fine images also allows for a good visualization of the mental foramen as well as anatomic variations in this area. In the case presented in Figure 7.10 the nerve splits in two large branches distal to the mental foramen. As a result, if placement of an implant in the vicinity of the mental foramen is considered, it might be more reasonable to maintain a greater distance than usual for the osteotomy, or to place an implant coronal to the secondary mesial branch. In fact, the presence of such a branch past the mesial aspect of the mental foramen is common and more easily identifiable on a CBCT (Orhan et al., 2011). Because contrast is inferior using CBCT, it is in fact possible that detection of the cortical bone defining the mandibular canal could be more difficult than traditional CT. Other considerations at the mandible include the presence of bone canals in the interforaminal area. According to Tepper et al. it is always present. Its identification might prevent its perforation and possibly prevent bleeding (Tepper et al., 2001). Similar to implant site evaluation, it is also possible to radiograph the block donor site when such a method is necessary. The symphyses of the mental area are easily radiographed and measurements easily obtained to assess the position and size of the block. Diagnosis Endodontic treatment versus implantation The presence of a CBCT in the office allows for imaging of a tooth with a guarded prognosis. When the decision to extract a tooth is questionable, it is often because endodontic treatment is a reasonable approach. Often, further treatment such as a crown elongation is also necessary and the survival of the tooth is debatable. There is ample research evaluating the long-term success of  endodontic treatment and demonstrating outcomes equivalent to implant success rates. In addition, CBCT helps enhance endodontic treatment and retreatment (see chapter 10). Yet the precise third dimension provided by CBCT might assist in the decision making, not only in evaluating the difficulty of treating the tooth but also in  recognizing the possible obstacles in implant placement. In the example of Figure 7.11, a periapical radiograph of a tooth with a guarded prognosis is representative of such a situation. Once a CBCT has been performed, the decision to remove the tooth is more easily made: the extent of the lesion is significant enough to choose extraction and later replacement of this second molar. Figure 7.12 illustrates a case considered for root coverage. Once a Figure 7.10 The mandibular nerve is bifid, and a significant branch continues mesial to the mental foramen. (A) This cross-section is located in the second premolar area, and shows the beginning of the nerve division. (B) This cross-section is located about 2mm mesial to the first section, once the two branches are distinguishable. (A) (B) 136 Cone Beam Computed Tomography CBCT is taken, the lack of cuspid bone support becomes evident and an extraction with implant placement is preferred. In Figure 7.13, it is possible to appreciate the positions of fractures endured during a sport accident on this lateral incisor. Two bucco-lingual fractures are identifiable, showing their relationship to the pulp and adjacent bone support. Upon identification of the fracture lines, the decision to remove the tooth and place an implant is easily made, although endodontic treatment was first considered: a significant crown elongation and possible orthodontic forced-eruption would be necessary prior to restoring the tooth, leaving a short root and an esthetic defect. In contrast, bone is present for an immediate implant placement after extraction, maintaining the buccal bone with minimal grafting and tissue height for an ideal esthetic outcome. Extraction When the extraction is performed, the maintenance of remaining supporting osseous material is critical to subsequent implant treatment, bone grafting, or implant placement. In particular, the buccal bone plate can be difficult to preserve because of its thickness. For instance, in the esthetic zone, such as in Figures  7.13 and 7.14, this structure is particularly susceptible to surgical trauma. In some instances, a fenestration or dehiscence might be visible using CBCT. Only a radiographic method capable of detecting fine areas can serve the clinician in analyzing a thin buccal bone plate. Once detected, the clinician can better prepare for the surgical act by allocating more time to expand the alveole and perhaps by modifying techniques to limit buccal pressures. Similarly, interradicular bone for posterior teeth is another delicate structure to manage during tooth removal. Once identified, the clinician can also modify the surgery to preserve this precious bone structure. For instance, the decision to section roots prior to attempting an elevation can be taken for the purpose of avoiding buccal tension on the interradicular structure. Because of the ability to travel through occluso-apical sections and modify angles, it is also possible to note if roots possess angles or apical fusion which might interfere with its mobilization. In fact, once a root form is understood anatomically, its path of extraction can also be anticipated. CBCT is a method of choice for such fine analysis Figure 7.11 (A) A periapical radiograph shows a lesion distal to the second molar. Probing is significant and watched for about 12 months. (B) A CBCT demonstrates the extent of the lesion, including communication to the sinus and nasal cavity. (A) (B) Implant Planning Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 137 because of the practical access to the machine, fine imaging, and relatively reasonable radiation. Orthodontic evaluation Another indication for CBCT is in the analysis of an implant site while orthodontic movement is anticipated or in progress. A typical example is a patient with missing lateral incisors. When possible, it is preferable to analyze the surgical anatomy before or prior to completion of tooth movement. It is not uncommon to find that adjacent roots converge apically, resulting in a lack of mesio-distal distance at mid-root or more apically. The use of CBCT can confirm if adequate space is present, and when insufficient, it is possible to request a torque movement. Again, when patients are of age to Figure 7.12 (A) A cuspid is considered for root coverage, but (B) inadequate bone support instead suggests an extraction and implant placement. (A) (B) 138 Cone Beam Computed Tomography receive CBCT, it is also conceivable to perform a second local CBCT to confirm that space has been established. In Figure  7.15, the orthodontist was about to complete treatment. A panoramic radiograph was insufficient to note that the mesio-distal distance at mid-root level was reduced due to root convergence. Once tooth movement was modified, the area was radiographed a second time to confirm that a narrow diameter implant had now become an option. Furthermore, mini-implants as anchoring devices for orthodontic applications can take advantage of CBCT to evaluate interradicular space and bone thickness. Once implant planning has been performed, the osteotomy must accurately be placed between roots. Recently, while the use of CAD/ CAM surgical guides is more commonly used for definitive implants, their application to miniimplants has also been explored (Kim et al., 2008). Immediate implantation When immediate implantation is a consideration, the ability to confirm that adequate bone is available for primary stability is a concern. CBCT is an Figure 7.13 (A) The extent of trauma on this lateral incisor is unclear until (B) a CBCT is obtained during the initial visit. Multiple fractures are evident, leading to a replacement with an implant. (C) The tooth is carefully removed while maintaining the buccal plate, and an implant is immediately inserted. (D) A bone graft is also packed prior to placement of a collagen membrane. (A) (B) (C) (D) Implant Planning Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 139 option to validate the presence of apical or interradicular bone. It is then possible to appreciate how much bone-implant contact is expected, and what area of the future implant would remain in the alveole. Furthermore, it is also possible to anticipate where the implant can be located to gain stability. Using a three-dimensional fine radiograph, the clinician can predetermine the available bone and be more confident that primary stability can be achieved. The localization of the implant may or Figure 7.14 (A) The rendering shows virtual implant apices coming through the buccal plates. (B) The thin buccal plate is more evident on this cross-section. (A) (B) Figure 7.15 (A) A preimplant evaluation is performed during orthodontic treatment. A future lateral incisor implant is desired, but the space is insufficient in the apical region. (B) Orthodontic movement is modified with further divergence of the roots and the CBCT update now shows adequate space. (A) (B) 140 Cone Beam Computed Tomography may not be centered on the extraction socket, apical bone might be available for anchorage, and selection of a wide enough implant to engage the socket walls can be performed using three-dimensional evaluation. At the maxillary anterior quadrant, the implant will engage the palatal wall of bone while knowledge of the buccal bone wall is critical (Braut et al., 2011). A CBCT image can provide adequate measurements of these two areas. More importantly, an implant emulation can be performed at this stage to ensure that the implant localization and angulation does not have to be compromised while searching for anchorage (Kan et al., 2011). Indeed, it is common to find implants placed with a significant buccal angulation because they follow the initial extraction socket. This is adequate from the surgical aspect, but the restoration is more difficult to achieve because the abutment is significantly angulated. Furthermore, in highly esthetic cases with thin buccal tissues, there is a high risk for the implant platform to show at the buccal gingival margin. In an effort to avoid this issue, the careful clinician would prepare the osteotomy more palatally and with the desire to direct the long axis of the implant towards the tooth cingulum (Figure 7.13C, Figure 7.13D). Therefore, the presence of a palatal wall and apical bone are critical to an ideal immediate implant placement. CBCT, again, is a useful tool to carefully study these specific dimensions. Figure  7.14 illustrates how a proshetically driven implant placement causes the apical portion of implants to perforate the buccal plate. In the maxillary premolar area, tooth anatomy significantly impacts the localization of an immediate implant at the time of extraction. For example, a single-rooted tooth can easily provide guidance for an osteotomy. In contrast, when two divergent roots are present, the implant osteotomy might digress towards the palatal root. With a periapical radiograph, it is more difficult to decipher the tooth anatomy, whereas a CBCT shows root anatomy and bone morphology. At the mandible, tooth anatomy is usually less significant to an immediate implant placement. However, localization of the mental foramen is critical because the osteotomy might be apical to the socket in order to obtain primary stability, thus approaching this important anatomic limitation. In the posterior quadrants, interradicular bone is often utilized to anchor an immediate implant. Again, a two-dimensional radiograph provides a limited view of this anatomy. Another consideration is the presence of the maxillary sinus, which can at times follow the anatomy of the molar roots. Once the tooth is removed, little bone height remains to prepare an osteotomy and bone density can be low. If an internal sinus elevation is to be  performed, it is preferable to anticipate the procedure using proper diagnosis. At the mandible, the availability of bone is also limited by the possible presence of the mandibular nerve. Small implant restorations For a single tooth implant, bone morphology is studied precisely on CBCT. The mesio-distal dimension can be measured, using a virtual ruler, on the  axial view: typically, software provided with the machine includes image manipulation and initial measurements such as rulers. The user can scroll axial views and select a level at which the measurement is most useful. It is important to note that axial views are cross-sections of the scanned volume. Consequently, head position impacts this view: axial view should ideally be perpendicular to  the plane of occlusion, but if the patient was “head down” or “head up” during scanning, the axial cut might intersect the anatomy at a different angle: the mesio-distal measurement is impacted because it is artificially greater than it should be. Notably, some software can help the user correcting for this error by providing a function to rotate the patient’s head on a separate scout-type view. This is only available on CBCT units with large fields of view. When a small area has been imaged, it is difficult to view and appreciate the plan of occlusion, and therefore the mesio-distal measurements could be erroneously trusted. The presence of adjacent teeth usually provides reliable anatomic landmarks such as cemento-enamel junctions from which measurements can be made. Once an arch has been traced on an axial view, a thin artificial “panoramic” image is created on which mesiodistal measurements can also be performed. The bucco-lingual evaluation, although precise, is also dependent upon angles. This time, the cross-section is a reconstructed view perpendicular Implant Planning Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 141 to the occlusal tracing. This line is user defined and  easily modified. Yet it is important to keep in  mind  that a cross-section relies upon this tracing  because dimensions can also be significantly impacted. Similarly, bone height is viewed on the same cross-sectional image and is influenced by left-right patient head tilt. Again, some software provides correction tools, and small field of view images are more difficult to correct. But in this particular direction, a measurement can be made at an angle. Notably, the presence of adequate bone is insufficient for an ideal implant placement. The ridge might be located more lingually than desired (Figure 7.16), or at an angle that prevents a prosthetically driven implant placement. The use of a scannographic guide is then essential to project the restorative plan onto the anatomy (Sarment et al., 2003). For a single tooth implant, adjacent teeth can also help guide the implant position: when looking at the cross-section, it is possible to modify its thickness to create an artificial projection of adjacent teeth towards the area of interest. For segmental cases, it is not possible to use this method and a scannographic guide, containing barium sulfate or another radio-opaque material, is necessary to identify the location of the future restoration (Figure 7.17). Regardless of the scanning method used, the use of a surgical guide is recommended to transfer planning to surgery, so as to achieve a better accuracy of placement (Behneke et al., 2012). Evaluation of the edentulous arch With small field of views, multiple scanning might be necessary. Some manufacturers provide software  methods to stitch images together: areas that overlay are recognized as identical on multiple data sets, and algorithm is written to reconcile these series of images into one file. It is important to recognize that image quality is usually slightly decreased for large scanning, because the amount of data would otherwise be overwhelming. Therefore, the pitch between sections is decreased several-fold. The clinical impact is minimal, but the clinician should understand the consequence of utilizing the appropriate protocol to optimize it to the clinical purpose. Evaluation of the edentulous arch using CBCT also requires a scannographic guide to better anticipate the restorative outcome. Typically, the lack of plane of occlusion should be addressed prior to scanning so that planning can be performed Figure 7.16 (A) The left lateral and central incisor are hopeless in this postorthodontic adult patient. The teeth are removed, roots sectioned, and crowns reattached to the wire. (B) A CBCT is then taken and shows that buccal bone is missing significantly if an ideal implant placement is to be achieved. This dimension cannot be seen on a two-dimensional radiograph. (A) (B) 142 Cone Beam Computed Tomography accordingly. The best method to visualize the future occlusal plane is to fabricate a scannographic guide that imitates the final restoration. The guide should contain radio-opaque material in  sufficient concentration to yield a contour on the screen, yet without causing image distortion seen with very dense objects (i.e., streak artifacts or beam hardening). Barium sulfate is usually mixed with acrylic. The guide can contain various concentrations of barium sulfate, which produces distinct densities (Sarment and Misch, 2002). When later exported to an implant-planning software, these various shades of gray can be segmented, assigned a color, and artificially removed on the screen for better viewing of other parts of images, such as the anatomy alone (Figure 7.18). Furthermore, when a soft tissue–supported surgical guide is expected, it is necessary to provide a duplicated denture with a radio-opaque base in order to identify soft tissue contours. In this instance, a double scanning protocol can be requested by the guide manufacturer. This second acquisition can also be performed on the CBCT unit, and will later help with segmentation and fabrication of the CAD/CAM surgical guide. Scanning update Because the level of radiation is somewhat reasonable, in particular when using small field of views CBCT, it is possible to scan an area of interest a second time. The decision must be carefully made in view of the use of additional radiation. However, the clinical benefit can be significant enough in Figure 7.17 (A) A scannographic guide is prepared prior to scanning. (B) Once images are acquired, future restorative teeth are visualized. (A) (B) Figure 7.18 (A) Various densities are segmented and assigned separate colors on the screen. (B) The panoramic radiograph has limited value to appreciate the prosthetic challenge. (A) (B) Implant Planning Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 143 specific situations. As is often the case, there are few published guidelines for rescanning, and the clinician should use good judgment. In the evaluation of the maxillary sinus, it is common to find pathology. If transient, soft tissue appearance might vary significantly within days. More importantly, once the patient has been referred to an otorhinolaryngologist and treated successfully, a decision must be made to use the original images or rescan the area. The medical specialist might have used other means to evaluate the results, such as direct vision and patient interview. Therefore, the exact state of the sinus to be entered for bone grafting is unknown. Furthermore, many months might have passed since the initial visit. In addition, there is value in rescanning a grafted maxillary sinus because the presence of new bone is essential to implant placement. When relying on the initial images, it is difficult to anticipate the success of the bone graft, and a two-dimensional radiograph, just like the initial evaluation, is insufficient to provide an accurate visualization of new bone (Figure 7.19, Figure 7.20). CBCT scanning can evaluate the new volume, localization, and density of bone. Within the graft, areas of lesser density can be anticipated as well. Although the clinical significance of these variations within the graft remains unclear at this time, the clinician can modify the surgical protocol in two different ways. First, a longer implant length might be preferred in order to engage sufficient stabilizing bone. Second, the osteotomy might be undersized, in areas of lower density, so that greater compression is gained in low-density areas, in a manner similar to that of poor native bone quality. It is questionable whether scanning after implant placement is of use (Corpas et al., 2011), in particular because the presence of titanium produces significant artifacts (Schulze et al., 2010). For research purposes, Peleg et al. followed up implant placement with scanning in order to evaluate anatomy parameters (Peleg et al., 1999). These and other authors (Murakami et al., 1999) found that healing was good but that a significant percentage of implants were not in contact with bone, in spite of their clinical success. When a flapless approach is utilized, postsurgical scanning might be of greater interest to ensure the penetration of implants into bone (Van Assche et al., 2010). In a more recent study, Naitoh et al. reported on bone to  implant contact assessment after successful implantation, Figure 7.19 This maxillary sinus augmentation has healed poorly and the window area is invaded with soft tissue only. On a two-dimensional radiograph, bone augmentation appears adequate. Figure 7.20 A ridge preservation graft was placed after extraction of a maxillary cuspid. CBCT scanning prior to implant surgery shows a void at the apical end of the alveole. Virtual implant planning shows that an ideally located implant would mostly traverse the graft while its apex would be in soft tissue. 144 Cone Beam Computed Tomography and claimed that such evaluation is possible using CBCT (Naitoh, Nabeshima, et al., 2010). Similarly, large bone augmentations such as block grafts can be imaged in preparation of implantation. The success of the graft and possible areas of graft resorption can be anticipated. The surgical approach may also be affected, in particular when regrafting might be necessary. For instance, a small approach could be preferred if the graft appears intact. In contrast, if an apical area needs to be accessed for further grafting, then a larger initial incision is preferable. The knowledge gained during rescanning is used for better incisions and a more effective surgery. A similar decision making can be applied to all grafting, including smaller areas. Conclusion There are limitations to the use of CBCT when preparing for the placement of implants. The presence of adjacent metallic restorations such as crowns or endodontic posts is a common problem. Image artifacts are significant enough to render the image unusable to diagnosis. In contrast, a standard radiograph has better value in these situations. This situation arises often in evaluating a potential crack, typically in the area of an endodontically treated tooth and in the presence of a post. For the same reason, the possible crack is masked by artifacts. This is also true when an implant has been placed in the vicinity. It is also important to remember that postimplantation evaluation of peri-implant bone is very limited. Beam hardening and artifacts are simply misinterpreted for a lack of bone. Therefore, in cases of ailing or failing implants, CBCT is usually not the image of choice. The presence of a CBCT in a dental office has a significant impact on the workflow. Obviously, the initial consultation should include, when appropriate, the use of scanning. In order to best utilize the technology, it is recommended to develop an internal protocol to clarify the decision tree to all members of the team. A well-informed staff will be trained to accommodate the schedule for scanning and will be prepared to acquire the radiograph when a patient is first seen for dental implantation. Furthermore, the clinician should decide to take the time to read the radiograph while the patient is present, or to schedule a second visit for treatment planning. More importantly, it is possible to obtain an over-read by a dental and maxillofacial radiologist (see chapter 3) to rule out pathology. Over the last few years, CBCT machines have become more refined, often offering the option of a small field of view scanning to minimize radiation (Farman, 2009). While guidelines are being developed by dental specialties, the clinician must rely on the reasonable use of the technology in order to utilize it when the benefit outweighs the possible risk. The issue at hand is that benefit and risk are loosely defined. Yet, with regard to dental implants and associated grafting, the clinical benefit is obvious because accurate implant planning is now available. References Behneke, A., Burwinkel, M., and Behneke, N. (2012). Clinical Oral Implants Research, 23: 416–23. Braut, V., Bornstein, M. M., Belser, U., and Buser, D. (2011). International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 31: 125–31. Corpas Ldos, S., Jacobs, R., Quirynen, M., Huang, Y., Naert, I., and Duyck, J. (2011). Clinical Oral Implants Research, 22: 492–9. Dawood, A., Brown, J., Sauret-Jackson, V., and Purkayastha, S. (2012). DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology, 41: 70–4. Farman, A.G. (2009). Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology & Endodontics, 108: 477–8. Fornell, J., Johansson, L.A., Bolin, A., Isaksson, S., and Sennerby, L. (2012). Clinical Oral Implants Research, 23: 28–34. Kan, J.Y., Roe, P., Rungcharassaeng, K., Patel, R.D., Waki,  T., Lozada, J.L., and Zimmerman, G. (2011). International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 26: 873–6. Kim, S.H., Kang, J.M., Choi, B., and Nelson, G. (2008). World Journal of Orthodontics, 9: 371–82. Murakami, K., Itoh, T., Watanabe, S., Naito, T., and Yokota, M. (1999). J Periodontol, 70: 1254–9. Naitoh, M., Aimiya, H., Hirukawa, A., and Ariji, E. (2010a). International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 25: 1093–8. Naitoh, M., Nabeshima, H., Hayashi, H., Nakayama, T., Kurita, K., and Ariji, E. (2010b). Journal of Oral Implantology, 36: 377–84. Implant Planning Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 145 Nickenig, H.J., and Eitner, S. (2007). Journal of Cranio Maxillo Facial Surgery, 35: 207–11. Norton, M.R., and Gamble, C. (2001). Clin Oral Implants Res, 12: 79–84. Orhan, K., Aksoy, S., Bilecenoglu, B., Sakul, B.U., and Paksoy, C.S. (2011). Surgical & Radiologic Anatomy, 33: 501–7. Peleg, M., Chaushu, G., Mazor, Z., Ardekian, L., and Bakoon, M. (1999). J Periodontol, 70: 1564–73. Rasmussen, O.C. (2000). In Phidias Rapid Prototyping in Medicine, Vol. 4 Materialise, Inc., pp. 10–12. Ritter, L., Mischkowski, R.A., Neugebauer, J., Dreiseidler, T., Scheer, M., Keeve, E., et al. (2009). Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology & Endodontics, 108. Sarment, D.P., Al-Shammari, K., and Kazor, C.E. (2003). Int J Period Rest Dent, 23: 287–95. Sarment, D.P., and Misch, C.E. (2002). Int Mag Oral Implantol, 3: 16–22. Schulze, R.K., Berndt, D., and d’Hoedt, B. (2010). Clinical Oral Implants Research, 21: 100–7. Song, Y.D., Jun, S.H., and Kwon, J.J. (2009). International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 24: 59–64. Sonick, M., Abrahams, J., and Faiella, R.A. (1994). A  comparison of the accuracy of periapical, panoramic, and computerized tomographic radiographs in locating the mandibular canal. Int Oral Maxillofac Implants, 9: 455–60. Tepper, G., Hofschneider, U.B., Gahleitner, A., and Ulm, C. (2001). Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 16: 68–72. Tyndall, A.A., and Brooks, S.L. (2000). Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: A position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 89: 630–7. Van Assche, N., van Steenberghe, D., Quirynen, M., and Jacobs, R. (2010). Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 37: 398–403. 147 Cone Beam Computed Tomography: Oral and Maxillofacial Diagnosis and Applications, First Edition. Edited by David Sarment. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2014 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. CAD/CAM Surgical Guidance Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography George A. Mandelaris and Alan L. Rosenfeld 8 Introduction Management of diagnostic and clinical information utilizing patient-specific 3D volumetric data and computer software is transforming oral health care. This paradigm shift, the result of technology advances and improved access to 3D imaging, benefits patients and clinicians most when an accurate diagnosis can be made that enhances the delivery of therapy. Implant placement has been and continues to be intuitive for most clinicians throughout the world. Research over the past decade has demonstrated that this approach to osteotomy site preparation carries the greatest magnitude of error compared to  approaches where computer-generated stereolithographic surgical guides are utilized (Sarment, Sukovic, et al., 2003; Jung et al., 2009). While less than optimal implant placement may appear to be rather trivial at the time of operation, the prosthetic reconciliation required to compensate can lead to a less than satisfactory prosthetic outcome and complicate patient care (Spielman, 1996; Beckers, 2003). Since 1999, advances in implant surgical guide development through computer-aided design/ computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) have allowed for osteotomy site preparation to occur alone (partial guidance) or in combination with the delivery of an endosseous osseointegrated dental implant through a single guide (total guidance). The shared qualities between all CAD/CAM generated surgical guides include the following: (1) They are designed to reflect consideration of patientspecific anatomy that has been acquired through computed tomography, either mutislice spiral CT (MSCT) or cone beam CT (CBCT). (2) They are based on a presurgical prosthetically directed plan that is determined after clinical examination to understand patient-specific regional anatomy and vital structure orientation prior to surgery. (3) They are generated through computer software applications that are utilized to analyze regional anatomy and simulate planned surgical and prosthetic therapy (Vrielinck et al., 2003; Schneider et al., 2009). The process involved in CAD/CAM implant surgical guide design and utilization is a prosthetically driven approach to implant therapy that usually benefits from the use of a scanning appliance. A scanning appliance is critical for predictable prosthetic outcomes because it allows the prosthetic parameters to be transferred to the CT dataset for coordinated interdisciplinary planning in the preoperative phase of therapy (Israelson et  al., 1992; Basten and Kois, 1996; Mecall and 148 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Rosenfeld, 1992; Mecall and Rosenfeld, 1996). This type of appliance is arguably the most critical aspect of the computer-guided implantology process. They are often misunderstood, incorrectly designed, and not utilized to their full potential. The opportunity to utilize stereolithographic medical modeling coupled with three-dimensional patient-specific CT information creates a variety of guide support strategies. These strategies include fabrication of bone, tooth, tooth-mucosa, or exclusively mucosal-supported surgical drilling guides (with or without implant delivery) that can facilitate the delivery of implant therapy in a more precise and efficient manner with less patient discomfort when compared to the conventional methods (Rosenfeld et  al., 2006a, 2006b, 2006c; Mandelaris and Rosenfeld, 2008; Mandelaris et  al., 2010). The purpose of this chapter is to give an overview of CAD/CAM surgical guidance using CBCT imaging. The authors have published extensively on the details of computer-guided implantology (Rosenfeld et al., 2006a, 2006b, 2006c; Mandelaris and Rosenfeld, 2008; Mandelaris et  al., 2009; Mandelaris and Rosenfeld, 2009a, 2009b; Mandelaris et al., 2010). While several companies make CAD/CAMgenerated surgical guides and multiple software manufacturers exist in the marketplace, the computer software planning system and CAD/CAMgenerated surgical guides utilized and described in this chapter are SimPlant and the SurgiGuide family from Materialise Dental (Leuven, Belgium). In addition, while many cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) companies exist, the images and 3D volumes demonstrated in this chapter will be from the Carestream Dental 9300 CBCT unit. Rapid prototyping and medical modeling Rapid prototyping is a method of producing solid physical hardcopies of human anatomy from threedimensional computer data (Popat, 1998). All rapid prototyping techniques are based on the same principle of constructing a 3D structure in layers. The most direct benefits to the dental implant patient include (1) a greater understanding of the treatment requirements and commitment needed for successful therapy; (2) a significant reduction in surgical time and proportional decrease in postsurgical pain, discomfort, and swelling; and (3) the ability to review the risks and benefits with the patient for a better understanding of anticipated outcomes as well as alternative types of treatment. Medical modeling has several principal uses (Swaelens, 1999; Erickson et al., 1999; Webb, 2000). The first is to enable visualization of anatomical features such as tumor size and location, bone morphology, and orientation of vital structures. The second is to facilitate communication between interdisciplinary team members involved in patient treatment. The third is to enable the rehearsal of surgical procedures such as osteotomy preparation, implant positioning, abutment selection, and implant provisionalization. Complex surgical intervention can be performed prior to patient intervention. Stereolithography Stereolithography is the most well known and used rapid prototyping technique. It is also the technique most commonly used for the generation of medical models and computer-generated drilling guides used during the progressive drilling sequence in dental implant surgery (Erickson et al., 1999). Accuracy and reliability are two of the distinguishing characteristics of the stereolithographic process (Barker et al., 1994). In addition, stereolithography allows for medical models to be generated that are transparent, constructed in a timely manner, cost effective, and allow for selective colorization of regions of visual interest (Wouters, 2001; Figure 8.1, Figure 8.1 A mucosal stereolithographic medical model with five interforamina osteotomy site preparations as a part of the presurgical workup. Note the colorization of the inferior alveolar nerve and mental foramen. CAD/CAM Surgical Guidance Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 149 Figure 8.2). The dimensional accuracy of anatomical skull replicas derived from three-dimensional CT imaging using the rapid prototyping technique of stereolithography has been shown to be less than one millimeter, another important quality of this technology (Cheng and Wee, 1999; Campbell et al., 2002; Gopakumar, 2004). Pretreatment analysis Determining surgical and dental anatomy requirements for the patient seeking dental implant rehabilitation are key factors leading to an esthetic, functional, and biologically acceptable tooth replacement solution. Case type patterns representing various forms of edentulism have been described in previous publications (Mecall, 2009). These case type patterns allow for classification of residual ridge resorption, changes in overall volume of bone and soft tissue, and prosthetic requirements to restore form and function. Table 8.1 describes the five case type patterns and typical corresponding treatment. The success of prosthetic outcomes is dependent upon multiple variables, including proper dental space appropriation, which directly influences the reconstructive requirements of both hard and soft tissue. This Figure 8.2 A stereolithographic maxillary medical model with selective colorization of planned trans-sinusal implants (pterygoid and zygoma). Courtesy of Dr. Philippe Tardieu (Dubai, UAE). Table 8.1 Computer-guided implantology treatment planning based on case type patterns. Case type Scanning Appliance Type of Wax-up Indicated Corresponding Anatomy I Tooth-form Tooth-form Dental and surgical anatomy within normal limits II, III, and IV Full-contour Full-contour Dental anatomy may or may not be within normal limits; determination of the volume of hard and soft tissue augmentation for optimal final tooth position required. Surgical anatomy requires augmentation; volume and/or position of tissue need to be determined. IV and V Partial or complete denture Trial tooth setup Complete edentalism; dental and possibly surgical anatomy require modification IV and V Provisional restoration Tooth-form Dental anatomy only requires modification IV or V Patient’s existing prosthesis None, but the existing prosthesis must meet all acceptable prosthodontic criteria Complete edentalism; dental and possibly surgical anatomy require modification. Fiduciary markers required. Source: Mecall, 2009. 150 Cone Beam Computed Tomography assessment improves the likelihood that an implant replacement solution will be successful from a biologic, esthetic, phonetic, and functional perspective. These determinants are assessed through a  diagnostic wax-up and the selection of the most appropriate scanning appliance. A properly positioned and stabilized scanning appliance worn during CT/CBCT imaging transfers meaningful prosthetic information into the imaging dataset. This enables the surgical treatment plan to be as effective as possible. Prosthetically directed and collaboratively based treatment planning leads to predictable patient outcomes that can be planned before surgical intervention occurs. This process is referred to as restorative leadership. Restorative leadership allows the interdisciplinary team members to embrace a computer-guided implantology framework called collaborative accountability, which ultimately focuses on the patient outcome (Rosenfeld et  al., 2006a, 2006b, 2006c; Mandelaris and Rosenfeld, 2008). This creates an atmosphere of disclosure and interactive discussion that allows the patient to become an active participant in the treatment planning process. The restorative leadership process and collaborative accountability framework (a codiscovery process) is described below for each case type pattern leading to dental implant tooth replacement therapy. The restorative leadership process: Case type pattern identification and patient-specific diagnostic wax-ups Case type pattern identification helps to identify patient characteristics and categorize dental and surgical requirements for treatment. In addition, identifying case type patterns allows the implant team to estimate the costs and duration of treatment as a part of the preoperative workup. The restorative leadership process usually begins with the prosthetic dentist and consists of appropriate dental radiographs and securing mounted diagnostic study models. The mounted study models should reflect the patient in a reproducible articulated position. Rehabilitation of partial or complete edentulism consists of a diagnostic wax-up that is either tooth form, full contour, or a trial tooth setup (whereby anatomically correct denture teeth are used). This leads to the fabrication of an accurate scanning appliance in preparation for  prosthetically meaningful volumetric imaging (CT/CBCT). Identification of case type patterns are based on the individual requirements of dental and surgical anatomy. The patient-specific tooth position and bone/soft tissue volume required to satisfy outcome goals of the final prosthesis must be established during the diagnostic phase. The utilization of case type patterns allows the prosthetic outcome  goals to set surgical performance standards required to support the prosthetic outcome. This is a distinct paradigm shift compared to the historic nature of implant therapy. Case type pattern I A case type pattern I identifies the patient and requirements limited to dental anatomy since the residual ridge (i.e., surgical anatomy–soft and hard tissue volume/position) does not require modification to enable an optimal prosthetic outcome (Figure  8.3A and B, Figure  8.4A). Essentially, the dental anatomy is either missing or intact (i.e., tooth is present), but the surgical anatomy is sufficient for optimal tooth replacement. This case type pattern may be applied to a patient who has lost a natural tooth but had a socket preservation procedure and the resulting surgical anatomy is intact, so only the dental anatomy requires workup. Alternatively, this case type pattern could apply to a patient who has not lost a natural tooth but has suffered a nonrestorable fracture or a resorptive process where tooth replacement is required and an immediate implant is an option (Figure  8.4 A and B). In this situation, when the dental and surgical anatomy have not been altered by tooth loss, no scanning appliance is needed (i.e., the natural tooth will serve as the optimal final tooth position). 3D masks can be created to separate the tooth from adjacent neighboring anatomy to optimize planning and fixture positioning during computerguided implant surgery (Figure 8.5A through F). Case type patterns II and III In case type patterns II and III, appropriating dental space/anatomy is given high priority. The  dental anatomy may or may not be within normal limits. The surgical anatomy, however, will require modification to enable an optimal regional anatomy/volume to be realized in the final prosthetic outcome. In other words, the bone and/or CAD/CAM Surgical Guidance Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 151 Figure 8.3A and B Case type pattern I clinical features of a patient with missing maxillary right central incisor #8. Dental anatomy only requires workup; surgical anatomy does not require modification. (A) (B) Figure 8.4A and B Case type pattern I clinical features of a patient who has not yet lost maxillary left central incisor (#9). Dental anatomy only requires workup; surgical anatomy does not require modification. Figure 8.4B demonstrates the radiograph resorption defect, substantiating a hopeless prognosis. (A) (B) soft tissue volume requires some form of augmentation, but the dental anatomy can simply be developed through a wax-up. A full-contour diagnostic wax-up is performed to establish optimal tooth position and proportion as well as an optimal surrounding bone/soft tissue environment within the established prosthetic outcome goals. Case type pattern II situations include gingival asymmetry or color alterations, early facial bone loss, mucogingival abnormalities, or thin periodontal  biotypes or may involve occlusal instability (Figure 8.6A and B). This case type pattern is usually limited to one or  two teeth and may require orthodontic forced 152 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Figure 8.5D Occlusal view of anterior maxilla of 3D reconstruction. Mask of tooth #9 toggled off to simulate extraction. Figure 8.5C 3D construction of maxillary CBCT volume. Masks created include maxilla and individual teeth #7–#10. Virtual implant placement at the #9 position. Transparency toggle tool turned on for root anatomy visualization in 3D. Figure 8.5B 3D construction of maxillary CBCT volume. Masks created include maxilla and individual teeth #7–#10. Transparency toggle tool turned on for root anatomy visualization in 3D. Figure 8.5A 3D construction of maxillary CBCT volume. Masks created include maxilla and individual teeth #7–#10. Figure 8.5E Occlusal view of anterior maxilla of 3D reconstruction. Mask of tooth #9 toggled off to simulate extraction and immediate implant. Note the implant:alveolus discrepancy, which will require management. Figure 8.5F Cross-sectional view of planned implant at the #9 position with clip art rendering engaged (3D cross-section simulated onto 2D-cross section). CAD/CAM Surgical Guidance Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 153 eruption or connective tissue grafting to gain sufficient soft tissue volume such that the dental anatomy has a resulting normal proportion. Case type pattern III cases are defined predominantly by horizontal bone loss (with some degree of vertical bone loss as a result of the postextraction resorption phenomenon; Figure 8.7A and B). These cases generally demonstrate a dental space appropriation anatomy considered to be of normal proportion. However, surgical anatomy is deficient and the required volume of tissue needs to be determined in order to establish an optimal surgical environment. The full-contour diagnostic wax-up creates a simulation of the dental anatomy and volume of bone/soft tissue which is transferred into a scanning appliance. This facilitates prosthetically relevant CBCT imaging and surgical planning to support the principles of restorative leadership and collaborative accountability (Figure 8.8). Case type pattern IV Case type pattern IV cases are defined predominantly by vertical bone loss (Figure 8.9) but demonstrate some level of horizontal resorption secondary to the postextraction resorption. These cases may demonstrate altered occlusal vertical dimension, reduced mesiodistal spacing, and some occlusal instability. Both surgical and dental anatomy require modification to establish optimal Figure 8.6A Case type pattern II clinical features of a patient with a nonrestorable and endodontically failing maxillary right central incisor #8. Dental anatomy is within normal limits, but surgical anatomy requires augmentation (note the thin periodontium). Figure 8.6B CBCT imaging and cross-sectional view of #8. Figure 8.7A and B Case type pattern III clinical features of a patient with partial edentulism #7–#10. Dental anatomy is mostly within normal limits, but surgical anatomy requires augmentation and volume/position of tissue needs to be determined. Predominantly horizontal with some vertical bone loss. (A) (B) 154 Cone Beam Computed Tomography dental proportion/position and hard/soft tissue volume. This can be determined in the form of a full-contour diagnostic wax-up for those situations involving limited tooth loss or in the form of  a trial tooth setup for more extensive tooth loss  using anatomically correct denture teeth (Figure 8.10A and B). Case type pattern V Case type pattern V cases are characterized by  advanced horizontal and vertical bone loss (Figure 8.11). They are situations of complete edentulism where advanced residual ridge resorption has usually occurred. Concomitantly, there is loss of perioral musculature support and occlusal instability. These cases require a trial tooth setup using anatomically correct denture teeth to establish an optimal dental anatomy and a favorable hard/soft tissue volume (Figure  8.12). Anatomically correct denture teeth are mandatory because they more appropriately reflect natural tooth dimensions representative of realistic prosthetic outcome dimensions for implant-supported prosthodontics. In these situations, the surgical (bone and soft tissue) and dental anatomy is generally altered such that both environments require modification. Figure 8.8 Full-contour diagnostic wax-up. Reprinted with permission from Mecall, 2009. Figure 8.9 Case type pattern IV clinical features of a patient with partial edentulism. Dental and surgical anatomy require modification. Predominantly vertical with some horizontal bone loss. Figure 8.10B Full-contour diagnostic wax-up for case type pattern IV clinical features of a patient with partial edentulism of the maxillary right posterior. Figure 8.10A Case type pattern IV clinical features of a patient with partial edentulism #2–#5. Dental and surgical anatomy require modification. Predominantly vertical with some horizontal bone loss. CAD/CAM Surgical Guidance Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 155 This requires that surgical and prosthetic landmarks be established, which allows for optimal esthetics, phonetics, and function to be realized in the prosthetic diagnostic phase. Once the tooth form, full-contour wax-up, or trial tooth setup are completed, representing “optimal” dental and regional anatomy, a scanning appliance is fabricated. The appliance must reflect that which was created in the diagnostic wax-up or trial tooth setup. Scanning appliances Scanning appliances were traditionally used to reflect the optimal final prosthetic tooth position in an edentulous space within the regional anatomy under investigation (Basten and Kois, 1996). The earliest type of appliance was a simple tooth silhouette outline created by painting a thin barium sulfate coating on a vacuform resin sheet (Mecall and Rosenfeld, 1992). This enabled the identification of tooth form to be evaluated against existing regional anatomy viewed in the CT dataset. Its earliest use was limited to plain film analog CT images. This format was awkward and not user friendly. With the evolution in computer software and CT-guided implant technology, four types of scanning appliances have emerged (Mecall, 2009). The choice reflects the extent of edentulism and disruption of regional anatomy. The four types are outlined below. 1. Tooth form This type of scanning appliance is typical for a patient who has dental and surgical anatomy within normal limits–in essence, a case type pattern I or II situation. The optimal, final tooth position is represented by a solid 30% barium sulfate (by weight) tooth and should contain a negative image center representing the center of the tooth or screw access hole emergence. The barium tooth can reside within a 0.040-inch vacuform wafer which covers sufficient teeth in the arch so that the appliance is stable. Ideally, inspection windows should be created at three different cusp tip points so that a triangulated plane is created and seating verification can be confirmed through visual inspection. The 30% barium sulfate standard can be substituted with other acceptable radiodense materials. The density of these materials should not compete with regional anatomic images or create artifacts that would negatively influence radiographic interpretation. A radiolucent interocclusal bite registration is also useful to ensure that the appliance is fully seated in a reproducible and accurate manner at an open vertical dimension during CBCT imaging. In some cases, the pontic or receptor site might need to be developed in the soft tissue (i.e., surgical anatomy) to allow complete seating of the scanning appliance reflecting optimal tooth form (Figure 8.13). 2. Full contour A full-contour scanning appliance may be used for case type pattern II cases and is always used for case type patterns III and IV situations. They consist of a  barium sulfate gradient differential. The dental anatomy should be represented as a solid tooth using 30% barium sulfate by weight while the Figure 8.11 Case type pattern V clinical features of a patient with complete edentulism. Dental and surgical anatomy require modification. Significant vertical and horizontal bone loss. Figure 8.12 Trial tooth setup. 156 Cone Beam Computed Tomography modified bone/soft tissue representation is 10% barium sulfate by weight. This barium gradient differential allows the dental anatomy to be segmented from the proposed bone/soft tissue requirements as viewed in the dataset images. This allows all existing and proposed anatomy to be viewed interactively as independent masks through computer software (Figure 8.14A and B, Figure 8.15A–C). As in the tooth-form scanning appliance, negative image holes should be positioned in the prosthetic center of the teeth or proposed screw access holes. The barium tooth/teeth and soft tissue can reside within a 0.040-inch vacuform wafer. The wafer must incorporate enough teeth in the arch so  that the Figure 8.13 Pontic/receptor site development performed in preparation for CBCT diagnostics. Tooth form provisional/ scan appliance utilized. Development of receptor site allows complete seating of the appliance, reflecting optimal tooth position and proportion. Figure 8.14A 3D reconstruction of CT diagnostics for the maxilla. #9 is a planned implant site. Masks included reflect bone + additional teeth, scanning appliance/dental anatomy for #9, and surgical anatomy/soft tissue position/volume for #9. Figure 8.14B 3D reconstruction of CT diagnostics for the maxilla with cross-sectional view. Clip art rendering tool engaged. 2D cross-section is imposed on 3D reconstruction. Figure 8.15A Full-contour scanning appliance in place. Radiolucent interocclusal bite registration used to ensure complete seating. Figure 8.15B Full-contour vacuform wafer scanning appliance. Dental anatomy is 30% barium with negative image centers. Surgical anatomy (soft tissue volume/position) is represented in 10% barium. CAD/CAM Surgical Guidance Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 157 appliance is stable when seated. This appliance will generally involve more surface area in direct contact with residual ridge soft tissue. In cases such as a  congenitally missing lateral incisor where the vertical soft tissue position is optimal but deficient in horizontal volume, the edentulous ridge may not allow seating of a full-contour appliance. The pontic receptor site soft tissue might need to be modified to enable complete seating of the scanning appliance. If not addressed, this situation often results in a ridge-lapped scanning appliance, which can complicate implant planning if a totally guided approach is used (Figure 8.16A and B). As for all vacuformbased scanning appliances, inspection windows should be made at three different cusp tips so that a triangulated plane is created and seating verification can be confirmed through visual inspection. A radiolucent interocclusal bite registration is also useful to ensure that the appliance is fully seated at an open vertical dimension for CBCT imaging. 3. Denture scannoguide In the situation where a patient’s existing partial or complete denture meets all the fundamental prosthodontic criteria of success, requiring no further modifications or setup, the prosthesis itself can be used as the scanning appliance, utilizing the dual scan protocol (see section on CBCT imaging protocols). The Tardieu scanning appliance is a separate laboratory processed barium gradient differential scanning appliance and has been previously published (Tardieu, 2009). It consists of a partial denture or complete denture consisting of anatomically correct denture teeth. The teeth are 30% barium sulfate and the base is 10%. This scanning appliance is fabricated either after a trial tooth setup has been performed when a new denture is needed, or by duplicating an existing acceptable denture (Figure 8.17A and B). This establishes the  proper phonetic, functional, and physiologic requirements that will be Figure 8.15C 3D reconstruction with multiple masks for prosthetically directed implant planning. Masks include natural teeth, maxilla, scan appliance dental anatomy/teeth, scan appliance surgical anatomy/soft tissue position/volume. Figure 8.16A Case type pattern II patient clinical presentation. Implant treatment planning to ensue for #7. Note the mild soft tissue volume loss requiring full-contour wax-up. Edentulous site requires pontic/receptor site modification/development if the proper tooth proportion is to be able to seat properly. Figure 8.16B Case type pattern II patient clinical presentation. Ridge-lapped full-contour scanning appliance in place. Ridge-lapped scan appliance used to allow for full proportion of tooth #7 to be visualized because the receptor/ pontic site was not developed preoperatively. 158 Cone Beam Computed Tomography incorporated in the scanning appliance. If a trial tooth setup is not required and the existing prosthesis meets all satisfactory prosthodontic requirements, it can be utilized as a scannoguide for imaging purposes (using a dual scan protocol; Figure  8.18). An interocclusal bite registration should be created so that complete seating of the scanning appliance can be verified. The bite registration is critical in these cases since it allows for accurate cross-mounting of the scanning appliance, virtual rapid prototype duplicate of the denture/scan appliance, and CAD/CAM surgical guide generated from the CBCT dataset and stereolithographic process. In situations involving immediate delivery of interim implant-supported teeth, cross-referencing ensures a more accurate prosthesis occlusion. 4. Provisional restoration or natural tooth In the case of a provisional restoration, 30% barium sulfate may be used for the missing tooth. However, if a provisional restoration spans more than the future implant site, corresponding abutment teeth should include significantly less barium sulfate. Using a concentration of more than 10% barium sulfate by weight for neighboring abutment tooth preparations may make it difficult, if not impossible, to decipher between scanning appliance and natural tooth structure. The competition between teeth and scanning appliance should be limited or reduced as much as possible. This will help ensure an accurate registration of the optically scanned stone model with the surgical planning software when the CAD/CAM guide is fabricated. In the case of a natural tooth that is to be lost due to a fracture, a resorptive process, or from another cause, the dental anatomy is already present and considered optimal. In these cases, the natural tooth serves as the scanning appliance for which optimal tooth position can be evaluated against regional anatomy and from which surgical Figure 8.17A Denture scannoguide created for the completely edentulous mandible. The patient’s maxillary denture is shown with bite registration created to ensure complete seating and to verify accurate positioning. Figure 8.17B Denture scannoguide created for the completely edentulous mandible. Dental anatomy (teeth) is 30% barium and surgical anatomy (soft tissue volume/denture base) is 10% barium. Figure 8.18 Accurate complete dentures for a patient seeking implant rehabilitation. Dentures are correct in all prosthodontic criteria. Scanning appliance creation is not needed. Patient will utilize existing dentures as the scanning appliances. Fiduciary markers are required and dual scan CBCT protocol will be used. CAD/CAM Surgical Guidance Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 159 planning can meaningfully commence (Figure 8.4A and B, Figure 8.5A–F). CBCT imaging protocols There are two scanning appliance protocols that can be used to transfer prosthetically relevant information to the CBCT dataset. They are described below: 1. Single scan protocol. This protocol implies that the patient is imaged with a fully seated scanning appliance. It is the traditional method for importing prosthetically meaningful data to the CT dataset (Figure 8.19A–C). 2. Dual scan protocol. This protocol is used when a differential barium gradient scanning appliance is not required. Either the patient’s existing prosthesis meets acceptable criteria or one  has been fabricated. Multiple fiduciary markers are attached to the appliance in strategic positions (Figure  8.20A–D). The fiduciary markers allow spatial orientation, which  facilitates registration of the radiolucent acrylic denture with the CBCT dataset (SimPlant; Materialise Dental, Glen Burnie, MD, USA). Again, a radiolucent interocclusal bite registration ensures that the patient is imaged with the appliance firmly compressing the supporting soft tissues, avoiding black air-pocket artifact indicative of a poorly positioned appliance. Then, the appliance itself is  imaged using a protocol recommended by the CT/CBCT manufacturer to image acrylic. Acrylic requires much lower radiation exposure for imaging when compared to bony structures. Registration of the two scans can be accomplished with commercially available proprietary imaging software. This registration process embeds the scanning appliance within the imaging dataset. The major benefit of the dual scan protocol is that a separate scanning appliance is not needed. This saves time and reduces the cost of diagnostics. However, it does not marginalize the need to ensure that the scanning appliance is an accurate prosthodontic prosthesis. The imaging technology used in computer-guided implantology is only effective when the correct diagnostic information is incorporated in the CT/CBCT study. Collaborative accountability The concept of collaborative accountability is preceded by the prosthetic leadership process. The  restorative leadership process and case type pattern identification leading to proper scanning appliances has been previously described in this chapter. The surgical planning can be incorporated into stereolithographic drilling guides that can be used for accurate osteotomy preparations and implant delivery using a variety of guide support platforms. The ability to incorporate the parameters of a successful prosthetic outcome into a CT dataset marks a collaborative breakthrough for the implant team (surgeon, prosthetic doctor, laboratory technologist, and patient). This paradigm shift is the fundamental basis for the current concept of collaborative accountability (Rosenfeld et al., 2006a, 2006b, 2006c; Mandelaris and Rosenfeld, 2008). This context allows the presurgical roles and responsibilities of the implant team to be determined. There are five aspects that describe the collaborative accountability context: 1. The prosthetic dentist assumes a leadership role in interdisciplinary collaboration by setting the treatment performance standards for those participating in patient care. 2. Prosthetic outcome determines surgical performance requirements, and becomes the responsibility of the implant surgeon. 3. Preoperative, not intraoperative, planning drives the treatment. 4. Stereolithographic medical modeling can reduce the so-called surgical talent gap. In other words, the placement of dental implants no longer relies on traditional “mental navigation” but rather on precise computerguided  implant positioning that is planned presurgically. 5. The very nature of a collaborative process focuses on the patient’s outcome. This preoperatively defines treatment limitations, expectation, and costs in an atmosphere of disclosure. 160 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Figure 8.19A–C Panoramic, cross-sectional, and 3D reconstruction views of single scan CBCT imaging technique for a patient with complete edentulism in the maxilla. Denture scannoguide in place with radiolucent interocclusal bite registration. (A) (B) (C) CAD/CAM Surgical Guidance Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 161 CAD/CAM surgical guides Introduction Most diagnostic scans are obtained using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanners. As previously discussed, scanning appliances are an important part of the imaging process. Surgical guides are designed and fabricated using CT/ CBCT scans with meaningful diagnostic anatomical information embedded within the study. Viewing and surgical treatment planning software enables the clinician to extract and manipulate relevant data set information critical to the planning process. The fabrication of rapid prototype (RP) stereolithographic surgical guides is dependent upon pretreatment analysis and identification of case type patterns, appropriate scanning appliance imaging protocols that incorporate the principles of restorative leadership and collaborative accountability (Rosenfeld et al., 2006a, 2006b, 2006c). Guided surgical planning and guided surgical drilling is not a passing fad. Anticipated worldwide growth is substantial (Armheiter, 2006). Surgical guides can assist in the selection of the least traumatic surgery within the context of evidence-based information with maximum consideration for principles of wound healing and prosthetic biomechanics (de Almeida et al., 2010). Definition and classification The first aspect of guide definition and classification is that RP-generated surgical guides can accommodate and facilitate different surgical implant delivery methods that include either partial or complete CAD/CAM surgical guidance. (Figure 8.21A and B). Inherent to all CAD/CAM-generated surgical guides is the element of drilling tube prolongation (i.e., drilling tube elongation). Prolongation is a critical concept to determining feasibility, Figure 8.20A–D Panoramic, axial, cross-sectional, and 3D reconstruction views of dual scan CBCT imaging technique for a patient with complete edentulism in the maxilla. Patient’s existing denture was used as the scanning appliance. Note multiple fiduciary markers in place at strategic positions. (A) (B) (C) (D) 162 Cone Beam Computed Tomography guide  development/fabrication, and realistic execution of vertical depth control in computerguided implant surgery using CAD/CAM surgical guides. (Mandelaris et al., 2009). Figure 8.22, parts A through C, demonstrates the concept of prolongation. Partial CAD/CAM surgical guidance implies assisted osteotomy preparation with or without depth control requiring manual implant installation. Partial guidance can be utilized in both fully and partially edentulous patients. Partial guidance can include successive guides representing increasing drill tube diameters or a single master tube with drill diameter reduction key inserts (Figure  8.23). The accuracy of partially guided implant placement has been documented by numerous authors (Sarment, Al-Shammari, et  al., 2003; Sarment, Sukovic, et al., 2003; van Steenberghe et  al., 2003; Vrielinck et  al., 2003; Ganz, 2003; Di Giacomo et al., 2005; van Assche et al., 2007; Ganz, 2007). Total guidance implies axial (buccolingual and mesiodistal) and vertical depth control during osteotomy preparation and implant placement. Total guidance is also applied to implant delivery with or without additional rotational control. Rotational control to have the power to direct hex orientation is implant manufacturer dependent. Figure 8.24 demonstrates a totally guided implant system whereby rotational control of hex orientation is incorporated. All totally guided implant systems utilize a single surgical guide. These totally guided osteotomy and implant delivery systems are manufactured by specific implant companies to  deliver their proprietary dental implants. It is important to remember that all totally guided implant delivery systems share similar characteristics. First, they are accurate. Second, they are sophisticatedly engineered. Third, they are efficient. Fourth, they are programmer dependent. Fifth and most important, they are all “brain dead.” The patient-specific nature of any RP totally navigated implant delivery system is the result of the doctor’s collaborative prosthetically directed treatment plan, which is developed by managing and manipulating information facilitated by using interactive planning software. The paradox nature of these systems allows the surgeon to deliver an accurate plan accurately or an inaccurate plan accurately. In other words, one can deliver a poorly conceived plan accurately. The delivery system does not know the difference. Figure 8.25 highlights the computer-guided implant treatment pathway process. Figure  8.26 and Figure  8.27 demonstrate the decision making and CAD/CAM guide application algorithms for partial and complete CAD/ CAM guide usage in the partially and completely edentulous patient, respectively. The second aspect of guide definition and classification is the guide support options. The case type pattern identification facilitates the selection of the most appropriate scanning appliance. The scanning appliance not only represents the surgical and Figure 8.21B Example of bone-supported, totally guided CAD/CAM surgical guide with multiple stabilization screws in place. Five interforamina implants delivered. This guide type controls all three planes of ostetomy site preparation as well as the implant delivery. Figure 8.21A Example of tooth-supported, partially guided CAD/CAM surgical guide to facilitate osteotomy site preparation only for #8 without bone exposure. Implant placement will occur manually. CAD/CAM Surgical Guidance Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 163 prosthetic treatment requirements but also identifies the most likely surgical guide support necessary at the time of implant placement. The nature of the  guide support underscores the importance of accurate diagnostics, a properly seated and verified scanning appliance, and proper scanning protocols. Support options can include bone, tooth, tooth/ mucosa, or mucosa. Included in the guide support options is consideration of either dual or single scan protocols, which was discussed previously. In each instance a radiolucent interocclusal bite registration ensures full seating and stabilization of the scanning appliance at the time the CT/CBCT study is taken. Figures  8.15A, 8.17A, and 8.29 demonstrate a tooth-mucosa vacuform–based scanning appliance and a mucosal supported differential gradient (Tardieu) scanning appliance, each with radiolucent interocclusal bite registrations for CBCT imaging. Selection of guide fixation strategies is most often considered for totally guided implant delivery systems which utilize bone, mucosa, or tooth/ mucosa guide support. While fixation can be used for tooth-supported guides, its use is less frequent. Stainless steel Planned SurgiGuide Low prolongation High prolongation Figure 8.22B If an implant is positioned close to an adjacent tooth, it might be impossible to fixate the tube next to the tooth, and the tube as such has to be positioned above the tooth. This is known as a “high tube prolongation.” Reprinted with permission from Mandelaris and Rosenfeld, 2009b. Implant height Tube: 5mm IMPLANT PROLONGATION Implant SurgiGuide Supporting surface (Bone of mucosa) Figure 8.22A The drilling tube is positioned at the highest point of the bone crest above the planned implant position. The implant prolongation is the distance from the planned implant platform to the highest point of the bone crest. This distance is determined by the largest diameter CAD/CAM guide and is the same for each CAD/CAM guide of the case. Reprinted with permission from Mandelaris and Rosenfeld, 2009b. 164 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Totally guided delivery systems use a single RP surgical guide with either pin inserts or fixation screws to stabilize the guide (Figure 8.28). The use of an interocclusal verification bite registration of the surgical guide is helpful and can be fabricated from the preoperative mounted diagnostic models. This ensures the accurate placement and verification of the fixated guide. Figures 8.29, 8.30, and 8.31 demonstrate the use of a bite registration between the scanning appliance, stereolithographic RP virtual denture, and a patient’s CAD/CAM surgical guide during minimally invasive immediate load surgery in the anterior mandible. This approach helps ensure the proper positioning of the CAD/CAM surgical guide and verifies positioning reproducibility/accuracy between the three appliances. Mandelaris et  al. (2010) described ten key elements influencing the ability to execute an accurate treatment outcome. These include but are not limited to the following: 1. Quality of the CT imaging, which includes panoramic, cross-sectional, and axial 2D views Tube height Gap Implant length Implant SurgiGuide Crest level Picture: tube at heighest crest point above implant Figure 8.22C Drilling depth for CAD/CAM guide assisted osteotomy site preparation. Drilling length = implant length + gap + tube height. Reprinted with permission from Mandelaris and Rosenfeld, 2009b. Figure 8.23 Partially guided CAD/CAM guidance system showing reduction key set that will be introduced into a single master tube, allowing for one guide to be used. Courtesy of Materialise Dental; Glen Burnie, MD, USA. Figure 8.24 Totally guided, bone-supported CAD/CAM guidance system with rotational orientation control. Note alignment indices that allow for rotational control of the implant platform. CAD/CAM Surgical Guidance Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 165 Initial diagnostics for implant candidate Clinical examination Radiographic examination Case type pattern determination Preliminary patient consultation Approval to proceed with diagnostic wax-up reflecting case type pattern Scanning appliance fabrication Selection of case type pattern–directed scanning appliance Fabrication of scanning appliance Delivery to patient with bite registration as needed CT/CBCT imaging and planning software conversion Determine single or dual scan protocol Conversion of data set for use in planning software Creation of appropriate anatomic segmentation/masks Definitive treatment planning process Incorporate principles of restorative leadership and collaborative accountability Preoperative consultation in an atmosphere of co-discovery and disclosure Select and order surgical guide consistent with treatment plan Medical modeling Surgical guide fabrication—selection either partial or full guidance Select guide support surface Fabrication of interim provisional prosthesis Surgery Determine surgical access—flap or flapless Implant placement—single or staged treatment Placement of provisional restoration Definitive restoration and supportive peri-implant maintenance Placement of definitive restoration Recommendation of appropriate maintenance intervals Figure 8.25 Implant treatment pathway. 166 Cone Beam Computed Tomography 2. Reliability of the 3D reconstruction that is created by the radiology technician using computer software 3. Quality of rapid prototype medical modeling 4. The challenge of determining the accurate position of thin crestal bone, which often competes with other radiodense structures (teeth, scanning appliances) 5. Regional anatomy characteristics 6. Dimensional stability of the stone model, which is optically imaged for tooth-supported cases 7. Accurate placement and stability of the scanning appliance at the time of imaging 8. Extent of imaging artifact 9. Movement and fit of the guide during surgical execution 10. Knowledge and experience in CT analysis and interpretation. These key elements either alone or in combination can influence the accuracy of implant placement. Implementation of CAD/CAM guidance into clinical practice Implementation of new technology into clinical practice presents unique challenges. Change is often difficult. The most important guiding principle Completely dentate patient; partially edentulous patient Diagnostics/preliminary case planning CT Scan (DICOM data set) SimPlant (with appropriate masks) 8-step algorithm Collaborative treatment planning Order SurgiGuide and medical modeling Surgery Scanning appliance fabrication: None (immediate implant); tooth is present tooth-form or full-contour Denture scannoguide (different barium gradient density scanning appliance) GBR/Site development and/or extraction and socket reconstruction (if needed) Partially guided CAD/CAM SurgiGuide Totally guided CAD/CAM SurgiGuide Partially or totally guided CAD/CAM Tooth-mucosal partially CAD/CAM SurgiGuide with or without bone exposure Tooth-mucosal partially or totally guided CAD/CAM SurgiGuide with or without bone exposure Mucosal-suported partial SurgiGuide Immediate provisionalization? Prosthetic phase completion 1-stage surgery 1-stage surgery 2-stage surgery Immediate provisionalization? Prosthetic phase completion Prosthetic phase completion Prosthetic phase completion Uncovery with SurgiGuide (optional) 1-stage surgery 2-stage surgery 2-stage surgery Immediate provisionalization? Uncovery with SurgiGuide (optional) 1-stage surgery 2-stage surgery Immediate provisionalization? Uncovery with SurgiGuide (optional) Figure 8.26 Completely edentulous patient with stereolithographic virtual mandibular denture scannoguide generated and stabilized with the bite registration used with the scannoguide. CAD/CAM Surgical Guidance Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 167 Fully edentulous patient maxilla and/or mandible Diagnostics/preliminary case planning (remake dentures?) Denture scannoguide CT scan (DICOM data set) SimPlant (with appropriate masks incorporated) 8-step algorithm Collaborative treatment planning Site development/guide bone regeneration (if needed) Order SurgiGuide and medical modeling Surgery With bone exposure Bone reduction guide Y/N Totally guided how supported SurgiGuide Totally guided how supported SurgiGuide 1-stage surgery Immediate load? 2-stage surgery Uncovery Provisionalization? Prosthetic phase completion Without bone exposure Partially guided mucosolsupported SurgiGuide Totally guided mucosolsupported SurgiGuide Combination SurgiGuide 1-stage surgery Immediate load? 2-stage surgery Punch/minimally invasive uncovery using SurgiGuide (optional) Prosthetic phase completion Provisionalization? Figure 8.27 Completely edentulous patient with partial guidance, mucosal-supported CAD/CAM surgical guide in place. Positioning verified with the bite registration used with the scannoguide during imaging and with the virtual denture. Bite registration allows for cross-mounting accuracy and repeatability to be ensured. Figure 8.28 Totally guided, mucosal-supported CAD/CAM surgical guide with multiple fixation points to ensure stabilization. Figure 8.29 Completely edentulous patient with mandibular denture scannoguide in place stabilized with bite registration. 168 Cone Beam Computed Tomography regarding new technology is that it is not a substitute for experience and sound clinical judgment. CBCT imaging and CAD/CAM technology is really a contemporary method of managing information. The implementation process comprises seven participants. These include (1) the prosthetic dentist, (2) the dental laboratory technologist, (3) the imaging center, (4) the CT/CBCT treatment plan, (5) the implant manufacturer, (6) the guide manufacturer, and (7) the surgeon. The guiding concepts of restorative leadership and collaborative accountability facilitate implementation of this technology. Mandelaris and Rosenfeld (2008) have published a logical and progressive method for implementing this paradigm shift into practice. The first level of implementation strategy is to utilize CT/CBCT information to enhance treatment planning and surgical decision making. Learn how to recognize and interpret scan images. Scans offer comprehensive three-dimensional images when compared with traditional radiographs. When combined with interactive three-dimensional viewing and planning software, more predictable treatment planning occurs. Implant surgery can be performed using the traditional manual approach using a conventional surgical template. The scan provides significantly improved diagnostic and treatment planning data, thus better preparing the surgeon, prosthetic dentist, and patient for anticipated treatment. Figure 8.32A through K demonstrates the use of CT-based treatment planning for immediate implant placement + immediate nonocclusal function provisionalization in the esthetic zone while operating by manual (non-CAD/CAM surgical guidance) technique. The second level of implementation strategy uses a bone-supported surgical guide (Figure 8.33A–C). This is an entry-level step into guided surgery that allows the surgeon to visualize, perform, and verify progress. The shift from nonguided surgery to this level of guidance is the smallest change from conventional surgery. The surgeon can visually confirm surgical progress, and if necessary, discontinue the use of the guide at a recoverable time during the surgery. It is recommended that a conventional template also be used during surgery as an adjunct to verify osteotomy-tooth position accuracy until a  sufficient level of comfort and experience is achieved. The third level of implementation strategy is the use of a tooth-supported drilling guide with or without bone exposure (Figure 8.21A, Figure 8.34 A–K). The clinician may or may not choose to visualize the surgical field to assess any deviation from the anticipated outcome. This could allow a minimally invasive approach to be considered. Figure  8.34 A–P demonstrates the use of a toothsupported CAD/CAM surgical guide under the partially guided context. Minimally invasive implant placement + immediate nonocclusal provisionalization is demonstrated. Presurgical, modelbased validation surgery is also performed as a Figure 8.31 Completely edentulous patient with partial guidance, mucosal-supported, CAD/CAM surgical guide in place. Positioning verified with the bite registration used with the scannoguide during imaging and with the virtual denture. Bite registration allows for cross-mounting accuracy and repeatability to be ensured. Figure 8.30 Completely edentulous patient with stereolithographic virtual mandibular denture scannoguide generated and stabilized with the bite registration used with the scannoguide. CAD/CAM Surgical Guidance Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 169 dress rehearsal to the actual event. A provisional restoration (nonocclusal function) is also made prior to the surgery taking place (Figure 8.34C, D). If successive guide is used, the utilization of a conventional surgical template is recommended to  verify osteotomy–tooth position accuracy. As Figure 8.32A Clinical example of fractured #8 with hopeless prognosis. Figure 8.32B Radiograph of fractured #8. Figure 8.32C 3D reconstruction of the maxillary arch with masks created of #7, #8, and #9, and the maxilla/remaining natural dentition. Figure 8.32D 3D reconstruction with mask of #8 toggle off to allow for simulated extraction and alveolus inspection. 170 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Figure 8.32E 3D reconstruction with mask of #8 toggle off and implant placed. Note implant:alveolus “gap,” which may require management. Figure 8.32F 3D reconstruction of the maxillary arch with masks created of #7, #8, and #9, and the maxilla/remaining natural dentition. Implant placed in the #8 position with transparency toggle switch turned on. Figure 8.32G Atraumatic extraction of #8. Figure 8.32H Manual osteotomy site preparation performed and positioning verification performed with conventional (non-CAD/CAM-generated) surgical template. Figure 8.32I Manual implant placement and vertical positioning verified to ensure sufficient prosthetic emergence (vertical depth) established. Figure 8.32J Immediate nonocclusal function provisionalization completed on #8. CAD/CAM Surgical Guidance Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 171 stated earlier, model surgery can also be performed prior to treatment to confirm accuracy with the planned outcome (Ganz, 2007). In implementation strategies 2 and 3, partial guidance can be expanded to include a totally guided approach to osteotomy site preparation and implant delivery. Attempting surgery with complete guidance should be undertaken after acquiring experience in computer-guided implant Figure 8.32K Final radiograph. Figure 8.33A Bone-supported, partially guided CAD/CAM surgical guide seated on the stereolithographic rapid prototype medical model of the maxilla. Figure 8.33C Osteotomy site preparation completed using bone-supported, partially guided CAD/CAM surgical guide. Implants placed manually at the #3, #4, #5, and #6 positions. Biologic shaping performed at #2. Figure 8.33B Bone-supported, partially guided CAD/CAM surgical guide seated on the edentulous ridge during open flap surgery. 172 Cone Beam Computed Tomography planning and surgery. The totally guided approach is less recoverable and therefore incurs the greatest risk potential, but it also offers the greatest rewards. The fourth step is to use a guide that is placed directly on the edentulous mucosal tissue (Figure  8.35). A partially or completely guided approach can be taken. Successive guides, guides with successive reduction keys, and those incorporating totally guided implant delivery systems can  be considered. Single surgical guides may be best served as fixated (Figure  8.24, Figure  8.28, Figure 8.36A). However, not all systems allow total guidance when using bone as support. With a system using total guidance, implants can be placed in a “flapless” manner (Figure 8.36A and B). Figure 8.34A Clinical view of partial edentulism #10. Figure 8.34B Cross-sectional view of #10 site. Virtual implant planning performed. Dual scan CBCT imaging protocol used. Green outline represents tooth position and denture flange. Figure 8.34C Partially guided, tooth-supported CAD/CAM surgical guide seated on stone model. Osteotomy site preparation performed in the stone model as a part of the presurgical workup and to develop an immediate nonocclusal function provisional prior to surgery. Note inspection windows allowing verification of complete seating of the guide. Figure 8.34D Guide pin inserted into osteotomy site within the stone model to verify angulation and overall positioning. Figure 8.34E Immediate nonocclusal provisional created prior to surgery. CAD/CAM Surgical Guidance Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 173 Figure 8.34F and G Partially guided, tooth-supported, CAD/CAM-generated surgical guide seated at the time of surgery. Note inspection windows allowing verification of complete seating of the guide. (F) (G) Figure 8.34H and I Guide pin in place demonstrating positional orientation of osteotomy site preparation performed without bone exposure of and via the partially guided, tooth-supported CAD/CAM surgical guide. (H) (I) Figure 8.34J Guide pin in place through the seated partially guided, tooth-supported CAD/CAM surgical guide. Figure 8.34K Osteotomy site preparation completed. 174 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Figure 8.34L Manual implant placement performed and implant stability quotient measured (Implant stability meter by Osstell; Linthicum, MD, USA). Figure 8.34M Vertical positioning of implant verified to ensure sufficient prosthetic emergence (vertical depth) established. Figure 8.34O Immediate nonocclusal function provisionalization of #10 completed. Figure 8.34P Postsurgical radiograph #10. Figure 8.35 Partially guided, mucosal-supported CAD/CAM surgical guide. Figure 8.34N Implant emergence relative to prefabricated, immediate nonocclusal function provisional. CAD/CAM Surgical Guidance Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 175 This is a true minimally invasive method of performing implant surgery and offers the clinical benefit of reduced patient morbidity. However, a blinded approach is associated with the highest risk and demands the most precise diagnostic prosthetic workup, scanning appliance fabrication, imaging quality, treatment planning, and surgical execution. Since it involves the greatest paradigm shift, it should be utilized by experienced clinicians. This paradigm shift requires the greatest leap of faith from conventional implant surgery. Last, it is recommended that all CAD/CAM surgical guides be preferentially disinfected with 80% alcohol or Octenidine using an incubation time of 15 minutes with ultrasonication before use in live surgery. This protocol has been shown to be the most effective approach at eliminating the growth of microorganisms such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter vaumanni, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli, and Candida albicans in vitro (Sennhenn-Kirchner et al., 2008). Specialized guide design options Bone reduction guides Unfavorable intra- and interarch bone anatomy and patient-specific requirements for implant placement can complicate or negate the ability to use a minimally invasive CAD/CAM guidance approach (i.e., mucosal-supported surgical guide). The crestal bone width should accommodate the diameter of the planned implant. Ideally, the bone crest should allow for circumferential bone thickness of at least 1–2mm circumferentially around the entire implant. Crestal bone width, at the level of the implant platform, is critical to the establishment of physiologic bone remodeling. It also is critical for the maintenance of soft tissue support. However, in many cases, thin crestal bone (associated with edentulous sites or in immediate implant cases) is present, precluding implant placement without vertical bone reduction. In conjunction with surgical planning software, the vertical bone height can be selectively reduced by using a bone reduction guide in order to establish bone width consistent with implant selection. In most cases the horizontal dimension of the residual ridge increases when measured inferiorly. Osteoplasty is often needed to reduce unusable thin crestal bone until sufficient horizontal bone width is achieved. Traditionally, this has been an intuitive process, leading to manual osteotomy site preparation and implant placement. With the advent of bone-supported CAD/CAM bone reduction surgical guides, precision osteoplasty can be performed in order to ensure guide stability. The bone reduction will also allow the establishment of the shortest prolongation height consistent with osteotomy drill length and intraoral access. To accomplish accurate bone position and fit of the surgical guide, a manual approach is too inaccurate. Figure 8.36A Totally guided, mucosal-supported CAD/CAM surgical guide with hex orientation allowed for and multiple fixation points used to ensure stabilization. Implants placed under total guidance and without bone exposure. Figure 8.36B Flapless implant placement of six maxillary fixtures. Abutment placement and temporary cylinders in place to allow for immediate loading to proceed. 176 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Bone reduction guides are stereolithographically generated CAD/CAM devices that allow for precisely guided osteoplasty to be performed. They are predominantly, but not exclusively, used in the anterior mandible during immediate load type cases or when the vertical position of implant placement requires a significant change from the patient’s existing anatomy. They are used when the total depth of osteotomy site preparation cannot be  accommodated with drilling systems due to excessive depth. The major advantage of a bone reduction guide is precision osteoplasty to optimize residual ridge anatomy to facilitate osteotomy site preparation. The main disadvantage of the bone reduction is its inherent weakness. This type of guide must have an open architectural design for surgical access. This design increases susceptibility to fracture or breakage. Additional disadvantages include visual seating verification, increased size of the surgical field, regional anatomic restrictions, and cost. Use of the bone reduction guide and its application in computer-guided surgery is illustrated through Figure 8.37A–Q. Cutting pathway guide for lateral antroscopy of the maxillary sinus Despite significant improvements made in CT imaging, difficulty in precisely creating the sinus window remains. The cutting path guide is a stereolithographically generated guide that facilitates precise osteotomy cuts, accurately defining the lateral boundaries of the maxillary sinus (Mandelaris et al., 2009). This technique uses three-dimensional CT imaging and computer software to presurgically outline the lateral boundaries of the maxillary sinus for antral bone grafting surgery. It can be used alone (Figure  8.38A–L) or in combination with partially or totally guided CAD/CAM surgical guides. (Figure 8.39A–C) The cutting paths can be verified in all planes of space to ensure that the planned osteotomy cuts will maximize the operator’s ability to elevate the sinus membrane. Figure 8.37A Clinical view of patient with partial edentulism in the mandible. Remaining natural teeth have poor prognoses. Figure 8.37B and C Radiographs of remaining mandibular dentition. (B) (C) CAD/CAM Surgical Guidance Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 177 Figure 8.37D 3D reconstruction of mandible. Masks of mandible, remaining natural dentition, scan appliance dental anatomy (teeth), and surgical anatomy (denture base) created. Figure 8.37E 3D reconstruction of mandible with transparency toggle switch engaged. Two interforamina implants have been placed to support a removable complete denture as the final prosthetic outcome goal. Figure 8.37F Cross-section view of implant positioning. Note the vertical positioning of the implant is 9 mm from the crest. Thin crestal bone requires significant osteoplasty in the vertical dimension to achieve a position where horizontal bone levels/position allow for implant placement. Also, note the differences in barium concentration between the denture flange (10%) and denture teeth (30%). Scan appliance is notably well seated as no air pocketing (radiolucencies) are noted. Figure 8.37G Stereolithographically generated medical model of postextraction, preosteoplasty anatomy with bone reduction guide. Figure 8.37H Stereolithographically generated medical model of postextraction, postosteoplasty anatomy with bone reduction guide. Bone reduction guide allows for precision osteoplasty to be performed. Figure 8.37I Clinical view of open flap surgery, postextraction anatomy. Bone reduction guide seated. 9mm of unusable bone height. 178 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Figure 8.37J and K Precision osteoplasty performed and directed via bone reduction guide. (J) (K) Figure 8.37L and M Totally guided, bone-supported CAD/CAM surgical guide in place on postosteoplasty anatomy in the mandibular anterior. (L) (M) Figure 8.37N and O Direction guides in place to verify osteotomy site orientation within the bone-supported, totally guided CAD/CAM surgical guide. (N) (O) CAD/CAM Surgical Guidance Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 179 Figure 8.37P Totally guided CAD/CAM surgical guide removed and positioning verified. Figure 8.37Q Postsurgical view of implant placement #22 and #27, + healing abutments. Surgical field closed. Figure 8.38A and B Preoperative view and initial radiographs. Partial edentulism #3 and #4. Reprinted with permission from Mandelaris and Rosenfeld, 2009a. (A) (B) Figure 8.38C Cross-sectional CT images of implant position #3. A tooth-form scanning appliance demonstrates optimal, final tooth position in space. Disuse atrophy and residual ridge resorption are apparent as well as sinus pneumatization. Reprinted with permission from Mandelaris and Rosenfeld, 2009a. Figure 8.38D 3D image of the maxillary arch with tooth form scanning appliance in place (purple). Transparency tool is engaged and implants planned have been toggled off. The red arrows point to the anterior and inferior sinus boundaries. Reprinted with permission from Mandelaris and Rosenfeld, 2009a. 180 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Figure 8.38E 3D reconstruction of the maxilla in Simplant OMS software and custom freeform cutting path outlining desired lateral window (red arrows). Reprinted with permission from Mandelaris and Rosenfeld, 2009a. Figure 8.38F Superior view of 3D reconstruction of the maxilla in SimPlant OMS software and the same custom freeform cutting path visualized (red arrow). Reprinted with permission from Mandelaris and Rosenfeld, 2009a. Figure 8.38G Bone-supported cutting guide defining the superior aspect of the planned lateral wall boundary. Reprinted with permission from Mandelaris and Rosenfeld, 2009a. Figure 8.38H Medical model of the maxilla with custom freeform cutting path colorized in red (arrows). Bone-supported cutting guide defining the desired anterior, distal, inferior, and posterior lateral wall boundaries is seated. Note that the distal extent of the guide is rather obtrusive and will need to be modified to facilitate intraoperative surgical adaptation. Reprinted with permission from Mandelaris and Rosenfeld, 2009a. Figure 8.38I Bone-supported cutting guide in place defining the desired superior boundary. Reprinted with permission from Mandelaris and Rosenfeld, 2009a. Figure 8.38J Bone-supported cutting guide in place following lateral window outlining and identification of membrane just prior to reflection. The anterior, distal, inferior, and posterior lateral wall boundaries are observed. Note that the distal aspect of the guide has been modified at the time of surgery to enable complete seating intraoperatively. Reprinted with permission from Mandelaris and Rosenfeld, 2009a. CAD/CAM Surgical Guidance Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 181 Surgical guide use for extraction of ankylosed teeth Root resorption and ankylosis are pathologic entities that complicate extraction of teeth. Either partial or total controlled surgical guides can be used to remove internal tooth structure to allow atraumatic removal of teeth. The patient is imaged with either CT or CBCT scan protocols. The DICOM data are interfaced with viewing and planning Figure 8.38K Bone-supported cutting guide removed and sinus bone grafting accomplished after verifying uneventful membrane reflection. Simultaneous implant placement has occurred manually. Reprinted with permission from Mandelaris and Rosenfeld, 2009a. Figure 8.38L Direct postsurgical radiograph demonstrating complete fill of the bone graft at planned anterior portion of the antrum. Reprinted with permission from Mandelaris and Rosenfeld, 2009a. Figure 8.39A Transparency toggle tool activated. Inferior and anterior sinus boundaries outlined (blue line) in SimPlant OMS via custom freeform cutting path desired for maxillary left lateral window. Implant placement planned for #12. Reprinted with permission from Mandelaris and Rosenfeld, 2009a. Figure 8.39B Stereolithographic tooth—bone-supported, totally guided CAD/CAM surgical guide combined with cutting guide to help outline the precise position of the inferior, distal, and anterior sinus boundaries desired to initiate Schneiderian membrane reflection. Reprinted with permission from Mandelaris and Rosenfeld, 2009a. Figure 8.39C Intrasurgical confirmation of guided implant positioning and precise outlining of the lateral window prior to Schneiderian membrane reflection. Guided implant placement performed at #12. Reprinted with permission from Mandelaris and Rosenfeld, 2009a. 182 Cone Beam Computed Tomography software. The guide design is developed, which allows osteotomies of increasing diameter to be introduced along the central long axis of the tooth. Once a sufficiently hollow root surface has been achieved, infracture of the residual tooth structure is easily accomplished. Figure 8.40A–J demonstrates the use of a CAD/CAM surgical guide for extraction of an ankylosed tooth. Fully integrated surgical and restorative guides A recent manufacturing breakthrough has enabled the implant team to take even fuller advantage of CAD/CAM technology. The possibility of developing an interim implant-supported prosthesis from only the patient’s CT/CBCT study is now a reality. The fundamental principles of presurgical diagnostic case type pattern identification, selection of appropriate scanning appliance or virtual teeth  from an implant library, and proper three-dimensional imaging set the stage for the delivery of both surgical and prosthetic treatment by merging several technologies. From the original dataset, fabrication of an RP model with receptacles for implant analogs along with representation of soft tissue serves as the working model for prosthesis fabrication. Once the prosthesis is fabricated it can be attached to the implants at the time of surgery. This process is efficient and simplifies the  immediate delivery of  teeth. While it is not the purpose of this chapter to discuss in detail this fully integrated surgical-prosthetic approach, clinical treatment examples are illustrated in Figure  8.41A–U and Figure 8.42A–Z. Figure  8.43 demonstrates an example of the immediate smile model (Materialise Dental; Glen Burnie, MD, USA) for the mandibular arch in preparation for immediate loading implant surgery.  Figure  8.44A–E demonstrate a case of the immediate smile model and bridge in preparation for immediate load implant surgery in the mandible. The immediate smile bridge is a polymethylmethacrylate appliance intended for provisionalization purposes and generated through CAD/CAM technology, CBCT DICOM volume, and computer software implant planning. (Materialise Dental, Glen Burnie, MD, USA). Figure 8.40A Presurgical view of ankylosed and nonrestorable #8. Figure 8.40B Tooth mucosal–supported, totally guided CAD/CAM surgical guide with medical model. Figure 8.40C Minute flap reflection and fractured #8 noted. CAD/CAM Surgical Guidance Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 183 Figure 8.40D and E Totally guided osteotomy site preparation performed for #8 to implode ankylosed tooth. (D) (E) Figure 8.40F Removal of remaining tooth fragments after totally guided implosion of ankylosed tooth. Figure 8.40G Extraction of #8 with an intact alveolus. Figure 8.40H Socket preservation via rh-BMP2. Figure 8.40I Rotated palatal pedicle connective tissue grafting performed to augment soft tissue and provide a primary wound closure of surgical site. 184 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Figure 8.40J Sutures and surgical field closure. Figure 8.41A Clinical view of patient with parulis formation at #9. Figure 8.41B Radiographic view of #8–#9 demonstrating advanced external root resorption. Prognosis was determined to be poor for both teeth. Figure 8.41C 3D reconstruction of CBCT with masks of the maxilla, natural teeth #8, #9, #10. Virtual implants placed at #8–#9. Figure 8.41D 3D reconstruction of CBCT with masks of the maxilla, natural teeth #8, #9, #10. Transparency toggle switch engaged. Virtual implants placed at #8–#9. Figure 8.41E Occlusal view of 3D reconstruction with masks #8–#9 toggled off to simulate extraction. Implants placed and alveolus:implant discrepancy noted. CAD/CAM Surgical Guidance Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 185 Figure 8.41F and G Cross-section view of sites #8–#9. Note the trajectory of the implants relative to the axial inclination of the teeth. Facial orientation is noted and will be compensated for in the prosthetic design. This interdisiciplinary discussion is made prior to surgery as a part of the workup and has an implication on vertical positioning of the fixtures. (F) (G) Figure 8.41H 3D reconstruction with optically imaged stone model interfaced in the maxilla. Optically imaged mandibular cast is also observed and articulated in the software program. Virtual implants placed at #8–#9 and facial trajectory confirmed. Figure 8.41I 3D reconstruction with optically imaged stone model interfaced in the maxilla. Optically imaged mandibular cast is also observed and articulated in the software program. Virtual implants placed at #8–#9 and facial trajectory confirmed. Simulated tooth-supported CAD/CAM surgical guide displayed. Figure 8.41J Tooth-supported, totally guided CAD/CAM surgical guide + medical model. Figure 8.41K Immediate smile (Materialise Dental; Glen Burnie, MD, USA) model of the maxillary arch with planned osteotomy sites created, #8–#9. Silicone soft tissue representation in pink with lateral screws to secure analogs at #8–#9. Presurgically developed laboratory-made custom healing abutments in place. 186 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Figure 8.41L Extraction of #8–#9. Figure 8.41M Tooth-supported, totally guided CAD/CAM surgical guide in place. Controlled osteotomy site preparation being performed. Figure 8.41N Tooth-supported, totally guided osteotomy site preparation completed, #8–#9. Figure 8.41O Guide pins positioned at sites #8–#9. Figure 8.41P Totally guided implant placement with rotational control of implant platform. Figure 8.41Q Implant positioning. CAD/CAM Surgical Guidance Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 187 Figure 8.41R and S Vertical positioning of implants #8–#9 verified. (R) (S) Figure 8.41T Presurgically developed, lab proceed custom healing abutments placed. Figure 8.41U Postsurgical radiographs of immediate implants #8–#9. Figure 8.42A and B Initial examination of remaining hopeless mandibular natural dentition. (A) (B) 188 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Figure 8.42C Radiographs of hopeless mandibular natural dentition. Figure 8.42D and E 3D and cross-sectional prosthetically directed implant planning for immediate load surgery in the mandible. Note the vertical position of the implant platform. 9 mm of unusable bone will require osteoplasty to allow for sufficient implant width. (D) (E) Figure 8.42F Mandibular immediate smile model with silicone soft tissue removed and analogs placed into planned positions. Abutments placed on anterior implants with temporary cylinders and immediate smile bridge seated. Figure 8.42G Full-thickness flap reflection and bone reduction guide in place for precision osteoplasty. CAD/CAM Surgical Guidance Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 189 Figure 8.42I Final precision osteoplasty performed and as directed by the bone reduction guide. Figure 8.42J Osteoplasty is verified using the bone reduction guide. Its accuracy is critical to the next step. Figure 8.42H Presurgically planned bone segment removed en bloc via piezosurgery and guided by bone reduction guide. Figure 8.42K Bone-supported, totally guided CAD/CAM surgical guide in place and further stabilized through three fixation screws. Figure 8.42L Totally guided implant surgery—osteotomy site preparation. Figure 8.42M Totally guided implant placement—implants delivered. 190 Cone Beam Computed Tomography (N) Figure 8.42N and O Final positioning of interforamina implants. (O) Figure 8.42P Abutments placed. Figure 8.42Q Anterior temporary cylinders placed. (R) Figure 8.42R and S Immediate smile bridge tried on over the two temporary cylinders. (S) CAD/CAM Surgical Guidance Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 191 Figure 8.42T Posterior two temporary cylinders placed within prosthesis and then seated to abutments. Distal orientation of posterior fixtures does not allow for parallelism which is compensated through angulated abutment. Introducing the temporary cylinders through the prosthesis minimizes fracture potential within the provisional prosthesis. Figure 8.42U and V Self-curing resin injected into lateral channels are within the polymethylmethacrylate CAD/ CAM-generated bridge. (U) (V) Figure 8.42W Following setting of the resin, prosthesis is picked up and finished and polished in the laboratory. Figure 8.42X and Y Completed immediate load prosthesis and sutures. (X) (Y) 192 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Figure 8.42Z Direct postsurgery radiographs. Figure 8.43 Mandibular immediate smile medical model with silicone soft tissue in place, analogs positioned with guide pins in place. Lateral screws noted on the buccal peripheral aspect of the medical model to secure analogs. Model will be mounted against maxillary arch to maintain vertical dimension of occlusion. Figure 8.44A Mandibular immediate smile medical model with silicone soft tissue in place, and six osteotomy sites noted for the positioning of implant analog at presurgically planned positions. Lateral screws noted on the buccal peripheral aspect of the medical model to secure analogs. CAD/CAM Surgical Guidance Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 193 Figure 8.44B Mandibular immediate smile medical model with silicone soft tissue in place, scanning appliance seated and case mounted with radiolucent interocclusal bite registration. Figure 8.44C–E Facial, occusal, and lateral views of the immediate smile model and bridge. (C) (D) (E) 194 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Discussion Perhaps the most underappreciated aspect of this technology is the ability for the implant team to manage complex information in an organized and objective manner. This helps define roles and responsibilities of patient care, allowing the implant team to consult with patients in an atmosphere of informed consent and disclosure. With the advent of in-office CBCT scanning machines, access to volumetric imaging data has become simpler and easier. Implant placement has been and continues to be manually driven for most clinicians. Research over the past decade has unequivocally demonstrated that this approach to osteotomy site preparation is the least accurate method of implant treatment compared to approaches utilizing computer-generated RP surgical guides (Valente et  al., 2009; Meloni et  al., 2010). While less than optimal implant placement may appear to be rather trivial at the time of operation, the prosthetic reconciliation required to compensate can lead to a less than satisfactory prosthetic outcome and complicate patient care on many levels (Beckers, 2003). Incorporating CAD/CAM guidance into implant practice offers many advantages for the treatment team as well as patients. The greatest value is that preoperative rather than intraoperative planning drives treatment. This can provide the treatment team sufficient time for planning by using accurate intuitive tools for case planning to achieve superior and consistent results. Compromises, modifications, alterations, and cost considerations can be evaluated, discussed, and negotiated before initiating treatment. This reduces aggravation, complications, and misunderstandings. Future applications will facilitate faster, more comfortable, and more predictable implant dentistry. The most important aspect of patient care is an accurate diagnosis and treatment strategy that address the needs and concerns of both the patient and implant team. The ability to incorporate the prosthetic outcome into a CT dataset marks a collaborative breakthrough between the implant surgeon and restorative prosthetic dentist. Roles and responsibilities can now be clearly defined. This is the fundamental basis for a paradigm shift in implant dentistry. In our opinion the restorative leadership process allows implementation of the collaborative accountability concept, which is becoming the emerging standard of care in implant dentistry. It should be stated that the use of CT scanning technology is not limited to so-called complex cases. Each and every implant surgery has its unique nuances affecting treatment outcomes. The ability to interpret CT radiographs is proportional to familiarity and its clinical application is related to experience. Rapid prototyping and stereolithographic medical modeling applications have opened an entirely new approach to the field of dental implantology. Last, it is important to recognize that CAD/CAM-based surgical guidance cannot be considered a substitute for adequate training, sound clinical judgment, experience, or  expertise (van de Velde et  al., 2008; Block and  Chandler, 2009). It is not the technology that  drives the care of our patients; rather, it is the  management of information that is the true breakthrough. Conclusions 1. Management of diagnostic and clinical information using 3D volumetric data is transforming oral health care. 2. The use of CAD/CAM technology in implant therapy provides great benefits in diagnostic, surgical, and restorative aspects of patient care. 3. Pretreatment analysis incorporating the principles of case type pattern identification is fundamental to developing an accurate diagnosis and treatment plan. 4. Restorative leadership and collaborative accountability provide the necessary framework for effective communication for all participants in the treatment process. 5. Selection, fabrication, and effective use of a scanning appliance is the fundamental method of incorporating surgical and prosthetic information into a volumetric dataset. 6. Volumetric scanning protocols can include single or dual scan strategies. Each strategy has its indications and benefits. CAD/CAM Surgical Guidance Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 195 7. Surgical guides can be categorized as partial or total guidance systems. The surgeon has the responsibility to understand the advantages and disadvantages and where best to implement their use. 8. Surgical guides can be supported by bone, teeth, teeth/mucosa, or mucosa. The surgeon has the responsibility to understand the characteristics and indications of each type of guide support. 9. Surgical guides have the potential to deliver minimally invasive or flapless surgery, depending upon the case type pattern. 10. Specialized surgical guides can be used to manage complex surgical procedures. 11. Fully integrated surgical and restorative guides can simplify immediate delivery of teeth in partial and fully edentulous patients. 12. The technology discussed in this chapter is not a substitute for experience and clinical judgment. Rather, the technology facilitates more effective management of information to enhance collaborative patient care. References Armheiter, C., Scarfe W.C., and Farman, A.G. (2006). Trends in maxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography use. Oral Radiology, 22(2): 80–5. Barker, T., Earwaker, W., and Lisle, D. (1994). Accuracy of  stereolithographic models of human anatomy. Australian Radiology, 38(2): 106–11. Basten, C., and Kois, J. (1996). The use of barium sulfate for implant templates. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 76: 451–4. Beckers, L. (2003). Positive effect of SurgiGuides on total cost. Materialise Headlines, 1: 3. Block, M.S., and Chandler, C. (2009). Computed tomography-guided surgery: Complications associated with scanning, processing, surgery, and prosthetics. Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 67(Suppl 3): 13–22. Campbell, S., Theile, R., Stuart, G., Cheng, E., et al. (2002). Separation of craniopagus joined at the occiput. Case report. Journal of Neurosurgery, 97: 983–7. Cheng, A., and Wee, A. (1999). Reconstruction of cranial bone defects using alloplastic implants produced from stereolithographically-generated cranial model. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, 20: 692–6. de Almeida, E.O., Pellizzer, E.P., Goiatto, M.C., et  al. (2010). Computer-guided surgery in implantology: Review of basic concepts. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 21: 1917–21. DiGiacomo, G.A., Cury, P.R., deAraujo, N.S., et al. (2005). Clinical applications of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: Preliminary results. Journal of Periodontology, 76: 503–7. Erickson, D., Chance D., Schmitt S., et  al. (1999). An opinion survey of reported benefits from the use of stereolithographic models. Journal of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, 57(9): 1040–3. Ganz, S.D. (2003). Use of stereolithographic models as  diagnostic and restorative aids for predictable immediate loading of implants. Practical Procedures and Aesthetic Dentistry, 15: 763–71. Ganz, S.D. (2007). CT-derived model based surgery for immediate loading of maxillary anterior implants. Practical Procedures and Aesthetic Dentistry, 19: 311–18. Gopakumar, S. (2004). RP in medicine: A case study in  cranial reconstructive surgery. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 10: 207–11. Israelson, H., Plemons, J., Watkins, P., et  al. (1992). Barium-coated surgical stents and computer-assisted tomography in the preoperative assessment of dental implant patients. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 12: 52–61. Jung, R.E., Schneider, D., Ganeles, J., et al. (2009). Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry. A systematic review. International Journal of Oral Maxillofacial Implants, 24(Suppl): 92–109. Mandelaris, G.A., and Rosenfeld, A.L. (2008). The expanding influence of computed tomography and the application of computer guided implantology. Practical Procedures and Aesthetic Dentistry, 20(5): 297–306. Mandelaris, G.A., and Rosenfeld, A.L. (2009a). Alternative applications to guided surgery. Precise outlining of the lateral window in antral sinus bone grafting. Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 67(Suppl 3): 23–30. Mandelaris, G.A., and Rosenfeld, A.L. (2009b). SurgiGuide options. In: P.B. Tardieu and A.L. Rosenfeld (eds.), The Art of Computer Guided Implantology (pp. 67–88). Chicago: Quintessence. Mandelaris, G.A., Rosenfeld, A.L., King, S., et al. (2010). Computer guided implantology for precision implant positioning. Combining specialized stereolithographically generated drilling guides and surgical implant instrumentation. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 30(3): 274–81. Mandelaris, G.A., Rosenfeld, A.L., and Tardieu, P.B. (2009). Clinical cases. In: P.B. Tardieu and A.L. Rosenfeld (eds.), The Art of Computer Guided Implantology (pp. 113–78). Chicago: Quintessence. Mecall, R.A. (2009). Computer-guided implant treatment pathway. In: P.B. Tardieu and A.L. Rosenfeld (eds.), The Art of Computer Guided Implantology (pp. 89–111). Chicago: Quintessence. 196 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Mecall, R.A., and Rosenfeld, A.L. (1992). The influence of residual ridge resorption patterns on implant fixture placement and tooth position. Part II: Presurgical determination of prosthesis type and design. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 12: 32–51. Mecall, R.A., and Rosenfeld, A.L. (1996). Influence of residual ridge resorption patterns on fixture placement and tooth position. Part III: Presurgical assessment of ridge augmentation requirements. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 16: 322–37. Meloni, S.M., De Riu, G., Pisano, M., et al. (2010). Implant treatment software planning and guided flapless sugery with immediate provisional prosthesis delivery in the fully edentulous maxilla. A retrospective analysis of 15 consecutively treated patients. European Journal of Oral Implantology, 3(3): 245–51. Popat, A. (1998). Rapid prototyping and medical modeling. Phidas Newsletter, 1: 10–12. Rosenfeld, A.L., Mandelaris, G.A., and Tardieu, P.B. (2006a). Prosthetically directed implant placement using computer software to ensure precise placement and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Part I: Diagnostics, imaging and collaborative accountability. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 26(3): 215–21. Rosenfeld, A.L., Mandelaris, G.A., and Tardieu, P.B. (2006b). Prosthetically directed implant placement using computer software to ensure precise placement and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Part II: Rapid prototype medical modeling and stereolithographic drilling guides requiring bone exposure. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 26(4): 347–53. Rosenfeld, A.L., Mandelaris, G.A., and Tardieu, P.B. (2006c). Prosthetically directed implant placement using computer software to ensure precise placement  and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Part III: Stereolithographic drilling guides that do not require bone exposure and the immediate delivery of teeth. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 26(5): 493–9. Sarment, D., Al-Shammari, K., and Kazor, C. (2003). Stereolithographic surgical templates for placement of dental implants in complex cases. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. 23: 287–95. Sarment, D., Sukovic, P., and Clinthorne, N. (2003). Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guides. International Journal of Oral Maxillofacial Implants, 18: 571–7. Schneider, D., Marquardt, P., Zwahlen, M., et al. (2009). A  systemic review on the accuracy and the clinical outcome of computer-guided template-based implant dentistry. Clinical Oral Implant Research, 20(Suppl 4): 73–86. Sennhenn-Kirchner, S., Weustermann, S., Mergeryan, H., et  al. (2008). Preoperative sterilization and disinfection of drill guide templates. Clinical Oral Investigations, 12: 179–87. Spielman, H. (1996). Influence of the implant position on the aesthetics of the restoration. Practical Procedures and Aesthetic Dentistry, 8: 897–904. Swaelens, B. (1999). Drilling templates for dental implantology. Phidias Newsletter, 3: 10–12. Tardieu, P.B. (2009). Scanning appliances and virtual teeth. In: P.B. Tardieu and A.L. Rosenfeld (eds.), The Art of Computer Guided Implantology (pp. 47–57). Chicago: Quintessence. Valente, F., Schiroli, G., and Sbrenna, A. (2009). Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: A clinical and  radiographic study. International Journal of Oral Maxillofacial Implants, 24: 234–42. van Assche, N., van Steenberghe, D., Guerrero, M., et al. (2007). Accuracy of implant placement based on presurgical planning of three dimensional cone-beam images: A pilot study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 34(9): 816–21. van de Velde, T., Glor, F., and De Bruyn, H. (2008). A model on flapless implant placement by clinicians with different experience level in implant surgery. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 19: 66–72. van Steenberghe, D., Malevez, C., van Cleynenbreugel, J., et  al. (2003). Accuracy of drilling guides for transfer from three-dimensional CT based planning to placement of zygoma implants in humans. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 14(1): 131–6. Vrielinck, L., Politis, C., Schepers, S., et al. (2003). Image based planning and clinical validation of zygoma and  pterygoid implant placement in patients with severe bone atrophy using customized drill guides. Preliminary results from a prospective follow-up study. International Journal of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, 32: 7–14. Webb, P. (2000). A review of rapid prototyping (RP) techniques in the medical and biomedical sector. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technolology, 24(4): 149–53. Wouters, K. (2001). Colour rapid prototyping. An extra dimension for visualizing human anatomy. Phidas Newsletter, 6: 4–7. Cone Beam Computed Tomography: Oral and Maxillofacial Diagnosis and Applications, First Edition. Edited by David Sarment. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2014 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 197 Assessment of the Airway and Supporting Structures Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography David C. Hatcher 9 Sleep disordered breathing (SDB), including obstructive sleep disordered breathing (OSDB) and upper airway resistance syndrome (UARS), is often associated with obstruction or increased airway resistance and cannot be diagnosed with cone beam CT scan (CBCT). Cone beam CT has a role in the anatomic assessment of the airway and the structures that support the airway (Hatcher, 2010a). Polysomnograms are currently the gold standard for diagnosis of SDB, but CBCT has an adjunctive role to assess the dimensions (size and shape) of the airway anatomy and to identify sites in and adjacent to the airway that may contribute to a change in airway dimensions (Kushida et al., 2005). OSDB and UARS affect the upper airway, including the nasal airway, nasopharynx, oropharynx, and hypopharynx. The nasal airway extends from the nares to the posterior nasal choanae. The nasopharynx extends from the posterior nasal choanae to a horizontal plane extending posterior from the palatal plane. The oropharynx includes the area posterior to the soft palate and tongue. The hypopharynx is the site between the tongue base (base of epiglottis) and larynx. Background Three-dimensional imaging studies of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) have indicated a reduction in cross-sectional area (CSA) of the airway when compared to non-OSA individuals (Ogawa et  al., 2007). Li et al. (2003) have demonstrated a relationship between the likelihood of OSA and airway CSA. The probability of airway obstruction is low in adults when the airway CSA is greater than 110 mm2 , medium between 52 and 110 mm2 , and high when the CSA is less than 52mm2 . Ogawa et al. (2007) using CBCT found similar results. The OSA patients with a high BMI in the Ogawa study had airway dimensional differences (volume, CSA, and linear distances) when compared to the normal BMI control group. The average smallest CSA was 46mm2 in the OSA group and 147mm2 in the control group. There has been recent progress in determining normal values for airway dimensions. Two separate studies have a combined study population of 1,159 individuals, comprising 753 females and 406 males (Smith, 2009; Chang, 2011). These studies  acquired CBCT scans of craniofacial regions, 198 Cone Beam Computed Tomography including the skull base and mandible, of individuals positioned in an upright position. In these studies the airway volume, linear distances, and cross-sectional areas are calculated at multiple 1–2mm intervals in a rostrocaudal direction using semiautomated software calibrated to examine this area. The age groups were stratified into the following groups: (1) ages 7–10.9, (2) ages 11–14.9 (3) ages 15–18, (4) ages 19–29, (5) ages 30–39, (6)  ages 40–49, (7) ages 50–59, (8) ages 60 and older. The human airway increases in length, cross-sectional area, and volume during a rapid period of craniofacial growth with males showing greater dimensional change than females (Smith, 2009; Chang, 2011). The female airway did not significantly lengthen after the age of 15 while the  male airway lengthened up to the age of 18 (Chang, 2011). The site of smallest cross-sectional area during period of facial growth tended to be bimodal with one site near the palatal plane and the other tangent to C4 vertebra. The female mean minimum CSA is 82mm2 for ages 7–10.9, 99mm2 for ages 11–14.9, and 118mm2 for ages 15–18 (Chang, 2011). In males the minimum CSA is 84mm2 for ages 7–10.9, 95mm2 for ages 11–14.9, and 137mm2 for ages 15–18 (Chang, 2011). In adults the minimum cross-sectional area is significantly different between males and females and is not influenced by age (Smith, 2009). The mean minimum cross-sectional area in males is 172mm2 and in females is 150mm2 . The site of the minimum cross-sectional airway area moves superiorly in normal adult males and females with increasing age (Smith, 2009). Airway dimensional relationships to airway resistance The inhalation process is an active movement of  the diaphragm and ribs to reduce the pressure  in  the lungs to a level lower than the external atmosphere. This moves air from higher (external atmosphere) to lower pressure (lungs). Resistance to airflow increases the pressure gradient between the lungs and external atmosphere and increases the respiratory effort required to move air into the lungs. Poiseuille’s and Ohm’s laws describe the  relationships between airflow, resistance, and airway dimensions. Poiseuille’s law Poiseuille’s law (R=8nl/πr4 , where R=resistance, n=viscosity, l=length, π=pi, and r=radius) shows that radius has a greater influence of resistance than other factors such as airway length. Ohm’s law Ohm’s law (V=Pmouth/nose − Palveoli/R, where V=flow, P=pressure, and R=resistance) shows that increased airway resistance increases the pressure gradient between the mouth/nose and the alveoli. The increased resistance can impede air flow, increase respiratory effort, and may predispose the airway to collapse on the downstream side of the high-resistance site. The airway dimensions, particularly small airway dimensions, are of clinical interest because they may contribute to SDB. Identifying small airways, site of narrowest constriction, and the factors that may contribute to the airway narrowing are in the domain of the three-dimensional imaging. Purpose The pathogenesis of SDB is heterogeneous and the purpose of this article to identify and discuss several imaging features associated with conditions that may contribute to OSDB and UARS. A stratified diagnostic process provides the opportunity to employ a therapy that targets the etiology. Imaging The airway anatomy can be imaged with a variety of methods that include lateral cephalometry, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), fluoroscopy, and more recently cone beam CT (Hatcher, 2010a). The methods include 2D and 3D imaging and imaging in supine and upright positions. CBCT was introduced into the North American dental market in May 2001 and thus created the opportunity for dentists to visualize the airway and adjacent anatomy in three dimensions (Hatcher, 2010b). Maturation or evolution of the CBCT systems have trended toward upright imaging, flat panel detectors, graphical Assessment of the Airway and Supporting Structures Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 199 (faster) processing, shorter scan times, pulsed dose, flat panel sensors, and smaller voxel sizes. CBCT provides high-resolution anatomic data of the airway space, soft tissue surfaces, and bones but does not provide much detail within the soft tissues adjacent to  the airway. CBCT imaging is considered a statedependent imaging method and not a dynamic method. The state-dependent imaging captures the anatomy in a static or nondynamic state. Dynamic motion of the soft tissues and bony structures occurs during respiration, sleep, swallowing, and airway obstruction, creating a change in size and shape of the airway. During a CBCT scan the scanner (x-ray source and a rigidly coupled sensor) rotates, usually 360 degrees, around the head, acquiring multiple images (ranging from approximately 150 to 599 separate and unique projection views; Hatcher, 2010b). Raw image data are collected from the scan and reconstructed into a viewable format. The scan time can range between 5 and 70 seconds depending on machine brand and protocol setting. The x-ray source emits a low milli-Amperage (mA) shaped or  divergent beam. The beam size is constrained (circular or rectangular) to match the sensor size but in some cases can be further constrained (collimated) to match the anatomic region of interest. The field of view for an airway study includes the rostral caudal area between the cranial base and menton. Following the scan, the resultant image set or  (raw) data are subjected to a reconstruction process that results in the production of a digital volume of anatomic data that can be visualized with specialized software. The smallest subunit of a digital volume is a volume element (voxel). CBCT voxels are generally isotropic (x, y, and z dimensions are equal) and range in size from approximately 0.07 to 0.4mm per side. The average voxel size for an airway study is 0.3mm3 . Each voxel is assigned a grey scale value that approximates the attenuation value of the represented tissue or space. Data visualization The reconstructed volumes are ready for viewing using specialized software. The voxel volume can be retrieved and viewed with various viewing options. Visualization options include multiplanar or orthogonal (coronal, axial, sagittal) viewing angles. The data can be sliced as single voxel row or column at a time. The multiple voxel layers can be combined to create a slab and then visualized. It is possible to produce and visualize oblique and curved slices or slabs. The entire volume can be rendered and visualized from any angle. There are  several techniques for visualizing a volume, including shaded surface display and volume rendering. All CBCT units are installed with viewing software, but third party software is also available for general viewing or specialized applications, such as implant planning, assessment for orthodontics, and airway assessment. Software optimized for airway assessment generally processes the image volume using the following steps: (1)  select the region of interest, (2) segmentation of  the airway volume, and (3) measurement of the  airway anatomy. The airway measurements include volume, linear distance (anteroposterior and mediolateral), and cross-sectional area. Dose The effective dose is expressed as micro-Sieverts (μSv). The effective doses for CBCT machines are not homogeneous with dose variations related to the machine settings (mA, kVp, time), field of view, signal requirements, sensor type, pulse, or continuous exposure. The effective dose for CBCT (87 μSv) is greater than a cephalometric projection (14.2–24.3 μSv) but less than a conventional CT scan (860 μSv; Ludlow and Ivanovic, 2008; Ludlow et al., 2008). Anatomic accuracy A semiautomated software (3dMD Vultus) designed to extract linear measurements, crosssectional areas, and volumes from CBCT volumes was calibrated against an air phantom of known dimension, and no significant differences were noted (p = .975; Schendel and Hatcher, 2010). Facial growth and airway Limitation of normal nasal respiration occurring during facial growth can alter the development of the craniofacial skeleton in humans and experimental 200 Cone Beam Computed Tomography animals. Severely reduced nasal airflow may lead to compensations that include an inferior positioning of the mandible, separation of the lips, increased interocclusal space, change in tongue posture, inferior positioning of the hyoid bone, anterior extension of the head and neck, increased anterior face height, increased mandibular and occlusal plane angles, posterior cross-bite, narrow maxillary arch, high palatal vault, narrow alar base, class II occlusion, modal shift from nasal to oral breathing, and a clockwise facial growth pattern. The facial phenotype described above, sometimes called adenoidal facies, can occur from an increased airflow resistance located in the nose or nasopharynx as outlined in animal studies. The differential diagnosis for this facial phenotype may include other etiologies. Conventional thinking suggests that small airway dimensions increase airflow resistance and this leads to abnormal or altered facial growth. Alternatively, a primary problem of abnormal facial growth may lead to a small airway and an increase in airway resistance. Airway dimensions have been shown to have a proportional relationship to jaw growth and facial growth pattern. In other words, small mandibular and/or maxillary growth is associated with a reduction in airway dimensions. The largest airway dimensions are associated with a counterclockwise facial and normal facial growth pattern; therefore, a smaller airway may be associated with a clockwise facial growth pattern and deficient jaw growth. Several congenital and developmental conditions may be associated with a reduction in mandibular growth and clockwise facial growth pattern (Stratemann et al., 2010; Stratemann et al., 2011). These altered mandibular growth conditions include juvenile onset degenerative joint disease (condylysis), juvenile idiopathic arthritis, condylar hypoplasia, and 1st and 2nd branchial arch syndromes. Of the conditions that limit mandibular growth, the most common is juvenile onset degenerative joint disease, distantly followed by juvenile idiopathic arthritis (Hatcher, 2010a). Arthrides Adolescent onset of degenerative joint disease or juvenile idiopathic arthritis can result in a limitation of mandibular growth, clockwise direction of mandibular growth, and compensations in the maxilla and cranial base. The small mandible and clockwise rotation of the mandible allows the tongue and hyoid to be posteroinferiorly displaced and ultimately diminish the airway dimensions. The mandibular growth changes include a reduction in the vertical dimensions of the condylar process, ascending rami, and body of the mandible.  The lateral development of the mandible is  reduced. There is an increase in the vertical dimension and decrease in the labiolingual dimensions of the anterosuperior regions of the mandible. The gonial angles are obtuse and the mandibular and occlusal plane angles are steep (Hatcher, 2011a, 2011b, 2011c; Figure 9.1, Figure 9.2). Figure 9.1A Reconstructed panoramic projection for an adult female who has developmental onset degenerative joint disease, also known as condylysis (Hatcher, 2011a) or idiopathic condylar resorption. The condyles were small secondary to the degenerative process. Assessment of the Airway and Supporting Structures Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 201 Condylysis Condylysis, also known as idiopathic condylar resorpton, osteoarthritis, degenerative joint disease, and progressive condylar resorption, is a localized noninflammatory degenerative disorder of TMJs that is characterized by lysis and repair of the articular fibrocartilage and underlying subchondral bone following the onset of purberty in females. Natural history Soft tissue changes precede osseous changes. The soft tissue changes include a nonreducing anteriorly displaced disc. The osseous changes begin with a loss of cortex along the anterosuperior surface of the condyle, followed by a cavitation defect and reduction in condylar volume. The active phase may be associated with a limited condylar motion and joint pain. The destructive phase is followed by a reparative phase that results in flattening and  recortication of the defective surface (Hatcher Diagnostic Imaging Dental, 2011a; Figure 9.1). Idiopathic juvenile arthritis Juvenile arthritis is an autoimmune musculoskeletal inflammatory disease of childhood. The best diagnostic imaging clue is bilateral flat, deformed Figure 9.1B Lateral view of a volume-rendered CBCT scan of the same patient. This rendering shows the recessive mandible, steep mandibular plane, obtuse gonial angle, short condylar process, short ramus, and large vertical dimension of the anterior region of the mandible. This image shows a clockwise facial growth pattern. Min area: 51.4 mm2 Figure 9.1D Midsagittal view of the same patient showing the airway. The clockwise facial growth pattern allows the menton region of the mandible and tongue to posteroinferiorly reposition and crowds the retroglossal airway dimensions. The minimum cross-sectional area of the airway is posterior to the tongue base and measured 51.4mm2 . Figure 9.1C Frontal volume-rendered CBCT scan of the same patient that shows the narrowed transverse dimensions of the mandible and maxilla. 202 Cone Beam Computed Tomography mandibular condyles with wide glenoid fossae (Hatcher Diagnostic Imaging Dental, 2011c; Figure 9.2). The reduced mandibular development and associated clockwise facial growth pattern can result in repositioning of the tongue and hyoid bone, resulting in a reduction in airway dimensions. Other contributions to a small airway may be  from masses in the airway, selected cervical spine abnormalities, and selected abnormalities of the airway valves (nares, soft palate, tongue, and epiglottis (Hatcher, 2010a). The following image series will be used to illustrate the various scenarios that result in a reduction in airway dimensions. The images will be sorted by the following anatomic zones: nose, nasopharynx, and oral pharynx. The ability to achieve a specific diagnosis Figure 9.2B Volume-rendered CBCT in a lateral orientation showing the spatial relationships between the skeleton and overlying soft tissues. There is a convex facial profile. The mandibular and occlusal planes are steep. The gonial angles are obtuse. The menton is posteroinferiorly positioned. The condylar processes are very short. Figure 9.2C Volume-rendered CBCT in a frontal orientation. The mediolateral development of the mandible is small. Total volume: 6.1 cc Min area: 54.9 mm2 Figure 9.2D Midsagittal view of the airway that has a segmented airway and is colored to represent the cross-sectional areas. The smallest cross-sectional area is 54.9 mm2 (white arrows). The hyoid bone is inferiorly repositioned. Figure 9.2A Lateral photograph of a 12-year-old female with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (Hatcher, 2011c). Note the recessive mandible and small maxilla creating a convex facial profile. Assessment of the Airway and Supporting Structures Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 203 may lead to a therapy that appropriately addresses the etiology of the small airway dimensions. Nose The evaluation of the nasal airway begins at the nares and extends posteriorly to the posterior nasal chonae. Nasal fossa (Figure 9.3), large turbinates (Figure  9.4), deviated nasal septum (Figure  9.5), small nares (Figure 9.6), nasal mucosal hypertrophy, and masses (Figure 9.5, Figure 9.6) may effectively increase air flow resistance. Nasopharynx Adenoids form in the posterosuperior region of the nasopharynx, and as they enlarge they extend toward the posterior nasal chonae and soft palate. In some patients the inferior turbinates may enlarge Figure 9.2E Reconstructed panoramic projection showing that the vertical dimensions of the condylar process, ascending rami, and body of the mandible are short. The coronoid processes are relatively long and superiorly repositioned. The antegonial notches are steep. Figure 9.3A A coronal CBCT section showing mediolaterally narrow nasal fossae (white two-headed arrow). The narrow airway dimensions may increase airway resistance. Figure 9.3B An axial CBCT section of the same patient showing the narrowed airway dimensions (white two-headed arrows) and a deviated septum (white dashed arrow). 204 Cone Beam Computed Tomography and extend posteriorly into the nasopharyx and occupy as much as 25% of the potential nasopharygeal air space (Aboudara et al., 2003; Aboudara et al., 2009). The laterosuperior recesses of the nasopharynx, called the fossae of Rosenmuller, are sites that may give rise to neoplasms, such as a carcinoma. Adenoids will present as a midline mass (Figure  9.7), while a nasopharyngeal carcinoma will present as mass extending from a laterosuperior pharyngeal wall. Submucosal lesions, such as  vascular lesions, may enlarge and produce a mass effect, reducing airway volume (Figure  9.6, Figure 9.7, Figure 9.8). Figure 9.5C Axial section through the midface and nasal fossa. The schwannoma (white arrow) is expanding the right nasal fossa medially and laterally. Figure 9.5B Coronal view showing mass occupying most of the right nasal fossa and expanding laterally to encroach on the maxillary sinus and medially to deviate the nasal septum toward the left, thus crowding the left nasal fossa. Figure 9.5A Facial photograph of 15-year-old male who had a mass within his right nasal fossa that was determined to be a schwannoma. A schwannnoma is a benign (99%) neural sheath tumor. Figure 9.4A Coronal view through the midface and nasal fossae. The middle turbinates were pneumatized, called concha bullosa (white arrows), and this is an anatomic variation that may crowd the nasal fossa and increase resistance to airflow. Concha bullosa may also crowd the middle meatus and predispose to occlusion of the ostiomeatal unit. Figure 9.4B Axial view of the middle turbinates. The pneumatized middle turbinates were pneumatized (solid white arrows). The nares were constricted (dashed white arrow). Figure 9.6A Facial photograph of 59-year-old female with narrow right nares and a right nasal fossa polyp. Figure 9.6B Coronal view showing a mass (polyp) nearly occluding the right nasal fossa without expanding the fossa (white arrow). Figure 9.6D Sagittal view of polyp mass showing its location in the posterior half of nasal fossa and occupying most of the nasopharynx (white arrow). The mass extended through the ostium leading the sphenoid sinus (curved arrow). Figure 9.6C Axial view showing the polyp (white arrow) extending posteriorly into nasopharynx. Figure 9.7A Midsagittal view showing adenoids extending from the posterosuperior regions of the nasopharynx (white arrow). Min area: 41.6 mm2 Figure 9.7B Sagittal section of airway that was segmented and measured (Anatomage, Inc). The white arrows show the site of the narrowest cross-sectional area (41.6mm2 ) located between the adenoids and soft palate. 206 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Oral pharynx Enlargement of the tongue (Figure  9.9) or posterior  displacement of the tongue may posteriorly displace the soft palate and reduce the airway dimensions. Masses extending from the tongue base (Figure 9.10) may reduce the size of the oropharyngeal air space. Changes in the cervical spine, including severe lordosis, horizontal misalignment of the vertebral bodies, and hyperostosis (diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperotosis), may anteriorly deflect the posterior pharyngeal wall and reduce the airway dimensions (Hatcher, 2010a; Figure 9.11). Figure 9.7C Coronal view of the oral and nasal pharynx. Tonsils are bilaterally extending from the lateral pharyngeal walls (white arrows). Note the large vertical and horizontal dimensions of these tonsils. Min area: 41.6 mm2 Figure 9.7D Coronal view of the oral and nasal pharynx showing a segmented and measured airway. The areas shaded in red and orange have a cross-sectional area below normal. Figure 9.8A CBCT sagittal view of the oral and nasal pharyngeal airway space showing a hemangioma enlarging the soft palate and extending posteriorly to encroach on the airway space. Figure 9.8B MRI sagittal view showing hemangioma in soft palate (white arrows) and narrowing the airway dimensions. Assessment of the Airway and Supporting Structures Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 207 Summary Small airway dimensions may be a risk factor for obstructive sleep disordered breathing and upper airway resistance. The airway dimensions can be influenced by many factors, including age, gender, jaw growth, peripharyngeal fat deposits, tongue size, and airway masses. The use of CBCT, spatially accurate 3D imaging, creates the opportunity to Figure 9.8C CBCT axial section showing the hemangioma enlarging the soft palate. Figure 9.8D MRI axial view showing distribution of the hemangioma in the left palatal region (white arrows) and adjacent to the right alveolar process. Figure 9.9A Volume-rendered CBCT scan shows a normal-sized maxilla and very large mandible. The mandibular teeth were in crossbite. Total volume: 8.5 cc Min area: 34.2 mm2 Figure 9.9B CBCT midsagittal view showing a retroglossal airway dimension with a minimal cross-sectional area of 34mm2 . The reduction in airway dimensions was secondary to a very large tongue. Note the large sella turcica (AP dimension of 20mm). This patient has acromegaly secondary to a pituitary adenoma. 208 Cone Beam Computed Tomography assess the airway dimensions and to identify factors that have contributed to the diminution of airway size. A stratified diagnostic process and identification of the etiology of a small airway provide the opportunity to employ a therapy that targets the etiology. References Aboudara, C.A., Hatcher, D., Nielsen, I.L., and Miller, A.J. (2003). A three-dimensional evaluation of the upper airway in adolescents. Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research, 6(Suppl 1): 173–5. Aboudara, C., Nielsen, I., Huang, J.C., Maki, K., Miller, A.J., and Hatcher, D.C. (2009). Comparison of evaluating the Figure 9.10A CBCT axial section showing a squamous cell carcinoma (SCCa; white arrow) extending from the right lateral side of the oral pharnynx. Figure 9.10B CBCT coronal view of same patient showing the airway encroachment by the SCCa (white arrow). Min area: 79.2 mm2 Figure 9.10C CBCT sagittal view showing that the smallest cross-sectional area of the airway (79.2mm2 ) is associated with the SCCa. Figure 9.11 Midsagittal CBCT scan showing hyperostosis extending anteriorly from C2 and C3 vertebral bodies (white arrows). The hyperostosis has anteriorly displaced the posterior pharyngeal wall and reduced the size of the airway to 52.9mm2 . Assessment of the Airway and Supporting Structures Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 209 human airway using conventional two-dimensional cephalography and three-dimensional volumetric data. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 135: 468–79. Chang, C.C. (2011). Three-dimensional airway evaluation in 387 subjects from a university orthodontic clinic using cone beam computed tomography. Thesis, University of Southern Nevada. Hatcher, D.C. (2010a). Cone beam computed tomography: Craniofacial and airway analysis. Sleep Medicine Clinics, 5: 59–70. Hatcher, D.C. (2010b). Operational principles for cone beam CT. Journal of the American Dental Association, 141(Suppl 3): 3S–6S. Hatcher, D.C. (2011a). Diagnostic imaging. Dental: Condylysis. Salt Lake City, UT: Amirsys. Hatcher, D.C. (2011b). Diagnostic imaging. Dental: TMJ degenerative disease. Salt Lake City, UT: Amirsys. Hatcher, D.C. (2011c). Diagnostic imaging. Dental: TMJ juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Salt Lake City, UT: Amirsys. Kushida, C.A., et al. (2005). Practice parameters for the indications for polysomnography and related procedures: An update for 2005. SLEEP, 28(4): 499–519. Li, H.Y., Chen, N.H., Wan, C.R., et al. (2003). Use of 3-dimensional computed tomography scan to evaluate upper airway patency for patients undergoing sleep-disordered breathing surgery. Oto-layrngol Head Neck Surg, 1294–336. Ludlow, J.B., Davies-Ludlow, L.E., and White, S.C. (2008). Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: The impact of 2007 Internal Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation. JADA, 139: 1237–43. Ludlow, J.B., and Ivanovic, M. (2008). Compariative dosimetery of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Patholo Oral Radiol Endod, 106(1): 106–14. Ogawa, T., Enciso, R., Shintaku, W.H., Clark, G.T. (2007). Evaluation of cross-section airway configuration of obstructive sleep apnea. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 103: 102–8. Schendel, S.A., and Hatcher, D.C. (2010). Automated 3-dimensional airway analysis from cone-beam computed tomography data. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 68(3): 696–70. Smith, J.M. (2009). The normal adult airway in 3-dimensions: A cone-beam computed tomography evaluation establishing normative values. MSc Thesis, University of Michigan. Stratemann, S., Huang, J.C., Maki, K., Hatcher, D.C., and Miller, A.J. (2010). Methods for evaluating the human mandible using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 137: S58–S70. Stratemann, S., Huang, J.C., Maki, K., Hatcher, D.C., and Miller, A.J. (2011). Three dimensional analysis of the  airway using cone beam computed tomography. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 140: 607–15. Cone Beam Computed Tomography: Oral and Maxillofacial Diagnosis and Applications, First Edition. Edited by David Sarment. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2014 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 211 Endodontics Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Martin D. Levin 10 Introduction Endodontics is an image-guided treatment and, until recently, has been restricted to in-office periapical (PA) and panoramic radiographic assessments. However, these planar image projections suffer from inherent limitations: magnification, geometric distortion, compression of three-dimensional structures, and misrepresentation of structures. While a thorough history, clinical examination, and periapical radiograph are still essential elements of a presumptive diagnosis, the addition of tomographic imaging allows the visualization of the true extent of lesions and their spatial relationship to anatomic landmarks with high-dimensional accuracy (Figure  10.1; Patel et al., 2007; Cotton et al., 2007). Radiographic imaging must rely on a risk and benefit analysis, whereby the degree of morbidity must be considered along with the consequences of patient exposure to ionizing radiation, misdiagnosis, or failure to diagnose. This requires knowledge of the potential diagnostic yield of additional radiographic imaging and the understanding that radiographic imaging will not provide a solution in all cases (Kau and Richmond, 2010). The most common radiolucencies of the jaws are inflammatory lesions of the pulp and periapical areas, namely, periapical periodontitis and radicular cysts (Scarfe et  al., 2009; Weir, 1987; Tay, 1999). These lesions result from the intraradicular presence of microorganisms (Kakehashi et  al., 1965) and begin as a periapical granuloma that sometimes forms a radicular cyst. While planar imaging generally provides better spatial resolution than three-dimensional radiography, surrounding bone density, X-ray angulation, image contrast, and the superimposition of structures often make interpretation of complex anatomy, morphologic variations, and surrounding structures difficult, with some periapical lesions not visible (Figure 10.2; Estrela, Bueno, Sousa-Neto, et  al., 2008). Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), on the other hand, allows for the threedimensional assessment of the craniofacial complex for the visualization of pathologic alterations and anatomic structures without errors due to anatomic superimpositions, resulting in a significant reduction of false-negative results. Endodontic disease An understanding of endodontic disease begins with a review of the literature with special emphasis on systematic cross-sectional studies, which 212 Cone Beam Computed Tomography provide the highest level of evidence. A metaanalysis of 300,861 teeth from patient samples in modern populations, taken from 33 articles out of  a total of 11,491 titles searched showed that 5% of all teeth had periapical radiolucencies and 10% were endodontically treated. Of the 28,881 endodontically treated teeth, 36% had periapical radiolucencies (Pak et  al., 2012). However, the cross-sectional studies that were included cannot distinguish between healing and nonhealing radiolucencies. Although billions of teeth are retained through root canal treatment, the incidence of one radiolucency per patient and two root canal treatments per patient studied showed a surprisingly high level of disease. The majority Figure 10.1 This series compares a periapical (PA) radiograph (A) of the maxillary right second molar with views of the same region using an LCBCT scan exposed to evaluate contradictory pulp test results. The limited field of view cone beam computed tomography (LCBCT) corrected sagittal view (B) of the palatal root shows a 6-mm well-defined oval-shaped radiolucency with a mildly corticated border, centered over the periapex of the palatal root, consistent with a radicular cyst or periapical abscess (yellow arrow). (A) (B) Figure 10.2 This series shows a PA radiograph (A) of a previously endodontically treated maxillary left second molar with views of the same region using LCBCT exposed to assess contradictory findings. The corrected sagittal view (B) of the mesiobuccal root shows a 6-mm well-defined oval-shaped radiolucency with a mildly corticated border (yellow arrow), centered over the periapex of the mesiobuccal root, consistent with a radicular cyst or periapical abscess. The proximity of the lesion and the floor of the maxillary sinus and a limited mucositis (green arrow) are clearly depicted in this image. (Courtesy, Dr. Anastasia Mischenko, Chevy Chase, MD) (A) (B) Endodontics Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 213 of researchers criticized the quality of root canal treatment performed. The loss of bone density around the apex of a tooth resulting from necrosis of the pulp is known as a periapical rarefying osteitis or apical periodontitis (AP). This radiolucency is a low-density or darkened area on a radiograph that indicates greater transparency to X-ray photons. The early phases of AP may be characterized by a widening of the periodontal ligament space followed by loss of the apical lamina dura. It shows endodontic lesions at the tissue level, where pathologic changes are macroscopic and do not correlate well with histologic findings (Barthel et al., 2004). Inflammatory lesions of the pulp and periapical areas are associated with an osteolytic process and remain radiolucent. Most endodontic lesions are unilocular, suggesting a local cause, while lesions that are  multilocular or distributed throughout the jaws suggest a nonodontogenic or systemic cause (MacDonald, 2011). CBCT imaging also allows for the diagnosis of the occurrence and enlargement of periradicular lesions associated with individual roots of a multirooted tooth (Nakata et al., 2006). Some lesions, such as focal osseous dysplasia, may initially present as a radiolucency but subsequently may become partially opacified or completely radiopaque. Alterations of the supporting structures of teeth and associated lesions can be divided into the following outline: • Alterations in supporting structures of teeth: Periapical radiolucencies, periapical radiopacities and mixed lesions, floating teeth, widened periodontal ligament space, lamina dura changes • Radiolucencies: Well-defined unilocular radiolucencies, pericoronal radiolucencies without radiopacities, pericoronal radiolucencies with radiopacities, multilocular radiolucencies, generalized rarefaction • Radiopacities: Well-defined radiopacities, ground-glass and granular radiopacities, generalized radiopacities • Periosteal reactions Aside from normal anatomic landmarks superimposed on teeth, AP or periapical rarefying osteitis can be confused with periapical cemental dysplasia, periapical scar, benign odontogenic tumors, osteomyelitis, and rarely, leukemia and metastasis. The key to differentiating AP from the aforementioned lesions is vitality testing, where the tooth will be nonvital in cases associated with AP. While any odontogenic or nonodontogenic tumor can be superimposed on any tooth or teeth, the most common nonendodontic lesion is the keratocystic  odontogenic tumor. These benign odontogenic tumors will have an intact lamina dura, may not be centered on the apex of the tooth, and can become secondarily infected if endodontic treatment was performed in error. Not every case of pulpal necrosis is related to oral bacterial contamination via caries or by traumatic injury. An initial infection with varicella zoster virus or chickenpox can lead to subsequent expression in the form of herpes zoster, which can result in pulpal necrosis and AP (Worth et al., 1975). Another potential cause of pulpal necrosis is homozygous sickle cell anemia (SCA). In a study by Demirbaş et  al. (2004), 36 patients with SCA, a genetically related systemic disease, and 36 patients without SCA as controls were evaluated for the presence of nonvital teeth. Fifty-one (6%) of the teeth with no history of trauma and no restorations were nonvital, with 67% of these teeth showing radiographic evidence of AP. CBCT imaging is especially useful for the visualization of the lesional borders of radiolucencies without the superimposition of other structures. Differentiating common periapical lesions from other more aggressive types of pathologic entities is a routine task made easier and more precise by the use of CBCT. Well-defined lesional borders suggest an odontogenic cyst, benign neoplasm, or slow-growing lesion that is remodeling the surrounding bone; however, the lack of a well-defined lesional border is often consistent with a more infective or aggressive, invasive-type lesion. Some pathologic alterations with indistinct borders are not aggressive lesions, like reactive bone lesions such as condensing osteitis and idiopathic osteosclerosis. Mixed lesions associated with odontogenic tumors are surrounded with capsules, as often seen with an odontoma, cementoblastoma, supernumerary tooth, or embedded root tip. Analysis of intraosseous lesions should include an assessment of the definition of the lesional interface, uniformity and thickness of the reactive bone layer around the lesion, and the nature of the attachment of the lesional tissue to the surrounding bone. 214 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Radicular cysts, for example, may exhibit a mostly corticated border with areas of ill-defined border consistent with an infected cyst, which is in contrast to more aggressive pathoses such as a malignancy (Bouquot, 2010). The radiographic diagnosis of the true nature of  an endodontic lesion has been shown to be somewhat elusive. Bashkar (1966) reported on the histology of periapical lesions, finding cystic degeneration in 42% of cases examined. Lalonde and Luebke (1968) determined the presence of cysts associated with endodontic lesions to be 44%. P. Nair et al. (1996) evaluated 256 extracted teeth and found that 35% were associated with periapical abscesses, 50% with granulomas, and only 15% were associated with cysts, which were composed of both 9% true apical cysts and 6% pocket cysts. Becconsall-Ryan et al. (2010) performed a retrospective analysis of the accuracy of clinical examination and the radiographic appearance of inflammatory radiolucent lesions of the jaws. Using histopathology as the criterion standard, they showed that in 17,038 specimens collected over a 20-year period in New Zealand, 29.2% were radiolucent jaw lesions, of which 72.8% were inflammatory. The largest group of radiolucent jaw lesions analyzed was AP (59.7%), followed by radicular cysts (29.2%). The mean age of the cohort study was 44 years old, with male and female equally represented. The study concluded that the provisional diagnosis before histopathologic evaluation was accurate for only 48.3% of periapical granulomas and 36% of radicular cysts. They concluded that while the incidence of cystic change in periapical lesions of endodontic origin is high at 30%, inflammatory radiolucent lesions cannot be accurately diagnosed from clinical presentation or radiographic appearance alone. In an additional study, Becconsall-Ryan and Love (2011) determined that the five most common radiolucent lesions of the jaws were periapical granuloma, radicular cyst, dentigerous cyst, hyperplastic dental follicle, and keratocystic odontogenic tumor. While it has been shown by Becconsall-Ryan and others that differentiating periapical granuloma from radicular cyst by clinical presentation or radiographic appearance alone was impossible, the studies by Becconsall-Ryan et  al. were conducted with periapical and/or panoramic imaging alone, without the benefit of three-dimensional imaging techniques (personal communication, Robert Love, January 12, 2011). Advantages of limited field of view CBCT in endodontics The newest CBCT units are available in large, medium, limited, or adjustable field of view (FOV) configurations. The FOV is controlled by the detector size, beam projection geometry, and beam collimation. CBCT units that offer either limited field of view (LCBCT) or that can be collimated to sizes of approximately 6 × 6 cm or smaller generally offer three main advantages over medium and large FOV scanners, including (1) a lower radiation dose, (2) a higher spatial resolution, and (3) a smaller area of responsibility, as described below. The aim of all radiographic imaging is to aid in the diagnosis of disease while exposing the patient to as little radiation as possible. Since most endodontic assessments are restricted to a quadrant or sextant of the jaw, LCBCT scans should be considered whenever possible to reduce radiation exposure in compliance with the ALARA principle (As Low As Reasonably Achievable). Choosing the  smallest possible FOV, the lowest mA setting with the shortest exposure time is preferred. Dose optimization procedures should include custom exposure protocols based on patient body size; use of personal protective torso apron and, where applicable, a thyroid collar; adherence to quality control guidelines; and machine calibration performance recommendations. CBCTs offering limited FOVs and dedicated limited FOV units generally produce images with higher spatial resolution than medium or large FOV units because acquisition occurs innately as high-resolution volumetric data. Newer scanners allow the clinician to select FOVs that best suit the  imaging requirements for the task at hand, and  range from 5 × 5 cm up to and including 17 × 13.5 cm. This projection data can then be sectioned nonorthogonally, allowing the best chance of lesion detection (Michetti et  al., 2010). This allows visualization of lesion boundaries and radicular features that will aid in the assessment of pathologic alterations to the teeth and supporting structures. Endodontics Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 215 The clinician ordering a CBCT study is responsible for interpreting the entire image volume (Carter et  al., 2008). LCBCT units produce volumetric datasets that demonstrate small areas of the  dentition and maxillofacial skeleton, limiting the area imaged. This greatly reduces interpreter responsibility because areas like the cranial base, spinal column, and airway are not imaged. The reduced image volume size also requires less time to interpret the image, which may result in lower costs to the patient. Radiographic imaging is essential during each stage of endodontic treatment. CBCT imaging use should be limited to those cases that are justified by the patient’s medical history and clinical examination and where lower dose conventional dental imaging cannot provide adequate information. Routine use of CBCT for endodontic assessments and for screening is not considered an acceptable practice (SEDENTEXCT, 2011). Periapical imaging may be required at all stages of endodontic treatment, including preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases (Figure  10.3). Tomographic assessments can often provide valuable additional information in each of these phases of treatment. Preoperative CBCT assessment of the teeth and alveolar hard tissue provides information on the effects and extent of periapical disease, the morphology of the dentition (Figure 10.4), the location of significant anatomical structures, and other diagnostic tasks, such as the location and extent of resorption lesions. Intraoperative use of CBCT allows for the visualization and triangulation of calcified canals, the visualization of anatomic anomalies, and guidance during periapical surgery. Figure 10.3 This 64-year-old female patient presented with a nonlocalized dull ache in the mandibular left posterior region. Endodontic testing revealed slight sensitivity to percussion and bite stick at the mandibular left second molar. The periodontal findings were normal and the patient’s medical history was noncontributory. The PA radiograph (A) shows the previous endodontic treatment with no apparent lesion. An LCBCT was exposed to elucidate the contradictory findings, with the sagittal view (B) showing a lesion measuring 6 mm with a well-defined, mildly corticated border, centered over the periapex. The corrected coronal (C) and axial view (D) show the same lesion centered on the physiologic terminus of the root canal on the buccal aspect of the mesial root, 2 mm coronal to apex, consistent with radicular cyst or periapical abscess. The same case demonstrates how different slice thicknesses, with decreasing superimposition, affect lesion visualization (E). (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) 216 Cone Beam Computed Tomography The use of PA radiography for the temporal assessment of disease progression is often challenging because serial imaging requires standardization of beam geometry, detector placement, and radiation exposure parameters. CBCT allows for more accurate assessment of healing, which may be especially useful in assessing medically complex patients and may lead to earlier interventions. Figure 10.4 Many anatomic anomalies are difficult to assess with PA radiography alone. This patient was referred for evaluation and possible treatment of the maxillary left first bicuspid. A PA (A, partial image) was exposed and no obvious cause for the patient’s continued postoperative discomfort was determined. An LCBCT was exposed, showing an untreated mesiobuccal canal in the sagittal (B), axial (C), and the reconstructed surface-rendered views (D). (Courtesy, Dr. Rajeev Gupta, Toms River, NJ) (A) (B) (C) (D) Endodontics Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 217 Limitations of 2D imaging in endodontics The ability to detect changes in periradicular structures is critical to endodontic diagnosis and the assessment of healing (Figure 10.5). Conventional radiography projects three-dimensional structures onto a two-dimensional image. This results in visualization of tissue features in the mesiodistal plane but not in the buccolingual plane. The often-cited classic study by Bender and Seltzer (2003a, 2003b) demonstrated the limitations of intraoral radiography for the detection of periapical lesions. Using human cadaver mandibles, their study revealed that in order for a lesion to be visible radiographically, the interface between the cancellous bone and cortical bone must be engaged. Many subsequent studies have underscored the  difficulty of detecting periapical lesions using planar imaging. Goldman et al. (1972) studied interand  intraobserver differences when interpreting periapical radiographs. Later studies have shown only limited success in viewing some early changes in the cancellous bone alone, but they are dependent on bone density and the location of the lesion (S.J. Lee and Messer, 1986). Wide disagreement between observers was found, and when the same observers viewed the same films at a second session, there was only 19%–80% agreement between the two evaluations. These radiographic limitations are summarized in a review by Huumonen and Ørstavik (2002), in which they state that such limitations exist, in part, because radiographs are 2D in nature and clinical or biological features may not be reflected in radiographic changes. Essentially, conventional imaging suffers from the superimposition of “shadows” as projected on a detector, creating a 2D representation of a 3D object. Periradicular bone loss can be detected with a higher accuracy with CBCT than with conventional radiography (de Paula-Silva et al., 2009). In a study of 888 patients involving 1,508 teeth, CBCT detected Figure 10.5 This PA radiograph (A) of a maxillary right first molar illustrates the difficulty in assessing the true nature of many periradicular lesions and their comorbid conditions. Although a periradicular periodontitis is visible on the mesiobuccal and palatal roots in the initial PA radiograph, the lesion on the distobuccal root (B), the osteoperiostitis on the palatal root (C), and the possibly associated moderate mucositis are not apparent. (A) (B) (C) 218 Cone Beam Computed Tomography more AP than either panoramic or PA imaging, with the presence of advanced lesions correctly identified with conventional two-dimensional radiography (Estrela, Bueno, Leles, et al., 2008). Although a low-dose tool to survey the jaws, panoramic imaging has several well-documented shortcomings. They are flat, two-dimensional, superoinferior or posteroanterior images that suffer from the superimposition of structures, distortion, and magnification errors. Direct measurements of objects on panoramic images are inaccurate. By contrast, CBCT images capture anatomic entities in three dimensions and can be viewed by digital selection of the region of interest with great accuracy. In a recent study published by Stratemann et  al. (2008), linear measurements of skulls comparing calipers and CBCT imaging revealed only a 1% relative error. When the lesion detection rate afforded by 2D imaging was compared to CBCT image data, additional clinically relevant findings were apparent, allowing the undistorted visualization of the maxillofacial complex, paranasal sinuses, and the relationship of anatomic structures in three dimensions (Pinsky et al., 2006). Velvart et al. (2001) showed that in a sample of 50 patients referred for possible endodontic surgery, volumetric imaging was able to identify all surgically diagnosed periapical lesions versus only 78% with periapical imaging. In a comparison of the accuracy of CBCT, CCD sensors, and film-based images for the detection of periapical bone defects artificially created in ten frozen pig jaws, Stavropoulos and Wenzel (2007) reported that there were few, if any, differences between the CCD sensors and film. However, CBCT showed better sensitivity (54%) and diagnostic accuracy (61%) than the CCD sensors. CCD sensors showed 23% sensitivity and 39% accuracy, while conventional radiographs had 28% sensitivity and 44% accuracy. The investigators point out that digital enhancement may result in limited improvement in the detection of periapical bone defects. When overall sensitivity for panoramic and periapical radiographs were tested to identify periradicular rarefactions, Estrela, Bueno, Leles, et  al. (2008) found that these planar imaging techniques  showed a relatively high probability of false negative results. Even when two periapical images with a 10-degree difference in horizontal beam angulation were compared with limited field of view LCBCT images for the detection of experimentally  induced periapical lesions in jaw specimens, LCBCT was deemed superior in accuracy (Soğur et al., 2012). Most CBCT imaging used for endodontic assessments will require voxel sizes smaller than 0.125mm in order to provide adequate spatial resolution or detail. Because these images will require longer exposure times, the radiographic dosage will increase. This dosage increase can be offset by using a smaller FOV, which is often possible with CBCT units with either a limited FOV or with the option to collimate the FOV. The determination of effective treatment is somewhat clouded by our inability to assess many lesions with PA imaging (Figure 10.6) and further degraded by a wide variation in our abilities to systematically assess even basic PA radiography. In a study performed by Sherwood (2011), 20 general practitioners were presented with two sets of questionnaires. The first asked which features they would interpret and the second consisted of 30 randomly selected PAs to assess. Fewer than 50% said they would interpret canal morphology, open apex, resorption, fracture, number of roots, and lamina dura. In the second questionnaire, 90% missed grade 1 or 2 periapical changes, resorption, and canal calcification, and more than 80% missed extra roots and root curvature buccally; most strikingly, no general practitioners were able to assess the periodontal ligament width changes. Limiting geometric distortion is difficult with intraoral periapical imaging because positioning the paralleling guides and image receptors properly is rarely achieved. According to Vande Voorde et al. (1969), at least a 5% magnification of the feature being radiographed is to be anticipated because of the divergent nature of the X-ray beam and the distance between the object and the receptor. Limitations of limited field of view CBCT in endodontics When compared to conventional imaging for endodontic assessments, known limitations of CBCT include increased radiation dose, diminished spatial resolution, and imaging artifacts. Artifact generation is an area that continues to confound endodontic interpretation in some instances. This impediment should be considered when selecting cases for endodontic consideration. Endodontics Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 219 Radiation dosage Radiation exposure for dental imaging is usually measured by calculating the effective dose in micro-Sieverts (μSv), a parameter that attempts to quantitatively evaluate the biologic effects of ionizing radiation. Other exposure parameters such as kVp (kilovolt peak) and mAs (milliamp seconds), pulsed or continuous beam, rotation geometry, the size of the tissue being irradiated, beam filtration, number of basis images, and other factors all affect dose. Many CBCT units allow adjustment of exposure factors such as the kVp, mA, and FOV, while beam filtration and nature of the X-ray beam are not. The effective dose, based on the International Commission on  Radiological Protection (ICRP, 1990) allows comparison of different CBCT units. In general, selecting the smallest FOV possible will result in  the lowest dose. When imaging teeth in the maxilla, for example, collimating the beam to avoid the mandible will greatly reduce the effective dose since the thyroid and salivary glands contribute in large measure to the calculation algorithm (Ludlow and Ivanovic, 2008; Ludlow et al., 2008). Additional dose savings can be expected by reducing the degree of rotation from 360 to 180 and reducing voxel size settings. Spatial resolution Spatial resolution for CBCT imaging (approximately 1.25–6.5 line pairs/mm) is lower than either film-based (approximately 20 line pairs/mm) or digital intraoral radiography (approximately 8–20 line pairs/mm; Farman and Farman, 2005), but the  lower resolution of CBCT images is offset by  elimination of superimposition errors and the advantage of undistorted volumetric representations of the teeth and jaws that are viewable from any angle. Since CBCT relies on isotropic, nonplanar geometry and true 3D reconstructions, the spatial resolution is excellent in all three dimensions (MacDonald, 2011) but is still diminished by partial volume averaging and other artifacts. Research by Bauman et  al. (2011) demonstrated that multiobserver use of CBCT for the detection of mesiobuccal canals increased from 60% at 0.40mm voxel resolution to more than 93% accuracy at 0.12mm voxel resolution. In general, smaller voxel sizes will result in better spatial resolution and Figure 10.6 The dentition and supporting structures are subject to superimposition error, especially evident in everyday endodontic treatment. The PA radiograph (A) of this asymptomatic maxillary right central incisor appears to show a resorptive lesion at the apical third of the root (yellow arrow). An LCBCT was exposed to verify the presence of a resorptive lesion, with the corrected coronal (B) and sagittal views (C) showing normal root and supporting tissues, indicating that no treatment is required. There is a beam hardening artifact resulting in a dark area along the palatal aspect of gutta percha (green arrow). (A) (B) (C) 220 Cone Beam Computed Tomography improved detection of features important in endodontic treatment. Image artifacts The diagnostic yield of CBCT imaging is sometimes affected by “beam hardening” artifact, caused when low energy photons are absorbed by material of high density, such as restorative materials, gutta percha, intracanal posts, implants, and retrograde amalgams. The resulting image can show two different but associated phenomena: (1) cupping, caused by the exaggerated attenuation of the beam as it passes through the center of a radiodense material in contrast to less attenuation as it passes through the edge of the same material, such as a post; and (2) dark streaks and bands, related to the direction of the beam as it passes through very radiodense objects, such as two adjacent obturated root-filled canals in close proximity. According to Katsumata et al. (2007, 2009), beam hardening artifact may be more problematic with LCBCT units. Partial volume artifacts result from radiodense objects that are outside of the region of interest but within the area covered by the beam geometry. An implant in the mandibular first molar position, for example, may corrupt a mandibular anterior image volume, even though it is not in the field of view (R.D. Lee, 2008). Metal artifacts will cause streaking if they are in the field of view, especially dental restorations and amalgam retrogrades. This artifact can cause significant beam attenuation, resulting in bright and dark streaks. Misregistration artifacts due to patient movement are common in CBCT imaging (Figure 10.7). Improper patient stabilization will result in suboptimal images since high-resolution images will register even small motions (Barrett and Keat, 2004). Positioning the patient in the sitting position is recommended whenever possible, to reduce this detrimental effect. CBCT has not been judged more useful in determining obturation length or homogeneity. When six observers used LCBCT, PSP plates, and F-speed film to study 17 extracted permanent mandibular incisor teeth, they found that both PSP plates and F-speed film were superior to LCBCT (Soğur et al., 2007). While CBCT should not be exposed for the detection of caries, it can be helpful in select cases where root amputations or furcal involvements require 3D analyses. As with any X-ray imaging modality, CBCT images should always be evaluated for any deviation from normal when performing a clinical evaluation (SEDENTEXT, 2009). Research has shown that CBCT was superior to F-speed film for  the detection of proximal caries depth, but dose, cost, and availability will continue to make PA imaging  the criterion standard for these assessments (Palomo et al., 2006). Figure 10.7 Motion artifact is evident in this sagittal view of an maxillary left first molar distobuccal root (A) and the starburst pattern associated with the gutta percha obturation material evident in the axial view of the same volume (B). (A) (B) Endodontics Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 221 Endodontic applications of CBCT Two-dimensional radiographic imaging is still one of the most commonly used diagnostic tools in endodontics, although many studies have shown that interpretation of changes in the root-supporting structures is not reliable (Molven et  al., 2002; Saunders et al., 2000). The use of CBCT in endodontics is an important tool in the identification of critical anatomic structures and their relation with  roots and periapical lesions (Estrela, Bueno, Sousa-Neto, et  al., 2008). CBCT can provide additional information that cannot be obtained in any other way, but it should not be considered as a substitute for two-dimensional imaging. Advancements in CBCT imaging are on the horizon, promising to  reduce radiation dose and improve resolution, readability, and functionality of CBCT imaging. These improvements include sophisticated algorithms that allow segmentation of different features of the dentition and maxillofacial skeleton which will enhance visualization (Figure 10.8). Figure 10.8 The ability to segment and measure individual canals is demonstrated in this in vitro series, exposed with an LCBCT and processed with special software (Courtesy, Carestream Dental, LLC, Atlanta GA). The individual canals are segmented (A), then sliced with an obliquely positioned plane, showing the resulting cross-sectional measurements of the canal size (B). The available spatial resolution is further demonstrated by this 0.076mm image showing the root canal morphology (C). Additional segmentation algorithms applied to the same molar dataset show the root canals in red (D) and a portion of the canal interior captured from a virtual endoscopy (E). (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) X Z Y 222 Cone Beam Computed Tomography The following applications of CBCT in endodontics are based on the 2010 Joint Position Statement of the American Association of Endodontics and the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, “Use of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Endodontics.” The last section describing the assessment of endodontic treatment outcomes was not included in this joint position statement. 1. Evaluation of anatomy and complex morphology While no systematic studies with large sample sizes justify the routine use of CBCT imaging for the assessment of endodontic anatomy, and the use  of the operating microscope may adequately reveal root canal anatomy without exposure to ionizing radiation, CBCT may prove valuable in select cases. There is a need for additional research in this area of endodontic practice. A. Anomalies Dental anomalies include dens invaginatus (DI), short roots, microdontia taurodontism, gemination, supernumerary teeth dentinogenesis iperfecta, agenesis, and malformations resulting from trauma. The radiographic features of these anomalies have been studied extensively and are well represented in the literature, showing that deviations from normal anatomy can cause difficulties in diagnosis and treatment. CBCT provides detailed information that can allow visualization of the root morphology, resulting in better treatment planning and postoperative assessments (Nair and Nair, 2007). DI is a developmental anomaly that may not only require endodontic treatment, it may also complicate endodontic therapy. It has been postulated that DI results from the infolding of the dental papilla prior to tooth calcification (Silberman et al., 2006; Bishop and Alani, 2008). Usually affecting the permanent maxillary lateral incisors, followed by maxillary central incisors, premolars, canines, and least frequently molars, DI has a wide range of  morphologic variations (Neves et  al., 2010). According to Oehlers’s (1957) classification, DI can be divided into three groups, with the most complex cases classified as type III, with extension of an enamel-lined invagination through the root to form an additional apical or lateral foramen. CBCT allows for the detailed three-dimensional visualization of the anomalous tooth and can facilitate the successful management of these anomalies. Normal variants in the human dentition include many examples where the apical foramen is not coincidental with the root apex (Figure 10.9; Grande et  al., 2008). Morphologic analysis has shown that the root apex is round only 35% of the time; the apical foramen is round 52.9% of the time; and is oval shaped 25.2% of the time (Martos et al., 2010). The location of the major foramen was in the center of the root in 58.4% of the teeth examined. Their largest diameter is in the buccolingual direction (Martos et al., 2009; M.K. Wu and Wesselink, 2001; M.K. Wu et  al., 2000), making visualization with periapical radiography nearly impossible. It is well known that every tooth in the human dentition presents with occasional anomalous features. All of these factors complicate endodontic assessments by planar radiographic means alone (Baratto Filho et al., 2009). Normal variants in the jaws include the mandibular salivary gland defect (Stafne bone cavity) and idiopathic osteosclerosis (dense bone island, enostosis, focal osteopetrosis; Figure 10.10). Both the Stafne bone cavity and idiopathic osteosclerosis can  usually be assessed by using periapical or panoramic imaging but occasionally confuse the differential diagnosis of endodontic lesions. The Stafne bone cavity is an asymptomatic radiolucency usually found in routine panoramic radiographs. Similar defects associated with the sublingual and parotid gland have been described (Richard and Ziskind, 1957). Usually found in males with an incidence of between 0.10% and 0.48%, Stafne bone cavities often develop at middle age (Correll et al., 1980) as an extension of the submandibular salivary gland. They are unilateral, radiolucent, and usually corticated (Prapanpoch and Langlais, 1994) ovoid defects anterior to the angle of the mandible. While two-dimensional imaging is often sufficient for diagnosis, confirmatory CBCT imaging is recommended in atypical cases, whereby distinguishing this defect from a periapical lesion is imperative (Branstetter et al., 1999). Idiopathic osteosclerosis, also a normal variant in the jaws, is a well-defined nonexpansile, homogeneous radiopacity with radiolucent periphery. Endodontics Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 223 It  is usually closely associated with roots and can be easily confused with condensing osteitis, periapical cemental dysplasia, hypercementosis, and Gardner Syndrome (Basaran and Erkan, 2008). In a report by McDonnell (1993), idiopathic osteosclerosis affects females twice as often as males. In this cohort of 107 patients with 113 lesions analyzed, idiopathic osteosclerosis involved the mandible in 96.5% of cases, with the bicuspids and  molar areas most commonly affected. Bony Figure 10.9 This comparison of a PA radiograph (A) with tomographically-generated views demonstrates the improved visualization provided. A sagittal section through the mesiobuccal root (B) shows the aberrant root morphology associated with the separate location of the physiologic apex (yellow arrow) and the radiographic apex (green arrow). The axial view (C) shows a mesiobuccal and mesioaccessory canal connected by a ribbon shaped isthmus (yellow arrow), and the oval shaped canal form (D) at the physiologic apex. The largest diameter is in the buccopalatal direction, making visualization with PA radiography nearly impossible. (A) (B) (C) (D) 224 Cone Beam Computed Tomography resorption was found in 9.7% of the cases and usually affected the succedaneous first molar. B. Root curvatures Thorough chemomechanical preparation and obturation of the root canal system are the principle steps necessary for successful root canal treatment. The purpose is to remove all of the pulpal tissue and canal debris from the root canal space while also removing infected inner layers of canal wall dentin. In endodontic cases where the canal configuration is relatively straight in its long axis and round in cross-section, our goal might be achieved using conventional hand and rotary-driven endodontic files. However, the cleaning, shaping, and disinfection of canals that are flat and oval-shaped in cross-section, as well as curved canals, represent  a significant clinical challenge in endodontic Figure 10.10 This 60-year-old male Caucasian patient presented for evaluation and possible endodontic treatment for nonlocalized pain in the mandibular posterior region. (A) The PA radiograph showed normal periapical tissues, a carious lesion and bifid canal structure on tooth #29, and two regions of idiopathic osteosclerosis. (B–E) These usually incidental findings are confirmed and well identified using an LCBCT; they are uniformly hyerdense foci of compact bone located in cancellous bone and demonstrate a spiculated structure (yellow arrow) with no surrounding rarefaction, typical of benign idiopathic osteosclerosis. (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) Endodontics Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 225 treatment. According to a study by Siqueira and Rôças (2008), AP is caused by bacterial populations within the root canal that should be eliminated or at least reduced to levels that allow periapical healing. Metzger et  al. (2009) determined that rotary file instrumentation left up to 60% of canal walls unaffected. Complex canal anatomy with compound curves, dilacerations, and other morphological variations are difficult to assess with two-dimensional radiographs, especially if the root curves in a direction perpendicular to the plane of the detector. Cunningham and Senia (1992) showed that 100% of 100 mandibular first and second molars examined had curvatures in both a buccolingual and mesiodistal direction with #8K files inserted. To better understand the extent of root curvatures, Estrela, Bueno, Sousa-Neto, et al. (2008) used CBCT imaging to plot the loci of three mathematical points within a root using specialized software. Understanding the severity of the canal curvatures allows for better treatment planning strategies, which may reduce the chances of instrument fracture and canal transportations (Lopes et al., 2008). C. Missed/accessory canals High-resolution CBCT images improve the identification and localization of accessory root canals over conventional radiography, so the precise location and the morphology can be understood (Figure  10.11; Cohenca et  al., 2007). Use of the operating microscope and CBCT imaging has been shown to be an important aid in the visualization of root canal orifices. In an investigation by Baratto Filho et  al. (2009), three different methods were used to investigate the internal morphology of the  root canals in maxillary first molars: ex vivo, clinical, and CBCT. In the ex vivo evaluation of 140 extracted teeth using an operating microscope, a second mesiobuccal canal was located in 92.9% of the teeth, with 17.4% of these canals judged nonnegotiable. During the clinical assessment of 291 teeth in this dental school cohort study, 95.63% of teeth exhibited a second mesiobuccal canal, with 27.5% being nonnegotiable. CBCT showed 90.9% of the teeth had an additional mesiobuccal canal. They concluded that the maxillary first molars exhibit significant variation and that the operating microscope and CBCT were good methods to assess their internal anatomy. In a limited study by Matherne et al. (2008), 72 teeth were exposed with 2D digital radiographic detectors, and these images were evaluated by three endodontists. Comparing the evaluation with CBCT images analyzed by an oral and maxillofacial radiologist, the endodontists failed to identify one or more root canal systems in approximately 40% of the teeth. Human teeth generally conform to specific morphometric patterns, but there are known variants that have a predilection among different racial groups, with mandibular premolars being the most difficult to treat endodontically (Slowey, 1979). In these cases, CBCT evaluations can be invaluable. D. Additional roots Human teeth have been extensively analyzed. Wide variations have been found in the root and root morphology, with many of these variations being dependent upon ethnicity (Michetti et  al., 2010; Sert  and Bayirli, 2004) and gender (Serman and Hasselgren, 1992). Using CBCT examinations, Wang et  al. (2010) examined the root and canal morphology of 558 mandibular first permanent molars Figure 10.11 This LCBCT axial section demonstrates the identification of an untreated buccal canal of a maxillary right second bicuspid (yellow arrow) using a 76-micron voxel size. 226 Cone Beam Computed Tomography in a western Chinese population. Using Vertucci’s criteria, they found that 51.4% had four canals and 25.8% had a separate distolingual root. In a study of 744 Taiwanese patients, Tu et  al. (2009) evaluated 123 permanent mandibular first molars. They found that 33.33% of these teeth had an extra distolingual root that could affect the success of endodontic procedures. Compared to an earlier 2D study by Tu et al. (2007), only 21.1% and 26.9%, respectively, had three-rooted mandibular first molars. The apparent differences between their 2D and 3D findings could possibly be attributed to the failure to detect the third root by conventional radiographic techniques. 2. Differential diagnosis A. Contradictory or nonspecific clinical signs and symptoms Diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic orofacial pain can be challenging because of the complex interrelationships of different structures in the head and neck region as well as the absence of pathologic alterations to implicate the cause of the pain. One of these conditions has been termed “phantom tooth pain,” “atypical odontalgia,” or “atypical facial pain,” and more recently, “chronic continuous dentoalveolar pain (CCDAP)” by the Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group of the International Association for the Study of Pain (Green and Murray, 2011). The diagnostic hallmarks of this condition are (1) chronic, continuous pain (8 hours/day, ≥15 days per month or ≥3 months’ duration); (2) pain localized in the dentoalveolar region; and (3) pain not caused by another disorder. These patients suffer from neuropathic pain, defined as pain as a result of a lesion or disease that affects the actual nerves that convey touch, pressure, pain, and temperature information to the brain (Figure 10.12; Treede et al., 2008). The pain is often reported after dental treatment, is considered not to be of questionable odontogenic origin, and may affect these patients’ psychological well-being and quality of life (List et al., 2007). Figure 10.12 This 60-year-old female patient presented with a history of longstanding chronic discomfort in the area of the maxillary left first molar, exacerbated when her cheek touched her tooth, after a crown cementation procedure. Three subsequent crowns were placed by three different dentists to attempt to alleviate her symptoms. Finally, endodontic treatment was performed by others. No change in her symptoms was obtained. This author evaluated the patient and all objective tests were normal. A PA radiograph (A) was exposed and an anesthetic test with topical xylocaine applied in the vestibule greatly diminished her symptoms for 15 minutes, consistent with a diagnosis of peripherally mediated neuropathic pain. An LCBCT was then exposed to assess the teeth and supporting structures in the region. The scan volume was normal except for a periradicular radiolucency centered on the apex of the mesiobuccal root, shown in a corrected sagittal view (B) associated with a missed mb2 canal, shown on the corrected axial view (C), consistent with a periapical periodontitis or radicular cyst. The patient was referred to an oral pain specialist for consultation. A diagnosis of neuropathic pain, left maxilla, was confirmed. The treatment plan consisted of medical treatment of the neuropathic pain with subsequent treatment of the periapical lesion, which was not contributing to her symptoms. Instead of starting with a tricyclic, which is standard treatment, she opted for topical medications, ketamine, ketoprofen, and amitriptyline. Her symptoms have improved and she has since been changed to topically applied ketamine, gabapentin, and clonidine. Successful endodontic retreatment was then performed, but only the application of the topical medication continues to provide relief. (A) (B) (C) Endodontics Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 227 A high degree of specialization in dental medicine and taxonomic difficulties and uncertainties also can lead to errors. The best results may only be  realized with an interdisciplinary approach to  treatment (Rechenberg et  al., 2011; Woda and Pionchon, 1999) including tomographic imaging. Difficulty in visualizing pathologic features using planar radiographic imaging has been supported by many studies. The use of CBCT is helpful in many of these cases, where periradicular radiolucency has not affected the cortical bone, or areas that do not show discontinuity of the periodontal membrane because of the superimposition of structures. The majority of patients with CCDAP had no pathologic findings. It has been postulated that injuries to nerves after restorative or endodontic treatment can precipitate deafferentation of peripheral sensory neurons in the trigeminal nerve, leading to this pain condition. Sometimes a “neuroma” develops, allowing nerve impulses to fire off spontaneously in cases where all of the known noxious stimuli have been removed or have healed. The trigeminal ganglion and the trigeminal subnucleus caudalis can also become activated. Persistent pain is experienced by these patients without any identifiable causation, mimicking a toothache when in fact this is a manifestation of referred pain which involves neoplastic changes in the brain (Sessle et  al., 2008; Greene, 2009). There is a great deal of overlap between the nociceptive pain symptoms of pulpitis, symptomatic AP, and CCDAP. These pain conditions are difficult to distinguish from one another and often rely on radiographic findings. CCDAP is a diagnosis by exclusion and requires the taking of a careful history, comprehensive examination, and planar and tomographic radiography. CBCT is an invaluable resource for definitively ruling out radiographic evidence of jaw lesions in these cases, where planar imaging may suffer from superimposition error. In a study reported by Pigg et  al. (2011), 25 patients were evaluated with conventional radiography and CBCT. Of these cases, 20 patients presented with CCDAP of more than 6 months’ duration after orthograde or surgical endodontic treatment, and 5 patients had symptomatic AP. The investigators concluded that CBCT improved the reliability of radiographic assessments, with 60% of patients with CCDAP showing no bony lesions detected with either conventional or CBCT examinations. In addition, CBCT showed 17% more periapical rarefactions than with conventional radiography. Nonodontogenic pain can be caused by many other conditions; a partial list includes periodontalgia, myofascial pain, myalgia, TMJ, neurovascular pain, herpes zoster, maxillary sinusitis, pain of psychogenic origin, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, temporal arteritis, neuralgias (e.g., peripheral and central), sialolithiasis, and neoplastic diseases. Planar and especially CBCT imaging modalities can be extremely useful in ruling out odontogenic causation. B. Poorly localized symptoms associated with an untreated or previously endodontically treated tooth with no evidence of pathosis Early diagnosis and management of patients with poorly localized or previously treated endodontic lesions in the absence of radiographic pathosis is  necessary to alleviate nonspecific pain. Patient encounters should begin with a thorough review of the medical and dental history, chief complaint, and physical and radiographic examination. Diagnosis is frequently accomplished with adherence to basic principles of endodontic testing (Hyman and Cohen, 1984). A recent study by Newton et al. (2009) evaluated the value of all testing and imaging parameters used during endodontic diagnosis. Measuring the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of each method, they showed that while imaging was the most commonly used diagnostic procedure, interpretation of periradicular changes were considered unreliable. Since volumetric assessments of teeth and supporting structures have been shown to be useful even when conventional imaging is normal, the value of this technology cannot be underestimated. C. Cases where anatomic superimposition of roots or areas of the maxillofacial skeleton hinders the performance of task-specific procedures The identification of anatomic structures and the pathologic alterations associated with endodontic disease are an important benefit of using volumetric 228 Cone Beam Computed Tomography imaging (Estrela, Bueno, Sousa-Neto, et al., 2008). CBCT has been shown by Low et  al. (2008) to be  significantly more sensitive in detecting periapical lesions that extend into the maxillary sinus when compared to periapical and panoramic imaging. Using two examiners to evaluate 156 roots of maxillary posterior teeth that were referred for possible apical surgery, the CBCT images showed 34% more lesions compared to conventional periapical radiography. They concluded that periapical lesions were the most difficult to assess when associated with maxillary second molars and roots closest to the maxillary sinus. Especially useful when assessing multirooted teeth and teeth in the maxillary posterior, CBCT leads to a better understanding of the true nature of dentoalveolar pathoses, such as periapical disease, the location of fractures, and the characterization of resorptive lesions (Patel, 2009). Estrela, Bueno, Leles, et al. (2008) found that in a population of more than 1,500 teeth with endodontic disease, the prevalence of this pathosis visible on conventional radiographs was only 17%, with panoramic radiographs showing 35% and CBCT imaging showing 63%, suggesting that tomographic imaging is especially useful in the visualization of periradicular rarefactions and their relationship to individual roots. Meaningful assessments of endodontic disease and associated comorbidities using planar imaging are difficult in the area of the maxillary sinus. The maxillary sinus is a pyramid-shaped area. It is the largest of the paranasal sinuses and the most likely to be affected by odontogenic pathoses. The floor of the maxillary sinus is formed by the alveolar process of the maxilla and is usually level with the floor of the nose. The proximity of the maxillary posterior teeth causes maxillary sinusitis in approximately 10% to 12% of all cases of sinusitis (Malokey and Doku, 1968). Misdiagnosis of maxillary sinusitis caused by odontogenic disease is well known, the basis of which is thought to be related to the innervation provided to the mucus membranes by the postganglionic parasympathetic nerve originating from the greater petrosal nerve (a branch of the facial nerve) and its proximity to the superior alveolar (anterior, middle, and posterior) nerves, branches of the maxillary nerve (Cymerman et al., 2011; Hassan et al., 2009; Yuan et al., 2009). D. Nonodontogenic and odontogenic lesions The use of CBCT for the assessment of nonodontogenic lesions is an extensive area of interest. There are many pathologic alterations that appear in the proximity of the teeth that require differentiation from endodontic pathoses in order to reach an accurate diagnosis and proper treatment plan. The differential diagnosis depends on a careful history and examination that must include pulp vitality testing as well as periodontal and radiographic evaluations. Careful analysis is necessary to distinguish endodontic conditions from nonodontogenic pathoses. It requires a thorough understanding of the pathogenesis of diseases that affect the oral cavity and a vigilant radiographic interpretation of the often confusing conditions listed below. Nonodontogenic • Cysts, nonodontogenic: aneurysmal bone cyst, nasopalatine duct cyst, nasolabial cyst, simple bone cyst (traumatic) • Fibro-osseous lesions: periapical cemental dysplasia, florid cemento-osseous dysplasia, cemento-ossifying fibroma, fibrous dysplasia • Neoplasm, benign, nonodontogenic: central hemangioma, osteoid osteoma, osteoblastoma, osteoma, nerve sheath tumor, neurofibromatosis type I, desmoplastic fibroma • Neoplasm, malignant, nonodontogenic: metastasis, osteosarcoma chondrosarcoma, primary intraosseous carcinoma, central mucoepidermoid carcinoma, Burkitt lymphoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, multiple myeloma, Ewing sarcoma, leukemia • Tumorlike lesions: central giant cell granuloma, Langerhans histiocytosis Odontogenic • Cysts: dentigerous cyst, lateral periodontal cyst, residual cyst, buccal bifurcation cyst • Neoplasm, benign: odontoma, adenomatoid odontogenic tumor, ameloblastoma, ameloblastic fibroma, ameloblastic fibro-odontoma, calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor, calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor, cementoblastoma, Endodontics Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 229 odontogenic myxoma, central odontogenic fibroma, keratocystic odontogenic tumor, basal cell nevus syndrome • Neoplasm, malignant: malignant ameloblastoma, ameloblastic carcinoma The assessment and possible treatment of odontogenic and nonodontogenic radiolucent lesions of the teeth and supporting structures often require different management strategies. Endodontic treatment or retreatment depends on the accurate assessment of periapical radiographs. For example, the superimposition of the incisive foramen or a nasopalatine duct cyst can lead to unnecessary or delayed treatment, since they may simulate periapical pathosis. Confounding the difficulty in accurate assessment of the nasopalatine region is the substantial variation of the nasopalatine duct and its associated foramina. When 2D and 2D/3D observational strategies were compared by Mraiwa et al. (2004), interpretation of the canal morphology was significantly different, and there was important variation in morphology and dimensions. Endodontic assessment of the maxillary central incisors using only conventional radiography is compounded by the projection of the upper openings of the incisive canal onto the apices of the maxillary central incisors. Most incisive canals have two foramina superiorly and exit in one foramen inferiorly (Song et al., 2009). Cases of up to six foramina, variously called the foramina of Scarpa and Stensen (Langland et  al., 2002), have been described, leading to superimposition error especially in cases resulting from a low nasal fossa and high angulation (Sicher, 1962). The nasopalatine duct cyst (NPDC), when present, is in close association with the apices of the maxillary central incisors, leading to difficulty in establishing an accurate diagnosis with conventional imaging alone, especially when the central incisors have been endodontically treated or a preoperative endodontic diagnosis is unavailable. NPDC, the most common nonodontogenic cyst, is a unilocular, rounded corticated lucent lesion in the midline maxilla arising from the spontaneous proliferation of epithelial remnants of the nasopalatine duct. It is usually an asymptomatic incidental finding but can cause pain and swelling. NPDC must be differentiated from a large nasopalatine foramen, AP or radicular cyst arising from a tooth with a necrotic pulp, residual cyst, central giant cell  granuloma, keratocystic odontogenic tumor, and dentigerous cyst to affect proper treatment (Faitaroni et al., 2011). E. Endodontic assessment of nonhealed cases AP results from inflammation of periapical alveolar bone and is opposed by the host’s attempt to prevent enlargement. After endodontic treatment, success is measured by the absence of symptoms, normal objective tests, and periapical radiographic confirmation of healing. Most teeth with AP demonstrate healing after orthograde endodontic treatment, but AP may persist after treatment, appear after treatment, or reemerge after having healed (Vieira et al., 2011). Measuring endodontic healing using 2D radiographic assessments has been shown to be inconsistent (Figure  10.13; Goldman et  al., 1974; Zakariasen et al., 1984), even when two PAs are exposed from different angles (Soğur et  al., 2012). Wound healing after nonsurgical and surgical endodontic therapy is similar, but postsurgical healing is faster (Kvist and Reit, 1991). In nonsurgical endodontic therapy, macrophages remove bacteria, necrotic cells, and tissue debris through biologic processes, whereas surgical debridement removes these inflammatory irritants during the operative procedure (Lin et  al., 1996). Ng et al. (2007) found that only 57% of outcome studies evaluated showed both clinical and radiographic healing. The remaining 43% of the reports were measured by radiographic examination alone. According to M.K. Wu et al. (2009), in many of these studies, published as recently as 2008, no limitations of periapical radiography were disclosed. CBCT and histologic (Brynolf, 1967) assessments of these findings have called this methodology into question. Teeth in different anatomical positions may have variations in cortical bone thickness. In addition, the location of the root apex of certain teeth may vary as to its distance to the junction of the cancellous and cortical bone, resulting in variations in lesion visibility as detected in conventional radiography (Figure  10.14). To some extent, this may invalidate some of the objective findings as seen in conventional periapical radiography as a consistent means of measuring AP. Paula-Silva 230 Cone Beam Computed Tomography et al. (2009) used histological evaluation as the criterion standard to evaluate the predictive value of CBCT scans for diagnosing AP. They found that whenever a histologic lesion was detected by either periapical or CBCT imaging, inflammation was present. Periapical radiography detected AP in 71% of roots, CBCT detected AP in 84% of roots, and histologic examination detected AP in 93% of roots. Progression and regression of AP can be difficult to interpret. Healing is defined as the complete cessation of symptoms clinically and elimination of  any radiographic radiolucency. The presence of an “apical scar” is rare in cases of orthograde endodontic treatment but is more common in cases after surgery, especially in the maxillary anterior region (Molven et al., 1987). It has also been seen that teeth showing a condensing osteitis or sclerotic bone before endodontic treatment will return to a  normal bone appearance or not progress after endodontic treatment (Eliasson et al., 1984). F. Vertical root fracture Most root fracture cases fall into two main categories, vertical root fractures usually associated with chronic trauma caused by normal function, and horizontal root fractures usually associated with acute trauma Figure 10.13 This 32-year-old female patient presented for evaluation and possible treatment 6 weeks after trauma to her maxillary left central incisor. The tooth was sensitive to percussion and palpation at the periapical area, was nonresponsive to thermal tests, and showed significant mobility. The periodontal findings were normal and the patient’s medical history was noncontributory. The initial PA radiograph (A, portion of PA), showed a periapical periodontitis (yellow arrow) consistent with a periapical abscess. An LCBCT (B) was exposed to rule out a root and/or alveolar fracture possibly associated with the acute trauma suffered. It showed an approximately 6-mm diameter, well-defined periapical radiolucency with noncorticated border, with the lesion centered over the apex, consistent with a periapical abscess or radicular cyst. The maxillary left central incisor was endodontically treated and a postobturation PA radiograph was exposed. (C) On check-up examination after 3 months, the patient complained of sensitivity to chewing and touch associated with the same tooth. It was sensitive to percussion and bite stick, and was in hyper-occlusion. (A) (B) 6.2 mm 6.7 mm (C) Endodontics Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 231 (D) (E) 5.8 mm 4.9 mm (F) 5.1 mm 4.5 mm Figure 10.13 (Continued) A PA radiograph was exposed (D, portion of PA), showing a possible increase in lesion size (yellow arrow). An LCBCT (E, F) was then exposed, showing a reduction of the lesion size, consistent with healing. Another LCBCT was exposed at a 6-month check-up appointment (F), showing a lesion approximately 4.5–5mm in diameter, consistent with healing. Figure 10.14 Furcal, periapical, and comorbid lesions in the maxillary sinus are often difficult or impossible to visualize with PA radiography alone. In this endodontically treated maxillary right second molar, the PA image shows a short obturation in the mesial root along with a widened periodontal membrane at the terminus of the palatal root (A). This sagittal section (B) through the same region clearly shows the periradicular periodontitis affecting the furcal and periapical areas (yellow arrows), as well as a moderate mucositis possibly associated with this periradicular lesion (green arrow). (A) (B) 232 Cone Beam Computed Tomography to anterior teeth, most often in children. Vertical root fractures (VRF) involve the dentin, cementum, and pulp (Malhotra et al., 2011) and have an enormous impact on treatment outcome (Figure 10.15). There have been a number of systematic reviews on the detection of vertical root fractures using CBCT, seven of which were laboratory studies using extracted teeth. These studies showed a significantly higher diagnostic accuracy with CBCT when compared with PA radiography. These results were tempered by lower sensitivity and specificity related to lower resolution scans and artifact generated by the presence of root fillings and posts. Patients may present with pain and swelling, radiographic evidence of a periapical and lateral radiolucency, or the presence of a deep isolated periodontal defect in an area of otherwise normal findings. Unfortunately, diagnosis of root fracture is challenging because the signs and symptoms are not pathognomonic. The criterion standard is visualization of the fracture, either directly or with transillumination and/or staining with dye and lighted magnification (Edlund et al., 2011). But the diagnosis of VRF can present significant challenges because there is often a lack of specific signs, symptoms, or radiographic findings. VRFs have the highest prevalence in the 40–60-year-old age group, and the teeth most often affected are mandibular molars and maxillary premolars (Cohen et al., 2006). The usefulness of LCBCT to assess root fractures has been detailed by multiple reports. A search of the current literature by Tsesis et al. (2010) showed that there is very little evidence-based data concerning the diagnostic accuracy of clinical or radiographic studies in endodontically treated teeth. They concluded that the determination of a VRF is more of a “prediction” than an absolute diagnosis. VRFs can be incomplete or complete and extend through the long axis of the tooth toward the apex. Vertical root fractures comprise between 2% and 5% of crown/root fractures, can affect the root at any level, and are usually found in patients older than 40 years (Cohen et  al., 2003). Mesiodistal fractures are rarely visualized with 2D radiographs because the X-ray beam must be within 4 degrees of the fracture plane to allow detection (Rud and Omnell, 1970). Hassan et  al. (2009) reported that the accuracy of detecting VRFs was higher for CBCT than PAs, and that the reconstructed axial view was the most accurate (Kajan and Taromsari, 2012). In this investigation, 80 teeth were endodontically prepared and divided into artificially fractured and unfractured groups; each group was further divided into root-filled teeth and non-rootfilled teeth. Four observers found that the sensitivity and specificity for VRF was 79.4% and 92.5% for CBCT and 37.1% and 95% for conventional radiography, respectively. The specificity of CBCT was reduced by the presence of endodontic filling, but accuracy was not reduced. The sensitivity and accuracy of PAs were reduced by  the presence of  root canal filling. In a 5-year follow-up study Figure 10.15 This symptomatic, vertically fractured mandibular left second bicuspid did not show a fracture on the PA radiograph (A), nor transillumination or staining of the exposed portion of the root, and probed normally upon periodontal examination. There was a condensing osteitis at the periapex that measured approximately 6mm. LCBCT imaging, sagittal view, showed a vertical radiolucency extending from the crest of the alveolus to the junction of the middle and apical third of the root (B), and a periradicular periodontitis (C, green arrow) bisected by the vertical fracture (yellow arrow). (A) (B) (C) Endodontics Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 233 by  Chen et  al. (2008), 32.1% of nonsurgically endodontically treated teeth that were extracted suffered from vertical root fracture. In a study that examined 46,000 insurance claims, Fennis et  al. (2002) showed that endodontically treated teeth had a higher incidence of VRF than nontreated teeth. Tang et al. (2010) suggested that endodontically treated teeth may undergo an increased incidence of VFR because of loss of tooth structure, stresses induced by endodontic and restorative procedures, access preparation, instrumentation and obturation of the root canal, post space preparation, and abutment selection. In a recent study by Mireku et al. (2010), 45 single-rooted teeth were endodontically treated, prepared for posts, and subjected to cyclic loading until fracture. They concluded that VRFs were most likely to occur in  teeth with thin dentin and in teeth of older patients. CBCT has also been found to improve the diagnostic accuracy of detecting transverse or horizontal fractures. LFOV with higher resolution have been shown to provide higher sensitivity and specificity when endodontic lesions are assessed, which may translate to better assessments of VRFs (Edlund et  al., 2011; Liang et al., 2010). Many of the studies performed to date using CBCT imaging have relied on resolutions greater than 0.20mm (200 microns) voxel size, which is more than two times larger than the lowest voxel size available today, 0.076mm (76 microns). Voxel size is not the sole determinant  of the resolving power of a scan, because the signal-to-noise ratio, bit depth, and other complex issues are also important factors. In a study authored by Özer (2011), 30 teeth with VRF and 30  teeth without VRF were examined using several voxel sizes to compare the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT scans with different voxel resolutions. Of the 0.125, 0.20, 0.30, and 0.40mm voxel sizes, the 0.20mm voxel size was deemed the best. The article does not specify the smallest native voxel size of the CBCT unit, leading to the possibility that 0.125mm voxel size or smaller could provide for the best detection of VRFs. According to Hassan et al. (2010), the detection of VRFs using CBCT was better with the smaller voxel sizes studied. In cases of suspected VRF, Wenzel et al. (2009) compared a photostimulable storage phosphor plate system with CBCT and found that CBCT was more accurate, leading to the recommendation that CBCT scans be used when VRFs cannot be visualized but are suspected. 3. Intra- or postoperative assessment of complications Instrument separation can occur at any stage of endodontic treatment, and in any canal location. In a study of 2,654 teeth with 6,154 canals treated at the Nanjing Medical University in Jiangsu, China, J. Wu et  al. (2011) reported that the overall incidence of instrument separation was 1.1%, with molars having the highest incidence. The ability to triangulate and remove the separated instrument can sometimes depend on visualization of the position of the instrument, the likelihood of removal, and whether the instrument poses an impediment to healing or not. When a separated instrument that is lodged in the apical third of a root canal, the chances of retrieval are the lowest (Gencoglu and Helvacioglu, 2009), and assessment of canals that anastomose at the apical terminus may be adequately sealed by a treatment of the joining canal. CBCT has been used by this author to assess the location of separated instruments in cases referred for revision treatment (Figure  10.16), and to provide more reliable assessment of treatment options. A. Calcified canal identification The number of elderly patients in the U.S. population is rising, with 10,000 Americans reaching the age of 65 every day until 2030. This aging cohort of Americans makes up 26% of the total U.S. population (Pew Research Center, 2010) and will continue to want to preserve their dentition (Qualtrough and Mannocci, 2011). Geriatric patients will present challenges for dental clinicians as biologic and anatomic conditions are considered, including narrower canals (Goodis et  al., 2001). Assessment and treatment of calcified canals can be assisted by the use of CBCT. Perioperatively, the location of calcified canals can be more precisely located with CBCT (Scarfe et  al., 2009) and may help correct an off-course access to prevent root perforation. All multiplanar views may be helpful in the process of triangulation, with the application of a radiodense 234 Cone Beam Computed Tomography instrument or gutta percha cone used as an indicator to help triangulate. B. Localization of perforations Iatrogenic root perforations may be caused by a post or fractured instrument, and are often difficult to localize with conventional imaging. While PAs do not provide information concerning the buccolingual dimension, LCBCT allows the three-dimensional examination of the perforation (Young, 2007; Tsurumachi and Honda, 2007). Streaking, flare, and cupping artifacts resulting from root canal obturation and restorative materials, such as gutta percha, posts, and perforative repair materials, present challenges to the interpretation of root integrity. An  approach advocated by Bueno et  al. (2011) suggested that map-reading strategy of viewing sequential axial slices reduces the beam hardening effect. Newer root canal obturation materials may present lower streaking, flare, and cupping artifacts by virtue of a lower radiopacity profile. 4. Dentoalveolar trauma Facial trauma results in dental injuries in approximately 48% of all traumatic injuries, with the male-to-female ratio associated with work-related injuries being 10:1 and violence being 8:1, respectively. Epidemiologic data suggests that facial trauma is common, with the dentition affected in 57.8% in household and play accidents, 50.5% in sports accidents, 38.6% in work-related accidents, 35.8% in acts of violence, 34.2% in traffic accidents, and 31% unspecified (Gassner et al., 1999). Injuries to the orofacial complex can cause dental trauma resulting in the following injuries to the primary and permanent dentition: (1) infraction; (2) crown fracture, uncomplicated and complicated; (3) crown/root fracture; (4) root fracture; (5) concussion; (6) subluxation; (7) lateral luxation; (8) intrusion; (9) extrusion; and (10) avulsion. The extent of injury requires a systematic approach that evaluates the teeth, periodontium, and associated structures (Figure 10.17; Andreasen and Andreasen, 2000). A study by Wang et al. (2011) showed that the sensitivity and specificity of root fractures for PA radiography was 26.3% and 100%, respectively, whereas CBCT was 89.5% and 97.5%, respectively. CBCT images of root-filled teeth showed lower sensitivity and unchanged specificity, whereas 2D  images showed the same sensitivity and specificity. Triangulating the exact position of teeth displaced by dental trauma and the extent of root and alveolar fractures, if any, is difficult to accomplish using 2D imaging modalities alone (Figure 10.18). Additional complications include damage to other Figure 10.16 This 62-year-old female patient was referred for endodontic revision of the mandibular left lateral incisor after a periradicular lesion and separated instrument were revealed on a routine PA radiograph (A). An LCBCT was exposed, and the separated instrument (green arrow) was localized at the lingual aspect of the ribbon-shaped canal on the axial view (B). A bypass strategy (yellow arrow) to engage and elevate the separated instrument was successfully adopted, followed by routine biomechanical preparation and obturation. A PA was then exposed to verify the instrument removal (C) and assess endodontic treatment (D). (A) (B) (C) (D) Endodontics Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 235 perioral structures, such as the maxillary sinuses and nasal floor. 5. Resorption Root resorption (RR) results in the loss of hard tissues from the action of multinucleated giant cells on teeth. In the primary dentition, RR is a normal physiologic process, except where resorption is premature, allowing the secondary dentition to erupt and enter function. Permanent teeth undergo RR in response to inflammation, but the exact mechanism remains unclear. RR is caused by orthodontic treatment, trauma, AP, neoplasia, or other factors that are considered a pathologic occurrence (Estrela et al., 2009; Cohenca et  al., 2007). Types of root resorption are repair-related (surface), ankylosis-related (osseous replacement), infection-related (inflammatory), and extracanal invasive cervical resorption. Each of these forms of RR has a poor prognosis if the causative lesion is not treated (Patel et al., 2009). Internal root resorption (IRR) is a relatively rare occurrence, characterized by structural changes of Figure 10.17 This 22 year old patient (A) was referred for evaluation and possible treatment nine months after the patient suffered horizontal root fractures to the maxillary lateral and central incisors as a result of a bicycle accident, shown in this accompanying film-based PA radiograph (B). A polyethylene splint was placed immediately after the accident, and the teeth remained asymptomatic, responded normally to pulp vitality testing, and the crowns remained normal in color. There is minimal mobility and normal periodontal probing. Each of the root-fractured teeth can be accurately monitored for future changes as a result of LCBCT assessment (C, cropped reconstructed view; D, the maxillary right lateral incisor; E, the maxillary right central incisor; F, the maxillary left central incisor; and G, the maxillary left lateral incisor). (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) 236 Cone Beam Computed Tomography the tooth that appear as a widening of the root canal. IRR is usually asymptomatic and is often detected on routine periapical and panoramic radiographs (L. Levin and Trope, 2002; Patel and Dawood, 2007). The pulp is nonvital in the area where the resorption is inactive and is vital or partially vital in the areas where the resorption is continuing, apical to the resorptive lesion. A uniform radiolucent enlargement of the pulp canal will include some part of the canal space, cause extensive destruction of the dentin, and will be filled with granulation tissue alone or in combination with mineralized tissues (Lyroudia et al., 2002). External root resorption (ERR) results from the inflammatory response to mechanical damage to the attachment of a tooth, and is always associated with bony resorption (Figure  10.19). Differentiation between IRR and ERR is challenging, even with multiple changes in X-ray angulation. ERR can be classified as surface resorption, external inflammatory resorption, external replacement resorption, external cervical resorption, and transient apical breakdown (Patel and Ford, 2007). Difficult to view with conventional radiography, the early stages of ERR will sometimes be visible on the mesial and distal surfaces of roots, but ERR is unlikely to be visualized when it affects only the buccal, palatal, or lingual surfaces of the root (Sigurdsson et  al., 2011). According to a study by Estrela et al. (2009), 48 periapical radiographs and CBCT scans were exposed on 40 patients. IRR was detected in 68.8% of periapical radiographs while CBCT scans showed 100% of the lesions. Conventional radiographs were only able to detect lesions between 1mm and 4mm in 52.1% of the images, whereas 95.8% of the lesions were detectable with CBCT. They concluded that using CBCT technology allowed more accurate and  earlier detection of IRR. This finding was in agreement with other studies (Cohenca et al., 2007; Liedke et al., 2009) and demonstrates the value of tomographic analysis. In a study by Kim et  al. (2003), the extent and location of the IRR was accurately reproduced with the fabrication of a rapid prototyping tooth model. Voxel size is also an important factor that affects detection of RR. In a study by Liedke et al. (2009) different voxel resolutions were evaluated to detect simulated RR. The results showed that the smaller Figure 10.18 This patient was referred for evaluation and possible treatment of a lateral luxation injury to the maxillary left and right central incisors and maxillary left lateral incisor. A PA radiograph (A) was exposed, showing a periapical rarefaction and a Class II crown fracture at the maxillary left central incisor. There were Class II crown fractures on the maxillary right and left lateral incisors with normal responses to pulp testing. The maxillary left central incisor showed significant mobility consistent with a root and/or alveolar fracture. An LCBCT was exposed, showing labial displacement and widened periodontal membrane space of the maxillary left central incisor in the corrected sagittal (B) and axial views (C), consistent with a traumatic fracture of the alveolus in this region. There was a vertical alveolar fracture at the periapex (yellow arrow) through the facial cortical plate and nutrient channel leading to the root canal. The axial view confirms the displacement to the facial. (Courtesy, Dr. Anastasia Mischenko, Chevy Chase, MD) (A) (B) (C) Endodontics Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 237 voxel resolutions were better than the larger voxel resolutions. While voxel size is an important consideration, the signal-to-noise ratio of different detectors and the processing algorithms also affect detection probability. While many in vitro studies on the ability of CBCT to detect RR have been performed, additional evaluations that use in vivo methodology will add to our knowledge. 6. Presurgical case planning The introduction of CBCT imaging has greatly improved our understanding of the relationships of teeth, their associated pathoses, and important anatomic features such as the antra, mandibular canal, mental foramen, and lingual artery have a significant impact on surgical treatment planning. In surgical case assessments, the interpretation of planar images are limited by complex background patterns so often present in the maxillofacial skeleton. When the detection of periradicular lesions with  PA radiography was compared with CBCT imaging, Lofthag-Hansen et  al. (2007) found 38% more lesions, even after PAs were exposed at two different angles. Low et  al. (2008) and Bornstein et  al. (2011) further highlighted the limitations of PA imaging by finding that 34% and 25.9%, respectively, of periradicular lesions were only detected Figure 10.19 Extracanal cervical resorption resulted in a perforative defect at the facial aspect of this maxillary right central incisor (A). Corrected sagittal views of the palatal and facial lesions showing the sparing of the peritubular dentin are apparent in these images (B, C). A semitransparent reconstructed view shows the true extent of the lesion (D). (A) (B) (C) (D) 238 Cone Beam Computed Tomography with CBCT imaging. When PAs of periradicular lesions were compared to sagittal and coronal CBCT images, the PAs were statistically smaller than their CBCT counterparts, causing an underestimation of the true size of the defects. Surgery requires precise treatment planning and  safe operative procedures, especially when significant anatomical structures are at risk. Injury to the inferior alveolar nerve resulting from surgical complications such as mechanical injury including compression, stretching, laceration, and partial or total resection is not rare (Figure 10.20). Wesson and Gale (2003) showed that between 20% and 21% of patients suffered temporary neuropathies of the lower lip after endodontic surgery in the vicinity of the inferior alveolar nerve, with permanent issues occurring in 1% of cases. The inability to detect the inferior alveolar canal with PA and panoramic radiography alone has been reported in numerous studies. Velvart et  al. (2001) and Bornstein et  al. (2011) showed that the  inferior alveolar nerve canal could only be identified in 62.0% of 50 cases and 35.3% of 68 cases assessed with PA radiography, respectively. Angelopoulos et  al. (2008) looked at 40 cases, in each comparing CBCT reformatted panoramic, direct digital panoramic, and storage phosphor panoramic radiographs. CBCT reformatted panoramic images were superior to the other two modalities and were free from magnification and superimposition error. Understanding the relationship between the apex of the mandibular posterior teeth and the roof of the inferior alveolar nerve is complicated by the fact that the nerve canal, lined by cribiform bone, is only visible in 64.7% of PA radiographs. Access to the apices of mandibular molars is challenging because the mean cortical bone thickness is 1.7mm and the mean access distance from the surface of the buccal plate to the apices of the teeth is 5.3mm (Borstein et al., 2011). The relationship of teeth, their associated pathoses, and important anatomic features such as the maxillary sinus, mandibular canal, and mental foramen have significant impact on surgical treatment planning. CBCT images provide unmatched visualization of these complex structures, so that each procedure can be planned appropriately. CBCT is also a great asset for determining the extent of postoperative healing. Because CBCT voxels are isotropic, image data can be sectioned nonorthogonally, allowing multiplanar reformations that allow the clinician to visualize tissue boundaries and accurately assess discontinuities in the periodontal membrane without superimposition. Christiansen et  al. (2009) evaluated 58 teeth one week and one year after apical surgery for assessing healing in root-filled teeth. They found that more periapical bone defects were detected after one year on CBCT images than on periapical radiographs. While they did not attempt to measure how this information would impact success or  failure, it was clear that CBCT imaging was superior to conventional imaging for the presence of AP. Surgical procedures, especially on posterior teeth, are dependent on a thorough preparation in order to determine the thickness of the cortical and cancellous bone, the location of the roots within the bone, and the root morphology and inclination (Patel et al., 2007). Identifying and excluding cases with an unfavorable prognosis can reduce the risk for iatrogenic injury. Anterior teeth are not exempt from consideration of their proximity to important anatomic structures. Taschieri et  al. (2011) evaluated 57 maxillary central and lateral incisors with CBCT imaging and found that the average central incisor measured 4.71 ± 1.26mm from the anterior wall of the nasopalatine duct at a level of 4mm from the apex. The exact location of the palatal roots of the maxillary first and second molars are also difficult to visualize in the buccopalatal direction with periapical radiographs alone. An examination of the palatal roots of 100 extracted maxillary first and second permanent molars showed that 85% curved more than 10 degrees (Bone and Moule, 1986). The proximity of the root apices to the nasal floor and the inferior border of the maxillary sinus depth and the location of the palatal vault also play a role in determining surgical access. The surgical management of overextensions of obturation materials and repair of perforating defects is another area where LCBCT can play an important adjunctive role (Shemesh et  al., 2011; Bhuva et al., 2011). The overextension of root canal obturation materials that results in damage to the inferior alveolar nerve or mental nerve is an infrequent complication of endodontic treatment. Injury may occur from mechanical impingement or Endodontics Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 239 chemical effects (Escoda-Francoli et al., 2007) and can be localized and in some cases removed by surgical intervention. In an early case report using CBCT, Tsuramachi and Honda (2007) described the triangulation of a tooth with a fractured instrument that extended into the maxillary sinus. Since obturation materials extending into the maxillary sinus can promote sinusitis (Rud and Rud, 1998), their judicious removal can prevent associated comorbidities. Figure 10.20 The superior wall of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) is located only 1.11mm from the radiographic apex of the distal root of the mandibular second molar. This proximity and the somewhat porous nature of the cribiform bone lining the canal can lead to impingement of the IAN due to inadvertent overextension of obturation material, as shown in this PA image (A) of a 58-year-old male patient who was referred for evaluation and possible treatment. The dental history included a transient parasthesia IAN, shown in these corrected sagittal (B), coronal (C) and axial (D) views. The errant material was localized with LCBCT imaging (yellow arrows). Subsequent extraction was accomplished due to a periradicular periodontitis that extended from the apex of the root on the lingual (green arrows). Localization of the errant material and subsequent treatment plan choices were elucidated by LCBCT. (A) (B) (C) (D) 240 Cone Beam Computed Tomography 7. Dental implant case planning Although a majority of endodontists limit their practice to endodontic treatment, a growing number are placing dental implants (<10%; Creasy et al., 2009). In a recent survey of practicing endodontists, 57.0% think that the scope of endodontic treatment should include implant placement (Potter et  al., 2009). LCBCT is useful for implant site assessment, when clinical examination, casts, and conventional radiographs are inadequate to determine ridge dimensions, bone quality, and location of anatomic structures such as the mental foramen, inferior alveolar nerve, incisive canal, maxillary sinus, and floor of the nasal cavity. The appropriate FOV and voxel size should be selected to limit patient dose and still provide the information needed. 8. Assessment of endodontic treatment outcomes Root canals systems are inherently complex. A systematic review (Ng et  al., 2008) of 63 outcome studies has shown that four main factors influence healing: (1) the presence or absence of preoperative periradicular periodontitis, (2) density of obturation, (3) apical extent of root canal filling, and (4) quality of coronal restoration. These studies were based on planar radiography, and suffer from superimposition error, where radiolucent lesions are covered by thick cortical bone or are confined within the cancellous bone. New studies using CBCT imaging to assess healing are now providing improved sensitivity when detecting periradicular lesions, especially when high resolution is available. It is generally accepted that CBCT provides improved sensitivity when detecting periradicular  lesions. In a study by Velvart et  al. (2001), 50  patients with persistent apical lesions were evaluated. There were 6 mandibular premolars and 44 mandibular molars, with a total of 80 roots. All 78 lesions diagnosed during surgery were also visible with the CBCT scans exposed, while PA images only showed 61 lesions. The mandibular canal could only be identified in 31 cases using PA radiography, whereas all mandibular canals were detected with CBCT. They concluded that CBCT provides additional beneficial information not available from PA radiography. What is success and how can CBCT help with decisions about treatment outcomes? While the terms success and failure or healed and nonhealed are commonly used to describe the end result of root canal treatment, these terms may be problematic. M.K. Wu et  al. (2011) describe a new terminology that includes effective and ineffective, where effective is defined as the absence of symptoms and complete or partial resolution of a periapical radiolucency at 1 year after treatment, or if no lucency was present, that the tooth remains asymptomatic at 1 year. If a periradicular lesion develops or enlarges and/or the signs or symptoms are present at 1 year postoperatively, revision should be recommended. Haalpasalo et al. (2011) suggests that a 1-year follow-up is too short to decide on the healing of some lesions. In a recent study by Christiansen et  al. (2009) comparing PA radiography with CBCT after apicectomy at 1 week and 12 months, the CBCT images were approximately 10% larger in coronal view than PA radiography, and CBCT showed more periradicular defects than PAs. While they did not draw conclusions on how this relates to success after root-end resection, improved visualization of the presence and size of lesions should help our guide our postoperative decisions. In a study by M.K. Wu et al. (2009) of previously published systematic reviews of endodontic healing, a high percentage of cases believed to be healed by PA radiography showed apical periodontitis when viewed with CBCT. The periapical index was focused on radiographic and histologic assessments of maxillary anterior teeth, which subjects the data to misinterpretation because of the variation in the position of the root apex to the cortex and the thickness of this bone. This study further implicates PA radiography as a useful but flawed tool to assess treatment outcomes and certainly speaks to the need to reevaluate long-term longitudinal studies. There are few case reports in the literature that have used limited field CBCT technology to assess the postoperative healing of endodontically treated teeth where 2D imaging has resulted in inconclusive findings. Liang et al. (2011) studied 74 patients with a total of 115 teeth (143 roots) that were endodontically treated and then followed up for 2 years. A multivariate regression analysis showed that CBCT detected periapical lesions more frequently (25.9% of roots) than with PA imaging (12.6% of roots). Additionally, CBCT analysis of obturation density, length of root Endodontics Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 241 canal filling, and treatment outcomes were different than the values determined with PA imaging. In a case study published by M. Levin and Mischenko (2010), three patients were evaluated with PA imaging followed by CBCT. In each case, the CBCT image clearly showed a reduction in the lesion size, and in the one case with an associated sinusitis, normal healing occurred. There is no question that CBCT is more sensitive that PA radiography in the detection of AP (Estrela, Bueno, Leles, et al., 2008). There are several reports of the potential correlation between AP and cardiovascular disease. While this research has been inconclusive, a recent prospective study by Cotti et  al. (2011) suggests that increased ADMA (asymmetrical dimethylarginine) levels and their relationship with poor endothelial flow reserve and increased IL-2 might suggest the presence of an early endothelial dysfunction in young adults with AP. There are other lesions that may affect systemic health, and patients with cardiac valvular prostheses and other conditions, total joint replacement, diabetes, and who are immunosuppressed because of cancer or rheumatoid arthritis may all be at greater risk of chronic periradicular lesions. Acknowledgment I wish to thank Ms. Angela Wang for her organizational assistance, and Drs. Barry Pass and Louis Berman for their help editing the manuscript. All of the PA images in this chapter were exposed with CS 6100 sensors and all of the CBCT images were exposed with CS 9000 3D units, manufactured by Carestream Dental, LLC, Atlanta, GA. (Disclosure: The author reports that he is a consultant to Carestream Dental, LLC). References Andreasen, J.O., and Andreasen, F.M. (2000). Essentials of traumatic injuries to the teeth, 2nd ed. Copenhagen, Denmark: Munksgaard and Mosby. Angelopoulos, C., Hechler, T.S., Parissis, N., et al. (2008). Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of pre-surgical dental implant assessment. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 66: 2130–5. Baratto Filho, F., Zaitter, S., Haragushiku, G.A., et  al. (2009). Analysis of the internal anatomy of maxillary first molars by using different methods. Journal of Endodontics, 35: 337–42. Barrett, J.F., and Keat, N. (2004). Artifacts in CT: Recognition and avoidance. Radiographics, 24(6): 1679–91. Barthel, C.R., Zimmer, S., and Trope, M. (2004). Relationship  of radiologic and histologic signs of inflammation in human root–filled teeth. Journal of Endodontics, 30: 75. Basaran, G., and Erkan, M. (2008). One of the rarest syndromes in dentistry: Gardner Syndrome. European Journal of Dentistry, 2: 208–12. Bauman, R., Scarfe, W., Clark, S., et  al. (2011). Ex vivo detection of mesa-buccal canals in maxillary molars using CBCT at four different isotropic voxel dimensions. International Endodontics Journal, 44(8): 752–8. Becconsall-Ryan, K., and Love, R.M. (2011). Range and  demographics of radiolucent jaw lesions in a New  Zealand population. Medical Imaging Radiation Oncology, 55(1): 43–51. Becconsall-Ryan, K., Tong, D., and Love, R.M. (2010). Radiolucent inflammatory jaw lesions: a twenty year  analysis. International Endodontic Journal, 43(10): 859–65. Bender, I.B., and Seltzer, S. (2003a). Roentgengraphic and direct observation of experimental lesions in bone: I. Journal of Endodontics, 29: 702–6. Bender, I.B., and Seltzer, S. (2003b). Roentgengraphic and direct observation of experimental lesions in bone: II. Journal of Endodontics, 29: 707–12. Bhaskar, S. (1966). Periapical lesions: Types, incidence and clinical features. Oral Surgery-Oral Pathology Conference No 17. Walter Reed Army Medical Centre. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology, 21: 657–71. Bhuva, B., Barnes, J.J., and Patel, S. (2011). The use of limited cone beam computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of a case of perforating internal root resorption. International Endodontic Journal, 44(8): 777–86. Epub 2011 Mar 4. Bishop, K., and Alani, A. (2008). Dens invaginatus. Part 1: classification, prevalence and aetiology. International Endodontics Journal, 41: 1123–36. Bone, J., and Moule, A.J. (1986). The nature of curvature of palatal canals in maxillary molar teeth. International Endodontic Journal, 19(4): 178–86. Bornstein, M., Lauber, R., Pedram, S., et  al. (2011). Comparison of periapical radiography and limited cone-beam computed tomography in mandibular molars for analysis of anatomical landmarks before apical surgery. Journal of Endodontics, 37: 151–7. Bouquot, J.E. (2010). Diagnostic oral pathology with computed tomography. In C.H. Kow and S. Richmond, 242 Cone Beam Computed Tomography eds., Three-Dimensional Imaging for Orthodontics and  Maxillofacial Surgery. Chichester, UK: WileyBlackwell. Branstetter, B.F., Weissman, J.L., and Kaplan, S.B. (1999). Imaging of a Stafne bone cavity: What MRI adds and why a new name is needed. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 20: 587–9. Brynolf, I. (1967). A histological and roentgenological study of periapical region of human upper incisors. Odontology Review, 18(suppl 11): 1–97. Bueno, M.R., Estrela, C., and Figueiredo, J.A. (2011). Map-reading strategy to diagnose root perforations near metallic intra-canal posts by using cone beam computed tomography. Journal of Endodontics, 37: 85–90. Carter, L., et al. (2008). AAOMR executive opinion statement on performing and interpreting diagnostic cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics, 106(4): 561–2. Chen, S.C., Chueh, L.H., Hsiao, C.K., et al. (2008). First untoward events and reasons for tooth extraction after  nonsurgical endodontic treatment in Taiwan. Journal of Endodontics, 34: 671–4. Christiansen, R., Kirkevang, L.L., Gotfredsen, E., et  al. (2009). Periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography for assessment of the periapical bone defect 1 week and 12 months after root-end resection. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 38(8): 531–6. Cohen, S., Blanco, L., and Berman, L. (2003). Vertical root fractures. Journal of the American Dental Association, 134: 434–41. Cohen, S., Berman, L.H., Blanco, L., et al. (2006). A demographic analysis of vertical root fractures. Journal of Endodontics, 32: 1160–3. Cohenca, N., Simon, J., Mathur, A., et al (2007). Clinical indications for digital imaging in dento-alveolar trauma. Part 2: Root resorption. Dental Traumatology, 23(2): 105–13. Correll, R.W., Jensen, J.L., and Rhyne, R.R. (1980). Lingual cortical mandibular defects: A radiographic incidence study. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology, 50: 287–91. Cotti, E., Dessi, C., Piras, A., et al. (2011). Association of endodontic infection with detection of an initial lesion to the cardiovascular system. Journal of Endodontics, 37(12): 1624–9. Cotton, T.P., Geisler, T.M., Holden, D.T., et  al. (2007). Endodontic applications of cone beam volumetric tomography. Journal of Endodontics, 33: 1121–32. Creasy, J.E., Mines, P., and Sweet, M. (2009). Surgical trends among endodontists: The results of a webbased survey. Journal of Endodontics, 35: 30–4. Cunningham, C.J., and Senia, E.S. (1992). A three dimensional study of canal curvatures in the mesial roots of  mandibular molars. Journal of Endodontics, 18: 294–300. Cymerman, J.J., Cymerman, D.H., and O’Dwyer, R.S. (2011). Evaluation of odontogenic maxillary sinusitis using cone beam computed tomography: Three case reports. Journal of Endodontics, 37: 1465–9. Day, P., Duggal, M. A. (2003). Multicentre investigation into the role of structured histories for patients with tooth avulsion at their initial visit to a dental hospital. Dental Traumatology, 19(5): 243–7. de Paula-Silva, F.W., Wu, M.K., Leonardo, M.R., et  al. (2009). Accuracy of periapical radiography and conebeam computed tomography scans in diagnosing apical periodontitis using histopathological findings as a gold standard. Journal of Endodontics, 35: 1009–12. Demirbaş, K.A., Aktener, B.O., and Ünsal, C. (2004). Pulpal necrosis with sickle cell anemia. International Endodontic Journal, 37: 602–6. Edlund, M., Nair, M.K., and Nair, U.P. (2011). Detection of vertical root fractures by using cone beam computed tomography: A clinical study. Journal of Endodontics, 37: 768–72. Eliasson, S., Halvarson, C., and Ljunheimer, C. (1984). Periapical condensing osteitis and endodontic treatment. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 57: 195. Escoda-Francoli, J., Canalda-Sahli, C., Soler, A., et  al. (2007). Inferior alveolar nerve damage because of overextended endodontic material: A problem of sealer cements biocompatibility? Journal of Endodontics, 33: 1484–9. Estrela, C., Bueno, M.R., De Alencar, A.H., et al. (2009). Method to evaluate inflammatory root resorption by using cone beam computed tomography. Journal of Endodontics, 35(11): 1491–7. Estrela, C., Bueno, M.R., Leles, C.R., et al. (2008). Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic and periapical radiography for detection of apical periodontitis. Journal of Endodontics, 34: 273–9. Estrela, C., Bueno, M.R., Sousa-Neto, M.D., et al. (2008). Method for determination of root curvature radius using cone-beam computed tomography images. Brazilian Dental Journal, 19(2): 114–8. Faitaroni, L.A., Bueno, M.R., Carvalbosa, A.A., et  al. (2011). Differential diagnosis of apical periodontitis and nasopalatine duct cyst. Journal of Endodontics, 37: 403–10. Farman, A.G., and Farman, T.T. (2005). A comparison of 18 different X-ray detectors currently used in dentistry. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics, 99(4): 485–9. Fennis, W.M., Kuijs, R.H., Kreulen, C.M., et al. (2002). A survey of cusp fractures in a population of general dental practices. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 15: 559–63. Endodontics Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 243 Gassner, R., Bosch, R., Tuli, T., et al. (1999). Prevalence of dental trauma in 6000 patients with facial injuries: Implications for prevention. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics, 87: 27–33. Gencoglu, N., Helvacioglu, D. (2009). Comparison of the different techniques to remove fractured endodontic instruments from root canal systems. European Journal of Dentistry, 3: 90–5. Goldman, M., Pearson, A.H., and Darzenta, N. (1972). Endodontic success: Who’s reading the radiograph? Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology, 33(3): 432–7. Goldman, M., Pearson, A.H., and Darzenta, N. (1974). Reliability of radiographic interpretations. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics, 38: 287–93. Goodis, H.E., Rossall, J.C., and Kahn, A.J. (2001). Endodontic status in older U.S. adults. Report of a survey. Journal of the American Dental Association, 132: 1525–6. Grande, N.M., Plotino, G., Pecci, R., et al. (2008). Microcomputerized tomographic analysis of radicular and canal morphology of premolars with long oval canals. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology Endodontics, 106: 70–6. Greene, C.S. (2009). Neuroplasticity and sensitization. Journal of the American Dental Association, 140(6): 676–8. Greene, C.S., and Murray, G.M. (2011). Atypical odontalgia. Journal of the American Dental Association, 142(9): 1031–2. Haapasalo, M., Shen, Y., and Ricucci, D. (2011). Reasons for persistent and emerging post-treatment endodontic disease. Endodontic Topics, 18: 31–50. Hasan, B., Metska, M.E., Ozok, A.R., et  al. (2009). Detection of vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth by a cone beam computed tomography scan. Journal of Endodontics, 35: 719–22. Hassan, B., Metska, M.E., Ozok, A.R, et  al. (2010). Comparison of five cone beam computed tomography systems for the detection of vertical root fractures. Journal of Endodontics, 36: 126–9. Huumonen S., and Ørstavik, D. (2002). Radiological aspects of apical periodontitis. Endodontic Topics, 1: 3–25. Hyman, J.J., and Cohen, M.E. (1984). The predictive value of endodontic diagnostic tests. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology, vol. 58. International Commission on Radiological Protection. (1990). Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection: Adopted by the commission in November 1990. New York: Pergamon. Joint Position Statement of the American Association of Endodontists and the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. (2010). Use of cone-beam computed tomography in endodontics. Accessed 29 Dec 2011. http://www.aaomr.org/?page=AAOMRAAE. Kajan, Z.D., and Taromsari, M. (2012). Value of cone beam CT in detection of dental root fractures. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 41: 3–10. Kakehashi, S., Stanley, H.R., Fitzgerald, R.J., et al. (1965). The effects of surgical exposures of dental pulps in germ-free and conventional laboratory rats. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology. 20: 340. Katsumata, A., Hirukawa, A., Okumura, S., et al. (2007). Effects of image artifacts on gray-value density in limited-volume cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics 104: 829–36. Katsumata, A., Hirukawa, A., Okumura, S., et al. (2009). Relationship between density variability and imaging volume size in cone-beam computerized tomographic scanning of the maxillofacial region: An in vitro study. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics 107: 420–5. Kau, C.H., and Richmond, S. (2010). Three-dimensional imaging for orthodontics and maxillofacial surgery. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. Kim, E., Kim, K.D., Roh, B.D., et  al. (2003). Computed tomography as a diagnostic aid for extra canal invasive resorption. Journal of Endodontics, 29: 463–5. Kvist, T., and Reit, C. (1991). Results of endodontic retreatment: a randomized clinical study comparing  surgical and nonsurgical procedures. Journal of Endodontics, 25: 814. Lalonde, E., and Luebke, R. (1968). The frequency and distribution of periapical cysts and granulomas. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology, 25: 861–8. Langland, O.E., Langlais, R.P., and Preece, J.W. (2002). Principles of dental imaging. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Lee, R.D. (2008). Common image artifacts in cone beam CT. Summer 2008 AADMRT Newsletter. Accessed 29 Dec 2011. http://aadmrt.com/static.aspx?content=currents/ lee_summer_08. Lee, S.J., and Messer, H.H. (1986). Radiographic appearance of artificially prepared periapical lesions confined to cancellous bone. International Endodontics Journal, 19: 64–72. Levin, L., and Trope, M. (2002). Root resorption. In: K.M.  Hargreaves and H.E. Goodis, eds., Seltzer and  Bender’s dental pulp (pp. 425–48). Chicago: Quintessence. Levin, M., and Mischenko, A. (2010). Limited field cone beam computed tomography: Evaluation of endodontic healing in three cases. Alpha Omegan, 103: 141–5. Liang, X., Lambrichts, I., Sun, Y., et al. (2010). A comparative evaluation of cone beam computed tomography 244 Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and multi-slice CT (MSCT). Part II: On 3D model accuracy. European Journal of Radiology, 75: 270–4. Liang, Y.H., Li, G., Wesselink, P.R., et al. (2011). Endodontic outcome predictors identified with periapical radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography scans. Journal of Endodontics, 37(3): 326–31. Liedke, G.S., Silveira, H.E.D., Silveira, H.L.D., et  al. (2009). Influence of voxel size in the diagnostic ability of cone beam tomography to evaluate simulated external root resorption. Journal of Endodontics, 35: 233–5. Lin, L.M., Gaenglerm, P., Langeland, K. (1996). Periapical curettage. International Endodontic Journal, 29: 220. List, T., Leijon, G., Helkimo, M., et  al. (2007). Clinical findings and psychosocial factors in patients with atypical odontalgia: a case-control study. Journal of Orofacial Pain, 21: 89–98. Lofthag-Hansen, S., Huumonen, S., Gröndahl, K., and Gröndahl, H.G. (2007). Limited cone-beam CT and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of periapical pathology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 103(1): 114–9. Lopes, H.P., Moreira, E.J.L., Elias, C.N., et  al. (2008). Cyclic fatigue of Protaper instruments. Journal of Endodontics, 33: 55. Low, K.M.T., Dula, K., Burgin, W., et  al. (2008). Comparison of periapical radiography and limited cone-beam tomography in posterior maxillary teeth referred for apical surgery. Journal of Endodontics, 34: 557–62. Ludlow, J.B., Davies-Ludlow, L.E., White, S.C. (2008). Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: The impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation. JADA, 139(9): 1237–43. Ludlow, J.B., Ivanovic, M. (2008). Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics, 106(1): 106–14. Lyroudia, K.M., Dourou, V.I., Pantelidou, O.C., et  al. (2002). Internal root resorption studied by radiography, stereomicroscope, scanning electron microscope and computerized 3D reconstructive method. Dental Traumatology, 18: 148–52. MacDonald, J. (1997). In: R. Novelline, Squire’s Fundamentals of Radiology, 5th ed. (chap. 9 and wiki). Harvard University Press. MacDonald, D. (2011). Oral & Maxillofacial Radiology. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford UK. Malhotra, N., Kundabala, M., and Acharaya, S. (2011). A review of fractures: Diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Dental Update, 38: 615–24. Maloney, P.L., and Doku, H.C. (1968). Maxillary sinusitis of odontogenic origin. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association, 34: 591–603. Martos, J., Ferrer-Luque, C.M., Gonzalez-Rodrıguez, M.P., et  al. (2009). Topographical evaluation of the major apical foramen in permanent human teeth. International Endodontics Journal, 42: 329–34. Martos, J., Lubian, C., Silveira, L.F., et  al. (2010). Morphologic analysis of the root apex in human teeth. Journal of Endodontics, 36: 664–7. Matherne, R.P., Angelopoulos, C., Kulild, J.C., et  al. (2008). Use of cone-beam computed tomography to identify root canal systems in vitro. Journal of Endodontics, 34: 87–9. McDonnell, D., (1993). Dense bone island: A review of 107 patients. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology, 76(1): 124–8. Metzger, Z., Huber, R., and Slavescu, D. (2009). Healing kinetics of periapical lesions enhanced by the apexum procedure: A clinical trial. Journal of Endodontics, 35(2): 153–9. Michetti, J., Maret, D., Mallet, J.P., et al. (2010). Validation of cone beam computed tomography as a tool to explore root canal anatomy. Journal of Endodontics, 36: 1187–90. Mireku, A.S., Romberg, E., Fouad, A.F., et  al. (2010). Vertical fracture of root filled teeth restored with posts: The effects of patient age and dentine thickness. International Endodontic Journal, 43: 218–25. Molven, O., Halse, A., Fristad, I. (2002). Long-term reliability and observer comparisons in the radiographic diagnosis of periapical disease. International Endodontics Journal, 35: 142–7. Molven, O., Halse, A., Grung, B. (1987). Observer strategy and the radiographic classification of healing after endodontic surgery. International Journal of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, 16: 432–9. Mraiwa, N., Jacobs, R., Van Cleynenbreugel, J., et al. (2004). The nasopalatine canal revisited using 2D and 3D CT imaging. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 33(6): 396–402. Nair, M.K., and Nair, U.P. (2007). Digital and advanced imaging in endodontics: A review. Journal of Endodontics, 33(1): 1–6. Nair, P., Pajarola, G., and Schroeder, H. (1996). Types and incidence of human periapical lesions obtained with extracted teeth. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics, 81: 93–102. Nakata, K., Naitoh, M., Izumi, M., InamotoK, et al. (2006). Effectiveness of dental computed tomography in diagnostic imaging of periradicular lesion of each root of a multi-rooted tooth: A case report. Journal of Endodontics, 32(6): 583–7. Neves, F.S., Luana, C.B., Solange, M.D., et al. (2010). Dens invaginatus: A cone beam computed tomography case report. Journal of Health Science Institute, 28(3): 249–50. Endodontics Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 245 Newton, C.W., Hoen, M.M., Goodis, H.E., et  al. (2009). Identify and determine the metrics, hierarchy, and predictive value of all the parameters and/or methods used during endodontic diagnosis. Journal of Endodontics, 35(12): 1635–44. Ng, Y.-L., Mann, V., Rahbaran, S., et al. (2007). Outcome of primary root canal treatment: Systematic review of the literature—Part 1. Effects of study characteristics on probability of success. International Endodontics Journal, 40: 921–39. Ng, Y.-L., Mann, V., Rahbaran, S., et al. (2008). Outcome of primary root canal treatment: Systematic review of the literature—Part 2. Influence of clinical factors. International Endodontics Journal, 41: 6–31. Oehlers, F.A. (1957). Dens invaginatus, Part I: Variations of the invagination process and association with anterior crown forms. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology, 10: 1204–18. Ozer, S.Y. (2011). Detection of vertical root fractures by using cone beam computed tomography with variable voxel sizes in an in vitro model. Journal of Endodontics, 37: 75–79. Pak, J.G., et al. (2012). Prevalence of periapical radiolucency and root canal treatment: A systematic review of  cross-sectional studies. Journal of Endodontics, 38: 1170–6. Palomo, J.M., Kan, C.H., Palomo, L.B., et al. (2006). Threedimensional cone beam computerized tomography in dentistry. Dentistry Today, 25(11): 130–5. Patel, S. (2009). New dimensions in endodontic imaging: Part 2. Cone beam computed tomography. Journal of Endodontics, 42(6): 463–75. Epub 2009 Mar 2. Patel, S., and Dawood, A. (2007). The use of cone beam computed tomography in the management of external cervical resorption lesions. International Endodontic Journal, 40(9): 730–7. Patel, S., Dawood, A., Ford, T., et al. (2007). The potential applications of cone beam computed tomography in the management of endodontic problems. International Endodontic Journal, 40: 818–30. Patel, S., Dawood, A., Wilson, R., et al. (2009). The detection and management of root resorption lesions using intraoral radiography and cone beam computed tomography: An in vivo investigation. International Endodontic Journal, 42: 831–8. Patel, S., and Ford, T.P. (2007). Is the resorption external or internal? Dental Update, 34: 218–29. Paula-Silva, F.W., Wu, M.K., Leonardo, M.R., et al. (2009). Accuracy of periapical radiography and cone-beam computed tomography scans in diagnosing apical periodontitis using histopathological findings as a gold standard. Journal of Endodontics, 35: 1009–12. Pew Research Center. (2010). Accessed 3 Feb 2012. And http://pewresearch.org/databank/dailynumber/ ?NumberID=1150 Pigg, M., List, T., Petersson, K., et al. (2011). Diagnostic yield of conventional radiographic and cone beam computed tomographic images in patients with atypical odontalgia. International Endodontics Journal, 44(12): 1092–101. Pinsky, H.M., Dyda, S., Pinsky, R.W., et  al. (2006). Accuracy of three dimensional measurements using cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 35: 410–6. Potter, K.S., McQuistan, M.R., Williamson, A.E., et  al. (2009). Should endodontists place implants? A survey of U.S. endodontists. Journal of Endodontics, 35: 966–70. Prapanpoch, S., and Langlais, R.P. (1994). Lingual cortical defect of the mandible: An unusual presentation and tomographic diagnosis. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 23: 234–7. Qualtrough, A.J., and Mannocci, F. (2011). Endodontics and the older patient. Dental Update, 38: 550–62. Rechenberg, D.K., Kruse, A., Grätz, K.W., et  al. (2011). Chronic orofacial pain (OFP) of different origin: A case report [Article in French, German]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed, 121(9): 839–48. Richard, E.L., and Ziskind, J. (1957). Aberrant salivary gland tissue in the mandible. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology, 10: 1086–90. Rud, J., and Omnell, K. (1970). Root fractures due to corrosion. Diagnostic aspects. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research, 78: 397–403. Rud, J., and Rud, V. (1998). Surgical endodontics of upper molars: Relation to the maxillary sinus and operation in acute state of infection. Journal of Endodontics, 24: 260–1. Saunders, M.B., Gulabivala, K., Holt, R., et  al. (2000). Reliability of radiographic observations recorded on a proforma measured using inter- and intra-observer variation: A preliminary study. International Endodontics Journal, 33: 272–8. Scarfe, W.C., Levin, M.D., Gane, D., et al. (2009). Use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics. International Journal of Dentistry, doi: 10.1155/2009/ 634567. SEDENTEXCT. (2009). Radiation protection: CBCT for dental and maxillofacial radiology. Provisional guidelines. A report prepared by the SEDENTEXCT project. Accessed Aug 2009. www.sedentexct.eu. SEDENTEXCT. (2011). Radiation Protection No. 172, Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology (evidence-based guidelines), SEDENTEXCT Project Consortium, 2011, The Seventh Framework Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom), Accessed 15 Oct 2012. http://www.sedentexct.eu/ content/guidelines-cbct-dental-and-maxillofacialradiology. Serman, N.J., and Hasselgren, G. (1992). The radiographic incidence of multiple roots and canals in human 246 Cone Beam Computed Tomography mandibular premolars. International Endodontics Journal, 25: 234–7. Sert, S., and Bayirli, G.S. (2004). Evaluation of the root canal configurations of the mandibular and maxillary permanent teeth by gender in the Turkish population. Journal of Endodontics, 30: 391–8. Sessle, B.J., Lavigne, G.J., Lund, J.P., et  al. (2008). Mechanisms of neuropathic pain. In: B.J. Sessle, G.J. Lavigne, J.P. Lund, and R. Dubner, eds., Orofacial pain: From basic science to clinical management, 2nd ed (pp. 53–9). Hanover Park, IL: Quintessence. Shemesh, H., Cristescu, R.C., Wesselink, P.R., et al. (2011). The use of cone-beam computed tomography and digital periapical radiographs to diagnose root perforations. Journal of Endodontics, 37: 513–6. Sherwood, I.A., (2011). Pre-operative diagnostic radiograph interpretation by general dental practitioners for root canal treatment. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 41(1): 43–54. Sicher, H. (1962). Anatomy and oral pathology. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology, 15: 1264–9. Sigurdsson, A., Trope, M., and Chivian, N. (2011). The role of endodontics after dental traumatic injuries. In:  K.M. Hargreaves and S. Cohen, eds., Pathways of the pulp, 10th ed (pp. 620–54). St Louis: Mosby. Silberman, A., Cohenca, N., and Simon, J.H. (2006). Anatomical redesign for the treatment of dens invaginatus type III with open apexes: A literature review and case presentation. Journal of American Dentistry Association, 137(2): 180–5. Siqueira, J.F., and Rôças, I.N. (2008). Clinical implications and microbiology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures. Journal of Endodontics, 34(11): 1291–1301. Slowey, R.R. (1979). Root canal anatomy: Road map to successful endodontics. Dental Clinics of North America, 23: 555–73. Soğur, E., Grondahl, H.G., and Baksi, B.G. (2012). Does a combination of two radiographs increase accuracy in detecting acid-induced periapical lesions and does it approach the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography scanning? Journal of Endodontics, 38: 131–6. Soğur, E., Baksi, B.G., Gröndahl, H.G. (2007). Imaging of root canal fillings: A comparison of subjective image quality between limited cone-beam CT, storage phosphor and film radiography. International Endodontic Journal, 40: 179–85. Song, W.C., Jo, D.I., Lee, J.Y., et al. (2009). Microanatomy of the incisive canal using three-dimensional reconstruction of microCT images: An ex vivo study. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics, 108(4): 583–90. Stavropoulos, A., and Wenzel, A. (2007). Accuracy of cone-beam dental CT, intraoral digital and conventional film radiography for the detection of periapical lesions. An ex vivo study in pig jaws. Clinical Oral Investigations, 11(1): 101–6. Stratemann, S.A., Huang, J.C., Maki, K., et  al. (2008). Comparison of cone beam computed tomography imaging with physical measures. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 37: 80–93. Tang, W., Wu, Y., and Smales, R.J. (2010). Identifying and reducing risks for potential fractures in endodontically treated teeth. Journal of Endodontics, 36: 609–17. Taschieri, S., Weinstein, T., Rosano, G., et  al. (2011). Morphological features of the maxillary incisors roots and relationship with neighboring anatomical structures: Possible implications in endodontic surgery. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology [Epub ahead of print]. Tay, A.B. (1999). A 5 year survey of oral biopsies in an oral surgical unit in Singapore: 1993–1997. Annals of the Academy of Medicine [Singapore], 28: 665–71. Treede, R.D., Jensen, T.S., Campbell, J.N., et  al. (2008). Neuropathic pain: Redefinition and a grading system for clinical and research purposes. Neurology, 70(18): 1630–5. Tsesis, I., Rosen, E., Tamse, A., et al. (2010). Diagnosis of vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth based on clinical and radiographic indices: A systematic review. Journal of Endodontics, 36: 1455–8. Tsurumachi, T., and Honda, K. (2007). A new cone beam computerized tomography system for use in endodontic surgery. International Endodontic Journal, 40: 224–32. Tu, M.G., Tsai, C.C., Jou, M.J., Chen, W.L., Chang, Y.F., Chen, S.Y., et  al. (2007). Prevalence of three-rooted mandibular first molars among Taiwanese individuals. J Endod, 33(10): 1163–6. Tu, M.G., Huang, H.L., Hsue, S.S., et al. (2009). Detection of permanent three-rooted mandibular first molars by  cone-beam computed tomography imaging in Taiwanese individuals. Journal of Endodontics, 35(4): 503–7. Vande Voorde, H.E., and Bjorndahl, A.M. (1969). Estimated endodontic “working length” with paralleling radiographs. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics. 27: 106–10. Velvart, P., Hecker, H., and Tillinger, G. (2001). Detection of the apical lesion and the mandibular canal in conventional radiography and computed tomography. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics, 92: 682–8. Vieira, A.R., Siqueira, J.F., Ricucci, D., et  al. (2011). Dentinal tubule infection as the cause of recurrent disease and late endodontic treatment failure: A case report. Journal of Endodontics, 38: 250–4. Wang, P., Yan, X.B., Zhang, W.L., et al. (2011). Detection of dental root fractures by using cone-beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 40: 290–8. Endodontics Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 247 Wang, Y., et al. (2010). Evaluation of the root and canal morphology of mandibular first permanent molars in a western Chinese population by cone beam computed tomography. Journal of Endodontics. 36(11): 1786–9. Weir, J.C., Davenport, W.D., and Skinner, R.L. (1987). A diagnostic and epidemiologic survey of 15,783 oral lesions. Journal of the American Dental Association, 115: 439–42. Wenzel, A., Neto, F.H., Frydenberg, M., et  al. (2009). Variable-resolution cone-beam computerized tomography with enhancement filtration compared with intraoral photo-stimulable phosphor radiography in detection of transverse root fractures in an in vitro model. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics, 108: 939–45. Wesson, C.M., and Gale, T.M. (2003). Molar apicoectomy with amalgam root-end filling: Results of a prospective study in two district general hospitals. British Dental Journal, 195: 707–14. Woda, A., and Pionchon, P. (1999). A unified concept of idiopathic orofacial pain: Clinical features. Journal of Orofacial Pain, 13(3): 172–84; discussion 185–95. Worth, B., Brooks, L.E., and Penick, C. (1975). Herpes zoster associated with pulpless teeth. Journal of Endodontics, 1(1): 32–5. Wu, J., Lei, G., Yan, M., et al. (2011). Instrument separation analysis of multi-used ProTaper Universal rotary system during root canal therapy. Journal of Endodontics, 37: 758–63. Wu, M.K., Shemesh, H., and Wesselink, P.R. (2009). Limitations of previously published systematic reviews evaluating the outcome of endodontic treatment. International Endodontics Journal, 42(8): 656–66. Wu, M.K., Shemesh, H., and Wesselink, P.R. (2011). Letter to the Editor, International Endodontic Journal, 44(11): 1079–80. Wu, M.K., and Wesselink, P.R. (2001). A primary observation on the preparation and obturation of oval canals. International Endodontics Journal, 34: 137–41. Wu, M.K., Wesselink, P.R., and Walton, R.E. (2000). Apical terminus location of root canal treatment procedures. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics, 89: 99–103. Young, G.R. (2007). Contemporary management of lateral root perforation diagnosed with the aid of dental computed tomography. Australian Endodontic Journal, 33: 112–8. Yuan, G., Ove, P.A., Hongkun, W., et al. (2009). An application framework of three-dimensional reconstruction and measurement for endodontic research. Journal of Endodontics, 35(2): 269–74. Zakariasen, K.L., Scott, D.A., and Jensen, J.R. (1984). Endodontic recall radiographs: How reliable is our interpretation of endodontic success or failure and what factors affect our reliability? Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics, 57: 343–7. Cone Beam Computed Tomography: Oral and Maxillofacial Diagnosis and Applications, First Edition. Edited by David Sarment. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2014 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 249 Periodontal Disease Diagnosis Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Bart Vandenberghe and David Sarment 11 Periodontal diseases Prevalence and progression Periodontal diseases are inflammatory processes causing loss of tooth support. Loss of clinical attachment and alveolar bone lead to tooth exfoliation, generally over a long period of time. Chronic periodontitis affects up to 75% of the population in one form or another (Brown et al., 1989; Levy et  al., 2003), while moderate periodontitis affects approximately one-half of the population. The prevalence, extent, and severity of this disease increase with age (Loe, 1967), but close to 10% of the population is susceptible to severe bone loss at a relatively young age. Because of population growth and aging, disease prevalence has not been decreasing over the last 20 years (Oliver and Heuer, 1995; Copeland et  al., 2004). In addition, there is evidence that periodontal disease is a contributing factor to systemic illnesses such as heart and cerebrovascular diseases (Khader et al., 2004). Unfortunately, patterns of attachment loss are not predicable and can vary in location, frequency, and severity (Jeffcoat and Reddy, 1991). Various models of disease activity such as cyclic or burstlike progression patterns have surfaced over time, challenging the  original linear hypothesis (Socransky et  al., 1984), but none have proven accurate, suggesting  that predictions are inadequate because of the complexity of disease progression. In addition, disease activity causes unpredictable bone loss,  resulting in a complex surface topology (Figure 11.1). This architecture is important to depict for diagnostic and treatment purposes. For example, loss of bone in interradicular areas has a greater likelihood to continue to progress. Similarly, treatment approaches may vary with bone morphology:  periodontal surgical techniques such as osteoplasty with or without ostectomy as well as bone  regeneration are highly dependent upon the  convoluted topology resulting from disease progression. Yet, only surgical access allows for a  true evaluation. This is due to limitations of two-dimensional radiographic imaging, only allowing for an incomplete evaluation of the periodontal anatomy. As a result, three-dimensional radiographic analysis has potential to enlighten the clinician and allow for enhanced diagnosis and treatment. In this chapter, the limitations of traditional diagnostic methods are reviewed to demonstrate 250 Cone Beam Computed Tomography the need for three-dimensional imaging. The impact of precise assessment on predicting future disease and treatment potential is briefly outlined. Next, three-dimensional imaging of periodontal tissues using computed tomography is introduced, followed by its potential to also impact treatment. Traditional diagnostic methods Clinical measurements Clinical measurements include pocket probing depth, clinical attachment levels, bleeding, and suppuration on probing. These methods are well Oral Buccal Oral (B) (A) Buccal Figure 11.1 (A) Periodontal bone loss can be linear topography (left) but is usually more complex (right). (B) Example of an angular defect on a standardized dry skull (molar region). The periapical radiograph is of limited value. The topography calculated using CBCT is seen buccally (right, top) and the three dimensions (right, bottom). Periodontal Disease Diagnosis Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 251 established, simple, and cost effective. They are utilized to establish the extent of disease as well to predict disease progression. Although much diagnostic information can be obtained from the clinical examination and some important markers like tooth mobility and bleeding on probing are exclusively related to this examination, there are limitations to the use of clinical measurements alone. Probing depth and clinical attachment measurements are subject to operator errors. Probing force, angle, and positioning around the tooth vary within the same examiner and in between examiners (Goodson, 1992). For probing depth and attachment level measurements, 2–3mm of errors is common, resulting in limited ability to detect disease progression. In fact, examiners involved in clinical research, requiring more accurate measurements to study disease or treatment modalities, must undergo training and calibration sessions in  the hope measurements can be standardized. Yet, even in such controlled environments, 1–2mm errors are expected (Polson, 1997). In practice, methodology varies among providers within the same office: probe angulation and localization in the interdental area are common sources of discrepancy. For example, some clinicians prefer to record probing depth at the line angle, whereas others will look for the presence of craters interproximally. Similarly, attachment level depends on these parameters as well as the ability to define the cemento-enamel junction. More advanced measurement tools such as semiautomated probes have provided only limited additional benefits with similar precision, and are therefore rarely utilized (Armitage, 2004). Because accuracy of pocket probing depths and clinical attachment levels is subject to large deviation errors in clinical practice, early detection of disease progression remains challenging (Cohen and Ralls, 1988). Supplemental clinical tests are at hand to address this issue. Although periodontal diseases are of bacterial origin, identification of specific pathogens is made difficult by the complexity of the flora. As a result, with the exception of rare forms of the disease, bacterial testing is a  limited indicator of present or future disease. New strategies that test host response or tissue breakdown factors using discriminant analysis may improve the ability to predict future periodontal disease. Yet, the extent of disease as well as osseous morphology cannot be appreciated using these various tests (Giannobile et al., 2003). The use of a radiographic method to assess damage caused to hard tissues continues to play a central role in diagnosis. Radiographic assessment The most important purpose of the radiographic examination for periodontal diagnosis is to measure the alveolar bone level relative to the roots and determine the pattern and extent of bone loss. This not only impacts treatment decisions but also allows visualization of bony changes over time. In addition, the periodontal ligament space, lamina dura, periapical regions, and other related factors such as subgingival calculus can be depicted on radiographs (Tugnait et al., 2000; Mol, 2004). There are three types of radiographic methods routinely used in dentistry: panoramic, bitewings, and periapical. Panoramic radiographs provide an overall picture of the periodontium but are susceptible to image distortion where patient positioning is critical. Their diagnostic value is therefore more limited than periapical radiographs (Pepelassi and Diamanti-Kipioti, 1997). The latter are—just like bitewings—projection radiographs that present a more detailed picture of the alveolar crest and other periodontal landmarks or pathologic conditions. However, intraoral radiographs remain a twodimensional projection of a three-dimensional disease. Ramadan and Mitchell (1962) confirmed that most funnel-shaped defects or lingually located defects cannot be detected. In addition, destruction of the buccal plate could not be distinguished from destruction of the lingual plate. Periodontal buccal or lingual defects are difficult to diagnose using radiographs only (Rees et  al., 1971),  and angular infrabony defects from vertical bone loss are underestimated by about 1.5mm on average, with great variations (±2.6mm; Eickholz and Haussman, 2000). One of the parameters often utilized for evaluation of periodontal stability is the appearance of a lamina dura. However, Manson (1963) using specimens and Greenstein et al. (1981) using patients and clinical longitudinal parameters found no evidence for such claim. In fact, Pauls and Trott (1966) suggested that a bone loss of 3mm or more is necessary before it can be detected radiographically. 252 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Sensitivity of radiography significantly improves when high-quality images are utilized. Many studies have explored the validity of digital radiography, as compared to conventional films (Wolf et al., 2001; Borg et al., 1997; Jorgenson et al., 2007), and found an equal or better detection of bone loss. The associated lower radiation dose and the ability to enhance images lead to better viewing, but intraoral radiography remains a 2D modality. Since no traditional technique describes complex periodontal defects, advanced methods have been introduced for research purposes. Digital subtraction radiography is one of them: it involves the acquisition of periapical radiographs at various time points, using reproducible angulation and exposure methods (Grondahl et al., 1983). Software is available to subtract the radiographs and underscore changes (Samarabandu et al., 1994). Although this technique is able to better detect changes for specific sites under clinical investigation (Reddy, 1997), it does not improve preoperative description of the patient’s overall condition, and it is complex for routine clinical usage. In summary, the diagnostic value of existing radiography is limited by its two-dimensional nature, and technical improvements cannot resolve this drawback. Accuracy of intraoral radiography has been validated as an appropriate diagnostic tool for interproximal bone height measurements. Under standardized conditions and using proper positioning, interobserver variability is within 1mm (Pecoraro et  al., 2005). Clinical studies from Borg et al. (1997) reported deviations up to 1.5mm, when compared to per-surgical measurements. Mean deviation might be approximately 1.5mm; Pepelassi and Diamanti-Kipioti (1997) reported 80% of their measurements within 1 mm, 91% within 2 mm, and 96% within 3mm. Overestimations were more significant in severe osseous defects and greater deviations were found in molar regions (Eickholz and Haussman, 2000). Serial radiographs allow the practitioner to evaluate periodontal disease over time, but standardization of the exposure is required for correct interpretation. When positioning instruments and exposure parameters are properly used, 1mm of crestal change might be detectable (Hausmann and Allen, 1997). Digital subtraction radiography has potential to identify mineral changes as small as 5%. However, this method is highly dependent upon angulation and exposure. In daily clinical practice, these parameters cannot be controlled, and radiography can only be utilized for evident diagnosis. Advanced imaging for periodontal applications Tuned aperture computed tomography Due to the limitations of two-dimensional radiography, various three-dimensional techniques have been developed over time, with hopes to identify subtle osseous defects located buccally or lingually. Conventional tomography produces a 2-dimensional cross-section but is of poor diagnostic quality: identification of major structures such as the mandibular canal is as low as 20% of cases (Kassebaum et  al., 1990). This is primarily due to the unavoidable blur inherent to the method. Furthermore, multiple slices are necessary to ensure that the region of diagnostic interest is sampled adequately. Because each slice is acquired successively, the process is time consuming, technique sensitive, and heavy in radiation (Tyndall and Brooks, 2000). To address these issues, tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT) was developed (Ruttimann et al., 1989), applying principles similar to that of linear tomography but utilizing traditional radiography. This method has shown good potential for detection of periodontal and peri-implant defects (Webber et al., 1997; Ramesh et  al., 2001; Ramesh et  al., 2002). However, it requires complex manipulation, so far unpractical to daily clinical use. Traditional computed tomography Computed tomography (CT) is a more sophisticated method for obtaining cross-sectional images without geometrical distortion. It is a modern and reliable technique for assessment of bone height and width, localization of the inferior alveolar canal, mental foramen, nasopalatine canal, or maxillary sinuses (Yang et al., 1999; Klinge et al., 1989). Although CT scanning has been used extensively for maxillofacial pathology, reconstruction, and Periodontal Disease Diagnosis Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 253 implants (Preda et al., 1997), some intent has been made to utilize it for estimating alveolar bone loss. Langen et  al. (1995) compared radiographs and axial CT scanning on dry skulls. The traditional radiograph could identify only 70% of defects, with a mean underestimation of 2.2mm. In contrast, 100% of defects were seen with CT scanning, with an underestimation of 0.5mm (Fuhrmann, Bücker, et al., 1995). Schliephake et al. (2003), investigating bone levels surrounding dental implants, also found that CT scanning was superior to radiography despite the presence of these dense metal objects. As expected, traditional CT scanning is not easily justified or practical in routine dentistry since radiation, cost, and machine complexity are significant. Cone beam computed tomography The introduction of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has revived interest in the use of three-dimensional radiography for periodontal applications. In spite of the obvious implementation of CBCT to implant and craniofacial surgical planning, its use is less evident for other dental applications such as periodontal diagnosis. In Figure  11.2, the left molar region of a maxillary cadaver jaw was imaged using intraoral radiography and CBCT. On the standardized projection radiograph (Figure  11.2B), infrabony defects and furcation involvements of both molars are suspected, but no information can be derived on the exact interproximal, buccal, or palatal bone topography. However, reconstructions of sagittal, coronal, or oblique slices allow viewing of subtle defects (Figure 11.2C). An oblique reslicing of the data following the jaw’s arch makes an overview of the periodontal bone possible at submillimeter slice thickness. By increasing the slice thickness (stacking several slices on top of each other), a panoramic reconstruction is simulated, at high resolution, without the drawbacks of a tomographic technique where image quality is degraded by overlaid anatomy. When scrolling through the sagittal, coronal, and axial slices, the exact extent of bone destruction can  be assessed around each tooth. For a true three-dimensional evaluation, software allows rendering of CBCT data into a volume (Figure 11.3). Requirements for periodontal applications The use of CBCT for periodontal evaluation is controversial because of limited research and justification of its usefulness. Interestingly, this is also true for traditional radiography in periodontology (Tugnait et al., 2000). Much information can be derived from the clinical examination alone, but for more complex patterns of bone destruction and the multitude of modern regenerative treatment techniques, the three-dimensional exam is advantageous. Radiation dose is within the range of an intraoral full-mouth series (Sukovic, 2003; Ludlow et  al., 2003), while spatial resolution of CBCT can be as small as 75 microns. Even when using fast films or  digital radiography, the exposure varies from 30 to 100 μSv (Ludlow et al., 2003; Ludlow et al., 2008).  Radiation using CBCT examination is similar, although a greater range exists among units and settings such as the size of the field of view, kV, and mAs (Palomo et al., 2008; Pauwels et al., 2012). The ability of CBCT to diagnose craters and furcations has been compared to 2-dimensional intraoral radiographs and found to be a superior imaging technique (Fuhrmann, Wehrbein, et al., 1995; Mengel et al., 2005; Misch et al., 2006; Vandenberghe et al., 2007a, 2008; Mol and Balasundaram, 2008). These encouraging results indicate that CBCT may be a desirable method where complex periodontal defects are inadequately assessed clinically and radiographically (Figure 11.4). Furthermore, CBCT might be utilized for treatment outcome assessment. For example, Grimard et  al. found that CBCT is superior to intraoral radiographic in postoperative evaluation of periodontal regeneration (Grimard et  al., 2009). Threedimensional analysis of defects, especially using volumetric measurements, may thus provide a more accurate tool to monitor osseous lesions. Note that similar studies have also focused on peri-implant bone loss (Schliephake et  al., 2003). Table  11.1 compares clinical and radiographic parameters for periodontal diagnosis. Alveolar bone loss: measurement accuracy When scanning the patient using CBCT along the occlusal plane, axial slices are obtained parallel to the occlusal plane. The orthogonal cross-sections Figure 11.2 (A) The bony defect would only become apparent after flap elevation. (B) Intraoral radiography of the same region only shows a projection of infrabony defects and furcation involvement. (C) A CBCT slice with oblique reslicing curve (orange), sagittal slices (green), and coronal slices (red) allows for interactive scrolling through the three-dimensional defects for topography determination. Periodontal Disease Diagnosis Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 255 Figure 11.3 Software allows the user to render 3D volumes of the acquired 3D dataset. The stack of slices is displayed as a volume, but careful interpretation is required because the rendering depends on chosen settings. Figure 11.4 A 40-year old patient with generalized aggressive periodontitis. (A) Panoramic radiograph and clinical probing reveal severe periodontal bone loss. (Courtesy of Pierre Koumi) (B) Maxillary right molars on intraoral radiographs (left) and CBCT images, the latter revealing the exact furcation involvements. (C) Mandibular right molars on intraoral radiograph and CBCT images, the latter revealing the exact defect morphology around the molars. 256 Cone Beam Computed Tomography that are recalculated from the dataset are perpendicular to these axial slices. As a result, alveolar bone loss measurements will be approximately perpendicular to the occlusal plane. However, if the patient is not scanned along the occlusal plane, alveolar bone level measurement deviations will most likely increase since orthogonal slices would no longer be perpendicular to the occlusal plane. Figure  11.5 illustrates that slight deviations in patient positioning, away from the occlusal plane, will generate orthogonal cross-sections perpendicular to the reconstruction axis but not the occlusal plane. Figure  11.5A shows CBCT scanning with the  plane of occlusion parallel to the grid and the  corresponding views on sagittal, axial, and cross-sections. Figure 11.5B shows the same views with a five-degree inclination of the occlusal plane. Consequently, all other images are affected. More importantly, bone loss measurements are significantly different. In fact, because of individual angulations, the long axis of each tooth must be found prior to performing a bone level measurement. When reformatting the volume and aligning it with the occlusal plane, new oblique cross-sections will be generated, counteracting for this alignment deviation. This angulation is important during the initial evaluation, and positioning of the patient is essential. The panoramic reconstruction is generated, consisting of an oblique reslicing along the curvature of the jaw on an axial slice at the level of the alveolar crest. This image manipulation is the standard view for implant site analyses to which the same principle applies when measuring the alveolar ridges. Yet for periodontal measurements, multiple individual sites need to be measured per tooth, and the long axes of teeth are often not aligned to this occlusal plane because of pathological tilting or strong lingual orientation of mandibular molars. Therefore, a more individualized image manipulation is needed for an accurate measurement of bone loss (Figure 11.6). While first-generation software did not allow for  real-time oblique reslicing and thus requiring Table 11.1 Visualization of important periodontal features using existing methods and CBCT. Clinical Intraoral XR CBCT Plaque ++ — — Gingival inflammation ++ — — Pocket depths/attachment level ++ — — Bone level — + ++ Infrabony craters + + ++ Furcation involvements + + ++ Follow-up of regenerative therapy + + ++ Mobility ++ — — Local factors (calculus, overhang, caries) ++ ++ +a Lateral abcess ++ — — Periapical abcess — + ++ Periodontal ligament space — ++ +b Lamina dura — ++ +b Trabecularization — ++ +b + = adequate method; ++ = best method; a dash denotes that the specific evaluation cannot be done. a. Metallic restorations cause artifacts and may obscure the image. Detection of caries on CBCT is limited, especially at initial stages. b. These factors depend on the CBCT unit and scanning protocol; for modern units with higher spatial resolution, a better depiction is likely. Periodontal Disease Diagnosis Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 257 a  new volume reconstruction as illustrated in Figure  11.5, latest upgrades accommodate realtime reconstruction along the long axis of teeth. Panoramic reconstruction and rapid measurement of the bone levels are now easily achieved. Care should be given in hospital environments where CBCT cross-sections are sent to a specific PACS system that does not allow for this kind of manipulation without having the entire specific dataset: prior to sending the images, adequate reconstruction is necessary. In the studies below, although correct positioning is often used, small deviation differences may thus be caused not only by the error of an observer’s anatomical landmark identification but also by the degree of standardization of measurements. Just like the paralleling technique of intraoral radiographs, CBCT data need correct standardization. Mengel et al. (2005) compared periodontal measurements (fenestrations, dehiscences, and furcations) on periapical radiographs, panoramic films, CT, and CBCT in animal and human mandibles to their corresponding histologic specimens. They reported mean height discrepancies of 0.29 mm for  intraoral radiographs and 0.16mm for CBCT. These small deviation errors are due to an elaborate standardization where the teeth’s occlusal surfaces were reduced for better alignment. Although the level of accuracy might not be reproducible clinically, this study highlights the geometric accuracy of CBCT. Using a geometric model, Marmulla et  al. (2005) reported a similar accuracy (0.13mm ± 0.09S.D.) with a maximum deviation of 0.3mm. Lascala et  al. (2004) using large measurements of skulls in vitro found errors varying from 0.07mm to 0.2mm. Misch et  al. (2006) compared linear measurements of artificially created periodontal defects on CBCT images and periapical radiographs. They reported a mean error of 0.41mm for measurements on CBCT. Again, a small measurement error was found, although the natural dentition was used to identify occlusal planes of dry skulls. The study also reported that CBCT measurements are  as accurate as direct measurements using a periodontal probe, and as reliable as radiographs for interproximal areas. Yet, because buccal and lingual defects could not be diagnosed with Figure 11.5 Clinical CBCT scan of the maxilla with the patient’s occlusal plane (A) parallel to the grid, and (B) with a 5-degree angulation. Note how this small change impacts other views and measurements of bone loss (red and green arrows). 258 Cone Beam Computed Tomography radiography, CBCT was a superior technique. Although no difference was found between intraoral radiographs and CBCT, the visualization of gutta percha fiducials along the infrabony defects on the radiographic images facilitated identification of cemento-enamel junctions, which would be more difficult in a clinical setting, resulting in greater errors, especially for intraoral radiography. Mol and Balasundaram (2008) assessed the accuracy of alveolar bone height measurements on dry skulls without the use of radiographic markers along the defects, and categorized the results by MPR (A) (B) 2.9 mm 3.7 mm 1.8 mm 2.4 mm 1 cm 1 cm TH: 0 [mm] 1x MPR 260 TH: 0 [mm] 1x Figure 11.6 (A) Orthogonal cross-sections (coronal and sagittal) on the maxillary premolar in Figure 11.5. (B) Angles of this cross-section were modified to find the long axis of the tooth. Note how different the measurements are. Periodontal Disease Diagnosis Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 259 tooth groups. They reported measurements varying between 1.16 and 2.24mm using radiography, versus variations of 0.91 to 1.95mm with CBCT. For the mandibular anterior region, it was concluded that both modalities have limited accuracy because of the specific anatomy of the region: bony plates are thin and the alveolar bone tapers towards the crest. The authors stated that the use of an older machine might have contributed to their observation because submillimeter detection and enhanced contrast are critical when cortical bone is thin and the bucco-lingual crestal thickness is reduced. However, it must be noted that in this study measurements were carried out on 1-mm crosssections, while the actual spatial resolution of most CBCT systems is below 0.4mm. The influence of a cross-section’s thickness was investigated by Vandenberghe et al. (2007a). When assessing naturally occurring periodontal bone defects of human cadaver jaws on a 5.2mm orthogonal cross-section (simulating a high-resolution panoramic reconstruction) measurements, deviations between 0.13 and 1.67mm were found. These were not significantly different from intraoral measurements, which ranged from 0.19 to 1.66mm. In a second study (Vandenberghe et al., 2008), these 5.2-mm reconstructed cross-sections were thus compared with measurements on 0.4-mm cross-sections (see Figure 11.7). For intraoral radiography, errors varied from 0.01 to 1.65mm. When using 5-mm-thick panoramic reconstructions, errors varied from 0.03 to 1.69mm but decreased to a range of 0.04 to 0.9mm when using 0.4-mm-thick reconstructions. These in-vitro studies all support the use of CBCT to measure alveolar bone levels. Furthermore, latest generations of CBCT technology with submillimeter slices would likely yield better results. To date, there is sparse clinical research comparing radiography to CBCT. Naito et al. (1998) assessed 186 sites on 9 patients for periodontal bone loss and found no significant difference in measurements, compared to bone sounding. de Faria Vasconcelos et al. (2012) compared bone loss measurements on intraoral radiographs and CBCT images of patients referred for periodontal evaluation and found the latter to be more precise. Nevertheless, the impact of CBCT periodontal diagnosis, choice of treatment protocols, or evaluation of postsurgical outcome remains anecdotal. Despite the high(er) precision of CBCT for alveolar bone loss measurements, other diagnostic markers that are more likely to influence treatment outcome, such as bone defect topography, have to be explored and considered in the application of CBCT for periodontal diagnosis. Infrabony defects and furcation involvement Two-dimensional radiography is particularly limited in detecting furcation involvement and infrabony defects, although these anatomic features are essential to periodontal diagnosis and prognosis (Muller et al., 1995; Walter et al., 2011; Figure 11.8). In contrast, CBCT has good potential 3.79 50 60 70 5.95 (A) (B) (C) Figure 11.7 (A) Standardized alveolar bone level measurements on intraoral digital radiographs. (B) a 5.2-mm thickness CBCT slice, reformatted along the alveolar crest to simulate a panoramic reconstruction and (C) on a 0.4-mm cross-sectional slice. 260 Cone Beam Computed Tomography and investigators have attempted to demonstrate its superiority. Fuhrmann, Wehrbein, et al. (1995), using human cadaver jaws and artificially produced infrabony defects, compared intraoral radiographs with highresolution CT and found that only 60% of infraalveolar bony defects were identified on radiographs, whereas 100% could be distinguished using CBCT. This is similar to the findings of Misch et al. (2006), where 67% of infrabony defects were detected on the intraoral radiographs, compared to 100% with CBCT. Fuhrmann et al. (1997) also investigated the detection of furcation involvements using highresolution CT and found that 21% were detected using intraoral radiographs, while 100% were detected using CT. Vandenberghe et  al. (2007b) studied the actual topography of crater and furcation involvements on intraoral and CBCT images. Observers were asked to classify the craters according to the number of bony walls (0 = no defect, 1 to 4 = 1 to 4  wall defects) and furcation involvements. Only 69% of crater defects and 58% of furcation involvements were identified using intraoral images, in contrast to 100% for both lesion types on CBCT images. For intraoral digital imaging, craters were classified correctly only 25% of the time, with a tendency to overestimate (62%). For CBCT, 80% of the craters and 100% of the furcation involvements were correctly classified. A recent in-vitro study from Noujeim et al. (2009) confirms that CBCT provides a more accurate detection of periodontal lesions than intraoral radiography. Similar in vivo findings had already been suggested in 2001 by Ito et al. (2001), reporting on a single patient who underwent CBCT scanning Figure 11.8 (A) Intraoral radiograph of a maxillary first molar shows bone loss centered on the disto-buccal root. (B–D) A CBCT uncovers a more significant lesion, as well as root resorption on the palatal root. Periodontal Disease Diagnosis Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 261 before periodontal regenerative surgery, and again one year after the procedure. As expected, the regenerative outcome and defect morphology were  clearly visible on CBCT. A few years later, the clinical studies by Walter et al. have demonstrated the accuracy of CBCT in the detection of furcation-involved teeth (Walter et al., 2010) and the usefulness of CBCT in decision making for furcation surgery (Walter et al., 2009; Walter et al., 2012). Walter et al. (2009) reported on 12 patients with generalized chronic periodontal disease. After completion of the initial therapy consisting of scaling and root planing, maxillary molars scheduled for periodontal surgery were further examined using CBCT. Interestingly, treatment planning was refined 60% to 80% of the time once three-dimensional imaging was obtained, in particular when furcations were affected. Furthermore, in their next study, Walter et  al. (2012) investigated the financial benefit, consisting of treatment costs and time, of CBCT-based imaging for treatment of furcation-involved maxillary molars and found a significant reduction, especially for second molars with elaborate treatment plan. They do suggest, however, that CBCT as an additional diagnostic tool is only justified when more invasive treatment choices are planned. Similarly, for interproximal infrabony defects, a recent study from Takane et  al. (2010) investigated the usefulness of CBCT in vivo, during presurgical planning. When using two-dimensional intraoral radiographs, preparation of surgical membranes could not be achieved while trimming time was more significant. Using CBCT, adequate defect evaluation and membrane trimming could be achieved prior to surgery. Other periodontal landmarks and subjective image analysis Radiographic examination also provides information on the presence of a lamina dura, the periodontal ligament space, the trabecular pattern of periodontal bone, the periapical region, and other factors such as overhang restorations or the  presence of subgingival calculus. Although Hashimoto et al. (2003; 2006) found that CBCT was superior to conventional helical CT for subjective evaluation of lamina dura, periodontal ligament space, and pulp cavity, they recognized that CBCT was limited in contrast resolution. Using cadaver jaws, Vandenberghe et al. (2008) asked observers to rate the ability to identify the lamina dura and trabecular patterns as well as the perception of contrast. For all variables, intraoral radiography scored significantly better than CBCT. Ozmeric et al. (2008) estimated CBCT in the detection of the periodontal ligament space. Although both intraoral radiography and CBCT were able to detect a thickness greater than 200 µm nearly 100% of the time, gaps smaller than 200 µm were less visible using CBCT. In addition, Liang et al. (2010) compared subjective image quality evaluations of five different CBCT units to multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and found that image quality was comparable or even superior to MSCT. Lamina dura delineation, periodontal space, and trabeculation were most difficult to assess and showed significant variation among different machines. For instance, in a recent study from Kamburoǧlu et al. (2011), dental landmarks like the lamina dura scored much better on  CBCT images acquired with modern units at small voxel sizes (<0.2mm). Besides the continuous improvement in image quality of modern CBCT units, it is quite obvious that the acquisition protocol is an important contributing factor to the visibility of such small structures. Figure 11.9 shows axial slices of a cadaver maxillary canine region scanned at high resolutions with four different CBCT units. Even though similar voxel sizes are used for optimal periodontal ligament space or lamina dura rating comparisons, differences in trabecular depiction are evident. Bone density and periodontal disease One particularly intriguing aspect of periodontal disease is its likely link to systemic changes in bone density. Although a relationship has been documented for many years, the advent of in-office head and neck computed tomography is opening new venues for research and clinical applications. Osteoporosis may be detectable in part using dental radiography. Attempts to utilize panoramic or periapical images have been reported (White et al., 2005; Lindh et al., 2008; Devlin et al., 2007). On the other hand, osteoporotic women may have less mandibular bone mass and density, more tooth 262 Cone Beam Computed Tomography loss, and more edentulism when compared with aged-matched individuals (Geurs, 2003; Mattson et  al., 2002; Nicopoulou-Karayianni et  al., 2009). Overall, studies suggest that treatment with estrogen replacement therapy may slow down bone loss  at the mandible (Narai and Nagahata, 2003). In addition, there is mounting evidence that periodontal disease is increased in the presence of osteoporosis, as suggested by various reports (Swoboda et  al., 2008; Pepelassi et  al., 2011). Inagaki  et  al. (2005) studied the efficacy of utilizing periodontal disease and tooth loss status to screen for low bone mineral density in a population of Japanese women. They found a positive association between decreasing bone mineral density and prevalence of periodontal disease in this population of women. They also concluded that tooth loss was significantly elevated in postmenopausal Japanese women with low bone mineral density and that their odds of periodontal disease increased as bone mineral density decreased. This study and others support an association between bone mineral density and periodontal status, suggesting the possible role of the dental clinician in the detection of osteoporosis. One common limitation of these studies is that radiographic modalities utilized to  assess bone density were imperfect: twodimensional projections can only provide limited density information since cortical plates and various regions of the trabecular bone are overlaid. Despite these limitations, it has been suggested that even traditional radiography such as panoramic films may be an imaging modality by which dentists can evaluate the dentition as well as screen for osteoporosis (White et  al., 2005; Lindh et  al., 2008; Devlin et al., 2007). Therefore, it is conceivable that a CBCT, in addition to dental evaluation, be utilized for screening low bone density to both detect a contributing factor to periodontal disease and detect undiagnosed osteopenia. Due to the nature of CBCT technology, Hounsfield units (HU) vary from machine to machine and between images on the same machine, depending on the patient size and position. Therefore, density measurements  are an approximation and more research needs to be conducted for the use of bone density measurements on CBCT images. Interestingly, one clinical study from Song et al. (2009) measured CT Figure 11.9 Axial slices of a maxillary cadaver canine region scanned with (A) Scanora 3D (0.2mm, 85kV, 8mA), (B) PaX-Uni3D (0.2mm, 85kV, 6mA), (C) Accuitomo 3D (0.125mm, 80kV, 4mA), and (D) I-CAT next generation (0.25mm, 120kV, 5mA). Periodontal Disease Diagnosis Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 263 numbers and thickness of compact bone around dental implants for correlation to primary stability and found CBCT values to be predictive of their stability. Koh and Kim (2011) also investigated the use of CT indices on CBCT images to assess bone mineral density and found it to be quite accurate in the assessment of osteoporotic women. However, Hua et al. (2009), using mandibular bone samples, seem to point out that methods like fractal analysis  (trabecular pattern analysis) and bone area measurements may have potential in assessment of bone quality on CBCT images but that density measurements do not seem to be valid. Future applications Detectors and algorithms are being refined in order  to improve soft tissue contrast and image quality in the vicinity of metals or dense objects such as endodontic treatments. Furthermore, it is  important to determine optimal protocols for specific diagnostic tasks by keeping the ALARA principle in mind: achieving optimal image quality at the lowest radiation dose. The field of view is an important variable for periodontal diagnosis since it is directly related to the radiation exposure. Depending on the clinical Figure 11.10 Various fields of view for periodontal applications. (A) Small field CBCT (4 × 4cm, CS9000, Carestream Dental, France) for a combined endodontic-periodontal problem. (B) Medium field CBCT (8 × 6cm, Cranex 3D, Soredex, Finland) of a mandibular jaw for implant site and periodontal diagnosis. (C) Large field CBCT (16 × 13cm, KaVo 3D Exam, KaVo Dental GmbH, Germany) for generalized, aggressive periodontal disease in combination with sinus pathology. 264 Cone Beam Computed Tomography case, it may only be necessary to supplement the periodontal examination with a local 3D examination. In more complex cases with generalized and severe periodontal breakdown, where implant treatment is foreseen, a larger field of view should be desirable (see Figure 11.10). Researchers are currently testing parameters to determine which specific settings are adequate for specific diagnostic tasks. Lowering the voltage and amperes as well as reducing exposure times and frame counts are among methods to reduce radiation while ensuring diagnostic quality. Figure 11.11 is an example of a standardized dry skull with soft tissue simulation at different exposure settings. Preliminary results reveal that image quality using low exposure parameters may be sufficient for adequate bone level measurements and/or subjective image quality ratings. Despite the excellent spatial resolution of CBCT, contrast resolution is still limited. It is therefore impossible to discern between soft tissue types such as the cheeks or lips and the gingival tissues (see Figure  11.12A). In order to overcome this inconvenience, for instance for soft tissue profile assessment in aesthetic implant rehabilitation, a modified CBCT protocol can be applied consisting of patient scanning while wearing a lip retractor (Vandenberghe et  al., 2010; Januario et  al., 2008; Barriviera et al., 209). This separates the surrounding tissues from the gingiva and traps air around it, which makes them more visible on the CBCT image (see Figure 11.12B). Januario et  al. (2008) utilized this scanning method to successfully measure soft and hard tissue parameters: cemento-enamel junction to the gingival margin, bony crest to the gingival margin, and gingival thickness. These encouraging initial results provide evidence for further research on periodontal soft tissue assessments using a modified Figure 11.11 Dry skull with soft tissue simulation, scanned with different exposure parameters (i-CAT next generation). Figure 11.12 (A) Sagittal view with limited soft tissue contrast. White arrows show that, both buccally and lingually, no distinction between gingival and surrounding tissues can be made. The asterisk indicates the airway, which makes the palatal mucosa visible. (B) Sagittal slice of a patient scanned while wearing a lip retractor. Gingival tissues are more apparent. Periodontal Disease Diagnosis Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 265 CBCT scanning technique. Barriviera et  al. (2009) also used this new scanning technique for assessments of the palatal mucosa thickness. This mucosa is the main donor site for soft tissue grafts in periodontal surgery. Determination of its thickness is clinical probing, which requires local anesthesia prior to surgery, thus limiting presurgical planning. In this clinical study, 31 patients were recruited and  palatal mucosa thickness was measured at 40 different sites on each patient. The authors found different thicknesses depending on tooth type and age, which were similar to other studies using different assessment methods. They concluded that this modality is accurate for planning of periodontal surgery. Few studies have addressed changes of alveolar bone levels after periodontal regenerative surgeries or implant therapy. Grimard et al. (2009) compared clinical, periapical radiographic, and CBCT measurements of bone level changes after periodontal regenerative surgery. Thirty-five intrabony defects on 29 patients were imaged before grafting, and again 6 months later. CBCT measurements correlated strongly with those performed during surgery, while intraoral radiographic measurements (calibrated with a millimetric grid) were less accurate. Loss of bone volume can also be evaluated. Feichtinger et  al. (2007) assessed bone resorption after site preservation using CT. They outlined bone on each slice by drawing its borders using dedicated software, and stacked them to obtain a small three-dimensional model of the local defect. This volume could then be compared to postsurgical scanning. Figure  11.13 shows scanning of a patient using CBCT at the time of site preservation Figure 11.13 (A) Pre- and postextraction CBCT views of a patient’s maxillary central incisor. A site-preservation technique was performed after extraction of the tooth. (Courtesy of Anthony Sclar) (B) Registered CBCT data of the maxillary central incisor. The prescan (taken at the time of site preservation, in yellow) and the postscan (6 months later, in blue) show a small local bone loss at the buccal plate. 266 Cone Beam Computed Tomography of a central maxillary incisor, and 6 months later. CBCT datasets were overlaid to highlight local bone loss at the ridge. Conclusion Although CBCT has been available only for a few years, its periodontal applications are becoming evident. Despite the fact that periodontal disease affects a growing population due to aging and better maintenance of the natural dentition, diagnostic methods have only evolved at a slow pace. Biologic markers are site specific but reveal little of  the osseous topography. As a result, surgical approaches continue to be empirical and decision making is often relegated to the surgical event. Three-dimensional imaging will likely improve patient understanding of their disease, enhance diagnosis, and assist clinicians in refining their treatment methods. References Armitage, G.C. (2004). Periodontal diagnoses and classification of periodontal diseases. Periodontol 2000, 34: 9–21. Barriviera, M., et al. (2009). A new method to assess and measure palatal masticatory mucosa by cone-beam computerized tomography. J Clin Periodontol, 36(7): 564–8. Borg, E., Gröndahl, K., and Gröndahl, H. (1997). Marginal bone level buccal to mandibular molars in digital radiographs from charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems: An in vitro study. Journal of Clinical Periodontol, 24: 306–12. Brown, L.J., Oliver, R.C., and Loe, H. (1989). Periodontal diseases in the U.S. in 1981: Prevalence, severity, extent and rate of tooth mortality. J Dent Res, 60: 363–70. Cohen, M.E., and Ralls, S.A. (1988). Distributions of periodontal attachment levels, mathematical models and implications. J Periodontol, 15: 254–8. Copeland, L.B., et  al. (2004). Predictors of tooth loss in  two US adult populations. Journal of Public Health Dentistry, 64(1): 31–7. de Faria Vasconcelos, K., et  al. (2012). Detection of periodontal bone loss using cone beam CT and intraoral radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 41(1): 64–9. Devlin, H., et al. (2007). Diagnosing osteoporosis by using dental panoramic radiographs: the OSTEODENT project. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 104(6): 821–8. Eickholz, P., and Haussman, E. (2000). Accuracy of radiographic assessment of interproximal bone loss in intrabony defects using linear measurements. Eur J Oral Sci, 108: 70–3. Feichtinger, M., Mossbock, R., and Karcher, H. (2007). Assessment of bone resorption after secondary alveolar bone grafting using three-dimensional computed tomography: A three-year study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 44(2): 142–8. Fuhrmann, R.A., Bücker, A., and Diedrich, P.R. (1995). Assessment of alveolar bone loss with high resolution computed tomography. Journal of Periodontal Research, 30(4): 258–63. Fuhrmann, R.A., Bücker, A., and Diedrich, P.R. (1997). Furcation involvement: Comparison of dental radiographs and HR-CT-slices in human specimens. J Periodontal Res, 32(5): 409–18. Fuhrmann, R.A., Wehrbein, H., et al. (1995). Assessment of the dentate alveolar process with high resolution computed tomography. Dento-Maxillo-Facial Radiology, 24(1): 50–4. Geurs, N.C. (2003). Osteoporosis and periodontal disease progression. Periodontol 2000, 32: 105–10. Giannobile, W.V., Al-Shammari, K.F., and Sarment, D.P. (2003). Matrix molecules and growth factors as indicators of periodontal disease activity. Periodontol 2000, 31: 125–34. Goodson, J.M. (1992). Conduct of multicenter trials to test agents for treatment of periodontitis. J Periodontol, 63(12 Suppl): 1058–63. Greenstein, G., et al. (1981). Associations between crestal lamina dura and periodontal status. Journal of Periodontology, 52: 362–6. Grimard, B.A., et al. (2009). Comparison of clinical, periapical radiograph, and cone-beam volume tomography measurement techniques for assessing bone level changes following regenerative periodontal therapy. J Periodontol, 80(1): 48–55. Grondahl, H.G., Grondahl, K., and Webber, R.L. (1983). A  digital substraction technique for dental radiography. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, & Endodontics, 55: 96–102. Hashimoto, K., Arai, Y., et al. (2003). A comparison of a new limited cone beam computed tomography machine for dental use with a multidetector row helical CT machine. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral  Pathology Oral Radiology & Endodontics, 95(3): 371–7. Hashimoto, K., Kawashima, S., et al. (2006). Comparison of image performance between cone-beam computed tomography for dental use and four-row multidetector helical CT. Journal of Oral Science, 48(1): 27–34. Periodontal Disease Diagnosis Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 267 Hausmann, E., and Allen, K. (1997). Reproducibility of bone height measurements made on serial radiographs. J Periodontol, 68(9): 839–41. Hua Y., et al. (2009). Bone quality assessment based on cone beam computed tomography imaging. Clin Oral Implants Res, 20(8): 767–71. Inagaki, K., et al. (2005). Efficacy of periodontal disease and tooth loss to screen for low bone mineral density in Japanese women. Calcif Tissue Int, 77(1): 9–14. Ito, K., et al. (2001). Clinical application of a new compact computed tomography system for evaluating the outcome of regenerative therapy: A case report. J Periodontol, 72(5): 696–702. Januario, A.L., Barriviera, M., and Duarte, W.R. (2008). Soft tissue cone-beam computed tomography: A novel method for the measurement of gingival tissue and the dimensions of the dentogingival unit. J Esthet Restor Dent, 20(6): 366–73, discussion p. 374. Jeffcoat, M.K., and Reddy, M.S. (1991). Progression of probing attachment loss in adult periodontitis. J Periodontol, 62: 185–9. Jorgenson, T., et al. (2007). Comparison of two imaging modalities: F-speed film and digital images for detection of osseous defects in patients with interdental vertical bone defects. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 36(8): 500–5. Kamburoǧlu, K., et  al. (2011). Comparative assessment of  subjective image quality of cross-sectional conebeam  computed tomography scans. J Oral Sci, 53(4): 501–8. Kassebaum, D.K., et  al. (1990). Cross-sectional radiography for implant site assessment. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, & Endodontics, 70: 674–82. Khader, Y., Albashaireh, Z., and Alomari, M. (2004). Periodontal diseases and the risk of coronary heary and cerebrovascular diseases: A meta-analysis. J Periodontol, 75: 1046–53. Klinge, B., Petersson, A., and Maly, P. (1989). Location of the mandibular canal: Comparison of macroscopic findings, conventional radiography, and computed tomography. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 4: 327–32. Koh, K.J., and Kim, K.A., et  al. (2011). Utility of the computed tomography indices on cone beam computed tomography images in the diagnosis of osteoporosis in women. Imaging Sci Dental, 41(3): 101–6. Langen, H.J., et  al. (1995). Diagnosis of infra-alveolar bony lesions in the dentate alveolar process with highresolution computed tomography: Experimental results. Investigative Radiology, 30(7): 421–6. Lascala, C.A., Panella, J., and Marques, M.M. (2004). Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 33(5): 291–4. Levy, S.M., et  al. (2003). The prevalence of periodontal disease measures in elderly adults, aged 79 and older. Special Care in Dentistry, 23(2): 50–7. Liang, X., et al. (2010). A comparative evaluation of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multi-slice CT (MSCT): Part I. On subjective image quality. Eur J Radiol, 75(2): 265–9. Lindh, C., et al. (2008). The use of visual assessment of dental radiographs for identifying women at risk of having osteoporosis: the OSTEODENT project. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 106(2): 285–93. Loe, H. (1967). The gingival index, the plaque index and  the retention index systems. J Periodontol, 36: 610–6. Ludlow, J.B., Davies-Ludlow, L.E., and White, S.C. (2008). Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: The impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation. J Am Dent Assoc, 139(9): 1237–43. Ludlow, J.B., Davies-Ludlow, L.E., and Brooks, S.L. (2003). Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 32: 229–34. Manson, J.D. (1963). Lamina dura. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, & Endodontics, 16: 432–8. Marmulla, R., et  al. (2005). Geometric accuracy of the NewTom 9000 Cone Beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 34(1): 28–31. Mattson, J.S., Cerutis, D.R., and Parrish, L.C. (2002). Osteoporosis: A review and its dental implications. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 23(11): 1001–4, 1006, 1008 passim; quiz 1014. Mengel, R., et al. (2005). Digital volume tomography in the diagnosis of periodontal defects: An in vitro study on native pig and human mandibles. Journal of Periodontology, 76(5): 665–73. Misch, K.A., Yi, E.S., and Sarment, D.P. (2006). Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography for periodontal defect measurements. Journal of Periodontology, 77(7): 1261–6. Mol, A. (2004). Imaging methods in periodontology. Periodontology 2000, 34: 34–48. Mol, A., and Balasundaram, A., (2008). In vitro cone beam computed tomography imaging of periodontal bone. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 37(6): 319–24. Muller, H.P., Eger, T., and Lange, D.E. (1995). Management of furcation-involved teeth: A retrospective analysis. J Clin Periodontol, 22(12): 911–7. 268 Cone Beam Computed Tomography Naito, T., Hosokawa, R., and Yokota, M. (1998). Threedimensional alveolar bone morphology analysis using computed tomography. Journal of Periodontology, 69(5): 584–9. Narai, S., and Nagahata, S. (2003). Effects of alendronate on the removal torque of implants in rats with induced osteoporosis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 18(2): 218–23. Nicopoulou-Karayianni, K., et  al. (2009). Tooth loss and  osteoporosis: the OSTEODENT Study. J Clin Periodontol, 36(3): 190–7. Noujeim, M., et al. (2009). Evaluation of high-resolution cone beam computed tomography in the detection of simulated interradicular bone lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 38(3): 156–62. Oliver, R.C., and Heuer, S.B. (1995). Dental practice patterns. II: Treatment related to oral health status. Gen Dent, 43: 170–5. Ozmeric, N., et al. (2008). Cone-beam computed tomography in assessment of periodontal ligament space: In vitro study on artificial tooth model. Clin Oral Investig, 12(3): 233–9. Palomo, J.M., Rao, P.S., and Hans, M.G. (2008). Influence of CBCT exposure conditions on radiation dose. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 105(6): 773–82. Pauls, V., and Trott, J.R. (1966). A radiological study of experimentally produced lesions in bone. Dent Pract Dent Rec, 16: 254–8. Pauwels, R., et  al. (2012). SEDENTEXCT Project Consortium: Effective dose range for cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol, 81(2): 267–71. Pecoraro, M., et al. (2005). Comparison of observer reliability in assessing alveolar bone height on direct digital and conventional radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 34: 279–84. Pepelassi, E., et al. (2011). The relationship between osteoporosis and peridontitis in women aged 45–70 years. Oral Dis, E-pub, ahead of print. Pepelassi, E.A., and Diamanti-Kipioti, A. (1997). Selection of the most accurate method of conventional radiography for the assessment of periodontal osseous destruction. J Clin Periodontol, 24: 557–657. Polson, A.M. (1997). The research team, calibration, and quality assurance in clinical trials in periodontics. Annals of Periodontology, 2(1): 75–82. Preda, L., et  al. (1997). Use of spiral computed tomography for multiplanar dental reconstruction. DentoMaxillo-Facial Radiology, 26: 327–31. Ramadan, A., and Mitchell, D.F. (1962). Roentgenographic study of experimental bone destruction. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, & Endodontics, 15: 934–43. Ramesh, A., et  al. (2001). Evaluation of tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT) in the localization of simulated periodontal defects. Dento-Maxillo-Facial Radiology, 30(6): 319–24. Ramesh, A., et  al. (2002). Evaluation of tuned-aperture computed tomography in the detection of simulated periodontal defects. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral  Pathology, Oral Radiology, & Endodontics, 93(3): 341–9. Reddy, M.S. (1997). The use of periodontal probes and radiographs in clinical trials of diagnostic tests. Ann Periodontol, 2: 113–22. Rees, T., Biggs, N.L., and Collins, C.K. (1971). Radiographic interpretation of periodontal osseous defects. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, & Endodontics, 2: 141–53. Ruttimann, U.E., Qi, X.L., and Webber, R.L. (1989). An optimal synthetic aperture for circular tomosynthesis. Med Phys, 16: 398–405. Samarabandu, J., et  al. (1994). Algorithm for the automated alignment of radiographs for image substraction. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, & Endodontics, 77: 75–9. Schliephake, H., et  al. (2003). Imaging of periimplant bone levels of implants with buccal bone defects. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 14(2): 193–200. Socransky, S.S., et al. (1984). New concepts of destructive periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol, 11: 21–32. Song, Y.D., Jun, S.H., and Kwon, J.J. (2009). Correlation between bone quality evaluated by cone-beam computerized tomography and implant primary stability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 24(1): 59–64. Sukovic, P. (2003). Cone beam computed tomography in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res, 6(Suppl 1): 31–6; discussion 179–82. Swoboda, J.R., et  al. (2008). Correlates of periodontal decline and biological markers in older adults. J Periodontol, 79: 1920–6. Takane, M., et  al. (2010). Clinical application of cone beam computed tomography for ideal absorbable membrane placement in interproximal bone defects. J Oral Sci, 52(1): 63–9. Tugnait, A., Clerehugh, V., and Hirschmann, P.N. (2000). The usefulness of radiographs in diagnosis and management of periodontal diseases: A review. J Dent, 28: 219–26. Tyndall, D.A., and Brooks, S.L. (2000). Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: A position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, & Endodontics, 89: 630–7. Vandenberghe, B., et  al. (2010). The influence of CBCT exposure parameters on periodontal bone measurements: In-vitro accuracy. Abstract Book XII European Periodontal Disease Diagnosis Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography 269 Congress of Dento-Maxillo Facial Radiology. Istanbul, Turkey, p. 24. Vandenberghe, B., Jacobs, R., and Yang, J. (2007a). Diagnostic validity (or acuity) of 2D CCD versus 3D CBCT-images for assessing periodontal breakdown. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 104(3): 395–401. Vandenberghe, B., Jacobs, R., and Yang, J. (2007b). Topographic assessment of periodontal craters and furcation involvements by using 2D digital images versus 3D cone beam CT: An in-vitro study. Chin J Dent Res, 10: 21–9. Vandenberghe, B., Jacobs, R., and Yang, J. (2008). Detection of periodontal bone loss using digital intraoral and cone beam computed tomography images: An in vitro assessment of bony and/or infrabony defects. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 37(5): 252–60. Walter, C., Kaner, D., et  al. (2009). Three-dimensional imaging as a pre-operative tool in decision making for furcation surgery. J Clin Periodontol, 36(3): 250–7. Walter, C., Weiger, R., Dietrich, T., et  al. (2012). Does three-dimensional imaging offer a financial benefit for treating maxillary molars with furcation involvement? A pilot clinical case series. Clin Oral Implants Res, 23(3): 351–8. Walter, C., Weiger, R., and Zitzmann, N.U. (2010). Accuracy of three-dimensional imaging in assessing maxillary molar furcation involvement. J Clin Periodontol, 37(5): 436–41. Walter, C., Weiger, R., and Zitzmann, N.U. (2011). Periodontal surgery in furcation-involved maxillary molars revisited—An introduction of guidelines for comprehensive treatment. Clin Oral Investig, 15(1): 9–20. Webber, R.L., et  al. (1997). Tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT). Theory and application for three-dimensional dento-alveolar imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 26: 53–62. White, S.C., et al. (2005). Clinical and panoramic predictors of femur bone mineral density. Osteoporos Int, 16(3): 339–46. Wolf, B., von Bethlenfalvy, E., and Hassfeld, S. (2001). Reliability of assessing interproximal bone loss by digital radiography: Intrabony defects. J Clin Periodontol, 28: 869–78. Yang, J., et al. (1999). 2-D and 3-D reconstructions of spiral computed tomography in localization of the  inferior alveolar canal for dental implants. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, & Endodontics, 87: 369–74. 271 Cone Beam Computed Tomography: Oral and Maxillofacial Diagnosis and Applications, First Edition. Edited by David Sarment. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2014 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Index Page numbers followed by “f” and “t” indicate figures and tables. Abscesses, 67, 82, 256t Absorbed dose, 40 Accessory root canals, 225 Accountability, collaborative, 150, 159, 194 Acquisition, defined, 3 Acute otitis media, 81–82 Adenoidal facies, 200 Adenoids, 203–204, 205f Adenomas, pleomorphic, 70 Adenomatoid odontogenic tumors, 58, 59 Aditus ad antrum, 81 Agenesis, 222 Agger nasi cells, 72, 72f, 75, 77–78 Airway assessment arthrides and, 200–201, 200f condylysis and, 200f, 201 facial growth and, 199–200 imaging protocols and, 198–199 juvenile arthritis and, 202–203f, 201–206 orthodontic and orthognathic planning and, 93–94, 94f overview of, 197–198, 207–208 resistance and, 198 ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle, 35, 214, 263 Alveolar bone and tooth assessment, 92, 92f Alveolar bone loss, 253–259, 258f, 259f, 260f, 265–266 Ameloblastic fibromas, 57, 58 Ameloblastomas, 57–58, 57f, 112f, 122 Aneurysmal bone cysts, 58 Angiofibromas. juvenile nasopharyngeal, 70 Angiography, 116, 124 Angles of rotation, 30, 39 Angulation, 256 Ankylosis, 181–182, 182–184f Anodes, 26, 27 Antrochoanal polyps, 68 Apical periodontitis (AP), 213, 229–230, 241 Application-specific integrated circuits (ASIC), 13 Arthrides, 200–201, 200f Arthritis, juvenile, 202–203f, 201–206 Artifacts beam hardening, 16, 22–23, 220 common, 20–23, 22f, 23f computer-aided surgery and, 96 cone beam, 14 metal and, 110, 220 misregistration, 220 motion, 220f nonuniformity, 20, 22f overview of, 220 partial volume, 220 ring, 20, 21f scatter, 22–23, 110 streaks, 20, 22, 22f, 220 272 Index ASIC. See Application-specific integrated circuits Atherosclerosis, 51 Atomic number, 25 Atoms, 25 Attenuation, 6–7, 220 Atypical odontalgia, 226–227 Auditory canal, external, 85–86, 86t Aurora, 99 Averaging, 7 Axial plane, 44f Back projection, 11, 12, 14–15 Background radiation, 33–34, 33f Basal cell nevus syndrome, 57 Beam hardening artifacts, 16, 22–23, 220 Bifid canals, 135, 135f Binding energy, 25 Biomarkers, 93 Biphosphonate drugs, 61 Bite registrations, 158, 159, 163 Blur effects, 19–20, 19f Bohr, Niels, 25 Bone canals, 134 Bone density, 130–132, 132f, 261–263 Bone displacement vectors, 99 Bone grafts. See Grafts Bone reduction guides, 175–176, 176–179f Bone resorption, 265–266, 265f Bone window imaging, 9–10, 14, 15f Bone-supported surgical guides, 168, 171f, 189f Brachial arch syndromes, 200 Bremsstrahlung photons, 27–28, 28f Buccal bifurcation cysts, 55 Buccal bone, 136, 138f, 139f, 140, 141, 141f CAC. See Carotid artery calcifications CAD/CAM collaborative accountability and, 159 imaging protocols and, 159 overview of, 147–148, 185, 194–195 prototyping and medical modeling and case type patterns and, 150–155 pretreatment analysis, 149–150, 149t stereolithography, 148–149, 148f, 149f, 159 scanning appliances and, 155–159 surgical guides and bone reduction guides, 175–176, 176–179f cutting pathway guides for lateral antroscopy of maxillary sinus, 176, 179–181f definition and classification, 161–166 for extraction of ankylosed teeth, 181–182, 182–184f fully integrated, 182, 184–193f implant planning and, 129, 138, 141, 142 implementation into clinical practice, 166–175 overview, 161 Calcification, 51, 52, 52f Calcified canals, 233–234 Calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumors, 58 Caldwell-Luc sinus grafting technique, 132, 133–134, 133f Calibration, 21–22 Canal stenosis, 86 Cancer, radiation-induced, 32–33, 34 Capsules, 46, 47f Carcinogenesis, 32–33, 34 Carcinomas, 61–62, 70, 87, 204, 208f. See also Squamous cell carcinomas Cardiovascular disease, 241 Carestream Dental 9300 CBCT unit, 148 Carotid arteries, 84 Carotid artery calcifications (CAC), 51–52, 52f Carotid atheromas, calcified, 51–52, 52f Carotid canal, 86t Cartilage, 93 Case type patterns I, 149t, 150, 151f II and III, 149t, 150–153, 152f, 153f IV, 149t, 153–154, 154f V, 149t, 154–155, 155f Cathodes, 26–27, 27f Cavernous sinus thrombosis, 67 CBCT. See Cone beam computed tomography CCDAP. See Chronic continuous dentoalveolar pain Cemental dysplasia, 50 Cementifying fibroma, 51 Cementoblastoma, 49 Cemento-osseous dysplasia, 50 Cementum, radiopaque lesions and, 48 Central giant cell granulomas (CGCG), 58 Central odontogenic fibromas, 58 Central ossifying fibroma, 51 Cephalometrics, 97–98 CGCG. See Central giant cell granulomas Cherubism, 58–59 Chicken pox, 213 Cholesteatomas, 82–84 Cholesterol granulomas, 84 Chondrosarcomas, 63, 87 Chordomas, 87 Chromosomes, 32 Chronic adhesive sclerosis, 82 Chronic continuous dentoalveolar pain (CCDAP), 226–227 Chronic otitis media, 82 Circular-orbiting cameras, 13f, 14 Clinical attachment measurements, 251 Closest point method, 91, 101, 102f CMFApp software, 95 Coalescent mastoiditis, 87 Cochlea, 78, 86t Cochlear implants, 81 Index 273 Cochlear otosclerosis, 80–81 Coherent scatter, 30, 30f Collaborative accountability, 150, 159, 194 Collimations, 29–30 Collimators, 5 Color maps, 91, 102, 102f Co-Me network, 95 Compton scatter, 30–31, 31f Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing. See CAD/CAM Computer-aided jaw surgery, 94–100, 95f Concha bullosa, 54, 71–72, 71f, 204f Condensing osteitis, 49, 50f Condylar hypoplasia, 200 Condylar remodeling, 93f Condylysis, 200f, 201 Cone beam artifacts, 14 Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), overview of, 3–6, 4f Continuous exposure, 29 Contrast, 8–9, 9f, 20 Cooling issues, 5 Cortication, 45 Cranial nerves, 86–87 Craniofacial anomalies, 94, 94f Craters, 252, 256t, 260 C-reactive protein, 93 Crest lines, 97 Cribiform plate, 86 Crista galli, 86 Cross-section views, 44f CUDA, 14 Cupping, 220 Current, 28–29 Cutting guides, 119, 120f, 124, 176, 179–181f Cysts aneurysmal bone, 58 buccal bifurcation, 55 dentigerous, 55, 55f, 59 jaw, 54–56, 55f, 58 mucous retention, 67–68, 68f, 68t nasopalatine duct, 229 overview of, 228 pseudocysts, 56–57, 56f radicular, 49, 55, 211, 214 radiographic diagnosis of, 214 simple bone, 56, 56f Deep circumflex iliac artery (DCIA) free flaps, 113 Degenerative joint disease, 200f, 201 Dehiscence of superior semicircular canal, 80 Dehiscences, 80, 257 Dens invaginatus (DI), 222 Dense bone islands, 49–50, 50f, 222–224, 224f Dental follicles, 59 Dental implants. See Implant placement Denticles, 48 Dentigerous cysts, 55, 55f, 59 Dentin, 48 Dentition, 3D visualization of, 115–116, 115f DentoCAT, 3–4, 4f Dentofacial deformities, 94, 94f Denture scanning appliances, 149t, 157–158, 158f, 160f Detector glare, 19 Detector lag, 19 Deterministic effects of ionizing radiation, 31–32 Developmental anomalies, of jaw, 53–54 Deviated nasal septum, 203, 204f DI. See Dens invaginatus Digital subtraction radiography, 252 Disinfection, 175 Distraction osteogenesis, 99 DNA, ionizing radiation and, 32 Dolphin Imaging, 95 Drilling guides, 117, 117f Dual scan protocols, 159, 161f Ear external auditory canal, 85–86, 86t inner, 78–81 middle, 81–85, 84t Ectopic calcification, 48 Edentulous arch, 141–142 Effective doses, 34–35, 36–37t, 40, 199, 219, 252 Effective treatment, defined, 240 Electromagnetic radiation, 26, 26f Electromagnetic tracking, 99 Electrons, 25, 27 Enamel, 48 Endodontic treatment dentoalveolar trauma, 234–235, 235f, 236f differential diagnosis anatomic structures hindering performance of task-specific procedures, 227–228 assessment of nonhealed cases, 229–230 contradictory or nonspecific signs and symptoms, 226–227 nonodontogenic lesions, 228 odontogenic lesions, 228–229 poorly localized symptoms, 227 vertical root fractures, 230–233, 232f evaluation of anatomy and complex morphology additional roots, 225–226 anomalies, 216f, 222–224 missed/accessory canals, 225 root curvatures, 224–225 implant planning and, 240 274 Index Endodontic treatment (cont’d) implantation vs., 135–136, 136f intra- or post-operative assessment of complications calcified canals, 233–234 perforation localization, 234 limitations of 2D imaging in, 217–218 limited field of view CBCT in advantages of, 214–216 limitations of, 218–220 outcome assessment, 240–241 overview of, 211–214 overview of applications of CBCT in, 221–222 presurgical planning, 237–239 root resorption, 235–237 Endolymphatic duct, 78 Endolymphatic sac tumors, 87 Endoscopy, 70–78 Enostosis, 49–50, 50f, 222–224, 224f Eosinophilic granulomas, 88 Epitympanum, 81 Equivalent dose, 40 ERR. See External root resorption Esthesioneuroblastomas, 87 Estrogen replacement therapy, 262 Ethmoid foramina, 86 Eustachian canals, 81, 82 Ewing’s sarcoma, 63 Exposure, defined, 39–40 Exposure time, 29, 38–39, 38f External auditory canal, 85, 86 External root resorption (ERR), 236 Extoses, 50, 85 Extractions, 136–137, 181–182, 182–184f Facial growth, airway and, 199–200 Facial nerve canal, 86t Fan beam geometries, 4–5 FBP. See Filtered back projection Feldkamp Davis Kress (FDK) algorithm, 11–14, 11f, 12f, 16 Fenestral otosclerosis, 80 Fenestrations, 257 FESS. See Functional endoscopic sinus surgery Fibro cartilage, 93 Fibroma, central ossifying, 51 Fibro-osseous lesions of jaw, 48–49, 50–51 overview of, 228 of sinuses, 69, 69f of skull base, 87 Fibro-osseous sclerosis, 82 Fibrosarcomas, 63 Fibrous dysplasia, 51, 52f, 61, 69, 87 Fibula grafts, 117 Fiduciary markers, 159 Fields of view (FOV). See also Limited field of view CBCT overview of, 6–7, 6f periodontal disease and, 263–264 radiation risks and, 29–30, 29f, 38, 38f Filtered back projection (FBP), 11, 15–16 Finite element models, 99 Florid osseous dysplasia (FOD), 50–51, 51f Focal osteoporotic bone marrow, 54 Focal spot, 27 FOD. See Florid osseous dysplasia Follicular (dentigerous) cysts, 55, 55f, 59 Foramina of Scarpa/Stensen, 229 Fossae of Rosenmuller, 204 Four-dimensional (4D) shape information, 98 FOV. See Fields of view Fractures, 86, 86t, 136, 138f. See also Vertical root fractures Free fibula, 117 Free fibula flaps, 112–113, 113f, 114f, 118f, 122–124 Free vascularized osseous flaps, 112–114, 113f, 114f Frontal bullar cells, 76–77 Frontal recess cells, 74–77 Frontoethmoid encephaloceles, 70 Full contour scanning appliances, 149t, 155–157, 156f, 157f Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS), 70–78 Fungal sinusitis, 66 Furcations, 252, 256t, 257, 259–261 Gardner syndrome, 223 Gemination, 222 General purpose graphics processing units (GPGPU), 15 Geometric projections, 10–11, 10f Giant cell reparative granuloma, 58 Giant cell tumors of skull base, 88 Glomus tumors, 84–85, 87 GPGPU. See General purpose graphics processing units Grafts dentition modeling and, 115 modeling bone and vessels and, 114–115 overview of, 124 prefabrication of, 117 preparation of jaw area, 119–120 selecting material for, 112–114, 116 surgery, 120–122 virtual planning of, 98, 116–119 Granuloma, dental, 49 Granulomas, cholesterol, 84 Ground glass appearance, 51, 69 Haller’s cells, 72, 73f Halos, 46, 47f Hamartomas, 48 Hemangiomas, 206–207f Hematopoietic malignancies, 62, 63 Index 275 Herpes zoster, 213 High tube prolongation, 163f Hounsfield units (HU), 7 HU. See Hounsfield units Hyperostosis, 78, 208f Hypopharynx, 197 Hypotympanum, 81 Idiopathic osteosclerosis, 49–50, 50f, 222–224, 224f Iliac artery flaps, 113 Iliac crest grafts, 110–111, 111f Image intensity, 7 Image noise, overview of, 18–20 Image quality, 128–130, 164 Image reconstruction conventional filtered, 10–14, 10f, 11f, 12–13f, 16f defined, 3, 6 iterative, 14–18, 16f overview of, 10 Image registration, 100 Image segmentation, 96–97, 100 Image Took Kit, 96 Imaging protocols, optimization of, 38–39, 38f Immediate smile model, 182, 190f, 192–193f Implant placement. See also CAD/CAM; Grafts anatomic evaluation prior to bone density, 130–132, 132f mandibles, 134–135 maxillary sinuses, 132–134 edentulous arch evaluation and, 141–142 endodontic treatment vs., 135–136, 136f extractions and, 136–157 image quality and, 128–130 immediate, 138–140 maxillofacial reconstructions and, 124 orthodontic evaluation and, 137–138 overview of, 127–128, 144 planning for, 240 scanning updates and, 142–144 small, 140–141 Incudomalleolar joint, 79f Incus, 79f, 81 Ineffective treatment, defined, 240 Inferior alveolar nerve, 239f Inflammation. See also Periodontal disease inner ear pathologies and, 78–80 jaw pathologies and, 49, 53, 54, 59–60 middle ear pathologies and, 81–82 sinus pathologies and, 67–68, 68f, 68t, 77 Infrabony defects, 259–261 Infraorbital nerve, 76f Infrared optical tracking devices, 99 Inner ear, 78–81, 79f, 80f InstaRecon, Inc., 15, 16–17, 16f, 17f Interfrontal sinus septal cells, 77 Internal root resorption (IRR), 235–236 Interradicular bone, 136, 140 Invasive fungal sinusitis, 66 Inverting papillomas, 69–70 InVivoDental, 95 Ionization, 25 Ionizing radiation. See also X-rays biological effects of, 31–33 Bremsstrahlung photons and, 27–28, 28f minimizing exposure to, 35–39 nature of, 25–26 risks from CBCT examinations and, 33–34 X-ray production and, 27f IRR. See Internal root resorption Ischemia time, 119, 124 ITK-SNAP software, 96, 96f Jacobson’s nerve, 85 Jaw pathologies classification of, 47–48 computer-aided surgery for, 94–100, 95f evaluation procedure, 45–47 overview of CBCT for, 43–44 protocol for reviewing scan volume, 44–45 radiolucent lesions rapidly growing, 59–63 slow-growing, 53–59 radiopaque lesions bone tissue lesions, 49–50 fibro-osseous lesions, 48, 50–51 miscellaneous, 51–52 overview of, 48 tooth tissue lesions, 48–49 reconstruction after surgery for, 110–112 role of dentist, 63–64 Jugular bulbs, 84 Jugular foramen, 87 Juvenile arthritis, 202–203f, 201–206 Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibromas, 70 Juvenile onset degenerative joint disease, 200f, 201 Keratocystic odontogenic tumors (KOT), 56–57, 56f, 58, 213 Keratosis obturans, 85 Keros classification, 74, 74t, 75f Kuhn classification, 75, 77t Labyrinth, 78, 79f, 80f Labyrinthine fistulas, 84 Labyrinthitis, 78–80 Lamina dura, 251, 261 Lamina papyracea, 74, 75, 76f Landmark-based measurements, 100–101 Langerhans cell histiocytosis, 88 Lateral periodontal cysts, 55 276 Index Lava Chairside Oral Scanner C.O.S., 110, 110f, 117, 122–124 Lenticular process, 81 Lesser sphenoid wings, 86 Limited field of view CBCT, 212f, 214–216, 218–220 Linear nonthreshold (LNT) model, 32–33 Lingual salivary gland depression, 54, 54f, 222 Longitudinal assessments, 93–94, 94f, 100–102, 101f, 102f Low-contrast detectability, 20 Lymphomas, 70 Malignancies, 61–63, 62f, 70. See also Specific types Malignant otitis externa, 85, 87 Malleus, 79f, 81 Mandibles, 134–135 Mandibular nerves, 134, 135f Mass tensor models, 99 Mastoiditis, 82, 87 Materialise Dental, 148 Matter, 25, 30–31 Maxilim system, 95 Maxillary sinuses augmentation of, 132–134, 142–143, 143f cutting guides for lateral antroscopy of, 176, 176–178f jaw pathologies and, 47, 47f Maxillofacial reconstructions case report of secondary reconstruction, 122–124 overview of, 109–110, 110f, 124 primary reconstruction after tumor ablative surgery, 110–112 secondary reconstruction of pre-existing defects, 112–122 Measurement noise, defined, 18 Measurements, quantitative, 100–102, 221f, 253–259 Medical Modeling system, 95 Medulla oblongata, 87 Melanoma, sinonasal, 70 Meningiomas, 87 Mesotympanum, 81 Metal, 110, 220 Metastases, of jaw, 52, 61–63 Microdontia taurodontism, 222 Middle ear, 81–85, 84t Misregistration artifacts, 220 Modulation transfer function (MTF), 20, 21f Morphometrics, 97–98, 98f Motion artifacts, 220f MPR. See Multiplanar rendering MSCT. See Multislice computed tomography MTF. See Modulation transfer function Mucoceles, 67–68, 68t Mucopyoceles, 68 Mucous retention cysts, 67–68, 68f, 68t Multilayer mass-spring models, 99 Multimodality registration, 95 Multiplanar rendering (MPR), 7, 8f, 44, 45 Multiple myeloma, 63 Multislice computed tomography (MSCT), 147, 261 Muscular function simulations, 99 Mycetoma, 66 Myringitis, 82, 83f Myxomas, odontogenic, 57, 58 Nasal mucosal hypertrophy, 204, 205f Nasal septum, 73 Nasopalatine duct cysts, 229 Nasopharynx, 197, 203–204, 205f National Alliance of Medical Computing, 101 Necrosis, 61 Necrotic otitis externa, 85, 87 Neoplasms, 81, 84–85, 228–229. See also Specific types Neuromas, 227 Neutrons, 25 NewTom, 39 NIH Visualization Tool Kit, 96 Noise. See Image noise; Measurement noise Nominal tomographic section thickness, 19f, 20 Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, 62f, 63 Nonuniformity artifacts, 20, 22f Nose, 203, 205f Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), 197 Obstructive sleep disordered breathing (OSDB), 197. See also Airway assessment Occipital bone, 86 Occlusal guides, 120–121, 120f Odontogenic keratocysts, 56–57, 56f, 58, 213 Odontogenic myxomas (OM), 57, 58 Odontomas, 48, 49f, 55f, 57 OF. See Ossifying fibromas Ohm’s law, 198 Olfactory fossa, 73–74, 74t, 75f OM. See Odontogenic myxomas OMC. See Osteomeatal complex Onodi cells, 72, 74f OpenCL, 14 Operator training, 37–38 Oral pharynx, 206, 206f Orbital plates, 86 Orbitals, 25 Oropharynx, 197 Orthodontics, 96, 137–138 Orthognathic surgery, 94, 96 Orthopedic corrections, 94 OSA. See Obstructive sleep apnea OSDB. See Obstructive sleep disordered breathing Osseous dysplasia, 50 Ossicles, 81, 86t Ossifying fibromas (OF), 51, 58, 69 Osteitis, 55f, 213, 229–230, 241 Index 277 Osteoarthritis, 200f, 201 Osteomas, 69, 69f, 85 Osteomeatal complex (OMC), 70 Osteomyelitis, 52, 60–61, 60f, 82, 87 Osteoneogenesis (hyperostosis), 78, 208f Osteopetrosis, 52, 87 Osteoplasty, 175, 189f Osteoporosis, 261–262 Osteoradionecrosis, 61 Osteosarcomas, 52, 61, 63 Osteosclerosis, idiopathic, 49–50, 50f, 222–224, 224f Osteotomies, virtual, 98–99 Osteotomy techniques, 132–133 Otic capsule, 86 Otitis media, 81–82 Otosclerosis, 80–81, 80f Outcome assessment, 240–241, 252 Pagetoid appearance, 69 Paget’s disease of the bone, 50–51, 61, 80, 87 Palatal mucosa thickness, 265 Panoramic images, 127 Panoramic radiographs, 251 Panoramic reconstructions, 44f, 45, 140, 142f Papillomas, inverting, 69–70 Paragangliomas, 84–85, 87 Parallel computing, 14–15 Paranasal sinus pathologies anatomic variants, 71–74, 72f fibro-osseous lesions, 69, 69f frontal recess and, 74–77 functional endoscopic sinus surgery and, 70–78 inflammatory polyps, mucoceles, mucous retention cysts, 67–68, 68f, 68t neoplasms and noninflammatory lesions, 69–70 overview of, 65–66 rhinoliths, 70 silent sinus syndrome, 68 sinusitis, 66–67, 67f Wegener’s granulomatosis, 70 Pars flaccida cholesteatomas, 83–84, 83f Partial volume artifacts, 220 Particulate radiation, 25–26 Perforations, 234 Periapical cemento-osseous dysplasia (PCOD), 50 Periapical cysts, 49, 55, 211, 214 Periapical rarefying osteitis, 213, 229–230, 241 Periapical region, 261 Perilymphatic space, 78 Periodontal cysts, lateral, 55 Periodontal disease alveolar bone loss measurement, 253–259, 258f, 259f, 260f bone density and, 261–263 bone tissue lesions and, 49 future applications of CBCT for, 263–266 infrabony defects and furcation involvement, 259–261 landmarks and subjective image analysis, 261 overview of CBCT for, 253, 254f, 255f, 256t, 266 prevalence and progression of, 249–250, 250f traditional computed tomography for, 252–253 traditional diagnostic methods for, 250–252 tuned aperture computed tomography for, 252 Periodontal ligament (PDL), 47, 261 Petrous ridge, 86 Petrous temporal bone, 86 Phantom tooth pain, 226–227 Phantoms, 14, 15f Photoelectric absorption, 31 Photons, 26, 26f, 28f, 29f Pindborg tumors, 58 Planning, 168, 169–171f, 194, 237–240 Plasmacytomas, 87 Plenum sphenoidale, 86 Pleomorphic adenomas, 70 Pneumatization, 71–72, 71f, 72f, 73f, 75–77, 77t Pocket probing depth, 250–251 Poiseuille’s law, 198 Polyps, 67–68, 68t, 204, 205f Polysomnograms, 197 Postcorrection methods, 22f, 23, 23f Postinflammatory ossicular fixation, 82 Progressive condylar resorption, 200f, 201 Projections, 10–12, 10f, 14–15 Prolongation, 161–162, 163f ProPlan CMF, 110, 110–111, 116–121 Protective equipment, 39 Protons, 25 Prototyping, rapid, 148–150, 161–162 Provisional restoration scanning appliances, 149t, 158–159 Prussak’s space, 84 Pseudocysts, 56–57, 56f Pulp vitality testing, 59, 213 Pulpal inflammation, 59 Pulsed exposure, 29 Punched out, 45, 46f Pyogenic sinusitis, 66 Quantitative measurements, 100–102, 221f, 253–259 Quarks, 25 Radiation. See also Ionizing radiation from 3D CBCT image acquisition, 100 necrosis from, 61 overview of, 25 risks from, 33, 34 sources of, 33–34, 33f units of, 39–40 Radiation dosage, 219. See also Effective doses Radicular cysts, 49, 55, 211, 214 278 Index Radiography, 127–128, 251–252, 256t Rapid prototyping, 148–150, 161–162 RDC/TMD. See Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Reconstruction grids, 6–7, 6f Reconstructions. See Maxillofacial reconstructions Regions of interest (ROI), 7, 8f Rems, 40 Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD), 92 Reslicing, 256–257 Resolution, 19–20, 219–220 Resorption, 200f, 201, 235–237, 265–266, 265f Restorative leadership, 150–159, 194 Retrofenestral otosclerosis, 80–81 Rhabdomyosarcomas, 85 Rhinoliths, 70 Ridge curves, 97 Ring artifacts, 20, 21f ROI. See Regions of interest Root curvatures, 224–225 Root fractures, vertical, 230–233, 232f Root perforations, 234 Root resorption, 235–237 Roots, additional, 225–226 Rotating anodes, 27 Rotation angle, 30, 39 Saccule, 78 Safebeam technology, 39 Salivary gland depression, 54, 54f, 222 Sarcomas, 62 SBC. See Simple bone cysts Scala media, 78 Scala tympani, 78 Scalloping, 56 Scan modes, 39 Scanning appliances, 147–148, 149t, 155–159 Scannographic guides, 142, 142f Scapula grafts, 113–114 Scatter, 22–23, 30–31, 110 Schwannomas, 84–85, 87, 204f Sclerosing osteitis, 49, 50f Sclerosis, 45–46 Sclerotic bone masses, 48 SDB. See Sleep disordered breathing Segmentation, 96–97, 100 Selection criteria, 35 Semicircular canals, 78, 80, 86t Semicircular ducts, 78 Semi-landmarks, 101 Septi, 133 Shape correspondence, 101 Short roots, 222 Sialoliths, submandibular, 51, 52 Sickle cell anemia, 213 Sieverts, 40 Sigmoid sinus thrombosis, 84 Silent sinus syndrome, 68 SimPlant, 95, 110, 115, 148 Simple bone cysts (SBC), 56, 56f Simulations, 98–99 Single scan protocols, 159, 160f Sinonasal osteomas, 69 Sinonasal polyps, 68 Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinomas, 87 Sinuses, 93. See also Functional endoscopic sinus surgery; Maxillary sinuses; Paranasal sinus pathologies Sinusitis, 66–67, 67f Skull base, 85, 86–88 Sleep disordered breathing (SDB), 197. See also Airway assessment Slice sensitivity profiles (SSP), 19–20, 19f Slicer3, 95 Soft tissue analysis, 264–265, 264f Soft tissue changes, simulation of, 99 Soft tissue window, 9 Spatial resolution, 19–20, 219–220 SPHARM-PDM framework, 101–102 Sphenoethmoidal recess, 70 Sphenoid bone, 86 Splints, 99 Squamous cell carcinomas, 70, 85, 87, 208f SSP. See Slice sensitivity profiles Staff training, 37–38 Stafne bone defect, 54, 54f, 222 Standard Model of atoms, 25 Stationary anodes, 27 StealthStation AXIEM, 99 Stereolithography, 148–149, 148f, 149f, 159 Stochastic effects of ionizing radiation, 32–33 Streaks, 20, 22, 22f, 220 Superimposition, 100, 102f Superior semicircular canal, 80 Supernumerary teeth dentinogenesis imperfecta, 222 Suprabullar cells, 76 Surface-based rendering, 97, 98f, 129, 129f Surgical guides. See also CAD/CAM bone reduction guides, 175–176, 176–179f cutting pathway guides for lateral antroscopy of maxillary sinus, 176, 179–181f definition and classification, 161–166 for extraction of ankylosed teeth, 181–182, 182–184f fully integrated, 182 implant planning and, 129, 138, 141, 142 implementation into clinical practice, 166–175 overview, 161 Surgical simulations, 98–99 SurgiGuide, 148 Syphilitic labyrinthitis, 80 Index 279 TACT. See Tuned aperture computed tomography Tardieu scanning appliance, 157, 163 Tegmen tympani, 81, 84, 84t Temporal bone, 78, 86, 86t Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) condylysis and, 200f, 201 evaluation of, 92–93, 93f MPR images and, 45 Tensor-based morphometry, 98f Three-dimensional (3D) augmented models, 110, 110f Three-dimensional (3D) volumetric renderings, 44, 44f, 45, 91–92 3dMD Vultus, 95, 199 Threshold dose, 32 Thyroid collars, 39 TMJ. See Temporomandibular joint Tonsilloliths, 51, 52 Tonsils, 206f Tooth-form scanning appliances, 149t, 155, 156f Tooth-supported surgical guides, 168–169, 171–172, 172– 174f, 185f Trabecular pattern analysis, 263 Tracking technologies, 99 Training, 37–38 Traumatic bone cysts, 56, 56f Traumatic injuries, 85–86, 138f, 234–235, 235f, 236f Treatment planning, 168, 169–171f, 194, 237–240 Tube current, 28–29 Tube voltage, 28 Tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT), 252 Tympanic isthmi, 81 Tympanic membrane, 82, 83, 83f, 84 Tympanosclerosis, 82 UARS. See Upper airway resistance syndrome Ultrasound tracking, 99 Uncinate process, 72, 78 Uniguide, 129–130, 130f Upper airway resistance syndrome (UARS), 197. See also Airway assessment Utricle, 78 Varicella zoster virus, 213 Vertical root fractures, 230–233, 232f Vestibular aqueduct, 78, 79f Vestibule, 86t Virtual osteotomies, 98–99 Virtual shaping, 110 Vitality testing, 59, 213 Voltage, 28 Volume changes, 100 Volume-based rendering, 97, 98f, 110, 129, 129f, 130f Voxels, 7, 199, 233, 236–237 Wave theory, 26 Wavelength, 26, 26f Wegener’s granulomatosis, 70 xCAT-ENT, 19f X-ray beams, 28–29 X-ray tubes, 26–27, 27f X-rays interactions of with matter, 30–31 nature of, 26, 26f parameters of in CBCT units, 23–30 production of, 26–27 Zygomatic air cell defect, 54

La entrada Cone Beam Computed Tomography Oral se publicó primero en Kadi México.

]]>
5620
Cone Beam CT of the Head and Neck https://kadimexico.com/cone-beam-ct-of-the-head-and-neck/ Wed, 12 Oct 2022 17:32:46 +0000 https://kadimexico.com/?p=5617 Cone Beam CT of the Head and Neck Chung How Kau • Kenneth Abramovitch Sherif Galal Kamel • Marko Bozic Cone Beam CT of the Head and Neck An Anatomical Atlas Professor Chung How Kau University of Alabama Birmingham School of Dentistry Department of Orthodontics 7th Avenue South 1919 35294 Birmingham Alabama Room 305, USA […]

La entrada Cone Beam CT of the Head and Neck se publicó primero en Kadi México.

]]>
Cone Beam CT of the Head and Neck
Chung How Kau • Kenneth Abramovitch
Sherif Galal Kamel • Marko Bozic
Cone Beam CT
of the Head and Neck
An Anatomical Atlas
Professor Chung How Kau
University of Alabama
Birmingham School of Dentistry
Department of Orthodontics
7th Avenue South 1919
35294 Birmingham Alabama
Room 305, USA
ckau@uab.edu
Dr. Kenneth Abramovitch
University of Texas
Health Science Center
Department of Diagnostic Sciences
Section for Oral Radiology
MD Anderson Blvd. 6516
77030 Houston Texas, USA
Kenneth.Abramovitch@uth.tmc.edu
Dr. Sherif Galal Kamel
University Hospital of Coventry
and Warwickshire
Clifford Bridge Road
CV2 2DX Coventry
Medical Residence Room 1-9A
UK
dr.sherif83@gmail.com
Dr. Marko Bozic
University Medical Center
Dept. of Maxillofacial and Oral
Surgery
Zaloska 2
1525 Ljubljana
Slovenia
marko.bozzich@gmail.com
ISBN: 978-3-642-12703-8 e-ISBN: 978-3-642-12704-5
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-12704-5
Springer Heidelberg Dordrecht London New York
Library of Congress Control Number: 2010932935
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of
the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilm or in any other way, and
storage in data banks. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only
under the provisions of the German Copyright Law of September 9, 1965, in its current
version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Violations are
liable to prosecution under the German Copyright Law.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication
does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt
from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
Product liability: The publishers cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information about
dosage and application contained in this book. In every individual case the user must
check such information by consulting the relevant literature.
Cover design: eStudioCalamar, Figueres/Berlin
Printed on acid-free paper
Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com)

v
Preface
This book is dedicated to the memory of the three anonymous individuals
whose cadaver prosections are the subject matter of this atlas. We are deeply
respectful of and indebted to these anonymous individuals. They unknowingly have made a donation to science that will benefit students and clinicians in the imaging sciences. The handling of the cadaver donations that
are displayed in this clinical atlas was managed with respect and driven by
our scientific yearn for discovery; the discovery to benefit the current and
next generation of clinicians and researchers. These donations will enrich
the basic foundational knowledge base of human anatomy as depicted in
cone beam CT imaging. The current effort made it possible to correlate the
CBCT images with the actual physical image. This is a foundational knowledge base from which to build and make new discoveries. Future generations can then build on this foundational knowledge base to identify bone
density states, tissue function profiles (atrophy, hypertrophy, etc) disease
states (neoplasia, metaplasia, etc.). We trust that the boundaries have few
limits.
These anonymous individuals did not know what value or impact their
donation to science has made. But as shepherds, we have guided their donation to generate a high yield for the benefit of future scientific endeavors in
the imaging sciences.
We have done all in our power to preserve, protect, and maintain the dignity of these individuals. We did not know them in life but studied them in
vi Preface
death. Whether they have been rich or poor, introverted or extraverted, domineering or submissive, powerful or shy, we honored their remains and dignified their gift.
To the three of you, our deepest thanks.
Chung H. Kau
Kenneth Abramovitch
Marco Bozic
Sherif K. Gala
vii
The following people have been involved in the project without which this
atlas would never have been completed:
1. Professor Mark Wong
2. Dr. Fen Pan
3. Dr. Hasmat Popat
4. Miss Jennifer Nguyen
5. Mr. Kurt E Clark
6. Dr. Nada Souccar
Acknowledgments

ix
Introduction………………………………………………………………………. 1
Conventional Computed Tomography ………………………………. 2
CBCT …………………………………………………………………………… 3
CBCT Data………………………………………………………………… 4
CBCT Acquisition Systems …………………………………………….. 5
Uses of CBCT Technology………………………………………………. 6
Diagnosis…………………………………………………………………… 6
Clinical Applications of the CBCT ……………………………….. 7
Late Evaluation with CBCT…………………………………………. 7
The Purpose of the Clinical Atlas……………………………………… 8
References…………………………………………………………………….. 8
Axial …………………………………………………………………………………. 11
Coronal……………………………………………………………………………… 31
Sagittal ……………………………………………………………………………… 47
Contents
Introduction
C.H. Kau et al., Cone Beam CT of the Head and Neck,
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-12704-5_1, © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011
2 Introduction
This pocket clinical atlas was produced to help dental and medical
colleagues understand and correlate structures of the head and neck
with cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging
technology.
Methods used for radiographic evaluation and diagnosis have undergone enormous changes in the last 20 years. New technologies are
being developed and are becoming readily available to the medical and
dental field. The advancements in hardware and software have allowed
the development of innovative methods for facial diagnosis, treatment
planning, and clinical application.
CBCT was developed in the 1990s as an advancement in technology resulting from the demand for three-dimensional (3D) information
obtained by conventional computed tomography (CT) scans. The
development of CBCT technology reduces exposure by using lower
radiation dose, compared with conventional CT [1–3]. As the demand
for the technology increases, so has the market for custom built craniomaxillofacial CBCT devices. The rates of increase for CBCTs have
been increasing in number on the market over the last decade and a
variety of applications to the facial and dental environments have been
established [2].
Conventional Computed Tomography
CT technology was developed by Sir Godfrey Hounsfield in 1967 and
there has been a gradual evolution to five generations of the system.
First generation scanners consisted of a single radiation source and a
single detector and information was obtained slice by slice. The second generation was introduced as an improvement and multiple
detectors were incorporated within the plane of the scan. The third
generation was made possible by the advancement in detector and
data acquisition technology. These large detectors reduced the need
for the beam to translate around the object to be measured and were
often known as the “fan-beam” CTs. Ring artifacts were often seen on
CBCT 3
the images captured distorting the 3D image and obscuring certain
anatomical landmarks. The fourth generation was developed to counter this problem. A moving radiation source and a fixed detector ring
were introduced. This meant that modifications to the angle of the
radiation source had to be taken into account and more scattered radiation was seen. Finally the fifth (sometimes known as the sixth) generation scanners were the introduction to reduced “motion” or
“scatter” artifacts. As with the previous two generations, the detector
is stationary and the electron beam is electronically swept along a
semicircular tungsten strip anode. Projections of the X-rays are so
rapid that even the heart beat may be captured. This has led some
clinicians to hail it as a 4D motion capture device [2, 4]. In 2007, the
Toshiba “dynamic volume” scanner based on 320 slices is showing
the potential to significantly reduce radiation exposure by eliminating
the requirement for a helical examination in both cardiac CT angiography and whole brain perfusion studies for the evaluation of stroke
[online reference, 1].
There are, however, limitations to these CT systems. They are
expensive and require a lot of space. The 3D reconstruction is time
consuming and so less cost efficient. Furthermore the radiation exposure to the patient has limited their usage to complex craniofacial problems and for specialized diagnostic information only.
CBCT
CBCTs for dental, oral, and maxillofacial surgery and orthodontic
indications were designed to counter some of the limitations of the
conventional CT scanning devices. The radiation source consists of a
conventional low-radiation X-ray tube and the resultant beam is projected onto a flat panel detector (FPD) or a charge-coupled device
(CCD) with an image intensifier. The FPD was shown to have a high
spatial resolution [5]. The cone beam produces a more focused beam
and much less radiation scatter compared with the conventional fan-
4 Introduction
shaped CT devices [6]. This significantly increases the X-ray utilization and reduces the X-ray tube capacity required for volumetric
scanning [7]. It has been reported that the total radiation is approximately 20% of conventional CTs and equivalent to a full mouth periapical radiographic exposure [8]. CBCT can therefore be recommended
as a dose-sparing technique compared with alternative standard medical CT scans for common oral and maxillofacial radiographic imaging
tasks [9]. The images are comparable to the conventional CTs and may
be displayed as a full head view, as a skull view, or as localized regional
views.
CBCT Data
The tube and the detector perform one rotation (180 or 360°) around
the selected region. The resulting primary data are converted into slice
data. The reconstructed slice data can be viewed in user-defined planes.
The CT volume consists of a 3D array of image elements, called voxels.
Each voxel is characterized with a height, width, and depth. Since the
voxel sizes are known from the acquisition, correct measurements can
be performed on the images. The spatial resolution in a CT image
depends on a number of factors during acquisition (e.g., focal spot, size
detector element…) and reconstruction (reconstruction kernel, interpolation process, voxel size). Image noise depends on the total exposure
and the reconstruction noise. Increasing the current in the X-ray tube
increases the signal-to-noise ratio, and thus reduces the quantum noise
of the statistical nature of X-rays, at the expense of patient dose. The
artifacts of CT imaging are the consequence of beam hardening, photon scattering, nonlinear partial volume effect, motion, stair step artifact, and others.
Most machines support the digital imaging and communications in
medicine (DICOM) format export. The images can therefore be used
for most if not all the (software) applications utilized by conventional CT [10].
CBCT Acquisition Systems 5
The following is a summary of the additions and modifications of
CBCT as compared with conventional CT, which make CBCT a more
appealing alternative:
• Radiation dose is lower. This is mainly because of the lower effective tube current used for the CBCT: while the voltage of the source
is approximately the same (90–120 kV), the current is roughly
between 1 and 8 mA for the CBCT while e.g., for the multislice CT
the current is around 80 mA but can also be as high as 200 mA.
• Detection systems are different (FPD or CCD with image intensifier.
• The resolution is higher; this is mainly due to lesser isotropic voxel
size [11].
• There is less artifacts caused by metallic structures but because of
lower dose there is more noise and detailed information about soft
tissues is lost [10].
• CBCT is less expensive and smaller.
CBCT Acquisition Systems
In 2005, four main CBCT devices were reported in the literature and it
was expected that many companies were to enter the market [2]. In
July 2008, there were 16 manufacturers of CBCT devices producing
23 different models. There are various classifications of devices but
CBCT devices may be divided to fit into four subcategories based on
the need of the clinician: and one field of view of the scan (FOV)
• Dentoalveolar (FOV less than 8 cm)
• Maxillo-mandibular (FOV between 8 and 15 cm)
• Skeletal (FOV between 15 and 21 cm)
• Head and neck (FOV above 21 cm)
The important differences besides the clinical classification are the
radiation dose, size and weight, time needed for the reconstruction,
voxel size, scanning time etc. Furthermore the differences in prices,
software, and warranty are important considerations.
6 Introduction
Uses of CBCT Technology
Radiographic evaluation and diagnosis have undergone enormous
changes in the last 20 years. The important differences between the
devices are their FOV, the irradiation dose, size and weight, time
needed for the reconstruction, voxel size, scanning time, price, software and warranty. The use of CBCT has many applications. The indications for the CBCT imaging has not been clearly established yet.
However, CBCT imaging may be used for the following reasons:
1. Diagnosis
2. Clinical application
3. Clinical evaluation of treatment outcomes
Diagnosis
Common uses of CBCT technology in the head and neck is for impacted
teeth evaluation [13], implant treatment planning [14], evaluations of
the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) [15], simulations for orthodontic
and surgical planning, diagnosis of dento-alveolar pathology, evaluation of the nasal/paranasal sinuses, and pharyngeal airways [16].
Furthermore, craniofacial anomalies, for example cleft patients and
those undergoing combined orthodontic and maxillofacial therapy,
benefit greatly from CBCT imaging as the technology provides more
information than conventional images [17]. There has been a debate on
the routine use of technology in orthodontics and further studies are
needed [18]. It has also been proven that CBCT is accurate to identify
apical periodontitis [19]. A recently suggested CBCT-aided method for
determination of root curvature radius allows a more reliable and predictable endodontic planning, which reflects directly on a more efficacious preparation of curved root canals [20]. CBCT provides better
diagnostic and quantitative information on periodontal bone levels in
three dimensions than conventional radiography [21]. CBCT can also
Uses of CBCT Technology 7
be used for maxillofacial growth and development assessment and
dental age estimation [22].
Clinical Applications of the CBCT
CBCT provides information for 3D models made by rapid prototyping.
The obtained 3D models can serve as a matrix that enables precise
planning of operations such as for mini-implant positions in anatomically complex sites [23]. A recent study that included phantoms
and human cadavers showed that intraoperative CBCT quantifiably
improved surgical performance in all excision tasks and significantly
increased surgical confidence. Such intraoperative imaging in combination with real-time tracking and navigation should be of great benefit
in delicate procedures in which excision must be executed in close
proximity to critical structures [24]. Another study included 179 patients
undergoing facial surgery and intraoperative CBCT was used. The
acquisition of the data sets was uncomplicated, and image quality was
sufficient to assess the postoperative result in all cases [25].
Late Evaluation with CBCT
CBCT is also a tool for the evaluation of surgical and orthodontic treatment. There have not been a lot of papers published but they are
increasing in their number as the CBCT is becoming more readily
available. CBCT was successfully used to compare the anteroposterior
positions of the cleft-side piriform margin and alar base with those of
the noncleft side in 52 postoperative unilateral cleft lip patients with no
alveolar bone graft [26]. CBCT can be used in combination with 3D
soft tissue data obtained with stereo photogrammetry, structured light
systems and laser acquisition systems for diagnostic, treatment planning and posttreatment evaluation purposes [27]. Evaluation of the
nasal and paranasal sinuses and of the pharyngeal airway is also becoming more relevant.
8 Introduction
The Purpose of the Clinical Atlas
The purpose of this clinical atlas is to provide every dental or medical
colleague with the platform to observe and understand images from the
Cone Beam Technology. Great care has been put into the dissection of
the cadavers and the reproductions of the slice sections both on the
human specimens and the CBCT image.
It is hoped that this will serve as a reference for all who are working
in the area of CBCT imaging of the head and neck.
References
1. Tam, K.C., S. Samarasekera, and F. Sauer, Exact cone beam CT with a spiral
scan. Phys Med Biol, 1998. 43(4): p. 1015-24.
2. Kau, C.H., et al., Three-dimensional cone beam computerized tomography in
orthodontics. J Orthod, 2005. 32(4): p. 282-93.
3. Tsiklakis, K., et al., Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose
Cone Beam CT. Eur J Radiol, 2005. 56(3): p. 413-7.
4. Robb, R.A., X-ray computed tomography: an engineering synthesis of multiscientific principles. Crit Rev Biomed Eng, 1982. 7(4): p. 265-333.
5. Baba, R., et al., Comparison of flat-panel detector and image-intensifier detector for cone-beam CT. Comput Med Imaging Graph, 2002. 26(3): p. 153-8.
6. Mah, J. and D. Hatcher, Current status and future needs in craniofacial imaging.
Orthod Craniofac Res, 2003. 6(Suppl 1): p. 10-6; discussion 179-82.
7. Sukovic, P., Cone beam computed tomography in craniofacial imaging. Orthod
Craniofac Res, 2003. 6 Suppl 1: p. 31-6; discussion 179-82.
8. Mah, J.K., et al., Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental
computed tomography device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
Endod, 2003. 96(4): p. 508-13.
9. Ludlow, J.B. and M. Ivanovic, Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices
and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2008. 106(1): p. 930-8.
10. Swennen, G.R.J., F. Schutyser, and J.-E. Hausamen, Three-dimensional cephalometry: a color atlas and manual. 1st. ed. 2006, Berlin: Springer. xxi, 365 p.
11. Hashimoto, K., et al., A comparison of a new limited cone beam computed
tomography machine for dental use with a multidetector row helical CT machine.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2003. 95(3): p. 371-7.
12. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological
Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP, 2007. 37(2-4): p. 1-332.
Uses of CBCT Technology 9
13. Nakajima, A., et al., Two- and three-dimensional orthodontic imaging using
limited cone beam-computed tomography. Angle Orthod, 2005. 75(6): p.
895-903.
14. Madrigal, C., et al., Study of available bone for interforaminal implant treatment using cone-beam computed tomography. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal,
2008. 13(5): p. E307-12.
15. Honda, K., et al., Osseous abnormalities of the mandibular condyle: diagnostic
reliability of cone beam computed tomography compared with helical computed tomography based on an autopsy material. Dentomaxillofac Radiol,
2006. 35(3): p. 152-7.
16. Maki, K., et al., Computer-assisted simulations in orthodontic diagnosis and the
application of a new cone beam X-ray computed tomography. Orthod Craniofac
Res, 2003. 6(Suppl 1): p. 95-101; discussion 179-82.
17. Korbmacher, H., et al., Value of two cone-beam computed tomography systems
from an orthodontic point of view. J Orofac Orthop, 2007. 68(4): p. 278-89.
18. Silva, M.A., et al., Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic
treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop, 2008. 133(5): p. 640 e1-5.
19. Estrela, C., et al., Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic
and periapical radiography for detection of apical periodontitis. J Endod, 2008.
34(3): p. 273-9.
20. Estrela, C., et al., Method for determination of root curvature radius using conebeam computed tomography images. Braz Dent J, 2008. 19(2): p. 114-8.
21. Mol, A. and A. Balasundaram, In vitro cone beam computed tomography imaging of periodontal bone. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2008. 37(6): p. 319-24.
22. Yang, F., R. Jacobs, and G. Willems, Dental age estimation through volume
matching of teeth imaged by cone-beam CT. Forensic Sci Int, 2006. 159(Suppl 1):
p. S78-83.
23. Kim, S.H., et al., Surgical positioning of orthodontic mini-implants with guides
fabricated on models replicated with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J
Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2007. 131(4 Suppl): p. S82-9.
24. Chan, Y., et al., Cone-beam computed tomography on a mobile C-arm: novel
intraoperative imaging technology for guidance of head and neck surgery.
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2008. 37(1): p. 81-90.
25. Pohlenz, P., et al., Clinical indications and perspectives for intraoperative conebeam computed tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Oral Surg Oral
Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2007. 103(3): p. 412-7.
26. Miyamoto, J., et al., Evaluation of cleft lip bony depression of piriform margin
and nasal deformity with cone beam computed tomography: “retruded-like”
appearance and anteroposterior position of the alar base. Plast Reconstr Surg,
2007. 120(6): p. 1612-20.
27. Lane, C. and W. Harrell, Jr., Completing the 3-dimensional picture. Am J
Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2008. 133(4): p. 612-20.

Axial
C.H. Kau et al., Cone Beam CT of the Head and Neck,
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-12704-5_2, © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011
12 Axial
9 – Mandible-body
33 – Temporal bone-styloid process
68 – C2 Axis-transverse process
70 – C2 Axis-body
71 – C2 Axis-spine
78 – Mandibular cuspid (Root)
80 – Mandibular first bi-cuspid (Root)
84 – Mandibular lateral incisor teeth (Root)
92 – Maxillary central incisor teeth (Root)
107 – Face
Axial 13
9 – Mandible-body
33 – Temporal bone-styloid process
68 – C2 Axis-transverse process
70 – C2 Axis-body
71 – C2 Axis-spine
78 – Mandibular cuspid (Root)
80 – Mandibular first bi-cuspid (Root)
84 – Mandibular lateral Incisor teeth (Root)
92 – Maxillary central incisor teeth (Root)
107 – Face
14 Axial
67 – C1 Atlas-posterior arch/ tubercle
70 – C2 Axis-body
82 – Mandibular first molar (Root)
85 – Mandibular second bi-cuspid (Crown)
87 – Mandibular second molar (Crown)
89 – Mandibular third molar (Crown)
107 – Face
109 – Tongue
Axial 15
67 – C1 Atlas-posterior arch/ tubercle
70 – C2 Axis-body
82 – Mandibular first molar (Root)
85 – Mandibular second
bi-cuspid (Crown)
87 – Mandibular second molar (Crown)
89 – Mandibular third molar (Crown)
107 – Face
109 – Tongue
16 Axial
9 – Mandible-body
13 – Maxilla-alveolar bone
52 – Incisive canal
65 – C1 Atlas-body
67 – C1 Atlas-posterior arch/tubercle
69 – C2 Axis-dens
92 – Maxillary central incisor teeth (Root)
94 – Maxillary cuspid (Root)
96 – Maxillary first bi-cuspid (Root)
100 – Maxillary lateral incisor teeth (Root)
104 – Maxillary second molar (Root)
106 – Maxillary third molar (Root)
107 – Face
Axial 17
9 – Mandible-body
13 – Maxilla-alveolar bone
52 – Incisive canal
65 – C1 Atlas-body
67 – C1 Atlas-posterior arch/tubercle
69 – C2 Axis-dens
92 – Maxillary central incisor teeth (Root)
94 – Maxillary cuspid (Root)
96 – Maxillary first bi-cuspid (Root)
100 – Maxillary lateral incisor teeth (Root)
104 – Maxillary second molar (Root)
106 – Maxillary third molar (Root)
107 – Face
18 Axial
10 – Mandible-condyle
14 – Maxilla-anterior
15 – Maxilla-anterior nasal spine
24 – Palatine bone-vomer
32 – Temporal bone
39 – Mastoid air cells
40 – Maxillary sinus
Axial 19
10 – Mandible-condyle
14 – Maxilla-anterior
15 – Maxilla-anterior nasal spine
24 – Palatine bone-vomer
32 – Temporal bone
39 – Mastoid air cells
40 – Maxillary sinus
20 Axial
10 – Mandible-condyle
16 – Maxilla-zygomatic process
20 – Nasal septum
24 – Palatine bone-vomer
31 – Sphenoid bone
33 – Temporal bone-styloid process
39 – Mastoid air cells
40 – Maxillary sinus
50 – Auricular canal
107 – Face
Axial 21
10 – Mandible-condyle
16 – Maxilla-zygomatic process
20 – Nasal septum
24 – Palatine bone -vomer
31 – Sphenoid bone
33 – Temporal bone-styloid process
39 – Mastoid air cells
40 – Maxillary sinus
50 – Auricular canal
107 – Face
22 Axial
3 − Concha-superior
20 − Nasal septum
24 − Palatine bone-vomer
34 − Zygoma
40 − Maxillary sinus
48 − Sphenoid sinus
53 − Internal carotid artery
Axial 23
3 − Concha-superior
20 − Nasal septum
24 − Palatine bone-vomer
34 − Zygoma
40 − Maxillary sinus
48 − Sphenoid sinus
53 − Internal carotid artery
24 Axial
19 − Nasal bone
31 − Sphenoid bone
32 − Temporal bone
34 − Zygoma
36 − Ethmoid sinus
53 − Internal carotid artery
58 − Orbit
107 − Face
Axial 25
19 − Nasal bone
31 − Sphenoid bone
32 − Temporal bone
34 − Zygoma
36 − Ethmoid sinus
53 − Internal carotid artery
58 − Orbit
107 − Face
26 Axial
4 − Ethmoid bone-crista galli
19 − Nasal bone
31 − Sphenoid bone
32 − Temporal bone
34 − Zygoma
36 − Ethmoid sinus
56 − Optic nerve canals
107 − Face
Axial 27
4 − Ethmoid bone-Crista galli
19 − Nasal bone
31 − Sphenoid bone
32 − Temporal bone
34 − Zygoma
36 − Ethmoid sinus
56 − Optic nerve canals
107 − Face
28 Axial
5 − Frontal bone
32 − Temporal bone
37 − Frontal sinus
107 − Face
Axial 29
5 − Frontal bone
32 − Temporal bone
37 − Frontal sinus
107 − Face

Coronal
C.H. Kau et al., Cone Beam CT of the Head and Neck,
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-12704-5_3, © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011
32 Coronal
1 − Concha-inferior
9 − Mandible-body
19 − Nasal bone
20 − Nasal septum
75 − Mandibular central incisor teeth
(Crown)
76 − Mandibular central incisor teeth
(Root)
77 − Mandibular cuspid (Crown)
83 − Mandibular lateral incisor teeth
(Crown)
84 − Mandibular lateral incisor teeth
(Root)
94 − Maxillary cuspid teeth (Root)
93 − Maxillary cuspid (Crown)
100 − Maxillary lateral incisor teeth (Root)
Coronal 33
1 − Concha-inferior
9 − Mandible-body
19 − Nasal bone
20 − Nasal septum
75 − Mandibular central incisor teeth
(Crown)
76 − Mandibular central incisor teeth
(Root)
77 − Mandibular cuspid (Crown)
83 − Mandibular lateral incisor teeth
(Crown)
84 − Mandibular lateral incisor teeth
(Root)
94 − Maxillary cuspid teeth ( Root)
93 − Maxillary cuspid (Crown)
100 − Maxillary lateral lncisor teeth (Root)
34 Coronal
3 − Concha-superior
5 − Frontal bone
8 − Mandible-alveolar bone
9 − Mandible-body
13 − Maxilla-alveolar bone
20 − Nasal septum
37 − Frontal sinus
40 − Maxillary sinus
55 − Mid palatal suture
57 − Oral cavity
58 − Orbit
85 − Mandibular second bi-cuspid (Crown)
86 − Mandibular second bi-cuspid (Root)
102 − Maxillary second bi-cuspid (Root)
103 − Maxillary second molar (Crown)
107 − Face
Coronal 35
3 − Concha-superior
5 − Frontal bone
8 − Mandible-alveolar bone
9 − Mandible-body
13 − Maxilla-alveolar bone
20 − Nasal septum
37 − Frontal sinus
40 − Maxillary sinus
55 − Mid palatal suture
57 − Oral cavity
58 − Orbit
85 − Mandibular second bi-cuspid (Crown)
86 − Mandibular second bi-cuspid (Root)
102 − Maxillary second bi-cuspid (Root)
103 − Maxillary second molar (Crown)
107 − Face
36 Coronal
5 − Frontal bone
9 − Mandible-body
13 − Maxilla-alveolar bone
26 − Perpendicular plate of the ethmoid
sinus
35 − Zygomatic arch
36 − Ethmoid sinus
40 − Maxillary sinus
42 − Nasal septum
58 − Orbit
96 − Maxillary first bi-cuspid (Root)
97 − Maxillary first molar (Crown)
Coronal 37
5 − Frontal bone
9 − Mandible-body
13 − Maxilla-alveolar bone
26 − Perpendicular plate of the ethmoid
sinus
35 − Zygomatic arch
36 − Ethmoid sinus
40 − Maxillary sinus
42 − Nasal septum
58 − Orbit
96 − Maxillary first bi-cuspid (Root)
97 − Maxillary first molar (Crown)
38 Coronal
5 − Frontal bone
6 − Hyoid
7 − Lateral pterygoid plate
9 − Mandible-body
18 − Medial pterygoid plate
31 − Sphenoid bone
32 − Temporal bone
35 − Zygomatic arch
48 − Sphenoid sinus
56 − Optic nerve canals
57 − Oral cavity
109 − Tongue
Coronal 39
5 − Frontal bone
6 − Hyoid
7 − Lateral pterygoid plate
9 − Mandible-body
18 − Medial pterygoid plate
31 − Sphenoid bone
32 − Temporal bone
35 − Zygomatic arch
48 − Sphenoid sinus
56 − Optic nerve canals
57 − Oral cavity
109 − Tongue
40 Coronal
2 − Concha-middle
5 − Frontal bone
11 − Mandible-coronoid process
24 − Palatine bone-vomer
35 − Zygomatic arch
36 − Ethmoid sinus
40 − Maxillary sinus
43 − Nasal sinus
109 − Tongue
Coronal 41
2 − Concha-middle
5 − Frontal bone
11 − Mandible-coronoid process
24 − Palatine bone-vomer
35 − Zygomatic arch
36 − Ethmoid sinus
40 − Maxillary sinus
43 − Nasal sinus
109 − Tongue
42 Coronal
25 − Parietal bone
39 − Mastoid air cells
50 − Auricular canal
69 − C2 Axis-dens
70 − C2 Axis-body
72 − C3-body
74 − C3-transverse process
107 − Face
Coronal 43
25 − Parietal bone
39 − Mastoid air cells
50 − Auricular canal
69 − C2 Axis-dens
70 − C2 Axis-body
72 − C3-body
74 − C3-transverse process
107 − Face
44 Coronal
5 − Frontal bone
10 − Mandible-condyle
31 − Spehnoid bone
48 − Sphenoid sinus
Coronal 45
5 – Frontal bone
10 – Mandible-condyle
31 – Spehnoid bone
48 – Sphenoid sinus

Sagittal
C.H. Kau et al., Cone Beam CT of the Head and Neck,
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-12704-5_4, © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011
48 Sagittal
Mid-Sagittal: Airspaces
1 − Concha-inferior
2 − Concha-middle
38 − Mandibular vestibule
36 − Ethmoid sinus
37 − Frontal sinus
44 − Nasopharyngeal airspace
45 − Oropharyngeal airspace
46 − Palatoglossal airspace
48 − Sphenoid sinus
Sagittal 49
1 − Concha-inferior
2 − Concha-middle
38 − Mandibular vestibule
36 − Ethmoid sinus
37 − Frontal sinus
44 − Nasopharyngeal airspace
45 − Oropharyngeal airspace
46 − Palatoglossal airspace
48 − Sphenoid sinus
50 Sagittal
Mid-Sagittal at Midline
5 − Frontal bone
6 − Hyoid
9 − Mandible-body
14 − Maxilla-anterior
17 − Maxilla-palatine process
19 − Nasal bone
22 − Occiput-clivus
29 − Sphenoid bone-dorsum sella
30 − Sphenoid bone-tuberculum sella
31 − Sphenoid bone
Sagittal 51
5 − Frontal bone
6 − Hyoid
9 − Mandible-body
14 − Maxilla-anterior
17 − Maxilla-palatine process
19 − Nasal bone
22 − Occiput-clivus
29 − Sphenoid bone-dorsum sella
30 − Sphenoid bone-tuberculum sella
31 − Sphenoid bone
52 Sagittal
Mid-Sagittal Osteology
4 − Ethmoid bone-crista galli
12 − Mandible-genial tubercle
20 − Nasal septum
27 − Septum in spehnoid sinus
28 − Sphenoid-posterior clinoid process
37 − Frontal sinus
47 − Pituitary fossa
52 − Incisive canal
54 − Lingual foramen
Sagittal 53
4 − Ethmoid bone-crista galli
12 − Mandible-genial tubercle
20 − Nasal septum
27 − Septum in spehnoid sinus
28 − Sphenoid-posterior clinoid process
37 − Frontal sinus
47 − Pituitary fossa
52 − Incisive canal
54 − Lingual foramen
54 Sagittal
2.5 cm from Mid-Sagittal
5 − Frontal bone
23 − Occiput-condylar process
32 − Temporal bone
36 − Ethmoid sinus
37 − Frontal sinus
40 − Maxillary sinus
60 − Pterygomaxillary fissure
65 − C1 Atlas-body
67 − C1 Atlas-posterior arch/tubercle
69 − C2 Axis-dens
Sagittal 55
5 − Frontal bone
23 − Occiput-condylar process
32 − Temporal bone
36 − Ethmoid sinus
37 − Frontal sinus
40 − Maxillary sinus
60 − Pterygomaxillary fissure
65 − C1 Atlas-body
67 − C1 Atlas-posterior arch/tubercle
69 − C2 Axis-dens
56 Sagittal
5 cm from Mid-Sagittal (S2)
5 − Frontal bone
9 − Mandible-body
10 − Mandible-condyle
16 − Maxilla-zygomatic process
21 − Occiput
33 − Temporal bone-styloid process
37 − Frontal sinus
40 − Maxillary sinus
59 − Orbital fissure
61 − Temporal bone-petrous ridge
65 − C1 Atlas-body
Sagittal 57
5 − Frontal bone
9 − Mandible-body
10 − Mandible-condyle
16 − Maxilla-zygomatic process
21 − Occiput
33 − Temporal bone-styloid process
37 − Frontal sinus
40 − Maxillary sinus
59 − Orbital fissure
61 − Temporal bone-petrous ridge
65 − C1 Atlas-body
58 Sagittal
7.5 cm from Mid-Sagittal
10 − Mandible-condyle
32 − Temporal bone
49 − Articular eminence
51 − External acoustic meatus
61 − Temporal bone-petrous ridge
63 − Zygomaticofrontal suture
Sagittal 59
10 − Mandible-condyle
32 − Temporal bone
49 − Articular eminence
51 − External acoustic meatus
61 − Temporal bone-petrous ridge
63 − Zygomaticofrontal suture
60 Sagittal
10 cm from Mid-Sagittal
10 − Mandible-condyle
16 − Maxilla-zygomatic process
25 − Parietal bone
32 − Temporal bone
39 − Mastoid air cells
49 − Articular eminence
62 − Temporal fossa
Sagittal 61
10 − Mandible-condyle
16 − Maxilla-zygomatic process
25 − Parietal bone
32 − Temporal bone
39 − Mastoid air cells
49 − Articular eminence
62 − Temporal fossa

Master Legends
1.  Concha – Inferior
2.  Concha – Middle
3.  Concha – Superior
4.  Ethmoid bone – Crista galli
5.  Frontal Bone
6.  Hyoid
7.  Lateral pyterygoid plate
8.  Mandible – alveolar bone
9.  Mandible – body
10.  Mandible – condylar process
11.  Mandible – coronoid process
12.  Mandible – Genial tubercle
13.  Maxilla – Alveolar bone
14.  Maxilla – anterior
15.  Maxilla – Anterior nasal spine
16.  Maxilla – zygomatic process
17.  Maxilla- Palatine process
18.  Medial pyterygoid plate
19.  Nasal Bone
20.  Nasal Septum
21.  Occiput
22.  Occiput – Clivus
23.  Occiput -Condylar process
24.  Palatine bone – Vomer
25.  Parietal Bone
26.  Perpendicular plate of the ethmoid sinus
27.  Septum in Sphenoid Sinus
28.  Sphenoid – Posterior Clinoid Process
29.  Sphenoid bone – Dorsum Sella
30.  Sphenoid bone – Tuberculum Sella
31.  Sphenoid bone
32.  Temporal Bone
33.  Temporal bone – Styloid process
Master Legends
34.  Zygoma
35.  Zygomatic arch
36.  Ethmoid Sinus
37.  Frontal Sinus
38.  Mandibular vestibule
39.  Mastoid Air cells
40.  Maxillary Sinus
41.  Maxillary Vestibule
42.  Nasal septum
43.  Nasal Sinus
44.  Nasopharyngeal airspace
45.  Oropharyngeal airspace
46.  Palatoglossal airspace
47.  Pituitary fossa
48.  Sphenoid Sinus
49.  Articular eminence
50.  Auricular Canal
51.  External acoustic meatus
52.  Incisive canal
53.  Internal Carotid artery
54.  Lingual foramen
55.  Mid palatal suture
56.  Optic nerve canals
57.  Oral cavity
58.  Orbit
59.  Orbital fissure
60.  Pterygomaxillary fissure
61.  Temporal Bone – petrous ridge
62.  Temporal fossa
63.  Zygomaticofrontal suture
64.  Zygomaticotemporal suture
65.  C1 Atlas – body
66.  C1 Atlas – anterior arch/tubercle
67.  C1 Atlas – posterior arch/tubercle
68.  C2 Axis – Transverse process
69.  C2 Axis – Dens
Master Legends
70.  C2 Axis – Body
71.  C2 Axis – spine
72.  C3 – Body
73.  C3 – spine
74.  C3 – transverse porcess
75.  Mandibular Central Incisor Teeth (Crown)
76.  Mandibular Central Incisor Teeth (Root)
77.  Mandibular Cuspid (Crown)
78.  Mandibular Cuspid (Root)
79.  Mandibular first bi-cuspid (Crown)
80.  Mandibular first bi-cuspid (Root)
81.  Mandibular first molar (Crown)
82.  Mandibular first molar (Root)
83.  Mandibular Lateral Incisor Teeth (Crown)
84.  Mandibular Lateral Incisor Teeth (Root)
85.  Mandibular second bi-cuspid (Crown)
86.  Mandibular second bi-cuspid (Root)
87.  Mandibular second molar (Crown)
88.  Mandibular second molar (Root)
89.  Mandibular third molar (Crown)
90.  Mandibular third molar (Root)
91.  Maxillary Central Incisor Teeth (Crown)
92.  Maxillary Central Incisor Teeth (Root)
93.  Maxillary Cuspid (Crown)
94.  Maxillary Cuspid (Root)
95.  Maxillary first bi-cuspid (Crown)
96.  Maxillary first bi-cuspid (Root)
97.  Maxillary first molar (Crown)
98.  Maxillary first molar (Root)
99.  Maxillary Lateral Incisor Teeth (Crown)
100.  axillary Lateral Incisor Teeth (Root)
101.  Maxillary second bi-cuspid (Crown)
102.  Maxillary second bi-cuspid (Root)
103.  Maxillary second molar (Crown)
104.  Maxillary second molar (Root)
105.  Maxillary third molar (Crown)
Master Legends
106.  Maxillary third molar (Root)
107.  Face
108.  Lips
109.  Tongue

La entrada Cone Beam CT of the Head and Neck se publicó primero en Kadi México.

]]>
5617
Atlas of Cone Beam Imaging https://kadimexico.com/atlas-of-cone-beam-imaging/ Wed, 12 Oct 2022 17:25:57 +0000 https://kadimexico.com/?p=5614 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Miles, Dale A. Atlas of cone beam imaging for dental applications / Dale A. Miles. — 2nd ed. p. ; cm. Rev. ed. of: Color atlas of cone beam volumetric imaging for dental applications / Dale A. Miles. c2008. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-86715-565-5 (hardcover) eBook ISBN 978-0-86715-592-1 […]

La entrada Atlas of Cone Beam Imaging se publicó primero en Kadi México.

]]>
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Miles, Dale A.
Atlas of cone beam imaging for dental applications / Dale A. Miles. — 2nd ed.
p. ; cm.
Rev. ed. of: Color atlas of cone beam volumetric imaging for dental applications / Dale A.
Miles. c2008.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-0-86715-565-5 (hardcover)
eBook ISBN 978-0-86715-592-1
I. Miles, Dale A. Color atlas of cone beam volumetric imaging for dental applications. II.
Title.
[DNLM: 1. Stomatognathic Diseases–radiography–Atlases. 2. Cone-Beam Computed
Tomography–methods–Atlases. WN 17] 616.07’5722–dc23
2012036568
© 2013 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc
Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc
4350 Chandler Drive
Hanover Park, IL 60133
www.quintpub.com
5 4 3 2 1
All rights reserved. This book or any part thereof may not be reproduced, stored in a
retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,
photocopying, or otherwise, without prior written permission of the publisher.
Editor: Bryn Grisham
Design: Ted Pereda
Production: Angelina Sanchez
Table of Contents
Preface to Second Edition
Preface to First Edition
Acknowledgments
1 CBCT in Clinical Practice
2 Basic Principles of CBCT
3 Anatomical Structures in Cone Beam Images
4 Airway Analysis
5 Dental Findings
6 Impacted Teeth
7 Implant Site Assessment
8 Odontogenic Lesions
9 Orthodontic Assessment
10 Orthognathic Surgery and Trauma Imaging
11 Paranasal Sinus Evaluation
12 Temporomandibular Joint Evaluation
13 Systemic Findings
14 Vertebral Body Evaluation
15 Selected Cases from Radiology Practice
16 Clinical Endodontics
17 Risk and Liability
Preface to the Second Edition
I am overwhelmed and somewhat humbled by the unexpected success of the
first edition of this atlas. I am also deeply grateful to the many colleagues
who have approached me at seminars to tell me that they keep this book
beside them when they are examining their cone beam volumes as well as to
the many others who have asked me to sign their copy of the first edition.
Obviously, the book has made an impact in this exciting new era of oral and
maxillofacial radiology.
In this updated second edition, I have used the term cone beam computed
tomography (CBCT) instead of cone beam volumetric imaging (CBVI). I still
believe that the more correct term for this modality is volumetric imaging.
However, as most of my radiology colleagues have pointed out, the term
CBCT is ensconced in the dental and medical literature, so I have decided,
somewhat reluctantly, to adopt the term myself. In addition to the minor title
change, I have added new cases to most chapters, developed a new section to
address anatomy in the small volume, and added three new chapters to
discuss applications for CBCT in endodontics, the risks and liabilities of
CBCT, and selected cases from my radiology practice. I believe that these
additions and updates have strengthened the book and made it even more
useful.
I am smart enough to know my limitations, and in this edition, I have
invited my first contributor, Dr Thomas McClammy*, a great endodontist
and a great friend. He has written chapter 16 about the use of CBCT in the
specialty of endodontics. As an early adopter, Dr McClammy did his due
diligence, agonized over the decision to purchase a CBCT machine, and then
plunged in. He has been like a kid in the proverbial candy store, and his
enthusiasm about this modality comes through as he explains its incredible
utility in his practice of endodontics.
Finally, some readers may question a radiologist attempting to address
liability issues arising from the use of CBCT. However, I feel very strongly
that some colleagues are setting themselves up for legal action by persisting
in looking at the CBCT volumes only to determine a suitable implant site,
and by neglecting the examination of the rest of the data or its referral to a
specialist. This is the profession’s standard of care when a task or diagnosis is
beyond our capability. Most of what I state in chapter 17 is common sense.
Nevertheless, I am taking this risk myself by addressing this concern directly.
I do it for my own peace of mind and to educate my colleagues.
I know the reader of this second edition will see these developments in
the book’s content as both necessary and exciting. Enjoy, and thanks again
for the support.
* Thomas V. McClammy, DMD, MS
Private Practice
Scottsdale, Arizona
Preface to the First Edition
Like any innovation in the dental profession, the availability of cone beam
volumetric imaging (CBVI) has preceded the understanding of its use. It
happened with panoramic imaging as it did with digital radiographic imaging.
The cone beam images in this atlas will educate dental professionals on how
to use CBVI technology to better visualize the diseases and disorders that
they encounter with their patients.
One aim of this atlas is to refresh the reader’s memory of anatomy. As
dentists we never “worked” in the axial plane of section after our anatomy
training; we have lived our lives in a world of plain films or digital images,
all in the format of 2D grayscale panoramic, intraoral, or lateral
cephalometric images. CBVI allows us to visualize patient anatomy and
pathology like never before. CBVI helps to reveal bony changes caused by
pathology. In addition, the level of anatomic detail in the 3D image sets
means that clinicians placing implants no longer have to experience anxiety
about whether they are placed correctly. CBVI allows us to determine the
precise location of the inferior alveolar nerve in relation to impacted
mandibular third molars, which improves preoperative planning and reduces
patient morbidity as well as our liability. At last, we can see out patients’
problems in a whole new manner—in 3D and color. I hope this book will
help you understand how CBVI can improve your clinical experiences and
the management of your patients’ treatment.
Acknowledgments
I am deeply appreciative to CyberMed USA and CyberMed International for
allowing me to continue to test their software product and to use it in my
practice. I happen to think that it is the premier software for examining cone
beam computed tomography image data. Mr Eusoon Han and the marketing
team at CyberMed USA work tirelessly to support the product and have
helped me understand the incredible tools within the software. Thanks to all.
Thanks once more to Prof C. Young Kim, the CEO of CyberMed
International for your product, your confidence, and your friendship. This
book would not be possible without your product and support.
A big thank you to Mr William Hartman of Quintessence for going the
extra mile with my requests, and to Ms Lisa Bywaters and Ms Bryn Grisham
for their editorial support.
Finally, love and special thanks to my wife, Kathryn, for her continued
support, love, confidence, sacrifice, and patience.
CBCT in Clinical Practice
Nothing has captured the dental profession’s imagination in the past few
years like the introduction of cone beam volumetric imaging (CBVI), which
is now referred to by most clinicians and even in the literature as cone beam
computed tomography (CBCT). I too now refer to the data volumes I receive
from clients as CBCT volumes, despite my opinion that CBCT images bear
no resemblance to traditional medical computed tomography (CT) scans
except in the display of the final product.
The process of image acquisition for CBCT machines is unlike traditional
medical CT scanners in that the patient is not usually supine, the image
gathered is in a voxel (volume element) format, the x-ray dose absorbed by
the patient is substantially lower, appointment availability is much easier, and
it is less expensive. In short, although this imaging modality produces
signicant data volumes like medical CT, it is different and vastly superior to
traditional CT data for specic dental applications.
Dentists and dental specialists continue to be amazed at the incredibly precise
and profound information produced by CBCT scans, and they are realizing
that the data they receive will influence their treatment decisions like no other
imaging modality used in the profession in the past 100 years. CBCT makes
clinical decision making easier and more precise, patient treatment decisions
more accurate, and visualization of the x-ray data more meaningful. Dentistry
is moving away from “radiographic interpretation” and into “disease
visualization,” and it could not have come at a better time.
Clinical Applications of CBCT
The applications for CBCT encompass most of the procedures clinicians
perform in their office. Some applications for CBCT are listed in Box 1-1;
examples of many of these applications are discussed in chapters 4 to 16.
Additional applications will undoubtedly follow as clinicians learn about and
begin to appreciate the incredibly beneficial data this imaging modality
delivers for improved treatment planning and clinical decision making.
The evolution of implant technology, the technical skills and training of
dental professionals, and the patients’ desire for more permanent and
predictable restorative solutions to missing teeth all ensure that implant
dentistry will remain the largest growth market for dental professionals and
commercial vendors for at least another decade. Within 5 years, the
reconstructed data in 2D/3D grayscale and color formats from CBCT
machines will become the standard of care for displaying patients’
radiographic information for presurgical implant site assessment, implant
placement, and follow-up radiographic assessment. CT, plain film imaging,
and digital imaging modalities will probably become obsolete, at least for
implant dentistry applications.
In recent years, the most rapid adoption of CBCT technology has been in
the endodontic community. Manufacturers of limited field of vision (FOV)
units have rigorously pursued the use of CBCT for endodontic imaging. In
addition, a position statement on the use of CBCT in endodontics was
developed jointly by the American Association of Endodontists (AAE) and
the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology (AAOMR) and
published in 2011.
1,2 More clinicians are discovering that CBCT data
provides tremendous advantages with its thin slices and precision in
endodontic imaging. For this application alone, sales of limited FOV
machines will continue to increase.
Another growing area for CBCT application is in the diagnosis and
treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). CBCT provides precision airway
assessment that can quantify the amount of airway opening as well as the
effects of different intraoral appliances. Treatment of OSA improves patient
quality of life while reducing the risk of cardiac complications related to
having an obstructed airway. This application of CBCT allows clinicians to
significantly improve patient systemic health. Construction of simple
intraoral appliances are essential for patients who have failed with continuous
positive airway pressure (CPAP) machines and have increased cardiac risk.
Considerations for CBCT
The rapid rate of adoption of this technology has been surprising. By the
summer of 2011, I had interpreted over 10,000 CBCT scans and the first
edition of this book was already out of print. Now I spend close to 80% of my
professional time interpreting CBCT scans and creating reports for clinicians
who use this technology. I practice my specialty of oral and maxillofacial
radiology both from my home in a dedicated radiology office environment as
well as while I travel to give lectures and consult. I can operate just as my
medical radiology colleagues do and practice my specialty from virtually
anywhere in the world because of global Internet access.
Just as there are many different CBCT models available on the market, I
receive the data volumes to interpret through many different avenues. Gone
are the days when we relied on 2D grayscale single images attempting to
represent 3D structures, viewed on light boxes under poor lighting
conditions, to help us make our clinical treatment decisions. It is now
possible to have 2D and 3D color “renderings” of each patient’s anatomy and
signs of clinical diseases/disorders.
Figure 1-1 shows this CBCT machine’s broad capabilities and power.
Whether you are considering purchase of a machine for image acquisition in
your practice or simply accessing this technology by requesting a scan, you
should consider the following important questions:
1. How much data (number of images) do you need?
2. How large an area do you wish to evaluate?
3. Do you simply need 2D grayscale information for your decision?
4. Does the diagnostic task really require a CBCT?
5. Does every patient require this type of imaging?
6. Are you comfortable diagnosing all of the data in the volume?
7. What is your risk of missing an important occult finding?
Fig 1-1 This 3D color reconstruction is 42 mm thick and shows bilateral
calcification of the stylohyoid complex as well as the airway, the hyoid
bone, and a cross section of the mandible.
The data volume vs the single image
Before I address these questions, it is very important to understand the size
difference between a data volume from a CBCT machine and traditional
static 2D grayscale images. Each periapical image in a computer is about 300
kB in size, and three of these static intraoral images would fill a 1-MB floppy
disk. A digital panoramic image is about 5 to 7 MB, so approximately 100
images could fit on a CD-ROM. By contrast, each CBCT data volume
acquired for a single patient can range from 100 to 250 MB. Only a few
patient scans would fit on an 800-MB CD-ROM. Even the so-called smallvolume machines provide much more anatomical information than we have
been accustomed to viewing and assessing (Fig 1-2).
Fig 1-2 Small-volume 3D color reconstruction of a 9-year-old patient with a
fractured mandible, rendered with Accurex (CyberMed International). The
fracture is easily identified in the anteroposterior view, and the 3D image
can be rotated 360 degrees to see the fracture in any orientation.
The impact of this data volume is huge, both literally and figuratively.
Several large-capacity computers or servers are necessary to store the
volumes. These data volumes should also be stored offsite via the Internet,
which requires high-speed Internet connection.
In addition, as a clinician, remember that you are responsible for all of the
information in a volume, whether you order or acquire it, and whether it is
for your own use or for a referral client. This tenet is still a source of
confusion within the profession and is sometimes made more confusing by
conflicting information provided by CBCT scanner manufacturers.
Chapter 16 is new to this edition and discusses the risk and liability issues
specific to CBCT volume data. The chapter is illustrated with multiple
examples of occult findings from volume data that, if missed, would have led
to patient harm and delayed treatment. Such oversights are unacceptable in
the dental profession, which has an implicit responsibility, like the medical
profession, to do no harm. No clinician can have a patient sign a form
absolving him/her from this important duty.
The responsibility for looking at the entire data volume is analogous to
looking at a single panoramic radiograph. No clinician would look at only
half of a panoramic radiograph; clinicians must look at the entire image.
CBCT data, although much more extensive, is no different, and if a clinician
cannot interpret the entire volume, referral to a specialist who can is
necessary. Although this at first seems to represent a fundamental paradigm
shift for all clinicians, it is really common sense and the standard of care that
we would use for any specialist referral. When a clinician is in doubt about a
finding, referral to a specialist is expected.
In 1999 the American Dental Association’s house of delegates voted to
accept the application for specialty recognition from the AAOMR to create
dentistry’s ninth specialty. Now clinicians have specialists in oral and
maxillofacial radiology to whom they can refer difficult cases.
In essence, this signals a move to the medical model of radiographic
imaging; that is, we are shifting the responsibility for the overall image
findings to a qualified radiologist after more than 100 years of clinicians
serving as their own radiology expert. Plain films and digital intraoral and
panoramic images will still be used for some diagnostic procedures, but
clinicians will probably need to enlist the services of an oral and
maxillofacial radiologist to look at patient CBCT data for occult pathology in
less familiar anatomical regions. It is both prudent and professional to do so.
Table 1-1 shows the reportable findings in 381 CBCT cases in a 1-year
period (March 2005 to March 2006).
Common CBCT concerns
How much data do you need?
This is a very difficult question to answer. Orthodontists or dentists who treat
orthodontic problems in their patients require much more diagnostic
information to assess a case and predict the outcome. Currently, orthodontic
assessment usually involves intraoral images; panoramic, cephalometric, and
sometimes hand-wrist radiographs; and plaster casts. Casts are mentioned
because, in the future, clinicians will create 3D casts from the radiographic
data in the cone beam scan. So the ability to acquire all the image data needed
in one single imaging procedure offers orthodontists a very distinct advantage
over current methods. Of course, the clinician does not always need all of
those images on an 8-year-old patient at the initial record visit because it is
unlikely that brackets will be placed on this patient until a few years later.
Dentists should think about the information they need for each diagnostic
task before they take or order a CBCT scan. This practice of applying
selection criteria is only now becoming standard practice.
4
How large an area do you wish to evaluate?
Some CBCT machines acquire larger data volumes than others. Data
acquisitions range from volumes of 4 x 4 cm2
to 22 x 22 cm2
. Figure 1-3
demonstrates the differences in size and region of the head corresponding to
these volumes. Not all clinicians need to see the entire skull or would wish to
be responsible for the occult pathology that might be encountered in the data
volume (slice). Radiologists and others wishing to assess the patient’s data
volume must scroll and be able to detect pathologic findings in as many as
512 slices (images) in three orthogonal planes (axial, sagittal, and coronal).
Most clinicians are not comfortable with this task or do not have the time to
look at such a large amount of information.
Fig 1-3 Comparison between the results from a small-volume machine
versus those from a large-volume machine. (top) Axial slice of the middle of
the condylar head. (bottom) Larger area at approximately the same level.
Both volumes contain anatomical structures and cells, such as the middle
ear, mastoid cells, airway, and vertebral bodies, all of which would require
evaluation to determine whether pathology was present.
Do you simply need 2D grayscale information for your
decision?
It may not be necessary to have 3D color information for decision making at
all. The reconstruction of a panoramic image from a 250-MB data volume
requires anywhere from 4 to 70 times the amount of x-rays needed for a
traditional panoramic film or digital image. Therefore, a 2D digital panoramic
radiograph from a full-featured panoramic machine can often suffice for the
preliminary visualization of the patient’s dentition, bone, condyles, and
related anatomy (Fig 1-4).
Fig 1-4 Digital panoramic radiograph of a developing mixed dentition.
Except for the slightly ectopic resorption of the primary canine roots, the
dentition is developing normally. This child would not need a cone beam
scan to make this determination. The x-ray dose from the CBCT scan would
not be justified when this panoramic image would suffice.
Does the diagnostic task really require CBCT?
The clinician must determine if CBCT is even necessary for a particular
diagnostic task. Applications and clinical indications to help with this
determination are discussed further in later chapters. Detection of caries does
not require a cone beam scan. Periodontal bone loss can be evaluated by
well-positioned bitewing and periapical radiographs. Some underestimation
of the alveolar architecture may occur in plain film or digital intraoral
radiography, but this task again does not require CBCT’s thin slice data to
see bone problems. If a patient exhibits systemic disease or a set of risk
factors that could accelerate the bone loss associated with periodontal
disease, a cone beam scan may be indicated to detect the disease earlier or
monitor the treatment success. However, noninvasive, diagnostic
immunoassay tests performed on saliva could detect disease processes even
earlier without exposing the patient to any x-rays. The clinician should
carefully consider the precise indications for this imaging modality and fully
expect the images produced to result in a positive finding that could affect a
treatment outcome. Although x-ray doses are lower for any CBCT machine
than traditional medical CT, not every patient will require a CBCT scan.
4
Does every patient require this type of imaging?
The short answer is an emphatic no. Again, the clinician must consider the
application and prescribe this imaging test only for those patients who would
actually benefit from a precise measurement for an implant site or a better
outcome prediction based on the data volume acquired. There are enough
reasons to use CBCT.
5,6
Income generation is not one of them, nor is the
production of “prettier images.”
Are you comfortable diagnosing all of the data in the
volume?
Most clinicians are not comfortable with viewing radiographic data in an
axial plane. We have rarely seen anatomical structures or pathology in a thin
slice format that displays a plane of information of 1 mm (or less). Consider
the image in Fig 1-5 and ask yourself if you can identify the structure
indicated by the white arrow.
Fig 1-5 Try to identify the structure designated by the arrow, but do not be
surprised if you do not recognize it; most dentists have never seen this
structure in this plane of section. Note the total opacification of the right
maxillary sinus. As is conventionally done in medical CT and with
panoramic radiographs, we are viewing the patient from the foot end, so the
patient’s right side is the left side of the image. The indicated structure is the
coronoid process.
What is your risk of missing an important occult finding?
There is a lot of interest and some confusion about who is responsible for the
image data in the CBCT volume. Is it the owner of the machine? Is it the
referring doctor? Is it the specialist whose office has the machine and
provides the radiographic data? The short answer is yes. Everyone in these
various scenarios is liable. The dentist, the dental specialist who only
provides images, and the radiographic imaging laboratory providing services
for the referring clinician would all be named in a lawsuit if a significant
finding were missed that resulted in harm to the patient. The only solution is
to look at all the images in all planes of section and record any abnormality.
Then refer this patient, with their images, for a consultation with the
appropriate clinician. If you do not feel capable of detecting and interpreting
the data, or if you do not have the time, you should probably consider using a
reading service, medical or dental, to review the image data set and report the
findings. There are always many reportable findings in CBCT scans.
1
References
1. American Association of Endodontists; American Acadamey of Oral and
Maxillofacial Radiography. AAE and AAOMR joint position statement.
Use of cone-beam-computed tomography in endodontics. Pa Dent J
(Harrisb) 2011;78:37–39.
2. American Association of Endodontists; American Academy of Oral and
Maxillofacial Radiology. Use of cone-beam computed tomography in
endodontics Joint Position Statement of the American Association of
Endodontists and the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial
Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
2011;111:234–237.
3. Miles DA. Clinical experience with cone beam volumetric imaging: Report
of findings in 381 cases. US Dent 2006;Sep:39–42.
4. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service,
Food and Drug Administration; American Dental Association, Council on
Dental Benefit Programs, Council on Dental Practice, Council on
Scientific Affairs. The selection of patients for dental radiographic
examinations. Revised 2004. Available at:
www.ada.org/sections/professionalResources/pdfs/-
topics_radiography_examinations.pdf. Accessed 14 March 2012.
5. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL. Dosimetry of two extraoral
direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos
Plus DS panoramic unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003;32:229–234.
6. Danforth RA, Miles DA. Cone beam volume imaging (CBVI): 3D
applications for dentistry. Ir Dent 2007;10(9):14–18.
Basic Principles of CBCT
The method of obtaining the patient’s data volume in cone beam computed
tomography (CBCT) differs signicantly from that of conventional medical
computed tomography (CT). In medical CT scanning (previously termed
CAT [computed axial tomography]), the patient’s region of interest (ROI),
such as the head or abdomen or other body part, is selected. As the x-ray
source rotates around the ROI 60 times per minute, multiple sensors,
consisting of either a gas or scintillator material (most commonly cesium
iodide), detect the x-ray beam. The patient must be moved into the scanner a
known distance in the z-plane. It is this distance—perhaps a centimeter, a half
centimeter, or in cases where high resolution is required, as little as 1
millimeter—that determines the slice thickness. This type of image
acquisition is very precise. The data acquired are voluminous and, in turn, the
patient’s absorbed x-ray dose is also very large. A typical CT scan for a
maxillary implant site assessment may have a radiation dose as high as 2,100
µSV, equivalent to the dose from about 375 panoramic lm or digital images.
1
Image Acquisition
Unlike conventional CT, CBCT uses a narrow cone-shaped beam to rotate
194 to 360 degrees around the patient (Fig 2-1). The sensor is either an image
intensifier (II) that is coupled to either a charge-coupled device (CCD) (Fig 2-
2) or complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS), or a thin film
transistor (TFT) flat-panel type image receptor (Fig 2-3). The II is an older
technology that was developed to improve the viewing of fluoroscopic
images in the operating room during surgery. In the past, the bright lights of
the operating room made it a poor environment for surgeons to view
radiographic film, necessitating a device to “intensify” the resulting images.
The major disadvantage of the II system is distortion at the periphery of its
images. The image pattern appears as a sphere or “ball” and thus the edge
regions are not ideal.
Fig 2-1 (left) Traditional medical CT detector array with x-ray source
rotates 360 degrees around the patient about 60 times per minute. The
thickness of each image slice is determined by the distance (usually 1.0 to
100.0 mm) the patient is moved through the gantry. This exposes the patient
to a large dose of x-rays. (right) A cone beam device, using the cone-shaped
beam, rotates around the patient. The exposure factors are similar to those
used for exposing traditional dental radiographs, so the x-ray dose to the
patient is substantially reduced.
Fig 2-2a In the II system, a curved input phosphor, usually censium iodide,
introduces geometric distortion, which must be compensated for by
software. The phosphor coating will degrade over time, so the II will have to
be replaced eventually—sometimes in as few as 3 or 4 years. This older
imaging system is being replaced by flat-panel displays that offer the many
advantages of a direct digital capture.
Fig 2-2b This II system is stylish but large because of the II configuration.
The x-ray source is on the left of the patient. The detector system is on the
right side. (Courtesy of Sirona USA.)
Fig 2-3a The flat-panel detector (FPD) system is a simple digital capture
system that uses only an x-ray source and a digital detector to capture the
image volume. The devices made with this type of system are much less
bulky and therefore more ergonomic.
Fig 2-3b This FPD system is the ProMax 3D. (Courtesy of Planmeca USA.)
Flat-panel detectors (FPDs) are the newest image receptors for solid-state
large-area arrays.
2 These panels are expensive but offer some advantages
over the older II systems including less distortion, wider scale of contrast,
and elimination of veiling glare.
Compared with medical CT, CBCT doses are much lower, only about 40
to 500 µSv.
1 The method of acquiring images is very different, and the
exposure factors (kV and mA) are much lower. CBCT machines use either a
single FPD or an II (scintillator or phosphor screen) coupled to a series of
CCDs. Table 2-1 illustrates the various current CBCT devices that are
available. More information about CCDs is available at the LearnDigital
website.
3
Several CBCT machines that were available in 2008, including the Iluma
(Imtec) and the CBMercuRay (Hitachi), are no longer marketed in North
America. However, manufacturers continue to introduce new machines and
improve their products. For example, in North America, the supine units like
the original NewTom 9000 (QR Verona) have largely been replaced by
machines used in mobile CBCT units, such as the NewTom VGi (QR
Verona). In addition, many manufacturers have introduced units with variable
fields of vision (FOVs) or units with either an FPD or an II.
Pixel vs Voxel Information
A pixel is a picture element. It is a square that measures between 20 and 60
µm in size. The size of the receptor area is the same whether it resides in an
intraoral device, the TFT screen, or the II and solid-state combination device.
CCDs and CMOSs for intraoral sensors are megapixel arrays, meaning that
each is one million pixels or more. The larger flat panels, of course, use many
millions of pixels.
A voxel is a volume element. This describes a pixel that has a third side; it
is really a cubed array. In CBCT this cube is made up of isotropic pixels with
equal sides. In conventional medical CT, the pixel is nonisotropic, meaning
that two sides are equal, but the third (z-plane) is a selectable width,
anywhere from 0.5 to 10 mm or more. Figure 2-4 illustrates this difference.
Fig 2-4 Traditional medical CT scanners use pixels. The slice thickness is
determined by gantry movement. The thickness, or z-plane, is determined
by the operator. CBCT devices gather the volume information directly using
voxels or cubes with known dimensions (typically 0.15 to 0.6 mm). All
CBCT slice thicknesses in the resulting image are much thinner than slices
created by medical CT devices.
Voxel Size and Image Resolution
Some manufacturers have touted voxel size as the sole measure of image
resolution and, by extension, image quality. While voxel size is important, it
is not the only parameter that affects image quality. Several studies have
addressed this point.
6–8 Pauwels et al
6 designed a cylindric prototype made
from polymethyl methacrylate that could be scanned to assess the image
quality parameters of various CBCT machines. In the results of the study, the
author stated that “the voxel size itself provides only a crude prediction of
spatial accuracy.”
6
Some types of assessment, like those for endodontic applications or
implant site assessment, may require the ability to select a very small voxel
size. Implant site assessment necessitates image capture using a voxel size of
0.2 mm or less. On the other hand, orthodontic records, airway analysis, and
temporomandibular joint (TMJ) assessment do not usually require very small
voxel sizes. Regardless, almost every contemporary CBCT unit offers
variable voxel parameters so that operators can select a voxel size ranging
from 0.076 to 0.125 mm.
Factors affecting image quality and resolution
Clinicians must identify the particular diagnostic abilities that they need from
their CBCT units. When planning to invest in a CBCT unit, clinicians must
consider many parameters in addition to voxel size in order to select the
CBCT unit that will best meet their needs:
• Detector type. II versus FPD.
• Head positioner. The most stable is a three-point configuration seen in Fig
2-3b.
• Exposure factors. The higher the milliamperage, the more photons available
to the detector. However, the trade-off is a higher radiation dose.
• Bit depth of the detector system. Affects the quality of the image
reconstruction.
• Reconstruction algorithm. Inherited from the manufacturer.
• Focal spot size at the anode. Just like that found in standard intraoral x-ray
machines.
Radiation Dose
Although the dose from CBCT machines is significant, it is much less than
that of traditional medical CT scans. Recent data from Ludlow et al
1
estimates that the absorbed x-ray dose from a CBCT examination for a
procedure like an implant site assessment is between 1% and 25% the dose
absorbed from a medical CT scan. This means that many dentally specific
evaluations can be performed much more safely with CBCT than with
medical CT. Thus, when a patient is being considered for any of the
applications cited in Box 1-1, a clinician cannot justify a medical CT
procedure since its radiation dose would greatly exceed that of a CBCT
evaluation. As more machines become available, more dose data are sure to
follow. CBCT will become the imaging modality of choice for most dental
tasks requiring 2D/3D information for clinical decision making.
Legal Concerns
A few of my colleagues believe, or have been advised by CBCT machine
manufacturers, that they can simply have their patient sign a consent form
stating that the dentist is not sufficiently trained to interpret the data beyond
the “dental bases” and is not to be held liable if a significant finding is
missed. Actually, both the owner of the CBCT machine and the referring
clinician have a co-responsibility to make sure the entire data volume is
reviewed for occult pathology. If they are not comfortable interpreting the
volume, it is up to them to make sure a qualified individual reads the volume
and reports the findings to them. There is no ignoring this responsibility.
Consider a lawyer questioning a machine owner on a witness stand. Here
is the hypothetic conversation, but I assure you it is a reasonable line of
inquiry.
Lawyer: Doctor X, was Miss Y present in your office on June 30, 2006,
for an appointment to have a CBCT examination performed?
Doctor X: Yes.
Lawyer: And Doctor X, was that CBCT examination actually performed?
Doctor X: Yes.
Lawyer: And Doctor X, did you charge a fee for that CBCT examination?
Doctor X: Yes.
Lawyer: Doctor X, what was the fee you charged Miss Y for said CBCT
examination?
Doctor X: Four hundred twenty-five dollars.
Lawyer: Doctor X, did you collect that fee from Miss Y?
Doctor X: Yes.
Lawyer: Well Doctor X, wouldn’t you call that “practicing dentistry”?
Doctor X: Yes, but …
Lawyer: Doctor X, just answer the question yes or no.”
Doctor X: Yes.
As this fictional scenario demonstrates, when a clinician performs a
procedure, charges a fee, and collects that fee, it is considered practicing
dentistry. There is no other recourse than to ensure the images in the data
volume are reviewed— all 512 images in each of the three orthogonal planes:
axial, sagittal, and coronal. If a clinician does not feel qualified to do this, it is
essential to have that volume read by an oral and maxillofacial radiologist or
a medical radiologist. See chapter 17 for further discussion of risk and
liability with cone beam imaging.
References
1. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL. Dosimetry of two extraoral
direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos
Plus DS panoramic unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003;32:229–234.
2. Floyd P, Palmer P, Palmer R. Radiographic techniques. Br Dent J
1999;187:359–367.
3. Miles DA. LearnDigital website. Available at: http://www. learndigital.net.
Accessed 19 March 2012.
4. Hirsch E, Silva M. Radiation doses from different conebeam-ct devices.
Presented at the 11th Congress of the European Academy of DentoMaxillo-Facial Radiology, Budapest, 27 Jun 2008.
5. Brooks SL. Answer to question #6120 submitted to “Ask the Experts.”
Health Physics Society website. Available at:
http://hps.org/publicinformation/ate/q6120.html. Accessed 19 March 2012.
6. Pauwels R, Stamatakis H, Manousaridis G, et al. Development and
applicability of a quality-control phantom for dental cone-beam CT. J Appl
Clin Med Phys 2011;12:245–260.
7. Loubele M, Jacobs R, Maes F, et al. Image quality vs radiation dose of
four cone beam computed tomography scanners. Dentomaxillofac Radiol
2008;37:309–318.
8. Loubele M, Maes F, Schutyser F, et al. Assessment of bone segmentation
quality of cone-beam CT versus multislice spiral CT: A pilot study. Oral
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;102:225–234.
Anatomical Structures in Cone Beam
Images
To discern a potential problem in the cone beam computed tomography
(CBCT) data volume, the clinician or radiologist must examine multiple
slices in three planes of section: axial, sagittal, and coronal. While clinicians
are quite familiar with many structures in the sagittal plane (since it is similar
to periapical, bitewing, panoramic, and cephalometric orientations), they are
not as familiar with these same structures as viewed in the coronal or
especially the axial plane. To illustrate this point, I would ask you to look
back at Fig 1-5 and recall the difficulty of interpreting thin slice data in a
plane of section most of us have not seen since dental school.
This chapter presents many anatomical structures in the three planes of
section as grayscale images, supported in most cases by thicker 3D slices,
slabs or volume images to help the reader orient themselves and reconstruct
the structures in the mind’s eye. No attempt was made to illustrate all
possible just structures; the chapter instead focuses on those that are
commonly seen by dentists and dental specialists to help them relearn
anatomical detail that may be long forgotten. Because many of the structures
involve several bones, they are repeated in various views and planes of
section.
Maxillary structures should be very familiar to all of us, especially in the
lateral or sagittal view. Although these bones can be described separately, we
will see them in this chapter as they appear clinically—joined together to
make walls, spaces, and structures that we must recognize to understand the
3D changes one might encounter during an examination of CBCT volume
data. When possible, these structures will be identied as they relate to one
another.
The first part of this chapter illustrates anatomy as seen in a large old of
vision (FOV). The second part focuses on these same anatomical structures
as seen in a small FOV.
Anatomy in the Large FOV
Structures identified in Figs 3-1 to 3-33 include the antra, incisive foramen
and canal, nasal fossa, nasal conchae, nasolacrimal canal, pterygoid
plates/processes, pterygoid hamulus, and styloid and mastoid processes. In
each section the structures are identified in the axial plane first (both thin and
thick sections), followed by similar views in the sagittal and coronal planes.
In some figures, we include all three planes to show the clinician and student
how a specific structure or anomaly is oriented between the three planes. In
most instances, the images start with a section through a recognizable part of
the anatomy such as the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) condyles.
F
i
g
3

1
A
0.1
5

m
m
s
l
i
c
e
a
t
t
h
e
l
e
v
e
l
o
f
t
h
e
m
a
n
d
i
b
u
l
a
r
f
o
s
s
a
(
t
o
p
o
f
c
o
n
d
y
l
e
).
F
i
g
3

2
A
1

m
m
s
l
i
c
e
a
t
t
h
e
l
e
v
e
l
o
f
t
h
e
m
a
n
d
i
b
u
l
a
r
f
o
s
s
a
(
m
i
d
d
l
e
o
f
c
o
n
d
y
l
e
).
Fig 3-3 A 21.5-mm slice from the palatal to midportion of condyle.
F
i
g
3

4
S
a
m
e
s
l
i
c
e
a
s
s
h
o
w
n
i
n
F
i
g
3

3
,
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
e
d
t
o
s
h
o
w
a
i
r
w
a
y
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s.
Fig 3-5 A 2.2-mm slice through the mandbiular fossa (middle of condyle).
F
i
g
3

6
A
0.1
5

m
m
s
l
i
c
e
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
m
a
n
d
i
b
u
l
a
r
f
o
s
s
a
(
m
e
d
i
a
l
p
o
l
e
o
f
c
o
n
d
y
l
e
).
Fig 3-7 A 100-mm slab rendering (lateral pole of condyle).
Fig 3-8 A 60-mm slab rendering (middle of condyle).
Fig 3-9 This 13.2-mm slice serves as a pseudoradiograph of the posterior
region of the condyles.
Fig 3-10 A 0.15-mm slice through the middle ear region.
F
i
g
3

1
1
A
3
3.2

m
m
s
l
i
c
e
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
p
o
s
t
e
r
i
o
r
r
e
g
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
m
a
n
d
i
b
u
l
a
r
f
o
s
s
a.
Fig 3-12 A 100-mm slab reconstruction through the mandibular fossa.
F
i
g
3

1
3
A
0.1
5

m
m
s
l
i
c
e
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
m
a
n
d
i
b
u
l
a
r
f
o
s
s
a
(
m
i
d
d
l
e
o
f
t
h
e
c
o
n
d
y
l
e
s
).
Fig 3-14 A 33.2-mm slab through the condyles.
Fig 3-15 A 100-mm slab rendering through the mandibular fossa showing
the airway.
Fig 3-16 A 100-mm slab rendering through the mandibular fossa.
Fig 3-17 A 0.15-mm slice through middle of sphenoid sinus.
Fig 3-18 A 0.15-mm slice through the middle of pterygoid plate.
Fig 3-19 A 0.15-mm slice through the middle of pterygoid plates.
Fig 3-20 A 0.15-mm slice through the posterior region of maxillary sinus.
Fig 3-21 A 0.15-mm slice through the middle of maxillary sinus.
Fig 3-22 A 0.15-mm slice through the anterior region of maxillary sinus.
Fig 3-23 A 32.3-mm slab through the anterior region of maxillary sinus.
Fig 3-24 A 26.9-mm slice through the middle of condyles.
Fig 3-25 A 53.2-mm slab through the posterior ramus.
Fig 3-26 A 53.2-mm slab through the middle of ascending ramus.
Fig 3-27 A 53.2-mm slab through the anterior region of the maxillary sinus.
F
i
g
3

2
8
A
5
3.2

m
m
s
l
a
b
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
p
o
s
t
e
r
i
o
r
r
e
g
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
m
a
x
i
l
l
a
r
y
s
i
n
u
s.
Fig 3-29 A 100-mm slab rendering through the region of the condyles.
Fig 3-30 A 69.9-mm slab rendering through the midregion of the maxillary
sinus, also showing the airway.
Fig 3-31 A 69.9-mm slab rendering through the posterior region of the
maxillary sinus, also showing the airway.
Fig 3-32 A 69.9-mm slab rendering through the anterior region of the
sphenoid sinus, also showing the airway.
Fig 3-33 Multiplanar reconstructed images showing axial (a), sagittal (b),
and coronal (c) views through the middle of the mandibular condyles.

Anatomy in the Small FOV
Anatomy is anatomy. There is no such thing as “small volume” anatomy.
However, CBCT machines are sold with different FOV sizes ranging from as
small as 38 x 50 mm to as large as 200 x 200 mm. Manufacturers have
perpetuated a belief among clinicians that the use of a small FOV CBCT
machine eliminates or greatly reduces diagnostic responsibility. This is true
to some extent. However, even an area as small as 4 x 4 cm, when positioned
over the condyle or used to image an impacted mandibular third molar, may
capture some very important anatomical structures. For example, both the
internal carotid artery and internal jugular vein lie within a half centimeter of
the medial pole of the condylar head. This section features images taken by a
CBCT unit with a small FOV that follow the path of the internal carotid
artery from the area of the medial condyle to the parasellar region.
Figures 3-34 to 3-40 illustrate that even small FOV CBCT units capture
data and images that are significant. A clinician must be familiar with as
many anatomical structures as possible to be able to delineate any potential
disparity from normal anatomical spaces and foramina.
Fig 3-34a The foramen for the internal carotid artery (top left, arrow) in its
position medial to the mandibular fossa and medial condylar pole. The
beginning of the path of the carotid artery toward the sella region is visible
(bottom right, arrows).
Fig 3-34b Continuation of the internal carotid artery (arrows).
Fig 3-34c A widening of the canal for the internal carotid artery (arrows).
Fig 3-34d As the scan moves superior to the condylar head, the upward turn
of the internal carotid artery adjacent to the sella turcica and sphenoid sinus
is visible (bottom right, arrows).
Fig 3-35a 3D color reconstruction taken through the neck of the condyle
showing the opening for the internal carotid artery (arrow).
Fig 3-35b The entire canal is outlined, including where the artery ascends
(black arrow), the canal itself (white arrows), and the opening near the
sphenoid sinus (orange arrow) where the artery ascends once more.
Fig 3-35c This view shows the sphenoid sinus (white arrow) and the place
adjacent to the sinus where the internal carotid artery ascends adjacent to the
sella turcica (orange arrow).
Fig 3-35d 3D reconstruction at the level of the superior portion of the ramus
where it joins the condylar neck. The canals for both the internal jugular
vein (white arrow) and the internal carotid artery (orange arrow) are visible.
Fig 3-36a The Endoscopic tool allows 3D reconstruction of the internal
carotid artery canal from inside the canal. The small red x near the condyle
in the scan on the left is in the vicinity of the stapes (arrows) shown in the
3D reconstruction on the right.
Fig 3-36b Further down the canal, the 3D reconstruction on the right shows
the stapes (upper arrow) and the central portion of the canal for the internal
carotid artery (lower arrow).
Fig 3-36c A view from inside the canal proceeding further toward the
region of the sphenoid sinus.
Fig 3-37a A view slightly more inferior on the ramus showing both the
foramen spinosum (left arrow) and the foramen ovale (right arrow). See if
you can identify the openings for the internal carotid artery and internal
jugular vein in this image.
Fig 3-37b A similar view of these two foramina seen at a more superior
level near the midportion of the condyle.
Fig 3-38 Multiplanar views showing the opening for the foramen ovale
(arrows) in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes as well as a 3D color
reconstruction. Note the proximity of this foramen to the condylar region.
Fig 3-39 Similar multiplanar reconstructions of the area showing the
approximate location of the internal carotid artery (arrows) near the
sphenoid sinus.
Fig 3-40a An axial slice taken by a small FOV CBCT unit to evaluate the
left TMJ. The sequence begins with the view of the midroot region of the
maxillary left second molar.
Fig 3-40b A slice from a slightly superior level showing the relationship of
a small portion of the dens axis to the lateral mass of the arch of C1 (atlas).
Fig 3-40c A slightly more superior view showing the origin of this styloid
process, a small region of the dens axis, and the foramen in C1 to transmit
the vertebral artery.
Fig 3-40d A slice at this level shows structures that are more recognizable,
such as the condyle, nasal septum, and medial and lateral pterygoid plates.
In most cases, the data set for the contralateral TMJ complex will be imaged
for comparison. Thus, the clinician needs to look at all of these structures
from the opposite side in the fossa of Rosenmüller. Obliteration of this
space can indicate a space-occupying lesion.
Fig 3-40e At a level near the top of the condyle, some of the foramina in the
base of the skull become visible, including the foramen spinosum and the
foramina for the internal carotid artery and internal jugular vein.
Fig 3-40f Structures in this axial slice may not be familiar to most dental
clinicians. The carotid canal is well identified as it nears the parasellar
region, and structures of the temporal bone, such as the tympanic membrane
and basal turn of the cochlea, now become apparent.
Fig 3-40g More superiorly, more temporal bone structures become visible,
including the malleus, vestibule, and cochlea. Neuroradiologists can identify
up to 70 structures in the temporal bone alone. It is beyond the scope of this
atlas to identify all structures within the temporal bone.
Fig 3-40h This thin slice coronal reconstruction shows some of the
structures in the parasellar region, including the foramen rotundum and
pterygoid canal.
Fig 3-40i A slightly more posterior view shows other structures of the floor
of the skull, such as the foramen ovale.
Fig 3-40j This view at the level of the neck of the condyle shows the
cavernous sinus and foramen spinosum.
Moreover, when a small FOV CBCT unit is used to image a condyle, an
impacted third molar, or the maxillary sinus for presurgical implant
assessment, there will be structures contained within this smaller data set that
may initially confuse you. Taking the time to relearn the anatomy outlined in
this chapter and in other resources will increase the comfort and competence
in assessing small FOV scans.
Airway Analysis
While a continuous positive airow pressure (CPAP) appliance is still
considered the first-line treatment for severe sleep apnea,
1 mild to moderate
cases may be treated effectively with either a mandibular advancement device
(MAD) or a tongue retraining device (TRD).
2The MAD, which looks similar
to a sports mouth guard and is the most common dental device for sleep
apnea, directs the mandible forward and down slightly to keep the airway
open during sleep. The TRD is a dental splint that holds the tonque in one
place during sleep to keep the airway as open as possible.
Dentists who make appliances for patients experiencing sleep apnea have
a signicant role in the management of this disorder. The assessment of the
patient’s airway is an integral part of the management strategy. There appears
to be no better way to visualize the airway than by employing cone beam
computed tomography.
Fig 4-1 Airway Narrowing
Fig 4-1a Sagittal image at 0.15 mm shows narrowing of the airway in a
young patient with enlarged adenoids (arrows).
Fig 4-1b The airway is reconstructed in grayscale (40 mm thick) to
resemble a typical cephalometric image.
Fig 4-1c Sagittal image in 3D color reconstruction (40 mm thick) shows
airway narrowing.
Fig 4-1d A 3D color reconstruction shows the airway without the spinal
column.
Fig 4-1e A slice only 5 mm thick allows for airway assessment in 3D color.
Fig 4-2 Patent Airway
Fig 4-2a An axial view in 3D color shows the patent airway space.
F
i
g
4

2
b
A
n
a
x
i
a
l
v
i
e
w
i
n
3
D
c
o
l
o
r
s
h
o
w
s
t
h
e
a
i
r
w
a
y
a
t
t
h
e
e
n
d
o
f
t
h
e
u
v
u
l
a.
Fig 4-2c A 3D color reconstruction of a sagittal slice 17.2 mm thick shows
the airway. There is no restriction of the volume in this airway.
Fig 4-2d A coronal view in 3D color is reconstructed in a slice 11.5 mm
thick, representing the beginning of the nasopharyngeal airway. All other
airway spaces such as the maxillary antra, nasal cavity, and ethmoid air cells
also appear patent.
Fig 4-2e A 3D color reconstruction of a coronal slice 30 mm thick
represents the beginning of the nasopharyngeal airway. Note that the molars
on each side of the maxillary arch are now visible.
Fig 4-2f Sagittal view of the airway in 3D color, reconstructed in a slice
11.6 mm thick, representing the beginning of the nasopharyngeal airway.
All other airway spaces such as the maxillary antra, nasal cavity, and
ethmoid air cells also appear patent.
Fig 4-2g Sagittal view in 3D color, reconstructed in a slice 30.1 mm thick.
This represents the entire 3D volume of the patent airway.
Fig 4-2h This 3D color reconstruction of an axial slice at 30.1 mm thick
shows the entire 3D volume of the airway from the nasopharyngeal opening.
Note also the patent maxillary sinuses.
References
1. Bradley TD, Logan AG, Kimoff RJ, et al. Continuous positive airway
pressure for central sleep apnea and heart failure. N Engl J Med
2005;353:2025–2033.
2. Kushida CA, Morgenthaler TI, Littner MR, et al. Practice paramerters for
the treatment of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea with oral appliances:
An update for 2005. Sleep 2006;29:240–243.
Dental Findings
Even after patients undergo comprehensive clinical and radiographic
examinations, their cone beam computed tomographic data volumes referred
for radiographic interpretation often reveal incidental dental ndings; that is,
dental diseases and conditions are found that could not be appreciated
through plain lm imaging alone. In some cases, even 2D digital images
(intraoral or panoramic) are insuf cient to detect some dental lesions.
Fig 5-1 Periapical Lesions
Fig 5-1a A 2D reconstruction of a conventional panoramic image. The
periapical lesion on the maxillary left lateral incisor is barely discernible and
could be missed. Note also the mucous retention cyst in the right antrum.
Fig 5-1b A thin slice (0.15 mm) 2D pseudopanoramic image. The periapical
lesion on the maxillary left lateral incisor is easily apparent in this thin
section.
Fig 5-1c A 2D maximum intensity projection (MIP) image of the same
patient.
Fig 5-1d A 3D color panoramic reconstruction of the same patient shows
cortical perforation.
Fig 5-1e A 3D full-volume reconstruction shows the same defect (arrow),
with the grayscale multiplanar images on the right. The clinician can toggle
between the images to completely visualize the lesion.
Fig 5-2 Mesiodens
Fig 5-2a A conventional panoramic image. The mesiodens was not very
distinguishable.
Fig 5-2b The pseudopanoramic image does not reveal the mesiodens, even
in a thin slice.
Fig 5-2c The MIP image, though distorted in the anterior region, shows the
mesiodens clearly.
Fig 5-2d An axial slice shows the mesiodens (arrow) in relation to the
beginning of the nasal cavity.
Fig 5-2e A 3D reconstruction of the mesiodens area suggests eruption of the
mesiodens into the right nasal cavity. This reconstruction is accomplished
by using the Cube tool in the OnDemand 3D software (CyberMed
International).
Fig 5-2f A 2D grayscale coronal image with a partial view of the problem
with the nasal cavity and mesiodens. The clinician would have to “stack”
many slices to recognize the true extent of the lesion. In the 3D color images
in Figs 5-2e and 5-2g, the lesion is easily visualized.
Fig 5-2g A 3D slab (11.0 mm thick) rendering of the mesiodens from the
coronal image in Fig 5-2f.
Fig 5-2h The Dental function in the OnDemand 3D software, normally used
for assessing implant sites, can also create cross-sectional images of the
mesiodens.
Fig 5-2i 3D color rendering of selected images from Fig 5-2h shows the
nasal cavity and maxillary sinus. Note that the thin layer of bone separating
the mesiodens from the nasal cavity is more apparent in this reconstruction.
Impacted Teeth
Impacted teeth are a common problem. Orthodontists and oral and
maxillofacial surgeons spend a lot of time assessing tooth position and
eruption patterns and managing patients referred from general dentists who
have usually seen these impactions on intraoral or panoramic radiographs.
Permanent canines erupting abnormally are common, as are horizontally
impacted mandibular third molars. Even supernumerary teeth are a common
enough anomaly to require additional radiographic assessment. Cone beam
computed tomography (CBCT) is the most appropriate way to perform this
assessment for preoperative planning and orthodontic management. It is
likely that CBCT will become the standard of care for the assessment of all
impactions in the near future.
Fig 6-1 Maxillary Canine and Mandibular Third Molar
Fig 6-1a A panoramic image, reconstructed from the cone beam data
volume, represents the type of image that would serve for the initial
assessment of the missing canine. There is no way to determine the correct
orientation (facial or palatal position) from this panoramic image. The
primary canine is retained. The permanent canine is impacted horizontally.
Fig 6-1b The same image as Fig 6-1a, using a maximum intensity projection
view. The canine appears to be anterior to the central and lateral incisors.
Fig 6-1c The cone beam multiplanar reconstructed (MPR) axial image
reveals the correct position of this impacted canine. It is posterior to the
central and lateral incisors and the retained primary canine.
Fig 6-1d The cone beam MPR sagittal image reveals the position of this
impacted canine (arrow) relative to the left lateral incisor.
Fig 6-1e The cone beam MPR coronal image reveals the position of this
impacted canine as posterior to the central and lateral incisors.
Fig 6-1f A 3D color reconstruction shows the palatal elevation caused by
the impacted canine (arrow).
Fig 6-1g A 3D color reconstruction (18.3 mm thick) shows the canine
position (arrow) unobstructed by bony anatomy.
Fig 6-1h A 3D color reconstruction (18.3 mm thick) formatted in a “4-
view” series shows the canine position unobstructed by bony anatomy at the
level of the incisal edges of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth.
Fig 6-1i A 3D color reconstruction (18.3 mm thick) formatted in a “4-view”
series shows the canine position unobstructed by bony anatomy at the level
of the midregion of the pulp canals of the maxillary premolars.
Fig 6-1j A panoramic image of a vertical impaction of the mandibular right
third molar reveals that the inferior alveolar nerve canal passes close to the
apex.
Fig 6-1k A pseudopanoramic image (5.0 mm) provides a sharper view of
the vertical impaction of the mandibular right third molar. The inferior
alveolar nerve canal now appears to touch the apex of the tooth.
Fig 6-1l A 3D reconstructed view of the region shows a vertical impaction
of the mandibular right third molar, with the inferior alveolar nerve touching
the apex of the tooth (arrow).
Fig 6-1m Axial, sagittal, and pseudopanoramic images with the nerve canal
drawn in and a reference line at the midroot level. At this location, the crosssectional image (top right) reveals that the inferior alveolar nerve (red oval)
does not touch the mandibular third molar (arrow).
Fig 6-1n Axial, sagittal, and pseudopanoramic images with the nerve canal
drawn in and a reference line at the level of the root apex. The crosssectional image (top right) reveals that the inferior alveolar nerve (red oval)
does touch the apex of the mandibular third molar (arrow).
Figs 6-1o and 6-1p Cross-sectional images with a reference line at the root
apex region confirm that the inferior alveolar nerve (red ovals) does touch
the very apex of the tooth (arrows).
Fig 6-2 Maxillary Third Molars
Fig 6-2a This axial image shows impactions of the maxillary third molars.
Note the root canal therapy on the second molars, as well as some minor
mucosal thickening in the left maxillary sinus (arrow).
Fig 6-2b A pseudopanoramic image (0.16 mm thick) shows the impactions
seen in Fig 6-2a. This thin section is not in the correct plane to show the
maxillary anterior teeth; however, these could be imaged by scrolling
anteriorly through the arch to the appropriate plane of section.
Fig 6-2c A sagittal image (left) shows impaction of the maxillary left third
molar; the Cube tool (right) is used to render the 3D image of the maxillary
second and third molars. Note the detail of the occlusal surface. This is a
small-volume image taken using the ProMax 3D machine (Planmeca) and
imaged with N-Liten 3D software (Planmeca).
Fig 6-2d A sagittal slice shows the same tooth impaction but with the buccal
bone imaged for preoperative evaluation. Detailed anatomy is again
visualized. This image was reconstructed using the ProMax 3D machine and
N-Liten 3D software.
Fig 6-2e This sagittal image shows the impaction of the maxillary right third
molar with the buccal bone imaged for preoperative evaluation. The
maxillary sinus is colored violet. This image was reconstructed using the
ProMax 3D machine and N-Liten 3D software.
Fig 6-2f A 3D color rendering shows the same impaction as in Fig 6-2e
without extra colorization of air space.
Fig 6-2g The image area from Fig 6-2f is rendered in 3D and color and
rotated to show the occlusal surface of the tooth (right). Because of the
communication of this tooth with the oral cavity, these pit depressions
(arrow) may be caries lesions. Image rendered using the ProMax 3D
machine and N-Liten 3D software.
Fig 6-3 Maxillary Left Quadrant
Fig 6-3a The arrow in this axial slice identifies the impacted mandibular
right third molar.
Fig 6-3b The maxillary left third molar is impacted, though the apices
appear normal in this coronal slice.
Fig 6-3c This reconstructed maximum intensity projection image shows the
vertical impaction of the maxillary left third molar and the horizontal
impaction of the mandibular left third molar.
Fig 6-3d 3D color reconstructed view showing the position of the maxillary
left third molar. In this image, extraction does not look problematic.
Fig 6-3e When the Nerve tool is used, it is clear that the inferior alveolar
nerve touches the apices of the impacted mandibular right third molar.
Fig 6-3f The apices of the maxillary left third molar still do not appear to be
a problem in these views.
Fig 6-3g A 3D color reconstructed view shows some of the apical region.
Fig 6-3h A rotated view from a superior position shows that the buccal
apices are severely dilacerated and fused. The configuration of these roots,
which could not be identified in the multiplanar 2D grayscale images, would
make extraction difficult. Only the 3D reconstruction reveals the true
situation and prevents an unpleasant surprise at the time of extraction.
Fig 6-3i A thin sagittal slice shows an unusual impaction of the maxillary
left first molar (arrow).
Fig 6-3j A thin coronal slice showing the mesial aspect of the maxillary left
first molar (arrow).
Fig 6-3k A slightly posterior coronal slice shows a minor dilaceration of the
distobuccal root (arrow).
Fig 6-3l The Cube tool (left) was used to create a 3D color reconstruction
(right) that shows the divergence and dilaceration of the mesiobuccal and
distobuccal roots (arrow) of the maxillary left first molar. The structure is
fused to the apical third.
Fig 6-3m A 20-mm reconstructed view shows the position of the impactions
in the maxillary left quadrant. Even if the maxillary left second molar were
extracted, the maxillary left first molar could not erupt because of the
dilacerated apices revealed in the 3D color reconstruction.
Implant Site Assessment
Probably the most common use for cone beam computed tomography
(CBCT), after endodontic and orthodontic evaluation, is preoperative implant
site assessment. When a clinician is placing multiple implants for an
overdenture, use of CBCT for site assessment is indispensable. However,
cases involving multiple implants and horizontal anchorage of the surgical
guide are not nearly as common as cases involving single tooth loss. With the
precision of CBCT, any clinician wishing to perform surgery for an implant
or restorative procedure can easily work on preoperative planning without
referring all surgical procedures to a specialist. The illustrated cases are not
intended to establish protocol for single implant site assessment, but rather
demonstrate the precision with which measurement and location can be
performed using appropriate CBCT software.
Importance of a Radiographic Stent and
Marker
The importance of using a radiographic stent with a nonmetallic marker for
implant site location cannot be overstated. Radiographic stents, which help to
precisely locate the desired bone receptor site, have been around for many
years.
1 The clinician provides the history, casts, and clinical findings
(including preliminary 2D radiographic information) and is the operator who
places or directs the placement of the implant. Providing a stent and a precise
description of the most desirable location is essential to allow the radiologist
and/or technician to take precise measurements of length, width, and
angulation for the implant site. If the clinician is analyzing the site, a marker
will invariably assist the evaluation. Placing a radiopaque marker at the
clinically determined location makes all subsequent steps much easier.
Software is available to perform measurements to within about 0.1 mm.
These measurement tasks are ideally performed at the site indicated by the
radiographic marker. Metal markers and barium pastes should not be used
because of their inevitable artifacts and image degradation. Metallic balls
such as copper balls may be suitable, but gutta-percha is probably the ideal
marker material. An article describing the simple construction of a
radiographic stent is available at the LearnDigital website.
2
Fig 7-1 Creating a Radiographic Stent
Fig 7-1a A clinical cast is shown in a surveyor with a coffee stir stick as
stylus. Gutta-percha will be placed into one half of the stick to provide a
radiopaque marker that will not produce scatter artifacts in the volume data.
Fig 7-1b The clinical cast is shown with the processed acrylic stent and
coffee stir stick with gutta-percha inside. A hot-wax instrument is then used
to cut off the excess gutta-percha, and the marker area is covered with new
cold-cure acrylic. Retention is provided during image acquisition by the
incisal/occlusal imprint. (Fig 7-1 courtesy of Dr Ron Shelley, Glendale,
AZ.)
Fig 7-2 Canine Site Assessment
Fig 7-2a A sagittal view (left) and a 3D color reconstruction (right) show
the metallic marker used to locate the ideal implant site.
Fig 7-2b With a marker in the implant site, the length, width, and even
angulation can be measured precisely in preparation for implant selection.
Fig 7-2c A close-up of the proposed implant site shows the ridge width and
bone height within one-tenth of a millimeter.
Fig 7-3 Premolar Site Assessment
Fig 7-3a Panoramic image of proposed implant site for the maxillary right
second premolar. With this type of 2D image it is not possible to measure
the precise distance to the maxillary sinus or the width of the alveolar bone
from the facial wall to the palatal wall.
Fig 7-3b The CBCT program identifies the precise implant site location,
ready to measure, in the cross-sectional view.
Fig 7-3c The CBCT program shows the measurement of the implant site in
the cross-sectional view.
Fig 7-4 Molar Site Assessment
Fig 7-4a The CBCT program shows the precise location of the inferior
alveolar nerve, as well as the reference line at the proposed implant site
location. (upper right) The nerve canal has been automatically labeled in red
after the arch and canal have been drawn using the simple program tools. To
stay in the center of the alveolar ridge and engage the cortical bone, an
implant measuring 4.5 × 10 mm may be used safely. Implant selection based
on 2D panoramic imaging alone would have resulted in a longer implant
and possible perforation into the submandibular fossa because of height
distortion in the radiograph.
Fig 7-4b Here, the cortex of the bone is easily visualized using the Dental
function and 3D tools. The shape of the submandibular fossa is also
apparent. (upper right) The two red dots demonstrate the change in position
of the nerve canal from the posterior end of the slice (upper dot) to the
anterior end of the slice (lower dot).
References
1. Danforth RA, Miles DA. Cone beam volume imaging (CBVI): 3D
applications for dentistry. Ir Dent 2007;10(9):14–18.
2. Miles DA, Shelley RK. Pre-surgical implant site assessment: Part I–Precise
and practical radiographic stent construction for cone beam CT imaging.
LearnDigital website. Available at:
http://www.learndigital.net/articles/2006/presurgical_stent.pdf. Accessed
11 July 2012.
Odontogenic Lesions
Although many odontogenic cysts and tumors are rare, the application of
cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to characterize these lesions is
invaluable for preoperative planning and clinical management.
Fig 8-1 Supernumerary Tooth
Fig 8-1a An 18-year-old white woman was referred to an oral and
maxillofacial imaging facility in Seattle, Washington, for CBCT evaluation
with respect to a suspected supernumerary tooth. The maxillary third molars
had not yet erupted. The axial section shows the maxillary left third molar
and associated supernumerary tooth.
Fig 8-1b The sagittal section shows these teeth in a more recognizable view.
Fig 8-1c A 3D grayscale reconstruction shows the orientation of the
maxillary left third molar and supernumerary tooth.
Fig 8-1d A 3D color reconstruction shows the orientation of the molar and
supernumerary tooth in relation to the bone.
Fig 8-1e A 3D color reconstruction shows the orientation of the molar and
supernumerary tooth in relation to soft tissue structures such as the
maxillary sinus and partial airway.
Fig 8-1f A 3D color reconstruction shows the orientation of the molar and
supernumerary tooth in relation to anatomical structures and facial soft
tissues. The black box over the eyes is necessary to preserve the anonymity
of the patient, since the facial detail is so remarkable.
Fig 8-1g In this 3D color panoramic reconstruction of the patient, note how
single midline anatomical structures such as the hyoid bone and spine are
still projected twice because of the image reconstruction process. The
maxillary left third molar is marked (arrow).
Fig 8-2 Simple Bone Cyst
Fig 8-2a A 10-year-old Hispanic girl presenting a large radiolucent lesion in
the anterior mandible was referred to the oral and maxillofacial imaging
facility in the orthodontic department at the University of California, San
Francisco, for CBCT evaluation. A panoramic-like image reconstructed
from the cone beam data volume reveals a large, well-defined, circular
radiolucency with a cortical border. No internal calcification or root
resorption is apparent. There appears to be some remodeling of the inferior
cortex of the mandible.
Fig 8-2b A thin axial slice at the level of the hyoid bone (arrow) reveals the
expansile nature of the lesion not seen in the previous panoramic image.
Fig 8-2c A thin sagittal slice shows thinning of the anterior mandible and
some expansion.
Fig 8-2d A sagittal slab (60.0 mm thick) rendered in 3D color shows the
lesion and soft tissue outlines. Note also the transparent airway and
paranasal sinus regions.
Fig 8-2e An axial slab (60.0 mm thick) rendered in 3D color showing lesion
and soft tissue outlines. Note also the transparent airway and paranasal sinus
regions.
Fig 8-2f A full 3D color rendering shows the lesion and soft tissue outlines.
Note the apparent perforation of the anterior cortical bone. This is a
pseudoperforation caused by the slice thickness. The cortex, though thinned,
is intact, as seen in the previous images.
Fig 8-2g A full 3D color rendering shows the lesion and soft tissue outlines.
Again, note the apparent perforation of cortical bone. This image is fully
rendered, so the “perforation” actually comes from the image processing.
The opacity and transparency functions may have been manipulated
incorrectly. All 2D and 3D image data must be examined to make a correct
assessment.
Fig 8-3 Nasopalatine Duct Cyst
Fig 8-3a A 58-year-old white woman was referred for implant site
assessment for replacement of the right mandibular second molar. The
panoramic radiograph was not provided, but a typical reconstruction
simulates what it would have shown; the reconstructed “panoramic” image
fails to reveal the existence of the nasopalatine duct cyst in the anterior
maxilla. This is a good example of the kind of occult pathology found in
CBCT data volumes by oral and maxillofacial radiologists.
Fig 8-3b An axial image shows the size and irregular margins of the palatal
cyst (arrows), indicating expansion.
Fig 8-3c A 3D color reconstruction suggests possible perforation of the
palatal cyst. Recall that, as shown in Fig 8-2g, this apparent bone loss may
be only an effect of the image processing.
Fig 8-3d A coronal slice demonstrates the expansile nature of the lesion.
Note that the lesion has already eroded the floor of the nasal fossa
bilaterally.
Fig 8-3e A coronal 3D color rendering further suggests perforation of the
buccal and possibly the palatal bones by the lesion.
Fig 8-3f A sagittal slice demonstrates expansion and possible erosion of the
inferior region of the palate, since the opening from the foramen (arrows)
appears larger than normal.
Fig 8-3g The Implant mode can be used to examine the central area of the
lesion in all three planes of section.
Fig 8-4 Odontogenic Keratocyst
Fig 8-4a A 53-year-old white man was referred to Case Western Reserve
University School of Dental Medicine in Cleveland, Ohio, for evaluation of
an impacted third molar. No information was provided to the radiologist
other than a request to study the data volume. There was no referral
comment on the prescription form about a suspected cyst. This is a
pseudopanoramic reconstruction slice (0.15 mm). At the time of this
evaluation, the Preferences section of the software had been programmed to
display the image in a reverse format; that is, with the patient’s left side on
the left (white arrow).The lesion actually surrounds the mandibular right
third molar.
Fig 8-4b An axial view shows the pericoronal nature and expansion of the
lesion, resulting in remodeling of the lingual cortex.
Fig 8-4c Use of the Nerve Drawing tool in the Implant mode to determine
the relationship of the tooth and lesion to the inferior alveolar canal. Orange
represents the nerve outside the plane of section. Green represents the nerve
in the particular plane of section.
Fig 8-4d By selecting the Cube tool in the software, this image is
automatically reconstructed in a 3D color rendering. The clinician or
operator can also change the coloration by selecting presets, which can be
created and stored in the program by assigning different colors and opacity
and transparency values to particular voxels.
Fig 8-4e By selecting the Cube tool, the image can be rotated in 3D to
demonstrate the occlusal surface anatomy.
Fig 8-4f A similar, but isolated view of the image from Fig 8-4e has been
rotated to view the inferior extent of the lesion in 3D color. Note the linear
resorptive pattern of the mandibular right second molar here and in Fig 8-4e.
Fig 8-4g The OnDemand 3D server-based platform software (CyberMed
International) also has an Endoscope tool that allows the visualization of
even more detail of this lesion. The cauliflower-like radiopaque object
posterior to the ramus is a calcified lymph node.
Fig 8-4h Applying the Endoscope tool and rotating the image displays the
occlusal surface even more precisely.
Fig 8-4i An enlarged, isolated image captured from the right side of Fig 8-
4h. This is done within the program with a Capture tool. All images
captured can be stored as compressed jpeg, tiff, or bitmap images. The size
of a compressed jpeg image is often less than 400 kB. Note that there is no
loss of image quality, even in this enlarged view.
Fig 8-5 Pericoronal Radiolucency
Fig 8-5a An 8-year-old Asian girl was referred to Advanced Dental Imaging
in Salem, New Hampshire, to evaluate a radiolucency in the right anterior
maxilla. The axial view through the midroot section of the maxillary
dentition reveals a large, expansile, well-defined pericoronal radiolucency
around the maxillary right canine, which was impacted and displaced
superiorly against the lateral wall of the right nasal fossa. The radiolucency
has a definitive cortical border.
Fig 8-5b Another axial view of the pericoronal lesion at the level of the
inferior portion of the condylar heads.
Fig 8-5c The Cube tool applied to the image section in Fig 8-5b results in a
3D color image of the developing first premolar in its deviated orientation.
The view is of the developing root structure from the facial side. The lesion
has displaced the first and second permanent premolars. The maxillary right
first premolar had completed only about one-third of its root formation. A
linear resorption pattern is seen on the roots of the primary canine and
primary first molar.
Fig 8-5d A more superior slice at the level of the lateral pterygoid plates
(white arrows).
Fig 8-5e An axial slice shows the lesion at the level of the developing
permanent canine crown. The lesion obviously extends to the maxillary
sinus region. The white arrow indicates the left antrum.
Fig 8-5f A typical 9 × 9 series, like traditional computerized tomography,
shows the axial views at 1.0-mm slices from the level of the developing
premolar crowns to the incisal tip of the maxillary right canine.
Fig 8-5g Another 9 × 9 series, continuing the axial views at 1.0-mm slice
thickness, shows extension into the maxillary sinus and the relationship of
the maxillary right canine to the root structure. Note the distinct cortical
margin.
Fig 8-5h A coronal section through the midcrown region of the ectopic first
premolar demonstrates the buccal expansion of the lesion. There are no
apparent internal calcifications, even at this slice thickness of 1.0 mm.
Fig 8-5i A more posterior coronal section shows the cortical definition of
the lesion’s border (arrow).
Fig 8-5j A 3D color reconstruction shows the developing first premolar
crown in precise relation to the incisal tip of the developing maxillary right
canine. The lesion extends from the right lateral incisor region through the
maxilla and into the maxillary right sinus midway up the nose. Posteriorly,
it reaches the first molar region.
Fig 8-5k A sagittal view shows the displacement of the canine and premolar
as well as extension into the maxillary sinus region.
Fig 8-5l The Arch tool defines the central plane of the maxilla to create a
pseudopanoramic image to visualize the internal contents of the lesion.
Fig 8-5m This maximum intensity projection image demonstrates the
difficulty in orienting the structures correctly from a panoramic-type view.
Fig 8-5n A reconstructed panoramic image at a thickness of 20.0 mm. Note
that this type of image would be deficient for any clinician to fully
characterize the lesion. The cortical margin is not appreciated, and the
precise orientation of the first premolar is not discernible.
Differential diagnosis
Although the lesion contained no discerrnible internal calcifications, the most
likely odontogenic lesion would be an adenomatoid odontogenic tumor. The
sex of the patient, location of the lesion, resorptive pattern, and tooth
displacement suggest this type of lesion. Additional possible diagnoses would
include an odontogenic keratocyst and an ameloblastic fibroma. Since an
ameloblastic fibroma behaves like a fibroma and rarely recurs, it can be
treated much more conservatively than an ameloblastoma. Incisional biopsy
prior to surgical removal was indicated to determine the precise histology of
the lesion for preoperative planning.
Fig 8-6 Mandibular Radiolucency
Fig 8-6a A 25-year-old white woman was referred to the Northwest
Radiography imaging center in Bellevue, Washington, for evaluation of a
lesion in the left posterior mandible. An axial slice shows a large, solitary,
well-defined expansile lesion with a cortical outline in the inferior portion of
the left mandible. There is no apparent perforation, but the cortex is
significantly thinned in this slice. One or two opacities are seen within the
lesion.
Fig 8-6b This coronal section confirms both the expansion of the lesion and
the thinning of the lingual cortex (arrow). The lesion is close to the molar
roots of the mandibular left first molar, which had previously undergone
root canal therapy.
Fig 8-6c This slice (0.15 mm) is a pseudopanoramic image showing the
anteroposterior extent of the lesion from the mandibular left canine to the
region of the third molar. The cortical border undulates around the second
premolar, first molar, and second molar. Note the small diffuse radiopacities
within the lesion at its inferior margin, as well as the displacement of the
inferior alveolar nerve.
Fig 8-6d The Cube tool was used to visualize the perforation of the buccal
cortex by the lesion in a 3D color view.
Fig 8-6e The lingual cortex in this patient also appears to be perforated. The
small opacity seen at the apex of the first molar represents some endodontic
fill material.
Fig 8-6f The Cube tool is used to create a 3D color image of the lingual area
and internal region of the lesion.
Fig 8-6g In this software, the clinician or radiologist can apply presets
(combinations of colors, opacities, and transparencies) to the histogram
region of selected tissues. In this patient, these presets have revealed a thin
soft tissue layer similar to a cyst lining around the molar apex and over the
bony enostosis at the inferior cortical margin.
Fig 8-6h A 3D color reconstruction of the same lesion from the lateral view.
Fig 8-6i The Arch and Nerve tools are used (left) to define the central plane
of the mandible and locate the inferior alveolar nerve (green line), as well as
(right) to create a cross-sectional image of the lesion. The vertical blue
reference line on the cross-sectional slice shows where the inferior alveolar
nerve (red dot) begins to dip below the lesion at its posterior border.
Fig 8-6j The Nerve tool illustrates the displacement of the inferior alveolar
nerve below the lesion.
Fig 8-6k (bottom panel) The reference line (orange arrow) within the
panoramic slice in a 3D color reconstruction reveals where the inferior
alveolar nerve (orange line) touches the area of enostosis. The blue arrow
points to the perforation of the buccal cortex.
Orthodontic Assessment
This section is not intended to present traditional orthodontic case workups;
instead, it simply demonstrates a few cases where cone beam volumetric
imaging (CBVI) information would help a clinician visualize the primary
case problems. No analyses are presented or suggested.
Fig 9-1 Eruption of Mandibular Permanent Teeth
Fig 9-1a A 7-year-old boy was referred to an imaging service in Seattle,
Washington, because of an unusual presentation of erupting mandibular
permanent teeth. A reconstructed pseudopanoramic image shows a possible
problem in the right anterior region of the mandible.
Fig 9-1b Even this maximum intensity projection (MIP) image does not
accurately demonstrate the mandibular problem. A supernumerary right
lateral incisor is suggested. The left lateral incisor appears to be “twinned”
or possibly fused to another extra tooth.
Fig 9-1c Instead of the fused tooth suggested in Fig 9-1b, the left lateral
incisor is actually a normal tooth. Fig 9-1b had an arch curve selected that
was too wide, which resulted in an inaccurate reconstruction. The axial and
sagittal views show a normal lateral incisor.
Fig 9-1d A 3D color reconstruction showing the anterior region reveals that
the mandibular right central incisor has erupted with an abnormal rotation.
Fig 9-1e A 3D color reconstruction in a profile configuration helps the
clinician visualize the problem.
Fig 9-1f A 3D color reconstruction in a profile configuration is created on
the left side for comparison.
Fig 9-1g A 2D grayscale sagittal view shows an unusual shape to the sella
turcica (blue arrow). The patient has no known endocrine or genetic
abnormality. The finding, while reportable, is inconsequential in this case.
Fig 9-1h A 2D grayscale sagittal view shows the development of the clivus
(blue arrows). This is a normal finding at this stage, but is never seen in the
conventional panoramic views used by orthodontists.
Fig 9-2 Palatal Impaction
Fig 9-2a This is a case of a palatal impaction of a canine in a 23-year-old
white man with retained primary molars. A temporary anchorage device had
been employed to obtain traction in a previously unobtainable location. A
2D grayscale axial view shows the palatally impacted maxillary right
canine.
Fig 9-2b A 3D color reconstruction of the axial view shows the anchorage
device.
Fig 9-2c This pseudopanoramic reconstruction slice (0.15 mm) shows the
canine, with its bracket, near the midline. Note the impacted maxillary left
third molar in this plane.
Fig 9-2d In a panoramic reconstruction including the impacted tooth, the
actual bracket is barely visible.
Fig 9-2e A 3D color panoramic reconstruction shows the impacted canine
and retained primary molars.
Fig 9-2f A 3D color reconstruction reveals the position of the canine relative
to the lateral incisor apex. Some transparency was used to show this
relationship.
Fig 9-2g A slab 3D color rendering (approximately 40 mm) in the axial
plane uses transparency to show canine position.
Fig 9-2h A 3D color reconstruction viewed from the foot end was created
for the entire volume and shows the condyle/ fossa relationships.
Fig 9-3 Facial Asymmetry
Fig 9-3a A 28-year-old white man was referred to the Northwest
Radiography imaging center in Bellevue, Washington, for radiographic
evaluation of his facial asymmetry and Class III malocclusion as part of his
orthodontic records workup. In this panoramic image, the maxillary right
teeth are not in the focal trough because of the patient’s cross-bite. Note the
shadow of thickened mucosa in the left antrum.
Fig 9-3b A panoramic MIP image provides a view of the cross-bite, as well
as the overerupted maxillary left third molar.
Fig 9-3c This 3D color panoramic reconstruction is even better than Fig 9-
3b for showing the cross-bite and Class III tooth relationships.
Fig 9-3d The Cube tool (left) renders a selected portion of the mandible to
show the ectopic position of the mandibular right second premolar from the
lingual aspect (right).
Fig 9-3e The Ortho Skeletal tool shows the tooth relationships from the
lateral (top left and right) and facial (bottom right) views.
Fig 9-3f The 3D Dentition tool uses the patient data to show the occlusion
from the palatal surfaces.
Fig 9-3g The 3D Skin tool in the OnDemand 3D software (CyberMed
International) shows the patient’s asymmetric facial outline.
Fig 9-3h The cross-bite and midline deviation of the patient’s mandible
suggest right side hyperplasia.
Fig 9-3i and 9-3j Comparison views confirm that the right side of the
patient’s mandible (left) is enlarged relative to the left side of the mandible
(right).
Orthognathic Surgery and Trauma
Imaging
Since preoperative planning is best accomplished with accurate information
about the morphology of the bony structures to be realigned, cone beam
computed tomography (CBCT) is ideal for these cases. 2D and 3D grayscale
and color information can accurately identify the anatomical architecture
beneath a patient’s soft tissue. Postoperatively, the screws, plates, implants,
and the surgical outcomes can also be assessed. Even with the presence of
scatter artifacts from the metallic materials often used, the images acquired
from the data are remarkable.
Fig 10-1 Facial Asymmetry: Preoperative/Orthodontic Evaluation
Fig 10-1a This patient has significant facial asymmetry. The right ramus
appears shorter than the left. There is a right posterior cross-bite from the
canine to the second molar and a significant midline deviation to the right
side as well.
Fig 10-1b The shortened right ramus is confirmed on this 3D color
panoramic reconstruction. A shortened condylar neck is also visualized.
Fig 10-1c A maximum intensity projection (MIP) image of the panoramic
reconstruction from Fig 10-1b. The distorted image of the cranium is due to
the large-volume machine data.
Fig 10-1d A typical panoramic reconstruction displays the calcified,
elongated stylohyoid ligament on the patient’s right side. This can also be
seen in the 3D color panoramic reconstruction in Fig 10-1b. This image
shows the shorter right ramus as part of the facial asymmetry, but it is much
less graphic than in Fig 10-1b.
Fig 10-1e During radiologic evaluation, a subchondral cyst and subchondral
sclerosis were discovered on the left condylar head (arrow). This finding
could impact the outcome of the proposed orthognathic surgery.
Fig 10-1f A coronal section from the data volume confirms the condylar
changes.
Fig 10-1g The thin slice pseudopanoramic image also confirms the condylar
cyst (arrow). This was not visualized on the panoramic reconstruction.
Fig 10-1h This 3D color reconstruction (20 mm) best reveals the
hypoplastic right condyle and neck, yet another component contributing to
the facial asymmetry.
Fig 10-1i Preoperative view of the patient’s right side.
Fig 10-1j Preoperative view of the patient’s left side.
Fig 10-2 Mandibular Fracture: Preoperative Evaluation
Fig 10-2a A 32-year-old American Indian woman was referred to an
imaging center at an oral and maxillofacial surgeon’s office in South Dakota
for evaluation of a suspected mandibular fracture. These slices show a leftside anterior mandibular fracture with slight displacement of the fragments.
Fig 10-2b A reconstruction of the patient’s right condyle from the lateral
view shows no fracture present.
Fig 10-2c A reconstruction of the patient’s left condyle from the lateral view
shows no fracture present.
Fig 10-2d This 3D color reconstruction from the facial view shows a
fracture with displaced segments.
Fig 10-2e Another 3D color reconstruction shows the fracture from the
inferior view. Note the second fracture line nearer to the midline.
Fig 10-2f A third 3D color reconstruction shows the fracture from the
lingual aspect. Here, the true extent of the lower portion of the fracture can
be appreciated.
Fig 10-2g Another fracture, located more posteriorly on the right side, has
caused the tooth to dislodge.
Fig 10-2h A 3D color reconstruction shows the fracture from the facial view
in the second molar region. This fracture apparently extends through the
tooth socket.
Fig 10-2i A 3D color reconstruction shows the fracture from a posterior
view in the second molar region. This fracture extends through the inferior
mandibular border and submandibular fossa to the tooth socket.
Fig 10-2j A 3D color reconstruction shows the position of the inferior
alveolar nerve (orange line) relative to the fracture lines.
Fig 10-2k A 3D color reconstruction in a thickened cross section (top right)
shows the position of the inferior alveolar nerve (red dot) in relation to the
second molar.
Fig 10-3 Chin Advancement: Postoperative Evaluation
Fig 10-3a A 38-year-old white woman was evaluated postoperatively for
healing following orthognathic surgery to advance her chin. This panoramic
reconstruction shows the condylar positions and gross occlusal
relationships. Note the discontinuity of the sections of the anterior mandible.
Although this is an acceptable panoramic image, this particular
reconstructed plane of section does not show the complete anterior maxilla.
Fig 10-3b The panoramic image displayed as an MIP image shows more
detail regarding the positions of the surgical plates and screws. The
occlusion is shown more precisely, but the anterior mandible is somewhat
distorted.
Fig 10-3c A 3D color reconstruction in a panoramic mode details the exact
appearance of the anatomical structures. Unfortunately, there are some
scatter artifacts from the metallic objects. This reconstruction was done at a
thickness of 30 mm. If a thicker slab rendering had been performed (at a
thickness of 50 to 60 mm), then the right zygoma would have been
displayed as nicely as the left.
Fig 10-3d A 3D color reconstruction of the entire skull details the
postoperative symmetry. Only a very slight midline deviation remains.
F
i
g
1
0

3
e
R
i
g
h
t
l
a
t
e
r
a
l
v
i
e
w
o
f
t
h
e
3
D
c
o
l
o
r
r
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
e
n
t
i
r
e
s
k
u
l
l.
Fig 10-3f Right lateral view of the 3D color reconstruction with transparent
soft tissue overlay to reveal the final esthetic result.
Fig 10-3g Left lateral view of the 3D color reconstruction of the entire skull.
Fig 10-3h Left lateral view of the 3D color reconstruction with transparent
soft tissue overlay to reveal the final esthetic result.
Fig 10-4 Mandibular Advancement: Postoperative Evaluation
Fig 10-4a A white woman was referred to an imaging center for
postoperative evaluation of a procedure to advance her entire mandible and
correct a facial asymmetry. In this thin slice pseudopanoramic
reconstruction showing the condyles, it is impossible to visualize the
surgical devices completely.
Fig 10-4b A panoramic view has been rendered in a thicker slice to see
more detail. Now it is possible to discern the surgical stabilization bar in the
left side of the mandible. Note that the length of the left ramus appears to be
much shorter than that of the right ramus.
Fig 10-4c The MIP view shows the occlusal detail and condylar fossa
relationships. The bony asymmetry has improved substantially.
F
i
g
1
0

4
d
T
h
i
s
3
D
c
o
l
o
r
p
a
n
o
r
a
m
i
c
r
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
e
m
p
h
a
s
i
z
e
s
t
h
e
s
y
m
m
e
t
r
i
c
r
e
s
u
l
t.
Fig 10-4e The Cube tool is used to show detail of the surgical screw
positioned on the patient’s right side.
Fig 10-4f The surgical screw in Fig 10-4e is viewed from the lingual aspect.
The position of the stabilization bar on the left side (arrow) starts to become
visible as well.
Fig 10-4g The area of the Cube tool is widened to show the entire right side
of the mandible.
Fig 10-4h The area of the Cube tool is widened to show the entire left side
of the mandible.
Fig 10-4i A 3D color reconstruction of the patient’s right side demonstrates
the surgical outcome.
Fig 10-4j A soft tissue rendering of the patient’s right side.
Fig 10-4k A 3D color reconstruction demonstrates the surgical results on
the patient’s left side.
Fig 10-4l A soft tissue rendering of the patient’s left side.
Fig 10-4m Note how the left mandibular angle flares out in this
anteroposterior view.
Fig 10-4n The soft tissue overlying the left mandibular angle in this
rendering reveals a slight but acceptable asymmetry.
Fig 10-4o An image taken from Waters projection shows the bony
structures of the patient.
Fig 10-4p The soft tissue is slightly enlarged over the stabilization bar
(arrow).
Fig 10-4q A right-side profile view of transparent soft tissue over bone
reveals the surgical site.
Fig 10-4r A transparent soft tissue profile on the left side also provides a
view of the surgical site.
Fig 10-4s A transparent soft tissue anteroposterior view over bone shows
the tracheal area. Note the calcification of the superior thyroid cartilage
(arrows).
Paranasal Sinus Evaluation
Every dentist has treated a patient with toothache pain for which acute or
chronic maxillary sinusitis is found to be the cause only after a thorough oral
examination rules out an odontogenic origin. Furthermore, patients
experiencing orofacial pain symptoms often require clinicians to evaluate
headaches that may be caused by paranasal pathology. Even if the sinus
involvement is suspected, how many times have clinicians underestimated a
pansinusitis because only the maxillary sinuses could be imaged? Cone beam
computed tomography (CBCT) is an exceptional way of imaging the
paranasal sinus region in toto.
Fig 11-1 Inflammation from Root Fragment
Fig 11-1a An axial section at the level of the maxillary first molar apices
reveals an inflammatory change in the left antrum (arrows).
Fig 11-1b A sagittal section shows the radiographic marker over the
extraction site of the left second premolar. Note the small uniform mucosal
thickening over the apical area (arrow).
Fig 11-1c A sagittal section shows mucosal thickening over the extraction
site, as well as a root tip containing endodontic fill material (arrow).
Fig 11-1d A coronal section shows mucosal thickening around the root tip.
The root tip and fill material are just barely visible in this orientation.
F
i
g
1
1

1
e
T
h
e
r
o
o
t
t
i
p
c
a
n
b
e
s
e
e
n
i
n
t
h
i
s
t
h
i
n
s
l
i
c
e
p
s
e
u
d
o
p
a
n
o
r
a
m
i
c
r
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n.
Fig 11-1f A 3D color reconstruction shows the root tip of the first molar and
its relation to the mesial root of the second molar.
Fig 11-1g A 3D color slab rendering (approximately 40 mm) shows the root
tip. The space between the antral floor (arrow) and the root tip is where the
inflammatory material would be. However, the margin of the reactive
material can also be seen superior to the root tip of the extracted first molar
as labeled.
Fig 11-1h A 3D color slab rendering (approximately 40 mm) shows the root
tip of the first molar by using presets with different colors assigned to voxel
transparency and opacity values.
Fig 11-2 Mucous Retention Cyst
Fig 11-2a An axial slice through the midregion of the sinuses reveals
inflammatory change around the developing apices.
Fig 11-2b An axial slice through a more superior region of the maxillary
antra shows the classic dome-shaped appearance of a mucous retention cyst,
usually seen in a panoramic or lateral image.
Fig 11-2c The dome shape of the mucous retention cyst is also visible
arising from the floor of the left antrum in this coronal slice.
Fig 11-2d Another coronal slice shows the lesion getting smaller as the slice
transects a more posterior region of the maxillary antra.
Fig 11-2e A panoramic reconstruction from the data volume demonstrates
the usual appearance of a mucous retention cyst (arrow) seen in this mode.
Fig 11-2f A pseudopanoramic reconstruction from the data volume shows
the lesion more precisely because of the thin slice (0.15 mm) presentation.
Fig 11-2g In this 3D color reconstruction of the airway spaces, note how the
mucous retention cyst has elevated the tissue of the left maxillary antrum
(arrow).
Fig 11-2h A different set of colors in a 3D color reconstruction of the
airway spaces shows the elevation of the tissue as transparent gray (arrow).
Fig 11-2i A coronal view of the same 3D color reconstruction of the airway
spaces and mucous retention cyst. The lesion border (an air–soft tissue
interface) is seen distinctly as a darker gray line. The superior portion of the
oropharyngeal airway is also well depicted (arrows).
F
i
g
1
1

2
j
A
3
D
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
r
e
n
d
e
r
i
n
g
h
a
s
b
e
e
n
c
u
t
a
w
a
y
t
o
s
h
o
w
t
h
e
m
u
c
o
u
s
r
e
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
c
y
s
t.
Fig 11-3 Pansinusitis
Fig 11-3a A 9-year-old white girl was referred to an imaging service for
evaluation of her permanent successor teeth. In this patient, almost all of the
paranasal sinuses are opacified and filled with inflammatory product. An
axial slice at the midregion of the condyle shows complete bilateral
opacification of the maxillary antra. Note the early development of the
permanent second molar follicles.
Fig 11-3b An axial slice above the condylar region shows complete
opacification of the left maxillary antrum and mucous or air bubbles in a
portion of the right maxillary antrum (arrow).
Fig 11-3c A slice at the midorbit level shows complete opacification of the
ethmoid cell complex. The eyeballs and the optic nerves are visible through
careful analysis.
F
i
g
1
1

3
d
O
p
a
c
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
f
r
o
n
t
a
l
s
i
n
u
s
e
s
i
s
e
v
i
d
e
n
t
a
t
t
h
e
s
u
p
e
r
i
o
r
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
o
r
b
i
t.
Fig 11-3e Opacification of the right frontal sinus and most of the left is seen
in the inferior region of the orbit.
Fig 11-3f A sagittal view of the opacification of the left maxillary sinus
confirms the presence of air bubbles.
Fig 11-3g Another sagittal slice confirms the involvement of the ethmoid
cells and an extension of the inflammatory change into the frontal sinus. The
patient’s adenoid tissues are also enlarged (arrow).
Fig 11-3h A coronal section of the maxillary antra, ethmoid cells, inferior
nasal concha, osteomeatal complex, and frontal sinuses.
Fig 11-3i Similar regions are involved in this more posterior slice. Only the
frontal sinuses are not seen here (compare to Fig 11-3h).
Fig 11-3j Although the maxillary sinus involvement is apparent on this
typical panoramic view, the other airspace involvement would be grossly
underestimated if this view alone were used for sinus evaluation.
Fig 11-3k This thin slice pseudopanoramic reconstruction is only slightly
better at demonstrating the involvement of the paranasal sinuses.
Fig 11-4 Oroantral Fistula
Fig 11-4a A 65-year-old edentulous woman was evaluated for implant
placement. She had a history of frequent sinus infections. A 3D color
reconstruction shows the edentulous maxilla and mandible as well as the
dens on axis (lower arrow) and vertebral bodies on atlas (upper arrows).
Fig 11-4b This thin coronal slice shows an interruption (arrow) in the floor
of the right maxillary sinus.
Fig 11-4c 3D color reconstructions show a fistula extending down through
the maxilla and opening into the oral cavity at the interruption in the antral
floor.
Fig 11-4d Another 3D color reconstruction of the fistula (arrow). This
oroantral fistula is a likely cause for the chronic sinusitis.
Fig 11-5 Lesion in the Ethmoid Sinus
Fig 11-5a A 27-year-old man was referred to an imaging service for an
orthodontic evaluation to assess the maxillary left canine after orthodontic
traction. In a panoramic reconstruction of the patient data volume, there is
no indication of a problem in any of the visible paranasal or nasal spaces.
Fig 11-5b A solid radiopacity is seen in the left ethmoid cell (blue arrow)
with inflammatory change (opacification) visible in an adjacent air cell
(orange arrow).
Fig 11-5c The same radiopacity seen in the left ethmoid cell (blue arrow) in
a 3D color slab rendering.
Fig 11-5d The lesion in the ethmoid region is an incidental finding. The
solid radiopacity seen in Fig 11-5b has inflammatory change surrounding
the lesion. The optic nerve and medial and lateral rectus muscles can also be
seen faintly.
Fig 11-5e A different color rendering also shows this solid radiopacity in
the left ethmoid cell (blue arrow).
Fig 11-5f The ethmoid lesion (arrows) is highlighted in a sagittal view.
Fig 11-5g In this sagitta l view of the ethmoid lesion (arrow), the airway is
colorized and an outline of the transparent soft tissue is provided.
Fig 11-5h A thin coronal slice (0.15 mm) at the midregion of the sinus
shows ethmoid cell opacity.
Fig 11-5i A thicker coronal slice (4.1 mm) at the same region also shows the
ethmoid cell opacity.
Fig 11-5j A colorized slab rendering of the ethmoid lesion (arrow) allows
comparison of the left-side ethmoid lesion to the normal right-side ethmoid
cells.
Fig 11-5k Unlike the more traditional panoramic image seen in Fig 11-5a,
this 3D color panoramic reconstruction does show the ethmoid lesion.
Osteoma of the ethmoid bone has been reported only rarely.
1
Fig 11-6 Extrinsic Tumor in the Maxillary Antrum
Fig 11-6a An 18-year-old Iranian man was referred to the orthodontic
department at the University of California, San Francisco, for evaluation of
a potential sinus problem. An extrinsic odontogenic tumor had invaded the
left maxillary antrum secondarily.
Fig 11-6b This thin-slice pseudopanoramic reconstruction provides a clearer
picture of the left maxillary antrum and nasal cavity than does Fig 11-6a. On
the left side, note the lack of sinus air space, the hypoplastic condyle, and
the altered malar region.
Fig 11-6c An axial slice shows the complete absence of the left sinus and
replacement by a somewhat multilocular lesion.
Fig 11-6d The axial slice at a slightly more superior level confirms that the
lesion has replaced the maxillary antrum and extended into the malar region.
Fig 11-6e Another axial slice shows complete replacement of the left
maxillary sinus, a multilocular appearance, and the suggestion of
inflammatory product within the multilocular lesion itself.
F
i
g
1
1

6
f
T
h
e
l
e
s
i
o
n
i
s
s
h
o
w
n
e
x
t
e
n
d
i
n
g
i
n
t
o
t
h
e
m
i
d
d
l
e
m
e
a
t
a
l
a
r
e
a
a
n
d
e
t
h
m
o
i
d
c
e
l
l
s.
Fig 11-6g This slice reveals ethmoid cell involvement and possible
displacement of the nasal septum to the right side.
Fig 11-6h The lesion extends posteriorly into the ethmoid cells and has
caused a loss of their normal architecture. The appearance is that of a
multilocular lesion within the air cells.
Fig 11-6i A slice demonstrating extension of the lesion into more air cells.
F
i
g
1
1

6
j
T
h
e
l
e
s
i
o
n
h
a
s
r
e
a
c
h
e
d
t
h
e
s
u
p
e
r
i
o
r
a
s
p
e
c
t
o
f
t
h
e
e
t
h
m
o
i
d
c
e
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
x.
Fig 11-6k A more superior slice shows probable extension of the
odontogenic lesion into the left frontal sinus.
F
i
g
1
1

6
l
A
s
a
g
i
t
t
a
l
v
i
e
w
s
h
o
w
s
t
h
e
l
e
s
i
o
n
o
c
c
u
p
y
i
n
g
t
h
e
l
e
f
t
s
i
d
e
o
f
t
h
e
m
a
x
i
l
l
a.
Fig 11-6m The multilocular appearance in this sagittal slice suggests loculi
of variable size, which is most consistent with an ameloblastoma.
Fig 11-6n A 3D color rendering of the image seen in Fig 11-6m.
Fig 11-6o This coronal slice confirms the lesion’s extension through the
ethmoid cell region into the left frontal sinus.
Fig 11-6p The frontal sinus opacification may just be secondary
inflammatory change because of the blocked osteomeatal complex. Note the
slight inflammatory change in the inferior region of the right maxillary
antrum. Note also the enlarged right inferior meatus and deviation of the
nasal septum.
Fig 11-6q The Dental tool, usually used to draw a preliminary curve for
implant-related tasks, was employed here to select a thin layer through the
maxilla. This provides another look at the lesion characteristics visible in the
left side of the maxilla.
Fig 11-6r A more refined curve through the middle nasal region shows the
lesion extension into the ethmoid cells.
Fig 11-6s A 3D color reconstruction compares the normal right maxillary
sinus region with the abnormal left antrum. The blue arrows are an attempt
to outline the margins of the lesion.
Fig 11-6t Another color combination created with the color presets confirms
the area of the lesion from maxilla to frontal sinus.
Fig 11-7 Fibrosseous Lesion in the Frontal Sinus
Fig 11-7a A 32-year-old man was evaluated for frontal sinus headaches of
an unknown origin. A thin coronal slice near the anterior portion of the right
frontal sinus shows a large, well-defined, mixed radiolucent/radiopaque
lesion (arrow).
Fig 11-7b The lesion (arrow) is shown slightly more posterior than in Fig
11-7a, at the level of the maxillary canines.
Fig 11-7c The sagittal view shows the lesion (arrow) near the lateral aspect
of the frontal sinus.
Fig 11-7d A second sagittal view of the lesion (arrow) near the midline.
F
i
g
1
1

7
e
A
n
a
x
i
a
l
s
l
i
c
e
o
f
t
h
e
l
e
s
i
o
n
(a
r
r
o
w)
j
u
s
t
a
b
o
v
e
t
h
e
s
u
p
e
r
i
o
r
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
o
r
b
i
t
s.
Fig 11-7f This axial view of the lesion (arrow) is slightly inferior to Fig 11-
7e.
Fig 11-7g A 3D color reconstruction slab rendering shows a dense
inhomogeneous mass (arrow).
Fig 11-7h This 3D color reconstructed slab rendering includes the soft
tissue and details the difference between the nonaerated space on the left
(arrow) and the normal aerated space on the right.
Fig 11-8 Antrolith in the Maxillary Antrum
Fig 11-8a Evaluation of an axial image of 58-year-old white male resulted
in the incidental finding of an antrolith (arrow) in the maxillary sinus.
Fig 11-8b The coronal image shows the cortical osteoma (arrow) attached
by a pedicle. Osteomas are less common in the maxillary sinus than in the
fronto-ethmoidal regions and will have either a broad base or a pedicle that
joins them to a cortical wall.
Fig 11-8c A 3D color reconstruction (10 mm) shows both the osteoma and
the antral lining surrounding it (arrow).
Fig 11-8d A 3D reconstruction using the Cube tool in OnDemand 3D
(CyberMed international) shows the dense lesion and the antral mucosal
lining surrounding the bony portion.
References
1. Lachanas VA, Koutsopoulos AV, Hajiioannou JK, Bizaki AJ, Helidonis
ES, Bizakis JG. Osteoid osteoma of the ethmoid bone associated with
dacryocystitis. Head Face Med 2006;2:23.
Temporomandibular Joint Evaluation
One of the most fascinating applications of cone beam computed tomography
(CBCT) for radiologists is the characterization of condylar changes and
appearance of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) complex. In conventional
2D and tomographic imaging, dentists previously made assertions that a
feature like the so-called bird-beak appearance was indicative of
osteoarthritis or a loose body in the joint space (also known as a joint mouse).
We used panoramic images as gross screening images, knowing that the
image was not truly a lateral projection and therefore almost always
underestimated the true changes. Several techniques were invented in an
attempt to capture the condyle in its true position, or to slice up the condyle
from medial to lateral pole to try to see the changes on various regions of the
condylar head. As if it were not difficult enough to image the TMJ complex
with conventional 2D grayscale techniques, the variations in the condyle’s
shape and size from one side to the other made the task of interpreting
signicant changes even more challenging.
This kind of guesswork in radiographic interpretation will become a thing
of the past with the use of CBCT. True condylar shapes in 3D and color can
replace the 2D grayscale “Rorscharch tests” we used for TMJ assessment.
For all clinicians, this represents a huge leap in our understanding of the
condyles, the TMJ complex, and the appearance of these structures in
response to arthritic insults and systemic alterations.
Fig 12-1 Altered Condylar Morphology
Fig 12-1a A 51-year-old white woman was referred to the Northwest
Radiography imaging center in Bellevue, Washington, for evaluation of the
TMJs after experiencing mild joint pain. A panoramic reconstruction shows
a shortened left condylar neck and altered condylar morphology relative to
the right condyle.
Fig 12-1b A 3D color reconstruction of the panoramic radiograph in Fig 12-
1a shows more detail of the clinical situation.
Fig 12-1c The right condyle is reconstructed by using the Cube tool. Note
the inflammatory changes in the antra.
Fig 12-1d The left condyle is reconstructed by using the Cube tool.
Compare this condyle to the rightside image in Fig 12-1c.
Fig 12-1e A 3D color reconstruction of the right condyle.
F
i
g
1
2

1
f
N
o
t
e
t
h
e
d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
F
i
g
1
2

1
e
a
n
d
t
h
i
s
3
D
c
o
l
o
r
r
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
l
e
f
t
c
o
n
d
y
l
e.
Fig 12-1g A thin coronal slice (0.15 mm) through the midregion of the
condyles demonstrates asymmetry.
Fig 12-1h Same view as Fig 12-1g, presented in a 20.0 mm slice.
Fig 12-1i A 3D color reconstruction at a thickness of 40 mm shows the
altered left condyle.
Fig 12-2 Facial Asymmetry
Fig 12-2a A 33-year-old white woman was referred to a Seattle,
Washington, imaging center for evaluation of a facial asymmetry. A
panoramic reconstruction shows left-side hypoplasia. The teeth are in
occlusion. Note the presence of mandibular tori.
Fig 12-2b A thin panoramic image (2.0 mm) shows hypoplasia of the left
condylar neck and head.
Fig 12-2c A 3D color panoramic reconstruction shows hypoplasia of the left
condylar neck and head, and the teeth are in occlusion. The midlines are
aligned.
Fig 12-2d A maximum intensity projection image with measurements
reveals that the entire ramus is hypoplastic. This finding, coupled with the
hypoplastic neck and condylar head, confirms hypoplasia of the entire left
ramus.
Fig 12-2e The right condylar head in a 3D color reconstruction.
Fig 12-2f 3D color reconstruction of the left condylar head.
Fig 12-2g A coronal slice demonstrates the hypoplastic left condyle in
comparison with the right condyle (arrows).
Fig 12-2h A 3D color reconstruction of the skull shows the shortened left
side. Note the difference between the left and right mandibular angles.
Fig 12-2i Right-side view of the 3D color reconstruction.
Fig 12-2j Left-side view of the 3D color reconstruction displaying smaller
structures than those in Fig 12-2i.
Fig 12-3 Bilateral Condylar Remodeling
Fig 12-3a A 31-year-old white woman was referred to the Northwest
Radiography imaging center in Bellevue, Washington, for evaluation of the
TMJs. The symmetric changes suggest an autoimmune problem such as
rheumatoid arthritis. This thin coronal slice shows bilateral remodeling and
flattening of the condylar heads.
Fig 12-3b This 3D color reconstruction confirms the bilateral remodeling
and flattening of the condylar heads seen in Fig 12-3a.
Fig 12-3c A 3D color reconstruction viewed from the foot end reveals a
rather symmetric relationship of the condyles and fossae.
Fig 12-3d The Cube tool is used to show the right condyle in an
anteroposterior orientation.
Fig 12-3e The Cube tool is used to show the left condyle in an
anteroposterior orientation.
Fig 12-3f The Cube tool is used to show the right condyle in a lateral
orientation.
Fig 12-3g The Cube tool is used to show the left condyle in a lateral
orientation.
Fig 12-3h 3D color reconstruction of the patient’s right side.
Fig 12-3i 3D color reconstruction of the patient’s left side.
Fig 12-3j A 3D color reconstruction of the patient from an anterior view
shows the obvious mandibular symmetry despite the gross condylar
changes.
Fig 12-4 Osteoarthritis of the TMJ Structures
Fig 12-4a This case represents a 34-year-old white woman with mild,
intermittent, unilateral joint pain. In the past, the term bird beak was
frequently applied to changes associated with osteoarthritis (OA) of the
TMJ, probably because of the myriad lateral projection techniques applied
to see the condylar change. Now that it is possible to visualize the condylar
structures in 3D color reconstructions, some of the terminology should be
reconsidered. A thin axial slice (0.15 mm) of the midregion of the condyles
reveals some condylar sclerosis on the lateral pole of the right condyle
(arrow).
Fig 12-4b In this thin-slice pseudopanoramic reconstruction, the left
condyle shows what appears to be an osteophytic projection, or what some
have called a classic bird-beak appearance.
Fig 12-4c In a thicker slice of the panoramic reconstruction, the left condyle
still demonstrates the bird-beak appearance.
Fig 12-4d Even this thin slice sagittal view suggests the same appearance as
in Fig 12-4c.
Fig 12-4e The condyle on the patient’s right side appears to be normal in
this saggital view.
Fig 12-4f The right condyle is not normal, but instead shows a flattened,
thickened, remodeled region (arrow) on the lateral pole as suggested in the
axial image, Fig 12-4a.
Fig 12-4g The right condyle seen from the lateral view confirms a flattened,
thickened, remodeled area (arrow); one might imagine that in a 2D lateral
grayscale image, this region would look like a beak.
Fig 12-4h The view of the left condyle in 3D color with the use of the Cube
tool reveals some significant lipping of the bone along the anterior margin
(arrow). Compare this image to Fig 12-4i to see how the bird-beak
appearance could also have been misinterpreted by simple angulation
changes.
Fig 12-4i Is it a bird beak appearance or not? You decide after comparison
with Fig 12-4h.
Fig 12-4j This coronal slice shows a subchondral cyst on the superior aspect
of the left condyle (arrow).
Fig 12-4k A 3D color reconstruction illustrates the lipping phenomenon
(arrow), but does not show the cyst seen in Fig 12-4j. As detailed as CBCT
views can be, multiple images from the data volume are usually required to
visualize all of the changes and problems.
Fig 12-5 Loose Body in the Joint Space
Fig 12-5a A 62-year-old white woman was referred to a Seattle,
Washington, imaging center for TMJ evaluation because of joint noises. A
panoramic reconstruction from the data volume shows little indication of a
loose body in the joint space (also known as a joint mouse), although the left
condylar head is altered in appearance.
Fig 12-5b A thin-slice pseudopanoramic reconstruction shows a very slight
radiopacity anterior to the left condylar head.
Fig 12-5c A sagittal slice at a thickness of approximately 20 mm simulates
the typical plain image view one might see in tomography. The loose body
is clearly depicted.
Fig 12-5d A thin sagittal slice (0.15 mm) demonstrates the loose body more
precisely.
F
i
g
1
2

5
e
A
t
h
i
n
s
a
g
i
t
t
a
l
s
l
i
c
e
(
0.1
5
m
m
)
o
f
t
h
e
n
o
r
m
a
l
r
i
g
h
t
s
i
d
e
i
s
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
f
o
r
c
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n.
Fig 12-5f A 3D color reconstruction visualizes the problem.
Fig 12-5g A coronal view is used to compare the left and right sides. The
left condyle is hypoplastic and shows an altered morphology. The right
condyle has some less dramatic changes.
Fig 12-5h The 3D color reconstruction compares left and right sides. The
left condyle is hypoplastic; lipping is evident. The loose body is not very
apparent.
Fig 12-5i A 3D color view created with the Cube tool shows the loose body
in the left condyle (arrow).
Fig 12-5j A 3-D color view created with the Cube tool shows the left
condyle in an anterior projection, revealing the loose body adjacent to the
lateral pole.
Fig 12-5k The left condyle is shown in 3D color Endoscope mode in
OnDemand 3D software (CyberMed International). Note how this tool
increases the image resolution significantly.
Fig 12-5l Enlargment of the Endoscope view.
Fig 12-5m An Endoscope view from the anterior perspective shows the
condyle at a distance.
Fig 12-5n A thin sagittal slice shows the vertebral bodies. Osteophytic
activity is seen on the superior portion of C2 (arrow). Changes in the
vertebral bodies are often seen concomitantly with condylar changes from
OA.
Fig 12-5o A 3D color panoramic reconstruction demonstrates the condylar
changes, including the hypoplastic left condylar neck and head.
Fig 12-6 Condylar Tumor
Fig 12-6a A 62-year-old white woman was referred to Advanced Dental
Imaging in Salem, New Hampshire, for evaluation of a proposed implant
site for a missing maxillary right lateral incisor, as well as for evaluation of
the TMJs. A panoramic reconstruction demonstrates an enlargement of the
right condylar neck and head relative to the left side. The right stylohyoid
process also appears elongated compared with the left.
Fig 12-6b A thin slice (0.15 mm) pseudopanoramic reconstruction confirms
the altered right condylar morphology and enlarged size.
Fig 12-6c A thin axial slice (0.15 mm) allows the clinician to compare the
right and left condylar heads.
Fig 12-6d A thin coronal slice (0.15 mm) allows the clinician to compare
the right and left condylar heads. Note the appearance of two loculi on the
right condyle.
Fig 12-6e A thin sagittal slice (0.15 mm) shows the normal left condyle.
Fig 12-6f A thin sagittal slice (0.15 mm) of the hyperplastic right condyle
includes the neck.
F
i
g
1
2

6
g
A
t
h
i
c
k
e
r
(
1
0.1
m
m
)
s
a
g
i
t
t
a
l
s
l
i
c
e
s
h
o
w
s
t
h
e
l
o
c
u
l
i
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
n
o
r
m
a
l
r
i
g
h
t
c
o
n
d
y
l
e.
Fig 12-6h An image rendered with the Cube tool shows the enlarged
condyle. The tumor is apparently originating from the pterygoid fovea
region.
Fig 12-6i An image rendered with the Cube tool shows the normal left
condyle for comparison.
Fig 12-6j A 3D color reconstruction shows the TMJ structures in a bilateral
comparison. The differential diagnosis for this lesion included central giant
cell granuloma, hyperplasia of the right condyle, osteochondroma, and
traumatic bone cyst.
Systemic Findings
Although patients who visit our dental practices can have many different
systemic conditions (eg, cardiopulmonary problems, endocrine disorders, and
so on), few of them will show overt radiographic signs of their disorders in
the head and neck region when imaged. Recent clinical studies have identied
the presence of sclerotic plaques in the carotid region as a potential harbinger
of hypertension and possibly stroke,
1–3 and there are always patients who are
referred to imaging centers if various head or neck cancers are suspected.
Regardless, signicant systemic findings are rare in the typical population of
patients that we treat and refer for cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
This is the good news.
The bad news, however, is that although the incidence of occult
pathology may be small, the outcome could be signicant for the patient with a
positive finding. I must reiterate here the absolute requirement for the entire
data volume to be examined by a competent radiologist, with either a medical
or oral and maxillofacial background, if we are to properly use CBCT for
our patients’ needs. A myopic clinician may become involved in a serious
lawsuit if no attempt is made to examine the data volume beyond an implant
site assessment or evaluation for a clicking joint. These CBCT data volumes
are not the single radiographs used in the past for most clinical decisions. The
scans produce powerful, reconstructable data sets that require the clinician to
have signicant anatomical and pathologic understanding as well as the skills
for thorough patient examination and precise radiographic interpretation.
The following cases demonstrate some of the serious systemic findings
reported in more than 1,800 patients. There is no doubt that, as more cases
are examined worldwide and the ndings reported, many more significant
systemic findings will be uncovered in these CBCT data volumes.
One systemic condition or disorder that appears to have identifiable
radiographic findings in the CBCT data volumes in its later stages is type 2
diabetes mellitus. In the first 1,000 data volumes that I examined, I believe
that I saw medial arterial calcification (MAC), formerly called Mönckeberg
sclerosis, in at least 13 cases. Although that translates into an incidence of
only 1.3%, this finding is significant. Type 2 diabetes mellitus affects over
300 million people worldwide.
4 The National Diabetes Education Program
(NDEP), a branch of the US Department of Health and Human Services, only
recently produced an informational brochure for dental clinicians to discuss
with and give to patients. The NDEP states that “nearly 21 million Americans
have diabetes, and some 7 million don’t know they have it.”
5
MAC is a unique problem for diabetic patients. Vessels with
calcifications in their medial layers cannot respond appropriately to the
vascular demands placed on them. This is a form of peripheral arterial disease
(PAD), which is significant because it could lead to below-the-knee
amputations in diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The
NDEP reports that diabetes is responsible for “fully 67% of lower-extremity
amputations.”
5
In my experience, MAC can be seen on panoramic and even
intraoral films.
6,7 We have known about the problem for years, but now we
have an incredible opportunity to visualize the changes in carotid arteries
through CBCT. The following cases illustrate this convincingly. It is likely
that some of the cases described in the literature as having “diffuse
calcifications,” suggesting a patient is at increased risk for stroke, may have
grossly underestimated cases of type 2 diabetes mellitus; the panoramic
image is a vastly inferior image modality for this type of evaluation. It also
underscores the necessity for the radiologist or clinician to have all of the
clinical information while examining CBCT data volumes, so the findings
can be placed in their proper context.
Type 2 diabetes mellitus is more common in African American, Hispanic,
American Indian, Asian American, and Pacific Islander populations than in
other populations. It is also more common in older members of the
population.
5
A quote from researchers at the Cleveland Clinic Center for Continuing
Education expertly sums up the relationship between type 2 diabetes mellitus
and kidney function. These researchers state
8
:
Diabetes has become the number one cause of ESRD in the United
States, and the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus continues to grow
both in the United States and worldwide. Approximately 45% of new
patients entering dialysis in the United States are diabetics. Early
diagnosis of diabetes and early intervention are critical in preventing the
normal progression to renal failure seen in many type 1 and a significant
percentage of type 2 diabetics.
Diabetes is the number one cause of adult blindness and the number one
cause of kidney failure. Two of every three people with diabetes die of heart
disease or stroke.
5 Once thought of as an incidental finding, MAC is now
considered to be a significant sign of PAD, which requires aggressive
treatment in the diabetic patient.
9
Fig 13-1 Medial Arterial Calcification: Case 1
Fig 13-1a A 71-year-old white woman was referred to a Seattle,
Washington, imaging service for follow-up evaluation of her mandibular
surgery. A maximum intensity projection (MIP) panoramic image reveals a
calcification in the right oropharyngeal area (arrow).This projection appears
very similar to calcifications seen in reports by Friedlander and Baker
1,2 and
Carter et al.
3
Fig 13-1b An MIP panoramic image shows bilateral calcifications (arrows),
which are very uncommon if the case represents a sclerotic plaque. This
presentation would be more consistent with a systemic condition that affects
more of the vascular system, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Fig 13-1c The axial view of this patient shows that the calcifications are
starting to surround the carotid arteries (arrows).
Fig 13-1d The coronal view of this patient shows the right-side calcification
(arrow).
Fig 13-1e In the coronal section of the right-side calcification, the Cube tool
reveals a more circumferential calcification pattern, like that seen in MAC.
Fig 13-1f The image in Fig 13-1e is enlarged to reveal this circumferential
calcification pattern (arrow).
Fig 13-1g In the axial section of the left side, the Cube tool reveals the
circumferential calcification pattern described previously.
Fig 13-1h The Cube tool is used on the left side of the coronal section to
help confirm the calcification (arrow).
Fig 13-1i A 3D color close-up of the left side confirms the calcification
(blue arrow). Note the patient’s airway (small orange arrow) and skin
(large orange arrow).
Fig 13-1j A 3D color reconstruction shows both the result of orthognathic
surgery and the bilateral MAC calcifications (arrows).
Fig 13-2 Medial Arterial Calcification: Case 2
Fig 13-2a A 72-year-old white woman was referred to an orthodontist for
temporomandibular joint (TMJ) evaluation related to moderate, intermittent
joint pain. Type 2 diabetes mellitus is possibly the underlying systemic
problem. A circumferential calcification (arrow) of the right carotid artery
region is seen in this thin axial slice (0.15 mm).
Fig 13-2b Bilateral calcifications (arrows) in the carotid artery regions are
present at the level of C3 to C4.
Fig 13-2c Bilateral circumferential calcifications (arrows) are confirmed in
the 3D color reconstruction.
Fig 13-2d A Cube tool reconstruction of the left-side calcification (arrow)
confirms the circumferential pattern.
Fig 13-2e Even this thin coronal slice (0.15 mm) suggests an MAC pattern
(arrow).
Fig 13-2f A 3D color reconstruction shows bilateral calcifications (arrows).
Note the airway and condyle anatomy in this image. This was rendered at a
thickness of about 40 mm.
Fig 13-2g The MIP image also suggests the bilateral circumferential pattern
of MAC (arrows).
Fig 13-3 Medial Arterial Calcification: Case 3
Fig 13-3a An 83-year-old white man was referred to the Northwest
Radiography imaging center in Bellevue, Washington, for CBCT evaluation
of implant sites. A panoramic reconstruction at a thickness of about 13 mm
fails to show the oropharyngeal calcifications.
Fig 13-3b A 3D color panoramic reconstruction at a thickness of about 30
mm clearly demonstrates the oropharyngeal calcifications consistent with
MAC (arrows).
Fig 13-3c Bilateral circumferential calcifications (arrows) show up in this
axial slice.
Fig 13-3d Bilateral circumferential calcifications (arrows) are visible in an
axial slice slightly superior to the level in Fig 13-3c.
Fig 13-3e Right-side calcifications in this 3D color reconstruction extend
along a significant portion of the artery.
Fig 13-3f Left-side calcifications in a 3D color reconstruction also extend
along a significant portion of the artery.
Fig 13-3g Use of the Endoscope tool in the software enhances the arterial
detail.
Fig 13-3h An enlarged view provided by the Endoscope tool depicts the
exact relationship of the arterial problem to the mandible and airway.
F
i
g
1
3

3
i
A
c
o
r
o
n
a
l
s
l
i
c
e
a
t
t
h
e
d
e
p
t
h
o
f
t
h
e
a
n
t
e
r
i
o
r
e
d
g
e
o
f
m
a
n
d
i
b
u
l
a
r
c
o
n
d
y
l
e
s.
Fig 13-3j A coronal section slightly more posterior to that in Fig 13-3i
shows excellent definition of the calcified arterial rings (arrows).
Fig 13-3k Multiplanar views of the right side with an automatic 3D color
reconstruction (bottom right).
Fig 13-3l Multiplanar views of the left side with an automatic 3D color
reconstruction (bottom right).
Fig 13-4 Bisphosphonate-Induced Osteonecrosis of the Jaw
Fig 13-4a A 55-year-old white woman was referred to Advanced Dental
Imaging in Salem, New Hampshire, for a cone beam scan to evaluate a
previous extraction site on the left side of the posterior mandible. The
imaging illustrates the diagnosis of osteonecrosis of the jaw secondary to
bisphosphonate medication. A thin axial slice shows an ill-defined
radiolucency in the left side of the posterior mandible. There are multiple
perforative defects.
Fig 13-4b The Cube tool is used to create a 3D color reconstruction.
Fig 13-4c An enlarged view of the reconstruction in Fig 13-4b.
Fig 13-4d A panoramic reconstruction at a thickness of about 25 mm.
Fig 13-4e A pseudopanoramic reconstruction at a thickness of about 9.1
mm.
Fig 13-4f The same reconstruction as in Fig 13-4e is created with a slice
slightly anterior to the previous position.
Fig 13-4g A 3D color panoramic image shows scatter artifacts from the
existing metallic restorations.
Fig 13-4h A panoramic MIP image. This image is not good for a detailed
view of the lesion, but it gives an overall impression of the dental treatment
without the scatter artifacts seen above.
Fig 13-4i The Dental tool, used mainly for implant site assessment, is
employed here to obtain crosssectional slices (top right) from the anterior to
the posterior of the lesion and to delineate the location of the inferior
alveolar nerve (red dot) relative to the lesion.
Fig 13-4j This cross-sectional slice is posterior to that in Fig 13-4i.
Fig 13-4k This cross-sectional slice is posterior to that in Fig 13-4j.
Fig 13-4l This cross-sectional slice is posterior to that in Fig 13-4k.
Fig 13-5 Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Fig 13-5a A 51-year-old white man was seen at an imaging center in South
Dakota for evaluation of radiolucencies associated with partially impacted
mandibular third molars. The mandibular left third molar was symptomatic.
Whole-body positron emission tomography and computerized tomography
scans identified bilateral focal hypermetabolic areas in the third molar
regions. The radiologist report also noted an asymmetric increase in 2-
fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) uptake in the left posterior mandible that
was deemed “suspicious” for focal squamous cell carcinoma. The cone
beam images confirm the presence of a malignancy. A panoramic image
reconstructed at a thickness of about 30 mm shows bilateral pericoronal
radiolucencies. Both lesions exhibit regular cortical outlines, and neither
lesion looks particularly ominous.
Fig 13-5b Scrolling through this panoramic image reveals that the lesion on
the patient’s left side appears much larger and seems to encroach on the
inferior alveolar nerve canal.
Fig 13-5c A thin-slice panoramic image (0.15 mm) shows some irregularity
at the margins of the left-side lesion, as well as small permeative defects.
These are more ominous radiographic features.
Fig 13-5d A sagittal view shows the proximity of the left-side lesion to the
nerve canal.
Fig 13-5e By using the Dental tool, which is most often reserved for implant
assessment, it is possible to colorize the inferior alveolar nerve canal
(green), show the proximity of the lesion to the canal, and assist the
surgeon’s approach.
Fig 13-5e A thin axial slice (0.15 mm) shows the lesion perforating the
buccal cortical bone.
Fig 13-5g A thin axial slice (0.15 mm) shows the lesion perforating the
buccal cortical bone, but more importantly, it shows the permeative
appearance of this lesion. The inferior alveolar nerve canal is shown by the
arrow.
Fig 13-5h A thin coronal slice (0.15 mm) shows the permeative appearance
on the buccal aspect of this lesion. The inferior alveolar nerve canal is
shown by the arrow.
Fig 13-5i A more posterior coronal slice reveals destroyed cortical bone.
Note the intact marginal area on the mandibular right third molar.
Fig 13-5j This is the site of the greatest cortical destruction.
Fig 13-5k The Dental tool shows axial, cross-sectional, and panoramic
images relating the lesion appearance.
Fig 13-5l The Dental tool shows axial, cross-sectional, and panoramic
images at the most posterior aspect of the lesion. The nerve canal (arrow)
appears to be separate from the lesion at this point.
Fig 13-5m A 3D color reconstruction shows the perforation caused by the
lesion.
Fig 13-5n A close-up 3D color reconstruction provides a detailed look at the
perforation.
Fig 13-5o The lesion is shown from the lingual aspect in this 3D color
reconstruction.
References
1. Friedlander AH, Baker JD. Panoramic radiography: An aid in detecting
patients at risk of cerebrovascular accident. J Am Dent Assoc
1994;125:1598–1603.
2. Friedlander AH. Identification of stroke-prone patients by panoramic and
cervical spine radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995;24:160–164.
3. Carter LC, Tsimidis K, Fabiano J. Carotid calcifications on panoramic
radiography identify an asymptomatic male patient at risk for stroke. A
case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
1998;85:119–122.
4. The World Health Organization. Diabetes Fact Sheet Nº 312.
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs312/en/index.htm. Accessed
7 September 2012.
5. National Diabetes Education Program. Working together to manage
diabetes: A guide for pharmacy, podiatry, optometry, and dental
professionals, 2007. Available at: http://www.
ndep.nih.gov/diabetes/WTMD/index.htm. Accessed 13 September 2012.
6. Miles DA, Craig RM, Langlais RP, Wadsworth WC. Facial artery
calcification: A case report of its clinical significance. J Can Dent Assoc
1983;49:200–202.
7. Miles DA, Craig RM. The calcified facial artery: A report of the panoramic
radiograph incidence and appearance. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
1983;55:214–219.
8. Augustine J, Vidt DG. Cleveland Clinic Disease Management Project:
Diabetic nephropathy. Available at: http://
www.clevelandclinicmeded.com/medicalpubs/
diseasemanagement/nephrology/diabeticnephropathy/
diabeticnephropathy.htm#prevalence. Accessed 8 August 2008.
9. Hayden MR, Tyagi SC, Kolb L, Sowers JR, Khanna R. Vascular
ossification–calcification in metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes mellitus,
chronic kidney disease, and calciphylaxis– calcific uremic arteriolopathy:
The emerging role of sodium thiosulfate. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2005;4(1):4.
Vertebral Body Evaluation
A joint is a joint is a joint … or so I used to teach my graduate students.
Although the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is specialized in its motion
capability, and the mandible is the only bone in the body with an articulation
on each side, the TMJs are considered “loaded” just like the knees and hips
and can demonstrate comparable osteoarthritic changes. On plain radiographs
or even digital images, many condyles that are “ugly,” misshapen, modied by
osteophytic activity, or even grossly altered in their morphology still might
be totally asymptomatic. On the other hand, using these same image receptors
(eg, panoramic, tomographic), TMJs may appear normal and yet be quite
painful. The pain, especially in conditions like osteoarthritis (OA), might
precede the actual radiographic change by many months. Now, with cone
beam computed tomography (CBCT), we may have an opportunity to detect
the osteoarthritic changes earlier. There can be a correlation to other loaded
joints like the knee and/or intervertebral joints as well. When I see vertebral
bodies with subchondral cyst formation and subchondral sclerosis in cone
beam images, I also often see concomitant changes on the condylar head. In
Table 1-1, 32 of the 381 total patients were found to have osteoarthritic
changes in the vertebrae. That represents approximately 8.4% of that initial
patient population.
Fig 14-1 Osteoarthritic Findings: Case 1
Fig 14-1a This patient showed significant changes in the cervical vertebrae
without major alteration of the TMJ condyles. Unlike rheumatoid arthritis,
which is polyarticular and symmetrical and can affect the condyles, OA
usually affects one or two major loaded joints in the body asymmetrically. A
panoramic reconstruction shows ostensibly normal condyles.
Fig 14-1b A sagittal view shows osteophytic activity on many surfaces, loss
of intervertebral joint space, and subluxation of the vertebrae C3 to C5
(arrows).
Fig 14-1c This sagittal view reveals significant subchondral sclerosis and
subchondral cyst formation on C3 to C5.
Fig 14-1c A coronal view shows the subchondral cysts on C5 (arrows).
Fig 14-1e The right condylar head appears normal in this thin sagittal slice
(0.15 mm).
Fig 14-1f The left condylar head may have a slight cortical thickening
(arrow), which is indicative of early subchondral sclerosis.
Fig 14-1g A 3D color panoramic reconstruction demonstrates that the
condyles, although altered slightly in shape, appear normal.
Fig 14-2 Osteoarthritic Findings: Case 2
Fig 14-2a A 56-year-old white woman showed osteoarthritic changes in the
vertebral bodies, along with slight concomitant condylar head involvement.
There are significant osteophytic changes on C3, C4, and C5, with collapse
of the intervertebral joint spaces and subluxation (bottom three arrows). C2
also shows subchondral sclerosis and possible fusion with the anterior arch
of C1 (top arrow).
Fig 14-2b Subchondral cyst formation on C1.
Fig 14-2c Additional subchondral cyst formation (arrow).
Fig 14-2d The left condylar head appears normal.
Fig 14-2e The right condylar head shows some surface thickening in the
form of subchondral sclerosis (arrow). This is an early change but indicative
of synovial fluid loss and subsequent bone formation to protect the condylar
surface.
Fig 14-2f Direct volumetric rendering of the TMJ. The Dual mode allows
both condylar heads to be viewed for comparison.
Fig 14-2g A pseudopanoramic reconstruction shows the condyles. The left
condyle looks marginally thicker than the right.
Fig 14-3 Osteoarthritic Findings: Case 3
Fig 14-3a A 66-year-old Asian man was referred to Northwest Radiology
imaging center in Seattle, Washington, for an implant site assessment.
Osteoarthritic findings are apparent, with severe osteophyte formation,
subluxation, and loss of intervertebral joint space seen on C3, C4, and C5
(arrows). There is also a large erosion on the anterior aspect of C4 (upper
left arrow).
Fig 14-3b Subchondral cyst formation on C4 (orange arrow) as well as C5
(blue arrow).
Fig 14-3c The condylar heads in the axial view, as well as the 3D Cube tool
color reconstruction of the right condyle appear relatively normal. (left)
Some slight cortical thickening may be present on the lateral pole (arrow) in
the axial view. (right) The 3D reconstruction shows it to be condylar lipping
(arrow).
Fig 14-3d The right condyle in 3D color is rotated to show the lateral
aspect. The deep depression (arrow) is an imaging artifact; the patient was
not correctly positioned to capture the entire condylar area.
Fig 14-3e The left condyle is essentially normal except for some mild
flattening (arrows).
Fig 14-3f Lateral aspect of the condyle seen in Fig 14-3e.
Fig 14-3g In this 2D thin slice grayscale image, the anterior portion of the
left condyle (arrow) looks like an osteophytic projection. However, the 3D
color rendering in Fig 14-3f shows that this shape is just the result of some
flattening of the condyle.
Fig 14-3h Lipping of the right condylar head (arrow) is confirmed in this
3D color reconstruction.
Fig 14-3i Even though this 3D color panoramic reconstruction suggests an
osteophytic projection with the traditional bird-beak appearance (arrow), it
has been shown that this is actually flattening and lipping of the condylar
surface. Regardless of appearance, the condition can still be attributed to
OA.
Fig 14-3j Although this grayscale panoramic reconstruction seems to be a
good depiction of the condyles, it grossly underrepresents the scope of
condylar change seen in the previous images of this case.
Selected Cases from Radiology
Practice
Although the featured cases in this chapter present some medical history, I
rarely have such information when I review a cone beam computed
tomography (CBCT) data set. In my practice, I ask clinicians to provide only
patient names and dates of birth. This approach is appropriate for an oral and
maxillofacial radiologist because having the entire dental and medical records
might bias my review of the cone beam volume data and my analysis of
occult pathology. However, if a case is sent to me for a second opinion, there
is often a specic nding that the referring clinician lacks the training to
characterize more specically. In referral cases, I still follow the same
systematic approach that I take to review any data volume. Although I
capture suf cient images to characterize the nding for which the referral was
made, I must study the entire data volume for occult pathology. If I limited
my review of the data, I would miss additional reportable ndings that could
be signicant and require additional follow-up management.
Fig 15-1 Undiagnosed Orofacial Pain
A healthy 15-year-old adolescent girl was referred for CBCT evaluation of a
lesion in the right posterior region. The patient had complained of pain in the
posterior right mandible and the initial dentist had supposed the pain was due
to the developing third molar. The area was imaged in a panoramic
radiograph in preparation for removal of the mandibular right third molar.
The panoramic radiograph revealed a 2 cm x 3 cm radiolucent lesion in the
posterior right mandible. The mandibular right third molar was extracted.
Even without access to the original conventional panoramic radiograph, the
lesion was obvious on the reconstructed panoramic view from the CBCT
volume (Fig 15-1a).
Fig 15-1a Reconstructed panoramic view from CBCT data. The extraction
site for the mandibular right third molar is obvious, as is the lesion in the
area of the mandibular right premolars and first molar.
The review of the data volume began with the axial view in the mandible
(Fig 15-1b). As the data slices moved into the paranasal sinus spaces,
significant mucosal change became apparent in the maxillary sinus, ethmoid
air cell complex, and sphenoid sinuses, and multiple images were captured in
the software for inclusion in the final report (Figs 15-1c to 15-1j). As the
mandibular slices were examined in full, the cystic lesion became apparent
and was captured in grayscale and color images, including 3D color
reconstructions that characterize the lesion for presurgical planning (Figs 15-
1k to 15-1o). Finally, review of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) complex
revealed osteoarthrosis of the right condyle (Fig 15-1p).
Fig 15-1b This axial view shows the recent extraction site of the mandibular
right third molar (arrow).
Fig 15-1c Thin slice axial view of significant mucosal change in the
ethmoid air cell complex (arrows).
Fig 15-1d Thin slice axial view of additional mucosal change in the inferior
region of the sphenoid sinus (arrows).
F
i
g
1
5

1
e
T
h
i
n
s
l
i
c
e
a
x
i
a
l
v
i
e
w
o
f
m
u
c
o
s
a
l
c
h
a
n
g
e
i
n
t
h
e
m
a
x
i
l
l
a
r
y
a
n
t
r
a
(a
r
r
o
w
s).
Fig 15-1f Another axial view of mucosal change (arrows) in the maxillary
antra at the level of the developing apices of the maxillary second molars.
Fig 15-1g Sagittal view of the mucosal change in the left maxillary antrum
(arrow).
Fig 15-1h Sagittal view of the mucosal change in the right maxillary
antrum. Note the lesion is also imaged around the mandibular right first
molar.
Fig 15-1i Coronal view of the mucosal changes in the maxillary antra
(lower arrows) and ethmoid air cell complex (upper arrows). Note also the
thinned cortex of the mandibular lesion with slight scalloping.
Fig 15-1j 3D color reconstruction of the lesion with an apparent perforation
of the lingual cortex.
Fig 15-1k Unilocular radiolucent lesion (arrow), which has thinned the
lingual cortex.
Fig 15-1l 3D color reconstruction (20 mm) showing an empty cavity
(arrow).
Discussion of the case
This case illustrates the problem of being confronted with a patient with
undiagnosed orofacial pain. It is interesting that the initial dentist thought that
the developing third molar could be the source of the pain. This is rarely the
case. If the tooth had been further developed and trying to erupt, there would
be the possibility of pericoronitis, but this is not the reality.
The volume data shows that the patient had more than one problem: a
mandibular lesion, pansinusitis, and condylar osteoarthrosis. The chronic
sinusitis could not have given rise to the pain in the right mandible; there is
no referral pattern from the paranasal sinus spaces to the mandibular posterior
region. The lesion surrounding the mandibular right premolars and first molar
was found only incidentally but is a more probable source of the patient’s
pain. However, the finding of osteoarthrosis of the right condyle cannot be
ruled out as a source of the pain because pain from the TMJ complex can
refer to the posterior mandible. To correctly diagnose the orofacial pain, the
clinician must delineate whether or not the reported pain in the right mandible
is related to a bone problem or a soft tissue/muscular problem. In addition,
there is no patient history to rule out a myofascial pain problem. There is
always the possibility that the finding of the lesion in the right mandible is
serendipitous.
Fig 15-1m Pseudopanoramic reconstruction at 1 mm in thickness shows the
region of the extraction site. This was probably not the source of the
patient’s pain. The mandibular lesion is not visible in this thin section.
Fig 15-1n Use of multiplanar and panoramic views clarifies the
radiographic features of the lesion. It is a well-defined, solitary radiolucency
with no internal calcification and a cortical margin situated between the
mandibular right premolars and first molar that envelops the root apices
without resorption or displacement. It also extends to the alveolar crest and
has thinned, but does not appear to have perforated, the lingual cortical
plate.
Nevertheless, there are some changes associated with this lesion that
suggest that the provisional diagnosis of a traumatic bone cyst is just that, a
provisional diagnosis. The lesion does not appear to behave like a traumatic
or simple bone cyst because of the thinning of the cortices and extension to
the alveolar crest.
Fig 15-1o 3D color reconstruction using the Cube tool. Rotating to view the
lesion from the lingual confirms that there is no root resorption of the
mandibular right first molar. Additional transparent lesions confirms no
resorption of any apices in the vicinity.
Fig 15-1p Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) condylar views show the
formation of a subchondral cyst on the right condylar head. Given the
patient’s age, this is most likely osteoarthrosis and not osteoarthritic change.
A differential diagnosis should include lesions of odontogenic origin such
as cysts or tumors. My list of differential diagnoses includes: traumatic bone
cyst, central giant cell granuloma or other vascular/reactive lesion, and
possible odontogenic keratocyst.
Consequently, the following recommendations were made:
1. Aspirational biopsy is indicated prior to any surgical intervention for
this lesion. The presence of a strong colored fluid would most likely
confirm a dramatic bone cyst.
2. The patient should also be referred to the primary care provider and/or
an otolaryngologist for clinical and endoscopic evaluation of the
paranasal sinuses.
Fig 15-2 Stafne Defect
A 41-year-old man was imaged in a local dental office with a CBCT machine
with a large field of view. The referring dentist was concerned about an ovoid
radiolucency seen in the right posterior mandible in the region of extracted
mandibular right third molar (Fig 15-2a). The patient was asymptomatic and
had no significant medical history. Although not exactly typical, the lesion is
not uncommon in the mandible and is often a source of unnecessary concern
for clinicians (Figs 15-2b to 15-2g). In addition, there were several incidental
findings in the data volume (Figs 15-2h to 15-2k).
Fig 15-2a A thin slice pseudopanoramic image shows a small, well-defined
somewhat ovoid radiolucency with a distinct cortical margin. Unlike a
typical lingual developmental submandibular salivary gland depression
(Stafne defect), this lesion is located superior to the inferior alveolar nerve
canal.
Fig 15-2bReconstructed multiplanar (axial and coronal) views (top) and a
thin slice panoramic (bottom) reveal that the lesion has developed from
outside the mandible and remodeled the bone. The typical Stafne defect
develops inferior to the inferior alveolar nerve.
F
i
g
1
5

2
c
3
D
c
o
l
o
r
r
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
S
t
a
f
n
e
d
e
f
e
c
t
w
i
t
h
a
f
a
m
i
l
i
a
r
a
p
p
e
a
r
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n.
Fig 15-2d 3D color reconstruction of the Stafne defect using the Virtual
Endoscopy tool with preset colors. Note the improved appearance of the
hyoid bone and the presence of the airway.
Fig 15-2e Colorization of the inferior alveolar nerve within the canal
showing the nerve’s relationship to the lesion.
Fig 15-2f This reconstructed panoramic view simulates what might be seen
on a conventional film-based panoramic radiograph.
Fig 15-2g These images better characterize the developmental lesion. The
image in the middle shows the lesion viewed from the posterior direction.
Fig 15-2h This thin slice coronal section shows another incidental finding, a
small mucus retention cyst in the right maxillary sinus.
Fig 15-2i Further posterior in the coronal plane, the beginning of the
palatine torus is visible as well as a deviated nasal septum (arrow).
Fig 15-2j This thin slice axial view shows the most obvious incidental
finding in the volume, a palatine torus.
Fig 15-2k Presence of the palatine torus was confirmed in a thin slice
sagittal view.
Discussion of the case
Although not a significant lesion to be biopsied, the developmental anomaly
in this case is often identified incorrectly. If a clinician uses only a panoramic
radiograph to assess the lesion, its location superior to the inferior alveolar
canal may suggest that it is something other than the lingual developmental
submandibular salivary gland depression, known as a Stafne defect. Such a
conclusion could lead to a biopsy, which increases patient cost and could
become a source of stress and anxiety for the patient from uncertainty about
the nature of the lesion. The coronal views and 3D color reconstructions
confirm that the reshaping of the mandible occurred from something outside
of the bone and not within it. This eliminates the possibilities of odontogenic
cysts and tumors of significance. Confirmation could be achieved by a plain
film sialography—certainly less invasive than a biopsy— but in this case,
only periodic radiographic follow-up is indicated to observe if there is any
enlargement of the lesion. Because the CBCT allowed for a more accurate
characterization of the developmental anomaly, the patient was spared the
anxiety and cost of an unneccessary surgical biopsy.
Fig 15-3 Nasophyaryngeal Carcinoma
A 71-year-old man underwent presurgical imaging to evaluate the extraction
site of the mandibular left first molar. Implant placement in the extraction site
was scheduled to take place 1 month after the radiographic examination.
According to the medical history, there were no medical contraindications to
the planned procedures.
Review of the data volume started in axial views at the extraction site and
continued superior to it. In the axial and sagittal planes of section, a condyle
cyst was revealed in the left condyle (Figs 15-3a to 15-3d). Moving superior
in the axial plane of section, significant mucosal changes were visible in the
sphenoid sinus and superior ethmoid air cells on the right side (Figs 15-3e to
15-3g).
F
i
g
1
5

3
a
T
h
i
n
s
l
i
c
e
a
x
i
a
l
v
i
e
w
s
h
o
w
i
n
g
a
s
u
b
c
h
o
n
d
r
a
l
c
y
s
t
i
n
t
h
e
l
e
f
t
c
o
n
d
y
l
a
r
h
e
a
d
(a
r
r
o
w).
Figs 15-3b Sagittal view of the subchondral cyst (arrow) in the left condylar
head.
Figs 15-3c and 15-3d 3D reconstructed views of the left condyle
demonstrating lipping. Both lipping and subchondral cysts appear frequently
in patients with osteoarthritis.
Fig 15-3e Thin slice axial view showing mucosal change in the sphenoid
sinus and superior ethmoid air cell complex on the right (arrow).
Fig 15-3f Additional changes in the ethomoidal air cell complex extending
inferiorly (upper arrow). In addition the lateral wall of the sphenoid sinus is
hyperostotic (lower arrow), suggesting a long-standing problem.
Fig 15-3g Another axial view showing the superior ethmoid air cells (upper
arrow) and the hyperostotic walls of the sphenoid sinus (lower arrow).
Once the same areas were reviewed in sagittal views, it became clear that
the changes in the nasal cavity and airway were more than just inflammation
(Figs 15-3h to 15-3j). The opacification of the paranasal sinus spaces
stemmed from an extrinsic problem. The coronal plane of section allowed for
better tracking of the extent of the lesion (Figs 15-3k to 15-3m). Additional
reportable findings affecting the patient’s treatment were seen in sagittal
views, including a residual periapical lesion (Fig 15-3n) and an osteophyte on
vertebral body C2 (axis) (Fig 15-3o).
Fig 15-3h A thin slice sagittal section showing a large mass in the
nasopharynx extending into the ethmoid air cells and sphenoid sinus. The
lesion also appears to have caused an erosion or perforation into the sella
turcica (arrow).
Fig 15-3i A thickened sagittal section showing the invasion of the tumor
(arrows) from the nasal cavity into the sphenoid sinus.
Fig 15-3j A sagittal view at the midline in the posterior nasopharynx
showing the location of the tumor (arrow) outside of the paranasal sinus
spaces.
Fig 15-3k A coronal view through the midportion of the paranasal sinuses
and nasal structure. Note the obliteration of the inferior and common meatal
spaces (lower arrow), as well as the extension from the inferior nasal cavity
to the ethmoid air cell complex (upper arrow).
Fig 15-3l A coronal view through the posterior portion of the nasal cavity
suggests an extension of the tumor into the posterior nasopharyngeal space
and confirms the presence of hyperostotic walls on the lateral aspect
(arrows).
Fig 15-3m Another coronal section showing the communication of the
lesion from the posterior nasopharynx region (lower arrow) into the right
sphenoid sinus (upper arrow).
Fig 15-3n A sagittal view reveals a residual periapical lesion (arrow) on the
endodontically treated maxillary left second molar.
Fig 15-3o An osteophyte (arrow) is noted on C2 (axis).
Discussion of the case
It was recommended that the patient undergo an immediate otolaryngologic
evaluation as well as both conventional computed tomography and magnetic
resonance imaging to rule out a possible tumor. A differential diagnosis of
the tumor would have included chronic unilateral pansinusitis, antrochoanal
polyp, angiofibroma, and nasopharygeal carcinoma.
The extension of the soft tissue mass from the maxillary sinus to the
nasopharynx is consistent with an antrochoanal polyp. However, the
extension of the mass through the ethmoid complex and involvement of the
sphenoid sinus are atypical. It is possible that a long-standing antrochoanal
polyp could have blocked the osteomeatal complex and caused a retrograde
inflammatory change leading to sinusitis in the ethmoid air cells and
sphenoid sinus. Certainly the hyperostotic walls of the sphenoid sinus and
ethmoid complex support that hypothesis.
As for angiofibroma, it is a relatively common tumor of the nasal cavity
but more common in adolescence, often with epistaxis as a complaint. It
would be simple to confirm this possible diagnosis with magnetic resonance
imaging.
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is rare in the United States. It is much more
common in China and the rest of Asia. Symptoms can include nasal
congestion, epistaxis, blood in the saliva, hearing loss, headaches, frequent
ear infections, and lymphadenopathy. Nasopharyngeal carcinomas are
classified into keratinizing and nonkeratinizing types, and the EpsteinBarr
virus is a known risk factor. The prognosis is influenced by the type of tumor
and of course the staging.
1 Unfortunately because of the rarity of this type of
tumor and the lack of symptomatology, the patient often has little indication
that anything is seriously wrong until the lesion is large and invading
structures secondarily.
The final histologic diagnosis in this case was a Schneiderian papilloma,
negative for squamous dysplasia.
Fig 15-4 Medial Arterial Calcification: Case 1
A 64-year-old woman was referred from a clinician in Illinois as part of a
diagnostic evaluation for obstructive sleep apnea. The review of the data
volume began in the axial plane of section, where calcification of the internal
carotid arteries was immediately identified (Fig 15-4a). Review of coronal
slices confirmed the extent of the calcification (Figs 15-4b to 15-4d).
Although intimal plaques are quite common in patients at this stage of life, in
this case, the widespread calcifications consistent with medial arterial
calcification (MAC) are more ominous. If carotid plaques are present
bilaterally in the cervical regions and the parasellar regions, the chances of
widespread MAC are significantly increased.
Fig 15-4a An axial view demonstrating bilateral calcification of the internal
carotid arteries in the parasellar region.
Fig 15-4b A coronal section showing the same arteries and the same
calcifications. Note the proximity of the structures to the condylar heads.
Clinicians who order CBCT volumes to examine the TMJ complex must
evaluate the sella turcica region.
Fig 15-4c These medial calcification changes must be delineated from the
anterior clinoid processes. The internal carotid artery ascends bilaterally past
the sphenoid sinus and past sella turcica. Thus, there is often the appearance
of four circular calcified vessels. Here, only three circular areas (arrows) are
visible.
Fig 15-4d A coronal section thickened to 10 mm demonstrates bilateral
carotid artery plaques (arrows) at the level of the C3 and C4 vertebrae. In
addition to significant carotid calcifications (cervical and parasellar
portions), there are physiologic calcifications of the pineal gland and
superior horns of the thyroid cartilage.
Discussion of the case
This patient was recommended for evaluation for undiagnosed or
uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus as well as a compromised renal function
possibly secondary to the diabetic changes.
Diabetic patients with the kind of widespread vascular change evidenced
in this CBCT data volume are often candidates for below the knee
amputations in the near future.
2 Aggressive therapy including control of the
diabetes is mandatory to extend life and improve the quality of it. Dental
specialists who use CBCT and identify these types of changes are responsible
to refer their patients to medical care for proper management of undiagnosed
or uncontrolled diabetes.
In response to my request, the referring clinician forwarded the patient’s
medical history, which included a history of acid reflux, arthritis, high blood
pressure, heart disease, depression, sleep apnea, and sarcoidosis. The surgical
history included a tonsillectomy, extraction of wisdom teeth, and removal of
an ovarian cyst. Additional signs or symptoms recorded by the patient
included dizziness. The record of medications included losartan (angiotensin
antagonist), hydrochlorothiazide (diuretic), simvastatin (cholesterollowering
agent), fluoxetine (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, antidepressant),
ropinirole (nonergoline dopamine agonist, antiparkinson agent), tramadol
(centrally acting analgesic), and fenofibrate (cholesterol-lowering agent) as
well as multivitamins, calcium and magnesium supplements, fish oil, aspirin,
and glucosamine sulfate.
There was no mention of diabetes. The relationship between diabetes,
renal problems, and cardiovascular disease is well documented. The clinician
was advised to refer the patient to a primary care provider for evaluation of
dysglycemia and possible renal problems.
Fig 15-5 Medial Arterial Calcification: Case 2
A 74-year-old white man underwent a diagnostic evaluation for orofacial pain
including a possible TMJ disorder. The medical history included a history of
arterial sclerosis and diabetes. During the course of the evaluation, a large
field of vision (FOV) CBCT scan was ordered to evaluate the TMJ complex.
The patient was in no physical distress at the time in the evaluation. The
clinician identified mild osteoarthritic changes of the left condyle and C2
vertebral body. There was also a loose body in the atlantoaxial junction.
However, none of these osteoarthritic changes were the source of the
patient’s TMJ pain, and the clinician had decided that the patient’s symptoms
were due to a myofascial pain problem.
My review of the data volume began in the axial plane of section. Axial
and saggital views show graphic changes that could possibly relate to the
TMJ pain, including mild osteoarthritic changes in the facet joints between
C3 and C4 vertebrae (Fig 15-5a), in the dens axis (Fig 15-5b), and in axis
(Fig 15-5c). There was also indication of bilateral calcification of the
stylohyoid ligament complex (Fig 15-5d). However, further evaluation of the
CBCT data quickly revealed significant calcification changes. The location of
a small ovoid radiopacity posterior to the clivus (see Fig 15-5c) was unusual
and unexpected. A thickened sagittal view reconstructed as a maximum
intensity projection (MIP) image revealed a tubularlike structure consistent
with a vessel and MAC (Fig 15-5e). The location was intriguing, but my
familiarity with such findings in the cervical and parasellar portions of the
internal carotid arteries in other cases told me this could be another example
of MAC. The focus of this case had to be identifying MAC in significant
portions of the arterial tree (Figs 15-5f to 15-5h). Further investigation into
the unusual vascular pattern in the clivus region proved that these changes
were in the vertebral arteries ascending through the foramen magnum into the
brain (Figs 15-5i to 15-5n).
Fig 15-5a An axial view showing remodeling, subchondral sclerosis, and
subchondral cyst formation in the facet joints between C3 and C4 vertebrae
(arrow).
Fig 15-5b Subchondral cyst formation (arrow) in the dens axis seen in an
axial view at a superior level.
Fig 15-5c Small subchondral cyst (lower arrow) in C2 (axis) in a sagittal
section. Also, note the unusual small ovoid calcification (upper arrow).
Fig 15-5d Bilateral calcification of the elongated stylohyoid ligament
complex (arrows). Although there were no signs or symptoms suggestive of
Eagle syndrome, this finding would also be reported to the clinician for his
evaluation of the undiagnosed orofacial pain.
Fig 15-5e Slice data thickened to 20 mm and reconstructed using the MIP
tool to delineate the vascular calcifications (arrow).
Fig 15-5f A sagittal slice revealing calcification in the left internal carotid
artery (arrows) adjacent to the sella turcica.
Fig 15-5g A similar vascular calcification of the right internal carotid artery
(arrows).
Fig 15-5h Axial slice at the level of the sella turcica showing the bilateral
involvement of the internal carotid arteries (arrows).
Fig 15-5i Axial slice at the level of the inferior portion of the mandibular
condyles showing the typical circular pattern of MAC (arrows).
Fig 15-5j Thick section MIP image showing MAC of the vertebral arteries
ascending into the cranial cavity (lower arrows). Note also the physiologic
calcifications seen in the pineal gland (upper arrow) and choroid plexuses
(middle arrows).
Fig 15-5k 3D color reconstruction (20 mm) to characterize the calcification
of the vertebral arteries (arrows).
Fig 15-5l The Cube tool in the OnDemand 3D software (CyberMed
International) focusing on the vertebral arteries within the foramen magnum.
Fig 15-5m The Cube tool show the calcification of the vertebral arteries
(arrows) within the foramen magnum.
Fig 15-5n Thick slice coronal section using an MIP tool to show the typical
circular pattern of MAC in the internal carotid arteries (arrows) adjacent to
the sella turcica and just superior to the sphenoid sinus./
Discussion of the case
The medical history was requested after the CBCT volume had been
reviewed. The patient’s medical questionnaire had recorded difficulty
sleeping, impaired hearing, heart murmur, heart palpitations, hypoglycemia,
poor circulation, shortness of breath, sleep apnea, slow-healing sores, swollen
and stiff and painful joints, tired muscles, and heart disease. The patient also
recorded clinical signs and symptoms of dizziness and injuries to his neck
and back. Previous surgeries included back surgery, tonsillectomy, knee
surgery, and five coronary bypasses. Medications taken by the patient
included carvedilol (beta-blocker), fenofibrate (cholesterol-lowering agent),
oxaprozin (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug) and oxybutynin (antispasmodic agent). With this history of heart problems, hypoglycemia,
dizziness, and slow-healing sores it is highly likely that this patient is also an
undiagnosed diabetic. It was necessary to recommend that the patient be
referred for evaluation for hypertension and stroke risk as well as
dysglycemia and potential end-stage renal disease.
Discussion of MAC Cases
Arterial calcifications in the medial layer of arteries are usually secondary to
compromised vascularity from type II diabetes mellitus. It can also signal that
a patient is approaching end stage renal disease.
3The type of calcification in
MAC is found in many other arteries in the body, but imaging it has never
been as easy as with CBCT. With the use of CBCT in dental imaging, it is
my belief that dental clinicians will be confronted more often with clear
evidence of arterial calcification. Intimal plaques such as those seen in the
pharyngeal space on panoramic radiographs are quite common, but the
plaques in the carotid arteries are only really visible in panoramic radiographs
when the patient is positioned just so and the resulting image layer is wide
enough to display it. However, there is no mistaking MAC findings on CBCT
images.
Clinicians who see evidence of arterial calcification in CBCT data
volumes should be ready to refer the patient to the primary care provider.
Anyone who reports MAC findings could be responsible for the initial
diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus, for identifying a patient who is
noncompliant with diabetes treatment, or for saving the limbs of a diabetic
patient who is approaching end-stage renal disease. Just because a clinician is
evaluating an implant site does not provide absolution from reporting on
significant unexpected findings. Some of these findings will have an
immediate and direct impact on the patient’s systemic health.
Conclusions
Occult findings in CBCT data volumes are unavoidable, all are reportable,
and some may actually save your patient’s life. It takes only patience to
examine CBCT data in full. Significant findings can be found in data from
CBCT units with both small and large FOV, and clinicians are responsible for
everything recorded within the CBCT data volume.
If you are uncomfortable looking at the entire data set, the standard of
care dictates that you refer this task to a qualified oral and maxillofacial
radiologist or other dental specialist. In doing this you will ensure that your
patient receives the best care possible and avoid any potential liability from
an inadequate evaluation of the data.
A formal report should be included with every CBCT image set and
recorded in the patient’s record. Clinicians who examine their own CBCT
volumes can use simple reporting software to produce a concise and complete
CBCT report. Additional information concerning reporting software can be
found at any of these websites:
• www.EasyRiter.com
• www.learndigital.net
• www.OnDemand3D.com
References
1. Tabuchi K, Nakayama M, Nishimura B, Hayashi K, Hara A. Early
detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma [epub ahead of print 8 June 2011].
Int J Otolaryngol 2011;2011:638058.
2. Schoppet M, Al-Fakhri N, Franke FE, et al. Localization of
osteoprotegerin, tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosisinducing ligand,
and receptor activator of nuclear factorκB ligand in Mönckeberg’s
sclerosis and atherosclerosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004;89:4104–
4112.
3. US Renal Data System. USRDS 2006 Annual Data Report: Atlas of EndStage Renal Disease in the United States. Bethesda, MD: National
Institutes of Health, National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and
Kidney Diseases, 2006.
Clinical Endodontics
Thomas V. McClammy, DMD, MS
The pace of adoption of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) within the
specialty of endodontics was not anticipated by dental CBCT specialists,
1
endodontists, or even the manufactures and marketers of cone beam
technology. When the rst edition of this atlas was published in 2008, there
were relatively few articles concerning CBCT. However, it is now
commonplace to see numerous references to CBCT in every dental journal or
trade magazine, especially for endodontics. CBCT is here to stay and the
technology is only getting better and more user friendly to the benet of
patient care globally. This chapter discusses some of the areas that CBCT is
being used on a regular basis in clinical endodontics.
Fig 16-1 Misdiagnosis: Case 1
There is little question that lesions of endodontic origin
2
(LEOs) can be
visualized much better with CBCT than with conventional periapical
radiographs. It has been suggested that a thorough endodontic diagnosis
should include at least three well-angulated periapical radiographs,
3 and even
a bitewing radiograph can provide important diagnostic information in almost
every endodontic case. Nowadays, most multiangulated radiographs are
unnecessary when compared with CBCT data in multiple planes of section.
CBCT images provide much more information than what can be visualized in
radiographs, regardless of the angulation used.
A woman was referred for evaluation and potential endodontic treatment
of the maxillary right second molar, which had been restored with a relatively
new crown. Routine diagnostic testing of the tooth with cold, palpation, and
percussion indicated results within normal limits. However, a periapical
radiograph provided a glimpse of the adjacent anatomy, including a
suspicious radiolucency associated with the palatal root of the maxillary right
first molar (Fig 16-1a). Further diagnostic testing indicated that the maxillary
right first molar was indeed compromised. The tooth was sensitive to
percussion, did not respond to a cold test, and was tender when palpated on
both the buccal and the palatal sides. Offangle periapical radiographs
revealed radiolucencies indicating compromised periapical tissues (Fig 16-
1b).
Fig 16-1a Periapical image of the maxillary right second molar showing a
little of the maxillary right first molar.
Fig 16-1b Off-angle preoperative periapical radiograph of the maxillary
right first molar.
Following diagnostic testing, CBCT imaging of the maxillary right
quadrant was undertaken to better visualize the area and allow for a more
accurate diagnosis. The CBCT scan with a 40 × 40 mm field of vision (FOV)
was centered on the maxillary right first molar (Fig 16-1c).
Fig 16-1c CBCT slice of the maxillary right quadrant with radiolucencies
noted in all three planes of section and in a 3D volume rendering (upper
right). DB—distobuccal; MB—mesiobuccal.
The changes that were visible only vaguely on the conventional
radiographs became evident in the 3D CBCT imaging. The maxillary right
first molar was subsequently treated endodontically (Fig 16-1d). Pulpal
necrosis was confirmed when the root canal system was accessed.
Fig 16-1d The maxillary right first molar following endodontic therapy.
Fig 16-2 Misdiagnosis: Case 2
A man had been referred to numerous clinicians for evaluation because of
pain he experienced when flying. The patient, an avid fisherman, described
severe pain on the left side of his head, face, and neck that occurred even
when he flew at low altitudes in a float plane to his favorite fishing holes.
The pain was also present when he flew commercially as well as at other
times when he changed altitude. The referring dentist had focused his
diagnostic efforts on maxillary left first premolar, an abutment tooth for a
three-unit fixed prosthesis. The patient had also been referred to a neurologist
who had made a diagnosis of trigeminal neuralgia. There had been
discussions of neurosurgery to treat the trigeminal neuralgia and relieve some
of the pain.
Periapical images of the maxillary left first premolar and first molar did
not reveal any suspicious radiographic findings (Figs 16-2a and 16-2b).
Fig 16-2a Periapical radiograph of the maxillary left first premolar.
Fig 16-2b Periapical radiograph of the maxillary left first molar.
Diagnostic tests were initiated on the patient’s left side with an emphasis
on the maxillary left quadrant. Periapical and CBCT images did not
demonstrate anything significant or out of the ordinary. Pain of odontogenic
origin could not be reproduced. However, near the end the evaluation, the
patient mentioned that his mandibular left second molar was slightly tender
after this appointment. A periapical radiograph was taken of the mandibular
left second molar, which revealed some osseous apical changes (Fig 16-2c).
A CBCT scan was ordered (Fig 16-2d).
Fig 16-2c Periapical radiograph of the mandibular left second molar.
Fig 16-2d CBCT images showing osseous changes in all three planes (axial,
sagittal, and coronal) as well as in a 3D volume rendering (upper left).
Further diagnostic tests indicated that the pulpal tissues in the mandibular
left second molar were necrotic. At the next appointment, the root canal of
the mandibular left second molar was accessed, and the pulp was found to be
necrotic and noticeably putrescent.
In follow-up appointments, the patient indicated that he had not had pain
on his left side or any incidence of aerodontalgia since completion of the
endodontic therapy (Fig 16-2e). Without the benefit of CBCT imaging, the
misdiagnosis of this case could have resulted in an unnecessary neurosurgical
procedure.
Fig 16-2e perative periapical radiograph of the mandibular left second
molar.
Fig 16-3 Nonsurgical Retreatment
A 75-year-old woman was referred for an evaluation and potential
retreatment of the maxillary left first molar. Examination revealed a draining
sinus tract on the buccal side between the maxillary left second premolar and
first molar. Tracing that sinus tract with a gutta-percha cone indicated that the
area responsible was the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary left first molar. In
addition to other diagnostic tests, periapical and panoramic radiographs as
well as a CBCT of the maxillary left quadrant were taken. Both the periapical
and the panoramic radiographs increased the suspicion concerning the
maxillary left second premolar and first molar (Fig 16-3a).
Fig 16-3a Periapical radiograph of the maxillary left first molar prior to
retreatment.
There is tremendous value in using panoramic imaging for diagnosis.
Some CBCT machines allow a panoramic scout image to be taken prior to
scanning the full CBCT data volume. Not only does this facilitate a more
accurate positioning of the CBCT unit, but in certain cases a 2D panoramic
image can be an asset to the diagnosis and the potential treatment (Fig 16-
3b). A well-positioned panoramic radiograph can provide immediate
information about a patient’s previous dental treatment and offer a helpful
visual context to discuss preventive dentistry.
Fig 16-3b Panoramic radiograph highlighting the region of interest (ROI).
A CBCT scan was taken with a 40 × 40–mm FOV of both the maxillary
left second premolar and first molar as well as adjacent anatomy (Fig 16-3c).
The maxillary left second premolar and first molar both had very profound
LEOs. Slices in all planes of section (axial, coronal, sagittal) showed the
lesions (Figs 16-3d and 16-3e). Although the endodontic treatment of both of
these teeth looked clinically acceptable in some planes of section, these
images also showed significant periradicular osseous changes. Further
evaluation of these slices revealed missed canals in both teeth. Being able to
identify missed canals requires familiarity with the imaging software and
knowledge of what to look for. After all, the eye cannot see what the mind
has not taught it to recognize, and likewise clinicians can only see and treat
what they know. The CBCT scans in Figs 16-3c to 16-3e clearly illustrate a
missed second mesiobuccal canal.
Fig 16-3c LEOs (yellow arrows) on both the maxillary left second premolar
and first molar.
Fig 16-3d Coronal CBCT slice showing LEO on the maxillary left second
premolar (arrow). The missed mesiobuccal canal in the maxillary left
second premolar is also visible (circle).
Fig 16-3e Sagittal CBCT slice showing LEOs (arrows) on both the
maxillary left second premolar and first molar.
An untreated necrotic canal houses virulent pathogens and their byproducts. Under the right conditions, these pathogens can create periradicular
lesions. Periapical images sometimes reveal these lesions radiographically,
but CBCT slices allow early detection of these lesions and provide the
advantage of 3D visualization prior to surgical and nonsurgical treatment.
Clinicians can now know exactly where to look for missed canals prior to
creating the access cavity, which increases pretreatment confidence.
Treatment options were discussed with the patient, and she elected to
have the maxillary left first molar re-treated nonsurgically. Access of the root
canal system through the existing porcelain-fused-to-metal crown revealed
that the original endodontic treatment was quite good but that the second
mesiobuccal canal had not been accessed at all (Fig 16-3f). The process of
shaping and cleaning the root canal system of the maxillary left first molar
demonstrated that the second mesiobuccal canal was positioned under a hood
of dentin resting under the mesial marginal ridge, a common spot for second
mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first molars (Fig 16-3g). The canals were
filled with gutta-percha (Figs 16-3h and 16-3i).
Fig 16-3f All three canals, including the unaccessed second mesiobuccal
canal. DB—distobuccal; MB—mesiobuccal; P—palatal.
Fig 16-3g Endodontic access cavity of the maxillary left first molar after
shaping, cleaning, and thorough disinfection of the first and second
mesiobuccal (MB) canals and the distobuccal (DB) canal. Conservative
endodontic access cavities often do not allow visualization of all canal
orifices simultaneously, especially through a well-placed crown.
Fig 16-3h The root canal system was obturated with the vertical
condensation of warm gutta-percha. DB—distobuccal; MB—mesiobuccal.
Fig 16-3i Postoperative periapical radiograph showing the nonsurgical
retreatment of the maxillary left first molar.
Fig 16-4 Surgical Retreatment
Advances in technology have made most surgical endodontic retreatment
unnecessary. However, when apical surgery becomes necessary, a CBCT
volume provides the tremendous advantage of 3D visualization of the tooth
and surrounding anatomy prior to picking up the scalpel.
A 19-year-old patient was referred for evaluation and potential
endodontic treatment of the mandibular right second premolar. The
preoperative radiograph showed a significant periradicular radiolucency (Fig
16-4a). Vitality tests indicated that the pulp was necrotic. The tooth was
treated initially with conventional endodontic therapy. A draining sinus tract
in the buccal vestibule seemed to heal but returned within a few months of
the original treatment. Nonsurgical retreatment was completed to place
mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) in the apical third of the root canal system,
which would make surgical endodontic retreatment easier if it proved
necessary
4
(Figs 16-4b and 16-4c). The draining sinus tract persisted and was
traced with a gutta-percha cone. Because apical endodontic surgery was
required, a CBCT scan was taken to provide 3D imaging prior to treatment
(Fig 16-4d). Knowing the exact location of important anatomical structures is
critical both for treatment planning as well as for the surgical procedure itself.
Fig 16-4a Preoperative radiograph of the mandibular right second premolar.
Fig 16-4b Placement of MTA in apical third of the mandibular right second
premolar.
Fig 16-4c Postoperative radiograph following nonsurgical retreatment.
Fig 16-4d CBCT scan taken prior to endodontic surgical retreatment
procedure. Axial (top left), sagittal (bottom left), and coronal (bottom right)
slices shown, as well as 3D rendering (top right).
The CBCT scan revealed a significant lesion in all three planes of section.
The apex was in close proximity to the neurovascular bundle and the mental
foramen. The coronal slice illustrated that although the lesion surrounded the
apical extent of the root, the buccal bone fenestration, and thus the location of
the draining sinus tract, was much more coronal. The midroot area was easily
accessed once a fullthickness flap was elevated. However, accessing the most
apical extent of the root required entry through 1 to 2 mm of buccal cortical
bone.
The apex of the root was accessed, and the root end was resected (Fig 16-
4e). Because the apical third of the root canal system had previously been
obturated with MTA, the surgery proceeded efficiently and in minimal time
(Fig 16-4f). Moreover, use of CBCT images of the mandibular right second
premolar prior to the surgery made the clinician confident in every stage of
the procedure.
Fig 16-4e Apical aspect of the mandibular right second premolar after root
end resection.
Fig 16-4f Radiographic image of the mandibular right second premolar
following apical surgery.
Fig 16-5 Resorption Defect
Prior to CBCT imaging, it was often difficult to provide a reliable prognosis
for a tooth with a resorption defect, regardless of whether the defect was
internal or external. However, CBCT scans allow clinicians to view the
defect in three dimensions. This is enough information to make an educated
preoperative assessment of resorption defects.
A 57-year-old woman was referred for evaluation of her maxillary central
incisors. The dental history indicated orthodontic treatment during her
teenage years and porcelain veneers on the maxillary anterior teeth from
canine to canine. The palatal aspect of the maxillary right central incisor was
extremely calcified and discolored. In radiographic examination, the
maxillary left central incisor appeared to have a resorption defect (Figs 16-5a
and 16-5b). A CBCT scan was ordered to assist with the treatment decisions
for both teeth.
Fig 16-5a Radiographic examination of the maxillary central incisors.
Fig 16-5b A closer look the maxillary left central incisior prior to treatment.
The calcification of the maxillary right central incisor was so complete
that even finding the canal was questionable. A CBCT scan can provide
important pretreatment information for significantly calcified canals. When a
calcified tooth is carefully viewed in the axial plane, the canal is usually
discovered somewhere along the length of the tooth. Once it is located in the
CBCT volume, the canal can also be found clinically with conservative
endodontic access and the use of a dental operating microscope.
At this point, the digital imaging and communications in medicine
(DICOM) files were sent electronically to an oral and maxillofacial
radiologist for an additional opinion as well as a written report on any occult
pathology. Figures 16-5c to 16-5e show images created by OnDemand 3D
software (CyberMed International) to analyze the DICOM data.
Fig 16-5c CBCT scans of the maxillary incisors showing the calcification of
the right central incisor and the resorption defect of the left central incisor.
Fig 16-5d Axial CBCT slice viewed using OnDemand 3D software to show
calcification of of the maxillary right central incisor with very faint evidence
of canal space remaining (arrow).
Fig 16-5e CBCT axial slice illustrating the contiguous resorptive defect,
externally and internally, of the maxillary left central incisor (arrow). The
extreme calcification of the right central incisor is also visible.
The maxillary right central incisor was treated endodontically; its single
canal was located, shaped, and cleaned. Because of the uncertain prognosis
for the maxillary left central incisor, the patient elected to have it removed
and have an immediate implant placed. Figure 16-5f shows the maxillary
right central incisor following endodontic therapy as well as the implantsupported provisional restoration in place of the maxillary left central incisor.
Fig 16-5f The maxillary right central incisor has undergone endodontic
therapy. The maxillary left central incisor has been replaced with an implant
and a provisional restoration.
Fig 16-6 Root Fracture: Case 1
Some manufacturers of CBCT machines purport that CBCT scans will allow
clinicians to see and diagnose all root fractures. Although many of these
statements are grossly exaggerated, there are some situations in which the
clinician can actually image root fractures clearly in CBCT scans prior to
treatment. More often, 2D radiographs and 3D CBCT data volumes do not
display fractures directly; rather, experienced clinicians know to analyze
imaging for evidence of root fractures such as bone destruction and
associated sequelae caused by bacterial invasion and the endotoxins they
produce. This is especially true when experienced clinicians use highresolution CBCT scans to image a suspected root fracture. CBCT imaging
can facilitate an accurate diagnosis of root fracture prior to treatment.
A 34-year-old woman was referred for evaluation of the maxillary left
second premolar treated 2 years previously with endodontic therapy.
Periodontal probing revealed a 7- to 9-mm pocket on the palatal side. Class
III mobility was evident. Radiographic analysis was inconclusive, but CBCT
imaging showed a palatal fracture (Figs 16-6a and 16-6b). The tooth was
extracted, and an immediate implant was placed with a provisional
restoration (Fig 16-6c).
Fig 16-6a Preoperative radiograph of the maxillary left second premolar.
Fig 16-6b Preoperative CBCT scans of the maxillary left second premolar
definitively illustrate a midroot fracture on the palatal side.
Fig 16-6c An immediate implant was placed and provisionally restored.
Fig 16-7 Root Fracture: Case 2
A 65-year-old woman was referred for evaluation of the maxillary right
lateral incisor. A clinical examination revealed that it had been previously
treated with surgical and nonsurgical endodontic therapy. The existing allceramic crown was retained intraradicularly by a post and core restoration.
The tooth exhibited Class III mobility, and a root fracture was suspected. In
addition to periapical radiographs, a CBCT scan was taken (Figs 16-7a and
16-7b).
Fig 16-7a Preoperative periapical radiograph of the maxillary right lateral
incisor.
Fig 16-7b Sagittal CBCT slice of the maxillary right lateral incisor clearly
showing the root fracture (arrow).
Although a fracture of this nature can sometimes be diagnosed with
conventional periapical images, CBCT scans provide additional benefits in
documentation and in aiding communication with the patient. Moreover, the
clinical information that can be used for treatment is substantial. Treatment
included removal of the fractured maxillary right lateral incisor and
immediate placement of an implant with a provisional restoration (Figs 16-7c
to 16-7e). The tooth was definitively restored with a porcelain-fused-to-metal
crown (Figs 16-7f and 16-7g). Root Fractures: Case 2 379
Fig 16-7c Labial aspect of the extracted maxillary right lateral incisor.
Fig 16-7d Sagittal view of the extracted maxillary right lateral incisor.
Fig 16-7e An implant was placed in the maxillary right lateral incisor site
and restored with a crown.
Fig 16-7f Implant-supported definitive restoration 16 months after
placement.
Fig 16-7g Coronal (left) and sagittal (right) CBCT slices showing the
maxillary right lateral incisor implant-supported restoration.
Fig 16-8 Unusual Root Canal Anatomy
Many times clinician’s would like to have another view of a tooth they are
considering treating. A clinician may even fantasize about having a tooth
extracted for just a few minutes just to have a look at its anatomy. While
temporary extraction is not possible, CBCT imaging does provide an
opportunity to visualize anatomy more precisely.
A 54-year-old man was referred for evaluation and possible treatment of
the mandibular left third molar. This molar was an abutment tooth for a
mandibular partial denture, and the patient expressed a sincere desire to save
the tooth. A periapical radiograph was taken (Fig 16-8a). It was quickly
determined that additional views including CBCT scans were necessary (Fig
16-8b).
Fig 16-8a Preoperative periapical radiograph of the mandibular left third
molar.
Fig 16-8b Preoperative CBCT scans of the mandibular left third molar
illustrating the challenging root canal anatomy. ML—mesiolingual; MB—
mesiobuccal.
The pulpal status of the mandibular left third molar was diagnosed as
necrotic, which was confirmed when endodontic therapy was performed. The
complexity of root canal anatomy increases exponentially from anterior teeth
to posterior teeth. This third molar was no exception and was a clinical
challenge. However, with enhanced CBCT imaging, patience, perseverance,
and disciplined application of fundamental shaping and cleaning principles,
the final result was well worth the effort (Fig 16-8c).
Fig 16-8c Periapical image of the mandibular left third molar after
endodontic treatment.
References
1. Miles DA, Danforth RA. A clinician’s guide to understanding cone beam
volumetric imaging. Acad Dent Ther Stomatol 2007;(special issue):1–13.
2. Schilder H. Canal debridement and disinfection. In: Cohen S, Burns RC
(eds). Pathways of the Pulp. St Louis: Mosby, 1976:111–133.
3. Kaffe I, Gratt BM. Variations in the radiographic interpretations of the
periapical dental region. J Endod 1988;14:330– 335.
4. Ruddle CJ. Nonsurgical endodontic retreatment. In: Cohen S, Burns RC
(eds). Pathways of the Pulp, ed 8. St Louis: Mosby, 2002:875–929.
Risk and Liability
The most controversial area of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)
imaging is the issue of who is liable for examining the data volume once it is
captured. This should not be controversial. In an executive opinion statement
from 2008, the Executive Committee of the American Academy of Oral and
Maxillofacial Radiology stated that “it is the responsibility of the practitioner
obtaining the CBCT images to interpret the ndings of the examination. Just as
a pathology report accompanies a biopsy, an imaging report must accompany
a CBCT scan.”
1 This opinion is shared by both the American Association of
Orthodontists and the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial
Surgery.
2,3The patient cannot sign away negligence. The clinician has an
obligation to review all of the data contained in a CBCT volume or to refer
the CBCT data set to either an oral and maxillofacial radiologist or medical
radiologist to review the volume for occult pathology.
Waiver of Liability
In one of the few articles specifically addressing medicolegal issues
associated with CBCT imaging, Friedland
4 discusses the issue of a waiver of
liability. Simply stated, the signing of any waiver of liability carries no legal
weight because the profession as a whole, not the individual clinician, sets
the standard of care that patients can expect. Anyone reading this textbook
would be well advised to read Friedland’s article.
Informed Refusal
Some clinicians believe that they can have a patient sign another type of
waiver called an informed refusal. The idea is that if a clinician stipulates that
the imaging is specific for a particular task, such as presurgical implant site
evaluation and the subsequent surgical procedure, the patient can waive the
clinician’s responsibility toward any data set outside of the stipulated
purpose. Unfortunately, the informed refusal waiver is also indefensible in a
courtroom.
In the California Book of Accepted Jury Instructions,
5
it reads:
It is the duty of a [dentist] who holds himself out as a specialist in a
particular field of [dental], surgical or other healing science, to have the
knowledge and skill ordinarily possessed, and to use the care and skill
ordinarily used, by reputable specialists practicing in the same field and
in the same or a similar locality and under similar circumstances. A
failure to fulfill such duty is negligence.
5
Under this definition, clinicians who interpret radiographic information
(including CBCT) are held to the same level of competence as a radiologist
because radiology is a recognized specialty within dentistry. Failure to read
the entire data volume is considered negligence. Thus, in a court of law, it
would be indefensible for a clinician to deny responsibility for an entire
CBCT data volume because he is not an oral and maxillofacial or a medical
radiologist.
Responsibility for Diagnosis
The issues of negligence and responsibility for CBCT scans are simple, but
understanding some of the statements that are made about these topics
requires a nuanced understanding. At the 2009 International Congress on 3D
Dental Imaging, Curley
6
told participants that “the risks and errors typically
found and assumed by patients with 2D imaging can be considered
malpractice and negligence since better technology is available.” In addition,
“dentists can recommend 3D imaging as an option without fears that they
could be liable for diagnosing everything seen on the image. They are only
responsible for those areas that are within the scope of their practice,
dentistry, jaws and oral cavity.”
6
Unfortunately, many attending clinicians depart these meetings thinking
that these statements absolve them from looking at the entire CBCT volume
or sending it to be read by a radiologist. Nothing could be further from the
truth. The lawyer is not saying you do not have to look at the volume. He is
saying you are not responsible for diagnosing everything in the volume. That
is a significant difference.
We are not required to diagnose everything on panoramic radiographs
either, but we do have to follow the American Dental Association (ADA)
standards of care: When you do not have the knowledge or skill to understand
what you are looking at, the standard is to refer.
7
In the 2011 revision of the
ADA Principles of Ethics and Code of Professional Conduct, under
consultation and referral, it states that “dentists shall be obliged to seek
consultation, if possible, whenever the welfare of patients will be safeguarded
or advanced by utilizing those who have special skills, knowledge, and
experience.”
7
So, a clinician cannot abrogate duty and responsibility by having the
patient sign a form to waive the need to refer the CBCT volume for
evaluation because the clinician is only reviewing that CBCT data for a
specific task. This is not informed refusal. If you have not looked at the data,
how can you inform the patient of anything that might be untoward in the
data? If you cannot inform the patient as to any of the potential risks from
occult pathology, how can they refuse? It is not enough to simply inform the
patient about the risks of the implant procedure. The following cases illustrate
a sample of some of the occult pathology that I have encountered over the
past few years.
Case Presentation 1
A 58-year-old white woman was referred to an imaging center for a CBCT
scan for temporomandibular joint (TMJ) analysis. In the axial images a mass
effect was noted in the right pharyngeal recess (fossa of Rosenmüller, behind
the ostium of the eustachian tube). Both a 3D color rendering and an audio
video interleave movie were created of this region where two large masses
were noted (Figs 17-1a and 17-1b) and reported to the clinician.
Fig 17-1a The lateral recess has been obliterated by a possible lesion
encroaching on the airway (arrows) on the right side.
Fig 17-1b This 3D reconstruction obtained using the 3D module shows one
large and one small elevation of a tumor (orange arrows). Note the
epiglottis (yellow arrow).
Case Presentation 2
A 57-year-old white woman underwent CBCT scanning because of exquisite
pain on palpation over the superior portion of the left mastoid process.
Several years earlier she had been diagnosed with breast cancer. She had
been treated with chemotherapy and lymphadenectomy. Because of this
medical history, the dentist repeatedly referred her to her medical providers to
investigate for metastases, but they countered that the probable diagnosis was
mastoiditis or otitis media and that a prescription for an antibiotic would be
sufficient. They even suggested that she might have a TMJ disorder. The
dentist referred the CBCT volume for analysis and requested that special
attention be paid to the region of the left ear. The data volume revealed
significant destruction of the medial portions of the left mastoid air cell
complex, which turned out to be one of several metastatic lesions (Figs 17-2a
to 17-2g). Other metastatic lesions were found with subsequent conventional
computed tomography and positron emission tomography scanning in her left
hip and liver.
Fig 17-2a The left mastoid air cell complex has lost the normal definition of
the air cells (upper left). Some sclerotic margins are also visible on the
TMJs (upper right). There is also some mild subchondral sclerosis on the
right condylar head (lower left).
Fig 17-2b An axial slice highlighting the changes in the left mastoid air cell
complex (arrow).
Fig 17-2c A coronal slice demonstrating changes in the left mastoid air cell
complex (arrow) as well as some perforation defects encroaching on the
lateral aspect of the mastoid process.
Fig 17-2d A sagittal slice near the medial pole of the right mandibular
condyle of the TMJ.
Fig 17-2e A sagittal slice just medial to Fig 17-2d showing gross destruction
of the posterior region of the mastoid process as well as radiopaque change
in the inferior portion within the cells. The faint outline of the mandibular
condyle head can be seen within the fossa in this image (arrow).
Fig 17-2f A 3D color reconstruction of the normal right mastoid process
using the Cube tool (OnDemand 3D software, CyberMed International).
Fig 17-2g A 3D reconstruction of the left mastoid process. The superior
portion reveals a perforation defect that has eroded through the bone
(arrow).
Case Presentation 3
An 81-year-old white woman was referred to an endodontist in Mesa,
Arizona, for evaluation of a radiographic radiolucency related to the
mandibular right first premolar that had been treated endodontically. In the
data volume taken by a limited field of view CBCT machine, the endodontist
also captured part of the mandibular right molar region. The patient was
asymptomatic. Regardless, the data volume was sent for a second opinion.
The first finding was the radiolucency associated with the mandibular right
first premolar (Figs 17-3a to 17-3d). The second was a pericoronal lesion
around the mandibular right third molar (Figs 17-3e to 17-3k).
Fig 17-3a Large radiolucency associated with the mandibular right first
premolar.
Fig 17-3b Continuation of the lesion to the mesial aspect of the root of the
mandibular right canine. The margins of the lesion are welldefined and there
are no internal calcifications.
Fig 17-3c The radiolucency associated with the mandibular right first
premolar seen in cross section.
Fig 17-3d From the distal aspect of the mandibular right first premolar, the
lesion shows thinning of the buccal cortex and small perforation defects on
the lingual aspect (arrows).
Fig 17-3e A pericoronal radiolucency associated with the mandibular right
third molar seen in axial section.
Fig 17-3f The coronal section shows the displacement of the molar and
thinning of the lingual cortical margin.
F
i
g
1
7

3
g
A
s
a
g
i
t
t
a
l
v
i
e
w
s
h
o
w
s
a
t
h
i
n
n
i
n
g
o
f
t
h
e
p
o
s
t
e
r
i
o
r
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
m
a
n
d
i
b
l
e.
Fig 17-3h A sagittal view from a more medial aspect showing expansion of
the lesion.
Fig 17-3i A 3D color reconstructed sagittal view, showing destruction of the
external oblique ridge.
Fig 17-3j A 3D color reconstructed sagittal view, showing destruction of the
external oblique ridge.
Fig 17-3k A 3D color reconstructed view attempting to show the soft tissue
of the cyst.
It is unlikely that these two radiolucent lesions are unrelated. The
presence of a pericoronal lesion around the mandibular right third molar
would give rise to the following differential diagnosis: dentigerous cyst,
odontogenic keratocyst, ameloblastoma, and, although more rare, a
mucoepidermoid carcinoma or even a squamous cell carcinoma. The
presence of another large lesion that has thinned or eroded the buccal or
lingual cortices and caused perforation defects suggests an odontogenic cyst
or ameloblastoma. Since the lesions could be related, it is more probable that
these are odontogenic keratocysts such as those seen in the nevoid basal cell
carcinoma syndrome. Even if these two lesions are separate, they are
significant.
After description of these lesions is completed and the differential
diagnosis is established, the patient has to be imaged again using a CBCT
machine with a larger field of view. In addition, confirmation of nevoid basal
cell carcinoma syndrome would require imaging of the chest and cranium to
search for indication of bifid ribs and calcified falx cerebri, respectively.
What is significant about this case from an imaging standpoint is that
both lesions were found in a data set taken by a CBCT unit with a small field
of vision. Even in a CBCT data set with a small field of view, there are often
significant findings for which the clinician is responsible, if not for diagnosis,
at least for follow-up. In this case, the patient was referred to an oral and
maxillofacial surgeon as well as to her primary care provider and a geneticist
for further evaluation. The clinician was responsible for locating and
describing the lesion and referring the patient for further evaluation. The
endodontist did not have to make the diagnosis of nevoid basal cell
carcinoma syndrome but was required to follow the standard of care of
referral.
Parting Comments
Dentistry has a new tool that will help clinicians to define the diseases and
disorders that they encounter with our patients. The CBCT technology
available to clinicians can improve presurgical planning and reduce the
patient’s morbidity and our liability. Clinicians can visualize the bony
changes caused by the pathology, capture sufficient presurgical anatomy in
such detail that they no longer have to fear placing implants, and determine
the precise location of the inferior alveolar nerve in relation to impacted
mandibular third molars. Now, at last, clinicians can visualize our patient
anatomy in a whole new manner—in three dimensions and in color.
References
1. Carter L, Farman AG, Geist J, et al. American Academy of Oral and
Maxillofacial Radiology executive opinion statement on performing and
interpreting diagnostic cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral
Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:561–562.
2. Turpin DL. Befriend your oral and maxillofacial radiologist. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:697.
3. Holmes SM. iCAT scanning in the dental office. Fortress Guardian
2007;9:2.
4. Friedland B. Medicolegal issues related to cone beam CT. Semin Orthod
2009;15:77–84.
5. Breckenridge PJ (ed). Book of Accepted Jury Instructions, ed 8. St Paul:
West Group, 1995.
6. Curley A. CBCT: Controversies in the Legal Standard of Care. Presented
at the 3rd International 3D Dental Imaging Congress, Chicago, 20 June
2009.
7. American Dental Association Principles of Ethics and Codes of
Professional Conduct. Chicago: American Dental Association, 2011.
Learn more about Quintessence Publishing Co.
www.QuintPub.com

La entrada Atlas of Cone Beam Imaging se publicó primero en Kadi México.

]]>
5614
La Tomografía Computarizada Cone Beam en la Ortodoncia https://kadimexico.com/la-tomografia-computarizada-cone-beam-en-la-ortodoncia/ Tue, 04 Jun 2019 17:17:39 +0000 https://kadimexico.com/?p=5502 La Tomografía Computarizada Cone Beam (TCCB) es una tecnología en rápido desarrollo que proporciona imágenes de alta resolución espacial del complejo craneofacial en tres dimensiones (3D). Durante la última década, el número de publicaciones relacionadas a la TCCB en la literatura se ha incrementado de manera significativa. La TCCB y su aplicación en la ortodoncia […]

La entrada La Tomografía Computarizada Cone Beam en la Ortodoncia se publicó primero en Kadi México.

]]>
La Tomografía Computarizada Cone Beam (TCCB) es una tecnología en rápido desarrollo que proporciona imágenes de alta resolución espacial del complejo craneofacial en tres dimensiones (3D). Durante la última década, el número de publicaciones relacionadas a la TCCB en la literatura se ha incrementado de manera significativa.

La TCCB y su aplicación en la ortodoncia es muy importante ya que esta nueva tecnología va evolucionando cada vez más rápido y nuevas imágenes se necesitan para responder algunos casos como los de recidiva. La imagen tomográfica nos va permitir tener una visión diferente comparando con las imágenes convencionales, y esta visión va de la mano con los movimientos realizados para la corrección de la maloclusión o desproporción facial.

El proceso de diagnóstico y planificación del tratamiento en ortodoncia empieza en el momento que el paciente llega a la consulta inicial. Después de la evaluación clínica, pedimos pruebas adicionales y el paciente es referido a la obtención de la documentación de ortodoncia que consiste en la radiografía lateral de craneo, radiografía panorámica, periapical, modelos de estudio y fotografías intra y extraorales.

Hoy en día, muchas oficinas de ortodoncia están reemplazando las imágenes de ortodoncia tradicionales para todos los pacientes para su documentación en 3D que tiene características especiales. Consiste en la adquisición de la TCCB, fotografías convencionales o fotografías en 3D obtenidas por medio de escáneres o mediante un método conocido como la cartografía 2D, modelos convencionales o digitales 3D.

Imágenes convencionales de radiografía panorámica, radiografía lateral de craneo y radiografías periapicales también se pueden obtener a partir de la TCCB y también hacen parte de la documentación en 3D, mientras que otros están agregando este tipo de imagen sólo en ciertos tipos de casos, como aquellos que tienen los caninos impactados o en pacientes que requieren cirugía ortognática.  Algunas de las diversas aplicaciones clínicas de nuevas tecnologías para el diagnóstico en 3D ha demostrado que el uso de la TCCB en ortodoncia ha ido creciendo y en aplicaciones tales como cefalometría, instalación de mini implantes, diagnóstico oportuno de reabsorciones radiculares, análisis de las vías aéreas, entre otros.

 

Fuente:

www.scielo.org.pe

La entrada La Tomografía Computarizada Cone Beam en la Ortodoncia se publicó primero en Kadi México.

]]>
5502
Conceptos Básicos Tomografía Cone Beam https://kadimexico.com/conceptos-basicos-tomografia-cone-beam/ Wed, 15 May 2019 14:15:45 +0000 https://kadimexico.com/?p=5493 La Tomografía Computarizada Cone Beam (TCCB) es una tecnología en rápido desarrollo que proporciona imágenes de alta resolución espacial del complejo craneofacial en tres dimensiones (3D). Durante la última década, el número de publicaciones relacionadas a la TCCB en la literatura se ha incrementado de manera significativa, pero la cuestión fundamental es si esta tecnología […]

La entrada Conceptos Básicos Tomografía Cone Beam se publicó primero en Kadi México.

]]>
La Tomografía Computarizada Cone Beam (TCCB) es una tecnología en rápido desarrollo que proporciona imágenes de alta resolución espacial del complejo craneofacial en tres dimensiones (3D). Durante la última década, el número de publicaciones relacionadas a la TCCB en la literatura se ha incrementado de manera significativa, pero la cuestión fundamental es si esta tecnología conduce a mejores resultados.

La Tomografía Con Beam es el sistema más completo de imágenes  odontológicas y máxilo-faciales que tiene como principal ventaja el campo de visión que ofrece, permitiendo visualización desde distintos ángulos con gran precisión.

  • Integra la radiografía panorámica, 3D y cefalométrica en un solo sistema
  • Permite visualizar cualquier examen anatómico desde todos los ángulos, con una precisión de 1:1
  • Menos Radiación: el haz cónico que se utiliza   para capturar las imágenes produce menos dosis de radiación.
  • La dosis de radiación efectiva recibida por el paciente es de hasta el 90% menos en comparación con un tomógrafo médico convencional.
  • En niños se puede reducir la dosis a un 50% con respecto a la del adulto.
  • El tiempo de captura de las imágenes es de sólo 12 segundos (según el campo elegido)
  • La calidad de imagen, y la facilidad con la que se logra un posicionamiento exacto del paciente, permite reducir en gran medida las repeticiones de tomas.

El campo de visión en la radiología dental 3D

En función del tipo de examen a realizar y su finalidad específica, se recurrirá a campos de visión de diversos tamaños. Con carácter general, y sin ánimo de exhaustividad, podemos señalar los siguientes:

  • Campo de visión sectorial. Este tamaño es adecuado para estudios endodóncicos y periodontales cuando se emplea alta definición. Si se utiliza una resolución estándar, este campo de visión es óptimo para trabajos de ortodoncia o estudios de implantes individuales.
  • Campo de visión de una arcada. Esta modalidad permite optimizar la dosis de radiación en todos aquellos supuestos en que solo se necesita visualizar una arcada.
  • Campo de visión medio. En este caso, se trata de tamaños adecuados para localizar áreas de infección, explorar muelas de juicio o bien para casos de ortodoncia o implantes que precisen este rango de campo de visión (10×10, 8×8, etc.).
  • Campo de visión grande. Se trata, en este caso, de tamaños que se utilizan para la evaluación de implantes complicados, exploración ATM bilateral, maxilofacial, etc.

La entrada Conceptos Básicos Tomografía Cone Beam se publicó primero en Kadi México.

]]>
5493
DIAGNÓSTICO PERIODONTITIS APICAL CON CBCT https://kadimexico.com/diagnostico-periodontitis-apical-con-cbct/ Tue, 07 May 2019 14:21:47 +0000 https://kadimexico.com/?p=5488 La periodontitis apical (AP) es la principal enfermedad infecciosa del conducto radicular. Actualmente, el método estándar de diagnóstico aceptado para la detección radiológica de AP es una radiografía periapical. Sin embargo, en las primeras etapas de AP, la destrucción del hueso periapical puede ser mínima o estar enmascarada por ruidos anatómicos, de manera que su […]

La entrada DIAGNÓSTICO PERIODONTITIS APICAL CON CBCT se publicó primero en Kadi México.

]]>
La periodontitis apical (AP) es la principal enfermedad infecciosa del conducto radicular.

Actualmente, el método estándar de diagnóstico aceptado para la detección radiológica de AP es una radiografía periapical.

Sin embargo, en las primeras etapas de AP, la destrucción del hueso periapical puede ser mínima o estar enmascarada por ruidos anatómicos, de manera que su presencia no se manifiesta en radiografías convencionales. Esto puede conducir a la falta de claridad sobre el diagnóstico, especialmente en casos donde los signos y síntomas clínicos indican una necrosis pulpar o pulpitis irreversible. 

La CBCT es significativamente más precisa y sensible que la radiografía convencional en la identificación de periodontitis apical. Esto se debe a que la destrucción periapical del hueso asociada a la infección endodóntica puede ser identificada usando CBCT antes de la evidencia de su existencia a través de las radiografías convencionales.  la CBCT detectó un 62% más de lesiones periapicales que las radiografías convencionales. Además, la CBCT puede mostrar defectos del hueso esponjoso y del hueso cortical por separado.

Como resultado, la identificación de la periodontitis apical con CBCT es sustancialmente más alta que con la radiografía periapical. La CBCT presentó significativamente más hallazgos, como la expansión de lesiones en el seno maxilar, engrosamiento de la membrana sinusal y conductos radiculares perdidos. 

La entrada DIAGNÓSTICO PERIODONTITIS APICAL CON CBCT se publicó primero en Kadi México.

]]>
5488